Outcomes and Characteristics of Patients Discharged Alive from Hospice

Hispanics and Hospice: A Systematic Literature Review

Background. Hospice has been shown to improve patient and family satisfaction with care, reduce hospitalizations and hospital costs, and reduce pain and symptoms. Despite more than 40 years of hospice care and related research in the U.S., few studies examining hospice experiences have included Hispanics. Thus, little is known about hospice barriers, facilitators, and outcomes among Hispanics.Aim. This systematic literature review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of studies assessing knowledge of and attitudes toward hospice, barriers and facilitators to hospice use, utilization patterns, and hospice-related outcomes among Hispanics.Design. Between March 2019 and March 2020 we searched Ovid Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and CINAHL, using search terms for hospice care, end-of-life care, Hispanics, and Latinos. All steps were guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. U.S. studies that examined Hispanics' knowledge and attitudes towards hospice, facilitators or barriers to hospice use, hospice use, and hospice-related outcomes were included. Qualitative studies and non-empirical work were excluded. Study quality was assessed using Hawker's quality criteria.Results. Of the 4,841 abstracts reviewed, 41 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies largely report lower hospice knowledge and awareness among Hispanics and mixed results around hospice use and outcomes in comparison to Whites.Conclusion. There has been relatively little research focused specifically on Hispanics' experience with hospice. Future research should focus on testing interventions for overcoming hospice-related disparities among Hispanics and on improving access to quality hospice care among terminally ill Hispanics.

Prognostic predictors relevant to end-of-life palliative care in Parkinson's disease and related disorders: a systematic review

Parkinson's disease and related disorders (PDRD) are the second most common neurodegenerative disease and a leading cause of death. However, patients with PDRD receive less end-of-life palliative care (hospice) than other illnesses, including other neurologic illnesses. Identification of predictors of PDRD mortality may aid in increasing appropriate and timely referrals. To systematically review the literature for causes of death and predictors of mortality in PDRD to provide guidance regarding hospice/end-of-life palliative care referrals. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases (1970-2020) of original quantitative research using patient-level, provider-level or caregiver-level data from medical records, administrative data or survey responses associated with mortality, prognosis or cause of death in PDRD. Findings were reviewed by an International Working Group on PD and Palliative Care supported by the Parkinson's Foundation. Of 1183 research articles, 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. We found four main domains of factors associated with mortality in PDRD: (1) demographic and clinical markers (age, sex, body mass index and comorbid illnesses), (2) motor dysfunction and global disability, (3) falls and infections and (4) non-motor symptoms. We provide suggestions for consideration of timing of hospice/end-of-life palliative care referrals. Several clinical features of advancing disease may be useful in triggering end-of-life palliative/hospice referral. Prognostic studies focused on identifying when people with PDRD are nearing their final months of life are limited. There is further need for research in this area as well as policies that support need-based palliative care for the duration of PDRD.

Live Discharge From Hospice Due to Acute Hospitalization: The Role of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics and Race/Ethnicity

BACKGROUND

Acute hospitalization is a frequent reason for live discharge from hospice. Although risk factors for live discharge among hospice patients have been well documented, prior research has not examined the role of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics, or how these characteristics relate to racial/ethnic disparities in hospice outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations between neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and risk for live discharge from hospice because of acute hospitalization. The authors also explore the moderating role of race/ethnicity in any observed relationship.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records of hospice patients (N=17,290) linked with neighborhood-level socioeconomic data (N=55 neighborhoods). Multilevel models were used to identify the independent significance of patient and neighborhood-level characteristics for risk of live discharge because of acute hospitalization.

RESULTS

Compared with the patients in the most well-educated and affluent sections of New York City [quartile (Q)4], the odds of live discharge from hospice because of acute hospitalization were greater among patients who resided in neighborhoods where lower proportions of residents held college degrees [Q1 adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.75; Q2 AOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07-1.84] and median household incomes were lower (Q1 AOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.85; Q2 AOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.10-1.85; Q3 AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07-1.80). However, these observed relationships were not equally distributed by patient race/ethnicity; the association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and risk for live discharge was significantly lower among Hispanic compared with white patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage poses a significant risk for live discharge from hospice. Additional research is needed to clarify the social mechanisms underlying this association, including greater attention to the experiences of hospice patients from under-represented racial/ethnic groups.

