Population pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in infants, children and adolescents during secondary thromboembolic prophylaxis: a cohort study

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Enoxaparin Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Dosing for Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES

Enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in pediatric patients is -typically dosed twice a day. The use of once-daily dosing like that used in adult patients is limited because of a lack of safety and efficacy data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of -once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of enoxaparin for pediatric VTE prophylaxis based on incidence of thrombotic and bleeding events.

METHODS

This was a 3-year retrospective chart review of enoxaparin received for VTE prophylaxis at -Cohen Children's Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY. Exclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, and renal dysfunction.

RESULTS

A total of 177 enoxaparin courses (81 in the once-daily and 96 in the twice-daily group) were included. The median dose in the once-daily group was 0.68 mg/kg/dose with dose capping at 40 mg/dose in 70% of patients. One patient in the once-daily group had a VTE, whereas no patients in the twice-daily group experienced a VTE. One major bleeding event occurred in the once-daily group (p = 0.46); however, minor bleeding events were comparable between the 2 groups (p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily enoxaparin prophylaxis appears to be safe and effective based on minimal -differences in incidence of thrombotic and bleeding events when compared to twice-daily dosing. Based on this study, it may be reasonable to consider once-daily enoxaparin dosing for prophylaxis, especially in older children. A larger multicenter cohort study evaluating once-daily dosing for prophylaxis is warranted to validate the safety and efficacy specifically for risk-based dosing strategies.

Once-daily Compared With Twice-daily Enoxaparin Maintenance Therapy Appears Safe and Efficacious in Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Once-daily enoxaparin (ODE), considered standard of care for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in adults, has been infrequently assessed in children. To contribute available data to a limited field, we reviewed our center's experience with ODE in treating pediatric VTE compared with twice-daily enoxaparin (TDE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of children and adolescents 18 years of age or below diagnosed with VTE and treated at our institution with ODE or TDE maintenance therapy between April 2015 and December 2020 was performed. Patient demographics, clinical and laboratory data pertaining to VTE diagnosis, and management were gathered from electronic medical records and compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

Seventy-one children met the eligibility criteria. All patients were initially treated with TDE for 2 weeks before transitioning to ODE maintenance therapy (n=39; 55%) or continuing with TDE dosing (n=32; 45%).Extremity VTE was more common in ODE ( P =0.051) versus pulmonary/intracardiac sites in TDE ( P =0.002) when compared with other sites. Median enoxaparin dosing was 1.5 and 1.1 mg/kg/dose in ODE and TDE cohorts, respectively. Bleeding episodes were rare without any difference between the cohorts. Two patients (6%) were lost to follow up in TDE cohort. All evaluable patients in both cohorts had either complete/partial response (ODE n=35 [90%]; TDE n=24 [75%] or stable thrombus ODE n=4 [10%]; TDE n=6 [19%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that ODE, used after the initial TDE treatment period, is as safe and efficacious as TDE maintenance for the treatment of pediatric VTE. The difference in VTE sites may have contributed to the equal efficacy of both the cohorts. Future prospective studies in pediatric VTE are needed to validate these results.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Probability of Target Attainment Analysis of Nadroparin in Different Stages of COVID-19

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The risk of thrombotic complications in critical patients with COVID-19 remains extremely high, and multicenter trials failed to prove a survival benefit of escalated doses of low-molecular-weight heparins (nadroparin calcium) in this group. The aim of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic model of nadroparin according to different stages of COVID-19 severity.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from 43 patients with COVID-19 who received nadroparin and were treated with conventional oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We recorded clinical, biochemical, and hemodynamic variables during 72 h of treatment. The analyzed data comprised 782 serum nadroparin concentrations and 219 anti-Xa levels. We conducted population nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) and performed Monte Carlo simulations of the probability of target attainment for reaching 0.2-0.5 IU/mL anti-Xa levels in study groups.

RESULTS

We successfully developed a one-compartment model to describe the population pharmacokinetics of nadroparin in different stages of COVID-19. The absorption rate constant of nadroparin was 3.8 and 3.2 times lower, concentration clearance was 2.22 and 2.93 times higher, and anti-Xa clearance was 0.87 and 1.1 times higher in mechanically ventilated patients and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group compared with patients treated with conventional oxygen, respectively. The newly developed model indicated that 5.900 IU of nadroparin given subcutaneously twice daily in the mechanically ventilated patients led to a similar probability of target attainment of 90% as 5.900 IU of subcutaneous nadroparin given once daily in the group supplemented with conventional oxygen.

CONCLUSIONS

Different nadroparin dosing is required for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to achieve the same targets as those for non-critically ill patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT05621915.

