Proton pump inhibitors: a survey of prescribing in an Irish general hospital

Forty years of Helicobacter pylori infection and changes in findings at esophagogastroduodenoscopy

BACKGROUND

It is 40 years since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori infection. Over that time major changes have occurred in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings. The aim of this review is to describe these changes, and the important role H. pylori infection has played in their evolution.

METHODS

References were identified through searches of PubMed using the search terms-endoscopy time trends, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, upper gastrointestinal cancer, gastric polyps, H. pylori, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and celiac disease, from 1970 through December 2021.

RESULTS

The prevalence of H. pylori infection has fallen and consequently, H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer disease has become rare. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is now the commonest disorder diagnosed at EGD, and Barrett's esophagus has increased in parallel. Cancer of the distal stomach has fallen while esophageal adenocarcinoma and reflux-related cardia cancer have risen. Gastric polyps have changed from hyperplastic and adenomas to sporadic fundic gland polyps. Antimicrobial resistance has made H. pylori infection more difficult to eradicate. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis, have emerged as important new allergic disorders. Celiac disease has changed and increased.

CONCLUSIONS

EGD findings appear to have changed from features suggesting a H. pylori-positive "phenotype" 40 years ago to a H. pylori-negative "phenotype" today. These changes have major implications for the management of gastrointestinal disorders.

Prescribing habits for the use of omeprazole as a gastroprotectant in dogs in a veterinary teaching hospital

OBJECTIVES

To examine the prescribing habits for omeprazole in a veterinary teaching hospital and to evaluate the effect of a clinical audit on omeprazole prescription.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational study with retrospective clinical audit followed by a prospective study. The evaluated data about omeprazole prescription included the dose, frequency and indication. These were assessed according to published guidelines. A seminar about the audit and current guidelines on the use of omeprazole was organised for all members of clinical staff. Prospective data collection was conducted after the seminar. A comparison of the collected data before and after the clinical audit was made.

RESULTS

A total of 301 dogs were prescribed omeprazole in the veterinary teaching hospital during the study period (including the retrospective and prospective parts). Complete data were acquired from 240 patients. The prescribed frequency of omeprazole was inappropriate in 23 (16.5%) of the prescriptions in the retrospective section but in only five (5.0%) in the prospective study. Inappropriate indications were reported in 12 (8.6%) patients in the retrospective section and in two patients (2.0%) in the prospective study. Overall inappropriate omeprazole prescription was identified in 34 (24.5%) patients in the retrospective part and in seven (6.9%) patients in the prospective part. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in frequency, indication and overall prescription of omeprazole.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study details the frequency of inappropriate prescription of omeprazole in a veterinary teaching hospital and provides some evidence that dissemination of guidelines based on clinical audit can improve prescribing habits.

Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of hyperprolactinemia with associated sexual disorders

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most widely prescribed medications in the world. According to numerous studies, PPIs have been linked to hyperprolactinemia, which can lead to a variety of sexual and reproductive issues. This review summarizes the effects of numerous PPIs on the blood prolactin levels and associated sexual dysfunctions, which have an effect on the patient's life quality and fertility. The study is taken into account all the available resources till January 31, 2021. Out of total 364, only 27 relevant resources were involved in this review. In certain studies, short-term PPIs use has been shown to have little or no effect on the blood prolactin and other reproductive hormones levels. PPIs have been linked to the development of hyperprolactinemia in several case studies with varying degrees of the blood prolactin levels increase seen in individuals taking PPI alone or in combination with medications, like prokinetics. The relative risk of the sexual consequences development, such as gynecomastia, has been documented using lansoprazole and omeprazole in various cohort studies. On the other hand, other bits of data are insufficient to establish a definite relationship that can turn a possibility into certainty. The majority of the literature data is comprising of double-blind, randomized, crossover studies, case reports, and adverse drug reaction incidents reported to various pharmacovigilance centers. To investigate this link, high-quality studies in patients taking PPIs for a longer time period are needed. We conclude this article with a comprehensive discussion of the hyperprolactinemia clinical implications and the PPIs' function.

Pharmacist-structured review of proton pump inhibitor utilisation in primary care: A nonrandomised control study

INTRODUCTION

In the primary care setting, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) overutilisation often stems from the failure to discontinue prophylaxis treatment prior to tertiary care discharge and consider step-down therapy following discharge. Long-term PPI use can result in potential drug-related problems and unnecessary drug expenditure. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacist-structured review in reducing inappropriate PPI prescriptions and estimate the potential cost saving.

METHODS

This non-randomised controlled study was conducted for 16 weeks at 17 government health clinics in Selangor, Malaysia. Eligible patients attending the outpatient pharmacies of intervention clinics were recruited consecutively and their consent was obtained. A structured review of PPIs was performed in which pharmacists identified patient demographics, indications and the length of PPI therapy using a PPI intervention form. Recommendations were discussed with physicians before prescription changes were made and documented. Moreover, standard management was conducted in the control clinics.

RESULTS

A total of 568 patients with prescriptions containing PPIs were sampled, with a total of 284 patients being placed into the control and intervention groups, respectively. Compared to the control group, inappropriate PPI utilisation in the intervention group significantly decreased from 79.9 to 30.4% (p<0.05). The changes to PPI prescriptions observed in the intervention group included: stop PPI therapy (30.8%), step-down therapy (22.9%), start substitution therapy (15.9%) and no change (30.4%). The physicians' acceptance rate for pharmacist intervention was 67.8%. A 66.1% reduction in monthly PPI pill count and a 72.0% reduction in monthly medication expenditure (RM44.85/patient/year) were observed.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacist-structured review was effective in increasing appropriate PPI utilisation and led to substantial cost savings.

[Appropriateness of Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) recommendation in discharge letters of a gastroenterological department]

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are one of the most often prescribed drugs worldwide. They were thought to have a great safety profile before adverse effects in case of long-term medication were discussed recently. Undoubtedly, the use of PPI has to be based on a clear indication. In this retrospective analysis, we investigated the number of patients being discharged from a gastroenterological department with a PPI medication. We also analyzed if this recommendation was based on an established indication and if dose and duration of therapy were correct.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1612 discharge letters from the period January 1^st to June 30^th 2011 were evaluated. Patients being discharged with a recommendation of PPI use were assigned to one of four groups: (1) PPI recommendation correct according to guidelines indication, dose and duration of treatment; (2) PPI recommendation correct according to guidelines indication, but with failing or false dose or duration of treatment; (3) PPI recommendation rational but not based on guidelines; (4) Failing indication, wrong recommendation. For a more detailed analysis the patients of group 1 to 4 were then assigned to various subgroups according to comorbidities and concomitant medication.

