Delayed graft function: a dilemma in renal transplantation

Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Solid Organ Transplantation: Harmful or Protective?

Transplanted organs carry donor immune cells into the recipient, the majority of which are tissue-resident macrophages (TRMs). The role they play in guiding the fate of the transplanted organ toward acceptance or rejection remains elusive. TRMs originate from both embryonic and bone marrow-derived precursors. Embryo-derived TRMs retain the embryonic capability to proliferate, so they are able to self-renew and, theoretically, persist for extended periods of time after transplantation. Bone marrow-derived TRMs do not proliferate and must constantly be replenished by adult circulating monocytes. Recent studies have aimed to clarify the different roles and interactions between donor TRMs, recipient monocytes, and monocyte-derived macrophages (MFs) after organ transplantation. This review aims to shed light on how MFs affect the fate of a transplanted organ by differentiating between the role of donor TRMs and that of MFs derived from graft infiltrating monocytes.

Effect of Recipient Body Mass Index on Kidney Transplantation Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by the Transplant Committee from the French Association of Urology

CONTEXT

The impact of recipient obesity on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise all available evidence on the outcomes of KT in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) versus nonobese patients (BMI <30 kg/m2).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Search was conducted in the MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all studies reporting the outcomes of KT in obese versus nonobese recipients.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Fifty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Delayed graft function and surgical complications were significantly higher in obese recipients (delayed graft function: relative risk [RR]: 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-1.57, p < 0.01; surgical complications: RR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.36-2.22, p < 0.0001). Five-year patient survival (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-1.00, p = 0.01), 10-yr patient survival (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.97, p = 0.006), and 10-yr graft survival (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96, p = 0.01) were significantly inferior in the obese group.

CONCLUSIONS

KT in obese recipients was associated with lower patient and graft survival, and higher delayed graft function, acute rejection, and medical and surgical complications than nonobese recipients. In the current situation of organ shortage and increasing prevalence of obesity, ways to optimize KT in this setting should be investigated.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Compared with nonobese population, kidney transplantation in obese recipients has inferior patient and graft survival, and higher medical and surgical complications.

Plasma Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Predicts Graft Function Following Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after kidney transplantation (KT) with a poor clinical outcome. There are no accurate biomarkers for the early prediction of DGF. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) release during surgery plays a key role in protecting the kidney, and may be a potential biomarker for predicting post-transplant renal allograft recovery.

Methods: Recipients who underwent KT between July 2020 and December 2020 were enrolled in the study. Plasma MIF levels were tested in recipients at different time points, and the correlation between plasma MIF and DGF in recipients was evaluated. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000035596).

Results: Intraoperative MIF levels were different between immediate, slowed, and delayed graft function groups (7.26 vs. 6.49 and 5.59, P < 0.001). Plasma MIF was an independent protective factor of DGF (odds ratio = 0.447, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.264–0.754, P = 0.003). Combining plasma MIF level and donor terminal serum creatinine provided the best predictive power for DGF (0.872; 95%CI 0.795–0.949). Furthermore, plasma MIF was significantly associated with allograft function at 1-month post-transplant (R² = 0.42, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Intraoperative MIF, as an independent protective factor for DGF, has excellent diagnostic performance for predicting DGF and is worthy of further exploration.

Renal Function Improvement Following ANG-3777 Treatment in Patients at High Risk for Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients (20%-50%) undergoing renal transplantation experience acute kidney injury resulting in delayed graft function. ANG-3777 is an hepatocyte growth factor mimetic that binds to the c-MET receptor. In animal models, ANG-3777 decreases apoptosis, increases proliferation, and promotes organ repair and function.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of patients undergoing renal transplantation with <50 cc/h urine output for 8 consecutive hours over the first 24 hours posttransplantation, or creatinine reduction ratio <30% from pretransplantation to 24 hours posttransplantation. Subjects were randomized as 2:1 to 3, once-daily IV infusions of ANG-3777, 2 mg/kg (n = 19), or placebo (n = 9). Primary endpoint: time in days to achieve ≥1200 cc urine for 24 hours.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ANG-3777 were more likely to achieve the primary endpoint of 1200 cc urine for 24 hours by 28 days posttransplantation (83.3% versus 50% placebo; log-rank test: χ2 = 2.799, P = 0.09). Compared with placebo, patients in the ANG-3777 arm had larger increases in urine output; lower serum creatinine; greater reduction in C-reactive protein and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; fewer dialysis sessions and shorter duration of dialysis; fewer hospital days; significantly less graft failure; and higher estimated glomerular filtration rate. Adverse events occurred in a similar percentage of subjects in both arms. Events per subject were twice as high in the placebo arm.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an efficacy signal for improved renal function in subjects treated with ANG-3777 relative to placebo, with a good safety profile.

Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update

Renal transplantation has become the best treatment for the patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The surgical procedures, immunosuppressive regiments and patient follow-up have evolved especially in the last 10 years. However, the diagnosis for renal transplantation dysfunction remained the same in these years. Serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by serum creatinine based equations are used in routine patient follow-up. Pelvic ultrasonography and color Doppler ultrasonography are used as a first-line imaging method. Assessment of allograft functions both qualitatively and quantitatively are possible using nuclear medicine procedures. Surgical complications, acute tubular necrosis, subacute and/or acute rejection, infections, toxicity due to immunosuppressive medications, complications relating the collecting system, chronic rejection are the main causes for renal function impairment. The imaging procedures can diagnose the worsening of renal transplant function; however, they still lack the ability to differentiate types of rejection as histopathology or differentiate rejection from other causes of allograft dysfunction. The transplant biopsy gives detailed diagnosis for allograft dysfunction, guide the treatment and therefore it is the preferred diagnostic choice in recent years. On recent years, literature on radionuclide imaging is focused on perfusion analysis for the early diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction and prognostic use of perfusion parameters, and then this article will focus on these studies and their outcome.