Use of Real-World Data and Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Characterize Enoxaparin Disposition in Children With Obesity

Dosing guidance for children with obesity is often unknown despite the fact that nearly 20% of US children are classified as obese. Enoxaparin, a commonly prescribed low-molecular-weight heparin, is dosed based on body weight irrespective of obesity status to achieve maximum concentration within a narrow therapeutic or prophylactic target range. However, whether children with and without obesity experience equivalent enoxaparin exposure remains unclear. To address this clinical question, 2,825 anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) surrogate concentrations were collected from the electronic health records of 596 children, including those with obesity. Using linear mixed-effects regression models, we observed that 4-hour anti-Xa concentrations were statistically significantly different in children with and without obesity, even for children with the same absolute dose (P = 0.004). To further mechanistically explore obesity-associated differences in anti-Xa concentration, a pediatric physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed in adults, and then scaled to children with and without obesity. This PBPK model incorporated binding of enoxaparin to antithrombin to form anti-Xa and elimination via heparinase-mediated metabolism and glomerular filtration. Following scaling, the PBPK model predicted real-world pediatric concentrations well, with an average fold error (standard deviation of the fold error) of 0.82 (0.23) and 0.87 (0.26) in children with and without obesity, respectively. PBPK model simulations revealed that children with obesity have at most 20% higher 4-hour anti-Xa concentrations under recommended, total body weight-based dosing compared to children without obesity owing to reduced weight-normalized clearance. Enoxaparin exposure was better matched across age groups and obesity status using fat-free mass weight-based dosing.

The Trilogy of SARS-CoV-2 in Pediatrics (Part 3): Thrombosis, Anticoagulant, and Antiplatelet Considerations

The hypercoagulable state induced by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affects all patients regardless of age. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2-related illnesses is not well established. Although deep vein thrombosis is rare in children in the absence of risk factors, coagulopathy and the development of thromboses have been described in pediatric patients with acute COVID-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. This comprehensive review provides a detailed overview of SARS-CoV-2-associated coagulopathy as well as strategies for optimizing the evaluation, management, and prevention of thrombosis in pediatric patients.

Effectiveness and Safety of Nadroparin Therapy in Preterm and Term Neonates with Venous Thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Optimal neonatal nadroparin dosages to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate therapeutic nadroparin dosages to reach therapeutic target ranges (TTR: 0.5-1.0 International Unit (IU)/mL) and the effectiveness and safety of nadroparin in neonatal VTE.

METHODS

Retrospective study including neonates with VTE on nadroparin in a tertiary center between 2007 and 2018. Two groups were distinguished: neonates before (group 1) and after (group 2) switch to higher starting dosages in 2014.

RESULTS

Sixty-one neonates (44 preterm, 17 term) with 64 VTEs were included. TTR was reached in 32/64 (50%) VTEs (group 1: 35.7%; group 2: 61.1%). Median nadroparin dosage to reach TTR was 197 (97.9-330.3) IU/kg/12 h. No therapy-related deaths occurred. Recurrent VTE developed in 6 (9.8%) neonates. Complete clot resolution was observed in 31/41 (75.6%) VTEs. TTR was reached in 58.1% VTEs with complete clot resolution. No major bleeding occurred. Non-major clinically relevant bleedings occurred in 3/64 (4.7%) VTEs, consisting of large hematomas due to the use of subcutaneous catheters.

CONCLUSIONS

High nadroparin dosages are needed to reach TTR in neonates, which seem to be safe. Clot resolution may occur without reaching TTR. Subcutaneous catheters may cause important bleeding complications.

Challenges and Opportunities in the Pharmacological Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Children

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important but historically under-recognized problem in pediatrics, with an incidence concentrated in hospitalized children. A number of specific VTE diseases with discrete triggers have been described, but the most common pediatric trigger is the presence of central venous access devices. VTE diseases, though heterogenous in etiology, are linked by the common therapeutic strategies shared by their management. Historically, the most commonly used drug therapies have been unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, and vitamin K antagonists, based on extrapolation from adult data rather than any specific pediatric trials. Although these widely used drugs appear safe and effective in expert hands, the historical lack of pediatric data is problematic in view of the recognized significant differences between children and adults with regards to hemostatic physiology, VTE etiology, and drug pharmacokinetics. The increasing adult usage of novel VTE pharmacotherapies such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has led to considerable interest in exploring the pediatric applications of these newer drugs. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of existing VTE pharmacotherapies and outlines emerging novel pediatric VTE therapies, particularly DOACs, within the context of the current pediatric trial landscape.

Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of central venous catheter-related thrombosis in children

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of children diagnosed with thrombotic events has been increasing in the last decades. The most common thrombosis risk factor in neonates, infants and children is the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC). It is unknown if anticoagulation prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) decreases CVC-related thrombosis in children. This is an update of the Cochrane Review published in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of LMWH prophylaxis on the incidence of CVC-related thrombosis and major and minor bleeding complications in children. Further objectives were to determine the effect of LMWH on occlusion of CVCs, number of days of CVC patency, episodes of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), other side effects of LMWH (allergic reactions, abnormal coagulation profile, heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia and osteoporosis) and mortality during therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 7 May 2019. We undertook reference checking of identified trials to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials comparing LMWH to no prophylaxis (placebo or no treatment), or low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) either as continuous infusion or flushes (low-dose UFH aims to ensure the patency of the central line but has no systemic anticoagulation activity), given to prevent CVC-related thrombotic events in children. We selected studies conducted in children aged 0 to 18 years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified eligible studies, which were assessed for study methodology including bias, and extracted unadjusted data where available. In the data analysis step, all outcomes were analysed as binary or dichotomous outcomes. The effects of interventions were summarised with risk ratios (RR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

