Apremilast in psoriasis - a prospective real-world study

Efficacy and safety of piclidenoson in plaque psoriasis: Results from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial (COMFORT-1)

OBJECTIVE

A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) is overexpressed in the skin and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of psoriasis patients. We investigated the efficacy/safety of piclidenoson (CF101), an orally bioavailable A3AR agonist that inhibits IL-17 and IL-23 production in keratinocytes, in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

The randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind phase 3 COMFORT-1 trial randomized patients (3:3:3:2) to piclidenoson 2 mg BID, piclidenoson 3 mg BID, apremilast 30 mg BID or placebo. At Week 16, patients in the placebo arm were re-randomized (1:1:1) to piclidenoson 2 mg BID, piclidenoson 3 mg BID or apremilast 30 mg BID. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline (PASI-75) at Week 16 versus placebo.

RESULTS

A total of 529 patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of study medication (safety population). The efficacy analysis population for the primary end point included 426 patients (piclidenoson 2 mg BID, 127; piclidenoson 3 mg BID, 103; apremilast, 118; placebo, 78). Piclidenoson at 2 and 3 mg BID exhibited similar efficacy. The primary end point was met with the 3 mg BID dose: PASI 75 rate of 9.7% versus 2.6% for piclidenoson versus placebo, p = 0.037. The PASI responses with piclidenoson continued to increase throughout the study period in a linear manner. At week 32, analysis in the per-protocol population showed that a greater proportion of patients in the piclidenoson 3 mg BID arm (51/88, 58.0%) achieved improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) compared to apremilast (59/108, 55.1%), and the test for noninferiority trended towards significance (p = 0.072). The safety/tolerability profile of piclidenoson was excellent and superior to apremilast.

CONCLUSIONS

Piclidenoson demonstrated efficacy responses that increased over time alongside a favourable safety profile. These findings support its continued clinical development as a psoriasis treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03168256).

Real-world apremilast use in biologic-naïve psoriatic arthritis patients. Data from Spanish clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Apremilast is approved for treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Real-world evidence on apremilast effectiveness in clinical practice is limited.

METHODS

Observational study enrolling adult patients, across 21 Spanish centres, who had initiated apremilast in the prior 6 (±1) months and were biologic naive. Data were collected at routine follow-up visits 6 and 12 months after apremilast initiation. Primary outcome was 6 and 12-month persistence to apremilast. Secondary outcomes included Disease Activity for PsA (DAPSA), joint erosions, enthesitis, dactylitis, and patient-reported quality of life (QoL, measured using the PsA impact of disease [PsAID] questionnaire).

RESULTS

We included 59 patients. Most had oligoarticular PsA, moderate disease activity, and high comorbidity burden. Three-quarters were continuing apremilast at 6 months and two-thirds at 12 months; mean (SD) apremilast treatment duration was 9.43 (1.75) months. DAPSA scores showed improved disease activity: one-third of patients in remission or low activity at apremilast initiation versus 62% and 78% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Eleven of 46 patients with radiographic assessments had joint erosions at apremilast initiation and none at month 12. Median (Q1, Q3) number of swollen joints was 4.0 (2.0, 6.0) at apremilast initiation versus 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) at 12 months. Incidence of dactylitis and enthesitis decreased between apremilast initiation (35.6% and 28.8%, respectively) and month 12 (11.6% and 2.4%, respectively). Over two-thirds of patients had a PSAID-9 score <4 (cut-off for patient-acceptable symptom state) at month 12.

CONCLUSIONS

In Spanish clinical practice, two-thirds of PsA patients continued apremilast at 12 months, with clinical benefits at the joint level, no radiographic progression of erosions, and a positive impact on patient-reported QoL. Trial registration number Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03828045.

Real-World Apremilast Use for Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis in Italy: Patient Perspective, Characteristics, and Clinical Outcomes from the DARWIN Study

INTRODUCTION

While several European studies have reported real-world apremilast use, patient-perceived benefits, and treatment satisfaction, local reimbursement criteria for apremilast vary and data from Italy are limited.

METHODS

The cross-sectional DARWIN study enrolled consecutive patients who had initiated apremilast for plaque psoriasis 6 (± 1) months prior to enrolment at a single visit across 24 Italian dermatological sites. Disease severity was assessed using body surface area (BSA) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Patient-reported outcomes assessed 6 (± 1) months after apremilast initiation were Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Benefit Index (PBI), and 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9).

