Peripheral osteopenia in adult patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The Potential Role of Exercise Training and Mechanical Loading on Bone-Associated Skeletal Nerves

The spatial distribution, innervation, and functional role of the bone-associated skeletal nerves have been previously reported in detail. However, studies examining exercise-induced associations between skeletal nerves and bone metabolism are limited. This review introduces a potential relationship between exercise and the skeletal nerves and discusses how it can contribute to exercise-induced bone anabolism. First, the background and current understanding of nerve fiber types and their functions in the skeleton are provided. Next, the influence of exercise and mechanical loading on the skeletal nervous system is elaborated. Effective synthesis of recent studies could serve as an established baseline for the novel discovery of the effects of exercise on skeletal nerve density and bone anabolic activity in the future. Therefore, this review overviews the existing evidence for the neural control of bone metabolism and the potential positive effects of exercise on the peripheral skeletal nervous system. The influence of exercise training models on the relationships of sensory nerve signals with osteoblast-mediated bone formation and the increased bone volume provides the first insight on the potential importance of exercise training in stimulating positive adaptations in the skeletal nerve-bone interaction and its downstream effect on bone metabolism, thereby highlighting its therapeutic potential in a variety of clinical populations.

The increase of neuropathic symptoms in diabetic patients is related with osteopenia

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between the intensity of neuropathic pain and the severity of osteopenia in type 2 diabetic patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (painful DPN).

METHODS

In 220 patients with type 2 diabetes included in the screening, the presence of neuropathic pain was evaluated using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4) scoring system. One hundred forty-five patients with painful DPN were identified and included in the study. Socio-demographic and laboratory evaluations were made and bone mineral density (BMD) of these patients was evaluated by the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) method.

RESULTS

There was a significant correlation between the neuropathic pain score and the total T scores of the lumbar spine and femur in patients with painful DPN. According to the regression analysis (standard coefficients), the DN4 score (0.498); the level of vitamin D (- 0.246) and the female sex (0.236) for the lumbar spine region; age (0.387); DN4 score (0.261); and vitamin D level (- 0.155) for the femur region were independently influencing factors on the development of osteoporosis. When osteoporosis (T score ≤ - 2.5) of the lumbar spine was analyzed by binary logistic regression, the risk of osteoporosis in women was 4.4 times higher, and the risk increased with increasing DN4 score.

CONCLUSION

The increase of neuropathic symptoms in patients with DPN is an effective and important factor in the development of diabetic osteopenia.

Bone mineral density spectrum in individuals with type 1 diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, and type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To assess bone mineral density (BMD) and associated clinical factors in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) and in non-diabetic subjects.

METHODS

Total 108 age-, sex-, disease duration-, and postmenopausal ratio-matched patients with T1D, LADA, and T2D each and 216 age-, sex-, and postmenopausal ratio-matched non-diabetic controls. Anthropometric, biochemical, and BMD data were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

BMD of total hip and lumbar spine of individuals in the LADA group was lower than those in the T2D and control groups but higher than those in the T1D group. After adjusting for body mass index (BMI), a significant difference in BMD in the lumbar spine was seen between groups. After adjustment for smoking, BMI, 25-(OH) vitamin D, calcium, haemoglobin A1c, and diabetic complication scores, BMD values of patients in LADA group were not significantly different from those of patients in T1D and T2D groups. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that BMD was (a) positively associated with weight and C-peptide, and negatively associated with age in patients with diabetes, (b) positively associated with C-peptide in the T1D and LADA groups. The proportion of patients with osteoporosis in the T1D, LADA, T2D, and control groups was 55.6%, 45.4%, 34.3%, and 26.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BMD values in T1D, LADA, and T2D were in an increasing order of mention. Patients with autoimmune diabetes were more susceptible to osteoporosis. A lower C-peptide level may be responsible for decreased BMD in individuals with autoimmune diabetes.

Peripheral Neuropathy as a Component of Skeletal Disease in Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to explore clinical associations between peripheral neuropathy and diabetic bone disease and to discuss how nerve dysfunction may contribute to dysregulation of bone metabolism, reduced bone quality, and fracture risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diabetic neuropathy can decrease peripheral sensation (sensory neuropathy), impair motor coordination (motor neuropathy), and increase postural hypotension (autonomic neuropathy). Together, this can impair overall balance and increase the risk for falls and fractures. In addition, the peripheral nervous system has the potential to regulate bone metabolism directly through the action of local neurotransmitters on bone cells and indirectly through neuroregulation of the skeletal vascular supply. This review critically evaluates existing evidence for diabetic peripheral neuropathy as a risk factor or direct actor on bone disease. In addition, we address therapeutic and experimental considerations to guide patient care and future research evaluating the emerging relationship between diabetic neuropathy and bone health.

Non-insulin treatments for Type 1 diabetes: critical appraisal of the available evidence and insight into future directions

Intensive insulin therapy is the mainstay of treatment for people with Type 1 diabetes, but hypoglycaemia and weight gain are often limiting factors in achieving glycaemic targets and decreasing the risk of diabetes-related complications. The inclusion of pharmacological agents used traditionally in Type 2 diabetes as adjuncts to insulin therapy in Type 1 diabetes has been explored, with the goal of mitigating such drawbacks. Pramlintide and metformin result in modest HbA_1c and weight reductions, but their use is limited by poor tolerability and, in the case of pramlintide, by frequency of injections and cost. The addition of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists to insulin results in improved glycaemic control, reduced insulin doses and weight loss, but this is at the expense of higher rates of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia with ketosis. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 and dual sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 and -1 inhibitors also improve glucose control, but with reductions in weight and insulin requirements potentiating the risk of acidosis-related events and hypoglycaemia. The high proportion of people with Type 1 diabetes not achieving glycaemic targets, the negative clinical impact of intensive insulin therapy and the rise in obesity and cardiovascular disease and mortality, underline the need for individualized clinical care. The evaluation of new therapies, effective in Type 2 diabetes, as adjuncts to insulin therapy represents a promising strategy, particularly given the beneficial effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in people with Type 2 diabetes with or at high risk of complications that are also observed in patients with Type 1 diabetes. As the population with Type 1 diabetes ages, our mission is to evolve and provide better tools and improved therapies to excel, not only in glycaemic control but also in risk reduction and reduction of complications.

Impact of the Autonomic Nervous System on the Skeleton

It is from the discovery of leptin and the central nervous system as a regulator of bone remodeling that the presence of autonomic nerves within the skeleton transitioned from a mere histological observation to the mechanism whereby neurons of the central nervous system communicate with cells of the bone microenvironment and regulate bone homeostasis. This shift in paradigm sparked new preclinical and clinical investigations aimed at defining the contribution of sympathetic, parasympathetic, and sensory nerves to the process of bone development, bone mass accrual, bone remodeling, and cancer metastasis. The aim of this article is to review the data that led to the current understanding of the interactions between the autonomic and skeletal systems and to present a critical appraisal of the literature, bringing forth a schema that can put into physiological and clinical context the main genetic and pharmacological observations pointing to the existence of an autonomic control of skeletal homeostasis. The different types of nerves found in the skeleton, their functional interactions with bone cells, their impact on bone development, bone mass accrual and remodeling, and the possible clinical or pathophysiological relevance of these findings are discussed.