One additional study was included for this update bringing the total to two included studies (with 1135 participants). Both studies were open-label RCTs comparing LMWH with low-dose UFH to prevent CVC-related thrombosis in children. We identified no studies comparing LMWH with placebo or no treatment. Meta-analysis found insufficient evidence of an effect of LMWH prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of CVC-related thrombosis in children with CVC, compared to low-dose UFH (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.75; 2 studies; 787 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study (158 participants) reported symptomatic and asymptomatic CVC-related thrombosis separately and detected no evidence of a difference between LMWH and low-dose UFH (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.93; low-certainty evidence; RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.08; low-certainty evidence; for symptomatic and asymptomatic participants respectively). There was insufficient evidence to determine whether LMWH impacts the risk of major bleeding (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.67; 2 studies; 813 participants; low-certainty evidence); or minor bleeding. One study reported minor bleeding in 53.3% of participants in the LMWH arm and in 44.7% of participants in the low-dose UFH arm (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.58; 1 study; 158 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and the other study reported no minor bleeding in either group (RR: not estimable). Mortality during the study period was reported in one study, where two deaths occurred during the study period. Both were unrelated to thrombotic events and occurred in the low-dose UFH arm. The second study did not report mortality during therapy per arm but showed similar 5-year overall survival (low-certainty evidence). No additional adverse effects were reported. Other pre-specified outcomes (including CVC occlusion, patency and CRBSI) were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pooling data from two RCTs did not provide evidence to support the use of prophylactic LWMH for preventing CVC-related thrombosis in children (low-certainty evidence). Evidence was also insufficient to confirm or exclude a difference in the incidence of major and minor bleeding complications in the LMWH prophylaxis group compared to low-dose UFH (low and very low certainty respectively). No evidence of a clear difference in overall mortality was seen. Studies did not report on the outcomes catheter occlusion, days of catheter patency, episodes of CRBSI and other side effects of LMWH (allergic reactions, abnormal coagulation profile, heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia and osteoporosis). The certainty of the evidence was downgraded due to risk of bias of the included studies, imprecision and inconsistency, preventing conclusions in regards to the efficacy of LMWH prophylaxis to prevent CVC-related thrombosis in children.

Management of thrombosis in children and neonates: practical use of anticoagulants in children

Venous thrombosis (VTE) in children and neonates presents numerous management challenges. Although increasing in frequency, VTE in children and neonates is still uncommon compared with adults. The epidemiology of VTE is vastly different in neonates vs children vs adolescents vs adults. In reality, pediatric thrombosis should be viewed as a multitude of rare diseases (eg, renal vein thrombosis, spontaneous thrombosis, catheter-related thrombosis, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis), all requiring different approaches to diagnosis and with different short- and long-term consequences, but linked by the use of common therapeutic agents. Further, children have fundamentally different physiology in terms of blood flow, developmental hemostasis, and, likely, endothelial function. The American Society of Hematology 2017 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Treatment of Pediatric VTE provides up-to-date evidence-based guidelines related to treatment. Therefore, this article will focus on the practical use of therapeutic agents in the management of pediatric VTE, especially unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and oral vitamin K antagonists, as the most common anticoagulants used in children. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remain in clinical trials in children and should not be used outside of formal trials for the foreseeable future.

Pharmacokinetics of Enoxaparin After Renal Transplantation in Pediatric Patients

Enoxaparin is commonly used in the prevention of renal allograft vascular thrombosis but off-label in children, and no consensus exists regarding the optimal dosing and dose adjustment. In this retrospective study, 444 anti-Xa levels were obtained from 30 pediatric renal transplant recipients in order to investigate enoxaparin population pharmacokinetics. The main results were (1) 25% of children achieved the target anti-Xa activity 36 hours after initiation of treatment, (2) anti-Xa time courses were best described by a 1-compartment open model with first-order absorption, (3) body weight but not renal function was the sole covariate influencing clearance and volume of distribution, and (4) large between-subject and between-occasion variabilities in anti-Xa activity were observed. However, creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate in the first post-renal transplantation hours may not reliably reflect the actual renal function of the children. Based on the final population model, a Bayesian-based program was developed in order to estimate the individual pharmacokinetic parameters on a single anti-Xa measurement, allowing determination of the next enoxaparin dose that will quickly achieve an appropriate anti-Xa activity (targeting 0.3-0.5 IU/mL) and anticoagulation. Finally, these results should help standardize practices that remain to date largely heterogeneous in pediatric intensive care units.

Management of Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis, Part 2: Acute Severe Colitis-An Evidence-based Consensus Guideline From the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization and the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Acute severe colitis (ASC) is one of the few emergencies in pediatric gastroenterology. Tight monitoring and timely medical and surgical interventions may improve outcomes and minimize morbidity and mortality. We aimed to standardize daily treatment of ASC in children through detailed recommendations and practice points which are based on a systematic review of the literature and consensus of experts.

METHODS

These guidelines are a joint effort of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) and the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). Fifteen predefined questions were addressed by working subgroups. An iterative consensus process, including 2 face-to-face meetings, was followed by voting of the national representatives of ECCO and all members of the Paediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Porto group of ESPGHAN (43 voting experts).

