Chicago classification version 4.0© technical review: Update on standard high-resolution manometry protocol for the assessment of esophageal motility

The impact of lung transplantation on esophageal motility and inter-relationships with reflux and lung mechanics in patients with restrictive and obstructive respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

For many patients with lung disease the only proven intervention to improve survival and quality of life is lung transplantation (LTx). Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are common in patients with respiratory disease, and often associate with worse prognosis following LTx. Which, if any patients, should be excluded from LTx based on esophageal concerns remains unclear. Our aim was to understand the effect of LTx on esophageal motility diagnosis and examine how this and the other physiological and mechanical factors relate to GER and clearance of boluses swallowed.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 62 patients with restrictive (RLD) and obstructive (OLD) lung disease (aged 33-75 years; 42 men) who underwent high resolution impedance manometry and 24-h pH-impedance before and after LTx.

KEY RESULTS

RLD patients with normal motility were more likely to remain normal (p = 0.02), or if having abnormal motility to change to normal (p = 0.07) post-LTx than OLD patients. Esophageal length (EL) was greater in OLD than RLD patients' pre-LTx (p < 0.001), reducing only in OLD patients' post-LTx (p = 0.02). Reduced EL post-LTx associated with greater contractile reserve (r = 0.735; p = 0.01) and increased likelihood of motility normalization (p = 0.10). Clearance of reflux improved (p = 0.01) and associated with increased mean nocturnal baseline impedance (p < 0.001) in RLD but not OLD. Peristaltic breaks and thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient impact both esophageal clearance of reflux and boluses swallowed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

RLD patients are more likely to show improvement in esophageal motility than OLD patients post-LTx. However, the effect on GER is more difficult to predict and requires other GI, anatomical and pulmonary factors to be taken into consideration.

Recent Advancement and Future Perspective of Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy

Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a preferred approach for the treatment of idiopathic achalasia and various esophageal motility disorders, offering a minimally invasive alternative to traditional laparoscopic Heller's myotomy. Over the past decade, POEM has solidified its status as the primary therapeutic choice in these conditions through constant improvements. Its evolution has been marked by continuous progress, driven by the integration of innovative technologies and sophisticated techniques. Notable advancements in the techniques include the advent of shorter myotomies and sling fiber-preserving gastric myotomies. The introduction of novel image-enhanced endoscopic techniques, such as red dichromatic imaging and much safer bipolar devices, promises to enhance safety and reduce the technical demands of the POEM procedure. Furthermore, significant strides have been made in understanding gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) following POEM, enabling the differentiation of "true reflux" from acidification resulting from fermentation through manual pH tracing assessment. This distinction aids in identifying cases necessitating treatment with proton pump inhibitors. Other treatment strategies of post-POEM GERD have expanded to the incorporation of NOTES fundoplication and device-assisted fundoplication if the necessity arises. This comprehensive review delves into recent developments in POEM, encompassing technical variations, the assessment and management of post-POEM reflux, outcomes in special populations, and future prospects. By exploring these facets, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of POEM, shedding light on its evolution and the promising directions it is poised to take in the field of third-space endoscopy.

Dysphagia associated with esophageal wall thickening in patients with nonspecific high-resolution manometry findings: Understanding motility beyond the Chicago classification version 4.0

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that 50% of patients with normal high-resolution manometry (HRM) findings or ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) may have abnormal functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) results. However, the specific HRM findings associated with abnormal FLIP results are unknown. Herein, we investigated the relationship between nonspecific manometry findings and abnormal FLIP results.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 684 patients who underwent HRM at a tertiary care center in Seoul, Korea, based on the Chicago Classification version 4.0 protocol.

KEY RESULTS

Among the 684 patients, 398 had normal HRM findings or IEM. Of these 398 patients, eight showed esophageal wall thickening on endoscopic ultrasonography or computed tomography; however, no abnormalities were seen during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Among these eight patients, seven showed repetitive simultaneous contractions (RSCs) in at least one of the two positions: 61% (±29%) in 10 swallows in the supine position and 51% (±30%) in five swallows in the upright position. Four patients who underwent FLIP had a significantly decreased esophagogastric junction distensibility index (1.0 ± 0.5m m 2 mmHg - 1 at 60 mL). Two of these patients underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) due to a lack of response to medication. Esophageal muscle biopsy revealed hypertrophic muscle with marginal eosinophil infiltration.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

A subset of patients (2%) with normal HRM findings or IEM and RSCs experienced dysphagia associated with poor distensibility of the thickened esophageal wall. FLIP assessment or combined HRM and impedance protocols may help better define these patients who may respond well to POEM.

Interpretation of Impedance Data on High-resolution Impedance Manometry Studies-A Worldwide Survey

Background/Aims

Esophageal manometry is the gold standard for esophageal motility evaluation. High-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HRIM) allows concurrent assessment of bolus transit and manometry. Inconsistencies between concomitant impedance and manometry data pose a clinical dilemma and has not yet been addressed. We aim to assess interpretation trends of HRIM data among gastroenterologists worldwide.

Methods

A cross-sectional study using an anonymous survey was conducted among gastroenterologists worldwide. Statistical analysis was performed to compare responses between providers.

