Peripheral neuropathy in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: prevalence and immunopathogenetic studies

Top 10 Clinical Pearls in Paraproteinemic Neuropathies

Paraproteinemic neuropathies represent an important subset of peripheral neuropathies. Once identified, further evaluation into the paraproteinemic subtype, clinical exam pattern, and electrodiagnostic phenotype helps clarify if the paraproteinemia is coincidental or causal of the neuropathy, as not all paraproteinemias cause neuropathy. Of all paraproteinemias, immunoglobulin M (IgM)-associated peripheral neuropathy, or IgM neuropathy, is of particular importance as half of IgM neuropathies also harbor anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies, which produce a characteristic demyelinating pattern on nerve conduction testing. Immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin A paraproteinemias are less strongly associated with peripheral neuropathy, except in the setting of multiple myeloma or osteosclerotic myeloma (POEMS syndrome), which have characteristic systemic features. In multiple myeloma, chemotherapy is more likely to result in neuropathy than the myeloma itself. Finally, the presence of systemic features (e.g., cardiomyopathy, nephropathy, recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, and autonomic insufficiency) should raise concern for hereditary or acquired light (AL) chain amyloidosis. AL amyloidosis can occur in the setting of any light or heavy chain paraproteinemia. Central to the proper evaluation of paraproteinemic neuropathy is electrodiagnostic testing, which helps delineate axonal versus demyelinating paraproteinemic neuropathy, the latter often misdiagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Monoclonal Gammopathy-Associated Neuropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is more commonly seen in individuals with monoclonal gammopathies, especially in patients with an IgM monoclonal gammopathy or Waldenström macroglobulinemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are multiple potential ways that the paraprotein may result in peripheral neuropathy. The diagnosis and management of monoclonal gammopathy-associated PN are challenging and necessitate a concerted effort between the hematologist/oncologist and the neurologist. This review describes the most common PN syndromes associated with monoclonal gammopathy, such as anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy, light chain amyloidosis, cryoglobulinemia, POEMS, CANOMAD, and others. We also review the therapies used to treat these conditions.

Optimizing Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein and IgM-Gammopathy Testing for Neuropathy Treatment Evaluation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with typical anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy have IgM-gammopathy, mimic distal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and are treatment resistant. Anti-MAG patients go unrecognized when IgM-gammopathy is undetected or with atypical phenotypes. We investigated an optimal anti-MAG titration cutoff for excluding CIDP and the impact of IgM-gammopathy detection on neuropathy treatment evaluation without anti-MAG antibodies.

METHODS

European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society 2021 guidelines were used to assess patients with neuropathy using anti-MAG Bühlmann titration units (BTU) and IgM-gammopathy with Mass-Fix (mass spectrophotometry) and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (SPIEP). The immunotherapy outcome was reviewed by inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) and summated compound muscle action potential (CMAP) nerve conduction changes.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and fifty-two patients (average age: 63.8 years, female: 31%) were identified over 30 months: (1) typical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 104); (2) atypical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 13); (3) distal or sensory-predominant CIDP (n = 25), including 7 without IgM-gammopathy; (4) typical CIDP (n = 47), including 36 without IgM-gammopathy; (5) axonal IgM-gammopathy-associated neuropathy (n = 104); and (6) IgM-gammopathy-negative, anti-MAG-negative axonal neuropathies (n = 426); and (7) without neuropathy (n = 33) anti-MAG negative. IgM-gammopathy was evaluated by Mass-Fix (n = 493), SPIEP (n = 355), or both (n = 96). Mass-Fix detected 4 additional IgM-gammopathies (3%, 4/117) among patients with anti-MAG antibodies and 7 additional patients (2%, 7/376) without anti-MAG not detected by SPIEP testing. Immunotherapy follow-up was available in 123 (mean: 23 months, range: 3-120 months) including 47 with CIDP (28 without IgM-gammopathy) and 76 non-CIDP (5 without IgM-gammopathy, 45 anti-MAG positive). Treatments included IVIG (n = 89), rituximab (n = 80), and ibrutinib or zanubrutinib (n = 24). An optimal anti-MAG-positive cutoff was identified at ≥1,500 BTU (78% sensitivity, 96% specificity) and at ≥10,000 BTU (74% sensitivity, 100% specificity) for typical anti-MAG neuropathy. Improvements in INCAT scores (p < 0.0001) and summated CMAP (p = 0.0028) were associated with negative anti-MAG (<1,500 BTU, n = 78) and absence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 34). Among 47 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed CIDP, all anti-MAG negative, the presence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 19) also correlated with a worse treatment response (INCAT scores p = 0.035, summated CMAP p = 0.049).

DISCUSSION

A cutoff of 10,000 BTU seems optimal for typical anti-MAG neuropathy while ≥1,500 BTU reduces the likelihood of immune-treatable CIDP. Mass-Fix improves IgM-gammopathy detection in anti-MAG and other IgM-gammopathy neuropathies. Patients with IgM-gammopathy lacking MAG antibodies show reduced treatment response.

IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: clinicopathologic features with and without IgM-related disorders

A subset of patients with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) develop IgM-related disorders (IgM-RD) including peripheral neuropathy, cryoglobulinemia and/or cold agglutinin disease (CAD). We examined the clinical and bone marrow pathologic findings in 191 IgM MGUS patients (2016 World Health Oragnization criteria). Clonal plasma cells were identified in 41 of 171 (24%) cases by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and clonal B cells in 43 of 157 (27%). IgM-RD was identified in 82 (43%) cases, including peripheral neuropathy (n=67, 35%), cryoglobulinemia (n=21, 11%), and CAD (n=10, 5%). Cases of CAD showed distinctive features including lack of MYD88 mutations (P=0.048), supporting the concept of primary CAD as a distinct clinicopathologic disorder. Following exclusion of CAD, comparison of the remaining cases with (n=72) or without (n=109) IgM-RD showed IgM-RD to be more frequent in men than women (P=0.02) and to be more highly associated with MYD88 L265P (P=0.011). Cases with and without IgM-RD otherwise showed similar features including serum IgM concentrations, presence of lymphoid aggregates, clonal B cells by flow cytometry or clonal plasma cells by IHC. No differences were observed in overall survival between cases with and without IgM-RD. No cases in this series met criteria for plasma cell type IgM MGUS as defined in the 2022 International Consensus Classification of lymphoid neoplasms. These results show IgM-RD to be common in patients with IgM MGUS. While CAD shows distinctive features, the remaining cases of IgM-RD largely show pathologic findings similar to IgM MGUS without IgM-RD.

Investigation and Management of Immunoglobulin M- and Waldenström-Associated Peripheral Neuropathies

The immunoglobulin M (IgM)-associated peripheral neuropathies (PN) are a heterogeneous group of disorders representing most paraproteinemic neuropathy cases. They are associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) or Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Establishing a causal link between a paraprotein and neuropathy can be challenging but is necessary to adopt an appropriate therapeutic approach. The most common type of IgM-PN is Antimyelin-Associated-Glycoprotein neuropathy, but half of the cases are of other causes. Progressive functional impairment is an indication for treatment, even when the underlying disorder is IgM MGUS, involving either rituximab monotherapy or combination chemotherapy to achieve clinical stabilization.

Autoimmune polyneuropathies

The autoimmune peripheral neuropathies with prominent motor manifestations are a diverse collection of unusual peripheral neuropathies that are appreciated in vast clinical settings. This chapter highlights the most common immune-mediated, motor predominant neuropathies excluding acute, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP and CIDP, respectively). Other acquired demyelinating neuropathies such as distal CIDP and multifocal motor neuropathy will be covered. Additionally, the radiculoplexus neuropathies, resulting from microvasculitis-induced injury to nerve roots, plexuses, and nerves, including diabetic and nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy and neuralgic amyotrophy (i.e., Parsonage-Turner syndrome), will be included. Finally, the motor predominant peripheral neuropathies encountered in association with rheumatological disease, particularly Sjögren's syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis, are covered. Early recognition of these distinct motor predominant autoimmune neuropathies and initiation of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressant treatment likely result in improved outcomes.

Polyneuropathy Associated with IgM Monoclonal Gammopathy; Advances in Genetics and Treatment, Focusing on Anti-MAG Antibodies

With increasing age, the chances of developing either MGUS or polyneuropathy increase as well. In some cases, there is a causative relationship between the IgM M-protein and polyneuropathy. In approximately half of these cases, IgM targets the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). This results in chronic polyneuropathy with slowly progressive, predominantly sensory neurological deficits and distally demyelinating features in nerve conduction studies. Despite the disease being chronic and developing slowly, it can cause considerable impairment. We reviewed English medical publications between 1980 and May 2022 on IgM gammopathy-associated polyneuropathy, with special attention to studies addressing the pathophysiology or treatment of anti-MAG polyneuropathy. Treatment options have been limited to a temporizing effect of intravenous immunoglobulins in some patients and a more sustained effect of rituximab but in only 30 to 55 percent of patients. An increase in our knowledge concerning genetic mutations, particularly the MYD88L265P mutation, led to the development of novel targeted treatment options such as BTK inhibitors. Similarly, due to the increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of anti-MAG polyneuropathy, new treatment options are emerging. Since anti-MAG polyneuropathy is a rare disease with diverse symptomatology, large trials with good outcome measures are a challenge.

Anti-MAG neuropathy: From biology to clinical management

The acquired chronic demyelinating neuropathies include a growing number of disease entities that have characteristic, often overlapping, clinical presentations, mediated by distinct immune mechanisms, and responding to different therapies. After the discovery in the early 1980s, that the myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG) is a target antigen in an autoimmune demyelinating neuropathy, assays to measure the presence of anti-MAG antibodies were used as the basis to diagnose the anti-MAG neuropathy. The route was open for describing the clinical characteristics of this new entity as a chronic distal large fiber sensorimotor neuropathy, for studying its pathogenesis and devising specific treatment strategies. The initial use of chemotherapeutic agents was replaced by the introduction in the late 1990s of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody against CD20⁺ B-cells. Since then, other anti-B cells agents have been introduced. Recently a novel antigen-specific immunotherapy neutralizing the anti-MAG antibodies with a carbohydrate-based ligand mimicking the natural HNK-1 glycoepitope has been described.

Approach to Neuropathic Pain

Neuropathic pain is a common chief complaint encountered by neurologists and primary care providers. It is caused by disorders involving the somatosensory nervous system. The clinical evaluation of neuropathic pain is challenging and requires a multifaceted systematic approach with an emphasis on a thorough history and physical examination to identify characteristic signs and symptoms. Ancillary laboratory investigations, targeted imaging, and electrodiagnostic studies further help identify underlying etiologies to guide specific treatments. Management of neuropathic pain encompasses treating the underlying pathology as well as symptomatic control with nonpharmacological, pharmacological, and interventional therapies. Here, we present an approach to help evaluate patients with neuropathic pain.

