Principles and practice of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Intraperitoneal and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

In our clinical practice, we have shifted away from the use of adjuvant normothermic intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, particularly following the publication of GOG 252. Our decision is rooted in the accumulating evidence indicating a lack of demonstrable superiority, alongside the recognized toxicities and logistical challenges associated with its administration. This strategic departure is also influenced by the rising utilization of maintenance therapies such as bevacizumab and PARP inhibitors, which present viable alternatives for improving patient outcomes. Our utilization of hyperthermic IP chemotherapy (HIPEC) is currently reserved for a specific cohort of patients, mirroring the patient population studied in the OVHIPEC-1 trial. Specifically, our HIPEC protocol applies to patients presenting with newly diagnosed stage IIIC high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer who are deemed ineligible for primary debulking surgery. Patients must exhibit at least stable disease with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, maintain a favorable performance status (ECOG score 0-1), possess good nutritional reserves (with no evidence of protein-calorie malnutrition and an albumin level exceeding 3.5), and not have chronic kidney disease. When HIPEC is planned, it is administered at the time of interval debulking surgery, contingent upon the attainment of optimal surgical outcomes (< 1 cm of residual disease). Our HIPEC protocol adheres to the original OVHIPEC-1 trial guidelines, employing cisplatin at a dosage of 100 mg/m2. We administer at least two antiemetics, antihistamines, and sodium thiosulfate to mitigate known side effects. Postoperatively, patients are admitted to the general surgical floor, reserving the intensive care unit for those in critical condition. We follow Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles, incorporating early ambulation and feeding into our postoperative care strategy. We have encountered encouraging results with this approach, with most patients having largely uncomplicated postoperative courses and resuming adjuvant chemotherapy within 3 to 4 weeks of surgery.

Intraperitoneal Carboplatin for Ovarian Cancer - A Phase 2/3 Trial

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been shown to be effective at reducing mortality for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer but is not widely used in practice. METHODS: We performed the Intraperitoneal Therapy for Ovarian Cancer with Carboplatin (iPocc) trial as an open-label, international, multi-institutional, randomized phase 2/3 clinical trial in women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy. All patients received intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle). In addition, patients in the control group received intravenous carboplatin (dose-dense intravenous paclitaxel plus intravenous carboplatin [dd-TCiv]), whereas patients in the experimental group received dose-dense intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal carboplatin (dd-TCip). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, tumor response, treatment completion rate, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Among 655 patients randomized to treatment, median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 20.7 (18.1 to 22.8) months for dd-TCiv (n=328) and 23.5 (20.5 to 26.9) months for dd-TCip (n=327; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99; P=0.04). The PFS benefit with dd-TCip was consistent in patients with different baseline characteristics, stage, size of residual tumor, age, and performance status. The treatment completion rates were 68.3 and 59.9% in the dd-TCiv and dd-TCip groups, respectively. The incidence of intraperitoneal catheter-related AEs in the dd-TCip group was 10.1%; there were no such AEs in the dd-TCiv group. CONCLUSIONS: In the first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, intraperitoneal carboplatin resulted in a modest prolongation of PFS when given with dose-dense weekly paclitaxel regardless of residual tumor size, with no impact on noncatheter-related toxicities. (Funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and others; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials number, jRCTs031180141.)

Intraperitoneal Administration of a Cisplatin-Loaded Nanogel through a Hybrid System Containing an Alginic Acid-Based Nanogel and an In Situ Cross-Linkable Hydrogel for Peritoneal Dissemination of Ovarian Cancer

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy demonstrates potential applicability in the treatment of peritoneally disseminated ovarian cancer because the disseminated tumors can directly receive exposure to high concentrations of anticancer drugs. However, a considerable proportion of drugs, particularly micromolecular and hydrophilic drugs, such as cisplatin (CDDP), are often excreted through glomerular filtration for a short period. To effectively deliver CDDP into peritoneally disseminated ovarian cancer tissues, we developed an alginate (AL)-based hybrid system in which a CDDP-loaded AL nanogel (AL/CDDP-nanogel) was encapsulated in an injectable AL-hydrogel cross-linked with calcium ions. This system enabled the sustained release of CDDP from the AL/CDDP-nanogel/AL-hydrogel hybrid for over a week. Herein, we constructed a peritoneally disseminated ovarian cancer mouse model using ovarian cancer cell lines with KRAS mutations (ID8-KRAS: KRAS^G12V). The AL/CDDP-nanogel/AL-hydrogel hybrid system showed significant antitumor activity in vivo. This therapy may be considered a novel strategy for the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer with KRAS mutations.

