Actions and interactions of psychotropic drugs on human performance and mood: single doses of ORG 3770, amitriptyline, and diazepam

Changes in activity patterns after the oral administration of brotizolam in institutionalized elderly patients with dementia

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the side effects of sedative-hypnotic agents in elderly dementia patients with sleep disorders. The present study describes activity pattern changes after a single dose of brotizolam in elderly patients with dementia.

METHODS

We conducted retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a case series at Asakayama Hospital (Osaka, Japan) between September 2008 and September 2009. Around-the-clock movements of dementia patients who were administered a single dose of brotizolam were recorded by the integrated circuit tag monitoring system during a 4-week baseline and 7-day peri-administration period. Diurnal and nocturnal activity levels and the onset times of the least-active and most-active phases were then measured.

RESULTS

Seven patients (four men, three women; age range 59-85 years) were analyzed. All seven patients had disturbed activity patterns during the peri-administration period. Compared with the pre-administration period, the incidence of reversed rest-activity pattern increased significantly in the post-administration period, as measured by the distance moved per hour (P < 0.000). Patients with advanced stages of dementia had prolonged and delayed activity responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings showed changes in activity levels and reversed active/resting phases after a single dose of brotizolam in elderly patients with dementia. Use of brotizolam in elderly patients with dementia, especially in advanced stages, calls for closer attention and longer observation periods.

Residual effects of esmirtazapine on actual driving performance: overall findings and an exploratory analysis into the role of CYP2D6 phenotype

INTRODUCTION

Esmirtazapine is evaluated as a novel drug for treatment of insomnia.

PURPOSE

The present study was designed to assess residual effects of single and repeated doses of esmirtazapine 1.5 and 4.5 mg on actual driving in 32 healthy volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment with single doses of zopiclone 7.5 mg was included as active control.

METHODS

Treatments were administered in the evening. Driving performance was assessed in the morning, 11 h after drug intake, in a standardized on-the-road highway driving test. The primary study parameter was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), a measure of "weaving". All subjects were subjected to CYP2D6 phenotyping in order to distinguish poor metabolizers from extensive metabolizers of esmirtazapine.

RESULTS

Overall, esmirtazapine 1.5 mg did not produce any clinically relevant change in SDLP after single and repeated dosing. Driving impairment, i.e., a rise in SDLP, did occur after a single-dose administration of esmirtazapine 4.5 mg but was resolved after repeated doses. Acute driving impairment was more pronounced after both doses of esmirtazapine in a select group of poor metabolizers (N = 7). A single-dose zopiclone 7.5 mg also increased SDLP as expected.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that single and repeated doses of 1.5 mg esmirtazapine are generally not associated with residual impairment. Single-dose administration of 4.5 mg esmirtazapine was associated with residual impairment that generally resolved after repeated administration. Exploratory analysis in a small group of poor CYP 2D6 metabolizers suggested that these subjects are more sensitive to the impairing effects of esmirtazapine on car driving.

Antidepressants in healthy subjects: what are the psychotropic/psychological effects?

A wide debate is ongoing regarding whether antidepressant effects should be considered a general property of these agents or whether they exclusively belong to the context of target symptoms. The aim of the present review is to summarize findings on antidepressant influences on healthy volunteers, focusing on changes in psychological and cognitive functions. Differences have been detected between acute and chronic treatments. Acute treatment has been found to lead to positive bias in emotion processing and facilitation in negative emotion recognition. Chronic treatments have been found to stabilise some changes induced by acute treatment, such as increased social behaviours. Regarding antidepressant modulation of affective symptomatology contrasting results have been reported suggesting that the link between action on cognitive processes and mood may be not direct. In fact, meta-analyzing data on mood and anxiety symptoms no difference was detected between subjects receiving placebo and SSRIs. However, meta-analyzing data on negative affects, a significant decrease was detected in subjects receiving SSRIs in comparison with subjects receiving placebo. In summary, antidepressants seem to exert a detectable influence also in healthy subjects.

Cognitive toxicity of pharmacotherapeutic agents used in social anxiety disorder

OBJECTIVE

To compare cognitive impairment of medications used in social anxiety disorder (SAD).

