Allergic contact dermatitis to carboxymethylcellulose in Comfeel®hydrocolloid dressing

Role of luteinizing hormone elevation in outcomes of ovulation induction with letrozole for polycystic ovary syndrome

Introduction

The effect of elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) on the clinical outcomes of ovulation induction (OI) in infertile anovulatory patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) remains controversial. This retrospective study included PCOS patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) following letrozole (LE) stimulation without OC pretreatment.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in a single, academic ART center from January 2013 to May 2019. In total, 835 IUI cycles of PCOS patients treated with letrozole were collected for the analysis. Cohorts were separated based on the level of basal LH (bLH) and LH level after letrozole administration (LH_le) during OI. OI response and reproductive outcomes were evaluated for each cohort.

Results

No adverse effects of dysregulated levels of either bLH or LH_le on ovulation rate or reproductive outcomes were observed. Furthermore, the cohort of individuals with normal bLH and high LH_le levels, exclusive of LH surge, exhibited significantly higher rates of clinical pregnancy (30.3% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.002) and live birth (24.2% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.024) than those with normal bLH and normal LH_le.

Conclusion

These results indicated that high LH levels in PCOS are not solid evidence of poor prognosis of letrozole-induced ovulation, while elevated LH_le may be a prospective predictor for better OI outcomes. It seems that preinhibition of LH secretion is not needed.

Keratin scaffolds with human adipose stem cells: Physical and biological effects toward wound healing

Keratin, a natural biomaterial derived from wool or human hair, has the intrinsic ability to interact with different types of cells and the potential to serve as a controllable extracellular matrix that can be used a scaffold for tissue engineering. In this study, we demonstrated a simple and fast technique to construct 3D keratin scaffolds for accelerated wound healing using a lyophilization method based on extraction of keratin from human hair. The physical properties of the keratin scaffolds such as water uptake, pore size, and porosity can be adjusted by changing the protein concentrations during the fabrication process. The keratin scaffolds supported human adipose stem cells (hASCs) adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. In vivo study performed on ICR mice showed that keratin scaffolds with hASCs shortened skin wound healing time, accelerated epithelialization, and promoted wound remodeling. Therefore, keratin scaffolds alone or together with hASCs may serve as therapeutic agents for repairing wounded tissue.

[Frequency of contact sensitization to modern dressings used to treat chronic leg ulcer]

INTRODUCTION

Allergic contact dermatitis around chronic leg ulcers (CLU) is a common complication in patients presenting CLU and prolongs healing times. The aim of this study was to describe the rate of sensitization to modern dressings (MD) used in these patients and to assess whether there is a relation between the number of sensitizations and ulcer type, the time from onset of the ulcer, and patient age and gender.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study at Reims University Hospital between 2010 and 2014 that included all patients with CLU of vascular etiology surrounded by eczematous lesions, and who had one of the patch-tests in the following 3 series: European baseline±leg ulcers±corticosteroids.

RESULTS

Among the 73 patients included, 43 % were polysensitized. Thirty-three patients (45 %) were sensitized to MD (38 % to hydrocolloids, 18 % to hydrogels, 7 % to hydrocellular dressings, 7 % to hydrofiber dressings, 5 % to contact layers and 3 % to alginates). Median age and sex did not differ between "polysensitized" patients and "non-polysensitized" patients (P=0.84 and P=0.25, respectively). Polysensitization was more frequent among patients presenting ulcers for more than 5 years (P=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Practically half of all patients presenting CLU with surrounding contact dermatitis had sensitization to modern dressings (mostly hydrocolloids and hydrogels). The rate of sensitization increased with the length of presence of CLU.

Wound-Related Allergic/Irritant Contact Dermatitis

PURPOSE

To provide information from a literature review about the prevention, recognition, and treatment for contact dermatitis.

TARGET AUDIENCE

This continuing education activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.

OBJECTIVES

After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to:1. Identify signs and symptoms of and diagnostic measures for contact dermatitis.2. Identify causes and risks for contact dermatitis.3. Select appropriate treatment for contact dermatitis and its prevention.

ABSTRACT

Contact dermatitis to wound care products is a common, often neglected problem. A review was conducted to identify articles relevant to contact dermatitis.A PubMed English-language literature review was conducted for appropriate articles published between January 2000 and December 2015.Contact dermatitis is both irritant (80% of cases) or allergic (20% of cases). Frequent use of potential contact allergens and impaired barrier function of the skin can lead to rising sensitization in patients with chronic wounds. Common known allergens to avoid in wound care patients include fragrances, colophony, lanolin, and topical antibiotics.Clinicians should be cognizant of the allergens in wound care products and the potential for sensitization. All medical devices, including wound dressings, adhesives, and bandages, should be labeled with their complete ingredients, and manufacturers should be encouraged to remove common allergens from wound care products, including topical creams, ointments, and dressings.

A Case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis Due to DuoDERM Extrathin®

Over the past years, hydrocolloid dressings have been introduced routinely in the treatment of various types of wounds. They provide a moist environment promoting autolytic debridement, and stimulate angiogenesis. However, long-term application often leads to inflammation of the skin in the immediate area of the ulcer, causing irritant dermatitis in many cases, but sometimes also leads to contact sensitization. A 32 year-old woman burnt herself by an iron, and presented to our clinic and was treated with Duoderm extrathin®. Nine days later, she again presented with an erythematous oozing patch with edema, and allergic contact dermatitis was suspected. A patch test (TRUE test) was performed and a positive reaction to colophonium was obtained. Duoderm extrathin® contains hydrogenated rosin (colophonium) as the tackifying agent, so we could diagnose this case as allergic contact dermatitis due to the hydrogenated rosin in Duoderm extrathin®. We report another case of allergic contact dermatitis due to Duoderm extrathin® in a 32 year-old woman.