Utilization of the Mayo risk score in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid

Prognostic scores for ursodeoxycholic acid-treated patients predict graft loss and mortality in recurrent primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recurrent primary biliary cholangitis (rPBC) develops in approximately 30% of patients and negatively impacts graft and overall patient survival after liver transplantation (LT). There is a lack of data regarding the response rate to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in rPBC. We evaluated a large, international, multi-center cohort to assess the performance of PBC scores in predicting the risk of graft and overall survival after LT in patients with rPBC.

METHODS

A total of 332 patients with rPBC after LT were evaluated from 28 centers across Europe, North and South America. The median age at the time of rPBC was 58.0 years [IQR 53.2-62.6], and 298 patients (90%) were female. The biochemical response was measured with serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bilirubin, and Paris-2, GLOBE and UK-PBC scores at 1 year after UDCA initiation.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 8.7 years [IQR 4.3-12.9] after rPBC diagnosis, 52 patients (16%) had graft loss and 103 (31%) died. After 1 year of UDCA initiation the histological stage at rPBC (hazard ratio [HR] 3.97, 95% CI 1.36-11.55, p = 0.01), use of prednisone (HR 3.18, 95% CI 1.04-9.73, p = 0.04), ALP xULN (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26-2.01, p <0.001), Paris-2 criteria (HR 4.14, 95% CI 1.57-10.92, p = 0.004), GLOBE score (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.71-4.66, p <0.001), and the UK-PBC score (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09, p <0.001) were associated with graft survival in the multivariate analysis. Similar results were observed for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with rPBC and disease activity, as indicated by standard PBC risk scores, have impaired outcomes, supporting efforts to treat recurrent disease in similar ways to pre-transplant PBC.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

One in three people who undergo liver transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis develop recurrent disease in their new liver. Patients with recurrent primary biliary cholangitis and incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid, according to conventional prognostic scores, have worse clinical outcomes, with higher risk of graft loss and mortality in similar ways to the disease before liver transplantation. Our results supportsupport efforts to treat recurrent disease in similar ways to pre-transplant primary biliary cholangitis.

Prognostic scores in primary biliary cholangitis

Aim: Evaluating prognostic scores' utility in predicting ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) biochemical response (BR) and long-term liver-related complications in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients. Patients & methods: This retrospective single-center study included 50 predominantly female PBC patients (median age: 56) on UDCA treatment. BR was defined by Paris II criteria. Liver-related complications during a median 76-month follow-up were assessed. APRI, ALBI, Mayo, GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were calculated. Results: 64% achieved BR, while 40% experienced liver-related complications. All scores showed good BR prediction (concordance statistics: 0.76-0.94) and excellent negative predictive values for 5-year liver complications (concordance statistics: 0.73-0.89). Conclusion: Implementing these scores in clinical practice is encouraged due to their effectiveness in predicting BR- and liver-related events.

Liver Transplantation: Contraindication and Ineligibility

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving therapeutic modality for patients with various advanced liver diseases. It is crucial to identify that the patient's illness is sufficiently advanced and unlikely to improve with medical management to justify the need for transplantation. At the same time, it is crucial to identify patients with comorbidities and far advanced disease that would result in an unacceptable outcome after LT. Specific care also is required before deciding on LT in the elderly, acute on chronic liver disease, patients with comorbidities, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation needs to be timed appropriately to avoid unnecessary LT and ensure that the decision is not left too late to avoid losing the patient without a transplant. Also, important is the decision as to when not to transplant. The current review explores some of these issues of contraindications and ineligibility for LT.

Treatment response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment response definitions have been introduced in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, the lack of a gold standard results in heterogeneity in second-line treatment research and clinical practice.

AIMS

This study aimed to explore which UDCA treatment response endpoint serves as the most accurate predictive model of long-term outcome.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of UDCA treatment response endpoints (and corresponding validations) were performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen individual UDCA treatment response endpoints and 96 external validations were found. Barcelona, Paris-1, Paris-2, Rotterdam, Toronto and GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores are currently most robustly validated in external populations. The results show that the continuous models (GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores) serve as the most accurate predictive models. Besides standard UDCA treatment response endpoints, the alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin normalization has been suggested as a new therapeutic target.

CONCLUSIONS

The GLOBE and UK-PBC Risk Scores are the most suitable for the real-world allocation of second-line therapies (obeticholic acid and fibrates). However, in the wake of the recent findings, alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin normalization should be the primary outcome in trial research in PBC.

Prognostic scores in primary biliary cholangitis patients with advanced disease

BACKGROUND

Due to the chronic progressive disease characteristics of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), patients with advanced PBC should not be ignored. Most prognostic score studies have focused on early stage PBC.

AIM

To compare the prognostic value of various risk scores in advanced PBC to help PBC patients obtain more monitoring and assessment.

METHODS

This study considered patients diagnosed with PBC during hospitalization between 2015 and 2021. The clinical stage was primarily middle and late, and patients usually took ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) after diagnosis. The discriminatory performance of the scores was assessed with concordance statistics at baseline and after 1 year of UDCA treatment. Telephone follow-up was conducted to analyze the course and disease-associated outcomes. The follow-up deadline was December 31, 2021. We compared the risk score indexes between those patients who reached a composite end point of death or liver transplantation (LT) and those who remained alive at the deadline. The combined performance of prognostic scores in estimating the risk of death or LT after 1 year of UDCA treatment was assessed using Cox regression analyses. Predictive accuracy was evaluated by comparing predicted and actual survival through Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

We included 397 patients who were first diagnosed with PBC during hospitalization and received UDCA treatment; most disease stages were advanced. After an average of 6.4 ± 1.4 years of follow-up, 82 patients had died, and 4 patients had undergone LT. After receiving UDCA treatment for 1 year, the score with the best discrimination performance was the Mayo, with a concordance statistic of 0.740 (95% confidence interval: 0.690-0.791). The albumin-bilirubin, GLOBE, and Mayo scores tended to overestimate transplant-free survival. Comparing 7 years of calibration results showed that the Mayo score was the best model.

CONCLUSION

The Mayo, GLOBE, UK-PBC, and ALBI scores demonstrated comparable discriminating performance for advanced stage PBC. The Mayo score showed optimal discriminatory performance and excellent predictive accuracy.

