Short administration of metformin improves insulin sensitivity in android obese subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

AMPK-Dependent YAP Inhibition Mediates the Protective Effect of Metformin against Obesity-Associated Endothelial Dysfunction and Inflammation

Hyperglycemia is a crucial risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Chronic inflammation is a central characteristic of obesity, leading to many of its complications. Recent studies have shown that high glucose activates Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP) by suppressing AMPK activity in breast cancer cells. Metformin is a commonly prescribed anti-diabetic drug best known for its AMPK-activating effect. However, the role of YAP in the vasoprotective effect of metformin in diabetic endothelial cell dysfunction is still unknown. The present study aimed to investigate whether YAP activation plays a role in obesity-associated endothelial dysfunction and inflammation and examine whether the vasoprotective effect of metformin is related to YAP inhibition. Reanalysis of the clinical sequencing data revealed YAP signaling, and the YAP target genes CTGF and CYR61 were upregulated in aortic endothelial cells and retinal fibrovascular membranes from diabetic patients. YAP overexpression impaired endothelium-dependent relaxations (EDRs) in isolated mouse aortas and increased the expression of YAP target genes and inflammatory markers in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). High glucose-activated YAP in HUVECs and aortas was accompanied by increased production of oxygen-reactive species. AMPK inhibition was found to induce YAP activation, resulting in increased JNK activity. Metformin activated AMPK and promoted YAP phosphorylation, ultimately improving EDRs and suppressing the JNK activity. Targeting the AMPK-YAP-JNK axis could become a therapeutic strategy for alleviating vascular dysfunction in obesity and diabetes.

Prediabetes: to treat or not to treat?

The incidence of diabetes is continuously increasing worldwide. Pre-diabetes (defined as impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose or both) represents an intermediate state, which often progresses to overt diabetes within a few years. In addition, pre-diabetes may be associated with increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Thus, reverting a pre-diabetic state as well as preventing the development of diabetes represents enormous challenge for the clinician. Lifestyle modification in pre-diabetic individuals was found particularly effective in the prevention of diabetes. However, compliance to lifestyle modification measures can be a crucial problem in the everyday clinical practice, especially in developing countries. During the last decade many studies support the use of anti-diabetic treatment schemes in pre-diabetic subjects to be advantageous. The American Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) as well as other minor studies and meta-analyses has convincingly demonstrated the efficacy of metformin in this patient group. In addition, results of the 10 year DPP follow up have recently been published, demonstrating the long term safety and sustainability of metformin treatment benefits in this population. In contrast to metformin, the evidence from the use of other anti-diabetic agents (thiazolidinediones, a-glucosidase inhibitors, incretin mimetics) in pre-diabetic individuals is rather inadequate and prospective data is further needed. Furthermore, large scale studies with hard clinical endpoints are needed to delineate the effect of pre-diabetes treatment on macro- and microvascular complications. In conclusion, several strategies of patient management, mainly lifestyle modification and pharmacological interventions can prevent diabetes development in subjects diagnosed with pre-diabetes or even revert pre-diabetic state. However, whether this biochemical improvement can be translated into actual clinical benefit remains to be established.

Antidiabetic agents in subjects with mild dysglycaemia: prevention or early treatment of type 2 diabetes?

Besides lifestyle, various pharmacological treatments have proven their efficacy to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals, especially in those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Major placebo-controlled clinical trials demonstrated favourable effects of various glucose-lowering drugs generally used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, i.e. metformin, acarbose and thiazolidinediones (glitazones). These trials showed a lower rate of progression to overt diabetes and a higher regression rate to a normal glucose status with active treatment as compared to placebo after a follow up of several years. Ongoing trials should confirm such a favourable effect with those drugs and may demonstrate a similar protective effect with other pharmacological approaches such as glinides or even basal insulin regimen. However, the reported favourable effects were generally observed while the subjects were still on treatment, and partially vanished after a rather short period of wash-out of several weeks. Therefore, the distinction between a true preventing effect and simply a masking effect is difficult with glucose-lowering drugs. In addition, as type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease, it is still questionable whether the effect corresponds to a prevention effect or only to a postponing of the development of the disease. Owing to the pathophysiology of the disease, the only way to block the progression of type 2 diabetes is probably to avoid the progressive loss of beta-cell function and/or mass. Whatsoever, these data obtained in large clinical trials bring further argument to support early treatment of diabetes, even at a prediabetic state, in order to stop the vicious circle leading to an inevitable deterioration of glycaemia in predisposed subjects.