RESULTS

Of 184 patients enrolled between July 2019 and January 2021, 180 were included in the analysis. At apremilast initiation, median (25th-75th percentile) time since psoriasis diagnosis was 8.6 (3.2-22.2) years; median BSA, 10.0% (5.0-16.0); mean (standard seviation, SD) DLQI total score, 13.5 (8.0). Over half (54.9%) of patients with available data reported psoriasis had a very or extremely large effect on their quality of life (QoL); half reported itching (50.6%) and/or special areas involvement (50.0%). Most (73.9%) had comorbidities and were biologic-naïve (81.5%). The most common reasons for initiating apremilast were lack of efficacy of previous treatment (56.7%) and contraindications to other treatments (44.4%). At 6 (± 1) months, most patients were continuing apremilast and/or reported a Global PBI score ≥ 1 (minimum clinical benefit) (86.1% and 90.0%, respectively); approximately half achieved BSA ≤ 3% and/or DLQI total score ≤ 5 (47.1% and 48.5%); 18.8% achieved PGA = 0; mean (SD) TSQM-9 global treatment satisfaction score was 59.0 (24.8). Apremilast was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with apremilast for 6 months in Italian clinical practice reported improved QoL, clinically relevant improvements in symptoms, high treatment satisfaction, and high treatment persistence. Our data indicate apremilast is a valuable treatment option for moderate plaque psoriasis.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04031027.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with psoriasis treated with apremilast in the real-world in Austria - results the APPRECIATE study

Background

Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, is approved in the European Union for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis in adult patients refractory or contraindicated to or intolerant of other systemic therapies.

Objectives

The APPRECIATE study assessed apremilast use in real-world practice and its clinical value to physicians and patients. APPRECIATE was a multinational, observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Methods

Apremilast effectiveness at 6 (±1) months was assessed on the basis of psoriasis severity and health-related quality-of-life scores and treatment satisfaction using physician/patient-reported outcomes, respectively. We report the Austrian cohort of 72 patients.

Results

At 6 (±1) months, three-quarters of patients remained on apremilast, while physicians and patients reported treatment benefits across all psoriasis symptoms and manifestations. Of patients, the majority were satisfied with their treatment and achieved treatment goals considered most relevant. Patients' and physicians' perceptions of treatment effectiveness were aligned, and health-related quality-of-life scores indicated an improvement in the majority of patients. Apremilast tolerability was consistent with the known safety profile.

Conclusions

Among psoriasis patients receiving apremilast in Austria, improvement in clinical outcomes were observed and satisfaction with apremilast treatment among patients and physicians was high.

Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02740218.

Retrospective study of apremilast drug survival in psoriasis patients in a daily practice setting: a long-term experience

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence about the real-world survival of apremilast in patients with psoriasis, especially over the long term.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term survival of apremilast and its predictive factors when used to treat psoriasis.

METHODS

A retrospective hospital-based study, including data collected from 104 patients. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Proportional hazard Cox regression models were used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The average duration of the treatment before discontinuation was 28.82 months (95% CI, 22.08-35.57 months) and the median was 12 months (95% CI, 2.68-21.31 months). The retention rates were 51% (1 year), and 33% (5 years). The survival study revealed statistically significant differences between patients with PASI<10 and those in the PASI≥10 group (log-rank test, p<0.001). The five-year prevalences were 64% for patients with a PASI of <10 and 5% for those with an index ≥10. In the PASI<10 patient group the retention rates were 77% (1 year) and 64% (5 years). Furthermore, 66% of patients who continued apremilast treatment for more than 2 years were receiving off-label doses (30 mg/day).

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast may be a suitable and efficient alternative for the treatment of psoriasis patients in the PASI<10 group. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A real-world, non-interventional, prospective study of the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve adults with moderate plaque psoriasis treated in the routine care in Greece - The 'APRAISAL' study

BACKGROUND

Real-world data in patients with moderate psoriasis treated with apremilast is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of apremilast in bio-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis in real-world clinical settings.

METHODS

This was a 52-week multicenter, observational, prospective study of adult outpatients with moderate psoriasis {[10%<body surface area<20% or 10<psoriasis area severity index (PASI)<20] and 10<dermatology quality of life index (DLQI)<20} initiated on apremilast ≤7 days before enrollment. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward method.

RESULTS

A total of 287 eligible patients (median age: 54.2 years; median psoriasis duration: 9.8 years) were consecutively enrolled. At baseline, the median DLQI and PASI scores were 12.0 and 11.8, respectively. The 52-week DLQI ≤5 and PASI75 response rates were 68.3% and 61.0%. At 52 weeks, 70.8% and 72.7% of the patients shifted from moderate/severe/very severe to clear/minimal scalp and palmoplantar psoriasis involvement, respectively; the pruritus severity state improved in 67.2%. The 52-week Kaplan-Meier estimated drug continuation rate was 85.3%. The adverse drug reaction rate was 19.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast is a safe and effective treatment for bio-naïve patients with moderate psoriasis and specific psoriasis manifestations.

