Value of Different Follow-Up Strategies to Assess the Efficacy of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation for the Curative Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

QDOT MICRO™ versus THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH™ and THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® Surround Flow in radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Aim: The objective of this study was to indirectly compare QDOT MICRO™ (QDOT), Thermocool® SmartTouch™ (ST) and Thermocool® SmartTouch® Surround Flow (STSF) to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Methods: Differences in baseline characteristics between study cohorts were reduced by reweighting patients using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary outcome was procedure time. Secondary outcomes were fluoroscopy time, clinical success at 12 months, and rhythm monitoring-adjusted recurrence. Results: QDOT was associated with significantly faster mean procedure and fluoroscopy time, and significant improvement in the rate of recurrence compared with pooled ST/STSF. No difference was observed for clinical success at 12 months. Conclusion: QDOT was associated with greater efficiency, greater effectiveness in rhythm monitoring-adjusted recurrence and similar effectiveness in clinical success at 12 months compared with pooled ST/STSF.

The impact of home electrocardiograph measurement rate on the detection of atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation: A prospective multicenter observational study

Background

This multicenter prospective observational study examined the impact of additionally using a home electrocardiograph (ECG) to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after ablation.

Methods

Between May 2019 and December 2020, 128 patients undergoing ablation were enrolled in the study. After performing ablation, they were instructed to measure their ECGs at home using Complete (ECG paired with a blood pressure monitor; Omron Healthcare, Japan) every day and to visit the hospital every 3 months until after 12 months for 24-hour Holter ECG and 12-lead ECG as usual care (UC).

Results

After ablation, 94 patients were followed up, and AF recurrence at 12 months was detected more commonly in adjudicators-interpreted Complete (31 [33 %]) than in UC (18 [9 %]) (hazard ratio 1.95, 95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.35-2.81, P < 0.001). In patients with recurrent AF found via both modalities (n = 16), the time to first AF detection by Complete was 40.9 ± 73.9 days faster than that in UC (P = 0.04). Notably, when the adherence to Complete measurement was divided by 80 %, the add-on effect of Complete on the detection of recurrent AF in UC indicated the hazard ratio (HR) of 1.71 (95 %CI 0.92-3.18, P = 0.09) for the low adherence (<80 %) group, but it was significant for the high adherence (≥80 %) group, with HR of 2.19 (95 %CI 1.43-3.36, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Despite a shorter measurement time, Complete detected recurrent AF more frequently and faster compared with UC after AF ablation. A significant adherence-dependent difference of Complete was found in detecting AF recurrence.

Recurrence of atrial fibrillation post-ablation: which is the most effective approach for detection?

Over the last 20 years, catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved from a research tool into a fundamental therapeutic measure, with the potential to improve symptoms, quality of life, and even risk of major adverse cardiac events (among patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction). Notwithstanding the tremendous evolution in techniques and tools, risk of AF recurrences post-ablation is not negligible, and a comprehensive structured follow-up is highly needed to deliver optimal patient care. In this follow-up process, monitoring of heart rhythm is quintessential to detect recurrences, and may be accomplished by means of symptoms-triggered, intermittent, or continuous monitors. In recent years, the development and widespread adoption of implantable cardiac monitors, by allowing continuous long-term rhythm assessment, has surged to become the gold-standard strategy, both in research settings and in clinical practice. In this review, we both summarize the present state-of-the art on the detection of post-ablation AF recurrences, and provide future perspectives on this emerging yet often neglected topic, aiming to give practical hints for evidence-based, personalized patient care.

Multiple procedure outcomes for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: Left atrial posterior wall isolation versus stepwise ablation

OBJECTIVE

To compare multiple-procedure catheter ablation outcomes of a stepwise approach versus left atrial posterior wall isolation (LA PWI) in patients undergoing nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) ablation.

BACKGROUND

Unfavorable outcomes for stepwise ablation of NPAF in large clinical trials may be attributable to proarrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. It is unknown if a more extensive initial ablation strategy results in improved outcomes following multiple ablation procedures.

METHODS

Two hundred twenty two consecutive patients with NPAF underwent first-time ablation using a contact-force sensing ablation catheter utilizing either a stepwise (Group 1, n = 111) or LA PWI (Group 2, n = 111) approach. The duration of follow-up was 36 months. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial arrhythmia >30 s. Secondary endpoints were freedom from persistent arrhythmia, repeat ablation, and recurrent arrhythmia after repeat ablation.