Phase 3 trial Design of the Hepatocyte Growth Factor Mimetic ANG-3777 in Renal Transplant Recipients With Delayed Graft Function

Introduction

One-third of kidney transplantation patients experience acute kidney injury (AKI) resulting in delayed graft function (DGF), associated with increased risk of graft failure and mortality. Preclinical and phase 2 data indicate that treatment with ANG-3777 (formerly BB3), a hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) mimetic, may improve long-term kidney function and reduce health care resource use and cost, but these data require validation in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

Methods

The Graft Improvement Following Transplant (GIFT) trial is a multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial, designed to determine the efficacy and safety of ANG-3777 in renal transplantation patients showing signs of DGF. Subjects are randomized 1:1 to ANG-3777 (2 mg/kg) administered intravenously once daily for 3 consecutive days starting within 30 hours after transplantation, or to placebo.

Results

The primary endpoint is estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include proportion of subjects with eGFR >30 at days 30, 90, 180, and 360; proportion of subjects whose graft function is slow, delayed, or primary nonfunction; length of hospitalization; and duration of dialysis through day 30. Adverse events are assessed throughout the study.

Conclusion

GIFT will generate data that are important to advancing treatment of DGF in this medically complex population.

Early Postoperative Complications and Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Moderately Obese Patients

BACKGROUND

Obese renal transplant recipients (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m²) are at risk of delayed graft function and postoperative complications, such as infections or delayed wound healing. There is also a tendency to exclude extremely obese patients from transplantation (KTx). Nonetheless, no association between obesity and increased mortality has been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of BMI on the most common surgical and infectious complications after KTx.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational study in 872 patients transplanted from 2010-2017 was conducted. Median BMI was 24.6 (13.9-34.3), and 8.3% of the group was obese. Patient records were searched for early postoperative complications: lymphocele or hematoma (>33 mL), urinary leakage, or urinary tract infection (UTI). Mann-Whitney U and χ² or Fisher exact tests were used. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The study complies with the Helsinki Congress and the Istanbul Declaration.

RESULTS

Renal primary nonfunction was observed in 1.4% (12/872) of patients. Surgical or infectious complications occurred in 52.7% (453/860) of patients. No correlation between BMI and complication rate was noted. Complications were observed in 56.9% (41/72) of obese vs 52.3% (412/788) of nonobese patients (P = .448), including lymphocele in 15.3% vs 16.4% (P = .810), hematoma in 22.2% vs 19.2% (P = .530), urinary leakage in 1.4% vs 4.6% (P = .203), and UTI in 31.9% vs 32.9% (P = .873), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipient's BMI has no significant association with the most common surgical complications after KTx. There is no need to delay KTx in moderately obese patients.

Effects of body weight variation in obese kidney recipients: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Obese kidney allograft recipients have worse results in kidney transplantation (KT). However, there is lack of information regarding the effect of body mass index (BMI) variation after KT. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of body weight changes in obese kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

In this study we used data from the Catalan Renal Registry that included KT recipients from 1990 to 2011 (n = 5607). The annual change in post-transplantation BMI was calculated. The main outcome variables were delayed graft function (DGF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and patient and graft survival.

Results

Obesity was observed in 609 patients (10.9%) at the time of transplantation. The incidence of DGF was significantly higher in obese patients (40.4% versus 28.3%; P < 0.001). Baseline obesity was significantly associated with worse short- and long-term graft survival (P < 0.05) and worse graft function during the follow-up (P < 0.005). BMI variations in obese patients did not improve eGFR or graft or patient survival.

Conclusions

Our conclusion is that in obese patients, decreasing body weight after KT does not improve either short-term graft outcomes or long-term renal function.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of BK Viremia and Clinical Impact of BK Virus Surveillance on Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES

BK virus is a polyomavirus that can cause nephropathy and graft loss after kidney transplant. The aim of our study was to screen the BK viremia prevalence, to understand the value of the inter-vention for BK virus nephropathy, and to determine the risk factors associated with BK viremia after kidney transplant in our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our retrospective cross-sectional study included 91 adult kidney transplant recipients who were seen between 2015 and 2017 and who had follow-up from 1 month to over 2 years. BK viremia was evaluated by use of plasma quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The prevalence of BK viremia and the clinical treatments and outcomes of BK virus nephropathy were assessed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of BK viremia was 5.5% (5/91 patients). BK virus nephropathy was confirmed by allograft biopsy in 4.4% (4/91 patients) of all patients. Delayed graft function was found to be an independent risk factor for BK viremia (P < .001). Patients with BK viremia had significantly higher serum creatinine levels (P = .04). Patients who were diagnosed with BK viremia at 1 to 5 years after kidney transplant had higher serum creatinine (P = .02) and uric acid levels (P = .02). After reduction or discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitor, BK virus was cleared in all patients with BK virus nephropathy, with higher level of serum creatinine but no graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed graft function was considered as a risk factor for viremia. Early detection of BK viremia replication is important. The strategy of reduction of immunosuppression was effective for BK virus nephropathy and graft function improvement.

Donor organ intervention before kidney transplantation: Head-to-head comparison of therapeutic hypothermia, machine perfusion, and donor dopamine pretreatment. What is the evidence?

Therapeutic hypothermia, hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (MP), and renal-dose dopamine administered to stable brain-dead donors have shown efficacy to reduce the dialysis requirement after kidney transplantation. In a head-to-head comparison of the three major randomized controlled trials in this field, we estimated the number-needed-to-treat for each method, evaluated costs and inquired into special features regarding long-term outcomes. The MP and hypothermia trials used any dialysis requirement during the first postoperative week, whereas the dopamine trial assessed >1 dialysis session as primary endpoint. Compared to controls, the respective rates declined by 5.7% with MP, 10.9% with hypothermia, and 10.7% with dopamine. Costs to prevent one endpoint in one recipient amount to approximately $17 000 with MP but are negligible with the donor interventions. MP resulted in a borderline significant difference of 4% in 3-year graft survival, but a point of interest is that the preservation method was switched in 25 donors (4.6%) for technical reasons. Graft survival was not improved with dopamine on intention-to-treat but suggested an exposure-response relationship with infusion time. MP was less efficacious and cost-effective to prevent posttransplant dialysis. Whether the benefit on early graft dysfunction achieved with any method will improve long-term graft survival remains to be established.