Race, Ethnicity, and Other Risks for Live Discharge Among Hospice Patients with Dementia

OBJECTIVES

The end-of-life trajectory for persons with dementia is often protracted and difficult to predict, placing these individuals at heightened risk of live discharge from hospice. Risks for live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline among patients with dementia are not well established. Our aim was to identify demographic, health, and hospice service factors associated with live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline among hospice patients with dementia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A large not-for-profit agency in New York City.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2629 hospice patients with dementia age 65 years and older.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was live discharge from hospice due to condition stabilization or failure to decline (vs death). Measures include demographic factors (race/ethnicity, Medicaid, sex, age, marital status, parental status), health characteristics (primary dementia diagnosis, comorbidities, functional status, prior hospitalization), and hospice service (location, length of service, number and timing of nurse visits).

RESULTS

Logistic regression models indicated that compared with white hospice patients with dementia, African American and Hispanic hospice patients with dementia experienced increased risk of live discharge (African American: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-4.38; Hispanic: aOR = 2.99; 95% CI = 1.81-4.94). Home hospice (aOR = 7.57; 95% CI = 4.04-14.18), longer length of service (aOR = 1.04; 95% CI = 1.04-1.05), and more days between nurse visits and discharge (aOR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.56-2.21) were also associated with live discharge.

CONCLUSION

To avoid burdensome and disruptive transitions out of hospice in patients with dementia, interventions to reduce live discharge due to condition stabilization or failure to decline should be tailored to meet the needs of African American, Hispanic, and home hospice patients. Policies regarding sustained hospice eligibility should account for the variable and protracted end-of-life trajectory of patients with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:551-558, 2020.

Electing Full Code in Hospice: Patient Characteristics and Live Discharge Rates

BACKGROUND

It is unknown how many hospice enrollees elect to be full code and if this is associated with higher hospice live discharge rates.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the rates of hospice enrollees electing full code, the characteristics predicting full code status, and the association of full code status with various hospice live discharge patterns.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of electronic medical record data.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

A total of 25,636 decedents enrolled in two Michigan hospices between 2009 and 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

Code status was defined as full code versus do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. Covariates include demographics, location (home, hospice facility, nursing home, and hospital), primary diagnosis, and length of stay. Hospice live discharge was defined as short (0-14 days), medium (15-179 days), and long (>179 days).

RESULTS

A total of 12.9% of hospice enrollees elected full code status. This was significantly (p < 0.05) predicted by male sex, younger age, nonwhite race, home setting of care, and cancer diagnosis. Those with full code status had 1.76 times the adjusted odds of hospice live discharge compared with those with DNR orders (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-2.16) and 2.47 times the odds of short live discharge (95% CI 1.69-3.62) with no significant difference in long live discharge. The association of full code orders with hospice live discharge was stronger for nonwhite enrollees, with a live discharge rate of 23.8% versus 11.6% for African Americans with full code versus DNR orders.

CONCLUSIONS

Those electing full code status on admission to hospice are at high risk of live hospice discharge after short enrollments, particularly nonwhite enrollees.

Factors Driving Live Discharge From Hospice: Provider Perspectives

CONTEXT

The proportion of patients disenrolling from hospice before death has increased over the decade with significant variations across hospice types and regions. Such trends have raised concerns about live disenrollment's effect on care quality. Live disenrollment may be driven by factors other than patient preference and may create discontinuities in care, disrupting ongoing patient-provider relationships. Researchers have not explored when and how providers make this decision with patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to ascertain provider perspectives on key drivers of live discharge from the Medicare hospice program.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured telephone interviews with 18 individuals representing 14 hospice providers across the country. Transcriptions were coded and analyzed using a template analysis approach.