New Treatment Paradigms in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an archetypal autoimmune disease. Chronic lymphocytic cholangitis is associated with interface hepatitis, ductopenia, cholestasis, and progressive biliary fibrosis. People living with PBC are frequently symptomatic, experiencing a quality-of-life burden dominated by fatigue, itch, abdominal pain, and sicca complex. Although the female predominance, specific serum autoantibodies, immune-mediated cellular injury, as well as genetic (HLA and non-HLA) risk factors, identify PBC as autoimmune, to date treatment has focused on cholestatic consequences. Biliary epithelial homeostasis is abnormal and contributes to disease. The impact of cholangiocyte senescence, apoptosis, and impaired bicarbonate secretion enhances chronic inflammation and bile acid retention. First-line therapy is a non-specific anti-cholestatic agent, ursodeoxycholic acid. For those with residual cholestasis biochemically, obeticholic acid is introduced, and this semisynthetic farnesoid X receptor agonist adds choleretic, anti-fibrotic, and anti-inflammatory activity. Future PBC licensed therapy will likely include peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) pathway agonists, including specific PPAR-delta agonism (seladelpar), as well as elafibrinor and saroglitazar (both with broader PPAR agonism). These agents dovetail the clinical and trial experience for off-label bezafibrate and fenofibrate use. Symptom management is essential, and encouragingly, PPAR agonists reduce itch; IBAT inhibition (eg, linerixibat) also appears promising for pruritus. For those where liver fibrosis is the target, NOX inhibition is being evaluated. Earlier stage therapies in development include therapy to impact immunoregulation in patients, as well other approaches to treating pruritus (eg, antagonists of MrgprX4). Collectively the PBC therapeutic landscape is exciting. Therapy goals are increasingly proactive and individualized and aspire to rapidly achieve normal serum tests and quality of life with prevention of end-stage liver disease.

The Albumin-Bilirubin Score as a Predictor of Liver-Related Mortality in Primary Biliary Cholangitis with Compensated Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Although several prognostic scores have been reported to correlate with the prognosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, there are limited tools to predict the prognosis of PBC with compensated cirrhosis. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic performance of the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score in PBC patients with compensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal study of 219 patients with compensated PBC cirrhosis to evaluate the prognostic performance of the ALBI using Cox regression model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

During follow-up, a total of 19 subjects (8.7%) met the primary endpoint of liver-related death or liver transplantation (LT). Patients who died/underwent LT have higher ALBI score (-1.06 vs. -2.06, p < 0.001) at baseline than those who survived. ALBI score (hazard ratio: 15.011, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.045-44.665, p < 0.001) was associated with an increase in liver-related mortality or LT. ALBI score had the best discriminative capacity to predict the 5-year liver-related mortality (area under the ROC curve: 0.871, 95% CI [0.820, 0.913]) compared with other prognostic scores. The ROC curve showed that the best cut-off value of ALBI score was -1.47, with 90.0% sensitivity and 76.6% specificity. Also, the probability of transplant-free survival decreased with increasing ALBI grade (log-rank p = 0.003). The 5-year transplant-free survival rates of patients in grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 were 100.0%, 96.4%, and 89.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ALBI score is a simple and effective predictive factor estimating the clinical outcome of patients with compensated PBC cirrhosis and provides better prognostic performance compared with other prognostic scores.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Promising Emerging Innovative Therapies and Their Impact on GLOBE Scores

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), previously referred to as primary biliary cirrhosis, is an autoimmune disorder leading to the destruction of intra-hepatic bile ducts. If untreated, progressive bile duct damage and cholestasis can lead to ductopenia and result in cirrhosis. Ursodiol, the first drug approved for PBC, has changed the natural history of this disease and improved patient outcomes. Subsequently, several new prediction models incorporating a response to ursodiol were developed. These include the GLOBE score, which was shown to predict long-term outcomes in patients with PBC. In 2016, obeticholic acid (OCA) became the second drug to be approved by the FDA, predominantly based on improvement in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. This trial has subsequently influenced the design of clinical trials. Several drugs are currently being evaluated as therapeutic options for PBC, with improvement in ALP being a main endpoint. In this review, we will discuss the impact of new therapies on GLOBE scores in patients with PBC.

Prognostic modeling in biliary diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the prognostic models for the cholestatic diseases focusing on primary sclerosing cholangitis and primary biliary cholangitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Noninvasive prognostic models that outperform alkaline phosphatase and Mayo Risk Score have been developed to predict clinically significant events, such as transplant free survival or hepatic decompensation. Models for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) include UK-PSC, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Risk Estimate Tool, and Amsterdam Oxford models. Models for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) include UK-PBC, Global primary biliary cholangitis group score (GLOBE) and Paris II scores. Other models have incorporated elastography with or without findings on magnetic resonance imaging.

SUMMARY

Noninvasive prognostic models can inform patients about their risk for clinical outcomes and serve as surrogate intermediate outcomes to determine efficacy of novel agents in clinical trials.

[Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis]

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune disease prevalent in middle-aged women and characterized by chronic cholestasis. PBC is diagnosed when at least two of the following three criteria are met: elevated alkaline phosphatase, presence of PBC-specific autoantibodies such as the anti-mitochondrial antibody or PBC-specific anti-nuclear antibodies, and non-suppurative inflammation of the interlobular bile duct after excluding other causes including drugs and biliary obstruction. The first-line treatment for PBC is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, 13-15 mg/kg/day). The response to UDCA is predictive of long-term prognosis and should be evaluated 6-12 months after the UDCA treatment. The second-line treatments for PBC recommended due to an inadequate response to UDCA include obeticholic acid and fibrates. Symptoms and complications, including pruritus, sicca syndrome, and osteoporosis, should be evaluated and appropriately managed.

Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid May Be Assessed Earlier to Allow Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Unresponsive Primary Biliary Cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been traditionally assessed 1 to 2 years after treatment initiation. With the development of new drugs, some patients may benefit from an earlier introduction of second-line therapies.

AIMS

This study aims to identify whether well-validated response criteria could correctly identify individuals likely to benefit from add-on second-line therapy at 6 months.

METHODS

Analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort which included only patients with clear-cut PBC.

RESULTS

206 patients with PBC (96.6% women; mean age 54 ± 12 years) were included. Kappa concordance was substantial for Toronto (0.67), Rotterdam (0.65), Paris 1 (0.63) and 2 (0.63) criteria at 6 and 12 months, whereas Barcelona (0.47) and POISE trial (0.59) criteria exhibited moderate agreement. Non-response rates to UDCA was not statistically different when assessed either at 6 or 12 months using Toronto, Rotterdam or Paris 2 criteria. Those differences were even smaller or absent in those subjects with advanced PBC. Mean baseline alkaline phosphatase was 2.73 ± 1.95 times the upper limit of normal (× ULN) among responders versus 5.05 ± 3.08 × ULN in non-responders (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 months of treatment with UDCA, the absence of response by different criteria could properly identify patients who could benefit from early addition of second-line therapies, especially in patients with advanced disease or high baseline liver enzymes levels.

Incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis: criteria, epidemiology, and possible mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

As a common autoimmune disease with the characteristic of early complication, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) leads to an increasing number of mortalities among people with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) waiting for liver transplantation. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only approved first-line medicine for PBC, and a good response to treatment could acquire an ideal prognosis. Patients with poor UDCA response usually have more adverse outcomes and worse survival, therefore, the management of this group become a major consideration.

