1
|
Su Z, Bentley BL, Yu X, Jiang J, Liu Y, McDonnell D, Cheshmehzangi A, da Veiga CP, Xiang YT. Where is the money? Insights into China's post-COVID healthcare corruption-busting campaign. J Public Health Policy 2024; 45:396-400. [PMID: 38548971 DOI: 10.1057/s41271-024-00474-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Su
- School of Public Health, Institute for Human Rights, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
| | - Barry L Bentley
- Bioengineering Research Group, Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK
- Collaboration for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation, University College London, London, UK
| | - Xin Yu
- School of Public Health, Institute for Human Rights, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Jianlin Jiang
- School of Public Health, Institute for Human Rights, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Yifan Liu
- School of Public Health, Institute for Human Rights, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China
| | - Dean McDonnell
- Department of Humanities, South East Technological University, Carlow, R93 V960, Ireland
| | - Ali Cheshmehzangi
- Center of Innovation for Education and Research (CIER), Qingdao City University, Qingdao, China
- Network for Education and Research On Peace and Sustainability (NERPS), Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, 739-8530, Japan
| | - Claudimar Pereira da Veiga
- Fundação Dom Cabral - FDC, Av. Princesa Diana, 760 Alphaville, Lagoa dos Ingleses, Nova Lima, MG, 34018-006, Brazil
| | - Yu-Tao Xiang
- Unit of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Medicinal Administration; Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences; Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences; Institute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao, SAR, China.
- Centre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noor MN, Rahman-Shepherd A, Siddiqui AR, Aftab W, Shakoor S, Hasan R, Khan M. Socioecological factors linked with pharmaceutical incentive-driven prescribing in Pakistan. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 6:bmjgh-2022-010853. [PMID: 36731921 PMCID: PMC10175940 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmaceutical marketing through financial incentivisation to general practitioners (GPs) is a poorly studied health system problem in Pakistan. Pharmaceutical incentivisation is seen to be distorting GPs prescribing behaviour that can compromise the health and well-being of patients. We draw on a conceptual framework outlined in the ecological system theory to identify multiple factors linked with pharmaceutical incentivisation to GPs in Pakistan. We conducted qualitative interviews with 28 policy actors to seek their views on the health system dynamics, how they sustain pharmaceutical incentivisation and their effect on the quality of care. Our analysis revealed four interlinked factors operating at different levels and how they collectively contribute to pharmaceutical incentivisation. In addition to influences such as the increasing family needs and peers' financial success, sometimes GPs may naturally be inclined to maximise incomes by engaging in pharmaceutical incentivisation. On other hand, the pharmaceutical market dynamics that involve that competition underpinned by a profit-maximisation mindset enable pharmaceutical companies to meet GPs' desires/needs in return for prescribing their products. Inadequate monitoring and health regulations may further permit the pharmaceutical industry and GPs to sustain the incentive-driven relationship. Our findings have important implications for potential health reforms such as introducing regulatory controls, and appropriate monitoring and regulation of the private health sector, required to address pharmaceutical incentivisation to GPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Naveed Noor
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.,Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Afifah Rahman-Shepherd
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Wafa Aftab
- Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Sadia Shakoor
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Rumina Hasan
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Mishal Khan
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Deruelle F. The pharmaceutical industry is dangerous to health. Further proof with COVID-19. Surg Neurol Int 2022; 13:475. [PMID: 36324959 PMCID: PMC9610448 DOI: 10.25259/sni_377_2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 period highlights a huge problem that has been developing for decades, the control of science by industry. In the 1950s, the tobacco industry set the example, which the pharmaceutical industry followed. Since then, the latter has been regularly condemned for illegal marketing, misrepresentation of experimental results, dissimulation of information about the dangers of drugs, and considered as criminal. Therefore, this study was conducted to show that knowledge is powerfully manipulated by harmful corporations, whose goals are: 1/financial; 2/to suppress our ability to make choices to acquire global control of public health. Methods: Pharmaceutical industry techniques for manipulating science and COVID-19 reporting were reviewed. Several sources of official documents were used: PubMed; National Institutes of Health resources; pharmaceutical companies; policy documents; national newspapers and news agencies; and books by prominent professionals (scientific and legal). A few studies have not been published in peer-reviewed journals; however, they have been conducted by reputable scientists in their respective fields. Results: Since the beginning of COVID-19, we can list the following methods of information manipulation which have been used: falsified clinical trials and inaccessible data; fake or conflict-of-interest studies; concealment of vaccines’ short-term side effects and total lack of knowledge of the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccination; doubtful composition of vaccines; inadequate testing methods; governments and international organizations under conflicts of interest; bribed physicians; the denigration of renowned scientists; the banning of all alternative effective treatments; unscientific and liberticidal social methods; government use of behavior modification and social engineering techniques to impose confinements, masks, and vaccine acceptance; scientific censorship by the media. Conclusion: By supporting and selecting only the one side of science information while suppressing alternative viewpoints, and with obvious conflicts of interest revealed by this study, governments and the media constantly disinform the public. Consequently, the unscientifically validated vaccination laws, originating from industry-controlled medical science, led to the adoption of social measures for the supposed protection of the public but which became serious threats to the health and freedoms of the population.
Collapse
|
4
|
Due A. Are 'phase IV' trials exploratory or confirmatory experiments? STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 2022; 95:126-133. [PMID: 36027655 DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Exploratory experiments are widely characterized as experiments that do not test hypotheses. Experiments that do test hypotheses are characterized as confirmatory experiments. Philosophers have pointed out that research programmes can be both confirmatory and exploratory. However, these definitions preclude single experiments being characterized as both exploratory and confirmatory; how can an experiment test and not test a hypothesis? Given the intuition that some experiments are exploratory, some are confirmatory, and some are both, a recharacterization of the relationship between exploratory and confirmatory experimentation is needed. I discuss 'phase IV' trials to show what this recharacterization could look like. Phase IV trials can be exploratory and confirmatory insofar as they concurrently test hypotheses and explore for unforeseen phenomena. Even if it is uncontroversial that a single experiment can have multiple aims, the recharacterization of the relationship between exploratory and confirmatory experimentation is still required for these aims to be held together coherently. I offer an alternative characterization of the relationship between exploratory and confirmatory experimentation where the former remains a distinct kind of experimentation but is not characterized as non-hypothesis-testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Due
- Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Boussageon R, Blanchard C, Charuel E, Menini T, Pereira B, Naudet F, Kassai B, Gueyffier F, Cucherat M, Vaillant-Roussel H. Project rebuild the evidence base (REB): A method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients. Therapie 2022:S0040-5957(22)00177-9. [PMID: 36371260 DOI: 10.1016/j.therap.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine is the cornerstone of shared-decision making in healthcare today. The public deserves clear, transparent and trust-worthy information on drug efficacy. Yet today, many drugs are prescribed and used without solid evidence of efficacy. Clinical trials and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the best method to evaluate drug efficacy and side effects. In a shared medical decision-making approach, general practitioners need drug assessment based on patient-important outcomes. The aim of project rebuild the evidence base (REB) is to bridge the gap between the data needed in clinical practice and the data available from clinical research. The drugs will be assessed on clinical patient important outcomes and for a population. Using the Cochrane tools, we propose to analyse for each population and outcome: 1) a meta-analysis based on RCTs with a low risk of bias overall; 2) an evaluation of results of confirmatory RCTs; 3) a statistical analysis of heterrogeneity between RCTs and 4) an analysis of publication bias. Depending on the results of these analyses, the evidence will be categorized in 4 different levels: firm evidence, evidence (to be confirmed), signal or absence of evidence. Project REB proposes a method for reading and interpreting RCTs and their meta-analysis to produce quality data for general practitioners to focus on risk-benefit assessment in the interest of patients. If this data does not exist, it could enable clinical research to better its aim.