RESULTS

Analysis generated four themes: 1) difficulty estimating patient prognosis, 2) fear of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services audits, 3) rising market competition, and 4) challenges with inpatient contracting. Participants emphasized challenges underlying each decision to discharge patients alive, stressing that there often exists a gray line between appropriate and inappropriate discharges. Discussions also focused on scenarios in which financial motivations drive enrollment and disenrollment practices.

CONCLUSION

This study provides significant contributions to existing knowledge about hospice enrollment and disenrollment patterns. Results suggest that live discharge patterns are often susceptible to market and regulatory forces, which may have contributed to the rising national rate.

Characteristics of Hospice Programs With Problematic Live Discharges

CONTEXT

Little is known about how hospice live discharges vary by hospice providers' tax status and chain affiliation.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize hospices with high rates of problematic patterns of live discharges.

METHODS

Three hospice-level patterns of live discharges were defined as problematic when the facility rate was at the 90th percentile or higher. A hospice with a high rate of patients discharged, hospitalized, and readmitted to hospice was considered to have a problematic live discharge pattern, which we have referred to as burdensome transition. The two other problematic live discharge patterns examined were live discharge in the first seven days of a hospice stay and live discharge after 180 days in hospice. A multivariate logistic model examined variation in the hospice-level rate of each discharge pattern by the hospice's chain affiliation and profit status. This model also adjusted for facility rates of medical diagnoses, nonwhite patients, average age, and the state in which the hospice program is located.

RESULTS

In 2010, 3028 hospice programs had 996,208 discharges, with 18.0% being alive. Each proposed problematic pattern of live discharge varied by chain affiliation. For-profit providers without a chain affiliation had a higher rate of burdensome transitions than did for-profit providers in national chains (18.2% vs. 12.1%, P < 0.001), whereas not-for-profit providers had the lowest rate of burdensome transitions (1.4%). About one in three (33.8%) for-profit providers exhibited one or more of these discharge patterns compared with 9.0% of not-for-profit providers.

CONCLUSION

Problematic patterns of live discharges are higher among for-profit providers, especially those not affiliated with a hospice chain.

Being discharged from hospice alive: the lived experience of patients and families

BACKGROUND

Approximately 259,000 patients were discharged alive from U.S. hospices in 2010. There is a paucity of research describing the experiences of these individuals and their family members.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to explore the experiences of adults discharged from a hospice program due to decertification related to ineligibility or extended prognosis, from the perspective of the individual and his or her adult family members. Research questions were, How do participants perceive and describe (1) the experience of being discharged alive from hospice, and (2) their quality of life after a live hospice discharge?

METHODS

A transcendental phenomenological design guided this study. Purposive, snowball sampling was used to recruit 12 volunteers, aged 35-92 years, who had experienced live hospice discharge due to decertification. Data collection included open-ended interviews and journals.

RESULTS

Findings included two primary themes: suffering "AS…" and the paradox of hospice discharge. These primary themes were supported by 12 subthemes: abandonment, unanswered questions, loss of security, loneliness, uncertainty, anger and frustration, physical decline, bearing exhaustive witness, having and needing support, mixed feelings, not dying fast enough, and hospice equals life.

CONCLUSION

Understanding this experience may enhance understanding and aid health care providers to anticipate the unique needs of the hospice population.

Coming and going: predicting the discharge of cancer patients admitted to a palliative care unit: easier than thought?

PURPOSE

Discharging a patient admitted to an inpatient palliative care unit (PCU) is a major challenge. A predictor of the feasibility of home discharge at the time of admission would be very useful. We tried to identify such predictors in a prospective observational study.

METHODS

Sixty patients with advanced cancer admitted to a PCU were enrolled. Sociodemographic data were recorded and a panel of laboratory tests performed. The Karnofsky performance status scale (KPS) and the palliative performance scale (PPS) were determined. A palliative care physician and nurse independently predicted whether the patient would die at the ward. The association of these variables with home discharge or death at the PCU was determined.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (26 men and 34 women) with advanced cancer were included in the study. Discharge was achieved in 45 % of patients, while 55 % of patients died at the PCU. The median stay of discharged patients was 15.2 days, and the median stay of deceased patients 13.6 days. Median KPS and PPS on admission was 56.2 % for the entire group and significantly higher for discharged patients (60.7 %) compared to deceased patients (52.4 %). Median BMI on admission was 22.8 in the entire group and was similar in discharged and deceased patients. No correlation was found between a panel of sociodemographic variables and laboratory tests with regard to discharge or death. In a binary logistic regression model, the probability of discharge as estimated by the nurse/physician and the KPS and PPS were highly significant (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Estimation by a nurse and a physician were highly significant predictors of the likelihood of discharge and remained significant in a multivariate logistic regression model including KPS and PPS. Other variables, such as a panel of laboratory tests or sociodemographic variables, were not associated with discharge or death.