Impact of Mitomycin-C-Induced Neutropenia after Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Cytoreductive Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Background

Mitomycin-C (MMC) is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, MMC has a side effect of myelosuppression. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations and impact of MMC-induced neutropenia after CRS and HIPEC in colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 124 colorectal cancer patients who underwent CRS with HIPEC between March 2015 and January 2019 were evaluated. Patients with malignancies of non-colorectal origin, hospital stay longer than 60 days, peritoneal cancer index > 30, and complete cytoreduction score > 2 were excluded. MMC 35 mg/m² was administered for 90 min at 41–43 °C. The patients were divided into three groups: no neutropenia, mild neutropenia (grade 1–2), and severe neutropenia (grade 3–4).

Results

In total, mild and severe neutropenia occurred in 30 (24.2%) and 48 (38.7%) patients, respectively. Age and body surface area were significantly different among the neutropenia groups. Severe neutropenia developed significantly earlier than mild neutropenia (6.9 days vs. 10.4 days, p < 0.001) and also lasted significantly longer (4.6 days vs. 2.5 days, p = 0.005). The rate of major postoperative complications was significantly higher in the severe neutropenia group than in the no and mild neutropenia groups (8.3% vs. 6.7% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.015)

Conclusions

Severe neutropenia starts earlier and lasts longer than mild neutropenia after CRS and HIPEC using an MMC triple method. The higher rate of major postoperative complications in patients with severe neutropenia highlights the importance of postoperative management during the neutropenia period.

An overview and update of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite, the strong rationale and evidence of the benefit of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer, it has not been widely adopted, mainly due to its high morbidity and logistical difficulties. Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a more tolerable and technically feasible method of intraperitoneal chemotherapy, whereas other potential advantages include homogenous drug distribution, application before tumor regrowth and combination with hyperthermia, which is directly cytotoxic and enhances the efficacy of many drugs.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors explain the rationale and indications for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC in advanced ovarian cancer. Data of major clinical studies, meta-analyses, and recent randomized trials are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

After many encouraging clinical studies and meta-analyses, a recent randomized study demonstrated survival benefit for HIPEC during interval CRS in primary ovarian cancer, without increased morbidity, whereas another implied its benefit in recurrent ovarian cancer. Results of recently completed and numerous ongoing randomized studies will further determine the benefit of HIPEC in ovarian cancer at different time points. Patient selection and appraisal of the best protocols are crucial. The field of gynecological oncology will most likely evolve to include HIPEC eventually as a routine treatment for ovarian cancer.

Landscape of systemic therapy for ovarian cancer in 2019: Primary therapy

According to the statement from the 5th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference in 2015, the primary systemic chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer is a combination of paclitaxel plus carboplatin administered every 3 weeks (PCq3w). Optional alternatives include weekly dose-dense paclitaxel, in combination and maintenance therapy with bevacizumab, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Since then, in addition to the PCq3w strategy, there has been emerging new evidence, especially for poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Moreover, there are multiple randomized, phase 3 trials testing the addition of antiangiogenic and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population. In this article, current and future perspectives of systemic chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer are discussed.

It's time to warm up to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer

The peritoneal spread of ovarian cancer makes it a potential target for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Intraperitoneal delivery exposes the tumor to concentrations of cytotoxic drugs much greater than with intravenous delivery, and in vitro studies have also shown that combining hyperthermia and platinum leads to an additive cytotoxic effect. Pharmacokinetic analyses have confirmed very high concentrations of cytotoxic drugs in the peritoneal cavity, with minimal systemic exposure and toxicity. The majority of historical data evaluating HIPEC in ovarian cancer are based on retrospective research, which included heterogeneous groups of patients and drugs used for HIPEC. Recent publications on the findings of prospective studies, including the first randomized trial in which the only difference in intervention was the addition of HIPEC with cisplatin to interval debulking surgery in stage III patients, have shown a benefit in favor of HIPEC. Yet, a recent prospective study from Korea did not find a benefit. Opponents of HIPEC have cited higher rates of complications with this approach, yet most of the serious adverse events observed are likely related to the surgery itself, and are comparable to the rates reported in studies evaluating cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC. Findings from a recent randomized controlled trial showed no delays in initiation or completion of postoperative chemotherapy in patients treated with HIPEC. A growing body of evidence is indicating that it might be time to seriously consider HIPEC as a complementary treatment at the time of cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer in the setting of an experienced center. Yet, more research is needed to identify the population of patients who gain the most benefit from this therapy.