Results

We received responses from 107 gastroenterologists (26 countries). Most were adult providers (69, 64.5%), and most (77, 72.0%) had > 5 years of experience. Impedance was found to be helpful by 83 (77.6%) participants, but over 30% reported inconsistencies between impedance and manometry data. With incomplete bolus clearance and normal manometry 41 (38.7%) recommended observation, 41 (38.7%) recommended 24-hours pH-impedance, and 16 (15.1%) recommended prokinetics. With abnormal manometry and complete bolus clearance, 60 (57.1%) recommended observation while 18 (17.1%) recommended 24-hours pH impedance and 15 (14.3%) recommended prokinetics. A significant difference was found between providers from different continents in treating cases with discrepancy between impedance and manometry findings (P < 0.001). No significant differences were seen in responses between adult versus pediatric providers and between providers with different years of experience.

Conclusions

There is no consensus on interpreting HRIM data. Providers' approaches to studies with inconsistencies between manometry and impedance data vary. There is an unmet need for guidelines on interpreting impedance data in HRIM studies.

A Comparison between Chicago Classification Versions 3.0 and 4.0 and Their Impact on Manometric Diagnoses in Esophageal High-Resolution Manometry Cases

High-resolution manometry (HRM) facilitates the detailed evaluation of esophageal motility. In December 2020, Chicago classification (CC) version 4.0 introduced modifications to improve consistency and accuracy. We conducted this study to compare the differences in the interpretations of HRM examinations between CC 3.0 and 4.0. Consecutive HRM records at a Taiwan tertiary medical center, including wet swallows and MRS performed in both supine and sitting positions from October 2019 to May 2021, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using both CC versions 3.0 and 4.0. A total of 105 patients were enrolled, and 102 patients completed the exam, while three could not tolerate HRM sitting up. Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (n = 65, 63.7%) and dysphagia (n = 37, 36.3%) were the main indications. A total of 18 patients (17.6%) were reclassified to new diagnoses using CC 4.0. Of the 11 patients initially diagnosed with absent contractility, 3 (27.3%) were reclassified as having Type 1 achalasia. Of the 18 patients initially diagnosed with IEM, 6 (33.3%) were reclassified as normal. The incidence of diagnosis changes was similar in both the dysphagia and refractory GERD symptoms groups (21.6% versus 15.3%, p = 0.43). The use of CC 4.0 led to changes in the diagnoses of esophageal motility disease, irrespective of examination indications. Early adoption improves the accuracy of diagnoses and affects patient management.

The current state of gastrointestinal motility evaluation in cystic fibrosis: a comprehensive literature review

Background and Objective

As life expectancy in cystic fibrosis (CF) has increased over the years, a shift in focus toward extra-pulmonary comorbidities such as gastrointestinal (GI) disease has become a topic of particular importance. Although not well-defined in the current literature, GI dysmotility is thought to significantly contribute to GI symptomatology in the CF population. The objective of this article was to provide a comprehensive review of diagnostic modalities at the disposal of the clinician in the evaluation of patients with CF (pwCF) presenting with GI complaints. Furthermore, we aimed to highlight the available literature regarding utilization of these modalities in CF, in addition to their shortcomings, and emphasize areas within the motility literature where further research is essential.

Methods

A comprehensive review of all available literature in the English language through December 1, 2022 utilizing PubMed was conducted. Our search was limited to GI motility/transit and dysmotility in pwCF. Two researchers independently screened references for applicable articles and extracted pertinent data.

Key Content and Findings

Several diagnostic imaging and manometry options exist in the evaluation of dysmotility; however, the literature is lacking in high-quality, prospective studies to validate such testing in pwCF. Common symptoms experienced and diagnostic motility tools available based on segment of the GI tract as related to pwCF are explored in the current review. Shortcomings in the current literature are identified and future direction to enhance research efforts within the field of CF-related dysmotility is provided.

Conclusions

The influence of CF on GI integrity and motility is far-reaching. Despite improvements in longevity and advancement of pulmonary-specific treatment strategies, further high-quality research targeting the evaluation and management of GI dysmotility in pwCF is needed.

Current Approach to Dysphagia: A Review Focusing on Esophageal Motility Disorders and Their Treatment

Background

Dysphagia is a prevalent condition which may severely impact the patient's quality of life. However, there are still lacking standardized therapeutic options for esophageal motility disorders.

Summary

Dysphagia is defined as a subjective sensation of difficulty swallowing which can result from oropharyngeal or esophageal etiologies. Regarding esophageal dysphagia, after excluding structural causes and esophageal mucosal lesions, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. HRM has not only improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia but has also expanded our understanding of spastic and hypomotility disorders of the esophageal body. The Chicago Classification v4.0 uses a hierarchical approach and provides a standardized diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders, allowing a tailored therapeutic approach. Dysphagia is often a long-term health problem that broadly impacts health and well-being and leads to physical and psychosocial disability, namely, malnutrition and aspiration pneumonia, as well as social isolation, depression, and anxiety. Apart from achalasia, most esophageal motility disorders tend to have a benign long-term course with symptoms of dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain that can improve significantly over time. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are self-assessment tools that capture the patients' illness experience and help providers better understand symptoms from the patients' perspective. Therefore, PROs have a critical role in providing patient-centered care.

Key Messages

Motility disorders should be ruled out in the presence of nonobstructive esophageal dysphagia, and treatment options should be considered according to the severity of symptoms reported by the patient.

