Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Unveiling the diagnostic enigma of D-dimer testing in cancer patients: Current evidence and areas of application

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a well-known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). A combined strategy of D-dimer testing and clinical pre-test probability is usually used to exclude VTE. However, its effectiveness is diminished in cancer patients due to reduced specificity, ultimately leading to a decreased clinical utility. This review article seeks to provide a comprehensive summary of how to interpret D-dimer testing in cancer patients.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA standards, literature pertaining to the diagnostic and prognostic significance of D-dimer testing in cancer patients was carefully chosen from reputable sources such as PubMed and the Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

D-dimers have not only a diagnostic value in ruling out VTE but can also serve as an aid for rule-in if their values exceed 10-times the upper limit of normal. This threshold allows a diagnosis of VTE in cancer patients with a positive predictive value of more than 80%. Moreover, elevated D-dimers carry important prognostic information and are associated with VTE reoccurrence. A gradual increase in risk for all-cause death suggests that VTE is also an indicator of biologically more aggressive cancer types and advanced cancer stages. Considering the lack of standardization for D-dimer assays, it is essential for clinicians to carefully consider the variations in assay performance and the specific test characteristics of their institution.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardizing D-dimer assays and developing modified pretest probability models specifically for cancer patients, along with adjusted cut-off values for D-dimer testing, could significantly enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of VTE diagnosis in this population.

Thrombogenesis-associated genetic determinants as predictors of thromboembolism and prognosis in cervical cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of death among cancer patients. Khorana score (KS) is the most studied tool to predict cancer-related VTE, however, it exerts poor sensitivity. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with VTE risk in the general population, but whether they are predictors of cancer-related VTE is a matter of discussion. Compared to other solid tumours, little is known about VTE in the setting of cervical cancer (CC) and whether thrombogenesis-related polymorphisms could be valuable biomarkers in patients with this neoplasia. This study aims to analyse the effect of VTE occurrence on the prognosis of CC patients, explore the predictive capability of KS and the impact of thrombogenesis-related polymorphisms on CC-related VTE incidence and patients' prognosis regardless of VTE. A profile of eight SNPs was evaluated. A retrospective hospital-based cohort study was conducted with 400 CC patients under chemoradiotherapy. SNP genotyping was carried on by using TaqMan® Allelic Discrimination methodology. Time to VTE occurrence and overall survival were the two measures of clinical outcome evaluated. The results indicated that VTE occurrence (8.5%) had a significant impact on the patient's survival (log-rank test, P < 0.001). KS showed poor performance (KS ≥ 3, χ², P = 0.191). PROCR rs10747514 and RGS7 rs2502448 were significantly associated with the risk of CC-related VTE development (P = 0.021 and P = 0.006, respectively) and represented valuable prognostic biomarkers regardless of VTE (P = 0.004 and P = 0.010, respectively). Thus, thrombogenesis-related genetic polymorphisms may constitute valuable biomarkers among CC patients allowing a more personalized clinical intervention.

A prospective study to evaluate the use of surveillance venous ultrasonography to detect incidence of deep venous thrombosis following neurosurgical excision of brain tumors

Objectives

Patients with brain tumors are prone to develop deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following neurosurgical excision of tumor. However, there is a deficiency of knowledge about the screening method, optimum frequency, and duration of the surveillance to diagnose DVT in the post-operative period. The primary objective was to find the incidence of DVT and associated risk factors. The secondary objectives were to find the optimum duration and frequency of surveillance venous ultrasonography (V-USG) in patients undergoing neurosurgery.

Materials and Methods

Hundred consecutive adult patients undergoing neurosurgical excision of brain tumors were included after their consent, over a period of 2 years. The risk factors for DVT were assessed in all the patients preoperatively. All patients underwent surveillance duplex V-USG of the upper and lower limbs at pre-planned time intervals in the perioperative period, by experienced radiologists and anesthesiologists. The occurrence of DVT was noted using the objective criteria. The association between the perioperative variables and the incidence of DVT was assessed using univariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

The most common prevalent risk factors were - malignancy (97%), major surgery (100%), and age >40 years (30%). Asymptomatic DVT was detected in the right femoral vein in one patient who underwent suboccipital craniotomy for high-grade medulloblastoma, on the 4th and 9th postoperative day, making the incidence of DVT 1%. The study found no association with perioperative risk factors and could not suggest the optimum duration and frequency of surveillance V-USG.

Conclusion

A low incidence of DVT (1%) was detected in patients undergoing neurosurgeries for brain tumors. Prevalent thromboprophylaxis practices and a shorter period of post-operative surveillance could be the reasons for the low incidence of DVT.

Impact of antiphospholipid antibodies on thrombotic events in ambulatory cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Despite the conflicting data, the positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in cancer patients may be associated with an increased risk of thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the prevalence and impact of aPL on venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and arterial thrombosis (ATE) in ambulatory cancer patients.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective cohort study, we enrolled newly diagnosed ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Non-cancer controls were age- and sex-matched. Participants were evaluated for aPL. Primary outcomes were the composite outcome of VTE or ATE and the prevalence of aPL positivity in cancer patients. Secondary outcomes included the risk of VTE and ATE in cancer patients and all-cause mortality at six-month follow-up duration.

RESULTS

There were 137 cases and 137 controls with mean age of 56.0±12.3 and 55.5±12.1 years, respectively. Cancer patients were more likely to have positive aPL compared to controls, with the risk difference of 9.4% (95%CI 1.5 to 17.5). Composite of ATE or VTE occurred in 9 (6.6%) in cancer patients and 2 (1.5%) in controls. Cancer patients with aPL positivity were associated with higher risk of ATE or VTE (risk ratio [RR] 3.6, 95% CI 1.04-12.4). Positive LA in cancer patients were associated with higher risk of composites of ATE or VTE (RR 5.3 95%CI 1.3-21.0), whereas the anti-β2-GPI positivity were associated with increased risk of VTE (RR 4.7, 95%CI 1.1-19.2).

CONCLUSION

aPL was more prevalent in active cancer patients and positive aPL in cancer patients was associated with arterial or venous thrombosis.

Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Cancer Patients: A Single Center Study

This study aimed to identify predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized cancer patients and develop a predictive model using demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Our analysis showed that patient groups categorized under a very high risk, and high risk, patients with low hemoglobin levels and renal disease were at a significantly increased risk of developing VTE. We developed a VTE risk-assessment model (RAM) with moderate discriminatory performance, high specificity, and negative predictive value, indicating its potential utility in identifying patients without VTE risk. However, the model's positive predictive value and sensitivity were low due to the low prevalence of VTE within the analyzed population. Future studies are needed to analyze additional predictive factors, and to validate the effectiveness of our VTE RAM to safely rule out VTE, compare it with other VTE RAMs in hospitalized cancer patients, and address any limitations of our study.

The role of tranexamic acid in reducing post-operative bleeding and seroma formation in breast surgery: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in surgery. Seroma and haematoma formation occur as complications of breast surgery. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis evaluating TXA in reducing post-operative haematoma and seroma formation for breast surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results were expressed as dichotomous variables pooled as odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Seven studies including 1446 patients were included. There were 1830 breast surgery procedures performed with TXA administered in 797 cases (43.6%). There was a significant reduction in haematoma rates in the TXA group (TXA: 3.184% (22/691) vs Control: 6.787% (64/943), OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.86, P = 0.020). Based on surgical procedure, haematoma rates were similar for TXA and control groups in cancer surgery (P = 0.230). Haematoma rates reduced following TXA use in cosmetic procedures (TXA: 3.807% (15/394) vs. Control: 9.091% (34/374), OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.75, P = 0.004). Haematoma rates were also reduced in procedures where axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was not performed; in the TXA group, 3.379% (22/651) developed a haematoma versus 6.623% (60/906) in the control group (OR: 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.77, P = 0.003). TXA administration did not impact seroma formation or infection rates.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative administration of TXA may impact the incidence of haematoma in breast surgery, particularly in cosmetic procedures and procedures without ALND. Well-designed randomised studies are required to determine its true efficacy. TXA has no effect on seroma formation or infection in breast surgery.

Perspectives for the Use of Fucoidans in Clinical Oncology

Fucoidans are natural sulfated polysaccharides that have a wide range of biological functions and are regarded as promising antitumor agents. The activity of various fucoidans and their derivatives has been demonstrated in vitro on tumor cells of different histogenesis and in experiments on mice with grafted tumors. However, these experimental models showed low levels of antitumor activity and clinical trials did not prove that this class of compounds could serve as antitumor drugs. Nevertheless, the anti-inflammatory, antiangiogenic, immunostimulating, and anticoagulant properties of fucoidans, as well as their ability to stimulate hematopoiesis during cytostatic-based antitumor therapy, suggest that effective fucoidan-based drugs could be designed for the supportive care and symptomatic therapy of cancer patients. The use of fucoidans in cancer patients after chemotherapy and radiation therapy might promote the rapid improvement of hematopoiesis, while their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and anticoagulant effects have the potential to improve the quality of life of patients with advanced cancer.

Pulmonary Embolism in the Cancer Associated Thrombosis Landscape

In cancer patients, pulmonary embolism (PE) is the second leading cause of death after the cancer itself, most likely because of difficulties in diagnosing the disease due to its nonclassical presentation. The risk of PE recurrence and possibly the case-fatality rate depends on whether the patient presents a symptomatic PE, an unsuspected PE, a subsegmental PE, or a catheter-related PE. Choosing the best therapeutic option is challenging and should consider the risk of both the recurrence of thrombosis and the occurrence of bleeding. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical characteristics and the treatment of cancer-associated PE, which could benefit clinicians to better manage the deadliest form of thrombosis associated with cancer. After a brief presentation of the epidemiological data, we will present the current attitude towards the diagnosis and the management of cancer patients with PE. Finally, we will discuss the perspectives of how the medical community can improve the management of this severe medical condition.

Clinical guideline highlights for the hospitalist: Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer

American Society of Hematology 2021 Guidelines for Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Prevention and Treatment in Patients with Cancer RELEASE DATE: February 23, 2021 PRIOR VERSION(S): n/a DEVELOPER: American Society of Hematology FUNDING SOURCE: American Society of Hematology TARGET POPULATION: Adult patients with cancer.

Step down to 6 months of prophylactic-dose low molecular weight heparin after initial full-dose anticoagulation for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (STEP-CAT): A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are treated with full-dose anticoagulation for at least 3 months, but optimal dosing thereafter is unknown.

AIM

We explored the feasibility of extended prophylactic-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment following a minimum of 3 months of full-dose LMWH.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective pilot study of patients with CAT who completed at least 3 months of therapeutic-dose LMWH. Patients received 6 months of prophylactic-dose subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once daily). The primary outcome was recurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), and secondary outcomes included major, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM), and minor bleeding.

RESULTS

From August 2016 to May 2019, 52 patients with a mean age of 64.1 years were included. The study was stopped early because of poor recruitment. Breast (23.1%) and colorectal (19.2%) were the most common cancers, and 61.0% had stage IV malignancy. Index CAT consisted of DVT alone in 57.7% of patients and pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without DVT in 42.3%. Patients received a mean of 7.6 months of weight-adjusted LMWH before enrollment. During a mean follow-up of 5.6 months, one patient was diagnosed with recurrent incidental PE (0.0035 events/subject-month). There were no major bleeding events, one CRNM, and one minor bleeding event. Eight (15.4%) patients died; six from cancer and two from respiratory disease unrelated to PE.

CONCLUSIONS

These results, in part, provide support for trials of extended reduced-dose anticoagulation for the secondary prevention of CAT. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02752607).

Pulmonary embolism diagnosis: clinical assessment at the front door

This first of two practice reviews addresses pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis considering important aspects of PE clinical presentation and comparing evidence-based PE testing strategies. A companion paper addresses the management of PE. Symptoms and signs of PE are varied, and emergency physicians frequently use testing to 'rule out' the diagnosis in people with respiratory or cardiovascular symptoms. The emergency clinician must balance the benefit of reassuring negative PE testing with the risks of iatrogenic harms from over investigation and overdiagnosis.

Emergency department cardiovascular disease encounters and associated mortality in patients with cancer: A study of 20.6 million records from the USA

BACKGROUND

there is limited data on Emergency department (ED) cardiovascular disease (CVD) presentations and outcomes amongst cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, prevalence, and clinical outcomes of the most common cardiovascular ED admissions in patients with cancer.

