Interactions between noradrenergic and cholinergic mechanisms involved in spinal nociceptive processing

The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)®: Updates on Clinical Pharmacology and Comorbidity Management in Intrathecal Drug Delivery for Cancer Pain

INTRODUCTION

The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise with international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on using intrathecal drug delivery in chronic pain treatment. This Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)® project's scope is to provide evidence-based guidance for clinical pharmacology and best practices for intrathecal drug delivery for cancer pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Meeting Abstracts, and Scopus from 2017 (when the PACC last published guidelines) to the present. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations were based on the strength of evidence, and when evidence was scant, recommendations were based on expert consensus.

RESULTS

The PACC evaluated the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based expert opinion recommendations to guide best practices in treating cancer pain. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process.

CONCLUSIONS

The PACC recommends best practices regarding the use of intrathecal drug delivery in cancer pain, with an emphasis on managing the unique disease and patient characteristics encountered in oncology. These evidence- and consensus-based expert opinion recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

Comparison of Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine by Intrathecal Clonidine and Transdermal Nitroglycerin Patch on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia

Background

Relief of pain is very important goal intraoperatively and postoperatively. Neostigmine has been used successfully intrathecally with other agents such as clonidine and opioids for pain relief.

Aims

This study aims to compare and evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining intrathecal (IT) neostigmine with IT clonidine and transdermal nitroglycerin (tNTG) patch for the relief of pain in patients after surgery.

Settings and Design

This was a randomized, prospective, and comparative study.

Materials and Methods

In this study, recruited patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Groups I, II, and III received intrathecally 25 μg of neostigmine + 15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, 25 μg of neostigmine + 25 μg clonidine + 15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, and 25 μg of neostigmine + tNTG patch (3 cm × 5 cm, 5 mg/24 h) +15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, respectively. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, analgesic properties, and complications were assessed and compared among groups.

Statistical Analysis

Mean and standard deviation were calculated. Test of analysis between two groups was done by t-test and among three groups by ANOVA, then P value was calculated.

Results

Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group III in comparison to Group II (7.142 ± 1.81 vs. 4.408 ± 0.813 h) and was significantly longer in Group II in comparison to Group I (4.408 ± 0.813 vs. 2.583 ± 0.493 h). Analgesic requirement was significantly less in Group III in comparison to Group II (1.9 ± 0.76 vs. 2.5 ± 0.51) and was significantly less in Group II in comparison to Group I (2.5 ± 0.51 vs. 3.1 ± 0.48). Sedation score was found significantly high in Group II than other groups.

Conclusion

Both IT clonidine and tNTG patch with bupivacaine + neostigmine spinal anesthesia were found effective in pain control. Results were found better with tNTG patch.

Oral analgesia for relieving post-caesarean pain

BACKGROUND

Oral analgesia is a convenient and widely used form of pain relief following caesarean section. It includes various medications used at different doses alone or in adjunction to other form of analgesia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of oral analgesia for post-caesarean pain relief.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 July 2014) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Cluster-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified. Quasi-randomised and cross-over trials were not eligible for inclusion.Interventions included oral medication given to women for post-caesarean pain relief compared with oral medication, or placebo/no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all the potential studies and independently assessed trial quality, extracted the data using the agreed data extraction form, and checked them for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight small trials involving 962 women (out of 13 included trials) contributed data to the analysis, of which only four trials had low risk of bias.None of the included studies reported on 'adequate pain relief', which is one of this review's primary outcomes. 1. Opiod analgesics versus placeboBased on one trial involving 120 women, the effect of opioids versus placebo was not significant in relation to the need for additional pain relief (primary outcome) (risk ratio (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 1.92), and the effect in terms of adverse drug effects outcomes was also uncertain (RR 6.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 113.96).Low (75 mg) and high (150 mg) doses of tramadol had a similar effect on the need for additional pain relief (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.78 and RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.68, respectively, one study, 80 women). 2. Non-opioid analgesia versus placeboThe confidence interval for the lower requirement for additional analgesia (primary outcome) with the non-opioid analgesia group was wide and includes little or no effect (average RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.01, six studies, 584 women). However, we observed substantial heterogeneity due to the variety of non-opioid drugs used (I(2) = 85%). In a subgroup analysis of different drugs, only gabapentin use resulted in less need for additional pain relief (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.51, one trial, 126 women). There was no difference in need for additional pain relief with the use of celexocib, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen, paracetamol. Maternal drug effects were more common with the use of non-opioid analgesics (RR 11.12, 95% CI 2.13 to 58.22, two trials, 267 women).Gabapentin 300 mg (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.49, one study, 63 women) and 600 mg (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.71, one study, 63 women) as well as ketoprofen 100 mg (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.79, one study 72 women) were both more effective than placebo with respect to the need for additional pain relief. However, the 50 mg ketoprofen group and the placebo group did not differ in terms of the number of women requiring additional pain relief (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.07, one study, 72 women). 3. Combination analgesics versus placeboOur pooled analysis for the effect of combination analgesics on the need for additional pain relief was RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.35 to 1.40, three trials, 242 women, I(2) = 69%). When comparing different drugs within the combination oral analgesics versus placebo comparison we observed subgroup differences (P = 0.05; I² = 65.8%). One trial comparing paracetamol plus codeine versus placebo resulted in fewer women requiring additional pain relief (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.82, one trial, 65 women). However, there were no differences in the the number of women requiring additional pain relief when comparing paracetamol plus oxycodone versus placebo, or paracetamol plus propoxyphene (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.28, one trial, 96 women and RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.69, one trial, 81 women, respectively).Maternal drug effects were more common in combination analgesics group versus placebo (RR 13.18, 95% CI 2.86 to 60.68, three trials, 252 women). 4. Opioid analgesics versus non-opioid analgesicsThe confidence interval for the effect on additional pain relief between opioid and non-opioid drugs was very wide (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.51, one trial, 121 women). Side effects were more common with the use opioids versus non-opioids analgesics (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.69, two trials 241 women). 5. Opioid analgesics versus combination analgesicsThere was no difference in need for additional pain relief in opioid analgesics versus combination analgesics based on one study involving 121 women comparing tramadol and paracetamol plus propoxyphene (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.51). Maternal adverse effects also did not differ between the two groups (RR 6.74, 95% CI 0.39 to 116.79). 6. Non-opioid versus combination analgesicsThe need for additional pain relief was greater in the group of women who received non-opoid analgesics (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.93, one trial, 192 women) compared with the group of women who received combination analgesics. Secondary outcomes not reported in the included studiesNo data were found on the following secondary outcomes: number of days in hospital post-operatively, re-hospitalisation due to incisional pain, fully breastfeeding on discharge, mixed feeding at discharge, incisional pain at six weeks after caesarean section, maternal post partum depression, effect (negative) on mother and baby interaction and cost of treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Eight trials with 962 women were included in the analysis, but only four trials were of high quality. All the trials were small. We carried out subgroup analysis for different drugs within the same group and for high versus low doses of the same drug. However, the relatively few studies (one to two trials) and numbers of women (40 to 136) limits the reliability of these subgroup analyses.Due to limited data available no conclusions can be made regarding the safest and the most effective form of oral analgesia for post-caesarean pain. Further studies are necessary.

