Transplant outcomes and economic costs associated with patient noncompliance to immunosuppression

Navigating normalcy: designing personal health visualizations for pediatric kidney transplant recipients and caregivers

OBJECTIVES

Patients with chronic illnesses, including kidney disease, consider their sense of normalcy when evaluating their health. Although this concept is a key indicator of their self-determined well-being, they struggle to understand if their experience is typical. To address this challenge, we set out to explore how to design personal health visualizations that aid participants in better understanding their experiences post-transplant, identifying barriers to normalcy, and achieving their desired medical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pediatric kidney transplant patients and their caregivers participated in three asynchronous design sessions involving sharing experiences, presenting symbolic objects, and providing feedback on visualizations to understand their perceptions of normalcy post-transplant. Data analysis of design session 1 and 2 comprised deductive and inductive analysis. We used affinity diagramming to identify thematic areas about participants' transplant experiences. Comprehension of design session three normalcy visualizations was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Participants effectively engaged in the design sessions, revealing diverse perspectives on their experiences. We found there is a significant need for visualizations that depict normalcy to better inform patients and caregivers about their health.

DISCUSSION

Normalcy Visualizations should incorporate three key design principles: personal values, facilitating peer and self-comparison, and seamlessly communicating abstract concepts to help youth kidney transplant recipients comprehend and contextualize if their transplant experience is normal and what normalcy means to them.

CONCLUSION

By incorporating holistic aspects of patients' and caregivers' lives into personal health visualizations, they can be cognizant of their progress to normalcy and empowered to make decisions that help them feel normal.

Kidney Transplant Candidacy: Addressing Common Medical and Psychosocial Barriers to Transplant

Improving access to kidney transplants remains a priority for the transplant community. However, many medical, psychosocial, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers exist that prevent or delay transplantation for candidates with certain conditions. There is a lack of consensus regarding how to best approach many of these issues and barriers, leading to heterogeneity in transplant centers' management and acceptance practices for a variety of pretransplant candidate issues. In this review, we address several of the more common contemporary patient medical and psychosocial barriers frequently encountered by transplant programs. The barriers discussed here include kidney transplant candidates with obesity, older age, prior malignancy, cardiovascular disease, history of nonadherence, and cannabis use. Improving understanding of how to best address these specific issues can empower referring providers, transplant programs, and patients to address these issues as necessary to progress toward eventual successful transplantation.

Parichay Patient Support Program: Useful Tool for Improving Compliance in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Medication nonadherence (MNA) in organ transplant recipients is associated with increased risk of rejection, allograft loss, patient death, and higher healthcare costs. Various approaches have been used in an attempt to reduce MNA. A patient support program (PSP) can be an invaluable tool for improving patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyze available data of PSP for kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A total of 3352 patients from all over the country were prospectively enrolled in the Parichay PSP between January 2021 and April 2023. Baseline demographic details were recorded. A monthly call was made thereafter. Data were analyzed for demographic details, compliance rate, dropouts, and tacrolimus levels when available.

RESULTS

The Parichay PSP had enrolled a total of 1371 kidney transplant patients in 2021, 1620 in 2022, and 361 in 2023 (January-April) from different parts of India (North, 25%; East, 35%; South, 26%; West, 14%). (n=2626) Of the 2626 patients who received tacrolimus (Tacrograf), 2158 (82%) were male, with a mean age of 42 years. The majority of patients (61%) were age 28 to 48 years. A patient compliance rate of >90% was maintained for longer than 13 months (n = 1920; April 2022 to April 2023). Of the 3352 patients, 250 (7.4%) dropped out of the study. Thus, use of PSP ensured a compliance rate of 92.6% in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates that participation in a PSP can be a useful tool for monitoring compliance and tacrolimus therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant recipients.

International Variability of Barriers to Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication in Adult Heart Transplant Recipients. A Secondary Data Analysis of the BRIGHT Study

Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication among transplant patients is associated with poor clinical outcomes and higher economic costs. Barriers to immunosuppressives are a proximal determinant of non-adherence. So far, international variability of barriers to adherence in transplantation has not been studied. As part of the cross-sectional multi-country and multi-center BRIGHT study, barriers to adherence were measured in 1,382 adult heart transplant recipients of 11 countries using the 28-item self-report questionnaire "Identifying Medication Adherence Barriers" (IMAB). Barriers were ranked by their frequency of occurrence for the total sample and by country. Countries were also ranked the by recipients' total number of barriers. Intra-class correlations were calculated at country and center level. The five most frequently mentioned barriers were sleepiness (27.1%), being away from home (25.2%), forgetfulness (24.5%), interruptions to daily routine (23.6%) and being busy (22.8%), fairly consistently across countries. The participants reported on average three barriers, ranging from zero up to 22 barriers. The majority of the variability among reported barriers frequency was situated at the recipient level (94.8%). We found limited international variability in primarily person-level barriers in our study. Understanding of barriers in variable contexts guides intervention development to support adherence to the immunosuppressive regimen in real-world settings.

Nonadherence to Immunosuppressant Therapy of Kidney Transplant Candidate Patients: External Validation of the KATITA-25 Scale

BACKGROUND

The self-administered Kidney AlloTransplant Immunosuppressive Therapy Adherence (KATITA-25) questionnaire is a multidimensional scale for use in the pretransplant setting that evaluates the predisposition to nonadherence of patients who are candidates to kidney transplant. The scale has shown adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. This study presents the results of an external validation study of the KATITA-25 scale.

METHODS

Patients >18 y old scheduled for kidney transplant were included in this multicenter study. The KATITA-25 scale was administered before surgery and then at 3-mo posttransplantation for evaluation of scale sensitivity to change. At this time, 2 validated medication adherence scales were applied for assessment of concurrent validity. For evaluation of predictive validity, nonadherence to immunosuppressive medication was assessed at 6 and 12 mo after transplantation by 3 independent methods: patient self-report of nonadherence using the Morisky-Green-Levine Medication Assessment Questionnaire scale, serum trough levels of immunosuppressants, and pharmacy refills.

RESULTS

Three twenty-two patients were available for evaluation of concurrent validity and 311 patients of predictive validity. After kidney transplant, the median KATITA-25 score decreased from 20 to 8 ( P  < 0.001), demonstrating scale sensitivity to change, and the KATITA-25 score showed correlation with the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale score (Spearman's ρ 0.18, P  = 0.002) and the Cuestionario para la Evaluación de la Adhesión al Tratamiento Antiretroviral scores (ρ -0.17, P  = 0.002), confirming concurrent validity. The nonadherence rate was 57.6%. The scale predictive validity was demonstrated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.68), sensitivity (59.8%), specificity (68.2%), and positive predictive value (71.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

This external validation study of KATITA-25 scale provided evidence of sensitivity to change, and structural, criterion, and predictive validity.

Electronic health record-enabled routine assessment of medication adherence after solid organ transplantation: the time is now

Medication nonadherence after solid organ transplantation is recognized as an important impediment to long-term graft survival. Yet, assessment of adherence is often not part of routine care. In this Personal Viewpoint, we call for the transplant community to consider implementing a systematic process to screen and assess medication adherence. We believe acceptable tools are available to support integrating adherence assessments into the electronic health record. Creating a standard assessment can be done efficiently and cost-effectively if we come together as a community. More importantly, such monitoring can improve outcomes and strengthen provider-patient relationships. We further discuss the practical challenges and potential rebuttals to our position.

Risk Factors for Non-Adherence to Medication for Liver Transplant Patients: An Umbrella Review

Background/Objectives: Liver Transplantation (LT) is the second most common solid organ transplantation. Medication adherence on LT patients is key to avoiding graft failure, mortality, and important quality of life losses. The aim of this study is to identify risk-factors for non-adherence to treatment of liver transplant patients according to reliable published evidence. Methods: An umbrella review within the context of adherence to immunosuppressant medication of LT patients, was conducted. The review was performed in accordance with the principles of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: A total of 11 articles were finally included for the review. Non-adherence factors were identified and allocated using the WHO classification of factors for non-adherence. Each of these groups contains a subset of factors that have been shown to influence adherence to medication, directly or indirectly, according to literature findings. Conclusions: The results of the review indicate that sociodemographic factors, factors related to the patient, factors related to the treatment, condition-related and health system-related factors are good categories of predictors for both adherence and non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication in LT patients. This list of factors may help physicians in the treating and recognizing of patients with a potential risk of non-adherence and it could help in the designing of new tools to better understand non-adherence after LT and targeted interventions to promote adherence of LT patients.