METHODS

All ED encounters with a primary CVD diagnosis from the US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample between January 2016 to December 2018 were stratified by cancer type as well as metastatic status. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the adjusted odds ratios of in-hospital mortality in different groups.

RESULTS

From a total of 20,737,247 ED encounters with a primary CVD diagnosis, cancer was present in 3.4%. In patients with cancer the most common CVDs were DVT/PE (20%), hypertensive heart or kidney disease (14.7%), and AF/flutter (11.2%). The distribution of CVDs varied by cancer type, with AF/flutter most common in patients with lung cancer, AMI most common in patients with prostate cancer, heart failure most common in those with haematological malignancies, and patients with colorectal cancer having the greatest frequency of DVT/PE. Cancer status was independently associated with significantly higher risk of mortality in almost all CVD categories, consistent across all the cancer types, amongst which lung cancer patients had the highest risk of mortality across all CVD categories, except intracranial haemorrhage and hypertensive crisis.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular presentations to the ED varied by cancer subtype. Across all cancer subtypes, patients presenting with cardiovascular presentations carried a significantly increased risk of mortality compared to patients with no cancer.

Impact on blood loss and transfusion rates following administration of tranexamic acid in major oncological abdominal and pelvic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Major bleeding and receiving blood products in cancer surgery are associated with increased postoperative complications and worse outcomes. Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and improves outcomes in various surgical specialities. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate TXA use on blood loss in elective abdominal and pelvic cancer surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was performed for studies comparing intravenous TXA versus placebo/no TXA in patients undergoing major elective abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery.

RESULTS

Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 723 patients who received TXA and 659 controls. Patients receiving TXA were less likely to receive a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (p < 0.001, OR 0.4 95% CI [0.25, 0.63]) and experienced less blood loss (p < 0.001, MD -197.8 ml, 95% CI [-275.69, -119.84]). The TXA group experienced a smaller reduction in haemoglobin (p = 0.001, MD -0.45 mmol/L, 95% CI [-0.73, -0.18]). There was no difference in venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates (p = 0.95, OR 0.98, 95% CI [0.46, 2.08]).

CONCLUSIONS

TXA use reduced blood loss and RBC transfusion requirements perioperatively, with no significant increased risk of VTE. However, further studies are required to assess its benefit for cancer surgery in some sub-specialities.

Preoperative oncologic therapy and the prolonged risk of venous thromboembolism in resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most prothrombotic cancers. Among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery, chemotherapy and surgery represent a compound risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), rendering the postoperative time a period of interest. We aimed to analyze whether preoperative oncologic therapy increases the risk for VTE after surgery and identify which characteristics associate with VTE.

METHODS

We first identified patients surgically treated for pancreatic cancer at Helsinki University Hospital between 2000 and 2017, collecting the following data: gender, age at surgery, preoperative medication, body mass index (BMI), preoperative chemo(radio)therapy, tumor size, positive node ratio, perineural and perivascular invasion, tumor grade, surgical technique, postoperative anticoagulation, adjuvant therapy, time of VTE, time of local disease recurrence, time of distant metastasis, and time of death. With a follow-up period of at least 2 years or until death, we compared a total of 93 preoperative oncologic therapy and 291 upfront surgery patients (n = 384, median age 66.5 years).

RESULTS

Preoperative oncologic therapy increased the risk for thrombosis after surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.53). The VTE incidence rate remained high for up to 2 years after surgery. BMI ≥30 kg/m2 , prior anticoagulation, and disease recurrence (p < 0.05, respectively) associated with VTE. VTE is also associated with shorter overall survival (HR 3.25; 95% CI 2.36-4.44). In 71.6% (95% CI 60.5-81.1) of patients, VTE was diagnosed after disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative oncologic therapy represents an independent risk factor for VTE, not only during the immediate postoperative period but up to 2 years after surgery. VTE is associated with obesity, prior anticoagulation, and disease recurrence and diminishes overall survival.

Ex vivo Vitamin D supplementation improves viscoelastic profiles in prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Increased risk of thromboembolic events is associated with prostate cancer, specifically linked to activation of tissue factor. Vitamin D has potential anticoagulant effects by the downregulation of tissue factor expression. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects on clot formation, the morphological and viscoelastic profiles of prostate cancer patients, before and after ex vivo supplementation of Vitamin D was studied. METHODS: Participants were recruited into a metastatic, non-metastatic and reference group. Whole blood samples were treated ex vivo with a dose of 0.5μg/kg Calcitriol. Clot kinetics were assessed using Thromboelastography ®. Morphology of the blood components were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: Results from the Thromboelastography ® and SEM indicated no major differences between the non-metastatic group before and after treatment compared to the reference group. The Thromboelastography ® showed that the metastatic group had an increased viscoelastic profile relating to a hypercoagulable state. Visible changes with regards to platelet activation and fibrin morphology were demonstrated with SEM analysis of the metastatic group. The viscoelastic and morphological properties for the non-metastatic group after treatment improved to be comparable to the reference group. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation may lead to a more favorable viscoelastic profile, with less dangerous clots forming.

Efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose infusion in reducing anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies: A randomized, placebo-controlled study (IRON-CLAD)

Erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESA) are effective for chemotherapy‐induced anemia (CIA) but associated with serious adverse events. Safer alternatives would be beneficial in this population. The efficacy and safety of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) as monotherapy for CIA was evaluated. This Phase 3, 18‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study randomized adults with ≥ 4 weeks of chemotherapy remaining for treatment of nonmyeloid malignancies with CIA to FCM (two 15 mg/kg infusions 7 days apart; maximum dose, 750 mg single/1500 mg total) or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage of patients with decreases in hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 0.5 g/dL from weeks 3 to 18; the key secondary efficacy endpoint was change in Hb from baseline to week 18. Inclusion criteria included: (Hb) 8–11 g/dL, ferritin 100–800 ng/mL, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) ≤35%. In 244 patients (n = 122, both groups), the percent of patients who maintained Hb within 0.5 g/dL of baseline from weeks 3 to 18 was significantly higher with FCM versus placebo (50.8% vs. 35.3%; p = 0.01). Mean change in Hb from baseline to week 18 was similar between FCM and placebo (1.04 vs. 0.87 g/dL) but significantly greater with FCM with baseline Hb ≤ 9.9 g/dL (1.08 vs. 0.42 g/dL; p = 0.01). The percent with ≥ 1 g/dL increase from baseline was significantly higher with FCM versus placebo (71% vs. 54%; p = 0.01), occurring in a median 43 versus 85 days (p = 0.001). Common adverse events in the FCM arm included neutropenia (17%), hypophosphatemia (16%), and fatigue (15%). FCM monotherapy effectively maintained Hb and was well tolerated in CIA.