[Systemic clonidine versus opioids in postoperative analgesia-A randomized double-blind study.]

INTRODUCTION

alpha(2)-Adrenozeptoragonisten agonists have shown antinociceptive and analgesic effects, which are not antagonized by naloxone. Therefore, the mechanism of action should be independent of opioid receptors. Most studies on this topic have been performed using clonidine. Experimentally the analgesic effect of clonidine can be suppressed by the inhibition of central adrenergic receptors. Furthermore, clonidine has analgesic effects at the spinal level. During recent years numerous studies have shown the analgesic effect of spinally or epidurally administered clonidine in humans. However, only very few studies have investigated the analgesic effect of parenterally administered clonidine in humans.

METHODS

After the approval of the local ethical committee had been obtained, 60 patients (ASA I-III, age 18-65 years) scheduled for elective orthopaedic procedures were included in this double-blind randomized study. All patients gave their written consent on the day before the operation. Premedication was standardized and involved benzodiazepines. Isoflurane was used as the sole anaesthetic. Postoperatively the pain level of the patients was controlled by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). When the VAS reached at least 5 and the patients requested an analgesic, they were randomly assigned to either the morphine, tramadol or clonidine group. Twenty patients received 5 mg morphine i.v., 20 patients received 50 mg tramadol and 20 patients received 150 clonidine i.v. If the analgesic effect was insufficient, the above-mentioned dosage was repeated after 30 min. The therapy was classified as a failure if no sufficent analgesia could be achieved within 60 min. These patients received 7.5 mg piritramide i.v. VAS and sedation were measured at 10-min intervals during the 1 st h and at 15-min intervals during the following 2h. Heart rate, blood pressure and oxygen saturation were measured at 5-min intervals during the whole study period. Statistical analysis of the data was performed by ANOVA, Wilcoxon test, Student'st-test and chi-square test using a level of significance ofP<0.05.

RESULTS

All groups were comparable as regards their basic clinical parameters. Morphine, tramadol and clonidine significantly reduced the VAS within 20 min. During the whole study period the analgesic effect of clonidine was comparable with that of morphine and tramadol. No significant differences were observed in the number of repetitions after 30 min or in the failure rate. After 2 h sedation was significantly higher in the morphine group. No clinically relevant cardiovascular or respiratory side-effects were observed in any of the patients.

DISCUSSION

In our study the analgesic effect of 150 mug clonidine i.v. was equivalent to that of 5 mg morphine i.v. and 50 mg tramadol. Our results in humans confirm the dosage relationship of 1ratio30 found by Eisenach in sheep. Further studies on the use of parenteral clonidine for postoperative analgesia seem to be warranted.

Intrathecal clonidine added to small-dose bupivacaine prolongs postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing transurethral surgery

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this prospective, double-blinded study was to investigate the effects of clonidine in co-administration with bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia, regarding the onset and regression of motor and sensory block, postoperative analgesia and possible side effects.

METHODS

We randomly selected 66 male patients (age 35 to 70), from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-II; these patients were scheduled for transurethral surgical procedures. These patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 33 patients each: group B (bupivacaine) only received 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg intrathecally and group BC (bupivacaine + clonidine) received bupivacaine 7.5 mg and clonidine 25 μg intrathecally. We performed the spinal anesthesia at a level of L3-L4 with a 25-gauge needle. We assessed the sensory block with a pin-prick, the motor block using the Bromage scale, analgesia with the visual analog scale and sedation with the modified Wilson scale. We also recorded the hemodynamic and respiratory parameters.

RESULTS

The groups were demographically similar. The mean time of achievement of motor block (Bromage 3) and sensory block at level T9 was significantly shorter in the BC group compared with B group (p = 0.002, p = 0.000, respeectively). The motor block regression time was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.237). The postoperative analgesia requirement was significantly longer in group BC compared with group B (p = 0.000). No neurological deficit, sedation or other significant adverse effects were recorded.

CONCLUSION

The intrathecal application of clonidine in combination with bupivacaine improves the duration and quality of spinal anesthesia; it also provides longer duration of postoperative analgesia, without significant side effects.

Two different doses of caudal neostigmine co-administered with levobupivacaine produces analgesia in children

SUMMARY BACKGROUND

This study was aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy duration of analgesia, and side effects of two different doses of caudal neostigmine used with levobupivacaine in children.

METHODS

Sixty boys, between 5 months and 5 years, undergoing genitourinary surgery were allocated randomly to one of three groups (n =20 each). Group I patients received caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine (1 ml.kg(-1)) alone. Groups II and III patients received neostigmine (2 and 4 microg.kg(-1) respectively) together with levobupivacaine used in the same does as Group I. Pain scores were assessed using Children's and Infant's Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) at 15th (t(1)) min after arrival to postanesthetic care unit, and 1st (t(2)), 2nd (t(3)), 3rd (t(4)), 4th (t(5)), 8th (t(6)), 16th (t(7)), and 24th (t(8)) hour postoperatively. Duration of analgesia, amount of additional analgesic (paracetamol), score of motor blockade and complications were recorded for 24 h postoperatively, and compared between groups.

RESULTS

CHIPPS scores were higher during t(2), t(3), t(6), t(7), and t(8) periods, duration of analgesia was shorter, and total analgesic consumption was higher in Group I compare to neostigmine groups (P < 0.05). Duration of postoperative analgesia and total analgesic consumption were similar in Groups II and III (P > 0.05). Adverse effects were not different between three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal neostigmine in doses of 2 and 4 microg.kg(-1) with levobupivacaine extends the duration of analgesia without increasing the incidence of adverse effects, and 2 microg.kg(-1) seems to be the optimal dose, as higher dose has no further advantages.