Development and Internal Validation of a Questionnaire Assessing Predisposition to Nonadherence to Immunosuppressive Medication in Kidney Pretransplant Patients

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplant, nonadherence to immunosuppressive therapy is the main cause of impaired kidney function and graft loss. The objective of this study was the development and internal validation of a clinical questionnaire for assessing the predisposition to adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in kidney pretransplant patients.

METHODS

Multicenter prospective study conducted in 7 kidney hemodialysis and 6 kidney transplant centers of 3 Brazilian state capitals. Kidney transplant candidate patients of both sexes and >18-y-old were included. Retransplanted patients were excluded. A 72-item pilot version of the questionnaire, created through literature review complemented with a focus group of 8 kidney pretransplant patients, was administered to 541 kidney transplant candidate patients. Factor analysis with varimax rotation was used for questionnaire development. Internal validity evaluation used Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed by differentiation by known groups.

RESULTS

The final questionnaire, named Kidney AlloTransplant Immunosuppressive Therapy Adherence (KATITA) Questionnaire, consisting of 25 items in 3 dimensions, presented good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.81). The 3 dimensions and respective Cronbach's alpha were "Carelessness" (14 items, 0.81), "Skepticism" (6 items, 0.57), and "Concern" (5 items, 0.62). The interdimension correlation matrix showed low correlation coefficients (<0.35). Test-retest reliability, evaluated with 154 patients, showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.62 (moderate agreement). The scale showed construct validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The KATITA-25 questionnaire is the first psychometric instrument for evaluation of predisposition to nonadherence to immunosuppressive medication in candidate patients for kidney transplant in the pretransplant setting.

Analysis of Factors Related to the Success of Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: A 35 Years Experience

BACKGROUND

Despite the significant improvement results over the past 20 years, pediatric kidney transplantation remains a challenge. Chronic rejection, thrombosis, and recurrence of the primary disease are frequent causes of graft loss that have been little studied. Therefore, our objective is to analyze factors related to a better prognosis, which can be used to improve future strategies to allow higher pediatric transplant success rates.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with patients under 15 years old submitted for kidney transplantation at the Hospital das Clínicas da UNICAMP between January 1, 1987, and January 1, 2022. Age, patient weight, time and type of dialysis, use of anticoagulation, complications, ischemia time, and donor weight were analyzed and related to graft loss. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5%.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two medical records were anaThe mean follow-up time was 11 years, and the mean graft duration was ration 8.5 years. The main causes of graft loss were chronic dysfunction, thrombosis, and acute cellular rejection. Thrombosis presented significantly with the donor's body mass index and second transplantation. There was no correlation between the analyzed variables and chronic dysfunction or acute cellular rejection.

DISCUSSION

Thrombosis remains the main cause of early graft loss, followed by acute cellular rejection. Measures such as thrombophilia screening and thromboprophylaxis have been proposed to improve results. However, they are still not standardized.

CONCLUSION

The main causes of graft loss were chronic dysfunction, thrombosis, and acute cellular rejection. Only the thrombosis was related to the donor's body mass index and a second transplantation.

A Descriptive, Correlational Study of Perceptions of Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients and Those Waiting for a Kidney Transplant About Managing Their Medications During a Pandemic

Introduction: Little is known about COVID-19 impact on patient medication management. Research Question: The aim was to describe medication management, healthcare team interactions, and adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in kidney transplant patients and those on the kidney transplant wait list. Design: Using a descriptive, correlational design 340 adults from a midwestern US transplant program were recruited. The Managing Medications in the Midst of a Pandemic Survey measured healthcare team encounters and medication management. The Basel assessment of adherence to medications scale measured medication adherence. Results: The response rate was 35% (119/340). During the pandemic, 88% had practiced/were currently practicing socially distancing, 85% had worn/were currently wearing a face mask in public, 18% had been/were currently diagnosed with COVID-19 and 82% received the vaccine. Medication management: 76% planned and organized their own medications. Healthcare team interactions: 89% met in the office, 20% via phone, 12% telehealth, and 13% delayed seeing a healthcare provider because of COVID-19 concerns. Pharmacy interactions: 11% changed their method of obtaining medications from pharmacy due to social distancing. Medication adherence implementation was problematic with 19% missing a dose; results from the binary logistic regression suggested that those with higher levels of education were more likely to report missing a dose. Conclusions: Patients acted to prevent COVID-19 but some still contracted the virus. The pandemic changed healthcare team medication management interactions. Adherence implementation problems were nearly 20%. Findings are relevant to the transplant healthcare team to understand the impact of a pandemic on patient/team interactions and medication adherence.

Measurement of the Immunosuppressant Possession Ratio by Transplant Clinical Pharmacists Captures a Non-Adherence Associated With Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Our objective was to calculate an immunosuppressant possession ratio (IPR) to diagnose non-adherence at the time of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). IPR was defined as the ratio of number of pills collected at the pharmacy to the number of pills prescribed over a defined period. In a first cohort of 91 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), those with an IPR < 90% had more frequently a tacrolimus through level coefficient of variation >30% than patients with an IPR = 100% (66.7% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.05). In a case-control study, 26 KTRs with ABMR had lower 6 months IPRs than 26 controls (76% vs. 99%, p < 0.001). In KTRs with ABMR, non-adherence was more often diagnosed by a 6 months IPR < 90% than by clinical suspicion (73.1% vs 30.8%, p = 0.02). In the multivariable analysis, only de novo DSA and 6 months IPR < 90% were independently associated with ABMR, whereas clinical suspicion was not (odds ratio, 4.73; 95% CI, 1.17-21.88; p = 0.03; and odds ratio, 6.34; 95% CI, 1.73-25.59; p = 0.007, respectively). In summary, IPR < 90% is a quantifiable tool to measure immunosuppressant non-adherence. It is better associated with ABMR than clinical suspicion of non-adherence.

Is Non-Adherence Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients? The Role of Non-Adherence as a Risk and Predictor Factor for Graft Loss and Death

Introduction

 Non-adherence in kidney transplants is diversely defined. Immunosuppression non-adherence (INA) is the most used definition and has been associated with graft loss and acute rejection. But INA assesses only one fraction of adherence. Therefore, we analyzed the association of a holistic non-adherence definition with transplant outcomes and compared its prediction performance with other definitions.

Methods

 We retrospectively included 739 kidney recipients between 2019 and 2021. We evaluated holistic non-adherence (HNA), suboptimal-immunosuppressor levels (SIL), appointment non-adherence (ANA), procedure non-adherence (PNA) and INA. The main outcomes were graft loss, graft rejection, and mortality. A backward logistic regression was performed estimating adjusted and un-adjusted odds ratio (OR) for each outcome. Finally, we compared the non-adherence definitions' prediction for the main outcomes using the area under the curve.

Results

HNA was present in 28.7% of patients. Non-adherent patients had an adjusted OR of 2.66 (1.37-5.15) for mortality, 6.44 for graft loss (2.71-16.6), and 2.28 (1.15-4.47) for graft rejection. INA and PNA presented a moderate discrimination for graft loss and HNA and ANA mild-to-moderate discrimination for graft loss and death.

Conclusion

Holistic non-adherence was associated with worst outcomes in kidney recipients and had a significant prediction performance for graft loss and mortality.

COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Operative Outcomes after Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation remains the best available treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, promoting graft longevity and preventing allosensitization requires strict adherence with a stringent immunosuppression regimen. The COVID-19 pandemic has offered new challenges for kidney transplant patients and many transplant centers are denying transplantation to unvaccinated patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether unvaccinated patients had inferior adherence after kidney transplantation along with a reduction in graft survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing a deceased donor kidney transplantation at a single academic medical center from February 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. February 2021 was chosen as the start date for record review because it was 3 months after the first COVID-19 vaccination was authorized for emergency use. Patients were considered to be vaccinated if they received at least 1 dose of any mRNA vaccine by their transplantation date.