AREAS COVERED

Due to the complexity of race and environment for PBC, different criteria for UDCA response exhibit various predictive performances. Factors affecting UDCA response conditions include gender, age, ethnicity, serum indicators, auto-antibodies, and autoimmune comorbidities, while no agreement has been reached. In this review, we mainly focus on cellular senescence, immune-mediated damage, and vitamin D deficiency as possible mechanisms for UDCA non-responders.

EXPERT OPINION

The pathogenesis of PBC has yet to be clarified. Immunology-related mechanisms and therapy targets ought to be the main effort made for further study. Irrespective of the response condition, UDCA is recommended for routine administration in all PBC patients without contraindication. Ongoing clinical trials of second-line and additional therapy exhibit promising prospects.

Liver Transplantation for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Despite a significant increase in the total number of liver transplants (LTs) performed over the last 3 decades, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has become an uncommon indication for LT, which likely reflects the benefits of earlier diagnosis and available treatment, such as ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Nonetheless, LT remains the only cure for patients with progressive PBC despite medical therapy with survival rates that are among the highest of all indications for LT. Post-LT PBC patients, however, are at increased risk of rejection and disease recurrence.

The prognostic value of antibodies to gp210 among patients with primary biliary cholangitis in Northeast China

BACKGROUND

Whether the anti-gp210 antibody can be used as a biomarker in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) remains controversial.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the association between anti-gp210 antibodies and prognosis in ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated PBC patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 180 UDCA-treated PBC patients to assess the prognostic value of anti-gp210 antibodies using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the patients included in our analysis, 50 (27.8%) were anti-gp210 positive, and 130 (72.2%) were anti-gp210 negative. The incidence of liver-related death or transplantation was more common in the anti-gp210 + group (22.0 vs. 9.2%, P=0.022). The five-year transplant-free survival rates of anti-gp210-positive patients vs. anti-gp210-negative patients were 77.0% and 90.3%, respectively. We found that the probability of transplant-free survival was significantly lower in the anti-gp210-positive patients than in the anti-gp210-negative patients (log-rank P=0.004). After adjusting for potential confounders using multivariable Cox regression model, positivity for anti-gp210 antibody (hazard ratio: 4.619, 95% confidence interval: 1.895-11.261, P=0.001) was found to be independently associated with an increase in liver-related mortality or transplantation.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of UDCA-treated PBC patients, positivity for anti-gp210 antibody was independently associated with a higher risk of liver-related death or transplantation.

Cumulative risk of developing a new symptom in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and its impact on prognosis

Background and Aim

Symptoms of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) frequently impair one's quality of life (QOL). Nonetheless, with improved treatment, the prognosis of PBC also improves. QOL plays an important role in patients with PBC. In this study, we aimed to reevaluate the transition of new symptom development in PBC and its predictive factors.

Methods

This retrospective multicenter study enrolled 382 patients with PBC for symptom analysis. The impact of a newly developed symptom on PBC prognosis was investigated by Kaplan–Meier analysis with propensity score matching and logistic progression analysis.

Results

The cumulative risk of developing a new symptom after 10 and 20 years of follow‐up was 7.6 and 28.2%, and specifically that of pruritus, which was the most common symptom, was 6.7 and 23.3%, respectively. In Cox hazard risk analysis, serum Alb level (hazard ratio [HR], 1.097; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.033–1.165; P = 0.002), the serum D‐Bil level (HR, 6.262; 95% CI, 2.522–15.553, P < 0.001), and Paris II criteria (HR, 0.435; 95% CI, 0.183–1.036; P = 0.037) were significant independent predictors of a new symptom. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the overall survival and liver‐related death were not significant between patients with and without a new symptom.

Conclusion

The cumulative risk of new symptom development is roughly 30% 20 years after diagnosis and could be predicted by factors including serum albumin levels, serum D‐Bil level, and Paris II criteria.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Current Knowledge of Pathogenesis and Therapeutics

Cholangiopathies encompass various biliary diseases affecting the biliary epithelium, resulting in cholestasis, inflammation, fibrosis, and ultimately liver cirrhosis. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are the most important progressive cholangiopathies in adults. Much research has broadened the scope of disease biology to genetic risk, epigenetic changes, dysregulated mucosal immunity, altered biliary epithelial cell function, and dysbiosis, all of which interact and arise in the context of ill-defined environmental triggers. An in-depth understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of these cholestatic diseases will help clinicians better prevent and treat diseases. In this review, we focus on the main underlying mechanisms of disease initiation and progression, and novel targeted therapeutics beyond currently approved treatments.

Simplified 6-month prediction scores for primary biliary cholangitis patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid

OBJECTIVES

To develop a prognostic score evaluating treatment response at 6 months after ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) initiation in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients.

METHODS

Adult PBC patients who were newly prescribed UDCA at our institution (n = 292) were included. Significant determinants of liver-related adverse events in the multivariable Cox model were used for score development, weighted by β-coefficients. Discrimination ability was assessed using Harrell's C-statistic. The performance of our model was compared to the previous models.

RESULTS

Our model included the following variables evaluated at 6 months: (1) alkaline phosphatase decline of less than 50% from baseline and >upper limit normal (ULN) (2 points); (2) bilirubin >ULN (2 points); (3) albumin <lower limit normal (1 point). The score ranged from 0 to 5 points. C-statistic estimates were 0.87 (overall cohort), 0.87 (no cirrhosis) and 0.77 (cirrhosis), indicating good discrimination of treatment response. Patients with scores ≥3 points had significant shorter transplant-free survival (TFS) than scores <3 points (P < 0.001). The TFS rates for patients with score ≥3 points at 5, 10 and 15 years were 52, 26 and 7%, and for patients with scores <3 points were 96, 92 and 82%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the performance of our 6-month model and the previous models (Paris I, Paris II, Barcelona, Rotterdam and GLOBE scores evaluated at 12 months) in predicting liver-related outcomes (all P = NS).

CONCLUSION

This novel 6-month prognostic model showed good prognostic performance. Utilization of this score would identify patients with suboptimal responses to UDCA earlier.

A randomized, controlled trial on fenofibrate in primary biliary cholangitis patients with incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid

Introduction:

About one-third of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients do not exhibit complete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). Some of these patients were reported to benefit from the combination therapy of fibrates and UDCA, but more clinical evidence is required. In this study, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial on the safety and efficacy of fenofibrate in the treatment of patients with PBC.

Methods:

Forty-eight PBC patients with incomplete response to UDCA were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups (24 in the experiment group and 24 in the control group). For the experimental group, the patients were administered 13–15 mg/kg/day UDCA in combination with 200 mg/day fenofibrate. For the control group, the patients continued to receive UDCA at 13–15 mg/kg/day. The patients were followed up for at least 12 months. The serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and other biochemical parameters were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months during the trial to assess patient conditions.