Pharmacologic Properties of the Carrier Solutions for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Comparative Analyses Between Water and Lipid Carrier Solutions in the Rat Model

Background

Carrier solutions play an important role in the distribution, plasma absorption, chemical stability, and solubility of anticancer agents during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). In the current study, lipophilic properties of carrier solutions were evaluated to determine whether they improved anticancer drug absorption rates using mitomycin-C (MMC) or oxaliplatin HIPEC as compared to hydrophilic carrier solutions.

Methods

Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into two groups: MMC and oxaliplatin treatment groups. Each group was then further subdivided by carrier solution: Dianeal^® PD-2 peritoneal dialysis solution, 5% dextrose solution and 20% lipid solution (Lipision^®). HIPEC was performed over 60 min at 41–42 °C using the anticancer drugs MMC (35 mg/m²) or oxaliplatin (460 mg/m²). The plasma area under the curve (AUC; AUC_plasma), peritoneal AUC (AUC_peritoneum), and peritoneal/plasma AUC ratios were compared among HIPEC carrier solutions.

Results

Plasma drug concentrations were significantly different among carrier solutions, varying by time. In contrast, peritoneal drug concentrations did not change with carrier solution. In the MMC group, the peritoneal/plasma AUC ratio of a lipid solution was three times higher than Dianeal^® (p < 0.001). In the oxaliplatin group, the peritoneal/plasma AUC ratio was significantly different between carrier solutions (p = 0.046). Although the oxaliplatin AUC_peritoneum did not vary (p = 0.941), the AUC_plasma of a lipid solution was lower than that of 5% dextrose solution (p = 0.039).

Conclusions

The lipid carrier solution increases the peritoneal/plasma AUC ratio and decreases plasma absorption rates. However, further study is required before clinical uses, considering its pharmacologic properties and possible risks after HIPEC.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-018-6628-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Amphiphilic PEGylated Lanthanide-Doped Upconversion Nanoparticles for Significantly Passive Accumulation in the Peritoneal Metastatic Carcinomatosis Models Following Intraperitoneal Administration

Inorganic nanoparticles have emerged as attractive materials for cancer research, because of their exceptional physical properties and multifunctional engineering. However, inorganic nanoparticle accumulation in the tumors located in the abdominal cavity after intravenous (IV) administration is confined because of the peritoneum-plasma barrier. To improve this situation, we developed lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), coated by amphiphilic polyethylene glycol (P-PEG), serving as a representative of inorganic nanoparticles. Following intraperitoneal (IP) administration into the peritoneal metastatic carcinomatosis models, UCNPs coated by P-PEG (P-PEG-UCNPs) passively accumulated in the cancerous tissues at a larger amount than that in the main normal organs. On the basis of spatial proximity, P-PEG-UCNPs administrated via the IP route exhibited higher passive accumulation in the tumors in the abdominal cavity compared to that via the IV route. It is suggested that IP administration could be a promising strategy for inorganic nanoparticles to be efficaciously applied in peritoneal cancer research.

Distinct implications of different BRCA mutations: efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy, PARP inhibition and clinical outcome in ovarian cancer

Approximately a fifth of ovarian carcinoma (OC) is associated with inherited germline mutations, most commonly in the DNA repair genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA). BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated OCs have historically been described as a single subgroup of OC that displays a distinct set of characteristics termed the "BRCAness" phenotype. The hallmarks of this phenotype are superior clinical outcome and hypersensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. However, growing evidence suggests that BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated OCs display distinct characteristics, most notably in long-term patient survival. Furthermore, recent data indicate that the site of BRCA1 mutation is important with regard to platinum and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Here, we summarize the body of research describing the BRCAness phenotype and highlight the differential implications of different BRCA mutations with regard to clinicopathologic features, therapy sensitivity and clinical outcome in OC.

Update on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Surgical treatment and chemotherapy administration in women with epithelial ovarian cancer is more controversial today than at any point in the last 3 decades. The use of chemotherapy administered intraperitoneally has been particularly contentious. Three large randomized phase III studies, multiple meta-analyses, and now real-world data have demonstrated substantial outcome benefit for the use of chemotherapy administered intraperitoneally versus intravenously for first-line postoperative treatment of optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, for each of these randomized studies, there was scope to either criticize the design or otherwise refute adoption of this route of administration. As a result, the uptake has been variable in North America, although in Europe it has been practically nonexistent. Reasons for this include unquestionable additional toxicity, more inconvenience, and extra cost. However, 10-year follow up of these studies demonstrates unprecedented survival in the intraperitoneal arm (median survival 110 months in patients with completely debulked stage III), raising the possibility that by combining maximal debulking surgery with postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy it may be possible to bring about a step change in the outcomes for these patients. In this review, we discuss the rationale for administering chemotherapy intraperitoneally, the merits of the main randomized clinical trials, the evidence regarding optimal regimes, issues of toxicity, port considerations, and reasons for lack of universal adoption. We also explore potential clinical and biologic factors that may be useful for patient selection in the future.