RESULTS

808 of 1612 discharge letters (50,1%) recommended a PPI use. Assignment to the four groups were as follows: (1) n=344 (42,6%); (2) n=115 (14,2%); (3) n=159 (19,7%); (4) n=190 (23,5%).

CONCLUSIONS

At time of discharge, PPI are frequently and partially uncritically recommended. Therefore, there is a need for a more intensive education of training interns and for a more critical review of the discharge letters by senior physicians. Even in case of optimal realization of these needs about 20% of debatable recommendations are not based on current guidelines.

Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Higher Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Heart Failure

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations of cumulative exposure to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with total cardiovascular disease (CVD; composed of stroke, coronary heart disease, and heart failure [HF]) and HF alone in a cohort study of White and African American participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

METHODS

Use of PPIs was assessed by pill bottle inspection at visit 1 (January 1, 1987 to 1989) and up to 10 additional times before baseline (visit 5; 2011 to 2013). We calculated cumulative exposure to PPIs as days of use from visit 1 to baseline. Participants (n=4346 free of total CVD at visit 5; mean age, 75 years) were observed for incident total CVD and HF events through December 31, 2016. We used Cox regression to measure associations of PPIs with total CVD and HF.

RESULTS

After adjustment for potential confounding variables, participants with a cumulative exposure to PPIs of more than 5.1 years had a 2.02-fold higher risk of total CVD (95% CI, 1.50 to 2.72) and a 2.21-fold higher risk of HF (95% CI, 1.51 to 3.23) than nonusers.

CONCLUSION

Long-term PPI use was associated with twice the risk of total CVD and HF compared with nonusers. Our findings are in concordance with other research and suggest another reason to be cautious of PPI overuse.

Impact of non-antibiotic drugs on the human intestinal microbiome

INTRODUCTION

The gut microbiota is composed of trillions of microbial cells and viruses that interact with hosts. The composition of the gut microbiota is influenced by several factors including age, diet, diseases, or medications. The impact of drugs on the microbiota is not limited to antibiotics and many non-antibiotic molecules significantly alter the composition of the intestinal microbiota.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the impact of four of the most widely prescribed non-antibiotic drugs in the world: Proton-pump inhibitors, metformin, statins, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory. We conducted a systematic review by searching online databases including Medline, Web of science, and Scopus for indexed articles published in English until February 2021. We included studies assessing the intestinal microbiome alterations associated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), metformin, statins, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Only studies using culture-independent molecular techniques were included.

EXPERT OPINION

The taxonomical signature associated with non-antibiotic drugs are not yet fully described, especially in the field of metabolomic. The identification of taxonomic profiles associated a specific molecule provides information on its mechanism of action through interaction with the intestinal microbiota. Many side effects could be related to the dysbiosis induced by these molecules.

Controversial link between proton pump inhibitors and anticancer agents: review of the literature

Drug-drug interactions represent a topic of great interest, not only due to the risk of unexpected adverse events but also due to the possibility of altering the effectiveness of a specific treatment. Inappropriate or concomitant use of drugs can often lead to changes in the bioavailability of various compounds, resulting in pharmacokinetic alterations. A recent example is the concomitant administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and anticancer agents. PPIs are overused beyond their classic indications, resulting in a high risk of interactions with other drugs, such as anticancer agents, both PO and intravenous. However, the real clinical impact of concomitant acid suppression therapy and anticancer therapies remains controversial and is not yet fully understood. Certainly, the gut microbiota plays a key role in regulating the response of the immune system, and PPIs can significantly alter the gut microbiome, resulting in gut dysbiosis. Indeed, while the link sometimes appears to lead to negative outcomes, as in the case of immunotherapy, oral capecitabine, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in other cases, it seems to enhance the effectiveness of intravenous chemotherapy. In this review, I analyse the possible drug interactions between PPIs and the main classes of anticancer drugs.

Inappropriate Prescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Outpatient Clinics

Proton pump inhibitors are the commonly prescribed drugs for acid-related disorders. However, many of those prescriptions are inappropriate in inpatient and outpatient settings according to the recommended guidelines. Many studies have been conducted in inpatient clinics, but data about the appropriateness of proton pump inhibitor prescribing in outpatient clinics are scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine inappropriate proton pump inhibitor prescribing rates among patients admitted to a tertiary hospital family medicine outpatient clinic. A total of 259 patients (median age = 59 years; 72.6% women) were enrolled into the study and 35.9% of them had no proper indications to utilize proton pump inhibitors. Inappropriate proton pump inhibitor usage rate was significantly higher in patients older than 60 years compared with their younger counterparts (62.4% vs. 37.6%; p = .001). The most frequent reason to use a proton pump inhibitor with nonapproved indications was polypharmacy (41.9%). Despite endoscopic evaluation, 41.9% of the patients received a proton pump inhibitor without an approved indication. A significant proportion of nonindicated prescriptions were a consequence of continued prescribing without re-evaluating patients in outpatient clinics. Consideration of proton pump inhibitor indications according to the guidelines in every admission may prevent inappropriate prescriptions.

A retrospective study on prescribing pattern and cost analysis of proton-pump inhibitors used among adults of Saudi Arabia

Objective

To evaluate the use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) for treatment of different gastric disease in Saudi population and their related administration cost.

Materials and methods

It was a cross-sectional retrospective drug utilization study. The utilization rates and cost analysis of each PPIs class of drugs were compared. Study data were obtained from pharmacy database. Data between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 were investigated, including incidence, prevalence and duration of use of proton-pump inhibitors among adults of Saudi Arabia.

Key findings

We observed 26 798 (4.27%) prescription of PPIs were dispensed in the in-patient and out-patient pharmacy department of Al-Mana Group of Hospital (AGH) Al khobar. Among all the PPIs user, more than the half ((53.01%, n = 14 208), 95% CI (52.42–53.62)) were male. 30–40 years age patients (24.57%, 95% CI (24.06–25.09) (n = 6585)) were highest number of PPI users. Nearly, equal number of PPI users belongs between 51–60 years ((20.88%, n = 5596), 95% CI (20.40–21.37)) and &gt;60 years ((20.36%, n = 5456), 95% CI (19.8–20.85)). Among all the dispensed PPIs drugs, Pantoprazole is dispensed to the highest number of patients (79.09% (95% CI, 78.61–79.58) (n = 21 197)) while their average duration of therapy was 18.86 days. Among all PPIs, pantoprazole average unit wise cost was highest SR 8.83 (USD 2.35) in comparison to other PPIs.

