1
|
Gordon M, Daniel M, Ajiboye A, Uraiby H, Xu NY, Bartlett R, Hanson J, Haas M, Spadafore M, Grafton-Clarke C, Gasiea RY, Michie C, Corral J, Kwan B, Dolmans D, Thammasitboon S. A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84. MEDICAL TEACHER 2024; 46:446-470. [PMID: 38423127 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2024.2314198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, and there is a critical need for a nuanced understanding of how AI is reshaping teaching, learning, and educational practice in medical education. This review aimed to map the literature regarding AI applications in medical education, core areas of findings, potential candidates for formal systematic review and gaps for future research. METHODS This rapid scoping review, conducted over 16 weeks, employed Arksey and O'Malley's framework and adhered to STORIES and BEME guidelines. A systematic and comprehensive search across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and MedEdPublish was conducted without date or language restrictions. Publications included in the review spanned undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education, encompassing both original studies and perspective pieces. Data were charted by multiple author pairs and synthesized into various thematic maps and charts, ensuring a broad and detailed representation of the current landscape. RESULTS The review synthesized 278 publications, with a majority (68%) from North American and European regions. The studies covered diverse AI applications in medical education, such as AI for admissions, teaching, assessment, and clinical reasoning. The review highlighted AI's varied roles, from augmenting traditional educational methods to introducing innovative practices, and underscores the urgent need for ethical guidelines in AI's application in medical education. CONCLUSION The current literature has been charted. The findings underscore the need for ongoing research to explore uncharted areas and address potential risks associated with AI use in medical education. This work serves as a foundational resource for educators, policymakers, and researchers in navigating AI's evolving role in medical education. A framework to support future high utility reporting is proposed, the FACETS framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morris Gordon
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Blackpool Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | - Michelle Daniel
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, SanDiego, CA, USA
| | - Aderonke Ajiboye
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Hussein Uraiby
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Nicole Y Xu
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, SanDiego, CA, USA
| | - Rangana Bartlett
- Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Janice Hanson
- Department of Medicine and Office of Education, School of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mary Haas
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Maxwell Spadafore
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | - Colin Michie
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Janet Corral
- Department of Medicine, University of Nevada Reno, School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA
| | - Brian Kwan
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, SanDiego, CA, USA
| | - Diana Dolmans
- School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL, USA
| | - Satid Thammasitboon
- Center for Research, Innovation and Scholarship in Health Professions Education, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giavina-Bianchi M, Amaro E, Machado BS. Medical Expectations of Physicians on AI Solutions in Daily Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIRX MED 2024; 5:e50803. [PMID: 38535503 PMCID: PMC11080601 DOI: 10.2196/50803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
Background The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has been a trending subject in the past few years. Although not frequently used in daily practice yet, it brings along many expectations, doubts, and fears for physicians. Surveys can be used to help understand this situation. Objective This study aimed to explore the degree of knowledge, expectations, and fears on possible AI use by physicians in daily practice, according to sex and time since graduation. Methods An electronic survey was sent to physicians of a large hospital in Brazil, from August to September 2022. Results A total of 164 physicians responded to our survey. Overall, 54.3% (89/164) of physicians considered themselves to have an intermediate knowledge of AI, and 78.5% (128/163) believed that AI should be regulated by a governmental agency. If AI solutions were reliable, fast, and available, 77.9% (127/163) intended to frequently or always use AI for diagnosis (143/164, 87.2%), management (140/164, 85.4%), or exams interpretation (150/164, 91.5%), but their approvals for AI when used by other health professionals (85/163, 52.1%) or directly by patients (82/162, 50.6%) were not as high. The main benefit would be increasing the speed for diagnosis and management (106/163, 61.3%), and the worst issue would be to over rely on AI and lose medical skills (118/163, 72.4%). Physicians believed that AI would be useful (106/163, 65%), facilitate their work (140/153, 91.5%), not alter the number of appointments (80/162, 49.4%), not interfere in their financial gain (94/162, 58%), and not replace their jobs but be an additional source of information (104/162, 64.2%). In case of disagreement between AI and physicians, most (108/159, 67.9%) answered that a third opinion should be requested. Physicians with ≤10 years since graduation would adopt AI solutions more frequently than those with >20 years since graduation (P=.04), and female physicians were more receptive to other hospital staff using AI than male physicians (P=.008). Conclusions Physicians were shown to have good expectations regarding the use of AI in medicine when they apply it themselves, but not when used by others. They also intend to use it, as long as it was approved by a regulatory agency. Although there was hope for a beneficial impact of AI on health care, it also brings specific concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edson Amaro
