1
|
Yang Q, Li B, Luan T, Wang X, Duan B, Wei C, Chen S. Exploring blood lipids-immunity associations following HBV vaccination: evidence from a large cross-sectional study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2024; 14:1369661. [PMID: 38524185 PMCID: PMC10959126 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1369661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Serological responses following hepatitis B vaccination are crucial for preventing hepatitis B (HBV). However, the potential relationship between serum lipid levels and immunity from HBV vaccination remains poorly understood. Methods In this study, we conducted an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data spanning from 2003 to 2016. Multivariable weighted logistic regression models, generalized linear analysis, stratified models, smooth curve fitting, segmentation effect analysis and sensitivity analysis were utilized to assess the relationships. Results After adjusting for relevant covariates, we observed that low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) were independently linked to a significantly lower seroprotective rate. Compared to HDL levels of ≥ 60 mg/dL, the odds ratios (ORs) for individuals with borderline levels (40-59 mg/dL for men, 50-59 mg/dL for women) and low levels (< 40 mg/dL for men, < 50 mg/dL for women) were 0.83 (95% CI 0.69-0.99) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.56-0.78), respectively. This association was particularly pronounced in individuals aged 40 or older. Conversely, higher levels of the triglyceride to HDL (TG/HDL) ratio (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98), total cholesterol to HDL (Chol/HDL) ratio (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64-0.92), and low-density lipoprotein to HDL (LDL/HDL) ratio (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.96) were associated with a decreased likelihood of seroprotection. Conclusion This study suggests that lipid levels may play a role in modulating the immune response following HBV vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Yang
- Clinical Molecular Medicine Testing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Benhua Li
- Clinical Molecular Medicine Testing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Tiankuo Luan
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaoyu Wang
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bixia Duan
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chengcheng Wei
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shi Chen
- Clinical Molecular Medicine Testing Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ginda T, Taradaj K, Kociszewska-Najman B. The influence of selected factors on the immunogenicity of preventive vaccinations against hepatitis A, B and influenza in solid organ transplant recipients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy - a review. Expert Rev Vaccines 2022; 21:483-497. [PMID: 35001777 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2027241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunization is the most effective form of the primary prevention of infectious diseases. Knowledge on the efficacy and immunogenicity of vaccinations in the group of organ transplant patients taking chronic immunosuppressive treatment remains incomplete. AREAS COVERED The aim of this paper was to analyze factors influencing the post-vaccination response in patients undergoing chronic immunosuppressive therapy based on a literature review. Only publications that evaluated the immunogenicity of influenza, HAV and HBV vaccinations in patients on immunosuppressive therapy were reviewed. EXPERT OPINION The following methods are used to potentially increase the immunogenicity of vaccinations against HAV and HBV amongst post-transplantation patients: increasing the number of doses, increasing dose volumes, the method of administering as well as the addition of adjuvant. Immunogenicity is also impacted by the immunosuppression mechanism. Overall, vaccination has been concluded to be safe for post-transplantation patients and adverse events following immunization (AEFI) have typically been rated as mild or moderate. The instances of transplant rejections as observable in the long term have not been related to administered vaccinations. The data shows certain correlations of some factors with increased immunogenicity, however it is necessary to repeat the studies on a more representative group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Ginda
- Department of Neonatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Karol Taradaj
- Department of Neonatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Duvoux C, Belli LS, Fung J, Angelico M, Buti M, Coilly A, Cortesi P, Durand F, Féray C, Fondevila C, Lebray P, Martini S, Nevens F, Polak WG, Rizzetto M, Volpes R, Zoulim F, Samuel D, Berenguer M. 2020 position statement and recommendations of the European Liver and Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA): management of hepatitis B virus-related infection before and after liver transplantation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2021; 54:583-605. [PMID: 34287994 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylaxis of HBV recurrence is critical after liver transplantation in HBV patients. Despite new prophylactic schemes, most European LT centres persist on a conservative approach combining hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ides analogues (NA). AIM This setting prompted the European Liver Intestine Transplantation Association (ELITA) to look for a consensus on the prevention of HBV recurrence. METHODS Based on a 4-round Delphi process, ELITA investigated 16 research questions and established 50 recommendations. RESULTS Prophylaxis should be driven according to 3 simplified risk groups: Low and high virological risk patients, with undetectable and detectable HBV DNA pre-LT, respectively, and special populations (HDV, HCC, poorly adherent patients). In low-risk patients, short-term (4 weeks) combination of third-generation NA+ HBIG, or third generation NA monotherapy can be considered as prophylactic options. In high-risk patients, HBIG can be discontinued once HBV DNA undetectable. Combined therapy for 1 year is advised. HBV-HCC patients should be treated according to their virological risk. In HDV/HBV patients, indefinite dual prophylaxis remains the gold standard. Full withdrawal of HBV prophylaxis following or not HBV vaccination should only be attempted in the setting of clinical trials. Organs from HBsAg+ve donors may be considered after assessment of risks, benefits, and patient consent. They should not be used if HDV is present. In poorly adherent patients, dual long-term prophylaxis is recommended. Budget impact analysis should be taken into account to drive prophylactic regimen. CONCLUSIONS These ELITA recommendations should stimulate a more rational and homogeneous approach to HBV prophylaxis across LT programs.