Results:

At 12 months, 20.8% of the patients in the experimental group had all three indexes of serum ALP, γ-GT, and total bilirubin normalized, while 0% of patients in the control group reached the primary outcome (difference, 20.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.6–37.0). 54.2% of the patients had normal ALP levels in the experimental group and 4.2% in the control group (difference, 50 percentage points; 95% CI, 28.5–71.5). The experimental group had greater improvement of ALP (p < 0.001) and IgG (p = 0.026) than the control group. The biochemical indexes of the patients in the experimental group also significantly improved during the treatment of fenofibrate.

Conclusion:

Addition of fenofibrate can improve biochemical indexes of PBC patients who had an incomplete response to UDCA. Reversible elevation of serum creatine and transaminases is observed in some patients.

The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) as ChiCTR1800020160 (protocol available online: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=32443).

Definition and Management of Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis and an Incomplete Response to Therapy

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an immune-mediated chronic liver disease characterized by biliary epithelial injury, cholestasis, and progressive fibrosis that can lead to cirrhosis and requirement for liver transplantation. All patients with PBC should receive initial treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), and odds for response are based on characteristics at baseline. It is important to have clear definitions of patients at risk for a poor response to therapy, of biochemical markers of an incomplete response, and standardized management. Patients typically are assessed after 12 months of treatment with UDCA for biochemical markers of response. However, evaluation at 6 months has been proposed for patients with more severe disease or symptoms (such as pruritus or fatigue). Markers of response to therapy include reduced serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin (Paris-2, Toronto, GLOBE, and so forth); patients with high levels of total and conjugated bilirubin or levels of alkaline phosphatase more than 1.5-fold the upper limit of normal should be considered for second-line therapy. Patients with adequate biochemical responses can continue UDCA monotherapy. Incomplete responders should be considered for second-line therapies with obeticholic acid (licensed) or fibrates (unlicensed) in addition to continued treatment with UDCA. Patients with PBC should be followed up for life.

Practical management of primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic and cholestatic liver disease of autoimmune pathogenesis that mainly affects middle-aged women. Patients show elevated alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels as the disease progresses. The main symptoms of the disease are pruritus and fatigue, which interfere with the quality of life of patients. Progressive damage leading to end stage liver disease could require liver transplantation. Despite the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the current standard of care for PBC, up to 40% of patients have an inadequate response to the treatment, requiring a second-line therapy. Obeticholic acid is the only second-line treatment approved for PBC in combination with UDCA in adults with an inadequate response to UDCA, or as monotherapy in patients intolerant to UDCA. Although different clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of PBC have been published, PBC is still challenging for many physicians. In this article we briefly review the main characteristics of the disease and include a practical user-friendly algorithm for the diagnosis and management of PBC developed by Spanish PBC experts and based on the European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendations.

A Comparison of Prognostic Scores (Mayo, UK-PBC, and GLOBE) in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Comparative data on scores that predict outcome in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are scarce. We aimed to assess and compare the prognostic value of the Mayo Risk Score (MRS, 1989 and 1994), UK-PBC score, and GLOBE score in a large international cohort of patients with PBC.

METHODS

Ursodeoxycholic acid-treated patients from 7 centers participating in the GLOBAL PBC Study Group were included. The discriminatory performance of the scores was assessed with concordance statistics at yearly intervals up to 5 years. Model for End-stage Liver Disease was included for comparison. Prediction accuracy was assessed by comparing predicted survival and actual survival in Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 1,100 ursodeoxycholic acid-treated patients with PBC were included, with a mean (SD) age of 53.6 (12.0) years, of whom 1,003 (91%) were female. During a median follow-up of 7.6 (interquartile range 4.1-11.7) years, 42 patients underwent liver transplantation, and 127 patients died. At 1 year, the concordance statistic for Model for End-stage Liver Disease was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.72), 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.80) for the UK-PBC score, 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.81) for the MRS (1989 and 1994), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84) for the GLOBE score. The GLOBE score showed superior discriminatory performance, but differences were not statistically different. For all scores, discriminatory performance increased in those with bilirubin >0.6 × ULN and advanced fibrosis estimated with Fibrosis-4. The predicted (median) minus observed 5-year transplant-free survival was +0.4% and +2.5% for the MRS (1989) and GLOBE score, respectively.

DISCUSSION

All prognostic scores developed for PBC (GLOBE, UK-PBC, and MRS) demonstrated comparable discriminating performance for liver transplantation or death as well as good prediction accuracy.

[Novel Insights of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Primary Biliary Cholangitis]

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are immune-mediated chronic liver diseases. PSC is a rare disorder characterized by multi-focal bile duct strictures and progressive liver diseases that ultimately results in the need for liver transplantation in most patients. Imaging studies, such as MRCP, have an essential role in the diagnosis of most cases of PSC. PSC is usually accompanied by inflammatory bowel disease, and there is a high risk of cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal cancer in PSC. No medical therapies have been proven to delay the progression of PSC. Endoscopic intervention for tissue diagnosis or biliary drainage is frequently required in cases of PSC with a dominant stricture, acute cholangitis, or clinically suspected cholangiocarcinoma. PBC is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune cholestatic liver disease, which, when untreated, will culminate in end-stage biliary cirrhosis requiring liver transplantation. A diagnosis is usually based on the presence of serum liver tests indicative of cholestatic hepatitis in association with circulating antimitochondrial antibodies. Patient presentation and course can be diverse in PBC, and risk stratification is important for ensuring that all patients receive a personalized approach to their care. Medical therapy using ursodeoxycholic acid or obeticholic acid has an important role in reducing the progression to end-stage liver disease in PBC.

Prognostic Factors in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Retrospective Study of Joint Slovak and Croatian Cohort of 249 Patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify pretreatment laboratory parameters associated with treatment response and to describe the relationship between treatment response and liver decompensation in patients with primary biliary cholangitis treated with ursodeoxycholic acid.