A national study of live discharges from hospice

BACKGROUND

Live discharges from hospice can occur because patients decide to resume curative care, their condition improves, or hospices may inappropriately use live discharge to avoid costly hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the variation, outcomes, and organizational characteristics associated with live discharges.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

Medicare fee-for-service hospice beneficiaries.

MEASUREMENT

Overall rate, timing, and health care transitions of live discharges.

RESULTS

In 2010, 182,172 of 1,003,958 (18.2%) hospice discharges were alive. Hospice rate of live discharges varied by hospice program with interquartile range of 9.5% to 26.4% and by geographic regions with the lowest rate in Connecticut (12.8%) and the highest in Mississippi (40.5%). Approximately 1 in 4 (n=43,889; 24.1%) beneficiaries discharged alive were hospitalized within 30 days. Nearly 8% (n=13,770) had a pattern of hospice discharge, hospitalization, and hospice readmission. These latter cases account for $126 million in Medicare reimbursement. Not-for-profit hospice programs had a lower rate of live discharges compared to for-profit programs (14.6% versus 22.4%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.91). More mature hospice programs (over 21 years in operation) had lower rates of live discharge compared to programs in operation for 5 years or less (14.2% versus 26.7%; AOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65-0.77). Small for-profits in operation 5 years or less had a higher live discharge rate than older, for-profit programs (31.5% versus 14.3%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 5 hospice patients are discharged alive with variation by geographic regions and hospice programs. Not-for-profit hospices and older hospices have lower rates of live discharge.

Patients surviving six months in hospice care: who are they?

BACKGROUND

On January 1, 2011, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began requiring U.S. hospices to conduct a "face-to-face" (F2F) assessment of eligibility for continued hospice care with patients entering their third certification period (180 days after initial enrollment). Understanding which patient populations require F2F assessment is important for evaluating the impact of the CMS regulation and gauging the appropriateness of the 6-month prognosis criteria for different patient groups.

METHODS

Retrospective program records were obtained for patients enrolled in a large hospice 6 months prior to implementation of the CMS regulation (N=375). Patients who remained in hospice and received a F2F (n=140) were compared to patients who were no longer in hospice (n=235) on demographics, terminal condition (categorized as debility/dementia, cancer, or other), presence of serious comorbidity, length of stay, setting of care prior to admission, and hospice outcome using bivariate statistics. Predictors of F2F recertification were examined using a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for demographics, setting of care prior to admission, comorbidity, and primary terminal diagnosis.

RESULTS

At the bivariate level, patients who received an F2F were older (p<0.001), and more likely to have lived in a facility care setting prior to hospice admission (p<0.001) than their non-F2F counterparts. Findings from the logistic regression analysis indicate that initial setting of care (odds ratio [OR] for inpatient versus home=0.20; p=0.01), presence of serious comorbidity (OR=2.84; p<0.001), and primary diagnosis (OR for debility/dementia versus cancer=3.35; p<0.001) were significant predictors of F2F recertification.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike hospice patients with cancer, patients with a primary diagnosis of dementia or debility are more likely to remain in hospice care beyond 6 months and require F2F recertification. Still, these patients need the services provided by hospice care and may be limited by the 6-month recertification criteria.

Time to Death and Reenrollment After Live Discharge From Hospice: A Retrospective Look

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to identify time to death and/or reenrolled patients alive at the time of hospice discharge.