METHODS

Data from peer-reviewed publications (1975-2007) of controlled, crossover design, pharmacodynamic studies on SAD medications in healthy volunteers were analysed. The number of objective psychometrics for each drug/dose level at all time points after dosing, and of instances of statistically significant impairment of cognitive function, enabled calculation of drug-induced cognitive impairment. The magnitude of impairment between drugs was compared using proportional impairment ratios (PIRs).

RESULTS

Olanzapine, oxazepam, lorazepam and mianserin had twice the average cognitive toxicity of other treatments. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) impaired cognition to a lesser extent than other pharmacological groupings. There was extensive intra-class variation: fluvoxamine (PIR = 0.08) possessed little detrimental cognitive activity, whereas sertraline (PIR = 5.33) caused impairment over five times the SSRI group average. Benzodiazepines caused noticeable cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial differences exist, both between and within therapeutic classes, in the behavioural toxicity of medications used for SAD.

Clinical trials of potential antidepressants: to what extent are the elderly represented: a review

BACKGROUND

There is widespread use of antidepressants in the elderly population. The principle of treatment of depression, however, is derived mostly from studies employing young adults and healthy elderly. This article reviews the literature on the extent to which the elderly are represented in clinical trials of potential antidepressants.

METHOD

Medline search of relevant articles of clinical trials of potential antidepressants.

RESULTS

The maximum age of inclusion for most clinical trials was 65 years. The highest age reported for depressed subjects was 90 years. There was no clear consensus on who were considered to be elderly; clinical trials conducted on the elderly included subjects who were 50, 55, or 60 years and over. Pharmacological studies on healthy subjects were most often done on young adults, age range 18 to 65 years. The period of study was relatively shorter for clinical trials done on elderly subjects. There was however, no difference in the exclusion or inclusion criteria between studies done in young and elderly subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly subjects aged 75 years and over were clearly underrepresented in the clinical trials of potential antidepressants. For drugs that are used by the elderly, in its pivotal studies for registration, the inclusion of at least 25% of subjects aged 75 years and over is recommended.

A placebo controlled investigation into the effects of paroxetine and mirtazapine on measures related to car driving performance

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of paroxetine and mirtazapine on psychometric performance related to car driving, including an on-the-road test of BRT.

METHOD

In a 4-way, double blind randomised crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received paroxetine 20mg mane, mirtazapine 15mg/30mg nocte (comparator), mirtazapine 15mg mane/15 mg b.i.d.(verum) and placebo over a 5 day period with a washout period of 7 days between treatments. Psychometric assessments included 'on-the-road' BRT (BRT), CFF (CFF), CRT (CRT) and subjective measures of sedation and sleep parameters.

RESULTS

Paroxetine had no significant effect on BRT compared with placebo. Although subjective ratings of sleep quality and sedation were impaired, there were significant improvements in both CFF and the recognition reaction component of CRT with paroxetine. Mirtazapine 15mg/30mg nocte impaired laboratory performance and some subjective tests. Mirtazapine 15mg mane/15mg b.i.d. improved sleep, but significantly impaired all other measures.

CONCLUSION

Paroxetine 20 mg/day has no psychomotor or behavioural toxicity and has no negative impact on BRT. Further research into the chronic and sub-chronic effects of mirtazapine is needed to establish the clinical significance of these results.

Mirtazapine in combination with amitriptyline: a drug-drug interaction study in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

To assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine (30 mg/day orally) and amitriptyline (75 mg/day orally) during combined administration compared with that of either drug administered alone. To evaluate the tolerability and effects on psychometric tests of acute and subchronic administration of both drugs combined and alone.

METHODS

In a single-blind, three-way cross-over study, 24 (12 male and 12 female) healthy subjects were randomly assigned to six different sequences of three 9-day treatments, i.e. racemic mirtazapine (30 mg/day), amitriptyline (75 mg/day) or the combination of these drugs. To control for acute pharmacodynamic assessments, during the first treatment period, a placebo group (n = 8; 4 females and 4 males) was added. Serial blood samples were drawn for plasma level measurements that were subsequently subjected to pharmacokinetic analysis. Psychometric tests assessed attentional performance, and a computer-assisted telephone questionnaire assessed self-ratings of drowsiness/alertness and sleep quality.