Conclusion

In our study, among all the PPIs Pantoprazole was prescribed to the highest number of patients also it was costliest; hence, their safe and effective use must be warranted. Current study will also help in to develop nation database regarding utilization of proton-pump inhibitors.

Cost-Utility and Budget Impact Analysis for Stopping the Inappropriate Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors After Cessation of NSAID or Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid Treatment

BACKGROUND

In accordance with current guidelines, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are now generally prescribed as a protective co-medication in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (LDASA). However, less attention is paid to the corresponding discontinuation of a PPI after cessation of NSAID or LDASA treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the extent of inappropriate PPI use, as the proportion of patients who started a PPI as a protective co-medication but continued using these drugs after cessation of NSAID and LDASA treatment. We also sought to estimate the potential cost savings and effect gains of discontinuing inappropriate PPI use and the resulting decrease in adverse effects and their detrimental consequences.

METHODS

Pharmacy dispensing data were used to map inappropriate PPI use in 2014 for community-dwelling patients. Strategies with or without PPI continuation were compared in the cost-utility analysis for a time horizon of 5 years from a healthcare perspective. Subsequently, incremental costs and effects (quality-adjusted life-years) were estimated with a Markov model.

RESULTS

Related to NSAID and LDASA treatment, 11.0% and 5%, respectively, of the PPI users were found to inappropriately continue PPI co-treatment. Discontinuation in 71- to 80-year-old patients suggested cost savings of €170.46 (95% confidence interval 75-282) at a 0.003 (95% confidence interval 0.001-0.005) quality-adjusted life-year increase. The total budget impact of stopping inappropriate PPI use related to NSAID/LDASA treatment in the Netherlands would amount to almost €1,050,000 after 1 year. Correspondingly, successful interventions to stop a patient's inappropriate use would cost up to €29 and probably would pay for themselves in the following years.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of patients inappropriately continue to use a PPI after cessation of NSAID or LDASA treatment. Because adverse effects and their detrimental consequences are avoided, interventions to stop inappropriate PPI use, particularly in older patients, are likely to pay for themselves.

A Cross-Sectional Study on Single-Day Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Tertiary Care Hospitals of South India

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most potent antacids used in clinical practice with greater safety and efficacy. Limited data are available on the usage of PPIs in Indian health-care settings. Our aim was to understand the usage pattern and potential drug interactions with concurrently administered medications employing a single-day cross-sectional study design. Methods: A prospective observational cross-sectional study conducted on a single day, at two tertiary care teaching hospitals in South India. Inpatients of above 18 years of age were included. Case profiles were reviewed and data were collected in predesigned forms and analyzed. Drug interactions were identified using Micromedex and Medscape drug-interaction databases. Results: A total of 797 case profiles screened from both the centers; 714 were prescribed with PPIs. In intensive care units (ICUs), the use of PPIs was highest with 95% of cases getting these drugs. A PPI was seen in about 93% of patients, who had more than or equal to 4 drugs in their prescriptions. Pantoprazole was the mostly prescribed PPI in around 90% of the cases. Around 33% of the PPIs usage was through IV (intravenous) route, and 75% of that use was seen in wards. Around 134 drug interactions were identified, of which 10 were of major severity. Conclusions: Around 90% of inpatients were prescribed with PPIs. Pantoprazole is the most commonly prescribed PPI (90%). The IV administration was seen more in wards than ICUs, and 10 major drug interactions were observed in this single-day study. Careful monitoring is needed to avoid serious drug interactions involving PPIs, and training programs should sensitize the clinicians on the evidence-based use of PPIs.

Adverse outcomes of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The association between the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risks of various diseases remains controversial. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to quantify the associations as presented in the literature and to also provide this information to healthcare professionals and patients about their potentially adverse effects. In July 2016, we searched through Medline (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception using common keywords. We included observational studies that provided risk estimates on the long-term use of PPIs and their adverse effects. Overall, 43 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 28 studies were also included in the random effect meta-analysis. Odds of community-acquired pneumonia, hip fracture, and colorectal cancer were 67% [odds ratio (OR)=1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-2.67], 42% (OR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.33-1.53), and 55% (OR=1.55; 95% CI: 0.88-2.73) higher in patients with long-term PPIs use compared with patients who did not use PPIs. Although the use of PPIs provides short-term health benefits, their prolonged use is associated with minor and also potentially major adverse health outcomes. Hence, we strongly recommend that the prescription of PPIs should be done with caution to improve the medication's efficacy and patients' safety.

Attitude and knowledge of Saudi community pharmacists towards use of proton pump inhibitors

Introduction

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) effectively suppress acid secretion and play an important role in peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. There is a real concern about the overutilization of PPIs, which will lead to significant high cost and undesirable outcomes. Despite that most of PPIs are classified as prescribed medications, yet most of their users take them without prescription in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, it was important to understand community pharmacists practice in dealing with PPIs and to evaluate their despising pattern of these medications.

Method

A cross-sectional survey-based study that was carried out between September and December 2017. The survey intended to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of CPs towards use of proton pump inhibitors and was built as an online survey.

Results

The results of this study showed that almost all CPs prescribe anti-ulcer drugs for their patients. Most of the participants (68.4%) have prescribed PPI for acute gastritis (68.4%), prophylaxis for stress ulcers (17.7%) and stress ulcer (11.1%). 54.9 percent of the participants recommend using acid suppression drugs for 1 to 2 weeks when they prescribe them to their patients. Thirty-two percent of the respondents had reported adverse events with PPIs. The study showed a significant association between length of work experience in community pharmacy and reporting adverse events.

Conclusion

Community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia usually recommend and prescribe PPIs to their patients. Most of them have some knowledge on PPIs indications and side effects. Managing OTC PPI use in the community pharmacy setting is necessary to promote both patient and medication safety.

[Proton pump inhibitors and kidney]

Assumed for a long time to be very well tolerated, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed for inpatients and outpatients; often beyond their validated indications. Nevertheless, many very varied side effects (pneumopathy, ischemic heart disease, dementia) have been associated with the PPIs during the last decade. Renal toxicity is mainly the occurrence of acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), related to a drug-class effect, involving cellular immunity. AINs, which occur especially in elderly patients, can be difficult to diagnose, with frequently isolated acute kidney injury, appearing with variable delay after the introduction of PPIs. Although sensitive to steroid therapy, patients frequently have an incomplete recovery of the kidney function. Very recently, the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the risk of progression of CKD among PPIs users have been well demonstrated in several large independent epidemiological studies. It is a low, but a significant side effect because of the millions of PPI prescriptions. Although further studies are needed to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms leading the use of PPI to CKD, it is appropriate for the physicians to limit PPIs to their correct indications and to monitor renal function during these treatments.