Neuropathies périphériques associées aux syndromes lymphoprolifératifs : spectre clinique et démarche diagnostique

Lymphoproliferative syndromes (multiple myeloma, Waldenström's disease, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, lymphomas) may be associated with peripheral neuropathies. The mechanism can be dysimmune, associated or not with monoclonal gammopathies; paraneoplastic; infiltrative; or more commonly, iatrogenic or due to vitamin deficiency. The diagnosis can be complex, especially when the neuropathy is the presenting manifestation, requiring a close cooperation between internists and neurologists. The positive diagnosis of the neuropathy is based on a systematic electro-clinical investigation, which specifies the topography and the mechanism of the nerve damage, sometimes reinforced by imaging examinations, in particular, nerve and/or plexus MRI. The imputability of the neuropathy to a lymphoproliferative syndrome is based on a set of arguments including the clinical context (B signs, tumour syndrome), first-line laboratory tests (hemogram, protein electrophoresis, viral serologies, complement), auto-antibodies discussed according to the neuropathy (anti-MAG, anti-gangliosides) and sometimes more invasive examinations (bone marrow or neuro-muscular biopsies).

Paraproteinaemic neuropathy: MGUS and beyond

Paraproteinaemic neuropathies comprise a heterogeneous group of neuro-haematological conditions with some distinct neurological, haematological and systemic phenotypes. The spectrum of disease varies from mild to severe, indolent to rapidly progressive and from small fibre sensory involvement to dramatic sensorimotor deficits. The haematological association may be overlooked, resulting in delayed treatment, disability, impaired quality of life and increased mortality. However, the presence of an irrelevant benign paraprotein can sometimes lead to inappropriate treatment. In this review, we outline our practical approach to paraproteinaemic disorders, discuss the utility and limitations of diagnostic tests and the distinctive clinical phenotypes and touch on the complex multidisciplinary management approaches.

Untangling fracture risk in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is the asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM). Lytic bone lesions and fractures are hallmarks of MM and although there are no lytic lesions in MGUS, it has also been associated with fractures. The causes of fractures in MGUS are currently unclear but potential causes include inherent MGUS bone disease, undiagnosed MM, and peripheral neuropathy (PN). We therefore conducted a large population-based study including 8395 individuals with MGUS and 30 851 matched controls from Sweden.

METHODS

Data on fractures, PN, and confounders were acquired from high-quality registers in Sweden.

RESULTS

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and PN were independently associated with fractures (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.21-1.37; P < .001 and HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.16-1.55; P < .001). Imminent MGUS progression increased the risk of fractures (odds ratio: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.27-2.16; P < .001). Fractures were not associated with long-term risk of MGUS progression (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.77-1.53; P = .64).

DISCUSSION

Based on these findings, we speculate that MGUS leads to fractures through at least 3 independent mechanisms: undetected MGUS progression to MM, MGUS inherent bone disease, and PN through falls. These findings highlight the need for further study of MGUS inherent bone disease and can inform further research into fracture prevention in MGUS.

CANOMAD: a neurological monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance that benefits from B-cell-targeted therapies

CANOMAD (chronic ataxic neuropathy, ophthalmoplegia, immunoglobulin M [IgM] paraprotein, cold agglutinins, and disialosyl antibodies) is a rare syndrome characterized by chronic neuropathy with sensory ataxia, ocular, and/or bulbar motor weakness in the presence of a monoclonal IgM reacting against gangliosides containing disialosyl epitopes. Data regarding associated hematologic malignancies and effective therapies in CANOMAD are scarce. We conducted a French multicenter retrospective study that included 45 patients with serum IgM antibodies reacting against disialosyl epitopes in the context of evocating neurologic symptoms. The main clinical features were sensitive symptoms (ataxia, paresthesia, hypoesthesia; n = 45, 100%), motor weakness (n = 18, 40%), ophthalmoplegia (n = 20, 45%), and bulbar symptoms (n = 6, 13%). Forty-five percent of the cohort had moderate to severe disability (modified Rankin score, 3-5). Cold agglutinins were identified in 15 (34%) patients. Electrophysiologic studies showed a demyelinating or axonal pattern in, respectively, 60% and 27% of cases. All patients had serum monoclonal IgM gammopathy (median, 2.6 g/L; range, 0.1-40 g/L). Overt hematologic malignancies were diagnosed in 16 patients (36%), with the most frequent being Waldenström macroglobulinemia (n = 9, 20%). Forty-one patients (91%) required treatment of CANOMAD. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) and rituximab-based regimens were the most effective therapies with, respectively, 53% and 52% of partial or better clinical responses. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs were largely ineffective. Although more studies are warranted to better define the optimal therapeutic sequence, IVIg should be proposed as the standard of care for first-line treatment and rituximab-based regimens for second-line treatment. These compiled data argue for CANOMAD to be included in neurologic monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance.

Polyneuropathy and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); update of a clinical experience

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Polyneuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) encompass a group of phenotypically and immunologically heterogeneous neuropathies. While the best characterized is that associated with anti-myelin glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies, there are phenotypical and immunological neuropathy variants that still lack a clear classification. We analyzed a significant number of patients, in order to better evaluate the distribution of neuropathy phenotypes and to look for some common characteristics.