RESULTS

Amitriptyline increased the C(max) of mirtazapine (+ 36%, p < 0.05) in male subjects only. Mirtazapine altered the C(max) of amitriptyline in both male (+ 23%, p < 0.05) and female (- 23%, p < 0.05) subjects. No changes were observed for other pharmacokinetic parameters. Metabolite parameters were not affected. Changes in parent compound levels mainly resulted from effects on absorption. The psychometric test results did not reveal significant changes between combined and single drug treatments. The telephone registrations of VAMRS and LSEQ did not show clinically relevant differences between the active treatments.

CONCLUSION

Combined administration of mirtazapine (30 mg/day) and amitriptyline (75 mg/day) alters the pharmacokinetics of either compound to a minor extent. Adding one drug to the other and substituting one drug by the other had no major effects on tolerability. Nevertheless, caution is warranted when combining amitriptyline and mirtazapine.

A review of the pharmacological and clinical profile of mirtazapine

The novel antidepressant mirtazapine has a dual mode of action. It is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) that acts by antagonizing the adrenergic alpha2-autoreceptors and alpha2-heteroreceptors as well as by blocking 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors. It enhances, therefore, the release of norepinephrine and 5-HT1A-mediated serotonergic transmission. This dual mode of action may conceivably be responsible for mirtazapine's rapid onset of action. Mirtazapine is extensively metabolized in the liver. The cytochrome (CYP) P450 isoenzymes CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 are mainly responsible for its metabolism. Using once daily dosing, steady-state concentrations are reached after 4 days in adults and 6 days in the elderly. In vitro studies suggest that mirtazapine is unlikely to cause clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Dry mouth, sedation, and increases in appetite and body weight are the most common adverse effects. In contrast to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), mirtazapine has no sexual side effects. The antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine was established in several placebo-controlled trials. In major depression, its efficacy is comparable to that of amitriptyline, clomipramine, doxepin, fluoxetine, paroxetine, citalopram, or venlafaxine. Mirtazapine also appears to be useful in patients suffering from depression comorbid with anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance. It seems to be safe and effective during long-term use.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine

Mirtazapine is the first noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant ('NaSSA'). It is rapidly and well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after single and multiple oral administration, and peak plasma concentrations are reached within 2 hours. Mirtazapine binds to plasma proteins (85%) in a nonspecific and reversible way. The absolute bioavailability is approximately 50%, mainly because of gut wall and hepatic first-pass metabolism. Mirtazapine shows linear pharmacokinetics over a dose range of 15 to 80mg. The presence of food has a minor effect on the rate, but does not affect the extent, of absorption. The pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine are dependent on gender and age: females and the elderly show higher plasma concentrations than males and young adults. The elimination half-life of mirtazapine ranges from 20 to 40 hours, which is in agreement with the time to reach steady state (4 to 6 days). Total body clearance as determined from intravenous administration to young males amounts to 31 L/h. Liver and moderate renal impairment cause an approximately 30% decrease in oral mirtazapine clearance; severe renal impairment causes a 50% decrease in clearance. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences between poor (PM) and extensive (EM) metabolisers of debrisoquine [a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 substrate] with regard to the pharmacokinetics of the racemate. The pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine appears to be enantioselective, resulting in higher plasma concentrations and longer half-life of the (R)-(-)-enantiomer (18.0 +/-2.5h) compared with that of the (S)-(+)-enantiomer (9.9+/-3. lh). Genetic CYP2D6 polymorphism has different effects on the enantiomers. For the (R)-(-)-enantiomer there are no differences between EM and PM for any of the kinetic parameters; for (S)-(+)-mirtazapine the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is 79% larger in PM than in EM, and a corresponding longer half-life was found. Approximately 100% of the orally administered dose is excreted via urine and faeces within 4 days. Biotransformation is mainly mediated by the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 isoenzymes. Inhibitors of these isoenzymes, such as paroxetine and fluoxetine, cause modestly increased mirtazapine plasma concentrations (17 and 32%, respectively) without leading to clinically relevant consequences. Enzyme induction by carbamazepine causes a considerable decrease (60%) in mirtazapine plasma concentrations. Mirtazapine has little inhibitory effects on CYP isoenzymes and, therefore, the pharmacokinetics of coadministered drugs are hardly affected by mirtazapine. Although no concentration-effect relationship could be established, it was found that with therapeutic dosages of mirtazapine (15 to 45 mg/day), plasma concentrations range on average from 5 to 100 microg/L.

