ENETS standardized (synoptic) reporting for neuroendocrine tumour pathology

[Establishment of a German ICCR dataset : Translation and integration of SNOMED CT using the example of TUR-B]

BACKGROUND

The structured recording of data from histopathological findings and their interoperability is critical for quality assurance in pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To harmonize the content of the reports, the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) has defined standardized datasets. These datasets are not yet available in German nationwide. This gap is addressed here using the transurethral bladder resection (TUR-B) dataset as a use case.

RESULTS

We describe the process of establishing the datasets by carrying out translation, mapping on SNOMED CT codes, and using SNOMED CTs hierarchy to fill dropdown menus. Furthermore, we identified rules for checking for self-consistency of reports by using the example of the TUR bladder.

DISCUSSION

With this article, we have created an example of a German version of the ICCR TUR‑B dataset including mapping to the SNOMED CT terminology. Further activities should include the definition of overarching cancer disease models to further exploit the potential of SNOMED CT.

Towards a better registration of neuroendocrine neoplasms: The results of the Italian retrospective population-based study

BACKGROUND

The increasing incidence, rapidly evolving classification, rarity and heterogeneity of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) pose challenges to NEN registration including difficulty in distinguishing neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Thus, in Italy a higher NEC incidence was reported. Focusing on gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NEN, we aimed to review GEP NEN, and in particular cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) and estimate the incidence of NEN, NET and NEC of the GEP.

METHODS

We launched a pilot study examining cases of neuroendocrine carcinomas NOS (ICD-O3 code 8246) of GEP incidents in the years 2012-2020. Cancer registries (CRs) reviewed information included in the pathology report regarding differentiation and tumour cells proliferation to decide whether to confirm the case as neuroendocrine carcinoma NOS or register it as NET or NEC. After the review, we estimated the GEP NEN, NET and NEC incidence.

RESULTS

Nine CRs contributed to the pilot study. After review, in all CRs, only 31% of GEP NOS neuroendocrine carcinomas were confirmed; 50% were recoded as NETs, and approximately 17% of cases were non-NENs. The IR of GEP NENs was 2.99/100,000, and the incidence of NETs was higher than that of NECs.

CONCLUSION

After the review, the incidence of GEP NEN, NET and NEC in the eight Italian CRs involved was comparable to that reported in other European countries.

IMPACT

Our results confirmed that heterogeneity of cancer registries in the registration of NEN requires collaborative work to define and promote a standard definition to be extended to all Italian registries.

Pediatric Neuroendocrine Tumors in Denmark: Incidence, Management, and Outcome From 1995 to 2020

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), although rare, are considered one of the most common gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary pediatric neoplasms. We aimed to determine the incidence, tumor characteristics, management, and outcome of NETs and explore the role of genetic predisposition, focusing on low and intermediate grade tumors.

METHODS

Using the Danish National Pathology Registry, we conducted a nationwide retrospective study including all Danish children aged ≤18 years diagnosed with a pathology-proven NET between 1995 and 2020.

RESULTS

We identified 220 patients, with a 1.89:1 female to male ratio. The yearly incidence was 6.84 per 1 million children, with no significant change in incidence throughout the observation period. NETs were located in the appendix (93.2%), the pulmonary system (4.5%), and pancreas (2.3%). One recurrence was noted in the pancreas in a genetically predisposed patient with multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), resulting in an overall recurrence rate of 0.5% (0% in appendiceal NETs; 0% in bronchopulmonary NETs; 20.0% in pancreatic NETs). No NET-related mortality was registered. Four patients had a known predisposing genetic condition, one appendiceal NET associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, and three pancreatic NETs associated with MEN1. Postsurgical surveillance regimes, choice of tumor markers, and imaging modality varied throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed a stable incidence of pediatric NETs during the study period. The overall recurrence rate was 0.5% and no NET-related mortality was observed. Known genetic predisposition was present in 1.8% of patients. Future guidelines should consider the apparent indolent nature and excellent prognosis of these tumors.

Evaluating RB1 and p53 as diagnostic markers in treatment-related neuroendocrine prostate cancer through immunohistochemistry and genomic analysis of RB1 and TP53

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of treatment-related neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t-NEPC) often involves a pathological assessment and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for neuroendocrine markers. Genomic alterations in RB1 and TP53 are frequently observed in NEPC and are believed to play a crucial role in the transformation of adenocarcinoma to NEPC. In this study, we examined the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of patients with t-NEPC to better understand their prognosis and diagnostic utility.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with t-NEPC at Kobe University Hospital between October 2018 and December 2022. Clinical data, including age, serum neuroendocrine marker levels, and treatment history, were collected. IHC was performed for conventional neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and CD56) and RB1 and p53 expression. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was conducted using FoundationOne® CDx to identify mutations in RB1 and TP53.