Comprehensive Manometric Evaluation of Dysphagia in Patients with Down Syndrome

Dysphagia is a common symptom in children with Down syndrome and is conventionally evaluated with imaging and endoscopy; high-resolution manometry is not routinely utilized. The aim of this study was to describe and correlate pharyngeal and esophageal manometry findings with contrast studies and endoscopy in patients with Down syndrome and dysphagia. Electronic medical records of patients with Down syndrome with dysphagia seen at our center between January 2008 and January 2022 were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, co-morbidities, symptoms, imaging, endoscopy, and manometry. Twenty-four patients with Down syndrome [median age of 14.9 years (IQR 7.6, 20.5), 20.8% female] met inclusion criteria. Common presenting symptoms of dysphagia included vomiting or regurgitation in 15 (62.5%) patients, and choking, gagging, or retching in 10 (41.7%) patients. Esophageal manometry was abnormal in 18/22 (81.2%) patients. The most common findings were ineffective esophageal motility in 9 (40.9%) followed by esophageal aperistalsis in 8 (36.4%) patients. Rumination pattern was noted in 5 (22.8%) patients. All 6 (25%) patients who previously had fundoplication had esophageal dysmotility. Strong agreement was noted between upper gastrointestinal studies and high-resolution esophageal manometry (p = 1.0) but no agreement was found between pharyngeal manometry and video fluoroscopic swallow studies (p = 0.041). High-resolution pharyngeal and esophageal manometry provide complementary objective data that may be critical in tailoring therapeutic strategies for managing patients with Down syndrome with dysphagia.

Functional Endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Functional endoscopy signifies a significant advancement in gastrointestinal examination, integrating motor function assessments alongside routine endoscopy findings. Traditional gastrointestinal endoscopy primarily focuses on the detection of early-stage cancer by identifying morphological changes within the gastrointestinal tract. These alterations include modifications in lumen structure, color tone, and surface patterns, which can be diagnosed using endoscopic images that assess these morphological changes. In contrast, functional endoscopy aims to dynamically evaluate the peristaltic movements of the digestive tract and the presence or movement of reflux of digestive fluids during the endoscopic procedure. It also seeks to identify morphological changes such as hiatal hernias, as observed in conventional endoscopy. Consequently, relying solely on endoscopic images proves inadequate for diagnosis, necessitating continuous observation of these dynamic movements.

SUMMARY

The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) serves as an exemplar of functional endoscopy. It incorporates a stress test to assess the functionality of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) through intragastric insufflation. A crucial element of EPSIS evaluation is the identification of the scope holding sign (SHS), which signifies LES contraction. EPSIS also encompasses the observation of esophageal peristaltic waves and the auditory detection of burping, providing a comprehensive diagnostic approach while observing the sphincter from a retroflex view on the stomach side. By integrating these dynamic findings, functional endoscopy offers an efficient method for diagnosing functional gastrointestinal diseases, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

KEY MESSAGES

Functional endoscopy combines motor function assessments with traditional endoscopy, enhancing the diagnostic capabilities of gastrointestinal examinations. Traditional endoscopy focuses on identifying morphological changes, while functional endoscopy evaluates dynamic movements, reflux, and sphincter functionality. EPSIS exemplifies functional endoscopy, featuring a stress test and the SHS for LES contraction assessment. EPSIS provides a comprehensive approach to diagnose GERD by integrating dynamic observations.

Relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in response to reduced volume distension during FLIP Panometry

BACKGROUND

The esophageal response to stepwise distension during the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) Panometry study often parallels high-resolution manometry (HRM) motility diagnoses. This study aimed to describe the changes in FLIP metrics during FLIP emptying, that is, reduced volume distension.

METHODS

Adult patients who completed FLIP and HRM for esophageal motility evaluation were included. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening parameters were assessed during stepwise FLIP filling to volumes of 60 mL ("filling 60 mL"), then 70 mL, and then back to 60 mL ("emptying 60 mL"). HRM studies were analyzed per Chicago classification version 4.0 (CCv4.0).

KEY RESULTS

Among 265 patients included, HRM/CCv4.0 diagnoses included achalasia in 80 patients (30%), normal motility in 70 (26%), and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) in 43 (16%). EGJ-distensibility index (DI) and EGJ diameter were greater during emptying 60 mL than filling 60 mL in achalasia, normal motility, and IEM (p values <0.002). If applying the emptying 60 mL EGJ-DI (vs. filling 60 mL EGJ-DI), EGJ opening classification changed from reduced EGJ opening to borderline EGJ opening in 31% of achalasia patients and in 2% of patients with normal motility or IEM. EGJ opening classification was unchanged in 69% achalasia and 96% of normal motility/IEM.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

This study suggests that isotonic or auxotonic relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter occurs with reduced volume distension in patients with achalasia and normal motility. The study also supports the importance of utilizing a standardized FLIP motility study protocol (i.e., controlled, stepwise filling to 50 mL, 60 mL, then 70 mL) to provide reliable and generalizable FLIP metrics to facilitate diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.

Assessing the diagnostic yield of achalasia using provocative testing in high-resolution esophageal manometry: Serial diagnostic study

BACKGROUND

Chicago Classification v4.0 recommends that if achalasia is demonstrated with single water swallows (SWS); provocative testing is not required. We determine whether provocative testing in patients with suspected achalasia can change manometric findings and reproduce symptoms.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2022, 127 consecutive manometry studies of patients with achalasia were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent SWS, a solid meal (SM) and/or a rapid drink challenge (RDC). Demographic data, fluoroscopy, gastroscopy, and pre-and post-treatment Eckardt scores were collated.

