Nurses' views regarding implementing advance care planning for older people: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies

The use of advance directives for autonomy in dementia care: A scoping meta-review and thematic synthesis

Dementia may reduce individuals' capacity for autonomy and decision-making competence. Advance directives are subject to theoretical bioethical debate as tools to safeguard or extend autonomy in dementia. However, the extent and manner in which advance directives are actually used for these purposes in practice remain less examined. We aimed to examine how advance directives are used as tools for individual autonomy in dementia care. We systematically searched six databases and performed a thematic analysis and synthesis of included reviews based on an original model of six autonomy-relevant dimensions of advance directives. A total of 18 reviews met the inclusion criteria. We identified 12 themes across six dimensions. We found a lack of knowledge integration on the actual use of advance directives for autonomy in dementia care. Evidence suggests significant variation in the autonomy-relevant dimensions of advance directives, with a tendency towards an inconsistent or low level of implementation as a tool for autonomy. Further reviews and primary studies on all aspects of the use of advance directives for autonomy in dementia care would contribute significantly to dementia research and practice.

Public attitudes to emergency care treatment plans: a population survey of Great Britain

OBJECTIVES

To measure community attitudes to emergency care and treatment plans (ECTPs).

DESIGN

Population survey.

SETTING

Great Britain.

PARTICIPANTS

As part of the British Social Attitudes Survey, sent to randomly selected addresses in Great Britain, 1135 adults completed a module on ECTPs. The sample was nationally representative in terms of age and location, 619 (55%) were female and 1005 (89%) were of white origin.

OUTCOME MEASURES

People's attitudes having an ECTP for themselves now, and in the future; how comfortable they might be having a discussion about an ECTP and how they thought such a plan might impact on their future care.

RESULTS

Predominantly, respondents were in favour of people being able to have an ECTP, with 908/1135 (80%) being at least somewhat in favour. People in good health were less likely than those with activity-limiting chronic disease to want a plan at present (52% vs 64%, OR 1.78 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.45) p<0.001). Developing a long-term condition or becoming disabled would lead 42% (467/1112) and 43% (481/1112) of individuals, respectively, to want an ECTP. More, 634/1112 (57%) would want an ECTP if they developed a life-threatening condition. Predominantly, 938/1135 (83%) respondents agreed that an ECTP would help avoid their family needing to make difficult decisions on their behalf, and 939/1135 (83%) that it would ensure doctors and nurses knew their wishes. Nevertheless, a small majority-628/1135 (55%)-agreed that there was a serious risk of the plan being out of date when needed. A substantial minority-330/1135 (29%)-agreed that an ECTP might result in them not receiving life-saving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There is general support for the use of ECTPs by people of all ages. Nevertheless, many respondents felt these might be out of date when needed and prevent people receiving life-saving treatment.

Nurse-Led Advance Care Planning in Adults in the U.S.- A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning involves discussing individuals' future medical treatment and care preferences. Nurses, due to their close relationships with patients and families, may be well-positioned to lead these discussions. Exploring the components and characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions is essential for enhancing their implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions in adult patients, identify the populations and settings where these interventions have been utilized, and the outcomes of these interventions in the U.S.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. Using keywords related to nurse-led ACP interventions, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in varied settings. Registered nurses, oncology nurse navigators, and other specialized nurses primarily delivered nurse-led ACP interventions. The interventions ranged from one to two sessions and utilized various models and resources such as the Five Wishes and Respecting Choices.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-led ACP interventions have shown significant positive outcomes, including increased engagement in ACP, improved attitudes towards ADs, higher completion rates of ADs, and enhanced patient-surrogate congruence. These interventions are well-received by patients and can be implemented in diverse settings. However, a general guideline regarding nurse-led ACP interventions is needed to address the specific duration, sessions, and mode of delivery required for their optimal effectiveness.

Interventions to promote readiness for advance care planning: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning is recommended as part of standard medical services. Readiness, denoting stages of behavior change, exerts a substantial influence on its uptake. However, the characteristics and impacts of advance care planning interventions on readiness are not well-established.

METHOD

We systematically reviewed and conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of advance care planning interventions on readiness. Studies were appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools. Meta-analyses were performed using mean difference of continuous variables or risk ratios of binary variables and their 95 % confidence interval as the pooled effect sizes.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in this review and were all rated low quality. Meta-analysis showed that interventions resulted in slight improvement in overall readiness (mean difference = 0.19, 95 % confidence interval: 0.02-0.36) for advance care planning. However, statistically significant effects of interventions were not identified for readiness in relation to specific behaviors (appointment of a healthcare proxy, talking to a healthcare proxy, talking to a medical practitioner about living wills, and signing a living will).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analyses demonstrated that interventions can improve the overall readiness for advance care planning, suggesting the necessity to integrate readiness into future health policies and clinical practices. Nevertheless, the absence of significant effects on specific behavioral readiness underscores the requirement for additional refinement in intervention design, advanced technologies, and theoretical foundations.

REGISTRATION

Not registered.

Nurses' engagement in advance care planning practices: A descriptive cross-sectional study

AIMS

To describe and compare nurses' awareness of, attitudes toward, and participation in advance care planning, as well as related facilitators and challenges, in four types of healthcare settings.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional descriptive study.

METHODS

Four hundred and ninety-eight registered nurses from tertiary, secondary and primary healthcare institutions, along with long-term care centres in South Korea, participated in an investigator-developed online survey. The collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Participants were on average 30.6 ± 7.3 years old, mostly female (95.4%), employed as staff nurses (95.4%), held bachelor's degrees or higher (84.1%), and had worked for less than 5 years at their current institutions (69.7%). Overall, 49% of the participants were familiar with advance care planning. While most participants supported nurse involvement in advance care planning with patients and surrogates, fewer were willing to engage or recommend it. Less than half were actively engaged in advance care planning practices. A notable challenge was the lack of time due to excessive workload. Compared to those from tertiary healthcare institutions, participants from secondary and primary healthcare institutions and long-term care centres were less likely to be aware of advance care planning. Participants from secondary and primary healthcare institutions had lower odds of checking for the presence of advance directives and the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment.

CONCLUSION

Nurses demonstrated low awareness and participation in advance care planning. Nurses' insufficient time and competency to conduct advance care planning in their practice should be addressed.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Educational programs, initiatives (e.g. guidelines, position statements) and legal and policy-level efforts (e.g. nurse staffing, role clarification, reimbursement) are crucial to incorporate advance care planning into routine nursing practice.

IMPACT

What problem did the study address? Nurses play an important role in advance care planning; however, limited is understood about their readiness and involvement in such practices. What were the main findings? Nurses' awareness of advance care planning practices and their participation in such practices is low across care settings. Although nurses have a positive attitude toward advance care planning, there are challenges (e.g. insufficient time to conduct advance care planning discussions and lack of relevant knowledge and skills) that impede their participation in practice. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study may serve as a foundation for nursing societies in countries, where advance care planning is emerging, to discuss strategies to increase nurses' competency in advance care planning and promote their participation in the practice.

REPORTING METHOD

The STROBE checklist was followed.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Characteristics associated with the intention to complete advance directives and end-of-life preferences in Brazilians with heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics associated with an intention to complete advance directives (ADs) and end-of-life treatment preferences for outpatients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS

A cross-sectional, analytical study. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from 108 patients with HF in an outpatient clinic in São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; knowledge about HF and the intention to complete ADs were assessed using a script. The relationships among variables were assessed through the chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

The intention to complete ADs was significantly associated with reporting adherence to pharmacological recommendations (99% vs. 88.1%, p = 0.02), worse QoL (29.7 ± 18.2 vs. 20.9 ± 11.0; p = 0.0336), perceived knowledge about HF (89.7% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.0495), not wishing the healthcare providers would decide about treatment (27.3% vs. 2.15, p = 0.0026), and considering ADs useful (91.8% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.001). End-of-life treatment preferences included living as long as possible (50.5%), not being sedated (37.1%), and staying close to family and friends for as long as possible (32.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Characteristics associated with an intention to complete ADs and end-of-life treatment preferences were identified in patients with HF.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

These results can help facilitate patients' completion of their ADs or activate their intention to maximize opportunities to exercise autonomy.