Collapse
|
6
|
Harris J. Moral Wrongs, Epistemic Wrongs, and the FDA. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:34-37. [PMID: 36170069 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2110967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
|
7
|
Lambert BL, Schiff GD. RaDonda
Vaught, medication safety, and the profession of pharmacy: Steps to improve safety and ensure justice. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce L. Lambert
- Department of Communication Studies Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Gordon D. Schiff
- Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA
- Center for Primary Care and Associate Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sud A, Strang M, Buchman DZ, Spithoff S, Upshur REG, Webster F, Grundy Q. How the Suboxone Education Programme presented as a solution to risks in the Canadian opioid crisis: a critical discourse analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059561. [PMID: 35820738 PMCID: PMC9277368 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pharmaceutical industry involvement in medical education, research and clinical practice can lead to conflicts of interest. Within this context, this study examined how the 'Suboxone Education Programme', developed and delivered by a pharmaceutical company as part of a federally regulated risk management program, was presented as a solution to various kinds of risks relating to opioid use in public documents from medical institutions across Canada. SETTING These documents were issued during the Canadian opioid crisis, a time when the involvement of industry in health policy was being widely questioned given industry's role in driving the overprescribing of opioid analgesics and contributing to population-level harms. DESIGN A critical discourse analysis of 69 documents collected between July 2020 and May 2021 referencing the Suboxone Education Program spanning 13 years (2007-2021) from medical, nursing and pharmacy institutions sourced from every Canadian province and territory. Discursive themes were identified through iterative and duplicate analyses using a semistructured data extraction instrument. RESULTS Documents characterised the Programme as addressing iatrogenic risks from overprescribing opioid analgesics, environmental risks from a toxic street drug supply and pharmacological risks relating to the dominant therapeutic alternative of methadone. The programme was identified as being able to address these risks by providing mechanisms to surveil healthcare professionals and to facilitate the prescribing of Suboxone. Medical institutions legitimised the Suboxone Education Programme by lending their regulatory, epidemiological and professional authority. CONCLUSIONS Addressing risk is considered as a central, moral responsibility of contemporary healthcare services. In this case, moral imperatives to address opioid crisis-related risks overrode other ethical concerns regarding conflicts of interest between industry and public welfare. Failing to address these conflicts potentially imperils efforts of mitigating population health harms by propagating an important driving force of the opioid crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhimanyu Sud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Strang
- Department of Sociology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Z Buchman
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bioethics Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sheryl Spithoff
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ross E G Upshur
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fiona Webster
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quinn Grundy
- Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) is due for reauthorization in 2022. Beyond creating the user fee program which now generates a majority of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Human Drugs Program budget, PDUFA has made numerous additional changes to FDA policy during its 29-year history. FDA's budgetary dependence on user fees may advantage the industry in negotiating favorable policy changes through PDUFA. METHODS The full texts of all prior PDUFA reauthorization bills and all submitted public comments and meeting minutes for the 2022 reauthorization were reviewed. Provisions affecting FDA regulatory authority and processes were identified. FINDINGS PDUFA legislation has instituted a broad range of changes to FDA policy, including evidentiary standards for drug approval, accelerated pathways for approval, industry involvement in FDA decision-making, rules regarding industry information dissemination to providers, and market entry of generic drugs. Negotiations over the 2022 reauthorization suggest that industry priorities include increased application of real-world evidence, regulatory certainty, and increased communication between FDA and industry during the drug application process. CONCLUSIONS The need for PDUFA reauthorization every 5 years has created a recurring legislative vehicle through which far-ranging changes to FDA have been enacted, reshaping the agency's interactions and relationship with the regulated industry. The majority of policy changes enacted through PDUFA legislation have favored industry through decreasing regulatory standards, shortening approval times, and increasing industry involvement in FDA decision-making. FDA's budgetary dependence on the industry, the urgency of each PDUFA reauthorization's passage to maintain uninterrupted funding, and the industry's required participation in PDUFA negotiations may advantage the industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron P. Mitchell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Niti U. Trivedi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter B. Bach
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Delfi Diagnostics, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Andrade G, Redondo MC. The need for "gentle medicine" in a post Covid-19 world. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2021; 24:475-486. [PMID: 34415502 PMCID: PMC8377702 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-021-10046-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
As it has historically been the case with many pandemics, the Covid-19 experience will induce many philosophers to reconsider the value of medical practice. This should be a good opportunity to critically scrutinize the way medical research and medical interventions are carried out. For much of its history, medicine has been very inefficient. But, even in its contemporary forms, a review of common protocols in medical research and medical interventions reveal many shortcomings, especially related to methodological flaws, and more importantly, conflicts of interests due to profit incentives. In the face of these problems, we propose a program of "gentle medicine". This term, originally formulated by philosopher Jacob Stegenga, describes a form of medicine in which physicians intervene less than they currently do. As part of this general program, we advance a series of reform recommendations that could be enacted both by medical staff in their everyday practice, but also by public health officials and policymakers.
Collapse
|
11
|
Makhinson M, Seshia SS, Young GB, Smith PA, Stobart K, Guha IN. The iatrogenic opioid crisis: An example of 'institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals'? J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:1033-1043. [PMID: 33760335 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Prescribed opioids are major contributors to the international public health opioid crisis. Such widespread iatrogenic harms usually result from collective decision failures of healthcare organizations rather than solely of individual organizations or professionals. Findings from a system-wide safety analysis of the iatrogenic opioid crisis that includes roles of pertinent healthcare organizations may help avoid or mitigate similar future iatrogenic consequences. In this retrospective exploratory study, we report such an analysis. METHODS The study population encompassed the entire age spectrum and included those in whom opioids prescribed for chronic pain (unrelated to malignancy) were associated with death or morbidity. Root cause analysis, incorporating recent suggestions for improvement, was used to identify possible contributory factors from the literature. Based on their mandated roles and potential influences to prevent or mitigate the iatrogenic crisis, relevant organizations were grouped and stratified from most to least influential. RESULTS The analysis identified a chain of multiple interrelated causal factors within and between organizations. The most influential organizations were pharmaceutical, political, and drug regulatory; next: experts and their related societies, and publications. Less influential: accreditation, professional licensing and regulatory, academic and healthcare funding bodies. Collectively, their views and decisions influenced prescribing practices of frontline healthcare professionals and advocacy groups. Financial associations between pharmaceutical and most other organizations/groups were common. Ultimately, patients were adversely affected. There was a complex association with psychosocial variables. LIMITATIONS The analysis suggests associations not causality. CONCLUSION The iatrogenic crisis has multiple intricately linked roots. The major catalyst: pervasive pharma-linked financial conflicts of interest (CoIs) involving most other healthcare organizations. These extensive financial CoIs were likely triggers for a cascade of erroneous decisions and actions that adversely affected patients. The actions and decisions of pharma ranged from unethical to illegal. The iatrogenic opioid crisis may exemplify 'institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Makhinson
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Shashi S Seshia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Gordon Bryan Young
- Clinical Neurological Sciences and Medicine (Critical Care), Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Grey Bruce Health Services, Owen Sound, Ontario, Canada
| | - Preston A Smith
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Kent Stobart
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Indra Neil Guha
- NIHR Nottingham BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Government Pharmaceutical Development to Address High Prices: Challenges Ahead. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2021; 55:1103-1105. [PMID: 34263440 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-021-00324-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Government development of new medicines has recently received attention as a means of lowering drug prices. These proposals are generally based on the assumption that the private market charges prices that are higher than justified by the costs of development. Although some costs could be avoided through government drug development, most costs would remain unchanged and some could potentially increase. Inefficiencies that are more difficult to quantify are likely to worsen with greater government involvement in research allocation decisions, including lobbying by industry or patient groups. Government manufacturing is an alluring proposition, but is unlikely in the long term to improve new drug development or lower costs.