Depression in epilepsy: etiology, phenomenology, and treatment

A history of depression or depressive symptomatology has been reported in up to two-thirds of patients with medically intractable epilepsy, whereas community studies have demonstrated affective disorder only in a quarter of these patients. Depression has been reported peri- and interictally. However, differentiation may be difficult in patients with frequent seizures. Most authors have found no correlation between depression and epilepsy variables. However, complex partial seizures, especially of temporal lobe origin, appear to be etiologic factors, particularly in men with left-sided foci. Depression is also more common in patients treated with polytherapy especially with barbiturates, phenytoin, and vigabatrin. Depression has also been described de novo after temporal lobectomy. Psychosocial factors also play a part, but underlying risk factors (e.g., genetic, endocrine and metabolic) may explain the increased rates of depression in people with epilepsy compared to those with other neurologic and chronic medical conditions. The depression appears to be endogenous. Patients tend to exhibit fewer neurotic traits and more psychotic symptoms such as paranoia, delusions, and persecutory auditory hallucinations. Treatment approaches include psychotherapy, rationalization of antiepileptic drug medication, antidepressant treatment, and ECT. The tricyclic and related antidepressants appear to be epileptogenic, especially in people at high risk (personal or family history of seizures, abnormal pretreatment EEG, brain damage, alcohol or substance abuse/withdrawal and concurrent use of CNS-active medication). Seizures tend to occur early in treatment or after dose increments, especially if rapidly titrated. There is little evidence that the newer antidepressants, e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, moclobemide, venlafaxine, or nefazodone are more epileptogenic than placebo.

Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression

Mirtazapine is a noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) which has predominantly been evaluated in the treatment of major depression. The drug had equivalent efficacy to tricyclic antidepressants and it was at least as effective as trazodone in the majority of available short term trials in patients with moderate or severe depression, including those with baseline anxiety symptoms or sleep disturbance and the elderly. A continuation study also showed that sustained remission rates were higher with mirtazapine than with amitriptyline and that the drugs had similar efficacy for the prevention of relapse. There is some evidence for a faster onset of action with mirtazapine than with the selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Mirtazapine was more effective than the SSRI fluoxetine at weeks 3 and 4 of therapy and it was also more effective than paroxetine and citalopram at weeks 1 and 2, respectively, in short term assessments (6 or 8 weeks). Preliminary data suggest that the drug may be effective as an augmentation or combination therapy in patients with refractory depression. Anticholinergic events and other events including tremor and dyspepsia are less common with mirtazapine than with tricyclic antidepressants. There was a greater tendency for SSRI-related adverse events with fluoxetine than with mirtazapine, but, overall, mirtazapine had a similar tolerability profile to the SSRIs. Increased appetite and bodyweight gain appear to be the only events that are reported more often with mirtazapine than with comparator antidepressants. In vitro and in vivo data have suggested that mirtazapine is unlikely to affect the metabolism of drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP)2D6, although few formal drug interaction data are available.

CONCLUSIONS

Mirtazapine is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe major depression. Further research is required to define the comparative efficacy of mirtazapine in specific patient groups, including the elderly and those with severe depression. Clarification of its efficacy as an augmentation therapy and in patients with refractory depression and its role in improving the efficacy and reducing the extrapyramidal effects of antipsychotic drugs would also help to establish its clinical value. The low potential for interaction with drugs that are metabolised by CYP2D6, including antipsychotics, tricyclic antidepressants and some SSRIs, may also make mirtazapine an important option for the treatment of major depression in patients who require polytherapy. Mirtazapine also appears to be useful in patients with depression who present with anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance.

Review of the results from clinical studies on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression

Mirtazapine is a presynaptic alpha-2 antagonist that has dual action by increasing noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. The enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission is specifically mediated via 5-HT1 receptors because mirtazapine is a postsynaptic serotonergic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 antagonist. In addition, mirtazapine has only a weak affinity for 5-HT1 receptors and has very weak muscarinic anticholinergic and histamine (H1) antagonist properties. As a consequence of its unique pharmacodynamic properties, mirtazapine is an effective, safe and well-tolerated addition to the antidepressant armamentarium. Mirtazapine is well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration, and it is extensively metabolized in the liver to four metabolites via demethylation and hydroxylation, followed by glucuronide conjugation. The unconjugated desmethyl metabolite is pharmacologically less active than the parent compound. Mirtazapine lacks auto-induction of hepatic isoenzymes. Although mirtazapine is a substrate of P450 isoenzymes 1A2, 2D6 and 3A4, in vitro studies show that it is not a potent inhibitor or inducer of any of these enzymes. Mirtazapine has been evaluated in a worldwide clinical development program involving approximately 4500 patients. Controlled clinical trials involving almost 2800 mirtazapine-treated patients have demonstrated the compound to be effective for the treatment of moderate-to-serve major depression. Mirtazapine was consistently superior to placebo, and equivalent in efficacy to the tricyclic antidepressants amitriptyline, doxepin and clomipramine, but with an improved tolerability profile. Mirtazapine has shown a rapid onset of action in patients with predominantly severe depressive illness in a comparative study against fluoxetine. Mirtazapine has a unique tolerability profile, since the specific postsynaptic 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptor blockade of mirtazapine provides early antidepressant effects without causing unwanted serotonin-related side-effects. Transient somnolence, hyperphagia and weight gain are the most commonly reported adverse events, which may be attributed to the antihistaminic (H1) activity of mirtazapine at low doses. Somnolence, the most commonly reported side-effect, appears to be less frequent at higher dosages. Mirtazapine also demonstrates important anxiolytic and sleep-improving effects, which may be related to its pharmacodynamic properties. In addition, mirtazapine does not appear to be associated with sexual dysfunction. Mirtazapine has shown no significant cardiovascular adverse effects at multiples of 7 to 22 times the maximum recommended dose. Mirtazapine is a unique addition to the antidepressant armamentarium as first-line therapy in patients with major depression and symptoms of anxiety/agitation or anxiety/somatization or complaints of insomnia and as a useful alternative in depressed patients who do not adequately respond to or are intolerant of tricyclic antidepressants or serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors.

A risk-benefit assessment of mirtazapine in the treatment of depression

Mirtazapine is the first of a new class of antidepressants, the noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (NaSSA). Its antidepressant effect appears to be related to its dual enhancement of central noradrenergic and serotonin 5-HT1 receptor-mediated serotonergic neurotransmission. Mirtazapine possesses a number of useful pharmacokinetic characteristics such as good absorption, linear pharmacokinetics over the recommended dosage range (15 to 80 mg/day), and an elimination half-life of 20 to 40 hours, thereby allowing once-daily administration. However, since the drug is extensively metabolised by the hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) system and is excreted mainly in the urine, its clearance may be reduced by hepatic or renal impairment. In vitro data suggest that from a clinical point of view it is unlikely that mirtazapine would inhibit the metabolism of coadministered drugs metabolised by CYP1A2, CYP2D6 or CYP3A4. In vivo data from a study in extensive and poor metabolisers of debrisoquine indicate that strong inhibitors of CYP2D6 would have no effect on the concentration of racemic mirtazapine. In some placebo-controlled studies mirtazapine showed an early onset of antidepressant action, with significant reductions in total Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores (relative to placebo) noted as early as 1 week after starting treatment. This therapeutic advantage was subsequently maintained during treatment, with mirtazapine proving significantly superior to placebo at treatment end-point in the majority of studies. In comparative trials, the antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine was comparable with that of tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline, clomipramine and doxepin, and in 2 studies superior to that of trazodone and fluoxetine. Mirtazapine appears to have a broad spectrum of activity, reflected in its efficacy in a variety of clinical settings. Its additional beneficial effects on the symptoms of anxiety and sleep disturbance associated with depression may reduce the need for concomitant anxiolytic and hypnotic medication seen with some antidepressants. Mirtazapine has demonstrated superior tolerability to the tricyclic antidepressants and trazodone, primarily on account of its relative absence of anticholinergic, adrenergic and serotonin-related adverse effects, in particular gastrointestinal adverse effects and sexual dysfunction. It appears that increased sedation associated with the drug is related to subtherapeutic dosages, and that it is reported in substantially fewer patients when the drug is used in appropriate dosages (> or = 15 mg as a single evening dose) from the beginning of treatment. Although 2 cases of reversible severe symptomatic neutropenia have been reported in clinical trials, there have been no additional reports of symptomatic neutropenia since the introduction of this drug to various countries in September 1994. Currently available data and initial clinical experience suggest that with its combination of dual action, simple pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy and tolerability, mirtazapine appears to be an important advance in the pharmacotherapy of depression.