N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) Ameliorates Lipid-Related Metabolic Dysfunction in Bone Marrow Stromal Cells-Derived Adipocytes

Recent experimental data suggest that fatty acids and lipotoxicity could play a role in the initiation and evolution of metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis. A functional bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) may provide support to surrounding cells and tissues or may serve as a lipid reservoir that protects skeletal osteoblasts from lipotoxicity. The present study examined the effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a powerful antioxidant and precursor of glutathione, commonly used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, on triglycerides accumulation in bone marrow stromal cells-derived adipocytes. Quantification of Oil Red O stained cells showed that lipid droplets decreased following NAC treatment. Additionally, exposure of bone marrow stromal cells (HS-5) to NAC increased adiponectin, PPARγ, HO-1, and SIRT-1 and increased beta-oxidation markers such as PPARα and PPARδ mRNA levels. As there is now substantial interest in alternative medicine, the observed therapeutic value of NAC should be taken into consideration in diabetic patients.

Diabetic foot syndrome: Charcot arthropathy or osteomyelitis? Part I: Clinical picture and radiography

One of significant challenges faced by diabetologists, surgeons and orthopedists who care for patients with diabetic foot syndrome is early diagnosis and differentiation of bone structure abnormalities typical of these patients, i.e. osteitis and Charcot arthropathy. In addition to clinical examination, the patient's medical history and laboratory tests, imaging plays a significant role. The evaluation usually begins with conventional radiographs. In the case of osteomyelitis, radiography shows osteopenia, lytic lesions, cortical destruction, periosteal reactions as well as, in the chronic phase, osteosclerosis and sequestra. Neurogenic arthropathy, however, presents an image resembling rapidly progressing osteoarthritis combined with aseptic necrosis or inflammation. The image includes: bone destruction with subluxations and dislocations as well as pathological fractures that lead to the presence of bone debris, osteopenia and, in the later phase, osteosclerosis, joint space narrowing, periosteal reactions, grotesque osteophytes and bone ankylosis. In the case of an unfavorable course of the disease and improper or delayed treatment, progression of these changes may lead to significant foot deformity that might resemble a "bag of bones". Unfortunately, radiography is non-specific and frequently does not warrant an unambiguous diagnosis, particularly in the initial phase preceding bone destruction. For these reasons, alternative imaging methods, such as magnetic resonance tomography, scintigraphy, computed tomography and ultrasonography, are also indicated.

Association between metabolic syndrome and bone mineral density in a Taiwanese elderly population

Previous studies have demonstrated uncertainty regarding the effect of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on bone. In the present work, we investigated the association between MetS, its components, and decreased bone mineral density (BMD) in a cross-sectional study of patients who underwent BMD measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during a health examination. Decreased BMD was defined as either osteopenia or osteoporosis. MetS components and body mass index (BMI) were compared between individuals with normal and decreased BMD, and simple and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between the variables and decreased BMD in women and men. Among 1162 subjects in the study, the mean age was 59.9 ± 7.3 years, and 59.5% were men. The prevalence of MetS and osteoporosis was 34.2 and 19.6%, respectively. MetS was positively associated with BMD in men, while in women it was negatively associated with BMD. Regarding the relationship between MetS components and BMD, we found that in women, waist circumference (WC) and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were negatively associated with BMD, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was positively associated. In men, WC and fasting glucose were positively associated with BMD, while HDL-C was negatively associated. We also found that an increase in the number of MetS components resulted in a significantly increased positive association with BMD, both before and after adjusting for age, in men but not in women, revealing a gender difference in the correlation between MetS components and BMD.

Effects of Type 2 Diabetic Serum on Proliferation and Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Diabetic patients have an increased risk of osteoporosis-associated fractures. However, the results of most studies of the effects of diabetes on bone mass in patients with type 2 diabetes (T₂DM) have been contradictory. To clarify these conflicting findings, we investigated the effects of diabetic serum on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). We used human sera from subjects with different levels of glycemic control to culture the MSCs and induce osteogenic differentiation. The rate of MSC proliferation differed when MSCs were cultured with sera from diabetic subjects with different levels of hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemic sera promoted MSC proliferation to some extent, but all the diabetic sera inhibited the differentiation of MSCs to osteoblasts. The effects of type 2 diabetic sera on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs are closely related to glycemic control. Our data demonstrate the importance of stratifying the study population according to glycemic control in clinical research into diabetic osteoporosis.

Bone Metabolism and Fracture Risk in Diabetes Mellitus

Individuals with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at increased risk for fragility fractures. Bone mineral density (BMD) is decreased in T1DM but often normal or even elevated in T2DM when compared with age-matched non-DM populations. However, bone turnover is decreased in both T1DM and T2DM. The pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to bone fragility is multifactorial, and potentially leads to reduced bone formation, altered bone microstructure and decreased bone strength. Interestingly, different antidiabetic treatments may influence fracture risk due to effects on glycemic control, triggering of hypoglycemic events or osteoblastogenesis.

Bone disease in diabetes: another manifestation of microvascular disease?

Type 1 and type 2 diabetes are generally accepted to be associated with increased bone fracture risk. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms of diabetic bone disease are poorly understood, and whether the associated increased skeletal fragility is a comorbidity or a complication of diabetes remains under debate. Although there is some indication of a direct deleterious effect of microangiopathy on bone, the evidence is open to question, and whether diabetic osteopathy can be classified as a chronic, microvascular complication of diabetes remains uncertain. Here, we review the current knowledge of potential contributory factors to diabetic bone disease, particularly the association between diabetic microangiopathy and bone mineral density, bone structure, and bone turnover. Additionally, we discuss and propose a pathophysiological model of the effects of diabetic microvascular disease on bone, and examine the progression of bone disease alongside the evolution of diabetes.

Mechanisms of diabetes mellitus-induced bone fragility

The risk of fragility fractures is increased in patients with either type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although BMD is decreased in T1DM, BMD in T2DM is often normal or even slightly elevated compared with an age-matched control population. However, in both T1DM and T2DM, bone turnover is decreased and the bone material properties and microstructure of bone are altered; the latter particularly so when microvascular complications are present. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying bone fragility in diabetes mellitus are complex, and include hyperglycaemia, oxidative stress and the accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts that compromise collagen properties, increase marrow adiposity, release inflammatory factors and adipokines from visceral fat, and potentially alter the function of osteocytes. Additional factors including treatment-induced hypoglycaemia, certain antidiabetic medications with a direct effect on bone and mineral metabolism (such as thiazolidinediones), as well as an increased propensity for falls, all contribute to the increased fracture risk in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes and Bone Disease

The World Health Organization estimates that diabetes mellitus occurs in more than 415 million people; this number could double by the year 2040. Epidemiologic data have shown that the skeletal system may be a target of diabetes-mediated damage, leading to the development of diabetes-induced osteoporosis. T1D and T2D have been associated with an increased risk of fracture. Bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction tools developed for the general population capture some of the risk associated with diabetes. Recent adaptations to these tools have improved their efficacy in patients with diabetes.

