1
|
Helm A, Shaffer P, Gonzalez G, Li W, Olmstead T, Berlowitz D, Epstein E, Smelson D. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial examining psychosocial enhancement and standard medication treatment for co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders: A half fractional factorial randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 145:107668. [PMID: 39163904 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The opioid epidemic disproportionately affects individuals with co-occurring opioid use and mental health disorders (COD), who often have poor treatment engagement. Multicomponent treatment models are popular solutions to increase treatment access and engagement for those with COD. Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION) is a hybrid multicomponent linkage and treatment approach that provides assertive community outreach combined with psychosocial treatment. This protocol paper describes a randomized controlled trial comparing MISSION and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), its multicomponent parts along with MOUD, and MOUD treatment as usual (TAU) to assess improvements in health and social outcomes. METHODS This study will use a half fractional factorial design and randomize 1000 patients with COD to one of five treatment conditions: (1) the full MISSION intervention plus MOUD; (2-4) a combination of two out of three MISSION components plus MOUD; or (5) TAU. Secondary aims include examination of mechanisms of action, economic evaluation of the implementation of MISSION and/or its components plus MOUD versus TAU, and exploratory predictive modeling to match optimal MISSION parts with patient needs. DISCUSSION This randomized controlled trial will help determine the effectiveness of MISSION (or its parts) and MOUD compared to TAU to improve engagement in treatment, substance use, and mental health symptoms. This trial is the first to compare MISSION and its parts with MOUD versus TAU in a real-world treatment scenario to determine which components are necessary and sufficient to drive treatment outcomes according to patient needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Helm
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Systems Science, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | - Paige Shaffer
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Systems Science, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Gerardo Gonzalez
- McLean Addiction Treatment Program at Naukeag, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wenjun Li
- Department of Public Health, Center for Health Statistics and Biostatistics Core, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
| | - Todd Olmstead
- Department of Public & Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Berlowitz
- Department of Public Health, Center for Health Statistics and Biostatistics Core, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Epstein
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - David Smelson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Systems Science, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Drazdowski TK, Castedo de Martell S, Sheidow AJ, Chapman JE, McCart MR. Leveraging Parents and Peer Recovery Supports to Increase Recovery Capital in Emerging Adults With Polysubstance Use: Protocol for a Feasibility, Acceptability, and Appropriateness Study of Launch. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e60671. [PMID: 39037768 DOI: 10.2196/60671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emerging adults (aged 18-26 years) are the most at-risk yet underserved age group among people with substance use disorder, especially rural emerging adults, and polysubstance use is common. Recovery capital is lower among emerging adults than older adults, and evidence-based treatments are typically unavailable or not developmentally tailored, especially in rural areas. Both supportive parents (or parental figures) and peer recovery support services (PRSS) can be leveraged to better support these emerging adults. Previous research indicates parents can be engaged to deliver contingency management (CM), an extensively researched evidence-based intervention for substance use. OBJECTIVE This protocol describes a funded pilot of Launch, a novel, scalable service package that pairs web-based coaching for parents to deliver CM for emerging adults (CM-EA) at home and in-person PRSS with educational and vocational goal setting. Specifically, this protocol describes feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness testing (implementation-related outcomes) and steps taken to prepare for a future large-scale trial of Launch. METHODS Upon the recruitment of 48 emerging adult and parent pairs from sites serving primarily rural clients, participants will be randomized into 1 of 3 conditions for this randomized controlled trial: virtual parent coaching to deliver CM-EA, in-person PRSS for emerging adults, or both sets of services. Emerging adult eligibility includes polysubstance use, a substance use disorder, and availability of a consenting parent. Emerging adults will be interviewed at baseline and 6 months about substance use, quality of life, recovery capital, parental relationship, and Launch implementation-related outcomes (6-month follow-up only). Parents, peer workers delivering PRSS, and parent CM-EA coaches will be interviewed about implementation-related outcomes at the end of the study period. Peer workers and CM-EA coaches will be asked to complete checklists of services delivered after each session. Finally, payers and providers will be interviewed for additional insights into Launch implementation and to identify key outcomes of Launch. Data analysis for emerging adult outcomes will be primarily descriptive, but parent CM-EA training adherence will be assessed using nested mixed-effects regression models of repeated measures. RESULTS Launch is currently ongoing, with funding received in August 2023, and is expected to end in September 2025, with data analysis and results in December 2026. Participants are expected to begin enrolling in June 2024. CONCLUSIONS While this pilot is limited by the small sample size and restriction to emerging adults with an involved parent, this is mitigated by the study's strengths and is appropriate for the pilot stage. Launch uses an innovative combination of existing strategies to generate better outcomes for emerging adults while remaining scalable. This pilot will provide insights into the feasibility and acceptability of Launch from the perspectives of service recipients, providers, and payers to inform a larger-scale effectiveness trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06414993; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06414993. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/60671.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess K Drazdowski
- Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL, United States
| | | | - Ashli J Sheidow
- Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL, United States
| | - Jason E Chapman
- Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, Bloomington, IL, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Polcin DL, Mahoney E, Witbrodt J, Subbaraman M, Mericle AA. Outcomes Among Sober Living House Residents Who Relapse: Role of Recovery Capital. J Psychoactive Drugs 2024; 56:433-441. [PMID: 37326458 PMCID: PMC10724373 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2023.2225502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Studies show individuals living in residential recovery homes on average make significant improvements in multiple areas of functioning. Residents who achieve and maintain complete abstinence have particularly good outcomes. Residents who relapse after entering the houses have been studied minimally. The current study examined outcomes for 197 residents who relapsed within six months after entering sober living houses (SLHs), which is one type of residential recovery home that is common in California. Despite having relapsed, these residents made significant improvements between entry into the house and 6-month follow-up on measures of percent days abstinent from alcohol and drugs (PDA), psychiatric symptoms, severity of employment problems, and stable housing. Higher recovery capital predicted higher PDA (coefficient = 0.28, SE = 0.09, p = .001) and lower severity of employment problems (coefficient = -0.00, SE = 0.00, p = .007). Recovery capital showed a significant decrease between baseline and 6-month follow-up among persons who relapsed and were no longer living in the house. SLH providers can draw upon social model recovery principles to enhance recovery capital. However, residents should also seek other sources of recovery capital outside the SLH, which may be particularly important for individuals who leave the home.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas L. Polcin
- Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California
| | - Elizabeth Mahoney
- Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California
| | - Jane Witbrodt
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| | - Meenakshi Subbaraman
- Behavioral Health and Recovery Studies, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California
| | - Amy A. Mericle
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sondhi A, Bunaciu A, Best D, Hennessy EA, Best J, Leidi A, Grimes A, Conner M, DeTriquet R, White W. Modeling Recovery Housing Retention and Program Outcomes by Justice Involvement among Residents in Virginia, USA: An Observational Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY 2024:306624X241254691. [PMID: 38855808 DOI: 10.1177/0306624x241254691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Living in recovery housing can improve addiction recovery and desistance outcomes. This study examined whether retention in recovery housing and types of discharge outcomes (completed, "neutral," and "negative" outcomes) differed for clients with recent criminal legal system (CLS) involvement. Using data from 101 recovery residences certified by the Virginia Association of Recovery Residences based on 1,978 individuals completing the REC-CAP assessment, competing risk analyses (cumulative incidence function, restricted mean survival time, and restricted mean time lost) followed by the marginalization of effects were implemented to examine program outcomes at final discharge. Residents with recent CLS involvement were more likely to be discharged for positive reasons (successful completion of their goals) and premature/negative reasons (e.g., disciplinary releases) than for neutral reasons. Findings indicate that retention for 6-18 months is essential to establish and maintain positive discharge outcomes, and interventions should be developed to enhance retention in recovery residents with recent justice involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arun Sondhi
- Therapeutic Solutions (Addictions) Ltd., London, UK
| | - Adela Bunaciu
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - David Best
- Centre for Addiction Recovery Research, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, UK
| | - Emily A Hennessy
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica Best
- Recovery Outcomes Institute, Boynton Beach, Florida, USA
| | | | - Anthony Grimes
- Virginia Association of Recovery Residences, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Matthew Conner
- Virginia Association of Recovery Residences, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Headid RJ, Doane TC, Cohen BD, Smith EC, Redden D, Stoner AM. Identifying components of recovery capital that support substance use disorder treatment completion. Addict Behav Rep 2024; 19:100538. [PMID: 38495390 PMCID: PMC10940757 DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Individuals who do not complete substance use disorder treatment (SUDT) have similar outcomes to the untreated. Recovery capital (RC) is the collection of one's resources that contribute to the initiation and maintenance of sobriety. The aim of this paper was to identify individual measures of RC that are associated with SUDT completion. Methods RC data for 69 residents from a men's recovery center was obtained from questionnaires administered to residents at intake and after SUDT graduation or dismissal. Participant data was divided into two groups, Graduates (n = 39, age 35.87±10.83) and Non-Graduates (n = 30, age 34.35±14.44), and retrospectively analyzed to compare RC between groups at various points during SUDT and which RC measures are associated with SUDT completion. Results At baseline all participants reported limited RC and there was no significant difference in RC between groups. At graduation, Graduates reported significantly more RC in all measures when compared to baseline and Non-Graduates at dismissal. Non-Graduates reported a significant increase in Checking and Savings at dismissal but no other measure. Conclusion Baseline levels of RC in both groups were limited and not significantly different which limited the capacity of the study to identify measures of RC associated with SUDT completion. A lack of RC at onset of SUDT did not preclude SUDT completion and obtaining RC during SUDT was associated with completion as only Graduates reported increases in RC. Future study designs should include participants with variable amounts of RC when entering SUDT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald J. Headid
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas Campus, 350 Howard St., Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA
| | - Trevor C. Doane
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas Campus, 350 Howard St., Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA
| | - Brett D. Cohen
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas Campus, 350 Howard St., Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA
| | - Emma C. Smith
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas Campus, 350 Howard St., Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA
| | - David Redden
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Auburn Campus, 910 S Donahue Dr., Auburn, AL 36832, USA
| | - Alexis M. Stoner
- Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine-Carolinas Campus, 350 Howard St., Spartanburg, SC 29303, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Batchelder AW, Claire Greene M, Scheer JR, Foley J, Jenny Shin HJ, Koehn KM, Kelly JF. Sexual minority disparities in psychosocial functioning following substance use recovery among a representative sample of US adults. Addict Behav Rep 2024; 19:100527. [PMID: 38226009 PMCID: PMC10788780 DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Sexual minority (SM; e.g., gay, lesbian, bisexual) individuals are disproportionately impacted by alcohol and other drug (AOD) use disorders and psychosocial factors that can exacerbate AOD use disorders and hinder recovery. This study examines SM sub-group differences (monosexual [gay/lesbian] versus bisexual) regarding adaptation to recovery measured by indices of psychosocial functioning. Identifying differential needs of gay/lesbian versus bisexual individuals could improve services to better meet the needs of SM individuals in recovery. Methods Using data from the National Recovery Study, a nationally representative cross-sectional sample of US adults who reported resolving an AOD problem (N = 2,002), we compared heterosexual to monosexual and bisexual SM individuals on socio-demographic characteristics, AOD use and treatment, and psychosocial variables. Results Bisexual individuals were significantly younger than heterosexual individuals (p = .002 and p ≤ 0.001 among men and women, respectively) and reported significantly fewer years since AOD problem resolution compared to heterosexual individuals (p = .004 and p = .003 among men and women, respectively). Most notably, bisexual individuals, but not gay/lesbian individuals, reported significantly lower quality of life (QOL), happiness, self-esteem, and significantly higher distress compared to heterosexual individuals. Conclusion Bisexual, but not monosexual, SM individuals in recovery from an AOD use disorder, were younger and reported worse psychosocial functioning than heterosexual individuals. Findings highlight significant differences between monosexual versus bisexual identified individuals with a notable disadvantage experienced by bisexual individuals. More needs to be learned about the challenges faced by bisexual individuals in recovery to better address their needs and support long-term AOD recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail W. Batchelder
- Psychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M. Claire Greene
- Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jacklyn Foley
- Psychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kyrié M. Koehn
- Psychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John F. Kelly
- Psychiatry Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thompson RA, Johnson D, Ashworth M, Stott M. Establishing Quality and Outcome Measures for Recovery Housing: A Tiered Approach Supporting Service Evolution. Community Ment Health J 2024; 60:681-690. [PMID: 38270727 PMCID: PMC11001738 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-023-01219-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
With over one-hundred thousand drug overdose deaths in 2021, substance use disorder (SUD) is a public health crisis in the United States. Medical stabilization has been the predominant focus of SUD interventions despite low levels of retention. Consequently, national quality measures for SUD care outside the clinical continuity of care are limited. The expansion of recovery support services addressing social drivers of health outside clinical settings is needed. The current SUD quality measures are not applicable nor feasible for recovery support service providers with limited resource capacities, like the estimated 17,900 recovery housing providers nationwide. Despite widespread support for recovery housing and its documented effectiveness, no universal set of measures has been developed for widespread adoption. In this brief, a matrix of quality measures are proposed to meet the needs of recovery housing providers with various capacities to support service evolution and improve equitable SUD treatment and recovery care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin A Thompson
- Fletcher Group, Inc., 601 Meyers Baker Road, Suite 238, London, KY, 40741, USA.
