1
|
Brown AR, Walters JE, Harmer B, Cates L, Jones AE. Non-prescribing clinicians' treatment orientations and attitudes toward treatments for opioid use disorder: Rural differences. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2023; 155:209153. [PMID: 37673286 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The United States has experienced substantial increases in opioid use for more than two decades. This growth has impacted rural areas where overdoses have risen drastically during this time period and more often involve prescription opioids than in urban areas. Medications for opioid use disorders (MOUDs) are highly underutilized in rural settings due to lack of access, inadequate prescribing, and stigma. METHODS The study collected data using a cross-sectional online survey of nonprescribing clinicians (NPCs) involved in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs) in the United States. The study used multiple recruitment methods to obtain a purposive sample of NPCs from a variety of geographical contexts across the nation. The survey assessed demographic and practice characteristics including rurality of practice location, exposure and training related to MOUDs, treatment orientation, treatment preferences for opioid use disorder (OUD), and attitudes toward MOUDs. The study compared treatment preferences for OUD and attitudes toward MOUDs based on rurality of practice location. We tested a mediation model to determine whether the relationship between rurality of practice setting and attitudes toward MOUDs is mediated by treatment orientation. RESULTS Most of the 636 NPCs surveyed favored a combination of MOUDs and psychosocial treatment. Compared to clinicians practicing in suburban or urban areas, self-identified rural clinicians were more likely to favor MOUDs alone as most effective and less likely to endorse a combination of MOUDs and psychosocial treatment. Although most NPCs were supportive of MOUDs overall, many endorsed misconceptions related to MOUDs. Rural clinicians were less likely to perceive MOUDs as effective or acceptable compared to those in urban settings. Results of a mediation analysis indicated that practicing in a rural location compared to in an urban location directly and indirectly influenced attitudes toward MOUDs through an effect on treatment orientation. CONCLUSIONS NPCs play important roles in the implementation of MOUDs, and while efforts to increase their knowledge of and exposure to MOUDs have contributed broadly to more favorable attitudes toward MOUDs among NPCs, this study's findings indicate that additional efforts are still needed, particularly among NPCs who work in rural settings. Findings also indicate that, among rural clinicians, increasing knowledge of and exposure to harm reduction principles may be a necessary prerequisite to engaging them in the implementation of specific harm reduction strategies such as MOUDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron R Brown
- University of Kentucky, College of Social Work, 619 Patterson Office Tower, Lexington, KY 40506-0027, USA.
| | - Jayme E Walters
- Utah State University, Department of Social Work, 0730 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-0730, USA
| | - Beth Harmer
- Western Carolina University, Department of Social Work, 3971 Little Savannah Rd, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA
| | - Lara Cates
- Western Carolina University, Department of Social Work, 3971 Little Savannah Rd, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA
| | - Aubrey E Jones
- University of Kentucky, College of Social Work, 619 Patterson Office Tower, Lexington, KY 40506-0027, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Staton M, Pike E, Tillson M, Lofwall MR. Facilitating factors and barriers for use of medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) among justice-involved individuals in rural Appalachia. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY 2023:10.1002/jcop.23029. [PMID: 36930568 PMCID: PMC10505241 DOI: 10.1002/jcop.23029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative study is to assess facilitating factors and barriers for medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation among justice-involved individuals in one rural Appalachian community, as well as how those factors may differ across the three types of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medications. Qualitative interviews were conducted with rural justice-involved individuals (N = 10) with a history of opioid use in the target community. Overall, participants demonstrated knowledge of the different types of MOUD and their pharmacological properties, but limited overall health literacy around opioid use disorder and MOUD treatment. Treatment access was hampered by transportation, time burdens, and costs. Findings call for research into improving health literacy education, training, and resources to decrease stigma and increase access to MOUD, particularly in light of the ongoing opioid crisis. State policies also need to increase access to all FDA medications among justice-involved individuals, as well as supporting a care continuum from facility entry, release, and community re-entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Staton
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| | - Erika Pike
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA
| | - Martha Tillson
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
- Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, Lexington, KY 40506-0027, USA
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, 845 Angliana Ave, Lexington, KY 40508, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Understanding language as a social action draws attention to the ways in which fat stigmatizing discourses do social harm. Drawing on interviews and experiences situated in Osaka, Japan and north Georgia, US, this paper looks closely at the ways in which fat stigma is expressed across the two sites, both blatantly and through more subtle language use. We identified four key themes in people's narratives around localized ideas about fatness. These themes are: (1) expressed pity or concern for fat people; (2) reported experiences of indirect stigma in public settings; (3) reported experiences of direct stigma in private settings; and (4) robust and repeated associations between fat and other conditions that had locally relevant negative connotations in each site. We further identify the expressed concern and pity articulated in the first theme as a form of cloaked, "dressed up" stigma and as such, we argue that it enacts social harm, especially when it co-occurs with more blatant forms of stigma. Linguistic niceties around caring actually, at least in these contexts, reify symbolic connections between fat bodies and their social failure.
