1
|
Rajasa ASW, Hidayat W. Oral Lesion Management in Juvenile SLE with Hepatosplenomegaly. Int Med Case Rep J 2024; 17:695-702. [PMID: 39076507 PMCID: PMC11284136 DOI: 10.2147/imcrj.s476377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with unknown etiology resulting in chronic multi-organ inflammation. Juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (JSLE) is a specific diagnosis of SLE in juvenile, characterized by oral ulceration. Purpose This case report attempts to provide information for oral medicine specialists in managing JSLE patients with hepatosplenomegaly. Case Presentation A 17-year-old female patient was referred from the Pediatrics Department with mouth ulcers accompanied by dry lips and a tendency to bleed. The most concerning lesion was located on the left buccal mucosa, a single ulceration measuring 5x6mm. Multiple ulcerations spread over the upper and lower labial mucosa, with haemorrhagic crusts on the lips. Painful ulceration can lead to difficulties in mouth opening and impaired function in eating and drinking. Central erythema was seen on the palate. Pseudomembranous candidiasis was also seen on the patient's tongue. The hepatosplenomegaly was confirmed by CT scan, with enzyme values of SGPT (386 U/L) and SGOT (504 U/L). Case Management Administration of 0.9% NaCl was instructed to the patient to maintain oral hygiene and help moisturize lips in order to remove haemorrhagic crusts. Administration of 0.025% hyaluronic acid mouthwash and topical steroid ointment mixture for ulcerated and inflammatory conditions. Drug adjustments were made based on laboratory tests and the patient's clinical condition was improving. Conclusion Managing oral symptoms helps reduce morbidity in JSLE patients. Topical corticosteroids are considered the first line in controlling oral inflammation. Dentists play a role in improving patients' oral hygiene with the aim of reducing the risk of other opportunistic infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wahyu Hidayat
- Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al Dali S, Al-Badriyeh D, Gulied A, Hamad A, Hail MA, Rouf PVA, El-Kassem W, Abushanab D. Characteristics of the clinical pharmacist interventions at the National Center for Cancer Care and Research Hospital in Qatar. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2024; 30:792-801. [PMID: 37431260 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231187305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Drug-related problems (DRPs) affect the health outcomes of patients during hospitalization. We sought to analyze the clinical pharmacist-documented interventions among hospitalized patients in the cancer hospital in Qatar. METHODS A retrospective analysis of electronically reported clinical pharmacist interventions of patients admitted to cancer units at Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar was conducted. Extracted data was based on an overall 3-month follow-up period; March 1-31, 2018, July 15-August 15, 2018 and January 1-31, 2019. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). RESULTS A total of 281 cancer patients with 1354 interventions were included. The average age of the study participants was 47 years (SD ± 17.36). The majority of the study population was females (n = 154, 54.80%). The prevailing pharmacist intervention was the addition of a drug therapy (n = 305, 22.53%), followed by medication discontinuation (n = 288, 21.27%) and the addition of a prophylactic agent (n = 174, 12.85%). This pattern was similar across all subgroups (i.e., gender, age, ward), except for the urgent care unit, where an increase in medication dose was the third highest frequently identified intervention (n = 3, 0.22%). The two medication groups associated with the majority of interventions were the anti-infective and fluid/electrolyte agents. Most of the interventions documented were in the oncology ward (73.19%), while the urgent care unit had the least documented interventions (1.62%). CONCLUSIONS Our analysis showed that clinical pharmacists can effectively identify and prevent DRPs among hospitalized cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Al Dali
- Department of Pharmacy, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Amaal Gulied
- Department of Pharmacy, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Anas Hamad
- Department of Pharmacy, National Center for Cancer Care and Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Moza Al Hail
- Department of Pharmacy, Hamad Bin Khalifa Medical City, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Wessam El-Kassem
- Department of Pharmacy, Hamad Bin Khalifa Medical City, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Dina Abushanab
- Department of Pharmacy, Hamad Bin Khalifa Medical City, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodríguez-Ramallo H, Báez-Gutiérrez N, Villalba-Moreno Á, Jaramillo Ruiz D, Santos-Ramos B, Prado-Mel E, Sanchez-Fidalgo S. Reducing the drug burden of sedative and anticholinergic medications in older adults: a scoping review of explicit decision criteria. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2024; 121:105365. [PMID: 38364710 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the extent, characteristics, and knowledge gaps regarding explicit decision criteria for deprescribing drugs with anticholinergic or sedative properties (Ach/Sed) in older adults. DESIGN Scoping review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Original studies, clinical trial protocols, grey literature, and Summaries of Product Characteristics. METHODS Searches targeting explicit decision criteria for deprescribing Ach/Sed were performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, including trial registries (clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, EU-CTR, ANZCTR) for pertinent articles, study protocols. Additionally, to encompass non-traditional or 'grey literature' sources, Google searches and relevant agency websites were explored, alongside the summary of product characteristics for Ach/Sed. RESULTS The initial literature search identified 8,192 unique data sources. After review, 188 original articles or books, 79 internet sources, and 127 SmPCs were included. Examining these sources for explicit criteria for 154 Ach/Sed, overall, 1,271 explicit criteria guidance for identifying clinical scenarios warranting deprescription of Ach/Sed across 145/154 Ach/Sed were identified. These criteria were identified mainly from qualitative research and Summaries of Product Characteristics. Additionally, 455 criteria-based recommendations suggesting approaches for tapering implementation across 76/154 Ach/Sed were identified, mostly from sources classified as expert opinions. Significant heterogeneity was found across the approaches for tapering Ach/Sed. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the literature providing guidance for clinical scenarios where Ach/Sed should be deprescribed and highlights the existing knowledge gaps regarding comprehensive guidance on tapering these drugs which warranties future research and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hector Rodríguez-Ramallo
- Pharmacy Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain; Clinical Unit of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | | | - Didiana Jaramillo Ruiz
- Pharmacy Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain; Andalusian Public Foundation for Health Research Management of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Elena Prado-Mel
- Pharmacy Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schleiden LJ, Klima G, Rodriguez KL, Ersek M, Robinson JE, Hickson RP, Smith D, Cashy J, Sileanu FE, Thorpe CT. Clinician and Family Caregiver Perspectives on Deprescribing Chronic Disease Medications in Older Nursing Home Residents Near the End of Life. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:367-377. [PMID: 38575748 PMCID: PMC11021174 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01110-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nursing home (NH) residents with limited life expectancy (LLE) who are intensely treated for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes may benefit from deprescribing. OBJECTIVE This study sought to describe NH clinician and family caregiver perspectives on key influences on deprescribing decisions for chronic disease medications in NH residents near the end of life. METHODS We recruited family caregivers of veterans who recently died in a Veterans Affairs (VA) NH, known as community living centers (CLCs), and CLC healthcare clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, registered nurses). Respondents completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences with deprescribing statin, antihypertensive, and antidiabetic medications for residents near end of life. We conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify key themes regarding influences on deprescribing decisions. RESULTS Thirteen family caregivers and 13 clinicians completed interviews. Key themes included (1) clinicians and caregivers both prefer to minimize drug burden; (2) clinical factors strongly influence deprescribing of chronic disease medications, with differences in how clinicians and caregivers weigh specific factors; (3) caregivers trust and rely on clinicians to make deprescribing decisions; (4) clinicians perceive caregiver involvement and buy-in as essential to deprescribing decisions, which requires time and effort to obtain; and (5) clinicians perceive conflicting care from other clinicians as a barrier to deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest a need for efforts to encourage communication with and education for family caregivers of residents with LLE about deprescribing, and to foster better collaboration among clinicians in CLC and non-CLC settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren J Schleiden
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA.