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hennessy C, McKernan DP. Anti-Viral Pattern Recognition Receptors as Therapeutic Targets. Cells 2021; 10:cells10092258. [PMID: 34571909 PMCID: PMC8466445 DOI: 10.3390/cells10092258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) play a central role in the inflammation that ensues following microbial infection by their recognition of molecular patterns present in invading microorganisms but also following tissue damage by recognising molecules released during disease states. Such receptors are expressed in a variety of cells and in various compartments of these cells. PRR binding of molecular patterns results in an intracellular signalling cascade and the eventual activation of transcription factors and the release of cytokines, chemokines, and vasoactive molecules. PRRs and their accessory molecules are subject to tight regulation in these cells so as to not overreact or react in unnecessary circumstances. They are also key to reacting to infection and in stimulating the immune system when needed. Therefore, targeting PRRs offers a potential therapeutic approach for chronic inflammatory disease, infections and as vaccine adjuvants. In this review, the current knowledge on anti-viral PRRs and their signalling pathways is reviewed. Finally, compounds that target PRRs and that have been tested in clinical trials for chronic infections and as adjuvants in vaccine trials are discussed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Phadke VK, Scanlon N, Jordan SC, Rouphael NG. Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021; 8:127-139. [PMID: 33688459 PMCID: PMC7931983 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00322-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a complex interplay between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) dynamics and host immune responses. Hosts with altered immunity, including solid organ transplant recipients, may be at increased risk of complications and death due to COVID-19. A synthesis of the available data on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection is needed to inform therapeutic and preventative strategies in this special population. RECENT FINDINGS Few studies have directly compared immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 between transplant recipients and the general population. Like non-transplant patients, transplant recipients mount an exuberant inflammatory response following initial SARS-CoV2 infection, with IL-6 levels correlating with disease severity in some, but not all studies. Transplant recipients display anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and activated B cells in a time frame and magnitude similar to non-transplant patients-limited data suggest these antibodies can be detected within 15 days of symptom onset and may be durable for several months. CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphopenia, a hallmark of COVID-19, is more profound in transplant recipients, but SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells can be detected among patients with both mild and severe disease. SUMMARY The limited available data indicate that immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are similar between transplant recipients and the general population, but no studies have been sufficiently comprehensive to understand nuances between organ types or level of immunosuppression to meaningfully inform individualized therapeutic decisions. The ongoing pandemic provides an opportunity to generate higher-quality data to support rational treatment and vaccination strategies in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun K. Phadke
- Emory University Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU), Division of Infectious Diseases, The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, 500 Irvin Court, Suite 200, Decatur, GA 30030 USA
- The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Decatur, GA USA
| | - Nicholas Scanlon
- The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Decatur, GA USA
| | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Nadine G. Rouphael
- The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Decatur, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fernández I, Pascasio JM, Colmenero J. Prophylaxis and treatment in liver transplantation. VII Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2020; 43:169-177. [PMID: 32094045 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Whilst prophylaxis of hepatitis B is universally accepted after liver transplantation (LT), national recommendations for the prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after LT are lacking in Spain. The aim of the VII consensus meeting organised by the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (SETH) was to set recommendations on the prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B after LT. The scientific evidence and strength of recommendations was evaluated by using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) system. This document describes the recommendations and their level of evidence for: the definition and risk factors for hepatitis B recurrence after LT, monitoring and prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence at different periods after LT, treatment of hepatitis B before and after LT, and the prophylaxis of HBV infection by the recipients of LT with hepatitis B core antigen positive donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inmaculada Fernández
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Hepatología y Trasplante Hepático, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - Juan Manuel Pascasio
- Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - Jordi Colmenero
- Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Univ. Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Antiviral Therapy for AECHB and Severe Hepatitis B (Liver Failure). ACUTE EXACERBATION OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS B 2019. [PMCID: PMC7498919 DOI: 10.1007/978-94-024-1603-9_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This chapter describes the principles of antiviral therapy, treatment strategies, medications and recommendations for AECHB, HBV-ACLF, HBV-related liver cirrhosis, HBV-related HCC, and liver transplantation.Severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B is closely related to continuous HBV replication. Therefore, inhibiting HBV replication to reduce viral load may block disease progression and improve the quality of life of these patients. ETV or TDF has been recommend first-line drug for the treatment of AECHB. A hyperactive immune response due to continuous HBV replication is the main mechanism for development of severe hepatitis B. In addition to comprehensive treatment, early administration of potent nucleoside analogs can rapidly reduce HBV DNA concentration, relieve immune injury induced by HBV, and reduce liver inflammation and patient mortality. Antiviral agents have become important in the treatment of severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B. Long-term antiviral treatment with nucleoside analogs can delay or reverse the progress of liver cirrhosis. Virologic response, viral resistance and adverse drug reactions should be closely monitored during treatment. The treatment should be optimized for maximum effect based on each patient’s responses. Effective antiviral therapy can suppress HBV replication and reduce the incidence of HBV-related HCC. Patients with HBV-related HCC should receive individualized and optimal multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment. Anti-viral drugs with high efficacy, low resistance and low adverse drug reactions should be selected to improve the patient’s quality of life and prolong survival time. Methods to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation include passive immunization (HBIG), antiviral treatment (nucleoside analogs) and active immunization (hepatitis B vaccine). Clinical trials involving sequential combination therapy with NUC and Peg-IFN have shown statistically significant decline in HBsAg levels on treatment and high rates of sustained post-treatment serologic response. Combination therapy with novel DAA and immunotherapeutic approach may hold promise to overcome both cccDNA persistence and immune escape, representing a critical step towards HBV cure.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wong TCL, Fung JYY, Chok KSH, Cheung TT, Chan ACY, Dai WC, Ng KKC, Chan SC, Lo CM. Hepatitis B Vaccination in Patients Receiving Oral Antiviral Therapy Without Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin After Liver Transplant. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3681-3688. [PMID: 30577255 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2017] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Our study aimed to determine if a double-dose pre-S containing hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination (Sci-B-Vac) could elicit an adequate and sustainable immune response in HBV patients who developed spontaneous hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) response after liver transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients who received transplants for HBV-related disease for >1 year with normal graft function and hepatitis B surface antigen seronegativity were evaluated. They received a 40-μg HBV vaccine if they were responders in our previous vaccine trial, if anti-HBs was positive for >1 year after liver transplant (LT), or if a peak anti-HBs at any time point after LT was >100 mIU/mL. Primary endpoint was the development of anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL from previous negative value or a 1-log increase from baseline. RESULTS A total of 86 patients were recruited; 5 were responders from a previous trial; 45 patients had detectable anti-HBs >1 year after LT, and 36 patients had an anti-HBs >100 mIU/mL. All (5/5, 100%) previous responders responded to booster vaccination. For the remaining 81 patients, 10 of 81 (12.3%) responded. CONCLUSION All previous responders responded to booster vaccination, implying durability and memory of HBV immune response, which is an important prerequisite for definitive host immunity for HBV. In patients who had spontaneous anti-HBs production after LT, a single vaccination can induce response in 12.3% of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T C L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - J Y Y Fung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - K S H Chok
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - T T Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - A C Y Chan
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - W C Dai
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - K K C Ng
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - S C Chan
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - C M Lo
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fensterheim BA, Young JD, Luan L, Kleinbard RR, Stothers CL, Patil NK, McAtee-Pereira AG, Guo Y, Trenary I, Hernandez A, Fults JB, Williams DL, Sherwood ER, Bohannon JK. The TLR4 Agonist Monophosphoryl Lipid A Drives Broad Resistance to Infection via Dynamic Reprogramming of Macrophage Metabolism. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY (BALTIMORE, MD. : 1950) 2018; 200:3777-3789. [PMID: 29686054 PMCID: PMC5964009 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA) is a clinically used TLR4 agonist that has been found to drive nonspecific resistance to infection for up to 2 wk. However, the molecular mechanisms conferring protection are not well understood. In this study, we found that MPLA prompts resistance to infection, in part, by inducing a sustained and dynamic metabolic program in macrophages that supports improved pathogen clearance. Mice treated with MPLA had enhanced resistance to infection with Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans that was associated with augmented microbial clearance and organ protection. Tissue macrophages, which exhibited augmented phagocytosis and respiratory burst after MPLA treatment, were required for the beneficial effects of MPLA. Further analysis of the macrophage phenotype revealed that early TLR4-driven aerobic glycolysis was later coupled with mitochondrial biogenesis, enhanced malate shuttling, and increased mitochondrial ATP production. This metabolic program was initiated by overlapping and redundant contributions of MyD88- and TRIF-dependent signaling pathways as well as downstream mTOR activation. Blockade of mTOR signaling inhibited the development of the metabolic and functional macrophage phenotype and ablated MPLA-induced resistance to infection in vivo. Our findings reveal that MPLA drives macrophage metabolic reprogramming that evolves over a period of days to support a macrophage phenotype highly effective at mediating microbe clearance and that this results in nonspecific resistance to infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Fensterheim