Analgo-sedation of patients with burns outside the operating room

Following the initial resuscitation of burn patients, the pain experienced may be divided into a 'background' pain and a 'breakthrough' pain associated with painful procedures. While background pain may be treated with intravenous opioids via continuous infusion or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and/or less potent oral opioids, breakthrough pain may be treated with a variety of interventions. The aim is to reduce patient anxiety, improve analgesia and ensure immobilization when required. Untreated pain and improper sedation may result in psychological distress such as post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression or delirium. This review summarizes recent developments and current techniques in sedation and analgesia in non-intubated adult burn patients during painful procedures performed outside the operating room (e.g. staple removal, wound-dressing, bathing). Current techniques of sedation and analgesia include different approaches, from a slight increase in background pain therapy (e.g. morphine PCA) to PCA with rapid-onset opioids, to multimodal drug combinations, nitrous oxide, regional blocks, or non-pharmacological approaches such as hypnosis and virtual reality. The most reliable way to administer drugs is intravenously. Fast-acting opioids can be combined with ketamine, propofol or benzodiazepines. Adjuvant drugs such as clonidine or NSAIDs and paracetamol (acetaminophen) have also been used. Patients receiving ketamine will usually maintain spontaneous breathing. This is an important feature in patients who are continuously turned during wound dressing procedures and where analgo-sedation is often performed by practitioners who are not specialists in anaesthesiology. Drugs are given in small boluses or by patient-controlled sedation, which is titrated to effect, according to sedation and pain scales. Patient-controlled infusion with propofol has also been used. However, we must bear in mind that burn patients often show an altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to drugs as a result of altered haemodynamics, protein binding and/or increased extracellular fluid volume, and possible changes in glomerular filtration. Because sedation and analgesia can range from minimal sedation (anxiolysis) to general anaesthesia, sedative and analgesic agents should always be administered by designated trained practitioners and not by the person performing the procedure. At least one individual who is capable of establishing a patent airway and positive pressure ventilation, as well as someone who can call for additional assistance, should always be present whenever analgo-sedation is administered. Oxygen should be routinely delivered during sedation. Blood pressure and continuous ECG monitoring should be carried out whenever possible, even if a patient is undergoing bathing or other procedures that may limit monitoring of vital pulse-oximetry parameters.

A prospective randomized double-blind study to determine the effect of thoracic epidural neostigmine on postoperative ileus after abdominal aortic surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ileus is a major gastrointestinal complication of abdominal aortic surgery leading to increased rates of morbidity and mortality, longer lengths of hospital stay, and higher costs. In this study, we evaluated the effect of epidurally administered neostigmine on postoperative ileus after abdominal aortic surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled 45 patients who were scheduled for elective abdominal aortic surgery at our institution. All patients received identical general and epidural anesthesia. Before the induction of general anesthesia, an epidural catheter was placed at the T7-T8 intervertebral space, and 20 mL bupivacaine (0.5%) was injected over 15 min. Patients were randomized into two groups. Patients received a 5 mL bolus of neostigmine (1 microg/kg) diluted with normal saline (Group 1) or a 5 mL bolus of normal saline (Group 2) via an epidural catheter at the end of surgery and 8 h postoperatively. Times of bowel sounds were recorded postoperatively in the intensive care unit. Times of daily passage of flatus and defecation also were recorded.

RESULTS

Times to the first bowel sounds and the first flatus were significantly shorter in Group 1 than they were in Group 2 (11.6 +/- 11.2 h vs 22.6 +/- 12.8 h and 21.8 +/- 15.6 h vs 36.6 +/- 19.1 h, respectively, P < 0.05). The times to first defecation were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Nausea was more frequent in patients in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic epidural neostigmine enables faster restoration of bowel sounds and shortens duration of postoperative ileus after abdominal aortic surgery.

Noradrenergic pain modulation

Norepinephrine is involved in intrinsic control of pain. Main sources of norepinephrine are sympathetic nerves peripherally and noradrenergic brainstem nuclei A1-A7 centrally. Peripheral norepinephrine has little influence on pain in healthy tissues, whereas in injured tissues it has variable effects, including aggravation of pain. Its peripheral pronociceptive effect has been associated with injury-induced expression of novel noradrenergic receptors, sprouting of sympathetic nerve fibers, and pronociceptive changes in the ionic channel properties of primary afferent nociceptors, while an interaction with the immune system may contribute in part to peripheral antinociception induced by norepinephrine. In the spinal cord, norepinephrine released from descending pathways suppresses pain by inhibitory action on alpha-2A-adrenoceptors on central terminals of primary afferent nociceptors (presynaptic inhibition), by direct alpha-2-adrenergic action on pain-relay neurons (postsynaptic inhibition), and by alpha-1-adrenoceptor-mediated activation of inhibitory interneurons. Additionally, alpha-2C-adrenoceptors on axon terminals of excitatory interneurons of the spinal dorsal horn possibly contribute to spinal control of pain. At supraspinal levels, the pain modulatory effect by norepinephrine and noradrenergic receptors has varied depending on many factors such as the supraspinal site, the type of the adrenoceptor, the duration of the pain and pathophysiological condition. While in baseline conditions the noradrenergic system may have little effect, sustained pain induces noradrenergic feedback inhibition of pain. Noradrenergic systems may also contribute to top-down control of pain, such as induced by a change in the behavioral state. Following injury or inflammation, the central as well as peripheral noradrenergic system is subject to various plastic changes that influence its antinociceptive efficacy.

Muscarinic receptor subtypes modulate the release of [3H]-noradrenaline in rat spinal cord slices

Spinal muscarinic receptors are involved in the mediation of antinociceptive effects. The modulation of noradrenaline (NA) release on muscarinic receptor subtypes in the rat spinal cord was investigated in in vitro perfusion experiments. After rat spinal cord slices were preincubated in [3H]NA, the slices were perfused with a superfusion apparatus. The slices were field stimulated during the 4th (S1) and 11th (S2) superfusion collection periods. Perfusion of drugs was initiated at the 8th collection period and was maintained until the 14th collection period. Fractional release was calculated as the percentage of the radioactivity present in the slices at the beginning of the stimulation period. Drugs were administered between S1 and S2. The following drugs were used: [3H]NA, neostigmine, pirenzepine (M1 antagonist), AFDX116 (M2 antagonist), atropine. Neostigmine significantly increased the release of [3H]NA in a concentration-dependent manner. Pirenzepine (1 microM) and atropine (0.3 microM) significantly reduced the release of [3H]NA, but AFDX116 (1 microM) did not significantly reduce release in the presence of neostigmine (1 microM). The results of this study indicate that neostigmine can enhance noradrenergic neurotransmission, and that acetylcholine can stimulate spinal cord NA release via M1 muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Intrathecal Neostigmine Prevents Intrathecal Clonidine from Attenuating Hypercapnic Cerebral Vasodilation in Rabbits

We previously demonstrated that lumbar intrathecal alpha(2) agonists attenuate hypercapnia-induced cerebral vasodilation. The combination of intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine is being investigated as pain therapy. The effects of their combination on cerebrovascular reactivity are unknown. We allocated rabbits anesthetized with pentobarbital to two groups: (a) clonidine (normal saline followed 30 min later by clonidine 2 microg/kg, both into the lumbar intrathecal space; n = 6), and (b) neostigmine-pretreatment (neostigmine 2 microg/kg followed 30 min later by clonidine 2 microg/kg, both into the lumbar intrathecal space; n = 6). We then evaluated the hypercapnia-induced changes in pial arteriolar diameter in these two groups using the closed cranial window preparation. The pial arteriolar dilator response to hypercapnia was significantly attenuated in the clonidine group (14% +/- 4%, 4% +/- 4%, 6% +/- 6%, and 5% +/- 7% for before and 30, 60, and 90 min, respectively). Neither normal saline nor neostigmine alone induced any change in the cerebral reactivity to hypercapnia. Pretreatment with neostigmine completely prevented the clonidine-induced attenuation of the hypercapnic cerebral vasodilation attenuated by intrathecal clonidine (16% +/- 7%, 15% +/- 6%, 12% +/- 6%, and 16% +/- 8%, respectively).