Future policy and research for advance care planning in dementia: consensus recommendations from an international Delphi panel of the European Association for Palliative Care

Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly recognised in the global agenda for dementia care. The European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) Taskforce on ACP in Dementia aimed to provide recommendations for policy initiatives and future research. We conducted a four-round Delphi study with a 33-country panel of 107 experts between September, 2021, and June, 2022, that was approved by the EAPC Board. Consensus was achieved on 11 recommendations concerning the regulation of advance directives, equity of access, and dementia-inclusive approaches and conversations to express patients' values. Identified research gaps included the need for an evidence-based dementia-specific practice model that optimises engagement and communication with people with fluctuating and impaired capacity and their families to support decision making, while also empowering people to adjust their decisions if their goals or preferences change over time. Policy gaps included insufficient health services frameworks for dementia-inclusive practice. The results highlight the need for more evidence and policy development that support inclusive ACP practice models.

What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review

Advance care planning (ACP) has been recognized as crucial by patients, families, and clinicians; however, different definitions and measurements have led to inconsistencies in practice and mixed evidence in the literature. This narrative review explores ACP's evolution, innovations, and outcomes using thematic analysis to synthesize data from randomized controlled trials, reviews, and editorials. Key findings include (1) ACP has evolved over the past several decades from a sole focus on code status and advance directive (AD) forms to a continuum of care planning over the life course focused on tailored preparation for patients and surrogate decision-makers and (2) ACP measurement has evolved from traditional outcome metrics, such as AD completion, to a comprehensive outcomes framework that includes behavior change theory, systems, implementation science, and a focus on surrogate outcomes. Since the recent development of an ACP consensus definition and outcomes framework, high-quality trials have reported mainly positive outcomes for interventions, especially for surrogates, which aligns with the patient desire to relieve decision-making burden for loved ones. Additionally, measurement of "clinically meaningful" ACP information, including documented goals of care discussions, is increasingly being integrated into electronic health records (EHR), and emerging, real-time assessments and natural language processing are enhancing ACP evaluation. To make things easier for patients, families, and care teams, clinicians and researchers can use and disseminate these evolved definitions; provide patients validated, easy-to-use tools that prime patients for conversations and decrease health disparities; use easy-to-access clinician training and simple scripts for interdisciplinary team members; and document patients' values and preferences in the medical record to capture clinically meaningful ACP so this information is available at the point of care. Future efforts should focus on efficient implementation, expanded reimbursement options, and seamless integration of EHR documentation to ensure ACP's continued evolution to better serve patients and their care partners.

Emergency Nurses' Perceived Barriers and Solutions to Engaging Patients With Life-Limiting Illnesses in Serious Illness Conversations: A United States Multicenter Mixed-Method Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess emergency nurses' perceived barriers toward engaging patients in serious illness conversations.

METHODS

Using a mixed-method (quant + QUAL) convergent design, we pooled data on the emergency nurses who underwent the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium training across 33 emergency departments. Data were extracted from the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium post-training questionnaire, comprising a 5-item survey and 1 open-ended question. Our quantitative analysis employed a cross-sectional design to assess the proportion of emergency nurses who report that they will encounter barriers in engaging seriously ill patients in serious illness conversations in the emergency department. Our qualitative analysis used conceptual content analysis to generate themes and meaning units of the perceived barriers and possible solutions toward having serious illness conversations in the emergency department.

RESULTS

A total of 2176 emergency nurses responded to the survey. Results from the quantitative analysis showed that 1473 (67.7%) emergency nurses reported that they will encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Three thematic barriers-human factors, time constraints, and challenges in the emergency department work environment-emerged from the content analysis. Some of the subthemes included the perceived difficulty of serious illness conversations, delay in daily throughput, and lack of privacy in the emergency department. The potential solutions extracted included the need for continued training, the provision of dedicated emergency nurses to handle serious illness conversations, and the creation of dedicated spaces for serious illness conversations.

DISCUSSION

Emergency nurses may encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Institutional-level policies may be required in creating a palliative care-friendly emergency department work environment.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards advance directives among clinical nurses: Multicenter cross-sectional survey

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of nurses in implementing advance directives (ADs) for older patients and analyze the influencing factors before the establishment of the first advance directives act in China.

DESIGN

Multicenter cross-sectional survey. The standards for reporting the STROBE checklist are used.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study developed a self-designed structured questionnaire to assess nurses' knowledge, attitudes and practices about ADs. Nurses were recruited by stratified random sampling through the Nursing Departments of 12 hospitals in southwest China and were asked to fill out the questionnaire face to face about knowledge, attitudes and practices. Data were analyzed following descriptive statistics, rank-sum test and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

This study included 950 nurses. The study found that nurses were extremely supportive of ADs. Unmarried nurses had better knowledge of ADs than married ones. Nevertheless, there was a discrepancy between the participants' knowledge, attitude and practice. The participants' practice was lower (4.3%) compared with their attitude (81.9%) and knowledge (42.2%). Knowledge on, attitudes towards and standardized procedures for ADs in the workplace affected nursing practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The study recommends that courses on ADs and appropriate support from medical institutions should be provided to nurses to increase their knowledge and confidence in implementing ADs. Healthcare professionals should be sufficiently equipped to implement ADs and handle their execution appropriately to provide adequate end-of-life care corresponding to patients' wishes.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study results inform rich insights as it discusses the numerous interrelating factors influencing these three fundamental aspects that affect the success of any AD policy by surveying the knowledge, attitudes and practices of clinical nurses. Furthermore, our results hint at distinct areas of improvement in the nursing practice to facilitate the wider implementation and acceptance of ADs in China.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study involved no patient.

Empowering nurses to increase engagement in advance care planning in a medicine transitional care unit: a best practice implementation project

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Advance care planning (ACP) communication and documentation are often inadequate, leading to care that is inconsistent with patients' preferences and moral dilemmas for family members. Nurses are patient advocates optimally positioned to initiate ACP but many feel that they lack the training and skills to navigate these conversations. The objective of this project was to increase nurses' capacity to engage in ACP.

METHODS

This project used the JBI audit and feedback method to implement evidence into practice. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice audit tools were used to incorporate ACP into nursing workflow. Eight audit criteria were created based on a JBI evidence summary. Compliance was measured by reviewing ACP notes from electronic health records and online survey responses. A baseline audit was followed by educational presentations and development of posted materials. Three follow-up audits examined sustainability.

RESULTS

Compliance with the best practice recommendation for nurses to engage in ACP discussions increased from 55% to 80%. There was improvement from zero ACP notes at baseline (0% compliance) to 12 ACP notes in the final audit. Of these notes, 42% included all best practice elements and 92% included patients' treatment preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of an integrative nursing education plan for ACP empowers nurses to engage in vital conversations. Informing nurses of their scope of practice, defining terms and expectations, and encouraging them to attempt and document conversations will benefit patients. Future initiatives would benefit from incorporating practical opportunities without real-life implications and providing continued support to cohorts.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing advance care planning in naïve contexts - where to look when plowing new terrain?