RESULTS

A total of 24 recommendations and 43 practice points were endorsed with a consensus rate of at least 91% regarding diagnosis, monitoring, and management of ASC in children. A summary flowchart is presented based on daily scoring of the Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index. Several topics have been altered since the previous 2011 guidelines and from those published in adults.

DISCUSSION

These guidelines standardize the management of ASC in children in an attempt to optimize outcomes of this intensive clinical scenario.

Deep vein thrombosis in pediatric patients

Due to advances in caring for critically ill children and those with chronic diseases, rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) are increasing in children. Risk factors consist of central venous catheters, chronic medical conditions, thrombophilia, and various medications. Compression Doppler ultrasonography is the method most commonly used to diagnose DVT, and patients will usually present with pain and swelling of the affected limb. Anticoagulation via subcutaneous injection is the most common treatment regime for children with DVT, and the new, direct oral anticoagulants are currently under investigation. Prevention techniques are not established, but clinical studies are addressing this need.

Population pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in early stage of paediatric liver transplantation

AIMS

Preventing post-liver transplantation (LT) hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis includes enoxaparin administration. Enoxaparin pharmacokinetics (PK) has not been investigated in children following LT. We described an enoxaparin PK model in 22 children the first week following LT.

METHODS

Anti-Xa activity time-courses were analysed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach with Monolix version 2016R.

RESULTS

Anti-Xa activity time-courses were well described by a one-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. Bodyweight prior to surgery (BW_PREOP ) and the related postoperative variation (BW(t)) were the main covariates explaining CL and V between subject variabilities. Parameter estimates were CL_i  = CL_TYP * (BW_PREOP /70)^3/4 ; V_i  = V_TYP * (BW(t)/70)¹ ; where typical clearance (CL_TYP ) and typical volume of distribution (V_TYP ) were 1.23 l h^-1 and 14.6 l, respectively. Standard dosing regimens of 50 IU kg^-1  12 h^-1 were insufficient to reach the target range of anti-Xa activity of 0.2-0.4 IU ml^-1 . Specifically, seven children (32%) never attained the target range during the whole period of treatment and all children were at least once underdosed. According to the final results, we simulated individualized dosing regimens within 4 h following the first administration. More than 100 IU kg^-1  12 h^-1 are suggested to reach the target range of anti-Xa activity of 0.2-0.4 IU ml^-1 from the first day.

CONCLUSION

Thanks to this model, the initial and maintenance doses could be assessed to rapidly achieve the target range. Higher doses per kg, especially in the youngest children, are suggested.

Anticoagulant prophylaxis and therapy in children: current challenges and emerging issues

This review is aimed at describing the unique challenges of anticoagulant prophylaxis and treatment in children, and highlighting areas for research for improving clinical outcomes of children with thromboembolic disease. The evidence presented demonstrates the challenges of advancing the evidence base informing optimal management of thromboembolic disease in children. Recent observational studies have identified risk factors for venous thromboembolism in children, but there are few interventional studies assessing the benefit-risk balance of using thromboprophylaxis in risk-stratified clinical subgroups. A risk level-based framework is proposed for administering mechanical and pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. More research is required to refine the assignment of risk levels. The anticoagulants currently used predominantly in children are unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists. There is a paucity of robust evidence on the age-specific pharmacology of these agents, and their efficacy and safety for prevention and treatment of thrombosis in children. The available literature is heterogeneous, reflecting age-specific differences, and the various clinical settings for anticoagulation in children. Monitoring assays and target ranges are not well established. Nevertheless, weight-based dosing appears to achieve acceptable outcomes in most indications. Given the limitations of the classical anticoagulants for children, there is great interest in the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), whose properties appear to be particularly suitable for children. All DOACs currently approved for adults have Pediatric Investigation Plans ongoing or planned. These are generating age-specific formulations and systematic dosing information. The ongoing pediatric studies still have to establish whether DOACs have a positive benefit-risk balance in the various pediatric indications and age groups.

Anticoagulation Therapies in Children

Venous thromboembolism is occurring with increasing frequency in children resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in pediatrics. Antithrombotic drugs in children can be divided into the standard and alternative agents. This review discusses standard and alternative anticoagulants. Because standard anticoagulants have significant limitations, including variable pharmacokinetics, issues with therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects, it is expected that the use of alternative anticoagulants will increase over time. With their improved properties and recent prospective clinical trial data, the current and future use of these agents will likely slowly replace of the standard anticoagulants.

Safe Use of Low-Molecular-weight Heparin in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma Around Lumbar Punctures

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma (ALL) undergo multiple lumbar punctures (LPs) and frequently require low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for thromboembolic complications. We evaluated if withholding LMWH 24 hours before and after LPs prevented bleeding complications. Children (n=133) with ALL from who were: (1) treated at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, (2) received LMWH (2×/day of ~1 mg/kg) between January 2004 until December 2012, and (3) underwent a LP were analyzed. Spinal hematoma was defined as a clinical suspicion leading to diagnostic imaging. Traumatic LP was defined as ≥10 red blood cells per microliter of cerebrospinal fluid. In 1708 LPs, no hematomas occurred. For each child treated with LMWH, the probability of experiencing a spinal hematoma during the entire ALL treatment course was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0%-2.7%), and in each LP, assuming no intrapatient correlation, the probability of spinal hematoma was 0% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%). Traumatic LPs were more common when performed when children were not receiving LMWH therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2) which may be explained by clinician optimization of known risk factors for traumatic cerebrospinal fluid before the procedures. Withholding LMWH for 24 hours before and after LPs in children being treated for ALL is safe.