Collapse
|
4
|
SCHERZ CHINA, BURRAWAY JOSHUA. Keeping it in the family. AMERICAN ETHNOLOGIST 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/amet.13105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- CHINA SCHERZ
- Department of Anthropology University of Virginia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leiner C, Antono B, Ostrach B. Perinatal OUD Treatment Provider Understandings of Rural Patients' Experiences. J Addict Med 2022; 16:177-182. [PMID: 35289773 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To present perspectives of substance use treatment providers offering perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in a largely rural, Appalachian region. To demonstrate the extent to which providers sought to understand their patients' experiences accessing treatment and how this understanding informed providers' approach to offering patient-centered care. METHODS A qualitative study combining semi-structured interviews and participant-observation with perinatal substance use treatment providers, conducted within a comprehensive program. Using purposive and opportunistic sampling with key informants (n = 10), a saturation sample was achieved. Data were analyzed using modified Grounded Theory. RESULTS Perinatal substance use treatment providers had a good understanding of their patients' experiences seeking treatment for opioid use disorder, including being aware of obstacles patients encountered. This understanding allowed providers to better address patients' needs in and out of the clinic. CONCLUSIONS Participants demonstrated a good understanding of what their largely rural, Appalachian patients experienced when attempting to access perinatal OUD treatment. This understanding may enable more patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Leiner
- UNC Health Sciences at MAHEC, Asheville, NC (CL); Family Medicine Residency Program, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC (BA); Medical resident in a program partially supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totaling $1,656,886 with 0 percent financed with non-governmental sources. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS, or the U.S. Government. For more information, please visit HRSA.gov. (This statement is required by HRSA to be included in all publications on which a HRSA-funded medical resident is listed as an author.) (BA); Department of Research, UNC Health Sciences at MAHEC, Asheville, NC (BO); Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA (BO)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson JR, Risser LR, Dunfee MN, Schoenberg NE, Burke JG. Place, Power, and Premature Mortality: A Rapid Scoping Review on the Health of Women in Appalachia. Am J Health Promot 2021; 35:1015-1027. [PMID: 33906415 DOI: 10.1177/08901171211011388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Appalachian women continue to die younger than in other US regions. We performed a rapid scoping review to summarize women's health research in Appalachia from 2000 to 2019, including health topics, study populations, theoretical frameworks, methods, and findings. DATA SOURCE We searched bibliographic databases (eg, PubMed, PsycINFO, Google Scholar) for literature focusing on women's health in Appalachia. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA Included articles were: (1) on women's health in Appalachia; (2) published January 2000 to June 2019; (3) peer-reviewed; and (4) written in English. We excluded studies without reported data findings. DATA EXTRACTION Two coders reviewed articles for descriptive information to create summary tables comparing variables of interest. DATA SYNTHESIS Two coders co-reviewed a sub-sample to ensure consensus and refine data charting categories. We categorized major findings across the social-ecological framework. RESULTS A search of nearly 2 decades of literature revealed 81 articles, which primarily focused on cancer disparities (49.4%) and prenatal/pregnancy outcomes (23.5%). Many of these research studies took place in Central Appalachia (eg, 42.0% in Kentucky) with reproductive or middle-aged women (82.7%). Half of the studies employed quantitative methods, and half used qualitative methods, with few mixed method or community-engaged approaches (3.7%). Nearly half (40.7%) did not specify a theoretical framework. Findings included complex multi-level factors with few articles exploring the co-occurrence of factors across multiple levels. CONCLUSIONS Future studies should: 1) systematically include Appalachian women at various life stages from under-represented sub-regions; 2) expand the use of rigorous methods and specified theoretical frameworks to account for complex interactions of social-ecological factors; and 3) build upon existing community assets to improve health in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Thompson
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, 51303University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren R Risser
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, 51303University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Jessica G Burke