Mitochondrial membrane potential and delayed graft function following kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) complicates 20%-40% of deceased-donor kidney transplants and is associated with increased length of stay and subsequent allograft failure. Accurate prediction of DGF risk for a particular allograft could influence organ allocation, patient counseling, and postoperative planning. Mitochondrial dysfunction, a reported surrogate of tissue health in ischemia-perfusion injury, might also be a surrogate for tissue health after organ transplantation. To understand the potential of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in clinical decision-making, we analyzed whether lower MMP, a measure of mitochondrial dysfunction, was associated with DGF. In a prospective, single-center proof-of-concept study, we measured pretransplant MMP in 28 deceased donor kidneys and analyzed the association between MMP and DGF. We used hybrid registry-augmented regression to adjust for donor and recipient characteristics, minimizing overfitting by leveraging Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data. The range of MMP levels was 964-28 333 units. Low-MMP kidneys (MMP<4000) were more likely from female donors (75% vs 10%, P = .002) and donation after cardiac death donors (75% vs 12%, P = .004). For every 10% decrease in MMP levels, there were 38% higher odds of DGF (adjusted odds ratio = 1.08 1.381.78 , P = .01). In summary, MMP might be a promising pretransplant surrogate for tissue health in kidney transplantation and, after further validation, could improve clinical decision-making through its independent association with DGF.

A phase I/II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing safety and efficacy of C1 esterase inhibitor for prevention of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients

Delayed graft function (DGF) is defined as need for dialysis early posttransplant. DGF is related to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) that diminishes allograft function and may be complement dependent. Here, we investigate the ability of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) to prevent IRI/DGF in kidney transplant recipients. Seventy patients receiving deceased donor kidney transplants at risk for DGF were randomized to receive C1INH 50 U/kg (#35) or placebo (#35) intraoperatively and at 24 hours. The primary end point was need for hemodialysis during the first week posttransplant. Assessments of glomerular filtration rate and dialysis dependence were accomplished. Complications and safety of therapy were recorded. Similar characteristics with no significant differences in cold-ischemia time or risk factors for DGF were seen. C1INH did not result in reduction of dialysis sessions at 1 week posttransplant, but significantly fewer dialysis sessions (P = .0232) were required 2 to 4 weeks posttransplant. Patients at highest risk for DGF (Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥85) benefited most from C1INH therapy. Significantly better renal function was seen at 1 year in C1INH patients (P = .006). No significant adverse events were noted with C1INH. Although the primary end point was not met, significant reductions in need for dialysis and improvements in long-term allograft function were seen with C1INH treatment.

N-acetylcysteine decreases urinary level of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in deceased-donor renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after kidney transplantation (KT), especially in recipients from deceased donors. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (u-NGAL) is an early and sensitive marker of AKI after transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the renoprotective effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on u-NGAL levels as an early prognostic marker of graft function immediately after transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 70 deceased-donor KT recipients ( www.irct.ir , trial registration number: IRCT2014090214693N4). Patients received 600 mg oral NAC or placebo twice daily from day 0 to 5 and urine samples were taken before, and on the first and fifth days after transplantation. U-NGAL and early graft function were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

NAC significantly reduced u-NGAL levels compared to placebo (p value = 0.02), while improvement in early graft function with NAC did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that NAC administration in deceased-donor KT recipients can reduce tubular kidney injury, evidenced by u-NGAL measurements. Improvement in early graft function needs a larger sample size to reach a statistical conclusion.

Comparing the Effect of Immediate versus Delayed Initiation of Tacrolimus on Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Open-label Clinical Trial

Objective:

Delayed graft function (DGF) is an early complication after kidney transplantation with negative impact on allograft outcomes. This study assessed the effect of delayed initiation of tacrolimus as a nephrotoxic drug, on DGF occurrence and allograft function.

Methods:

This randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted on kidney transplant recipients with the age of at least 14 years who underwent the first kidney transplantation from deceased or living donor. Patients were randomly allocated to immediate (n = 26) or delayed tacrolimus (n = 27) groups. All patients received thymoglobulin as induction therapy and similar maintenance immunosuppression including tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisolone with the difference in the time of initiation of tacrolimus either on the day of transplantation (immediate tacrolimus group) or day 3 after transplant (delayed tacrolimus group).

Findings:

DGF incidence (46.15% vs. 37.04%; P = 0.501) and duration (9.75 ± 6.41 vs. 8.6 ± 6.16 days; P = 0.675) were not different between the immediate and delayed tacrolimus groups. Estimated creatinine clearance using Cockcroft–Gault equation (63.14 ± 18.81 vs. 58.19 ± 19.42 mL/min in immediate and delayed tacrolimus groups respectively; P = 0.373) and estimated acute rejection-free survival were also comparable between the groups over the 3 months of follow-up. Compared with the immediate group, the delayed tacrolimus group showed higher estimated 3-month grafts' survival (100% vs. 84.27%; P = 0.072).

Conclusion:

Delayed initiation of tacrolimus after kidney transplantation under the umbrella of thymoglobulin induction did not result in either lower incidence or duration of DGF or improved the level of graft function in kidney transplant recipients but non-statistically significant increased 3-month grafts' survival.

Use of a Targeted Urine Proteome Assay (TUPA) to identify protein biomarkers of delayed recovery after kidney transplant

PURPOSE

Development of delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplant is associated with poor outcomes. An ability to rapidly identify patients with DGF versus those with immediate graft function (IGF) may facilitate the treatment of DGF and the research needed to improve prognosis. The purpose of this study was to use a Targeted Urine Proteome Assay to identify protein biomarkers of delayed recovery from kidney transplant.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Potential biomarkers were identified using the Targeted Urine Proteome (MRM) Assay to interrogate the relative DGF/IGF levels of expression of 167 proteins in urine taken 12-18 h after kidney implantation from 21 DGF, 15 SGF (slow graft function), and 16 IGF patients. An iterative Random Forest analysis approach evaluated the relative importance of each biomarker, which was then used to identify an optimum biomarker panel that provided the maximum sensitivity and specificity with the least number of biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Four proteins were identified that together distinguished DGF with a sensitivity of 77.4%, specificity of 82.6%, and AUC of 0.891. This panel represents an important step toward identifying DGF at an early stage so that more effective treatments can be developed to improve long-term graft outcomes.