Caudal neostigmine with bupivacaine produces a dose-independent analgesic effect in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and duration of varying doses of caudal neostigmine with plain bupivacaine and its side effects in children undergoing genito-urinary surgery.

METHODS

In a randomized double-blind prospective study 80 boys aged two to eight years scheduled for surgical repair of hypospadias were allocated randomly to one of four groups (n = 20 each) and received either only caudal 0.25% plain bupivacaine 0.5 mL.kg(-1) (Group I) or 0.25% plain bupivacaine 0.5 mL.kg(-1) with neostigmine (Groups II-IV) in doses of 2, 3 and 4 microg.kg(-1) respectively. Postoperative pain was assessed for 24 hr using an objective pain score. Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, total amount of analgesic consumed and adverse effects were also recorded.

RESULTS

The duration of postoperative analgesia in Group I (5.1 +/- 2.3 hr) was significantly shorter than in the other three groups (II -16.6 +/- 4.9 hr; III - 17.2 +/- 5.5 hr; IV - 17.0 +/- 5.8 hr; P < 0.05). Total analgesic (paracetamol) consumption was significantly more in Group I (697.6 +/- 240.7 mg) than in the groups receiving caudal neostigmine (II - 248.0 +/- 178.4; III - 270.2 +/- 180.8 and IV -230.6 +/- 166.9 mg; P < 0.05). Groups II, III and IV were comparable with regards to duration of postoperative analgesia and total analgesic consumption (P > 0.05). Incidence of nausea and vomiting were comparable in all four groups. No significant alteration in vital signs or any other adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal neostigmine (2, 3 and 4 microg.kg(-1)) with bupivacaine produces a dose-independent analgesic effect ( approximately 16-17 hr) in children as compared to those receiving caudal bupivacaine alone (approximately five hours) and a reduction in postoperative rescue analgesic consumption without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.

CEREBROVENTRICULAR INJECTION OF CLONIDINE CAUSES ANALGESIA MEDIATED BY A NITROGEN PATHWAY

Whereas neuroaxially administered clonidine produces analgesia partially mediated by alpha2-adrenoceptor-induced augmented synthesis of nitric oxide (NO), the central mechanisms by which clonidine produces its antinociceptive effects are still speculative. We used the tail-flick model of acute pain in mice to further explore the role of NO in mediating clonidine-induced central analgesia. Cerebroventricular administration of the following agents was studied: clonidine, L-arginine (NO precursor), the NO production inhibitor nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME), the NO antagonist methylene blue (MB), and nitroglycerine (NO-releasing agent). Analgesic response was achieved with clonidine and L-arginine. Simultaneous administration of L-arginine and clonidine produced no additive analgesic effect. Prior administration of L-NAME or MB partially abolished the clonidine-induced analgesic effect, whereas nitroglycerine administration did not affect it. NO may be involved in the mediation of the central antinociceptive effects of clonidine. Further investigation is necessary to determine the possible role of NO-promoting agents in analgesia when co-administered with clonidine.

INVOLVEMENT OF NITRIC OXIDE IN CLONIDINE-INDUCED SPINAL ANALGESIA

BACKGROUND

The chronic pain relieving effects following spinal administration of clonidine are probably connected to alpha2-adrenoreceptor-induced augmented synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) in the spinal cord. In contrast, when acute pain is considered, the possible role of NO is still speculative. The aim of the present study was to explore the role of NO in acute pain relief following intraspinal administration of clonidine.

METHODS

We used the mouse tail-flick model of acute pain. Spinal injections of the following agents and their combinations were administered: clonidine, L-arginine (NO precursor), the NO production inhibitor nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME), the NO antagonist methylene blue (MB) and nitroglycerine (NO releasing agent).

RESULTS

A 95% analgesic response was achieved with 2.0 microg clonidine. L-Arginine produced analgesia, and L-arginine administration followed by clonidine resulted in a pronounced synergistic analgesic effect. This synergistic effect was attenuated by L-NAME. Pre-treatment with MB decreased and nitroglycerine administration did not affect the clonidine-induced analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

NO may be involved in the mediation of the acute pain relieving effects of intraspinally administered clonidine. Further research is warranted to establish the potential benefits and possibility for incorporation of NO promoting agents in therapeutic regional pain regimens.

Spinal muscarinic receptors are activated during low or high frequency TENS-induced antihyperalgesia in rats

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-pharmacological modality used clinically to relieve pain. Central involvement of serotonin and endogenous opioids are implicated in TENS-induced analgesia. Activation of spinal cholinergic receptors is antinociceptive and these receptors interact with opioid and serotonin receptors. In the current study, the possible involvement of spinal cholinergic receptors in TENS analgesia was investigated in rats. Hyperalgesia was induced by inflaming one knee joint with 3% kaolin-carrageenan and assessed by measuring paw withdrawal latency (PWL) to heat before and 4 h after injection. The non-selective nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine (50 microg), non-selective muscarinic antagonist atropine (30 microg) or one of the muscarinic subtype antagonists: pirenzepine (M1, 10 microg), methoctramine (M2, 10 microg), 4-DAMP (M3, 10 microg), or saline was administered intrathecally just prior to TENS treatment. Low or high frequency TENS was then applied to the inflamed knee and PWL was determined again. Atropine, pirenzepine and 4-DAMP significantly attenuated the antihyperalgesic effects of low and high frequency TENS while mecamylamine and methoctramine had no effects, compared to saline control. The results show that TENS-induced antihyperalgesia is mediated partially by activation of spinal muscarinic receptors but not spinal nicotinic receptors. Further, the results also indicate that spinal M1 and M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes mediate the muscarinic component of TENS antihyperalgesia.

The effect of intrathecal medetomidine on small bowel transit in the rat

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Gastrointestinal motility is influenced by abdominal trauma, laparotomy and particularly by intestinal ischaemia. The reflex inhibition of gastrointestinal motility is mediated mainly by the sympathetic nervous system. There are reports on the effects of systemically applied alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists on gastric emptying and recovery of bowel motility, but the effect of spinally applied alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists on intestinal motility has not been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of intrathecal medetomidine on gastrointestinal transit in rats after transient intestinal ischaemia.