Front-line intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy in stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer with minimal residual disease: a competing risk analysis

Background

In the analysis of survival data for cancer patients, the problem of competing risks is often ignored. Competing risks have been recognized as a special case of time-to-event analysis. The conventional techniques for time-to-event analysis applied in the presence of competing risks often give biased or uninterpretable results.

Methods

Using a prospectively collected administrative health care database in a single institution, we identified patients diagnosed with stage III or IV primary epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers with minimal residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery between 1995 and 2012. Here, we sought to evaluate whether intraperitoneal chemotherapy outperforms intravenous chemotherapy in the presence of competing risks. Unadjusted and multivariable subdistribution hazards models were applied to this database with two types of competing risks (cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality) coded to measure the relative effects of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 1263 patients were recruited as the initial cohort. After propensity score matching, 381 patients in each arm entered into final competing risk analysis. Cumulative incidence estimates for cancer-specific mortality were statistically significantly lower (p = 0.017, Gray test) in patients receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy (5-year estimates, 34.5 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 29.5–39.6 %, and 10-year estimates, 60.7 %; 95 % CI, 52.2–68.0 %) versus intravenous chemotherapy (5-year estimates, 41.3 %; 95 % CI, 36.2–46.3 %, and 10-year estimates, 67.5 %, 95 % CI, 61.6–72.7 %). In subdistribution hazards analysis, for cancer-specific mortality, intraperitoneal chemotherapy outperforms intravenous chemotherapy (Subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.82; 95 % CI, 0.70–0.96) after correcting other covariates.

Conclusions

In conclusion, results from this comparative effectiveness study provide supportive evidence for previous published randomized trials that intraperitoneal chemotherapy outperforms intravenous chemotherapy even eliminating the confounding of competing risks. We suggest that implementation of competing risk analysis should be highly considered for the investigation of cancer patients who have medium to long-term follow-up period.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2279-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recent achievements in colorectal cancer diagnostic and therapy by the use of nanoparticles

Colorectal cancer is a major public health issue, being the third most common cancer in men and the second in women. It is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths. Nanomedicine is an emerging field of interest, many of its aspects being linked to cancer research. Chemotherapy has a well-established role in colorectal cancer management, unfortunately being limited by inability to have a selective distribution, by multidrug resistance and adverse effects. Researches carried out in recent years about nanotechnologies aimed, among others, to resolve the issues mentioned above. Targeted and localized delivery of the chemotherapeutic drugs, using nanoparticles, with selective destruction of cancerous cells would minimize the toxicity on healthy tissues. Also, the use of nanomaterials as contrast agent could improve sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. The purpose of this review is to highlight the recent achievements of cancer research by use of nanomaterials, in the idea of finding the ideal composite, capable to simultaneous diagnostic and treat cancer.

Lipid-dendrimer hybrid nanosystem as a novel delivery system for paclitaxel to treat ovarian cancer

Combining lipids and dendrimers into one formulation is an emerging platform in the drug delivery field. This study aims to (i) develop and characterize a lipid-dendrimer hybrid (LDH) nanosystem for the hydrophobic anticancer drug paclitaxel, and (ii) evaluate its in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer activity in ovarian cancer models. The LDH nanosystems were prepared from 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and poly (amidoamine) (PAMAM) G4.0. The size and zeta potential of the LDH nanosystem were 37.6 ± 6.1n m and +2.9 ± 0.1 mV, respectively, with vesicular morphology observed under cryo-TEM. The encapsulation efficiency of paclitaxel in the LDH system was 78.0 ± 2.1%. The potency of paclitaxel could be significantly improved by 37-fold when presented in the LDH nanosystem as compared to free drug, whereby paclitaxel and PAMAM G4.0 acted synergistically in killing the ovarian cancer cells. As shown by fluorescence confocal microscopy, majority of the lipids in the LDH nanosystem were located in the plasma membrane, while the dendrimers were distributed intracellularly upon uptake. Despite the use of a 10-fold lower paclitaxel dose, the survival of IGROV-1 ovarian tumor-bearing animals could be significantly prolonged by the paclitaxel-loaded LDH nanosystem, as reflected by a 50% increase in the median survival time. Such hybrid nanosystem emerged from combining two established drug delivery platforms could pave way for the development of multifunctional delivery systems for potential theranostic applications.