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, 51303University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leiner C, Cody T, Mullins N, Ramage M, Ostrach BMM. "The elephant in the room;" a qualitative study of perinatal fears in opioid use disorder treatment in Southern Appalachia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:143. [PMID: 33596843 PMCID: PMC7890815 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03596-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnoses of perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) continue to rise in the United States. Patients and providers report obstacles to OUD treatment access. Difficulties include legal ambiguity related to Social Services notification requirements following a birth to people using opioids or in medication-assisted treatment for OUD. METHODS Through semi-structured interviews, participant-observation, and a focus group conducted in a mostly rural, region of the Southern United States (where perinatal OUD is more prevalent), patients' and providers' perspectives about perinatal substance use treatment were initially sought for a larger study. The findings presented here are from a subset analysis of patients' experiences and perspectives. Following ethics review and exemption determination, a total of 27 patient participants were opportunistically, convenience, and/or purposively sampled and recruited to participate in interviews and/or a focus group. Data were analyzed using modified Grounded Theory. RESULTS When asked about overall experiences with and barriers to accessing perinatal substance use treatment, 11 of 27 participants reported concerns about Social Services involvement resulting from disclosure of their substance use during pregnancy. In the subset analysis, prevalent themes were Fears of Social Services Involvement, Preparation for Delivery, and Providers Addressing Fears. CONCLUSIONS Perinatal OUD patients may seek substance use treatment with existing fears of Social Services involvement. Patients appreciate providers' efforts to prepare them for this potential reality. Providers should become aware of how their own hospital systems, counties, states, and countries interpret laws governing notification requirements. By becoming aware of patients' fears, providers can be ready to discuss the implications of Social Services involvement, promote patient-centered decision-making, and increase trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Leiner
- UNC School of Medicine, 321 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516321, USA
| | - Tamara Cody
- Mountain Area Health Education Center, 119 Hendersonville Rd, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA
| | - Nathan Mullins
- Mountain Area Health Education Center, 119 Hendersonville Rd, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA
| | - Melinda Ramage
- Mountain Area Health Education Center, 119 Hendersonville Rd, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA
| | - Bayla M M Ostrach
- Department of Research, UNC Health Sciences at MAHEC, 121 Hendersonville Road, Asheville, NC, 28803, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Staton M, Bunting AM, Pike E, Stevens-Watkins D. A Latent Profile Analysis of Rural Women who Use Drugs and Commit Crimes. JOURNAL OF RURAL SOCIAL SCIENCES 2021; 36:1. [PMID: 38501115 PMCID: PMC10948048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
The majority of rural Appalachian women in jail meet criteria for a drug use disorder and need treatment. Using a latent profile analysis of a random sample of rural women in Appalachian jails (N=400), the current study established groups of women based on criminal history, drug use in the commission of crimes, and role of the partner's drug use in the commission of crimes. Analysis found five distinct profiles of rural women based on involvement of criminal activities as a function of drug use severity. Results suggest that among criminally involved rural women, severity of drug use is a critical factor in the criminal career. Findings can be used to better inform treatment approaches and tailor treatment to meet the needs of this vulnerable population.
Collapse
|
9
|
"I didn't want to be on Suboxone at first…" - Ambivalence in Perinatal Substance Use Treatment. J Addict Med 2020; 13:264-271. [PMID: 30585875 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives of this article are to present findings from recent qualitative research with patients in a combined perinatal substance use treatment program in Central Appalachia, and to describe and analyze participants' ambivalence about medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), in the context of widespread societal stigma and judgement. METHODS We conducted research in a comprehensive outpatient perinatal substance use treatment program housed in a larger obstetric practice serving a large rural, Central Appalachian region. The program serves patients across the spectrum of substance use disorders but specifically offers medication-assisted treatment to perinatal patients with OUD. We purposively and opportunistically sampled patients receiving prescriptions for buprenorphine or buprenorphine-naloxone dual product, along with prenatal care and other services. Through participant-observation and semi-structured interviews, we gathered qualitative data from 27 participants, in a total of 31 interviews. We analyzed transcripts of interviews and fieldnotes using modified Grounded Theory. RESULTS Participants in a combined perinatal substance use treatment program value supportive, non-judgmental care but report ambivalence about medication, within structural and institutional contexts of criminalized, stigmatized substance use and close scrutiny of their pregnancies. Women are keenly aware of the social and public consequences for themselves and their parenting, if they begin or continue medication treatment for OUD. CONCLUSIONS Substance use treatment providers should consider the social consequences of medication treatment, as well as the clinical benefits, when presenting treatment options and recommendations to patients. Patient-centered care must include an understanding of larger social and structural contexts.