Severity and pattern of bone mineral loss in endocrine causes of osteoporosis as compared to age-related bone mineral loss

Background:

Data are scant on bone health in endocrinopathies from India. This study evaluated bone mineral density (BMD) loss in endocrinopathies [Graves’ disease (GD), type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism (HypoH), hypergonadotropic hypogonadism (HyperH), hypopituitarism, primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT)] as compared to age-related BMD loss [postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO), andropause].

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective audit of records of patients >30 years age attending a bone clinic from August 2014 to January 2016 was done.

Results:

Five-hundred and seven records were screened, out of which 420 (females:male = 294:126) were analyzed. A significantly higher occurrence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency was noted in T1DM (89.09%), HyperH (85%), and HypoH (79.59%) compared to age-related BMD loss (60.02%; P < 0.001). The occurrence of osteoporosis among females and males was 55.41% and 53.97%, respectively, and of osteopenia among females and males was 28.91% and 32.54%, respectively. In females, osteoporosis was significantly higher in T1DM (92%), HyperH (85%), and HypoH (59.26%) compared to PMO (49.34%; P < 0.001). Z score at LS, TF, NOF, and greater trochanter (GT) was consistently lowest in T1DM women. Among men, osteoporosis was significantly higher in T1DM (76.67%) and HypoH (54.55%) compared to andropause (45.45%; P = 0.001). Z score at LS, TF, NOF, GT, and TR was consistently lowest in T1DM men. In GD, the burden of osteoporosis was similar to PMO and andropause. BMD difference among the study groups was not significantly different after adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and vitamin D.

Conclusion:

Low bone mass is extremely common in endocrinopathies, warranting routine screening and intervention. Concomitant vitamin D deficiency compounds the problem. Calcium and vitamin D supplementations may improve bone health in this setting.

Diabetes and Osteoporotic Fractures

The purpose of this article is to present information that will assist the diabetes educator in screening patients with diabetes for risk of osteoporosis and fracture, to offer appropriate treatment options for patients, and to identify potential referrals to other providers for patients with diabetes and increased risk of fracture.

The association between bone turnover markers and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes

Background

Global epidemic of diabetes is a serious health care concern because of its complications and consequently reduced life expectancy and increased morbidity. However, the bone turnover and thus bone health may be affected or even compromised by diabetes and its complications. The aim of this study was to assess whether bone turnover markers are associated with diabetes micro-vascular complications.

Methods

A total of 204 type 2 diabetes patients (104 patients with diabetic micro-vascular complications (retinopathy and/or nephropathy) as a case group and 100 patients without retinopathy and/or nephropathy) as a control group were recruited in this case–control study. The biochemical and metabolic parameters and bone turnover markers were assessed in all patients.

Results

Our findings showed serum levels of osteocalcin (OC) (p = 0.0001) and, carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX) (p = 0.006) were higher in diabetic patients with both diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy compared with control group. However, there was no significant difference in serum levels of procollagen I aminoterminal propeptide (P1NP) between diabetic patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and/or diabetic nephropathy (DN) compared with control.

In diabetes patients with complications, there were significant negative correlation between OC and CTX with estimated-glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) and also positive correlation between each bone marker (OC and CTX) and PTH levels (p = 0.0001) and BUN (p = 0.0001).

In a general linear model, after adjusting for age, sex and BMI, and microvascular complications, there was not any significant association between three bone turnover markers and metabolic markers including fasting glucose, insulin, and lipid profile. Among kidney markers, there were significant positive associations between serum levels of CTX and OC with BUN (p < 0.05) as well as PTH (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Our data suggest the possible role of PTH and BUN levels in modulating bone turnover markers in diabetic patients.

Association of bone mineral density and diabetic retinopathy in diabetic subjects: the 2008-2011 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Because diabetic retinopathy increases fracture risk, we studied the association between bone mineral density (BMD) and diabetic retinopathy in a nationally representative sample. A significant association between the presence of diabetic retinopathy and low BMD was observed. Therefore, diabetic retinopathy might be considered as a marker of low BMD.

INTRODUCTION

Several diabetic complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy, and peripheral neuropathy, are associated with a higher fracture risk in diabetic subjects. However, in contrast to diabetic nephropathy and peripheral neuropathy, which are associated with low bone mineral density (BMD), little is known about the association between BMD and diabetic retinopathy. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy is associated with BMD.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included a nationally representative sample consisting of 4357 men aged 50 years and older and 4392 postmenopausal women who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2008 to 2011 and underwent BMD measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and diabetic retinopathy assessments using seven standard gradable photographs.

RESULTS

The diabetic women with retinopathy had lower mean BMD at all measured sites than those without retinopathy, although the BMD difference between the two groups was small (3-5 %). In addition, the diabetic women with retinopathy were 2.27 times more likely to have osteoporosis following adjustments for all clinically relevant covariates. However, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) or diabetic retinopathy was not associated with the prevalence of osteoporosis in men.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that the presence of diabetic retinopathy is significantly associated with a reduced BMD and increased prevalence of osteoporosis in diabetic women.

MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Mechanisms and evaluation of bone fragility in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) have decreased bone mineral density and an up to sixfold increase in fracture risk. Yet bone fragility is not commonly regarded as another unique complication of diabetes. Both animals with experimentally induced insulin deficiency syndromes and patients with T1DM have impaired osteoblastic bone formation, with or without increased bone resorption. Insulin/IGF1 deficiency appears to be a major pathogenetic mechanism involved, along with glucose toxicity, marrow adiposity, inflammation, adipokine and other metabolic alterations that may all play a role on altering bone turnover. In turn, increasing physical activity in children with diabetes as well as good glycaemic control appears to provide some improvement of bone parameters, although robust clinical studies are still lacking. In this context, the role of osteoporosis drugs remains unknown.

Relationship between mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease and decreased bone mineral density in Chinese adult population

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown ethnic differences in bone and mineral metabolism in healthy people and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there have been few studies regarding CKD and bone mineral density (BMD) in Chinese population. We aimed to explore the relationship between mild-to-moderate CKD and decreased BMD in Chinese adult population.

METHODS

A total of 24,002 adults were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Mild-to-moderate CKD was defined as 30 < estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) with proteinuria greater than 1+. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine. Either osteopenia or osteoporosis was defined as decreased BMD. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the associations with decreased BMD.

RESULTS

The subjects comprised 71.5 % men and 28.5 % women, the age was 49.9 ± 13.9 years. The overall prevalence of CKD was 2.9 %. Decreased BMD was 22.1, 19.9 % had osteopenia, and 2.2 % had osteoporosis. The percentage of patients with decreased BMD, osteopenia and osteoporosis were statistically higher (P < 0.05) in CKD patients compared with those of non-CKD participants, which was 29.5 versus 21.9 %, 25.9 versus 19.8 % and 3.6 versus 2.1 %, respectively. The risk for decreased BMD increased with CKD in a simple logistic analysis. However, the correlation disappeared after adjusted for age, sex, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes and obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with worse renal function have significantly lower BMD, but after adjusted for confounders, mild-to-moderate CKD is not independently associated with decreased BMD.

Prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Increased risk of osteoporosis and its clinical significance in patients with diabetes is controversial. We analyze osteoporosis prevalence and determinants of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Three hundred and ninety-eight consecutive diabetic patients from a single outpatient clinic received a standardized questionnaire on osteoporosis risk factors, and were evaluated for diabetes-related complications, HbA1c levels, and lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD. Of these, 139 (71 men, 68 women) type 1 and 243 (115 men, 128 women) type 2 diabetes patients were included in the study. BMD (T-scores and values adjusted for age, BMI and duration of disease) was compared between patient groups and between patients with type 2 diabetes and population-based controls (255 men, 249 women).

RESULTS

For both genders, adjusted BMD was not different between the type 1 and type 2 diabetes groups but was higher in the type 2 group compared with controls (p < 0.0001). Osteoporosis prevalence (BMD T-score < -2.5 SD) at FN and LS was equivalent in the type 1 and type 2 diabetes groups, but lower in type 2 patients compared with controls (FN: 13.0% vs 21.2%, LS: 6.1% vs 14.9% men; FN: 21.9% vs 32.1%, LS: 9.4% vs 26.9% women). Osteoporosis prevalence was higher at FN-BMD than at LS-BMD. BMD was positively correlated with BMI and negatively correlated with age, but not correlated with diabetes-specific parameters (therapy, HbBA1c, micro- and macrovascular complications) in all subgroups. Fragility fracture prevalence was low (5.2%) and not different between diabetes groups. Fracture patients had lower BMDs compared with those without fractures; however, BMD T-score was above -2.5 SD in most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes-specific parameters did not predict BMD. Fracture occurrence was similar in both diabetes groups and related to lower BMD, but seems unrelated to the threshold T-score, <-2.5 SD. These results suggest that osteoporosis, and related fractures, is a clinically significant and commonly underestimated problem in diabetes patients.

The effect of diabetic neuropathy on foot bones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

It is proposed that diabetic neuropathy may affect peripheral bone. Direct innervation of bone as well as neural control over its vascular supply and muscular influences may be affected by diabetes-induced peripheral neuropathies. Associated changes to bone may contribute to the occurrence of foot bone pathology in this population. This systematic review aims to examine the literature related to the effect of diabetic neuropathy on foot bones.

METHODS

Studies examining relationships between neuropathy and indicators of bone health (e.g. bone mineral density) in populations with diabetes were sought. Relevant publications were obtained from searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase in the period up to March 2013. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model in the statistical package Stata version 12.1.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative synthesis. All studies were cross-sectional or case-control in design. Four of the 10 included studies found results indicating poorer bone health in those with diabetes and neuropathy compared with those with diabetes without neuropathy. Seven of the 10 studies were able to be included in a meta-analysis. The mean pooled effect was -0.36 (95% CI -0.76 to 0.04; P = 0.08), indicating a non-significant trend towards poorer bone health in those with diabetic neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a significant relationship between presence of neuropathy in those with diabetes and poorer peripheral bone health. However, methodological limitations of the included studies mean further research is required to investigate this theoretical relationship.

The alliance of mesenchymal stem cells, bone, and diabetes

Bone fragility has emerged as a new complication of diabetes. Several mechanisms in diabetes may influence bone homeostasis by impairing the action between osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes and/or changing the structural properties of the bone tissue. Some of these mechanisms can potentially alter the fate of mesenchymal stem cells, the initial precursor of the osteoblast. In this review, we describe the main factors that impair bone health in diabetic patients and their clinical impact.

Celiac Disease in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate screening practices for celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes across North America. The research question investigated was whether diabetes centers screen for celiac disease in type 1 diabetes more frequently than other facilities.

Research Design and Methods

A survey with 27 questions on screening practices for celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes was designed by experts in celiac disease and diabetes. Surveys were sent by email to diabetes educators and dietitians throughout the United States and Canada between December 2010 and May 2011.

Results

There were 514 respondents from 484 endocrine clinics, diabetes clinics, private practices, community nutrition centers, and inpatient centers. Thirty-five percent of work locations screened for celiac disease, with endocrine clinics reporting screening at the highest frequency (80%). Tissue transglutaminase was the most common screening test used. The most frequently recommended treatment of confirmed celiac disease was a gluten-free diet. However, only 71% of respondents recommended biopsy in patients with positive serologies. Most respondents (55.3%) reported that the gluten-free diet resulted in symptom improvement in the majority of patients.

Conclusions

Staff at endocrine clinics were more likely to suggest screening for celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. Both low screening frequency as well as inconsistency in management of positive celiac disease serological tests indicated an increase in education regarding celiac disease in patients with type 1 diabetes is required. In addition uniform guidelines should be developed.

Diabetic polyneuropathy relates to bone metabolism and markers of bone turnover in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: greater effects in male patients

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that diabetic polyneuropathy (PNP) is associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD) in type 1 diabetes but little is known about the impact of diabetic PNP on bone metabolism in type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in bone metabolism by measuring markers of bone turnover and BMD in men and postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and diabetic PNP compared with those without PNP. Gender differences were analyzed for both groups of patients.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients with type 2 diabetes, 68 without PNP (43 men, 25 women, mean age 62 [8] years) and 52 with PNP (28 men, 24 women, mean age 64 [8] years) were studied. Clinical parameters with bone turnover biomarkers such as osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase, procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide, and carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen were measured in all patients. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to evaluate BMD was performed in a subgroup of patients.

RESULTS

After controlling for age, body mass index, duration of diabetes, smoking, glycosylated hemoglobin, homeostasis model assessment index for insulin resistance, serum C-reactive protein, creatinine, calcium, gamma-glutamyltransferase, parathyroid and sex hormones levels, presence of micro/macrovascular complications, statin- as well as diabetes-related therapies, levels of carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen and procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide were significantly higher among patients with PNP when compared with patients without PNP (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Differences in bone biomarkers were more pronounced among men with diabetes. BMD did not differ significantly between patients with and without PNP, independent of gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Male patients with PNP exhibit a higher rate of bone turnover than men without PNP. High rate of bone turnover increases the susceptibility for developing osteoporosis. Prevention of diabetic PNP might also reduce the incidence of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Bone, sweet bone--osteoporotic fractures in diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus adversely affects the skeleton and is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The mechanisms underlying low bone strength are not fully understood but could include impaired accrual of peak bone mass and diabetic complications, such as nephropathy. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) affects the skeleton more severely than type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), probably because of the lack of the bone anabolic actions of insulin and other pancreatic hormones. Bone mass can remain high in patients with T2DM, but it does not protect against fractures, as bone quality is impaired. The class of oral antidiabetic drugs known as glitazones can promote bone loss and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women and, therefore, should be avoided if osteoporosis is diagnosed. A physically active, healthy lifestyle and prevention of diabetic complications, along with calcium and vitamin D repletion, represent the mainstay of therapy for osteoporosis in patients with T1DM or T2DM. Assessment of BMD and other risk factors as part of the diagnostic procedure can help design tailored treatment plans. All osteoporosis drugs seem to be effective in patients with diabetes mellitus. Increased awareness of osteoporosis is needed in view of the growing and aging population of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus: what do we know, and what we can do?