Protective Effects of L-Carnitine Against Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Pilot, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

Delayed graft function (DGF) is an early complication after deceased donor kidney transplantation with significant adverse effects on graft outcomes. Ischemia-reperfusion injury during transplantation is a major cause of DGF. Tissue concentrations of carnitine, an antioxidant and regulator of cellular energy supply, decrease in the kidney following ischemia-reperfusion insult. Based on promising animal data, this study evaluated the possible protective effect of L-carnitine against DGF.

DESIGN

This study is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial that was conducted on kidney transplantation patients in kidney transplant ward of Imam Khomeini hospital complex affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

SUBJECTS

Patients older than 14 years old undergoing their first kidney transplantation from a deceased donor were evaluated for eligibility to take part in this study. Fifty-six patients were randomly assigned to L-carnitine or placebo groups.

INTERVENTION

During this trial, 3 g of oral L-carnitine or placebo was administered in 3 divided doses each day for 4 consecutive days starting the day before kidney transplantation (i.e., days -1, 0, 1, and 2).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The need for dialysis within the first week after transplantation, serum creatinine and urine output were assessed daily. After hospital discharge, patients were followed for 3 months regarding organ function.

RESULTS

DGF incidence did not differ between the L-carnitine and placebo groups (18.51% vs. 23.8%, respectively; P = .68). Total allograft failure within 3 months after kidney transplantation happened in 6 patients in the placebo and 1 patient in the L-carnitine group (P = .05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed no protective effects of oral L-carnitine supplementation against DGF occurrence recipients; however, 3-month graft loss was lower in the L-carnitine supplemented group.

Body mass index and outcome in renal transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether overweight or obese end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are suitable for renal transplantation (RT) is often debated. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to systematically investigate the outcome of low versus high BMI recipients after RT.

METHODS

Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library 2014, issue 8). We reviewed four major guidelines that are available regarding (potential) RT recipients. The methodology was in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and written based on the PRISMA statement. The quality assessment of studies was performed by using the GRADE tool. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Random-effects models were used.

RESULTS

After identifying 5,526 studies addressing this topic, 56 studies were included. We extracted data for 37 outcome measures (including data of more than 209,000 RT recipients), of which 26 could be meta-analysed. The following outcome measures demonstrated significant differences in favour of low BMI (<30) recipients: mortality (RR = 1.52), delayed graft function (RR = 1.52), acute rejection (RR = 1.17), 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival (RR = 0.97, 0.95, and 0.97), 1-, 2-, and 3-year patient survival (RR = 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99), wound infection and dehiscence (RR = 3.13 and 4.85), NODAT (RR = 2.24), length of hospital stay (2.31 days), operation duration (0.77 hours), hypertension (RR = 1.35), and incisional hernia (RR = 2.72). However, patient survival expressed in hazard ratios was in significant favour of high BMI recipients. Differences in other outcome parameters were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Several of the pooled outcome measurements show significant benefits for 'low' BMI (<30) recipients. Therefore, we postulate that ESRD patients with a BMI >30 preferably should lose weight prior to RT. If this cannot be achieved with common measures, in morbidly obese RT candidates, bariatric surgery could be considered.

Challenges in early clinical drug development for ischemia-reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

In an effort to expand the donor pool, kidneys from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors are increasingly utilised in renal transplantation. These kidneys suffer greater ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and have a higher incidence of delayed graft function. In the last 25 years, relatively few pharmacological therapies to reduce IRI have been tested in randomised controlled trials in renal transplantation and currently no pharmacological agents are routinely utilised for this purpose.

AREAS COVERED

The authors look at why promising treatments in pre-clinical studies have not translated to significant clinical benefit in human trials. This may reflect a translational disconnect between the pre-clinical models used and clinical problems that are encountered in the transplant population. They also discuss the issues in conducting clinical trials and its implication on drug development.

EXPERT OPINION

Translating pharmacological strategies for reducing IRI is highly challenging at every stage of development from pre-clinical studies to clinical trials. Scientific knowledge of the complexity of IRI is rapidly evolving and new treatments are expected to emerge. There are ethical barriers that prevent donor treatments, particularly in the DCD setting. However, new clinical techniques such as normothermic regional and ex-vivo perfusion represent exciting opportunities to utilise pharmacological agents earlier in the process of transplantation.

Urinary calprotectin and posttransplant renal allograft injury

Objective

Current methods do not predict the acute renal allograft injury immediately after kidney transplantation. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of urinary calprotectin for predicting immediate posttransplant allograft injury.

Methods

In a multicenter, prospective-cohort study of 144 incipient renal transplant recipients, we postoperatively measured urinary calprotectin using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.

Results

We observed a significant inverse association of urinary calprotectin concentrations and eGFR 4 weeks after transplantation (Spearman r = −0.33; P<0.001). Compared to the lowest quartile, patients in the highest quartile of urinary calprotectin had an increased risk for an eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m² four weeks after transplantation (relative risk, 4.3; P<0.001; sensitivity, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.98; specificity, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.66). Higher urinary calprotectin concentrations predicted impaired kidney function 4 weeks after transplantation, as well as 6 months and 12 months after transplantation. When data were analyzed using the urinary calprotectin/creatinine-ratio similar results were obtained. Urinary calprotectin was superior to current use of absolute change of plasma creatinine to predict allograft function 12 months after transplantation. Urinary calprotectin predicted an increased risk both in transplants from living and deceased donors. Multivariate linear regression showed that higher urinary calprotectin concentrations and older donor age predicted lower eGFR four weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after transplantation.

Conclusions

Urinary calprotectin is an early, noninvasive predictor of immediate renal allograft injury after kidney transplantation.