Collapse
|
13
|
Yarborough M. Do we really know how many clinical trials are conducted ethically? Why research ethics committee review practices need to be strengthened and initial steps we could take to strengthen them. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2021; 47:572-579. [PMID: 32532827 PMCID: PMC8011810 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-106014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) play a critical gatekeeping role in clinical trials. This role is meant to ensure that only those trials that meet certain ethical thresholds proceed through their gate. Two of these thresholds are that the potential benefits of trials are reasonable in relation to risks and that trials are capable of producing a requisite amount of social value. While one ought not expect perfect execution by RECs of their gatekeeping role, one should expect routine success in it. This article reviews a range of evidence showing that substantial numbers of ethically tainted trials are receiving REC approvals. Many of the trials are early phase trials that evidence shows have benefits that may not be reasonable compared with their risks and many others are later trials that evidence shows may lack sufficient social value. The evidence pertains to such matters as methodologically inadequate preclinical studies incapable of supporting the inferences that REC members must make about the prospects for potential benefit needed to offset the risks in early phase trials and sponsorship bias that can cause improperly designed, conducted, analysed and reported later phase trials. The analysis of the evidence makes clear that REC practices need to be strengthened if they are to adequately fulfil their gatekeeping role. The article also explores options that RECs could use in order to improve their gatekeeping function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Yarborough
- Bioethics Program, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rickard E, Ozieranski P. A hidden web of policy influence: The pharmaceutical industry's engagement with UK's All-Party Parliamentary Groups. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252551. [PMID: 34166396 PMCID: PMC8224875 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Our objective was to examine conflicts of interest between the UK’s health-focused All-Party Parliamentary Groups (APPGs) and the pharmaceutical industry between 2012 and 2018. APPGs are informal cross-party groups revolving around a particular topic run by and for Members of the UK’s Houses of Commons and Lords. They facilitate engagement between parliamentarians and external organisations, disseminate knowledge, and generate debate through meetings, publications, and events. We identified APPGs focusing on physical or mental health, wellbeing, health care, or treatment and extracted details of their payments from external donors disclosed on the Register for All-Party Parliamentary Groups. We identified all donors which were pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical industry-funded patient organisations. We established that sixteen of 146 (11%) health-related APPGs had conflicts of interest indicated by reporting payments from thirty-five pharmaceutical companies worth £1,211,345.81 (16.6% of the £7,283,414.90 received by all health-related APPGs). Two APPGs (Health and Cancer) received more than half of the total value provided by drug companies. Fifty APPGs also had received payments from patient organisations with conflicts of interest, indicated by reporting 304 payments worth £986,054.94 from 57 (of 84) patient organisations which had received £27,883,556.3 from pharmaceutical companies across the same period. In total, drug companies and drug industry-funded patient organisations provided a combined total of £2,197,400.75 (30.2% of all funding received by health-related APPGs) and 468 (of 1,177–39.7%) payments to 58 (of 146–39.7%) health-related APPGs, with the APPG for Cancer receiving the most funding. In conclusion, we found evidence of conflicts of interests through APPGs receiving substantial income from pharmaceutical companies. Policy influence exerted by the pharmaceutical industry needs to be examined holistically, with an emphasis on relationships between actors potentially playing part in its lobbying campaigns. We also suggest ways of improving transparency of payment reporting by APPGs and pharmaceutical companies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Rickard
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
| | - Piotr Ozieranski
- Department of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vaismoradi M, Jordan S, Logan PA, Amaniyan S, Glarcher M. A Systematic Review of the Legal Considerations Surrounding Medicines Management. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2021; 57:65. [PMID: 33450903 PMCID: PMC7828352 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57010065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This study explores the legal considerations surrounding medicines management, providing a synthesis of existing knowledge. An integrative systematic review of the current international knowledge was performed. The search encompassed the online databases of PubMed (including Medline), Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science using MeSH terms and relevant keywords relating to the legal considerations of medicines management in healthcare settings. The search process led to the identification of 6051 studies published between 2010 and 2020, of which six articles were found to be appropriate for data analysis and synthesis based on inclusion criteria. Research methods were varied and included qualitative interviews, mixed-methods designs, retrospective case reports and cross-sectional interrupted time-series analysis. Their foci were on the delegation of medicines management, pharmacovigilance and reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) before and after legislation by nurses, physicians and pharmacists, medico-legal litigation, use of forced medication and the prescription monitoring program. Given the heterogenicity of the studies in terms of aims and research methods, a meta-analysis could not be performed and, therefore, our review findings are presented narratively under the categories of 'healthcare providers' education and monitoring tasks', 'individual and shared responsibility', and 'patients' rights'. This review identifies legal aspects surrounding medicines management, including supervision and monitoring of the effects of medicines; healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes; support and standardised tools for monitoring and reporting medicines' adverse side effects/ADRs; electronic health record systems; individual and shared perceptions of responsibility; recognition of nurses' roles; detection of sentinel medication errors; covert or non-voluntary administration of medication, and patient participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojtaba Vaismoradi
- Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, 8049 Bodø, Norway
| | - Sue Jordan
- Department of Nursing, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK;
| | - Patricia A. Logan
- Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst 2795, Australia;
| | - Sara Amaniyan
- Student Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan 3514799442, Iran;
| | - Manela Glarcher
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bennett CL, Hoque S, Olivieri N, Taylor MA, Aboulafia D, Lubaczewski C, Bennett AC, Vemula J, Schooley B, Witherspoon BJ, Godwin AC, Ray PS, Yarnold PR, Ausdenmoore HC, Fishman M, Herring G, Ventrone A, Aldaco J, Hrushesky WJ, Restaino J, Thomsen HS, Yarnold PR, Marx R, Migliorati C, Ruggiero S, Nabhan C, Carson KR, McKoy JM, Yang YT, Schoen MW, Knopf K, Martin L, Sartor O, Rosen S, Smith WK. Consequences to patients, clinicians, and manufacturers when very serious adverse drug reactions are identified (1997-2019): A qualitative analysis from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR). EClinicalMedicine 2021; 31:100693. [PMID: 33554084 PMCID: PMC7846671 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse drug/device reactions (ADRs) can result in severe patient harm. We define very serious ADRs as being associated with severe toxicity, as measured on the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE)) scale, following use of drugs or devices with large sales, large financial settlements, and large numbers of injured persons. We report on impacts on patients, clinicians, and manufacturers following very serious ADR reporting. METHODS We reviewed clinician identified very serious ADRs published between 1997 and 2019. Drugs and devices associated with reports of very serious ADRs were identified. Included drugs or devices had market removal discussed at Food and Drug Advisory (FDA) Advisory Committee meetings, were published by clinicians, had sales > $1 billion, were associated with CTCAE Grade 4 or 5 toxicity effects, and had either >$1 billion in settlements or >1,000 injured patients. Data sources included journals, Congressional transcripts, and news reports. We reviewed data on: 1) timing of ADR reports, Boxed warnings, and product withdrawals, and 2) patient, clinician, and manufacturer impacts. Binomial analysis was used to compare sales pre- and post-FDA Advisory Committee meetings. FINDINGS Twenty very serious ADRs involved fifteen drugs and one device. Legal settlements totaled $38.4 billion for 753,900 injured persons. Eleven of 18 clinicians (61%) reported harms, including verbal threats from manufacturer (five) and loss of a faculty position (one). Annual sales decreased 94% from $29.1 billion pre-FDA meeting to $4.9 billion afterwards (p<0.0018). Manufacturers of four drugs paid $1.7 billion total in criminal fines for failing to inform the FDA and physicians about very serious ADRs. Following FDA approval, the median time to ADR reporting was 7.5 years (Interquartile range 3,13 years). Twelve drugs received Box warnings and one drug received a warning (median, 7.5 years following ADR reporting (IQR 5,11 years). Six drugs and 1 device were withdrawn from marketing (median, 5 years after ADR reporting (IQR 4,6 years)). INTERPRETATION Because very serious ADRs impacts are so large, policy makers should consider developing independently funded pharmacovigilance centers of excellence to assist with clinician investigations. FUNDING This work received support from the National Cancer Institute (1R01 CA102713 (CLB), https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/national-cancer-institute-nci; and two Pilot Project grants from the American Cancer Society's Institutional Grant Award to the University of South Carolina (IRG-13-043-01) https://www.cancer.org/ (SH; BS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles L. Bennett