- Big Data Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Busch F, Hoffmann L, Truhn D, Palaian S, Alomar M, Shpati K, Makowski MR, Bressem KK, Adams LC. International pharmacy students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in medicine-A multinational, multicentre cross-sectional study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 90:649-661. [PMID: 37728146 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To explore international undergraduate pharmacy students' views on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into pharmacy education and practice. METHODS This cross-sectional institutional review board-approved multinational, multicentre study comprised an anonymous online survey of 14 multiple-choice items to assess pharmacy students' preferences for AI events in the pharmacy curriculum, the current state of AI education, and students' AI knowledge and attitudes towards using AI in the pharmacy profession, supplemented by 8 demographic queries. Subgroup analyses were performed considering sex, study year, tech-savviness, and prior AI knowledge and AI events in the curriculum using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Variances were reported for responses in Likert scale format. RESULTS The survey gathered 387 pharmacy student opinions across 16 faculties and 12 countries. Students showed predominantly positive attitudes towards AI in medicine (58%, n = 225) and expressed a strong desire for more AI education (72%, n = 276). However, they reported limited general knowledge of AI (63%, n = 242) and felt inadequately prepared to use AI in their future careers (51%, n = 197). Male students showed more positive attitudes towards increasing efficiency through AI (P = .011), while tech-savvy and advanced-year students expressed heightened concerns about potential legal and ethical issues related to AI (P < .001/P = .025, respectively). Students who had AI courses as part of their studies reported better AI knowledge (P < .001) and felt more prepared to apply it professionally (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Our findings underline the generally positive attitude of international pharmacy students towards AI application in medicine and highlight the necessity for a greater emphasis on AI education within pharmacy curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Busch
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena Hoffmann
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Truhn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Subish Palaian
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Muaed Alomar
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Kleva Shpati
- Department of Pharmacy, Albanian University, Tirana, Albania
| | | | - Keno Kyrill Bressem
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blease C, Kharko A, Bernstein M, Bradley C, Houston M, Walsh I, D Mandl K. Computerization of the Work of General Practitioners: Mixed Methods Survey of Final-Year Medical Students in Ireland. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 9:e42639. [PMID: 36939809 PMCID: PMC10131917 DOI: 10.2196/42639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential for digital health technologies, including machine learning (ML)-enabled tools, to disrupt the medical profession is the subject of ongoing debate within biomedical informatics. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the opinions of final-year medical students in Ireland regarding the potential of future technology to replace or work alongside general practitioners (GPs) in performing key tasks. METHODS Between March 2019 and April 2020, using a convenience sample, we conducted a mixed methods paper-based survey of final-year medical students. The survey was administered at 4 out of 7 medical schools in Ireland across each of the 4 provinces in the country. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests. We used thematic content analysis to investigate free-text responses. RESULTS In total, 43.1% (252/585) of the final-year students at 3 medical schools responded, and data collection at 1 medical school was terminated due to disruptions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. With regard to forecasting the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI)/ML on primary care 25 years from now, around half (127/246, 51.6%) of all surveyed students believed the work of GPs will change minimally or not at all. Notably, students who did not intend to enter primary care predicted that AI/ML will have a great impact on the work of GPs. CONCLUSIONS We caution that without a firm curricular foundation on advances in AI/ML, students may rely on extreme perspectives involving self-preserving optimism biases that demote the impact of advances in technology on primary care on the one hand and technohype on the other. Ultimately, these biases may lead to negative consequences in health care. Improvements in medical education could help prepare tomorrow's doctors to optimize and lead the ethical and evidence-based implementation of AI/ML-enabled tools in medicine for enhancing the care of tomorrow's patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Blease
- General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Anna Kharko