Prevention and treatment of thrombosis in cancer and oncohematological patients

The purpose of the review is to highlight the current possibilities for the prevention and treatment of venous thrombotic complications in patients with cancer.

The data of 52 scientific sources published in the Russian and foreign press in 1997–2020 are considered.

Cancer patients are at high risk of thrombotic complications, which worsen the outcome of anticancer treatment and are one of the leading causes of death. Thrombosis in an oncological patient increases the risk of death by 30 times, which is associated with fatal thromboembolism and a more aggressive course of the disease. The leading role in the pathogenesis of thrombotic complications is played by disorders in the hemostasis system caused both by the tumor itself and by therapy. Low molecular weight heparins are considered the basis for specific prophylaxis of thromboembolic complications in cancer patients. The use of low molecular weight heparins after surgery and during chemotherapy effectively reduces the incidence of venous thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants are promising drugs for oral administration and are indicated as one of the treatment options for patients with tumor-associated thrombosis with a low risk of bleeding and no drug interactions with ongoing systemic chemotherapy.

Thrombin Generation Profile in Various Lymphoma Sub-Groups and Its Augmentation by Andexanet Alfa

The prevalence of thrombosis in lymphoma patients is reportedly high and ranges from 3-10%. Vascular malfunction and inflammatory processes further contribute to the thrombotic activation process in these patients. Andexanet alfa (AA) is an antidote for factor Xa inhibitors and its usage has been reported with thrombotic complications. This study was designed to compare the effect of AA on the thrombin generation (TG) potential. Blood samples from 78 patients with confirmed diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were collected from the University of Belgrade Clinic, Serbia. Normal human plasma (NHP) was used for referencing purposes. Individual samples were supplemented with AA at 100 ug/ml. TG studies were carried out using a commercially available fluorogenic substrate method. TG parameters such as peak thrombin (PT), lag time (LT) and area under the curve (AUC) were compiled. Cumulatively, lymphoma patients showed an increase in LT compared to NHP which decreases with AA. The PT and AUC levels were decreased compared to NHP and increases with AA. Upon sub-grouping of lymphoma patients, PT levels for all sub-groups were increased with AA. The AUC values increased for HL and NHL and decreased for CLL with AA. Variations in lag time were noted in all 3 sub-groups. Lymphoma represents a heterogenous group of patients where both the hypercoagulable state and inflammatory responses simultaneously occur. Increased thrombin generation in post AA supplemented samples suggest that the use of this agent may potentially be associated with thrombotic complications.

Cancer-Associated Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), which includes portal, mesenteric, and splenic vein thrombosis and the Budd-Chiari syndrome, is an infrequent manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Like typical site VTE, SVT is also frequently associated with cancer, particularly intra-abdominal solid malignancies and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The clinical presentation of SVT is nonspecific. Symptoms may be related to the underlying malignancy, and thrombosis is incidentally diagnosed by imaging studies for cancer staging or follow-up in a substantial proportion of cases. The occurrence of SVT predicts worse prognosis in patients with liver or pancreatic cancer and, not uncommonly, SVT may precede the diagnosis of cancer. Therefore, the occurrence of an apparently unprovoked SVT should prompt careful patient evaluation for the presence of an underlying malignancy or MPN. Cancer patients carry a high risk of VTE extension and recurrence and long-term anticoagulant treatment is suggested in the absence of high risk of bleeding. Either LMWH or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are suggested for the treatment of patients with cancer-related SVT, although limited experience is available on the use of DOACs in these settings. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are suggested for the short and long-term treatment of SVT associated with MPN. This review outlines the epidemiological aspects, pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of cancer-associated SVT, and addresses questions regarding the management of this challenging condition.

Clinical Benefits of Oral Anticoagulant Use in Cancer Patients at Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism per Khorana Index

Background

Cancer patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to cancer-induced hypercoagulability. However, current guidelines do not routinely recommend prophylactic use of oral anticoagulants to prevent VTE in cancer patients.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus no anticoagulant use (no-use) and, additionally, differential effects between NOACs and warfarin, in VTE and adverse bleeding prevention among cancer patients, in consideration of risk stratification by gender, high-risk chemotherapy exposure, and Khorana index.

Methods

This national health insurance data-based study with a 180-day follow-up enrolled cancer patients with or without oral anticoagulant use in 2017. The primary outcome was VTE risk in oral anticoagulant users vs non-users. Four propensity score-matched comparison pairs were designed: use vs no-use, NOAC vs no-use, warfarin vs no-use, and NOAC vs warfarin. A logistic regression model was used to investigate between-group differences in VTE and bleeding risk.

Results

When compared to no-use, NOACs showed substantial effects in preventing VTE complications (OR=0.40, p<0.001), primarily deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events (OR=0.38, p<0.001), in both male and female cancer patients as well as those with a Khorana score ≥1. Adverse bleeding risk was comparable or lower in NOAC-receiving female patients (p=0.13) and male patients (p=0.04), respectively. In contrast, no protective effects were found with warfarin compared to no-use in controlling thrombosis and adverse bleeding risk. In a head-to-head comparison of NOACs versus warfarin, DVT risk in those patients exposed to high-risk chemotherapy was significantly decreased with NOAC use (OR=0.19, p=0.03).

Conclusion

NOACs can be a promising thromboprophylactic option in both male and female cancer patients with VTE risk.

Risk Factors and Anticoagulation Therapy in Patients With Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Early Post-operative Period After Thoracic Surgery

Background: Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (IDDVT) accounts for ~50% of all patients diagnosed with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but the diagnosis and optimal management of IDDVT remains unclear and controversial. The aim of this study was to explore potential risk factors and predictors of IDDVT, and to evaluate different strategies of anticoagulation therapy.