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) is a way of applying modern medicine to the principle of patient autonomy and ensuring that patients receive medical care that is consistent with their values, goals and preferences. Robust evidence supports the benefits of ACP, but it remains an underutilized resource in most countries. This paper goes from the naïve point of view, and seeks to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementation in unfamiliarized contexts and in a whole system approach involving the clinical, institutional and policy level to improve the implementation of ACP.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were chosen to enable an explorative, flexible design. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 health care professionals and chief physicians in hospitals and in municipalities. The thematic analysis was done following Braun and Clarke's strategy for thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The main reported barriers were the lack of time and space, a lack of culture and leadership legitimizing ACP, lack of common communication systems, and unclear responsibility about who should initiate, resulting in missed opportunities and overtreatment. Policy development, public and professional education, and standardization of documentation were reported as key to facilitate ACP and build trust across the health care system.

CONCLUSIONS

Progressively changing the education of health professionals and the clinical culture are major efforts that need to be tackled to implement ACP in unfamiliarized contexts, particularly in contexts where patient's wishes are not legally binding. This will need to be tackled through rectifying the misconception that ACP is only about death, and providing practical training for health professionals, as well as developing policies and legislation on how to include patients and caregivers in the planning of care.

Experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals implementing advance care planning for people suffering from life-limiting illness: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

BACKGROUND

Life-limited patients may lose decision-making abilities during disease progression. Advance care planning can be used as a discussion method for healthcare professionals to understand patients' future care preferences. However, due to many difficulties, the participation rate of healthcare professionals in advance care planning is not high.

AIM

To explore the facilitators of and barriers to healthcare professionals' provision of advance care planning to life-limited patients to better implement it for this population.

METHODS

We followed ENTREQ and PRISMA to guide this study. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CNKI, and SinoMed to include qualitative data on the experiences and perspectives of healthcare professionals in different professional fields in providing advance care planning for life-limited patients. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included. Two themes were identified: unsupported conditions and facilitative actions. Healthcare professionals regarded cultural concepts, limited time, and fragmented record services as obstacles to implementation. They had low confidence and were overly concerned about negative effects. They needed to possess multiple abilities, learn to flexibly initiate topics, and facilitate effective communication based on multidisciplinary collaboration.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare professionals need an accepting cultural environment to implement advance care planning, a sound legal system, financial support, and a coordinated and shared system to support them. Healthcare systems need to develop educational training programs to increase the knowledge and skills of healthcare professionals and to promote multidisciplinary collaboration to facilitate effective communication. Future research should compare the differences in the needs of healthcare professionals in different cultures when implementing advance care planning to develop systematic implementation guidelines in different cultures.

Education, Policy, and Advocacy in Predicting Use of Do-Not-Hospitalize Orders in Skilled Nursing Facilities

Nurses and social workers are uniquely positioned to advocate for patients' wishes for do-not-hospitalize (DNH) directives. The purpose of the current study was to explore the impact of DNH education, policy, and advocacy on the use of DNH orders by nurses (RNs and licensed practical nurses [LPNs]) and social workers employed in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). This multisite secondary analysis used cross-sectional survey data and analyzed responses of RNs, LPNs, and social workers (N = 354) from 29 urban SNFs. Mixed model regression was used to examine possible predictors of frequency of DNH orders within SNFs while adjusting for random effects. Results showed that having a DNH written policy, education on DNH orders, and having an advanced care planning advocate in the facility were strongly associated with a higher reported frequency of DNH discussions with residents and their families (p < 0.01 for each variable). [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(11), 45-52.].

A quantitative study of nurses perception to advance directive in selected private and public secondary healthcare facilities in Ibadan, Nigeria

Objectives

The study evaluated nurses’ perceptions on the benefits, drawbacks, and their roles in initiating and implementing advance directives (AD) at private and public secondary healthcare units.

Methods

The study adopted a cross-sectional, comparative-descriptive research design and was anchored on the structural functional theory. A total of 401 nurses (131 private and 270 public) were chosen on purpose. The data was collected between January and March 2018 among nurses at the selected hospitals. Analysis was done via SPSSv28.0.1.0.

Results

Compared to nurses working in private healthcare facilities (72.5%), the majority of nurses at the public healthcare facilities (75.2%) indicated a more favorable opinion of AD’s benefits and (61.9%) felt they had a substantial involvement in the development and execution of AD than their private counterpart (56.5%). Similarly, 60.7% of nurses employed by the government agreed that AD has some disadvantages compared to those employed by the private sector (58.8%). Significantly, Christian nurses are 0.53 times less likely than Muslims to contest AD’s benefits; 0.78 times less likely than Muslim to disagree that AD has flaws; and 1.30 times more likely than Muslim nurses to deny they contributed to the development and execution of AD, though not significant.

Conclusion

Making decisions at the end-of-life can be challenging, thus AD should be supported across the board in the healthcare industry. Nurses should be trained on their role in developing and implementing AD, as well as on its advantages and how to deal with its challenges.

Beratung zu Advance Care Planning in der ambulanten Pflege

Zusammenfassung. Hintergrund: StAdPlan ist eine multizentrische, Cluster-randomisierte kontrollierte Studie mit der Zielstellung, eine Intervention zu Advance Care Planning (ACP) für den Anwendungskontext der ambulanten Pflege in Deutschland zu entwickeln und zu evaluieren. Fragestellung/Ziel: In diesem Beitrag wird die Interventionsentwicklung unter Einbezug bestehender ACP-Konzepte und deren Anpassung auf die zeitlichen und personellen Ressourcen im System der ambulanten Pflege in Deutschland dargestellt. Pflegefachpersonen kommt dabei die Rolle zu, ältere pflegebedürftige Menschen und deren Angehörige im Rahmen von strukturierten Gesprächen für das Thema ACP zu sensibilisieren und die Nutzung bestehender Beratungsangebote zu fördern. Methoden: Die Interventionskomponenten wurden unter Anwendung des Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) entwickelt. Ergebnisse: Die komplexe Intervention in Form eines niedrigschwelligen Beratungsangebotes richtet sich an Pflegebedürftige über 65 Jahre und ihre Angehörigen. Ein zweitägiges Schulungsangebot qualifiziert Pflegefachpersonen ambulanter Pflegedienste für leitfadengestützte Beratungsgespräche, die im häuslichen Umfeld der pflegebedürftigen Person, möglichst unter Einbeziehung Angehöriger, im Rahmen von mindestens zwei Terminen durchgeführt werden. Eine Broschüre ergänzt das Informationsangebot. Schlussfolgerungen: Das Vorgehen entlang des BCW-Modells war für Analyse, Beschreibung und Definition der spezifischen Funktionen der Intervention gut geeignet. Die Intervention wird in der anschließenden Studie auf ihre Effektivität untersucht.

Advance care planning at life milestones

Much progress has been made in advance care planning (ACP), especially related to end of life and palliative care. These advances have moved thinking about ACP from a checklist approach to an upstream recognition that ACP is an iterative process that should begin early in adulthood and be revisited with each milestone or life-changing event. It is recognized that there are many stages and milestones in adult life that contribute to changing loci of responsibility and life goals. These changes impact how individuals view their lives, the complexity of health care, and the myriad of health conditions they may encounter. ACP discussions should routinely be started and reexamined at the time of key life events like starting a career or a marriage and not delayed until hospitalization, the occurrence of a serious accident, or the development of a catastrophic illness.

Knowledge of and Barriers to Palliative Care Perceived by Healthcare Providers before and after Promotion of the Patient Autonomy Act: A Cross-Sectional Study

This study was designed to investigate healthcare providers’ knowledge of palliative care and perceptions of palliative care barriers before and after promoting the Patient Autonomy Act (PAA). A convenience sample was recruited, including 277 healthcare providers in 2013 and 222 healthcare providers in 2018. Multivariate linear regression analyses were used to identify predictors of knowledge of and perceived barriers to palliative care. A principal component analysis was carried out to identify the most appropriate factorial structure for the contents of knowledge and perceived barriers to palliative care. Three factors related to knowledge of palliative care were identified in both 2013 and 2018 data: ‘policy, regulation, and promotion’, ‘philosophy and treatments’, and ‘myths and misunderstandings’. Study findings for the two periods were similar. As for barriers to providing palliative care, three factors were identified for 2013: ‘quality care’, ‘difficulties’ and ‘communication’, and for 2018, ‘information’, ‘attitudes’ and ‘quality care’ were identified. Study findings differed between the two periods. Policies can better reinforce mitigating strategies—including opportunities for education, shared decision making, and changes in institutions and care systems. Additionally, assessing barriers creates important opportunities for further research to address the most critical aspects in improving end-of-life care for patients and their families.