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212
| | - Jamey D Young
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212
| | - Liming Luan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| | - Ruby R Kleinbard
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| | - Cody L Stothers
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212
| | - Naeem K Patil
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| | | | - Yin Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| | - Irina Trenary
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235
| | - Antonio Hernandez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| | - Jessica B Fults
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| | - David L Williams
- Department of Surgery, James H. Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614
| | - Edward R Sherwood
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| | - Julia K Bohannon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232; and
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Du K, Liu J, Broering R, Zhang X, Yang D, Dittmer U, Lu M. Recent advances in the discovery and development of TLR ligands as novel therapeutics for chronic HBV and HIV infections. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2018; 13:661-670. [PMID: 29772941 DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2018.1473372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands remain as promising antiviral drug candidates for the treatment of chronic viral infections. Basic research on the mechanisms of antiviral activity of TLR ligands in preclinical animal models and clinical testing of drug candidates have been carried out in recent years. Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the preclinical and clinical testing of TLR ligands in two major viral infections: hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Recent results have further demonstrated the potent antiviral activity of various TLR ligands . A TLR7 agonist is in clinical trials for the treatment of chronic HBV infection while a HBV vaccine using a TLR9 ligand as an adjuvant has proven to be superior to conventional HBV vaccines and has been approved for clinical use. Generally, TLR activation may achieve viral control mainly by promoting adaptive immunity to viral proteins. Expert opinion: Recent research in this field indicates that TLR ligands could be developed as clinically effective drugs if the obstacles concerning toxicity and application routes are overcome. TLR-mediated promotion of adaptive immunity is a major issue for future studies and will determine the future development of TLR ligands as drugs for immunomodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keye Du
- a Department of Infectious Disease , Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan , China
| | - Jia Liu
- a Department of Infectious Disease , Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan , China
| | - Ruth Broering
- b Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen , Germany
| | - Xiaoyong Zhang
- c Hepatology Unit and Department of Infectious Diseases , Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Dongliang Yang
- a Department of Infectious Disease , Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan , China
| | - Ulf Dittmer
- d Institute of Virology , University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen , Germany
| | - Mengji Lu
- d Institute of Virology , University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aggeletopoulou I, Davoulou P, Konstantakis C, Thomopoulos K, Triantos C. Response to hepatitis B vaccination in patients with liver cirrhosis. Rev Med Virol 2017; 27. [PMID: 28905444 DOI: 10.1002/rmv.1942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis B vaccination is strongly recommended for all infants and children but also for adults who are at risk of HBV infection. Attempts to immunize patients with liver cirrhosis have been proven relatively ineffective, and several strategies have already been used to improve the immune response in this group. The primary aim of this review is to examine, discuss, and summarize the immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination in patients with liver cirrhosis. MEDLINE search identified 11 studies (n = 961). The dose of the vaccine and the schedule of the vaccination varied. The response rates to the HBV vaccination ranged from 16% to 87% among patients with cirrhosis regardless of the number and vaccine dose. In particular, patients who received the standard dose of vaccination achieved seroprotection rates ranged from 16% to 79% (mean response rate 38%) and those who received a double dose achieved relatively better seroprotection rates (range: 26%-87%; mean response rate 53%). The overall mean response rate to the HBV vaccination was 47%. In conclusion, cirrhotic patients achieve lower seroprotection rates after the completion of HBV vaccination series. Several strategies have tried to improve the immunogenicity; however, there is a great need for additional studies to further explore (1) the immune response in relation to poor vaccination responsiveness confounding factors, (2) novel strategies to improve immunogenicity, and (3) the immune mechanism underlying the differences in response rates to HBV vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Panagiota Davoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | - Christos Triantos
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Duan BW, Lu SC, Lai W, Liu XE, Liu Y. The detection of (total and ccc) HBV DNA in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B vaccine against HBV reinfection. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2016; 11:2490-4. [PMID: 26177383 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1063755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate the levels of hepatitis B virus total DNA (HBV DNA) and covalently closed circular (ccc) DNA in liver transplant recipients who received hepatitis B vaccination, including responders and non-responders, following liver transplantation due to hepatitis B-related diseases and to investigate the efficacy of hepatitis B immune reconstitution against HBV reinfection. Twenty responders and 34 non-responders were enrolled in the present study. The levels of HBV total DNA and ccc DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and the liver and plasma were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fifty-three blood samples and 38 liver allograft tissues were acquired. For the responders, the mean serum titer for anti-HBs (antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen) was 289 (46.64-1000) IU/ml. Also for the responders, HBV total DNA was detected in PBMCs for one recipient and in the liver for another recipient, but ccc DNA was not detected in either of those 2 recipients. For the non-responders, HBV total DNA was detected in PBMCS for 2 recipients, neither of whom had ccc DNA. Also for the non-responders, HBV total DNA was detected in the livers of 3 recipients, 2 of whom also had ccc DNA. All responders had discontinued hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), and 13 responders had discontinued antiviral agents. One responder experienced HBV recurrence during the follow-up period. For the majority of liver transplant recipients, no HBV total DNA or ccc DNA was detected in the blood or liver. The lack of HBV total DNA and ccc DNA both in PBMCs and the liver in liver transplant recipients who received hepatitis B vaccination to prevent HBV reinfection should be a prerequisite for the withdrawal of HBIG and/or antiviral agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin-Wei Duan
- a Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Program ; Beijing You-An Hospital; Capital Medical University ; Beijing , China
| | - Shi-Chun Lu
- b Institute & Hospital of Hepatobiliary Surgery; Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA; Chinese PLA Medical School; Chinese PLA General Hospital ; Beijing , China
| | - Wei Lai
- c Department of General Surgery ; Chengdu First People's Hospital ; Sichuan , China
| | - Xue-En Liu
- d Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease Center ; School of Basic Medical Sciences; Peking University Health Science Center ; Beijing , China
| | - Yuan Liu
- a Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Program ; Beijing You-An Hospital; Capital Medical University ; Beijing , China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoshizawa A, Yamashiki N, Ueda Y, Kaido T, Okajima H, Marusawa H, Chiba T, Uemoto S. Long-term efficacy of hepatitis B vaccination as post-transplant prophylaxis in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive recipients and HBsAg negative recipients of anti-hepatitis B core positive grafts. Hepatol Res 2016; 46:541-51. [PMID: 26348993 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2015] [Revised: 08/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after liver transplantation in HBV patients, or in HBV negative recipients of anti-hepatitis B core (HBc) positive grafts, has been prevented by prophylactic use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and/or nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NA). Vaccination against HBV is an alternative that may provide a chance to discontinue prophylaxis by producing anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) antibodies. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 40 HBV positive recipients (HBV+ group) and 27 HBV negative recipients of anti-HBc positive grafts (HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group), who were administrated double-dose hepatitis B vaccination. Recipients were regarded as responders when anti-HBs greater than 100 IU/L was maintained for 6 months or more without HBIG. Response rates of vaccine and long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Eighteen of the 40 patients in the HBV+ group (45%) and 18 of the 27 patients in the HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group (67%) responded to vaccination after a median of four and three times, respectively. Younger age was the only independent factor associated with vaccine response in the HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group (P = 0.03), whereas no factor was found to be an independent predictor for vaccine response in the HBV+ group. Among the 18 responders in the HBV+ group, 17 remained without NA or HBIG 8.2 years after the start of vaccination. Ten of those required periodic booster vaccination. All 18 responders in the HBV-/anti-HBc+ graft group remained free from HBV prophylaxis 6.2 years after the start of vaccination. CONCLUSION Younger recipients have a greater chance to develop sufficient anti-HBs after double-dose HBV vaccination, leading to discontinue HBV prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsushi Yoshizawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Yoshihide Ueda
- Organ Transplantation Unit, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshimi Kaido
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Organ Transplantation Unit, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hideaki Okajima
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Marusawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Chiba
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinji Uemoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.,Organ Transplantation Unit, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rational Basis for Optimizing Short and Long-term Hepatitis B Virus Prophylaxis Post Liver Transplantation: Role of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin. Transplantation 2016; 99:1321-34. [PMID: 26038873 PMCID: PMC4539198 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates, such as entecavir or tenofovir, suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, and delay or obviate the need for liver transplantation in some patients. After liver transplantation, the combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in greater than 90% of transplant recipients. Some forms of HBV prophylaxis need to be continued indefinitely after transplantation but, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence (i.e., HBV DNA levels undetectable before transplantation), it is possible to discontinue HBIG and maintain only long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) therapy. A more cautious approach is necessary for those patients with high pretransplant HBV DNA levels, those with limited antiviral options if HBV recurrence occurs (i.e., HIV or hepatitis D virus coinfection, preexisting drug resistance), those with a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and those at risk of noncompliance with antiviral therapy. In this group, HBIG-free prophylaxis cannot be recommended. The combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose Hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in > 90% of liver transplant recipients. In patients with low HBV DNA levels, nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) treatment without HBIG is possible.