Anticoagulation in children: Making the most of little patients and little evidence

Thrombotic complications are increasing at a steady and significant rate in children resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in this population. Anticoagulant drugs in children can be divided into the standard agents (heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists) and alternative agents (argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux). This review will compare and contrast the standard and alternative anticoagulants and suggest situations in which it may be appropriate to use argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux. Clearly, the standard anticoagulants all have significant shortcomings including variable pharmacokinetics, issues with therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects. The alternative anticoagulants have properties which overcome these shortcomings and prospective clinical trial data are presented supporting the current and future use of these agents in place of the standard anticoagulants.

IV Versus Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Critically Ill Infants and Children: Comparison of Dosing, Anticoagulation Quality, Efficacy, and Safety Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Subcutaneous enoxaparin is the mainstay anticoagulant in critically ill pediatric patients although it poses several challenges in this patient population. Enoxaparin infused IV over 30 minutes represents an attractive alternative, but there is limited experience with this route of administration in children. In this study, we assess dosing, anticoagulation quality, safety, and clinical efficacy of IV enoxaparin compared to subcutaneous enoxaparin in critically ill infants and children.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center study comparing dosing, anticoagulation quality, safety, and clinical efficacy of two different routes of enoxaparin administration (IV vs subcutaneous) in critically ill infants and children. Key outcome measures included dose needed to achieve target antifactor Xa levels, time required to achieve target antifactor Xa levels, proportion of patients achieving target anticoagulation levels on initial dosing, number of dose adjustments, duration spent in the target antifactor Xa range, anticoagulation-related bleeding complications, anticoagulation failure, and radiologic response to anticoagulation.

SETTING

Tertiary care pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

All children admitted to the cardiac ICU, PICU, or neonatal ICU who were prescribed enoxaparin between January 2014 and March 2016 were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred ten patients were identified who had received IV or subcutaneous enoxaparin and had at least one postadministration peak antifactor Xa level documented.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 139 courses of enoxaparin administered, 96 were therapeutic dose courses (40 IV and 56 subcutaneous) and 43 were prophylactic dose courses (20 IV and 23 subcutaneous). Dosing, anticoagulation quality measurements, safety, and clinical efficacy were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that anticoagulation with IV enoxaparin infused over 30 minutes is a safe and an equally effective alternative to subcutaneous enoxaparin in critically ill infants and children.

Effect of Plasmapheresis on the Anti-Factor Xa Activity of Enoxaparin in an Obese Adolescent Patient

To our knowledge, the effect of plasmapheresis on the anti-factor Xa activity of enoxaparin has never been reported. We describe a 13-year-old, obese (92-kg) girl who was treated with enoxaparin for a pulmonary embolism while receiving plasmapheresis for suspected autoimmune encephalitis and who experienced clinically significant reductions in anti-factor Xa activity after plasmapheresis. She received five courses of plasmapheresis, with the final two administered during treatment with enoxaparin. Her anti-factor Xa concentrations were highly variable, and we hypothesized that plasmapheresis was affecting these levels. To test this hypothesis, anti-factor Xa concentrations were measured before and immediately after the patient's last plasmapheresis treatment, and then again 2 days after plasmapheresis. The rate of anti-factor Xa activity decline was 0.28 IU/mL/hour with plasmapheresis and only 0.088 IU/mL/hour on the day without plasmapheresis, representing a greater than 3-fold difference. The changes in anti-factor Xa activity due to plasmapheresis altered the final enoxaparin dosage required to remain in the therapeutic range of 0.5-1 IU/mL (0.98 mg/kg/dose while receiving plasmapheresis vs 0.69 mg/kg/dose without plasmapheresis). Our patient's data suggest that plasmapheresis can significantly alter enoxaparin's anticoagulant effect as measured by anti-factor Xa concentrations, which could cause a decreased anticoagulant effect during plasmapheresis and an increased risk of bleeding on plasmapheresis discontinuation. If concurrent enoxaparin-based anticoagulation and plasmapheresis are necessary, close monitoring of anti-factor Xa levels is advisable. Dose escalations and reductions of enoxaparin may be necessary when initiating and discontinuing plasmapheresis, respectively.

Stability and Sterility of Enoxaparin 8 mg/mL Subcutaneous Injectable Solution

BACKGROUND: Enoxaparin is often diluted to accurately deliver doses to neonatal and infant patients. Current recommendations for dilutions may not be adequate for the smallest patients. METHODS: Review of dosing at our institution occurred, and an 8 mg/mL concentration of enoxaparin was chosen. A concentration of 8 mg/mL was compounded by diluting 0.4 mL of enoxaparin (100 mg/mL) into 4.6 mL of sterile water for injection into an empty sterile vial. Four syringes of the 8 mg/mL concentration were prepared by 5 technicians (20 total syringes). Stability and sterility testing occurred a 0, 7, 14, and 30 days. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to detect significant differences in Anti-Factor Xa concentrations at the testing time points. RESULTS: The dilution of enoxaparin was sterile at 30 days but exhibited significant degradation at the 30-day point (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A dilution of enoxaparin 8 mg/mL is stable and sterile for 14 days refrigerated but is not stable at 30 days.