RESULTS

There was similar freedom from atrial arrhythmias after index ablation for both stepwise and LA PWI groups at 36 months (60% vs. 69%, p = .1). The stepwise group was more likely to present with persistent recurrent arrhythmia (29% vs. 14%, p = .005) and more likely to undergo second catheter ablation (32% vs. 12%, p < .001) compared to LA PWI patients. Recurrent arrhythmia after repeat ablation was more likely in the stepwise group compared to the LA PWI group (15% vs. 4%, p = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to a stepwise approach, LA PWI for patients with NPAF resulted in a similar incidence of any atrial arrhythmia, lower incidence of persistent arrhythmia, and fewer repeat ablations. Results for repeat ablation were not improved with a more extensive initial approach.

Impact of monitoring on detection of arrhythmia recurrences in the ESC-EHRA EORP atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry

AIMS

Monitoring of patients after ablation had wide variations in the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term (AFA-LT) registry. We aimed to compare four different monitoring strategies after catheter AF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ESC-EHRA AFA-LT registry included 3593 patients who underwent ablation. Arrhythmia monitoring during follow-up was performed by 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter ECG, trans-telephonic ECG monitoring (TTMON), or an implanted cardiac monitoring (ICM) system. Patients were selected to a given monitoring group according to the most extensive ECG tool used in each of them. Comparison of the probability of freedom from recurrences was performed by censored log-rank test and presented by Kaplan-Meier curves. The rhythm monitoring methods were used among 2658 patients: ECG (N = 578), Holter ECG (N = 1874), TTMON (N = 101), and ICM (N = 105). A total of 767 of 2658 patients (28.9%) had AF recurrences during follow-up. Censored log-rank test discovered a lower probability of freedom from relapses, which was detected with ICM compared to TTMON, ECG, and Holter ECG (P < 0.001). The rate of freedom from AF recurrences was 50.5% among patients using the ICM while it was 65.4%, 70.6%, and 72.8% using the TTMON, ECG, and Holter ECG, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Comparing all main electrocardiographic monitoring methods in a large patient sample, our results suggest that post-ablation recurrences of AF are significantly underreported by TTMON, ECG, and Holter ECG. The ICM estimates AF ablation recurrences most reliably and should be a preferred mode of monitoring for trials evaluating novel AF ablation techniques.

Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Medication on Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPTAF Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Quality of life is not a standard primary outcome in ablation trials, even though symptoms drive the indication.

OBJECTIVE

To assess quality of life with catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months in patients with atrial fibrillation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Randomized clinical trial at 4 university hospitals in Sweden and 1 in Finland of 155 patients aged 30-70 years with more than 6 months of atrial fibrillation and treatment failure with 1 antiarrhythmic drug or β-blocker, with 4-year follow-up. Study dates were July 2008-September 2017. Major exclusions were ejection fraction <35%, left atrial diameter >60 mm, ventricular pacing dependency, and previous ablation.

INTERVENTIONS

Pulmonary vein isolation ablation (n = 79) or previously untested antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 76).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcome was the General Health subscale score (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) at baseline and 12 months, assessed unblinded (range, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]). There were 26 secondary outcomes, including atrial fibrillation burden (% of time) from baseline to 12 months, measured by implantable cardiac monitors. The first 3 months were excluded from rhythm analysis.

RESULTS

Among 155 randomized patients (mean age, 56.1 years; 22.6% women), 97% completed the trial. Of 79 patients randomized to receive ablation, 75 underwent ablation, including 2 who crossed over to medication and 14 who underwent repeated ablation procedures. Of 76 patients randomized to receive antiarrhythmic medication, 74 received it, including 8 who crossed over to ablation and 43 for whom the first drug used failed. General Health score increased from 61.8 to 73.9 points in the ablation group vs 62.7 to 65.4 points in the medication group (between-group difference, 8.9 points; 95% CI, 3.1-14.7; P = .003). Of 26 secondary end points, 5 were analyzed; 2 were null and 2 were statistically significant, including decrease in atrial fibrillation burden (from 24.9% to 5.5% in the ablation group vs 23.3% to 11.5% in the medication group; difference -6.8% [95% CI, -12.9% to -0.7%]; P = .03). Of the Health Survey subscales, 5 of 7 improved significantly. Most common adverse events were urosepsis (5.1%) in the ablation group and atrial tachycardia (3.9%) in the medication group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation despite use of antiarrhythmic medication, the improvement in quality of life at 12 months was greater for those treated with catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic medication. Although the study was limited by absence of blinding, catheter ablation may offer an advantage for quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrialsregister.eu Identifier: 2008-001384-11.