- Healthcare Sciences and e-Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Bernstein
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Colin Bradley
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Muiris Houston
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ian Walsh
- Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, Ireland
| | - Kenneth D Mandl
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Civaner MM, Uncu Y, Bulut F, Chalil EG, Tatli A. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:772. [PMID: 36352431 PMCID: PMC9646274 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03852-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the information age wanes, enabling the prevalence of the artificial intelligence age; expectations, responsibilities, and job definitions need to be redefined for those who provide services in healthcare. This study examined the perceptions of future physicians on the possible influences of artificial intelligence on medicine, and to determine the needs that might be helpful for curriculum restructuring. METHODS A cross-sectional multi-centre study was conducted among medical students country-wide, where 3018 medical students participated. The instrument of the study was an online survey that was designed and distributed via a web-based service. RESULTS Most of the medical students perceived artificial intelligence as an assistive technology that could facilitate physicians' access to information (85.8%) and patients to healthcare (76.7%), and reduce errors (70.5%). However, half of the participants were worried about the possible reduction in the services of physicians, which could lead to unemployment (44.9%). Furthermore, it was agreed that using artificial intelligence in medicine could devalue the medical profession (58.6%), damage trust (45.5%), and negatively affect patient-physician relationships (42.7%). Moreover, nearly half of the participants affirmed that they could protect their professional confidentiality when using artificial intelligence applications (44.7%); whereas, 16.1% argued that artificial intelligence in medicine might cause violations of professional confidentiality. Of all the participants, only 6.0% stated that they were competent enough to inform patients about the features and risks of artificial intelligence. They further expressed that their educational gaps regarding their need for "knowledge and skills related to artificial intelligence applications" (96.2%), "applications for reducing medical errors" (95.8%), and "training to prevent and solve ethical problems that might arise as a result of using artificial intelligence applications" (93.8%). CONCLUSIONS The participants expressed a need for an update on the medical curriculum, according to necessities in transforming healthcare driven by artificial intelligence. The update should revolve around equipping future physicians with the knowledge and skills to effectively use artificial intelligence applications and ensure that professional values and rights are protected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Murat Civaner
- Department of Medical Ethics, Bursa Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
| | - Yeşim Uncu
- Department of Family Medicine, Bursa Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Filiz Bulut
- Institute of Health Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu DS, Sawyer J, Luna A, Aoun J, Wang J, Boachie L, Halabi S, Joe B. Perceptions of US Medical Students on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Mixed Methods Survey Study. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 8:e38325. [PMID: 36269641 PMCID: PMC9636531 DOI: 10.2196/38325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the rapidity with which artificial intelligence is gaining momentum in clinical medicine, current physician leaders have called for more incorporation of artificial intelligence topics into undergraduate medical education. This is to prepare future physicians to better work together with artificial intelligence technology. However, the first step in curriculum development is to survey the needs of end users. There has not been a study to determine which media and which topics are most preferred by US medical students to learn about the topic of artificial intelligence in medicine. OBJECTIVE We aimed to survey US medical students on the need to incorporate artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education and their preferred means to do so to assist with future education initiatives. METHODS A mixed methods survey comprising both specific questions and a write-in response section was sent through Qualtrics to US medical students in May 2021. Likert scale questions were used to first assess various perceptions of artificial intelligence in medicine. Specific questions were posed regarding learning format and topics in artificial intelligence. RESULTS We surveyed 390 US medical students with an average age of 26 (SD 3) years from 17 different medical programs (the estimated response rate was 3.5%). A majority (355/388, 91.5%) of respondents agreed that training in artificial intelligence concepts during medical school would be useful for their future. While 79.4% (308/388) were excited to use artificial intelligence technologies, 91.2% (353/387) either reported that their medical schools did not offer resources or were unsure if they did so. Short lectures (264/378, 69.8%), formal electives (180/378, 47.6%), and Q and A panels (167/378, 44.2%) were identified as preferred formats, while fundamental concepts of artificial intelligence (247/379, 65.2%), when to use artificial intelligence in medicine (227/379, 59.9%), and pros and cons of using artificial intelligence (224/379, 59.1%) were the most preferred topics for enhancing their training. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study indicate that current US medical students recognize the importance of artificial intelligence in medicine and acknowledge that current formal education and resources to study artificial intelligence-related topics are limited in most US medical schools. Respondents also indicated that a hybrid formal/flexible format would be most appropriate for incorporating artificial intelligence as a topic in US medical schools. Based on these data, we conclude that there is a definitive knowledge gap in artificial intelligence education within current medical education in the US. Further, the results suggest there is a disparity in opinions on the specific format and topics to be introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Shalom Liu
