Mycophenolate mofetil: effects on cellular immune subsets, infectious complications, and antimicrobial activity

Development of a nomogram to predict the risk of secondary failure of platelet recovery in patients with β-thalassemia major after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective study

Background

Secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) is a common complication that influences survival and quality of life of patients with β-thalassemia major (β-TM) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Objectives

A model to predict the risk of SFPR in β-TM patients after HSCT was developed.

Design

A retrospective study was used to develop the prediction model.

Methods

The clinical data for 218 β-TM patients who received HSCT comprised the training set, and those for another 89 patients represented the validation set. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression algorithm was used to identify the critical clinical factors with nonzero coefficients for constructing the nomogram. Calibration curve, C-index, and receiver operating characteristic curve assessments and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the calibration, discrimination, accuracy, and clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Internal and external validation were used to test and verify the predictive model.

Results

The nomogram based on pretransplant serum ferritin, hepatomegaly, mycophenolate mofetil use, and posttransplant serum albumin could be conveniently used to predict the SFPR risk of thalassemia patients after HSCT. The calibration curve of the nomogram revealed good concordance between the training and validation sets. The nomogram showed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.780 (95% CI: 70.3-85.7) and 0.868 (95% CI: 78.5-95.1) and AUCs of 0.780 and 0.868 in the training and validation sets, respectively. A high C-index value of 0.766 was reached in the interval validation assessment. DCA confirmed that the nomogram was clinically useful when intervention was decided at the possibility threshold ranging from 3% to 83%.

Conclusion

We constructed a nomogram model to predict the risk of SFPR in patients with β-TM after HSCT. The nomogram has a good predictive ability and may be used by clinicians to identify SFPR patients early and recommend effective preventive measures.

Basics and Art of Immunosuppression in Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation is one of the most challenging areas in the medical field. Despite that, it has already been established as a standard treatment option, especially in decompensated cirrhosis and selected cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and acute liver failure. Complications due to graft rejection, including mortality and morbidity, have greatly improved over time due to better immunosuppressive agents and management protocols. Currently, immunosuppression in liver transplant patients makes use of the best possible combinations of effective agents to achieve optimal immunosuppression for long-term graft survival. Induction agents are no longer used routinely, and the aim is to provide minimal immunosuppression in the maintenance phase. Currently available immunosuppressive agents are mainly classified as biological and pharmacological agents. Though the protocols may vary among the centers and over time, the basics of effective use usually remain similar. Most protocols use the combination of multiple agents with different mechanisms of action to reduce the dose and minimize the side effects. Along with the improvement in operative and perioperative techniques, this art of immunosuppression has contributed to the recent progress made in the outcomes of liver transplants. In this review, we will discuss the various types of immunosuppressive agents currently in use, the different protocols of immunosuppression used, and the art of optimal use for achieving maximum immunosuppression without increasing toxicity. We will also discuss the practical aspects of various immunosuppression regimens, including drug monitoring, and briefly discuss the concepts of immunosuppression minimization and withdrawal.

Non-biologic immunosuppressive drugs for inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases

Non-biologic immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine, dapsone or methotrexate are fundamental treatment options for a wide range of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Some of these drugs were initially used for malignancies (e.g., azathioprine or methotrexate) or infectious diseases (e.g., hydroxychloroquine or dapsone) but are nowadays mostly used for their immunosuppressive/immunomodulating action. Although dermatologists have years of clinical experience with these drugs, some of the mechanisms of action are not fully understood and are the subject of research. Although these drugs are commonly used, lack of experience or knowledge regarding their safety profiles and management leads to skepticism among physicians. Here, we summarize the mechanism of action and detailed management of adverse effects of the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs for skin diseases. Furthermore, we discuss the management of these drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding, as well as their interaction and handling during vaccination.

Nicht-Biologika-Immunsuppressiva bei entzündlichen und autoimmunen Hautkrankheiten: Non-biologic immunosuppressive drugs for inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases

Nicht‐Biologika‐Immunsuppressiva wie Azathioprin, Dapson oder Methotrexat sind grundlegende Behandlungsmöglichkeiten für ein breites Spektrum von Autoimmunerkrankungen und chronisch‐entzündlichen Hauterkrankungen. Einige dieser Medikamente wurden ursprünglich bei malignen Erkrankungen (zum Beispiel Azathioprin oder Methotrexat) oder Infektionskrankheiten (zum Beispiel Hydroxychloroquin oder Dapson) eingesetzt, werden aber heute hauptsächlich wegen ihrer immunsuppressiven/immunmodulierenden Wirkung verwendet. Obwohl Dermatologen über jahrelange klinische Erfahrung mit diesen Arzneimitteln verfügen, sind einige der Wirkmechanismen noch nicht vollständig geklärt und noch Gegenstand der Forschung. Obwohl diese Medikamente häufig eingesetzt werden, führen mangelnde Erfahrung oder fehlendes Wissen über ihre Sicherheitsprofile und ihr Management zu einer skeptischen Haltung bei den Ärzten. Hier fassen wir den Wirkmechanismus und das detaillierte Management der Nebenwirkungen der am häufigsten verwendeten immunsuppressiven Medikamente für Hautkrankheiten zusammen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir den Umgang mit diesen Medikamenten während der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit sowie ihre Wechselwirkung und Handhabung im Zusammenhang mit Impfungen.

Potential Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease Treatment and Computational Approach for Future Drug Development

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by swelling in at least one joint. Owing to an overactive immune response, extra-articular manifestations are observed in certain cases, with interstitial lung disease (ILD) being the most common. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the interstitial space, which causes fibrosis and the scarring of lung tissue. Controlling inflammation and pulmonary fibrosis in RA-ILD is important because they are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Pirfenidone and nintedanib are specific drugs against idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and showed efficacy against RA-ILD in several clinical trials. Immunosuppressants and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with anti-fibrotic effects have also been used to treat RA-ILD. Immunosuppressants moderate the overexpression of cytokines and immune cells to reduce pulmonary damage and slow the progression of fibrosis. DMARDs with mild anti-fibrotic effects target specific fibrotic pathways to regulate fibrogenic cellular activity, extracellular matrix homeostasis, and oxidative stress levels. Therefore, specific medications are required to effectively treat RA-ILD. In this review, the commonly used RA-ILD treatments are discussed based on their molecular mechanisms and clinical trial results. In addition, a computational approach is proposed to develop specific drugs for RA-ILD.

Immunosuppressive Agents-Effects on the Cardiovascular System and Selected Metabolic Aspects: A Review

The widespread use of immunosuppressive drugs makes it possible to reduce inflammation in autoimmune diseases, as well as prevent transplant rejection in organ recipients. Despite their key action in blocking the body's immune response, these drugs have many side effects. These actions primarily affect the cardiovascular system, and the incidence of complications in patients using immunosuppressive drugs is significant, being associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular incidents such as myocardial infarction and stroke. This paper analyzes the mechanisms of action of commonly used immunosuppressive drugs and their impact on the cardiovascular system. The adverse effect of immunosuppressive drugs is associated with toxicity within the cardiovascular system, which may be a problem in the clinical management of patients after transplantation. Immunosuppressants act on the cardiovascular system in a variety of ways, including fibrosis and myocardial remodeling, endothelium disfunction, hypertension, atherosclerosis, dyslipidemia or hyperglycaemia, metabolic syndrome, and hyperuricemia. The use of multidrug protocols makes it possible to develop regimens that can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. A better understanding of their mechanism of action and the range of complications could enable physicians to select the appropriate therapy for a given patient, as well as to reduce complications and prolong life.