METHODS

Forty rats were randomly assigned to four groups of 10 each. Intrathecal catheter insertion and laparotomy were performed on each rat. Saline (10 microL) was injected intrathecally in Groups A and B. Medetomidine (10 microg in 10 microL) was injected intrathecally in Groups C and D. Intestinal ischaemia was induced in Groups B and D. Gastrointestinal transit was determined by measuring the length that a standardized marker meal of activated charcoal had travelled. Intrathecal medetomidine was compared to intrathecal saline in their effect on intestinal motility after 30 min period of bowel ischaemia.

RESULTS

Laparotomy and intestinal ischaemia slowed gastrointestinal transit. Intrathecal medetomidine accelerated transit in both ischaemia and non-ischaemia groups.

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal medetomidine markedly accelerated small intestinal transit and may also hasten the recovery from post-ischaemic paralytic ileus.

The role of spinal muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in clonidine-induced anti-nociceptive effects in rats

We have examined the effects of intrathecal (i.t.) injection of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist atropine on the clonidine-induced nociceptive effect in formalin-induced nociception in rats. The injection of 5% formalin into the hind paw caused biphasic nociceptive responses, and i.t. injection of clonidine inhibited both phases of the nociceptive response in a dose-dependent manner. Pretreatment with atropine (i.t.) only partially inhibited the nociceptive effect of clonidine. These results suggest that the nociceptive effect of clonidine in the rat formalin model may be at least partly mediated by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the spinal cord.

Dose response study of caudal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing genitourinary surgery

BACKGROUND

Neostigmine given through the neuraxial route has been found to have analgesic properties. In this clinical trial, we evaluated for the first time the efficacy of a varying dose of caudal neostigmine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing genitourinary surgery.

METHOD

In this double blind prospective study, we studied 120 children ASA physical status I in age group of 2-8 years scheduled for surgical repair of hypospadias under general anaesthesia. Children were randomly allocated to one of the six groups (n = 20 each) and received either no caudal block (group C) or neostigmine (groups I-V) in doses of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 microgram.kg-1 respectively at the end of the surgery. Postoperatively pain was assessed using an objective pain score for 24 h. Blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2, total amount of analgesic consumed and adverse effects, if any, were also recorded.

RESULT

The duration of postoperative analgesia did not differ significantly between group C and I (P > 0.05). There was significant prolongation in the duration of analgesia in rest of the groups (group II-3.52 +/- 1.37 h; group III-6.50 +/- 1.93 h; group IV-10.45 +/- 3.41 h; group V-13.70 +/- 5.52 h) (P < 0.05). A dose dependent increase in the incidence of nausea and vomiting was also observed with highest incidence in group IV and V (group C-15%; group I-20%; group II and III-30%; group IV-45% and group V-60%) (P < 0.05). No significant alteration in vital signs and other adverse effects were noticed.

CONCLUSION

Caudal neostigmine in the dose range of 20-50 microgram.kg-1 provides dose dependent analgesia. However, dose exceeding 30 microgram.kg-1 is associated with a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.

[Neostigmine added to bupivacaine in axillary plexus block: which benefit?]

INTRODUCTION

Recent study showed that neostigmine (500 microg) by intra-articular produces postoperative analgesia without adverse effect. The author's goal was to determine whether 500 microg of neostigmine added to bupivacaine in axillary plexus block could prolonged postoperative analgesia without increasing the incidence of side effects.

METHODS

Ninety patients scheduled for orthopedic or plastic surgery with axillary plexus block were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups : group 1 (TGr n = 30) received saline solution (1 ml) in the axillary plexus, group 2 (NAGr n = 30) received 500 microg (1 ml) neostigmine in the axillary plexus and group 3.500 microg neostigmine subcutaneously (NSGr n = 30). We evaluated visual analog pain scores (VAS), the consumption of the ketoprofene, nausea and vomiting incidence during the first 24 h. ANOVA, Kruskall Wallis and Fisher tests were used for statistical analysis. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The VAS score was lower in NAGr (21 +/- 18) vs NSGr (31 +/- 14) and control group TGr (45 +/- 2) (p < 0.05). The consumption of the ketoprofene is 127 +/- 65 mg in NAGr vs 150 +/- 53 mg in NSGr and 200 +/- 50 mg in group TGr (p = 0.02). Incidence of nausea and vomiting was 3.5% in NAGr vs 6.8% in NSGr and 0% for TGr.

CONCLUSION

Neostigmine combined to a mixture of lidocaine and bupivacaine prolongs postoperative analgesia after axillary plexus block.

Clonidine combined with small-dose bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy: a randomized double-blinded study

The aim of this randomized double-blinded study was to see whether the addition of small-dose clonidine to small-dose bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia and also provided a sufficient block duration that would be adequate for inguinal herniorrhaphy. We randomized 45 patients to 3 groups receiving intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 6 mg combined with saline (Group B), clonidine 15 micro g (Group BC15), or clonidine 30 micro g (Group BC30); all solutions were diluted with saline to 3 mL. The sensory block level was insufficient for surgery in five patients in Group B, and these patients were given general anesthesia. Patients in Groups BC15 and BC30 had a significantly higher spread of analgesia (two to four dermatomes) than those in Group B. Two-segment regression, return of S1 sensation, and regression of motor block were significantly longer in Group BC30 than in Group B. The addition of clonidine 15 and 30 micro g to bupivacaine prolonged time to first analgesic request and decreased postoperative pain with minimal risk of hypotension. We conclude that clonidine 15 micro g with bupivacaine 6 mg produced an effective spinal anesthesia and recommend this dose for inguinal herniorrhaphy, because it did not prolong the motor block.

IMPLICATIONS

The addition of clonidine 15 micro g to 6 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine increases the spread of analgesia, prolongs the time to first analgesic request, and decreases postoperative pain, compared with bupivacaine alone, during inguinal herniorrhaphy under spinal anesthesia.

Postoperative pain relief following intrathecal bupivacaine combined with intrathecal or oral clonidine

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative analgesic and adverse effects of equal doses of oral or intrathecal clonidine in spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine plain.

METHODS

Forty-five ASA I-III orthopaedic patients scheduled for osteosynthesis of a traumatic femur fracture were randomised in a double-blind fashion to one of 3 groups. Patients received 15 mg of plain bupivacaine intrathecally (group B) or an intrathecal mixture of bupivacaine 15 mg and clonidine 150 mg (group CIT). In group CPO oral clonidine 150 mg was administered 60 min before intrathecal injection of bupivacaine 15 mg.