METHODS

We defined treatment response as both ALP ≤ 1.67 × ULN and total bilirubin ≤ 2 × ULN. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for confounding effects of sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

Pretreatment total bilirubin ((TB); OR = 0.3388, 95%CI = 0.1671-0.6077), ALT (OR = 0.5306, 95%CI = 0.3830-0.7080), AST (OR = 0.4065, 95%CI = 0.2690-0.5834), ALP (OR = 0.3440, 95%CI = 0.2356-0.4723), total cholesterol ((TC); OR = 0.7730, 95%CI = 0.6242-0.9271), APRI (OR = 0.3375, 95%CI = 0.1833-0.5774), as well as pretreatment albumin (OR = 1.1612, 95%CI = 1.0706-1.2688) and ALT/ALP (OR = 2.4596, 95%CI = 1.2095-5.5472) were associated with treatment response after six months of treatment. Pretreatment TB (OR = 0.2777, 95%CI = 0.1288-0.5228), ALT (OR = 0.5968, 95%CI = 0.4354-0.7963), AST (OR = 0.4161, 95%CI = 0.2736-0.6076), ALP (OR = 0.4676, 95%CI = 0.3487-0.6048), APRI (OR = 0.2838, 95%CI = 0.1433-0.5141), as well as pretreatment albumin (OR = 1.2359, 95%CI = 1.1257-1.3714) and platelet count (OR = 1.0056, 95%CI = 1.0011-1.0103) were associated with treatment response after 12 months of treatment. Treatment response after 6 months of UDCA therapy is significantly associated with treatment response after 12 months of UDCA therapy (OR = 25.2976, 95% CI = 10.5881-68.4917). Treatment responses after 6 and 12 months of UDCA therapy decrease the risk of an episode of liver decompensation in PBC patients (OR = 12.1156, 95%CI = 3.7192-54.4826 and OR = 21.6000, 95%CI = 6.6319-97.3840, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There are several pretreatment laboratory parameters associated with treatment response in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Treatment response after six months is significantly associated with treatment response after 12 months of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy. Treatment responses after 6 and 12 months of UDCA decrease the risk of an episode of liver decompensation.

Paris II and Rotterdam criteria are the best predictors of outcomes in patients with primary biliary cholangitis in Japan

BACKGROUND

Biochemical response to treatment in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) reflects prognosis. However, the best predictive criteria to detect biochemical response remain undetermined. In addition, because these criteria need > 6 months until definition, parameters that can estimate its results before initiating treatment are needed.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study on 196 patients with PBC, followed up for at least 12 months after initiating treatment.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that Paris II (p = 0.002) and Rotterdam criteria (p = 0.001) could estimate the overall survival of PBC patients, whereas Paris II (p = 0.001), Rotterdam (p = 0.001), and Rochester criteria (p= 0.025) could estimate liver-related deaths. Cox hazard analysis revealed Paris II and Rotterdam criteria as significantly independent predictors of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 3.948, 95% CI 1.293-12.054, p = 0.016 and HR 6.040, 95% CI 1.969-18.527, p = 0.002, respectively) and liver-related deaths (HR 10.461, 95% CI 1.231-88.936, p = 0.032 and HR 10.824, 95% CI 1.252-93.572, p = 0.032, respectively). The results of Paris II criteria could be estimated by serum prothrombin time (Odds ratio (OR) 1.052, 95% CI 1.008-1.098, p = 0.021) and alanine transaminase level (OR 0.954, 95% CI 0.919-0.991, p = 0.014) whereas, those of Rotterdam criteria could be estimated by serum albumin level (OR 3.649, 95% CI 1.098-12.128, p = 0.035) at the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the best prediction criteria and pre-treatment parameters that facilitate the prognosis of PBC patients.

Primary biliary cholangitis: treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the most recent data regarding treatment of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with PBC at high-risk of progressive disease are younger, have advanced fibrosis and showed inadequate response to UDCA after 12 months of treatment. These patients need a second-line treatment in addition to UDCA. The goal of therapy should be the normalization of ALP and bilirubin below 0.6 the upper limit of normal. Obeticholic acid (OCA) has proven to be effective in improving surrogate markers of prognosis in PBC, also in real-life cohort. Pruritus is the most frequent adverse event during treatment with OCA. Bezafibrate is another option in patients with inadequate response to UDCA as it was proven to improve surrogate endpoints, pruritus and even, clinical outcome compared with UDCA monotherapy. Finally, budesonide may be considered in patients with marked portal inflammation. Triple therapy with UDCA, OCA and bezafibrate may be considered in patients showing inadequate response to dual therapy.

SUMMARY

Patients with PBC need to be evaluated at baseline, and on-treatment, for the risk of progressive disease and eventually treated with second-line therapies in addition to UDCA.

Antibodies to gp210 and understanding risk in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A variety of auto-antibody assays are available as part of the clinical care of patients with liver disease. We sought to better understand the clinical utility of immune serological testing in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from 2846 patients investigated for liver disease at a UK liver centre between 2001 and 2017. A total of 499 patients with PBC were identified. Immune serology results were examined for their diagnostic utility and prognostic significance to predict transplant-free survival.

RESULTS

Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) were specific (94.5%) and sensitive (85.6%) for PBC; antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) against glycoprotein 210 (gp210) and sp100 were specific (>98%) but not sensitive (<25%). The disease-specific ANAs were detectable in 29.6% of AMA-negative patients. Anti-gp210 auto-antibodies were significantly associated with elevated serum aminotransferase activity, bilirubin and liver stiffness at presentation (P < .010). Anti-gp210 auto-antibodies predicted non-response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) by GLOBE criteria (39.3% vs 16.7%, P = .005). Moreover, anti-gp210 was independently associated with death or liver transplantation (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.49-6.96; P = .003), after accounting for other significant baseline determinants of outcome. Serologic finding of anti-gp210 antibodies conferred an independent risk of death or transplantation (HR 4.13, 95% CI 1.85-9.22; P = .001) after accounting for treatment response.

CONCLUSION

In our single-centre cohort of patients with PBC, the presence of anti-gp210 was associated with an adverse presenting phenotype, predicted treatment non-response and independently predicted reduced transplant-free survival.

A placebo-controlled randomised trial of budesonide for PBC following an insufficient response to UDCA

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), the efficacy of budesonide, a synthetic corticosteroid displaying high first-pass metabolism, is unresolved. In a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, we evaluated the added-value of budesonide in those with PBC and ongoing risk of progressive disease despite ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment.

METHODS

We evaluated 62 patients with PBC who had histologically confirmed hepatic inflammatory activity, according to the Ishak score, and an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) >1.5× upper limit of normal (ULN), after at least 6 months of UDCA therapy. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive budesonide (9 mg/day) or placebo once daily, for 36 months, with UDCA treatment (12-16 mg/kg body weight/day) maintained. Primary efficacy was defined as improvement of liver histology with respect to inflammation and no progression of fibrosis. Secondary outcomes included changes in biochemical markers of liver injury.

RESULTS

Recruitment challenges resulted in a study that was underpowered for the primary efficacy analysis. Comparing patients with paired biopsies only (n = 43), the primary histologic endpoint was not met (p >0.05). The proportion of patients with ALP <1.67×ULN, a ≥15% decrease in ALP and normal bilirubin was higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group at 12, 24, and 36 months (p <0.05, each). In contrast to placebo, budesonide reduced mean ALP and 35% of budesonide-treated patients achieved normalisation of ALP (placebo 9%; p = 0.023). Serious adverse events occurred in 10 patients receiving budesonide and 7 patients receiving placebo.