- College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Jake Sawyer
- College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Alexander Luna
- College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Jihad Aoun
- College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Janet Wang
- College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Lord Boachie
- College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| | - Safwan Halabi
- Pediatric Radiology, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Bina Joe
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hossain MS, Syeed MMM, Fatema K, Uddin MF. The Perception of Health Professionals in Bangladesh toward the Digitalization of the Health Sector. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13695. [PMID: 36294274 PMCID: PMC9602521 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Bangladesh is undertaking a major transformation towards digitalization in every sector, and healthcare is no exception. Digitalization of the health sector is expected to improve healthcare services while reducing human effort and ensuring the satisfaction of patients and health professionals. However, for practical and successful digitalization, it is necessary to understand the perceptions of health professionals. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional survey in Bangladesh to investigate health professionals' perceptions in relation to various socio-demographic variables such as age, gender, location, profession and institution. We also evaluated their competencies, as digital health-related competencies are required for digitalization. Additionally, we identified major digitalization challenges. Quantitative survey data were analyzed with Python Pandas, and qualitative data were classified using Valence-Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER). This study found significant relationships between age χ2(12,N=701)=82.02,p<0.001; location χ2(4,N=701)=18.78,p<0.001; and profession χ2(16,N=701)=71.02,p<0.001; with technical competency. These variables also have similar influences on psychological competency. According to VADER, 88.1% (583/701) of respondents have a positive outlook toward digitalization. The internal consistency of the survey was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha score (0.746). This study assisted in developing a better understanding of how professionals perceive digitalization, categorizes professionals based on competency, and prioritizes the major digitalization challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md Shakhawat Hossain
- Department of CS, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
- RIoT Research Center, Independent University, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
| | - M. M. Mahbubul Syeed
- RIoT Research Center, Independent University, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
- Department of CSE, Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB), Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
| | - Kaniz Fatema
- RIoT Research Center, Independent University, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
- Department of CSE, Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB), Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
| | - Mohammad Faisal Uddin
- RIoT Research Center, Independent University, Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
- Department of CSE, Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB), Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Zander QEW, van der Ende-van Loon MCM, Janssen JMM, Winkens B, van der Sommen F, Masclee AAM, Schoon EJ. Artificial intelligence in (gastrointestinal) healthcare: patients' and physicians' perspectives. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16779. [PMID: 36202957 PMCID: PMC9537305 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20958-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering into daily life and has the potential to play a significant role in healthcare. Aim was to investigate the perspectives (knowledge, experience, and opinion) on AI in healthcare among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, gastroenterologists, and GI-fellows. In this prospective questionnaire study 377 GI-patients, 35 gastroenterologists, and 45 GI-fellows participated. Of GI-patients, 62.5% reported to be familiar with AI and 25.0% of GI-physicians had work-related experience with AI. GI-patients preferred their physicians to use AI (mean 3.9) and GI-physicians were willing to use AI (mean 4.4, on 5-point Likert-scale). More GI-physicians believed in an increase in quality of care (81.3%) than GI-patients (64.9%, χ2(2) = 8.2, p = 0.017). GI-fellows expected AI implementation within 6.0 years, gastroenterologists within 4.2 years (t(76) = − 2.6, p = 0.011), and GI-patients within 6.1 years (t(193) = − 2.0, p = 0.047). GI-patients and GI-physicians agreed on the most important advantages of AI in healthcare: improving quality of care, time saving, and faster diagnostics and shorter waiting times. The most important disadvantage for GI-patients was the potential loss of personal contact, for GI-physicians this was insufficiently developed IT infrastructures. GI-patients and GI-physicians hold positive perspectives towards AI in healthcare. Patients were significantly more reserved compared to GI-fellows and GI-fellows were more reserved compared to gastroenterologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quirine E W van der Zander