Levamisole suppresses activation and proliferation of human T cells by the induction of a p53-dependent DNA damage response

Levamisole (LMS) is a small molecule used in the treatment of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). The pathogenesis of INS remains unknown, but evidence points toward an immunological basis of the disease. Recently, LMS has been shown to increase the relapse-free survival in INS patients. While LMS has been hypothesized to exert an immunomodulatory effect, its mechanism of action remains unknown. Here, we show that LMS decreased activation and proliferation of human T cells. T-cell activation-associated cytokines such as IL-2, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were reduced upon LMS treatment, whereas IL-4 and IL-13 were increased. Gene expression profiling confirmed that the suppressive effects of LMS as genes involved in cell cycle progression were downregulated. Furthermore, genes associated with p53 activation were upregulated by LMS. In agreement, LMS treatment resulted in p53 phosphorylation and increased expression of the p53 target gene FAS. Accordingly, LMS sensitized activated T cells for Fas-mediated apoptosis. LMS treatment resulted in a mid-S phase cell cycle arrest accompanied by γH2AX-foci formation and phosphorylation of CHK1. Our findings indicate that LMS acts as an immunosuppressive drug that directly affects the activation and proliferation of human T cells by induction of DNA damage and the activation of a p53-dependent DNA damage response.

Effect of Immunosuppressive or Immunomodulatory Agents on Severe COVID-19 Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

We estimated the association between immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory agent (IIA) exposure and severe COVID-19 outcomes in a population-based cohort study.

METHODS

Participants were 18 years or older, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between February 6, 2020, and August 15, 2021, and were from administrative health data for the entire province of British Columbia, Canada. IIA use within 3 months prior to positive SARS-CoV-2 test included conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (antimalarials, methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, individually), immunosuppressants (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolate sodium [MMF], cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, individually and collectively), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) biologics (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, collectively), non-TNFi biologics or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) (rituximab separately from abatacept, anakinra, secukinumab, tocilizumab, tofacitinib and ustekinumab collectively), and glucocorticoids. Severe COVID-19 outcomes were hospitalizations for COVID-19, ICU admissions, and deaths within 60 days of a positive test. Exposure score-overlap weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics of participants with IIA use compared with nonuse of that IIA. Logistic regression measured the association between IIA use and severe COVID-19 outcomes.

RESULTS

From 147,301 participants, we identified 515 antimalarial, 573 methotrexate, 72 leflunomide, 180 sulfasalazine, 468 immunosuppressant, 378 TNFi biologic, 49 rituximab, 144 other non-TNFi biologic or tsDMARD, and 1348 glucocorticoid prescriptions. Risk of hospitalizations for COVID-19 was significantly greater for MMF (odds ratio [95% CI]): 2.82 [1.81-4.40], all immunosuppressants: 2.08 [1.51-2.87], and glucocorticoids: 1.63 [1.36-1.96], relative to nonuse. Similar outcomes were seen for ICU admission and MMF: 2.52 [1.34-4.74], immunosuppressants: 2.88 [1.73-4.78], and glucocorticoids: 1.86 [1.37-2.54]. Only glucocorticoids use was associated with a significant increase in 60-day mortality: 1.58 [1.21-2.06]. No other IIAs displayed statistically significant associations with severe COVID-19 outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Current use of MMF and glucocorticoids were associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with nonuse. These results emphasize the variety of circumstances of patients taking IIAs.

CMV retinitis in patients on mycophenolate immunosuppression: a report of two cases

BACKGROUND

The rate of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is increasing, likely secondary to aggressive immunosuppressive regimens for a variety of diseases. Transplant and rheumatological literature show growing evidence suggesting a unique relationship between CMV infection and mycophenolate in particular. This study reports two cases of CMV retinitis infection in patients on mycophenolate immunosuppression.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case A was a 39-year-old African American woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with stage IV lupus nephritis who presented for bilateral retinal detachments with areas of moth-eaten and thin retina concerning for prior viral retinitis. Case B was a 53-year-old man who presented with floaters in the right eye status-post heart transplant since 2008 on immunosuppressive therapy. Fundoscopic examination of the right eye showed frosted branch angiitis with intraretinal hemorrhage and inner retinal thickening and disorganization, consistent with CMV retinitis infection. Both patients were on mycophenolate immunosuppression with the recommendation to reduce or discontinue mycophenolate.

CONCLUSION

Patients on mycophenolate immunosuppression may be more vulnerable to cytomegalovirus infection, including CMV retinitis. Ophthalmologists should be aware of this increased risk and consider reducing or discontinuing mycophenolate to promote viral clearance in these susceptible patients, in conjunction with the patient's transplant or rheumatology teams.

SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is higher in vaccinated patients with inflammatory autoimmune diseases or liver transplantation treated with mycophenolate due to an impaired antiviral immune response: results of the extended follow up of the RIVALSA prospective cohort

Background

A relevant proportion of immunocompromised patients did not reach a detectable seroconversion after a full primary vaccination cycle against SARS-CoV-2. The effect of different immunosuppressants and the potential risks for SARS-CoV-2 infection in these subjects is largely unknown.

Methods

Patients from the Rivalsa prospective, observational cohort study with planned anti SARS-CoV-2 third dose mRNA vaccination between October and December 2021 were asked to participate to this follow-up study. Patients were asked about eventual confirmed positivity to SARS-CoV-2 infection within 6 months from the third dose and to undergo a blood draw to evaluate seroconversion status after the additional vaccine shot.

Results

19 out of 114 patients taking part in the survey developed a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection; we identified mycophenolate treatment as an independent predictor of an increased risk of infection even after the third vaccine dose (OR: 5.20, 95% CI: 1.70-20.00, p=0.0053). This result is in agreement with the in vitro evidence that MMF impairs both B and T lymphocytes driven immune responses (reduction both in memory B cells producing anti-spike antibodies and in proliferating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells).

Conclusions

Immunocompromised patients need an additional vaccine administration to reach a detectable seroconversion, thus fostering a more personalized approach to their clinical management. Moreover, patients undergoing mycophenolate treatment show a specific increased infection risk, with respect to other immunosuppressants thus supporting a closer monitoring of their health status.

Human circulating and tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells

Our current knowledge of human memory CD8⁺ T cells is derived largely from studies of the intravascular space. However, emerging data are starting to challenge some of the dogmas based on this work, suggesting that a conceptual revision may be necessary. In this review, we provide a brief history of the field and summarize the biology of circulating and tissue-resident memory CD8⁺ T cells, which are ultimately responsible for effective immune surveillance. We also incorporate recent findings into a biologically integrated model of human memory CD8⁺ T cell differentiation. Finally, we address how future innovative human studies could improve our understanding of anatomically localized CD8⁺ T cells to inform the development of more effective immunotherapies and vaccines, the need for which has been emphasized by the global struggle to contain severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Perspectives on Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Management of Autoimmunity

Before becoming a cornerstone in the treatment of numerous immune-mediated diseases, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was first introduced as an immunosuppressive agent in transplant immunology and later received the attention of rheumatologists and clinicians involved in the management of autoimmune diseases. MMF is now a widespread immunosuppressive drug for the treatment of several conditions, including lupus nephritis, interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis while being efficacious also as rescue therapy in various orphan diseases, including dermatomyositis and IgA-associated nephropathy. Similarly, case reports or series support a possible use of MMF in other rare autoimmune diseases. Beyond modulating lymphocyte activation, MMF acts on other immune and non-immune cells and these effects may explain the therapeutic profile of this medication. The effects of MMF are broadly characterized by the impact on the immune system and the antiproliferative and antifibrotic changes induced. In this latter case, mechanistic data on fibroblasts may in the future allow to reevaluate the use of MMF in selected patients with inflammatory arthritis or systemic sclerosis. Attention must be paid towards the possible occurrence of adverse events, such as gastrointestinal complaints and teratogenicity, while the risk of infections and cancer related to MMF needs to be further investigated.