CONCLUSION

Budesonide add-on therapy was not associated with improved liver histology in patients with PBC and insufficient response to UDCA; however, improvements in biochemical markers of disease activity were demonstrated in secondary analyses.

LAY SUMMARY

Around one-third of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) needs additional medical therapy alongside ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment. In this clinical trial, the addition of the corticosteroid budesonide did not improve liver histology; there were however relevant improvements in liver blood tests. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV NUMBER

NCT00746486.

The association of histological progression with biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is currently diagnosed at an early stage; therefore, the number of patients with PBC without symptoms at the time of diagnosis is increasing. However, up to 30% of patients with PBC exhibit the suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and are at high risk of end-stage liver disease. Obeticholic acid is an approved second-line therapy for patients with PBC that are refractory to UDCA. Novel surrogate endpoints are required to identify individuals eligible for second-line therapies. An inadequate biochemical response to UDCA is a useful predictor of poor outcomes in patients with PBC. In addition to UDCA effects on biochemical parameters, histological outcomes could be considered as candidate surrogate endpoints. Alterations in liver histology are used as surrogate endpoints in clinical studies. However, current staging systems are insufficient to determine PBC disease severity and progression because of the pathological heterogeneity of the disease. Histological features at baseline and biochemical response to UDCA treatment can affect the disease course of PBC. Therefore, novel surrogate endpoints must be represented by parameters characterized by histological outcomes and treatment responses in PBC. In this review, we discuss the existing histological parameters and newly created factors to identify patients with PBC who are at a high risk of developing end-stage liver disease and, consequently, the potential need for additional treatments.

Treatment of primary biliary cholangitis with ursodeoxycholic acid, prednisolone and immunosuppressants in patients not responding to ursodeoxycholic acid alone and the prognostic indicators

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We reviewed the medical records of primary biliary cholangitis patients who were diagnosed by liver biopsy and treated with the corresponding treatment. We evaluated the therapeutic effect and long-term prognostic indicators.

METHODS

This observational cohort study enrolled 80 eligible patients diagnosed by liver biopsy between December 2013 and December 2018 in our department. UDCA monotherapy or UDCA added to prednisolone and immunosuppressant triple therapy was prescribed to patients. We analyzed and compared the demographic characteristics, biochemistry profiles, immune parameters, and noninvasive liver fibrosis assessments at baseline as well as the treatment efficacy, long-term outcomes and adverse effects at baseline and at each visit between the two groups. The indicators that could affect prognosis were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight primary biliary cholangitis patients received UDCA monotherapy (group A), and another 42 patients received UDCA, prednisolone and immunosuppressant triple therapy (group B). After therapy, all patients showed significant improvements in liver biochemical parameters, immune indicators, and noninvasive fibrosis indicators (Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI)), all P values<0.0001. The Mayo score also decreased significantly after treatment (P=0.022). Triple therapy was more effective, and there was a significant difference between the two groups. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that anti-gp210 antibody positivity; antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) negativity; high alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin (TBIL) and globulin levels; and a severe degree of fibrosis at baseline were independent predictors of a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple therapy was a treatment option for UDCA-refractory PBC patients. Anti-gp210 antibody positivity; AMA negativity; high ALP, TBIL and globulin levels; and a severe degree of fibrosis at baseline were associated with a poor prognosis.

Review article: pathophysiology and management of primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), an immune-mediated disease characterised by destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts, results in progressive damage to the biliary tree, cholestasis and ultimately advanced liver disease. In the last decade, advances in practice have improved clinical care, driven novel therapeutic options and improved risk stratification tools.

AIMS

To provide an overview of the disease characteristics of PBC and review a patient-centred management approach for the clinical team caring for those with PBC.

METHODS

We reviewed the current literature and guidelines on PBC with a focus on management and therapies.

RESULTS

A confident diagnosis of PBC is usually made based on serum liver tests and immune serology. Management of PBC should focus on three main 'process' pillars: (a) treat and risk-stratify through use of biochemical and prognostic criteria; (b) manage concurrent symptoms and other associated diseases; and (c) stage disease, monitor progression and prevent complications. With ongoing complexities in management, including a newly licensed therapy (obeticholic acid) and alternative non-licensed treatments and ongoing clinical trials, discussion with PBC expert centres is encouraged.

CONCLUSIONS

PBC is a dynamic disease wherein current treatment goals have become appropriately ambitious. Goals of care should prioritise prevention of end-stage liver disease and amelioration of patient symptom burden for all.

An insight into primary biliary cholangitis and its recent advances in treatment: semi-synthetic analogs to combat ursodeoxycholic-acid resistance

INTRODUCTION

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease which on progression causes cirrhosis; various studies also suggested that several diseases can co-exist in patients. In existing depiction of disease PBC, apart from entire use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), several patients need to step forward to liver-transplantation or death due to resistance or non-responder with UDCA monotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

To overcome this non-respondent treatment, novel bile acid semi-synthetic analogs have been identified which shows their potency against for farnesoid X receptor and transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor-5 which are identified as target for many developing analogs which have desirable pharmacokinetic profiles.

EXPERT OPINION

A range of studies suggests that adding semisynthetic analogs in therapeutic regime improves liver biochemistries in patients with suboptimal response to UDCA. Thus, the aspire of this review is to abridge and compare therapeutic value and current markets affirm of various bile acids semi-synthetic analogs which certainly are having promising effects in PBC monotherapy or in pooled treatment with UDCA for PBC.

Update on Emerging Treatment Options for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare autoimmune cholestatic liver disease that may progress to fibrosis or cirrhosis. Treatment options are currently limited. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains first-line therapy and has been proven to normalize serum biochemistries, halt histologic disease progression, and lead to patient survival comparable to the general population. Obeticholic acid (OCA) was recently approved as adjunct therapy in PBC patients with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA. However, OCA has been associated with worsening pruritus in clinical studies which may limit its use in this patient population. Several studies are currently underway to address the lack of treatment options for PBC. Of these, fibrates, which have been used in Japan for over a decade, have produced promising results. Furthermore, as currently approved therapies for PBC do not address the potentially debilitating clinical symptoms of PBC such as pruritus and fatigue, supplemental therapy is often required for symptom control.

Epidemiology and clinical course of primary biliary cholangitis in Eastern Slovakia

OBJECTIVE

To determine both the incidence and the prevalence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in Eastern Slovakia and to describe its clinical course and the response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

METHODS

We recorded data of patients with PBC, who were followed up in gastroenterology and hepatology centers in Eastern Slovakia during the period from June 30, 1999, through June 30, 2019.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of PBC varied from 0.7 to 1.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants between 2014 and 2018. PBC prevalence steadily increased from initial 10.2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2014 to 14.9 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in June 2019. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 56.3 ± 10.9 years. 95.7% of patients were females, and female/male gender ratio was 22.3:1. In June 2019, prevalence in the female population was 28 cases per 100,000 women. At the time of diagnosis, three-quarters of patients were symptomatic and 10% of patients had liver cirrhosis. The mean follow-up was 7.3 ± 5.2 years. Response to UDCA was observed in 72.1% of patients. Patients with higher baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels, liver cirrhosis at entry or at the end of follow-up and women younger than 45 years responded worse to UDCA. One-quarter of patients had liver cirrhosis at the end of follow-up. During follow-up, 1.6% of patients underwent liver transplantation and 5.5% of patients died. Five-year and 10-year liver-related mortalities were 2.7% and 4.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PBC prevalence in Eastern Slovakia is increasing, and most of the patients respond to therapy with UDCA.