- City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, California, United States
- University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Shamia Hoque
- University of South Carolina College of Engineering and Computing in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | | | - Matthew A. Taylor
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - David Aboulafia
- Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Courtney Lubaczewski
- University of South Carolina College of Arts and Sciences in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Andrew C. Bennett
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Jay Vemula
- University of South Carolina College of Arts and Sciences in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Benjamin Schooley
- University of South Carolina College of Engineering and Computing in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Bartlett J. Witherspoon
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Ashley C Godwin
- University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Paul S. Ray
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Paul R. Yarnold
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Henry C. Ausdenmoore
- City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, California, United States
- University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- University of South Carolina College of Engineering and Computing in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- University of South Carolina College of Arts and Sciences in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- University of South Carolina School of Medicine in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida, United States
- Uniformed Services University F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland, United States
- Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Rush University School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
- University of Copenhagen in Copenhagen, Denmark
- Caris Life Sciences in Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Highland Hospital in Oakland, California, United States
- Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle, Washington, United States
- New York Center for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in New Hyde Park, New York, United States
- University of Florida in Gainesville, Florida, United States
| | - Marc Fishman
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Georgne Herring
- University of South Carolina College of Arts and Sciences in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Anne Ventrone
- University of South Carolina College of Arts and Sciences in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Juan Aldaco
- City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, California, United States
| | - William J. Hrushesky
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - John Restaino
- University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | | | - Paul R. Yarnold
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Robert Marx
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine in Miami, Florida, United States
| | | | - Salvatore Ruggiero
- New York Center for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in New Hyde Park, New York, United States
| | - Chadi Nabhan
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- Caris Life Sciences in Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Kenneth R. Carson
- Rush University School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - June M. McKoy
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Y. Tony Yang
- George Washington University School of Nursing and Milken Institute School of Public Health in Washington, District of Columbia, United States
| | - Martin W. Schoen
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Kevin Knopf
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
- Highland Hospital in Oakland, California, United States
| | - Linda Martin
- The SONAR Project of University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy in Columbia, South Carolina, United States
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Tulane University School of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
| | - Steven Rosen
- City of Hope National Medical Center in Duarte, California, United States
| | - William K. Smith
- Uniformed Services University F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bhasale AL, Sarpatwari A, De Bruin ML, Lexchin J, Lopert R, Bahri P, Mintzes BJ. Postmarket Safety Communication for Protection of Public Health: A Comparison of Regulatory Policy in Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 109:1424-1442. [PMID: 32767557 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
In the wake of the withdrawal of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug rofecoxib, regulators worldwide reconsidered their approach to postmarket safety. Many have since adopted a "life cycle" approach to regulation of medicines, facilitating faster approval of new medicines while planning for potential postmarket safety issues. A crucial aspect of postmarket safety is the effective and timely communication of emerging risk information using postmarket safety advisories, commonly issued as letters to healthcare professionals, drug safety bulletins, media alerts, and website announcements. Yet regulators differ in their use of postmarket safety advisories. We examined the capacity of regulators in the United States, Europe, Canada, and Australia to warn about postmarket safety issues through safety advisories by assessing their governance, legislative authority, risk communication capabilities, and transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice L Bhasale
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ameet Sarpatwari
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL) Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marie L De Bruin
- Copenhagen Center for Regulatory Science, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ruth Lopert
- George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Priya Bahri
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam
| | - Barbara J Mintzes
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
James JE. Can public financing of the private sector defeat antimicrobial resistance? J Public Health (Oxf) 2020; 41:422-426. [PMID: 29982521 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Public financing to incentivise private sector innovation in antimicrobial pharmaceuticals is believed by many to be necessary to defeat growing threats from antimicrobial resistance. Large cash incentives from the public sector are said to be essential to stimulate 'normal' market forces capable of unleashing much-needed innovation. However, there is little evidence to suggest that lack of innovation in drug development is peculiar to antimicrobials or that current deficits in the supply of antimicrobials is due to unique inefficiencies in the antimicrobial market. Neither the history of drug development in general nor of antimicrobial innovation in particular supports economic interventions intended to stimulate private sector supply of new antimicrobials. On the contrary, public underwriting of the private sector, which by definition is compelled to prioritise profit, risks dire consequences for future global health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack E James
- Department of Psychology, School of Business, Reykjavík University, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Regulatory Capture in Pharmaceutical Policy Making: The Case of National Medicine Agencies Related to the EU Falsified Medicines Directive. Pharmaceut Med 2020; 33:199-207. [PMID: 31933284 DOI: 10.1007/s40290-019-00277-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regulatory capture describes the phenomenon in which regulators (e.g. medical agencies) protect the interest of the companies they regulate rather than the interest of the public. Not much is known about the mechanisms of this potential threat within the area of pharmaceutical regulation. OBJECTIVES Through a comparison of two EU member states, the Netherlands and Denmark, this study aimed to investigate how regulatory capture could exist in pharmaceutical regulation. The EU Falsified Medicines Directive was used as the case, as it provided an opportunity for national medicine agencies to interact with various stakeholders. METHODS The processes of negotiation and implementation of the directive were mapped by interviewing 23 stakeholder representatives and triangulated with relevant documents. A meaning condensation method was applied to show how stakeholders were involved with authorities, and the theory of regulatory capture was used to interpret how the two countries were susceptible to capture. RESULTS The Danish Medical Agency was central in all relevant processes, whereas in the Netherlands, the Ministry of Health initiated the processes during the negotiation phase and, subsequently, three medical agencies shared responsibilities in the implementation phase. During the negotiation phase, the Dutch process was more focused on consensus among stakeholders while the Danish process focused on preparing the subsequent implementation. Neither member state prioritised transparency during implementation, but rather focused on timely implementation. CONCLUSIONS The processes of EU negotiations and implementation of the Falsified Medicines Directive were handled quite differently in Denmark and the Netherlands. It is possible that regulatory capture could be prevalent in both member states as policy makers were only in limited dialogue with patients. EU countries must decide whether this technocratic approach is acceptable, or whether they should make a more concerted effort to include the public.