Gut Microbiota-Mediated Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions between Mycophenolic Acid and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Humans

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are commonly prescribed together in certain groups of patients, including solid organ transplant recipients. However, little is known about the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between these two medications. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effects of TMP-SMX on MPA pharmacokinetics in humans and to find out the relationship between MPA pharmacokinetics and gut microbiota alteration. This study enrolled 16 healthy volunteers to take a single oral dose of 1000 mg mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a prodrug of MPA, administered without and with concurrent use of TMP-SMX (320/1600 mg/day) for five days. The pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA and its glucuronide (MPAG) were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. The composition of gut microbiota in stool samples was profiled using a 16S rRNA metagenomic sequencing technique during pre- and post-TMP-SMX treatment. Relative abundance, bacterial co-occurrence networks, and correlations between bacterial abundance and pharmacokinetic parameters were investigated. The results showed a significant decrease in systemic MPA exposure when TMP-SMX was coadministered with MMF. Analysis of the gut microbiome revealed altered relative abundance of two enriched genera, namely the genus Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium, following TMP-SMX treatment. The relative abundance of the genera Bacteroides, [Eubacterium] coprostanoligenes group, [Eubacterium] eligens group, and Ruminococcus appeared to be significantly correlated with systemic MPA exposure. Coadministration of TMP-SMX with MMF resulted in a reduction in systemic MPA exposure. The pharmacokinetic DDIs between these two drugs were attributed to the effect of TMP-SMX, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, on gut microbiota-mediated MPA metabolism.

Increased clonal hematopoiesis involving DNA damage response genes in patients undergoing lung transplantation

BACKGROUNDCellular stressors influence the development of clonal hematopoiesis (CH). We hypothesized that environmental, inflammatory, and genotoxic stresses drive the emergence of CH in lung transplant recipients. METHODSWe performed a cross-sectional cohort study of 85 lung transplant recipients to characterize CH prevalence. We evaluated somatic variants using duplex error-corrected sequencing and germline variants using whole exome sequencing. We evaluated CH frequency and burden using χ2 and Poisson regression, and we evaluated associations with clinical and demographic variables and clinical outcomes using χ2, logistic regression, and Cox regression. RESULTSCH in DNA damage response (DDR) genes TP53, PPM1D, and ATM was increased in transplant recipients compared with a control group of older adults (28% versus 0%, adjusted OR [aOR], 12.9 [1.7-100.3], P = 0.0002). Age (OR, 1.13 [1.03-1.25], P = 0.014) and smoking history (OR 4.25 [1.02-17.82], P = 0.048) were associated with DDR CH. Germline variants predisposing to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were identified but not associated with CH. DDR CH was associated with increased cytomegalovirus viremia versus patients with no (OR, 7.23 [1.95-26.8], P = 0.018) or non-DDR CH (OR, 7.64 [1.77-32.89], P = 0.024) and mycophenolate discontinuation (aOR, 3.8 [1.3-12.9], P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONCH in DDR genes is prevalent in lung transplant recipients and is associated with posttransplant outcomes including cytomegalovirus activation and mycophenolate intolerance. FUNDINGNIH/NHLBI K01HL155231 (LKT), R25HL105400 (LKT), Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital (LKT), Evans MDS Center at Washington University (KAO, MJW), ASH Scholar Award (KAO), NIH K12CA167540 (KAO), NIH P01AI116501 (AEG, DK), NIH R01HL094601 (AEG), and NIH P01CA101937 (DCL).

Safety and efficacy of mycophenolate in COVID-19: a nonrandomised prospective study in western India

Background

Antivirals and immunosuppressive agents are used with variable success in the treatment of COVID-19. Mycophenolate, an inhibitor of enzyme inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, is an immunosuppressant used to prevent allograft rejection and other autoimmune diseases. Few laboratory studies have also reported antiviral properties of mycophenolate. The current study tried to assess the safety and efficacy of mycophenolate in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.

Methods

This was a prospective non-randomised open label study with the objective to assess the effect of addition of mycophenolate to the standard of care on mortality due to COVID-19 and duration of hospital stay. The target study population was comprised of patients requiring inpatient treatment for COVID-19 during the period from Jan 15-April 15, 2021. The study was registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/01/030477, registered on date-14/01/2021). Adult patients (n = 106) requiring hospitalisation for COVID-19 received mycophenolate, 360 mg, one tablet daily for one month. Mycophenolate was initiated within 48 h of the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT‒PCR. While patients who did not consent for mycophenolate (n = 106), received only standard of care, and were considered as control group. The relevant clinical data including NEWS2 scores and high-resolution computed tomography of the thorax were collected and analysed.

Findings

The mortality and hospital stay were significantly lower in the study group compared to the control group. Mycophenolate significantly reduced mortality after adjustment for other predictors (adjusted odds ratio: 0.082 with 95% CI: 0.012-0.567). Mycophenolate was an independent predictor of survival in patients hospitalised due to COVID-19. There was also no evidence of secondary bacterial infections and post-COVID complications.

Interpretation

Mycophenolate administration is safe in COVID-19. Mycophenolate reduces mortality and duration of hospital stay in patients with COVID-19.

Funding

Shri Janai Research Foundation, India.

Zetomipzomib (KZR-616) attenuates lupus in mice via modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses

Zetomipzomib (KZR-616) is a selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome currently undergoing clinical investigation in autoimmune disorders. Here, we characterized KZR-616 in vitro and in vivo using multiplexed cytokine analysis, lymphocyte activation and differentiation, and differential gene expression analysis. KZR-616 blocked production of >30 pro-inflammatory cytokines in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), polarization of T helper (Th) cells, and formation of plasmablasts. In the NZB/W F1 mouse model of lupus nephritis (LN), KZR-616 treatment resulted in complete resolution of proteinuria that was maintained at least 8 weeks after the cessation of dosing and was mediated in part by alterations in T and B cell activation, including reduced numbers of short and long-lived plasma cells. Gene expression analysis of human PBMCs and tissues from diseased mice revealed a consistent and broad response focused on inhibition of T, B, and plasma cell function and the Type I interferon pathway and promotion of hematopoietic cell lineages and tissue remodeling. In healthy volunteers, KZR-616 administration resulted in selective inhibition of the immunoproteasome and blockade of cytokine production following ex vivo stimulation. These data support the ongoing development of KZR-616 in autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)/LN.

The impact of COVID-19 on liver transplantation: challenges and perspectives

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unique challenges to patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting transplant, with respect to accessing medical facilities for routine clinic visits, imaging, laboratory workup, or endoscopies. There was a delay in organ procurement that led to a decrease in the number of liver transplants (LTs) and an increase in the morality of waitlisted patients at the beginning of the pandemic. LT numbers later equalized to pre-pandemic numbers due to combined efforts and adaptability of transplant centers as well as dynamic guidelines. Due to being immunosuppressed, the demographics of LT patients were at an increased risk of infection. Although there is a higher rate of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic liver disease, LT itself is not a risk factor for mortality in COVID-19. There was no difference in overall mortality in LT patients compared to non-LT patients, and mortality risk factors were the same: age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. The most common causes of death were respiratory complications. Liver-related deaths were reported in 1.6% of patients. The optimal timing of liver transplantation post-infection depends on various factors, such as the severity of liver injury, the presence of comorbidities, and the progression of the underlying liver disease. There is not enough data available on COVID-19 cholangiopathy and the number of cases that will be seen in the future that will require LT. There are some concerns of lower immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in LT patients but available evidence suggests that the vaccines are safe and well-tolerated.

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes associated with, and risk factors for, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remain ill-defined.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed, including SOT recipients with an Enterobacterales BSI between 2005 and 2018. Exposed subjects were those with a CRE BSI. Unexposed subjects were those with a non-CRE BSI. A multivariable survival analysis was performed to determine the association between CRE BSI and risk of all-cause mortality within 60 d. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for CRE BSI.

RESULTS

Of 897 cases of Enterobacterales BSI in SOT recipients, 70 (8%) were due to CRE. On multivariable analysis, CRE BSI was associated with a significantly increased hazard of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-4.84; P < 0.001). Independent risk factors for CRE BSI included prior CRE colonization or infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 9.86; 95% CI, 4.88-19.93; P < 0.001)' liver transplantation (aOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.23-5.65; P = 0.012)' lung transplantation (aOR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.40-10.09; P = 0.009)' and exposure to a third-generation cephalosporin (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.17-4.17; P = 0.015) or carbapenem (aOR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.54-5.10; P = 0.001) in the prior 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CRE BSI is associated with significantly worse outcomes than more antibiotic-susceptible Enterobacterales BSI in SOT recipients.