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Janneke M M Janssen
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Fons van der Sommen
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ad A M Masclee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen M, Zhang B, Cai Z, Seery S, Gonzalez MJ, Ali NM, Ren R, Qiao Y, Xue P, Jiang Y. Acceptance of clinical artificial intelligence among physicians and medical students: A systematic review with cross-sectional survey. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:990604. [PMID: 36117979 PMCID: PMC9472134 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.990604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) needs to be accepted and understood by physicians and medical students, but few have systematically assessed their attitudes. We investigated clinical AI acceptance among physicians and medical students around the world to provide implementation guidance. Materials and methods We conducted a two-stage study, involving a foundational systematic review of physician and medical student acceptance of clinical AI. This enabled us to design a suitable web-based questionnaire which was then distributed among practitioners and trainees around the world. Results Sixty studies were included in this systematic review, and 758 respondents from 39 countries completed the online questionnaire. Five (62.50%) of eight studies reported 65% or higher awareness regarding the application of clinical AI. Although, only 10–30% had actually used AI and 26 (74.28%) of 35 studies suggested there was a lack of AI knowledge. Our questionnaire uncovered 38% awareness rate and 20% utility rate of clinical AI, although 53% lacked basic knowledge of clinical AI. Forty-five studies mentioned attitudes toward clinical AI, and over 60% from 38 (84.44%) studies were positive about AI, although they were also concerned about the potential for unpredictable, incorrect results. Seventy-seven percent were optimistic about the prospect of clinical AI. The support rate for the statement that AI could replace physicians ranged from 6 to 78% across 40 studies which mentioned this topic. Five studies recommended that efforts should be made to increase collaboration. Our questionnaire showed 68% disagreed that AI would become a surrogate physician, but believed it should assist in clinical decision-making. Participants with different identities, experience and from different countries hold similar but subtly different attitudes. Conclusion Most physicians and medical students appear aware of the increasing application of clinical AI, but lack practical experience and related knowledge. Overall, participants have positive but reserved attitudes about AI. In spite of the mixed opinions around clinical AI becoming a surrogate physician, there was a consensus that collaborations between the two should be strengthened. Further education should be conducted to alleviate anxieties associated with change and adopting new technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyang Chen
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziting Cai
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Samuel Seery
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nasra M. Ali
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Ran Ren
- Global Health Research Center, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Youlin Qiao
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Youlin Qiao,
| | - Peng Xue
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Peng Xue,
| | - Yu Jiang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Yu Jiang,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sorg H, Ehlers JP, Sorg CGG. Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:8308. [PMID: 35886156 PMCID: PMC9317432 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The German healthcare system is facing a major transformation towards digitalized medicine. The aim was to find out the attitude and the degree of preparation of upcoming medical professionals for digital medicine. By means of an online survey, medical students from 38 German faculties were asked about different topics concerning digitalization. Most students (70.0%) indicated that they had not had any university courses on digital topics. Thus, only 22.2% feel prepared for the technical reality of digitalized medicine. Most fear losing patient contact because of digitalized medicine and assume that the medical profession will not be endangered by digitalization. Security systems, data protection, infrastructure and inadequate training are cited as the top problems of digitalization in medicine. Medical students have major concerns about incorrect decisions and the consecutive medicolegal aspects of using digital support as part their treatment plans. Digitalization in medicine is progressing faster than it can currently be implemented in the practical work. The generations involved have different understandings of technology, and there is a lack of curricular training in medical schools. There must be a significant improvement in training in digital medical skills so that the current and future healthcare professionals are better prepared for digitalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Sorg