We have had a gutful: The need for deprescribing proton pump inhibitors

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing may often be inappropriate and expose patients to a risk of adverse effects, while incurring unnecessary healthcare expenditure. Our objective was to determine PPI usage in Australia since 2002 and review international studies investigating inappropriate PPI prescribing, including those that discussed interventions to address this issue.

METHODS

Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (RPBS) data were analysed. A narrative literature review relevant to the objective was conducted. Time series analysis was also used to examine the trend of reported PPI appropriate use across the international studies included in this review.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Proton pump inhibitor use in Australia increased between 2002 and 2010 and then gradually decreased. Estimates of the extent of inappropriate use in the international literature had a wide variation (11-84%). There appeared to be little change in the extent of appropriate PPI use reported through 34 international studies from 2000 to 2016. Interventions to address inappropriate use included patient-centred deprescribing, academic detailing, educational programmes and drug safety notifications.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Proton pump inhibitors continue to be overused worldwide and should be a focus for deprescribing programmes. Ongoing education and awareness campaigns for health professionals and patients, including electronic reminders at the point of prescribing, are strategies that have potential to reduce PPI use in individuals who do not have an evidence-based clinical indication for their long-term use.

The appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): Need for a reappraisal

The advent of powerful acid-suppressive drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has revolutionized the management of acid-related diseases and has minimized the role of surgery. The major and universally recognized indications for their use are represented by treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in combination with antibiotics, therapy of H. pylori-negative peptic ulcers, healing and prophylaxis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastric ulcers and control of several acid hypersecretory conditions. However, in the last decade, we have witnessed an almost continuous growth of their use and this phenomenon cannot be only explained by the simple substitution of the previous H2-receptor antagonists, but also by an inappropriate prescription of these drugs. This endless increase of PPI utilization has created an important problem for many regulatory authorities in terms of increased costs and greater potential risk of adverse events. The main reasons for this overuse of PPIs are the prevention of gastro-duodenal ulcers in low-risk patients or the stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-intensive care units, steroid therapy alone, anticoagulant treatment without risk factors for gastro-duodenal injury, the overtreatment of functional dyspepsia and a wrong diagnosis of acid-related disorder. The cost for this inappropriate use of PPIs has become alarming and requires to be controlled. We believe that gastroenterologists together with the scientific societies and the regulatory authorities should plan educational initiatives to guide both primary care physicians and specialists to the correct use of PPIs in their daily clinical practice, according to the worldwide published guidelines.

Appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) prescription in patients admitted to hospital: Attitudes of general practitioners and hospital physicians in Italy

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions have raised concern for both huge increase of health expenditure and possible long-term adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate appropriateness of PPI prescription in ambulatory and hospital care.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Unit of Bologna S. Orsola Hospital between 15/09/2013 and 15/12/2013. Data on clinical condition and drug therapy were collected at three time points: admission (reflecting GP's prescription), hospital stay and discharge.

MAIN MEASURES

Appropriateness of PPI use was evaluated as follows: (1) agreement between PPI use/non-use and appropriate clinical condition; (2) in PPI users, assessment of Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Differences in appropriateness among time points were analyzed by chi-square test. Logistic regression model was used to identify possible determinants of PPI appropriateness.

KEY RESULTS

Among 280 patients, 56% received PPI at least once in the three time points. Appropriateness, according to indication of use, was similar between admission and hospital stay (61% vs. 62%; p=0.82) and between hospital stay and discharge (62% vs. 59%; p=0.94). MAI score showed important, although statistically non-significant, change in appropriateness between admission and hospital stay (20% vs. 28%; p=0.16). Age≥65 was always associated with appropriate PPI use (up to OR=4.37; p<0.01), whereas cardiovascular comorbidity and conditions requiring analgesic treatment influenced appropriateness only at admission (OR=3.84; p<0.01 and OR=0.34; p<0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital clinicians only rarely reconsidered GP's choice to prescribe PPI. Room for improvement in PPI appropriateness is represented by (1) assessing gastrointestinal risk in each patient under analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs, and (2) short-term re-evaluation of PPI prescription after discharge.

Review of Proton Pump Inhibitor Overuse in the US Veteran Population

Objective: A growing body of evidence provides proof that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are overused in the general population and that such use is associated with adverse risks and unnecessary costs. Our objective was to systematically evaluate PPI overuse in the veteran population. Data Sources: A literature search using MEDLINE and CINHAL databases (1946-December 2014) was performed using the search term proton pump inhibitors coupled with each of the following key words: inappropriate use, misuse, and overuse. Searches were limited to studies and reviews in English language and human subjects. Additional references were identified from a review of literature citations. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All articles that centrally addressed the issue of PPI overuse were evaluated, following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Data were extracted into Microsoft Excel 2013. Articles that focused on the pediatric or non-US veteran populations were excluded. Data Synthesis: Among 30 articles included, 5 evaluated PPI overuse in veterans. The reported prevalence rate of PPI overuse in veterans ranged from 33% to 67%. Several cases reported PPI-associated Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and pneumonia. One Veterans Affairs center reported the total cost of PPI overuse to be more than $200 000 based on over-the-counter costs and more than $1.5 million based on average wholesale price cost. Conclusions: PPI overuse is common among veterans and exposes them to adverse risks and costs the system enormous dollars. Based on the findings of this review, we provide recommendations to curb PPI overuse among veterans and in the Veterans Affairs system.

The Inappropriate Prescription of Oral Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Hospital Setting: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used to treat upper gastrointestinal tract disorders. Their efficacy and perceived safety have led to widespread prescription. This is not without effect, in terms of adverse events and resource utilization.

AIM

To prospectively assess oral PPI prescription in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

PPI prescription in consecutive hospitalized patients was assessed. Indication and dose were assessed by patient interview and medical record review. Comparisons with current published prescribing guidelines were made.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-seven patients were included. 57.5 % were prescribed PPIs. 26.8 % prescriptions were for inappropriate or unclear indications. 68.4 % were on higher doses than guidelines recommended, of which 41.6 % could have undergone dose reduction, and 26.5 % discontinued. In a multivariate analysis, age, gender, and length of stay had no association with PPI prescription. Although aspirin use was appropriately associated with PPI prescription (RR: 1.8, 95 % CI 1.127-3.69; p < 0.05), the PPI was often given at higher than recommended doses (p < 0.001). This may reflect older age and multiple risk factors in this subset. Surgical patients commenced more PPIs and at higher dosages (p < 0.001). Omeprazole and lansoprazole were most often inappropriately prescribed (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate PPI therapy is still a problem in hospitals, though it appears to be at a lower level compared with previous studies. Awareness of evidence-based guidelines and targeted medicine reconciliation strategies are essential for cost-effective and safe use of these medications.

