Comparison of insulins detemir and glargine: effects on glucose disposal, hepatic glucose release and the central nervous system

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of insulin detemir and insulin glargine 300 U/mL in healthy dogs

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin detemir are synthetic long-acting insulin analogs associated with minimal day-to-day variability or episodes of hypoglycemia in people. Here, 8 healthy purpose-bred dogs each received 2.4 nmol/kg subcutaneous injections of insulin detemir (0.1 U/kg) and insulin glargine 300 U/mL (0.4 U/kg) on 2 different days, >1 wk apart, in random order. Blood glucose (BG) was measured every 5 min, and glucose was administered intravenously at a variable rate with the goal of maintaining BG within 10% of baseline BG ("isoglycemic clamp"). Endogenous and exogenous insulin were measured for up to 24 h after insulin injection. The effect of exogenous insulin was defined by glucose infusion rate or a decline in endogenous insulin. Isoglycemic clamps were generated in all 8 dogs after detemir but only in 4 dogs after glargine. Median time to onset of action was delayed with glargine compared to detemir (4.0 h [3.3-5.8 h] vs 0.6 h [0.6-1.2 h], P = 0.002). There was no difference in time to peak (median [range] = 6.3 h [5.0-21.3 h] vs 4.3 h [2.9-7.4 h], P = 0.15) or duration of action (16.3 h [6.1-20.1 h] vs 10.8 h [8.8-14.8 h], P = 0.21) between glargine and detemir, respectively. Glargine demonstrated a peakless time-action profile in 4/8 dogs. The total metabolic effect and peak action of detemir was significantly greater than glargine. Significant concentrations of glargine were detected in all but 1 dog following administration. Glargine might be better suited than detemir as a once-daily insulin formulation in some dogs based on its long duration of action and peakless time-action profile. Day-to-day variability in insulin action should be further assessed for both formulations.

Glycemic Control in Adult Type 1 Diabetes Patients with Insulin Glargine, Insulin Detemir, or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Daily Practice

BACKGROUNDS

This study aims to compare glycemic control of persons with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections (MDI) with insulin glargine versus insulin detemir or with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in daily practice.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All adult individuals with type 1 diabetes (n = 1053) were identified from the electronic patient database in North Karelia, Finland. The persons' individual data for insulin treatment, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and hemoglobin A_1c (HbA1c) measurements during the year 2014 were obtained from medical records. Persons using long-acting insulin analogs or CSII were included in the analyses (n = 1004).

RESULTS

Altogether, 47.7% used glargine, 43.9% used detemir, and 8.4% used CSII. The mean HbA1c was lower in the CSII group (63 mmol/mol [7.9%]) compared with the glargine group (66 mmol/mol [8.2%]) or the detemir group (67 mmol/mol [8.3%]). The overall rate of DKA was 5.1% per year. The rate of DKA was higher in the detemir group compared with the glargine group (6.3% per year vs. 3.8% per year, respectively, P < 0.049). In logistic regression analyses, the higher rate of DKA with detemir use was explained by HbA1c.

CONCLUSIONS

In daily practice, the glycemic control of type 1 diabetes patients with MDI was similar regardless of basal insulin, glargine, or detemir, whereas CSII allowed better glycemic control than MDI. The rate of DKA was higher with detemir than with glargine, but this is likely related to higher HbA1c rather than insulin regimen.

Plasma insulin profiles after subcutaneous injection: how close can we get to physiology in people with diabetes?

Many people with diabetes rely on insulin therapy to achieve optimal blood glucose control. A fundamental aim of such therapy is to mimic the pattern of 'normal' physiological insulin secretion, thereby controlling basal and meal-time plasma glucose and fatty acid turnover. In people without diabetes, insulin release is modulated on a time base of 3-10 min, something that is impossible to replicate without intravascular glucose sensing and insulin delivery. Overnight physiological insulin delivery by islet β cells is unchanging, in contrast to requirements once any degree of hyperglycaemia occurs, when diurnal influences are evident. Subcutaneous pumped insulin or injected insulin analogues can approach the physiological profile, but there remains the challenge of responding to day-to-day changes in insulin sensitivity. Physiologically, meal-time insulin release begins rapidly in response to reflex activity and incretins, continuing with the rise in glucose and amino acid concentrations. This rapid response reflects the need to fill the insulin space with maximum concentration as early as 30 min after starting the meal. Current meal-time insulins, by contrast, are associated with a delay after injection before absorption begins, and a delay to peak because of tissue diffusion. While decay from peak for monomeric analogues is not dissimilar to average physiological needs, changes in meal type and, again, in day-to-day insulin sensitivity, are difficult to match. Recent and current developments in insulin depot technology are moving towards establishing flatter basal and closer-to-average physiological meal-time plasma insulin profiles. The present article discusses the ideal physiological insulin profile, how this can be met by available and future insulin therapies and devices, and the challenges faced by healthcare professionals and people with diabetes in trying to achieve an optimum plasma insulin profile.

