Variable dystrophin expression in different muscles of a Duchenne muscular dystrophy carrier

DMD carrier model with mosaic dystrophin expression in the heart reveals complex vulnerability to myocardial injury

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a devastating neuromuscular disease that causes progressive muscle wasting and cardiomyopathy. This X-linked disease results from mutations of the DMD allele on the X-chromosome resulting in the loss of expression of the protein dystrophin. Dystrophin loss causes cellular dysfunction that drives the loss of healthy skeletal muscle and cardiomyocytes. As gene therapy strategies strive toward dystrophin restoration through micro-dystrophin delivery or exon skipping, preclinical models have shown that incomplete restoration in the heart results in heterogeneous dystrophin expression throughout the myocardium. This outcome prompts the question of how much dystrophin restoration is sufficient to rescue the heart from DMD-related pathology. Female DMD carrier hearts can shed light on this question, due to their mosaic cardiac dystrophin expression resulting from random X-inactivation. In this work, a dystrophinopathy carrier mouse model was derived by breeding male or female dystrophin-null mdx mice with a wild type mate. We report that these carrier hearts are significantly susceptible to injury induced by one or multiple high doses of isoproterenol, despite expressing ~57% dystrophin. Importantly, only carrier mice with dystrophic mothers showed mortality after isoproterenol. These findings indicate that dystrophin restoration in approximately half of the heart still allows for marked vulnerability to injury. Additionally, the discovery of divergent stress-induced mortality based on parental origin in mice with equivalent dystrophin expression underscores the need for better understanding of the epigenetic, developmental, and even environmental factors that may modulate vulnerability in the dystrophic heart.

Symptomatic female carriers of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD): genetic and clinical characterization

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive disease caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene and is characterized by muscle degeneration and death. DMD affects males; females being asymptomatic carriers of mutations. However, some of them manifest symptoms due to a translocation between X chromosome and an autosome or to a heterozygous mutation leading to inactivation of most of their normal X chromosome. Six symptomatic female carriers and two asymptomatic were analyzed by: I) Segregation of STRs-(CA)n and MLPA assays to detect a hemizygous alteration, and II) X chromosome inactivation pattern to uncover the reason for symptoms in these females. The symptomatic females shared mild but progressive muscular weakness and increased serum creatin kinase (CK) levels. Levels of dystrophin protein were below normal or absent in many fibers. Segregation of STRs-(CA)n revealed hemizygous patterns in three patients, which were confirmed by MLPA. In addition, this analysis showed a duplication in another patient. X chromosome inactivation assay revealed a skewed X inactivation pattern in the symptomatic females and a random inactivation pattern in the asymptomatic ones. Our results support the hypothesis that the DMD phenotype in female carriers of a dystrophin mutation has a direct correlation with a skewed X-chromosome inactivation pattern.

Genetic characterization in symptomatic female DMD carriers: lack of relationship between X-inactivation, transcriptional DMD allele balancing and phenotype

BACKGROUND

Although Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies, X-linked recessive myopathies, predominantly affect males, a clinically significant proportion of females manifesting symptoms have also been reported. They represent an heterogeneous group characterized by variable degrees of muscle weakness and/or cardiac involvement. Though preferential inactivation of the normal X chromosome has long been considered the principal mechanism behind disease manifestation in these females, supporting evidence is controversial.

METHODS

Eighteen females showing a mosaic pattern of dystrophin expression on muscle biopsy were recruited and classified as symptomatic (7) or asymptomatic (11), based on the presence or absence of muscle weakness. The causative DMD gene mutations were identified in all cases, and the X-inactivation pattern was assessed in muscle DNA. Transcriptional analysis in muscles was performed in all females, and relative quantification of wild-type and mutated transcripts was also performed in 9 carriers. Dystrophin protein was quantified by immunoblotting in 2 females.

RESULTS

The study highlighted a lack of relationship between dystrophic phenotype and X-inactivation pattern in females; skewed X-inactivation was found in 2 out of 6 symptomatic carriers and in 5 out of 11 asymptomatic carriers. All females were characterized by biallelic transcription, but no association was found between X-inactivation pattern and allele transcriptional balancing. Either a prevalence of wild-type transcript or equal proportions of wild-type and mutated RNAs was observed in both symptomatic and asymptomatic females. Moreover, very similar levels of total and wild-type transcripts were identified in the two groups of carriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study deeply exploring the DMD transcriptional behaviour in a cohort of female carriers. Notably, no relationship between X-inactivation pattern and transcriptional behaviour of DMD gene was observed, suggesting that the two mechanisms are regulated independently. Moreover, neither the total DMD transcript level, nor the relative proportion of the wild-type transcript do correlate with the symptomatic phenotype.

