Body composition, atherogenic risk factors and apolipoproteins following growth hormone treatment

Role of growth hormone in hepatic and intestinal triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism

BACKGROUND

Elevated plasma concentrations of hepatic- and intestinally-derived triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) are implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Excess of TRL is the driving cause of atherogenic dyslipidemia commonly occurring in insulin-resistant individuals such as patients with obesity, type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Interestingly, growth hormone (GH)-deficient individuals display similar atherogenic dyslipidemia, suggesting an important role of GH and GH deficiency in the regulation of TRL metabolism.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the direct and/or indirect role of GH on TRL metabolism.

METHODS

We investigated the effect on fasting and postprandial hepatic-TRL and intestinal-TRL metabolism of short-term (one month) withdrawal of GH in 10 GH-deficient adults.

RESULTS

After GH withdrawal, we found a reduction in fasting plasma TRL concentration (significant decrease in TRL-TG, TRL-cholesterol, TRL-apoB-100, TRL-apoC-III and TRL-apoC-II) but not in postprandial TRL response. This reduction was due to fewer fasting TRL particles without a change in TG per particle and was not accompanied by a change in postprandial TRL-apoB-48 response. Individual reductions in TRL correlated strongly with increases in insulin sensitivity and decreases in TRL-apoC-III.

CONCLUSION

In this relatively short term 'loss of function' human experimental model, we have shown an unanticipated reduction of hepatic-TRL particles despite increase in total body fat mass and reduction in lean mass. These findings contrast with the atherogenic dyslipidemia previously described in chronic GH deficient states, providing a new perspective for the role of GH in lipoprotein metabolism.

Body fat distribution and circulating adipsin are related to metabolic risks in adult patients with newly diagnosed growth hormone deficiency and improve after treatment

OBJECTIVE

The relationships between body fat distribution, the adipokine adipsin and metabolic risks were assessed in patients with adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) before and after growth hormone (GH) treatment.

METHODS

Sixty newly diagnosed AGHD patients were included in our study, 24 of whom were evaluated after at least one year of GH treatment. Anthropometric parameters, glucolipid metabolism and the adipokine adipsin were measured. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and body composition were evaluated using a dual-energy X-ray-absorptiometry (DXA) scanner.

RESULTS

At baseline, the higher VAT group had worse glucolipid metabolism parameters. Basal GH was negatively associated with VAT (r=-0.277, p = 0.045), while minimal correlations were found with fat mass depots, such as limbs and trunk fat (all p > 0.05). Adipsin was correlated with total body fat (r = 0.543, p < 0.001), VAT (r = 0.563, p < 0.001) and insulin resistance (r = 0.353, p = 0.006). The effect of GH administration on fat distribution was mainly reflected in the reduction in VAT. Partial improvements were found in lipid profiles, including increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and decreases in triglycerides (TGs) and lipoprotein(a), while glucose metabolism showed little change. The adipsin level also decreased significantly. The best predictors of VAT at baseline were trunk fat and IGF-I, and after treatment, VAT was predicted by decreased adipsin and an increase in lean mass.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) VAT is an important metabolic risk factor for AGHD patients. (2) GH treatment decreased body fat predominantly in the visceral and central fat depots. (3) The lipid profiles partially improved after treatment, while glucose metabolism showed little change.

Effect of growth hormone treatment on energy expenditure and its relation to first-year growth response in children

PURPOSE

The effects of growth hormone (GH) treatment on linear growth and body composition have been studied extensively. Little is known about the GH effect on energy expenditure (EE). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of GH treatment on EE in children, and to study whether the changes in EE can predict the height gain after 1 year.

METHODS

Total EE (TEE), basal metabolic rate (BMR), and physical activity level (PAL) measurements before and after 6 weeks of GH treatment were performed in 18 prepubertal children (5 girls, 13 boys) born small for gestational age (n = 14) or with growth hormone deficiency (n = 4) who were eligible for GH treatment. TEE was measured with the doubly labelled water method, BMR was measured with an open-circuit ventilated hood system, PAL was assessed using an accelerometer for movement registration and calculated (PAL = TEE/BMR), activity related EE (AEE) was calculated [AEE = (0.9 × TEE) - BMR]. Height measurements at start and after 1 year of GH treatment were analysed. This is a 1-year longitudinal intervention study, without a control group for comparison.

RESULTS

BMR and TEE increased significantly (resp. 5% and 7%). Physical activity (counts/day), PAL, and AEE did not change. 11 out of 13 patients (85%) with an increased TEE after 6 weeks of GH treatment had a good first-year growth response (∆height SDS > 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

GH treatment showed a positive effect on EE in prepubertal children after 6 weeks. No effect on physical activity was observed. The increase in TEE appeared to be valuable for the prediction of good first-year growth responders to GH treatment.