Quality-of-Life Outcomes, Effectiveness and Tolerability of Apremilast in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis and Routine German Dermatology Care: Results from LAPIS-PSO

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease characterised by pruritic skin lesions that impair quality of life (QOL). Long-Term Documentation of the Utilization of Apremilast in Patients with Plaque Psoriasis under Routine Conditions (LAPIS-PSO; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02626793) was a 52-week, prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study conducted in real-world dermatology clinical settings in Germany. We evaluated physician- and patient-reported outcomes for QOL, effectiveness and tolerability in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris in LAPIS-PSO.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score ≤ 5 or ≥ 5-point improvement from baseline in DLQI score at visit 2 (~ 4 months after baseline). Secondary endpoints included assessments of symptoms and disease severity. Tolerability was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs). A pre-defined subgroup analysis based on baseline Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score (2 or 3 versus 4) was performed. Data were examined descriptively through visit 5 (~ 13 months) using the last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) approach and data as observed.

RESULTS

In total, 257 patients were included for efficacy assessment. On LOCF analysis, most patients achieved the primary endpoint at visit 2 (66.5%); DLQI response was maintained at visit 5 (72.4%). Earlier treatment response was observed in patients with a PGA score of 2 or 3 versus 4 (visit 1 PASI ≤ 3: 20.5% versus 10.8%). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of apremilast.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine clinical care in Germany, patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis benefited from apremilast treatment up to ~ 13 months, consistent with findings from clinical trials, with a good safety profile.

Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in the treatment of plaques psoriasis: A real-world, single-center experience

Apremilast is a small molecule approved for the treatment of plaques psoriasis and adult psoriatic arthritis. Pivotal studies have demonstrated short and long term efficacy and safety of apremilast but few data in real life are still available. The aim of this study is to report the efficacy and safety results of apremilast in clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, focusing on therapeutic results obtained after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. From May 2018 to December 2018, 40 patients with plaques psoriasis have been enrolled. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area, Physician Global Assessment, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were performed at baseline at 24 (W24) and 52 (W52) weeks after treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was to evaluate the percentage of patient that achieved PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 at week 24 and 52 of treatment. Additional measure of efficacy was percentage of patients reaching the minimal disease activity (MDA = PGA0/1 and DLQI 0/1) after 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. As secondary endpoint, we evaluated the percentage of patient that achieved DLQI 0-1 at W24 and W52, and long-term safety of apremilast. The percentage of patients who achieved PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 was 47.5%, 30% and 10% and 25%, 35% and 10% at W24 and W52 respectively. About the half of the reported patients reached MDA at W24 (n = 21) and at W52 (n = 20). The 60% of patients achieved and maintained DLQI 0-1 at W24 until W52. Diarrhea, nausea, headache, insomnia, and other AEs have been reported by 28 patients. Apremilast in real life experience confirmed the levels of efficacy and safety obtained in pivotal trials. In particular, the good initial response to the treatment is predictive of the maintenance or improvement of the outcome over W52. The efficacy is supported by an excellent safety profile even in frail patients.

Effectiveness and clinical predictors of drug survival in psoriasis patients receiving apremilast: A registry analysis

Background

Little is known about the effectiveness and drug survival associated with apremilast under real-world conditions.

Objective

To investigate the influence of patient and disease characteristics on drug survival associated with apremilast and to elucidate clinical effectiveness with regard to the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) reduction.

Methods

This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter analysis from the Austrian Psoriasis Registry.

Results

Data from 367 patients were eligible for analysis. The 12-month drug survival rate associated with apremilast (ie, the proportion of patients on the drug) was 57.3% and decreased significantly in patients younger than 40 years (relative hazard ratio = 1.49, P = .007918). Sex; concomitant arthritis; previous biologic therapy; obesity; and palmoplantar, scalp, nail, and intertriginous involvement did not significantly affect drug survival. At 12 months, the response rates in patients receiving apremilast per protocol with a PASI of 50, 75, 90, and 100 were 80.0%, 56.4%, 38.2%, and 22.7%, respectively.

Limitations

Inclusion of a substantial number of patients with no record of absolute PASI at study entry and lack of PASI reduction follow-up data of 103 patients (28.1%) after starting apremilast treatment.

Conclusion

Apremilast is a robust antipsoriatic drug for which the drug survival is not strongly influenced by most patient- or disease-related factors except age. Drug survival is significantly shorter in patients younger than 40 years.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a possible predictor of treatment preference in psoriasis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of small molecule inhibitors for intracellular signal mediators varies among the individuals, and their mechanism of action is broad. A phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor apremilast shows a dramatic effect on a certain proportion of psoriatic patients by modulating the cellular metabolism and regulating the production of pro-inflammatory molecules. However, it is unclear to which disease subtype this drug benefits. While psoriasis is a Th17-mediated disease, how immune cells are affected by the modulation of cellular metabolism is not fully evaluated, either.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the indices which predict the efficacy of apremilast in psoriasis, and to investigate the impact of metabolic activity in immune cells on the psoriatic pathogenesis.