| | - Gloria Klima
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Keri L Rodriguez
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Mary Ersek
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jacob E Robinson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ryan P Hickson
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dawn Smith
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Cashy
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Veteran Experience Center, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Florentina E Sileanu
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
| | - Carolyn T Thorpe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Research Office Building #30, University Drive (151C), Pittsburgh, PA, 15240, USA
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boyd CM, Shetterly SM, Powers JD, Weffald LA, Green AR, Sheehan OC, Reeve E, Drace ML, Norton JD, Maiyani M, Gleason KS, Sawyer JK, Maciejewski ML, Wolff JL, Kraus C, Bayliss EA. Evaluating the Safety of an Educational Deprescribing Intervention: Lessons from the Optimize Trial. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:45-54. [PMID: 37982982 PMCID: PMC11101016 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01080-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients, family members, and clinicians express concerns about potential adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) following medication discontinuation or fears of upsetting a stable medical equilibrium as key barriers to deprescribing. Currently, there are limited methods to pragmatically assess the safety of deprescribing and ascertain ADWEs. We report the methods and results of safety monitoring for the OPTIMIZE trial of deprescribing education for patients, family members, and clinicians. METHODS This was a pragmatic cluster randomized trial with multivariable Poisson regression comparing outcome rates between study arms. We conducted clinical record review and adjudication of sampled records to assess potential causal relationships between medication discontinuation and outcomes. This study included adults aged 65+ with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, one or more additional chronic conditions, and prescribed 5+ chronic medications. The intervention included an educational brochure on deprescribing that was mailed to patients prior to primary care visits, a clinician notification about individual brochure mailings, and an educational tip sheets was provided monthly to primary care clinicians. The outcomes of the safety monitoring were rates of hospitalizations and mortality during the 4 months following brochure mailings and results of record review and adjudication. The adjudication process was conducted throughout the trial and included classifications: likely, possibly, and unlikely. RESULTS There was a total of 3012 (1433 intervention and 1579 control) participants. There were 420 total hospitalizations involving 269 (18.8%) people in the intervention versus 517 total hospitalizations involving 317 (20.1%) people in the control groups. Adjusted risk ratios comparing intervention to control groups were 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72, 1.16] for hospitalization and 1.19 (95% CI 0.67, 2.11) for mortality. Both groups had zero deaths "likely" attributed to a medication change prior to the event. A total of 3 out of 30 (10%) intervention group hospitalizations and 7 out of 35 (20%) control group hospitalizations were considered "likely" due to a medication change. CONCLUSIONS Population-based deprescribing education is safe in the older adult population with cognitive impairment in our study. Pragmatic methods for safety monitoring are needed to further inform deprescribing interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03984396. Registered on 13 June 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Susan M Shetterly
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - John D Powers
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Linda A Weffald
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Orla C Sheehan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emily Reeve
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Melanie L Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jonathan D Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mahesh Maiyani
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathy S Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer K Sawyer
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Courtney Kraus
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Watterson TL, Stone JA, Kleinschmidt PC, Chui MA. CancelRx case study: implications for clinic and community pharmacy work systems. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1360. [PMID: 38057835 PMCID: PMC10698877 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10396-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication prescribing and discontinuation processes are complex and involve the patient, numerous health care professionals, organizations, health information technology (IT). CancelRx is a health IT that automatically communicates medication discontinuations from the clinic electronic health record to the community pharmacy dispensing platform, theoretically improving communication. CancelRx was implemented across a Midwest academic health system in October 2017. The health system also operates 15 outpatient community pharmacies. OBJECTIVE The goal of this qualitative study was to describe how both the clinic and community pharmacy work systems change and interact over time regarding medication discontinuations, before and after CancelRx implantation. APPROACH Medical Assistants (n = 9), Community Pharmacists (n = 12), and Pharmacy Administrators (n = 3), employed by the health system were interviewed across 3-time periods between 2017 and 2018- 3-months prior to CancelRx implementation, 3-months after CancelRx implementation, and 9-months after CancelRx implementation. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and conducted a hybrid analysis with deductive content analysis following the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework and inductive analysis to capture additional codes and themes. KEY RESULTS CancelRx changed the medication discontinuation process at both clinics and community pharmacies. In the clinics, the workflows and medication discontinuation tasks changed over time while MA roles and clinic staff communication practices remained variable. In the pharmacy, CancelRx automated and streamlined how medication discontinuation messages were received and processed, but also increased workload for the pharmacists and introduced new errors. CONCLUSIONS This study utilizes a systems approach to assess disparate systems within a patient network. Future studies may consider health IT implications for systems that are not in the same health system as well as assessing the role of implementation decisions on health IT use and dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jamie A Stone
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, 53704, USA
| | | | - Michelle A Chui
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, 53704, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ashkanani FZ, Rathbone AP, Lindsey L. The role of pharmacists in deprescribing benzodiazepines: A scoping review. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2023; 12:100328. [PMID: 37743854 PMCID: PMC10511800 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Polypharmacy can increase the risk of adverse drug events, hospitalisation, and unnecessary healthcare costs. Evidence indicates that discontinuing certain medications, such as benzodiazepines, can improve health outcomes, by resolving adverse drug effects. This scoping review aims to explore the pharmacists' role in deprescribing benzodiazepines. Method A scoping review has been conducted to distinguish and map the literature, discover research gaps, and focus on targeted areas for future studies and research. A systematic search strategy was conducted to identify relevant studies from PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases. The eligibility criteria involved studies that focused on the role of pharmacists in benzodiazepine deprescribing, quantitative and qualitative studies conducted in humans, full-text articles published in English. Results Twenty studies were identified, revealing three themes: 1) pharmacists' involvement in benzodiazepine deprescribing, 2) the impact of their involvement, and 3) obstacles impeding the process. Pharmacists involved in deprescribing procedures, mainly through completing medication reviews, collaborative work with other healthcare providers, and education. Pharmacists' involvement in benzodiazepine deprescribing intervention led to better health and economic outcomes. Withdrawal symptoms after medication discontinuation, dependence on medication, and lack of time and guidelines were identified in the literature as barriers to deprescribing. Conclusion Pharmacists' involvement in deprescribing benzodiazepines is crucial for optimizing medication therapy. This scoping review examines the pharmacists' role in benzodiazepine deprescribing. The findings contribute to enhancing healthcare outcomes and guiding future research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemah Zakariya Ashkanani
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE2 7RU, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Pattison Rathbone
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE2 7RU, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Lindsey
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, King George VI Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE2 7RU, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Akter J, Konlan KD, Nesa M, Ispriantari A. Factors influencing cancer patients' caregivers' burden and quality of life: An integrative review. Heliyon 2023; 9:e21243. [PMID: 38027739 PMCID: PMC10643105 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This integrative review assessed the factors influencing cancer patients' caregivers' burden and quality of life (QoL). Relevant studies were retrieved from five electronic databases and screened. After systematic screening by title, abstract, and full text, the review included 15 studies published between 2000 and 2022 and used an interpretive thematic synthesis design for analysis. Age (older), sex (male), high work requirements, relationships with patients, low-income levels, high subjective stress, patient dependency level, and trait anxiety were significantly associated with higher caregiver burden. Factors associated with the low QoL of caregivers were age (less than 35 years), caregiving role (more responsibility), relationship with patients (first-degree relative), low income, living in the same home with the patient, and higher social and family responsibilities. A moderate negative correlation (n = 6) was identified between the sum of the QoL scores and the burden. Future research should be integrated into identifying appropriate means to support caregivers of patients with chronic diseases, including cancer by segregating interventions to target specific caregiver populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jotsna Akter
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- National Institute of Advanced Nursing Education and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Kennedy Diema Konlan
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Public Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Meherun Nesa
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- National Institute of Advanced Nursing Education and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Aloysia Ispriantari
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Nursing, Institute of Technology Science and Health RS dr Soepraoen, Malang, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thorpe C, Niznik J, Li A. Deprescribing research in nursing home residents using routinely collected healthcare data: a conceptual framework. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:469. [PMID: 37542226 PMCID: PMC10401751 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04194-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts are needed to strengthen evidence and guidance for appropriate deprescribing for older nursing home (NH) residents, who are disproportionately affected by polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing. Given the challenges of conducting randomized drug withdrawal studies in this population, data from observational studies of routinely collected healthcare data can be used to identify patients who are apparent candidates for deprescribing and evaluate subsequent health outcomes. To improve the design and interpretation of observational studies examining determinants, risks, and benefits of deprescribing specific medications in older NH residents, we sought to propose a conceptual framework of the determinants of deprescribing in older NH residents. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of observational studies examining patterns and potential determinants of discontinuing or de-intensifying (i.e., reducing) medications for NH residents. We searched PubMed through September 2021 and included studies meeting the following criteria: conducted among adults aged 65 + in the NH setting; (2) observational study designs; (3) discontinuation or de-intensification as the primary outcome with key determinants as independent variables. We conceptualized deprescribing as a behavior through a social-ecological lens, potentially influenced by factors at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy levels. RESULTS Our search in PubMed identified 250 potentially relevant studies published through September 2021. A total of 14 studies were identified for inclusion and were subsequently synthesized to identify and group determinants of deprescribing into domains spanning the five core social-ecological levels. Our resulting framework acknowledges that deprescribing is strongly influenced by intrapersonal, patient-level clinical factors that modify the expected benefits and risks of deprescribing, including index condition attributes (e.g., disease severity), attributes of the medication being considered for deprescribing, co-prescribed medications, and prognostic factors. It also incorporates the hierarchical influences of interpersonal differences relating to healthcare providers and family caregivers, NH facility and health system organizational structures, community trends and norms, and finally healthcare policies. CONCLUSIONS Our proposed framework will serve as a useful tool for future studies seeking to use routinely collected healthcare data sources and observational study designs to evaluate determinants, risks, and benefits of deprescribing for older NH residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Thorpe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joshua Niznik