| | - David Johnson
- Fletcher Group, Inc., 601 Meyers Baker Road, Suite 238, London, KY, 40741, USA
| | - Madison Ashworth
- Fletcher Group, Inc., 601 Meyers Baker Road, Suite 238, London, KY, 40741, USA
| | - Milena Stott
- Fletcher Group, Inc., 601 Meyers Baker Road, Suite 238, London, KY, 40741, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Castedo de Martell S, Wilkerson JM, Howell J, Brown HS, Ranjit N, Holleran Steiker L, McCurdy SA. The peer to career pipeline: An observational study of peer worker trainee characteristics and training completion likelihood. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 159:209287. [PMID: 38160878 PMCID: PMC10947928 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peer recovery support services (PRSS) for substance use disorder (SUD) are a flexible and evidence-based intervention employed across multiple settings and for a variety of populations. These services have expanded over the past two decades, but there is little research on recruitment and training of prospective peer workers - the peer to career pipeline. This study observed training outcomes for applicants to a peer worker scholarship program in Texas. METHODS A total of 448 participants provided baseline personal history information, and a subset of participants (n = 239) completed optional psychosocial surveys. Logistic regression analysis tested associations of personal history and psychosocial variables with three training stage completion outcomes: classroom training completion, placement at an internship site, and full certification. RESULTS The greatest decline in advancement between stages occurred in the transition between classroom training (78.1 % of participants completed) and internship placement (43.3 % of participants completed). Participants were diverse in terms of race/ethnicity and life experiences salient to the peer worker role, but Hispanic/Latinx peer workers were under-represented. Past work with a SUD peer worker, age, and having a bachelor's degree were each positively associated with training stage completion across multiple models, while having basic technological access, being a woman, and veteran status were each positively associated with training stage completion in only one model. Years since recovery initiation date, non-monosexual orientation, White race, and quality of life were each negatively associated with training stage completion in only one model. CONCLUSIONS The existing peer workforce may be a key source of recruitment for new peer workers; thus retention of existing workers is key to ensuring continued expansion of these services. Additional support may be required to recruit and retain younger peer worker trainees, men trainees, Hispanic/Latinx trainees, trainees who lack basic technological access, or trainees without bachelor's degrees. Unanswered questions about the peer workforce remain and must be addressed to ensure that an appropriately diverse workforce is recruited, that disparities in training outcomes are minimized or prevented, and that existing peer workers are well-supported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra Castedo de Martell
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin, Suite 1880, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Chestnut Health Systems, 1003 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr., Bloomington, IL 61701, USA.
| | - J Michael Wilkerson
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin, Suite 1880, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | - H Shelton Brown
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin, Suite 1880, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Nalini Ranjit
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin, Suite 1880, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Lori Holleran Steiker
- The University of Texas at Austin, Steve Hicks School of Social Work and School of Undergraduate Studies, 110 Inner Campus Drive, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
| | - Sheryl A McCurdy
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 7000 Fannin, Suite 1880, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patton R, Chou J, Kestner T, Feeney E. Exploring social connectedness, isolation, support, and recovery factors among women seeking substance use treatment. Women Health 2024; 64:202-215. [PMID: 38282278 DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2024.2308518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between social variables, recovery orientation, and recovery capital among a sample of n = 30 women actively seeking substance use disorder treatment at a community-based facility in the Midwest United States. Results indicated a positive association between social connectedness, abstinence recovery orientation (p = .048) and social isolation (p = .010). Social isolation was positively associated with abstinence recovery orientation (p = .004) and negatively related to recovery capital (p = .003). Social support was positively correlated with positive expectancy (p = .030) and recovery capital (p = .033). Further, moderate/high alcohol use was related to lower normal living scores (t(28) = 3.10, p = .004), lower recovery capital scores (t(28) = 4.15, p < .000), and higher social isolation scores (t(28) = -2.53, p = .017). Screening at moderate/high risk for cannabis use was related to lower normal living scores (t(28) = 3.01, p = .005), and lower positive expectancy scores (t(28) = 3.03, p = .005). Finally, screening for moderate/high risk for polysubstance use was related to lower normal living orientation (t(28) = 2.52, p = .018) and recovery capital scores (t(28) = 2.79, p = .009). Current findings may inform strategies for examining social connectedness and social isolation variables in future clinical practice, policy, and scholarship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikki Patton
- Department of Counseling and Family Therapy, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica Chou
- Department of Counseling and Family Therapy, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tiffanie Kestner
- The Counseling Center of Wayne & Holmes County, Wooster, Ohio, USA
| | - Erika Feeney
- Department of Counseling and Family Therapy, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Belanger MJ, Sondhi A, Mericle AA, Leidi A, Klein M, Collinson B, Patton D, White W, Chen H, Grimes A, Conner M, De Triquet B, Best D. Assessing a pilot scheme of intensive support and assertive linkage in levels of engagement, retention, and recovery capital for people in recovery housing using quasi-experimental methods. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 158:209283. [PMID: 38159911 PMCID: PMC11090106 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Strong and ever-growing evidence highlights the effectiveness of recovery housing in supporting and sustaining substance use disorder (SUD) recovery, especially when augmented by intensive support that includes assertive linkages to community services. This study aims to evaluate a pilot intensive recovery support (IRS) intervention for individuals (n = 175) entering certified Level II and III recovery residences. These individuals met at least three out of five conditions (no health insurance; no driving license; substance use in the last 14 days; current unemployment; possession of less than $75 capital). The study assesses the impact of the IRS on engagement, retention, and changes in recovery capital, compared to the business-as-usual Standard Recovery Support (SRS) approach (n = 1758). METHODS The study employed quasi-experimental techniques to create weighted and balanced counterfactual groups. These groups, derived from the Recovery Capital assessment tool (REC-CAP), enabled comparison of outcomes between people receiving IRS and those undergoing SRS. RESULTS After reweighting for resident demographics, service needs, and barriers to recovery, those receiving IRS exhibited improved retention rates, reduced likelihood of disengagement, and growth in recovery capital after living in the residence for 6-9 months. CONCLUSION The results from this pilot intervention indicate that intensive recovery support, which integrates assertive community linkages and enhanced recovery coaching, outperforms a balanced counterfactual group in engagement, length of stay, and recovery capital growth. We suggest that this model may be particularly beneficial to those entering Level II and Level III recovery housing with lower levels of recovery capital at admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arun Sondhi
- Therapeutic Solutions (Addictions) Ltd., London, UK
| | - Amy A Mericle
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | - Maike Klein
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - David Patton
- College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | | | - Hao Chen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anthony Grimes
- Virginia Association of Recovery Residences, Virginia, USA
| | - Matthew Conner
- Virginia Association of Recovery Residences, Virginia, USA
| | - Bob De Triquet
- Virginia Association of Recovery Residences, Virginia, USA
| | - David Best
- Centre for Addiction Recovery Research, Leeds Trinity University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Härd S. A qualitative study of a recovery capital assessment tool in alcohol and drug treatment facilities: Perspectives from social work professionals. NORDIC STUDIES ON ALCOHOL AND DRUGS 2024; 41:7-23. [PMID: 38356784 PMCID: PMC10863555 DOI: 10.1177/14550725231175354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The ambition to translate the concept of recovery capital (RC) from research to practice has entailed operationalisations of RC to measure progress and outcomes of alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatments.At the same time, the role played by standardisation in social work organisations is known to be a complex matter, and research suggests that the implementation of standardisation should be carried out with caution. By examining the need for a RC assessment tool in a Swedish AOD treatment context, this paper contributes to the discussion on the use of assessment tools for measuring treatment progress and outcome in AOD treatments, as well as interrelations between standardisation aims and social work professionals. Four group interviews with employees at AOD treatment facilities were conducted in Stockholm, Sweden. The interviewees were presented with an example of an RC-based assessment tool and asked to review the applicability of the tool in their daily work. The findings provide insights on the applicability of specific assessment list items, as well as general observations on the complex relationship between standardisation and discretion in social work. The findings suggest that professionals will ultimately rely on their knowledge and experience, and act accordingly to support the service user, regardless of any manual or standardisation that regulates their work.