METHODS

The association of treatment efficacy with clinical and laboratory data of the 58 psoriatic patients was evaluated. The reflector of the associated index was also sought among the indices of cellular metabolic pathways by use of an extracellular flux analyzer.

RESULTS

There was a correlation between clinical improvement and the serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level in the patients treated with apremilast but not in those with biologics. Serum LDH level did not correlate with the cutaneous disease severity but correlated with the oxygen consumption rate of blood T cells.

CONCLUSION

Psoriatic patients with high serum LDH level can be benefitted by apremilast. The serum LDH level reflects the augmented respiratory activity of T cells in psoriasis. Our results would highlight the importance of regarding metabolic skew in immune cells as a treatment target in psoriasis.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Drug Survival of Apremilast in Treating Psoriasis: A Real-World Experience

BACKGROUND

Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor used for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Long-term data on the effectiveness and drug survival of patients treated with apremilast are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics, effectiveness, and drug survival of patients treated with apremilast in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with psoriasis who received at least 1 dose of apremilast between 2015 and 2018. We documented sex; age; type, duration, and severity (using Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] and Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]) of psoriasis; comorbidities; previous treatment modalities; adverse events; and reasons for therapy discontinuation. For drug survival, estimates and efficacy analysis with Kaplan-Meier statistics were used.

RESULTS

The drug survival rate of the 93 reviewed patients was 69.5% at 6 months, 34.7% at 12 months, and 25.8% at 24 months after initiating therapy. The median survival duration was 8.0 months. Therapy was discontinued in 66.6 and 27.8% due to loss of efficacy and adverse events, respectively. At 24 months, 35.9% had achieved PASI75 response and 23.7% had achieved PASI90 response. Most observed adverse events were gastrointestinal issues, weight loss, and headache.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, especially for patients with difficult-to-treat locations and/or contraindications to other biologics. Furthermore, apremilast was used for patients with a history of nonresponse to biologics and was favored for patients with relatively low PASI (<10) and a high DLQI.

Characterization and Outcomes in Patients Treated With Apremilast in Routine Clinical Practice in Spain: Results From the APPRECIATE Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is necessary to expand the knowledge in the use of apremilast in clinical practice. The APPRECIATE study (NCT02740218) aims to describe the characteristics of patients with psoriasis treated with apremilast, to evaluate their perspectives and those of dermatologists, as well as the outcomes obtained in clinical practice in Spain.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who could be contacted 6 (±1) months after apremilast initiation. The data were obtained from medical records and questionnaires from patients and physicians.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were evaluated; at apremilast onset, they showed mean (standard deviation, SD) Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) = 8.3 (5.3), mean (SD) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) = 8.9 (6.6). At six months, 58.8% (n=47) of patients continued apremilast treatment (discontinuations due to lack of efficacy [16.3%], safety/tolerability [20.0%]). In patients continuing treatment, PASI75 was achieved by 36.7% of patients; mean (95% CI) DLQI score was 2.2 (0.7-3.6) and mean (SD) Patient Benefit Index score was 2.8 (0.8). Compliance with physicians' expectations was correlated with benefits reported by patients (r=0.636). Adverse events were reported by 56.3% of patients (the most common were diarrhoea and nausea).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving apremilast for 6 months in Spanish clinical practice, reported substantial improvements in their quality of life (mean DLQI reduced by more than 6 points) and disease severity (PASI75 achieved by over one-third of patients), despite less skin involvement than patients who enrolled in clinical trials.

Apremilast Pharmacogenomics in Russian Patients with Moderate-to-Severe and Severe Psoriasis

One of the target drugs for plaque psoriasis treatment is apremilast, which is a selective phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor. In this study, 34 moderate-to-severe and severe plaque psoriasis patients from Russia were treated with apremilast for 26 weeks. This allowed us to observe the effectiveness of splitting patient cohorts based on clinical outcomes, which were assessed using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). In total, 14 patients (41%) indicated having an advanced outcome with delta PASI 75 after treatment; 20 patients indicated having moderate or no effects. Genome variability was investigated using the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array. Genome-wide analysis revealed apremilast therapy clinical outcome associations at three compact genome regions with undefined functions situated on chromosomes 2, 4, and 5, as well as on a single single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on chromosome 23. Pre-selected SNP sets were associated with psoriasis vulgaris analysis, which was used to identify four SNP-associated targeted therapy efficiencies: IL1β (rs1143633), IL4 (IL13) (rs20541), IL23R (rs2201841), and TNFα (rs1800629) genes. Moreover, we showed that the use of the global polygenic risk score allowed for the prediction of onset psoriasis in Russians. Therefore, these results can serve as a starting point for creating a predictive model of apremilast therapy response in the targeted therapy of patients with psoriasis vulgaris.