Collapse
|
15
|
Maiwall R, Kumar M. Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis B after Liver Transplantation. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2016; 4:54-65. [PMID: 27047773 PMCID: PMC4807144 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2015.00041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2015] [Revised: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis B is a global health problem that leads to development of various complications, such as cirrhosis, liver cancer, and liver failure requiring liver transplantation. The recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) post-liver transplantation is a major cause of allograft dysfunction, cirrhosis of the allograft, and graft failure. Patients with high viral load at the time of transplantation, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity, or those with a history of anti-viral drug resistance are considered as high-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation, while patients with low viral load, including HBeAg negative status, acute liver failure, and hepatitis D virus (HDV) co-infection are considered to be at low-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation. Antivirals for patients awaiting liver transplantation(LT) cause suppression of HBV replication and reduce the risk of recurrent HBV infection of the allograft and, therefore, all HBV patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be treated with potent antivirals with high genetic barrier to resistance (entecavir or tenofovir) prior to liver transplantation. Prevention of post-liver transplantation recurrence should be done using a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antivirals in patients at high risk of recurrence. Low dose HBIG, HBIG-free protocols, and monoprophylaxis with high potency antivirals can still be considered in patients at low risk of recurrence. Even, marginal grafts from anti-HBc positive donors can be safely used in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, preferably in anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)/anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) positive recipients. In this article, we aim to review the mechanisms and risk factors of HBV recurrence post-LT in addition to the various treatment strategies proposed for the prevention of recurrent HBV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhi Maiwall
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Togashi J, Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Kaneko J, Tamura S, Tanaka T, Arita J, Sakamoto Y, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N. One-year extended, monthly vaccination prophylaxis combined with hepatitis B immune globulin for hepatitis B after liver transplantation. Hepatol Res 2016; 46:E51-9. [PMID: 25899139 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Revised: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM The feasibility of vaccination in liver transplant recipients is highly controversial, and the present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a 1-year extended, monthly vaccine prophylaxis protocol of a second-generation recombinant vaccine for transplant recipients. METHODS The recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (10 µg) was administrated s.c. every month for 12 months as the vaccination protocol to 39 liver transplant recipients in stable condition, including those with hepatitis B-related chronic liver disease (n = 30), those with acute hepatitis B liver failure (hepatitis B surface antibody [HBsAb], n = 4), and those with hepatitis B core antibody positive grafts (n = 5). A fixed dose of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) was administrated during the study based on the monoprophylaxis approach, and the increase in the hepatitis B surface antibody titer was measured to evaluate the efficacy of the vaccination. RESULTS The vaccination protocol was initiated a mean of 54 months (range, 13-124) after liver transplantation, and all patients tolerated the vaccination well without adverse effects. The overall hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rate was 5% (2/39) based on hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, and 2% (1/39) based on HBV DNA detectability. Six (15%) patients showed a good response to vaccination with an increase in the HBsAb titer greater than 100 IU/L at the end of vaccination, but only three (8%) maintained an adequate HBsAb level to spare HBIG during the 2-year observation period. CONCLUSION While a few patients demonstrated an adequate response to vaccination, the clinical indication for the HBV vaccination for liver transplant recipients is currently minimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Togashi
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgery, Tokyo Rosai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Akamatsu
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiko Sugawara
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Kaneko
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sumihito Tamura
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Tanaka
- Department of Organ Transplant Service, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Arita
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sakamoto
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Artificial Organ and Transplantation Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Onoe T, Tahara H, Tanaka Y, Ohdan H. Prophylactic managements of hepatitis B viral infection in liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:165-175. [PMID: 26755868 PMCID: PMC4698483 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Revised: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a considerably effective treatment for patients with end-stage hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease. However, HBV infection often recurs after LT without prophylaxis. Since the 1990s, the treatment for preventing HBV reinfection after LT has greatly progressed with the introduction of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), resulting in improved patient survival. The combination therapy consisting of high-dose HBIG and lamivudine is highly efficacious for preventing the recurrence of HBV infection after LT and became the standard prophylaxis for HBV recurrence. However, mainly due to the high cost of HBIG treatment, an alternative protocol for reducing the dose and duration of HBIG has been evaluated. Currently, combination therapy using low-dose HBIG and NAs is considered as the most efficacious and cost-effective prophylaxis for post-LT HBV reinfection. Recently, NA monotherapy and withdrawal of HBIG from combination therapy, along with the development of new, potent high genetic barrier NAs, have provided promising efficacy, especially for low-risk recipients. This review summarizes the prophylactic protocol and their efficacy including prophylaxis of de novo HBV infection from anti-HBc antibody-positive donors. In addition, challenging approaches such as discontinuation of all prophylaxis and active immunity through hepatitis B vaccination are discussed.