Comparison of two modes of long-term ECG monitoring to assess the efficacy of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Optimal ECG monitoring in detecting recurrences of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia (AT) after catheter ablation has not been well established. The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the utility of daily ECG monitoring with episodic card recorder (ECR) vs. periodic monitoring with episodic loop recorder (ELR) for the detection of post-blanking AF/AT recurrences during early (Months 4-6) and late (Months 7-12) periods after catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

The study included 105 consecutive patients, who received ECR for 12 months and were instructed to send at least 2 random ECG recordings daily with extra-recordings during symptoms. The patients were simultaneously monitored for one week with ELR at the end of each period (Months 6 and 12).

RESULTS

Thirty-one and 12 patients with AF/AT recurrence were identified by means of ECR and ELR, respectively. In patients with complete and valid data, ELR technology was inferior to ECR by detecting AF/AT in 5 (31%) of 16 and 5 (26%) of 19 patients with arrhythmia identified by ECR in the early and late period, respectively. Overall, ELR had a sensitivity of 8/23 (35%) for detecting AF/AT recurrence. There was no single patient with AF/AT recurrence on ELR that would not be known from ECR monitoring. Only 2 patients with arrhythmia recurrence were completely asymptomatic throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

Daily ECG monitoring with ECR was better than periodic monitoring with ELR in detecting AF/AT recurrences during the follow-up periods. Entirely asymptomatic patients with AF/AT recurrences were rare.

Assessment of atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes with clinic ECG, monthly 24-h Holter ECG, and twice-daily telemonitoring ECG

Differences in the methodologies for evaluating atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcomes should be evaluated. In the present study, we compared the AF ablation outcomes among periodic clinic electrocardiography (ECG), 24-h Holter ECG, and telemonitoring ECG to evaluate the differences among these methods. In addition, we evaluated the AF-free survival rate for each method with different durations of the blanking period. A total of 30 AF patients were followed up for 6 months after initial catheter ablation, with clinic ECG on every clinic visit, monthly 24-h Holter ECG, and telemonitoring ECG twice daily and upon symptoms. AF relapse was defined as AF or atrial tachycardia detected with any of the methods. Two patients dropped out of the study, and 28 patients were followed up for 8.8 ± 2.7 months. Patients underwent 3.6 ± 0.8 clinic ECG, 5.1 ± 0.8 Holter ECG, and 273 ± 68 telemonitoring ECG examinations. During the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth months of follow-up, Holter ECG detected relapses in 11.1, 8.3, 11.5, 15.4, 4.2, and 4.8 % of patients and telemonitoring ECG detected relapses in 32.1, 25.0, 25.0, 17.9, 28.6, and 17.9 % of patients, respectively. When no duration was set for the blanking period, the AF-free survival rate was significantly lower with telemonitoring ECG (46.4 %) than with Holter ECG (78.6 %, P = 0.013) or clinic ECG (85.7 %, P = 0.002). In addition, when the duration of the blanking period was set to 3 months, the AF-free survival rate was significantly lower with telemonitoring ECG than with clinic ECG (92.9 vs. 71.4 %, P = 0.041). The AF ablation outcomes with twice-daily telemonitoring ECG might differ from those with clinic ECG when the duration of the blanking period is 0-3 months. A follow-up based solely on clinic ECG might underestimate AF recurrence.

Very Long-Term Results Of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Confirm That This Therapy Is Really Effective

Catheter ablation -in general- is a highly effective and "curative" intervention for a broad spectrum of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. After a successful procedure eliminating a simple arrhythmia substrate, the recurrence rate is low and the short term success correlates well with the long term freedom from the arrhythmia.

Health-related quality of life changes in patients undergoing repeated catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) should increase health-related quality of life (QOL).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients scheduled for PVI.

SETTING

University Medical Center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

QOL was assessed using the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores from the SF-12v2 in patients undergoing PVI (mean 50, range 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater QOL). SF-12v2 was obtained at initial presentation (3-months) before PVI and after PVI at the end of follow-up (mean 1.7 ± 1.4 years) which included: (1) Clinical status, ECG, and 24-h ECG every 3 months, (2) trans-telephonic ECGs for 4 weeks every 3 months, or (3) continuous ECG via implanted devices. A recurrence was any atrial arrhythmia >30 s.