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Center for Aging and Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, 5003 Old Clinic CB#7550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Anna Li
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Watterson TL, Stone JA, Kleinschmidt P, Chui MA. CancelRx Case Study: Implications for Clinic and Community Pharmacy Work Systems. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-2859918. [PMID: 37205417 PMCID: PMC10187422 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2859918/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Background The medication prescribing, and de-prescribing process is complex with numerous actors, organizations, and health information technology (IT). CancelRx is a health IT that automatically communicates medication discontinuations from the clinic electronic health record to the community pharmacy's dispensing platform, theoretically improving communication. CancelRx was implemented across a Midwest academic health system in October 2017. Objective The goal of this study was to describe how both the clinic and community pharmacy work systems change and interact over time regarding medication discontinuations. Approach Medical Assistants (n = 9), Community Pharmacists (n = 12), and Pharmacy Administrators (n =3), employed by the health system were interviewed across 3-time periods- 3-months prior to CancelRx implementation, 3-months after CancelRx implementation, and 9-months after CancelRx implementation. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via deductive content analysis. Key Results CancelRx changed the medication discontinuation process at both clinics and community pharmacies. In the clinics, the workflows and medication discontinuation tasks changed over time while MA roles and clinic staff communication practices remained variable. In the pharmacy, CancelRx automated and streamlined how medication discontinuation messages were received and processed, but also increased workload for the pharmacists and introduced new errors. Conclusions This study utilizes a systems approach to assess disparate systems within a patient network. Future studies may consider health IT implications for systems that are not in the same health system as well as assessing the role of implementation decisions on health IT use and dissemination.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee J, Singh N, Gray SL, Makris UE. Optimizing Medication Use in Older Adults With Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Diseases: Deprescribing as an Approach When Less May Be More. ACR Open Rheumatol 2022; 4:1031-1041. [PMID: 36278868 PMCID: PMC9746667 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The world population is aging, and the rheumatology workforce must be prepared to care for medically complex older adults. We can learn from our colleagues and experts in geriatrics about how to best manage multimorbidity, polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes, and shifting priorities of older adults in the context of delivering care for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Polypharmacy, a common occurrence in an aging population with multimorbidity, affects half of older adults with RMDs and is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. In addition, potentially inappropriate medications that should be avoided under most circumstances is common in the RMD population. In recent years, deprescribing, known as the process of tapering, stopping, discontinuing, or withdrawing drugs, has been introduced as an approach to improve appropriate medication use among older adults and the outcomes that are important to them. As the rheumatology patient population ages globally, it is imperative to understand the burden of polypharmacy and the potential of deprescribing to improve medication use in older adults with RMDs. We encourage the rheumatology community to implement geriatric principles, when possible, as we move toward becoming an age-friendly health care specialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiha Lee
- JUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
| | | | | | - Una E. Makris
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and VA North Texas Health Care SystemDallas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mann NK, Schmiedl S, Mortsiefer A, Bencheva V, Löscher S, Ritzke M, Drewelow E, Feldmeier G, Santos S, Wilm S, Thürmann PA. Development of a deprescribing manual for frail older people for use in the COFRAIL study and in primary care. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2022; 13:20420986221122684. [PMID: 36091625 PMCID: PMC9452796 DOI: 10.1177/20420986221122684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Many older adults are affected by multimorbidity and subsequent polypharmacy which is associated with adverse outcomes. This is especially relevant for frail older patients. Polypharmacy may be reduced via deprescribing. As part of the complex intervention in the COFRAIL study, we developed a deprescribing manual to be used by general practitioners (GPs) in family conferences, in which GPs, patients and caregivers jointly discuss treatments. Methods We selected indications with a high prevalence in older adults in primary care (e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypertension) and conducted a literature search to identify deprescribing criteria for these indications. We additionally reviewed clinical practice guidelines. Based on the extracted information, we created a deprescribing manual which was then piloted in an expert workshop and in family conferences with volunteer patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol. Results Initially, 13 indications/topics were selected. The literature search identified deprescribing guides, reviews and clinical trials as well as lists of potentially inappropriate medication and systematic reviews on the risk and benefits of specific drugs and drug classes in older patients. After piloting and revisions, the deprescribing manual now covers 11 indications/topics. In each chapter, patient- and medication-related deprescribing criteria, monitoring and communication strategies, and information about concerns related to the use of specific drugs in older patients are provided. Discussion We found varying deprescribing strategies in the literature, which we consolidated in our deprescribing manual. Whether this approach leads to successful deprescribing in family conferences is being investigated in the cluster-randomised controlled COFRAIL study. Plain Language Summary Development of a manual to help doctors to identify which medications can be withdrawn Many older adults suffer from chronic diseases and take multiple medications concurrently. This can lead to side effects and other undesired events. We developed a manual to help doctors identify which medications can be withdrawn, so that they can discuss this with their patients. This manual was used in the COFRAIL study where doctors, patients and caregivers met in family conferences to discuss their preferences and decide together how future treatments should be handled. The manual contains information on common medications, symptoms and diseases in older patients such as diabetes and high blood pressure. Before the manual was used in the study, it was tested by volunteer patients and their doctors and caregivers to make sure that it is user-friendly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina-Kristin Mann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Sven Schmiedl
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Achim Mortsiefer
- Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, Chair of General Practice II and Patient-Centredness in Primary Care, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Veronika Bencheva
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Susanne Löscher
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Manuela Ritzke
- Institute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Eva Drewelow
- Institute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Gregor Feldmeier
- Institute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Sara Santos
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefan Wilm
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Petra A. Thürmann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Novak J, Goldberg A, Dharmarajan K, Amini A, Maggiore RJ, Presley CJ, Nightingale G. Polypharmacy in older adults with cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A review. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:778-783. [PMID: 35227626 PMCID: PMC9283217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is characterized by the simultaneous use of multiple medications, including prescription drugs, over-the-counter drugs, and nutritional supplements. Polypharmacy is known to increase the risk of adverse drugs reactions, drug-drug interactions, and medication errors, and to negatively impact quality of life. The prevalence of polypharmacy varies by population, but has been reported to exceed 90% among older adults with cancer. Polypharmacy may be exacerbated among older adults with cancer receiving radiation therapy due to the resulting acute or chronic side effects that need to be managed with additional medications. The medications prescribed to manage radiation-related side effects increase the risk of adverse drug events, as do changes in nutritional status related to the secondary side effects of radiation treatment. Side effects from treatment may result in the need for breaks in cancer therapy or treatment delays, which ultimately can lead to worse oncologic outcomes. Few studies have examined polypharmacy in the context of older adults undergoing radiation therapy. We sought to review the literature pertaining to polypharmacy among older adults with cancer and discuss implications specifically for those individuals undergoing radiation therapy. This paper presents a narrative review of studies published in the past decade that provided detailed information on polypharmacy in older adults undergoing radiation therapy for cancer. The review elucidated good practices to avoid adverse drug events from polypharmacy, but more studies are warranted to develop standard guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Novak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Annette Goldberg
- Department of Nutrition Services, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kavita Dharmarajan
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ronald J Maggiore
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Carolyn J Presley
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Ginah Nightingale
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ó Ciardha D, Blake AM, Creane D, Callaghan MÓ, Darker C. Can a practice pharmacist improve prescribing safety and reduce costs in polypharmacy patients? A pilot study of an intervention in an Irish general practice setting. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e050261. [PMID: 35623753 PMCID: PMC9150158 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility and cost impact of an intervention involving a practice pharmacist embedded in general practice to improve prescribing safety, deprescribe where appropriate and reduce costs. SETTING Four-doctor suburban general practice. PARTICIPANTS Inclusion criteria: patients receiving 10+ repeat drugs per month. EXCLUSION CRITERIA deceased, <18 years of age, nursing home resident, no longer attending, late-stage life-limiting condition, unsuitable on clinical/capacity grounds. 137 patients were eligible. 78 were recruited as participants, all of whom completed the study. INTERVENTION Pharmacist conducting holistic medication reviews in the study group over a 6-month period. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Anonymised medication changes, cost, biochemical monitoring and clinical measurements data were collected. Cost analysis of having a pharmacist as part of the general practice team was calculated. RESULTS In total, 198 potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs), and 163 opportunities for deprescribing were identified; 127 PIPs (64.1%) were actioned; 104 deprescribing opportunities were actioned (63.8%). The pharmacist identified 101 instances in which further investigations were warranted prior to prescription issue, of which 80 were actioned (79.2%). It was calculated that monthly savings of €1252 were made as a result of deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS This study has shown that the integration of pharmacists within general practice in Ireland is feasible and is an effective means of improving prescribing safety and implementing deprescribing through medication reviews. The combination of safety and cost concerns support taking a holistic approach to deprescribing with the patient. This study highlights the ease with which a pharmacist could integrate into the general practice setting in Ireland and points to how this could be sustainably funded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darach Ó Ciardha
- Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anne-Marie Blake
- Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dylan Creane
- Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Ó Callaghan
- Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Catherine Darker
- Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rosenfeld RM, Kelly JH, Agarwal M, Aspry K, Barnett T, Davis BC, Fields D, Gaillard T, Gulati M, Guthrie GE, Moore DJ, Panigrahi G, Rothberg A, Sannidhi DV, Weatherspoon L, Pauly K, Karlsen MC. Dietary Interventions to Treat Type 2 Diabetes in Adults with a Goal of Remission: An Expert Consensus Statement from the American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med 2022; 16:342-362. [PMID: 35706589 PMCID: PMC9189586 DOI: 10.1177/15598276221087624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this Expert Consensus Statement is to assist clinicians in achieving remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in adults using diet as a primary intervention. Evidence-informed statements agreed upon by a multi-disciplinary panel of expert healthcare professionals were used. Methods Panel members with expertise in diabetes treatment, research, and remission followed an established methodology for developing consensus statements using a modified Delphi process. A search strategist systematically reviewed the literature, and the best available evidence was used to compose statements regarding dietary interventions in adults 18 years and older diagnosed with T2D. Topics with significant practice variation and those that would result in remission of T2D were prioritized. Using an iterative, online process, panel members expressed levels of agreement with the statements, resulting in classification as consensus, near-consensus, or non-consensus based on mean responses and the number of outliers. Results The expert panel identified 131 candidate consensus statements that focused on addressing the following high-yield topics: (1) definitions and basic concepts; (2) diet and remission of T2D; (3) dietary specifics and types of diets; (4) adjuvant and alternative interventions; (5) support, monitoring, and adherence to therapy; (6) weight loss; and (7) payment and policy. After 4 iterations of the Delphi survey and removal of duplicative statements, 69 statements met the criteria for consensus, 5 were designated as near consensus, and 60 were designated as no consensus. In addition, the consensus was reached on the following key issues: (a) Remission of T2D should be defined as HbA1c <6.5% for at least 3 months with no surgery, devices, or active pharmacologic therapy for the specific purpose of lowering blood glucose; (b) diet as a primary intervention for T2D can achieve remission in many adults with T2D and is related to the intensity of the intervention; and (c) diet as a primary intervention for T2D is most effective in achieving remission when emphasizing whole, plant-based foods with minimal consumption of meat and other animal products. Many additional statements that achieved consensus are highlighted in a tabular presentation in the manuscript and elaborated upon in the discussion section. Conclusion Expert consensus was achieved for 69 statements pertaining to diet and remission of T2D, dietary specifics and types of diets, adjuvant and alternative interventions, support, monitoring, adherence to therapy, weight loss, and payment and policy. Clinicians can use these statements to improve quality of care, inform policy and protocols, and identify areas of uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard M Rosenfeld
- Department of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA (RMR)
| | - John H Kelly
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA (JHK)
| | - Monica Agarwal
- Department of Medicine Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, & Metabolism, Birmingham, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA (MA)
| | - Karen Aspry
- Lipid and Prevention Program, Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, East Greenwich, RI, USA (KA)
| | - Ted Barnett
- Rochester Lifestyle Medicine Institute, Rochester, NY, USA (TB)
| | - Brenda C Davis
- American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO, USA (BCD, KP, MCK)
| | | | - Trudy Gaillard
- Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA (TG)
| | - Mahima Gulati
- Middlesex Health Multispecialty Group, Middletown, CT, USA (MG)
| | | | | | | | - Amy Rothberg
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA (AR)
| | - Deepa V Sannidhi
- University of California San Diego Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, La Jolla, CA, USA (DVS)
| | | | - Kaitlyn Pauly
- American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO, USA (BCD, KP, MCK)
| | - Micaela C Karlsen
- American College of Lifestyle Medicine, Chesterfield, MO, USA (BCD, KP, MCK)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dalin DA, Frandsen S, Madsen GK, Vermehren C. Exploration of Symptom Scale as an Outcome for Deprescribing: A Medication Review Study in Nursing Homes. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:505. [PMID: 35631333 PMCID: PMC9143953 DOI: 10.3390/ph15050505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of inappropriate medication is an increasing problem among the elderly, leading to hospitalizations, mortality, adverse effects, and lower quality of life (QoL). Deprescribing interventions (e.g., medication reviews (MRs)) have been examined as a possible remedy for this problem. In order to be able to evaluate the potential benefits and harms of a deprescribing intervention, quality of life (QoL) has increasingly been used as an outcome. The sensitivity of QoL measurements may, however, not be sufficient to detect a change in specific disease symptoms, e.g., a flair-up in symptoms or relief of side effects after deprescribing. Using symptom assessments as an outcome, we might be able to identify and evaluate the adverse effects of overmedication and deprescribing alike. The objective of this study was to explore whether symptom assessment is a feasible and valuable method of evaluating outcomes of MRs among the elderly in nursing homes. To the best of our knowledge, this has not been investigated before. We performed a feasibility study based on an experimental design and conducted MRs for elderly patients in nursing homes. Their symptoms were registered at baseline and at a follow-up 3 months after performing the MR. In total, 86 patients, corresponding to 68% of the included patients, received the MR and completed the symptom questionnaires as well as the QoL measurements at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Forty-eight of these patients had at least one deprescribing recommendation implemented. Overall, a tendency towards the improvement of most symptoms was seen after deprescribing, which correlated with the tendencies observed for the QoL measurements. Remarkably, deprescribing did not cause a deterioration of symptoms or QoL, which might otherwise be expected for patients of this age group, of whom the health is often rapidly declining. In conclusion, it was found that symptom assessments were feasible among nursing home residents and resulted in additional relevant information about the potential benefits and harms of deprescribing. It is thus recommended to further explore the use of symptom assessment as an outcome of deprescribing interventions, e.g., in a controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagmar Abelone Dalin
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark; (D.A.D.); (S.F.)
| | - Sara Frandsen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark; (D.A.D.); (S.F.)
| | - Gitte Krogh Madsen
- General practice ”Roskilde Lægehus”, Roskilde, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark;
| | - Charlotte Vermehren
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark; (D.A.D.); (S.F.)
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, PHARMA, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Polypharmacy characterizes ongoing prescription of multiple medications in a patient. Following the demographic change and growing number of elderly patients, polypharmacy is of major concern due to the associated risks and even mortality. Many causes made this geriatric syndrome more common in the past decade. First, the management of comorbidities is often lacking in disease-specific guidelines. Second, multimorbidity is rising due to the ageing population. Third, deprescribing methods are sparse, and results are conflicting. This mini review integrates the effects of polypharmacy on mortality and morbidity, the causes and confounders of polypharmacy, and presents a practical stepwise manual of deprescribing. The work is based on a literature search for randomized control trials and reviews in English and German from 2015 onwards in the PubMed database, with integration of relevant citations as a result of this search.
Collapse
|
18
|
Prescribing at 95 years of age: cross-sectional findings from the Newcastle 85+ study. Int J Clin Pharm 2022; 44:1072-1077. [PMID: 35906504 PMCID: PMC9362142 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01454-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research has examined prescribing amongst 85-year-olds in English primary care, but less is known about prescribing amongst 95-year-olds in spite of population ageing. AIM We describe the most commonly prescribed medicines in a cohort of 95-year-olds, using 10-year follow-up data from the Newcastle 85+ Study (n = 90). METHOD A total of 1040 participants were recruited to the Newcastle 85+ Study through general practices at 85-years of age, and 90 surviving participants were re-contacted and assessed at 95-years of age. Prescribed medications from general practice medical records were examined through cross-tabulations and classified as preventative or for symptom control based on their customary usage. RESULTS Preventative medications with unclear evidence of benefit such as statins (36.7%), aspirin (21.1%) and bisphosphonates (18.9%) were frequently prescribed. CONCLUSIONS Future research in a larger clinical dataset could investigate this preliminary trend, which suggests that benefit/risk information for preventive medication, and evidence for deprescribing, is needed in the very old.
Collapse
|
19
|
Hickson RP, Kucharska-Newton AM, Rodgers JE, Sleath BL, Fang G. Disparities by sex in P2Y 12 inhibitor therapy duration, or differences in the balance of ischaemic-benefit and bleeding-risk clinical outcomes in older women versus comparable men following acute myocardial infarction? A P2Y 12 inhibitor new user retrospective cohort analysis of US Medicare claims data. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050236. [PMID: 34853104 PMCID: PMC8638457 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine if comparable older women and men received different durations of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and if therapy duration differences were justified by differences in ischaemic benefits and/or bleeding risks. DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING 20% sample of 2007-2015 US Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data. PARTICIPANTS ≥66-year-old P2Y12 inhibitor new users following 2008-2013 AMI hospitalisation (N=30 613). Older women compared to older men with similar predicted risks of study outcomes. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome: P2Y12 inhibitor duration (modelled as risk of therapy discontinuation). SECONDARY OUTCOMES clinical events while on P2Y12 inhibitor therapy, including (1) death/hospice admission, (2) composite of ischaemic events (AMI/stroke/revascularisation) and (3) hospitalised bleeds. Cause-specific risks and relative risks (RRs) estimated using Aalen-Johansen cumulative incidence curves and bootstrapped 95% CIs. RESULTS 10 486 women matched to 10 486 men with comparable predicted risks of all 4 study outcomes. No difference in treatment discontinuation was observed at 12 months (women 31.2% risk; men 30.9% risk; RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.05), but women were more likely than men to discontinue therapy at 24 months (54.4% and 52.9% risk, respectively; RR 1.03; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05). Among patients who did not discontinue P2Y12 inhibitor therapy, women had lower 24-month risks of ischaemic outcomes than men (13.1% and 14.7%, respectively; RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.96), potentially lower 24-month risks of death/hospice admission (5.0% and 5.5%, respectively; RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.02), but women and men both had 2.5% 24-month bleeding risks (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.14). CONCLUSIONS Risks for death/hospice and ischaemic events were lower among women still taking a P2Y12 inhibitor than comparable men, with no difference in bleeding risks. Shorter P2Y12 inhibitor durations in older women than comparable men observed between 12 and 24 months post-AMI may reflect a disparity that is not justified by differences in clinical need.