Clinical Updates in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Trends, Epidemiology, Diagnostics, and New Therapeutic Approaches

Primary biliary cholangitis, formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is a chronic, autoimmune, and cholestatic disease ameliorating the biliary epithelial system causing fibrosis and end-stage liver disease, over time. Patients range from an asymptomatic phase early in the disease course, to symptoms of decompensated cirrhosis later in its course. This review focuses on the current consensus on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. We also discuss established medical management as well as novel and investigational therapeutics in the pipeline for management of PBC.

Quality of Life in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Single-Center Experience in Serbia

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic autoimmune disease, predominantly affecting middle-aged women, which may progress to end-stage liver disease. We aimed to assess the quality of life (QoL) in patients with PBC given that social, economic, and geographical factor also influence QoL.

METHODS

This study included patients with diagnosed PBC according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines, who were treated for at least 6 months in order to allow adequate time for the initial burden of symptoms to subside. We used the PBC-40 questionnaire validated in the Serbian language.

RESULTS

The mean total PBC-40 score was 89.4 ± 29.3. The overall frequency of moderate and severe involvement in each domain was as follows: 84.9% (n = 107) in "Symptoms," 29.3% (n = 36) in "Itch," 76.4% (n = 97) in "Fatigue," 58.1% (n = 72) in "Cognitive," 77.2% (n = 98) in "Social," and 70.9% (n = 90) in "Emotional." There was a statistically significant negative correlation of disease duration and albumin score with the Emotional domain score. Furthermore, this domain showed a significant positive correlation with the Mayo score.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that patients with PBC have significant impairment in QoL with fatigue being the most prevalent symptom. The Social and Emotional domains were also significantly affected in these individuals, particularly in patients with peripheral edema who exhibited worse QoL that those who were euvolemic.

Emerging therapies for PBC

Primary biliary cholangitis is an uncommon cholestatic liver disease predominantly affecting middle-aged women. Left untreated, there is a high risk of progression to end-stage liver disease. Few treatment options exist. To date, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and obeticholic acid (OCA) are the only medical therapies approved for use, other than symptomatic treatments and liver transplantation, the latter of which is reserved for those developing complications of cirrhosis or with intractable pruritus. UDCA improves outcomes, but many patients do not adequately respond. OCA therapy may improve response, but long-term data are limited. New therapies are desperately needed, but evaluation has been limited by the fact that the disease is heterogeneous, hard end points take years to develop, and there are different criteria in use for determining therapeutic response based on surrogate biomarkers. Fibrates appear to be the most promising new therapy and have beneficially affected surrogate end points and are beginning to show improvement in clinical end points.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Cholestatic liver diseases encompass a broad spectrum of pathologies, with the core injury occurring at the level of cholangiocytes and progressing to hepatic fibrosis and liver dysfunction. Primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the most significant progressive cholangiopathies in adults. Although rare, they commonly evolve to liver failure and need for liver transplantation. Despite recent advances in the basic knowledge of these cholangiopathies, the pathogenesis is still elusive. Targeted treatments to prevent disease progression and to preclude malignancy are not yet available. This review will address the general clinical features of both diseases, analyze their commonalities and differences, and provide a state-of-the art overview of the currently available therapeutics.

The Potential Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Background

The impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the natural progression of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has not yet been determined. The objective of this study was to determine whether DM is associated with increased liver damage in PBC.

Material/Methods

There were 168 treatment-naïve PBC patients, including 37 patients with DM, enrolled in this study between 2012 and 2018. Patient demographics, clinical features, and biochemical and histopathological parameters were collected. Disease severity was assessed by pathological data, Child Pugh grade, and noninvasive indicators. Relevant risks for PBC-related cirrhosis were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The noninvasive scores predicting fibrosis were all significantly higher in PBC-DM versus PBC-only patients (fibrosis-4 score: 4.08 versus 3.21, P=0.029; aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index: 1.46 versus 1.09, P=0.036; red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio: 0.12 versus 0.08, P=0.016; Mayo Risk Score: 1.52 versus 0.19, P=0.011; the Newcastle model: 2.85 versus 2.07, P=0.009; albumin-bilirubin score: −1.92 versus −2.10, P=0.023). Cirrhosis occurred at a higher rate (62.2% versus 42.0%, P=0.030) in PBC-DM patients, but Child Pugh grade and pathological differences could not be accurately determined. A multivariate analysis revealed DM increased the risk of PBC-related cirrhosis, with a resulting adjusted odds ratio of 2.351 (95% confidence interval, 1.022–5.409).

Conclusions

The results of this retrospective, single-center study suggest that DM is associated with more severe liver fibrosis in PBC. Consequently, improved management of DM might alter the prognosis of PBC patients.

Validation of Risk Scoring Systems in Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Treated Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Risk stratification based on biochemical variables is a useful tool for monitoring ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-treated patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Several UDCA response criteria and scoring systems have been proposed for risk prediction in PBC, but these have not been validated in large external cohorts.

METHODS

We performed a study on data of 1746 UDCA-treated patients with PBC from 25 centers in Europe, United States, and Canada. The prognostic performance of the risk scoring systems (GLOBE and UK-PBC) and the UDCA response criteria (Barcelona, Paris I, Paris II, Rotterdam, and Toronto) were evaluated. We regarded cirrhosis-related complications (ascites, variceal bleeding, and/or hepatic encephalopathy) as clinical end points.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients reached a clinical end point during a median 7 years (range 1-16 years) of follow-up. The 5-, 10- and 15-year adverse outcome-free survivals were 95%, 85%, and 77%. The GLOBE and UK-PBC scores predicted cirrhosis-related complications better than the UDCA response criteria. The hazard ratio (HR) for a 1 standard deviation increase was HR 5.05 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.43-5.74, P < 0.001) for the GLOBE score and HR 3.39 (95% CI: 3.10-3.72, P < 0.001) for the UK-PBC score. Overall, the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scores showed similar and excellent prognostic performance (C-statistic, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91%-95% vs 0.94; 95% CI: 0.91%-0.96%).

DISCUSSION

In our international, multicenter PBC cohort, the GLOBE and UK-PBC risk scoring systems were good predictors of future cirrhosis-related complications.