Clinical and genetic characterization of manifesting carriers of DMD mutations

Manifesting carriers of DMD gene mutations may present diagnostic challenges, particularly in the absence of a family history of dystrophinopathy. We review the clinical and genetic features in 15 manifesting carriers identified among 860 subjects within the United Dystrophinopathy Project, a large clinical dystrophinopathy cohort whose members undergo comprehensive DMD mutation analysis. We defined manifesting carriers as females with significant weakness, excluding those with only myalgias/cramps. DNA extracted from peripheral blood was used to study X-chromosome inactivation patterns. Among these manifesting carriers, age at symptom onset ranged from 2 to 47 years. Seven had no family history and eight had male relatives with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Clinical severity among the manifesting carriers varied from a DMD-like progression to a very mild Becker muscular dystrophy-like phenotype. Eight had exonic deletions or duplications and six had point mutations. One patient had two mutations (an exonic deletion and a splice site mutation), consistent with a heterozygous compound state. The X-chromosome inactivation pattern was skewed toward non-random in four out of seven informative deletions or duplications but was random in all cases with nonsense mutations. We present the results of DMD mutation analysis in this manifesting carrier cohort, including the first example of a presumably compound heterozygous DMD mutation. Our results demonstrate that improved molecular diagnostic methods facilitate the identification of DMD mutations in manifesting carriers, and confirm the heterogeneity of mutational mechanisms as well as the wide spectrum of phenotypes.

Cardiac abnormalities and skeletal muscle weakness in carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies and controls

Cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy and skeletal muscle weakness have been described in female carriers of the Xp21 (Duchenne and Becker) muscular dystrophies (J Neurol 1975;209(4):279-285; Br Med J 1969;2:418-420; J AmMed Assoc 1996;275(17):1335-1338; Neurology 1980;30(5):497-501; Neuromusc Disord 1999;9:347-351; Arch Neurol 1989;46:673-675). We have screened volunteers from our Xp21 genetics register and found the prevalence of previously unrecognized, clinically relevant, abnormalities in this group to be less than previously reported. We studied 91 women (56 carriers and 35 controls), aged between 18 and 69 years, from our local population known to the Oxford Regional Genetics Register. Our study included controls, with the investigators being blind to the subject's genetic status. The prevalence of previously unrecognised cardiac abnormalities on echocardiogram and ECG was 18% (10/56). Seven percent (4/56) of carriers had cardiomyopathy, defined by significant LV dilatation and decreased shortening fraction. In most cases, subjects with abnormal cardiac findings were asymptomatic. Echocardiography was more frequently abnormal than electrocardiography, but in many subjects the measurements of left ventricular dimensions were only just outside the normal ranges. The prevalence of skeletal muscle weakness was 12% (7/56). It was usually recognized by the individual, although not previously volunteered, but was mild and did not substantially affect activities of daily living.

Immunocytochemical analysis of human muscular dystrophy

Immunocytochemistry is an essential tool for the assessment of muscle biopsies from patients with muscular dystrophy, especially the recessive forms. Antibodies can detect primary defects when there is an alteration in expression, in particular in Xp21 muscular dystrophies, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, the limb-girdle dystrophies caused by abnormal expression of the sarcoglycans, and in the form of congenital muscular dystrophy linked to the gene for laminin alpha2. Absence of a protein is easily observed and reduction in expression can be assessed provided adequate controls and baselines are established. Assessment of secondary defects can also be of diagnostic value; they widen the understanding of pathology changes, and are helping in the development of therapeutic strategies.

Muscle X-inactivation patterns and dystrophin expression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy carriers

Muscle pathology, dystrophin expression and X-inactivation patterns were studied in the muscle of five asymptomatic females heterozygous for deletions in the dystrophin gene (non-manifesting carriers) and five symptomatic carriers (manifesting carriers). Muscle from the non-manifesting carriers showed an increase in the population of centrally nucleated fibres (9.0 +/- 2.8%; controls, 1.4 +/- 0.3%), frequent fibers with abnormally interrupted dystrophin staining (38 +/- 5%), and, in sections from three individuals, small numbers of dystrophin-negative fibers (1-4%). The amount of dystrophin measured by immunoblotting was reduced to 64 +/- 5% (P < 0.001 n = 5) of normal. The pattern of X-inactivation in muscle DNA was non-biased (50: 50-60: 40) in all cases. In the manifesting carriers both highly biased (90: 10) and non-biased patterns of X-inactivation were found, but no consistent relationship was apparent between the patterns of X-inactivation and the proportions of dystrophin-negative fibers. We conclude from studies of the non-manifesting carriers that the proportion of residual dystrophin is similar to the relative activation in muscle of the X-chromosome carrying the wild-type allele. Extreme bias of X-inactivation can be associated with early clinical symptoms and severe pathology. However, as non-manifesting and some manifesting adult carriers had identical patterns of X-inactivation, abnormalities in the distribution of dystrophin, as well as overall levels of expression, may be important for the development of myopathic pathology.