Enhanced Spontaneous Skin Tumorigenesis and Aberrant Inflammatory Response to UVB Exposure in Immunosuppressed Human Papillomavirus Type 8‒Transgenic Mice

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) from the beta genus are commensal viruses of the skin usually associated with asymptomatic infection in the general population. However, in individuals with specific genetic backgrounds, such as patients with epidermodysplasia verruciformis, or those with immune defects, such as organ transplant recipients, they are functionally involved in sunlight-induced skin cancer development, mainly keratinocyte carcinoma. Despite their well-established protumorigenic role, the cooperation between β-HPV infection, impaired host immunosurveillance, and UVB exposure has never been formally shown in animal models. In this study, by crossing skin-specific HPV8-transgenic mice with Rag2-deficient mice, we have generated a preclinical mouse model, named Rag2^‒/‒:K14-HPV8. These mice display an unhealthy skin phenotype and spontaneously develop papilloma-like lesions spreading to the entire skin much more rapidly compared with Rag2^+/+:K14-HPV8 mice. Exposure to low doses of UVB radiation is sufficient to trigger severe skin inflammation in Rag2^‒/‒:K14-HPV8 but not in Rag2^+/+:K14-HPV8 mice. Their inflamed skin very much resembled that observed in cutaneous field cancerization in organ transplant recipients, showing high levels of UVB-damaged cells, enhanced production of proinflammatory cytokines, and mast cell recruitment to the dermis. Overall, this immunocompromised HPV8-transgenic mouse model shows that the coexistence of immune defects, β-HPV, and UVB exposure promotes skin cancer development.

Immunogenicity of an mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine among Adolescents with Obesity or Liver Transplants

There are limited data regarding the immunogenicity of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2 among immunosuppressed or obese adolescents. We evaluated the humoral immune response in adolescents with obesity and adolescent liver transplant recipients (LTRs) after receiving two BNT162b2 doses. Sixty-eight participants (44 males; mean age 14.9 ± 1.7 years), comprising 12 LTRs, 24 obese, and 32 healthy adolescents, were enrolled. Immunogenicity was evaluated by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein immunoassay and surrogate viral neutralization tests (sVNT) against the Delta and Omicron (BA.1) variants. At 27.1 ± 3.2 days after the second dose, the antibody levels were 1476.6 ± 1185.4, 2999.4 ± 1725.9, and 4960.5 ± 2644.1 IU/mL in the LTRs, obese adolescents, and controls, respectively (p < 0.001). Among obese individuals, liver stiffness <5.5 kPa was associated with higher antibody levels. The %inhibition of sVNT was significantly lower for the Omicron than that for the Delta variant. Injection site pain was the most common local adverse event. Nine participants (three obese and six controls) developed COVID-19 at 49 ± 11 days after the second vaccination; four were treated with favipiravir. All infections were mild, and the patients recovered without any consequences. Our study supports the need for the booster regimen in groups with an inferior immunogenic response, including LTRs and obese individuals.

Characteristics of patients with viral infections of the lower respiratory tract: A retrospective study

While the impact of respiratory virus infections has been well researched in some respiratory diseases, no clinical studies have discussed the subject of who would be more likely to develop respiratory virus infections among patients with various respiratory illnesses who come from different backgrounds. This study aimed to identify respiratory diseases that are frequently associated with respiratory virus infections along with the characteristics of patients who develop such infections in clinical settings. Tested specimens were obtained from the lower respiratory tract by bronchoscopy to provide more accurate data. Data of bronchoscopies at Ryukyu University Hospital between August 2012 and September 2016 were reviewed, and patients who underwent multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for detecting respiratory viruses in bronchoscopy specimens were retrospectively recruited for descriptive statistics. Differences among patients' primary pulmonary diseases and backgrounds were compared between the PCR-positive and -negative patients, and multivariate statistical analysis was performed to analyze factors associated with a positive PCR test result. Overall, 756 bronchoscopies were performed during the study period and PCR tests were performed for 177 patients. Of them, 27 tested positive for respiratory viruses, mainly parainfluenza virus and rhinovirus, and out of those, 7 were hospitalized for >1 month. Overall, all patients did not experience typical upper respiratory infection symptoms. In positive patients, 13 and 7 had diagnoses of interstitial lung disease and bacterial pneumonia, respectively. The diagnoses of 3 bacterial pneumonia cases were changed to viral pneumonia after receiving their PCR-positive tests. Respiratory virus infections were confirmed in 14 patients on immunosuppressant therapy and 4 on maintenance dialysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that immunosuppressant therapy and maintenance dialysis were independently associated with respiratory virus infections. Viruses were commonly detected in patients with interstitial lung diseases and bacterial pneumonia, while few patients were diagnosed with pure viral pneumonia. These illnesses were considered to be induced by respiratory infections. Immunosuppressant therapy and maintenance dialysis were associated with respiratory virus infections. Multiplex PCR testing is an essential diagnostic tool for respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil-induced hypogammaglobulinemia and infectious disease susceptibility in pediatric patients with chronic rheumatic disorders: a monocentric retrospective study

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive drug used for the treatment of autoimmune rheumatological diseases. To test the risk of hypothetical drug-induced hypogammaglobulinemia, the aim of this study was to report the trend of the immunoglobulin (Ig) values and of the infectious diseases in children treated with MMF. This study retrospectively evaluated demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of a cohort of patients affected by a chronic rheumatic disease receiving MMF, followed at the Rheumatology Unit of Meyer Children Hospital, Florence. A total of 29 pediatric patients were enrolled. In patients with normal values of immunoglobulins at the baseline, treatment with MMF resulted in a statistically significant reduction of the IgG levels (p = 0.0058) and in a decrease of IgM levels not reaching statistical significance. The levels of IgA were not affected. During the follow-up, seven patients developed an humoral immune defect. The univariate analysis did not identify any risk factors related to the iatrogenic hypogammaglobulinemia. The infection rate during MMF therapy was significantly higher than the 12-month period before therapy (p = 0.006), while the severe infections did not significantly increase (p = 0.1818), even considering only the patients with hypogammaglobulinemia.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric patients with chronic rheumatic diseases, immunological first level tests and serological analyses to screen the protection against the common childhood pathogens are suggested before starting an immunosuppressive drug. These patients should also complete the vaccination schedule. In patients treated with MMF a strict monitoring of Ig is required during treatment and after discontinuation of the drug.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• MMF is an immunosuppressive drug initially used for the treatment of the graft-versus-host disease. • Mycophenolic acid is an inhibitor of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase, expressed in lymphocytes; therefore, MMF could impair the immune system function.

WHAT IS NEW

• MMF resulted in a reduction of IgG and an increase of not severe infection rate. • Immunological first level tests, including Ig, lymphocyte subpopulations, and antibody response to vaccines, are suggested in pediatric patients before starting MMF; a strict monitoring of Ig is important before, during, and after MMF treatment.

MMF/MPA Is the Main Mediator of a Delayed Humoral Response With Reduced Antibody Decline in Kidney Transplant Recipients After SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) show significantly lower seroconversion rates after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination compared to dialysis patients (DP). Mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid (MMF/MPA) in particular has been identified as a risk factor for seroconversion failure. While the majority of all KTR worldwide receive MMF/MPA for immunosuppressive therapy, its impact on antibody decline in seroconverted KTR still remains unclear. In an observational study (NCT04799808), we investigated whether 132 seroconverted KTR (anti-spike S1 IgG or IgA positive after 2 vaccinations) show a more rapid antibody decline with MMF/MPA than those without this medication. A total of 2 months after mRNA vaccination, average anti-spike S1 IgG levels of KTR with MMF/MPA were lower than without (p = 0.001), while no differences between these two groups were observed after 6 months (p = 0.366). Similar results were obtained for anti-RBD IgG antibodies (T2 p = 0.003 and T3 p = 0.135). The probability of severe IgG decline with MMF/MPA was three times lower than without (p = 0.003, OR 0.236, 95% CI 0.091-0.609). In the multivariate analysis, neither immunosuppressants, such as calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors (mTOR-I; mechanistic target of rapamycin), glucocorticoids, nor vaccine type, sex, or age showed a significant influence on IgG titer decline between 2 and 6 months. For the decision on additional booster vaccinations, we consider immunosurveillance to be needed as an integral part of renal transplant follow-up after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Not only the lack of seroconversion but also the peak and titer decline of the specific IgG and RBD IgG antibody formation after two mRNA vaccinations is significantly influenced by MMF/MPA.