Collapse
|
12
|
Byrne KA, Roth PJ, Cumby S, Goodwin E, Herbert K, Schmidt WM, Worth S, Connolly K, Uzor O, Eiff B, Black D. Recovery Barrier Characterizations by Hospitalized Patients with Substance Use Disorders: Results from a Randomized Clinical Study on Inpatient Peer Recovery Coaching. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:93. [PMID: 38248556 PMCID: PMC10815630 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Patients hospitalized with medical complications from substance use disorder (SUD) encounter unique health problems that may complicate their recovery. Recovery barriers are not well understood in this population. The study objective is to characterize recovery barriers in this patient population. Participants (n = 96) in this six-month longitudinal study were randomized to a peer recovery coaching intervention or standard of care. The primary outcome measures were qualitative, open-ended questions addressing factors interfering with participants' recovery. Data were analyzed using content analysis. Themes were identified a priori using past research on recovery capital domains; these seven barriers were (1) psychological health difficulties, (2) physical health challenges, (3) lack of social support, (4) insufficient treatment or recovery support to maintain sobriety, (5) environmental and housing concerns, (6) deficits in coping skills, and (7) lack of meaningful activities. At baseline, the most common recovery barriers were in the environment and housing (28.1%), psychological health (27.1%), and social support (22.9%) domains. At six-month follow-up, participants were asked to describe barriers they felt they had made improvement in over the last six months. The primary themes that participants reported improvements in were treatment and recovery support to maintain sobriety (52.1%), coping skills (35.4%), and social support (27.1%). Hospitalization and participation in a randomized controlled trial may be a turning point in which to address recovery barriers for patients hospitalized with complications from SUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaileigh A. Byrne
- Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; (B.E.)
| | - Prerana J. Roth
- Greenville Memorial Hospital, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC 29605, USA
| | - Sam Cumby
- Greenville Campus, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; (S.C.); (W.M.S.); (S.W.)
| | - Eli Goodwin
- Greenville Campus, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; (S.C.); (W.M.S.); (S.W.)
| | - Kristin Herbert
- Greenville Campus, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; (S.C.); (W.M.S.); (S.W.)
| | - William Michael Schmidt
- Greenville Campus, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; (S.C.); (W.M.S.); (S.W.)
| | - Samantha Worth
- Greenville Campus, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; (S.C.); (W.M.S.); (S.W.)
| | - Kyleigh Connolly
- Greenville Campus, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; (S.C.); (W.M.S.); (S.W.)
| | - Onye Uzor
- Greenville Campus, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA; (S.C.); (W.M.S.); (S.W.)
| | - Brandi Eiff
- Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; (B.E.)
| | - Dominique Black
- Department of Psychology, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; (B.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen G. Identity Construction in Recovery from Substance Use Disorders. J Psychoactive Drugs 2024; 56:109-116. [PMID: 36538493 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2022.2159592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Long-term recovery from substance use disorders has been described as a process of identity construction, through which the stigma of being a substance user is replaced by a new identity of a non-user. Identity construction has been widely acknowledged as a significant factor in different pathways of substance use cessation, such as self-change and treatment-change. However, almost no articles have discussed the role of identity construction in desistance and recovery among both self-changers and treatment-change. The aim of this narrative review was to explore this subject in the two groups. Based on the recovery capital approach and the social identity model of recovery, I posited that self-changers and treatment-changers undergo different processes of identity construction. Moreover, the prospects for successful identity construction depend upon personal and social resources (recovery capital) that provide identity-building materials such as relationships, attitudes, and role models. This article contributes to the field by presenting the different identity constructions in the process of long-term recovery from SUDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gila Chen
- Department of Criminology, Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Obekpa EO, McCurdy SA, Schick V, Markham CM, Gallardo KR, Wilkerson JM. Health-related quality of life and recovery capital among recovery residents taking medication for opioid use disorder in Texas. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1284192. [PMID: 38054070 PMCID: PMC10694473 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1284192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD) includes improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and is supported by recovery capital (RC). Little is known about RC and HRQOL among recovery residents taking medication for OUD. We described HRQOL and RC and identified predictors of HRQOL. Methods Project HOMES is an ongoing longitudinal study implemented in 14 recovery homes in Texas. This is a cross-sectional analysis of data from 358 participants' on HRQOL (five EQ-5D-5L dimensions-mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and RC (Assessment of Recovery Capital scores) collected from April 2021 to June 2023. Statistical analyses were conducted using T-, Chi-squared, and Fisher's exact tests. Results Most participants were 35 years/older (50.7%), male (58.9%), non-Hispanic White (68.4%), heterosexual (82.8%), and reported HRQOL problems, mainly anxiety/depression (78.4%) and pain/discomfort (55.7%). Participants who were 35 years/older [mean (SD) = 42.6 (7.3)] were more likely to report mobility and pain/discomfort problems than younger participants. Female participants were more likely to report pain/discomfort problems than male participants. Sexual minorities were more likely to report anxiety/depression problems than heterosexual participants. Married participants and those in committed relationships were more likely to report problems conducting self-care than single/never-married participants. Comorbid conditions were associated with mobility, pain/discomfort, and usual activities problems. Most participants reported high social (65.4%), personal (69.0%), and total (65.6%) RC. Low personal RC was associated with mobility (aOR = 0.43, CI = 0.24-0.76), self-care (aOR = 0.13, CI = 0.04-0.41), usual activities (aOR = 0.25, CI = 0.11-0.57), pain/discomfort (aOR = 0.37, CI = 0.20-0.68), and anxiety/depression (aOR = 0.33, CI = 0.15-0.73) problems. Low total RC was associated with problems conducting self-care (aOR = 0.20, CI = 0.07-0.60), usual activities (aOR = 0.43, CI = 0.22-0.83), pain/discomfort problems (aOR = 0.55, CI = 0.34-0.90), and anxiety/depression (aOR = 0.20, CI = 0.10-0.41) problems. Social RC was not associated with HRQOL. Conclusion Personal and total RC and comorbid conditions predict HRQOL. Although the opioid crisis and the increasing prevalence of comorbidities have been described as epidemics, they are currently being addressed as separate public health issues. Our findings underscore the importance of ensuring residents are provided with interprofessional care to reduce the burden of comorbidities, which can negatively impact their OUD recovery. Their RC should be routinely assessed and enhanced to support their recovery and improve HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth O. Obekpa
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sheryl A. McCurdy
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Vanessa Schick
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Christine M. Markham
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kathryn R. Gallardo
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Johnny Michael Wilkerson
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Day E, Manitsa I, Farley A, Kelly JF. A UK national study of prevalence and correlates of adopting or not adopting a recovery identity among individuals who have overcome a drug or alcohol problem. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:68. [PMID: 37978529 PMCID: PMC10657010 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00579-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of recovery has increasingly become an organizing paradigm in the addiction field in the past 20 years, but definitions of the term vary amongst interested groups (e.g. researchers, clinicians, policy makers or people with lived experience). Although professional groups have started to form a consensus, people with lived experience of alcohol or drug (AOD) problems use the term in a different way, leading to confusion in policy making in the UK. Greater knowledge about the prevalence and correlates of adopting a recovery identity amongst those who have overcome an AOD problem would inform clinical, public health, and policy communication efforts. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional nationally representative survey of individuals resolving a significant AOD problem (n = 1,373). Weighted analyses estimated prevalence and tested correlates of label adoption. Qualitative analyses summarized reasons for adopting or not adopting a recovery identity. RESULTS The proportion of individuals currently identifying as being in recovery was 52.4%, never in recovery 28.6%, and no longer in recovery 19.0%. Predictors of identifying as being in recovery included current abstinence from AOD, formal treatment, recovery support service or mutual-help participation, and history of being diagnosed with AOD or other psychiatric disorders. Qualitative analyses found themes around not adopting a recovery identity related to low AOD problem severity, viewing the problem as resolved, or having little difficulty in stopping. CONCLUSIONS Despite increasing use of the recovery label and concept in clinical and policy contexts, many resolving AOD problems do not identify in this manner. These are most likely to be individuals with less significant histories of impairment secondary to AOD and who have not engaged with formal or informal treatment systems. The understanding of the term recovery in this UK population did not completely align with abstinence from alcohol or drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ed Day
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B152TT, UK.