Feasibility and safety of a modified outpatient regimen with intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy for optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy improves survival in optimally debulked ovarian cancer patients. However, the need for inpatient administration and the perceived higher toxicity rates compared with standard intravenous chemotherapy have limited its widespread application. Several modified outpatient schemes, such as the Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group (GEICO) regimen, have been tested and have reported overall better tolerance with an improvement in completion treatment rates. The aim of our study was to assess the toxicity of the GEICO regimen in patients treated at our institution.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical records of stage III ovarian cancer patients with optimally debulked primary cytoreduction surgery that were treated from June 2009 to April 2013 with the GEICO regimen. Patients received intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) for 3 hours on day 1, i.p. cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 2, and i.p. paclitaxel (60 mg/m2) on day 8 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were identified. In 67% of the patients, i.p. port placement was performed at the primary surgery. The most common grade 3-to-4 toxicities seen were abdominal pain (14.3%) and neurotoxicity (9.5%). Eighteen patients (85.7%) completed the 6 cycles. Three patients stopped chemotherapy because of treatment-related toxicity. There were no serious port-related complications. With a median follow-up of 46 months, median progression-free survival was 23 months (95% confidence interval [11.8-34.6]). Nine patients (42.9%) have relapsed; most relapses were multifocal and extraperitoneal.

CONCLUSION

The administration of the GEICO outpatient modified regimen was feasible with a good safety profile. It seems to show less toxicity than previously reported IP chemotherapy regimens. In our institution, port-related complications were infrequent and easily managed. However, further studies are warranted to establish the optimal i.p. regimen in a prospective manner and to validate it in a larger phase 3 trial.

Pharmacology of cancer chemotherapy drugs for hyperthermic intraperitoneal peroperative chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer

The peritoneal parietal and visceral surfaces of the abdomen and pelvis are an important anatomic site for the dissemination of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The transcoelomic spread of cancer cells gives rise to peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) which, without special treatments, is a fatal manifestation of EOC. In order to control PC cytoreductive surgery to remove macroscopic disease is combined with perioperative intraperitoneal (IP) and perioperative intravenous chemotherapy to eradicate microscopic residual disease. Chemotherapy agents are selected to be administered by the IP or intravenous route based on their pharmacologic properties. A peritoneal-plasma barrier which retards the clearance of high molecular weight chemotherapy from the peritoneal cavity results in a large exposure of small cancer nodules on abdominal and pelvic surfaces. Tissue penetration is facilitated by moderate hyperthermia (41-42 °C) of the IP chemotherapy solution. Timing of the chemotherapy as a planned part of the surgical procedure to maximize exposure of all peritoneal surfaces is crucial to success.

Principle and evolving role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy has been extensively studied in the ovarian cancer field. Despite the fact that three large randomized trials that were conducted in the United States showed survival benefit, meta-analysis also showed survival benefit and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) released a clinical announcement recommending i.p. chemotherapy for optimally debulked advanced stage ovarian cancer in 2006, i.p. chemotherapy has not been widely accepted by the gynecologic oncology community, mainly because of its toxicities.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, previously available evidence, new evidence published since the NCI clinical announcement and ongoing clinical trials will be discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Three currently ongoing randomized Phase III trials will provide extremely important information about whether a less toxic i.p. regimen using carboplatin will be beneficial for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. They are important because it may be possible to solve many of the questions or unmet needs in i.p. chemotherapy by combining these three trials.

Optimization of drug delivery systems for intraperitoneal therapy to extend the residence time of the chemotherapeutic agent

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is an effective way of treating peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin after complete cytoreduction. Although IP therapy has been already performed for many years, no standardized treatment design has been developed in terms of schedule, residence time, drug, or carrier solution. Because of the fast clearance of the conventional intravenous (IV) drug delivery systems used for IP therapy, a lot of research is performed to optimize IP drug delivery and extend the residence time of the cytotoxic agent in the peritoneal cavity. This paper reviews the recent advances made in drug delivery systems for IP chemotherapy, discussing the use of microparticles, nanoparticles, liposomes, micelles, implants, and injectable depots for IP delivery.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: rationale and clinical data

The outcome of ovarian cancer remains poor with conventional therapy. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has some advantages over systemic chemotherapy, including favorable pharmacokinetics and optimal treatment timing. Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) provides improved exposure of the entire seroperitoneal surface to the agent and utilizes the direct cytoxic and drug-enhancing effect of hyperthermia. While standard normothermic, nonintraoperative, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been demonstrated to be beneficial in randomized trials and meta-analyses, there are no data from randomized HIPEC trials available yet. Cautious extrapolation of data from standard normothermic, nonintraoperative, intraperitoneal chemotherapy and data from Phase II and nonrandomized comparative studies suggest that HIPEC delivered at the time of surgery for ovarian cancer has definite potential. Data from ongoing randomized HIPEC trials to adequately answer the question of whether the addition of HIPEC actually prolongs survival in patients with peritoneal dissemination of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer are awaited in the near future.