COVID-19 and Kidney Transplantation: Epidemiology, Histopathological Presentation, Clinical Presentation and Outcomes, and Therapeutic Strategies

Multiple case series of kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 have shown increased mortality compared to nontransplant patients. To date, we do not have high-level evidence to inform immunosuppression minimization strategies in infected transplant recipients. Most centers, however, have adopted an early antimetabolite withdrawal in addition to other interventions. The epidemiological problem concerns also dialysis patients and waitlisted patients who have a higher COVID-19 infection diffusion with respect to kidney transplant recipients. Several factors influence mortality among kidney transplant recipients. Among these factors are the age, race, and comorbidity factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and previous respiratory problems. Treatment is still limited. The only effective antiviral drug is remdesivir that should be administered before the development of the cytokine storm. Vaccination seems to be useful, but due to the concomitant immunosuppression limiting its efficacy, at least three or four doses should be administered.

Cryptococcus neoformans-specific and non-Cryptococcous neoformans-specific antibody profiles in organ transplant recipients with and without cryptococcosis

Antibody immunity has not been studied in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) with cryptococcosis. We determined serum antibody levels in OTRs: 23 cryptococcosis cases and 21 controls. Glucuronoxylomannan immunoglobulin M (IgM) and laminarin IgM were lower in cases than controls, were inversely associated with cryptococcosis status, and may hold promise as markers of cryptococcosis.

Bacterial and Viral Infection and Sepsis in Kidney Transplanted Patients

Kidney transplanted patients are a unique population with intrinsic susceptibility to viral and bacterial infections, mainly (but not exclusively) due to continuous immunosuppression. In this setting, infectious episodes remain among the most important causes of death, with different risks according to the degree of immunosuppression, time after transplantation, type of infection, and patient conditions. Prevention, early diagnosis, and appropriate therapy are the goals of infective management, taking into account that some specific characteristics of transplanted patients may cause a delay (the absence of fever or inflammatory symptoms, the negativity of serological tests commonly adopted for the general population, or the atypical anatomical presentation depending on the surgical site and graft implantation). This review considers the recent available findings of the most common viral and bacterial infection in kidney transplanted patients and explores risk factors and outcomes in septic evolution.

Long-Term Varicella Zoster Virus Immunity in Paediatric Liver Transplant Patients Can Be Achieved by Booster Vaccinations—A Single-Centre, Retrospective, Observational Analysis

Varicella is one of the most common vaccine-preventable infections after paediatric solid organ transplantation; thus, vaccination offers simple and cheap protection. However, children with liver disease often progress to liver transplantation (LT) before they reach the recommended vaccination age. As a live vaccine, varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccination after transplantation is controversial; however, many case series demonstrate that vaccination may be safe and effective in paediatric liver transplant recipients. Only limited data exists describing long-term vaccination response in such immunocompromised patients. We investigated retrospectively vaccination response in paediatric patients before and after transplantation and describe long-term immunity over ten years, including the influence of booster-vaccinations. In this retrospective, single-centre study, 458 LT recipients were analysed between September 2004 and June 2021. Of these, 53 were re-transplantations. Patients with no available vaccination records and with a history of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and clinical chickenpox were excluded from this analysis (n = 198). In total, data on 207 children with a median annual follow-up of 6.2 years was available: 95 patients (45.9%) were unvaccinated prior to LT. Compared to healthy children, the response to vaccination, measured by seroconversion, is weaker in children with liver disease: almost 70% after one vaccination and 93% after two vaccinations. One year after transplantation, the mean titres and the number of children with protective antibody levels (VZV IgG ≥ 50 IU/L) decreased from 77.5% to 41.3%. Neither diagnosis, gender, nor age were predictors of vaccination response. Booster-vaccination was recommended for children after seroreversion using annual titre measurements and led to a significant increase in mean titre and number of protected children. Response to vaccination shows no difference from monotherapy with a calcineurin inhibitor to intensified immunosuppression by adding prednisolone or mycophenolate mofetil. Children with liver disease show weaker seroconversion rates to VZV vaccination compared to healthy children. Therefore, VZV-naïve children should receive basic immunization with two vaccine doses as well as those vaccinated only once before transplantation. An average of 2–3 vaccine doses are required in order to achieve a long-term seroconversion and protective antibody levels in 95% of children.

The Role of the Microbiota in Graves' Disease and Graves' Orbitopathy

Graves' disease (GD) is a clinical syndrome with an enlarged and overactive thyroid gland, an accelerated heart rate, Graves' orbitopathy (GO), and pretibial myxedema (PTM). GO is the most common extrathyroidal complication of GD. GD/GO has a significant negative impact on the quality of life. GD is the most common systemic autoimmune disorder, mediated by autoantibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR). It is generally accepted that GD/GO results from complex interactions between genetic and environmental factors that lead to the loss of immune tolerance to thyroid antigens. However, the exact mechanism is still elusive. Systematic investigations into GD/GO animal models and clinical patients have provided important new insight into these disorders during the past 4 years. These studies suggested that gut microbiota may play an essential role in the pathogenesis of GD/GO. Antibiotic vancomycin can reduce disease severity, but fecal material transfer (FMT) from GD/GO patients exaggerates the disease in GD/GO mouse models. There are significant differences in microbiota composition between GD/GO patients and healthy controls. Lactobacillus, Prevotella, and Veillonella often increase in GD patients. The commonly used therapeutic agents for GD/GO can also affect the gut microbiota. Antigenic mimicry and the imbalance of T helper 17 cells (Th17)/regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the primary mechanisms proposed for dysbiosis in GD/GO. Interventions including antibiotics, probiotics, and diet modification that modulate the gut microbiota have been actively investigated in preclinical models and, to some extent, in clinical settings, such as probiotics (Bifidobacterium longum) and selenium supplements. Future studies will reveal molecular pathways linking gut and thyroid functions and how they impact orbital autoimmunity. Microbiota-targeting therapeutics will likely be an essential strategy in managing GD/GO in the coming years.

COVID-19 susceptibility and outcomes among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), clinical features and outcome among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase from December 1, 2019, to July 2, 2021. The gray literature including the references of original studies, review studies, conference abstracts, and WHO COVID-19 database was also searched. We included any type of studies that reported NMOSD patients with COVID-19, prevalence of COVID-19 among NMOSD patients or the infection outcome (hospitalization, intensive care unit [ICU] admission, or mortality).

RESULTS

Out of 540 records, a total of 23 studies (19 published articles and 4 conference abstracts) including 112 NMOSD patients with COVID-19 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies reporting risk of COVID-19 and nine studies on outcome were included in a quantitative synthesis. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.001%-0.030%; I2 = 92%, p< 0.001), with hospitalization of 33.7% (95% CI: 23.3-44.8%; I2 = 9.1%, p = 0.360) with 52.9% on rituximab treatment. ICU admission was 15.4% (95% CI: 7.6%-24.7%; I2 = 20.7%, p = 0.272) and mortality was 3.3% (95% CI: 0-9.7%; I2 = 21.3%, p = 0.253). Thirty-eight patients (48.7%) reported at least one comorbidity. The mean age of the included patients was 40.8 (10.63) years, female/male ratio was 3.35:1. The most common COVID-19 symptom was fever (54.5%), followed by fatigue/asthenia (42.9%), headache (41.6%), and cough (40.3%). Four patients developed neurological worsening. The Begg's and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSION

The analysis suggests that comorbidity and treatment with rituximab may be risk factors for COVID-19 infection in NMOSD patients.