- Didactics and Education Research in the Health Sector, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany;
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marien Hospital Witten, 58452 Witten, Germany
| | - Jan P. Ehlers
- Didactics and Education Research in the Health Sector, Faculty of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany;
| | - Christian G. G. Sorg
- Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Medical Students' Perceptions towards Digitization and Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10040723. [PMID: 35455898 PMCID: PMC9027704 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10040723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Digital technologies in health care, including artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, constantly increase. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes of 2020 medical students’ generation towards various aspects of eHealth technologies with the focus on AI using an exploratory sequential mixed-method analysis. Data from semi-structured interviews with 28 students from five medical faculties were used to construct an online survey send to about 80,000 medical students in Germany. Most students expressed positive attitudes towards digital applications in medicine. Students with a problem-based curriculum (PBC) in contrast to those with a science-based curriculum (SBC) and male undergraduate students think that AI solutions result in better diagnosis than those from physicians (p < 0.001). Male undergraduate students had the most positive view of AI (p < 0.002). Around 38% of the students felt ill-prepared and could not answer AI-related questions because digitization in medicine and AI are not a formal part of the medical curriculum. AI rating regarding the usefulness in diagnostics differed significantly between groups. Higher emphasis in medical curriculum of digital solutions in patient care is postulated.
Collapse
|
12
|
Blease C, Kharko A, Bernstein M, Bradley C, Houston M, Walsh I, Hägglund M, DesRoches C, Mandl KD. Machine learning in medical education: a survey of the experiences and opinions of medical students in Ireland. BMJ Health Care Inform 2022; 29:bmjhci-2021-100480. [PMID: 35105606 PMCID: PMC8808371 DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Blease
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anna Kharko
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.,Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Michael Bernstein
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Colin Bradley
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Muiris Houston
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.,School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ian Walsh
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Maria Hägglund
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Catherine DesRoches
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kenneth D Mandl
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Teng M, Singla R, Yau O, Lamoureux D, Gupta A, Hu Z, Hu R, Aissiou A, Eaton S, Hamm C, Hu S, Kelly D, MacMillan KM, Malik S, Mazzoli V, Teng YW, Laricheva M, Jarus T, Field TS. Health Care Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Countrywide Survey in Canada. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 8:e33390. [PMID: 35099397 PMCID: PMC8845000 DOI: 10.2196/33390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a futuristic concept; it is increasingly being integrated into health care. As studies on attitudes toward AI have primarily focused on physicians, there is a need to assess the perspectives of students across health care disciplines to inform future curriculum development. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore and identify gaps in the knowledge that Canadian health care students have regarding AI, capture how health care students in different fields differ in their knowledge and perspectives on AI, and present student-identified ways that AI literacy may be incorporated into the health care curriculum. METHODS The survey was developed from a narrative literature review of topics in attitudinal surveys on AI. The final survey comprised 15 items, including multiple-choice questions, pick-group-rank questions, 11-point Likert scale items, slider scale questions, and narrative questions. We used snowball and convenience sampling methods by distributing an email with a description and a link to the web-based survey to representatives from 18 Canadian schools. RESULTS A total of 2167 students across 10 different health professions from 18 universities across Canada responded to the survey. Overall, 78.77% (1707/2167) predicted that AI technology would affect their careers within the coming decade and 74.5% (1595/2167) reported a positive outlook toward the emerging role of AI in their respective fields. Attitudes toward AI varied by discipline. Students, even those opposed to AI, identified the need to incorporate a basic understanding of AI into their curricula. CONCLUSIONS We performed a nationwide survey of health care students across 10 different health professions in Canada. The findings would inform student-identified topics within AI and their preferred delivery formats, which would advance education across different health care professions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minnie Teng
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rohit Singla
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Olivia Yau
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Aurinjoy Gupta
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Zoe Hu
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Ricky Hu
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Camille Hamm
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Sophie Hu