Successful Treatment of Refractory Palmoplantar Pustular Psoriasis With Apremilast: A Case Series

Introduction: Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPPP) is a debilitating inflammatory skin disorder of the palms and soles that poses a high burden on affected patients. Satisfactory treatment response is rarely achieved using current treatment options, little is known about the potential benefit of the PDE4 inhibitor apremilast in the treatment of refractory PPPP patients. We aimed to evaluate the use of apremilast in PPPP patients. Patients and Methods: Six patients, four with severe physician global assessment (PGA) = 3 on a scale of 0-4 and two with very severe (PGA = 4) treatment-refractory PPPP [mean age (years ± SD): 56.2 ± 15.6], were included in this study. Five patients had concomitant psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Prior to apremilast administration, topical corticosteroids, psoralen-UVA and multiple systemic oral and biologic anti-inflammatory treatments were insufficient to improve their skin condition or had to be discontinued due to adverse events. Apremilast (titrated to a maintenance dose of 30 mg 2x/d) was commenced in all patients with clinical follow-up over 18 months. Results: Within the first 4 weeks of treatment, each patient's symptoms improved as assessed by PGA score. At 3 months, four patients had a mild PGA score and two were cleared from PPPP. After 18 months of follow-up, three patients improved from PGA = 3 to PGA = 1 and one patient from PGA = 4 to PGA = 1. Two patients discontinued treatment, one due to a lack of efficacy against PsA and the other to a desire to have a child. However, both patients recorded improvements before discontinuing treatment. Conclusion: Apremilast may be a promising treatment option for refractory and severely affected PPPP patients. Our observation, however, requires further validation.

The effect of apremilast therapy on skin cytokine levels in patients with psoriasis

Objective — Assessment of phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor (apremilast) therapy’s influence on skin cytokine levels in patients with moderate-to-severe and severe psoriasis. Material and Methods — An open, uncontrolled study was conducted. 16 patients with plaque psoriasis (13 men, 3 women; mean ± standard deviation (SD) age 35.1±9.7 years, range 21-60) were enrolled. The mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 20.7±8.93 (range 10-47). All patients were prescribed apremilast 30 milligrams (mg) per os (PO) Bis In Die (BID). The efficacy of therapy was evaluated by PASI at 14 and 26 weeks of therapy. Lesional skin samples were collected at baseline and weeks 14 and 26. Levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-21, IL-22, IL-23, IL-25, IL-31, IL -33, interferon (INF)-γ, Soluble CD40-ligand (sCD40L), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were measured by microsphere-based suspension array technology (Luminex® xMAP™ system). Results — Levels of cytokines (except IL-4 and IL-33) in lesional skin samples were found to have decreased at week 14 compared with those at baseline. Similar decreases were seen for IL-23, IL-25, IL-31, sCD40L at week 26. In contrast, the levels of other cytokines increased again at week 26, in comparison with baseline. Levels of IL-4 and IL-33 rose throughout the follow-up period. Cytokine levels in lesional skin samples were compared with those of healthy controls both at baseline and during therapy. Conclusion — The results of our study show that administering apremilast therapy to patients with psoriasis can bring the levels of cytokines involved in the IL-23/IL-17 axis in the lesional skin to the level of cytokine in non-lesional skin and to the levels in the skin of healthy individuals.

Deciphering the Association Between Psoriasis and Obesity: Current Evidence and Treatment Considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity and psoriasis represent chronic inflammatory states that are interconnected in a vicious cycle, sharing also a degree of synergy. In this review, we aim to decipher the various lines of evidence supporting the bidirectional association between psoriasis and obesity highlighting their pathophysiologic connections as well as we attempt to strategize a therapeutic holistic approach for obese psoriatic patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent meta-analyses have shown that (1) genetically higher BMI increased the odds of psoriasis occurrence; (2) obesity is associated with higher incidence and prevalence of psoriasis as well as psoriasis severity; (3) obesity is associated with lower efficacy to anti-TNF agents and may predict biologic treatment discontinuation; and (4) weight loss through diet and physical exercise may improve pre-existing psoriasis and prevent from de novo psoriasis. Methotrexate, acitretin, and cyclosporine could worsen hypertension, liver steatosis, and dyslipidemia. Since infliximab and ustekinumab are weight adjusted, they may be ideal drugs to treat obese psoriatic patients. IL-17 inhibitors are very effective independently from body weight; however, they tend to present better clearance rates in normal weight patients. There is a paucity on weight data regarding the efficacious IL-23 inhibitors. Apremilast may induce weight loss as an adverse effect presenting also some beneficial metabolic actions. Finally, simvastatin and some antidiabetic drugs could decrease psoriasis severity. More mechanistic, observational studies and well-conducted RCTs are necessary to decipher the enigmatic link between psoriasis and obesity, and to provide evidence-based specific guidelines for the screening and management of obese psoriatic patients.