Safety of conventional immunosuppressive therapies for patients with dermatological conditions and coronavirus disease 2019: A review of current evidence

The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients receiving conventional immunosuppressive (IS) therapy has yet to be fully determined; however, research on using IS therapy for treating COVID-19 in acutely ill patients is increasing. While some believe that IS therapy may be protective, others argue that these agents may make patients more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and morbidity and advocate for a more cautious, individualized approach to determining continuation, reduction, or discontinuation of therapy. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of COVID-19 risk in dermatological patients who are receiving conventional IS therapies, including mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, apremilast, JAK inhibitors, and systemic steroids. Additionally, we provide recommendations for management of these medications for dermatological patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Treatment of dermatological disease during the COVID-19 pandemic should involve shared decision-making between the patient and provider, with consideration of each patient's comorbidities and the severity of the patient's dermatological disease.

Antibody Response and Safety After mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients - the Vienna Cohort

Background

Dialysis patients are at high risk for a severe clinical course after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Safety and early immune responses after mRNA-based vaccination have been reported mostly in patients on hemodialysis (HD), whereas reports of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients remain rare.

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, 39 PD patients had received two doses of the mRNA-1273 Moderna^® vaccine. We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) antibody titers 4 weeks after each dose of mRNA-1273 and report local and systemic side effects in PD patients that occurred within one week after each mRNA-1273 dose. Using a quantile regression model we examined factors that might influence SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels in PD patients.

Results

Four weeks after the first dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine 33 of 39 (84.6%) PD patients seroconverted and presented with 6.62 U/mL (median; IQR 1.57-22.5) anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titers. After the second dose, 38 of 39 (97.4%) PD patients developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibodies and titers increased significantly (median 968 U/mL; IQR 422.5-2500). Pain at the injection site was the most common local adverse event (AE) (71%). Systemic AEs occurring after the first dose were mostly fatigue (33%) and headache (20%). No severe systemic AEs were reported after the first injection. After the second dose the incidence and the severity of the systemic AEs increased. The most common systemic AEs were: fatigue (40.5%), headache (22.5%), joint pain (20%), myalgia (17.5%) and fever (13%). Lower Davies Comorbidity Score (p=0.04) and shorter dialysis vintage (p=0.017) were associated with higher antibody titers after the first dose. Patients with higher antibody titers after the first dose tended to have higher antibody titers after the second dose (p=1.53x10^-05).

Conclusions

Peritoneal dialysis patients in this cohort had a high seroconversion rate of 97.4%, showed high antibody titers after full vaccination and tolerated the anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine well without serious adverse events.

Adverse Effects of Immunosuppression: Infections

Immunosuppressive therapies are currently indicated for a wide range of diseases. As new agents emerge and indications evolve the landscape grows increasingly complex. Therapies can target pathologic immune system over-activation in rheumatologic or autoimmune disease, or conditioning and graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylactic regimens may eliminate or inhibit host immune function to improve graft survival and risk of complication in solid organ transplantation (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). With immunosuppressive therapy, infections occur. Complex disease states, host factors, and concomitant therapies contribute to a "net state" of immunosuppression that must be considered and may confound perceived increased infection risks in patients receiving treatment.

COVID-19 and the Use of Immunomodulatory Agents in Ophthalmology

Immunomodulatory agents are often used in the systemic treatment of non-infectious uveitis. These drugs consist of corticosteroids, conventional immunosuppressives, and biological agents. As it is known that they suppress the immune system, the most important concern associated with immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) is the increased risk of infection. The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020. Although severe acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection may develop in all people, patients who receive IMT may be at higher risk in terms of both the transmission of the infection and more severe disease course. Therefore, guidelines on the management of patients receiving IMT due to uveitis during the pandemic are needed. In this review, we examined the immunomodulatory drugs used in the treatment of uveitis in terms of infectious complications and the data of patients who received IMT during the COVID-19 pandemic and discussed recommendations for the use of these drugs. According to the latest information, patients who receive IMT may continue their treatment as long as there are no disruptions in regular complete blood count (especially white blood cell count >4,000/μL) and liver and kidney function tests. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 should be managed with a multidisciplinary approach.

The Effects of Mycophenolate on the Formation of Granulation Tissue Post-operatively in Canine Tracheal Stent Patients (2014-2020)

Objectives: To determine if mycophenolate mofetil reduces the incidence and severity of granulation tissue in-growth in canine tracheal stent patients. Study design: Randomized clinical trial. Animals: 111 dogs from the hospital population. Methods: Client-owned dogs that received an endoluminal self-expanding tracheal stent for canine tracheal collapse between 2014 and 2020 were randomly assigned into one of two treatment groups. Control group medication protocol consisted of prednisone 0.5 mg/kg PO BID/SID/EOD × 30 days, hydrocodone 0.25 mg/kg PO TID × 30 days, and cefovecin 8 mg/kg SQ post-placement. Mycophenolate group medication protocol was identical to the control group medication protocol with the addition of mycophenolate mofetil 10 mg/kg PO BID × 30 days, SID for life. Recheck tracheoscopy was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-stent placement. Presence and severity of granulation tissue were determined by tracheoscopy and were recorded as a percentage of tracheal lumen obstruction by blinded evaluators (none present, <25%, >25-50%, and >50%). Results: At none of the three time points was there a statistically significant difference in grade between controls and those receiving mycophenolate (p = 0.467, p = 0.330, and p = 0.410). Conclusions and Clinical Significance: Our results suggest that mycophenolate can be safely given to these patients but do not support that its administration will reduce the incidence and severity of granulation tissue. Although a difference was observed in the severity of granulation tissue between the two groups, loss to follow-up may have influenced conclusions. A larger study would be warranted to further evaluate the effect of mycophenolate on the development of granulation tissue.

COVID-19 and Myositis: What We Know So Far

PURPOSE

Myositis as a rare manifestation of COVID-19 is only recently being reported. This review examines the current literature on COVID-19-induced myositis focusing on etiopathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnostic practices, and therapeutic challenges with immunosuppression, and the difficulties experienced by rheumatologists in established myositis in the COVID-19 era.

RECENT FINDINGS

COVID-19 is associated with a viral myositis attributable to direct myocyte invasion or induction of autoimmunity. COVID-19-induced myositis may be varied in presentation, from typical dermatomyositis to rhabdomyolysis, and a paraspinal affliction with back pain. It may or may not present with acute exponential elevations of enzyme markers such as creatine kinase (CK). Virus-mediated muscle inflammation is attributed to ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme) receptor-mediated direct entry and affliction of muscle fibers, leading on to innate and adaptive immune activation. A greater recognition of the stark similarity between anti-MDA5-positive myositis with COVID-19 has thrown researchers into the alley of exploration - finding common etiopathogenic basis as well as therapeutic strategies. For patients with established myositis, chronic care was disrupted during the pandemic with several logistic challenges and treatment dilemmas leading to high flare rates. Teleconsultation bridged the gap while ushering in an era of patient-led care with the digital transition to tools of remote disease assessment. COVID-19 has brought along greater insight into unique manifestations of COVID-19-related myositis, ranging from direct virus-induced muscle disease to triggered autoimmunity and other etiopathogenic links to explore. A remarkable shift in the means of delivering chronic care has led patients and caregivers worldwide to embrace a virtual shift with teleconsultation and opened doorways to a new era of patient-led care.

Immunity to hepatitis A virus in liver transplant recipients: A population-based study in Iran

BACKGROUND

Acute hepatitis A is usually a self-limited viral disease but can be severe and even fatal in special groups of patients including those with chronic liver disease and recipients of liver transplantation. To take appropriate preventive measures, it is important to determine the immune status against the hepatitis A virus in patients at risk of grave clinical outcomes following infection. To assess the need for immunization against hepatitis A, we aimed to determine the immune status against hepatitis A in a population of liver transplant recipients. We also investigated the association between hepatitis A immune status and demographic factors such as age and sex, underlying liver disease, source of drinking water, geographical area of residence and socioeconomic status.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed on 242 recipients of allogenic liver transplants at Abu Ali Sina Organ Transplant Hospital in Shiraz, Iran, between January 2017 and April 2017. The level of immunity was assessed using hepatitis A antibody detection kits.