METHODS

Medical records of all adults alive at hospice discharge during a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

In all, 83 patients were alive at discharge, with 3 lost to follow-up. Average time from discharge to death was 199.9 days for all patients and 50 days for the 17 patients who reenrolled. Average time from discharge to reenrollment was 245 days.

CONCLUSION

Our research supports past findings that over a third of patients disenrolled from hospice die within 6 months, indicating ongoing hospice eligibility up to the time of death. Interestingly, if enrollment was revoked by patient or family, as often was done to allow the patient to pursue more aggressive treatments, the mortality risk was higher in the 6 months after discharge. This should prompt careful reevaluation of disenrolled hospice patients in the months after disenrollment, and hospice reenrollment should be continually available and offered during this time.

Hospice use among nursing home patients

OBJECTIVES

Among hospice patients who lived in nursing homes, we sought to: (1) report trends in hospice use over time, (2) describe factors associated with very long hospice stays (>6 months), and (3) describe hospice utilization patterns.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a retrospective study from an urban, Midwest cohort of hospice patients, aged ≥ 65 years, who lived in nursing homes between 1999 and 2008.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and health care utilization were collected from Medicare claims, Medicaid claims, and Minimum Data Set assessments. Patients with overlapping nursing home and hospice stays were identified. χ(2) and t tests were used to compare patients with less than or longer than a 6-month hospice stay. Logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of being on hospice longer than 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1452 patients received hospice services while living in nursing homes. The proportion of patients with noncancer primary hospice diagnoses increased over time; the mean length of hospice stay (114 days) remained high throughout the 10-year period. More than 90% of all patients had 3 or more comorbid diagnoses. Nearly 20% of patients had hospice stays longer than 6 months. The hospice patients with stays longer than 6 months were observed to have a smaller percentage of cancer (25% vs 30%) as a primary hospice diagnosis. The two groups did not differ by mean cognitive status scores, number of comorbidities, or activities of daily living impairments. The greater than 6 months group was much more likely to disenroll before death: 33.9% compared with 13.8% (P < .0001). A variety of patterns of utilization of hospice across settings were observed; 21% of patients spent some of their hospice stay in the community.

CONCLUSIONS

Any policy proposals that impact the hospice benefit in nursing homes should take into account the difficulty in predicting the clinical course of these patients, varying utilization patterns and transitions across settings, and the importance of supporting multiple approaches for delivery of palliative care in this setting.

Characteristics and outcomes of hospice enrollees with dementia discharged alive

OBJECTIVES

To examine the characteristics of hospice enrollees with dementia who were discharged alive because their condition stabilized or improved and predictors of death in the year after discharge.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of clinical and administrative data.

SETTING

For-profit hospice provider.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospice enrollees aged 65 and older with an admission diagnosis of dementia who died or were discharged alive because their condition stabilized or improved between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2003.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic variables and hospice length of stay; data did not include functional status or comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of 24,111 enrollees with dementia, 1,204 (5.0%) were discharged alive because their condition stabilized or improved; the remainder died while receiving hospice. The median length of stay for those who died was 12 versus 236 days for those discharged alive. Those discharged alive were more likely to be female or have a length of stay exceeding 180 days and less likely to be in the oldest age group (≥ 85), be African American, or reside in a nursing home. In a subgroup of 303 patients discharged alive, 75.5% were still alive at 1 year; none of the demographic variables were associated with death after hospice discharge.

CONCLUSION

A small proportion of hospice enrollees with dementia was discharged alive. Most died shortly after enrollment. Future research should examine other factors that may predict which hospice enrollees with dementia are likely to be discharged alive and their subsequent trajectory, such as functional status, comorbidities, and preferences for care.

Relationships among advance directives, principal diagnoses, and discharge outcomes in critically ill older adults

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships among advance directive status, principal diagnoses, and the discharge outcomes in community-dwelling, critically ill older adults.

METHOD

Using administrative and clinical data (n = 1673), multinomial logit regressions were used to examine the relationships among advance directive status, principal diagnoses, and discharge outcomes (in-hospital deaths, hospice discharges, and transition to institutions).