KEY RESULTS

Of 127 achalasia patients (50.6 ± 16.6 years and 54.6% male), all completed a SM and 116 (91.3%) completed RDC; overall 83 were naïve (65.4%) to previous therapy. 15.4% patients with normal integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on SWS demonstrated obstruction with RDC. SM gave a different achalasia phenotype in 44.9% of patients (p ⟨ 0.001). Twelve patients with normal IRP during SWS had persistent/recurrent obstruction during provocative testing; 83.3% had previous achalasia therapy. None of 13 patients with Type III (TIII) achalasia with SWS exhibited a change in manometric findings with provocative testing. Impedance bolus heights were lower in patients with TIII achalasia and those with normal IRP with SWS. During the SM, symptoms were reproduced in 56.7% of patients. Forty-six of 103 patients (44.7%) underwent therapy based upon the final achalasia subtype which was defined by the provocative test result of the high-resolution manometry (HRM) study. All treatments were effective, regardless of the achalasia subtype.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Manometric findings remain unchanged when TIII achalasia is diagnosed with SWS. In patients with normal IRP, Type I, or Type II achalasia during SWS, provocative testing can alter achalasia phenotype or uncover achalasia where diagnosis is unclear. Further, it can reproduce symptoms. Such findings can personalize and guide effective therapeutic decisions.

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication: a safe and effective anti-reflux option in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Fundoplication is known to improve allograft outcomes in lung transplant recipients by reducing retrograde aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease, a modifiable risk factor for chronic allograft dysfunction. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has historically been the anti-reflux procedure of choice, but the procedure is associated with discernable rates of postoperative dysphagia and gas-bloat syndrome. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication, an alternate anti-reflux surgery with lower rates of foregut complications in the general population, is the procedure of choice on our institution's lung transplant protocol. In this work, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication in our lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

A prospective case series of 44 lung transplant recipients who underwent laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication by a single surgeon between September 2018 and November 2020 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative results from 24-h pH, esophageal manometry, gastric emptying, and pulmonary function studies were collected alongside severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease and other gastrointestinal symptoms.

RESULTS

Median DeMeester score decreased from 25.9 to 5.4 after fundoplication (p < 0.0001), while percentage of time pH < 4 decreased from 7 to 1.1% (p < 0.0001). The severity of heartburn and regurgitation were also reduced (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0029 respectively). Overall, pulmonary function, esophageal motility, gastric emptying, severity of bloating, and dysphagia were not significantly different post-fundoplication than pre-fundoplication. Patients with decreasing rates of FEV1 pre-fundoplication saw improvement in their rate of change of FEV1 post-fundoplication (p = 0.011). Median follow-up was 32.2 months post-fundoplication.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication provides objective pathologic acid reflux control and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux improvement in lung transplant recipients while preserving lung function and foregut motility. Thus, laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication is a safe and effective antireflux surgery alternative in lung transplant recipients.

Modern Achalasia: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment

Achalasia is a major esophageal motor disorder featured by the altered relaxation of the esophagogastric junction in the absence of effective peristaltic activity. As a consequence of the esophageal outflow obstruction, achalasia patients present with clinical symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, weight loss, and regurgitation of indigested food. Other less specific symptoms can also present including heartburn, chronic cough, and aspiration pneumonia. The delay in diagnosis, particularly when the presenting symptoms mimic those of gastroesophageal reflux disease, may be as long as several years. The widespread use of high-resolution manometry has permitted earlier detection and uncovered achalasia phenotypes which can have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Other tools have also emerged to help define achalasia severity and which can be used as objective measures of response to therapy including the timed barium esophagogram and the functional lumen imaging probe. Such diagnostic innovations, along with the increased awareness by clinicians and patients due to the availability of alternative therapeutic approaches (laparoscopic and robotic Heller myotomy, and peroral endoscopic myotomy) have radically changed the natural history of the disorder. Herein, we report the most recent advances in the diagnosis, classification, and management of esophageal achalasia and underline the still-grey areas that needs to be addressed by future research to reach the goal of personalizing treatment.

[Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders - Significance of the new Chicago classification v4.0]

Esophageal motility disorders are diseases in which there are malfunctions of the act of swallowing due to a change in neuromuscular structures. The main symptom is therefore dysphagia for solid and/or liquid foods, often accompanied by symptoms such as chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn, and weight loss. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard in diagnostics. Endoscopy and radiology serve to exclude inflammatory or malignant changes. With the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders has improved and led to a new classification with the Chicago Classification, which has been modified several times in the last decade, most recently in 2021 with the Chicago Classification v4.0. Compared to the previous version 3.0, there are some important changes that are presented based on the most important esophageal motility disorders in everyday clinical practice.

Esophageal Motility Patterns in Paraesophageal Hernia Patients Compared to Sliding Hiatal Hernia: Bigger Is Not Better

BACKGROUND

In patients with paraesophageal hernias (PEH), the course of the esophagus is often altered, which may affect esophageal motility. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is frequently used to evaluate esophageal motor function prior to PEH repair. This study was performed to characterize esophageal motility disorders in patients with PEH as compared to sliding hiatal hernia and to determine how these findings affect operative decision-making.

METHODS

Patients referred for HRM to a single institution from 2015 to 2019 were included in a prospectively maintained database. HRM studies were analyzed for the appearance of any esophageal motility disorder using the Chicago classification. PEH patients had confirmation of their diagnosis at the time of surgery, and the type of fundoplication performed was recorded. They were case-matched based on sex, age, and BMI to patients with sliding hiatal hernia who were referred for HRM in the same period.

RESULTS

There were 306 patients diagnosed with a PEH who underwent repair. When compared to case-matched sliding hiatal hernia patients, PEH patients had higher rates of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (p<.001) and lower rates of absent peristalsis (p=.048). Of those with ineffective motility (n=70), 41 (59%) had a partial or no fundoplication performed during PEH repair.