Collapse
|
20
|
Light DW. Addressing Health Care Disparities: A Radical Perspective and Proposal. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2020; 5:29. [PMID: 33869437 PMCID: PMC8022773 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This paper begins by rethinking the sociological theory that social conditions are fundamental causes of health disparities and that controlling disease ironically increases or creates them. While usually true, the radical proposal of non-profit health care and pharmaceutical development could ameliorate health disparities if a nation like Canada or a region like the EU looked to radically different but successful models such as the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative. It uses what could be called entrepreneurial collaboration for public health markets and inverts intellectual property to public health IP to maximize health gain instead of profits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald W. Light
- Professor of Sociology, Psychiatry and Comparative Health Policy Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, United States
- Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
- New York University, New York City, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mohamed FA, Chaufan C. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Within NAFTA 1.0: Implications for NAFTA 2.0 and for Democratic (Health) Governance in Canada. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES 2020; 50:278-291. [PMID: 32019396 DOI: 10.1177/0020731420902600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In 1993, the Canadian federal government ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Prior to ratification, compulsory licensing was eliminated from Canada's Patent Act and intellectual property rights (IPRs) were strengthened. Compulsory licensing allows competitors to produce drugs under patent without the consent of the patent holder, challenging drug monopolies and lowering prices, whereas IPRs lengthen patent protections, shielding patent holders from competition and increasing prices. We perform a critical discourse analysis of key provisions in Chapter 17 of NAFTA in light of industry claims that pharmaceutical innovation requires important investments in research and development, justifying high drug prices. We note that since NAFTA, spending in research and development in Canada has decreased and drug prices have increased, becoming a major barrier to equitable access to critically necessary medications. We argue that by modifying the law, the federal government has wronged the Canadian people by discursively appropriating the language of protecting the public good while in practice legitimizing and consolidating private drug development and production, legalizing exorbitant profits, and excluding well-tested publicly financed alternatives. While NAFTA has now been superseded by the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement, our analysis offers important lessons moving forward.
Collapse
|
22
|
Barker KK. Lay Pharmacovigilance and the Dramatization of Risk: Fluoroquinolone Harm on YouTube. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR 2019; 60:509-524. [PMID: 31771357 DOI: 10.1177/0022146519888242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Sociologists have documented how the pharmaceutical industry has corrupted pharmacovigilance (PV), defined as the practices devoted to detecting and preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this article, I juxtapose the official postmarketing system of PV with firsthand accounts of ADRs as found in 60 YouTube vlogs created by 29 individuals who recount debilitating reactions to fluoroquinolones, a common class of antibiotics. Whereas official PV is said to contribute the banalization of risk, these vlogs exemplify the dramatization of risk. I consider the vlogs as instances of lay PV. They represent lay knowledge claims created in response to perceived failures in the official system of regulation. As such, lay PV shares commonalties with other articulations of lay expertise as a counter to medical authority. At the same time, this case also underscores how the YouTube platform offers new tools for the creation and distribution of lay expertise.
Collapse
|
23
|
Capraş RD, Urda-Cîmpean AE, Bolboacă SD. Is Scientific Medical Literature Related to Endometriosis Treatment Evidence-Based? A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA 2019; 55:medicina55070372. [PMID: 31311075 PMCID: PMC6681304 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55070372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Informed decision-making requires the ability to identify and integrate high-quality scientific evidence in daily practice. We aimed to assess whether randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on endometriosis therapy follow methodological criteria corresponding to the RCTs' specific level in the hierarchy of evidence in such details to allow the reproduction and replication of the study. Materials and Methods: Using the keywords "therapy" and "endometriosis" and "efficacy" three bibliographic databases were searched for English written scientific articles published from 1 January 2008 to 3 March 2018. Only the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were evaluated in terms of whether they provided the appropriate level of scientific evidence, equivalent to level 1, degree 1b in the hierarchy of evidence. A list of criteria to ensure study replication and reproduction, considering CONSORT guideline and MECIR standards, was developed and used to evaluate RCTs' methodological soundness, and scores were granted. Three types of bias, namely selection bias (random sequence generation and allocation concealment), detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment), and attrition bias (incomplete outcome data) were also evaluated. Results: We found 387 articles on endometriosis therapy, of which 38 were RCTs: 30 double-blinded RCTs and 8 open-label RCTs. No article achieved the maximum score according to the evaluated methodological criteria. Even though 73.3% of the double-blinded RCTs had clear title, abstract, introduction, and objectives, only 13.3% provided precise information regarding experimental design and randomization, and also showed a low risk of bias. The blinding method was poorly reported in 43.3% of the double-blinded RCTs, while allocation concealment and random sequence generation were inadequate in 33.3% of them. Conclusions: None of the evaluated RCTs met all the methodological criteria, none had only a low risk of bias and provided sufficient details on methods and randomization to allow for the reproduction and replication of the study. Consequently, the appropriate level of scientific evidence (level 1, degree 1b) could not be granted. On endometriosis therapy, this study evaluated the quality of reporting in RCTs and not the quality of how the studies were performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana-Denisa Capraş
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- "Dominic Stanca" Gynaecology Clinic, 400124 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - Sorana D Bolboacă
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen B, Restaino J, Tippett E. Key Elements in Adverse Drug Reactions Safety Signals: Application of Legal Strategies. Cancer Treat Res 2018; 171:47-59. [PMID: 30552656 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43896-2_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions, or unintended and harmful outcomes related to the administration of a pharmaceutical product, are a major public health concern, particularly for cancer patients. If counted as a separate cause of death, adverse drug reactions would represent the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. Several legal strategies are available to help mitigate their occurrences and to compensate victims for the harm that results from adverse events. Prior to FDA approval of a drug, the limited size and duration of clinical trials often fail to detect adverse drug reactions. However, after FDA approval, pharmacovigilance efforts are bolstered by recent expansions of FDA post-marketing regulatory powers codified in the 2007 Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act, as well as advances in big data analytics that improve adverse signal detection through data mining of large electronic health records. For victims of adverse drug reactions, tort lawsuits filed in the courts help compensate for the harm suffered and may also serve as warnings to manufacturers to improve drug safety to avoid future legal liability. While encouraging developments have occurred, new and existing legal structures to mitigate and compensate for adverse drug reactions must continue to be refined given increasingly complex pharmaceutical agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chen
- University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Deprescribing in Geriatric Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018; 19:919-922. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
26
|
Abstract
Aspects of Canada’s health regulatory system are currently being reviewed. This is timely, as the regulation and definition of drugs, foods, and natural health products (NHPs) is in need of revision to facilitate greater transparency and less ambiguity. A number of studies have illustrated the importance of a nutritious diet to prevent and manage chronic disease. Therefore, legislation surrounding food health claims needs to be adjusted so that it is more informative for disease prevention and, in some cases, treatment. Canada is modernizing the regulation of self-care products, under which NHPs, including probiotic products, are listed. With the growing appreciation for the role that microbes play in human health and the recognition that many foods, including those containing probiotic organisms, can prevent or mitigate disease, this provides an opportunity to reassess regulatory categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica White
- Lawson Health Research Institute, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
| | - Gregor Reid
- Lawson Health Research Institute, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