Phase II study of interval debulking surgery followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: a Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study (KCOG9812)

OBJECTIVE

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP) is known to be effective after optimal primary debulking surgery (PDS) for ovarian cancer (OC). Here, we conducted a phase II study to investigate its effectiveness after interval debulking surgery (IDS).

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with FIGO stage IIIB-IV and suboptimal (≥1cm diameter) residual disease after PDS were enrolled. Carboplatin (AUC 4 IV, Day 1) and cisplatin (50mg/m(2) IV, Day 3) were given q21d for 3cycles. After IDS, paclitaxel (175mg/m(2) IV Day 1 or 60mg/m(2) IV Days 1, 8, and 15, since 2000) and cisplatin (75mg/m(2) IP Day 2) were given q21d for 4cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and adverse events (CTCAE ver. 2.0). Clinical manifestations at first recurrence and subsequent treatment were also surveyed.

RESULTS

Of the 37 patients, high-grade, serous adenocarcinoma was found in 33. Stages IIIB, IIIC, and IV were found in 2, 24, and 11 patients, respectively. After IDS, 23 patients had no macroscopic residual tumor. No patients had permanent enterostomy, febrile neutropenia, or platelet transfusion. The treatment protocol was completed in 22 patients, and discontinued in 5 due to IP catheter-related complications. Median PFS and OS were 22 and 57months, respectively. Among the 28 patients with recurrence, 10 had no intraperitoneal disease at first recurrence. Among the 8 patients who underwent surgical cytoreduction, 6 had no residual tumor, while 2 had a <1-cm-diameter residual tumor.

CONCLUSION

IP after IDS for patients with initially suboptimally debulked OC was effective.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian cancer - single center experience

Majority of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy complications were related to the chemoport. Aim of our study was to find the means of reducing complications of IP chemoport, to increase the benefits of IP chemotherapy. During January 2007 to December 2010, hundred consecutive patients of stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who had optimal cytoreduction underwent chemoport insertion during laparotomy. Initial 20 cases had 14.3F Bard IP chemoport, and later cases had 9.6Fr single lumen venous port inserted intraperitoneally. Entry point into the peritoneum was single, 6 cm lateral to the umbilicus and double purse-string suture taken around the catheter to prevent peri-catheter backflow of ascitic fluid or drug. Modified IP chemotherapy regimen (SWOG-9912 trial) was used. Age of the patient ranged from 34 years to 76 years. In total 600 cycles, 516 cycles (86 %) were completed. Seventy patients (70 %) received all the 6 cycles by IP route. Two in the initial 10 patients had vaginal leak, for whom first 2 cycles were given by IV route and then shifted to IP route. Subsequently all cases had double layer closure of vaginal vault. Nine patients (9 %) had port related complications, in which 8 were transient. Catheter block was seen in 5 cases, of which 4 salvaged by heparin injection lock for 2 h and in subsequent cases IV port access catheter with valve replaced the fenestrated IP catheter. None of the IV catheters had the block. Four cases had backflow of fluid around catheter collecting around the port chamber site. Two patients had severe abdominal pain due to dense adhesions and further cycles were completed by IV route. Cisplatin was replaced with carboplatin in 5 cases with severe toxicity. Longest follow-up is 4 years with median follow up of 1.8 years.70 % are disease free on follow up. Local recurrence rate was 18 and systemic in 8 cases. Mortality rate is 4 %. Complications of IP ports are low when insertion is done meticulously with a dedicated team. With modified IP dose and drug regimen, side effects are less and most patients can complete all the desired cycles.

Regimens with intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenuous cyclophosphamide and intraperitoneal carboplatin plus intravenuous cyclophosphamide are equally effective in second line intraperitoneal chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

We compared response, survival and side effects of regiments with intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by intraperitoneal cisplatin versus intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by intraperitoneal carboplatin as second line treatment in one center retrospective study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria were: relapse or recurrence of the disease after surgery and first line treatment; stage III histologicaly documented serous epithelial ovarian cancer after one or more prior regiments of chemotherapy. Recurrence were confirmed throughout restaging laparotomy or second look laparotomy. Patients from one of the groups received 90 mg/m(2) cisplatin on the first day and 750 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide intravenously, while the second group members AUC 6 carboplatin intraperitoneally and 750 mg/m(2) cyclophosphamide intravenously. Four courses were administrated for each patient.