Collapse
Grants
- T32 HL007055 NHLBI NIH HHS
- UL1 TR001111 NCATS NIH HHS
- Pharmacoepidemiology Gillings Innovation Lab (PEGIL)
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center at the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA
- American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- the CER Strategic Initiative of UNC’s Clinical and Translational Science Award
- Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P Hickson
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anna M Kucharska-Newton
- Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Jo E Rodgers
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Betsy L Sleath
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gang Fang
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Walsh-Bailey C, Tsai E, Tabak RG, Morshed AB, Norton WE, McKay VR, Brownson RC, Gifford S. A scoping review of de-implementation frameworks and models. Implement Sci 2021; 16:100. [PMID: 34819122 PMCID: PMC8611904 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01173-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reduction or elimination of inappropriate, ineffective, or potentially harmful healthcare services and public health programs can help to ensure limited resources are used effectively. Frameworks and models (FM) are valuable tools in conceptualizing and guiding the study of de-implementation. This scoping review sought to identify and characterize FM that can be used to study de-implementation as a phenomenon and identify gaps in the literature to inform future model development and application for research. METHODS We searched nine databases and eleven journals from a broad array of disciplines (e.g., healthcare, public health, public policy) for de-implementation studies published between 1990 and June 2020. Two raters independently screened titles and abstracts, and then a pair of raters screened all full text records. We extracted information related to setting, discipline, study design, methodology, and FM characteristics from included studies. RESULTS The final search yielded 1860 records, from which we screened 126 full text records. We extracted data from 27 articles containing 27 unique FM. Most FM (n = 21) were applicable to two or more levels of the Socio-Ecological Framework, and most commonly assessed constructs were at the organization level (n = 18). Most FM (n = 18) depicted a linear relationship between constructs, few depicted a more complex structure, such as a nested or cyclical relationship. Thirteen studies applied FM in empirical investigations of de-implementation, while 14 articles were commentary or review papers that included FM. CONCLUSION De-implementation is a process studied in a broad array of disciplines, yet implementation science has thus far been limited in the integration of learnings from other fields. This review offers an overview of visual representations of FM that implementation researchers and practitioners can use to inform their work. Additional work is needed to test and refine existing FM and to determine the extent to which FM developed in one setting or for a particular topic can be applied to other contexts. Given the extensive availability of FM in implementation science, we suggest researchers build from existing FM rather than recreating novel FM. REGISTRATION Not registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callie Walsh-Bailey
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
| | - Edward Tsai
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Rachel G Tabak
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Alexandra B Morshed
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Wynne E Norton
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Virginia R McKay
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, 4921 Parkview Place, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Sheyna Gifford
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Washington University in St. Louis, 4444 Forest Park Ave, Campus Box 8518, St. Louis, MO, 63108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Horowitz MA, Jauhar S, Natesan S, Murray RM, Taylor D. A Method for Tapering Antipsychotic Treatment That May Minimize the Risk of Relapse. Schizophr Bull 2021; 47:1116-1129. [PMID: 33754644 PMCID: PMC8266572 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbab017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The process of stopping antipsychotics may be causally related to relapse, potentially linked to neuroadaptations that persist after cessation, including dopaminergic hypersensitivity. Therefore, the risk of relapse on cessation of antipsychotics may be minimized by more gradual tapering. There is converging evidence that suggests that adaptations to antipsychotic exposure can persist for months or years after stopping the medication-from animal studies, observation of tardive dyskinesia in patients, and the clustering of relapses in this time period after the cessation of antipsychotics. Furthermore, PET imaging demonstrates a hyperbolic relationship between doses of antipsychotic and D2 receptor blockade. We, therefore, suggest that when antipsychotics are reduced, it should be done gradually (over months or years) and in a hyperbolic manner (to reduce D2 blockade "evenly"): ie, reducing by one quarter (or one half) of the most recent dose of antipsychotic, equivalent approximately to a reduction of 5 (or 10) percentage points of its D2 blockade, sequentially (so that reductions become smaller and smaller in size as total dose decreases), at intervals of 3-6 months, titrated to individual tolerance. Some patients may prefer to taper at 10% or less of their most recent dose each month. This process might allow underlying adaptations time to resolve, possibly reducing the risk of relapse on discontinuation. Final doses before complete cessation may need to be as small as 1/40th a therapeutic dose to prevent a large decrease in D2 blockade when stopped. This proposal should be tested in randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Abie Horowitz
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, Fitzrovia, London W1T 7BN, UK
- North East London Foundation Trust. Goodmayes Hospital, 157 Barley Lane, Goodmayes, Ilford IG3 8XJ, UK
| | - Sameer Jauhar
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Sridhar Natesan
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Robin M Murray
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London SE5 8AF, UK
| | - David Taylor
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London SE5 8AF, UK
- Pharmacy Department, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nightingale G, Mohamed MR, Holmes HM, Sharma M, Ramsdale E, Lu-Yao G, Chapman A. Research priorities to address polypharmacy in older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:964-970. [PMID: 33589379 PMCID: PMC9320625 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Polypharmacy poses a significant public health problem that disproportionately affects older adults (≥65 years) since this population represents the largest consumers of medications. Clinicians caring for older adults with cancer must rely on evidence to understand polypharmacy and its implications, not only to communicate with patients and other healthcare providers, but also because of the significant interplay between polypharmacy, cancer, cancer-related treatment, and clinical outcomes. Interest in polypharmacy is rising because of its prevalence, the origins and facilitating factors behind it, and the direct and indirect clinical outcomes associated with it. The growing body of publications focused on polypharmacy in older adults with cancer demonstrates that this is a significant area of research; however, limited evidence exists to guide medication use (e.g., prescribing, administration) in this population. Currently, research priorities aimed at polypharmacy in the field of geriatric oncology lack clarity. We identified current gaps in the literature in order to establish research priorities for polypharmacy in older adults with cancer. The five research priorities-Polypharmacy Methodology and Definitions, Suboptimal Medication Use, Comorbidities and Geriatric Syndromes, Underrepresented Groups, and Polypharmacy Interventions-highlight critical areas for future research to improve outcomes for older adults with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ginah Nightingale
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jefferson College of Pharmacy, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Mostafa R Mohamed
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Holly M Holmes
- McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Manvi Sharma
- Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
| | - Erika Ramsdale
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Grace Lu-Yao
- College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Chapman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hanlon JT, Tjia J. Avoiding Adverse Drug Withdrawal Events When Stopping Unnecessary Medications According to the STOPPFrail Criteria. Sr Care Pharm 2021; 36:136-141. [PMID: 33662236 DOI: 10.4140/tcp.n.2021.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide clinicians with information about avoiding adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) when discontinuing unnecessary medications as per the STOPPFrail criteria. DATA SOURCES Searches of MEDLINE (1970-June 2020), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through June 2020), Google Scholar (through June 2020). STUDY SELECTION Reviews and original studies of ADWEs. DATA EXTRACTION Tapering protocols for specific drugs/ classes from randomized controlled deprescribing trials. DATA SYNTHESIS Six drug classes were identified as being high risk for physiological ADWEs. CONCLUSION The occurrence of ADWEs is rare in comparison to adverse drug reactions in older adults. Few drugs/classes have been reported to have physiological ADWEs with abrupt discontinuation. For these we provide information about tapering protocols and symptom monitoring to avoid ADWEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Hanlon
- 1University of Pittsburgh, Department of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- 3University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Li Y, Whelan CM, Husain AF. Deprescribing in the Home Palliative Setting. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:1030-1035. [PMID: 33326319 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: When patients' goals of care have shifted toward comfort, treatment should focus on alleviating symptoms rather than prolonging life at the expense of comfort. Objective: To determine whether the number of noncomfort medications is associated with deprescribing in patients seen by a home-visiting palliative care physician. Design: Single-centre retrospective chart review of patients cared for in the home setting by a specialty palliative care program to determine factors associated with deprescribing. All medications on initial consult were classified as comfort, possibly for comfort, and definitely not for comfort (DNC). Patients were stratified depending on whether intentional deprescribing occurred. Data were analyzed for associations between deprescribing and other variables: number and proportion of DNC medications, diagnosis, palliative performance scale (PPS), number of encounters, code status, preferred place of death, and time to death. Setting: Study population included 80 patients followed by specialist home-visiting palliative physicians in a tertiary center. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with PPS ≤60%, initially seen by a home-visiting palliative physician between 2016 and 2018 and followed for at least 60 days or until death. Results: Deprescribing occurred in 44% of study patients within 60 days. Median number of DNC medications was 3 in the deprescribed group and 0 in the nondeprescribed group (p < 0.001). Proportion of DNC medications was 29% in the deprescribed group and 15% in the nondeprescribed group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Deprescribing is associated with an increased number and proportion of DNC medications at the time of initial in-home palliative assessment. Deprescribing rates varied greatly between different home-visiting palliative providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Li
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ciara M Whelan
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amna F Husain
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health Division of Palliative Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Describing deprescribing trials better: an elaboration of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2020; 127:87-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
26
|