RESULTS

Of the 301 patients who met study criteria, 234 were vaccinated and 67 were unvaccinated. Cohorts stratified by vaccination status were well matched. Younger age was an independent risk factor for nonvaccination. Interestingly, unvaccinated patients had worse postoperative adherence with a greater average number of missed postoperative clinic visits (p = 0.03) and a strong trend toward missing 3 or more postoperative clinic visits (p = 0.07). Finally, unvaccinated patients had statistically more subtherapeutic tacrolimus troughs (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients not vaccinated against COVID-19 had higher rate of postoperative nonadherence in key areas of immunosuppression monitoring and clinic visit attendance. Providers should be cognizant that an unvaccinated status may be a harbinger for poor adherence; therefore, stricter strategies for patient outreach are critical to ensure graft success in this vulnerable patient population.

Immunosuppressant Adherence Factors Differentiating Compliant and Non-Compliant Kidney Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study is to find out the psychological factor characteristic of non-adherence patients. The study population comprised kidney transplant recipients aged between 18 and 82 years at least 3 months post-transplant who voluntarily agreed to answer a couple of fully anonymous questionnaires that questions pertaining to basic data, type of immunosuppressive drugs taken, and standardized questionnaires. Participants were recruited using direct routine, free-of-charge visits to specialist doctors in transplant clinics. There was no significant difference in the percentage of men and women in both adherence and non-adherence groups. Non-adherence patients were significantly younger compared to adherence patients. There was also a significant difference in the patient's level of education. Adherence patients were better educated. No significant differences in criteria such as place of residence, having children or a partner, or way of living were observed. However, the emotion scale correlated negatively with the level of life orientation in both groups, but the level of the emotions scale and distractions subscale was negatively correlated with the level of self-esteem only for the adherence group. In future research, it would be worthwhile to focus on lifestyle and health-promoting behaviors in juxtaposition with the propensity for adherence.

Psychosocial determinants of healthcare use costs in kidney transplant recipients

Introduction

Psychosocial factors frequently occur in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), leading to behavioral alterations and reduced therapeutic adherence. However, the burden of psychosocial disorders on costs for KTRs is unknown. The aim of the study is to identify predictors of healthcare costs due to hospital admissions and emergency department access in KTRs.

Methods

This is a longitudinal observational study conducted on KTRs aged >18 years, excluding patients with an insufficient level of autonomy and cognitive disorder. KTRs underwent psychosocial assessment via two interviews, namely the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview 6.0 (MINI 6.0) and the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research Interview (DCPR) and via the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-R) scale, a self-administrated questionnaire. Sociodemographic data and healthcare costs for hospital admissions and emergency department access were collected in the 2016-2021 period. Psychosocial determinants were as follows: (1) ESAS-R psychological and physical score; (2) symptomatic clusters determined by DCPR (illness behavior cluster, somatization cluster, and personological cluster); and (3) ICD diagnosis of adjustment disorder, anxiety disorder, and mood disorder. A multivariate regression model was used to test the association between psychosocial determinants and total healthcare costs.

Results

A total of 134 KTRs were enrolled, of whom 90 (67%) were men with a mean age of 56 years. A preliminary analysis of healthcare costs highlighted that higher healthcare costs are correlated with worse outcomes and death (p < 0.001). Somatization clusters (p = 0.020) and mood disorder (p < 0.001) were positively associated with costs due to total healthcare costs.

Conclusions

This study showed somatization and mood disorders could predict costs for hospital admissions and emergency department access and be possible risk factors for poor outcomes, including death, in KTRs.

Sickness Symptoms in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review

Sickness symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety, and fatigue) are common among people with chronic illness, often presenting as a symptom cluster. Sickness symptoms persist in many patients with chronic kidney disease, even after kidney transplantation (KT); however, little is known about sickness symptom-induced burden in KT recipients. This scoping review synthesizes available evidence for sickness symptoms in KT recipients, including findings on symptom prevalence, predictors, outcomes, interrelationships, and clustering. Among 38 reviewed studies, none identified sickness symptoms as a cluster, but we observed interrelationships among the symptoms examined. Fatigue was the most prevalent sickness symptom, followed by anxiety and depressive symptoms. Predictors of these symptoms included demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, and health-related quality of life was the most researched outcome. Future research should use common data elements to phenotype sickness symptoms, include biological markers, and employ sophisticated statistical methods to identify potential clustering of sickness symptoms in KT recipients.

Improving adherence to immunosuppression after liver or kidney transplantation in individuals with impairments in personality functioning – A randomized controlled single center feasibility study

Introduction

Although adherence to immunosuppressive medication is the key factor for long-term graft survival today, 20–70% of transplant recipients are non-adherent to their immunosuppressive medication.

Objective

A prospective, randomized, controlled single-center feasibility study was designed to evaluate the impact of a step guided multicomponent interprofessional intervention program for patients after kidney or liver transplantation on adherence to their immunosuppressive medication in daily clinical practice.

Materials and methods

The intervention consisted of group therapy and daily training as well as individual sessions in a step guided approach. The primary endpoint of the study was adherence to immunosuppression as assessed with the “Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale” (BAASIS). The coefficient of variation (CV%) of Tacrolimus (TAC) through levels and the level of personality functioning was a secondary endpoint. We conducted six monthly follow-up visits.

Results

Forty-one age- and sex-matched patients [19 females, 58.5 (SD = 10.56) years old, 22 kidney- and 19 liver transplantation] were randomized to the intervention- (N = 21) or control-group (N = 20). No differences between intervention- and control groups were found in the primary endpoint adherence and CV% of TAC. However, in further exploratory analyses, we observed that individuals with higher impairments in personality functioning showed higher CV% of TAC in the controls. The intervention might compensate personality-related susceptibility to poor adherence as evident in CV% of TAC.

Discussion

The results of the feasibility study showed that this intervention program was highly accepted in the clinical setting. The Intervention group could compensate higher CV% of TAC after liver or kidney transplantation in individuals with lower levels of personality functioning and non-adherence.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04207125.

Does an eHealth Intervention Reduce Complications and Healthcare Resources? A mHeart Single-Center Randomized-Controlled Trial

(1) Background: In the mHeart trial, we showed that an eHealth intervention, mHeart, improved heart transplant (HTx) recipients' adherence to immunosuppressive therapy compared with the standard of care. Herein, we present the analysis assessing whether mHeart reduces complication frequency and healthcare resource use, and whether this reduction depends on patients' adherence. (2) Methods: The mHeart was a single-center randomized-controlled trial (IIBSP-MHE-2014-55) in 134 adult HTx recipients (n = 71 intervention; n = 63 controls). The endpoints were mortality, complications, and resource use during follow-up (mean 1.6 ± 0.6 years). (3) Results: A significantly lower proportion of HTx recipients in mHeart had echocardiographic alteration (2.8% vs. 13.8%; p = 0.02), cardiovascular events (0.35% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.006), infections (17.2% vs. 56%; p = 0.03), and uncontrolled Hba1c (40.8% vs. 59.6%; p = 0.03) than controls. In addition, a significantly lower proportion of patients in the intervention needed hospital (32.4% vs. 56.9%; p = 0.004) or urgent admissions (16.9% vs. 41.4%; p = 0.002) and emergency room visits (50.7% vs. 69.0%; p = 0.03). Adherence status (measured by the self-reported SMAQ) influenced only controls regarding hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Differences were not significant on deaths (intervention 4.2% vs. control 9.5%; p = 0.4) (4) Conclusions: the mHeart strategy significantly reduced the occurrence of the studied post-transplant complications and the need for medical attention in HTx recipients. Adherence status influenced controls in their need for medical care.

My Kidney Identity: Contextualizing pediatric patients and their families kidney transplant journeys

BACKGROUND

Even though having a kidney transplant is the treatment of choice for children with kidney failure, it can cause anxiety for patients and their families resulting in decreased psychosocial functioning, adherence, and self-management. We set out to identify the information needs required to help pediatric patients and their families contextualize their posttransplant experiences as they recalibrate their understanding of normalcy throughout their transplant journey.

METHODS

Participants submitted photographs related to feeling: (1) worried, (2) confident, (3) similar to peers without kidney disease, and (4) different from these peers. The photographs served as a foundation for an in-depth interview.

RESULTS

Nineteen individuals (10 pediatric transplant recipients and 9 caregivers) were interviewed at a mean of 8 years posttransplant. We identified five specific themes and tensions our participants associated with recalibrating their version of "normal" throughout the transplant journey: (1) exchanging information (information consumers vs. information contributors, (2) transitional management (family management vs. self-management), (3) building confidence (worry vs. confidence), (4) telling one's story (hiding vs. self-expression), and (5) normalizing kidney transplantation (feeling different vs. feeling similar). These five themes/tensions form one's Kidney Identity, shift from negative to positive throughout the transplant journey, illustrating a more abstract and complex account of kidney transplantation over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Having a patient view their Kidney Identity over time may support self-reflection of one's progress posttransplant and potentially help clinicians, patients, and their caregivers identify barriers and areas where they may need more support to ensure their successful engagement in their care.