Methods: A total of 310 consecutive patients after thoracic surgery, who underwent whole-leg ultrasonography as well as routine measurements of D-dimer levels before and after surgery were evaluated. The general clinical data, anticoagulant therapy, pre- and postoperative D-dimer levels were collected. Differences between IDDVT, DVT and non-DVT groups were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors of postoperative IDDVT.

Results: Age and postoperative D-dimer levels were significantly higher in IDDVT group than in non DVT group (p = 0.0053 and p < 0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative D-dimer level was a significant independent predictor of IDDVT even when adjusted for age and operation method (p = 0.0003). There were no significant side effects associated with both full-dose and half-dose anticoagulation regimens. Half-dose therapy was associated with a significant decrease in the requirement for anticoagulation medications after discharge (p = 0.0002).

Conclusion: Age and D-dimer levels after surgery are strong predictors of IDDVT following thoracic surgery. Half-dose therapeutic anticoagulation has the same efficiency in preventing IDDVT progression, is not associated with any additional risks of adverse effects compared to a full-dose regimen, and may be adopted for treating IDDVT patients after thoracic surgery.

Midterm Prognosis of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Receiving Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis or Systemic Thrombolysis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

Background This study compared the efficacy and safety between catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and systemic thrombolysis for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with midterm follow-up. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective open cohort study by using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for 2001 to 2013. Patients who were first admitted for PE and were treated by either systemic thrombolysis or CDT were included and compared. Inverse probability of treatment weighting, based on the propensity score, was used to mitigate possible selection bias. A total of 145 CDT-treated and 1158 systemic thrombolysis-treated patients with PE were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the CDT group (12.7% versus 21.4%; odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36-0.67) after inverse probability of treatment weighting. No significant differences between the groups were observed for the safety (bleeding) outcomes. In patients who survived the index PE admission, the 1-year all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in the CDT group after inverse probability of treatment weighting (12.2% versus 13.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.94). Treatment with CDT was also associated with lower risks of recurrent PE (9.3% versus 17.5%; subdistribution HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.66). The difference remained through the last follow-up. Conclusions Among patients with PE requiring reperfusion therapy, those accepting CDT had lower all-cause mortality and recurrent PE over both short-term and midterm follow-up periods than those receiving systemic thrombolysis. The bleeding risk was similar for both groups. These findings should be cautiously validated in future randomized trials.

Real-World Data on Thromboprophylaxis in Active Cancer Patients: Where Are We? Are We Getting There?

Background: Cancer patients are at high risk for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). CAT is the second leading cause of death in these patients but it can be preventable with thromboprophylaxis. Patients and Methods: An observational, prospective, multicenter study aiming to record CAT management in clinical practice was conducted by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO). Results: A total of 426 active cancer patients (mean age 65.3 years, mean BMI: 26.1 kg/m²) who received thromboprophylaxis, were included from 18 oncology units. Tumor types were lung 25.1%, pancreas 13.9%, breast 8.7%, stomach 8.5%, ovarian 7.8%, and others 36%, while 69% had metastases. A total of 71% had a Khorana score ≤2 and 61% received High Thrombotic Risk Chemotherapy Agents (HTRCAs, e.g., platinum). For thromboprophylaxis patients received mainly Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs), on higher than prophylactic doses in 50% of cases. Overall, 16 (3.8%) thrombotic events and 6 (1.4%) bleeding events were recorded. Notably, patients on higher doses of LMWHs compared to patients who received standard prophylactic doses had 70% lower odds to develop thrombotic events (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.10–1.0, p = 0.04). Conclusion: CAT is an important issue in oncology. Along with the Khorana score, factors as metastases and use of HTRCAs should also be taken into consideration. Thromboprophylaxis for active cancer patients with LMWHs, even on higher doses is safe and efficient.

[Treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients]

Oncological patients are a high-risk group for venous thromboembolic complications. These complications significantly impair the outcome of antitumor treatment and take a leading place in the structure of mortality. Treatment of venous thromboembolic complications in oncological patients is a serious challenge. When selecting an anticoagulant, the physician should consider its efficacy and safety and possible drug interactions. Based on results of multiple studies presented in this article, physicians will be able to choose an optimum therapeutic tactics and secondary prevention of thromboembolic complications for this group of patients.

[Use of 'Korona' cava filter in oncological patients]

Using the 'Korona' cava filter in a total of 1345 oncological patients revealed regularity of a change in the shape of the inferior vena cava at the level of implantation. This made it feasible to determine one of the causes of long-term complications following implantation of other models of cava filters. The absence of clinically significant complications in the remote period after using this model of cava filter made it possible to implant it for a longer period, which is of special importance in oncological patients.

Keeping prognostic assessment simple: The value of clinical features in normotensive cancer patients with pulmonary embolism

INTRODUCTION

Although normotensive cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are a heterogeneous population, most validated clinical prognostic scores classify these patients as high-risk individuals, which limits their usefulness in this setting. In this study, we aimed to identify readily available clinical predictors of overall 30-day and one-year mortality in normotensive cancer patients with PE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective single-center study that included all normotensive cancer patients with PE diagnosed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) during emergency department stay between January 2010 and December 2011. Clinical, MDCT and laboratory variables were collected for all patients. A total of 69 patients were included. All-cause mortality was 28% and 55% at 30 days and one year of follow-up, respectively. Lower mean arterial pressure, higher lactate level and a higher Shock Index (SI) at hospital admission were associated with increased all-cause mortality at 30 days and one year of follow-up. The simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index was not a predictor of short- or long-term mortality. An SI of ≥0.7 was found to be associated with lower event-free survival in both short- and long-term follow-up (hazard ratio 7.20 [95% CI, 1.66-31.21, p<0.01] and 3.51 [95% CI, 1.70-7.25, p<0.01], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first article reporting the value of the SI, a user-friendly and readily available clinical tool, as an independent and accurate predictor of 30-day and one-year all-cause mortality in normotensive cancer patients with symptomatic PE.