Delayed graft function: risk factors and the effects of early function and graft survival

INTRODUCTION

Delayed graft function (DGF), a well-known immediate postoperative complication is defined as the need for dialysis during the first week after deceased donor kidney transplantation. It affects 25% to 50% of recipients. In this study we identified risk factors for DGF and its impact on patient and graft survivals.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed medical records from renal transplant recipients aged above 18 years who received a deceased donor kidney graft between November 2008 and December 2011, excluding kidney losses during the first week.

RESULTS

Among 137 transplantations, 64 (46.5%) displayed DGF. Multivariate analysis showed secondary renal disease (OR 3.7, CI 1.36-10.30; P = .011), HLA mismatches > 3 (OR 4.4, CI 1.53-12.51; P = .006) and donor urine output ≤ 3000 ml/24h (OR 25.8, CI 3.60-185.70; P = .001) to be significant risk factors for DGF. The hospitalization time was longer in the DGF group (38,2 ± 20,75 vs. 25,6 ± 8,18; P < .001). At 1 month, DGF group showed worse graft function based upon serum creatinine: 207.7 ± 148.52 vs 118.1 ± 36.63 μmol/L (P < .001). At 1 year follow-up, incidence of biopsy-proven acute renal rejection episodes was higher in the DGF (28; 51,9%) vs. the non-DGF group (18; 33,3%; P = .05). The 1-year recipient survival in DGF and no DGF groups were 90% vs 97% respectively (P = .124). With 1-year death censored graft survivals of 92% vs 100% respectively (P = .062).

CONCLUSION

Secondary renal disease, HLA mismatches and lower donor urinary output were associated with a greater incidence of DGF, leading to prolonged hospitalizations and an increased risk for an acute rejection episode.

Comparing molecular assessment of implantation biopsies with histologic and demographic risk assessment

We hypothesized that measurement of previously defined acute kidney injury-induced transcripts at the time of implantation would add a new dimension to existing methods based on donor factors, histology and recipient factors. We analyzed microarray results from implantation biopsies taken after reperfusion from 70 kidneys from 53 deceased donors. We used two definitions of early dysfunction: serum creatinine > 265 umol/L at day 7 posttransplant; and dialysis in the first week. The strongest correlate with early dysfunction was the mean expression of 30 injury transcripts. Older donor and recipient age were associated with early dysfunction, but histologic lesions were not. Prediction was best when the injury transcript expression was combined with donor or recipient age, particularly in standard criteria donors. In contrast, although extended criteria donor kidneys had a high risk of early dysfunction, no variables tested, including injury transcripts, predicted risk significantly, probably because these kidneys were allocated preferentially to old, high risk recipients. The injury transcripts did not predict late function, which was mainly associated with donor age. Thus, measurement of injury-induced transcripts at the time of implantation improves the prediction of early kidney dysfunction, but risk prediction may fail when old kidneys are transplanted into old recipients.

A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of glycemic control on renal transplantation outcomes

CONTEXT

Outcomes from intensive glycemic control postrenal transplant have not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to observe the optimal management of hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance receiving renal transplantation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial with patients undergoing renal transplantation randomized to either i.v. insulin therapy (intensive) or standard s.c. insulin therapy while the patients were admitted to the hospital.

INTERVENTIONS

The study consisted of a 3-day postrenal transplant group treated with intensive i.v. insulin [blood glucose (BG) = 70-110 mg/dl] or a control group treated with s.c. insulin (BG = 70-180 mg/dl).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary endpoint was delayed graft function (DGF). Secondary endpoints were glycemic control, graft survival, and acute rejection episodes.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients were screened and randomized to either the intensive or control condition; however, the intention-to-treat analysis set consisted of only the 93 participants (n = 44 intensive, n = 49 control) that underwent a renal transplant. DGF was present in 18% (eight of 44) of the intensive group and 24% (12 of 49) of the control group (P = 0.46). The occurrence of severe hypoglycemia (BG < 40 mg/dl) and severe hyperglycemia (BG > 350 mg/dl) were the primary safety outcome measures. There were nine participants with hypoglycemia identified, seven of which (78%) were in the intensive treatment group (P = 0.08). There were 30 instances of hyperglycemia with five participants (11%) in the intensive group and 12 participants (24%) in the control group having at least one hyperglycemic event (P = 0.10). For the 11 rejection episodes, nine were in the intensive treatment group (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary outcome measure of DGF was not statistically different for the two treatment groups. Regarding longer-term rejection and graft survival, the intensively treated participants were at higher risk for a rejection episode.

Delayed graft function is not associated with an increased incidence of renal allograft rejection

Delayed graft function (DGF) is considered as a risk factor for renal allograft rejection, but this association might be confounded by diagnostic biases (e.g., higher biopsy frequency in patients with DGF, inclusion of clinically diagnosed rejection episodes, and limited details on the rejection phenotype). This retrospective study including 329 deceased donor transplantations aimed to clarify a causal relationship between DGF and rejection. DGF occurred in 93/329 recipients (28%), whereas immediate graft function (IGF) in 236/329 recipients (72%). The percentage of patients with ≥1 allograft biopsy within the first year post-transplant was similar between the DGF and IGF group (96% vs. 94%; p=0.60). The cumulative one-yr incidence of biopsy-proven clinical (35% vs. 34%; p=0.62) and combined (sub)clinical rejection (58% vs. 60%; p=0.79) was not different between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no differences regarding rejection phenotypes/severities and time frame of occurrence. By multivariable Cox regression analysis, donor-specific HLA antibodies, younger recipient age, and immunosuppressive regimens were independent predictors for clinical rejection, while DGF was not. These results in an intermediate sized, but thoroughly investigated patient population challenge the concept that DGF is a risk factor for rejection and highlights the need for additional studies in this regard.

Association of pre-transplant statin use with delayed graft function in kidney transplant recipients

Background

Administration of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), prior to ischemia or prior to reperfusion has been shown to decrease ischemia-reperfusion renal injury in animal studies. It is unknown whether this protective effect is applicable to renal transplantation in humans. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between prior statin use in renal transplant recipients and the subsequent risk of delayed graft function.