RESULTS

Of the 49 patients in the cisplatin group the response rates were 21 (43%), 10 (20%) and 18 (37%) in the groups of pathologic complete response, pathologic partial response and progressive disease, respectively. The median survival from the initiation of intraperitoneal chemotherapy was 59 months. Of the 25 patients in the carboplatin group the response rates were 10 (40%), 4 (16%) and 11 (44%) respectively. The median survival -51 months. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant p>0.05 either in response or in toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our research including relatively long survival from intraperotoneal chemotherapy initiation confirm that carboplatin treatment is as good as cisplatin in second line intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Feasibility of a modified outpatient regimen of intravenous/intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer patients: a GEICO study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and reasons for early discontinuation of a modified outpatient intraperitoneal/intravenous (IP/IV) chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Between February 2006 and November 2008, 51 consecutive patients from Institutions of the Spanish Ovarian Cancer Group (GEICO) were treated with a modified outpatient IP chemotherapy regimen. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m over 3 hours on day 1, followed by IP cisplatin 100 mg/m (or 75 mg/m according to the principal investigator's criteria) on day 2. On day 8, patients received IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m. To homogenize the IP administration and supportive measures, a GEICO guideline for IP chemotherapy was established. Patients were treated with the intention to receive 6 courses of chemotherapy every 21 days.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 49 years (range, 36-75 years), and most of them had papillary serous ovarian cancer (78%), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC (76%). Thirty-nine patients completed 4 or more IP cycles, and 28 (61%) completed all 6 IP cycles. Twenty-two patients discontinued the IP/IV treatment, mainly because of chemotherapy toxicity (10 patients) and catheter-related complications (5 patients). The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (14 patients; 30%) and gastrointestinal events (12 patients; 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

The GEICO outpatient modified regimen resulted in a lesser toxicity and a greater rate of treatment completion than previously reported. The accurate selection of patients and the administration following well-defined guidelines can increase the feasibility of IP chemotherapy administration.

Intraperitoneal treatment in ovarian cancer: the gynecologic oncology group perspective in 2012

The peritoneal cavity is the major site of disease in ovarian cancer. The peritoneal predominance of disease provides a rationale for administration of chemotherapy within the peritoneal cavity. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for ovarian cancer has been studied rigorously for more than 30 years and has been reproducibly shown to improve the survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Three large randomized trials of IP compared with intravenous (IV) therapy have demonstrated statistically significant improvement in clinical outcome measures. Despite this, the IP approach has not gained widespread acceptance in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Here, we review reported, recently completed, and ongoing trials of IP therapy in ovarian cancer including attempts to improve the tolerability and acceptance of this proven approach.

Comparison of hyperthermia and adrenaline to enhance the intratumoral accumulation of cisplatin in a murine model of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Background

The best method to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer is not well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of hyperthermia and adrenaline to enhance the intratumoral accumulation of cisplatin in a rat model of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Methods

Four groups of 5 BDIX rats with ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis underwent IPC with 30 mg/l of cisplatin according to the following conditions: normothermia at 37° for 1 or 2 hours, hyperthermia at 42°C for 1 hour or normothermia at 37°C for 2 hours with 2 mg/l adrenaline. Tissue platinum content was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The effect of hyperthermia, adrenaline and the duration of exposure to the drug was measured in vivo (tissue concentration of platinum in tumor, abdominal and extra abdominal tissues) and in vitro (cytotoxicity on human ovarian cancer cells).

Results

In vitro, hyperthermia and longer exposure enhanced the accumulation and the cytotoxic effect of cisplatin on cancer cells. In vivo, only the 2 hours treatment with adrenaline resulted in increased platinum concentrations. The rats treated with adrenaline showed significantly lower concentrations of cisplatin in extra peritoneal tissues than those treated with hyperthermia.

Conclusion

Adrenaline is more effective than hyperthermia in order to enhance the intratumoral concentration of cisplatin in rats with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian origin. It may also decrease the systemic absorption of the drug.