Diagnosis and Management of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, cholestatic, autoimmune disease with a variable progressive course. PBC can cause debilitating symptoms including fatigue and pruritus and, if left untreated, is associated with a high risk of cirrhosis and related complications, liver failure, and death. Recent changes to the PBC landscape include a name change, updated guidelines for diagnosis and treatment as well as new treatment options that have recently become available. Practicing clinicians face many unanswered questions when managing PBC. To assist these healthcare providers in managing patients with PBC, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) Institute for Clinical Research & Education, in collaboration with the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation (CLDF), organized a panel of experts to evaluate and summarize the most current and relevant peer-reviewed literature regarding PBC. This, combined with the extensive experience and clinical expertise of this expert panel, led to the formation of this clinical guidance on the diagnosis and management of PBC.

Influence factors and a predictive scoring model for measuring the biochemical response of primary biliary cholangitis to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment

AIMS

The biochemical response after ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment contributes toward predicting the prognosis for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients. This study aimed to establish a score model that can be used for predicting the biochemical response.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 218 patients in the derivation group and 66 patients in the verification group were enrolled. Response endpoints were based on the Barcelona criteria combined with the Paris I criteria. We determined independent factors of the biochemical response by univariate and multivariate analyses. Then, we established a predictive score model on the basis of regression coefficients after adjusted multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration in the derivation and the verification group was 12.9 and 12.2 months, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis after adjusting for sex and age indicated that First-UDCA treatment [odds ratio (OR)=2.543, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.234-5.240, P=0.011], baseline alanine aminotransferase level (OR=1.265, 95% CI: 1.089-1.471, P=0.002), and baseline total bilirubin level (OR=0.571, 95% CI: 0.420-0.776, P<0.001) were independent factors that influenced the biochemical response in PBC patients after 1 year of UDCA treatment. Therefore, the resulting biochemical response prediction score model represented the sum of the points corresponding to these three variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the score model in the derivation group and the verification group was 0.763 (95% CI: 0.701-0.817, P<0.001) and 0.798 (95% CI: 0.681-0.887, P<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We developed and verified an easy-to-use scoring model for the first time, which showed excellent predictive value for the biochemical response in PBC patients.

Primary biliary cholangitis in Spain. Results of a Delphi study of epidemiology, diagnosis, follow-up and treatment

INTRODUCTION

primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare disease with limited data regarding its epidemiology and standard clinical management in Spain.

OBJECTIVE

to gain insight into the epidemiology, patient flow, diagnosis, follow-up and treatment of PBC in Spain.

METHODS

a review of the literature and Delphi study involving 28 specialists in two rounds of consultations and an in-person results validation workshop.

RESULTS

there are approximately 9,400 patients with PBC in Spain, with an annual incidence of 0.51-3.86 cases/100,000 population. Albeit, a high error margin may be presumed due to the scarcity of relevant studies on this subject. Several months may elapse from suspicion to a confirmed diagnosis, usually by a gastroenterologist or hepatologist. The role of the liver biopsy for diagnosis and follow-up is heterogeneous. Overall, 95% of patients are treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and response is primarily monitored using the Barcelona criteria. Follow-up is performed every six months, with a heterogeneous use of the various available techniques. No recommendations or second-line commercial drugs are available in the case of no response, inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA.

CONCLUSIONS

while epidemiology may be estimated based on expert opinions, national registries are needed to provide accurate, up-to-date information on epidemiological parameters, disease stage and response to treatment in patients with PBC. Furthermore, novel therapies are required for selected patient groups.

The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines

Primary biliary cholangitis (formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease in which a cycle of immune mediated biliary epithelial cell injury, cholestasis and progressive fibrosis can culminate over time in an end-stage biliary cirrhosis. Both genetic and environmental influences are presumed relevant to disease initiation. PBC is most prevalent in women and those over the age of 50, but a spectrum of disease is recognised in adult patients globally; male sex, younger age at onset (<45) and advanced disease at presentation are baseline predictors of poorer outcome. As the disease is increasingly diagnosed through the combination of cholestatic serum liver tests and the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies, most presenting patients are not cirrhotic and the term cholangitis is more accurate. Disease course is frequently accompanied by symptoms that can be burdensome for patients, and management of patients with PBC must address, in a life-long manner, both disease progression and symptom burden. Licensed therapies include ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and obeticholic acid (OCA), alongside experimental new and re-purposed agents. Disease management focuses on initiation of UDCA for all patients and risk stratification based on baseline and on-treatment factors, including in particular the response to treatment. Those intolerant of treatment with UDCA or those with high-risk disease as evidenced by UDCA treatment failure (frequently reflected in trial and clinical practice as an alkaline phosphatase >1.67 × upper limit of normal and/or elevated bilirubin) should be considered for second-line therapy, of which OCA is the only currently licensed National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommended agent. Follow-up of patients is life-long and must address treatment of the disease and management of associated symptoms.

Natural History of Primary Biliary Cholangitis in the Ursodeoxycholic Acid Era: Role of Scoring Systems

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic disease that progresses to end-stage liver disease. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the standard treatment for PBC for several decades, is associated with improved survival without liver transplantation. Approximately 40% of patients do not respond to UDCA. Because of disease variability, several prognostic models exist that incorporate various factors including biochemical response to UDCA. Useful for patient care and counseling as well as risk stratification for research and clinical trials, the role of these models in the pre-UDCA and UDCA eras is discussed.

Current Treatment Options for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis is a progressive, autoimmune disease of the interlobular bile ducts, leading to secondary damage of hepatocytes that may progress to cirrhosis and liver failure. Until recently, the only approved treatment was ursodeoxycholic acid. However, 40% of patients do not have an adequate response. Obeticholic acid was approved for treatment as add-on therapy in this group of patients. Off-label use of fibrates has also been reported to be effective. Several new therapies are in development and may further add to the treatment options available to patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

Risk stratification and prognostic modelling in primary biliary cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a slowly progressive chronic cholestatic liver disease that, in a subgroup of patients, may result in liver failure or death. The definition of specific risk profiles, i.e. risk stratification, is of critical importance for the identification of these subgroups and thereby the targeting of care. Over the last few years large multicentre cohort studies have improved our knowledge regarding factors associated with progressive disease. Stratification based on biochemical response to ursodoxycholic acid provides a readily available measure to identify groups that might benefit from additional therapies to further improve prognosis. In addition, serum total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase are now considered the most robustly validated biomarkers of long-term outcome in PBC and are used as endpoints in clinical trials. The GLOBE score and UK-PBC risk score enable us to quantify the risk of future events for the individual patient, allowing more individualized risk prediction. In this review, we discuss both established prognostic factors and newly developed tools to estimate prognosis in PBC, highlighting their strengths, limitations and applicability in clinical practice.