Treatment of cancer-related thrombosis: from recommendations to real clinical practice

Aim. To highlight the modern treatment and secondary prevention of recurrent thrombotic complications in patients with cancer. Materials and methods. We studied 40 scientific sources published in the Russian and foreign press in the period of 1997 to 2018. Results. Oncology patients are at higher risk of thrombotic complications which can worse outcomes of antitumor treatment and occupy one of the leading places among causes of death. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are the drugs of first choice for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Taking into account the complexity of LMWH application, many patients stop receiving the recommended therapy and are switching to oral anticoagulants. For instance, according to the GARFIELD-AF prospective registry direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are used in 25% of cancer patients. The most promising drug in this group is rivaroxaban (Xarelto). Multiple studies are currently undergoing in the framework of CALLISTO Program, designed to study various issues of managing patients with cancer-associated thrombosis: primary and secondary prevention of thrombosis using rivaroxaban, to study quality of life and the treatment adherence. In the Mayo Clinic Thrombophilia database retrospective study was demonstrated comparable efficacy of rivaroxaban and LMWH and in the studies US claims analysis and US Humana database were noted the reduction of recurrences of thromboembolic complications on using rivaroxaban treatment in comparison with LMWH on the same frequency of severe bleeding. In subanalysis of the prospective XALIA study was showed a favorable profile of efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban therapy in cancer patients, so the results proved the results of real practice. Conclusion. In 2018 the results of submitted studies helped several international societies, such as International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis and The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, to recommend rivaroxaban as one of the treatment options for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis with low risk of bleeding and no drug-drug interactions with current systemic therapy. Rivaroxaban can be considered as an alternative to low molecular weight

Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: An Overview of Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Treatment

Cancer-associated thrombosis is a major cause of mortality in cancer patients, the most common type being venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several risk factors for developing VTE also coexist with cancer patients, such as chemotherapy and immobilisation, contributing to the increased risk cancer patients have of developing VTE compared with non-cancer patients. Cancer cells are capable of activating the coagulation cascade and other prothrombotic properties of host cells, and many anticancer treatments themselves are being described as additional mechanisms for promoting VTE. This review will give an overview of the main thrombotic complications in cancer patients and outline the risk factors for cancer patients developing cancer-associated thrombosis, focusing on VTE as it is the most common complication observed in cancer patients. The multiple mechanisms involved in cancer-associated thrombosis, including the role of anticancer drugs, and a brief outline of the current treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis will also be discussed.

Low molecular weight heparin versus rivaroxaban in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in gastrointestinal malignancies

: Due to their ease of use, the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an attractive treatment option for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) and have been readily adopted by many clinicians. A recent published study comparing a DOAC (edoxaban) to the current standard-of-care low molecular weight heparin dalteparin for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis showed that edoxaban was noninferior to dalteparin for recurrent VTE, but the risk of major bleeding was higher. We present three patients with high-risk gastrointestinal malignancies complicated by cancer-associated VTE with progression of thrombosis while treated with the oral direct Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban. Upon switching therapy to low molecular weight heparin, we found that these patients had clinical and radiologic improvement of VTE. More studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of rivaroxaban in high-risk gastrointestinal-VTE. We suggest that in some patients, DOACs may not be sufficient for the treatment of VTEs related to high-risk gastrointestinal malignancies.

Venous thromboembolic events in lymphoma patients: Actual relationships between epidemiology, mechanisms, clinical profile and treatment

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are an underestimated health problem in patients with lymphoma. Many factors contribute to the pathogenesis of thromboembolism and the interplay between various mechanisms that provoke VTE is still poorly understood. The identification of parameters that are associated with an increased risk of VTE in lymphoma patients led to the creation of several risk-assessment models. The models that evaluate potential VTE risk in lymphoma patients in particular are quite limited, and have to be validated in larger study populations. Furthermore, the VTE prophylaxis in lymphoma patients is largely underused, despite the incidence of VTE. The lack of adequate guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in lymphoma patients, together with a cautious approach due to an increased risk of bleeding, demands great efforts to ensure the implementation of current knowledge in order to reduce the incidence and complications of VTE in lymphoma patients.

The safety of low-molecular-weight heparins in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgically-treated cancer patients: results of a multicentre observational study

Aim of the study

Despite widespread use of pharmacological prophylaxis, venous thromboembolism (VTE) still constitutes a common complication in cancer patients. The aim of the study was to analyse the safety of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) in the prevention of VTE in surgically-treated cancer patients.

Material and methods

A total of 5207 cancer patients (44.5% men and 55.5% women) aged 16–97 years participated in a prospective observational study conducted in 13 Polish cancer centres in 2005–2008. This cohort included 4782 subjects who were treated surgically and received LMWH as a pharmacological prophylaxis for VTE prior to or after the surgery. The incidence of haemorrhagic complications and thrombocytopaenia was analysed in this cohort, along with intra-hospital mortality.

Results

Mean duration of LMWH administration was 9.4 ±7.8 days. Haemorrhagic complications: heavy (n = 15) or light bleeding (n = 299), were observed in 314 patients (6.5%). A total of 314 patients (6.5%) presented with haemorrhagic complications: heavy (n = 15, 0.3%) or light bleeding (n = 299, 6.3%). Four cases of heavy bleeding: gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 2), retroperitoneal bleeding (n = 1), and central nervous system bleeding (n = 1), were classified as definitely related to LMWH. No significant association was found between the incidence of haemorrhagic complications and the type of administered LWMH (p = 0.523). No cases of thrombocytopaenia or deaths related to administration of LMWH were reported.

Conclusions

LMWH seems to be a safe form of pharmacological prophylaxis for VTE in surgically-treated cancer patients.

Prognostic Value of Treatment Setting in Patients With Cancer Having Pulmonary Embolism: Comparison With the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index

Background:

Active cancer is a poor prognostic factor for survival after pulmonary embolism (PE). This retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate how accurately the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) predicts 30-day mortality in patients with active cancer. Whether the treatment setting (palliative vs curative) could predict mortality in these patients was also investigated.

Methods:

All consecutive patients with active cancer and PE who visited the emergency department of Asan Medical Center in January 2007 to June 2014 were identified. The covariates for predicting 30-day mortality were PESI classification, treatment setting (curative vs palliative), brain natriuretic peptide ≥ 150 ng/L, troponin I ≥ 0.10 ng/mL, right ventricular dysfunction, deep vein thrombosis, and anticoagulants used. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the association between treatment setting and 30-day mortality.