Collapse
|
18
|
Molecular Mechanisms to Control Post-Transplantation Hepatitis B Recurrence. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16:17494-513. [PMID: 26263973 PMCID: PMC4581205 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160817494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2015] [Revised: 07/25/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B often progresses to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although newer nucleos(t)ide analogues result in >90% viral and hepatitis activity control, severely decompensated patients still need OLT because of drug-resistant virus, acute exacerbation, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Acute hepatitis B is also an indication for OLT, because it can progress to fatal acute liver failure. After OLT, the hepatitis B recurrence rate is >80% without prevention, while >90% of transplant recipients are clinically controlled with combined hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. However, long-term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost; therefore, several treatment protocols with low-dose HBIG, combined with nucleos(t)ide analogues, have been investigated. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using an HBV envelope (HBs) antigen vaccine. Patients who are not HBV carriers, such as those with acutely infected liver failure, are good candidates for vaccination. For chronic HBV carrier liver cirrhosis patients, a successful vaccine response can only be achieved in selected patients, such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols. The present protocol for post-OLT HBV control and the future prospects of newer treatment strategies are reviewed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Takaki A, Yagi T, Yamamoto K. Safe and cost-effective control of post-transplantation recurrence of hepatitis B. Hepatol Res 2015; 45:38-47. [PMID: 24905970 PMCID: PMC4309460 DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2014] [Revised: 05/18/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleoside/nucleotide analogs (NUC) is the current standard of care for controlling hepatitis B recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, long-term HBIG administration is associated with several unresolved issues, including limited availability and extremely high cost, and thus several protocols for treatment with low-dose HBIG combined with NUC or HBIG-free regimens have been developed. This article reviews recent advances in post-OLT hepatitis B virus (HBV) control and future methodological directions. New NUC such as entecavir, tenofovir or lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil combinations induce a very low frequency of viral resistance. The withdrawal of HBIG after several months of OLT under new NUC continuation also has permissible effects. Even after HBV reactivation, NUC can usually achieve viral control when viral markers are strictly followed up. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-HBV antibodies via vaccination with a hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine. However, HBV vaccination is not sufficiently effective in patients to treat liver cirrhosis type B after OLT because immune tolerance to the virus has already continued for several decades. Trials of its safety and cost-effectiveness are required. This review advocates a safe and economical approach to controlling post-OLT HBV recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akinobu Takaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan,Correspondence: Dr Akinobu Takaki, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Takahito Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Transplant and Surgical Oncology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical SciencesOkayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Contradictory immune response in post liver transplantation hepatitis B and C. Int J Inflam 2014; 2014:814760. [PMID: 25215259 PMCID: PMC4158295 DOI: 10.1155/2014/814760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2014] [Revised: 08/10/2014] [Accepted: 08/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis B and C often progress to decompensated liver cirrhosis requiring orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). After OLT, hepatitis B recurrence is clinically controlled with a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues. Another approach is to induce self-producing anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) antibodies using a HBV envelope antigen vaccine. Patients who had not been HBV carriers such as acutely infected liver failure or who received liver from HBV self-limited donor are good candidate. For chronic HBV carrier patients, a successful response can only be achieved in selected patients such as those treated with experimentally reduced immunosuppression protocols or received an anti-HBV adaptive memory carrying donor liver. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfects transplanted livers at a rate of >90%. HCV reinfected patients show different severities of hepatitis, from mild and slowly progressing to severe and rapidly progressing, possibly resulting from different adaptive immune responses. More than half the patients require interferon treatment, although the success rate is low and carries risks for leukocytopenia and rejection. Managing the immune response has an important role in controlling recurrent hepatitis C. This study aimed to review the adaptive immune response in post-OLT hepatitis B and C.
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee TH, Kim MH, Lee CS, Lee JH, Rhee JH, Chung KM. Protection against Vibrio vulnificus infection by active and passive immunization with the C-terminal region of the RtxA1/MARTXVv protein. Vaccine 2013; 32:271-6. [PMID: 24252692 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 09/27/2013] [Accepted: 11/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Vibrio vulnificus is a foodborne pathogen that is prevalent in coastal waters worldwide. Infection with V. vulnificus causes septicemia with fatality rates exceeding 50% even with aggressive antibiotic therapy. Several vaccine studies to prevent V. vulnificus infection have been performed but have had limited success. In this study, we identified the C-terminal region (amino acids 3491 to 4701) of the V. vulnificus multifunctional autoprocessing RTX (MARTXVv or RtxA1) protein, RtxA1-C, as a promising antigen that induces protective immune responses against V. vulnificus. Vaccination of mice with recombinant RtxA1-C protein with adjuvant elicited a robust antibody response and a dramatic reduction in blood bacterial load in mice infected intraperitoneally. Vaccination resulted in significant protection against lethal challenge with V. vulnificus. Furthermore, intraperitoneal passive immunization with serum raised against the recombinant RtxA1-C protein demonstrated marked efficacy in both prophylaxis and therapy. These results suggest that active and passive immunization against the C-terminal region of the RtxA1 protein may be an effective approach in the prevention and therapy of V. vulnificus infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hee Lee
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-756, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi Hyun Kim
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-756, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Seop Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-756, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju-Hyung Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-756, Republic of Korea
| | - Joon Haeng Rhee
- Clinical Vaccine R&D Center, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 520-724, Republic of Korea; Department of Microbiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju 520-724, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Min Chung
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-756, Republic of Korea; Institute for Medical Science, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-756, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Roche B, Samuel D. Treatment of patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis and liver transplanted patients. Clin Liver Dis 2013; 17:451-73. [PMID: 23905816 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2013.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogs with lower resistance rates could suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, delay or obviate liver transplantation in some patients, and reduce the risk of HBV recurrence. Some form of HBV prophylaxis needs to be continued indefinitely posttransplant. However, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence it is possible to discontinue hepatitis B immunoglobulins and maintain long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy. Currently, treatment of posttransplantation hepatitis B is a less important clinical problem than it was historically because effective antiviral therapies exist to rescue patients who failed initial prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Roche
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif F-94800, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Immune response to vaccine adjuvants during the first year of life. Vaccine 2012; 31:2500-5. [PMID: 23085363 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2012] [Revised: 09/25/2012] [Accepted: 10/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Subunit vaccine formulations often include adjuvants that primarily stimulate innate immune cells. While young infants represent the major target population for vaccination, effective immunization in this age group remains a challenge. Many parameters of innate immune responses differ quantitatively and qualitatively from newborns to infants and adults, revealing a highly regulated developmental program. Herein, we discuss the potential implications of innate immune ontogeny for the activity of adjuvants contained in licensed infant vaccines, as well as future directions for rational design of adjuvanted vaccines for this age group.