Reduction of inappropriate exit prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors: A before-after study using education paired with a web-based quality-improvement tool

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are overprescribed despite concerns regarding associated adverse drug events.

OBJECTIVE

To reduce inappropriate PPI prescriptions using hospitalization as the point of contact to effect meaningful change.

DESIGN

Before-after study design.

SETTING

Forty-six-bed medical clinical teaching unit in a 417-bed university teaching hospital in Montreal, Canada.

PATIENTS

Four hundred sixty-four consecutively admitted patients in the preintervention control group, and 640 consecutively admitted patients in the intervention group.

INTERVENTION

A monthly educational intervention paired with a Web-based quality improvement tool.

MEASUREMENTS

We determined the proportion of patients admitted on PPIs, their indications, and appropriateness of use. We then compared the proportion of patients whose PPIs were discontinued at discharge before and after our intervention.

RESULTS

Forty-four percent of patients were already using a PPI prior to their hospitalization. In evaluated patients, only 54% of these patients had an evidence-based indication for ongoing use. The proportion of PPIs discontinued at hospital discharge increased from 7.7% per month in the 6 months prior to intervention, to 18.5% per month postintervention (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies to combat PPI overuse are needed to improve the overall quality of patient care. We significantly reduced discharge prescriptions for PPIs through the implementation of an educational initiative paired with a Web-based quality improvement tool. An active interventional strategy is likely required considering the increasingly recognized and preventable adverse events associated with PPI misuse.

Indication of acid suppression therapy and predictors for the prophylactic use of protonpump inhibitors vs. histamine-2 receptor antagonists in a Malaysian tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) are common acid suppressants used in gastrointestinal disorders. The trend of usage in Malaysia has changed from predominantly H2RA to PPI from 2007 to 2008, 3.46 versus 2.87 and 2.99 versus 3.24 DDD (Defined Daily Dose)/1000 population/day respectively. This raises concerns as PPI overutilization amounts to higher cost expenditure and are associated with various untoward consequences such as Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, pneumonia, and osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the indication of acid suppression therapy (AST) and to look for predictors associated with the prophylactic use of PPI as compared to H2RA.

METHODS

Data collection was conducted via a standardized surveillance form over a 2-month period in the general medical wards of Sarawak General Hospital. All patients who received at least one dose of PPI or H2RA in any dosage form were included in the study. Appropriateness of prophylaxis was determined using current available guidelines. Selected risk factors were analysed using simple logistic regression to look for predictors associated with the choice of PPI in prophylactic AST.

RESULTS

Out of 212 cases in the present cohort, about three quarters (75.5%, n=160) of acid suppressants were given as prophylaxis. Over half of these did not have appropriate indications for prophylactic AST (58.1%, n=93). Among all cases given prophylactic AST, 75.0% (n=120) of them were given PPI. Renal insufficiency was identified as the only predictor associated with the use of prophylactic PPI in preference to H2RA (OR=2.86, 95%CI 1.21:6.72, p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate prophylactic AST is a major concern and may even be underestimated due to the lack of appropriate guidelines. More data is required to guide the selection between PPI and H2RA, specifically the more cost-effective use of H2RA in patients with lower gastrointestinal risk or in whom PPI has no clear advantage.

Celecoxib prevents curcumin-induced apoptosis in a hematopoietic cancer cell model

Molecules targeting pro-inflammatory pathways have demonstrated beneficial effects in cancer treatment. More recently, combination of natural and synthetic anti-inflammatory drugs was suggested as an appealing strategy to inhibit tumor growth. Herein, we show that curcumin, a polyphenol from Curcuma longa and celecoxib induce apoptosis in hematopoietic cancer cell lines (Hel, Jurkat, K562, Raji, and U937). Further investigations on the most sensitive cell line, U937, indicated that these effects were tightly associated with an accumulation of the cells in S and G2/M for curcumin and in G0/G1 phase of cell cycle for celecoxib, respectively. The effect of celecoxib on cell cycle is associated with an induction of p27 and the down-regulation of cyclin D1. However, in the case of combination experiments, the pretreatment of U937 cells with celecoxib at non-apoptogenic concentrations counteracted curcumin-induced apoptosis. We found that this effect correlated with the prevention of the accumulation in S and G2/M phase of cell cycle induced by curcumin. Similar results have been obtained when celecoxib and curcumin were co-administrated at the same time. Overall our data suggest that this natural and synthetic drug combination is detrimental for cell death induction.

Use of proton pump inhibitors is associated with lower trabecular bone density in older individuals

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are highly effective in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal acid-related conditions and are fast becoming one of the most frequently prescribed treatments in adult or older persons. Recent data show that long-term use of PPIs in older subjects is associated with important undesirable effects, including a higher risk of osteoporotic fractures. The mechanisms of this association are unclear and the relationship between the use of PPIs and parameters of bone mass and geometry has never been fully explored. This study investigates the relationship between the chronic use of PPIs and the parameters of bone mass (cortical and trabecular bone mineral density - vBMDc and vBMDt) and bone geometry (cortical and trabecular cross sectional area - tCSA and cCSA) in older individuals. The study population consisted of 1038 subjects (452 men and 586 women) 65years or older, selected from the InCHIANTI study, with complete information on computerized tomography performed at tibial level (pQCT) and on medications. Participants were classified as PPI users and nonusers based on self-report of PPI use over the last 15days, with PPI users (36 subjects, 14 men and 22 women) making up 3.4% of the study population (mean age 75.7±7.4years). The relationship between use of PPIs and pQCT bone parameters was tested by multivariate linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and several clinical factors and/or statistically confounding variables identified by partial correlation coefficient and Spearman partial rank order correlation coefficients, as appropriate (age, sex, BMI, caloric intake, IGF-1, IL-6, calcium, estradiol, bioavailable testosterone, vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, cross-sectional muscle area, and level of physical activity). PPI users showed age- and sex-adjusted lower vBMDt than nonusers (180.5±54.8 vs. 207.9±59.4, p=0.001). The inverse association between PPI use and vBMDt remained almost unchanged after adjustment for multiple confounders. There was no statistically significant difference in vBMDc, tCSA and cCSA between PPI users and nonusers. In community dwelling older persons, the use of PPIs is inversely associated with vBMDt, an early marker of the osteoporotic process. These findings suggest that PPI use might increase the risk of fractures in older subjects through its detrimental effects on trabecular bone.