RESULTS

Oral and intrathecal clonidine prolonged the time until the first request for analgesics, 313 +/- 29 and 337 +/- 29 min, respectively, vs. 236 +/- 27 min in group B (P < 0.01). The total 24- h PCA morphine dose was significantly lower in group CIT(19.3 +/- 1.3 mg) compared to groups B and CPO(33.4 +/- 2.0 and 31.2 +/- 3.1 mg). MAP was decreased significantly during the first hour after intrathecal clonidine(14%) and during the first 5 h after oral clonidine(14-19%). HR decreased in CIT during the 5th and 6th postoperative hours(7-9%) and during the first 2 h(9%) in CPO (P < 0.01). The degree of sedation was more pronounced in group CPO during the first 3 h. Four patients had pruritus in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of intrathecal clonidine prolonged analgesia and decreased morphine consumption postoperatively more than oral clonidine. Hypotension was more pronounced after oral than after intrathecal clonidine. Intrathecal clonidine is therefore recommended.

Intrathecal alpha2 adrenoceptor agonist clonidine inhibits mechanical transmission in mouse spinal cord via activation of muscarinic M1 receptors

We examined the role of the spinal muscarinic receptor subtype in the anti-nociceptive effect of intrathecal (i.t.) alpha2 adrenoceptor agonist clonidine in mice. I.t. injection of the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine completely inhibited i.t. clonidine-induced increase in the mechanical threshold, but did not affect the increase in tail-flick latency induced by i.t. clonidine. The clonidine-induced increase in mechanical threshold was inhibited by i.t. injection of the M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine in a dose-dependent manner, and by the M3 receptor antagonist 4-DAMP, but not by the M2 receptor antagonist methoctramine. The potency of pirenzepine was greater than that of 4-DAMP. These results suggest that the clonidine-induced increase in mechanical threshold is mediated via the activation of M1 receptors in the spinal cord.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Preemptive analgesia I: physiological pathways and pharmacological modalities

PURPOSE

This two-part review summarizes the current knowledge of physiological mechanisms, pharmacological modalities and controversial issues surrounding preemptive analgesia.

SOURCE

Articles from 1966 to present were obtained from the MEDLINE databases. Search terms included: analgesia, preemptive; neurotransmitters; pain, postoperative; hyperalgesia; sensitization, central nervous system; pathways, nociception; anesthetic techniques; analgesics, agents.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The physiological basis of preemptive analgesia is complex and involves modification of the pain pathways. The pharmacological modalities available may modify the physiological responses at various levels. Effective preemptive analgesic techniques require multi-modal interception of nociceptive input, increasing threshold for nociception, and blocking or decreasing nociceptor receptor activation. Although the literature is controversial regarding the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia, some general recommendations can be helpful in guiding clinical care. Regional anesthesia induced prior to surgical trauma and continued well into the postoperative period is effective in attenuating peripheral and central sensitization. Pharmacologic agents such as NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) opioids, and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) - and alpha-2-receptor antagonists, especially when used in combination, act synergistically to decrease postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

The variable patient characteristics and timing of preemptive analgesia in relation to surgical noxious input requires individualization of the technique(s) chosen. Multi-modal analgesic techniques appear most effective.

P75-expressing elements are necessary for anti-allodynic effects of spinal clonidine and neostigmine

Cells expressing nerve growth factor are implicated in development of hypersensitivity following nerve injury and cholinergic neurons are implicated in reduction of such hypersensitivity by alpha2-adrenergic agonists. Intrathecal injection of the cell toxin, saporin, linked to an antibody to the low-affinity nerve growth factor, p75 (192-IgG saporin), an agent which destroys cholinergic neurons in the brain, was used in the current study to further elucidate these mechanisms. Mechanical hypersensitivity was established in rats by ligation of the L5 and L6 spinal nerves. Animals were pretreated with intrathecal saline or 192-IgG saporin, and one week later received intrathecal clonidine or neostigmine. Spinal cords were removed for acetylcholine and norepinephrine analysis and for cholinergic and p75 immunohistochemistry. Treatment with 192-IgG saporin had no effect on mechanical hypersensitivity following spinal nerve ligation, but blocked the anti-hypersensitivity effects of intrathecal clonidine and neostigmine. Destruction of p75-expressing fibers in the superficial dorsal horn by 192-IgG saporin was not accompanied by changes in acetylcholine or norepinephrine content or by reduction in cholinergic neuronal number in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Unlike in the brain, 192-IgG saporin does not destroy cholinergic neurons in the spinal cord dorsal horn and cannot be used as a tool for this purpose. P75-expressing elements are not necessary for the maintenance of mechanical hyperalgesia in this model of neuropathic pain, but their destruction disrupts the targets or circuitry activated by alpha2-adrenergic and cholinergic agents to reduce hypersensitivity.

Formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine from nitric oxide and norepinephrine in the spinal cord and its role in spinal analgesia

Spinally released norepinephrine is thought to produce analgesia in part by stimulating alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors, which in turn leads to nitric oxide synthesis. Also, nitric oxide is known to react with norepinephrine in vivo in the brain to form 6-nitro-norepinephrine, which inhibits neuronal norepinephrine reuptake. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine occurs in the spinal cord and that intrathecal administration of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produces analgesia by stimulating norepinephrine release. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine was present in rat spinal cord tissue and microdialysates of the dorsal horn and intrathecal space. Intrathecal norepinephrine injection increased 6-nitro-norepinephrine. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine also stimulated norepinephrine release in dorsal spinal cord in vitro. Intrathecal injection of 6-nitro-norepinephrine produced antinociception and interacted additively with norepinephrine for antinociception. Spinal noradrenergic nerve destruction increased antinociception from intrathecally injected norepinephrine, but decreased antinociception from 6-nitro-norepinephrine. These results suggest a functional interaction between spinal nitric oxide and norepinephrine in analgesia, mediated in part by formation of 6-nitro-norepinephrine. Stimulation of auto-inhibitory alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors at noradrenergic synapses decreases norepinephrine release. Paradoxically, alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist injection increases and alpha(2)-adrenergic antagonist injection decreases norepinephrine release in the spinal cord. 6-Nitro-norepinephrine may be an important regulator of spinal norepinephrine release and could explain the positive feedback on norepinephrine release after activation of spinal alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors.