RESULTS

Out of 229 patients (73% males; 58 ± 11 years), 72% returned SF-12v2 regarding 187 PVI procedures: 56% for 1st PVI, 48% for 2nd PVI, 71% for 3rd PVI, and 44% for 4th PVI. The mean difference between before and after PVI was 10 for PCS and 9 for MCS. History of paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal AF did not influence QOL (p = 0.724). Patients with an estimated PCS improvement ≥ 10 or an estimated MCS improvement ≥ 9 had the best outcome after repeated PVI. Success rates were 72 or 82% after 1 year compared to 20 and 22% in patients not achieving this improvement, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Improvement in QOL correlates with success of AF ablation after single and repeated PVI. Assessment of QOL pre- and post-PVI can complement ECG techniques for PVI success monitoring.

Detection of occult atrial fibrillation in patients with embolic stroke of uncertain source: a work in progress

Atrial fibrillation accounts for a substantial proportion of ischemic strokes of known etiology and may be responsible for an additional subset of the 25–40% of strokes of unknown cause (so-called cryptogenic). Oral anticoagulation is significantly more effective than antiplatelet therapy in the secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation-related strokes, providing justification for developing more sensitive approaches to detecting occult paroxysms of atrial fibrillation. In this article, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the value of in-hospital and out-patient monitoring for detecting atrial fibrillation in the context of cryptogenic stroke. We review the evidence for and against screening with standard Holter monitors, external loop recorders, the newer real-time continuous attended cardiac monitoring systems, cardiac implantable electronic devices, and insertable loop recorders. We review key questions regarding prolonged cardiac arrhythmia monitoring, including the relationship between duration of the atrial fibrillation episode and risk of thromboembolism, frequency of monitoring and its impact on the diagnostic yield in detecting occult or subclinical atrial fibrillation, and the temporal proximity of device-detected atrial fibrillation to stroke events. We conclude by proposing avenues for further research.

Detecting and monitoring arrhythmia recurrence following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia prompting clinical presentation, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence and prevalence of this arrhythmia is expected to grow significantly in the coming decades. Of the available pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment options, the fastest growing and most intensely studied is catheter-based ablation therapy for AF. Given the varying success rates for AF ablation, the increasingly complex factors that need to be taken into account when deciding to proceed with ablation, as well as varying definitions of procedural success, accurate detection of arrhythmia recurrence and its burden is of significance. Detecting and monitoring AF recurrence following catheter ablation is therefore an important consideration. Multiple studies have demonstrated the close relationship between the intensity of rhythm monitoring with wearable ambulatory cardiac monitors, or implantable cardiac rhythm monitors and the detection of arrhythmia recurrence. Other studies have employed algorithms dependent on intensive monitoring and arrhythmia detection in the decision tree on whether to proceed with repeat ablation or medical therapy. In this review, we discuss these considerations, types of monitoring devices, and implications for monitoring AF recurrence following catheter ablation.

Selection for atrial fibrillation ablation: Importance of diastolic function grading

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become an accepted therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the indications have widened to include non-paroxysmal AF-patients. Maintenance of sinus rhythm after PVI can be adversely affected by clinical or echocardiographic parameters, which should be clearly identified.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After baseline clinical and echocardiographic evaluations, PVI was performed in patients with paroxysmal or non-paroxysmal AF. The follow-up strategy after PVI included: (1) clinical follow up, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and 24-h ECG every 3 months, (2) trans-telephonic ECGs twice daily and when symptomatic (over 4 weeks) every 3 months, or (3) continuous monitoring via implanted devices. A recurrence was an atrial arrhythmia lasting >30s. All 340 PVI procedures of 229 patients were analyzed. On average, 1.5 PVI procedures per patient (range, 1-6 PVI) were performed. The mean age was 58±11 years (73% male) with 109 paroxysmal and 120 non-paroxysmal AF cases. Clinical follow-up with 12-lead ECGs, 24-h ECGs, trans-telephonic ECGs, and implanted devices was complete in 100%, 63%, 51%, and 16% of cases, respectively. The overall one-year recurrence rate of 59% (range, 24-82%) was dependent on grades of diastolic function (normal - dysfunction grade III) in a multivariable analysis model. Patients with normal diastolic function had the lowest recurrence rates of 24% and 49% after 1 and 3 years of follow-up, respectively (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Diastolic function could serve as a simple summary predictor for AF recurrence, and would facilitate clinical decision-making in AF treatment.