METHODS

Clinical, neurophysiological, and laboratory data from 87 consecutive MGUS patients with peripheral neuropathy were analyzed and compared among patient groups with different MGUS classes and autoantibody reactivity.

RESULTS

Anti-MAG neuropathy cases account for the most homogeneous group with regard to clinical and neurophysiological findings. Patients with anti-gangliosides or sulfatide (GS) antibodies, despite a marked phenotype heterogeneity, still share several common features, including a younger age at diagnosis, a more severe disease, and a prompt and sustained response to both immunoglobulin and rituximab therapies, mostly requiring chronic administration of immune treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although heterogeneous, MGUS-associated, anti-GS antibody positive neuropathies have important similar features possibly resulting from a similar biological background.

Neuropathy associated with IgA monoclonal Gammopathy. A harbinger of AL amyloidosis

Peripheral neuropathy is seen in 15% of patients with IgA monoclonal gammopathy. Treatment and prognosis of dysproteinemic neuropathy is usually guided by the underlying plasma cell disorders, which could be either benign or malignant. The true incidence of hematologic malignancy in patients with neuropathy associated with IgA monoclonal gammopathy is not known. However, patients with IgA M-protein are generally at increased risk for malignant transformation. Since neuropathy may be the first and only organ involvement, neurologists are key contributors in identifying each patient's plasma cell dyscrasia. We report two patients who presented with severe progressive polyneuropathy, had a detectable low-level IgA lambda paraproteinemia dismissed as incidental. Both were diagnosed later with a combination of malignant plasma cell dyscrasia and AL amyloidosis resulting in multiorgan failure and death. Both patients demonstrated red flags for malignant progression including abnormal serum free light chain, rapidly progressive debilitating neuropathy refractory to immunotherapy, prominent autonomic dysfunction, and weight loss. In summary, patients with IgA monoclonal gammopathy presenting with polyneuropathy can be at risk for malignant transformation. Failure to investigate for hematologic malignancy and AL amyloidosis may cause significant delays in treatment and result in fatal outcomes.

Frequency of diabetes and other comorbidities in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and their impact on clinical presentation and response to therapy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of different comorbidities in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and their impact on outcome, treatment choice and response.

METHODS

Using a structured questionnaire, we collected information on comorbidities from 393 patients with CIDP fulfilling the European Federation of Neurological Societies and Peripheral Nerve Society criteria included in the Italian CIDP database.

RESULTS

One or more comorbidities were reported by 294 patients (75%) and potentially influenced treatment choice in 192 (49%) leading to a less frequent use of corticosteroids. Response to treatment did not differ, however, from that in patients without comorbidities. Diabetes (14%), monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) (12%) and other immune disorders (16%) were significantly more frequent in patients with CIDP than expected in the general European population. Patients with diabetes had higher disability scores, worse quality of life and a less frequent treatment response compared with patients without diabetes. Patients with IgG-IgA or IgM MGUS had an older age at CIDP onset while patients with other immune disorders had a younger age at onset and were more frequently females. IgM MGUS was more frequent in patients with motor CIDP than in patients with typical CIDP.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidities are frequent in patients with CIDP and in almost 50% of them have an impact on treatment choice. Diabetes, MGUS and other immune diseases are more frequent in patients with CIDP than in the general population. Only diabetes seems, however, to have an impact on disease severity and treatment response possibly reflecting in some patients a coexisting diabetic neuropathy.

Quality of life in patients with polyneuropathy associated with different types of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Polyneuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS-PNP) has a chronic and slowly progressive course but can lead to significant disability and reduced quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to analyze QoL in MGUS-PNP patients and to determine its predictors. Our study included 51 patients diagnosed with MGUS-PNP (23.5% with IgM, 66.7% IgG or IgA, 7.8% undetermined paraprotein, 2.0% light chains). QoL was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. The Medical Research Council Sum Score (MRC-SS), INCAT disability and sensory scores, ataxia score, Krupp's Fatigue Severity Scale and Beck's Depression Inventory were also used. Total SF-36 score was 50.0 ± 21.4 and no difference was observed between IgM and IgG/IgA MGUS-PNP. Physical composite score was worse than mental (44.4 ± 21.4 vs. 54.5 ± 20.9). Following factors showed correlation with SF-36 total score in univariate analysis: INCAT disability score, MRC-SS, INCAT sensory score, level of ataxia, fatigue and depression (p < 0.01). Significant predictors of worse SF-36 total score in our MGUS-PNP patients were depression (β = - 0.46, p < 0.01), fatigue (β = - 0.32, p < 0.01) and INCAT disability score (β = - 0.27, p < 0.01). QoL in MGUS-PNP is equally affected in patients with different types of paraprotein. MGUS-PNP patients with more severe functional disability, fatigue and depression need special attention of clinicians since they could be at higher risk to have worse QoL. This should be taken into account when treating subjects with MGUS-PNP.