[Haemostatic disorders in children]

Haemorrhagic and thrombotic events occur in both children and adults. The underlying causes are congenital or acquired disorders. In contrast to haemorrhagic disorders, inherited thrombotic disorders nearly exclusively in association with additional external risk factors lead to thrombotic events predominantly during the newborn period and adolescence. It is necessary to be aware of age-specific properties of coagulation in order to correctly interpret clinical and laboratory findings and to provide optimal care for children with haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications.

Improving evidence on anticoagulant therapies for venous thromboembolism in children: key challenges and opportunities

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly diagnosed in pediatric patients, and anticoagulant use in this population has become common, despite the absence of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication. Guidelines for the use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are largely extrapolated from large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults, smaller dose-finding and observational studies in children, and expert opinion. The recently FDA-approved direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban, provide potential advantages over oral vitamin K antagonists and subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). However, key questions arise regarding their potential off-label clinical application in pediatric thromboembolic disease. In this Perspective, we provide background on the use of LMWHs such as enoxaparin as the mainstay of treatment of pediatric provoked VTE; identify key questions and challenges with regard to DOAC trials and future DOAC therapy in pediatric VTE; and discuss applicable lessons learned from the recent pilot/feasibility phase of a large multicenter RCT of anticoagulant duration in pediatric VTE. The challenges and lessons learned present opportunities to improve evidence for anticoagulant therapies in pediatric VTE through future clinical trials.

Anticoagulants in children and adolescents

Thrombotic complications are increasing at a steady and significant rate in children, resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in this population. Anticoagulant drugs in children can be divided into the older multitargeted agents (heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and warfarin) and the newer targeted agents (argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux). This review will compare and contrast the multitargeted and targeted anticoagulants and suggest situations in which it may be appropriate to use argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux. The various agents differ in their pharmacokinetics, requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects. The targeted anticoagulants have properties that may make them more attractive for use in specific clinical situations. Prospective clinical trial data are presented supporting the current and future use of these agents in children.

Anticoagulants in children and adolescents

Thrombotic complications are increasing at a steady and significant rate in children, resulting in the more widespread use of anticoagulation in this population. Anticoagulant drugs in children can be divided into the older multitargeted agents (heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and warfarin) and the newer targeted agents (argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux). This review will compare and contrast the multitargeted and targeted anticoagulants and suggest situations in which it may be appropriate to use argatroban, bivalirudin, and fondaparinux. The various agents differ in their pharmacokinetics, requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring, frequency of administration, efficacy, and adverse effects. The targeted anticoagulants have properties that may make them more attractive for use in specific clinical situations. Prospective clinical trial data are presented supporting the current and future use of these agents in children.

A guide to the use of anticoagulant drugs in children

Increasing thrombotic complications in children with complex medication conditions have led to more widespread use of anticoagulants [Raffini et al. in Pediatrics 124(4):1001-8, 2009]. While current guidelines for the management of antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children exist, they are based on low- and very low-quality evidence [Monagle et al. in Chest 141(2 Suppl):e737-801S, 2012]. Despite numerous differences, current anticoagulation practice is largely extrapolated from adult studies. This is sub-optimal, particularly in neonates who have a rapidly evolving hemostatic system. The majority of pediatric patients have underlying medical conditions that may significantly influence drug choice and bleeding risk. This article reviews the use of anticoagulants in children with thrombosis, focusing on practical aspects such as dosing, monitoring, and complications. Low molecular weight heparin has become the preferred anticoagulant in children, although unfractionated heparin and warfarin remain frequently used. Other anticoagulants, including fondaparinux, direct thrombin inhibitors, and the newer target-specific oral anticoagulants are also discussed. Given the many unique challenges surrounding the use of anticoagulants in children, pediatric hospitals should have written practice guidelines as well as experienced providers to care for children with thrombosis. This is an evolving field, and further studies of the use of anticoagulants in neonates and children are greatly needed to help optimize care.

A practical approach to the use of low molecular weight heparins in VTE treatment and prophylaxis in children and newborns

Low-molecular weight heparins are currently the most commonly used anticoagulants in children and newborns. However, since thrombotic complications rarely occur outside large children's hospitals, physicians often encounter some practical problems in managing these treatments when a pediatric thrombosis specialist is not available. The drug of choice is enoxaparin, due to its favorable FXa/FIIa ratio and the availability of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. The treatment of acute thrombosis should be started with two daily injections but when compliance is an issue, a single daily administration schedule could be chosen for secondary prophylaxis ensuring careful measurement of the post 24-hour anti-FXa activity. Furthermore, a subcutaneous device may be a useful tool and a topical dermal anesthetic could be effective in controlling pain without affecting anti-FXa levels. In neonate and toddlers, where mini doses are frequently needed, the dead space of syringes and needles could represent an issue and therefore the use of insulin syringes without dead space is advisable, while a dilution of the drug is useful with other syringes. This article derives from a nonsystematic review of the available literature, with special attention to recent international guidelines and expert recommendations, combined to authors' clinical practice in large tertiary pediatric hospitals and will provide concise and practical information for the use of low-molecular weight heparin in childhood and infancy in a sort of "answering frequently asked questions."