[Proton bomb inhibitors: a study of the prescription in a functional recovery unit]

INTRODUCTION

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has increased exponentially since they were introduced. However concerns have been raised regarding the appropriateness of these prescriptions, and the potential side effects, particularly in frail elderly people, as well as the cost of this treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the extent and appropriateness of PPI prescribing in a group of patients over 65 years old admitted to the functional recovery unit of a medium-stay hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of inpatient prescribing of PPI was carried out in a functional recovery unit in Hospital de la Fuenfría, selecting those older than 65 years, who were admitted during 2011. Data obtained from medical records included, prescription of a PPI before admission and at the time of discharge from hospital (both acute care hospital and Hospital de la Fuenfría), type of PPI, and indications for their prescription.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 296 patients (mean age 78.8 years, 70.6% females). A total of 45.3, 79.1 and 75.5% of patients were on PPIs before admission, and at the time of being discharge from acute care hospital, and Hospital de la Fuenfría, respectively. A valid indication for therapy was not apparent in 62.7, 30.8 and 54.2% of them. Omeprazole was the most widely prescribed PPI.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a widespread and inappropriate use of PPIs in hospital practice. Interventions are needed to curtail this inappropriate prescribing practice, avoiding side effects and drug interactions.

Inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors among medical inpatients: a questionnaire-based observational study

Objectives

To evaluate the appropriateness of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescribing by conducting an audit of medical inpatients against recommended guidelines.

Design

Questionnaire-based study. All medical wards were audited and different information was documented by patients' medical records review (both hospital visit notes and general practitioner's letters) and short interview, where we asked them to name the clinical reason for using PPI.

Setting

This study was carried out in the setting of a regional hospital (537-bed, secondary care referral centre) in Ireland.

Participants

The study participants were all consecutive medical patients admitted to the medical wards at Waterford Regional Hospital, Waterford.

Main outcome measures

The appropriateness of PPI usage in our regional hospital by assessing the level of its prescribing against published guidelines (NICE, 2000).

Results

During the audit period, 205 consecutive medical inpatients were assessed. Seventy-nine percent (162 out of 205) of the studied patients were found to be using PPI. For 45% (n = 73) of patients, there was no documentation of valid indication for being on PPI. Overall, 64% of patients were prescribed PPI by hospital doctors, either during their current or previous admissions. We noted that 31% (n = 51) of patients were taking PPI for ≥2 years and another 25% of patients were using PPI for about one year. Only 12% (n = 20) of patients had undergone endoscopy procedures.

Conclusion

Inappropriate use of PPI remains common in hospital practice. The risks of using long-term PPI must be weighed against the benefits.

Association between proton pump inhibitor therapy and clostridium difficile infection: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Emerging epidemiological evidence suggests that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) acid-suppression therapy is associated with an increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).

Methods

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from 1990 to January 2012 for analytical studies that reported an adjusted effect estimate of the association between PPI use and CDI. We performed random-effect meta-analyses. We used the GRADE framework to interpret the findings.

Results

We identified 47 eligible citations (37 case-control and 14 cohort studies) with corresponding 51 effect estimates. The pooled OR was 1.65, 95% CI (1.47, 1.85), I² = 89.9%, with evidence of publication bias suggested by a contour funnel plot. A novel regression based method was used to adjust for publication bias and resulted in an adjusted pooled OR of 1.51 (95% CI, 1.26–1.83). In a speculative analysis that assumes that this association is based on causality, and based on published baseline CDI incidence, the risk of CDI would be very low in the general population taking PPIs with an estimated NNH of 3925 at 1 year.

Conclusions

In this rigorously conducted systemic review and meta-analysis, we found very low quality evidence (GRADE class) for an association between PPI use and CDI that does not support a cause-effect relationship.

Proton pump inhibitors: potential cost reductions by applying prescribing guidelines

BACKGROUND

There are concerns that proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are being over prescribed in both primary and secondary care. This study aims to establish potential cost savings in a community drug scheme for a one year period according to published clinical and cost-effective guidelines for PPI prescribing.

METHODS

Retrospective population-based cohort study in the Republic of Ireland using the Health Services Executive (HSE) Primary Care Reimbursement Services (PCRS) pharmacy claims database. The HSE-PCRS scheme is means tested and provides free health care including medications to approximately 30% of the Irish population. Prescription items are WHO ATC coded and details of every drug dispensed and claimants' demographic data are available. Potential cost savings (net ingredient cost) were estimated according to UK NICE clinical guidelines for all HSE-PCRS claimants on PPI therapy for ≥3 consecutive months starting in 2007 with a one year follow up (n=167,747). Five scenarios were evaluated; (i) change to PPI initiation (cheapest brand); and after 3 months (ii) therapeutic switching (cheaper brand/generic equivalent); (iii) dose reduction (maintenance therapy); (iv) therapeutic switching and dose reduction and (v) therapeutic substitution (H2 antagonist).

RESULTS

Total net ingredient cost was €88,153,174 for claimants on PPI therapy during 2007. The estimated costing savings for each of the five scenarios in a one year period were: (i) €36,943,348 (42% reduction); (ii) €29,568,475 (34%); (iii) €21,289,322 (24%); (iv) €40,505,013 (46%); (v) €34,991,569 (40%).

CONCLUSION

There are opportunities for substantial cost savings in relation to PPI prescribing if implementation of clinical guidelines in terms of generic substitution and step-down therapy is implemented on a national basis.

Proton pump inhibitors: are they overutilised in clinical practice and do they pose significant risk?

Proton pump inhibitors are highly effective acid suppressants with decades of use highlighting positive outcomes in millions of patients worldwide, and they offer minimal risk of adverse events. PPIs are considered overutilised when prescribed without an appropriate indication, when patients are left on them 'indefinitely' without appropriate indications and when they are continued after being utilised for most cases of hospital SUP. While several adverse outcomes have been linked to PPI therapy, most data are from retrospective observational studies that may be subject to confounding and bias.

Outcomes of a decision support prompt in community pharmacy-dispensing software to promote step-down of proton pump inhibitor therapy

AIM

To evaluate the effect of a computerized decision support prompt regarding high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on prescribing and medication costs.

METHODS

A prompt activated on dispensing high-dose esomeprazole or pantoprazole was implemented in 73 of 185 pharmacies. Anonymized prescription data and a patient survey were used to determine changes in prescribing and associated medication costs.

RESULTS

The pharmacist-recorded PPI intervention rate per 100 high-dose PPI prescriptions was 1.67 for the PPI prompt group and 0.17 for the control group (P < 0.001). During the first 28 days of the trial, 196 interventions resulted in 34 instances of PPI step-down, with 28 of these occurring in PPI prompt pharmacies. Cost savings attributable to the prompt were AUD 7.98 (£4.95) per month per PPI prompt pharmacy compared with AUD 1.05 (£0.65) per control pharmacy.