Distinctive patterns of peripheral neuropathy across the spectrum of plasma cell disorders

Many patients with plasma cell disorders suffer from peripheral neuropathy, but differential diagnosis with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is difficult. We aimed to (1) identify factors useful for differential diagnosis between peripheral neuropathy associated with plasma cell disorders versus CIDP and (2) determine whether neuropathy presentations and severity varied across the spectrum of different plasma cell disorders. A retrospective chart review of 18 monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) patients, 15 POEMS syndrome patients and 34 CIDP patients between January 2005 and December 2016 was conducted. The peripheral neuropathy associated with plasma cell disorders seemed to be more sensory oriented compared to CIDP. MGUS patients were significantly older than CIDP patients (median age 70 vs. 59, respectively, p = 0.027). POEMS syndrome patients showed significantly higher platelet count at the time of neuropathy presentation compared to CIDP (p = 0.028). Lambda type MGUS patients were associated with less severe symptoms compared to POEMS syndrome patients despite harboring lambda monoclonal gammopathy as a common denominator. Kappa type MGUS patients showed predominantly axonal type neuropathy compared to its counterpart and POEMS syndrome. Careful inspection of clinical profiles and symptoms of patients presenting with neuropathy can help to discriminate those with underlying plasma cell disorders. The phenotype of neuropathy, platelet count and age at presentation seem to be the most useful indicators.

Chronic Demyelinating Polyneuropathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the chronic demyelinating neuropathies, with a focus on the diagnosis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies and the features that can help differentiate immune-mediated neuropathies from other chronic demyelinating peripheral nerve conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in clinical phenotyping and outcomes assessment have enabled neurologists to improve disease recognition, treatment, and disease monitoring. Our understanding of the immunopathogenesis of demyelinating neuropathies is evolving. Identification of new antibodies and recognition that node of Ranvier dysfunction may be an early pathogenic feature may herald further diagnostic and treatment advancements.

SUMMARY

The chronic demyelinating polyneuropathies are heterogeneous. The clinical and diagnostic features are sometimes overlapping, and the specific disorders are variable in pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis. This heterogeneity underscores the importance of achieving diagnostic accuracy and implementing disease-specific treatment approaches.

Plasma-exchange in Chronic Peripheral Neurological Disorders

We investigated 19 patients affected by chronic peripheral neurological disorders treated with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to verify the efficacy of the therapeutic protocol used in these diseases.

Every patient was clinically considered after 5 TPE. Those who showed an improvement started chemotherapy and continued TPE at the rate of 2 procedures/week for 2 weeks, then 1 procedure/week for 1 month and finally 1 procedure every 2 weeks for 2 months. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) were infused at the end of apheretic treatment in one of the patients affected by neurological disorders due to monoclonal gammopathy undetermined significance. HCV-positive patients with cryoglobulins were treated with α-interferon (α-IFN) for 6 months before TPE. Eleven patients (58%) had a symptomatic improvement, 2 (1.5%) stopped TPE treatment owing to side effects and 6 (31.5%) did not respond to apheretic therapy.

In order to improve the advantages of TPE we suggest using IVIg at the end of apheretic therapy, while in HCV-positive patients, at least one year of α-IFN therapy is required before initiating TPE.

Are neurological complications of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance underestimated?

Objectives

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a premalignancy preceding multiple myeloma (MM) or related disorders. Neurological symptoms caused by the monoclonal immunoglobulins or free light-chains are often associated with a high morbidity. We analyzed the prevalence of neuropathy, clinical features and the long-term outcome in 223 patients (pts.) with MGUS.

Patients and Methods

Between 1/2005 and 3/2015, 223 adult pts. with MGUS were identified in our database.

Results

In36/223 pts. (16%) a neuropathy was diagnosed (MGUS associated neuropathy, MGUS-N). 20 pts. (55%) had a distal symmetric axonal neuropathy, 10 pts. (28%) had a chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and 6 pts (17%) a distal acquired demyelinating symmetric polyneuropathy. In MGUS-NN (without neuropathy) and in MGUS-N, progression to smoldering MM, MM or Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) occurred in 17% of the pts. The Immunoglobulin subtype was predominantly IgG in MGUS-NN and IgM in MGUS-N and ≥5.5% plasma cells in the bone-marrow predicted progression to MM and AL-amyloidosis in MGUS-NN and to WM in MGUS-N (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Due to the substantial prevalence of neuropathies, MGUS pts. should be monitored carefully and referred to a specialized center if neurological symptoms occur.

High frequency of MGUS in DSP

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal gammopathy has been reported in several polyneuropathies. In this study, we sought to explore the frequency and characteristics of monoclonal gammopathy in patients with diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP).

METHODS

Patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM 1, DM 2) and controls without diabetes were evaluated between November 2008 and December 2013.

RESULTS

Fifty controls, 66 patients with DM 1, and 106 patients with DM 2 were included, with average ages of 43 ± 18, 45 ± 17, and 65 ± 10 years, respectively; the frequency of monoclonal gammopathy was 0%, 8%, and 15%, respectively. In patients with DSP, the frequency of monoclonal gammopathy increased to 14% in DM 1 and 21% in DM 2; the most common monoclonal proteins were immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG, respectively.

DISCUSSION

DSP might be associated with a high frequency of monoclonal gammopathy, with different characteristics in DM 1 and in DM 2. Muscle Nerve 57: 1018-1021, 2018.

Monoclonal Gammopathy-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy: Diagnosis and Management

Monoclonal gammopathies comprise a spectrum of clonal plasma cell disorders that include monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, multiple myeloma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. In this review, we outline the epidemiology, etiology, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of monoclonal gammopathy-associated peripheral neuropathy. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is relatively common in the general population, with a prevalence of 3% to 4% among individuals older than age 50 years. Therefore, the presence of M protein in a patient with neuropathy does not automatically indicate a causal relationship. Monoclonal gammopathy-associated peripheral neuropathy is often a difficult diagnosis with limited treatment options. Studies addressing the optimal approach to diagnosis and management of this entity are limited. In addition to a review of the literature, we present a diagnostic approach to patients with monoclonal gammopathy-associated peripheral neuropathy and discuss available data and options for treatment.