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith KE, Archuleta A, Staton M, Winston E. Risk factors for heroin use following release from jail or prison in adults in a Central Appalachian state between 2012-2017. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2020; 46:485-497. [PMID: 33223579 PMCID: PMC7678949 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2020.1725032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Corrections-involved adults with a history of opioid use disorder are at elevated risk of opioid overdose following release from correctional settings. Increased opioid prescribing restrictions and monitoring during a time when heroin is becoming cheaper and ubiquitous means that adults who misused prescription opioids prior to incarceration may be reentering communities at greater risk for heroin exposure and use. Objectives Determine risk factors of post-release heroin use among a sample of adults who participated in corrections-based drug treatment in Kentucky released between 2012 and 2017. Methods Survey data obtained as part of an ongoing evaluation of corrections-based drug treatment were examined. Results The final sample (N = 1,563) was majority male (80.9%). Nearly 11.0% reported past-year heroin use following their release. Depressive symptoms, polydrug use, and urban proximity were more common among participants reporting post-release heroin use. Heroin use 30 days prior to incarceration was associated with a 432.1% increase in odds of heroin use subsequent to incarceration. Post-release suicidal ideation increased odds of heroin use by 154.2%, whereas reporting satisfaction from social interactions decreased odds of use by nearly 60%. Post-release use of cocaine and diverted buprenorphine were associated with increased likelihood of heroin use during this time period, increasing odds by 469.1% and 265.9%, respectively. Residing in Central Appalachia subsequent to incarceration was associated with decreased likelihood of use. Conclusions In this sample, post-release heroin use was associated with concerning features, such as polydrug use, lack of social satisfaction, and suicidal ideation. These features can serve as clear targets for clinical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Elin Smith
- Center on Drug and Alcohol and Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Adrian Archuleta
- Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Michele Staton
- Center on Drug and Alcohol and Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Erin Winston
- Center on Drug and Alcohol and Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Linn BK, Ely GE, Staton M. Latent Profiles of Health and Reproductive Risk and Protective Factors among Women in Appalachia. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE IN THE ADDICTIONS 2020; 20:155-167. [PMID: 33209100 PMCID: PMC7668409 DOI: 10.1080/1533256x.2020.1748976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Women who use opiates and are involved in the criminal justice system in Appalachia may be prone to adverse health outcomes. In this study, we performed a latent class analysis of risk and protective factors on 400 drug-using women recruited from rural, Appalachian jails. A two-profile solution best fit the data. Both profiles evinced low levels of condom use, reproductive and physical health screens, and STD history. However, the primary substantive difference between the profiles was partner risk behavior: the higher risk class had main male partners with histories of injection drug use and incarceration. Results suggest that interventions need to be tailored to unique profiles of risk and protective factors, which should include taking partner risk into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Braden K Linn
- Clinical and Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
| | - Gretchen E Ely
- School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY
| | - Michele Staton
- University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thomas N, van de Ven K, Mulrooney KJD. The impact of rurality on opioid-related harms: A systematic review of qualitative research. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2019; 85:102607. [PMID: 31864787 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, there has been mounting recognition that opioid use and related mortality and morbidity is a significant public health problem in rural, non-urban areas across the globe. Taking what has been termed the 'opioid crisis' as a starting off point, this article aims to systematically review the qualitative literature on the ways in which rurality shapes the risk for opioid-related harm. METHODS A systematic review was undertaken using database searches and secondary reference list searches for qualitative literature on rural and non-urban opioid-related harms. A total of 32 qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed in NVivo 12 using a codebook based on the 'risk environment' framework. RESULTS The findings explore how rurality shapes the risk environment for opioid-related harms through four environment influences: (1) economic conditions, including economic transition and deindustrialisation that has occurred in many rural areas, and the high levels of economic distress experienced by rural residents; (2) physical conditions, including a lack of infrastructure and recreation opportunities, larger geographic distances, and limited transportation; (3) social conditions, where social networks could be both protective but also amplify risk through a lack of knowledge about treatment and risk behaviours, a lack of anonymity and stigmatisation of people who use opioids in rural areas; and (4) policy conditions including limited coverage and availability of harm reduction and drug treatment services, and stigmatising service provider practices. CONCLUSIONS The impact of rurality on risk of opioid-related harm is multifaceted. We suggest that future research on rural opioid use would benefit from drawing on the theoretical toolkit of rural criminology to attend to the ways the 'rural crisis', and attendant insecurities, anxieties and strains, impacts upon rural communities and shapes risk, along with how socio-cultural characteristics of the rural 'organise' risks of drug use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Thomas