Long-term Safety of Oral Systemic Therapies for Psoriasis: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Oral systemic therapies are important treatment options for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, either as monotherapy or in therapy-recalcitrant cases as combination therapy with phototherapy, other oral systemics or biologics. Long-term treatment is needed to maintain sufficient disease control in psoriasis, but continuous use of systemic treatments is limited by adverse events (AEs) and cumulative toxicity risks. The primary aim of this comprehensive literature review was to examine the long-term safety profiles of oral agents commonly used in the treatment of adults with psoriasis. Searches were conducted in EMBASE and PubMed up to November 2018, and 157 relevant publications were included. Long-term treatment with acitretin could be associated with skeletal toxicity and hepatotoxicity, although evidence for skeletal toxicity is mixed and hepatotoxicity is rare, particularly at low doses. Other safety issues include hyperlipidaemia and potential for teratogenicity up to 2-3 years after discontinuation of treatment. There is a paucity of data on long-term treatment with apremilast. Continued exposure to apremilast does not seem to increase the incidence of common AEs, such as gastrointestinal (GI) AEs, upper respiratory tract infections and headache, while the long-term risks for depression, suicidal thoughts and weight loss are unknown. Long-term ciclosporin treatment is associated with renal toxicity, hypertension, non-melanoma skin cancer, neurological AEs and GI AEs. Long-term methotrexate treatment is associated with hepatotoxicity, GI AEs, haematological toxicity, renal toxicity and alopecia. Finally, long-term treatment with fumaric acid esters (FAE) is associated with GI AEs, flushing, lymphocytopenia, proteinuria and elevated liver enzymes. Median drug survival estimates varied considerably: ~  2.9-9.7 months for apremilast; ~ 5.4 months for ciclosporin; ~ 8.6 months for acitretin; ~ 12.1-21.6 months for methotrexate; and ~  54.8 months for FAE. These long-term safety profiles may help to guide clinicians to select the optimal oral systemic treatment for the long-term treatment of psoriasis in adults.

Clinical efficacy, speed of improvement and safety of apremilast for the treatment of adult Psoriasis during COVID-19 pandemic

Time to improvement is a crucial characteristic for effective treatments of chronic inflammatory conditions, such as psoriasis. Apremilast is a recently approved drug, belonging to the small molecule phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, whose optimal safety and efficacy profile is somewhat affected by slow activity rate in clinical trials. Real world case series are suggesting a more consistent improvement, and with this additional personal investigation on 48 patients, we signal that 58% of patients achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, and 19% PASI 75 improvement in the first 8 weeks of treatment. Results at 16‐week are remarkable, with overall 55% of patients achieving PASI 75, 21% PASI 90 and 14% PASI 100. Only 8 patients (18, 6%) had slightly improved, although satisfied with the regimen, and determined to continue. Noteworthy, our population was rather problematic in terms of comorbidities (86%), and resistance to other treatments, with only 28% naïve to systemics, including biologics. Moreover, the observation period includes the Italian outbreak of COVID‐19 epidemic, and further information on apremilast safety are provided, no one of the patients having stopped treatment. In such a critical period, the apremilast satisfactory speed of therapeutic response in a real‐world setting has further strengthens patient's compliance to remain safely at home, which is the best strategy to limit contagion.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of apremilast in psoriasis at 52 weeks: a retrospective, observational, multicentre study by the Spanish Psoriasis Group

BACKGROUND

Little has been published on the real-world effectiveness and safety of apremilast in psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and drug survival of apremilast at 52 weeks in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis or palmoplantar psoriasis in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicentre study of adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis or palmoplantar psoriasis treated with apremilast from March 2016 to March 2018.

RESULTS

We studied 292 patients with plaque psoriasis and 85 patients with palmoplantar psoriasis. The mean (SD) Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score was 10.7 (7.0) at baseline and 3.0 (4.2) at 52 weeks. After 12 months of treatment, 73.6% of patients had a PASI score of 3 or less. In terms of relative improvement by week 52, 49.7% of patients achieved PASI-75 (≥75% reduction in PASI score) and 26.5% achieved PASI-90. The mean physician global assessment score for palmoplantar psoriasis fell from 4.2 (5.2) at baseline to 1.3 (1.3) at week 52. Overall drug survival after 1 year of treatment with apremilast was 54.9 %. The main reasons for treatment discontinuation were loss of efficacy (23.9%) and adverse events (15.9%). Almost half of the patients in our series (47%) experienced at least one adverse event. The most common events were gastrointestinal problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Apremilast may be a suitable alternative for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and palmoplantar psoriasis. Although the drug has a good safety profile, adverse gastrointestinal effects are common.