Metabolic alterations in paediatric GH deficiency

Growth hormone (GH) has a large number of metabolic effects, involving lipid and glucose homoeostasis, lean and fat mass. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) is associated with a metabolic profile similar to the Metabolic Syndrome which is characterized by dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, haemostatic alterations, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation. GH replacement treatment in GHD children improves these cardiovascular risk factors, while cessation of GH is associated with a deterioration of most of these risk factors. However, it is unclear whether the changes of these risk factors are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases especially after discontinuing GH treatment. GH treatment itself can lead to insulin resistance, which probably also influences the cardiovascular health status. Therefore, longitudinal studies with the primary outcome cardiovascular diseases are needed in GHD children. Furthermore, new approaches such as metabolomic studies might be helpful to understand the relationship between GHD, GH treatment, and cardiovascular diseases.

Favorable Impacts of Growth Hormone (GH) Replacement Therapy on Atherogenic Risks in Japanese Children with GH Deficiency

Growth hormone (GH) affects body composition and atherogenic risk factors. Severe hyperlipidemia may develop in GH-deficient adults as a consequence of continuous GH deficiency. We investigated changes in lipid profiles in 158 Japanese children (103 boys and 55 girls) with GH deficiency who had been enrolled in the Pfizer International Growth Database Japan during 3 yr of GH replacement therapy to evaluate whether GH treatment has beneficial effects on atherogenic risk factors. Total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) and atherogenic index were evaluated before treatment and then once a year during treatment. The mean baseline TC was within the normal range in both boys and girls. Seventeen (16.5%) of the 103 boys and 18 (32.7%) of the 55 girls, however, had a TC level over 200 mg/dl before treatment. The mean TC level showed a significant decrease in girls. In a separate analysis, patients of both sexes with a TC level > 200 mg/dl showed significantly decreased TC. LDLC decreased significantly only in girls, while HDLC showed no change in either sex. The atherogenic index decreased significantly in girls. GH replacement therapy in children with GH deficiency had beneficial effects on lipid metabolism and atherogenic risk in both sexes. Early GH treatment would produce lipid metabolism benefits in these patients.

Growth hormone: health considerations beyond height gain

The therapeutic benefit of growth hormone (GH) therapy in improving height in short children is widely recognized; however, GH therapy is associated with other metabolic actions that may be of benefit in these children. Beneficial effects of GH on body composition have been documented in several different patient populations as well as improvements in lipid profile. Marked augmentation of bone mineral density also seems evident in many pediatric populations. Some of these benefits may require continued therapy past the acquisition of adult height. With long-term therapy of any kind, the adverse consequences of treatment should also be considered. Fortunately, long-term GH treatment seems to be safe and well-tolerated. This review describes the long-term metabolic effects of GH treatment in the pediatric population and considers how these may benefit children who are treated with GH.

Metabolic effects of growth hormone (GH) replacement in children and adolescents with severe isolated GH deficiency due to a GHRH receptor mutation

BACKGROUND

The interpretation of the true effect of GH replacement therapy (GHRT) on metabolic status in GH deficiency (GHD) is often complicated by differing aetiologies of GHD and by the presence of additional hormone deficits.

OBJECTIVE

To study the growth and response of the lipid profile and body composition to GHRT in a cohort of children with the same mutation in the GHRH receptor gene. Design Nine GH-deficient subjects (mean age 12.8 years, range 5-17.5 years; three male) in a rural community in Northeast Brazil were treated with GHRT for 2 years and compared with indigenous normal controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and body composition were measured at baseline and after 3, 12 and 24 months of GHRT.

RESULTS

At baseline, the subjects with GHD had an adverse lipid profile, including elevated TC, elevated LDL-C and elevated TG. GHRT normalized TG in 3 months, LDL-C in 12 months and TC in 24 months. At baseline, older pubertal subjects with GHD had adverse body composition, including higher percentage fat mass (%FM), and GHRT induced a reduction in %FM that was maintained after 24 months. By contrast, younger prepubertal subjects did not have an adverse body composition.

CONCLUSIONS

Lipid profile was abnormal at baseline, while abnormal body composition was only seen in older subjects in late puberty, indicating that body composition is less sensitive to the effect of GHD than lipid profile. GHRT improves lipid profile at all ages, while it affects body composition only towards the end of growth, emphasizing its importance in achieving normal somatic development in the transition period.

Changes in adiposity and excess body weight correlate with growth responses but not with decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels during GH treatment in GH-deficient children

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

GH has profound effects on body composition and lipid metabolism in children as well as in adults. The relationship between such metabolic effects and the growth-promoting effects of GH has not been studied thoroughly in children with GH deficiency. This prospective study was designed to determine the relationship between growth and lipid metabolism during long-term GH treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two boys with idiopathic GH deficiency were studied. Height, per cent overweight (%OW), per cent body fat (%BF) and serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were determined every 6 months during 3 years of GH treatment.