Methods

All patients who underwent deceased or living donor renal transplantation at the Princess Alexandra Hospital between 1 July 2008 and 1 August 2010 were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study. Graft function was classified as immediate graft function (IGF), dialysis-requiring (D-DGF) and non-dialysis-requiring (ND-DGF) delayed graft function. The independent predictors of graft function were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for donor characteristics, recipient characteristics, HLA mismatch and ischaemic times.

Results

Overall, of the 266 renal transplant recipients, 21% exhibited D-DGF, 39% had ND-DGF and 40% had IGF. Statin use prior to renal transplantation was not significantly associated with the risk of D-DGF (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% CI 0.96 – 1.15, P = 0.28). This finding was not altered when D-DGF and ND-DGF were pooled together (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.89-1.06, p = 0.56).

Conclusions

The present study did not show a significant, independent association between prior statin use in kidney transplant recipients and the occurrence of delayed graft function.

A CD3+ count-based thymoglobulin induction regimen permits delayed introduction of calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Withholding calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) can be considered when graft function is inadequate following kidney transplantation (KT). Thymoglobulin (rATG) can be used to prevent acute rejection while CNIs are being withheld. Here, we report our results of a novel CNI-sparing induction protocol, which utilizes a CD3+ cell count-based rATG treatment regimen when delayed graft function (DGF) develops in the immediate postoperative period.

METHODS

In a cohort of 153 consecutive deceased-donor KT recipients, all received a single intraoperative dose of basiliximab; 84 subsequently developed DGF and therefore received rATG (rATG+ group), while 69 demonstrated immediate graft function and received CNIs (rATG- group).

RESULTS

In the rATG+ group, mean duration of therapy was 8.5±6.0 d, permitting CNI initiation to be delayed until postoperative day 10.3±6.2. Cumulative dose of rATG was only 5.1±4.5 mg/kg while targeting CD3+ counts of ≤30 cells/mm3. CD3+ counts were reduced to a mean of 16.7±17.0 cells/mm3 during therapy. At one yr, patient and graft survival rates were 97.6% and 92.9%, respectively, while the frequency of infections and malignancies were not significantly increased compared to the rATG- group.

CONCLUSION

A unique induction regimen successfully delayed CNI initiation by using modest doses of rATG to deplete CD3+ cells, while yielding excellent long-term graft outcome without increased risk of infection or malignancy.

The clinical and financial burden of early dialysis after deceased donor kidney transplantation

Background

The economic implications of dialysis-requiring allograft dysfunction early after kidney transplantation are not well-described.

Methods

Data for Medicare-insured adult kidney transplant recipients in 1995-2004 who did not develop permanent graft failure in the first 90 days were drawn from the United States Renal Data System. We identified dialysis treatment records from Medicare claims and categorized patients according to frequency and duration of post-transplant dialysis as: first week (delayed graft function, DGF), second week, weeks 3 or 4, second month, or third month. Associations of dialysis requirements with Medicare payments for the transplant hospitalization and over the next three years were estimated with multivariable linear regression. Graft and patient survival according to early dialysis requirements were examined with multivariable survival analysis.

Results

Among 37,533 recipients, 15,314 (41%) experienced DGF and 3,184 (21% of those with DGF) received dialysis beyond the first week. Compared with no dialysis in the first 3 months, adjusted marginal first-year costs associated with early post-transplant dialysis ranged from $6,467 for dialysis requirement limited to first week to $27,606 for dialysis in multiple periods (p<0.0001). Patients who experienced DGF and received dialysis in >2 early periods were more than twice as likely to lose their grafts within 3 years as those without early dialysis requirements.

Conclusions

While dialysis in the first week post-transplant is an adverse risk marker, early dialysis in weeks 2 to 12 is associated with similarly adverse, if not worse, costs and clinical consequences. This observation supports a need for broader definition of DGF.

Both darbepoetin alfa and carbamylated erythropoietin prevent kidney graft dysfunction due to ischemia/reperfusion in rats

BACKGROUND

Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is an important cause of renal graft dysfunction. Increases in cold and warm ischemia times lead to a higher risk of early posttransplant complications including delayed graft function and acute rejection. Moreover, prolonged cold ischemia is a predictor of long-term graft loss in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Darbepoetin alfa (DA) and carbamylated nonerythropoietic derivative of erythropoietin (CEPO) protective effects were evaluated in a model of I/R injury after kidney transplantation in both syngeneic and allogeneic combinations. The effects of wortmannin (phosphorylated Akt [p-Akt] inhibitor) administration were also investigated. Serum creatinine was evaluated at 16, 24, 48 hr and at 4 and 7 days posttransplant. Animals were killed 24 hr or 7 days after transplant and kidneys were processed for histological analysis, immunohistochemistry assessment of erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) and β-common chain receptor expression, granulocyte infiltration, nitrotyrosine staining, p-Akt expression, peritubular capillary (PTC) density, apoptosis, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic gene expression.

RESULTS

DA and CEPO significantly reduced serum creatinine, tubular injury, tubular nitrotyrosine staining, and prevented I/R-induced tubular apoptosis, but only when given both to the donor and to the recipient. DA and CEPO cytoprotection was associated with prevention of I/R-induced drop of p-Akt expression in tubuli, and almost complete preservation of capillary density in the tubulointerstitium of the graft. CEPO was more effective than DA in reducing tubular oxidative stress and preserving PTCs.

CONCLUSION

DA and CEPO when given both to the donor and to the recipient, prevented renal graft dysfunction, tubular oxidative stress, and apoptosis after I/R injury in kidney transplantation. Their cytoprotection was mediated by tubular p-Akt activation and PTC density preservation.

Urine cystatin C as a biomarker of proximal tubular function immediately after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Clinical methods to predict allograft function soon after kidney transplantation are ineffective.