RESULTS

This study included 20 patients with t-NEPC. The median time from ADT initiation to development was 42.8 months. IHC revealed RB1 loss in 75% of cases and p53 abnormalities in 75% of cases. NGS identified RB1 mutations in 55% and TP53 mutations in 75% of cases. The concordance between NGS and IHC results was high, with 70% (14/20) agreement for RB1/RB1 and 80% (16/20) for p53/TP53. The immunostaining and genomic analysis of RB1/RB1 and p53/TP53 showed abnormal findings for the four negative cases for conventional neuroendocrine markers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated high concordance between IHC and NGS findings for RB1/RB1 and p53/TP53 in t-NEPC. We provide a comprehensive benchmark of NGS performance compared with IHC, and these findings may help increase the diagnostic sensitivity of t-NEPC.

Modified Histopathological Grading Optimizes Prediction of Survival Outcomes in Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

CONTEXT

One of the major prognostic indices in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is Ki67 proliferation index.

OBJECTIVE

To identify optimal grading Ki67 cutoffs to delineate differences in prognosis of patients with small intestinal NETs (SI-NETs).

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort analysis of 551 SI-NET patients diagnosed from 1993 through 2021 at 5 European referral centers with a mean (±SD) follow-up time of 51.5 (±52.9) months, measuring rates of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS).

RESULTS

Median age at baseline was 62.3 (range, 17-90) years; 252 (45.7%) patients were female. All SI-NETs were well-differentiated, with 326 being grade 1 (G1; 59.2%), 169 G2 (30.7%), and 8 G3 (1.5), while 48 tumors were unspecified grade (8.7%). The median Ki67 was 2% (range, 1%-70%). At baseline, 247 (44.8%) patients had distant metastases (stage IV), 217 locoregional disease (41.1%; stage III), while 29 (7.1%) and 25 (4.5%) presented at stages II and I, respectively. Median OS was 214.7 (95% CI, 152.7-276.6) months and median EFS was 79.8 (68.2-91.5) months. In multivariable Cox-regression OS analysis, the proposed modified histopathological Ki67 grading system (Ki67 5%-10% group: HR = 2.2 [95% CI, 1.15-4.31], P = .018 and Ki67 ≥ 10% group: HR = 5.11 [2.87-9.09], P < .001), age (HR = 1.07 [1.04-1.09], P < .001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR = 1.08 [1-1.16], P = .028), and TNM stage (HR = 1.79 [1.05-3.06], P = .034) were independent predictors for death. Pertinent EFS analysis confirmed the proposed modified histopathological Ki67 grading system (Ki67 ≥ 10% group: HR = 4.01 [2.6-6.37], P < .001) and age (HR = 1.04 [1.02-1.05], P < .001) as independent predictors for recurrence, progression, and/or death.

CONCLUSION

Ki67 proliferation index was a strong and independent predictor of OS and EFS. A modified histopathological grading system applying Ki67 cutoffs of 5% and 10% could be superior to predict differences in SI-NET patient survival outcomes.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of head and neck, genitourinary and gynaecological systems, unknown primaries, parathyroid carcinomas and intrathyroid thymic neoplasms: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing rare endocrine tumours. •Neuroendocrine neoplasms of different origins, parathyroid carcinoma and intrathyroid thymic neoplasms are included. •The guideline covers clinical imaging and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •The authors comprise a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.

Longitudinal Changes in Ki-67 Indices in Small-Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumours and Their Impact on Survival

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate longitudinal changes in Ki-67 indices of SI-NETs and assess the impact of these in overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We screened 551 patients with SI-NETs diagnosed from 1993, through 2021, identified using the SI-NET databases from five European referral centres. Only patients with well-differentiated tumours and available baseline tumour samples and follow-up re-biopsies were included. For tumour grading, apart from 2017 WHO classification system, we applied a recently proposed SI-NET site-specific modified histopathological grading system with Ki-67 cut-offs of 5 and 10%. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine whether there was a difference between OS in SI-NET patients stratified by increment of Ki-67 indices over time and/or progression to a higher grade.