RESULTS

The rate of immunity against hepatitis A was detected as 88.8% in our study population. In the multivariable logistic regression model, younger age (OR=1.175, P<0.001) and higher education level (OR=2.142, P=0.040) were the main determinants of non-immune status. However, hepatitis A immunity was independent of gender, monthly family income, water supply source, residential area and underlying liver disorder.

CONCLUSION

Although a significant proportion of liver transplant recipients in this study showed evidence of natural immunity to hepatitis A, a considerable proportion of younger patients and those with a higher level of education were non-immune. The results of this study signify the importance of screening for hepatitis A immunity in this at-risk population of patients and the need for vaccinating non-immune patients.

Disseminated bartonellosis in a child with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome receiving mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy

Cat scratch disease, usually a benign infectious disease, may develop as multisystem disease with multiorgan involvement, particularly in immunocompromised patients. We report on a patient who developed disseminated bartonellosis while receiving mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy treating steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, highlighting that severe infection can be observed in those patients. Therefore, this category of patients should be cautious when having contact with kittens and receives proper prevention advice.

Invasive fungal disease and the immunocompromised host including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: Improved understanding and new strategic approach with sargramostim

In hosts with damaged or impaired immune systems such as those undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) or intensive chemotherapy, breakthrough fungal infections can be fatal. Risk factors for breakthrough infections include severe neutropenia, use of corticosteroids, extended use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and intensive care unit admission. An individual's cumulative state of immunosuppression directly contributes to the likelihood of experiencing increased infection risk. Incidence of invasive fungal infection (IFI) after HCT may be up to 5-8%. Early intervention may improve IFI outcomes, although many infections are resistant to standard therapies (voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, amphotericin B, posaconazole or itraconazole, as single agents or in combination). We review herein several contributing factors that may contribute to the net state of immunosuppression in recipients of HCT. We also review a new approach for IFI utilizing adjunctive therapy with sargramostim, a yeast-derived recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhu GM-CSF).

The risk of infections in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the magnitude of infection risk in patients with SLE and evaluate the effect of general and SLE-related factors on infection risk.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to July 2018, screening for observational studies that evaluated infection risk in patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls. Outcomes of interest included overall severe infection, herpes zoster infection/reactivation, opportunistic infections, pneumonia and tuberculosis. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RRs) for each type of infection. Sensitivity analysis assessed the impact of removing studies with high risk of bias.

Results

Eleven retrospective or prospective cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis: overall severe infection (n = 4), pneumonia (n = 6), tuberculosis (n = 3) and herpes zoster (n = 2). Pooled RRs for overall severe infection significantly increased for patients with SLE compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.96 (95% CI 1.28, 6.83)]. Pooled RRs for pneumonia, herpes zoster and tuberculosis showed significantly increased risk compared with the general population/healthy controls [RR 2.58 (1.80, 3.70), 2.50 (2.36, 2.65) and 6.11 (3.61, 10.33), respectively]. Heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias were present for all analyses, except herpes zoster. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of the results.

Conclusion

Patients with SLE have significantly higher risk of infection compared with the general population/healthy controls. Efforts to strengthen strategies aimed at preventing infections in SLE are needed.

Protocol registration

PROSPERO number: CRD42018109425.

Safety and effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil associated with tacrolimus for liver transplantation immunosuppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

A combination of immunosuppressants may improve outcomes due to the synergistic effect of their different action mechanisms. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best immunosuppressive protocol after liver transplantation. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients undergoing liver transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eight randomized trials were included. The proportion of patients with at least one adverse event related to the immunosuppression scheme with tacrolimus associated with MMF was 39.9%. The tacrolimus with MMF immunosuppression regimen was superior in preventing acute cellular rejection compared with that of tacrolimus alone (risk difference [RD]=-0.11; p =0.001). The tacrolimus plus MMF regimen showed no difference in the risk of adverse events compared to that of tacrolimus alone (RD=0.7; p=0.66) and cyclosporine plus MMF (RD=-0.7; p=0.37). Patients undergoing liver transplantation who received tacrolimus plus MMF had similar adverse events when compared to patients receiving other evaluated immunosuppressive regimens and had a lower risk of acute rejection than those receiving in the monodrug tacrolimus regimen.

Complete Recovery from COVID-19 Bilateral Pneumonia in an Immunosuppressed Man with Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a rare form of idiopathic immune myopathy (IIM) that requires immunotherapies, including immunosuppressive medications, if severe. There is a paucity of data regarding outcomes of patients with immune-mediated polymyositis who continue immunosuppressive medications during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is the first reported case of COVID-19 in a patient with IMNM. Despite being on two immunotherapies, having risk factors, and having radiographic abnormalities on chest X-ray, the patient had an unremarkable COVID-19 course. He was discharged from the emergency department with a 7-day course of azithromycin and quickly resumed his immunotherapies, but he experienced a flare in his myositis. The 14-week follow-up computed tomography (CT) was negative for residual pneumonitis or fibrosis. More data are needed regarding management and prognosis of patients with connective tissue diseases who become infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Post-transplant immunosuppression and COVID-19: From a double whammy to a mixed blessing

The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has had an unprecedented effect on various disease processes and their management. COVID-19 is likely to have a complex pathophysiological interplay with the post-transplant patients; one affecting the clinical course and outcome of the other. In the absence of validated data from trials, there is strong dependence on experience based on previous similar epidemics (SARS/MERS), and from consensus based on expert opinions. Despite the fact that our knowledge is rapidly evolving with time, there still is relatively limited objective data on the effect of COVID-19 on the human body. Numerous questions remain unanswered, one of which involves the management of immunosuppression in the post-transplant recipient during this contagion. The core tenet of which continues to be that of establishing an equipoise between infection and rejection. This review summarises the current knowledge on immune interactions of the virus, the immunomodulatory effects that may be at play, and its relation to the art of immunosuppression.

A Systematic Review of COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Universal Effort to Preserve Patients' Lives and Allografts

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a significant challenge to physicians and healthcare systems worldwide. Evidence about kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is still limited. A systematic literature review was performed. We included 63 articles published from 1 January until 7 July 2020, reporting on 420 adult KTx recipients with confirmed COVID-19. The mean age of patients was 55 ± 15 years. There was a male predominance (67%). The majority (74%) were deceased donor recipients, and 23% were recently transplanted (<1 year). Most patients (88%) had at least one comorbidity, 29% had two, and 18% three. Ninety-three percent of cases were hospitalized. Among them, 30% were admitted to the intensive care unit, 45% developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 44% had acute kidney injury with 23% needing renal replacement therapy. From the hospitalized patients a total of 22% died, 59% were discharged, and 19% were still in hospital at the time of publication. Immunosuppression was reduced in 27%, discontinued in 31%, and remained unchanged in 5%. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 78% of patients, antibiotics to 73%, and antivirals to 30% while 25% received corticosteroid boluses, 28% received anti-interleukin agents, and 8% were given immunoglobulin. The main finding of our analysis was that the incidence of COVID-19 among kidney transplant patients is not particularly high, but when they do get infected, this is related to significant morbidity and mortality.