Long-term effects of antidepressants on balance, equilibrium, and postural reflexes

To assess the long-term effects of antidepressant medication on balance, equilibrium, and postural reflexes, we studied 30 patients, ages 20-76 years, who had a diagnosis of depressive disorder (as defined by DSM-III-R criteria) and had been treated with tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for > or = 1 year. They were assessed by a Balance Master System. The assessment included three tasks: static balance, rhythmic weight shift, and limits of stability. When compared with 30 nonhospitalized healthy controls (of comparable age and the same sex), patients who took TCAs showed impaired balance function in all main indices. The results suggest that the impairment of balance function includes motor coordination, fine-motor control, postural reflexes, maintaining equilibrium, and reaction time. No obvious impairment of balance function was observed in patients who took SSRIs.

Mirtazapine : A Review of its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential in the Management of Major Depression

SYNOPSIS

Mirtazapine is a tetracyclic antidepressant with a novel mechanism of action; it increases noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission via blockade of central α2-adrenergic auto- and heteroreceptors. The increased release of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) stimulates serotonin 5-HT1 receptors because mirtazapine directly blocks 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors. The enhancement of both noradrenergic- and 5-HT1 receptor-mediated neurotransmission is thought to be responsible for the antidepressant activity of mirtazapine. In short term (5 to 6 weeks) clinical trials in patients with depression. mirtazapine produces clinical improvements significantly superior to those of placebo, similar to those of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) [amitriptyline, clomipramine and doxepin] and possibly superior to those of trazodone. Short term clinical tolerability data suggest that mirtazapine produces fewer anticholinergic-, adrenergic- and serotonergic-related adverse events than TCAs. In rare cases, mirtazapine, in common with many antidepressants, was associated with potentially serious changes in haematological parameters (e.g. agranulocytosis and neutropenia). The drug appears to be safe in overdose and possesses a very low propensity for inducing seizures. Comparisons with other classes of antidepressants are needed to determine the relative position of mirtazapine in clinical practice. However, preliminary data indicate that mirtazapine, with its novel mechanism of action, is a promising addition to currently available options for the treatment of depression.

PHARMACODYNAMIC PROPERTIES

In vitro neurochemical studies have demonstrated that mirtazapine blocks central α2-adrenergic auto- and heteroreceptors, but has no effect on noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake. The affinity of the drug was 10-fold higher for central presynaptic α2-adrenoceptors than for central postsynaptic and peripheral α2-adrenoceptors, and 30-fold higher for α2-adrenoceptors than for α1-adrenoceptors. Microdialysis and neurophysiological experiments as well as behavioural studies performed in rats support the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist properties of mirtazapine. Receptor binding studies have shown that mirtazapine has a high affinity for serotonin 5-HT2 and 5-HT3 receptors, central and peripheral histamine H1 receptors and a low affinity for 5-HT1, dopaminergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Its activity at serotonin receptor subtypes has been confirmed in animal behaviour models. Mirtazapine activates 5-HT1 receptor-mediated serotonergic neurotransmission by enhancing the stimulatory effect of the noradrenergic system on serotonergic cell firing (an α1-adrenoceptor-mediated effect) as well as antagonising the inhibitory effect of the noradrenergic system on serotonin release (an α2-adrenoceptor-mediated effect). Electrophysiological experiments have demonstrated that mirtazapine enhances serotonergic transmission through blockade of presynaptic α2-adrenoceptors. The drug does not inhibit serotonin reuptake.

PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES

The bioavailability of mirtazapine is approximately 50%. Peak plasma concentrations are reached within 2.2 to 3.1 hours after single oral doses of 15 to 75mg and are dose-dependent. Mirtazapine is extensively metabolised in the liver; up to 85% of the drug is eliminated in the urine (up to 4% as unchanged drug) and the remaining 15% is eliminated in the faeces. The mean elimination half-life of mirtazapine is approximately 22 hours, making it suitable for once-daily administration.

THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL

In randomised double-blind comparative trials including patients with major depression, short term (5 to 6 weeks) therapy with mirtazapine was significantly more effective than placebo, as effective as amitriptyline, clomipramine and doxepin, and at least as effective as trazodone. Results from a meta-analysis of 5 comparative trials in which 60% of patients were hospitalised with severe depression [mean baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score ≥25] revealed no significant differences between mirtazapine and amitriptyline. The responder rates (≥50% decrease in HAMD score from baseline) at 6 weeks and study end-point were 70 and 61 %, respectively, for mirtazapine and 73 and 64%, respectively, for amitriptyline. In a comparative trial in older outpatients (mean age 61 to 63 years), reductions in rating scale scores of depression and the percentage of responders tended to be higher in mirtazapine than in trazodone recipients.

TOLERABILITY

The tolerability profile of mirtazapine is based on results from short term (5 to 6 weeks) comparisons with placebo and other antidepressants; no longer term data are available. Drowsiness (23 vs 14%), excessive sedation (19 vs 5%), dry mouth (25 vs 16%), increased appetite (11 vs 2%) and bodyweight gain (10 vs 1%) occurred significantly more frequently with mirtazapine in placebo-controlled trials. Analysis of blood pressure, heart rate and symptoms of sexual dysfunction indicated no significant differences between mirtazapine and placebo recipients. In a meta-analysis, mirtazapine appeared to be better tolerated than amitriptyline, with significantly fewer patients experiencing anticholinergic (dry mouth, constipation, and abnormal accommodation and vision), cardiac (palpitations and tachycardia) and neurological (tremor and vertigo) adverse events. Mirtazapine was at least as well tolerated as clomipramine, doxepin and trazodone in comparative trials and appeared to be associated with slightly lower incidences of anticholinergic and neurological adverse events than these drugs. Clinical trial and postmarketing surveillance data suggest that mirtazapine has a very low potential for inducing seizures. Excessive but transient somnolence was the only symptom noted in 10 patients taking an overdose (up to 315mg) of mirtazapine. Mirtazapine is infrequently associated with clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters. Granulocytopenia and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels have been reported; most were mild in severity and returned to normal values with continued administration of mirtazapine. Elevated cholesterol levels (mean 3 to 4%) have also been reported.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

The recommended starting dosage of mirtazapine is 15 mg/day for 4 days, then 30 mg/day for 10 days. If effective, the drug should be continued unchanged at this dosage or, in patients assessed as insufficiently improved, the daily dosage may be further increased to 45 mg/day. In patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency, careful dosage titration as well as regular and close monitoring for adverse events is recommended. Concomitant use of mirtazapine and diazepam or alcohol (ethanol) may also impair cognitive and/or motor performance.

Cardiovascular variability in major depressive disorder and effects of imipramine or mirtazapine (Org 3770)

Spectral analysis of fluctuations in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) was applied to assess sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiovascular control mechanisms in patients with unipolar affective disorder before and after treatment with imipramine (IMI) or mirtazapine (MIR). In a double-blind randomized study, 10 patients received treatment with IMI and 10 patients received treatment with MIR. Cardiovascular parameters were studied before and after 4 weeks of treatment: HR and BP (Finapres) were recorded continuously during supine rest (SR) and orthostatic challenge (OC; 60-degrees head-up tilting). During SR and OC, power spectra were calculated for HR and systolic BP. Spectral density was assessed for three frequency bands: low (0.02-0.06 Hz), mid (0.07-0.14 Hz), and high (0.15-0.50 Hz). Before treatment, the depressed patients (N = 20) differed from age-matched controls (N = 20) only in their response to OC: the depressed patients showed more suppression of HR variability (both mid- and high-frequency band fluctuations), indicating stronger vagal inhibition, and a reduced increase of BP variability (mid-frequency band fluctuations), indicating reduced sympathetic activation. After 4 weeks of treatment, patients treated with either antidepressant drug showed significant changes of HR (increase) and HR variability (decrease) during SR and OC; the suppression of mid- and high-frequency fluctuations of HR was larger for IMI than for MIR. The increase in HR and decrease in HR variability may be attributed to the anticholinergic properties of IMI (strong) and MIR (weak), resulting in cardiac vagal inhibition. Whereas MIR had no effect on BP or BP variability, IMI specifically reduced mid-frequency band fluctuations of BP as the result of a suppression of central sympathetic activity. Our data confirm and extend previous observations on the presence of autonomic dysfunctions in unmedicated depressed patients: spectral analysis of HR and BP fluctuations suggested that both parasympathetic and sympathetic mechanisms are involved, specifically during OC. The preexisting autonomic cardiovascular dysfunctions were not normalized by antidepressant drugs. In fact, some of the components of the cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction were further aggravated, depending on the pharmacologic profile of the drug under investigation.