Advance Care Planning among Older Gay Men Living with HIV in Montreal, Canada: Challenges to Thinking and Talking about Future Care

This qualitative study employed a cross sectional focus group design to explore how older gay men living with HIV, experience, perceive, and engage with advance care planning (ACP). Seven gay men 50+, residing in Montreal, Canada, participated in a focus group that was audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed. Findings suggested that social isolation, preoccupations with day-to-day living, and managing disclosures related to sexual orientation and HIV status created barriers to these men's capacities to think about let alone talk about future care. These findings challenge current conceptualizations of ACP, which position reflection as an individual process that precedes allocating a decision-maker and communicating care preferences. Analyses further revealed that relational connections helped create a space where ACP could occur for participants. Hence, improving the uptake of ACP amongst older gay men with HIV may require interventions that embed such discussions into broader programs aimed at building support and community.

Differences in goals of care discussion outcomes among healthcare professionals: an observational cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Goals of care discussions ensure patients receive the care that they want. Recent studies have recognized the opportunity for allied health professionals, such as nurses, in facilitating goals of care discussions. However, the outcomes of such interventions are not well studied.

AIM

To compare the outcomes of goals of care discussions led by physicians and nurses.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to an Internal Medicine unit from January 2018 to August 2019. A comprehensive chart review was performed on a random sample of patients. Patient's decision to accept or refuse cardiopulmonary resuscitation was recorded and analyzed. Analysis was stratified by patients' comorbidity burden and illness severity.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

The study took place at a tertiary care center and included 200 patients. Patients aged ⩾ 18 were included. Patients who have had pre-existing goals of care documentation were excluded.

RESULTS

About 52% of the goals of care discussions were completed by nurses and 48% by physicians. Patients were more likely to accept cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nurse-led discussions compared to physician-led ones (80.8% vs 61.4%, p = 0.003). Multiple regression showed that patients with higher comorbidity burden (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.82), more severe illness (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.88-0.99), and physician-led goals of care discussions (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62) were less likely to accept cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant difference between the outcomes of goals of care discussions led by nurses and physicians. Patients were more likely to accept aggressive resuscitative measures in nurse-led goals of care discussions. Further research efforts are needed to identify the factors contributing to this discrepancy, and to devise ways of improving goals of care discussion delivery.

Refinement of an Emergency Department-Based, Advance Care Planning Intervention for Nurses

Background: Most older adults visit the emergency department (ED) near the end of life without advance care planning (ACP) and thus are at risk of receiving care that does not align with their wishes and values. ED GOAL is a behavioral intervention administered by ED clinicians, which is designed to engage seriously ill older adults in serious illness conversations in the ED. Seriously ill older adults found it acceptable in the ED. However, its potential to be used by nurses remains unclear. Objective: The aim of this study is to identify refinements to adapt an ED-based ACP intervention by eliciting the perspectives of nurses. Design: This is a qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using axial coding methods. Setting/Subjects: We recruited a purposeful sample of ED nurses in one urban academic ED and one urban community ED in the northeastern region of the United States. Results: Twenty-five nurses were interviewed (mean age 46 years, 84% female, and mean clinical experience of 16 years). Emerging themes were identified within six domains: (1) nurses' prior experience with serious illness conversations, (2) overall impression of ED GOAL, (3) refinements to ED GOAL, (4) implementation of ED GOAL by ED nurses, (5) specially trained nursing model, and (6) use of telehealth with ED GOAL. Conclusions: ED nurses were generally supportive of using ED GOAL and provided insight into how to best adapt and implement it in their clinical practice. Empirical evidence for adapting ED GOAL to the nursing practice remains to be seen.

Assessment of emergency department staff awareness, access and utilisation of advance care directives and goals of care: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Emergency department staff awareness, access and implementation of advance care directives and goals of care documents and the related patient consent processes are important but not well understood.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey using purposive sampling was undertaken at a tertiary hospital's Emergency Department from 15th March to 26th April 2021. Participants were recruited through online platforms. Pre-validated questionnaires were distributed by email or as QR codes on bulletin boards. Data collected included staff: demographics, knowledge, access and implementation of advance care directives and goals of care documentation.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four (28%) of 476 targeted participants responded with nursing forming largest group. Results showed that previous attendance of advance care planning education was low at 20%. Familiarity with advance care directive documentations was only 19% while with goals of care document was average. 61 (48%) respondents reported ease of accessing electronic documents and 21 (19%) reported feeling very comfortable discussing and setting goals of care with patients (p = <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Staff awareness of advance care directive was poor, while awareness of goals of care was average. There was no association between advance care directives awareness and staff age group, gender, length of: - professional practice, practice at the study site.

A scoping review of nurse-led advance care planning

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) supports persons at any age or health status to determine their values, goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. The American Nurses Association endorses nurses to facilitate ACP to promote patient- and family-centered care.

PURPOSE

This project reviewed and synthesized literature on nurse-led ACP training models.

METHODS

A scoping review used the Arksey and O'Malley Framework to identify: (a) ACP training model type, (b) nurse-led ACP recipients, (c) ACP in special populations, (d) ACP outcomes.

FINDINGS

Of 33 articles reviewed, 19 included 11 established models; however, the primary finding was lack of a clearly identified evidence-based nurse-led ACP training model.

DISCUSSION

Nurses are integral team members, well positioned to be a bridge of communication between patients and care providers. This is a call to action for nurse leaders, researchers, educators to collaborate to identify and implement an evidence-based, effective nurse-led ACP training model.

Barriers to Advance Care Planning Implementation in Health care: An Umbrella Review with Implications for Evidence-Based Practice

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning (ACP) refers to a process of discussions between professionals, patients, and their families, which allows the patient to define and communicate their care and treatment preferences. Understanding the barriers to advance care planning is the first step on the way to overcoming them and to improving person-centred care and attention.

AIMS

To identify the barriers perceived by professionals, patients, and family members when implementing ACP in a clinical context and to analyse the methodological quality of the evidence.

METHODS

An umbrella review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute and a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA 2015 were utilized. Data were obtained from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, The Joanna Briggs Institute, CINAHL, Scopus, and EMBASE in November 2018.

RESULTS

Fourteen systematic reviews were included. The main barriers reported by professionals were lack of knowledge and skills to carry out ACP, a certain fear of starting conversations about ACP, and a lack of time for discussions. Patients and family members considered that the main barriers were fear of discussing their relative's end of life, lack of ability to carry out ACP, and not knowing who was responsible for initiating conversations about ACP.

LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION

This review has examined the barriers presented by health professionals, patients, and family members, so that future lines of research can develop preventive or decisive measures that encourage the implementation of ACP in health care.

Nurse-led normalised advance care planning service in hospital and community health settings: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Advance Care Planning (ACP) by Registered Nurses (RNs) has been emerging. However, there is limited understanding about what RNs experience as they incorporate ACP into their practice. This study aimed to elicit the experiences of ACP RNs with the implementation of a normalised ACP (NACP) service in hospital and community care settings.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study invited four ACP RNs who delivered a nurse-led NACP for a 6 months duration at two hospital and two community health care settings in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The experiences of the ACP RNs were captured through a semi-structured interview and weekly debriefing meetings. The interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and the minutes of weekly debriefing meetings were utilized. Data were analysed by two independent researchers using thematic analysis with the Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) as a methodological framework.