Predictors of complete arrhythmia free survival in patients undergoing surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. PRAGUE-12 randomized study sub-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical ablation (SA) is commonly used in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, its effect has been established in few randomized studies. To assess the complete atrial fibrillation free (AF-free) survival in randomized study assessing the effects of additional concomitant SA of AF in patients primarily indicated for other cardiac surgery.

METHODS

The PRAGUE-12 study was a prospective randomized study comparing the effect of adding SA to other cardiac surgery. We examined the data from the PRAGUE-12 trial and grouped patients according to complete AF-free survival. All patients had regular check-ups at 3, 6, 9 months, some of them with Holter recordings, and a final check-up at 12 months with Holter recording.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients were analyzed; 104 originally randomized to surgery with adding SA (SA group) and 90 without it (non-SA group). Complete AF-free status was found in 46 patients from the SA group (44.2%) and 25 patients (27.8%) from the non-SA group (p<0.05). In a multivariate logistic regression, the SA group was associated with a greater chance for complete AF-free survival (OR 1.87, p<0.05). In the multivariate analysis of the SA group, history of myocardial infarction (OR 0.2, p<0.05) and a higher EuroSCORE (OR 0.9, p 0.05) were independently associated with a lower probability of AF-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Complete AF-free survival following SA was present in almost one half of patients. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction and higher EuroSCOREs were less likely to benefit from an add-on SA procedure.

Immediate and medium-term outcomes of cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with cryoballoon is a recently developed technique for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) with acceptable mid-term results in terms of the success and safety. The purpose of our study is to identify the periprocedural complications, mid-term success rates and predictors of recurrence after AF ablation with cryoballoon.

METHOD

A total of 236 patients (54% male, mean age 54.6 ± 10.45 years and 79.6% paroxysmal AF) with symptomatic AF underwent PV isolation with cryoballoon due to failure with ≥1 antiarrhythmic drug previously. Procedural success, complications and follow-up data were defined according to recent guidelines.

RESULTS

Acute procedural success rate was 99.5%. Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 72.5 ± 5.3 and 14 ± 3.5 min. At a median of 18 (6-27) months follow-up, 80.8% of paroxysmal AF patients and 50.0% of persistent AF patients were free from AF recurrence. In multivariate regression analysis, body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio (HR), 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-2.93, p = 0.001), smoking (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.36-6.67, p < 0.001), non-paroxysmal AF (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-2.56, p = 0.024), duration of AF (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.18-2.61, p = 0.015), left atrium (LA) diameter (HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.64-5.88, p < 0.001) and early AF recurrence (HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 2.86-35.6, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of AF recurrence following cryoablation.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that AF ablation with cryoballoon is effective and safe. Non-paroxysmal AF, duration of AF, smoking, BMI, LA diameter and early recurrence were found to be the most powerful predictors and could be helpful to select patients for appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Long-term success and follow-up after atrial fibrillation ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and has been identified as an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke and thromboembolic events. Catheter ablation has become an established rhythm control therapy in patients with highly symptomatic drug-refractory AF. The definition of ablation success remains controversial since current symptom-based or intermittent electrocardiogram monitoring strategies fail to sufficiently disclose rhythm outcome. This failure is mainly related to the high incidence of asymptomatic AF recurrences, the unpredictable nature of arrhythmia relapses, and the poor correlation of symptoms and AF episodes. There is a clear correlation between the intensity of the monitoring strategy and the sensitivity for it to detect arrhythmia recurrences. Furthermore, several clinical studies assessing the long-term efficacy of catheter ablation procedures have reported late AF recurrences in patients who were initially considered responders to catheter ablation. In certain subsets of patients, precise long-term monitoring may help to guide therapy, e.g. patients in whom withdrawal of antithrombotic therapy may be considered if they are free of arrhythmia recurrences. Recently, sub-cutaneous implantable cardiac monitors (ICM) have been introduced for prolonged and continuous rhythm monitoring. The performance of a leadless ICM equipped with a dedicated AF detection algorithm has recently been assessed in a clinical trial demonstrating a high sensitivity and overall accuracy for identifying patients with AF. The clinical impact of ICM-based follow-up strategies, however, has to be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.