Targeting FcRn for immunomodulation: Benefits, risks, and practical considerations

The neonatal fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptor (FcRn) functions as a recycling mechanism to prevent degradation and extend the half-life of IgG and albumin in the circulation. Several FcRn inhibitors selectively targeting IgG recycling are now moving rapidly toward clinical practice in neurology and hematology. These molecules accelerate the destruction of IgG, reducing pathogenic IgG and IgG immune complexes, with no anticipated effects on IgA, IgM, IgE, complement, plasma cells, B cells, or other cells of the innate or adaptive immune systems. FcRn inhibitors have potential for future use in a much wider variety of antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases. Given the imminent clinical use, potential for broader utility, and novel mechanism of action of FcRn inhibitors, here we review data from 4 main sources: (a) currently available activity, safety, and mechanism-of-action data from clinical trials of FcRn inhibitors; (b) other procedures and treatments that also remove IgG (plasma donation, plasma exchange, immunoadsorption); (c) diseases resulting in loss of IgG; and (d) primary immunodeficiencies with potential mechanistic similarities to those induced by FcRn inhibitors. These data have been evaluated to provide practical considerations for the assessment, monitoring, and reduction of any potential infection risk associated with FcRn inhibition, in addition to highlighting areas for future research.

Management Strategies of Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era

The ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health emergency of international concern and has affected management plans of many autoimmune disorders. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies are pivotal in the management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), potentially placing patients at an increased risk of contracting infections such as COVID-19. The optimal management strategy of NMOSD during the COVID-19 era remains unclear. Here, however, we examined the evidence of NMOSD disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) use during the present period and highlighted different scenarios including treatment of relapses as well as initiation and maintenance of DMTs in order to optimize care of NMOSD patients in the COVID-19 era.

Immunosuppressive Agents and Infectious Risk in Transplantation: Managing the "Net State of Immunosuppression"

Successful solid organ transplantation reflects meticulous attention to the details of immunosuppression, balancing risks for graft rejection against risks for infection. The 'net state of immune suppression' is a conceptual framework of all factors contributing to infectious risk. Assays which measure immune function in the immunosuppressed transplant recipient relative to infectious risk and allograft function are lacking. The best measures of integrated immune function may be quantitative viral loads to assess the individual's ability to control latent viral infections. Few studies address adjustment of immunosuppression during active infections. Thus, confronted with infection in solid organ recipients, the management of immunosuppression is based largely on clinical experience. This review examines known measures of immune function and the immunologic effects of common immunosuppressive drugs and available studies reporting modification of drug regimens for specific infections. These data provide a conceptual framework for the management of immunosuppression during infection in organ recipients.

Immunosuppressive and immunomodulator therapy for rare or uncommon skin disorders in pandemic days

Immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies are important in dermatology, but indications are influenced by SARS-CoV-2. We will focus on skin disorders such as autoimmune connective tissue disorders, neutrophilic dermatoses, and vasculitis. Immunomodulators such as colchicine and antimalarials can easily be preferred taking their beneficial effects on COVID-19 into consideration and also given their wide spectrum of action. Among the conventional therapies, methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil increase the risk of infection, and thus their use is recommended only when necessary and at low doses. On the other hand, use of cyclosporine is also not recommended as it increases the risk of hypertension, which is susceptible to COVID-19. Anti-TNF agents from among the biological therapies appear to be slightly risky in terms of susceptibility to infection. However, there are ongoing studies which suggest that some biological treatments may reduce cytokine storm impeding the COVID-19 progression as a result, in spite of their susceptibilities to COVID-19. Patients, who will be started on immunosuppressive therapy, should be tested for COVID-19 prior to the therapy, and in the event that COVID-19 is suspected, the therapy should be discontinued.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

Infection is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of infection in SLE by comparing demographic factors, laboratory data, clinical features, and therapeutic factors between infection and non-infection SLE patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically without restricting the language or year (up to September 2019) by using MeSH terms and keywords pertaining to SLE and infection. Three independent reviewers selected all observational studies based on the established inclusion criteria. Odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used and the analyses were carried out by using a random/fixed-effects model. When necessary, different subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Study quality was assessed by the modified version (nine-star scoring system) of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots, and Egger's and Begg's tests.

RESULTS

In total, we included 39 studies (3709 infection SLE patients and 10526 non-infection SLE patients) based on the inclusion criteria. Compared with the SLE patients without infection, we found that infected SLE patients had a significantly higher incidence rate of the following: 1) lymphopenia (OR = 2.738 95%CI (1.017-7.376), P = 0.046, I² = 81.4%), 2) thrombocytopenia (OR = 1.61 95%CI (1.4-1.85), P<0.001, I² = 0%), 3) anemia (OR = 2.294 95%CI (1.402-3.755), P = 0.001, I² = 83.0%), 4) hypoproteinemia (OR = 2.336 95%CI (1.408-3.876), P = 0.001, I² = 84.2%), 5) C3 consumed (OR = 1.890 95%CI (1.190-3.002), P = 0.007, I² = 77.4%), 6) diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.890 95%CI (2.450-6.160), P < 0.001, I² = 0%), 7) elevated creatinine (OR = 1.954 95%CI (1.646-2.320), P < 0.001, I² = 0.0%), 8) renal involvement (OR = 2.692 95%CI (2.000-3.623), P < 0.001, I² = 76.0%), 9) serositis (OR = 3.877 95%CI (0.995-15.110), P = 0.051, I² = 79.1%), and 10) use of steroid immunosuppressants (OR = 3.116 95%CI (1.959-4.957), P < 0.001, I² = 77.9%). Furthermore, infected SLE patients had a significantly higher mean dose of prednisone (SMD = 2.088 95%CI (1.196-2.981), P < 0.001, I² = 97.8%). In addition, SLE patients with infection showed a significantly lower incidence of antimalarial drug use (OR = 0.634 95%CI (0.451-0.892), P = 0.009, I² = 56.0%). Infected SLE patients had a significantly higher level of 1) 24-h urinary protein (SMD = 0.560 95%CI (0.300-0.810), P < 0.001, I² = 0%), 2) CRP (SMD = 0.437 95%CI (0.184-0.691), P = 0.001, I² = 68.6%), and 3) SLE Collaborating Clinics damage index (SDI) (SMD = 0.451 95%CI (0.238-0.664), P < 0.001, I² = 0.0%), along with a significantly lower level of albumin (SMD = -0.400 95%CI (-0.610--0.200), P < 0.001, I² = 0.0%). After adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR), lymphopenia and serositis were no longer associated with the occurrence of infection; however, the remaining factors were still associated with infection in SLE. According to the nine-star scoring system of NOS, 71.79% of the studies were considered as high methodological quality (low risk of bias). No significant publication bias, except for renal involvement, was detected from funnel plots or Egger's and Begg's test, while this publication bias of renal involvement did not impact the pooled estimates.

CONCLUSION

We identified many factors including thrombocytopenia, anemia, hypoproteinemia, hypocomplementemia, hypoalbuminemia, higher level of CRP, higher SDI score, renal involvement and diabetes mellitus that were associated with infection in SLE patients. In addition, glucocorticoids (especially high-dose) and immunosuppressants (e.g. cyclophosphamide) rendered SLE patients more susceptible to infection, while antimalarial drug administration (hydroxychloroquine) was a protective factor against infection in SLE patients. SLE patients with the above clinical characteristics and risk factors might be at high risk from infection, which might contribute to the early identification of infection in SLE patients for better prognosis.

COVID-19 and kidney transplantation: an Italian Survey and Consensus

Italy was the first Western country to face the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we report the results of a national survey on kidney transplantation activity in February and March 2020, and the results of a three-round Delphi consensus promoted by four scientific societies: the Italian Society of Organ Transplantation, the Italian Society of Nephrology, the Italian Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, and the Italian Group on Antimicrobial Stewardship. All 41 Italian transplant centers were invited to express their opinion in the Delphi rounds along with a group of seven experts. The survey revealed that, starting from March 2020, there was a decline in kidney transplantation activity in Italy, especially for living-related transplants. Overall, 60 recipients tested positive for SARS-CoV2 infection, 57 required hospitalization, 17 were admitted to the ICU, and 11 died. The online consensus had high response rates at each round (95.8%, 95.8%, and 89.5%, respectively). Eventually, 27 of 31 proposed statements were approved (87.1%), 12 at the first or second round (38.7%), and 3 at the third (9.7%). Based on the Italian experience, we discuss the reasons for the changes in kidney transplantation activity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Western countries. We also provide working recommendations for the organization and management of kidney transplantation under these conditions.