Phase II study of intraperitoneal carboplatin with intravenous paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer: a Sankai Gynecology Cancer Study Group Study

PURPOSE

To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of 2 treatment modalities: intraperitoneal carboplatin combined with intravenous (IV) paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were those with epithelial ovarian carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma stages II to IV who underwent initial surgery and had a residual tumor size of 2 cm or larger. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m followed by intraperitoneal carboplatin AUC6. The primary end point was a response. Secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled, and 24 patients were eligible for assessment. The response rate was 83.3% (95% CI, 62.6%-95.3%; ). The median progression-free survival was 25 months. The median overall survival had not been reached. Incidences of grade (G) 3/4 hematological toxicities were absolute neutrophil count, 96%; hemoglobin, 29%; and thrombocytopenia, 16%. Nonhematological toxicities included G2 liver function, 4%; G3 sensory neuropathy, 8%; and G3 myalgia and arthralgia, 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin combined with IV paclitaxel was well tolerated and showed satisfactory response in the patients with bulky residual tumor. Large-scale phase III trial comparing with IV carboplatin is warranted in this patient population.

Intraperitoneal access via direct puncture is an alternative way to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has not been widely accepted in the treatment of ovarian cancer. One of the main reasons is the lack of a convenient and safe way to deliver IP therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of delivering IP chemotherapy via direct puncture using a peripheral venous needle, as well as evaluating the associated risk factors and complications in the primary treatment of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

METHODS

The clinical records of all patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 01/1995 to 11/2006 were reviewed retrospectively to identify patients who had received IP therapy via direct puncture after primary cytoreduction.

RESULTS

We identified 194 patients, and 121 (62.4%) of them successfully completed six or more cycles of IP chemotherapy, whereas 73 (37.6%) failed. Two (1%) patients ceased IP therapy directly due to IP access related complications and 35 (18.1%) discontinued IP therapy for reasons unrelated to IP access. Old age might be a potential risk factor for IP therapy failure. The IP therapy failure rate in patients over 60 years old was higher than that in patients under or at 60 (57.1% versus 34.3%, P=0.021). Body mass index were not associated with IP therapy failure.

CONCLUSIONS

IP access via direct puncture using a peripheral venous needle could be an alternative and safe way to deliver IP chemotherapy in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer.

Combination chemotherapy of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in suboptimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer

The objective of this study was to retrospectively assess the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy of intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin and intravenous (IV) paclitaxel in suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer. Between March 1998 and March 2006, 44 patients with histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian carcinoma or peritoneal carcinoma with a residual mass greater than 1 cm received combination chemotherapy of IV paclitaxel and IP carboplatin. Administration of IV paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 immediately followed by IP carboplatin at an area under the curve of 6 was scheduled every 3 weeks for at least six cycles. The diagnosis and stage were ovarian carcinoma stage II in 8, III in 25, and IV in 6 cases, and peritoneal carcinoma stage III in 5 cases. Eighty-three percent of patients completed more than six cycles of chemotherapy. The incidences of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were 41 (93%) for neutrocytopenia, 10 (41%) for thrombocytopenia, and 18 (23%) for anemia. Observed grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were 1 (2%) for allergy, 1 (2%) for fatigue, 1 (2%) for vomiting, 1 (2%) for liver dysfunction, and 4 (9%) for peripheral neuropathy. Two patients (5%) encountered catheter problems (one obstruction and one infection). Overall response rate was 80% (16 complete response, 19 partial response, 3 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 24 and 31 months, respectively. Combination chemotherapy of IP carboplatin and IV paclitaxel is effective and safe in suboptimally debulked ovarian cancer, and further evaluation is warranted.

Prognostic factors for ovarian metastases from primary gastric cancer

The purpose of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for ovarian metastases from primary gastric cancer, helping establish optimal strategy in ameliorating survival for this entity. Clinical data of 68 consecutive patients histologically diagnosed with ovarian metastases from primary gastric cancer were accrued from 1096 cases with female gastric cancer. Metachronous surgery was performed on 36 patients and 32 received synchronous surgery. There were 14 patients treated with surgery alone and 54 with combined modality therapy. After the median follow-up time of 9.1 months, the median survival time (MST) of 12.4 months was observed for all patients. Patients treated with synchronous surgery tended to have an inferior survival compared with those treated with metachronous surgery (MST: 10.9 vs 14.3 months; P = 0.100). Combined modality showed a significantly better MST compared with surgery alone (13.6 vs 7.9 months; P = 0.004). Chemotherapy cycles (more than four or less than or equal to four) were found to have an impact on survival (MST: 14.3 vs 9.4 months; P = 0.031). Peritoneal metastases, lymphovascular involvement, and unilateral ovarian metastasectomy were independent unfavorable prognostic factors. Combined modality therapy as primary therapy resulted in good outcome, and more aggressive chemotherapy (more than four cycles) was accompanied by an improvement in survival. Innovative systemic treatments need to be explored in treatment of peritoneal metastases and lymphovascular involvement. Bilateral oophorectomy was considered when ovarian metastases were histologically diagnosed.