CONCLUSION

PEH patients had higher rates of IEM compared to controls, possibly due to a chronically distorted esophageal lumen. Offering the appropriate operation hinges on understanding the involved anatomy and esophageal function of each individual. HRM is important to obtain preoperatively for optimizing patient and procedure selection in PEH repair.

Atypical presentations and pitfalls of achalasia

Achalasia is a rare disease with significant diagnostic delay and association with false diagnoses and unnecessary interventions. It remains unclear, whether atypical presentations, misinterpreted symptoms or inconclusive diagnostics are the cause. The aim of this study was the characterization of typical and atypical features of achalasia and their impact on delays, misinterpretations or false diagnoses. A retrospective analysis of prospective database over a period of 30 years was performed. Data about symptoms, delays and false diagnoses were obtained and correlated with manometric, endoscopic and radiologic findings. Totally, 300 patients with achalasia were included. Typical symptoms (dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss and retrosternal pain) were present in 98.7%, 88%, 58.4% and 52.4%. The mean diagnostic delay was 4.7 years. Atypical symptoms were found in 61.7% and led to a delay of 6 months. Atypical gastrointestinal symptoms were common (43%), mostly 'heartburn' (16.3%), 'vomiting' (15.3%) or belching (7.7%). A single false diagnosis occurred in 26%, multiple in 16%. Major gastrointestinal misdiagnoses were GERD in 16.7% and eosinophilic esophagitis in 4%. Other false diagnosis affected ENT-, psychiatric, neurologic, cardiologic or thyroid diseases. Pitfalls were the description of 'heartburn' or 'nausea'. Tertiary contractions at barium swallows, hiatal hernias and 'reflux-like' changes at endoscopy or eosinophils in the biopsies were misleading. Atypical symptoms are common in achalasia, but they are not the sole source for diagnostic delays. Misleading descriptions of typical symptoms or misinterpretation of diagnostic studies contribute to false diagnoses and delays.

Opioid-Induced Esophageal Dysmotility (OIED) - A Case Report

Recent studies have shown that chronic opioid use is associated with an increased risk of symptomatic esophageal motility disorders. Opioid-induced esophageal dysfunction (OIED) is most often identified in patients taking high doses of opioids. This condition is associated with poorer treatment outcomes than primary motility disorders and management of these cases is further complicated by the presence of chronic pain, opioid addiction, and physical and psychological comorbidity.We present the case of a 68-year-old Caucasian woman with OIED, induced by the chronic intake of low-dose Fentanyl and Tramadol prescribed to treat severe back pain. The clinical course highlights the sometimes difficult diagnosis and management of this recently recognized condition.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment Strategies

BACKGROUND

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are caused by the impaired relaxation of the upper/lower esophageal sphincter and/or defective esophageal peristaltic contractions, resulting in dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is essential for the diagnosis of primary EMD; however, the recognition of EMD and HRM by general practitioners in Japan is limited. This review summarizes the diagnosis of and treatment strategies for EMD.

SUMMARY

HRM is a specific test for the diagnosis of EMD, whereas endoscopy and barium swallow as screening tests provide characteristic findings (i.e., esophageal rosette and bird's beak sign) in some cases. It is important to note that manometric diagnoses apart from achalasia are often clinically irrelevant; therefore, the recently updated guidelines suggest additional manometric maneuvers, such as the rapid drink challenge, and further testing, including functional lumen imaging, for a more accurate diagnosis before invasive treatment. Endoscopic/surgical myotomy, pneumatic dilation, and botulinum toxin injections need to be considered for patients with achalasia and clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

KEY MESSAGE

Since the detailed pathophysiology of EMD remains unclear, their diagnosis needs to be cautiously established prior to the initiation of invasive treatment.

Interrater Reliability of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry and High-Resolution Manometry for the Assessment of Esophageal Motility Disorders

INTRODUCTION

High-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are primary and/or complementary diagnostic tools for the evaluation of esophageal motility. We aimed to assess the interrater agreement and accuracy of HRM and FLIP interpretations.

METHODS

Esophageal motility specialists from multiple institutions completed the interpretation of 40 consecutive HRM and 40 FLIP studies. Interrater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Fleiss' κ statistics for nominal variables. Accuracies of rater interpretation were assessed using the consensus of 3 experienced raters as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Fifteen raters completed the HRM and FLIP studies. An excellent interrater agreement was seen in supine median integral relaxation pressure (ICC 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98), and a good agreement was seen with the assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, peristalsis, and assignment of a Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis using HRM (κ = 0.71, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively). An excellent interrater agreement for EGJ distensibility index and maximum diameter (0.91 [0.90-0.94], 0.92 [0.89-0.95]) was seen, and a moderate-to-good agreement was seen in the assignment of EGJ opening classification, contractile response pattern, and motility classification (κ = 0.68, 0.56, and 0.59, respectively) on FLIP. Rater accuracy for Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis on HRM was 82% (95% confidence interval 78%-84%) and for motility diagnosis on FLIP Panometry was 78% (95% confidence interval 72%-81%).

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates high levels of interrater agreement and accuracy in the interpretation of HRM and FLIP metrics and moderate-to-high levels for motility classification in FLIP, supporting the use of these approaches for primary or complementary evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on esophageal motility, esophageal acid exposure, and gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms

Background

The effects of Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are yet to be fully elucidated. Few studies have investigated the mechanisms underlying the correlations between HP and GERD with prospective methods. The objective of this prospective clinical study was to explore the effects of HP eradication on GERD.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with both GERD and HP were included. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, and the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ) were performed before and after the successful eradication of HP, and the data were compared using statistical analysis.