Long-term efficacy and safety of apremilast in psoriatic arthritis: Focus on skin manifestations and special populations

Few real-life studies evaluated long-term apremilast therapy in the variable spectrum of clinical-anamnestic features which can be found in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. This real-life retrospective observational study aimed to assess long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of apremilast among patients with PsA and concomitant cutaneous psoriasis. A stratified analysis was performed on special populations, defined as (a) number (≤1 vs >2) of comorbidities, presence or absence of: (b) history of malignancy, and (c) previous exposure to biologics. Patients attending three Italian University and Hospital centers, who received at least one dose of apremilast and had at least one follow-up visit were included. Ninety-six patients with PsA were identified. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Body Surface Area, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores improved during treatment, already at week 4, relative to baseline. More than 2 comorbidities, history of malignancy and previous biologic treatment negatively influenced PASI responses. At least one adverse event was experienced by 56/96 patients, and 11/56 events required drug withdrawal. In conclusion, this study confirm efficacy and safety of apremilast on joints and skin involvement of PsA, highlighting which patients could have less favorable treatment response.

Real-world Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast Monotherapy in the Management of Moderate-to-severe Psoriasis

Introduction:

Apremilast is the new oral drug in the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with well-established effectiveness and safety in long-term clinical trials and a few real-world studies. However, its effectiveness and safety in Indian setup have not been reported yet.

Materials and Methods:

This was retrospective, single-center, longitudinal, observational cohort study where the total study period was 24 weeks. Effectiveness parameters were the proportion of patients achieving psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 50, 75, 90, and 100 response at week 16 and 24. Safety was measured as the proportion of patients reporting ≥1 adverse event (AE) during the study period.

Results:

Data of a total of 70 patients were included in our study. At week 16, 76.92%, 41.53%, 15.38%, and 6.15% patients achieved PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100, respectively. At week 24, 81.53%, 58.46%, 29.23%, and 10.76% patients achieved PASI 50, 75, 90, and 100, respectively. Mean percentage reduction in PASI was 67% at week 24 and DLQI score was reduced significantly to 3.4 from mean baseline DLQI score of 10.8 (P < 0.001). 40% of patients reported ≥1 AE during the study period. 5 out of 70 patients discontinued apremilast due to AE. Nausea was most common AE reported by 21.4% patients followed by diarrhea (18.57%), headache (17.4%), vomiting (8%), weight loss (7.69%), myalgia (6.15%), and gastritis (6.15%). Most of the AEs were of mild-to-moderate severity.

Conclusion:

The results of this study support the long-term use of apremilast monotherapy as an efficacious and safe treatment option for the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Phototherapy achieves significant cost savings by the delay of drug-based treatment in psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Although used for decades in psoriasis, access to phototherapy is becoming increasingly restricted. Besides patient inconvenience, this is in large part to do with a perception of "high cost." We previously reported a comprehensive analysis of direct and indirect phototherapy treatment cost. However, no robust data exist on the actual savings associated with providing phototherapy in the treatment pathway.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the cost savings achieved by phototherapy by delaying alternative treatments.

METHODS

Costs accruing through the UK-wide established treatment pathway with and without phototherapy were analysed. Direct and indirectly incurred drug treatment costs were calculated using drug tariff, laboratory cost, estate rates and clinic review costs. To enhance reliability, ranges of cost scenarios were calculated by varying parameters such as drug dosing.

RESULTS

Medium annual cost savings per patient were £2200 [range: £1800-£2900] for NB-UVB, and £3700 [range: £2500-£5300] if both NB-UVB and PUVA courses were administered, respectively. As the provider treated 656 ± 76 patients per year during the 6-year observational window, this amounted to savings of £Mio 2.4 [range: £Mio 1.6-£Mio 3.4], even excluding additional non-modelled drug-associated costs (eg diagnostics, adverse event management). Since we only consider cost savings by delay of drug treatment for the duration of phototherapy, drug price reductions through biosimilar introduction only have a small effect. We provide spreadsheets allowing adaptation cost savings projections by varying input variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare providers may achieve significant cost savings by implementing and/or widening access to phototherapy.