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Adherence Promotion Strategies to Improve Rejection Rates in Adolescent Kidney Transplant Recipients

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Nonadherence to medical regimens increases the risk of graft loss among adolescent and young adult recipients of kidney transplants. Interventions that improve adherence may decrease rejection rates, but their perceived costs are a barrier to clinical implementation. We developed a model to assess the cost-effectiveness of an adherence promotion strategy, the Medication Adherence Promotion System (MAPS).

STUDY DESIGN

Simulation-based. Data sources included published articles indexed in Medline or referenced in bibliographies of relevant English-language articles. Data on costs and outcomes were taken from a single clinical center.

SETTING & POPULATION

US adolescent patients after their first kidney transplant.

INTERVENTION

Usual posttransplant care versus usual care plus MAPS.

OUTCOME

Effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs measured in 2020 US dollars.

MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME

Markov state transition decision model. We used a health care system perspective with a lifelong time horizon.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, MAPS was more effective and less costly than usual care. MAPS cost $9,106 per patient less than usual care and resulted in a gain of 0.32 QALYs. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, MAPS was cost saving 100% of the time. Extending results to a program level with 100 patients, any adherence promotion intervention similar in effectiveness to MAPS would cost less than $50,000/QALY if the start-up costs were <$2.5 million and annual costs <$188,000. Strategies with costs similar to MAPS that reduce the risk of rejection by as little as 3% would also have similar cost-effectiveness.

LIMITATIONS

Estimates of components and costs for MAPS were based on a single center.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence promotion strategies with costs similar to MAPS can be cost-effective as long as they reduce rejection rates by at least 3%. This model can be applied to study the cost-effectiveness of adherence promotion strategies with varying costs and outcomes.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Personal Systems Approach in Improving Medication Adherence in Adult Kidney Transplant Patients

ABSTRACT

Interventions to improve medication nonadherence in transplantation have recently moved from a focus on motivation and intention, to a focus on person-level quality improvement strategies. These strategies link adherence to established daily routines, environmental cues, and supportive people. The objective of this evaluation was to estimate the cost of implementation and the cost-effectiveness of a person-level intervention shown to increase medication adherence. To estimate the intervention costs, a direct measure microcosting approach was used after key informant interviews with project champions and a review of implementation expenditures. Cost-effectiveness was calculated by comparing the incremental implementation costs and healthcare costs associated with nonadherence to the incremental percent adherent, defined as the percent of patients who took greater or equal to 85% of their medication doses, for each pairwise comparison. The intervention was low-resource to implement, costing approximately $520 to implement per patient, and was associated with significant improvements in medication adherence. These implementation costs were more than outweighed by the expected healthcare savings associated with improvements in adherence. This person-level intervention is a low-cost, efficacious intervention associated with significant statistical and clinical improvements in medication adherence in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Health Facts Medication Adherence in Transplantation (H-MAT) Study: A Secondary Analysis of Determinants and Outcomes of Medication Nonadherence in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

Aims

To explore the relationship between determinants and posttransplant medication nonadherence (MNA) in adult kidney transplant recipients, and to examine the relationship between posttransplant MNA and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Using the World Health Organization's model, this retrospective, multicenter, correlational study examined the relationship between determinants, posttransplant MNA, and clinical outcomes in 16,671 adult kidney transplant recipients from the Cerner Health Facts national data warehouse.

Results

With 12% MNA, those who were nonadherent were more likely to have the social/economic factors of being younger, single, Caucasian versus Hispanic race, have the condition-related factor of mental health/substance use disorder, and have the healthcare system-related factor of government/health maintenance organization/managed care insurance (p′s < 0.05). Bivariate correlations indicated both age (OR = 1.006, p=0.01) and mental health or substance use disorder diagnosis (OR = 1.26, p=0.04) were significant predictors of MNA. Patients were 0.6% more likely to be medication adherent for each year they increased in age and 26% more likely to be MNA if they were diagnosed with a mental health/substance use disorder. Nonadherent patients were less likely to be readmitted, but more likely to have complications after transplant and medication side effects (p′s < 0.01).

Conclusions

Using one of the largest samples of adult kidney transplant patients, our findings support the WHO model and move the body of medication adherence intervention research forward by clarifying the importance of focusing interventions not only on the patient but on multilevel determinants. Consistent with previous studies, MNA negatively impacts transplant outcomes.

Adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapies after Kidney Transplantation from a Biopsychosocial Perspective: A Cross-Sectional Study

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best method for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) because of patient survival rates and quality of life (QoL). Nowadays, the main cause of graft loss is antibody-mediated rejection. The treatment of humoral injury is difficult with uncertain results and still not firmly established. Therefore, appropriate adherence is crucial to prolong graft and patient survival. This study aims to evaluate the association of transplant patients’ acceptance of illness, symptoms of anxiety and depression, frailty, and QoL with medication adherence in KT recipients. A total of 210 patients after KT completed the surveys. The instruments were distributed during patients’ admission at the clinic by a qualified nurse, who assisted the patients’ in completing the questionnaires. A cross-sectional study of KT recipients 9.45 ± 7.26 years after KT was performed. Patient adherence with medications was assessed using the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS). Explanatory variables were examined with validated instruments, such as the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL-BREF) questionnaire, The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) scale, respectively. Simple linear and multiple regression analyses demonstrated the positive correlation between acceptance of illness and adherence to immunosuppressive medications in a patient sample of KT recipients. The other important factor facilitating adherence to medications was linked with physical and environmental dimensions. On the other hand, frail kidney transplant patients were more likely to be non-adherent. In conclusion, identifying contributors to better medication adherence in immunosuppressive therapy is crucial in preventing transplant rejection or graft loss. In the kidney transplant population, the acceptance of illness, selected dimensions of QoL, and demographic variables associated with rural living and vocational education favored adherence behaviors.

Depression, Quantified Medication Adherence, and Quality of Life in Renal Transplant Candidates and Recipients

Like patients with many chronic illnesses, ESRD patients experience psychological challenges with greater incidence of depression and reduced quality of life (QoL). A series of 139 transplant candidates' depression and QoL, and a subset of 82 candidates' medication adherence were monitored, revealing heterogenous patterns of depression and adherence and reduced QoL. Twenty-eight patients who received kidney transplants were re-evaluated 6 months post-transplant revealing mixed patterns. Mean depression and quantitated adherence decreased and QoL increased. Some patients improved whereas others declined in depression and adherence. Pre-transplant depression was negatively correlated with post-transplant adherence but positively correlated with post-transplant depression. Nevertheless, the ability to predict individuals' post-transplant adherence and depression, principal objectives of pre-transplant psychological evaluations, is limited. Consequently, it is important to provide periodic screening of ESRD patients for depression and adherence pre- and post-transplant as they reflect changing states, rather than static traits, with variable patterns across patients.

Graft Failure Due to Nonadherence among 150 Prospectively-Followed Kidney Transplant Recipients at 18 Years Post-transplant: Our Results and Review of the Literature

Background: We previously reported that graft failure due to nonadherence (GFNA) was a major cause of graft loss in kidney transplantation. Here, among 150 prospectively-followed kidney transplant recipients at 18 years post-transplant, we provide: updated (longer-term) estimates of cause-specific graft loss probabilities, risk factors for developing GFNA, and detailed characterizations of patients’ overt nonadherent (NA) behavior, including timing, extent, and clinical consequences. Methods: Determination of the patient becoming NA in taking his/her immunosuppressive medications, and the underlying cause of graft loss, were determined prospectively by the attending physicians. For never-functioning-graft, GFNA, GF due to causes other than NA (Other GF), and death with a functioning graft (DWFG), cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the cumulative probabilities of cause-specific graft loss. Cox stepwise regression was used to determine significant multivariable predictors for the hazard rate of developing GFNA. Results: GFNA was a major cause of graft loss (22/150 patients), particularly among African-American and Hispanic recipients <50 years of age-at-transplant (20/56 experienced GFNA), with estimated percentages of such patients ever developing GFNA ranging between 36.9 and 41.5%. These patients were also at a higher risk of developing Other GF. For the remaining patients (2/94 experienced GFNA), estimated percentages of ever-developing GFNA were much lower (range: 0.0−6.7%). The major cause of graft loss among recipients ≥50 years of age was DWFG; GFNA rarely occurred among older recipients. In 21/22 GFNA patients, NA behavior lasted continuously from the time of developing NA until GFNA. In total, 28/150 patients became NA, and 67.9% (19/28) occurred beyond 36 months post-transplant. A total of 25 of 28 NA patients (89.3%) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection and/or chronic rejection that was directly attributed to the NA behavior. Lastly, 25/28 admitted to NA behavior, with financial and psychological components documented in 71.4% (20/28) and 96.4% (27/28) of NA cases, respectively. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of performing serial monitoring of patients for overt NA behavior throughout their post-transplant follow-up. Financial and psychological components to NA behavior need to be simultaneously addressed with the goal of achieving complete avoidance/elimination of NA behavior among higher risk patients.