Results

Sixty-eight patients diagnosed with both GERD and HP were included. The After HP eradication group showed significantly decreased median distal contractile integral (DCI) [610.40 (847.45) vs. 444.90 (559.60)] and significantly increased median inefficient esophageal motility (IEM) [36.00 (50.00) vs. 60.00 (57.00)] in the HRM compared with those of the Before HP eradication group, indicating that HP eradication reduced esophageal peristalsis. The 24-h esophageal pH monitoring showed that the longest reflux event, the percentage of time that the pH was &lt;4, the number of reflux episodes, and the DeMeester score were all significantly different between the Before and After HP eradication groups (P &lt; 0.05), suggesting that HP eradication increased esophageal acid exposure. The After HP eradication group also had a significantly higher GerdQ score than that of the Before HP eradication group (P &lt; 0.05).

Conclusions

HP eradication reduced esophageal peristalsis, enhanced esophageal acid exposure, and aggravated GERD symptoms, suggesting that HP infection may be a protective factor for GERD.

[Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders - Significance of the new Chicago classification v4.0]

Esophageal motility disorders are diseases in which there are malfunctions of the act of swallowing due to a change in neuromuscular structures. The main symptom is therefore dysphagia for solid and/or liquid foods, often accompanied by symptoms such as chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn, and weight loss. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard in diagnostics. Endoscopy and radiology serve to exclude inflammatory or malignant changes. With the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders has improved and led to a new classification with the Chicago Classification, which has been modified several times in the last decade, most recently in 2021 with the Chicago Classification v4.0. Compared to the previous version 3.0, there are some important changes that are presented based on the most important esophageal motility disorders in everyday clinical practice.

Anti-reflux mucosal resection for treatment of refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Efficacy and impact on perioperative indicators

BACKGROUND

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) is difficult to treat and recurrent. For such patients, anti-reflux mucosal resection (ARMS) is the main clinical treatment, but its advantages and disadvantages remain unclear.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of endoscopic ARMS in the treatment of RGERD and its impact on perioperative indicators.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with RGERD were selected from January 2019 to December 2021 and divided into either a control group or an observation group using the random number table method, with 51 cases in each group. The control group underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, and the observation group underwent ARMS treatment. The operation conditions, postoperative recovery, GerdQ score before and after surgery, extraesophageal symptom score, high-resolution esophageal manometry parameters [abdominal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length, LES resting pressure (LESP), upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure (UESP), and distal systolic integral (DCI)], 24 h pH-impedance monitoring indexes (DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, fluid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux), gastric dynamics indicators [serum motilin (MTL) and gastrin (GAS)], and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the observation group, the operation time was shorter than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P < 0.05), but the difference in hospitalization time between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The GerdQ score and extraesophageal symptom score decreased in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05), and these scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). At 1 and 6 months after surgery, the length of the LES in the abdominal segment was longer in both groups than that before surgery (P < 0.05), and longer in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05), while LESP, UESP, and DCI were higher than those before surgery (P < 0.05), and higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, liquid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux were lower in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery, and lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Serum MTL and GAS were higher in the two groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery than those before surgery, and were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ARMS for treatment of RGERD can significantly optimize the surgical situation, promote clinical symptom regression, improve esophageal and gastric dynamics, reduce gastric reflux events, and reduce the incidence of complications.

Anti-reflux mucosal resection for treatment of refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Efficacy and impact on perioperative indicators

BACKGROUND

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) is difficult to treat and recurrent. For such patients, anti-reflux mucosal resection (ARMS) is the main clinical treatment, but its advantages and disadvantages remain unclear.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of endoscopic ARMS in the treatment of RGERD and its impact on perioperative indicators.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with RGERD were selected from January 2019 to December 2021 and divided into either a control group or an observation group using the random number table method, with 51 cases in each group. The control group underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, and the observation group underwent ARMS treatment. The operation conditions, postoperative recovery, GerdQ score before and after surgery, extraesophageal symptom score, high-resolution esophageal manometry parameters [abdominal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) length, LES resting pressure (LESP), upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure (UESP), and distal systolic integral (DCI)], 24 h pH-impedance monitoring indexes (DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, fluid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux), gastric dynamics indicators [serum motilin (MTL) and gastrin (GAS)], and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the observation group, the operation time was shorter than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P < 0.05), but the difference in hospitalization time between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The GerdQ score and extraesophageal symptom score decreased in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05), and these scores were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). At 1 and 6 months after surgery, the length of the LES in the abdominal segment was longer in both groups than that before surgery (P < 0.05), and longer in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05), while LESP, UESP, and DCI were higher than those before surgery (P < 0.05), and higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). DeMeester score and the number of episodes of acid reflux, weak acid reflux, liquid reflux, gas reflux, and mixed reflux were lower in both groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery compared with those before surgery, and lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Serum MTL and GAS were higher in the two groups at 1 and 6 months after surgery than those before surgery, and were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications was lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ARMS for treatment of RGERD can significantly optimize the surgical situation, promote clinical symptom regression, improve esophageal and gastric dynamics, reduce gastric reflux events, and reduce the incidence of complications.

High-resolution manometry with additional maneuvers using the Starlet system: normative thresholds and diagnostic yields for relevant esophagogastric junction outflow disorders

BACKGROUND

Chicago classification version 4.0 suggests additional maneuvers, such as upright testing, multiple rapid swallows (MRS), and the rapid drink challenge (RDC), for high-resolution manometry (HRM) to minimize ambiguity in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. The present study investigated normative thresholds for these new metrics using the Starlet system as well as their diagnostic yields for relevant esophagogastric outflow disorders (EGJOD).