- Departments of Microbiology and Immunology and Surgery, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sommersguter-Reichmann M, Wild C, Stepan A, Reichmann G, Fried A. Individual and Institutional Corruption in European and US Healthcare: Overview and Link of Various Corruption Typologies. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2018; 16:289-302. [PMID: 29572725 PMCID: PMC5940713 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-018-0386-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, the fight against healthcare corruption has intensified. Estimates from the European Healthcare Fraud and Corruption Network calculate an approximate €56 billion annual loss to Europe as a result of corruption. To promote understanding of the complexity and interconnection of corrupt activities, we aim to present healthcare-related corruption typologies of the European Union and European Healthcare Fraud and Corruption Network. We subsequently link them to the typology of individual and institutional corruption introduced by Dennis Thompson in the context of investigating misconduct of US Congressional members. According to Thompson, individual corruption is the personal gain of individuals performing duties within an institution in exchange for nurturing private interests, while institutional corruption pertains to the failure of the institution in directing the individual's behaviour towards the achievement of the institution's primary purpose because the institutional design promotes the pursuit of individual goals. Effective anti-corruption activities not only require the enactment of anti-corruption laws but also the monitoring and, where appropriate, revision of institutional frameworks to prevent the undermining of the primary purposes of health systems or institutions. To gain further understanding of the similarities and differences of the three typologies, prime examples of corrupt activities in the health sector in the European Union and USA (along with their potential remedies) are provided. Linking corruption cases to Thompson's typology revealed that many corrupt activities may show elements of both individual and institutional corruption because they are intertwined, partly overlap and may occur jointly. Hence, sanctioning individual actors only does not target the problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia Wild
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Health Technology Assessment, Vienna, Austria
| | - Adolf Stepan
- Institute of Management Science, Technical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerhard Reichmann
- Department of Information Science and Information Systems, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Fried
- Transparency International-Austrian Chapter, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zheng H, George LK. Does Medical Expansion Improve Population Health? JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR 2018; 59:113-132. [PMID: 29390884 PMCID: PMC5946318 DOI: 10.1177/0022146518754534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Medical expansion has become a prominent dynamic in today's societies as the biomedical model becomes increasingly dominant in the explanation of health, illness, and other human problems and behavior. Medical expansion is multidimensional and represented by expansions in three major components of the healthcare system: increasing medical investment, medical professionalization/specialization, and the relative size of the pharmaceutical industry. Using Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development health data and World Development Indicators 1981 to 2007, we find medical investment and medical professionalization/specialization significantly improve all three measures of life expectancy and decrease mortality rate even after controlling for endogeneity problems. In contrast, an expanded pharmaceutical industry is negatively associated with female life expectancy at age 65 and positively associated with the all-cause mortality rate. It further compromises the beneficial effect of medical professionalization/specialization on population health. In general, medical professionalization/specialization and gross domestic product per capita have similar and stronger effects than medical investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zheng
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Madureira Lima J, Galea S. Corporate practices and health: a framework and mechanisms. Global Health 2018; 14:21. [PMID: 29448968 PMCID: PMC5815179 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-018-0336-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Global Burden of Disease estimates that approximately a third of deaths worldwide are attributable to behavioural risk factors that, at their core, have the consumption of unhealthful products and exposures produced by profit driven commercial entities. We use Steven Lukes' three-dimensional view of power to guide the study of the practices deployed by commercial interests to foster the consumption of these commodities. Additionally, we propose a framework to systematically study corporations and other commercial interests as a distal, structural, societal factor that causes disease and injury. Our framework offers a systematic approach to mapping corporate activity, allowing us to anticipate and prevent actions that may have a deleterious effect on population health. CONCLUSION Our framework may be used by, and can have utility for, public health practitioners, researchers, students, activists and other members of civil society, policy makers and public servants in charge of policy implementation. It can also be useful to corporations who are interested in identifying key actions they can take towards improving population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Madureira Lima
- Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Manor Rd Building, Manor Road, Oxford, OX1 3UQ, UK.
| | - Sandro Galea
- School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Seshia SS, Bryan Young G, Makhinson M, Smith PA, Stobart K, Croskerry P. Gating the holes in the Swiss cheese (part I): Expanding professor Reason's model for patient safety. J Eval Clin Pract 2018; 24:187-197. [PMID: 29168290 PMCID: PMC5901035 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although patient safety has improved steadily, harm remains a substantial global challenge. Additionally, safety needs to be ensured not only in hospitals but also across the continuum of care. Better understanding of the complex cognitive factors influencing health care-related decisions and organizational cultures could lead to more rational approaches, and thereby to further improvement. HYPOTHESIS A model integrating the concepts underlying Reason's Swiss cheese theory and the cognitive-affective biases plus cascade could advance the understanding of cognitive-affective processes that underlie decisions and organizational cultures across the continuum of care. METHODS Thematic analysis, qualitative information from several sources being used to support argumentation. DISCUSSION Complex covert cognitive phenomena underlie decisions influencing health care. In the integrated model, the Swiss cheese slices represent dynamic cognitive-affective (mental) gates: Reason's successive layers of defence. Like firewalls and antivirus programs, cognitive-affective gates normally allow the passage of rational decisions but block or counter unsounds ones. Gates can be breached (ie, holes created) at one or more levels of organizations, teams, and individuals, by (1) any element of cognitive-affective biases plus (conflicts of interest and cognitive biases being the best studied) and (2) other potential error-provoking factors. Conversely, flawed decisions can be blocked and consequences minimized; for example, by addressing cognitive biases plus and error-provoking factors, and being constantly mindful. Informed shared decision making is a neglected but critical layer of defence (cognitive-affective gate). The integrated model can be custom tailored to specific situations, and the underlying principles applied to all methods for improving safety. The model may also provide a framework for developing and evaluating strategies to optimize organizational cultures and decisions. LIMITATIONS The concept is abstract, the model is virtual, and the best supportive evidence is qualitative and indirect. CONCLUSIONS The proposed model may help enhance rational decision making across the continuum of care, thereby improving patient safety globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashi S Seshia
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - G Bryan Young
- Clinical Neurological Sciences and Medicine (Critical Care), Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, Grey Bruce Health Services, Owen Sound, Canada
| | - Michael Makhinson
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, USA
| | - Preston A Smith
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Health Sciences Building, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Kent Stobart
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Pat Croskerry
- Critical Thinking Program, Division of Medical Education, Dalhousie University Medical School, Halifax, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sommersguter-Reichmann M, Stepan A. Hospital physician payment mechanisms in Austria: do they provide gateways to institutional corruption? HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2017; 7:11. [PMID: 28251553 PMCID: PMC5332321 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-017-0148-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/21/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Institutional corruption in the health care sector has gained considerable attention during recent years, as it acknowledges the fact that service providers who are acting in accordance with the institutional and environmental settings can nevertheless undermine a health care system's purposes as a result of the (financial) conflicts of interest to which the service providers are exposed. The present analysis aims to contribute to the examination of institutional corruption in the health sector by analyzing whether the current payment mechanism of separately remunerating salaried hospital physicians for treating supplementary insured patients in public hospitals, in combination with the public hospital physician's possibility of taking up dual practice as a self-employed physician with a private practice and/or as an attending physician in private hospitals, has the potential to undermine the primary purposes of the Austrian public health care system. Based on the analysis of the institutional design of the Austrian public hospital sector, legal provisions and directives have been identified, which have the potential to promote conduct on the part of the public hospital physician that systematically undermines the achievement of the Austrian public health system's primary purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adolf Stepan