- Centre for Rural Criminology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia; School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Katinka van de Ven
- Centre for Rural Criminology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia; Drug Policy Modelling Program, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kyle J D Mulrooney
- Centre for Rural Criminology, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia; School of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Snell-Rood C, Jenkins R, Hudson K, Frazier C, Noble W, Feltner F. Building interventions when distress is under debate: a case study from Appalachia. Transcult Psychiatry 2019; 56:918-946. [PMID: 31042120 DOI: 10.1177/1363461519833580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Scholarship on idioms of distress has emphasized cross-cultural variation, but devoted less attention to intra-cultural variation-specifically, how the legitimacy of distress may vary according to the context in which it is expressed, social position, and interaction with medical categories of distress. This variation can pose challenges for interventionists seeking to establish culturally acceptable ways of identifying distress and creating relevant resources for recovery. We describe efforts over three years (2014-2016) to identify and adapt a culturally appropriate evidence-based intervention for depressed rural Appalachian women. Though the prevalence of depression among rural women is high, limited services and social barriers restrict treatment access. Formative research revealed varied understandings of distress. Depression was (a) medicalized as a treatable condition, (b) stigmatized as mental illness, (c) accepted as a non-pathological reaction to regional poverty and gendered caregiving responsibilities, (d) rejected as a worthy justification for seeking individual care, and (e) less represented in comparison to other competing forms of distress (i.e., multiple morbidities, family members' distress). In a small pilot trial, we applied an implementation science perspective to identify and implement appropriate evidence-based programming for the context. We outline how we reached Appalachian women despite these diverse understandings of depression and established a flexible medicalization of depression that enabled us to legitimize care-seeking, work with varied rural healthcare professionals, and engender culturally relevant support. Our adaptation and implementation of the concept of "mental health recovery" enabled the development of programming that furthered non-pathological communicative distress while resisting the normalization that silences women in the context of deep health disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Keisha Hudson
- University of Kentucky, Center of Excellence in Rural Health
| | - Carole Frazier
- University of Kentucky, Center of Excellence in Rural Health
| | - Wayne Noble
- University of Kentucky, Center of Excellence in Rural Health
| | - Frances Feltner
- University of Kentucky, Center of Excellence in Rural Health
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cloud DH, Ibragimov U, Prood N, Young AM, Cooper HLF. Rural risk environments for hepatitis c among young adults in appalachian kentucky. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2019; 72:47-54. [PMID: 31113713 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rural Kentucky is an epicenter of hepatitis C(HCV), especially among young adults who inject drugs. While the Risk Environment Framework (REF) has been used widely to study and address socio-ecological determinants of infectious disease among people who inject drugs (PWID), it has been almost exclusively applied to urban environments. Applying REF to rural environments can enhance our understanding of the drivers of HCV epidemics in these hard-hit areas, and inform the creation and implementation of harm reduction interventions in this local context. METHODS Participants were recruited between March and August 2017 via community-based outreach methods (e.g., cookouts, flyers) and peer referral. Individuals who met eligibility criteria (aged 18-35, recently used prescription opioids and/or heroin to get high, lived in one of the 5 target counties) participated indepth, semi-structured interviews. The interview guide was informed by the REF, and covered HCV-related risk behaviors and environmental features that shaped vulnerability to engaging in these behaviors. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using constructivist grounded-theory methods. RESULTS Participants (N=19) described multiple intersecting risk environment features that shaped vulnerability to HCV transmission. Economic decline generated intergenerational poverty, dwindling employment prospects, and diminished social enrichment opportunities that collectively contributed to substance misuse and risky injection practices. Geographic isolation, lack of collective knowledge about HCV transmission risks, scarce harm reduction services, familial poverty, and fear of law enforcement interacted to increase the odds of people injecting in "trap houses" (akin to shooting galleries) or secluded areas, spaces in which they rushed to inject and shared injection equipment. Pervasive stigma was a structural barrier to adopting, expanding, and using harm reduction services. CONCLUSION This exploratory study identified features of rural risk environments that may contribute to significant HCV burdens in Appalachian Kentucky. Findings signal the importance of expanding proven harm reduction strategies and anti-stigma interventions tailored to rural contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Cloud
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, United States.