Prevalence of Mental Disorders in a German Kidney Transplant Population: Results of a KTx360°-Substudy

In patients after kidney transplantation (KTx) an increased rate of affective and anxiety disorders has been observed. Repeatedly, a relationship between mental health issues and increased morbidity and mortality in KTx recipients has been reported. However, information on the prevalence of mental disorders in KTx patients is scarce. As part of the structured multimodal follow-up program (KTx360°), mental disorders were examined in 726 patients after KTx through structured diagnostic interviews using the Mini-DIPS Open Access. Overall, 27.5% had a current and 49.2% a lifetime mental disorder. Only 14.5% with a current mental disorder reported to be in treatment. Affected patients were younger, more often female, reported more symptoms of anxiety and depression and less perceived social support. While comparable to the rate in general population samples, the prevalence of mental disorders should attract attention. The low treatment rate requires an improved identification of afflicted patients and provision of specialist treatment.ISRCTN registry, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN29416382 , date of registry: 03.05.2017.

Illness Perceptions and Medication Nonadherence to Immunosuppressants After Successful Kidney Transplantation: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Medication nonadherence to immunosuppressants is a well-known risk factor for suboptimal health outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This study examined the relationship between illness perceptions and medication nonadherence in prevalent Dutch KTRs and whether this relationship depended on post-transplant time.

Methods: Eligible KTRs transplanted in Leiden University Medical Center were invited for this cross-sectional study. The illness perceptions and medication nonadherence were measured via validated questionnaires. Associations between illness perceptions and medication nonadherence were investigated using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: For the study, 627 participating KTRs were analyzed. 203 (32.4%) KTRs were considered nonadherent to their immunosuppressants with “taking medication more than 2 h from the prescribed dosing time” as the most prevalent nonadherent behaviour (n = 171; 27.3%). Three illness perceptions were significantly associated with medication nonadherence: illness identity (adjusted odds ratio [OR_adj] = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.14), concern (OR_adj = 1.07; 95%CI,1.00–1.14), and illness coherence (OR_adj = 1.11; 95%CI,1.01–1.22). The relationships between illness perceptions and medication nonadherence did not differ depending on post-transplant time (p-values ranged from 0.48 to 0.96).

Conclusion: Stronger negative illness perceptions are associated with medication nonadherence to immunosuppressants. Targeting negative illness perceptions by means of psychoeducational interventions could optimize medication adherence and consequently improve health outcomes in KTRs.

Designing an App for Immunosuppression Adherence and Communication: A Qualitative Approach

Background:

Immunosuppression nonadherence may be the most important factor limiting long-term allograft survival.

Objective:

Following user-centered design, we explored the essential priorities and preferences of kidney transplant recipients and healthcare providers (HCP) to inform development of a smartphone app to improve immunosuppression adherence and communication.

Design:

A qualitative descriptive research design was used.

Setting:

The University of Alberta Hospital adult kidney transplant program in Edmonton, Canada.

Participants:

Participants were recruited by convenience sampling and included 32 kidney transplant recipients and 11 HCPs.

Methods:

Seven focus groups (5 with recipients and 2 with HCPs) were conducted to inform app development. Sessions were recorded, and transcripts were coded to elucidate themes.

Results:

App development to improve adherence was not a priority for HCP. Recipients prioritized choice: that all features be optional. Recipients preferred support while traveling; access to laboratory results; and use by younger or newly transplanted recipients. Both recipients and HCP preferred linkage to pharmacy; and self-management and accountability. For the app to improve communication, HCPs believed the priorities to be addressed included: clarity on scope of app; legal, ethical, and professional obligations; and charting. Both recipients and HCP prioritized HCP workload, and broader medication and health concerns. Healthcare providers preferred tech support; both recipients and HCPs preferred app access for nontransplant HCP.

Limitations:

Limitations include underrepresentation of physicians, recipients with racial/ethnic diversity, and potential selection bias of transplant recipients who perceived themselves to be adhering to immunosuppression medications.

Conclusion:

Future research is needed for the app to become a comprehensive, secure platform for broader communication between recipients and HCP, pharmacies, and nontransplant clinicians while streamlining HCP workload.

Age at Time of Kidney Transplantation as a Predictor for Mortality, Graft Loss and Self-Rated Health Status: Results From the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

Introduction: The effect of age on health outcomes in kidney transplantation remains inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between age at time of kidney transplantation with mortality, graft loss and self-rated health status in adult kidney transplant recipients.

Methods: This study used data from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study and included prospective data of kidney transplant recipients between 2008 and 2017. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Cox’ regression analysis, and -in the case of graft loss- competing risk analysis. A random-intercept regression model was applied to analyse self-rated health status.

Results: We included 2,366 kidney transplant recipients. Age at transplantation linearly predicted mortality. It was also predictive for graft loss, though nonlinearly, showing that recipients aged between 35 and 55 years presented with the lowest risk of experiencing graft loss. No relationship of age with self-rated health status was detected.

Conclusion: Higher mortality in older recipients complies with data from the general population. The non-linear relationship between age and graft loss and the higher scored self-rated health status at all follow-up time-points compared to the pre-transplant status -regardless of age- highlight that age alone might not be an accurate measure for risk prediction and clinical decision making in kidney transplantation.

Detecting, preventing, and treating non-adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation

Medication non-adherence (MNA) is a major issue in kidney transplantation and it is associated with increased risk of rejection, allograft loss, patients’ death and higher healthcare costs. Despite its crucial importance, it is still unclear what are the best strategies to diagnose, prevent and treat MNA. MNA can be intentional (deliberate refusal to take the medication as prescribed) or unintentional (non-deliberate missing the prescribed medication). Its diagnosis may rely on direct methods, aiming at measuring drug ingestions, or indirect methods that analyse the habits of patients to adhere to correct drug dose (taking adherence) and interval (time adherence). Identifying individual risk factors for MNA may provide the basis for a personalized approach to the treatment of MNA. Randomized control trials performed so far have tested a combination of strategies, such as enhancing medication adherence through the commitment of healthcare personnel involved in drug distribution, the use of electronic reminders, therapy simplification or various multidisciplinary approaches to maximize the correction of individual risk factors. Although most of these approaches reduced MNA in the short-term, the long-term effects on MNA and, more importantly, on clinical outcomes remain unclear. In this review, we provide a critical appraisal of traditional and newer methods for detecting, preventing and treating non-adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation from the perspective of the practising physician.

Nurse-led self-management support after organ transplantation-protocol of a multicentre, stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Recipients of an organ transplantation face a number of challenges and often need to change their health behaviour. Good self-management skills are essential for optimal clinical outcomes. However, few interventions are available to support post-transplant self-management. To fill this gap, we developed a self-management support intervention offered by nurse practitioners. The primary aim of the study is to implement and test the effectiveness of the ZENN intervention in promoting self-management skills among heart, kidney liver and lung transplant recipients in comparison to standard care. The secondary aim is to assess the self-management support skills of nurse practitioners who will deliver the intervention.

METHODS

This multi-centre stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial will take place from September 2020 until May 2023. All departments will commence with inclusion of patients in the control period. Each department will be randomly assigned to a start date (step in the wedge) to commence the experimental period. Patients in the control period will receive standard care and will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline (T0), 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2), to assess self-management, self-regulation, quality of life and adherence. During the experimental period, patients will receive standard care plus the ZENN intervention and receive the same set of questionnaires as participants in the control period. Nurse practitioners will complete a baseline and follow-up questionnaire to assess differences in self-management support skills. Video recordings of outpatient clinic consultations during the control and experimental periods will determine the differences in nurses' needs-thwarting and needs-supporting skills between the control and experimental period.