Diagnosis and management of neuropathies associated with plasma cell dyscrasias

Neuropathies associated with plasma cell dyscrasias are a major cause of morbidity for patients managed by medical oncologists. Because of similarities in clinical presentation and on nerve conduction studies, identifying the underlying disease leading to a paraproteinemic neuropathy can often be difficult. In addition, the degree of neurologic deficit does not strictly correlate with the extent of abnormalities on common clinical laboratory testing. Fortunately, with increasing understanding into the biologic mechanisms of underlying hematologic diseases, additional biomarkers have recently been developed, thus improving our diagnostic capacity. Neuropathies associated with plasma cells dyscrasias are seen with Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) particularly IgM subtype, followed by IgG and IgA MGUS, multiple myeloma, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, amyloid, Castleman's disease, and POEMS syndrome. The mechanisms of neuronal injury associated with plasma cell dyscrasia vary based on underlying diagnosis and include malignant infiltration, immune-mediated antibody deposition, or local compression of nerve roots. The polyneuropathies are frequently demyelinating, although axonal and mixed neuropathies can also be seen. As demonstrated by the cases included in this review, patients frequently present with symmetric sensory disturbance, followed by progressive motor weakness. Unfortunately, because of the complexity of diagnostic testing, patients are frequently examined late, often after receiving several ineffective therapies. The aim of this case-based review is to provide clinicians with insight on how to properly recognize these atypical neuropathies and send the appropriate diagnostic work, increasing the likelihood of accurately classify the patient's underlying hematologic disorder.

Cerebrospinal fluid findings in Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies

The classic immunologic alteration of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), albuminocytologic dissociation, has been known since the original paper by Guillain, Barré, and Strohl. Albuminocytologic dissociation has been also described in other forms of the GBS spectrum, such as axonal motor or motor-sensory forms (AMAN, AMSAN), the anti-GQ1b spectrum of Miller Fisher syndrome, and Bickerstaff brainstem encephalitis. Cytokines, chemokines, antibodies, complement components, and molecules with a putative neuroprotective role or indicating axonal damage have also been examined using different methods. Besides these candidate approaches, proteomics has been recently applied to discover potential biomarkers. The overall results support the immunopathogenesis of GBS, but albuminocytologic dissociation remained the only consistent CSF biomarker supporting the diagnosis of GBS. Chronic inflammatory neuropathies also comprise a heterogeneous group of diseases. Increased protein in the CSF is a supportive factor of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, especially in the absence of definite electrophysiologic criteria. A number of other markers have also been investigated in the CSF of patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies, similar to GBS. However, none has been used in supporting diagnosis, differentiating among syndromes, or predicting the clinical course and treatment responses.

Long-term disability and prognostic factors in polyneuropathy associated with anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) antibodies

AIM OF THE STUDY

Neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy (MGUS) represents distinctive clinical syndrome, characterized by male predominance, late age of onset, slow progression, predominantly sensory symptoms, deep sensory loss, ataxia, minor motor impairment. More than 50% of patients with neuropathy-associated MGUS possess antibodies against myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). Purpose of our study was to assess effects on disease progression of demographic, clinical and neurophysiological variables in our large cohort of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three Caucasians patients were followed every eight months for median duration time of 93 months. Extremity strength was assessed with Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale, disability with overall disability status scale (ODSS), modified Rankin Scale and sensory function with Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) sensory scale (ISS). Statistical analyses were conducted with parametric or non-parametric measures as appropriate. Survival analysis was used to test predictive value of clinical, demographical and neurophysiological variables. Variance analysis was conducted to explain difference on MRC between patients and groups at different time from onset.

RESULTS

Results showed that demyelinating pattern, older age and absence of treatment were significant risk factors for disability worsening. No other factors emerged as predictors including gender, ataxia and tremor at baseline, level of anti-MAG and IgM protein concentration in serum. Despite worsening of all outcome measures between first and last visit, quality of life (HRQol) judged by patients did not vary significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides evidence that electrophysiologic pattern, age of onset and absence of treatment are strong predictor of prognosis in anti-MAG polyneuropathy.

Paraproteinemic neuropathy: a practical review

The term paraproteinemic neuropathy describes a heterogeneous set of neuropathies characterized by the presence of homogeneous immunoglobulin in the serum. An abnormal clonal proliferation of B-lymphocytes or plasma cells, which may or may not occur in the context of a hematologic malignancy, produces the immunoglobulins in excess. If malignancy is identified, treatment should be targeted to the neoplasm. Most cases, however, occur as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Few prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are available to inform the management of paraproteinemic neuropathies. Clinical experience combined with data from smaller, uncontrolled studies provide a basis for recommendations, which depend on the specific clinical setting in which the paraprotein occurs. In this review, we provide a clinically practical approach to diagnosis and management of such patients.