| | - Ifigeneia Manitsa
- Institute for Mental Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B152TT, UK
| | - Amanda Farley
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B152TT, UK
| | - John F Kelly
- Recovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Obekpa EO, McCurdy SA, Schick V, Markham C, Gallardo KR, Wilkerson JM. Situational Confidence and Recovery Capital Among Recovery Residents Taking Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Texas. J Addict Med 2023; 17:670-676. [PMID: 37934528 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Situational confidence, that is, confidence to resist substance use in high-risk situations, and recovery capital (RC) are resources that individuals can draw upon to initiate and sustain their recovery from opioid use disorder. We assessed the associations between total, social, and personal RC and situational confidence among recovery residents taking medications for opioid use disorder. METHODS Cross-sectional associations between the Brief Situational Confidence Questionnaire and Assessment of Recovery Capital scores were assessed among participants (N = 267) enrolled in a longitudinal study in 13 recovery homes for persons taking medications for opioid use disorder in Texas using χ 2 tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Most participants were 35 years or older (51.7%), male (59.4%), non-Hispanic White (71.5%), and unemployed (66.0%); used more than one substance (77.9%); and had higher educational levels (53.8%). The majority had high situational confidence (66.7%), social (63.7%), physical (67.0%), and total (64.8%) RC. Education (model 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.96; confidence interval [CI], 1.13-3.40; model 2: aOR, 2.03; CI, 1.17-3.51) and social (aOR, 2.08; CI, 1.11-3.92), personal (aOR, 2.06; CI, 1.08-3.93), and total (aOR, 2.98; CI, 1.71-5.20) RC were associated with situational confidence. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the need for recovery housing operators to be trained on the relevance of RC and situational confidence to practice to improve recovery outcomes among residents with opioid use disorder. Health planners, recovery housing administrators, and policymakers should strengthen recovery residence-based services and systems to improve individual RC and situational confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth O Obekpa
- From the Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston is the full name of the university. University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX; Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bormann NL, Weber AN, Arndt S, Lynch A. Improvements in recovery capital are associated with decreased alcohol use in a primary opioid use disorder treatment-seeking cohort. Am J Addict 2023; 32:547-553. [PMID: 37132067 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Comorbid substance use can negatively impact multiple aspects of treatment for patients with an opioid use disorder (OUD). We investigated if treatment for OUD led to improvements in patients' recovery capital (RC) overtime, and whether there were associated changes in co-occurring alcohol use. METHODS Participants (n = 133) were patients with OUD seeking outpatient treatment, who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) and reported drinking days per 30-day period thrice over the 6-month study. No specific treatments targeting alcohol were used. Two different models were employed to assess changes in total ARC score and adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for past 30-day abstinence. RESULTS Baseline mean ARC scores were 36.6 and significantly increased to mean score of 41.2 at study end. Ninety-one participants (68.4%) reported no alcohol use at baseline, and 97 (78.9%) reported no use in the previous 30 days at study endpoint. For each increase in ARC, there was an aOR 1.07 (confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.13) for past 30-day abstinence. Considering ARC standard deviation of 10.33 over all measurements, this equates to an aOR of 2.10 (CI: 1.22-3.62) for past 30-day abstinence. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS We saw significantly increased aOR for past 30-day abstinence as RC improved in an OUD treatment-seeking population. This difference was not caused by differences in ARC between study completers and noncompleters. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE Showcases how RC growth may be protective of past 30-day alcohol use in an OUD cohort and adds specific aOR for abstinence per ARC increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Bormann
- Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Andrea N Weber
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Stephan Arndt
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Alison Lynch
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bormann NL, Weber AN, Miskle B, Arndt S, Lynch AC. Recovery Capital Correlates With Less Methamphetamine Use and Crime in the Community. J Addict Med 2023; 17:e361-e366. [PMID: 37934526 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reentry postcorrectional involvement is a high-risk time for patients with a history of addiction. We investigated whether participation in an addiction medicine clinic with active case management led to improvements in patients' recovery capital and whether there were associated changes in criminal activity and co-occurring methamphetamine or alcohol use. METHODS Participants (n = 136) were patients with an opioid or stimulant use disorder who had Department of Corrections involvement in the preceding year, who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) and reported criminal activity and days of methamphetamine or alcohol use twice over a 6-month study. Three logistic regression models were used to assess changes in total ARC with criminal activity, alcohol use, and methamphetamine use over the previous 30 days. RESULTS Baseline mean (SD) ARC scores were 34.1 (11.1) and increased to a mean (SD) score of 40.3 (9.4) at study end. A 1-SD shift in ARC was significantly protective across outcomes, with adjusted odds ratios of 0.32, 0.18, and 0.34 for any past 30-day criminal activity, alcohol use, or methamphetamine use. There was no significant difference in baseline ARC, crimes committed, days of alcohol use, or days of methamphetamine use for study completers versus noncompleters; however, unmeasured confounders may have had a differential impact on retention. CONCLUSIONS Recovery capital provides an additional framework to help address patients' substance use and criminal activity in a multifaceted way, which is especially important in the postincarceration community. Recovery capital is dynamic and has multiple areas to target psychosocial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Bormann
- From the Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN (NLB); Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (ANW, BM, SA, ACL); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (ANW); Department of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (BM); Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (SA); Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (ACL)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bormann NL, Weber AN, Miskle B, Arndt S, Lynch AC. Recovery Capital Gains May Precede Craving Reduction in Opioid Use Disorder. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2023; 14:113-118. [PMID: 37818109 PMCID: PMC10561754 DOI: 10.2147/sar.s433350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cravings for drugs and alcohol have been significantly associated with worse treatment outcomes. We investigated if improvements in recovery capital (RC) (eg, a measure of social capital/network, financial resources, education, and cultural factors) over time were associated with decreased reported cravings. Patients and Methods The original cohort consisted of 133 participants (63 females) with opioid use disorder seeking outpatient treatment, who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) (range 0 to 50) and the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) thrice over the 6-month study. Intervention was medication and case management. Analysis included one-way mixed models testing change over time for ARC total scores and single question craving rating (5-point Likert scale). Cross-lagged panel estimates used structural equation models with variables z-scored, allowing for path coefficient evaluation as standard deviations (sd). Results Total ARC significantly increased over the study (χ2 = 33.77, df = 2, p < 0.0001), with baseline of 36.6 (n = 114, sd = 11.1) and 6-month of 41.2 (n = 107, sd = 9.5). Craving also changed significantly (χ2 = 8.51, df = 2, p < 0.015), with baseline of 1.1 (n = 101, sd = 1.2) and 6-month of 0.9 (n = 107, sd = 1.1). The cross-lag from baseline RC to 3-month craving was significant (β = -0.28, SE = 0.11, z = -2.53, p < 0.011). The converse was not true; baseline craving did not affect later RC. Results were similarly significant when comparing 3-month to 6-month. The majority of sample was on buprenorphine. Conclusion As RC improves, the reported cravings at both 3- and 6-month study time points are significantly reduced. When evaluated inversely, there was not a significant association with baseline cravings and follow-up RC. Significant path coefficients provide an estimation of a directional effect from increased RC towards craving reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Bormann
- Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Albert Lea, MN, USA
| | - Andrea N Weber
- Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Benjamin Miskle
- Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Stephan Arndt
- Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Alison C Lynch
- Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
- Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hennessy EA, Krasnoff P, Best D. Implementing a Recovery Capital Model Into Therapeutic Courts: Case Study and Lessons Learned. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY 2023:306624X231198810. [PMID: 37752857 DOI: 10.1177/0306624x231198810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
Recovery capital is a strengths-based and multi-level model for examining the process and outputs of recovery and desistance. Recovery capital posits that the more positive resources one accrues, the better the chances of recovery. Oftentimes growth of one's recovery capital must be initiated through identifying programs in the community to create supportive scaffolding: this may be especially true for individuals involved in the justice system who may experience additional barriers to accessing programming. This manuscript presents the results of a pilot evaluation of the REC-CAP, a recovery-capital oriented system of measurement, planning, and engagement in two drug treatment courts. We include a description of the implementation process and results from surveys and focus groups with the court staff. Results suggests that the trainings were useful and that court staff meaningfully engaged with the REC-CAP system. Court staff felt the REC-CAP provided important information about court clients' strengths and barriers and suggested next steps for staff to take to guide their clients. Future work should explore how the REC-CAP score profile may change with client progress through the court phases as well as how to incorporate more system level supports for a REC-CAP orientation among probation officers and other court staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Hennessy
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bormann NL, Weber AN, Miskle B, Arndt S, Lynch AC. Sex Differences in Recovery Capital Gains Post-Incarceration. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 58:1839-1846. [PMID: 37702512 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2257303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with substance use disorders are highly prevalent in the carceral system. Recovery capital (RC) is the resources available to an individual to initiate or maintain substance use cessation. Sex differences have been identified in RC during both active substance use and recovery in the general population, however, less is known about these sex differences in the post-incarceration population. METHODS Participants (n = 136) were those with an opioid or stimulant use disorder with past year involvement with the Iowa criminal justice system (USA), who completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) twice over a six-month cohort study. Participants were involved in an addiction clinic that utilized active case management. Analysis of covariance evaluated changes in ARC during the study. Separate models compared total ARC and individual ARC domains, with sex as the independent variable of interest. Model means were generated for interpretation based on sex, comparing baseline and study endpoint ARC scores. RESULTS There were no baseline sex differences in total ARC. ARC increased significantly for the group, however, males showed disproportionate growth. Females ended the study with a mean ARC of 37.8 (SD= 9.3) and males finished at 41.6 (SD= 9.3), which was a significant difference (p = 0.044); this significant difference was driven by ARC subdomains of 'Psychological Health' and 'Physical Health.' CONCLUSIONS People post-incarceration are at high risk for return to substance use. Treatment that is informed by sex-based differences may have the potential to decrease the differing rates of growth in RC between sexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea N Weber
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Benjamin Miskle
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Stephan Arndt
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Alison C Lynch
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pars E, VanDerNagel JEL, Dijkstra BAG, Schellekens AFA. Using the Recovery Capital Model to Explore Barriers to and Facilitators of Recovery in Individuals with Substance Use Disorder, Psychiatric Comorbidity and Mild-to-Borderline Intellectual Disability: A Case Series. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5914. [PMID: 37762855 PMCID: PMC10531644 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Recovery capital (RC) encompasses the wide range of resources individuals can employ to recover from Substance Use Disorder (SUD). It consists of five subdomains: human, social, cultural, financial, and community RC. Negative recovery capital (NRC) represents the obstacles to recovery. Research on (N)RC in complex multimorbid populations is scarce. This study offers an initial exploration of the viability of (N)RC in three individuals with SUD, psychiatric comorbidities, and an intellectual disability (a triple diagnosis) in inpatient addiction treatment. We collected case file data, ranked recovery goals, and conducted follow-up interviews. The data were subjected to template analysis, using (N)RC domains as codes. All domains were prevalent and relevant, showing dynamic and reciprocal effects, influenced by critical life events acting as catalysts. Notably, during treatment, patients prioritized individual skill development despite challenges in other domains. RC emerges as a valuable concept for mapping recovery barriers and facilitators in individuals with a triple diagnosis, serving as an alternative to the medical model and complementing the biopsychosocial model. It provides a systematic framework to assess critical factors for recovery in complex cases and accordingly align interventions. Future studies should explore the intersections of NRC domains and the dynamic nature of (N)RC to enhance the understanding of the challenges faced by individuals with a triple diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Pars
- Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
- Nijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction (NISPA), 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (J.E.L.V.); (B.A.G.D.)
- Department of Human Media Interaction (HMI), University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Joanne E. L. VanDerNagel
- Nijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction (NISPA), 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (J.E.L.V.); (B.A.G.D.)
- Department of Human Media Interaction (HMI), University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
- Tactus, Centre for Addiction and Intellectual Disability, 7400 AD Deventer, The Netherlands
- Aveleijn, 7622 GW Borne, The Netherlands
| | - Boukje A. G. Dijkstra
- Nijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction (NISPA), 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (J.E.L.V.); (B.A.G.D.)
- Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Novadic-Kentron, Addiction Care Centre, 5261 LX Vught, The Netherlands
| | - Arnt F. A. Schellekens
- Department of Psychiatry, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
- Nijmegen Institute for Scientist-Practitioners in Addiction (NISPA), 6525 HR Nijmegen, The Netherlands; (J.E.L.V.); (B.A.G.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Okrant E, Reif S, Horgan CM. Development of an addiction recovery patient-reported outcome measure: Response to Addiction Recovery (R2AR). Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2023; 18:52. [PMID: 37658373 PMCID: PMC10474628 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00560-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recovery, a primary goal of addiction treatment, goes beyond abstinence. Incorporating broad domains with key elements that vary across individuals, recovery is a difficult concept to measure. Most addiction-related quality measurement has emphasized process measures, which limits evaluation of treatment quality and long-term outcomes, whereas patient-reported outcomes are richer and nuanced. To address these gaps, this study developed and tested a patient-reported outcome measure for addiction recovery, named Response to Addiction Recovery (R2AR). METHODS A multi-stage mixed methods approach followed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure development standard. People with lived experience (PWLE) of addiction, treatment providers, and other experts contributed to item distillation and iterative measure refinement. From an item bank of 356 unique items, 57 items were tested via survey and interviews, followed by focus groups and cognitive interviews. RESULTS Face validity was demonstrated throughout. PWLE rated item importance higher and with greater variance than providers, yet both agreed that "There are more important things to me in my life than using substances" was the most important item. The final R2AR instrument has 19 items across 8 recovery domains, spanning early, active, and long-term recovery phases. Respondents assess agreement for each item as (1) a strength, and (2) importance to ongoing recovery. CONCLUSION R2AR allows PWLE to define what is important to their recovery. It is designed to support treatment planning as part of clinical workflows and to track recovery progress. Inclusion of PWLE and providers in the development process enhances its face validity. Including PWLE in the development of R2AR and using the tool to guide recovery planning emphasizes the importance of patient-centeredness in designing clinical tools and involving patients in their own care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Okrant
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| | - Sharon Reif
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA.
| | - Constance M Horgan
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, MS035, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA, 02453, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bunaciu A, Bliuc AM, Best D, Hennessy EA, Belanger M, Benwell C. Measuring recovery capital for people recovering from alcohol and drug addiction: A systematic review. ADDICTION RESEARCH & THEORY 2023; 32:225-236. [PMID: 39045096 PMCID: PMC11262562 DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2245323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Recovery capital theory provides a biopsychosocial framework for identifying and measuring strengths and barriers that can be targeted to support recovery from alcohol and drug addiction. This systematic review analyzed and synthesized all quantitative approaches that have measured recovery capital since 2016. Method Three databases were searched to identify studies published from 2016 to 2023. Eligible studies explicitly stated they measured recovery capital in participants recovering from alcohol and/or drug addiction. Studies focusing on other forms of addiction were excluded. Results Sixty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Forty-six studies used one of the ten identified recovery capital questionnaires, and twenty-five studies used a measurement approach other than one of the ten recovery capital questionnaires. The ten recovery capital questionnaires are primarily developed for adult populations across clinical and community recovery settings, and between them measure 41 separate recovery capital constructs. They are generally considered valid and reliable measures of recovery capital. Nevertheless, a strong evidence base on the psychometric properties across diverse populations and settings still needs to be established for these questionnaires. Conclusion The development of recovery capital questionnaires has been a significant advance in the field of addiction recovery, in alignment with the emerging recovery-oriented approach to addiction recovery care. Additionally, the non-recovery capital questionnaire-based approaches to recovery capital measurement have an important place in the field. They could be used alongside recovery capital questionnaires to test theory, and in contexts where the application of the questionnaires is not feasible, such as analyses of data from online recovery forums.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adela Bunaciu
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Ana-Maria Bliuc
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - David Best
- Centre for Addiction Recovery Research, Leeds Trinity University
| | - Emily A. Hennessy
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, United States
| | - Matthew Belanger
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Benwell
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities, Social Science and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Amaral RAD. Performance measures for alcohol and other drugs services: a commentary. Int Rev Psychiatry 2023; 35:475-485. [PMID: 38299659 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2023.2249093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Alcohol and other drugs treatment includes a wide range of service and personal characteristics, along with expected and unexpected barriers to treatment. To capture the benefits and the gaps of a designed treatment, one needs to consider process-of-care and outcome measurements. Process-of-care measures are mainly developments of the rationale proposed by The Washington Circle and capture all variants in the process-of-care as proportions. Outcome measures are strongly related to different concepts of recovery and described as simple yes/no answers type to wide levels of response, such as in Likert-type scales. According to the studies collected here, more realistic periods of data-collection for process-of-care measures and a more reliable format to capture outcome particularities should be designed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Abrantes do Amaral
- Perdizes Institute of the Clinical Hospital of School of Medicine of the University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Martinelli TF, Roeg DPK, Bellaert L, Van de Mheen D, Nagelhout G. Understanding the Process of Drug Addiction Recovery Through First-Hand Experiences: A Qualitative Study in the Netherlands Using Lifeline Interviews. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2023; 33:857-870. [PMID: 37279186 PMCID: PMC10426251 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231174161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Understandings of drug addiction recovery are still being debated. Research on perspectives from first-hand experiences with recovery is rare and often contains short-term experiences in the context of a treatment setting. We aim to gain further understanding of recovery by analyzing autobiographical data from persons in different stages of drug addiction recovery who are not linked to any specific treatment service. We conducted 30 in-depth qualitative interviews with participants from various parts of the Netherlands. Participants self-identified as being "in recovery" or "recovered" from drug addiction for at least 3 months. Men and women are equally represented, and the sample consists of an equal number of participants in early (<1 year, n = 10), sustained (1-5 years, n = 10), and stable (>5 years, n = 10) recovery. We undertook a data-driven thematic analysis. Participants described that recovery is a broad process of change because addiction is interwoven with everything (theme 1); that recovery is reconsidering identity, seeing things in a new light (theme 2); that recovery is a staged long-term process (theme 3); and that universal life processes are part of recovery (theme 4). Thus, Drug addiction recovery is experienced as an interwoven long-term process, including identity change and common or universal life processes. Policy and clinical practice should therefore be aimed at supporting long-term tailored recovery goals and disseminating first-hand recovery experiences to enhance long-term outcomes and reduce stigmatization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. F. Martinelli
- IVO Research Institute, Den Haag, Netherlands
- Tranzo Scientific Centre for Care and Wellbeing, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - D. P. K. Roeg
- Tranzo Scientific Centre for Care and Wellbeing, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
- Kwintes Housing and Rehabilitation Services, Zeist, Netherlands
| | - L. Bellaert
- Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - D. Van de Mheen
- Tranzo Scientific Centre for Care and Wellbeing, School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - G.E. Nagelhout
- IVO Research Institute, Den Haag, Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University (CAPHRI), Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Meisel SN, Hennessy EA, Jurinsky J, Kelly JF. Improving Social Recovery Capital Research To Enhance Clinical Utility: A Proposed Agenda. ADDICTION RESEARCH & THEORY 2023; 32:153-159. [PMID: 39109166 PMCID: PMC11299860 DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2224964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Social recovery capital (SRC) is the combination of social resources that can be used to initiate and sustain addiction recovery through friends, family, and peers. Broadly, understanding one's SRC allows us to get a sense of where one has social support for recovery and where there may be social barriers to their recovery process. SRC is often a vital component of many people's recovery journey, yet our understanding of how best to use this concept in research and practice remains underdeveloped. To improve understanding of the role of social recovery capital and strategies to measure and increase it, we present a roadmap involving a five-pronged research agenda to: (1) Refine the measurement of social recovery capital; (2) Model the complexity of social recovery capital empirically; (3) Integrate personality science with social recovery capital research; (4) Optimize evidence-based behavior change techniques of social recovery capital; and (5) Incorporate an intersectional framework when examining or applying social recovery capital. Overall, this five-pronged research agenda seeks to enhance the clinical utility of SRC research to maximize the impact of SRC on one's recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel N. Meisel
- E. P. Bradley Hospital, Riverside, RI 02915, USA
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Emily A. Hennessy
- Recovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jordan Jurinsky
- Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John F. Kelly
- Recovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rubio G, Esteban Rodríguez L, Sion A, Ramis Vidal L, Blanco MJ, Zamora-Bayon A, Caba-Moreno M, Macias-Molina AI, Pérez-Sánchez D, Rubio-Escobar E, Ruiz-Diez J, Marin M, Arias F, Lora D, Jurado-Barba R. How, when, and to what degree do people with alcohol dependence recover their psychological wellbeing and quality of life? The Madrid Recovery Project. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1130078. [PMID: 37398602 PMCID: PMC10313403 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1130078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The consensus on recovery from alcohol use disorder (AUD) has shifted toward encompassing psychological wellbeing and quality of life dimensions. However, few studies have explored the long-term recovery process and its dimensions, timing, styles, and modes. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent, timing, and process of psychological wellbeing and quality of life recovery in alcohol use disorder (AUD) patients, as well as the relationship with classic dimensions of AUD recovery. Method A cross-sectional study has been carried out with 348 participants with AUD, in different abstinence periods (1 month-28 years), and 171 control subjects. Participants underwent a psychological evaluation, which included self-informed measures of psychological wellbeing, quality of life, negative emotionality, and coping strategies related to alcohol consumption avoidance. Statistical analysis included linear and non-linear regression models between psychological dimensions and maintenance of abstinence, as well as matching the scores of the sample with AUD to those of controls. Scatter plots were used to explore inflection points. In addition, mean comparison tests were performed between participants with AUD and controls and by gender. Results In general, according to the regression models, there were pronounced increases in indices of wellbeing and coping strategies (and pronounced decreases in negative emotionality) during the first 5 years of abstinence, followed by less pronounced improvements. The matching of AUD subjects in wellbeing and negative emotionality indices with controls occurs at different times: (a) 1 year or less: physical health; (b) 1-4 years: psychological health; (c) 4-10 years: social relationships, wellbeing, and negative emotionality; and (d) more than 10 years: autonomy and self-acceptance. There are statistically significant differences by gender for the negative emotionality and physical health variables. Conclusion Recovery from AUD is a long process that involves improvements in wellbeing and quality of life. Four stages can be described in this process, with the most pronounced changes occurring during the first 5 years of abstinence. However, AUD patients take more time to obtain similar scores to controls in several psychological dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Rubio
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Medicine Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Primary Care Research Network on Addictions (RIAPAd), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ana Sion
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Medicine Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Psychology Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lilian Ramis Vidal
- Alcoholics Federation of the Community of Madrid (FACOMA), Madrid, Spain
| | - María J. Blanco
- Alcoholics Federation of the Community of Madrid (FACOMA), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Marta Caba-Moreno
- Alcoholics Federation of the Community of Madrid (FACOMA), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Joaquín Ruiz-Diez
- Alcoholics Federation of the Community of Madrid (FACOMA), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Marin
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Medicine Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Arias
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Medicine Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Lora
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Statistical Studies, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Jurado-Barba