Weight-sparing effect of insulin detemir: a consequence of central nervous system-mediated reduced energy intake?

Insulin therapy is often associated with adverse weight gain. This is attributable, at least in part, to changes in energy balance and insulin's anabolic effects. Adverse weight gain increases the risk of poor macrovascular outcomes in people with diabetes and should therefore be mitigated if possible. Clinical studies have shown that insulin detemir, a basal insulin analogue, exerts a unique weight-sparing effect compared with other basal insulins. To understand this property, several hypotheses have been proposed. These explore the interplay of efferent and afferent signals between the muscles, brain, liver, renal and adipose tissues in response to insulin detemir and comparator basal insulins. The following models have been proposed: insulin detemir may reduce food intake through direct or indirect effects on the central nervous system (CNS); it may have favourable actions on hepatic glucose metabolism through a selective effect on the liver, or it may influence fluid homeostasis through renal effects. Studies have consistently shown that insulin detemir reduces energy intake, and moreover, it is clear that this shift in energy balance is not a consequence of reduced hypoglycaemia. CNS effects may be mediated by direct action, by indirect stimulation by peripheral mediators and/or via a more physiological counter-regulatory response to insulin through restoration of the hepatic-peripheral insulin gradient. Although the precise mechanism remains unclear, it is likely that the weight-sparing effect of insulin detemir can be explained by a combination of mechanisms. The evidence for each hypothesis is considered in this review.

Hepatic branch vagus nerve plays a critical role in the recovery of post-ischemic glucose intolerance and mediates a neuroprotective effect by hypothalamic orexin-A

Orexin-A (a neuropeptide in the hypothalamus) plays an important role in many physiological functions, including the regulation of glucose metabolism. We have previously found that the development of post-ischemic glucose intolerance is one of the triggers of ischemic neuronal damage, which is suppressed by hypothalamic orexin-A. Other reports have shown that the communication system between brain and peripheral tissues through the autonomic nervous system (sympathetic, parasympathetic and vagus nerve) is important for maintaining glucose and energy metabolism. The aim of this study was to determine the involvement of the hepatic vagus nerve on hypothalamic orexin-A-mediated suppression of post-ischemic glucose intolerance development and ischemic neuronal damage. Male ddY mice were subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) for 2 h. Intrahypothalamic orexin-A (5 pmol/mouse) administration significantly suppressed the development of post-ischemic glucose intolerance and neuronal damage on day 1 and 3, respectively after MCAO. MCAO-induced decrease of hepatic insulin receptors and increase of hepatic gluconeogenic enzymes on day 1 after was reversed to control levels by orexin-A. This effect was reversed by intramedullary administration of the orexin-1 receptor antagonist, SB334867, or hepatic vagotomy. In the medulla oblongata, orexin-A induced the co-localization of cholin acetyltransferase (cholinergic neuronal marker used for the vagus nerve) with orexin-1 receptor and c-Fos (activated neural cells marker). These results suggest that the hepatic branch vagus nerve projecting from the medulla oblongata plays an important role in the recovery of post-ischemic glucose intolerance and mediates a neuroprotective effect by hypothalamic orexin-A.

Novel PEGylated basal insulin LY2605541 has a preferential hepatic effect on glucose metabolism

The impact of the novel basal insulin LY2605541 (LY) on hepatic and nonhepatic glucose uptake (non-HGU) was evaluated. Conscious dogs underwent euglycemic clamps with tracer and hepatic balance measurements. Clamp period infusions were peripheral venous regular insulin (0.1 nmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ h(-1) [control], n = 6) or LY (bolus [nmol/kg], continuous [nmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ h(-1)]: 0.5, 0.5 [n = 6]; 0.375, 0.375 [n = 5]; 0.25, 0.25 [n = 4]), somatostatin, and glucose, as well as intraportal glucagon (basal). During the clamp, the dogs switched from net hepatic glucose output to uptake (rates reached 2.1 ± 1.2, 0.9 ± 2.1, 8.6 ± 2.3, and 6.0 ± 1.1 µmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ min(-1) within 5 h in control, LY0.25, LY0.375, and LY0.5, respectively). Non-HGU in LY increased less than in control; the ratio of change from basal in non-HGU to change in net hepatic glucose balance, calculated when glucose infusion rates (GIRs) were ~20 µmol ⋅ kg(-1) ⋅ min(-1) in all groups, was higher in control (1.17 ± 0.38) versus LY0.25 (0.39 ± 0.33), LY0.375 (-0.01 ± 0.13), and LY0.5 (-0.09 ± 0.07). Likewise, the change from baseline in glucose Rd-to-Ra ratio was greatest in control (1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 0.6 ± 0.4, 0.5 ± 0.2, and 0.6 ± 0.2 in LY0.25, LY0.375, and LY0.5, respectively). In contrast to exogenously administered human insulin, LY demonstrated preferential hepatic effects, similar to endogenously secreted insulin. Therefore, the analog might reduce complications associated with current insulin therapy.