Treatment for IgG and IgA paraproteinaemic neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Paraproteinaemic neuropathy refers to those neuropathies associated with a monoclonal gammopathy or paraprotein. The most common of these present with a chronic, predominantly sensory, symmetrical neuropathy, similar to chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) but with relatively more sensory involvement, both clinically and neurophysiologically. The optimal treatment for neuropathies associated with IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance is not known. This is an update of a review first published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of any treatment for IgG or IgA paraproteinaemic peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 18 January 2014 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We also checked bibliographies for controlled trials of treatments for IgG or IgA paraproteinaemic peripheral neuropathy. We checked clinical trials registries for ongoing studies in November 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered for inclusion randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs using any treatment for IgG or IgA paraproteinaemic peripheral neuropathy. We excluded people with IgM paraproteins. We excluded people where the monoclonal gammopathy was considered secondary to an underlying disorder. We included participants of any age with a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance with a paraprotein of the IgG or IgA class and a neuropathy. Included participants were not required to fulfil specific electrophysiological diagnostic criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology to select studies, extract data and analyse results. One trial author provided additional data and clarification.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified one RCT, with 18 participants, that fulfilled the predetermined inclusion criteria. The trial compared plasma exchange to sham plasma exchange in participants with IgG or IgA paraproteinaemic neuropathy over a three-week follow-up period. We identified four other studies but these were not RCTs or quasi-RCTs. The included RCT did not report our predefined primary outcome measure, change in disability six months after randomisation. The trial revealed a modest benefit of plasma exchange in the weakness component of the Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS, now the Neuropathy Impairment Score); the mean improvement with plasma exchange was 17 points (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2 to 28.8 points) versus 1 point (95% CI -7.7 to 9.7 points) in the sham exchange group at three weeks' follow-up (mean difference (MD) 16.00; 95% CI 1.37 to 30.63, low quality evidence). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall NDS (MD 18.00; 95% CI -2.03 to 38.03, low quality evidence), vibration thresholds or neurophysiological indices. Adverse events were not reported. The trial was at low risk of bias overall, although limitations of trial size and duration reduce the quality of the evidence in support of its conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from RCTs for the treatment of IgG or IgA paraproteinaemic neuropathy is currently inadequate. More RCTs of treatments are required. These should have adequate follow-up periods and contain larger numbers of participants, perhaps through multicentre collaboration, considering the relative infrequency of this condition. Observational or open trial data provide limited support for the use of treatments such as plasma exchange, cyclophosphamide combined with prednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin, and corticosteroids. These interventions show potential therapeutic promise but the potential benefits must be weighed against adverse effects. Their optimal use and the long-term benefits need to be considered and validated with well-designed RCTs.

Autoimmune peripheral neuropathies

Peripheral nervous system axons and myelin have unique potential protein, proteolipid, and ganglioside antigenic determinants. Despite the existence of a blood-nerve barrier, both humoral and cellular immunity can be directed against peripheral axons and myelin. Molecular mimicry may be triggered at the systemic level, as was best demonstrated in the case of bacterial oligosaccharides. The classification of immune neuropathy has been expanded to take into account specific syndromes that share unique clinical, electrophysiological, prognostic and serological features. Guillain-Barré syndrome encompasses a classical syndrome of acute demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and many variants: axonal motor and sensory, axonal motor, Miller-Fisher, autonomic, and sensory. Similarly, chronic immune neuropathy is composed of classic chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and variants characterized as multifocal (motor or sensorimotor), sensory, distal symmetric, and syndromes associated with monoclonal gammopathy. Among putative biomarkers, myelin associated glycoprotein and several anti-ganglioside autoantibodies have shown statistically significant associations with specific neuropathic syndromes. Currently, the strongest biomarker associations are those linking Miller-Fisher syndrome with anti-GQ1b, multifocal motor neuropathy with anti-GM1, and distal acquired symmetric neuropathy with anti-MAG antibodies. Many other autoantibody associations have been proposed, but presently lack sufficient specificity and sensitivity to qualify as biomarkers. This field of research has contributed to the antigenic characterization of motor and sensory functional systems, as well as helping to define immune neuropathic syndromes with widely different clinical presentation, prognosis and response to therapy. Serologic biomarkers are likely to become even more relevant with the advent of new targeted forms of immunotherapy, such as monoclonal antibodies.

Paraproteinemic neuropathies

The term paraproteinemic neuropathy refers to a heterogeneous group of neuropathies, which share the common feature of a homogeneous immunoglobulin in the serum. The presence of a monoclonal gammopathy indicates an underlying clonal B-cell expansion, which may appear in the context of a lymphoproliferative disorder. If a neoplastic origin of the gammopathy is identified, the treatment should be targeted to the neoplasm. In most patients, however, the monoclonal gammopathy is not associated with malignant haematological disorders, and is defined as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Clinical spectrum and evolution of monoclonal gammopathy-associated neuropathy: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Paraproteinemic neuropathy (PPN) is often under-diagnosed because of its clinical and electrophysiological variability. Progression of neuropathy is considered an alarm bell for possible malignant conversion of underlying monoclonal gammopathy (MG).

OBJECTIVE

To report clinical presentation, course, and evolution in a group of patients with PPN in order to identify findings useful for achieving the diagnosis, suspecting progression, and recognizing the underlying hematological conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with PPN underwent clinical examination, electrodiagnostic studies, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and laboratory tests. These parameters were compared between the different peak groups.