Results:

The PESI classification and 30-day mortality did not associate significantly. Area under the receiver–operating curve of the PESI was 0.565 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.453-0.677). Palliative treatment setting associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, regardless of the PESI classification (adjusted hazard ratio: 3.72, 95% CI: 1.49-9.26). Treatment setting predicted mortality 30 days, 3 months, and 6 months after PE presentation better than PESI.

Conclusion:

The PESI did not accurately predict mortality in patients with active cancer. Treatment setting was the most important determinant of clinical outcome in these patients. When stratifying patients with active cancer and PE, palliative treatment setting should be considered as it is predictive of high mortality.

Recent advances in anticoagulant drug delivery

INTRODUCTION

Anticoagulants have been prescribed to patients to prevent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. However, because of several problems in anticoagulant therapy, much attention has been directed at developing an ideal anticoagulant, and numerous attempts have been made to develop new anticoagulant delivery systems in recent years.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the challenges associated with the recent development of anticoagulants and their delivery systems. Various delivery methods have been developed to improve the use of anticoagulants. Recent advances in anticoagulant delivery and antidote development are also discussed in the context of their current progression states.

EXPERT OPINION

There have been many different approaches to developing the delivery system of anticoagulants. One approach has been to expand the use of new oral agents and develop their antidotes. Reducing the size of heparins to use smaller heparins for delivery, and developing oral or topical heparins are also some of the approaches used. Various physical formulations or chemical modifications are other ways that have enhanced the therapeutic potential of anticoagulant agents. On the whole, recent advances have contributed to increasing the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant clinically and have benefited the field of anticoagulant delivery.

Heparins – DOACS – VKA

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). At the same time they have often an underlying bleeding risk. That can often make decisions surrounding the administration of anticoagulants complicate. Individual risk-benefit calculation is necessary. During hospital stage the patients get, if there are no contraindications, a medical VTE prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Whereas out-patients don’t get a prophylaxis because they are at low risk of thromboembolism. If additional risk factor for VTE exists a decision for medical VTE prophylaxis should be taken into account. In patients with cancer and acute VTE, LMWH is recommended as treatment of choice for initial and long-term management in a body weight adapted dosage. After a period of 3–6 month and if a prolonged treatment is necessary, guidelines allow to switch from LMWH to VKA for further anticoagulant therapy. Beside the established anticoagulants like heparin, vitamin K antagonists, fondaparinux new oral direct anticoagulants (DOACs) were established in the last years. These substances are evaluated in in clinical trials. They are approved for treatment of acute VTE, for secondary prophylaxis and for prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with arterial fibrillation. In the VTE trials, 4–10 % of the enrolled patients had a history of cancer. The data shows that DOACs can prevent recurrent VTE as good as standard therapy with enoxaparin/warfarin without more bleeding complications. The results are encouraging. Because of the limited data the direct oral anticoagulants are not recommended for treatment of VTE at this time. Further studies are necessary.

Testing Clinical Scores to Diagnose Incident Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients Hospitalized in a Department of Medicine: Can Biomarkers Improve Accuracy?

Shifting the context from the emergency department to the department of medicine, we compared different scores to diagnose deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with several comorbidities, hospitalized in a department of internal medicine. We prospectively recruited 178 consecutive hospitalized patients in whom clinical suspicion of DVT was assessed by Wells modified score for DVT, Hamilton, Kahn, and St Andrè Hospital scores. Deep vein thrombosis was confirmed in 85 (48%) patients by both echocolor Doppler and angiocomputed tomography scan. The use of risk scores based on symptoms and clinical signs was weakly useful (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.69, positive predictive value: 59%, and negative predictive value: 74%). Patients with DVT had significantly (P < .0001) lower serum albumin and protein S levels compared to those without DVT. Moreover, serum protein S (AUC: 0.82) and albumin in percentage (AUC: 0.80) showed a better accuracy than clinical scores (P < .001) in assessing the diagnosis of DVT. Therefore, serum albumin and protein S improved the accuracy of clinical scores for the diagnosis of incident DVT in patients hospitalized in a department of medicine.

Life-threatening complications and outcomes in patients with malignancies and severe pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Data are scarce about ICU patients with malignancy and severe pulmonary embolism. Here, our main objective was to identify risk factors for life-threatening complications, organ failures, and death in ICU patients with severe pulmonary embolism, with special attention to the impact of malignancy. We also described the clinical features of PE in patients with and without malignancies.

METHODS

Data from consecutive adults admitted to our ICU in 2002-2011 with severe pulmonary embolism were collected retrospectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to look for factors associated with death, organ failures, or life-threatening complications (major bleeding, recurrent PE, and cardiac arrest).

RESULTS

Of 119 included patients (42 [35%] with bilateral pulmonary embolism), 41 had solid malignancies, 27 hematological malignancies, and 51 no malignancies. The most common symptoms were syncope (40%) and hemoptysis (18%) in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, respectively. Life-threatening complications occurred in 23 (19%) patients; risk factors were obesity (OR, 13.22; 1.93-90.70), disseminated intravascular coagulation/ischemic hepatitis (OR, 27.06; 5.14-142.46), fluid load ≥1000 mL/24 h (OR, 6.42; 1.60-25.76), and solid malignancy (OR, 5.45; 1.15-25.89). Inhospital mortality was 27/119 (23%) and respiratory or circulatory failure developed in 36 (30%) patients. Risk factors for these adverse outcomes were older age (OR, 1.04/year; 1.01-1.07), higher oxygen flow rate (OR, 1.28/L; 1.13-1.45); and renal failure (OR, 8.08; 2.50-26.11); whereas chest pain was protective (OR, 0.13; 0.04-0.48).

CONCLUSION

In this study, solid malignancy was a risk factor for life-threatening complications but not for death.

Pulmonary embolism: current and new treatment options

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) can be a life-threatening emergency. Accurate diagnostic techniques and patient-specific management strategies are necessary to ensure favorable clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Relevant guidelines, articles, reviews, and abstracts were identified using a narrative approach in PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov and nice.org.uk. English-language articles published in 2000-2014 were initially identified using the search terms: novel OAC, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, diagnosis, treatment, rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban. The initial literature search was supported by a 'snowballing' style literature search, and relevant articles were included based on a professional judgment of relevance.