FINDINGS

The ACP RNs were females with a mean age of 43 years old. Their nursing experiences ranged 2 to 25 years but they had minimal experiences with ACP and had not attended any education about ACP previously. The following four themes were identified in the experiences of the ACP RNs; 1) Embracing NACP service; 2) Enablers and barriers related to patients and health professionals; 3) Enablers and barriers related to ACP RNs; and 4) What it means to be an ACP RN.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a NACP service into existing clinical systems is complex. The study demonstrated the capacity of RNs to engage in ACP processes, and their willingness to deliver an NACP service with a raft of locally specific enablers and barriers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12618001627246 ). The URL of the trial registry record.

Improving End-of-Life Care for People with Dementia in LTC Homes During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant increase in deaths in long-term care homes (LTCH). People with dementia living in LTCHs represent one of the most frail and marginalized populations in Canada. The surge of COVID-19 cases in LTCHs and rationing of health-care resources during the pandemic have amplified the pre-existing need for improvements in palliative and end-of-life care in LTCHs. This position statement, created by a task force commissioned by the Alzheimer Society of Canada, provides recommendations for a multipronged coordinated approach to improving palliative and end-of-life care of people with dementia living in LTCHs during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Advance care planning for older people in mainland China: An integrative literature review

BACKGROUND

Recently, the attempts to promote advance care planning (ACP) and advance directives (ADs) have appeared in mainland China. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that the concept of ACP and ADs is not widely known to the public and healthcare professionals.

AIM

To examine and synthesise currently available research about ACP and ADs for older people in mainland China, and to discuss implications for future nursing practice and research.

DESIGN

An integrative literature review.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in seven English electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Cochrane, JBI, Scopus and Wiley) and four Chinese electronic databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM). Eligible articles were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

FINDINGS

From various groups including older people, families and healthcare professionals, low levels of knowledge and awareness about ACP and ADs are reported. Demographic characteristics such as age, gender, education and clinical conditions were related to positive or negative attitude towards ACP. The main reason people cited for being 'reluctant/fairly reluctant' to make an AD was that they were 'Not familiar with it'.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that older people showed positive attitudes towards ACP, policy support and practice guidelines about ADs and ACP are necessary to respect their wishes and to guide healthcare professionals in mainland China.

Feasibility of an Advance Care Planning Program (ACP) for Korean Community-Dwelling Older Adults and ACP Training of Advance Practice Nurses

This study aimed to develop a locally suitable advance care planning (ACP) program for older community-dwelling adults and a training program for nurse facilitators in Korea, and to evaluate their feasibility from the facilitators' experiences. This was a mixed methods pilot study that assessed the feasibility of an ACP program by analyzing survey, checklist, and focus group interview data. The ACP program was named CLOSE (Communicating and Listening to Our Seniors' voices about End-of-life care). Home health care nurses (N = 9) participated in this study. The participants reported that CLOSE was applicable to older community-dwelling adults and the training program was useful for increasing facilitator competency. We suggest some lessons from this pilot study that can be used to improve the ACP program and encourage community health nurses to participate in ACP as facilitators.

The Role Complexities in Advance Care Planning for End-of-Life Care-Nursing Students' Perception of the Nursing Profession

Nurses’ perceptions of being responsible for advance care planning (ACP) vary greatly across different studies. It could, however, affect their involvement in advance care planning and patients’ quality of death. Recent studies on this topic have mostly focused on advance directives but not ACP and nurses in the ward setting. This study aimed to assess the perception of Hong Kong nursing undergraduates of the nurse’s role in advance care planning and examine its associations with knowledge, attitude, and experience. A cross-sectional 57-item survey was delivered to nursing undergraduates between June and August 2020. The chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test were used for univariate analysis. The multiple logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. A total of 469 participants were assessed for eligibility; 242 of them were included in the data analysis, with a response rate of 97.6%. The majority of respondents—77.3% (95% CI: 72.0–82.6%)—perceived having a role in ACP, but large discrepancies were found between their perception of their role regarding different aspects of ACP. Participants who had a better knowledge status (p = 0.029) or supported the use of ACP (p < 0.001) were more likely to have a positive perception of their role in ACP. A negative correlation was found between the experience of life threat and positive role perception (p < 0.001). Through strengthening training, the role clarity of nursing undergraduates could be achieved, maximizing their cooperation with and implementation of ACP in their future nursing career. The enhancement of end-of-life education could also be undertaken to fill nursing undergraduates’ knowledge gap in this area and change their attitudes.

Knowledge of and willingness to promote advanced care planning among oncology nurses in southwest China

BACKGROUND

Nurses feature prominently in promoting advance care planning (ACP), but only a limited amount of relevant research has been conducted from the nurses' viewpoint, and little is known about the nurses' knowledge of and their willingness to promote ACP in China.

AIMS

The aims of this study were to investigate oncology nurses' knowledge of and their willingness to promote ACP, and to explore associated factors.

METHODS

A multi-centre study was conducted to investigate 350 nurses in the oncology departments of four university hospitals in southwestern China. Cluster sampling was used in data collection, which involved three categories of questionnaires concerning demographic characteristics, knowledge about ACP and willingness to promote ACP. Chi-squared tests and multiple linear regression were employed in data analysis.

RESULTS

Some 293 valid questionnaires were collected, among which, 60.1% of respondents never received palliative care education, 89.1% never received training about ACP and 72.7% had not even heard of ACP. Nurses with higher position titles (χ²=18.41, p<0.001) and longer working experience (χ²=12.25, p=0.001) were more likely to have received palliative care education; nurses with higher educational background levels (χ²=12.91, p<0.001), higher position titles (χ²=9.77, p=0.003) and longer working experience (χ²=7.92, p=0.006) were more likely to have learned about ACP; nurses with higher position titles had more access to relevant training (χ²=5.10, p=0.03). Furthermore, whether the nurse had 'heard about ACP' (B=3.113, p=0.018) and 'received training about ACP' (B=3.894, p=0.04) were both associated with their willingness to promote ACP.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study indicated that oncology nurses were highly inclined to promote ACP, but limited by their lack of knowledge and understanding of it. Therefore, a systematic and adequate training programme about ACP for nurses is an urgent requirement to effectively enhance the implementation of ACP in China.

Barriers to Palliative Care Referral and Advance Care Planning (ACP) for Patients With COPD: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Palliative Care Nurses

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive, life-limiting illness that requires end-of-life care planning, yet remains under-served. Understanding barriers to advance care planning (ACP) from different specialties' perspectives will enable a co-ordinated, cross-disciplinary approach to improving ACP access.

METHODS

Australia and New Zealand palliative care nurses were invited to complete an anonymous online cross-sectional survey. Questions tested knowledge of validated ACP-related practice indicators and canvassed perspectives on barriers to ACP in COPD. Data are described and free-text thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

The 90 participants had high knowledge and positive attitudes to ACP in COPD, however, lacked consensus as to whether patients want to know their prognosis or discuss treatment options and end-of-life wishes. 59% discussed ACP in more than half their patients with COPD, and 77% and 73% routinely initiated or followed-up these discussions. Key barriers included: lack of confidence and training in COPD; reluctance to distress patients and families; referral late in the disease course; lack of consensus on referral timing; and lack of patient and clinician understanding of COPD prognoses. Many reported that lack of consensus in the treating team, paired with prognostic uncertainty, precluded timely ACP engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care nurses have substantial knowledge and positive beliefs regarding ACP, however, some beliefs and practices lack alignment with qualitative data on patients' wishes in COPD. While palliative care nurses are well placed to facilitate early implementation for patients with advanced COPD, ACP training and practice guidelines specific to COPD may increase implementation in this life-limiting disease.

Differences in advance care planning among nursing home care staff

BACKGROUND

A team-based approach has been advocated for advance care planning in nursing homes. While nurses are often put forward to take the lead, it is not clear to what extent other professions could be involved as well.