De Sutter E, Zaçe D, Boccia S, Di Pietro ML, Geerts D, Borry P, Huys I. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19129. [PMID: 33030440 PMCID: PMC7582148 DOI: 10.2196/19129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Informed consent is one of the key elements in biomedical research. The introduction of electronic informed consent can be a way to overcome many challenges related to paper-based informed consent; however, its novel opportunities remain largely unfulfilled due to several barriers. Objective We aimed to provide an overview of the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives of multiple stakeholder groups in order to assist responsible implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search using Web of Science (Core collection), PubMed, EMBASE, ACM Digital Library, and PsycARTICLES. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were used for reporting this work. We included empirical full-text studies focusing on the concept of electronic informed consent in biomedical research covering the ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface domains. Studies written in English and published from January 2010 onward were selected. We explored perspectives of different stakeholder groups, in particular researchers, research participants, health authorities, and ethics committees. We critically appraised literature included in the systematic review using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies, Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for mixed methods studies, and Jadad tool for randomized controlled trials. Results A total of 40 studies met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the studies were heterogeneous in the type of study design, population, intervention, research context, and the tools used. Most of the studies’ populations were research participants (ie, patients and healthy volunteers). The majority of studies addressed barriers to achieving adequate understanding when using electronic informed consent. Concerns shared by multiple stakeholder groups were related to the security and legal validity of an electronic informed consent platform and usability for specific groups of research participants. Conclusions Electronic informed consent has the potential to improve the informed consent process in biomedical research compared to the current paper-based consent. The ethical, legal, regulatory, and user interface perspectives outlined in this review might serve to enhance the future implementation of electronic informed consent. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020158979; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158979
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien De Sutter
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Drieda Zaçe
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Di Pietro
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - David Geerts
- Meaningful Interactions Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Turner J, Kantilal K, Kantilal K, Holmes H, Koczwara B. Optimising Medications for Patients With Cancer and Multimorbidity: The Case for Deprescribing. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:609-617. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
28
|
Abstract
A personal top ten list of literature about aging and the practice of geriatrics is offered. This is primarily directed at those completing their training in the care of older patients. While acknowledging the limitations of any such exercise, it is hoped that it will engender interest in prior work by and about older persons and their care. Those at the start of their careers in geriatrics are encouraged to read these and other primary contributions, make their own list of essential literature, and incorporate the lessons learned and the examples of prior practitioners into their professional practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Hogan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thorpe CT, Sileanu FE, Mor MK, Zhao X, Aspinall S, Ersek M, Springer S, Niznik JD, Vu M, Schleiden LJ, Gellad WF, Hunnicutt J, Thorpe JM, Hanlon JT. Discontinuation of Statins in Veterans Admitted to Nursing Homes near the End of Life. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68:2609-2619. [PMID: 32786004 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Geriatric guidelines recommend against statin use in older adults with limited life expectancy (LLE) or advanced dementia (AD). This study examined resident and facility factors predicting statin discontinuation after nursing home (NH) admission in veterans with LLE/AD taking statins for secondary prevention. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of Veterans Affairs (VA) bar code medication administration records, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, and utilization records linked to Medicare claims. SETTING VA NHs, known as community living centers (CLCs). PARTICIPANTS Veterans aged 65 and older with coronary artery disease, stroke, or diabetes mellitus, type II, admitted in fiscal years 2009 to 2015, who met criteria for LLE/AD on their admission MDS and received statins in the week after admission (n = 13,110). MEASUREMENTS Residents were followed until statin discontinuation (ie, gap in statin use ≥14 days), death, or censoring due to discharge, day 91 of the stay, or end of the study period. Competing risk models assessed cumulative incidence and predictors of discontinuation, stratified by whether the resident had their end-of-life (EOL) status designated or used hospice at admission. RESULTS Overall cumulative incidence of statin discontinuation was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 30%-32%) by day 91, and it was markedly higher in those with (52%; 95% CI = 50%-55%) vs without (25%; 95% CI = 24%-26%) EOL designation/hospice. In patients with EOL designation/hospice (n = 2,374), obesity, congestive heart failure, and admission from nonhospital settings predicted decreased likelihood of discontinuation; AD, dependency in activities of daily living, greater number of medications, and geographic region predicted increased likelihood of discontinuation. In patients without EOL designation/hospice (n = 10,736), older age and several specific markers of poor prognosis predicted greater discontinuation, whereas obesity/overweight predicted decreased discontinuation. CONCLUSION Most veterans with LLE/AD taking statins for secondary prevention do not discontinue statins following CLC admission. Designating residents as EOL status, hospice use, and individual clinical factors indicating poor prognosis may prompt deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn T Thorpe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Florentina E Sileanu
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria K Mor
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Xinhua Zhao
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sherrie Aspinall
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,VA Center for Medication Safety, Hines, Illinois.,University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mary Ersek
- Veterans Experience Center and the Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion; Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sydney Springer
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,University of New England College of Pharmacy, Portland, Maine
| | - Joshua D Niznik
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Michelle Vu
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,VA Center for Medication Safety, Hines, Illinois
| | - Loren J Schleiden
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Walid F Gellad
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jacob Hunnicutt
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua M Thorpe
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Joseph T Hanlon
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs (VA) Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
A nurse practitioner led protocol to address polypharmacy in long-term care. Geriatr Nurs 2020; 41:956-961. [PMID: 32718755 PMCID: PMC7380258 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is common in long term care facilities and frequently associated with poor outcomes. A focus on decreasing polypharmacy as part of 60-day periodic review process in long term care facilities has the potential to improve resident outcomes and assist health care providers in improved medication management. To achieve success in decreasing polypharmacy, an interdisciplinary team with shared goals and communication is needed.
Polypharmacy is common in long term care facilities and frequently associated with poor outcomes. This study sought to determine if a medication management protocol completed at four month intervals by nurse practitioners (NP) could impact polypharmacy and administration times for long term care residents. The data was collected as part of a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) “Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Hospitalization among Nursing Facility Residents” grant. Residents were recruited from participating long-term care facilities. NP completed a medication management protocol on admission to the program and at subsequent 4-month intervals or with an acute change in condition. A total of 2442 non-duplicated individuals were seen for at least 1 visit. Although the protocol did not result in a reduction of regularly scheduled medications, the number of scheduled medication administration times did significantly decrease. NP polypharmacy assessments and recommendations are important but were insufficient to decrease the medication burden.
Collapse
|
31
|
Bain KT, Knowlton CH. Role of Opioid-Involved Drug Interactions in Chronic Pain Management. J Osteopath Med 2020; 119:839-847. [PMID: 31790129 DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2019.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The use of opioids for chronic pain management is extraordinarily common despite substantial evidence of only modest benefits, when compared with nonopioid analgesics. Opioid use is also associated with serious risks, including overdose and death. A growing body of evidence suggests that opioids are involved in significant drug interactions that often go unrecognized in clinical practice. Understanding opioid-involved drug interactions is of great practical importance for all health care professionals caring for patients with chronic pain. In this article, we describe the mechanisms of opioid-involved drug interactions and their potential consequences, which have major public health implications. Additionally, this article provides practical strategies to aid health care professionals in avoiding and mitigating opioid-involved drug interactions in order to obtain a favorable balance in the risk-benefit ratio associated with opioid use. These strategies include using osteopathic principles for chronic pain management, separating the times of administration of the opioid(s) from the nonopioid(s) involved in the interaction, changing the opioid(s) adversely affected by the interaction, changing the nonopioid(s) causing the interaction, and partnering with pharmacists in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
32
|
Michiels-Corsten M, Gerlach N, Schleef T, Junius-Walker U, Donner-Banzhoff N, Viniol A. Generic instruments for drug discontinuation in primary care: A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:1251-1266. [PMID: 32216066 PMCID: PMC7319012 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The aim of this systematic review was to identify generic instruments for drug discontinuation in patients with polypharmacy in the primary care setting. Methods We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE, 8 guideline databases (AWMF, NICE, NGC, SIGN, NHMRC, CPG, KCE), the Cochrane Library and grey literature (Google) in 2016 and 2017. Two independent researchers screened and analysed data. The drug discontinuation instruments of the included publications were described and classified. Results We identified 16 relevant publications. Here we found complex algorithms as well as instruments composed of distinct sequential steps. Two guidelines are constructed as electronic web‐applications. Instruments revealed diverging emphases on the stages of deprescribing, i.e. preparation, drug evaluation, decision‐making and implementation. Accordingly, 3 types of instruments emerged: general frameworks, detailed drug assessment tools and comprehensive discontinuation guidelines. Conclusion Diverse generic instruments exist for different areas of applications in regard to drug discontinuation. However, there is still a need for practical and user‐friendly tools that support physicians in communicational aspects, visualise trade‐offs and also enhance patient involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navina Gerlach
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Schleef
- Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Norbert Donner-Banzhoff
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Annika Viniol
- Department of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
El Desoky ES. Deprescription in elderly: A spotlight on pharmacoeconomic aspect. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2020; 47:333-336. [DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.13193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ehab S. El Desoky
- Pharmacology Department Faculty of Medicine Assiut University Assiut Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aligning Prescribing Practices with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Guidelines: A Sisyphean Struggle? Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019; 16:187-188. [PMID: 30707064 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201811-797ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
35
|
Does Deprescribing Improve Quality of Life? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Drugs Aging 2019; 36:1097-1110. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00717-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
36
|
Verdoorn S, Blom J, Vogelzang T, Kwint HF, Gussekloo J, Bouvy ML. The use of goal attainment scaling during clinical medication review in older persons with polypharmacy. Res Social Adm Pharm 2019; 15:1259-1265. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Revised: 10/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
37
|