Pathophysiological implications of insulin resistance on vascular endothelial function

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance is a key component of the insulin resistance syndrome and is a crucially important metabolic abnormality in Type 2 diabetes. Insulin-resistant individuals are at significantly increased risk of cardiovascular disease, although the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. The endothelium is thought to play a critical role in maintaining vascular homeostasis, a process dependent on the balance between the production of nitric oxide, superoxide and other vasoactive substances. Endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated in insulin-resistant states in animals and humans and may represent an important early event in the development of atherosclerosis. Insulin resistance may be linked to endothelial dysfunction by a number of mechanisms, including disturbances of subcellular signalling pathways common to both insulin action and nitric oxide production. Other potential unifying links include the roles of oxidant stress, endothelin, the renin angiotensin system and the secretion of hormones and cytokines by adipose tissue. Lifestyle measures and drug therapies which improve insulin sensitivity and ameliorate endothelial dysfunction may be important in delaying the progression to overt cardiovascular disease in at risk individuals.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search using Medline, restricted to articles published in the English language between 1966 and the present, and reviewed bibliographies of relevant articles. An initial search strategy employing combinations of the MeSH terms: insulin resistance; endothelium, vascular; insulin; nitric oxide or hyperinsulinaemia produced over 300 references. Focused searches using keywords relevant to the molecular aspects of endothelial function and insulin signalling, and lifestyle or pharmacological interventions relevant to insulin resistance or endothelial function, produced over 300 further references. Abstracts of all references were screened before selecting those relevant to this review.

Thiazolidinedione therapy: the benefits of aggressive and early use in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is now a global epidemic, with the number of people affected worldwide predicted to more than double to 300 million by the year 2025. While the importance of good glycemic control in countering the microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes is widely recognized, monotherapy with sulfonylureas or metformin achieves target blood glucose levels in only a minority of patients. Consequently, there is a pressing need for new treatment strategies that are more effective in providing sustained glycemic control and so reducing the burden of morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes and its complications. There is growing evidence of the benefits of early intervention with aggressive treatment strategies in improving glycemic control and reducing diabetic complications. To provide sustained control, such strategies need to address the combination of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction that underlies most cases of type 2 diabetes. At the same time, treatment needs to address not only glycemic control but also the range of cardiovascular risk factors that are often found clustered together in patients with type 2 diabetes. This paper reviews the rationale and evidence for early combination therapy including a thiazolidinedione in improving glycemic control, and considers the potential for such aggressive therapy in reducing diabetic complications.

Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance

Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a world-wide growing health problem affecting more than 150 million people at the beginning of the new millennium. It is believed that this number will double in the next 25 yr. The pathophysiological hallmarks of type 2 diabetes mellitus consist of insulin resistance, pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction, and increased endogenous glucose production. To reduce the marked increase of cardiovascular mortality of type 2 diabetic subjects, optimal treatment aims at normalization of body weight, glycemia, blood pressure, and lipidemia. This review focuses on the pathophysiology and molecular pathogenesis of insulin resistance and on the capability of antihyperglycemic pharmacological agents to treat insulin resistance, i.e., a-glucosidase inhibitors, biguanides, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and insulin. Finally, a rational treatment approach is proposed based on the dynamic pathophysiological abnormalities of this highly heterogeneous and progressive disease.

Oral administration of RAC-alpha-lipoic acid modulates insulin sensitivity in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus: a placebo-controlled pilot trial

Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA), a naturally occuring compound and a radical scavenger was shown to enhance glucose transport and utilization in different experimental and animal models. Clinical studies described an increase of insulin sensitivity after acute and short-term (10 d) parenteral administration of ALA. The effects of a 4-week oral treatment with alpha-lipoic acid were evaluated in a placebo-controlled, multicenter pilot study to determine see whether oral treatment also improves insulin sensitivity. Seventy-four patients with type-2 diabetes were randomized to either placebo (n = 19); or active treatment in various doses of 600 mg once daily (n = 19), twice daily (1200 mg; n = 18), or thrice daily (1800 mg; n = 18) alpha-lipoic acid. An isoglycemic glucose-clamp was done on days 0 (pre) and 29 (post). In this explorative study, analysis was done according to the number of subjects showing an improvement of insulin sensitivity after treatment. Furthermore, the effects of active vs. placebo treatment on insulin sensitivity was compared. All four groups were comparable and had a similar degree of hyperglycemia and insulin sensitivity at baseline. When compared to placebo, significantly more subjects had an increase in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (MCR) after ALA treatment in each group. As there was no dose effect seen in the three different alpha-lipoic acid groups, all subjects receiving ALA were combined in the "active" group and then compared to placebo. This revealed significantly different changes in MCR after treatment (+27% vs. placebo; p < .01). This placebo-controlled explorative study confirms previous observations of an increase of insulin sensitivity in type-2 diabetes after acute and chronic intravenous administration of ALA. The results suggest that oral administration of alpha-lipoic acid can improve insulin sensitivity in patients with type-2 diabetes. The encouraging findings of this pilot trial need to be substantiated by further investigations.