METHODS

In study 1, 30 asymptomatic volunteers prospectively performed HRM including MRS and RDC in the supine/upright positions. We calculated normative thresholds for the new metrics, such as upright integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), upright intrabolus pressure (IBP), and IRP during RDC (RDC-IRP). In study 2, we retrospectively analyzed the HRM tracings of 82 patients who underwent HRM in both positions at our hospital to assess the diagnostic yields of HRM metrics.

RESULTS

Based on the results of study 1, we adopted the following normative thresholds: upright IRP < 20 mmHg, upright IBP < 21 mmHg, and RDC-IRP < 16 mmHg. In study 2, 45 patients with dysphagia or chest pain were included in the analysis to identify predictive factors for clinically relevant esophagogastric outflow disorders (true EGJOD). Supine/upright IRP, RDC-IRP, and pan-esophageal pressurization > 20 mmHg during RDC (RDC-PEP) predicted true EGJOD with RDC-PEP with the highest sensitivity of 91.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM with additional maneuvers may facilitate the diagnosis of clinically relevant EGJOD.

Esophageal Dysfunction in Post-lung Transplant: An Enigma

The prevalence of lung transplants has increased over the years, albeit with a low survival rate amongst all solid organ transplants, including liver and heart transplantation. Microaspiration is one of the primary mechanisms that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of lung injury following lung transplants. Of late, esophageal dysfunction such as gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal hypercontractility is often noted post-lung transplant. However, reflux is associated with chronic allograft lung injury such as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, which is one of the predictors for long-term survival in this specialized population. Its role in acute lung injury post-lung transplant is still being explored. This review critically examines the salient points which provide the current understanding of the characteristics, pathophysiology, and implications of esophageal dysfunction following lung transplant.

Peroral Endoscopy Myotomy (POEM) for Esophageal Motility Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide an overview of the current role of per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the management of primary esophageal motility disorders and treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.

RECENT FINDINGS

POEM has been shown to be an effective treatment for achalasia. Recent research has suggested that the length of myotomy may be tailored to the disease phenotype and that short myotomy may be equally effective compared to long myotomy. The role of intra-operative EndoFLIP has shown promise as a tool to assess of the adequacy of myotomy. Further research is needed to determine the role of POEM in other esophageal motility disorders and for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum. Per oral endoscopic myotomy has been shown to be an effective and durable treatment option for achalasia with additional potential roles for the treatment of other esophageal motility disorders and Zenker's diverticulum.

British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN) joint consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and management of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common cause of dysphagia in both children and adults, as well as one of the most prevalent oesophageal diseases with a significant impact on physical health and quality of life. We have provided a single comprehensive guideline for both paediatric and adult gastroenterologists on current best practice for the evaluation and management of EoE.

METHODS

The Oesophageal Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology was commissioned by the Clinical Standards Service Committee to develop these guidelines. The Guideline Development Group included adult and paediatric gastroenterologists, surgeons, dietitians, allergists, pathologists and patient representatives. The Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes process was used to generate questions for a systematic review of the evidence. Published evidence was reviewed and updated to June 2021. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the evidence and make recommendations. Two rounds of voting were held to assess the level of agreement and the strength of recommendations, with 80% consensus required for acceptance.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven statements on EoE presentation, diagnosis, investigation, management and complications were produced with further statements created on areas for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

These comprehensive adult and paediatric guidelines of the British Society of Gastroenterology and British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition are based on evidence and expert consensus from a multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals, including patient advocates and patient support groups, to help clinicians with the management patients with EoE and its complications.

Automated Chicago Classification for Esophageal Motility Disorder Diagnosis Using Machine Learning

The goal of this paper is to provide a Machine Learning-based solution that can be utilized to automate the Chicago Classification algorithm, the state-of-the-art scheme for esophageal motility disease identification. First, the photos were preprocessed by locating the area of interest—the precise instant of swallowing. After resizing and rescaling the photos, they were utilized as input for the Deep Learning models. The InceptionV3 Deep Learning model was used to identify the precise class of the IRP. We used the DenseNet201 CNN architecture to classify the images into 5 different classes of swallowing disorders. Finally, we combined the results of the two trained ML models to automate the Chicago Classification algorithm. With this solution we obtained a top-1 accuracy and f1-score of 86% with no human intervention, automating the whole flow, from image preprocessing until Chicago classification and diagnosis.

How provocative tests in addition to wet swallows during high-resolution manometry can direct clinical management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provocative tests have been advocated to address limitations of high-resolution manometry (HRM) with wet swallows. We describe the commonly used provocative manometric manoeuvres [rapid drink challenge (RDC), multiple rapid swallows (MRS), solid swallows and the solid test meal (STM)], compare their diagnostic yield and accuracy to wet swallows, and outline their role in directing clinical management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Provocative testing with RDC and STM identifies a proportion of achalasia cases missed by standard testing, and RDC can play a similar role to radiology in the evaluation of treatment response. In EGJOO, provocative testing with RDC and STM not only increase the diagnostic yield, but can also help differentiate between spurious cases and those representing true outflow obstruction likely to respond to achalasia-type therapies. MRS and STM can help determine the clinical relevance (or otherwise) of ineffective oesophageal motility, and in this setting, MRS may predict the likelihood of postfundoplication dysphagia. RDC and STM can help identify cases of postfundoplication dysphagia more likely to respond to dilatation.

SUMMARY

Provocative testing has been shown to increase diagnostic yield of HRM, clarify inconclusive diagnoses, allows corroboration of dysmotility with patient symptoms and helps direct clinical management.