Successful thrombolysis following enoxaparin therapy in two pediatric patients with congenital heart disease presenting with intracardiac and cerebral thrombosis

Enoxaparin displays fibrinolytic activity through stimulation of endothelial release of tissue plasminogen activator. Moreover, enoxaparin increases the release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor, which inhibits coagulation activity. However, there are only few reports regarding the use of enoxaparin for the treatment of children with thrombosis complicating congenital heart disease. We report the clinical findings from two patients, one child with an A. cerebri media infarction and another with a left ventricular thrombus. In both cases successful thrombolysis was obtained by intravenous administration of enoxaparin. The first patient was a 12-year-old girl with an atrioventricular septal defect, who underwent biventricular repair at the age of 8 months. She presented with right-sided middle cerebral artery infarction. Thrombolysis was contraindicated, because she was beyond the therapeutic window recommended by accepted guidelines. Enoxaparin 2.5 mg/kg/d was administered as a continuous intravenous infusion (CII). The MRI 10 days later revealed a reopened middle cerebral artery and she experienced complete remission of the neurological signs. The second patient was a 16-year-old boy who had tetralogy of Fallot corrected in late infancy. He presented with severe heart failure and a mural thrombus in the left ventricular apex. Enoxaparin was administered and resulted in complete disappearance of the thrombus within a week. According to our experience, CII of enoxaparin was safe and well tolerated without secondary bleeding and resulted in complete dissolution of the thrombi without secondary embolization. Therefore, CII of enoxaparin may be a possible alternative for the treatment of thrombotic complications in children with contraindications against conventional thrombolytic therapy.

Anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics

Thromboembolic episodes are disorders encountered in both children and adults, but relatively more common in adults. However, the occurrence of venous thromboembolism and use of anticoagulants in pediatrics are increasing. Unfractionated Heparin (UH) is used as a treatment and prevention of thrombosis in adults and critically ill children. Heparin utilization in pediatric is limited by many factors and the most important ones are Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) and anaphylaxis. However, Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) appears to be an effective and safe alternative treatment. Hence, it is preferred over than UH due to favorable pharmacokinetic and side effect profile. Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) is a promising class over the other anticoagulants since it offers potential advantages. The aim of this review is to discuss the differences between adult and pediatric thromboembolism and to review the current anticoagulants in terms of pharmacological action, doses, drug reactions, pharmacokinetics, interactions, and parameters. This review also highlights the differences between old and new anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulants in paediatric patients

Given the rising incidence of thrombotic complications in paediatric patients, understanding of the pharmacologic behaviour of anticoagulant drugs in children has gained importance. Significant developmental differences between children and adults in the haemostatic system and pharmacologic parameters for individual drugs highlight potentially unique aspects of anticoagulant pharmacology in this special and vulnerable population. This review focuses on pharmacologic information relevant to the dosing of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin, warfarin, bivalirudin, argatroban and fondaparinux in paediatric patients. The bulk of clinical experience with paediatric anticoagulation rests with the first three of these agents, each of which requires higher bodyweight-based dosing for the youngest patients, compared with adults, in order to achieve comparable pharmacodynamic effects, likely related to an inverse correlation between age and bodyweight-normalized clearance of these drugs. Whether extrapolation of therapeutic ranges targeted for adult patients prescribed these agents is valid for children, however, is unknown and a high priority for future research. Novel oral anticoagulants, such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, hold promise for future use in paediatrics but require further pharmacologic study in infants, children and adolescents.

Assessment of the outcomes associated with periprocedural anticoagulation management in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcomes of an institutional protocol for periprocedural anticoagulant (AC) management in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

STUDY DESIGN

Children being treated for ALL who received full-dose (therapeutic) anticoagulation before undergoing at least 1 lumbar puncture (LP) were included in this retrospective cohort study. The main outcome was the risk of traumatic LP; exploratory analysis included the risks of symptomatic spinal hematoma and progression/recurrence of the thrombotic event. Analyses were conducted using logistic regression analysis with a generalized estimating equation approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-two children with ALL receiving an AC underwent a total of 396 LPs. Although traumatic LP was associated with full-dose AC therapy in univariable analysis, a multiple logistic regression model controlling for other risk factors for traumatic LP showed that AC therapy was not significantly associated with the risk of traumatic LP when the ACs were held as per the institutional protocol. No patient developed symptomatic spinal hematoma. Exploratory analysis revealed that AC dose, a likely marker of thrombus burden, was significantly associated with progression/recurrence of the thrombotic event in univariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, recent AC therapy was not statistically associated with an increased risk of bleeding after LP when following a specific protocol for periprocedural AC management. The risk associated with the progression/recurrence of thromboembolic events requires further evaluation.

Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of central venous catheterization-related thrombosis in children

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of children diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism has been increasing in the last decade. The most common thrombosis risk factor in neonates, infants and children is the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC). To date, it is unknown if the practice of anticoagulation prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) decreases CVC-related thrombosis in children.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to determine the effect of LMWH prophylaxis on reducing the incidence of CVC-related thrombosis in children.Secondary objectives were to determine the effect of LMWH on occlusion of CVCs, number of days of CVC patency, episodes of catheter-related sepsis, side effects of LMWH (allergic reactions, major and minor bleeding complications, abnormal coagulation profile, osteoporosis) and mortality during therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched June 2013), CENTRAL (2013, Issue 5) and clinical trial databases. The authors searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (July 2013). Bibliographies of identified articles were searched. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing LMWH prophylaxis to standard care given to prevent CVC-related thrombotic events in children were included. We selected studies conducted in children aged 0 to 18 years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently identified eligible studies, which were assessed for study quality including bias, and extracted unadjusted data where available. In the data analysis step, all outcomes were analysed as binary or dichotomous outcomes. The effects of interventions were summarised with risk ratios (RR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

One of 17 studies retrieved for full-text assessment for eligibility was included in the final analysis. This study included a total of 186 participants and investigated the effect of LMWH to prevent CVC-related thrombosis compared to standard care. The risk of bias of the study was assessed to be low, except for the unclear risk of selection bias (allocation concealment not reported) and detection bias since it was an open-label study. Nonetheless, outcome adjudication was blinded. However, overall the quality of the evidence was low due to the fact that the study was underpowered. The CIs for the risk of CVC-related thrombosis (symptomatic and asymptomatic events) were compatible with benefits of either LMWH (reviparin) or the control (RR for symptomatic thrombosis 1.03, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.93; RR for asymptomatic thrombosis 1.17, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.08). Similarly, only one patient in the standard care group suffered a major bleeding event, while minor bleeding was found in 53.3% of patients in the reviparin arm and in 44.7% of patients in the standard care arm (major bleeding RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.26; minor bleeding RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.58). Lastly, there were two deaths within the study and neither were the result of a venous thrombotic event (VTE), occurring in the standard care arm. No additional adverse effects were reported. Other pre-specified outcomes for this review were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A single study reported imprecise effects for the risk of CVC-related thrombosis in children on a CVC anticoagulant prophylaxis regimen. The quality of the evidence was low due to the fact that the included study was clearly underpowered, hampering any conclusions in regards to the efficacy of LMWH prophylaxis to prevent CVC-related thrombi in children. Further prospective randomised studies are highly encouraged.

Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Neonates and children differ from adults in physiology, pharmacologic responses to drugs, epidemiology, and long-term consequences of thrombosis. This guideline addresses optimal strategies for the management of thrombosis in neonates and children.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow those described in the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

RESULTS

We suggest that where possible, pediatric hematologists with experience in thromboembolism manage pediatric patients with thromboembolism (Grade 2C). When this is not possible, we suggest a combination of a neonatologist/pediatrician and adult hematologist supported by consultation with an experienced pediatric hematologist (Grade 2C). We suggest that therapeutic unfractionated heparin in children is titrated to achieve a target anti-Xa range of 0.35 to 0.7 units/mL or an activated partial thromboplastin time range that correlates to this anti-Xa range or to a protamine titration range of 0.2 to 0.4 units/mL (Grade 2C). For neonates and children receiving either daily or bid therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin, we suggest that the drug be monitored to a target range of 0.5 to 1.0 units/mL in a sample taken 4 to 6 h after subcutaneous injection or, alternatively, 0.5 to 0.8 units/mL in a sample taken 2 to 6 h after subcutaneous injection (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence supporting most recommendations for antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children remains weak. Studies addressing appropriate drug target ranges and monitoring requirements are urgently required in addition to site- and clinical situation-specific thrombosis management strategies.

FondaKIDS: a prospective pharmacokinetic and safety study of fondaparinux in children between 1 and 18 years of age

BACKGROUND

The incidence of thromboembolic disease is increasing in children. New anticoagulants have been licensed in adults and need to be studied in children. This report describes the first prospective study of fondaparinux in children.

PROCEDURE

The purpose of the study was to determine the dosing, pharmacokinetics, and safety of fondaparinux in children with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Hospitalized children between 1 and 18 years of age with DVT or HIT received fondaparinux 0.1 mg/kg once daily. Fondaparinux-based anti-factor Xa levels were assessed at 2, 4, 12, and 24 hr following the first dose, and peak levels were measured twice weekly thereafter. Detailed pharmacokinetic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty four subjects in 3 age cohorts were enrolled and completed the study. Pharmacokinetic modeling demonstrated that a once-daily dose of fondaparinux at 0.1 mg/kg resulted in similar concentrations known to be efficacious in adults. Safety was demonstrated with only two bleeding events: one which may have pre-dated study drug administration and one which led only to temporary discontinuation of study drug.

CONCLUSION

Dosing of fondaparinux at 0.1 mg/kg once daily in children resulted in PK profiles comparable to those in adults receiving standard dosing. Fondaparinux can be considered an attractive alternative to LMWH given its once-daily dosing, acceptable safety data, and other favorable properties.