Adenosine testing after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation improves long-term clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Adenosine infusion after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency energy reveals dormant muscular sleeves and predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. The aim of our study was to determine whether adenosine could reveal dormant PV sleeves after cryoballoon isolation and study its effect on long-term recurrence of AF.

METHODS

Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent cryoballoon PVI. After PVI, adenosine 25 mg was infused to test for dormant muscular sleeves in each vein. If reconnection under adenosine was shown, further cryoballoon ablation was performed until no more reconnection occurred. Follow-up was performed with ECG, 24-h Holter recording, and a symptom questionnaire at three monthly intervals. Transtelephonic Holter monitoring was performed for 1 month before and 3 months after PVI. Patients who underwent cryoballoon PVI without adenosine administration were used as controls for comparison.

RESULTS

In the study group (n = 34, 24 males), adenosine revealed dormant sleeves in 9/132 (8 %) veins, and 7/34 (21 %) patients. All but one vein was further treated until the dormant sleeves were isolated. During a mean follow-up of 520 ± 147 days, 23/34 (68 %) patients were free of AF without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). In the control group (n = 65, 46 males), 29/65 (46 %) were free of AF without AADs. There were significantly less AF recurrences in the study group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Adenosine administration after cryoballoon PVI reveals dormant muscular sleeves in 21 % of patients. Clinical follow-up shows that adenosine testing is effective in reducing AF recurrence after cryoballoon ablation.

Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

There are limited data comparing radiofrequency catheter ablation with antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first-line treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 294 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and no history of antiarrhythmic drug use to an initial treatment strategy of either radiofrequency catheter ablation (146 patients) or therapy with class IC or class III antiarrhythmic agents (148 patients). Follow-up included 7-day Holter-monitor recording at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Primary end points were the cumulative and per-visit burden of atrial fibrillation (i.e., percentage of time in atrial fibrillation on Holter-monitor recordings). Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the ablation and drug-therapy groups in the cumulative burden of atrial fibrillation (90th percentile of arrhythmia burden, 13% and 19%, respectively; P=0.10) or the burden at 3, 6, 12, or 18 months. At 24 months, the burden of atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the ablation group than in the drug-therapy group (90th percentile, 9% vs. 18%; P=0.007), and more patients in the ablation group were free from any atrial fibrillation (85% vs. 71%, P=0.004) and from symptomatic atrial fibrillation (93% vs. 84%, P=0.01). One death in the ablation group was due to a procedure-related stroke; there were three cases of cardiac tamponade in the ablation group. In the drug-therapy group, 54 patients (36%) underwent supplementary ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparing radiofrequency ablation with antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first-line treatment in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, we found no significant difference between the treatment groups in the cumulative burden of atrial fibrillation over a period of 2 years. (Funded by the Danish Heart Foundation and others; MANTRA-PAF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00133211.).

Relevance of Monitoring Atrial Fibrillation in Clinical Practice

The monitoring of atrial fibrillation (AF) is performed using a variety of tools, ranging from the conventional Holter electrocardiogram to modern implantable loop recording with remote data exchange. The main clinical areas in AF where monitoring is crucial for decision-making are catheter and surgical ablation, as well as anticoagulation to prevent strokes. Identifying the patient cohort at risk - e.g., those with subclinical silent AF - is a challenge. In addition, the interaction of AF with implanted devices - e.g. AF-triggered inadequate shock therapy - should be the object of continuous monitoring. The prevention of inadequate shock delivery in particular is of major clinical importance.

Feasibility and efficacy of minimally invasive stand-alone surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. A single-center experience

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has shown good results and low complications incidence. Our objective was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of this technique in our center.

METHODS

The procedure included pulmonary vein isolation, ganglionic plexi ablation, ligament of Marshall resection, and left atrial appendage exclusion through beating heart minimally invasive bilateral thoracotomies. Patients were monitored daily by telemedicine during the first 4 months and then by quarterly 24-h Holter monitoring or by implantable cardiac monitor. Ablation success was defined as freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting more than 30 s and from antiarrhythmic drugs. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-two consecutive patients with AF, paroxysmal in 27% and persistent in 73%, were treated. Mean age was 63 ± 10 years, 86% were men. Seventy-three percent of patients had previously undergone to one or more catheter ablations. Median follow-up period was 22 months (25°-75° percentile, 20-27). Patients free from any arrhythmia recurrence for at least 6 consecutive months discontinued antiarrhythmic therapy. Ablation was successful in 73% of patients at 12 months. Freedom from AF recurrences independently from antiarrhythmic therapy status was 91% at 12 months. Results were consistent in patients that reached 24 months follow-up. There were no deaths. Complications were: one conversion to sternotomy owing to thoracic adherences, one pacemaker implant, and one postoperative hemothorax requiring surgical revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that minimally invasive surgical ablation was feasible and gave satisfactory results at long-term term follow-up in patients with AF.