Linsky A, Gellad W, Linder JA, Friedberg MW. Advancing the Science of Deprescribing: A Novel Comprehensive Conceptual Framework. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:2018-2022. [PMID: 31430394 PMCID: PMC6800794 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is common in older adults and associated with inappropriate medication use, adverse drug events, medication nonadherence, higher costs, and increased mortality compared with those without polypharmacy. Deprescribing, the clinically supervised process of stopping or reducing the dose of medications when they cause harm or no longer provide benefit, may improve outcomes. Although potentially beneficial, clinicians struggle to overcome structural, organizational, technological, and cognitive barriers to deprescribing, limiting its use in clinical practice. Deprescribing science would benefit from a unifying conceptual framework to prioritize research. Current deprescribing conceptual frameworks have made important contributions to the field but often with a focus on specific medication classes or aspects of deprescribing. To further this relatively nascent field, we developed a broader deprescribing conceptual framework that builds on prior frameworks and includes patient, prescriber, and system influences; the process of deprescribing; outcomes; and dissemination. Patient factors include patients' biology, experience, values, and preferences. Prescriber factors include rational (eg, based on explicit knowledge) and nonrational (eg, behavioral tendencies, biases, and heuristics) decision making. System factors include resources, incentives, goals, and culture that contribute to deprescribing. The framework separates the deprescribing decision from the deprescribing process. The framework captures the results of deprescribing by examining changes in clinical structures, performance processes, patient experience, health outcomes, and cost. Through testing and refinement, this novel, more comprehensive conceptual framework has the potential to advance deprescribing research by organizing the existing evidence, identifying evidence gaps, and categorizing deprescribing interventions and the settings in which they are applied. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:2018-2022, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Linsky
- General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System and Boston University School of Medicine; Boston, MA
| | - Walid Gellad
- University of Pittsburgh and the VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System; Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jeffrey A. Linder
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Chicago, IL
| | - Mark W. Friedberg
- RAND, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zueger PM, Holmes HM, Calip GS, Qato DM, Pickard AS, Lee TA. Older Medicare Beneficiaries Frequently Continue Medications with Limited Benefit Following Hospice Admission. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:2029-2037. [PMID: 31346909 PMCID: PMC6816724 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05152-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Revised: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of medications not relieving symptoms or maximizing quality of life should be minimized following hospice enrollment. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the frequency of and predictive factors for continuation of medications with limited benefit after hospice admission among those admitted for cancer- and non-cancer-related causes. DESIGN Cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database. PATIENTS Medicare Part D-enrolled beneficiaries 66 years and older who were admitted to and died under hospice care between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2013 (N = 70,035). MAIN MEASURES Patients were followed from hospice enrollment through death for Part D dispensing of limited benefit medications (LBMs) they had used in the 6 months prior to hospice admission, including anti-hyperlipidemics, anti-hypertensives, oral anti-diabetics, anti-platelets, anti-dementia medications, anti-osteoporotic medications, and proton pump inhibitors. The proportion of patients continuing an LBM after hospice admission was evaluated. Adjusted relative risks (RRs) were estimated for factors associated with LBM continuation. KEY RESULTS Overall, 29.8% and 30.5% of patients admitted to hospice for a cancer- and non-cancer-related cause, respectively, continued at least one LBM after hospice admission. Anti-dementia medications were continued most frequently (29.3%) while anti-osteoporotic medications were continued least often (14.1%). Compared to home hospice, LBM continuation was greater in hospice patients residing in skilled nursing (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.20-1.29), non-skilled nursing (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.32), and assisted living facilities (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.24-1.32). Patients with hospice stays ≥ 180 days were more likely to continue at least one LBM compared to those with stays of 1 week or less (RR 13.11, 95% CI 12.25-14.02). CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of Medicare hospice beneficiaries continued to receive LBMs following hospice enrollment. Providers should evaluate the necessity of continuing non-palliative medications at the end of life through a careful, patient-centric consideration of their potential risks and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick M Zueger
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Holly M Holmes
- Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gregory S Calip
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Epidemiology Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dima M Qato
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Todd A Lee
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Aim This study aimed to explore attitudes, beliefs and experiences regarding polypharmacy and discontinuing medications, or deprescribing, among community living older adults aged ≥65 years, using ≥5 medications. It also aimed to investigate if health literacy capabilities influenced attitudes and beliefs towards deprescribing. Background Polypharmacy use is common among Australian older adults. However, little is known about their attitudes towards polypharmacy use or towards stopping medications. Previous studies indicate that health literacy levels tend to be lower in older adults, resulting in poor knowledge about medications. Methods A self-administered survey was conducted using two previously validated tools; the Patients’ Attitude Towards Deprescribing (PATD) tool to measure attitudes towards polypharmacy use and deprescribing and the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale (AAHLS) to measure functional, communicative and critical health literacy. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Findings The 137 responses showed that 80% thought all their medications were necessary and were comfortable with the number taken. Wanting to reduce the number of medications taken was associated with concerns about the amount taken (P<0.001), experiencing side effects (P<0.001), or believing that one or more medications were no longer needed (P<0.000). Those who were using ten or more medications were more likely to want to reduce the number taken (P=0.019). Most (88%) respondents would be willing to stop medication/s in the context of receiving this advice from their doctor. Willingness to consider stopping correlated with higher scores on the critical health literacy subscale (P<0.021) and overall AAHLS score (P<0.009). Those with higher scores on the overall AAHLS measure were more likely to report that they understood why their medications were prescribed (P<0.000) and were more likely to participate in decision-making (P=0.027). Opportunities to proactively consider deprescribing may be missed, as one third of the respondents could not recall a recent review of their medications.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
In the United States, the adult population that will need hospice and palliative care is expected to double in the next 40 years. In primary care, providers are often faced with tough decisions on how to manage patients' medications at the end of life. This article describes how to deprescribe in the last year of life.
Collapse
|
41
|
Horowitz MA, Taylor D. Tapering of SSRI treatment to mitigate withdrawal symptoms. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6:538-546. [PMID: 30850328 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30032-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
All classes of drug that are prescribed to treat depression are associated with withdrawal syndromes. SSRI withdrawal syndrome occurs often and can be severe, and might compel patients to recommence their medication. Although the withdrawal syndrome can be differentiated from recurrence of the underlying disorder, it might also be mistaken for recurrence, leading to long-term unnecessary medication. Guidelines recommend short tapers, of between 2 weeks and 4 weeks, down to therapeutic minimum doses, or half-minimum doses, before complete cessation. Studies have shown that these tapers show minimal benefits over abrupt discontinuation, and are often not tolerated by patients. Tapers over a period of months and down to doses much lower than minimum therapeutic doses have shown greater success in reducing withdrawal symptoms. Other types of medication associated with withdrawal, such as benzodiazepenes, are tapered to reduce their biological effect at receptors by fixed amounts to minimise withdrawal symptoms. These dose reductions are done with exponential tapering programmes that reach very small doses. This method could have relevance for tapering of SSRIs. We examined the PET imaging data of serotonin transporter occupancy by SSRIs and found that hyperbolically reducing doses of SSRIs reduces their effect on serotonin transporter inhibition in a linear manner. We therefore suggest that SSRIs should be tapered hyperbolically and slowly to doses much lower than those of therapeutic minimums, in line with tapering regimens for other medications associated with withdrawal symptoms. Withdrawal symptoms will then be minimised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Abie Horowitz
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Health and Environment Action Lab, London, UK.
| | - David Taylor
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Krishnaswami A, Steinman MA, Goyal P, Zullo AR, Anderson TS, Birtcher KK, Goodlin SJ, Maurer MS, Alexander KP, Rich MW, Tjia J. Deprescribing in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 73:2584-2595. [PMID: 31118153 PMCID: PMC6724706 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Deprescribing, an integral component of a continuum of good prescribing practices, is the process of medication withdrawal or dose reduction to correct or prevent medication-related complications, improve outcomes, and reduce costs. Deprescribing is particularly applicable to the commonly encountered multimorbid older adult with cardiovascular disease and concomitant geriatric conditions such as polypharmacy, frailty, and cognitive dysfunction-a combination rarely addressed in current clinical practice guidelines. Triggers to deprescribe include present or expected adverse drug reactions, unnecessary polypharmacy, and the need to align medications with goals of care when life expectancy is reduced. Using a framework to deprescribe, this review addresses the rationale, evidence, and strategies for deprescribing cardiovascular and some noncardiovascular medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashok Krishnaswami
- Division of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente San Jose Medical Center, San Jose, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| | - Michael A Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California; Division of Geriatrics, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Parag Goyal
- Division of Cardiology and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Andrew R Zullo
- Departments of Health Services, Policy, Practice and Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; Center of Innovation in Long-Term Services and Supports, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Timothy S Anderson
- Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Kim K Birtcher
- University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas
| | - Sarah J Goodlin
- Geriatrics Section, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Mathew S Maurer
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Karen P Alexander
- Division of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael W Rich
- Cardiovascular Division, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer Tjia
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Magnuson A, Sattar S, Nightingale G, Saracino R, Skonecki E, Trevino KM. A Practical Guide to Geriatric Syndromes in Older Adults With Cancer: A Focus on Falls, Cognition, Polypharmacy, and Depression. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:e96-e109. [PMID: 31099668 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_237641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Geriatric syndromes are multifactorial conditions that are prevalent in older adults. Geriatric syndromes are believed to develop when an individual experiences accumulated impairments in multiple systems that compromise their compensatory ability. In older adults with cancer, the presence of a geriatric syndrome is common and may increase the complexity of cancer treatment. In addition, the physiologic stress of cancer and cancer treatment may precipitate or exacerbate geriatric syndromes. Common geriatric syndromes include falls, cognitive syndromes and delirium, depression, and polypharmacy. In the oncology setting, the presence of geriatric syndromes is relevant; falls and cognitive problems have been shown to be predictive of chemotherapy toxicity and overall survival. Polypharmacy and depression are more common in older adults with cancer compared with the general geriatric population. Multiple screening tools exist to identify falls, cognitive problems, polypharmacy, and depression in older adults and can be applied to the oncology setting to identify patients at risk. When recognized, several interventions exist that could be considered for this vulnerable population. We review the available evidence of four geriatric syndromes in the oncology setting, including clinical implications, validated screening tools, potential supportive care, and therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Magnuson