RESULTS

We included 45 patients. Median Ki-67 index at SI-NET diagnosis was 2% (range: 0.5-15%). Thirty-three patients had Ki-67 indices <5% (70.2%), 6 had Ki-67: 5-10% (12.8%), and 8 had Ki-67 ≥10% (17%). Mean time to re-biopsy was 48.8 months (SD: ±162.5). At re-biopsy, the median change in Ki-67 index (absolute value; follow-up minus time of diagnosis) was 1% (range: -10 to +38%). An increase in Ki-67 occurred in 20 patients (42.6%); in 14 patients, the change in Ki-67 resulted in progression to higher tumour grade following the modified grading system. Patients with an increment in Ki-67 ≥1% had a median OS of 32.9 months versus 80.5 months in patients without (HR = 5.6, 95% CI: 1.42-22.02; p = 0.014). When applying the novel modified histopathological grading system for SI-NETs, patients with grade progression had a median OS of 32.9 months versus 53.7 months in those without (HR = 4.61, 95% CI: 1.22-13.54; p = 0.022). At multivariable analysis, grade progression was confirmed as an independent predictor for death (HR = 7.2, 95% CI: 1.58-32.82; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Metachronous increment in Ki-67 indices and related grade progression over time following a site-specific modified histopathological grading system with Ki-67 cut-offs of 5 and 10% is observed in approximately 1/3 of SI-NETs subjected to re-biopsy and it is associated with worse survival outcomes.

Management of patients with rare adult solid cancers: objectives and evaluation of European reference networks (ERN) EURACAN

About 500,000 patients with rare adult solid cancers (RASC) are diagnosed yearly in Europe. Delays and unequal quality of management impact negatively their survival. Since 2017, European reference networks (ERN) aim to improve the quality of care of patients with rare disease. The steering committee of EURACAN, including physicians, researchers and patients review here the previous actions, present objectives of the ERN EURACAN dedicated to RASC. EURACAN promoted management in reference centres, and equal implementation of excellence and innovation in Europe and developed 22 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Additionally, fourteen information brochures translated in 24 EU languages were developed in collaboration with patient advocacy groups (ePAGs) and seventeen training session were organized. Nevertheless, connections to national networks in the 26 participating countries (106 centres), simplification of cross-border healthcare, international multidisciplinary tumour boards, registries and monitoring of the quality of care are still required. In this Health Policy, evaluation criteria of the performances of the network and of health care providers are proposed.

Multimodal management of foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms

The foregut, which includes the esophagus, stomach and duodenum, represents one of the most common sites for neuroendocrine neoplasms. These are highly heterogenous with different risk of progression depending on location, cell-type of origin, size, grade and other factors. Various endoscopic and imaging modalities exist to inform therapeutic decision-making, which may be in the form of surgical or endoscopic resection and medical therapy depending on the extent of the disease after diagnostic evaluation. This narrative review aims to explore the literature on the multimodal management of such foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: an Update for 2023

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the literature from the last 5 years on treatment of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (aNEN). Furthermore, to evaluate the prognostic significance of lymph node metastases, indications for adjuvant treatment, and challenges of the current follow-up regimen.

RECENT FINDINGS

Simple appendectomy is sufficient in tumors < 1 cm while extended surgery is indicated in tumors > 2 cm. In a multicenter study of aNENs measuring 1-2 cm, extended surgery offered no significant prognostic advantage and is now limited to incomplete tumor resection or high-grade G2 or G3 aNEN. Follow-up remains debatable, as the use of imaging and biomarkers lacks validation. While surgical procedure is well established in aNEN tumors < 1 cm and > 2 cm, the need for extended surgery in aNEN tumors 1-2 cm is questionable. Future studies should address the prognostic impact of lymph node metastases and the optimal design and duration of follow-up.

The Driver Role of Pathologists in Endocrine Oncology: What Clinicians Seek in Pathology Reports

Endocrine neoplasia represents an increasingly broad spectrum of disorders. Endocrine neoplasms range from incidental findings to potentially lethal malignancies. In this paper, we cover the impact of pathology in the interpretation of the clinic-pathological, genetic, and radiographic features underpinning these neoplasms. We highlight the critical role of multidisciplinary interactions in structuring a rational diagnostic and efficient therapeutic plan and emphasize the role of histopathological input in decision-making. In this context, standardized pathology reporting and second opinion endocrine pathology review represent relevant tools to improve the overall diagnostic workup of patients affected by endocrine tumors in every specific scenario. In fact, although a relevant proportion of cases may be correctly identified based on clinical presentation and biochemical/imaging investigations, a subset of cases presents with atypical findings that may lead to an inappropriate diagnosis and treatment plan based on a wrong pathological diagnosis if all pieces of the puzzle are not correctly considered. Pathologists have a responsibility to actively guide clinicians before and during surgical procedures to prevent unnecessary interventions. In all areas of endocrine pathology, pathologists must understand the complexity of tissue preservation and assay sensitivities and specificities to ensure the optimal quality and interpretation of diagnostic material. Finally, pathologists are central actors in tumor tissue biobanking, which is an expanding field in oncology that should be promoted while adhering to strict ethical and methodological standards.