Biomarkers of Inflammation in Obesity-Psoriatic Patients

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory multisystemic disease with a complex pathogenesis consisting of genetic, immunological, and environmental components. It is associated with a number of comorbidities, including diabetes, metabolic syndrome, obesity, and myocardial infarction. In addition, the severity of psoriasis seems to be related to the severity of obesity. Patients with higher levels of obesity show poorer response to systemic treatments of psoriasis. Several studies have demonstrated that white adipose tissue is a crucial site of the formation of proinflammatory adipokines such as leptin, adiponectin, and resistin and classical cytokines such as interleukin- (IL-) 6 and tumour necrosis factor-α. In psoriasis, due to the proliferation of Th1, Th17, and Th22 cells, IL-22, among others, is produced in addition to the abovementioned cytokines. With respect to leptin and resistin, both of these adipokines are present in high levels in obese persons with psoriasis. Further, the plasma levels of leptin and resistin are related to the severity of psoriasis. These results strongly suggest that obesity, through proinflammatory pathways, is a predisposing factor to the development of psoriasis and that obesity aggravates existing psoriasis. Different inflammatory biomarkers link psoriasis and obesity. In this paper, the most important ones are described.

TT genotype of rs10036748 in TNIP1 shows better response to methotrexate in a Chinese population: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate (MTX) is an efficacious treatment for psoriasis; however, its widespread application is limited by its unpredictable efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of clinical factors and variants of psoriasis susceptibility genes with clinical responses to MTX in a prospective cohort.

METHODS

A total of 221 patients with psoriasis were recruited. Patients who achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvement ≥ 75% at week 12 were defined as responders, whereas those with PASI improvement < 50% were defined as nonresponders. In 90 screening patients, genetic variants for 18 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 14 susceptibility genes, and HLA-Cw6 status were initially compared for responders and nonresponders. Statistically significant associations in genetic variants were verified in all 221 patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 49% and 45% of patients achieved PASI 75 improvement during screening and verification stages, respectively. Concomitant arthritis with psoriasis and high body mass index (BMI) negatively affect the efficacy of MTX. TT genotype of rs10036748 in TNIP1 was significantly associated with PASI 75 response at week 12 (54% and 37%, P < 0·05). A significantly higher PASI 90 response was observed in patients with TT genotype of rs10036748 (27% vs. 12%, P < 0·01) and TC/TT genotype of rs4112788 in LCE3D (25% vs. 13%, P < 0·05) at week 12 compared with those who had other genotypes. After adjustment for all confounding factors, only BMI (P < 0·05), arthritis (P < 0·05) and genotype of rs10036748 (P < 0·05) were significantly associated with clinical responses to MTX.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psoriasis with TT genotype of rs10036748 in TNIP1, with lower BMI, without arthritis will achieve a better response to MTX.

Apremilast in Psoriasis and Beyond: Big Hopes on a Small Molecule

Apremilast, an orally administered small molecule inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), has been licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of active psoriatic arthritis (March 21, 2014) and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (September 23, 2014). It has got approval from Drug Controller General of India for marketing in India in 2017. The drug has drawn much attention from the practising dermatologists for its commendable safety profile and prescription convenience. Introduced initially as an orally administered small molecule in psoriasis patients, the drug has now been used in various other indications as evident by the recent surge in literature for its off-label uses. Being a relatively new drug in the treatment armamentarium of psoriasis and other inflammatory dermatoses; in this review, we will discuss various practical aspects of prescribing oral apremilast, based on the current and emerging literature.

Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of apremilast in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis

Background: Real-world data differ from clinical trial data. Although some real-world data regarding apremilast use for psoriasis treatment has been reported in Western countries, no such data has been reported in Asian countries. Objective: To study the efficacy, including Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and drug survival, and safety of apremilast in Japanese patients with psoriasis. Methods: Data on all the patients treated with apremilast in Kurume University Hospital between May 2017 and June 2018 were retrieved, with June 30 2018, as the data lock date. Efficacy was analyzed by PASI50, PASI75, and PASI90; drug survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis; and drug safety by the proportion of adverse events (AEs). Results: Fourteen of 42 (33.3%) patients achieved PASI75/90; 16 (32%) patients had discontinued apremilast by the data lock date. Drug survival at week 28 was 70%. No serious AEs were reported; the most prevalent one was loose stools/diarrhea (60%), followed by nausea (38%). The most common reason for apremilast discontinuation was primary/secondary failure. Conclusions: Apremilast is safe and effective in Japanese patients with psoriasis. Higher occurrence of loose stools/diarrhea was noted in our cohort than that reported in Western real-world studies on apremilast.

Psoriasis: Which therapy for which patient: Psoriasis comorbidities and preferred systemic agents

Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with increased risk of comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, malignancy, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases. These factors have a significant impact on the decision to use one therapy over another. The past decade has seen a paradigm shift in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis that has led to identification of new therapeutic targets. Several new drugs have gained approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, expanding the psoriasis armamentarium, but still a large number of patients continue to be untreated or undertreated. Treatment regimens for psoriasis patients should be tailored to meet the specific needs based on disease severity, the impact on quality of life, the response to previous therapies, and the presence of comorbidities. The first article in this continuing medical education series focuses on specific comorbidities and provides insights to choose appropriate systemic treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.