- Institute of Management Science, Technical University Vienna, Theresianumgasse 27, A-1040 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zuckerman DM. Can the FDA Help Reduce Drug Prices or the Cost of Medical Care? Am J Public Health 2017; 107:1752-1754. [PMID: 29019779 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.304093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diana M Zuckerman
- Diana M. Zuckerman is the president of the National Center for Health Research, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lexchin J. The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Canadian Government: Folie à Deux. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 13:10-16. [PMID: 28906232 PMCID: PMC5595210 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2017.25195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
The interest of the pharmaceutical industry is in achieving a profit for its shareholders while the interest of the Canadian government should be in protecting public health. However, over the course of the past few decades the actions of the Canadian government have been tilted in favour of industry in two areas. The first is in the relationship between industry and Health Canada and is manifested in the regulation of clinical trials, the drug approval system, drug safety and promotion. The second is in economic policy as it applies to policies about patent protection, the price of medications and measures taken to incentivize research and development. The problems in the relationship are structural and will only be solved through systemic changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Lexchin
- Professor Emeritus, School of Health Policy and Management, York University; Emergency Physician, University Health Network; Associate Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Heneghan C, Mahtani KR, Goldacre B, Godlee F, Macdonald H, Jarvies D. Evidence based medicine manifesto for better healthcare. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 22:120-122. [DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-j2973rep] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
35
|
Fisher JA, Cottingham MD. This isn't going to end well: Fictional representations of medical research in television and film. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE (BRISTOL, ENGLAND) 2017; 26:564-578. [PMID: 27048679 DOI: 10.1177/0963662516641339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Fictional television shows and films convey cultural assumptions about scientists and the research enterprise. But how do these forms of entertainment portray medical research participants? We sampled 65 television shows and films released between 2004 and 2014 to determine the ways in which medical research and human participants are represented in popular media. We found that research participants are largely represented as White, male, and lower or working class and that 40% of the participants depicted in these fictional accounts were seeking financial compensation, 34% were hoping for a therapeutic benefit, and 15% were coerced into participation. Regardless of participant motivation, media representations tended to portray a negative outcome of medical research. Interpreting the themes in these media, we argue that these fictional portrayals might provide the public with valuable representations of medical research, especially in terms of risks to research participants, scientific failure, and researchers' conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill A Fisher
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Major environmental changes and recurring pressures have made universities in the United States that educate health care professionals vulnerable to corruption. Based on the experiences of one large, state-supported university, this essay argues that, in adapting to pressures, universities rely on the ordinary structures and processes characteristic of large formal organizations. Hierarchy becomes an opening to corruption when it is associated with low levels of transparency, a culture of deference that discourages questioning, and the absence of countervailing centers of authority. Where the need for resources is great and access is uncertain, these can become incentives to ensure access through corrupt means. Embeddedness opens opportunities for misconduct by fostering relations based on narrow loyalties. The ordinariness of the pathways to corruption in higher education can obscure timely recognition of misconduct even by members working in affected organizations. But, once recognized, it is also possible to find equally ordinary solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mildred A. Schwartz
- University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
- New York University, New York City, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Myths and Realities About Why Prescription Drug Prices in the United States Are So High. Pharmaceut Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40290-017-0191-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
38
|
David-Barrett E, Yakis-Douglas B, Moss-Cowan A, Nguyen Y. A Bitter Pill? Institutional Corruption and the Challenge of Antibribery Compliance in the Pharmaceutical Sector. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY 2017. [DOI: 10.1177/1056492617696885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We investigate why top-down directives aimed at eradicating corruption are ineffective at altering on-the-ground practices for organizations that have adopted industry-wide “gold standards” to prevent bribery and corruption. Using interview and focus group data collected from leading multinational pharmaceutical firms, we unearth antecedents contributing to organizations’ systemic failure to embed their anticorruption policies in business practice. We identify two tensions that contribute to this disconnect: a culture clash between global and local norms, especially in emerging markets and a similar disconnect between the compliance and commercial functions. To overcome these tensions, we suggest that organizations are likely to find it easier to implement a no gifts policy if they cease to rely on local agents embedded in local norms and that there needs to be strong evidence of board-level commitment to antibribery programs, innovative ways of incentivizing compliant behavior, and a fundamental rethinking of organizations’ business model and remuneration practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yen Nguyen
- Global Commercial Strategy Organization, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rönnerstrand B, Lapuente V. Corruption and use of antibiotics in regions of Europe. Health Policy 2017; 121:250-256. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 12/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
40
|
Habets MGJL, van Delden JJM, Bredenoord AL. The unique status of first-in-human studies: strengthening the social value requirement. Drug Discov Today 2016; 22:471-475. [PMID: 27894931 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Revised: 11/12/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
For clinical research to be ethical, risks need to be balanced by anticipated benefits. This is challenging for first-in-human (FIH) studies as participants are not expected to benefit directly, and risks are potentially high. We argue that this differentiates FIH studies from other clinical trials to the extent that they should be given unique status in international research ethics guidelines. As there is a general positive attitude regarding the benefits of science, it is important to establish a more systematic method to assess anticipated social value to safeguard participants not only from enrolling in risky, but also in futile trials. Here, we provide some of necessary steps needed to assess the anticipated social value of the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle G J L Habets
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Primary Care and Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Primary Care and Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Primary Care and Health Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan, 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
King M, Bearman PS. Gifts and influence: Conflict of interest policies and prescribing of psychotropic medications in the United States. Soc Sci Med 2016; 172:153-162. [PMID: 27856120 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 10/30/2016] [Accepted: 11/07/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The pharmaceutical industry spends roughly 15 billion dollars annually on detailing - providing gifts, information, samples, trips, honoraria and other inducements - to physicians in order to encourage them to prescribe their drugs. In response, several states in the United States adopted policies that restrict detailing. Some states banned gifts from pharmaceutical companies to doctors, other states simply required physicians to disclose the gifts they receive, while most states allowed unrestricted detailing. We exploit this geographic variation to examine the relationship between gift regulation and the diffusion of four newly marketed medications. Using a dataset that captures 189 million psychotropic prescriptions written between 2005 and 2009, we find that uptake of new costly medications was significantly lower in states with marketing regulation than in areas that allowed unrestricted pharmaceutical marketing. In states with gift bans, we observed reductions in market shares ranging from 39% to 83%. Policies banning or restricting gifts were associated with the largest reductions in uptake. Disclosure policies were associated with a significantly smaller reduction in prescribing than gift bans and gift restrictions. In states that ban gift-giving, peer influence substituted for pharmaceutical detailing when a relatively beneficial drug came to market and provided a less biased channel for physicians to learn about new medications. Our work suggests that policies banning or limiting gifts from pharmaceutical representatives to doctors are likely to be more effective than disclosure policies alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa King
- Yale School of Management, Yale University, United States.