OBJECTIVES

To examine to what extent engagement in advance care planning practices (e.g. conversations, advance directives), knowledge and self-efficacy differ between nurses, care assistants and allied care staff in nursing homes.

DESIGN

Survey study.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

The study involved a purposive sample of 14 nursing homes in Flanders, Belgium. Nurses, care assistants and allied care staff (e.g. social workers, physical therapists) completed a survey.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study was approved by the University Hospital of Brussels (B.U.N. 143201834759), as part of a cluster randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03521206).

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six nurses, 319 care assistants and 169 allied staff participated (67% response rate). After adjusting for confounders, nurses were significantly more likely than care assistants to have carried out advance care planning conversations (odds ratio 4; 95% confidence interval 1.73-9.82; p < 0.001) and documented advance care planning (odds ratio 2.67; 95% confidence interval 1.29-5.56; p < 0.001); differences not found between allied staff and care assistants. Advance care planning knowledge total scores differed significantly, with nurses (estimated mean difference 0.13 (score range 0-1); 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.17; p < 0.001) and allied staff (estimated mean difference 0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.12; p < 0.001) scoring higher than care assistants. We found no significant differences regarding self-efficacy.

DISCUSSION

While nursing home nurses conducted more advance care planning conversations and documentation than allied care staff and care assistants, these two professional groups may be a valuable support to nurses in conducting advance care planning, if provided with additional training.

CONCLUSIONS

Allied care staff and care assistants, if trained appropriately, can be involved more strongly in advance care planning to enhance relational and individual autonomy of nursing home residents, alongside nurses. Future research to improve and implement advance care planning should consider this finding at the intervention development stage.

Oncology nurses' perceptions of advance directives for patients with cancer

This study examined oncology nurses' perceptions of the impact of advance directives on oncology patients' end-of-life care. Nurses (n = 104), who were members of an oncology nursing society or worked in a large metropolitan cancer center, completed a cross-sectional survey assessing perceptions of advance directives. There was high agreement that advance directives (i) make decisions easier for family (87%) and providers (82%); (ii) are doctors' responsibility to implement (80%); (iii) reduce unwanted aggressive treatment in the last weeks of life (80%); (iv) protect patient autonomy (77%); and (v) increase the likelihood of dying in a preferred location (76%). There was moderate or low agreement that advance directives (i) are accessible when needed (60%); (ii) are oncology nurses' responsibility to implement (46%); (iii) are always followed (41%); (iv) reduce the likelihood of pain in the last weeks of life (31%); (v) contain difficult to follow statements (30%); and (vi) have no impact on comfort in the last weeks of life (15%). Most nurses perceive benefits for advance directives, however, there remains uncertainty around accessibility and implementation. Guidelines and education about advance directive processes in oncology could improve person-centered end-of-life care.

Discrepancies among knowledge, practice, and attitudes towards advance care planning among Chinese clinical nurses: A national cross-sectional study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the Chinese nurses' knowledge and attitudes concerning advance care planning (ACP) and their engagement in ACP practice.

BACKGROUND

Nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice of ACP are important in promoting ACP in patients, but little is known about knowledge, attitudes, and practice of ACP among nurses in countries where there are no national policies or regulations on ACP.

DESIGN

A descriptive study with a cross-sectional design.

METHODS

An online questionnaire survey was distributed to Chinese nurses who attended a national conference.

RESULTS

A total of 531 nurses completed the survey and were included in the final analysis. No nurses answered all questions correctly, while 31 (5.8%) answered all the survey questions wrong. The participants were most knowledgeable about the item "Once ACP is made, the content of advance directives cannot be revoked" and were least knowledgeable about the item "ACP is valid only when the patients are well informed of the medical condition". The implementation of ACP was favored by 92.5% of participants, but only 3.4% of them had actually engaged in all 5 ACP practices listed in the survey. Experience of dealing with death was positively associated with nurses' knowledge concerning ACP. The number of dying patients cared for in the past 6 months, school education of palliative care, knowledge of ACP, and age were related to engagement in the practice of ACP.

CONCLUSION

Chinese nurses have supportive attitudes towards ACP, but they have limited knowledge and little practice in ACP.

Realization and personalization by facing fatality: A grounded theory of developing the view of dying in people with heart failure

AIM

To explore how people with heart failure develop and change their views of dying and death.

DESIGN

A Straussian grounded theory approach.

METHODS

Purposive and theoretical sampling were used. Data collection and analysis were repeated until reaching data saturation using the constant comparative method. We conducted semi-structured interviews between January 2019 and July 2020 with 24 people with heart failure from a university and a community hospital in Japan.

RESULTS

Initially, participants' views of dying and death were unrelated to their disease. After the first turning point, namely the confirmation of the deterioration and incurability of the disease, their views became related to their own disease, adding to the suffering caused by the exacerbated symptoms. After the second turning point, namely when participants became tormented by the inevitability of death, they added their struggles with physical, psychological, and spiritual pain owing to medical interventions to their views of dying and death. Only a few participants reached the last stage of this process as it was emotionally distressing; some chose not to proceed to the next stage.

CONCLUSION

Participants develop their views of dying and death gradually and in stages while they experience two turning points. Healthcare providers need to address this process while keeping in mind that proceeding this process requires some turning points, and it can be painful.

IMPACT

This study provides a theoretical framework on the development of the views regarding dying and death of people with heart failure; it showed that these people need some turning points and to pass through stages to develop/individualize their views, and that this process is inherently distressing. This theory provides a cornerstone for healthcare professionals to understand the disease-specific transition in views of dying and psychological readiness, and it may help establish a therapeutic relationship that includes advance care planning.

Nurses' Perceptions of Facilitating Advance Care Planning Conversations in the Emergency Department

Background: Nurses are well positioned to initiate advance care planning (ACP) conversations because of their unique strength in communication and central patient-facing role in the interdisciplinary team. Nurse-led ACP conversations have demonstrated promising results in settings outside of the emergency department (ED). Understanding ED nurses' perspectives regarding ACP conversations is needed before implementing similar practices in the ED.

Objective: To explore ED nurses' perception of facilitating ACP conversations.

Design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess ED nurses' perceptions of facilitating ACP conversations in the ED.

Setting: ED nurses at one academic hospital and one community hospital located within the northeastern region of the United States.

Results: Seventy-seven (53.1%) out of 145 eligible ED nurses completed the survey. All participants perceived ACP conversations in the ED as at least somewhat important. Forty (51.9%) felt somewhat comfortable in facilitating these conversations. The majority of participants (77.9%) agreed that a specially trained nurse consultation model might be helpful in the ED. We found a correlation between total clinical experience and interest in facilitating ACP conversations in the ED (p = 0.045).

Conclusion: ED nurses are well positioned to help patients clarify their goals-of-care and end-of-life care preferences. They perceived ACP conversations to be important and felt comfortable to facilitate them in the ED. Additional studies are needed to empirically test its implementation.

Homecare nurses guide goals for care and care transitions in serious illness: A grounded theory of relationship-based care

AIMS

To identify the process that homecare nurses use when recognizing serious illness, engaging patients and families in goals-for-care discussions and guiding transitions to comfort-focused care.

DESIGN

Constructivist grounded theory.

METHODS

Semi-structured focus group interviews of 31 homecare Registered Nurses were recorded and transcribed (June-August 2019). Line-by-line coding using the constant comparative method until saturation was achieved and a grounded theory was identified. Credibility, transferability, and confirmability establish study rigor.