RESULTS

In the overall sample, the adjusted probability of in-hospital deaths with advance directives (12%) was lower than that without advance directives (17%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; p = 0.007) and the adjusted probability of hospice discharges with advance directives (11%) was higher than that without advance directives (7%; OR = 1.96; p = 0.03). Subgroup analysis showed that the magnitude of the abovementioned changes was aggregated when their principal diagnoses were a group of diseases with more difficult prognostication (circulatory and respiratory diseases) and more potential for reversibility (infectious diseases). By contrast, the magnitude of the abovementioned findings was diminished with other principal diagnoses. On the other hand, the presence of advance directives did not make a contribution to transition from communities to institutions.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Significantly fewer in-hospital deaths in addition to higher hospice discharges were observed with any advance directives in community-dwelling, critically ill older adults. The magnitude of these findings was aggregated when their principal diagnoses were a group of diseases with more difficult prognostication (circulatory and respiratory diseases) and more potential for reversibility (infectious diseases). By contrast, the magnitude of these findings was diminished with other principal diagnoses.

Is a home-care network necessary to access the Medicare hospice benefit?

OBJECTIVE

To test whether the presence of an informal or formal care network in the home leads to different hospice utilization patterns near death. To examine how the informal care relationship affects hospice use patterns.

DATA SOURCES

Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), 1997-2001.

STUDY DESIGN

Using logistic regression and ordinary least squares, we examine the association between a person's in-home network of care and the use of Medicare hospice services in the last year of life. We also examine whether the care-dyad relationship is associated with different hospice use patterns.

DATA EXTRACTION

All individuals in the MCBS who lived at home at the time of the interview and who died between 1998 and 2001, 1404 persons.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

People receiving formal home care had a much higher chance of enrolling in hospice prior to death. Informal care did not influence the likelihood of hospice but was associated with longer use among hospice users. Daughter caregivers increased the likelihood and duration of hospice use whereas sons significantly decreased the likelihood.

CONCLUSIONS

Because formal care is associated with increased use of hospice, future work should examine whether patients without an in-home network faced access barriers. Caregiver relationships had large effects on length of hospice stays, yet we do not know whether changes moved a patient closer to or further away from their optimum use of the benefit.

Characterizing hospice discharge patterns in a nationally representative sample of the elderly, 1993-2000

The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence and correlates of individuals discharged alive from hospice in the Medicare program to determine whether the current hospice benefit matches the needs of dying patients. Using a nationally representative sample of age-eligible Medicare beneficiaries who died from 1993 to 2000, the use of hospice and other Medicare-financed care was analyzed during the last year of life for different groups of hospice users. It was found that 84.5% (n = 1029) of hospice users initiate and use it continuously until death; 15.5% of hospice users are discharged alive, with some later reinitiating hospice. The main difference between continuous hospice users and those discharged alive is the time survived after initial hospice use (those discharged alive live longer). After controlling for survival time, costs per day survived are similar for all groups. This study suggests several motivations for being discharged alive that are worthy of more research.

"Lost to Follow-up": Ethnic Disparities in Continuity of Hospice Care at the End of Life

BACKGROUND

Hospice has become the major provider of comprehensive end-of-life care in the United States, but is underutilized by African American patients. It is likely that whatever factors are responsible for lower rates of hospice utilization among African Americans also lead to lower rates of return to hospice after discharge, but this is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether African American patients who leave hospice are less likely to return before death.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated hospice.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients discharged after a first admission.

MEASUREMENTS

All patient characteristics were defined by abstraction of electronic medical records at the time of hospice discharge.

RESULTS

Of 358 discharged patients, 98 (27%) were decertified and 260 (73%) left voluntarily. Ninety-six patients returned to hospice during the study period. In bivariate analysis, African Americans were less likely to return than were other patients (odds ratio (OR) 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.80; p = .005). In a multivariable logistic regression model, African American ethnicity was independently associated with a decreased likelihood of return.

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnic disparities in hospice utilization may extend even to those patients who do enroll in hospice. African Americans who leave hospice during their first admission and their families may be less likely to have access to the comprehensive services that hospice programs provide near the end of life, including intensive nursing care, pain and symptom management, and education.