METHODS

We analyzed urine cystatin C (CyC) in a prospective multicenter observational cohort study of deceased-donor kidney transplants to determine its peritransplant excretion pattern, utility for predicting delayed graft function (DGF) and association with 3-month graft function. Serial urine samples were collected for 2 days following transplant and analyzed blindly for CyC. We defined DGF as any hemodialysis in the first week after transplant, slow graft function (SGF) as a serum creatinine reduction < 70% by the first week and immediate graft function (IGF) as a reduction ≥ 70%.

RESULTS

Of 91 recipients, 33 had DGF, 34 had SGF and 24 had IGF. Urine CyC/urine creatinine was highest in DGF for all time-points. The area under the curve (95% CI) for predicting DGF at 6 h was 0.69 (0.57-0.81) for urine CyC, 0.74 (0.62-0.86) for urine CyC/urine creatinine and 0.60 (0.45-0.75) for percent change in urine CyC. On the first postoperative day, urine CyC/urine creatinine and percent change in urine CyC were associated with 3-month graft function.

CONCLUSION

Urine CyC on the day after transplant differs between degrees of perioperative graft function and modestly corresponds with 3-month function.

Is perioperative low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch infusion a risk factor for delayed graft function in renal transplant recipients?

BACKGROUND

Crystalloid or colloid fluids may be utilized during kidney transplantation. Histopathological and clinical data indicate that hydroxyethyl starch (HES) may have nephrotoxic potential.

METHODS

This retrospective single-centre cohort study screened 192 and included 113 patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2003 and 2007 at University of Leipzig Medical Faculty, Germany. The primary outcome parameter was delayed graft function (DGF). Patients were divided into two groups. Patients in group CRYS (N = 73) received crystalloid solution (acetated Ringer's or normal saline) only. Patients in the group HES (N = 40) received a minimum of 500 mL 6% HES 130/0.4 and additional crystalloid solution by discretion of the transplant team.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups did not differ with respect to demographic data and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System scores, except for the donor age, which was significantly lower in the group HES. The rate of DGF was not found to be different in group CRYS (31.5%) when compared to group HES (32.5%) (P = 1.00, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

In this single-centre retrospective cohort study, infusion of low molecular weight 6% HES 130/0.4 during and after renal transplantation was found to have no significant negative effect upon the rate of DGF.

Machine perfusion versus cold storage for preservation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors after brain death

The purpose of this study was to analyze the possible effects of machine perfusion (MP) versus cold storage (CS) on delayed graft function (DGF) and early graft survival in expanded criteria donor kidneys (ECD). As part of the previously reported international randomized controlled trial 91 consecutive heart-beating deceased ECDs--defined according to the United Network of Organ Sharing definition--were included in the study. From each donor one kidney was randomized to MP and the contralateral kidney to CS. All recipients were followed for 1 year. The primary endpoint was DGF. Secondary endpoints included primary nonfunction and graft survival. DGF occurred in 27 patients in the CS group (29.7%) and in 20 patients in the MP group (22%). Using the logistic regression model MP significantly reduced the risk of DGF compared with CS (OR 0.460, P=0.047). The incidence of nonfunction in the CS group (12%) was four times higher than in the MP group (3%) (P=0.04). One-year graft survival was significantly higher in machine perfused kidneys compared with cold stored kidneys (92.3% vs. 80.2%, P=0.02). In the present study, MP preservation clearly reduced the risk of DGF and improved 1-year graft survival and function in ECD kidneys. (Current Controlled Trials number: ISRCTN83876362).

A risk prediction model for delayed graft function in the current era of deceased donor renal transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) impacts short- and long-term outcomes. We present a model for predicting DGF after renal transplantation. A multivariable logistic regression analysis of 24,337 deceased donor renal transplant recipients (2003-2006) was performed. We developed a nomogram, depicting relative contribution of risk factors, and a novel web-based calculator (http://www.transplantcalculator.com/DGF) as an easily accessible tool for predicting DGF. Risk factors in the modern era were compared with their relative impact in an earlier era (1995-1998). Although the impact of many risk factors remained similar over time, weight of immunological factors attenuated, while impact of donor renal function increased by 2-fold. This may reflect advances in immunosuppression and increased utilization of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) in the modern era. The most significant factors associated with DGF were cold ischemia time, donor creatinine, body mass index, donation after cardiac death and donor age. In addition to predicting DGF, the model predicted graft failure. A 25-50% probability of DGF was associated with a 50% increased risk of graft failure relative to a DGF risk < 25%, whereas a > 50% DGF risk was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of graft failure. This tool is useful for predicting DGF and long-term outcomes at the time of transplant.

Outcomes of renal transplantation in older high risk recipients: is there an age effect?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes in high risk renal transplant recipients over 60 years of age compared with those younger than 60 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed outcomes in 131 consecutive renal transplant recipients at our institution between November 2001 and December 2007. Primary outcomes included incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection, graft survival, patient survival, and incidence of infections and neoplasms.

RESULTS

Older recipients (Over 60 group, n = 45) received more organs from extended criteria donors (ECD) or donation after cardiac death donors (DCD) compared with younger recipients (Under 60 group, n = 86), 42% versus 17% respectively, P = 0.001. Multivariate analyses revealed that African American ethnicity and DCD donation had the greatest impact on the incidence of DGF in both groups; P < 0.05. Patient survival and graft survival beyond 1 y were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that long-term transplant outcomes in older, high risk renal transplant recipients are similar to those of younger, high risk recipients. Older recipients' age and high-risk characteristics, such as African American ethnicity and increased sensitization, should not be a contraindication to renal transplantation in the elderly.