RESULTS

A grounded theory of relationship-based care. Nurses cogitate and act when recognizing serious illness. They have difficult conversations and support care transitions with wisdom and knowing, by identifying changes in illness trajectories and being informed and alert to diminishing quality of life. Nurses are skilled at engaging patients, families, and the team and accommodate care in the home for as long as possible, while manoeuvring through complex systems of care; ultimately relinquishing and guiding care to other providers and settings. However, nurses feel inadequately prepared and frustrated with a fragmented healthcare system and lack of collaboration among the team.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies a grounded theory to support clinical decision-making and position homecare nurses as leaders in guiding goal care discussions and transitions to comfort-focused care. These findings reinforce the importance of developing health policy that ensures care continuity in serious illness. Further research is needed to improve relationships across care settings and enhance training for the delivery of comfort-focused care in the home as changing needs emerge during serious illness management.

Characteristics of Advance Care Planning Interventions Across Dementia Stages: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Little is known regarding how advance care planning (ACP) interventions change with the progression of dementia. Thus, the primary purpose of this systematic review is to compare characteristics of ACP interventions across dementia stages. We also identify the role of nurses in implementing ACP interventions for persons with dementia and their surrogates.

DESIGN

A systematic review of ACP intervention studies.

METHODS

After searching PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, PsycArticles, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literture (CINAHL), and Scopus, the final sample included 11 studies representing 10 interventions. We conducted a quality assessment and extracted data on dementia stage, intervention characteristics, and the role of nurses in the intervention. The extracted data were categorized according to stages of dementia, and analyzed to identify commonalities and differences between intervention characteristics.

FINDINGS

Three ACP interventions focused on mild dementia and seven on advanced dementia. We observed four primary findings. First, we found a major difference in intervention recipients between the two dementia stages. Second, most ACP interventions included structured discussions regarding the person's life goals and values, goals of care, and preferences concerning future care via individual, face-to-face interactions. Third, ACP interventions designed to promote ongoing discussions and documentation were lacking. Finally, nurses played important roles in implementing ACP interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest more nurse-led, dementia-related ACP interventions. In addition, ACP interventions should promote ongoing discussions and documentation and target persons with dementia and their surrogates in various countries.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Many persons with dementia and their surrogates have limited knowledge about ACP; thus, more nurse-led ACP programs that reflect dementia stages may help them prepare for the situations in which persons with dementia lack decision-making capacity.

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of advance care planning in palliative care unit: a qualitative descriptive study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe healthcare professionals' perceptions of advance care planning (ACP) in palliative care unit in hospital ward or outpatient clinic.

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend timely ACP as a central component of patient-centred palliative care. However, the ACP concept and terminology have been judged to be confusing, and practices are not established. Professionals' views are needed for ACP adoption and usage.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive design.

METHODS

The study used purposive sampling. The data were collected through focus group interviews with registered nurses and practical nurses and individual or couple interviews with physicians and social workers. The data (n = 33) were analysed by inductive content analysis. The study complied with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist.

RESULTS

Three main categories emerged: Information content of ACP, coordination of care activities through ACP, and support for patients' and family members' coping. The information content of ACP included assessment of need for patient care, preparing for changes in patient's state of health and proactive medication. Coordination of care activities through ACP contained ACP care planning, cooperation and work practices between healthcare professionals. Support for patients' and family members' coping included communication between patient, family members and professionals and promoting patient self-care.

CONCLUSIONS

ACP is a useful and proactive tool for integrating patient-centred information, care and services as well as support for patients' and family members' coping. Palliative care activities can be coordinated through ACP in a multidisciplinary manner. ACP is significant and relevant for both professionals' work and patient care throughout the service system.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Results highlight the importance of proactive, concrete and holistic ACP. ACP should be up to date to reflect patient's current wishes. Raising professional awareness and implementing ACP into work processes are essential. Results can be utilised in planning and implementing interprofessional in-service training.

Lay Health Workers' Perspectives on Delivery of Advance Care Planning and Symptom Screening Among Adults With Cancer: A Qualitative Study

INTRODUCTION

Advance care planning and symptom screening among patients with cancer require team-based approaches to ensure that these services are equitably and appropriately delivered. In several organizations across the United States, we trained and employed lay health workers (LHWs) to assist with delivering these services for patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to understand LHWs' views on delivering these services.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 LHWs in 6 US-based clinical cancer care settings in 4 large cities. We recorded, transcribed, and analyzed interviews using the constant comparative method of qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

Participants noted the importance of their role in assisting with the delivery of advance care planning (ACP) and symptom screening services. Participants noted the importance of developing relationships with patients to engage openly in ACP and symptom screening discussions. Participants reported that ongoing training provided skills and empowered them to discuss sensitive issues with patients and their caregivers. Participants described challenges in their roles including communication with oncology providers and their own emotional well-being. Participants identified solutions to these challenges including formal opportunities for introduction with oncology clinicians and staff and grievance sessions with LHWs and other team members.

DISCUSSION

LHWs from several organizations endorsed the importance of their roles in ensuring the delivery of ACP and proactive symptom screening. LHWs noted challenges and specific solutions to improve their effectiveness in delivering these important services to patients after their diagnosis of cancer.

Health Personnel's Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy Related to Providing Palliative Care in Persons with Chronic Diseases

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships of knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy related to palliative care among health care providers (doctors and nurses) in order to provide a basis to develop a training program for health care providers.

Methods

A correlational and descriptive study design was used. Participants were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital located in Daejeon and an e-nurse community. After IRB approval, data were collected from July 12, 2018, to September 30, 2018. A total of 169 responses were finally analyzed using version SPSS 24. The data were analyzed in terms of descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage or mean and standard deviation, as appropriate), the t-test, analysis of variance (with the Duncan post hoc test), and Pearson correlation coefficients.

Results

Knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy were significantly higher in those who had received palliative care training or had been exposed to awareness-raising initiatives. There were positive relationships among knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy, with small to moderate effect sizes.

Conclusion

Palliative care training for health care professionals is necessary to meet patients' needs. Such programs should take into account not only knowledge about palliative care, but also ways to improve empathy and resolve ethical dilemmas. Interprofessional training would be an excellent option to share therapeutic goals and develop communication skills among multidisciplinary team members.

Association between training experience and readiness for advance care planning among healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Training has been found effective in improving healthcare professionals' knowledge, confidence, and skills in conducting advance care planning (ACP). However, the association between training and its actual practice in the clinical setting has not been well demonstrated. To fill this gap, this paper examines the association between their readiness for ACP, in terms of perceived relevancy of ACP with their clinical work, attitudes toward and confidence and willingness to perform it, based on the Theory Planned Behavior and relevant training experiences.

METHODS

An online survey about experiences about ACP of healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, social workers, and allied healthcare professionals, currently working in hospital and community care in Hong Kong was conducted.

RESULTS

Of 250 respondents, approximately half (52.0%) had received ACP-related training. Those with relevant training reported significantly more positive in the perceived clinical relevance, willingness, and confidence in conducting ACP and different levels of agreement with 19 out of the 25 statements in a questionnaire about attitudes toward ACP than those without (ps ≤ 0.001-0.05). Respondents who received training only in a didactic format reported a significantly lower level of confidence in conducting ACP than did others who received a blended mode of learning (p = 0.012). Notwithstanding significant differences between respondents with and without relevant training, respondents generally acknowledged their roles in initiating conversations and appreciated ACP in preventing decisional conflict in surrogate decision-making regardless of their training experience.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper revealed the association between training and higher level of readiness toward ACP among healthcare professionals. The findings showed that training is a predictor of their readiness for ACP in terms of perceived relevancy, willingness, and confidence. Those who had received training were less likely to consider commonly reported barriers such as time constraints, cultural taboos, and avoidance among patients and family members as hindrances to ACP implementation.