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a pandemic and chronic metabolic disorder with substantial morbidity and mortality. In addition, osteoporosis (OP) is a silent disease with a harmful impact on morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this systematic review focuses on the relationship between OP and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Systematic reviews of full-length articles published in English from January 1950 to October 2010 were identified in PubMed and other available electronic databases on the Universiti Sains Malaysia Library Database. The following keywords were used for the search: T2DM, OP, bone mass, skeletal. Studies of more than 50 patients with T2DM were included. Forty-seven studies were identified. The majority of articles (26) showed increased bone mineral density (BMD), while 13 articles revealed decreased BMD; moreover, eight articles revealed normal or no difference in bone mass. There were conflicting results concerning the influence of T2DM on BMD in association with gender, glycemic control, and body mass index. However, patients with T2DM display an increased fracture risk despite a higher BMD, which is mainly attributable to the increased risk of falling. As a conclusion, screening, identification, and prevention of potential risk factors for OP in T2DM patients are crucial and important in terms of preserving a good quality of life in diabetic patients and decreasing the risk of fracture. Patients with T2DM may additionally benefit from early visual assessment, regular exercise to improve muscle strength and balance, and specific measures for preventing falls. Patient education about an adequate calcium and vitamin D intake and regular exercise is important for improving muscle strength and balance. Furthermore, adequate glycemic control and the prevention of diabetic complications are the starting point of therapy in diabetic patients.

The effects of vanadium (V) absorbed by Coprinus comatus on bone in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of vanadium absorbed by Coprinus comatus (VACC) treatment on bone in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. Forty-five Wistar female rats used were divided into three groups: (1) normal rats (control), (2) diabetic rats, and (3) diabetic rats treated with VACC. Normal and diabetic rats were given physiological saline, and VACC-treated rats were administered VACC intragastrically at doses of 0.18 mg vanadium/kg body weight once daily. Treatments were performed over a 12-week period. At sacrifice, one tibia and one femur were removed, subjected to micro computed tomography (micro-CT) for determination of trabecular bone structure, and then processed for histomorphometry to assess bone turnover. Another femoral was used for mechanical testing. In addition, bone samples were collected to evaluate the content of mineral substances in bones. Treatment with VACC increased trabecular bone volume fraction in diabetic rats. Vanadium-treated animals had significant increases in ultimate load, trabecular thickness, and osteoblast surface. However, vanadium treatment did not seem to affect bone stiffness, bone energy absorption, trabecular separation, and osteoclast number. P levels in the femurs of diabetic rats treated with VACC were significantly higher than those of diabetic animals. Ca levels in diabetic and diabetic rats treated with vanadium showed no obvious changes. In conclusion, our results provide an important proof of concept that VACC may represent a powerful approach to treating or reversing diabetic osteopathy in humans.

Osteoporosis and risk of fracture in patients with diabetes: an update

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and osteoporotic fractures are two of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in older subjects. Recent data report a close association between fragility fracture risk and DM of both type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2). However, DM1 is associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD), whereas patients with DM2 generally have normal or increased BMD. This apparent paradox may be explained by the fact that, at a given level of BMD, diabetic patients present lower bone quality with respect to non-diabetics, as shown by several studies reporting that diabetes may affect bone tissue by means of various mechanisms, including hyperinsulinemia, deposition of advanced glycosylation endproducts (AGEs) in collagen, reduced serum levels of IGF-1, hypercalciuria, renal failure, microangiopathy and inflammation. In addition, the propensity to fall and several comorbidities may further explain the higher fracture incidence in DM patients with respect to the general population. It is reasonable to expect that close metabolic control of diabetes may improve bone status, although its effect on reduction of fracture risk has not yet been demonstrated. However, metformin has a direct effect on bone tissue by reducing AGE accumulation, whereas insulin acts directly on osteoclast activity, and thiazolidinediones (TZD) may have a negative effect by switching mesenchymal progenitor cells to adipose rather than bone tissue. New prospects include the incretins, a class of antidiabetic drugs which may play a role linking nutrition and bone metabolism. Better knowledge on how diabetes and its treatments influence bone tissue may lie at the basis of effective prevention of bone fracture in diabetic patients. Thus, close glycemic control, adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, screening for low BMD, and prevention and treatment of diabetic complications are key elements in the management of osteoporosis in both DM1 and DM2. Attention should be paid to treating diabetes with TZD in women with DM2, particularly if elderly. Lastly, patients with osteoporosis and diabetes should be offered the same pharmacological treatments as non-diabetics, although specific trials on the effects of anti-osteoporotic drugs in the diabetic population are lacking.

Autonomic nerve fiber function and bone mineral density in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

AIMS

Experimental models support a role for the sympathetic nervous system in bone metabolism. Beta-adrenoreceptors have been demonstrated on osteoblast-like cells. Beta-blocker use is associated with higher bone mineral density (BMD) in some epidemiologic studies. The aim of this study was to determine if measures of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) were associated with reduced BMD in type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

We studied 66 individuals with type 1 diabetes. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMD and bone mineral content (BMC). Measures of heart rate variability (HRV) (e.g., power spectral analysis, mean circular resultant) and circulating norepinephrine levels were used to evaluate autonomic function.

RESULTS

BMD/BMC were examined by gender for individuals with a normal versus elevated low-frequency (LF) band (expressed in normalized units). No significant differences in BMD/BMC were shown for individuals with an elevated LF band. Direct-entry linear regression models with BMD/BMC as the dependent variable were performed. Duration, gender, BMI, HbA(1c), insulin dose/kg, activity energy expenditure, and measures of HRV were entered as potential independent variables. No measures of HRV, or norepinephrine, were independently associated with BMD/BMC.

CONCLUSIONS

The ANS, as assessed by measures of HRV, does not appear to impact BMD/BMC in type 1 diabetes.

Bone health in diabetes: considerations for clinical management

BACKGROUND

The metabolic and endocrine alterations of diabetes adversely affect bone quantity and/or quality and may increase fracture risk.

SCOPE

A survey of the scientific literature on diabetes and bone cited on PubMed/MEDLINE and published in English from January 1970 to November 2008.

FINDINGS

Subjects with type 1 diabetes have reduced bone mass and increased risk of fragility fracture, while those with type 2 diabetes, despite having normal or above-normal bone mineral density (BMD), are susceptible to low-trauma fractures, especially hip fractures. A recent meta-analysis, involving 836 000 subjects and 139 000 incident cases of fracture, found that type 2 diabetes was associated with significantly increased risks of non-vertebral (relative risk 1.2), hip (relative risk 1.7) and foot (relative risk 1.3) fracture. The association with hip fracture persisted after adjustment for age, physical activity and body weight, and was more pronounced in men and in those with long-standing diabetes. Insulin has an anabolic effect on bone, and the qualitatively different effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on bone mass are consistent with the opposing insulin-secretory states (hypoinsulinaemia vs. hyperinsulinaemia). However, the existence of an elevated fracture risk in type 2 diabetes, despite the underlying hyperinsulinaemia, suggests the involvement of other potential pathogenic influences (e.g., hyperglycaemia, diabetic complications and lifestyle factors) on bone. Animal studies suggest that diabetic bone may be more fragile than non-diabetic bone. Falls arising from diabetes-related comorbidities are another possible cause of low-trauma fracture. Clinical trial findings, supported by bone marker and bone density data, suggest that the oral antidiabetic agents metformin and glibenclamide significantly lower fracture risk, whereas the thiazolidinediones slightly increase fracture risk in postmenopausal women, but not in men, with type 2 diabetes. Recent preclinical studies have helped elucidate the mechanisms underlying the dynamics of bone remodelling, but more research is needed to improve outcomes for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone health is an important consideration in diabetes, and caution should be exercised in prescribing thiazolidinediones to postmenopausal women with low BMD and patients with prior fracture.