Role of spinal muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in clonidine-induced nitric oxide release in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Intrathecal administration of alpha(2) adrenergic agonists, such as clonidine, is capable of alleviating neuropathic pain. Recent studies suggest that spinal nitric oxide (NO) mediates the analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine. Furthermore, compared to nicotinic receptors, spinal muscarinic receptors play a greater role in the analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine. In the present study, we tested a hypothesis that clonidine-evoked NO release is dependent primarily on muscarinic receptors in the spinal cord after nerve injury. A rat model of neuropathic pain was induced by ligation of the left L(5)/L(6) spinal nerves. Using an in vitro spinal cord perfusion preparation, the effect of muscarinic and nicotinic receptor antagonists on clonidine-evoked nitrite (a stable product of NO) release was determined. Both muscarinic and nicotinic antagonists dose-dependently attenuated clonidine-elicited nitrite release. In spinal cords from the neuropathic rats, the inhibitory effect of muscarinic receptor antagonists (atropine and scopolamine) on clonidine-elicited nitrite release was more potent than that of nicotinic receptor antagonists (mecamylamine and hexamethonium). However, in spinal cords obtained from sham animals, the inhibitory effect of muscarinic and nicotinic antagonists did not differ significantly. These results indicate that muscarinic, as well as nicotinic, receptors mediate clonidine-induced NO release in the spinal cord. These data also suggest that after nerve injury, the cascade of activation of alpha(2) adrenergic receptors-muscarinic receptors-NO in the spinal cord likely plays a predominant role in the analgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine on neuropathic pain.

Systemic physostigmine shows antiallodynic effects in neuropathic rats

The aim of this study was to examine the antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects of subcutaneously administered physostigmine (50, 100, 200 micrograms/kg), compared with morphine (2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg) and NaCl after spinal nerve ligation in rats. The following stimuli were used: acetone (cold allodynia), von Frey hairs (mechanical allodynia), and paw flick test (thermal nociception). Motility boxes were used to investigate the effects of the drugs on motor performance. Physostigmine attenuated both mechanical and cold allodynia dose-dependently but had no effect on the paw flick test. The effect was antagonized by atropine (muscarinic receptor antagonist) but not by mecamylamine (nicotinic receptor antagonist) or naloxone (opioid receptor antagonist). Morphine produced dose-dependent antiallodynic and antinociceptive effects. In the antiallodynic doses, morphine caused severe rigidity. Physostigmine 200 micrograms/kg impaired locomotor activity, but no rigidity was observed.

IMPLICATIONS

Physostigmine has different effects on allodynia and nociception, which suggests that different cholinergic (muscarinic) mechanisms may be involved in neuropathic and nociceptive pain.

Research-overview article: membrane lipolysis and cholinergic priority

Cholinergic drugs and antigenic and toxicological challenges induced lipolysis in twelve sheep. A lipolytic end product, the PGF2alpha metabolite, was found to be a reliable non-specific cholinergic marker. The lipolytic membrane alterations supported the concept of a general priority of the cholinergic system. A main feature is the breaking of molecular stability in dynamic hydrogen-bond interactions. Both acetylcholine and dioxygen reactivity are apparently moderated by cholinesterases. Free radicals appeared to be normal intermediates of catabolism, serving to neutralize excess protons. Antioxidants regenerate molecular oxygen, and so counteract part of excess activated oxygen. Intrinsic reactivity against its own structures characterizes the immuno-cholinergic system. Genetic priority could be assumed for cholinergic constituents and constitutions. A broad spectrum of etiologies was suggested. Lasting or repeated challenges may cause heterochiral conversions of vital proteins. The priority aspect of cholinergism also suggested methods to rank among the multitude of secondary biomolecules.

Nitric oxide modulates spinal antinociceptive effect of clonidine but not that of baclofen in the formalin test in rats

The aim of present study was to determine the influence of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis on intrathecal (i.t.) clonidine or baclofen antinociception in the formalin test. Formalin injection into the hindpaw of a rat induces a biphasic response in pain-related behaviours, such that C-fiber activation (acute pain) during phase 1 triggers a state of spinal sensitization characterized by longer lasting phase 2 (tonic pain). Intrathecal clonidine and baclofen, at doses without effect upon motor performance, produced a dose-dependent inhibition of both phases of the formalin test. Potency of both drugs, defined by ID50 for phase 2 of the formalin test, was 3.5 and 0.6 nmol, respectively. Intrathecal coadministration of L-arginine, substrate of NO synthase (NOS) or NOS inhibitor, N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), dose-dependently reduced or potentiated, respectively, the antinociceptive effect of clonidine but not that of baclofen in the formalin test. The importance of NO formation in the antinociceptive effect of clonidine is further supported by the observation that neither D-arginine nor D-NAME were able to modify clonidine antinociception. These results suggest that the NO synthesis plays a modulatory role in the antinociceptive effect of clonidine, while the mechanism underlying the baclofen-induced antinociception seems to be different.

The mechanism of alpha2-adrenergic inhibition of sympathetic ganglionic transmission

Alpha2-adrenergic agonists produce analgesia and reduce hemodynamic stress through central and peripheral mechanisms, but the effect of adrenergic agonists on pre- and postganglionic sites has not yet been clarified. In this study, we examined the effects of dexmedetomidine (DMT), an alpha2-agonist, on neural conduction and neurotransmitter release in sympathetic ganglia. The stellate ganglia from 48 mongrel dogs were isolated, desheathed, and superfused with Krebs' solution. Compound action potentials were evoked, and chromatography was used to detect acetylcholine released by preganglionic stimulation in the presence or absence of DMT. To further elucidate the mechanism of alpha2 effects, DMT was applied in combination with the alpha2-antagonist atipamezole (AT) or the imidazoline antagonist idazoxan (ID). In other experiments, DMT was applied in the presence of exogenous nicotinic stimulation with 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium iodide or muscarinic stimulation with (+)cis-dioxolane. DMT dose-dependently inhibited synaptic transmission with a 50% effective dose of 71.6 (26.0-174.3) microM. Neurotransmitter release was reduced 25% by 70 microM DMT during low-frequency (0.4 Hz) stimulation, but this effect was abolished at higher frequency (5 Hz) stimulation. AT but not ID blocked the inhibitory action of DMT. DMT inhibited the excitatory postsynaptic response to exogenous muscarinic stimulation but not nicotinic stimulation. These results indicate that alpha2-receptor activation depresses ganglionic transmission through postsynaptic inhibition of muscarinic stimulation, although reduction of neurotransmitter release through a presynaptic autofeedback mechanism is also involved.

IMPLICATIONS

This article provides novel insights into the mechanism of drug action of alpha2-receptor agonists in the sympathetic ganglia of dogs by directly measuring the relative contribution of pre- and postganglionic receptors. Our study indicates that the central sympatholytic effects of alpha2-adrenoceptor stimulation are augmented by peripheral inhibition of ganglionic transmission.