- University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Dayton Kelly
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, ON, Canada
| | | | - Shamir Malik
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vienna Mazzoli
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yu-Wen Teng
- Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Maria Laricheva
- Faculty of Arts, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tal Jarus
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Thalia S Field
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Vancouver Stroke Program, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pangti R, Gupta S, Gupta P, Dixit A, Sati HC, Gupta S. Acceptability of artificial intelligence among Indian dermatologists. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021; 88:232-234. [DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_210_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanjeev Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, MM Institute, Ambala, Haryana, India
| | - Praanjal Gupta
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Ambika Dixit
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Deen Dayal Upadhaya College, New Delhi, India
| | - Hem Chandra Sati
- Department of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tran AQ, Nguyen LH, Nguyen HSA, Nguyen CT, Vu LG, Zhang M, Vu TMT, Nguyen SH, Tran BX, Latkin CA, Ho RCM, Ho CSH. Determinants of Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnosis Support System Among Prospective Physicians. Front Public Health 2021; 9:755644. [PMID: 34900904 PMCID: PMC8661093 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop a theoretical model to explore the behavioral intentions of medical students to adopt an AI-based Diagnosis Support System. Methods: This online cross-sectional survey used the unified theory of user acceptance of technology (UTAUT) to examine the intentions to use an AI-based Diagnosis Support System in 211 undergraduate medical students in Vietnam. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equational modeling was employed to assess the relationship between latent constructs. Results: Effort expectancy (β = 0.201, p < 0.05) and social influence (β = 0.574, p < 0.05) were positively associated with initial trust, while no association was found between performance expectancy and initial trust (p > 0.05). Only social influence (β = 0.527, p < 0.05) was positively related to the behavioral intention. Conclusions: This study highlights positive behavioral intentions in using an AI-based diagnosis support system among prospective Vietnamese physicians, as well as the effect of social influence on this choice. The development of AI-based competent curricula should be considered when reforming medical education in Vietnam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anh Quynh Tran
- Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Long Hoang Nguyen
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Cuong Tat Nguyen
- Institute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.,Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam
| | - Linh Gia Vu
- Institute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.,Faculty of Medicine, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam
| | - Melvyn Zhang
- National Addictions Management Service (NAMS), Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Son Hoang Nguyen
- Center of Excellence in Evidence-Based Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Bach Xuan Tran
- Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.,Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Carl A Latkin
- Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Roger C M Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Institute for Health Innovation and Technology (iHealthtech), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cyrus S H Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lim SS, Ohn J, Mun JH. Diagnosis of Onychomycosis: From Conventional Techniques and Dermoscopy to Artificial Intelligence. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:637216. [PMID: 33937282 PMCID: PMC8081953 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.637216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Onychomycosis is a common fungal nail infection. Accurate diagnosis is critical as onychomycosis is transmissible between humans and impacts patients' quality of life. Combining clinical examination with mycological testing ensures accurate diagnosis. Conventional diagnostic techniques, including potassium hydroxide testing, fungal culture and histopathology of nail clippings, detect fungal species within nails. New diagnostic tools have been developed recently which either improve detection of onychomycosis clinically, including dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and artificial intelligence, or mycologically, such as molecular assays. Dermoscopy is cost-effective and non-invasive, allowing clinicians to discern microscopic features of onychomycosis and fungal melanonychia. Reflectance confocal microscopy enables clinicians to observe bright filamentous septate hyphae at near histologic resolution by the bedside. Artificial intelligence may prompt patients to seek further assessment for nails that are suspicious for onychomycosis. This review evaluates the current landscape of diagnostic techniques for onychomycosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jungyoon Ohn
- Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Institute of Human-Environment Interface Biology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Je-Ho Mun
- Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Institute of Human-Environment Interface Biology, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|