Diabetes and osteoporosis

Care of patients with diabetes should include assessment of bone health. The extension of the average life expectancy of people with diabetes, which has accompanied improvements in medical care, has also increased the significance of osteoporosis. In addition to the usual causes of osteoporosis associated with aging, bone health is also compromised by diabetes. Studies on bone involvement in patients with diabetes mellitus have generated conflicting results, largely because of the pathogenetic complexity of the condition. It is now clear that patients with type 1 diabetes have lower bone mineral density (BMD) and a higher risk of fractures. Evidence is emerging that patients with type 2 diabetes who have complications are also at increased risk of certain types of osteoporotic fractures, despite having a higher BMD when compared to patients with type 1 diabetes. Although many factors, including number and type of falls, visual impairment, neuropathy, and reduced muscle strength, influence the probability of fractures, the most significant factor seems to be the strength of the bone itself. Thus, sarcopenia, a reduction in muscle mass and muscle strength, is considered one of the main determinants of bone fragility. The aim of this review is to examine the occurrence of osteoporosis in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy

The classical neurotraumatic and neurotrophic theories for the pathogenesis of the acute Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN) in diabetes, do not address certain key features of the disease. These features include the facts that the condition usually affects just one side, that it is self-limiting, and that it is also very uncommon. Similarly, it is not known to what extent the condition may depend, as suggested by Jean-Martin Charcot, on pre-morbid osteopenia. Recent advances in understanding the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of osteopenia and osteoporosis and the central role of the RANKL/OPG signalling system have, however, suggested the possible involvement of other factors in the evolution of the disease. Specifically, it has been suggested that acute CN may be triggered in a susceptible individual by any event that leads to localized inflammation in the affected foot. This local inflammation leads to a vicious cycle in which there is increasing inflammation, increasing expression of RANKL, and increasing bone breakdown. The likely central role for the RANKL/OPG pathway suggests new possibilities for future treatments.

Osteopenia: a common aspect of Fabry disease. Predictors of bone mineral density

PURPOSE

We investigated the bone mineral status in patients with untreated Fabry disease (FD).

METHODS

Descriptive, cross-sectional study in 53 patients with FD investigating bone mineral density (BMD)/content (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan), bone metabolism (parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, and insulin-like growth factor I), and renal function (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid clearance).

RESULTS

Mean BMD z score at the lumbar spine and femoral neck were -0.05 +/- 1.46 SD and -0.37 +/- 1.02 SD, respectively. Approximately 50% had osteopenia in the hip or lumbar spine and additionally four had osteoporosis. Multivariate analysis including body weight, impaired renal function, and genotype overall explained 48% of the variance in lumbar spine BMD (P < 0.001), whereas body weight, impaired renal function, and menopausal status in the female population accounted for more than 50% of the variation in BMD of both the lumbar spine and femoral neck (both P < 0.001). Twenty percent of patients had hyperparathyroidism. Although the level of parathyroid hormone was significantly associated with impaired renal function, osteocalcin levels were significantly higher in patients with lumbar spine osteopenia or osteoporosis than in those with normal BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteopenia was present in approximately 50% of patients with untreated FD. Whether BMD and bone metabolism will improve after enzyme replacement therapy remains to be established.

Osteoporosis among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Both diabetes and fractures are prevalent in adults. The relationship between diabetes and osteoporosis is complex and, although it has been investigated extensively, the subject remains controversial. While low bone mineral density (BMD) is consistently observed in type 1 diabetes, the relationship is less clear in type 2 diabetes, with some studies reporting modestly increased or unchanged BMD. Both type 1 and type 2 diabetes have been associated with a higher risk of fractures. Despite discrepancies between BMD and fracture rates, clinical trials uniformly support the fact that new bone formation and bone microarchitecture and, thus, bone quality, are altered in both types of diabetes. Although a causal association between diabetes and osteoporosis cannot be established on the basis of existing data, it is possible to conclude from many studies and from a better understanding of the physiopathology of diabetes that it can increase the risk of fractures through skeletal (decreased BMD and bone quality) and extraskeletal (increased risk of falls) factors. Even though osteoporosis screening or prophylactic treatment in all patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes is not being recommended at present, such patient populations should be given general guidelines regarding calcium and vitamin D intakes, exercise and the avoidance of potential risk factors for osteoporosis. The extent of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions should be based on the individual's risk profile for fractures.

Increased bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Studies of bone mineral density (BMD) in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus have shown conflicting results. We conducted this study to determine whether postmenopausal women with diabetes have higher BMD than non-diabetic women of similar age, and to investigate the relationship between BMD and relevant clinical characteristics in these groups of women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed lumbar spine, femoral neck, and radius BMD data and other relevant clinical data for 130 postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 166 non-diabetic women collected during a voluntary screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women without a history of low bone mass or osteoporotic fractures.

RESULTS

Women with type 2 diabetes mellitus had significantly higher mean lumbar spine BMD ( 0.903+/-0.165 vs. 0.824+/-0.199, respectively, P<.001) and mean femoral neck BMD (0.870+/-0.132 vs. 0.832+/-0.134, respectively, P<.05) than non-diabetic women. In both groups of women, age correlated negatively with BMD levels at all three anatomical sites. Higher body mass index was associated only with higher lumbar spine BMD in both groups. Alkaline phosphatase levels showed a negative correlation with BMD at all sites in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

Postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus have higher BMD levels than non-diabetic women with similar clinical characteristics, and require a more scrutinized approach in managing low bone mass.

The causes of the Charcot syndrome

The Charcot syndrome is a rare complication of neuropathy in diabetes and is characterized by an acute inflammatory episode of the foot that is associated with variable degrees of dislocation, fracture, and deformity. It has no single cause but represents the final common pathway in people who are predisposed to its development by the varying overlap of several different factors. The association of the active phase of the disease with inflammation, increasing osteopenia, and increasing calcification of the arterial walls strongly suggests, however, the involvement of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) cytokine pathway, which is closely involved in all three processes. The evidence for increased expression of RANKL and OPG in diabetes and neuropathy as well as its potential significance is reviewed.