CONCLUSION

The use of electronic decision support prompts in community pharmacy practice can promote the quality use of medicines.

Appropriateness of treatment recommendations for PPI in hospital discharge letters

PURPOSE

The reasons for the dramatic increase in proton pump inhibitors (PPI) prescriptions remain unclear and cannot be explained solely by increased morbidity, new indications or a decrease in alternative medication. Inappropriate use and discharge recommendations in hospitals are considered to be possible explanations. As the quality of PPI recommendations in hospital discharge letters in Germany has not been investigated to date, we have studied the appropriateness of these referrals.

METHODS

Hospital discharge letters with recommendations for PPI medication from 35 primary care practices in the county of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (MV; North-east Germany) were collected and analysed, and the appropriateness of the PPI indication was rated.

RESULTS

No information justifying the recommendation for continuous PPI medication could be identified in 54.5% of the discharge letters; in 12.7%, the indication was uncertain, and in 32.7%, we found an evidence-based indication for PPI medication. The most common indication for adequate PPI use was nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-prophylaxis in high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate recommendations for PPIs in discharge letters are frequent. This may lead to a continuation of this therapy in primary care, thereby unnecessarily increasing polypharmacy and the risk of adverse events as well as burdening the public health budget. Hospitals should therefore critically review recommendations for PPI medication and the dosage thereof in their discharge letters and clearly document the reason for PPI use and the need for continuous prescription in primary care.

Proton pump inhibitors and rebound acid hypersecretion

Rebound acid hypersecretion is defined as an increase in gastric acid secretion above pre-treatment levels after cessation of antisecretory therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been proved to be more effective than histamine-2 receptor antagonists in suppressing intragastric acidity and have therefore become the main choice for management of acid-related complaints. Recent studies have shown that PPI therapy-elicited rebound acid hypersecretion could in turn induce acid-related symptoms. This makes it difficult for patients to cease PPI therapy. Hypergastrinemia is an important mechanism that leads to rebound acid hypersecretion. To reduce the occurrence of rebound acid hypersecretion, efforts should be made to restrict indications for using PPIs.

The pharmacological therapy of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

The modern management of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding includes, in selected patients, the performance of timely multimodal endoscopic hemostasis followed by profound acid suppression. This article discusses the available data on the use of antisecretory regimens in the management of patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, which are a major cause of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and briefly addresses other medications used in this acute setting. The most important clinically relevant data are presented, favoring fully published articles.

Measuring quality of care in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: development of an explicit quality indicator set

OBJECTIVES

With an increasing emphasis on quality in health care and recognition of inconsistencies in the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH), it is critical to establish a set of explicit quality indicators (QIs) in NVUGIH.

METHODS

We conducted a nine-member, multidisciplinary expert panel and followed modified Delphi methods to systematically identify a set of QIs for NVUGIH. The panel performed independent ratings of each candidate QI using a nine-point RAND appropriateness scale, then met in person and re-voted using an iterative process of discussion. The final set comprised QIs with a median RAND Appropriateness Score >or=7 and no disagreement among experts.

RESULTS

Among 116 candidate QIs, the panel rated 26 as valid measures of quality care. The selected QIs cover pre-endoscopy, endoscopy, and post-endoscopy care, including diagnosis, early resuscitation, risk stratification, endoscopic care, Helicobacter pylori management, and proton pump inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed an explicit set of evidence-based QIs in NVUGIH, providing physicians and institutions with a tool to identify processes amenable to quality improvement. This tool is intended to be applicable in all institutions providing care for NVUGIH patients.

Barriers to the implementation of practice guidelines in managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A qualitative approach

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Guidelines for the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) are inconsistently applied by health care providers, potentially resulting in suboptimal care and patient outcomes. A needs assessment was performed to assess health care providers' barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in Canada.

METHODS

Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted by trained research personnel with 22 selectively sampled health care professionals actively treating and managing NVUGIB patients, including emergency room physicians (ER), intensivists (ICU), gastroenterologists (GI), gastroenterology nurses and hospital administrators. Participants were chosen from a representative sample of six Canadian community- and academic-based hospitals that participated in a national Canadian audit on the management of NVUGIB.

RESULTS

Participants reported substantive gaps in the implementation of NVUGIB guidelines that included the following: lack of knowledge of the specifics of the NVUGIB guidelines (ER, ICU, nurses); limited belief in the value of guidelines, especially in areas where evidence is lacking (ER, ICU); limited belief in the value of available tools to support implementation of guidelines (GI); lack of knowledge of the roles and responsibilities of health care professions and disciplines, and lack of effective collaboration skills (ER, ICU and GI); variability of knowledge and skills of health care professionals within professions (eg, variability of nurses' knowledge and skills in endoscopic procedures); and perceived overuse of intravenous proton pump inhibitor treatment, with limited concern regarding cost or side effect implications (all participants).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study population, ER, ICU and nurses did not adhere to NVUGIB guidelines because they were neither aware of nor familiar with them, whereas the GI lack of adherence to NVUGIB guidelines was influenced more by attitudinal and contextual barriers. These findings can guide the design of multifaceted educational and behavioural interventions when attempting to effectively disseminate existing guidelines, and for guideline implementation into practice.

Co-prescription of gastro-protectants in hospitalized patients: an analysis of what we do and what we think we do

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the risk of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) associated with the use of many medications.

GOALS

To examine how clinicians perceive such risk and whether PPI co-prescribing is based on an accurate assessment.

STUDY METHODS

Clinicians in a single teaching hospital were asked to estimate risk of UGIH and comment on PPI co-prescription in hypothetical patients. Records of 160 hospital in-patients (median age; 74 y) were then reviewed to examine PPI prescribing and risk factors for UGIH.

RESULTS

In general, clinicians estimated UGIH risk accurately and reported low thresholds for PPI co-prescription. Prescribing records showed regular PPI use increased between admission and discharge of patients from 61/160 (38%) to 93/160 (58%). Ten percent had a prior history of peptic ulcer disease. Proton pump inhibitor prescription was significantly associated with the use of aspirin and clopidogrel. Half of the patients with multiple risk factors for UGIH on admission and almost a third at discharge were not co-prescribed a PPI.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians generally estimate correctly the risk of UGIH and report a low threshold for prescribing gastro-protection. Despite this, prescribing practice does not consistently take account of relative risk of UGIH. Targeted PPI co-prescribing on the basis of risk factors would lead to more rational PPI use.