| | - Peter S Bearman
- Department of Sociology, Columbia University, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Immunothérapie : une innovation de rupture non soutenable économiquement ? Bull Cancer 2016; 103 Suppl 1:S186-S192. [DOI: 10.1016/s0007-4551(16)30377-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
43
|
Abstract
The primary health care approach advanced at Alma Ata to address social determinants of health was replaced by selective health care a year later at Bellagio. Subsequently, immunization was endorsed as a cost-effective technical intervention to combat targeted infectious diseases. Multilateral efforts to collaborate on immunization as a universal public health good ambiguously capture the interests of the world's governments as well as private, public, and not-for-profit institutions. Global assemblages of scientists, governments, industry and nongovernmental organizations now work in public-private partnerships to develop and make essential vaccines accessible, with vaccines marketed as single fix solutions for global health. Drawing from ethnographic fieldwork in France and Burkina Faso that followed the development, regulation, and implementation of the group A meningococcal conjugate vaccine for sub-Saharan Africa, in this article I describe events during and after the development of MenAfriVac. A technological success narrative steeped in collaborative capitalist rhetoric disguises neglected health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Graham
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
The 2013 cholesterol guideline controversy: Would better evidence prevent pharmaceuticalization? Health Policy 2016; 120:797-808. [PMID: 27256859 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2015] [Revised: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
45
|
Brooks E, Geyer R. Whatever happened to the Norwegian Medical Need Clause? Lessons for current debates in EU pharmaceutical regulation. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2016; 38:576-591. [PMID: 26564268 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Until 1994, pharmaceutical products seeking market authorisation in Norway were required to demonstrate a fulfilment of unmet medical need. This clause enabled the national regulator to dramatically limit the number of products on the market whilst encouraging price competition to keep drug expenditure low and was credited with encouraging the development of drugs with genuine added therapeutic value and reducing the incidence of antimicrobial resistance. Norway was forced to abandon its Medical Need Clause (MNC) when it joined the European Economic Area as it was incompatible with the acquis communautaire of the European Union. This article reviews Norway's experience with its MNC in light of contemporary debates in European health policy. It discusses the potential contribution of an MNC-style regulation to improving health, reducing illness, ensuring sustainable health systems and fostering pharmaceutical innovation. It concludes by asking how these findings can inform current European Union debates over the growing cost of prescription drugs and direction of pharmaceutical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Brooks
- Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, County South, Lancaster University, UK
| | - Robert Geyer
- Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, County South, Lancaster University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Eight-year experience of using HTA in drug reimbursement: South Korea. Health Policy 2016; 120:612-20. [PMID: 27086557 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2015] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This study describes the process and results of drug reimbursement decision-making in South Korea and evaluates its performance from the perspectives of the various stakeholders involved. Data were retrieved from the evaluation report posted on the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) website. As of 2014, 253 new drugs had been submitted to the HIRA for appraisal. Of these, 175 (69.2%) were recommended in favor of listing and 78 (30.8%) were rejected. Furthermore, 68 of these drugs were deemed clinically improved relative to existing drugs. For those drugs that did not demonstrate clinical superiority (which was most of them), a simple price comparison to the existing drug was utilized as a gate toward listing. On top of the base-line analysis, 104 stakeholders from the industry, academia, public office, and civic society responded to a questionnaire designed to obtain their opinions on the South Korean positive list system (PLS). Stakeholders agreed that the consistency of reimbursement decision-making has improved since 2007, while accessibility to new drugs has apparently decreased. Respondents also indicated a preference toward improved public access to decision-making information. This examination of reimbursement decisions in South Korea will illuminate critical issues for countries that are considering the introduction of similar policies.
Collapse
|
47
|
Godman B, Malmström RE, Diogene E, Gray A, Jayathissa S, Timoney A, Acurcio F, Alkan A, Brzezinska A, Bucsics A, Campbell SM, Czeczot J, de Bruyn W, Eriksson I, Yusof FAM, Finlayson AE, Fürst J, Garuoliene K, Guerra Júnior A, Gulbinovič J, Jan S, Joppi R, Kalaba M, Magnisson E, McCullagh L, Miikkulainen K, Ofierska-Sujkowska G, Pedersen HB, Selke G, Sermet C, Spillane S, Supian A, Truter I, Vlahović-Palčevski V, Vien LE, Vural EH, Wale J, Władysiuk M, Zeng W, Gustafsson LL. Are new models needed to optimize the utilization of new medicines to sustain healthcare systems? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2015; 8:77-94. [PMID: 25487078 DOI: 10.1586/17512433.2015.990380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Medicines have made an appreciable contribution to improving health. However, even high-income countries are struggling to fund new premium-priced medicines. This will grow necessitating the development of new models to optimize their use. The objective is to review case histories among health authorities to improve the utilization and expenditure on new medicines. Subsequently, use these to develop exemplar models and outline their implications. A number of issues and challenges were identified from the case histories. These included the low number of new medicines seen as innovative alongside increasing requested prices for their reimbursement, especially for oncology, orphan diseases, diabetes and HCV. Proposed models center on the three pillars of pre-, peri- and post-launch including critical drug evaluation, as well as multi-criteria models for valuing medicines for orphan diseases alongside potentially capping pharmaceutical expenditure. In conclusion, the proposed models involving all key stakeholder groups are critical for the sustainability of healthcare systems or enhancing universal access. The models should help stimulate debate as well as restore trust between key stakeholder groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Riaz H, Godman B, Hussain S, Malik F, Mahmood S, Shami A, Bashir S. Prescribing of bisphosphonates and antibiotics in Pakistan: challenges and opportunities for the future. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/jphs.12091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Humayun Riaz
- Faculty of Pharmacy; Sargodha University; Sargodha Pakistan
| | - Brian Godman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine; Division of Clinical Pharmacology; Karolinska Institute; Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge; Stockholm Sweden
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences; Strathclyde University; Glasgow UK
| | - Shahzad Hussain
- Drugs Control and Traditional Medicines Division; National Institute of Health; Islamabad Pakistan
| | - Farnaz Malik
- Drugs Control and Traditional Medicines Division; National Institute of Health; Islamabad Pakistan
| | - Sidra Mahmood
- Department of Pharmacy; Quaid e Azam University; Islamabad Pakistan
| | - Ali Shami
- Orthopaedic Department; Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences; Islamabad Pakistan
| | - Sajid Bashir
- Faculty of Pharmacy; Sargodha University; Sargodha Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jamoulle M. Quaternary prevention, an answer of family doctors to overmedicalization. Int J Health Policy Manag 2015; 4:61-4. [PMID: 25674569 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2014] [Accepted: 02/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In response to the questioning of Health Policy and Management (HPAM) by colleagues on the role of rank and file family physicians in the same journal, the author, a family physician in Belgium, is trying to highlight the complexity and depth of the work of his colleagues and their contribution to the understanding of the organization and economy of healthcare. It addresses, in particular, the management of health elements throughout the ongoing relationship of the family doctor with his/her patients. It shows how the three dimensions of prevention, clearly included in the daily work, are complemented with the fourth dimension, quaternary prevention or prevention of medicine itself, whose understanding could help to control the economic and human costs of healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Jamoulle
- Espace Temps, Maison de Santé, Charleroi, Belgium, and Department of General Practice, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Seshia SS, Makhinson M, Phillips DF, Young GB. Evidence-informed person-centered healthcare part I: do 'cognitive biases plus' at organizational levels influence quality of evidence? J Eval Clin Pract 2014; 20:734-47. [PMID: 25429739 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is increasing concern about the unreliability of much of health care evidence, especially in its application to individuals. HYPOTHESIS Cognitive biases, financial and non-financial conflicts of interest, and ethical violations (which, together with fallacies, we collectively refer to as 'cognitive biases plus') at the levels of individuals and organizations involved in health care undermine the evidence that informs person-centred care. METHODS This study used qualitative review of the pertinent literature from basic, medical and social sciences, ethics, philosophy, law etc. RESULTS Financial conflicts of interest (primarily industry related) have become systemic in several organizations that influence health care evidence. There is also plausible evidence for non-financial conflicts of interest, especially in academic organizations. Financial and non-financial conflicts of interest frequently result in self-serving bias. Self-serving bias can lead to self-deception and rationalization of actions that entrench self-serving behaviour, both potentially resulting in unethical acts. Individuals and organizations are also susceptible to other cognitive biases. Qualitative evidence suggests that 'cognitive biases plus' can erode the quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS 'Cognitive biases plus' are hard wired, primarily at the unconscious level, and the resulting behaviours are not easily corrected. Social behavioural researchers advocate multi-pronged measures in similar situations: (i) abolish incentives that spawn self-serving bias; (ii) enforce severe deterrents for breaches of conduct; (iii) value integrity; (iv) strengthen self-awareness; and (v) design curricula especially at the trainee level to promote awareness of consequences to society. Virtuous professionals and organizations are essential to fulfil the vision for high-quality individualized health care globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashi S Seshia
- Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|