Effects of current therapeutic interventions on insulin resistance

Although diet and exercise remain the cornerstones of type 2 diabetes therapy, attempts at lifestyle changes seldom result in the achievement of glycaemic control. As a result, the addition of pharmacological agents is usually necessary. Currently available treatment options improve glycaemic control in the short term; however, maintaining long-term glycaemic control, halting disease progression, and preventing the complications of type 2 diabetes have all proven to be elusive therapeutic goals. For more than 30 years, sulphonylureas (SUs) have been first-line therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes. These compounds control hyperglycaemia by stimulating insulin release from pancreatic beta cells, and thus their benefits are limited to patients with preserved beta-cell function. Despite historic reliance on these agents to treat type 2 diabetes, long-term use of SUs may desensitize beta cells. The meglitinides (e.g. repaglinide) are a new class of non-sulphonylurea secretagogues that bind to a different receptor on the beta cell. Repaglinide has a short duration of action and may be useful for the treatment of postprandial hyperglycaemia. The biguanides (e.g. metformin) represent another class of antidiabetic agents and improve glycaemic control primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output. Metformin and SUs provide similar glucose-lowering effects, and, in combination, may provide additional benefits in some patients. Reducing the rate of glucose absorption with alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (e.g. acarbose) has been explored as an alternative approach to the management of postprandial hyperglycaemia, but these agents do not address the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Eventually, prolonged overproduction of insulin to compensate for hyperglycaemia leads to dramatically reduced beta-cell function, and exogenous insulin therapy is required.

Prevention of type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is a major cause of morbidity and mortality resulting from its microangiopathic and macroangiopathic complications. Current approaches to its management and to the prevention of diabetic complications are difficult to implement effectively, and there is little evidence to date that these approaches are reducing the impact of this disease. The recognition that type 2 diabetes usually has a prolonged prediabetic phase raises the possibility that the emergence of hyperglycemia and the atherosclerotic complications associated with diabetes may be preventable by the institution of early treatment modalities. Sufficient data suggest that life-style modification or pharmacotherapy directed at improving insulin sensitivity or insulin secretion in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance may reduce progression to diabetes. Two long-term prospective, controlled trials have been initiated to test this hypothesis.

Evidence for dissociation of insulin- and weight-reducing effects of metformin in non-diabetic male patients with coronary heart disease

Metformin effects on insulin resistance and insulin/glucose relationships during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were investigated in 60 non-diabetic male patients previously treated with coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty in an open, 12 week prospective study. During a 4 week run-in period, all patients were treated with diet and lifestyle advice and lovastatin 40 mg daily. Lovastatin treatment was continued in all the patient throughout the study. After randomization, the metformin group got additional treatment with metformin up to 2000 mg/day. Fasting plasma glucose levels and glucose area during OGTT remained unaffected by metformin treatment. Insulin resistance, assessed as the insulin area/glucose area ratio during OGTT decreased by 24% (P = 0.028) in the whole group and by 30% in obese subjects (P = 0.049). Notably, the reduction in body weight by metformin treatment did not correlate with amelioration of insulin resistance or changes in lipid levels. However, changes in insulin resistance correlated with changes in lipid levels. Hence, metformin effects on insulin resistance and body weight appear to be mediated, at least partly, by different mechanisms, while metformin effects on insulin resistance and lipid metabolism are associated in non-diabetic subjects.

Treatment with the oral antidiabetic agent troglitazone improves beta cell responses to glucose in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is associated with defects in both insulin secretion and action and carries a high risk for conversion to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Troglitazone, an insulin sensitizing agent, reduces glucose concentrations in subjects with NIDDM and IGT but is not known to affect insulin secretion. We sought to determine the role of beta cell function in mediating improved glucose tolerance. Obese subjects with IGT received 12 wk of either 400 mg daily of troglitazone (n = 14) or placebo (n = 7) in a randomized, double-blind design. Study measures at baseline and after treatment were glucose and insulin responses to a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, insulin sensitivity index (SI) assessed by a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test, insulin secretion rates during a graded glucose infusion, and beta cell glucose-sensing ability during an oscillatory glucose infusion. Troglitazone reduced integrated glucose and insulin responses to oral glucose by 10% (P = 0.03) and 39% (P = 0.003), respectively. SI increased from 1.3+/-0.3 to 2.6+/-0.4 x 10(-)5min-1pM-1 (P = 0.005). Average insulin secretion rates adjusted for SI over the glucose interval 5-11 mmol/liter were increased by 52% (P = 0.02), and the ability of the beta cell to entrain to an exogenous oscillatory glucose infusion, as evaluated by analysis of spectral power, was improved by 49% (P = 0.04). No significant changes in these parameters were demonstrated in the placebo group. In addition to increasing insulin sensitivity, we demonstrate that troglitazone improves the reduced beta cell response to glucose characteristic of subjects with IGT. This appears to be an important factor in the observed improvement in glucose tolerance.