Patterns and predictors of proton pump inhibitor overuse among academic and non-academic hospitalists

OBJECTIVE

In the hospital setting, several studies have reported proton pump inhibitor (PPI) overuse, a majority of which is continued after discharge. In addition to being expensive, PPIs are associated with an increased risk of infections, osteoporosis and serious drug interactions. We examined the trends and predictors of PPI guidelines non-compliance among academic and non-academic hospitalists in USA.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Oral PPI prescriptions initiated by 2 academic and 2 non-academic hospitalist groups were reviewed. Prescription indications were recorded when explicitly stated in the chart. Otherwise, qualified physicians reviewed the chart to make such determination. Indications were then compared to the published guidelines. Several variables were tested to determine independent predictors of initiation and post discharge continuation of guideline non-compliant prescriptions.

RESULTS

Of the 400 PPI prescriptions 39% were guideline compliant. Academic hospitalists were significantly more compliant with PPI prescription guidelines (50 vs 29%). Gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding prophylaxis (GIP) for low risk patients was the most common indication for non-compliant prescriptions, while that of guideline compliant prescriptions was dyspepsia treatment. Independent predictors of the initiation of guideline non-compliant prescriptions were non-academic hospitalist group, PPI indication not documented in the chart, and GIP as part of the admission orderset. The latter was an independent predictor of those prescriptions continuation post-discharge (protective) in addition to non-academic hospitalists group.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalists overprescribe PPI to a level comparable to that of the non-hospitalist providers in the literature. Understanding the determinants of increased compliance among academic groups is instrumental to design interventions aimed at increasing PPI prescription compliance.

Therapeutic intent of proton pump inhibitor prescription among elderly nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users

BACKGROUND

Prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased dramatically.

AIM

To assess therapeutic intent of PPI prescription among elderly veterans prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

METHODS

Medical-record abstraction identified therapeutic intent of PPI prescription. An 'appropriate therapeutic intent' was defined as symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or endoscopic oesophagitis, Zollinger-Ellison disease, dyspepsia, upper gastrointestinal event, Helicobacter pylori infection or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastroprotection. Logistic regression predicted the outcome while adjusting for clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 1491 patients [mean 73 years (s.d. 5.6), 73% white and 99.8% men], among those charts which did document a therapeutic indication, 88.8% were appropriate. Prior gastroscopy was predictive of an appropriate therapeutic intent (OR 2.7; 95% CI: 1.9-3.7). Prescription to patients who used VA pharmacy services only, to in-patients, or by a cardiologist or an otolaryngologist were less likely to be appropriate. Gastroprotection was poorly recognized as an indication for PPI prescription, except by rheumatologists (OR 46.7; 95% CI: 15.9-136.9), or among highly co-morbid patients (OR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.9). Among in-patients, 45% of PPI prescriptions were initiated for unknown or inappropriate reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Type of provider predicts appropriate PPI use. In-patient prescription is associated with poor recognition of necessary gastroprotection and unknown therapeutic intent.

Risk factors of peptic ulcer in 4943 inpatients

BACKGROUND

Over the past few years, major changes have taken place in the treatment of gastroduodenal peptic ulcer.

AIM

To evaluate risk factors associated with the incidence of peptic ulcer in inpatients.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2004, the number of prescriptions of H2-antagonists and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in each department of Verona University Hospital was monitored. Over the same period we prospectively recorded the number of upper endoscopies per department for inpatients with a diagnosis of peptic ulcer.

RESULTS

We analyzed 4943 inpatients. A significantly decreasing trend in H(2)-antagonist prescriptions (r=-0,88; P<0.001) and an increasing trend in PPI prescriptions (r=0.97; P<0.001) were observed. The endoscopic incidence of duodenal ulcers decreased linearly from 2001 to 2004 as follows: 6.5% (94/1439) in 2001, 5.6% (82/1473) in 2002, 4.5% (63/1411) in 2003, and 3.1% (22/702) (P<0.001) in 2004. Gastric ulcer incidence, sex, age, indication for endoscopy, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), presence of Helicobacter pylori (32%), and smoking and drinking habits showed no significant changes over the study period. Considering time-dependent variables, multivariate regression analysis identified only PPI use and NSAID use as factors predictive of duodenal ulcer but not of gastric ulcer.

CONCLUSIONS

In inpatients, PPIs are associated with a reduced risk of duodenal ulcer, whereas NSAIDs are associated with an increased risk. Gastric ulcer was not associated with any increased or degreased risk with the 2 above-mentioned variables.

Overprescribing proton pump inhibitors

Is expensive and not evidence based

[A survey of gastroprotective drugs: prescription-indication in hospitalized patients]

Prescription rates of anti-ulcer drugs in hospitals and their spill-over to general practice have risen over the last few years, increasing pharmaceutical expenses. The aim of this study was to analyze gastroprotective drug prescription habits in our hospital by assessing both prevalence and adherence to approved indications. An observational study of prescription-indication was performed with 2 cross sections separated by 6 months to avoid selection bias. We found overprescription of gastroprotective drugs, mainly proton pump inhibitors for the prevention of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced ulcer (17.1%). Overall, 77.6% of prescriptions had no acceptable indication, despite the availability of a specific protocol produced by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee in our center. There was a high prevalence of prescriptions for non-approved indications such as prophylaxis in patients administered corticosteroids without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (25.7%). New programs to train clinicians and clinical managers in rational drug use are required.

The influence of hospitalisation on drug prescription in primary care--a large-scale follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the influence of hospitalisation on the prescription of drugs in the primary care sector using prescription data of a major statutory health insurance (SHI) organisation, with a special focus on the so-called "Me-Too" drugs - in particular, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl (HMG) CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

A comprehensive outpatient drug prescription analysis was conducted on members of a SHI who had been hospitalised during the first 3 months of 2004. The number and costs of all prescriptions of 2426 patients during a 3-month period before admission and after discharge, respectively, were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Data are shown in absolute and relative numbers as well as relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The total number of prescriptions before hospitalisation and after discharge remained nearly the same, while the number of different active substances prescribed per patient decreased by 4%. However, overall costs increased after discharge by 15% due to the higher cost per prescription. Changes in medication affected nearly every patient (98.1%), and 60% had at least five changes. Of the substances prescribed to an individual before admission, 57% were cancelled after discharge, and 55% of all substances prescribed after discharge were novel prescriptions. Significantly more patients received a PPI or statin after hospitalisation (RR for a PPI: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.12 -1.45; RR for a statin: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02-1.32). The increase in PPI medication was due to a 58% increase in the number of patients receiving pantoprazole, a "Me-Too" drug.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalisation exerts a marked influence on drug therapy in ambulatory care, with a significant increase in the prescription of novel, on-patent drugs instead of less expensive alternatives.