SCOPE

We discuss the diagnosis of PE and the categorization of risk for subgroups, which may assist with making treatment decisions. We review current guidance on acute and long-term treatment, possible limitations of traditional anticoagulant therapy, and the development of direct oral anticoagulants, which may significantly alter the management of patients with PE. Finally, we discuss special considerations in high-risk and hard-to-treat subpopulations that may benefit from the improved benefit-risk profile offered by these newer agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct oral anticoagulants may overcome several of the limitations associated with traditional anticoagulant therapy, potentially improving the standard of care for PE patients, including high-risk and hard-to-manage subgroups.

Transferrin-bound proteins as potential biomarkers for advanced breast cancer patients

Background

Serum profiling using mass spectrometry-based proteomic techniques has great potential to detect biomarkers that might improve the management for advanced breast cancer patients. The albuminome has previously been investigated as a tool in biomarker discovery, however other high abundant blood proteins are also likely to sequester potentially interesting molecules.

Methods

Affinity resin purified and isolated Transferrin and associated bound proteins from normal control and breast cancer patient serum samples were analysed by label-free mass spectrometry during the discovery phase.

Results

21 significant proteins were identified with Fibrinogen and Fibronectin selected for further analysis in an independent sample set, with significant difference found when comparing the controls groups (normal healthy control, inflammatory bowel disease and benign breast disease) to stage IV breast cancer.

Conclusions

The area under the curve value for Fibrinogen compared favourably with cancer antigen 15-3, an established breast cancer tumour marker. A combination of all three biomarkers improved accuracy when comparing control/benign to stage IV breast cancer patient groups.

General significance

Mass spectrometry profiling of Transferrin-bound proteins has revealed serum proteins that can distinguish between serum from advanced breast cancer patients and healthy control subjects with high confidence.

•

Transferrin was found to interact with many candidate biomarkers.

•

21 significant proteins were identified bound to Transferrin.

•

Many of these proteins are associated with the complement and coagulations systems.

•

Fibrinogen and Fibronectin were found to have significant AUC values.

•

High abundant proteins harbour potential diagnostic molecules.

Retrospective evaluation of thromboembolic events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Thromboembolic events (TE) are common in patients with cancer and are potentially life-threatening. In lung cancer, little is known about thrombosis during chemotherapy treatment. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of TE in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring during treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected patients with NSCLC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy at the VU University Medical Center Amsterdam between 2000 and 2012. Patients who underwent recent surgery were excluded. All TE were included that occurred from start of chemotherapy treatment until 30 days after last administration.

RESULTS

Among 784 included patients, 63 (8.0%) patients had 69 TE during treatment. Forty-five venous TE (VTE) and 24 arterial TE (ATE). Six patients had multiple events within treatment period, 3 of which had simultaneous ATE and VTE. In total, 613 patients were treated with cisplatin, 119 patients received carboplatin and 52 patients received both in first- or second-line treatment. In 8% (55/665) of the patients exposed to cisplatin a TE had occurred vs. 5% (8/171) in patients exposed to carboplatin (p=0.42). The majority of TE occurred in the first 2 cycles (70%). History of TE was related to occurrence of TE during chemotherapy (p<0.01). Median PFS was similar in patients with and without TE (6.2 vs. 7.2 months, respectively; p=0.10). Median OS was significantly shorter in patients with TE (9.5 vs. 12.9 months, respectively; p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

In our series, both ATE and VTE were a common finding during chemotherapy. TE was a poor prognostic factor. No difference in TE incidence was found between patients treated with cisplatin or carboplatin.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Thrombocytopenic Cancer

Background:

Guidelines are discordant concerning management of patients having thrombocytopenia with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT).

Methods:

Hospitalized adults with CAT and platelets ≤50 × 109 cells/L were managed with dalteparin 100 units/kg subcutaneously once daily. Comparator patients with CAT and platelets >50 × 109 cells/L were managed with dalteparin 200 units/kg/d.

Results:

Outcomes of 35 patients with thrombocytopenia (mean platelet count 26 ± 8.3 × 109 cells/L) and 58 comparator patients (mean platelet count 155 ± 75 × 109 cells/L) were evaluated. In all, 2 (5.7%) patients in the thrombocytopenia group and 1 patient (1.9%) in the comparator group experienced new-onset venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 3.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-37.90, P = .556). The incidence of bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia (8.6%) was similar to that in comparator patients (9.4%; risk ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.37-2.39, P = .607).

Conclusion:

In hospitalized patients having thrombocytopenia with CAT, reduced-dose low-molecular-weight heparin was generally efficacious.

Biomarkers predictive of venous thromboembolism in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas

BACKGROUND

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are among the most prothrombotic of malignancies.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study to investigate 11 potential biomarkers for prediction of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in newly diagnosed HGG patients who had undergone a neurosurgical intervention. In addition, we tested 2 VTE risk assessment models (RAMs). The strongest predictors of VTE, which were identified by statistical forward selection, were used for the first RAM. The parameters used for the second RAM were both predictive of VTE and available in routine clinical practice.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-one HGG patients were included in this study, and 24 (17%) of them developed VTE during follow-up. An association with the risk of future VTE was found for the following parameters: leukocyte count, platelet count, sP-selectin, prothrombin-fragment 1 + 2, FVIII activity, and D-dimer. The first RAM included low platelet count (<25th percentile of the study population) and elevated sP-selectin (≥75th percentile). The cumulative VTE probability after 12 months was 9.7% for score 0 (n = 76), 18.9% for score 1 (n = 59), and 83.3% for score 2 (n = 6). The second RAM included low platelet count (<25th percentile), elevated leukocyte count, and elevated D-dimer (≥75th percentile). The probability of VTE was 3.3% for score 0 (n = 63), 23.0% for score 1 (n = 53), and 37.7% for score 2 (n = 22) or score 3 (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified biomarkers suitable for assessing the VTE risk in newly diagnosed HGG patients. The application of 2 RAMs allowed identification of patients at high risk of developing VTE. We could also define patients at low risk of VTE, who would most probably not benefit from extended primary thromboprophylaxis.