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Medicine Faculty, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Psychology, Education and Health Science Faculty, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bowen E, Irish A, Wilding G, LaBarre C, Capozziello N, Nochajski T, Granfield R, Kaskutas LA. Development and psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC). Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 247:109875. [PMID: 37119593 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Researchers have developed several instruments to measure recovery capital-the social, physical, human, and cultural resources that help people resolve alcohol and other drug problems. However, existing measures are hampered by theoretical and psychometric weaknesses. The current study reports on process and psychometric outcomes for the Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC), a novel measure of recovery capital. METHODS We used a three-phase, mixed methods approach to develop the MIRC. Individuals who identified as having resolved alcohol problems were recruited in each phase. Phase one focused on item development, with participants providing qualitative feedback on potential items. In phase two (pilot testing) and phase three (final psychometric evaluation), participants completed revised versions of the MIRC to assess its psychometric strength and item performance. RESULTS Phase one (n=44) resulted in significant item alteration, culminating in a 48-item pilot measure. Pilot testing analyses (n=497) resulted in the deletion or replacement of 17 items. In the final psychometric evaluation (n=482), four additional items were deleted, resulting in a 28-item MIRC comprising four subscales measuring social, physical, human, and cultural capital. The psychometric properties of the final MIRC and its subscales ranged from sound to strong, with high response variability suggesting appropriate item discrimination. CONCLUSION Results confirm the psychometric strength of the MIRC and underscore the importance of incorporating the insights of diverse samples of people in recovery. The MIRC holds promise as an assessment tool in future research and is available for use at no cost in treatment and community-based settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Irish
- West Virginia University School of Social Work, United States
| | - Gregory Wilding
- University at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions, Department of Biostatistics, United States
| | | | | | | | - Robert Granfield
- University at Buffalo College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Sociology, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Best D, Sondhi A, Best J, Lehman J, Grimes A, Conner M, DeTriquet R. Using Recovery Capital to Predict Retention and Change in Recovery Residences in Virginia, USA. ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT QUARTERLY 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2182246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David Best
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Leeds Trinity University College, Leeds, UK of Great Britain and UK
| | - Arun Sondhi
- Therapeutic Solutions, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jessica Best
- Recovery Outcomes Institute, Boynton Beach, Florida, USA
| | - John Lehman
- Recovery Outcomes Institute, Boynton Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Anthony Grimes
- Virginia Association of Recovery Residences, Richmond, USA
| | - Matthew Conner
- Virginia Association of Recovery Residences, Richmond, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Byrne KA, Mericle AA, Litwin AH. Development and initial findings from the Peer Recovery Coach (PRC) checklist: a new tool to assess the nature of peer recovery coaching service delivery. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2023; 49:159-169. [PMID: 36745742 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2164504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background: Peer recovery coaching is recovery support service for Substance Use Disorder (SUD) that emphasizes shared lived experience and social support. Though a promising intervention for SUD, differences in the roles, responsibilities, and operationalization of peer recovery coaching across studies make objective implementation and evaluation of this service a challenge.Objective: This study sought to develop a tool to better guide and operationalize peer recovery coaching service delivery. This study describes the initial development, acceptability, feasibility, and validity of this tool: The PRC Checklist.Methods: The PRC Checklist was conceptualized and operationalized by drawing from social support theory and recovery capital research. The PRC Checklist was utilized by PRCs in a pilot randomized controlled trial to demonstrate feasibility and acceptability. To further validate the PRC Checklist, recovery coaches (N = 16; 56% female) were recruited to complete a survey about their responsibilities and their perspectives on the content and potential utility of the PRC Checklist.Results: The PRC checklist used in the pilot study delineates personalized from generalized support and tracks 25 specific activities across three domains of support (i.e. socioemotional, informational, and instrumental). PRCs in the pilot study were able to use the PRC Checklist in all in-person initial baseline encounters and 96.4% of follow-up encounters. Qualitative information collected during project meetings was generally positive but also identified potential limitations to its use. All PRCs surveyed reported that they agreed that the PRC Checklist was helpful, encompassed the services they provided, represented a good idea, provided meaningful information, and would be easy to use. All five of the most common activities PRCs engaged in were reflected in the PRC Checklist.Conclusion: Capturing both personal and generalized support provided by PRCs, this work suggests that the PRC Checklist captures key activities engaged in and is a helpful tool for use in healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy A Mericle
- Alcohol Research Group at the Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | - Alain H Litwin
- Department of Addiction Medicine, Prisma Health - Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
LaBelle O, Hastings M, Vest N, Meeks M, Lucier K. The role of mindfulness, meditation, and peer support in recovery capital among Recovery Dharma members. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2023; 145:208939. [PMID: 36880913 PMCID: PMC9992926 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2022.208939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recovery Dharma (RD) is a Buddhist-based peer support program for the treatment of addiction that incorporates mindfulness and meditation into meetings, program literature, and the recovery process, creating the opportunity to study these variables in a peer-support program context. Mindfulness and meditation are beneficial for people in recovery, yet we know little about their relationship to recovery capital, a positive indicator of recovery outcomes. We explored mindfulness and meditation (average length of sessions and average frequency per week) as predictors of recovery capital and examined perceived support in relation to recovery capital. METHODS The study recruited participants (N = 209) through the RD website, newsletter and social media pages for an online survey that included measures of recovery capital, mindfulness, perceived support, and questions about meditation practices (e.g., frequency, duration). Participants' mean age was 46.68 years (SD = 12.21), with 45 % female (5.7 % non-binary), and 26.8 % from the LGBTQ2S+ community. The mean time in recovery was 7.45 years (SD = 10.37). The study fitted univariate and multivariate linear regression models to determine significant predictors of recovery capital. RESULTS As anticipated, multivariate linear regressions indicated that mindfulness (β = 0.31, p < .001), meditation frequency (β = 0.26, p < .001), and perceived support from RD (β = 0.50, p < .001) were all significant predictors of recovery capital when controlling for age and spirituality. However, longer time in recovery and the average duration of meditation sessions did not predict recovery capital as anticipated. CONCLUSIONS Results indicate the importance of a regular meditation practice for recovery capital rather than engaging in prolonged sessions infrequently. The results also support previous findings, which point to the influence of mindfulness and meditation on positive outcomes for people in recovery. Further, peer support is associated with higher recovery capital in RD members. This study is the first examination of the relationship between mindfulness, meditation, peer support, and recovery capital in recovering people. The findings lay the groundwork for the continued exploration of these variables as they relate to positive outcomes both within the RD program and in other recovery pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onawa LaBelle
- Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, Canada.
| | | | - Noel Vest
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, United States of America
| | - Matthew Meeks
- Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, Canada
| | - Krista Lucier
- Department of Psychology, University of Windsor, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Truby MP, Hewitt C, Raistrick D, Tober G, Watson J. Measuring Recovery: The Addiction Recovery Questionnaire (ARQ). ALCOHOLISM TREATMENT QUARTERLY 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2023.2167529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mr Philip Truby
- Department of Public Health, Public Health, City of York Council, UK
| | - Catherine Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Duncan Raistrick
- FRCPsych, Formerly of Leeds Addiction Unit and University of Leeds Medical School, UK
| | - Gillian Tober
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences and Formerly of Leeds Addiction Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Judith Watson
- York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ohayon S, Ronel N. Multi-Dimensional Recovery and Growth Among the Homeless: A Positive Criminology Perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY 2023:306624X221144292. [PMID: 36604791 DOI: 10.1177/0306624x221144292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The research literature on the recovery and growth processes of the homeless population is limited and lacking-particularly with regard to the recovery and growth potential of that population, and its recovery capital (RC) dynamics. This qualitative study fills the research gap by examining the recovery process on its various manifestations, the formation of RC, the patterns of coping with distress, and the growth processes experienced. Ten semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with participants from a homeless hostel. The results show how a population with low or depleted RC, in a state of extreme distress, and in the throes of a bottom-up experience, succeeds in developing RC on a personal, social, and spiritual level-and through it, also reaching post-crisis growth. This study yields innovative terminology to describe the coping patterns and their development in three stages-economical coping, liminal stage of resources mustering, and resourceful coping-and a model to explain the phenomenon, and re-conceptualize it.
Collapse
|
35
|
Athamneh LN, King MJ, Craft WH, Freitas-Lemos R, Tomlinson DC, Yeh YH, Bickel WK. The Associations between Remission Status, Discounting Rates, and Recovery from Substance Use Disorders. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 58:275-282. [PMID: 36622296 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2161312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Background: Recovery from substance use disorders (SUDs) requires sustained and purposeful support to maintain long-term remission. Methods: This study investigated the association between assessment of recovery capital, household chaos, delay discounting (DD) and probability discounting (PD), and remission status among individuals in recovery from SUD. Data from 281 participants from the International Quit & Recovery Registry (IQRR), an ongoing online registry that aims to study the recovery process, were included in the analysis. Results: Lower DD rates and higher recovery capital were found among those in remission compared to those not in remission after controlling for demographics. In contrast, the association of household chaos and PD with remission status were insignificant. Overall, DD accounted for 20% of the total effect between the recovery capital and the remission status. Conclusion: This study contributes to the understanding of recovery as a multidimensional process, supports DD as a behavioral marker of addiction, and suggests areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liqa N Athamneh
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.,Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Michele J King
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.,Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - William H Craft
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.,Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Roberta Freitas-Lemos
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.,Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Devin C Tomlinson
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.,Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Yu-Hua Yeh
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.,Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Warren K Bickel
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.,Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Majer JM, Jason LA, Bobak TJ. Understanding recovery Capital in relation to categorical 12-Step involvement and abstinence social support. ADDICTION RESEARCH & THEORY 2022; 30:207-212. [PMID: 36275074 PMCID: PMC9585994 DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2021.1999935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Background Although recovery capital represents various resources for persons recovering from substance use disorders, measures of this construct examine components that might not necessarily reflect the recovery goals of individuals who base their recovery through involvement in 12-step groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA). It is not clear whether 12-step involvement is related to recovery capital, particularly among individuals living in recovery homes who utilize social networks of recovering peers for their recovery. Thus, categorical involvement in a set of 12-step activities was examined in relation to recovery capital and abstinence social support. Methods Differences in terms of general (recovery capital scores, retention rates) and abstinence-specific (abstinence social support) resources were examined in relation to recovery home residents who were (n = 395) and were not (n = 232) categorically involved in their 12-step recovery. Results Residents with categorical 12-step involvement reported significantly higher levels of recovery capital and abstinence social support, and there was no significant difference observed in retention rates between residents who were/were not categorically involved in 12-step groups. Conclusions Findings suggest community resources such as recovery homes and categorical involvement in 12-step groups are important recovery capital components that help individuals who use a 12-step approach to their recovery. Recovery capital among those involved with 12-step fellowships such as AA and NA should be assessed by examining abstinence-specific components such as representative involvement in 12-step groups and social support that is abstinence-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Majer
- Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Harry S. Truman College, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leonard A. Jason
- Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ted J. Bobak
- Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Individual Paths to Recovery from Substance Use Disorder (SUD): What Are the Implications of the Emerging Recovery Evidence Base for Addiction Psychiatry and Practice? Psychiatr Clin North Am 2022; 45:547-556. [PMID: 36055738 DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Although the research base around 12-step effectiveness has been grown markedly in recent years, there has also been growth in the broader evidence base around recovery models, and this article reviews three key components: the transition to a social model of recovery; the emergence of a metric of recovery progress, recovery capital focused on building strengths; and multiple pathways to recovery, involving mutual aid groups, recovery community organizations, and access to jobs, friends, and housing. We conclude with an overview of the practical implications for addiction treatment and sustaining the gains made in specialist treatment services.