Competing expectations: Advance care planning from the perspectives of doctors and nurses in the South-East Asian context

This study qualitatively examines the perspectives of doctors and nurses on the implementation of the Advance Care Planning program in Singapore. Findings suggest that a combination of structural and conceptual factors hindered the performance of ACP. Themes on structural factors indicated that low awareness of ACP among senior staff resulted overall lack of buy-in and incorrect implementation of the program due to misconceptions. Conceptual factors pointed to lack of clarity on intended outcomes or roles. Consequently, participants drew meaning through the prism of their profession, resulting in competing expectations and tensions on possible outcomes of the program.

Development of a Japanese version of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey: Examination of its reliability and validity

OBJECTIVES

The importance of supporting advance care planning (ACP) by healthcare professionals is recognized worldwide, and assessing the outcomes, such as people's understanding and readiness for ACP, using an appropriate instrument is essential. We, therefore, developed a Japanese version of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey (ACP Engagement Survey; 15 items, 9 items, and 4 items), an international scale for assessing the progress of the ACP, and examined its validity and reliability.

METHODS

The ACP Engagement Survey was translated into Japanese, back-translated, and culturally adapted, and the final version was reviewed by the author of the original version. Data on basic demographic information and ACP-related experiences were simultaneously collected as external criteria in an online survey of older adults with chronic diseases. The Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess its internal consistency, and a retest was performed three days later to calculate the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

A total of 200 respondents (mean age 70; 9.5% female) were included in the analysis. None of the items showed a ceiling effect, but several items did exhibit a floor effect. The factor structure was the same 2-factor structure as the original version, and both factors exhibited a high cumulative contribution rate. The Cronbach's alphas were 0.94 (15-item version), 0.91 (9-item version), and 0.95 (4-item version), and ICCs were of 0.88 (15-item version), 0.9 (9-item version), and 0.84 (4-item version).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The Japanese version of the ACP Engagement Survey was confirmed to have very good reliability regarding both internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Together with the result of the item analysis, we can conclude that the Japanese version of the ACP Engagement Survey is sufficiently reliable to be utilized in interventional studies, and it has acceptable content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity.

Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Advance care planning (ACP) has shown benefit in some, but not all, studies. It is important to understand the utility of ACP. We conducted a scoping review to identify promising interventions and outcomes.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

MEASUREMENTS

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for ACP randomized controlled trials from January 1, 2010, to March 3, 2020. We used standardized Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses methods to chart study characteristics, including a standardized ACP Outcome Framework: Process (e.g., readiness), Action (e.g., communication), Quality of Care (e.g., satisfaction), Health Status (e.g., anxiety), and Healthcare Utilization. Differences between arms of P < .05 were deemed positive.

RESULTS

Of 1,464 articles, 69 met eligibility; 94% were rated high quality. There were variable definitions, age criteria (≥18 to ≥80 years), diseases (e.g., dementia and cancer), and settings (e.g., outpatient and inpatient). Interventions included facilitated discussions (42%), video only (20%), interactive, multimedia (17%), written only (12%), and clinician training (9%). For written only, 75% of primary outcomes were positive, as were 69% for multimedia programs; 67% for facilitated discussions, 59% for video only, and 57% for clinician training. Overall, 72% of Process and 86% of Action outcomes were positive. For Quality of Care, 88% of outcomes were positive for patient-surrogate/clinician congruence, 100% for patients/surrogate/clinician satisfaction with communication, and 75% for surrogate satisfaction with patients' care, but not for goal concordance. For Health Status outcomes, 100% were positive for reducing surrogate/clinician distress, but not for patient quality of life. Healthcare Utilization data were mixed.

CONCLUSION

ACP is complex, and trial characteristics were heterogeneous. Outcomes for all ACP interventions were predominantly positive, as were Process and Action outcomes. Although some Quality of Care and Health Status outcomes were mixed, increased patient/surrogate satisfaction with communication and care and decreased surrogate/clinician distress were positive. Further research is needed to appropriately tailor interventions and outcomes for local contexts, set appropriate expectations of ACP outcomes, and standardize across studies.

Implementing advance directives-An international literature review of important considerations for nurses

AIM(S)

To review the global literature on the implementation of advance health care directives to date, and the experiences of the health care professionals who must initiate the discussions around advance care planning, as well as support patients' ultimate decisions.

BACKGROUND

Ireland's Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 legalizes advance health care directives. It promotes the autonomy of the person and enables them to have treatment in accordance with their will and preferences. However, there is professional uncertainty on how to support and integrate assisted decision-making.

EVALUATION

16 studies featuring the views of health care professionals are included and evaluated using a framework of 'benefits versus challenges'.

KEY ISSUE(S)

Four themes clearly emerge during the review process: the concept of capacity and who decides; autonomy versus paternalism-conflict among the health care professional/patient/family caregiver triad; barriers to advance directives; and timing issues.

CONCLUSION(S)

Significant benefits of advance health care directives exist for all parties including less stress for patients and families alike, less burden and less residual guilt for surviving relatives, and an over-arching prevention of 'crisis' decision-making.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

This review highlights the central role of the nurse in empowering patients to express their wills and preferences, supporting patients' capacity to make decisions about their own care, initiating end-of-life care discussions and advocating to have advance health care directives acknowledged. Moreover, it identifies the challenges ahead for all nurse managers in implementing this new mandate.

Nurses' self-efficacy, rather than their knowledge, is associated with their engagement in advance care planning in nursing homes: A survey study

BACKGROUND

Considering social cognitive theory and current literature about successful advance care planning in nursing homes, sufficient knowledge and self-efficacy are important preconditions for staff to be able to carry out advance care planning in practice.

AIM

Exploring to what extent nurses' knowledge about and self-efficacy is associated with their engagement in advance care planning in nursing homes.

DESIGN

Survey study as part of a baseline measurement of a randomised controlled cluster trial (NCT03521206).

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Nurses in a purposive sample of 14 nursing homes in Belgium.

METHODS

A survey was distributed among nurses, evaluating knowledge (11 true/false items), self-efficacy (12 roles and tasks on 10-point Likert-type scale) and six advance care planning practices (yes/no), ranging from performing advance care planning conversations to completing advance directives.

RESULTS

A total of 196 nurses participated (66% response rate). While knowledge was not significantly associated with advance care planning practices, self-efficacy was. One unit's increase in self-efficacy was statistically associated with an estimated 32% increase in the number of practices having carried out.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses' engagement in advance care planning practices is mainly associated with their self-efficacy rather than their knowledge. Further research is necessary to improve the evidence regarding the causal relationship between constructs. However, these results suggest that educational programmes that focus solely on knowledge might not lead to increasing uptake of advance care planning in nurses.

The Crucial Role of Nurses and Social Workers in Initiating End-of-Life Communication to Reduce Overtreatment in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The large scale and rapid spread of the current COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way hospitals and other health services operate. Opportunities for patient-centered decision-making at the end of life are being jeopardized by a scarcity of health system resources. In response, the traditional doctor-initiated advanced care planning (ACP) for critical illness may also need to be readjusted. We propose nurse-led and allied health-led ACP discussions to ensure patient and family inclusion and understanding of the disease prognosis, prevention of overtreatment, and potential outcomes in crisis times. We highlight known barriers and list enablers, long-term and short-term opportunities to assist in the culture change.

Delivering an advance care planning facilitated model

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning is increasingly recognised as an integral part of achieving excellence at the end of life (EoL), but barriers still prevent individuals from having the opportunity to discuss their wishes and preferences for the future.

AIM

To describe the development and initial evaluations of an innovative facilitated ACP model, the ACP Triple E, which empowers individuals through education to engage in ACP conversations.

METHODS

This model uses a collaborative approach involving all sectors of a large university health board to equip all health and social care professionals with the knowledge, skills and confidence to engage in ACP discussion and also raise public awareness of the benefits of ACP.

CONCLUSION

This model includes recognised elements that support successful implementation of ACP. Initial evaluations of the model are extremely positive. Further analysis of the data is now needed to evaluate the model's flexibility and its ability to change practice and achieve strategic objectives.