Collapse
|
24
|
Laryea MA, Watt KD. Immunoprophylaxis against and prevention of recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2012; 18:514-23. [PMID: 22315212 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The reinfection of the hepatic allograft with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus can have important sequelae that result in poor long-term patient and graft survival. Although a response to treatment with antiviral medications can improve these outcomes, not all patients tolerate these medications or experience viral eradication. Avoiding reinfection of the graft is the most effective means of improving the long-term outcomes for these patient populations. This review is focused on the prevention of viral hepatitis reinfection after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie A Laryea
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fox AN, Terrault NA. The option of HBIG-free prophylaxis against recurrent HBV. J Hepatol 2012; 56:1189-1197. [PMID: 22274310 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2011] [Revised: 08/01/2011] [Accepted: 08/10/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Since the early 1990's, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has been central to the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation. When used in combination with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues, HBIG prevents reinfection with HBV in ⩾90% of transplant recipients. While HBIG is highly efficacious, its use is undermined by its high cost. Because of this limitation, there have been many studies of alternative regimens seeking to minimize the dose or duration of HBIG without sacrificing low HBV recurrence rates. Toward that goal, lower dose intramuscular HBIG in combination with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues has been shown to be highly efficacious in preventing disease recurrence and represents a significant cost savings when compared with high dose intravenous administration. The withdrawal of HBIG after a defined course of combination HBIG and oral antivirals has also been shown to be effective, particularly if combination antiviral therapy is used. The ability to achieve undetectable HBV DNA levels pre-transplantation in the majority of patients may contribute to the high efficacy of these HBIG "light" regimens. Additionally, the success of antiviral rescue therapy for those patients who fail prophylaxis and develop recurrent HBV infection post-transplant has provided the impetus to move increasingly towards HBIG-free approaches. New techniques to detect occult HBV in hepatic and extrahepatic sites may allow clinicians to define a subgroup of patients in whom withdrawal of HBIG or all prophylaxis may be applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyson N Fox
- Medicine and Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
| | - Norah A Terrault
- Medicine and Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Montomoli E, Piccirella S, Khadang B, Mennitto E, Camerini R, De Rosa A. Current adjuvants and new perspectives in vaccine formulation. Expert Rev Vaccines 2012; 10:1053-61. [PMID: 21806399 DOI: 10.1586/erv.11.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Given the important role of adjuvants in prophylactic vaccines, identification and development of new adjuvants with enhanced efficacy and safety is necessary. The use of adjuvants with immunopotentiating properties that can direct the immune responses to humoral or cell-mediated immunity and can induce T-cell responses has made it possible to design more protective vaccines. Although current regulations focus on traditional adjuvants, notably aluminum and calcium salts, advances have been made in regulatory considerations. The regulatory agencies for the evaluation of medicinal products are actively drafting guidance on requirements for the evaluation of new adjuvants. This article briefly summarizes the most widely studied adjuvants in vaccination, including those licensed for human vaccines and the regulatory aspects relevant to adjuvant quality at development stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Montomoli
- Molecular Epidemiology Research Division, University of Siena, Tuscany, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Educating CD4 T cells with vaccine adjuvants: lessons from lipopolysaccharide. Trends Immunol 2010; 31:429-35. [PMID: 20880743 DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2010.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2010] [Revised: 08/11/2010] [Accepted: 08/18/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Toll-like receptor (TLR) adjuvants are capable of driving T cell immunity. The TLR4 agonist LPS activates antigen-presenting cells through myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) and TIR domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon-beta (TRIF)-dependent signaling pathways, initiating CD4 T helper cell clonal expansion and differentiation. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) supports the development of diverse T helper (Th) lineages depending on the tissue microenvironment. For instance, peripheral immunization with LPS drives Th1 priming in lymphoid tissue and Th17 priming in the gut. This could be due to commensal bacteria inducing Th17-stabilizing cytokines within the intestinal lamina propria. Here, we detail how the response to LPS stimulates CD4 T cell priming in lymphoid tissue and the intestinal mucosa. How this knowledge might be exploited to target specific features of T cell immunity by vaccine adjuvants is also considered.
Collapse
|