Collapse
|
38
|
Härd S, Best D, Sondhi A, Lehman J, Riccardi R. The growth of recovery capital in clients of recovery residences in Florida, USA: a quantitative pilot study of changes in REC-CAP profile scores. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:58. [PMID: 35933398 PMCID: PMC9356455 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00488-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing evidence base around predictors of retention and completion in a range of recovery residence models, particularly Oxford Houses and Sober Living Houses, and recovery housing is recognized as a clearly evidenced area of recovery intervention. The aim of the study was to quantitatively assess recovery capital in a sample of recovery residence clients. Method The study used a repeated measures self-completion of a standardized recovery capital instrument (REC-CAP) for clients retained across various houses within one Level 2 recovery residence provider whose program was based on a 12-step approach. While 823 clients participated in the baseline assessment, a sample of 267 clients was achieved for six-month follow-up interview, based on those retained in the residence. A logistic regression model examined factors associated with retention and a repeated measures marginal mixed model evaluated the factors associated with changes in recovery capital between the baseline and the follow-up assessment. Results Members of the group that remained in recovery residences were more likely to be older with a record of high participation in recovery groups, with greater drop-out among younger residents, female residents and those with an identified housing need. For those retained to follow-up, greater recovery capital growth was associated with employment, higher levels of social support and more recovery group involvement, as well as age and a higher quality of life. The need for family support was shown to reduce levels of recovery capital. However, those younger people who were retained reported better recovery capital growth during the initial six months of residence. Conclusion The key conclusion is that while recovery capital generally increases during a stay in a recovery residence, it does not do so consistently across the sample population. This has implications for how pathways to recovery group engagement are supported for women and young people and how social support (encompassing housing, employment and family issues) is provided to those populations during periods of residence. This suggests the potential need for training and guidance for house managers working with these groups.
Collapse
|
39
|
Theodoropoulou L, Vitellone N, Duff C. Practising recovery: New approaches and directions. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2022; 107:103802. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
40
|
Gavriel-Fried B, Lev-el N, Kraus SW. The Holistic Recovery Capital in Gambling Disorder index: A pilot study. J Behav Addict 2022; 11:600-606. [PMID: 35895478 PMCID: PMC9295245 DOI: 10.1556/2006.2022.00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Recovery is a challenge for individuals coping with a gambling disorder (GD). Recovery capital (RC) is a conceptual framework describing positive external and internal (e.g., human, social, community and financial) resources that promote recovery. Negative RC relates to external and internal obstacles to recovery. To date, no scale has captured both positive and negative RC items in the gambling field. Based on the RC framework, this pilot study aimed to develop The Holistic Recovery Capital in Gambling Disorder (HRC-GD) instrument, and to explore its associations with recovery status, measures of psychopathology and happiness. We hypothesized that higher HRC-GD scores will be positively related to recovery and subjective happiness, but negatively linked to depression, anxiety, and gambling severity. METHOD Recovered and non-recovered individuals with a lifetime DSM-5 GD (n = 164) completed the HRC-GD instrument, the DSM-5 GD diagnostic criteria, and measures of depression, anxiety, and subjective happiness. RESULTS Through a process of item reduction, which included a principal components analysis, 19 items were retained. Since exploratory factor analysis (EFA) yielded uninterpretable findings, an index score reflecting human, financial, community, and social resources and obstacles was calculated. HRC-GD index scores were negatively correlated with anxiety, depression, and GD symptom severity, but positively related with subjective happiness. Index scores were significantly associated with recovery status. CONCLUSIONS The HRC-GD index holds promise as a new tool for measuring RC in GD. Additional research is needed to validate this index using larger and more ethnically and gender diverse clinical and community samples of individuals with GD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belle Gavriel-Fried
- The Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Corresponding author. Tel.: +971+36409151. E-mail:
| | - Niva Lev-el
- The Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Shane W. Kraus
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lee BK, Ofori Dei SM. Changes in Work Status, Couple Adjustment, and Recovery Capital: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Congruence Couple Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial. Subst Abuse 2022; 16:11782218221088875. [PMID: 35645564 PMCID: PMC9130820 DOI: 10.1177/11782218221088875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Employment and family/social relationships are 2 of the highest priorities among those in substance use recovery. This study examined the relationship of work status with couple adjustment and other recovery capital treatment outcomes among symptomatic alcohol, substance use, and gambling participants (N = 38) using data collected in a randomized trial comparing a systemic Congruence Couple Therapy (CCT) and individual-based Treatment-as-Usual (TAU). Method Change scores and associations between work status and couple adjustment together with 8 other recovery outcome variables at post-treatment (5 months from baseline) and follow-up (8 months from baseline) in TAU (n = 17) and CCT (n = 21) were analyzed. Results Number of those working increased with both CCT and TAU but without reaching significance in either CCT (Cochran's Q = 5.429, P = .066) or TAU (Cochran's Q = 2.800, P = .247). Relative to those not working in the combined sample, those working showed significantly improved scores in post-treatment and follow-up in addictive symptoms, couple adjustment, psychiatric symptoms, depression, and life stress. Separating the CCT and TAU groups, similar trend was found in the CCT group but was inconsistent in the TAU group. Conclusion Significantly greater improvement in addictive symptoms and recovery capital of couple adjustment, mental health, and life stress was found in the working vs not-working group. Compared to individual-based TAU, exploratory findings indicate that the systemic treatment of CCT showed a clearer and more consistent difference in improved working days, addictive symptoms and recovery capital. Replication with larger samples is needed to generalize these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie K Lee
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of
Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
| | - Samuel M Ofori Dei
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of
Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Francis MW, Bourdon JL, Chan G, Dick DM, Edenberg HJ, Kamarajan C, Kinreich S, Kramer J, I-Chun Kuo S, Pandey AK, Pandey G, Smith RL, Bucholz KK, McCutcheon VV. Deriving a Measure of Social Recovery Capital From the Important People and Activities Instrument: Construction and Psychometric Properties. Alcohol Alcohol 2022; 57:322-329. [PMID: 35356964 PMCID: PMC9086804 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This study presents a measure of Social Recovery Capital (SRC) derived from the Important People and Activities instrument (IPA). METHODS The sample comprised young adults who participated in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, a high-risk family study of alcohol use disorder (N = 2472). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified influential items and factor structure, adjusting for family relatedness. The final scale was tested for reliability and validity. RESULTS Factor analysis retained 10 items loading on three factors (Network Abstinence Behaviors, Basic Network Structure and Network Importance) that together explained 42% of the variance in SRC. The total model showed adequate fit (Comparative Fit Index = 0.95; Tucker Lewis Index = 0.93; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.06; Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual = 0.05) and acceptable reliability (α = 0.60; McDonald's ω = 0.73) and correlated with validation measures mostly in the weak to moderate range. Due to variable factor scores for reliability and validity, we only recommend using the total score. CONCLUSION The SRC-IPA is a novel measure of SRC derived from the IPA that captures social network data and has applications in research and clinical work. Secondary data analyses using the SRC-IPA in studies that collected the IPA can further demonstrate the interaction of SRC with a wide variety of clinical indicators and demographic characteristics, making it a valuable addition to other measures of SRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith W Francis
- Washington University in St. Louis, Brown School of Social Work, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jessica L Bourdon
- Wellbridge Addiction Treatment and Research, Center for Addiction Science, Calverton, NY, USA
| | - Grace Chan
- University of Connecticut, Department of Psychiatry, Farmington, CT, USA
- University of Iowa, Department of Psychiatry, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Danielle M Dick
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Chella Kamarajan
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Psychiatry, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Sivan Kinreich
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Psychiatry, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - John Kramer
- University of Iowa, Department of Psychiatry, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Sally I-Chun Kuo
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Ashwini K Pandey
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Psychiatry, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Gayathri Pandey
- SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Department of Psychiatry, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca L Smith
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kathleen K Bucholz
- Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychiatry, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Vivia V McCutcheon
- Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychiatry, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sión A, Jurado-Barba R, Esteban-Rodríguez L, Arias F, Rubio G. Spanish Validation of the Assessment of Recovery Capital Scale in Clinical Population with Alcohol Use Disorder. THE SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2022; 25:e16. [PMID: 35503039 DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2022.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Recovery from alcohol use disorder involves achieving certain resources for positive lifestyle changes, well-being, and long-term abstinence. The present study aims to translate and validate the Assessment Capital Recovery (ARC) in a Spanish clinical sample of individuals with alcohol use disorder, in abstinence. The participants were 184 patients who attended outpatient treatments. They were evaluated with the adapted version of the ARC (Spanish abbreviation: "Valoración del Capital de Recuperación, VCR") and by WHOQOL-BREF (quality of life scale), in one session. Statistical analysis included the calculation of reliability, convergent validity (relationship with WHOQOL-BREF), specificity and sensitivity, as well as validity based on internal structure (confirmatory factor analysis). VCR scores show appropriate values for reliability (α = .90), and a low convergent validity with WHOQOL-BREF (Rho = .33-.53). The VCR appears to distinguish between patients with early and stable sobriety (χ2 = 20.55, p < .01). The ROC curve indicates significant discrimination values (p < .05) for stable recovery (5 years of abstinence) and sensitivity of 85.2% and specificity of 71.2%. Further, confirmatory factor analysis suggests the presence of a single factor, with relatively acceptable values of goodness of fit and factor loadings. We used ULS parameter estimation to study VCR properties, an appropriate tool for assessing recovery in clinical populations of individuals with alcohol use disorder in abstinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Sión
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Spain)
- Universidad Complutense (Spain)
| | - Rosa Jurado-Barba
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Spain)
- Universidad Camilo José Cela (Spain)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Sahker E, Pro G, Sakata M, Poudyal H, Jordan A, Furukawa TA. Factors supporting substance use improvement for Black Americans: A population health observational study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 234:109405. [PMID: 35316688 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black clients in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment are associated with the lowest successful completion and substance use reductions. More work is needed to identify specific factors that support successful recovery of Black clients. METHODS Data from U.S. outpatient SUD treatment facilities receiving public funding from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed (N = 2239,197). Primary analyses consisted of Black clients (n = 277,726) reporting admission and discharge substance use frequency. Multiple logistic regression was used to predict substance use frequency improvement from Black client demographic, recovery capital, treatment characteristics, and state. Disparities were compared between Black and non-Black clients. RESULTS The overall Black client improvement percentage was 46.95%. Mutual-help group attendance and Length of Stay demonstrated clinically meaningful effect sizes controlling for all other variables and state. Attending mutual-help groups 8-30 times per month (State aOR = 2.54, 95% CI = 2.43, 2.64) and outpatient treatment stays of 4 months or more (State aOR = 2.50, 95% CI = 2.44, 2.56) were factors supporting Black client improvement. Importantly, states are associated with disparate Black client risk differences and only South Dakota had greater Black improvement (RD = 6.35, 95% CI = 1.00, 11.71). CONCLUSIONS Black client factors supporting substance use improvement include ancillary mutual-help group attendance and increased treatment retention. These factors may be more critical in states with larger Black improvement disparities. In general, treatment providers increasing access to mutual-help groups, and adjusting program inclusiveness and motivational factors for retention, would make strides in increasing improvement outcomes for Black clients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Sahker