Advancing high-resolution manometry: evaluating the use of multiple rapid swallows versus apple viscous swallows in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

High-Resolution Manometry (HRM) with provocative maneuvers, such as Multiple Rapid Swallows (MRS) and Apple Viscous Swallows (AVS), is commonly utilized to diagnose esophageal disorders. Increasing standardization in HRM protocol can help save time and reduce patient discomfort. This study assesses AVS and MRS to determine their respective benefits and limitations.

METHODS

Retrospective reviews were performed on 100 patients to analyze their AVS and/or MRS results. Parameters included abnormal motility patterns, tolerance, and DCI. Diagnostic benefits from MRS and AVS were assessed. Based on the previous studies, additional benefit from MRS was defined as detection of good peristaltic reserve, weak peristaltic reserve, or an abnormal motility/pressurization pattern. Additional benefit from AVS was defined as detection of IEM features or abnormal motility/pressurization pattern.

RESULTS

When patients completed both MRS and AVS (n = 70), MRS provided additional benefit in assessing 36% of patients, while AVS provided additional benefit in 19% of patients (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, MRS detected significantly more abnormal motility/pressurization patterns than AVS (27% MRS; 8% AVS; p = 0.0005). Two unique strengths of AVS were higher tolerance for test completion (p = 0.009) and better detection of severe hypokinetic disorders in 4% of patients, which were missed by MRS.

CONCLUSIONS

MRS may uniquely identify abnormal motility/pressurization patterns, such as paradoxical LES response, distal pressurization, hypercontractile, and spasm patterns. These findings argue for a tailored approach when selecting provocative testing. MRS may be more useful for patients with abnormal pathophysiology, while AVS may help to supplement MRS in detecting severe hypokinetic disorders in preoperative management.

Towards a more precise classification of esophageal motility disorders in patients with systemic sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic and generalized disease affecting the connective tissue of the skin and many internal organs, in particular the gastrointestinal tract. The esophagus is involved in up to 80% of the cases and represents a major cause of serious morbidities that deeply impact on the quality of life and survival of patients. Indeed, the presence of esophageal dysfunction is a good prognostic indicator in SSc, primarily due to its impact on pulmonary disease. Thus, the detection of esophageal motility alterations plays a critical role to prevent the development of both esophageal and pulmonary complications and to improve the survival of these patients. Currently, this diagnostic work-up has been limited to the use of esophageal manometry, which is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of motor physiology and pathophysiology of this organ in different clinical situations. However, in recent years, new equipments such as high-resolution (-impedance) manometry and functional luminal imaging probe have been developed and used in many esophageal clinical settings, including SSc. In this mini-review, we summarize current evidence regarding esophageal dysmotility, in the light of new data on secondary peristalsis published in this issue of the journal.

A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans

Swallowing impairment is a highly prevalent and clinically significant problem affecting people and dogs. There are myriad causes of swallowing impairment of which gastroesophageal reflux is the most common in both species. Similarities in anatomy and physiology between humans and canines results in analogous swallowing disorders including cricopharyngeus muscle achalasia, esophageal achalasia, hiatal herniation, and gastroesophageal reflux with secondary esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility. Accordingly, the diagnostic approach to human and canine patients with swallowing impairment is similar. Diagnostic procedures such as swallowing fluoroscopy, high-resolution manometry, pH/impedance monitoring, and endolumenal functional luminal imaging probe can be performed in both species; however, nasofacial conformation, increased esophageal length, and the difficulty of completing several of these procedures in awake dogs are inherent challenges that need to be considered. Human patients can convey their symptoms and respond to verbal cues, whereas veterinarians must rely on clinical histories narrated by pet owners followed by comprehensive physical examination and observation of the animal eating different food consistencies and drinking water. Dogs may also be unwilling to drink or eat in the hospital setting and may be resistant to physical restraint during diagnostic procedures. Despite the species differences and diagnostic challenges, dogs are a natural animal model for many oropharyngeal and esophageal disorders affecting people, which presents a tremendous opportunity for shared learnings. This manuscript reviews the comparative aspects of esophageal anatomy and physiology between humans and canines, summarizes the diagnostic assessment of swallowing impairment in both species, and discusses future considerations for collaborative medicine and translational research.

Esophageal Motility Disorders: Current Approach to Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Dysphagia is a common symptom with significant impact on quality of life. Our diagnostic armamentarium was primarily limited to endoscopy and barium esophagram until the advent of manometric techniques in the 1970s, which provided the first reliable tool for assessment of esophageal motor function. Since that time, significant advances have been made over the last 3 decades in our understanding of various esophageal motility disorders due to improvement in diagnostics with high-resolution esophageal manometry. High-resolution esophageal manometry has improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia and has also enhanced our understanding of spastic and hypomotility disorders of the esophageal body. In this review, we discuss the current approach to diagnosis and therapeutics of various esophageal motility disorders.

How Updates in Chicago Classification Impact Clinical Practice

Chicago Classification version 4.0 (CC v4.0), published in 2021, presents several modifications largely aimed at minimizing over-diagnosis of inconclusive patterns on high-resolution manometry (HRM). These include: 1) introduction of a standardized HRM protocol for consistency among centers, 2) emphasis on the need for supportive data in instances of inconclusive manometric patterns, 3) required presence of relevant symptoms in certain instances to reduce over-diagnosis and inappropriate interventions, and 4) classification as disorders of EGJ outflow or disorders of peristalsis. These updates aim to improve the clinical application of HRM and patient outcomes.