Drug and ethanol effects on the clinical test for drunkenness: single doses of ethanol, hypnotic drugs and antidepressant drugs

The clinical test for drunkenness has been used in Finland to detect alcohol-induced impairment of driving fitness. Since the data about the effects of psychotropic drugs on the clinical test for drunkenness are limited, this test was administered in two randomized double-blind cross-over trials with 12 subjects in each. The clinical tests were done at 2 hr and 5 hr after drug intake. For comparison, the representative laboratory tests used were digit symbol substitution, simulated driving (tracking+reaction time) and "global psychomotor performance". In Trial I, 15 mg of diazepam, 50 mg of amitriptyline and 15 mg of mirtazepine, each drug administered alone, had minor effects on the clinical tests. Compared to the placebo, mirtazepine, and diazepam, diazepam+mirtazepine impaired performance on the motor subtests at 2 hr. The tracking error percentage was increased by amitriptyline, diazepam+amitriptyline, and diazepam+mirtazepine up to 4.5 hr. In Trial II with 7.5 mg of zopiclone, 0.25 mg of triazolam and 0.8 g/kg of ethanol, ethanol alone and hypnotic-ethanol combinations impaired performance on the motor and vestibular subtests, whereas single drug intake had minor effects. Tracking was more sensitive to drugs than to ethanol. In conclusion, the clinical test for drunkenness detected impaired performance following single doses of ethanol or drug-ethanol combinations better than it detected impaired performance following moderate doses of drugs or drug-drug combinations, respectively.

Diazepam effects on the performance of healthy subjects are not enhanced by treatment with the antihistamine ebastine

1. We have given 12 healthy subjects the H1-antihistamine ebastine (20 mg) or placebo in a randomized double-blind and crossover study for 1 week each. The subjects were tested for drug effects on day 6 of each period, and for interactions of ebastine with oral 15 mg diazepam (DZ) on day 7. On both days, the testing runs were at baseline and 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 h after intake. 2. The performance was evaluated both objectively (digit symbol substitution, flicker fusion, Maddox wing, simulated driving, body balance) and subjectively (visual analogue scales, questionnaires). Venous blood was sampled daily during the maintenance and during each testing round for the assay of plasma carebastine (the active metabolite of ebastine) by high pressure liquid chromatography and plasma diazepam by radioreceptor assay. Three-way ANOVA, paired t-test, Wilcoxon rank sign test and Fisher's fourfold table test were used for data analysis. 3. Plasma carebastine reached steady levels from day 3 onwards. The mean concentrations in the morning were 82 micrograms l-1 on day 6 and 85 micrograms l-1 on day 7. The rise (+ 150%) in plasma carebastine after an extra 20 mg ebastine was not modified by DZ. Ebastine did not affect performance objectively or subjectively, yet borderline drowsiness was recorded during the first 3 h. On day 7, plasma DZ concentrations peaked (mean 480 micrograms l-1) at 1.5 h after the intake. DZ produced impaired performance in various objective tests, and drowsiness, weakness, clumsiness, mental slowness and poor performance were reported on visual analogue scales.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amitriptyline, clovoxamine and cognitive function: a placebo-controlled comparison in depressed outpatients

No longer prescribed only for vegetative signs of depression, tricyclic antidepressants also lessen depressive cognitive distortions. Less clear is whether they ameliorate depressed patients' other cognitive deficits in memory, information processing speed, and psychomotor performance. We tested the alternative hypothesis that amitriptyline, because of its anticholinergic and sedative properties, would exacerbate depressed patients' cognitive disturbances. Depressed outpatients received double-blind placebo (n = 15), amitriptyline (n = 10), or clovoxamine fumarate (n = 10), a serotonin reuptake inhibitor relatively lacking in anticholinergic properties. Depression, memory, and psychomotor performance were assessed at baseline and after 7 and 28 days of drug treatment. Depression was alleviated after all treatments, including placebo. Only amitriptyline impaired performance on tests of memory, producing a significant decrement, relative to placebo, after 4 weeks of treatment. None of the treatments adversely affected performance on psychomotor tasks. These findings add to the evidence that antidepressant drugs with high anticholinergic activity can impair memory, despite alleviation of depression.