RESULTS

IgM MG was found in 51.4%, IgG MG in 33.3%, and IgA MG in 10.3% of our cohort. PPN appeared as mainly sensory, demyelinating, mildly progressive neuropathy, regardless of the type of peak or light chain. However, axonal findings were present in many IgG patients and in part of the IgM patients and a small number of the IgG patients may have presented with motor symptoms at the onset. The IgM patients had a significant tendency toward clinical worsening and IgG subjects had a more elevated rate of malignancy. IgA-related neuropathies were rare, heterogenous, and with a high tendency to evolution and malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of PPN often present a relatively monomorphic clinical picture but they can be clinically heterogenous and must be suspected even if sensory impairment and demyelination are not the dominant features. Tendency to malignancy seems globally elevated and needs intensive follow-up. Diagnostic approach to patients presenting with peripheral neuropathy should always include the typing of monoclonal immunoglobulins in serum and urine. In contrast, patients presenting with MG should be submitted to nerve conduction study/electroneurography and neurological evaluation.

Antibody testing in peripheral nerve disorders

The identification of autoantibodies associated with dysimmune neuropathies was a major contribution to the characterization of peripheral nerve disorders, the understanding of their pathophysiology, and the clinical diagnosis of neuropathies. Antibodies directed to GM1, GQ1b, and disyalilated gangliosides, and anti-MAG antibodies are very useful in the diagnosis of acute or chronic motor or sensory-motor neuropathies with or without monoclonal IgM. Anti-onconeural anti-Hu and anti-CV2/CRMP antibodies allow when they are detected the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neuropathies. This chapter focuses on the description of these antibodies as diagnostic markers and on their immunopathogenesis. We give a background overview on the origin of these antibodies, their detection, and review those studies, which clearly show that these antibodies are capable of binding to the target tissues in peripheral nerve and thereby can exert a variety of pathophysiological effects. The corresponding electrophysiological and histological changes observed both in human and animal models are exemplified in order to get a better understanding of the immune mechanisms of these antibody-mediated neuropathies.

Peripheral neuropathy in the elderly

Peripheral neuropathy is an important factor of disability in the elderly, which is significant now that up to 20% of the population is older than 60 years in industrialized countries. Potentially treatable neuropathies including primary inflammatory polyneuropathies and systemic disorders, especially vasculitic neuropathies, are as common in this age group as in younger patients. Neuropathies associated with diabetes, malignancy, and monoclonal gammopathies are even more common in these patients. It is thus essential to identify the causes of these neuropathies in this group of patients and treat them whenever feasible.

[A case of IgM paraproteinemic neuropathy associated with anti-sulfated glucuronic paragloboside (SGPG) IgG antibody without anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) activity]

We report a case of IgM paraproteinemic neuropathy associated with anti-sulfated glucuronic paragloboside (SGPG) IgG antibody. An 84-year old man complained of numbness on the left side of the face and in the distal portions of the limbs. Neurological examination showed mild sensory ataxia. The laboratory tests revealed the presence of IgM lambda paraproteinemia and anti-SGPG IgG antibody without anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) activity and anti-MAG/SGPG IgM antibody. Results of nerve conduction study showed decreased sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude, indicating the presence of sensory-dominant axonal polyneuropathy, and the prolongation of distal latency was not observed. Treatment with corticosteroids resulted in a rapid improvement in neurological abnormalities. In IgM paraproteinemic neuropathy associated with anti-MAG/SGPG antibody, distal acquired demyelinating sensory neuropathy and resistance to immunological treatments are the characteristic pathologic and clinical features, respectively. On the other hand our rare case of IgM paraproteinemic neuropathy positive for anti-SGPG IgG antibody presented with axonal sensory polyneuropathy and a good responsiveness to corticosteroids.

Neuropathy and monoclonal gammopathy

The association of neuropathy with monoclonal gammopathy has been known for several years, even if the clinical and pathogenetic relevance of this association is not completely defined. This is not a marginal problem since monoclonal gammopathy is present in 1-3% of the population above 50 years in whom it is often asymptomatic, and in at least 8% of patients is associated with a symptomatic neuropathy, representing one of the leading causes of neuropathy in aged people. Monoclonal gammopathy may result from malignant lymphoproliferative diseases including multiple myeloma or solitary plasmocytoma, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM), other IgM-secreting lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and primary systemic amyloidosis (AL). In most instances it is not associated with any of these disorders and is defined monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) for its possible, though infrequent, evolution into malignant forms. Several data support the pathogenetic role of the monoclonal gammopathy in the neuropathy particularly when of IgM isotype where IgM reactivity to several neural antigens has been reported. Increased levels of VEGF have been implicated in POEMS syndrome. However, there are as yet no defined therapies for these neuropathies, as their efficacy has not been confirmed in randomized trials.

An update on monoclonal gammopathy and neuropathy

Peripheral neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy is a rare but important cause of neuropathy that can herald serious underlying disease. IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is the most commonly found monoclonal gammopathy associated with neuropathy, with characteristic clinical, electrophysiologic, and pathologic features. The IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathies are rarely associated with specific neuropathies. Standard immunomodulatory agents including steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis have shown limited efficacy in IgM MGUS. Neuropathies associated with specific lymphoproliferative disorders may not respond to treatments aimed at that disorder. Case series had shown promising results with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the B cell surface antigen CD20 and results in a rapid and sustained depletion of B cells; however, two recent randomized controlled trials with rituximab failed to provide evidence of efficacy in primary outcome measures, despite reduction in antibody levels. Long-term studies looking at the association between specific immunologic markers and disease recurrence are needed to ultimately develop targeted therapies.