Integrated study of 100 patients with Xp21 linked muscular dystrophy using clinical, genetic, immunochemical, and histopathological data. Part 3. Differential diagnosis and prognosis

This report is the third part of a trilogy from a multidisciplinary study which was undertaken to investigate gene and protein expression in a large cohort of patients with well defined and diverse clinical phenotypes. The aim of part 3 was to review which of the analytical techniques that we had used would be the most useful for differential diagnosis, and which would provide the most accurate indication of disease severity. Careful clinical appraisal is very important and every DMD patient was correctly diagnosed on this basis. In contrast, half of the sporadic BMD patients and all of the sporadic female patients had received different tentative diagnoses based on clinical assessments alone. Sequential observations of quantitative parameters (such as the time taken to run a fixed distance) were found to be useful clinical indicators for prognosis. Intellectual problems might modify the impression of physical ability in patients presenting at a young age. Histopathological assessment was accurate for DMD but differentiation between BMD and other disorders was more difficult, as was the identification of manifesting carriers. Our data on a small number of women with symptoms of muscle disease indicate that abnormal patterns of dystrophin labelling on sections may be an effective way of differentiating between female patients with a form of limb girdle dystrophy and those carrying a defective Xp21 gene. Dystrophin gene analysis detects deletions/duplications in 50 to 90% of male patients and is the most effective non-invasive technique for diagnosis. Quantitative Western blotting, however, would differentiate between all Xp21 and non-Xp21 male patients. In this study we found a clear relationship between increased dystrophin abundance (determined by densitometric analysis of blots) and clinical condition, with a correlation between dystrophin abundance and the age at loss of independent mobility among boys with DMD and intermediate D/BMD. This indicates that blotting is the most sensitive and accurate technique for diagnosis and prognosis.

Manifesting carriers of Xp21 muscular dystrophy; lack of correlation between dystrophin expression and clinical weakness

Ten females presenting with muscle weakness and a raised serum creatine kinase revealed abnormalities in the expression of dystrophin in their muscle biopsies and were diagnosed as manifesting carriers of Xp21 Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Seven cases, aged 3-22 yr at the time of biopsy, had a variable proportion of dystrophin-deficient fibres and an abnormal expression on immunoblot. These were confidently diagnosed as manifesting carriers. Results in the remaining three cases, aged 8-10 yr, were less clear-cut. Dystrophin expression on immunoblots was slightly reduced and some unevenness and reduction of immunolabelling was seen on sections, but dystrophin-deficient fibres were not a feature of these cases. The weakness in the ten carriers ranged from minimal to severe and there was no correlation between the degree of weakness and the number of dystrophin-deficient fibres. Two minimally weak girls had a high proportion of dystrophin-deficient fibres. Our results show that analysis of dystrophin expression is useful for the differential diagnosis of carriers of Xp21 dystrophy and autosomal muscular dystrophy, but that dystrophin expression does not correlate directly with the degree of clinical weakness.

Diagnosis of DMD carrier status in a family with no known affected males

A 30-year-old woman and her two-year-old daughter were found by chance to have moderately raised serum creatine kinase (CK) levels. Since the mother was pregnant, the authors investigated the possibility that the two females were carriers of the common Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) gene. No immunohistochemical abnormality was detected in the mother, but in the daughter a clear mosaic pattern of dystrophin positive and negative fibres was found, indicating carrier status for DMD. These data indicate that a diagnosis of DMD carrier status can be made even in families without a positive history for this disorder; therefore, immunocytochemical studies, using antidystrophin antibodies, should be performed on all females with raised CK levels, including the youngest.

Variability in clinical, genetic and protein abnormalities in manifesting carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy

We have analysed the results of clinical assessment, X-inactivation status, deletion screening and dystrophin analysis in eight manifesting carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD and BMD). Only two had a prior family history of X-linked muscle disease, all had normal karyotypes and none were twins. Presentation varied from 2 to 25 yr and progression varied from a DMD-like severity to a very mild BMD-like course. In one girl the initial symptoms were restricted to learning difficulties. Where methods for assessing X-inactivation were informative, three patients showed an abnormal pattern. However, in one patient, the obligate carrier daughter of a BMD patient who had presented at the age of 2 yr, X-inactivation appeared normal in lymphocytes and muscle. While dystrophin analysis seems to be reliable in identifying manifesting carriers of DMD and BMD, the relationship between X-inactivation status, dystrophin analysis and phenotype is not simple.