Increased cathepsin K and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase expression in bone of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

The effect of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) on bone metabolism was evaluated using the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rat 1 week after the induction of diabetes. The urinary excretion of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTx) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpd) in diabetic rats increased to 3.6-fold and 1.2-fold the control level, respectively. The amount of hydroxyproline and calcium in the distal femur of diabetic rats significantly decreased to 76% and 90% of the control, respectively. The levels of serum osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in the distal femur of the diabetic rats were significantly reduced to about 40% and 70% of the control levels, respectively. The decrease in the expression osteocalcin was observed in distal femur of the diabetic rats, although the level of ALP mRNA was unchanged. The activity and the mRNA level of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) increased to 1.5- and 2.3-fold the control level, respectively, in distal femur of the diabetic rats. The activity, protein, and mRNA levels of cathepsin K of diabetic rats also elevated to about 2-, 2.3-, and 2-fold the control levels, respectively. These results suggest that IDDM contributes to bone loss through changes in gene expression of TRAP and cathepsin K in osteoclasts as well as osteocalcin in osteoblasts resulting in increased bone resorptive activity and decreased bone formation.

Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes--a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Diabetes affects bone metabolism. The hypothesis was that type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) affects BMD and fracture risk differently.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using the terms "diabetes", "fracture", and "bone mineral".

RESULTS

Hip fracture risk was increased in T1D (RR = 6.94, 95% CI: 3.25-14.78, five studies) and T2D (1.38, 95% CI: 1.25-1.53, eight studies) compared to subjects without diabetes. The increase in relative hip fracture risk was significantly higher in T1D than in T2D. BMD Z-score was decreased in the spine (mean +/- SEM -0.22 +/- 0.01) and hip (-0.37 +/- 0.16) in T1D and increased in the spine (0.41 +/- 0.01) and hip (0.27 +/- 0.01) in T2D. A meta-regression showed that body mass index (BMI) was a major determinant for BMD in both the spine and hip. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) was not linked to BMD. The increase in fracture risk was higher and BMD lower in patients with complications to diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip fracture risk is increased in both T1D and T2D, whereas BMD is increased in T2D and decreased in T1D. A common factor such as complications may explain the increase in fracture risk, whereas BMI may ameliorate the increase in fracture risk in T2D.

Reduced peripheral nerve function is related to lower hip BMD and calcaneal QUS in older white and black adults: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study

Bone tissue is innervated, and peripheral nerve function may impact BMD. Older black and white men and women (N = 2200) in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study with worse sensory and motor peripheral nerve function had lower hip BMD and calcaneal BUA independent of lean mass, strength, physical ability, and diabetes. Poor peripheral nerve function may directly affect bone.

INTRODUCTION

Bone tissue is innervated, yet little is known about the impact of nerve function on BMD. Poor peripheral nerve function may contribute to lower BMD and higher fracture risk, particularly in those with diabetic neuropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study included annual exams in white and black men and women 70-79 years of age recruited from Pittsburgh and Memphis. Nerve function in legs/feet was assessed by 1.4- and 10-g monofilament detection, vibration threshold, and peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and amplitude (CMAP). Total hip BMD, heel broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and total fat and lean mass were measured 1 year later (QDR 4500A, Sahara QUS; Hologic).

RESULTS

Participants (N = 2200) were 48% men and 37% black. Poor nerve function (lower monofilament detection, higher vibration threshold, lower CMAP, lower NCV) was associated with 1.4-5.7% lower BUA and significant for all but NCV, adjusted for demographics, diabetes, body composition, and physical ability. Results were similar for adjusted hip BMD, with 1.0-2.9% lower BMD, significant for monofilament and CMAP testing. When considering the components of BMD, total hip area was 1.8-4.9% higher in those with the worst nerve function, although BMC showed little difference. Lower monofilament detection and CMAP were independently associated with lower heel BUA (p < 0.01), and monofilament detection was associated with lower hip BMD (p < 0.05) in regression additionally adjusted for lifestyle factors, bone-active medications, and diabetes-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor peripheral nerve function may directly related to lower BMD, likely through an increase in bone area in older adults, independent of lean mass, strength, physical ability, and diabetes. Whether those with impaired nerve function are at higher risk for fracture independent of falls needs to be studied.

Middle-aged premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes have lower bone mineral density and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound than nondiabetic women

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether middle-aged premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes had more self-reported fractures and lower bone mineral density (BMD) compared with nondiabetic women.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants were premenopausal women aged 35-55 years with type 1 diabetes (n = 67; 32.2 +/- 5.3 years duration) and without diabetes (n = 237). Total hip, femoral neck, whole-body, and spine BMD were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) was assessed with quantitative ultrasound.

RESULTS

Women with type 1 diabetes were more likely to report a fracture after age 20 years compared with nondiabetic women (33.3 vs. 22.6%; age-adjusted odds ratio 1.89 [95% CI 1.02-3.49]). Type 1 diabetes was associated with lower total hip BMD (0.890 vs. 0.961 g/cm2; P < 0.001), femoral neck BMD (0.797 vs. 0.847 g/cm2; P = 0.001), whole-body BMD (1.132 vs. 1.165 g/cm2; P < 0.01), and lower calcaneal BUA (71.6 vs. 84.9 dB/MHz; P < 0.001) after multivariate adjustment. BMD was 3-8% lower in type 1 diabetic compared with control women and calcaneal BUA was 15% lower. Spine BMD and biomarkers of bone remodeling were not significantly different between groups. In the type 1 diabetic women, reduced monofilament detection and blindness were both associated with lower BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower BMD in premenopausal women with type 1 diabetes may substantially increase their risk of developing osteoporosis after menopause. Type 1 diabetic women should be targeted for osteoporosis screening and possible fracture prevention as they transition through menopause.

Theories concerning the pathogenesis of the acute charcot foot suggest future therapy

The acute Charcot foot is characterized by bone fracture and dislocation, and is a rare complication of distal symmetrical neuropathy in diabetes. The cause is unknown, but it cannot be attributed solely to loss of protective sensation. However, recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of osteoclast activation have suggested that the key abnormality may lie in an enhanced inflammatory response to injury, which is itself linked to increased bone lysis. The recognition that the acute Charcot foot is essentially an inflammatory arthropathy suggests new options for the management of this potentially devastating condition.

Increased bone density and decreased bone turnover, but no evident alteration of fracture susceptibility in elderly women with diabetes mellitus

Bone density, bone turnover and fracture susceptibility were evaluated in 1,132 randomly recruited women, all 75 years old. Seventy-four of the women had diabetes, while 1,058 women did not. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the hip and lumbar spine was investigated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bone mass of the calcaneus was measured by ultrasound. Urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine (U-DPD/Crea) and serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen (S-CTX) were assessed as markers of bone resorption. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (S-bone ALP) and serum osteocalcin (S-OC) were assessed as markers of bone formation. Also, serum 25(OH) vitamin D and serum parathyroid hormone (S-PTH) were assessed. Fracture susceptibility was evaluated retrospectively and prospectively for up to 6.5 years. In diabetic women, the aBMD of the femoral neck was 11% higher (p<0.001), and BMD of the lumbar spine was 8% higher (p=0.002) than in non-diabetic women. There was no difference in bone mass by ultrasound of the calcaneus. Women with diabetes had higher BMD of the femoral neck (p<0.001) and lumbar spine (p=0.03) also after correction for differences in body weight. In diabetic women, U-DPD/Crea, S-CTX, and S-OC were decreased when compared with non-diabetic women (p=0.001 or less). After correction for covariance of body weight and plasma creatinine, S-CTX (p<0.001) and S-OC (p<0.001) were still lower in the diabetic women. Diabetic patients had hypovitaminosis D (p=0.008), a difference explained by differences in time spent outdoors and body weight. S-PTH did not differ between the groups. Women with diabetes had no more lifetime fractures (52%) than women without diabetic disease (57%), (p=0.31). This study shows that elderly women with diabetes and without severe renal insufficiency have high bone mass and low bone turnover. The high bone mass and low bone turnover is not likely to have a strong influence on fracture susceptibility.