Promising non-narcotic analgesic techniques for labour

Epidural analgesia and spinal analgesia are the most effective techniques for relieving labour pain. Basically, local anaesthetics (i.e. bupivacaine) and opioids (i.e. fentanyl or sufentanil), especially when combined, produce excellent analgesia with minimal motor blockade. However, none of these agents is devoid of side-effects and analgesia remains sometimes imperfect, suggesting that new drugs would be welcome. Adrenalin and clonidine act on a2-adrenoceptors in the spinal cord and both have been found to improve analgesia. These two drugs have already been used in many patients and studies because the absence of neurotoxicity has been well documented. Clonidine looks more attractive, although sedation and hypotension limit its use. Other analgesic drugs are promising alternatives but are still at an experimental or very early clinical stage. Neostigmine and ketamine (without preservative) are not neurotoxic while midazolam neurotoxicity is still controversial. Intravenous remifentanil might prove useful when neuraxial analgesia is contraindicated.

An isobolographic analysis of drug interaction between intrathecal clonidine and baclofen in the formalin test in rats

The inhibition of both phases of the formalin response by intrathecal (IT) clonidine and baclofen, given alone or in combination at a fixed dose ratio, was studied. Both drugs, at doses not affecting motor performance, produced a dose-dependent inhibition of phase 2 of the formalin test. The potency of baclofen and clonidine, defined by their ID50's for phase 2 of the formalin test, was 0.56 and 3.4 nmol, respectively. The combination ID50 of baclofen and clonidine, with the equieffective dose ratio of 1:6, was found to be statistically lower than the theoretical additive ID50. These data suggest that co-administration of alpha2-adrenoceptor or GABA(B) receptor agonists may prove therapeutically useful in treating chronic pain.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in humans

Dexmedetomidine's potential for analgesia without respiratory depression and its opioid- and anesthetic-sparing properties make it an attractive choice as an anesthetic adjunct for patients undergoing neurosurgery. However, the effects of dexmedetomidine on intracranial pressure are not known. We therefore studied the effect of dexmedetomidine on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure in patients after transphenoidal pituitary tumor surgery. Sixteen transphenoidal pituitary tumor surgery patients were randomized to receive placebo (n = 9) or dexmedetomidine (n = 7) for 60 min in the postanesthesia care unit. The study drug was administered by a continuous computer-controlled infusion to achieve an estimated plasma dexmedetomidine concentration of 600 pg/mL, the highest plasma concentration that has been used for clinical purposes. Patient-controlled analgesia was used to administer morphine for postoperative discomfort. Lumbar CSF pressure (via lumbar intrathecal catheter), intraarterial blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored continuously. There was no change in lumbar CSF pressure in either group. The highest values obtained were 19 mm Hg in the dexmedetomidine group and 20 mm Hg in the placebo group. During infusion, mean arterial pressure decreased from 103 +/- 10 mm Hg to 86 +/- 6 mm Hg (P < 0.05), heart rate decreased from 77 +/- 12 bpm to 64 +/- 7 bpm (P < 0.05), and cerebral perfusion pressure decreased from 95 +/- 8 mm Hg to 78 +/- 6 mm Hg (P < 0.05) in the dexmedetomidine group, but not in the placebo group. We conclude that dexmedetomidine does not have an effect on lumbar CSF pressure in patients with normal intracranial pressure who have undergone transphenoidal pituitary hypophysectomy.

IMPLICATIONS

The effects of dexmedetomidine (an alpha2-agonist) or placebo on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure, measured via an intrathecal catheter, were studied postoperatively in 16 patients. Dexmedetomidine had no effect on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure. We will continue to investigate the potential utility of dexmedetomidine for neurosurgical anesthesia.

Adjunctive methods of pain control in burns

Opiates remain the most common form of analgesic therapy in the burn patient today. Because of increased opiate requirements, optimal relief of burn pain continues to be a problem for these patients. The purpose of this article is to summarize those alternative pain control methods that appear in the literature. For instance, in minor burns acetominophen continues to be a useful first line analgesic. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and benzodiazepine are generally combined with opiates while entonox seems to be used commonly in the adolescent patients to relieve procedural pain. Antidepressants appear to enhance opiate-induced analgesia while anticonvulsants are useful in the treatment of sympathetically maintained pain following burns. Ketamine has been extensively used during burn dressing changes but its psychological side-effects have limited its use. Clonidine, however, has shown promise in reducing pain without causing pruritus or respiratory depression. Other forms such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), psychological techniques, topical and systemic local anaesthetics are also useful adjuncts.

Analgesic doses of intrathecal but not intravenous clonidine increase acetylcholine in cerebrospinal fluid in humans

Epidural clonidine increases acetylcholine (ACh) concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in humans, and experiments in animals support a cholinergic link in spinal alpha2-adrenoceptor-mediated antinociception. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether intravenous (I.V.) clonidine is also able to increase CSF ACh in humans. Accordingly, we studied 20 patients scheduled for resection of an acoustic neuroma under general anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with propofol and N2O. After induction, an intrathecal catheter was inserted at the L3-4 interspace. Patients were then assigned, in a random, blind manner to receive either a bolus of 1 microg/kg intrathecal (I.T.) clonidine and an I.V. infusion of saline (n = 10) or an I.V. infusion of 4 microg/kg clonidine given in 20 min and an I.T. injection of saline (n = 10). CSF samples for ACh and clonidine concentration determination were drawn immediately before I.T. injection (time -20), at the end of the I.V. injection (time 0), then every 10 min thereafter. CSF ACh concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography and CSF clonidine by radioimmunoassay. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to age, gender, weight, and ASA physical status. I.T. but not I.V. administration of clonidine increased the CSF ACh concentration. We conclude that I.V. administration of four times the dose of clonidine delivered spinally failed to induce a significant increase of ACh in the CSF. These observations indicate that the analgesic effects observed after I.V. clonidine administration are not mediated by a cholinergic mechanism at the spinal level.

Dose-response study of intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal neostigmine, their combination, or placebo for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing anterior and posterior vaginoplasty

This study was designed to examine postoperative analgesia with intrathecal neostigmine in a randomized, blinded trial with morphine as the active control in patients undergoing anterior and posterior vaginoplasty. A secondary aim was to provide preliminary data on the interaction between these two drugs. The incidence of adverse effects was also assessed. Forty-eight patients were divided into eight groups (50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms morphine [M]; saline; 50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms neostigmine [N]; and 50 micrograms morphine + 50 micrograms neostigmine). Anesthesia was provided with a balanced technique. All patients stayed 24 h in the recovery room where adequacy of postoperative analgesia and side effects were assessed. Increasing doses of intrathecal morphine (50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms) and intrathecal neostigmine (50 micrograms, 100 micrograms, and 200 micrograms) showed a dose-dependent pattern of analgesia (P < 0.001). The M50 + N50 combination resulted in a better analgesic effect with fewer side effects than M50, N50, and control groups. These preliminary data suggest that spinal neostigmine produces analgesia for vaginoplasty surgery similar in duration to spinal morphine and that the combination of morphine and neostigmine may allow a reduction in the dose of each component for postoperative analgesia.