Glomerular damage as a predictor of renal allograft loss

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) are the most common cause of renal graft failure. Chronic transplant glomerulopathy (CTG) is present in approximately 1.5-3.0% of all renal grafts. We retrospectively studied the contribution of CTG and recurrent post-transplant glomerulopathies (RGN) to graft loss. We analyzed 123 patients with chronic renal allograft dysfunction and divided them into three groups: CTG (N = 37), RGN (N = 21), and IF/TA (N = 65). Demographic data were analyzed and the variables related to graft function identified by statistical methods. CTG had a significantly lower allograft survival than IF/TA. In a multivariate analysis, protective factors for allograft outcomes were: use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.12, P = 0.001), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; HR = 0.17, P = 0.026), hepatitis C virus (HR = 7.29, P = 0.003), delayed graft function (HR = 5.32, P = 0.016), serum creatinine > or =1.5 mg/dL at the 1st year post-transplant (HR = 0.20, P = 0.011), and proteinuria > or =0.5 g/24 h at the 1st year post-transplant (HR = 0.14, P = 0.004). The presence of glomerular damage is a risk factor for allograft loss (HR = 4.55, P = 0.015). The presence of some degree of chronic glomerular damage in addition to the diagnosis of IF/TA was the most important risk factor associated with allograft loss since it could indicate chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. ACEI and MMF were associated with better outcomes, indicating that they might improve graft survival.

IL-18 and urinary NGAL predict dialysis and graft recovery after kidney transplantation

Current methods for predicting graft recovery after kidney transplantation are not reliable. We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of deceased-donor kidney transplant patients to evaluate urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), IL-18, and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) as biomarkers for predicting dialysis within 1 wk of transplant and subsequent graft recovery. We collected serial urine samples for 3 d after transplant and analyzed levels of these putative biomarkers. We classified graft recovery as delayed graft function (DGF), slow graft function (SGF), or immediate graft function (IGF). Of the 91 patients in the cohort, 34 had DGF, 33 had SGF, and 24 had IGF. Median NGAL and IL-18 levels, but not KIM-1 levels, were statistically different among these three groups at all time points. ROC curve analysis suggested that the abilities of NGAL or IL-18 to predict dialysis within 1 wk were moderately accurate when measured on the first postoperative day, whereas the fall in serum creatinine (Scr) was not predictive. In multivariate analysis, elevated levels of NGAL or IL-18 predicted the need for dialysis after adjusting for recipient and donor age, cold ischemia time, urine output, and Scr. NGAL and IL-18 quantiles also predicted graft recovery up to 3 mo later. In summary, urinary NGAL and IL-18 are early, noninvasive, accurate predictors of both the need for dialysis within the first week of kidney transplantation and 3-mo recovery of graft function.

Increased primary non-function in transplanted deceased-donor kidneys flushed with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution

Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution is increasingly used to flush and preserve organ donor kidneys, with efficacy claimed equivalent to University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. We observed and reported increased graft pancreatitis in pancreata flushed with HTK solution, which prompted this review of transplanting HTK-flushed kidneys. We analyzed outcomes of deceased-donor kidneys flushed with HTK and UW solutions with a minimum of 12 months follow-up, excluding pediatric and multi-organ recipients. We evaluated patient and graft survival and rejection rates, variables that might constitute hazards to graft survival and renal function. Two-year patient survival, rejection, renal function and graft survival were not different, but early graft loss (<6 months) was worse in HTK-flushed kidneys (p < 0.03). A Cox analysis of donor grade, cold ischemic time, panel reactive antibodies (PRA), donor race, first vs. repeat transplant, rejection and flush solution showed that only HTK use predicted early graft loss (p < 0.04; relative risk = 3.24), almost exclusively attributable to primary non-function (HTK, n = 5 (6.30%); UW, n = 1 (0.65%); p = 0.02). Delayed graft function and early graft loss with HTK occurred only in lesser grade kidneys, suggesting it should be used with caution in marginal donors.

"Nature versus nurture" study of deceased-donor pairs in kidney transplantation

Donor characteristics such as age and cause of death influence the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and graft survival; however, the relative influence of donor characteristics ("nature") versus transplant center characteristics ("nurture") on deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes is unknown. We examined the risks for DGF and allograft failure within 19,461 recipient pairs of the same donor's kidneys using data from the US Renal Data System. For the 11,894 common-donor pairs transplanted at different centers, a recipient was twice as likely to develop DGF when the recipient of the contralateral kidney developed DGF (odds ratio [OR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82 to 2.30). Similarly, for 7567 common-donor pairs transplanted at the same center, the OR for DGF was 3.02 (95% CI 2.62 to 3.48). For pairs transplanted at the same center, there was an additional 42% risk for DGF compared with pairs transplanted at different centers. After adjustment for DGF, the within-pair ORs for allograft failure by 1 yr were 1.92 (95% CI 1.33 to 2.77) and 1.77 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.52) for recipients who underwent transplantation at the same center and different centers, respectively. These data suggest that both unmeasured donor characteristics and transplant center characteristics contribute to the risk for DGF and that the former also contribute significantly to allograft failure.

Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Static cold storage is generally used to preserve kidney allografts from deceased donors. Hypothermic machine perfusion may improve outcomes after transplantation, but few sufficiently powered prospective studies have addressed this possibility.

METHODS

In this international randomized, controlled trial, we randomly assigned one kidney from 336 consecutive deceased donors to machine perfusion and the other to cold storage. All 672 recipients were followed for 1 year. The primary end point was delayed graft function (requiring dialysis in the first week after transplantation). Secondary end points were the duration of delayed graft function, delayed graft function defined by the rate of the decrease in the serum creatinine level, primary nonfunction, the serum creatinine level and clearance, acute rejection, toxicity of the calcineurin inhibitor, the length of hospital stay, and allograft and patient survival.

RESULTS

Machine perfusion significantly reduced the risk of delayed graft function. Delayed graft function developed in 70 patients in the machine-perfusion group versus 89 in the cold-storage group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; P=0.01). Machine perfusion also significantly improved the rate of the decrease in the serum creatinine level and reduced the duration of delayed graft function. Machine perfusion was associated with lower serum creatinine levels during the first 2 weeks after transplantation and a reduced risk of graft failure (hazard ratio, 0.52; P=0.03). One-year allograft survival was superior in the machine-perfusion group (94% vs. 90%, P=0.04). No significant differences were observed for the other secondary end points. No serious adverse events were directly attributable to machine perfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypothermic machine perfusion was associated with a reduced risk of delayed graft function and improved graft survival in the first year after transplantation. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN83876362.)