Elevated hip fracture risk in type 1 diabetic patients: a population-based cohort study in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

Patients with type 1 diabetes often have low bone mineral density, but epidemiological data on fracture risk are sparse and imprecise, particularly for men.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In the Swedish Inpatient Register, we identified a population-based cohort of 24,605 patients (12,551 men and 12,054 women) who were hospitalized for diabetes before age 31 years during 1975 through 1998. Follow-up for hip fracture was accomplished through cross-linkage in the Inpatient Register until the end of 1998. Censoring information was obtained from the registers of Death and Migration. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we calculated the cumulative probability of getting a hip fracture. Standardized hospitalization ratios and their 95% CIs estimated relative risks with the age-, sex-, and calendar period-matched Swedish general population as reference.

RESULTS

In total, 70 and 51 first hip fractures were ascertained in men and women, respectively, corresponding to a cumulative probability (both sexes) of 65.8/1,000 until age 65 years. Markedly elevated risks were observed in both men and women (standardized hospitalization ratios = 7.6 [95% CI 5.9-9.6] and 9.8 [7.3-12.9], respectively), increasing with follow-up time. Ophthalmic, nephropathic, neurological, and cardiovascular complications were indicators of particularly high risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Both male and female type 1 diabetic patients are at increased risk for hip fracture. Although optimal preventive measures still need to be defined, the co-occurrence with other diabetes complications suggests that tighter metabolic control might reduce the risk.

Is insulin an anabolic agent in bone? Dissecting the diabetic bone for clues

Diabetic osteoporosis is increasingly recognized as a significant comorbidity of type 1 diabetes mellitus. In contrast, type 2 diabetes mellitus is more commonly associated with modest increases in bone mineral density for age. Despite this dichotomy, clinical, in vivo, and in vitro data uniformly support the concept that new bone formation as well as bone microarchitectural integrity are altered in the diabetic state, leading to an increased risk for fragility fracture and inadequate bone regeneration following injury. In this review, we examine the contribution that insulin, as a potential anabolic agent in bone, may make to the pathophysiology of diabetic bone disease. Specifically, we have assimilated human and animal data examining the effects of endogenous insulin production, exogenous insulin administration, insulin sensitivity, and insulin signaling on bone. In so doing, we present evidence that insulin, acting as an anabolic agent in bone, can preserve and increase bone density and bone strength, presumably through direct and/or indirect effects on bone formation.

Abnormalities of vasomotor regulation in the pathogenesis of the acute charcot foot of diabetes mellitus

The acute Charcot foot complicates distal symmetrical neuropathy but is remarkably rare. This article reviews the multiple processes that may complicate both diabetes and neuropathy and might, in turn, explain the association of features that are typical of this disorder: osteolysis, vascular calcification in association with intact lower limb blood flow, and uncontrolled inflammation. Specifically, it is suggested that the disorder arises because of abnormal expression of the nuclear transcription factor, NFkappaB, in diabetic neuropathy and that this is further enhanced at the onset of the acute arthropathy as a result of the release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1. These proinflammatory cytokines and RANKL may then enter a cycle of mutual augmentation, and this is a factor that underlies the continuing inflammation that characterizes the disorder. If this hypothesis is confirmed, it would suggest the option of new effective treatments for this sometimes devastating disorder.

Calcaneal bone mineral density in patients with Charcot neuropathic osteoarthropathy: differences between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To measure bone density and neuropathy in both feet in Type 1 and Type 2 patients with unilateral Charcot osteoarthropathy and controls.

METHODS

Calcaneal bone density, temperature and vibration thresholds were compared between 17 Type 1 diabetic patients with osteoarthropathy and 47 Type 1 controls and between 18 Type 2 diabetic patients and 48 Type 2 controls. As well as the Charcot foot, the non-Charcot foot was studied to assess osteopenia at onset of osteoarthropathy.

RESULTS

In Type 1 diabetes, bone density was reduced in the non-Charcot foot compared with controls [Z-score: -1.7 ({-1.9}-{-1.4}) vs. -0.2 ({-1.1}-{0.5}), P < 0.0001, median (interquartile range)]; but not in Type 2 diabetes [Z-score: 0.15 ({-0.45}-{0.85}) vs. 0.3 ({-0.5}-{0.9}), P = 0.675]. Bone density in the Charcot foot was lower compared with the non-Charcot foot in both Type 1 [Z-score: -2.0 ({-2.8}-{-1.4}) vs. -1.7 ({-1.9}-{-1.4}), P = 0.018] and Type 2 diabetes [Z-score: -0.2 ({-1.4}-{0.1}) vs. 0.3 ({-0.5}-{0.9}), P = 0.001]. In Type 1 diabetes, bone density of the non-Charcot foot was reduced compared with that in Type 2 (P < 0.0001). Body mass index was lower in Type 1 than in Type 2 Charcot patients (P = 0.007). Type 2 patients had high temperature (P = 0.001) and vibration thresholds (P < 0.0001) in the non-Charcot foot compared with Type 2 controls whereas Type 1 patients had a high temperature threshold (P = 0.01) but not vibration threshold compared with Type 1 controls (P = 0.077).

CONCLUSION

Bone density was reduced in the non-Charcot foot in Type 1 but not in Type 2 diabetes. Type 2 patients had high temperature and vibration thresholds in contrast to Type 1 patients who had a high temperature threshold only.

Vascular calcification and osteolysis in diabetic neuropathy-is RANK-L the missing link?

Diabetic neuropathy is associated with osteopenia and calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells. These changes are most marked in patients with acute neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot foot), in which osteopenia is universal and the prevalence of vascular calcification exceeds 90%. While it has been thought that both osteopenia and vascular calcification may be linked to sympathetic denervation with increased peripheral limb perfusion, the cellular mechanism was not clear. However, the recent recognition that the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANK-L)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) signalling pathway is central to the processes regulating bone turnover in a wide variety of medical conditions has raised the possibility that the same cytokines may be involved in the osteolysis which accompanies diabetic neuropathy. This is made more likely by the realisation that the RANK-L/OPG pathway is also thought to mediate the calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells in coronary and peripheral vascular disease. The circumstantial evidence underpinning this hypothesis is reviewed here, and it is suggested that the unregulated activation of RANK-L-mediated effects on bone and arteries may be triggered by the loss of nerve-derived peptides, e.g. calcitonin gene-related peptide, which normally exert a moderating influence on the pathway.