DISCUSSION

The ZENN intervention could be a useful approach to support patients' self-management skills after organ transplantation and thus promote clinical outcomes as well as avoid adverse events.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register NL8469 . Registered on March 19, 2020.

A Novel Digital Pill System for Medication Adherence Measurement and Reporting: Usability Validation Study

Background

Medication nonadherence is a costly problem that is common in clinical use and clinical trials alike, with significant adverse consequences. Digital pill systems have proved to be effective and safe solutions to the challenges of nonadherence, with documented success in improving adherence and health outcomes.

Objective

The aim of this human factors validation study is to evaluate a novel digital pill system, the ID-Cap System from etectRx, for usability among patient users in a simulated real-world use environment.

Methods

A total of 17 patients with diverse backgrounds who regularly take oral prescription medications were recruited. After training and a period of training decay, the participants were asked to complete 12 patient-use scenarios during which errors or difficulties were logged. The participants were also interviewed about their experiences with the ID-Cap System.

Results

The participants ranged in age from 27 to 74 years (mean 51 years, SD 13.8 years), and they were heterogeneous in other demographic factors as well, such as education level, handedness, and sex. In this human factors validation study, the patient users completed 97.5% (196/201) of the total use scenarios successfully; 75.1% (151/201) were completed without any failures or errors. The participants found the ID-Cap System easy to use, and they were able to accurately and proficiently record ingestion events using the device.

Conclusions

The participants demonstrated the ability to safely and effectively use the ID-Cap System for its intended use. The ID-Cap System has great potential as a useful tool for encouraging medication adherence and can be easily implemented by patient users.

Medication adherence interventions in transplantation lack information on how to implement findings from randomized controlled trials in real-world settings: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Growing numbers of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are showing the effectiveness of interventions to improve medication adherence in transplantation recipients. However, real-world implementation is still a major challenge. This systematic review assesses the range of information available in RCTs supporting these interventions' clinical adoption in adult transplant populations.

METHODS

We included RCTs of interventions that a) targeted any phase of medication adherence in solid organ or allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients and b) were published between January 2015 and November 2020. We excluded study protocols, conference abstracts and studies focusing only on pediatric populations. We identified relevant database and trial registries as well as traced references backward and citations forward. Implementation-relevant information was evaluated using adapted versions of Peters' ten criteria: 1. healthcare/organizational context; 2. social/economic/policy context; 3. patient involvement; 4. other stakeholder involvement; 5. sample representativeness; 6. trial conducted in a real-world-setting; 7. presence of feasibility study; 8. implementation strategy; 9. process evaluation; 10. implementation outcomes, using a stoplight color-rating system.

RESULTS

Screening 17'004 titles/abstracts resulted in 23 eligible RCTs, including 2'339 patients (n = 19-209/study). All included studies focused on the implementation phase of medication adherence. The best-reported criteria were feasibility study (43%), representative sample (17%) and conducted in a real-world-setting (17%). Least reported were context (9%), implementation strategies (4%), process evaluation (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs testing medication adherence interventions tend to report limited implementation-relevant information. This hinders their translation to real-world transplant settings. Integrating implementation science principles early in the conceptualization of RCTs would fuel real-world-translation, reducing research waste.

Prevalence and Correlates of Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence to Immunosuppressive Drugs After Heart Transplantation: The International Multicenter Cross-sectional Bright Study

BACKGROUND

Cost-related medication nonadherence (CRMNA) refers to not taking medications as prescribed because of difficulties paying for them.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were (1) to assess the prevalence of CRMNA to immunosuppressants in heart transplant recipients internationally and (2) to determine multilevel correlates (patient, center, and healthcare system levels) of CRMNA.

METHODS

Using data from the cross-sectional international BRIGHT study, applying multistaged sampling, CRMNA was assessed via 3 self-report items in 1365 patients from 36 heart transplant centers in 11 countries. Cost-related medication nonadherence was defined as any positive answer on any of the 3 items. Healthcare system-level (ie, insurance coverage, out-of-pocket expenditures) and patient-level (ie, intention, perceived financial burden, cost as a barrier, a health belief regarding medication benefits, cost-related self-efficacy, and demographic factors) CRMNA correlates were assessed. Correlates were examined using mixed logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Across all study countries, CRMNA had an average prevalence of 2.6% (range, 0% [Switzerland/Brazil] to 9.8% [Australia]) and was positively related to being single (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-4.47), perceived financial burden (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.99), and cost as a barrier (odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-4.07). Four protective factors were identified: white ethnicity (odds ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.74), intention to adhere (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.63), self-efficacy (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.67), and belief about medication benefit (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.87). Regarding variability, 81.3% was explained at the patient level; 13.8%, at the center level; and 4.8%, at the country level.

CONCLUSION

In heart transplant recipients, the CRMNA prevalence varies across countries but is lower than in other chronically ill populations. Identified patient-level correlates are novel (ie, intention to adhere, cost-related barriers, and cost-related self-efficacy) and indicate patient-perceived medication cost burden.

Perspectives of solid organ transplant recipients on medicine-taking: Systematic review of qualitative studies

Medicine-taking among transplant recipients is a complex and ubiquitous task with significant impacts on outcomes. This study aimed to describe the perspectives and experiences of medicine-taking in adult solid organ transplant recipients. Electronic databases were searched to July 2020, and thematic synthesis was used to analyze the data. From 119 studies (n = 2901), we identified six themes: threats to identity and ambitions (impaired self-image, restricting goals and roles, loss of financial independence); navigating through uncertainty and distrust (lacking tangible/perceptible benefits, unprepared for side effects, isolation in decision-making); alleviating treatment burdens (establishing and mastering routines, counteracting side effects, preparing for the unexpected); gaining and seeking confidence (clarity with knowledge, reassurance through collective experiences, focusing on the future outlook); recalibrating to a new normal posttransplant (adjusting to ongoing dependence on medications, in both states of illness and health, unfulfilled expectations); and preserving graft survival (maintaining the ability to participate in life, avoiding rejection, enacting a social responsibility of giving back). Transplant recipients take medications to preserve graft function, but dependence on medications jeopardizes their sense of normality. Interventions supporting the adaptation to medicine-taking and addressing treatment burdens may improve patient satisfaction and capacities to take medications for improved outcomes.

Designing biomaterials for the modulation of allogeneic and autoimmune responses to cellular implants in Type 1 Diabetes

The effective suppression of adaptive immune responses is essential for the success of allogeneic cell therapies. In islet transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes, pre-existing autoimmunity provides an additional hurdle, as memory autoimmune T cells mediate both an autoantigen-specific attack on the donor beta cells and an alloantigen-specific attack on the donor graft cells. Immunosuppressive agents used for islet transplantation are generally successful in suppressing alloimmune responses, but dramatically hinder the widespread adoption of this therapeutic approach and fail to control memory T cell populations, which leaves the graft vulnerable to destruction. In this review, we highlight the capacity of biomaterials to provide local and nuanced instruction to suppress or alter immune pathways activated in response to an allogeneic islet transplant. Biomaterial immunoisolation is a common approach employed to block direct antigen recognition and downstream cell-mediated graft destruction; however, immunoisolation alone still permits shed donor antigens to escape into the host environment, resulting in indirect antigen recognition, immune cell activation, and the creation of a toxic graft site. Designing materials to decrease antigen escape, improve cell viability, and increase material compatibility are all approaches that can decrease the local release of antigen and danger signals into the implant microenvironment. Implant materials can be further enhanced through the local delivery of anti-inflammatory, suppressive, chemotactic, and/or tolerogenic agents, which serve to control both the innate and adaptive immune responses to the implant with a benefit of reduced systemic effects. Lessons learned from understanding how to manipulate allogeneic and autogenic immune responses to pancreatic islets can also be applied to other cell therapies to improve their efficacy and duration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review explores key immunologic concepts and critical pathways mediating graft rejection in Type 1 Diabetes, which can instruct the future purposeful design of immunomodulatory biomaterials for cell therapy. A summary of immunological pathways initiated following cellular implantation, as well as current systemic immunomodulatory agents used, is provided. We then outline the potential of biomaterials to modulate these responses. The capacity of polymeric encapsulation to block some powerful rejection pathways is covered. We also highlight the role of cellular health and biocompatibility in mitigating immune responses. Finally, we review the use of bioactive materials to proactively modulate local immune responses, focusing on key concepts of anti-inflammatory, suppressive, and tolerogenic agents.