RESULTS

After 3 years of GH treatment, the mean height SD score had increased significantly from -2.70 SD to -1.59 SD (P < 0.0001), while the mean %OW and LDL cholesterol level had decreased significantly from 7.0% to 1.3% (P < 0.0001) and from 2.69 mmol/l to 2.04 mmol/l (P < 0.0001), respectively. The mean %BF fell significantly from 15.5% to 11.1% during the first 6 months of GH treatment (P < 0.0001). The 6-month reduction in %BF correlated significantly with the 3-year increase in height SD score (r = -0.58, P = 0.008). The decrease in %OW also correlated negatively with the change in height SD score (r = -0.48, P = 0.03). However, there was no correlation between the changes in LDL cholesterol levels and those in %BF, %OW or height SD score.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the growth-promoting effects of GH correlate significantly with the reductions in %BF and %OW but not with the decrease in LDL cholesterol level in children with GH deficiency. The changes in LDL cholesterol did not correlate with any of the changes in body composition parameters, suggesting that the various actions of GH may have different mechanisms of regulation.

Continuation of growth hormone (GH) therapy in GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood: impact on insulin sensitivity and substrate metabolism

The appropriate management of GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood has not been reported in controlled trials, even though there is evidence to suggest that this phase is associated with specific problems in relation to GH sensitivity. An issue of particular interest is the impact of GH substitution on insulin sensitivity, which normally declines during puberty. We, therefore, evaluated insulin sensitivity (euglycemic glucose clamp) and substrate metabolism in 18 GH-deficient patients (6 females and 12 males; age, 20 +/- 1 yr; body mass index, 25 +/- 1 kg/m2) in a placebo-controlled, parallel study. Measurements were made at baseline, where all patients were on their regular GH replacement, after 12 months of either continued GH (0.018 +/- 0.001 mg/kg day) or placebo, and finally after 12 months of open phase GH therapy (0.016 mg/kg x day). Before study entry GH deficiency was reconfirmed by a stimulation test. During the double-blind phase, insulin sensitivity and fat mass tended to increase in the placebo group [deltaM-value (mg/kg x min), -0.7 +/- 1.1 (GH) vs. 1.3 +/- 0.8 (placebo), P = 0.18; deltaTBF (kg), 0.9 +/- 1.2 (GH) vs. 4.4 +/- 1.6 (placebo), P = 0.1]. Rates of lipid oxidation decreased [delta lipid oxidation (mg/kg x min), 0.02 +/- 0.14 (GH) vs. -0.32 +/- 0.13 (placebo), P < 0.05], whereas glucose oxidation increased in the placebo-treated group (P < 0.05). In the open phase, a decrease in insulin sensitivity was found in the former placebo group, although they lost body fat and increased fat-free mass [M-value (mg/kg x min), 5.1 +/- 0.7 (placebo) vs. 3.4 +/- 1.0 (open), P = 0.09]. In the group randomized to continued GH treatment almost all hormonal and metabolic parameters remained unchanged during the study. In conclusion, 1) discontinuation of GH therapy for 1 yr in adolescent patients induces fat accumulation without compromising insulin sensitivity; and 2) the beneficial effects of continued GH treatment on body composition in terms of decrease in fat mass and increase in fat-free mass does not fully balance the direct insulin antagonistic effects.

Unfavourable impact of growth hormone (GH) discontinuation on body composition and cholesterol profiles after the completion of height growth in GH-deficient young adults

AIM

Growth hormone (GH) plays an important role in the regulation of body composition and metabolism. GH deficiency is associated with obesity and hypercholesterolemia, which respond to GH treatment. In this study we evaluated changes in body composition and cholesterol profiles after discontinuation of GH therapy to assess atherogenic risk factors in GH-deficient patients.

METHODS

We studied 18 male patients with GH deficiency 17-20 years of age at the time of discontinuing GH therapy. Body composition and cholesterol were measured 6 months before discontinuation of GH therapy with a weekly dose of 0.5 IU/kg (approximately 0.19 mg/kg), and immediately, 2 months, and 6 months after the end of GH therapy.

RESULTS

Two months after termination of GH therapy the percentage of body fat and fat mass increased from 7.4% to 9.4% and from 3.8 kg to 5.0 kg, respectively, and remained high thereafter. Lean body mass decreased gradually, but the change was not significant. Lean body mass: fat mass ratio decreased from 14.7 at termination of GH therapy to 10.9 at the end of study. Total cholesterol (TC) showed a significant linear increase from 156 mg/dl immediately after discontinuation to 169 mg/dl 6 months after discontinuation of GH, whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) showed no change during the study. The TC to HDLC ratio showed a slight but insignificant trend toward an increase. There were no significant changes in any variables during the last 6 months of GH therapy.

CONCLUSION

GH therapy in patients with GH deficiency can reduce risk factors for obesity-related diseases and atherosclerosis. These beneficial effects are reversed after discontinuation of GH therapy. Further long-term studies of the effects of the GH withdrawal on lipid profiles, adiposity and life expectancy must be performed.