- 1 Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Verdoorn S, Kwint HF, Blom JW, Gussekloo J, Bouvy ML. Effects of a clinical medication review focused on personal goals, quality of life, and health problems in older persons with polypharmacy: A randomised controlled trial (DREAMeR-study). PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002798. [PMID: 31067214 PMCID: PMC6505828 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical medication reviews (CMRs) are increasingly performed in older persons with multimorbidity and polypharmacy to reduce drug-related problems (DRPs). However, there is limited evidence that a CMR can improve clinical outcomes. Little attention has been paid to patients' preferences and needs. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a patient-centred CMR, focused on personal goals, on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and on number of health problems. METHODS AND FINDINGS This study was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) performed in 35 community pharmacies and cooperating general practices in the Netherlands. Community-dwelling older persons (≥70 years) with polypharmacy (≥7 long-term medications) were randomly assigned to usual care or to receive a CMR. Randomisation was performed at the patient level per pharmacy using block randomisation. The primary outcomes were HR-QoL (assessed with EuroQol [EQ]-5D-5L and EQ-Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) and number of health problems (such as pain or dizziness), after 3 and 6 months. Health problems were measured with a self-developed written questionnaire as the total number of health problems and number of health problems with a moderate to severe impact on daily life. Between April 2016 and February 2017, we recruited 629 participants (54% females, median age 79 years) and randomly assigned them to receive the intervention (n = 315) or usual care (n = 314). Over 6 months, in the intervention group, HR-QoL measured with EQ-VAS increased by 3.4 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 5.8; p = 0.006), and the number of health problems with impact on daily life decreased by 12% (difference at 6 months -0.34; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.044; p = 0.024) as compared with the control group. There was no significant difference between the intervention group and control group for HR-QoL measured with EQ-5D-5L (difference at 6 months = -0.0022; 95% CI -0.024 to 0.020; p = 0.85) or total number of health problems (difference at 6 months = -0.30; 95% CI -0.64 to 0.054; p = 0.099). The main study limitations include the risk of bias due to the lack of blinding and difficulties in demonstrating which part of this complex intervention (for example, goal setting, extra attention to patients, reducing health problems, drug changes) contributed to the effects that we observed. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed that a CMR focused on personal goals improved older patients' lives and wellbeing by increasing quality of life measured with EQ-VAS and decreasing the number of health problems with impact on daily life, although it did not significantly affect quality of life measured with the EQ-5D. Including the patient's personal goals and preferences in a medication review may help to establish these effects on outcomes that are relevant to older patients' lives. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register; NTR5713.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Verdoorn
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Henk-Frans Kwint
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanet W. Blom
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobijn Gussekloo
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gerontology and Geriatrics Section, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel L. Bouvy
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Linsky A, Meterko M, Bokhour BG, Stolzmann K, Simon SR. Deprescribing in the context of multiple providers: understanding patient preferences. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE 2019; 25:192-198. [PMID: 30986016 PMCID: PMC6788284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Deprescribing could reduce the risk of harm from inappropriate medications. We characterized patients' acceptance of deprescribing recommendations from pharmacists, primary care providers (PCPs), and specialists relative to the original prescriber's professional background. STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of national Patient Perceptions of Discontinuation survey responses from Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients with 5 or more prescriptions. METHODS We created 4 relative deprescribing authority (RDA) outcome groups from responses to 2 yes/no (Y/N) items: (1) "Imagine…a specialist…prescribed a medicine. Would you be comfortable if your PCP told you to stop...it?" and (2) "Imagine…your VA PCP prescribed a medicine. Would you be comfortable if a VA clinical pharmacist [Pharm] told you to stop…it?" Multinomial regression associated patient factors with RDA. RESULTS Respondents (n = 803; adjusted response rate, 52%) were predominantly men (85%) and older than 65 years (60%). A total of 281 (38%) respondents said no to both questions (PCP-N/Pharm-N) and 146 (20%) said yes to both (PCP-Y/Pharm-Y). A total of 155 (21%) said no to a PCP stopping a specialist's medicine but yes to a pharmacist stopping a PCP's (PCP-N/Pharm-Y). A total of 153 (21%) said that a PCP could stop a specialist's medication but a pharmacist could not stop a PCP's (PCP-Y/Pharm-N). In adjusted models (reference, PCP-N/Pharm-N), those with greater medication concerns were more likely to respond PCP-Y/Pharm-Y (odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09-1.92). Those with more interest in shared decision making were more likely to respond PCP-N/Pharm-Y (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.92). Those with greater trust in their PCP were less likely to respond PCP-N/Pharm-Y (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34-0.81) but more likely to respond PCP-Y/Pharm-N (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.31-3.56) or PCP-Y/Pharm-Y (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.13-2.98). CONCLUSIONS Understanding patient preferences of RDA can facilitate effective design and implementation of deprescribing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Linsky
- Section of General Internal Medicine (152G), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 S Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02130.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schenker Y, Park SY, Jeong K, Pruskowski J, Kavalieratos D, Resick J, Abernethy A, Kutner JS. Associations Between Polypharmacy, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced, Life-Limiting Illness. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:559-566. [PMID: 30719645 PMCID: PMC6445911 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04837-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy may be particularly burdensome near the end of life, as patients "accumulate" medications to treat and prevent multiple diseases. OBJECTIVE To evaluate associations between polypharmacy, symptom burden, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced, life-limiting illness (clinician-estimated, 1 month-1 year). DESIGN Secondary analysis of baseline data from a trial of statin discontinuation. PARTICIPANTS Adults with advanced, life-limiting illness. MAIN MEASURES Polypharmacy was assessed by summing the number of non-statin medications taken regularly or as needed. Symptom burden was assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (range 0-90; higher scores indicating greater symptom burden) and QOL was assessed using the McGill QOL Questionnaire (range 0-10; higher scores indicating better QOL). Linear regression models assessed associations between polypharmacy, symptom burden, and QOL. KEY RESULTS Among 372 participants, 47% were age 75 or older and 35% were enrolled in hospice. The mean symptom score was 27.0 (standard deviation (SD) 16.1) and the mean QOL score was 7.0 (SD 1.3). The average number of non-statin medications was 11.6 (SD 5.0); one-third of participants took ≥ 14 medications. In adjusted models, higher polypharmacy was associated with higher symptom burden (coefficient 0.81; p < .001) and lower QOL (coefficient - .06; p = .001). Adjusting for symptom burden weakened the association between polypharmacy and QOL (coefficient - .03; p = .045) without a significant interaction, suggesting that worse quality of life associated with polypharmacy may be related to medication-associated symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Among adults with advanced illness, taking more medications is associated with higher symptom burden and lower QOL. Attention to medication-related symptoms and shared decision-making regarding deprescribing are warranted in this setting. NIH TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier for Parent Study - NCT01415934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Schenker
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Seo Young Park
- Center for Research on Healthcare Data Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kwonho Jeong
- Center for Research on Healthcare Data Center, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Pruskowski
- Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, UPMC Palliative and Supportive Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dio Kavalieratos
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Judith Resick
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Place, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | | | - Jean S Kutner
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Noaman S, Al-Mukhtar O, Abramovic S, Mohammed H, Goh CY, Long C, Neil C, Janus E, Cox N, Chan W. Changes in Statin Prescription Patterns in Patients Admitted to an Australian Geriatric Subacute Unit. Heart Lung Circ 2019; 28:423-429. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Revised: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
48
|
Effectiveness and feasibility of deprescribing of symptomatic medications in a Singapore rehabilitation hospital. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2010105818782006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to determine the effectiveness, cost savings and feasibility of implementing a systematic process of deprescribing medications for symptomatic management, namely, acid suppressants, laxatives, analgesics and antiemetics for patients of a Singapore rehabilitation hospital. Methods: A total of 200 patients were randomized to a deprescribing intervention ( n = 100) or control (usual care) group ( n = 100). The patient-centred deprescribing process was utilized. Symptomatic medications were deprescribed following initial pharmacist assessment, discussion with doctors and consideration of patients’ preferences regarding discontinuation or dose reduction. Symptom recurrence, adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) and the need for drug re-initiation or initiation of new symptomatic medications after deprescribing were monitored in the first, second and sixth weeks. Results: The mean age of patients was 72.8 years and 68.6 years in the intervention and control groups. There were no significant reductions in the monthly cost and total number of medications between both intervention and control groups. Systematic deprescribing of acid suppressants was the highest among the four target drug classes. Recurrence of pain and re-initiation of analgesics occurred in two out of seven cases of discontinuation. However, no ADWEs or constipation were noted in the intervention group. On average, a total of 19 minutes was required by pharmacists and doctors to complete the deprescribing process. Conclusion: The systematic deprescribing of symptomatic medications did not reduce costs nor the total number of medications. The risk of symptom recurrence and adverse events was negligible. Knowledge, attitudes and collaboration among healthcare professionals regarding deprescribing are critical. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03354845.
Collapse
|
49
|
Pichot C, Gentric A. Observational Study Investigating the Prescription of Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and/or Secondary Prevention in Residents Aged 80 Years and Over Institutionalized in Nursing Homes in Brest. J Nutr Health Aging 2019; 23:1043-1047. [PMID: 31781736 DOI: 10.1007/s12603-019-1292-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prescription of lipid-lowering therapy in nursing home residents aged 80 and older. DESIGN Observational descriptive study, led in Brest, France, between February and May 2017. SETTING 15 nursing homes in Brest, France. PARTICIPANTS Nursing home residents, aged 80 and older, treated with a lipid-lowering therapy for primary and / or secondary prevention. MEASUREMENTS The primary endpoint was to observe the frequency of prescription of lipid-lowering therapy at the time of the study. The secondary endpoints were to analyse the relevance of these prescriptions regarding the latest French recommendations and current literature data and to evaluate the monitoring of treatment. RESULTS 213 of the 1121 included residents (19%) were treated with a lipid-lowering drugs. A total of 141 prescriptions (66.2%) were considered irrelevant. In the past 12 months, monitoring of lipids, liver and muscle enzymes was observed respectively in 41.3%, 60.1% and 9.4% of residents. CONCLUSION lipid-lowering prescription was not optimal in nursing homes. The results highlighted inadequate treatment monitoring and a gap between the French National Authority for Health (HAS) recommendations and actual practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Pichot
- C. Pichot, Service de médecine interne gériatrique, hôpital de la Cavale Blanche, CHRU de Brest, boulevard Tanguy-Prigent, 29609 Brest, France,
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Use of Nonpalliative Medications Following Burdensome Health Care Transitions in Hospice Patients. Med Care 2019; 57:13-20. [DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|