Utility of histopathological revision in the management of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Histological evaluation and grading assessment are key points in the diagnostic work-up of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs).

AIM

To analyze the impact of histopathological revision on the clinical management of patients with GEP-NEN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients referred to our Center of Excellence between 2015 and 2021 were included in this study. Immunohistochemical slides at the time of initial diagnosis were reviewed to assess tumor morphology, diagnostic immunohistochemistry, and Ki67.

RESULTS

101 patients were evaluated, with 65 (64.4%) gastrointestinal, 25 (24.7%) pancreatic, and 11 (10.9%) occult neoplastic lesions suspected to be of GEP origin. The main changes resulting from the revision were: first Ki-67 assessment in 15.8% of patients, Ki-67 change in 59.2% of patients and grading modification in 23.5% of patients. An additional immunohistochemical evaluation was performed in 78 (77.2%) patients, leading to a confirmation of GEP origin in 10 of 11 (90.9%) of unknown primary site neoplastic lesions and an exclusion of NEN diagnosis in 2 (2%) patients. After histopathological revision, a significant modification in clinical management was proposed in 42 (41.6%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological revision in a referral NEN center is strongly advised in newly diagnosed GEP-NENs to properly plan prognostic stratification and therapeutic choice.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (aNET)

The aim of the present guidance paper is to update the previous ENETS guidelines on well differentiated appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (NET), providing practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of appendiceal NET (aNET); poorly differentiated neoplasms are dealt with in a separate guidance paper. This paper is structured on a question-answer format in order to also address controversial issues and areas where uncertainty regarding the management and follow-up of aNET exists. All recommendations are offered on the basis of the best available evidence, along with the authors' experiences in managing these neoplasms. Each recommendation for treatment will provide a level of evidence and grade of recommendation as per the GRADE system (adapted in Infectious Disease Society of United States Public Health Service grading system).

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for colorectal neuroendocrine tumours

This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides an update on the previous colorectal guidance paper in a different format. Guided by key clinical questions practical advice on the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) of the caecum, colon, and rectum is provided. Although covered in one guidance paper colorectal NET comprises a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. The most common rectal NET are often small G1 tumours that can be treated by adequate endoscopic resection techniques. Evidence from prospective clinical trials on the treatment of metastatic colorectal NET is limited and discussion of patients in experienced multidisciplinary tumour boards strongly recommended. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) are discussed in a separate guidance paper.

ENETS standardized (synoptic) reporting for radiological imaging in neuroendocrine tumours

This expert consensus document represents an initiative by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) to provide guidance for synoptic reporting of radiological examinations critical to the diagnosis, grading, staging and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Template drafts for initial tumor staging and follow-up by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were established, based on existing institutional and organisational reporting templates relevant for NEN imaging, and applying the RadLex lexicon of radiological information (Radiological Society of North America), for consistency regarding the radiological terms. During the ENETS Scientific Advisory Board meeting 2018, the template drafts were subject to iterative interdisciplinary discussions among experts in imaging, surgery, gastroenterology, oncology and pathology. Members of the imaging group stated a strong preference for a combination of limited and standardised options by way of drop-down menus. Separate templates were produced for the initial work-up and for follow-up, respectively. To provide a detailed description of the radiological findings of the primary tumor and its local extension and spread, different templates were developed for bronchial, pancreatic and gastrointestinal NENs for CT and MRI, respectively. Each template was structured in 10 sections: clinical details, comparative imaging modality, acquisition technique, primary tumor findings, regional lymph node metastases, distant metastases, TNM classification, reference lesions according to RECIST 1.1, additional findings and conclusion. Two templates were developed for follow-up, for CT and MRI, respectively, and were specifically focused on assessment of therapy response. These included a qualitative response assessment, such as decrease of vascularisation and presence of necrosis, and a quantitative assessment according to RECIST 1.1 and the modified RECIST (mRECIST) for assessing tumor response following transarterial chemoembolisation.