Impact of once-daily ER-Tac on trough concentration variability in a stable AYA renal transplant recipient cohort

BACKGROUND

Successful renal transplantation requires complex medication regimens that rely on strict adherence to be effective. Variability in immunosuppression exposure, specifically tacrolimus, is associated with poor allograft outcomes. Wide intra-patient variability of tacrolimus trough concentrations (Vtac) is likely, in part, attributable to regimen complexity and poor medication adherence. Once-daily tacrolimus formulations create opportunity to simplify therapeutic regimens, and this study aims to evaluate their impact on Vtac and ultimately transplant outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated stable (AYA) renal transplant recipients converted from (IR-Tac) to (ER-Tac). Subjects served as their own controls. Vtac was assessed by measuring the (SD) of serial tacrolimus trough concentrations prior to and at four time points post-conversion to ER-Tac over 24-month follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included graft function, infection rates, and effect on modifiable treatment-related factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight AYA subjects were converted from IR-Tac to ER-Tac. Vtac significantly improved following conversion and was sustained for 24 months (Vtac₀ 2.32 vs. Vtac₂₄ 1.11, p .017). Renal function remained stable, and (BPAR) rates were modest (14%). Mean pill burden was reduced by 15%, and 42.9% of subjects achieved a once-daily medication regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from IR-Tac to ER-Tac in this AYA population significantly improved Vtac with sustained effect over 2 years. This effect is likely attributable in part to simplification of the medication regimen and presumably improved medication adherence. Such conversion does not appear to compromise graft function for at least 2 years post-conversion.

Use of an electronic medication monitoring device to estimate medication adherence in kidney transplant patients

Electronic medication monitoring devices (EMD) have been used as a gold standard for assessing medication adherence. We used a wireless EMD (SimpleMed+), assessed its usability in patients after kidney transplantation (KTx), evaluated adherence, and analyzed concordance with other adherence measures. Fifty-five patients (53% female, mean age 46 years) at least 6 months after KTx agreed to use the EMD over a period of 8 weeks. Self-reported adherence was measured with the BAASIS, and immunosuppressant trough level variability was assessed prior to and again during the study period. Fourteen patients stopped using the EMD or were low users (<70%). These non-completers reported that using the EMD would interfere with their daily activities. Taking-adherence of the completers was high with 98.3% (±1.9) over the entire study period. Timing-adherence was somewhat lower (94.6% ± 7.9) and decreased during the second half of the study. We found statistically significant correlations between EMD results and self-reported adherence with moderate effect sizes, but no significant association with trough level variability. The low usage of the EMD supports the need to assess the practicability of an EMD before applying it in research and clinical routine. Taking- and timing-adherence of KTx patients using the EMD was satisfactory. Self-reported adherence might be a good enough estimate of medication adherence.

Loss to Follow-up in Adolescent and Young Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Patients' loss to follow-up (LFU) has significant impacts on outcomes and is a barrier to improving care, especially in adolescent and young adult (AYA) renal transplant recipients. There is limited information regarding the relationship between transfer of care from pediatric to adult transplant centers, age, and LFU among AYA renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

We studied 16 386 individuals aged 10-29 years who received kidney transplants between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. The primary outcome was LFU, which was defined as >1 year without follow-up in a transplant clinic/program. Death or graft failure within a year of the last follow-up was not classified as LFU. We performed a retrospective cohort study describing LFU using Pearson's chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the change in likelihood of LFU associated with recipient characteristics and institution transfer.

RESULTS

In total, 22.26% (n = 3647) of our study population met criteria for LFU. About 11.17% (n = 1830) transferred institutions during the study period. LFU occurred in 50.18% of recipients who transferred institutions. LFU peaked at the age of 20 years, with 7.4% of 20-year-olds having LFU. The odds of LFU among renal transplant recipients who transferred institutions were 3.36 times greater (95% confidence interval, 3.1-3.6) than the odds of LFU among those who did not transfer institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

LFU is a critical problem faced by AYA renal transplant recipients, and institution transfer is a significant risk factor for LFU. Additional studies investigating the interplay between age, institution transfer, and LFU in the AYA population are still needed.

Non-Adherence to Appointments is a Strong Predictor of Medication Non-Adherence and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence is an important aspect of transplantation that affect outcomes. This study aims to investigate the impact of non-adherence to laboratory and clinic appointments on medication non-adherence and outcomes in kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed KT recipients between 2005-14 with a detailed review of the medical records for non-adherence to laboratory and clinic appointments, as well as medication regimens. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between adherent and non-adherent groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1413 KT recipients were included: 754 who were adherent and 659 who were non-adherent. Non-adherent recipients tend to be younger, African American, and have private insurance. Adherent patients tend to have a history of DM, heart disease, and receive an ECD kidney. Non-adherence to appointments was a strong predictor of medication non-adherence (OR 3.1), acute rejection (OR 1.4), and subsequent rejection episodes (OR 3.3 and 8.1 respectively for ≥ 1 and ≥ 2 rejection episodes). Subset analysis of patients who had early non-adherence within 1-year post-transplant showed predominance of younger, African American patients. The same patients had higher prevalence of medication non-compliance, overall and ≥ 1-year post-transplant, and mean number of readmissions. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a trend towards lower graft survival in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early non-adherence to laboratory and clinic appointments is a strong predictor of late medication non-adherence, acute rejection, and graft loss. Targeting patients that demonstrate early non-adherence to appointments with focused interventions may help improve kidney transplant outcomes in this high risk group.

Prospective Measures of Adherence by Questionnaire, Low Immunosuppression and Graft Outcome in Kidney Transplantation

Background: Non-adherence with immunosuppressant medication (MNA) fosters development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA), rejection, and graft failure (GF) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, there is no simple tool to assess MNA, prospectively. The goal was to monitor MNA and analyze its predictive value for dnDSA generation, acute rejection and GF. Methods: We enrolled 301 KTRs in a multicentric French study. MNA was assessed prospectively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (M) post-KT, using the Morisky scale. We investigated the association between MNA and occurrence of dnDSA at year 2 post transplantation, using logistic regression models and the association between MNA and rejection or graft failure, using Cox multivariable models. Results: The initial percentage of MNA patients was 17.7%, increasing to 34.6% at 24 months. Nineteen patients (8.4%) developed dnDSA 2 to 3 years after KT. After adjustment for recipient age, HLA sensitization, HLA mismatches, and maintenance treatment, MNA was associated neither with dnDSA occurrence, nor acute rejection. Only cyclosporine use and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal were strongly associated with dnDSA and rejection. With a median follow-up of 8.9 years, GF occurred in 87 patients (29.0%). After adjustment for recipient and donor age, CNI trough level, dnDSA, and rejection, MNA was not associated with GF. The only parameters associated with GF were dnDSA occurrence, and acute rejection. Conclusions: Prospective serial monitoring of MNA using the Morisky scale does not predict dnDSA occurrence, rejection or GF in KTRs. In contrast, cyclosporine and CNI withdrawal induce dnDSA and rejection, which lead to GF.

Reflecting on patient-generated photographs of the pediatric renal transplant experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Poor self-management contributes to reduced renal allograft survival during adolescence and young adulthood. Providing patients with self-reflection tools to help explore the question "Is my experience normal?" may help mitigate these challenges. We explore Photograph-elicitation, a qualitative method where images are used to prompt individuals to talk about their personal experiences and values, engages pediatric transplant recipients and their families to generate insight into their experiences and the challenges they face after transplant.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS

Pediatric renal transplant recipients and one family member from Seattle Children's Hospital submitted 5 photographs showcasing their transplant story, which were used as prompts during semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-four individuals (13 patients: ages 7-21, and 11 parents) completed the study. Conversations generated by the photographs covered topics in more depth than a routine clinical encounter leading to more opportunities for reflection by patients and their family. The photographs generated conversations on four emergent themes: (a) sensemaking; (b) transitions and agency; (c) social interactions and community engagement; and (d) barriers and obstacles.

CONCLUSIONS

Photograph elicitation generated a rich dataset describing a range of pediatric renal transplant experiences helping physicians gain a rich and nuanced understanding of the daily lives and experiences of their patients outside the clinical setting. Photograph elicitation, as a clinical intervention, may provide new opportunities to address previously unrecognized modifiable risk factors, improving graft survival and health-related quality of life.