| | | | - Nadya Prood
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, United States
| | - April M Young
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Staton M, Dickson M, Tillson M, Webster M, Leukefeld C. Staying Out: Reentry Protective Factors Among Rural Women Offenders. WOMEN & CRIMINAL JUSTICE 2019; 29:368-384. [PMID: 32855583 PMCID: PMC7449142 DOI: 10.1080/08974454.2019.1613284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
The current study examines protective factors for women who transition from county jails to rural Appalachian communities, areas with limited health and behavioral health services. The study included drug-using women recruited from three jails in rural Appalachia and were followed 12-months post-release. Analyses focused on differences between women who remained in the community and those who returned to custody, as well as a multivariate model to determine protective factors for re-entry success. At the bivariate level, staying out of jail was associated with being older, having a job, not using drugs, stable housing, receiving health treatment, and having prosocial peers. In the multivariate model, the most robust predictors of staying out of jail were drug use abstinence, health care utilization, and prosocial peers. Most research on criminogenic needs associated with re-entry success have focused on men, and most focused on re-entry to urban communities where services and resources are more accessible. These findings have important implications for criminal justice systems to implement re-entry programs for women offenders during the transition to the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Staton
- University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Science, Center on Drug & Alcohol Research, 141 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086
| | - Megan Dickson
- University of Kentucky, Center on Drug & Alcohol Research
| | - Martha Tillson
- University of Kentucky, Center on Drug & Alcohol Research
| | - Matthew Webster
- University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Science
| | - Carl Leukefeld
- University of Kentucky, College of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Science
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Snell-Rood C, Carpenter-Song E. Depression in a depressed area: Deservingness, mental illness, and treatment in the contemporary rural U.S. Soc Sci Med 2018; 219:78-86. [PMID: 30391873 PMCID: PMC6290352 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
People with mental illness face public scrutiny that provokes questions about their ability to cope, membership in society, and entitlement to state support. Less attention has been focused on how such scrutiny occurs at the community level, particularly when shared economic distress has generated a high burden of poor mental health. We employ theorizations of health-related deservingness to examine the local moral economies through which residents of an economically depressed area question who deserves to be depressed, how those with depression should cope, and what forms of treatment are sincere. Drawing on a multi-phase study (2014-2016) in Appalachian Kentucky, we analyze interviews conducted with women with depression and the health practitioners who work with them. In the rural U.S., the dim economy and scarce healthcare resources are attributed to exclusion from broader society. Naturalized as a moral response for enduring dead-end jobs and poverty, participants described how depression coping can positively demonstrate individuals' commitment to providing for their families and mobility. However, when individuals are perceived to use depression diagnoses to access state entitlements or obtain medication as a "quick fix" that facilitates substance use, area residents question the veracity of symptoms and argue that treatment-seeking is insincere. In this way, rural moral concepts about work, entitlement, and self-sufficiency become embedded in contemporary ideas about mental health and its treatment. The tempered normalization of depression may offer possibilities for decreasing stigma and engendering conversations about patterned exclusions of rural Americans from broader U.S. prosperity. However, tense moral meanings about depression coping reveal both deepening and emergent social inequalities within rural communities. Attending to local moral economies that shape mental health deservingness is critical to understanding the complex overlaps and intersections between state, community, and family discourses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Snell-Rood
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Kinship processes contribute to the experience and interpretation of depression-generating empathy as well as silencing. We explore intersubjective experiences of depression among kin with the aim of understanding how depression can reveal kinship expectations and evolving concepts of distress. In interviews with 28 low-income rural Appalachian women about their depression, participants articulated depression as a social process that neither starts nor ends in themselves. Yet kinship obligations to recognize family members' depression limited women's ability to admit distress, let alone request care. The intersubjective experience of depression among kin can challenge the individual expression of distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Snell-Rood
- Division of Community Health Sciences School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley 207H University Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-7360 859-559-7640
| | - Merkel Richard
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800623, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0623, 434-243-4646, rlm3
| | - Nancy Schoenberg
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 125 Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, 859-323-8175, n
| |
Collapse
|