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan; Population Health and Policy Research Unit, Medical Education Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
| | - George Pro
- Southern Public Health and Criminal Justice Research Center, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - Masatsugu Sakata
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
| | - Hemant Poudyal
- Population Health and Policy Research Unit, Medical Education Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
| | - Ayana Jordan
- Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Toshi A Furukawa
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Best D, Hennessy EA. The science of recovery capital: where do we go from here? Addiction 2022; 117:1139-1145. [PMID: 34729852 PMCID: PMC9209877 DOI: 10.1111/add.15732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of recovery capital (RC) has emerged in studies and discussions of the addiction recovery process and as a potential metric and marker for recovery gains. Although conceptual and applied development of the concept in the 20 years since the term was coined has increased, there remains insufficient clarity of key domains, factors and best practice research and applications for populations experiencing addiction. We aimed to review progress around the conceptualisation and operationalisation of RC and to consider future directions for a science of recovery capital. METHOD We provided a brief overview of theoretical foundations and advances, empirical measurement and application in treatment and continuing care settings. We next introduced four primary areas for addiction science to address, namely: (i) conceptual development (e.g. how RC domains are unique, but interrelated entities, valence of RC), (ii) empirical testing, adequacy of measurement and analysis, (iii) directions for novel application in treatment and recovery settings and (iv) dissemination and communication to policy, practice and lived experience groups. In this review, we also focussed on some of the challenges that must be addressed for a science of RC, which could produce long-term impact in treatment and policy. RESULTS Despite burgeoning empirical work on RC, its application and translation has been unsystematic. The field currently relies on self-report questionnaires for the development of the theory and quantification of RC. Therefore, there is an urgent need for rigorous and systematic conceptual and empirical development of RC. CONCLUSIONS A formal collaboration between scholars, practitioners and experts by experience worldwide would move recovery capital forward in an empirically driven and culturally appropriate manner, as would testing its applicability at individual, organisational and societal levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Best
- Criminology and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - Emily A. Hennessy
- Recovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kaur A, Lal R, Sen MS, Sarkar S. Comparison of Recovery Capital in Patients with Alcohol and Opioid Dependence - An Exploratory Study. ADDICTION & HEALTH 2022; 14:105-114. [PMID: 36544508 PMCID: PMC9743817 DOI: 10.22122/ahj.2022.196722.1314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Recovery capital helps in the assessment of the personal strengths and challenges that exist in an individual with substance use which may have an impact on recovery process. This study aims at finding out the factors which help such individuals to sustain their recovery and how these factors differ across the two groups of people suffering from Alcohol Dependence Syndrome and Opioid Dependence Syndrome. Methods A cross-sectional observational was designed where sociodemographic and clinical variables, the recovery capital ARC (Assessment of Recovery Capital) Scale and Severity of substance use SDS (Severity of Dependence) Scale of patients diagnosed with Alcohol Dependence Syndrome (ADS group) and those with Opioid Dependence Syndrome (ODS group) were assessed among patients not reporting withdrawal symptoms. Findings A total of 49 subjects in the ODS group and 30 subjects in the ADS group were enrolled. The majority of the subjects in both groups were married, belonged to urban areas, practiced Hinduism, and were living in nuclear families. There was a significant difference between the educational status (p<0.001), religion practiced (p<0.001), age of onset of dependence (p<0.001), severity of dependence (p=0.11), and duration of abstinence (p<0.001) between the ADS and ODS groups. The mean scores on ARC Scale were 45.9 (S.D. =3.5) in the ODS group and 47.4 (S.D. =4.3) in the ADS group. ADS group had higher scores in Social Support Domain (p=0.034) and Housing and Safety domain (p=0.025). Other domains like global health, citizenship, meaningful activities, risk-taking, coping, and recovery experience did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion This study aims at comparing the recovery capital of ADS patients with ODS patients. It also suggests that tailored treatment plans for people with ADS and ODS especially in housing and social support and common treatment approach in other domains of recovery will help them sustain the state for a longer term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apinderjit Kaur
- Department of Psychiatry and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rakesh Lal
- Department of Psychiatry and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Mahadev Singh Sen
- Department of Psychiatry and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India,Correspondence to: Mahadev Singh Sen; Department of Psychiatry and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India;
| | - Siddharth Sarkar
- Department of Psychiatry and NDDTC, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Keith D, Tegge A, Athamneh L, Freitas-Lemos R, Tomlinson D, Craft W, Bickel W. The phenotype of recovery: Association among delay discounting, recovery capital, and length of abstinence among individuals in recovery from substance use disorders. J Subst Abuse Treat 2022; 139:108783. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
48
|
Cuesta-Briand B, Taran M, Coleman M. A rural ecosystem of recovery: Lessons from substance users' experiences of accessing services in Western Australia's South West. Drug Alcohol Rev 2022; 41:963-973. [PMID: 35315552 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Substance use is a public health issue with a greater burden in rural areas. Barriers to accessing services are exacerbated for rural substance users, with confidentiality concerns, longer travel distances, workforce issues and limited availability of services. This paper presents results from a study exploring substance users' experiences of accessing services in Western Australia's South West. METHODS This qualitative study was informed by phenomenology, and drew from social determinants and socio-ecological theories. Data were collected through 22 semi-structured telephone interviews with current and past substance users residing in the South West. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis. RESULTS Two themes were identified: readiness to engage as a three-way street; and building an ecosystem of recovery networks. Effective engagement with services required multi-level readiness. Individual readiness was strongly influenced by the social environment, while service readiness required trustworthiness and responsiveness. A number of local access barriers were identified that hindered broader system readiness. Participants experienced recovery as on-going and require an ecosystem of support with peer support at the centre and a network of healthy relationships established through meaningful connections. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS An effective ecosystem of support for alcohol and other drugs users in the South West should include expanded access to health, community and welfare services, with an emphasis on peer-led support programs, and strong cross-sector collaboration to mitigate the access barriers operating at the broader community level. Lessons from our study can inform the development of rural ecosystems of support for alcohol and other drugs users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz Cuesta-Briand
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, University of Western Australia, Albany, Australia
| | - Michael Taran
- Great Southern Mental Health Service, WA Country Health Service, Albany, Australia
| | - Mathew Coleman
- The Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, University of Western Australia, Albany, Australia.,Great Southern Mental Health Service, WA Country Health Service, Albany, Australia.,Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abreu Minero V, Best D, Brown L, Patton D, Vanderplasschen W. Differences in addiction and recovery gains according to gender - gender barriers and specific differences in overall strengths growth. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:21. [PMID: 35287696 PMCID: PMC8919581 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00444-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing evidence on the importance of a gendered understanding of recovery. Gender differences have been reported in relation to the nature and extent of substance use, pathways to and through substance use disorder and recovery capital acquisition and maintenance. There is little existing research on factors associated with recovery capital growth by gender. METHODS The current paper uses the European Life in Recovery database to assess specific domains of the Strengths and Barriers Recovery Scale (SABRS) that best predict growth of recovery capital amongst people in recovery from drug addiction. The 1313 participants were drawn from the REC-PATH study and recruited by the Recovery Users Network (RUN) from across Europe. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify relationships between specific SABRS items and gender, as well as differences in the dimensions of the SABRS scale most likely to predict recovery capital growth by gender. RESULTS Between their time in active addiction and in recovery, females show greater growth in strengths, despite females reporting fewer recovery strengths during active addiction than males, and males have greater reductions in barriers to recovery compared to females. Multivariate analyses show that strengths specifically related to prosocial meaningful activities are found to be highly significant for growth of recovery capital amongst males, whereas strengths related to both prosocial meaningful activities and general health management seem particularly relevant for growth of recovery capital amongst females. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that this further demonstration of gender differences in recovery pathways should suggest gender-specific approaches adopted in recovery community organisations to address these different needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Abreu Minero
- Department of Criminology, College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
| | - David Best
- Department of Criminology, College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - Lorna Brown
- Department of Criminology, College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - David Patton
- Department of Criminology, College of Business, Law and Social Sciences, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - Wouter Vanderplasschen
- Recovery and Addiction Cluster, Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Burns J, Yates R. An examination of the reliability and validity of the recovery capital questionnaire (RCQ). Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 232:109329. [PMID: 35101817 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND BACKGROUND Recovery capital refers to the resources people can call upon to initiate and sustain alcohol and drug problem resolution. Measuring this phenomenon could help an individual better understand their strengths as well as gauge the impact of any interventions designed to improve recovery capital and / or reduce addiction severity. This study aimed to test the internal consistency, stability reliability, criterion-related concurrent validity and content validity of the Recovery Capital Questionnaire (RCQ). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Participants (n = 173) accessing community based addiction treatment (n = 108) and residential treatment (n = 65) in England and Scotland completed the RCQ at two time-points one week apart (n = 102) to test stability reliability, and also completed the RCQ alongside measures of quality of life and resilience (n = 152). Content validity was assessed by seven subject matter experts with content validity ratio and index calculated. FINDINGS Cronbach's Alpha values (internal consistency) included: social α = 0.52 (0.40-62); physical α = 0.73 (0.66-0.78); human α = 0.85 (0.82-0.88); community α = 0.85 (0.82-0.88); RCQ Total α = 0.88 (0.85-90). RCQ stability reliability (r = 0.89) and ICC (0.88) were calculated. Content Validity Index statistic of 0.91 was calculated. Correlations between relevant domains within the RCQ and WHOQOL Bref were found to include: r = 0.44, 0.59, 0.66 and 0.40. Correlations between RCQ and CD-RISC scores were calculated (r = 0.65). CONCLUSION The Recovery Capital Questionnaire was found to possess good overall internal consistency and stability reliability. Content validity was found to be strong and the RCQ demonstrated good concurrent validity with a measure of quality of life and a measure of resilience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Burns
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK94LA, UK.
| | - Rowdy Yates
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland FK94LA, UK
| |
Collapse
|