Benefit of a pharmacist-led intervention for medication management of renal transplant patients: a controlled before-and-after study

Aims

To assess the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention, using Barrows cards method, during the first year after renal transplantation, on patient knowledge about their treatment, medication adherence and exposure to treatment in a French cohort.

Methods

We conducted a before-and-after comparative study between two groups of patients: those who benefited from a complementary pharmacist-led intervention [intervention group (IG), n = 44] versus those who did not [control group (CG), n = 48]. The pharmacist-led intervention consisted of a behavioral and educational interview at the first visit (visit 1). The intervention was assessed 4 months later at the second visit (visit 2), using the following endpoints: treatment knowledge, medication adherence [proportion of days covered (PDC) by immunosuppressive therapy] and tacrolimus exposure.

Results

At visit 2, IG patients achieved a significantly higher knowledge score than CG patients (83.3% versus 72.2%, p = 0.001). We did not find any differences in treatment exposure or medication adherence; however, the intervention tended to reduce the proportion of non-adherent patients with low knowledge scores. Using the PDC by immunosuppressive therapy, we identified 10 non-adherent patients (10.9%) at visit 1 and six at visit 2.

Conclusions

Our intervention showed a positive effect on patient knowledge about their treatment. However, our results did not show any improvement in overall medication adherence, which was likely to be because of the initially high level of adherence in our study population. Nevertheless, the intervention appears to have improved adherence in non-adherent patients with low knowledge scores.

Prevalence of Non-Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Barriers and Predictors

Background

Non-adherence to immunosuppressant therapy (IST) is a major risk factor for graft rejection. Limited reports are available regarding the prevalence of non-adherence to IST in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) as well as the predictors and barriers of non-adherence.

Material/Methods

The study included ambulatory KTRs, ≥18 years of age, with a functional kidney, from January 2017 to November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of non-adherence, assessed with: 1) A telephone interview to complete the Arabic-translated and validated Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Instrument Scale (ITAS) and 2) IST serum blood levels within therapeutic levels. The secondary outcomes were the barriers to adherence using the validated Immunosuppressant Therapy Barriers of Adherence Scale (ITBS).

Results

We enrolled 102 of 141 patients screened. The mean±SD for age, body mass index, and the baseline of the estimated glomerular filtration rate were 45.5±15.6 years, 29.1±6 kg/m², and 72.7±21.9 ml/min/1.73 m², respectively. The prevalence of non-adherence was 5.9%, 95% CI (2.19–12.36%) and 14.7%, 95% CI (8.47–23.09%) using the ITAS and the average blood serum drug levels, respectively. The concordance of the 2 methods demonstrated an agreement of 81.3%, kappa of 0.01, and 95% CI (−0.16 to 0.18). The median, interquartile range (IQR) for ITBS, and uncontrollable and controllable barriers for adherence were 21, (18–25), 15, (12–18), and 6, (5–8), respectively.

Conclusions

The current study demonstrated a low to moderate prevalence of non-adherence to IST in KTRs. The barriers for adherence with IST necessitate additional targeted interventions to manage and optimize therapeutic and clinical outcomes.

Adoption of a novel smart mobile-health application technology to track chronic immunosuppression adherence in solid organ transplantation: Results of a prospective, observational, multicentre, pilot study

BACKGROUND

Low adherence to chronic immunosuppression is associated with suboptimal transplantation outcomes. Mobile-health technology is a promising tool to monitor medication adherence, but data on patient engagement to these tools are lacking.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, multicenter, 2-phase trial in kidney and liver transplant recipients, investigating the degree of engagement to TrackYourMed^® (TYM), a novel m-Health technology with a QR code-scan app to track immunosuppression adherence and its association with drug monitoring.

RESULTS

Out of 204 consecutive transplant patients, 90 patients were eligible to participate. 61 (68%) used TYM regularly, 21 (23%) never or barely used it, 5 (5.5%) were irregular users, and 3 (3.3%) were lost to follow-up. 6-month total correct intakes (CIN) ranged between 69%-76%, 12%-19% intakes were out-of-time (OUT), and 9%-12% were missed (MIS). Notably, a rate of intakes out of the scheduled time higher than 20% in the 6 days prior to blood immunosuppressant trough levels was associated with a higher intra-patient variability (17 IQR 13-21% vs. 29 IQR 23%-36%, p = .001), and with a higher dose-adjustment (p < .001). At 1 year, 53(59%) patients were still active users of TYM.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing m-Health technologies promoting immunosuppression adherence may be useful for a relevant number of transplant patients and help transplant physicians identifying erratic immunosuppression adherence.

A Large-Scale Bank of Organ Donor Bone Marrow and Matched Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Promoting Immunomodulation and Transplant Tolerance

Induction of immune tolerance for solid organ and vascular composite allografts is the Holy Grail for transplantation medicine. This would obviate the need for life-long immunosuppression which is associated with serious adverse outcomes, such as infections, cancers, and renal failure. Currently the most promising means of tolerance induction is through establishing a mixed chimeric state by transplantation of donor hematopoietic stem cells; however, with the exception of living donor renal transplantation, the mixed chimerism approach has not achieved durable immune tolerance on a large scale in preclinical or clinical trials with other solid organs or vascular composite allotransplants (VCA). Ossium Health has established a bank of cryopreserved bone marrow (BM), termed "hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC), Marrow," recovered from deceased organ donor vertebral bodies. This new source for hematopoietic cell transplant will be a valuable resource for treating hematological malignancies as well as for inducing transplant tolerance. In addition, we have discovered and developed a large source of mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSC) tightly associated with the vertebral body bone fragment byproduct of the HPC, Marrow recovery process. Thus, these vertebral bone adherent MSC (vBA-MSC) are matched to the banked BM obtained from each donor, as opposed to third-party MSC, which enhances safety and potentially efficacy. Isolation and characterization of vBA-MSC from over 30 donors has demonstrated that the cells are no different than traditional BM-MSC; however, their abundance is >1,000-fold higher than obtainable from living donor BM aspirates. Based on our own unpublished data as well as reports published by others, MSC facilitate chimerism, especially at limiting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) numbers and increase safety by controlling and/or preventing graft-vs.-host-disease (GvHD). Thus, vBA-MSC have the potential to facilitate mixed chimerism, promote complementary peripheral immunomodulatory functions and increase safety of BM infusions. Both HPC, Marrow and vBA-MSC have potential use in current VCA and solid organ transplant (SOT) tolerance clinical protocols that are amenable to "delayed tolerance." Current trials with HPC, Marrow are planned with subsequent phases to include vBA-MSC for tolerance of both VCA and SOT.

Survival implications of prescription opioid and benzodiazepine use in lung transplant recipients: Analysis of linked transplant registry and pharmacy fill records

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid and benzodiazepine use have been associated with morbidity and mortality among some groups of solid organ transplant recipients, but implications for outcomes among lung transplant patients are not well described.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked national transplant registry and pharmaceutical records to characterize the associations between benzodiazepine and opioid prescription fills in the years before and after lung transplant (2006-2017), with risk-adjusted posttransplant survival (adjusted hazard ratio, _LCLaHR_UCL).

RESULTS

Among 11,568 recipients, 33.7% filled an opioid prescription, and 25.8% filled a benzodiazepine prescription before transplant. Compared to patients without prescriptions, those who filled both short- and long-acting benzodiazepine prescriptions before transplant had 2-fold higher mortality in the first year posttransplant (aHR, _1.392.12_3.21), after adjustment for baseline factors and opioid fills, while pretransplant opioid fills were not associated with posttransplant mortality after adjustment for benzodiazepine fills. Pretransplant opioid and benzodiazepine use strongly predicted more use after transplant. Fills of both short- and long-acting benzodiazepines in the first year posttransplant were associated with 77% increased mortality >1-to-2 years posttransplant (aHR, _1.061.77_2.96). Compared with no posttransplant opioid fills, there was a dose-dependent association between first-year opioid fills and subsequent adjusted mortality risk (level 2: aHR, _1.171.50_1.92 to level 4: aHR, _1.562.01_2.59). These effects were independent, and interactions were not detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Benzodiazepine prescription fills before and after lung transplant, and opioid fills after transplant, are independently associated with posttransplant mortality. Review of benzodiazepine and opioid use history is relevant to risk-stratifying patients before and after lung transplant.

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation

The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.