[Surgical atrial fibrillation ablation therapy and postoperative monitoring]

Atrial fibrillation represents the most common atrial arrhythmia seen in clinical practice. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation is recommended in symptomatic patients as well as in asymptomatic patients at low postoperative risk. As a "stand alone" procedure, surgical ablation therapy is indicated after failed catheter ablation therapy, which occurs increasingly due to the high number of catheter-based ablation techniques. In order to gain acceptance among patients as well as referring cardiologists, the surgical ablation procedure ought to be performed in a minimally invasive fashion and with a very high success rate. When applied in an interdisciplinary approach by cardiologists/electrophysiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons, both ablative techniques have the potential to treat atrial fibrillation effectively and in the long-term. In order to document the true heart rhythm after ablation therapy, intermittent "snapshot" ECG documentation ought to be avoided. Small leadless devices that can be implanted subcutaneously enable full heart rhythm disclosure with documentation of atrial arrhythmias. The modern technique of implantable loop recorders permits individualized treatment for each patient.

Ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during coronary artery bypass grafting: 12 months' follow-up through implantable loop recorder

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to identify responders to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, through continuous subcutaneous monitoring in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), who underwent epicardial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) concomitantly with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Seventy-two patients aged 61.6±4.7 years with PAF underwent epicardial PVI with bipolar radiofrequency during CABG. Conduction block was confirmed by pacing. At the end of the procedure, the implantable loop recorder (ILR) for continuous monitoring was implanted in all patients. Follow-up data were collected through the ILR telemetry. Patients with an AF burden (AF%)<0.5% were considered AF free (responders). Patients with AF%>0.5% were classified as non-responders. The AF episodes stored by the implanted device were visually inspected by the investigators to confirm the arrhythmia. The data were collected each month during 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

No procedure-related complications occurred either for ablation or for the monitoring device. At the first post-ablation follow-up (1 month) during the blanking period, 37 patients (51%) were AF free, that is, with AF%<0.5%. At the end of the blanking period (3rd follow-up), 44 (61%) patients were AF free. At 12 months' follow-up, 52 (72%) patients were AF free. Among 20 (28%) patients with AF recurrence, six (30%) patients were completely asymptomatic. There were no ischaemic strokes during the 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant AF ablation during CABG is effective in the treatment of AF, as assessed through 1 year of continuous monitoring. Use of subcutaneous monitors is safe and accurate for AF detection, clinically relevant in identifying responders and non-responders and managing the medical therapies accordingly.

Left atrial ganglion ablation as an adjunct to atrial fibrillation surgery in valvular heart disease

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to evaluate early results of ganglionic plexus (GP) ablation with modified Cox maze lesion sets for concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) during corrective valve surgery.

METHODS

Between December 2006 and April 2008, 20 patients (7 men; median age, 65 years; range, 52 to 82 years) with valvular heart disease and AF (intermittent in 12 [60%]) underwent corrective valve surgery with maze and GP ablation. Patients were then compared with a case-matched control cohort who underwent radiofrequency ablation maze alone.

RESULTS

Procedures included mitral valve repair in 7 patients (35%), multivalve procedures in 5 (25%), mitral valve replacement in 4 (20%), aortic valve replacement in 3 (15%), and valve-sparing aortic root replacement in 1 (5%). All patients underwent concomitant AF ablation procedures (biatrial maze in 11 [55%], left-sided maze in 9 [45%]). Ganglionic plexus stimulation was performed in all patients. Sites at which the R-R interval doubled were considered active and were ablated. There were no early deaths. Freedom from AF at 1 year was significantly higher (90% versus 50%; p=0.01) and mean New York Heart Association functional class was better (1 versus 1.7; p<0.001) in the group that underwent maze and GP ablation compared with maze alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Active left atrial GP are frequently present in patients with AF and valvular heart disease, and GP ablation can be safely performed as an adjunct to AF ablation during valve surgery. Early results are promising and may yield higher freedom from AF compared with radiofrequency ablation maze alone.