Pathophysiology and treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease: looking beyond acid

The foregut in cystic fibrosis

The aerodigestive organs share a kindred embryologic origin that allows for a more complete explanation as to how the foregut can remain a barrier to normalcy in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The structures of the aerodigestive tract include the nasopharynx, the oropharynx, the hypopharynx, the esophagus, the stomach, as well as the supraglottic, glottic, and subglottic tubular airways (including the trachea). Additional gastrointestinal (GI) luminal/alimentary organs of the foregut include the duodenum. Extraluminal foregut structures include the liver, the gall bladder, the biliary tree, and the pancreas. There are a variety of neurologic controls within these complicated anatomic compartments to separate the transit of food and liquid from air. These structures share the same origin from the primitive foregut/mesenchyme. The vagus nerve is a critical structure that unites respiratory and digestive functions. This article comments on the interconnected nature of cystic fibrosis and the GI tract. As it relates to the foregut, this has been typically treated as simple "reflux" as the cause of worsened lung function in pwCF. That terms like gastroesophageal reflux (GER), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), heartburn, and regurgitation are used interchangeably to reflect pathology further complicates matters; we offer a more physiologically accurate term called "GI-related aspiration" or "GRASP." Broadly, this term reflects that aspiration of foregut contents from the duodenum through the stomach to the esophagus, into the pharynx and the respiratory tree in pwCF. As a barrier to normalcy in pwCF, GRASP is fundamentally two disease processes-GERD and gastroparesis-that likely contribute most to the deterioration of lung disease in pwCF. In the modulator era, successful GRASP management will be critical, particularly in those post-lung transplantation (LTx), only through successful management of both GERD and gastroparesis. Standardization of clinical management algorithms for GRASP in CF-related GRASP is a key clinical and research gap preventing normalcy in pwCF; what exists nearly exclusively addresses surgical evaluations or offers guidance for the management of GI symptoms alone (with unclear parameters for respiratory disease considerations). We begin first by describing the result of GRASP damage to the lung in various stages of lung disease. This is followed by a discussion of the mechanisms by which the digestive tract can injure the lungs. We summarize what we anticipate future research directions will be to reduce the impact of GRASP as a barrier to normalcy in pwCF.

Regurgitation, eructation, and supragastric belch: retrograde esophageal motility, disorders, and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes pathologic conditions of retrograde flow into the esophagus along with recent therapeutic advances and treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

The esophagus facilitates anterograde and retrograde movement of contents, the latter of which is mediated by transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often includes esophageal-specific symptoms such as heartburn or regurgitation. Volume regurgitation responds less frequently to acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) than heartburn, given its relationship with incompetence of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and increased frequency of TLESRs. Therefore, although the refluxate pH can be altered with PPIs, the frequency of reflux episodes is generally not reduced and surgical and endoscopic treatments may be favored. Other instances of abnormal retrograde esophageal flow respond better to medical therapy, or lifestyle interventions. Compared to gastric belching because of increased stomach distension, supragastric belching is caused by intake of air from pharynx into the esophagus followed by rapid expulsion of air. These conditions can be distinguished on esophageal tests such as high-resolution manometry and are likely to respond to behavioral modifications.

SUMMARY

Retrograde flow into the esophagus can be a normal occurrence, but diagnostic testing to distinguish causes can guide appropriate intervention.

Causal effect between gut microbiota and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Previous observational studies have found that the gut microbiota is closely related to the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), while their causal relationship is unclear. A two-sample multivariate Mendelian randomization analysis was implemented to estimate the causal effect of gut microbiota on GERD. The gut microbiota aggregated statistics were derived from a meta-analysis of the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted by the MiBioGen alliance ( n  = 13 266). GERD aggregated statistics were derived from published GWAS (129 080 cases and 473 524 controls). A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study was conducted to explore the causal relationship between gut microbiota and GERD using the inverse variance weighted (IVW), Mendelian randomization Egger, single model, weighted median, and weighted model. To verify the stability of the main results of Mendelian randomization analysis, we performed sensitivity analysis. Based on the results of IVW, we found that Anaerostipes was causally associated with an increased risk of GERD [odds ratio (OR): 1.09, P  = 0.018]. Eight gut microbiota taxa ( Actinobacteria, Bifidobacteriales, Bifidobacteriaceae, Clostridiales vadin BB60 group, Rikenellaceae, Lachnospiraceae UCG004, Methanobrevibacter , and unknown genus id.1000000073 ) are predicted to act causally in suppressing the risk of GERD ( P  < 0.05). In addition, reverse Mendelian randomization analyses revealed that the abundance of 15 gut microbiota taxon was found to be affected by GERD. No significant estimation of heterogeneity or pleiotropy is detected. Our study presents a complicated causal relationship between gut microbiota and GERD that offers guidance on the selection of appropriate probiotics as clinical interventions for GERD.

Analysis of the Correlation Between Dynamic Characteristics and Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the esophageal motility characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and their relationship with symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined 101 patients diagnosed with GERD by endoscopy and divided them into 3 groups as follows: nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux esophagitis, and Barrett esophagus. Esophageal high-resolution manometry and the GERD Questionnaire were used to investigate the characteristics of esophageal dynamics and symptoms. In addition, the reflux symptom index was completed and the patients were divided into 7 groups according to symptoms. We then determined the correlation between dynamic esophageal characteristics and clinical symptoms.

RESULTS

Upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincter pressures and the 4-second integrated relaxation pressure in the RE group were lower than those in the NERD group. The 4-second integrated relaxation pressure in the Barrett esophagus group was also lower than that in the NERD group. In the analysis of extraesophageal symptoms, high-resolution manometry showed significant differences in UES pressures among all groups. Further subgroup analysis showed that compared with the group without extraesophageal symptoms, the UES pressure of the groups with pharyngeal foreign body sensation, throat clearing, and multiple extraesophageal symptoms was lower.

CONCLUSIONS

As GERD severity increases, motor dysfunction of the LES and esophageal body gradually worsens, and the LES plays an important role in GERD development. Decreased UES pressure plays an important role in the occurrence of extraesophageal symptoms, which is more noticeable in patients with pharyngeal foreign body sensation and throat clearing.

Evaluation of the impact of oesophageal reflux disease on muscle fatigue

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a gastrointestinal tract disorder associated with regurgitation of gastric acid into the oesophagus. It can present itself as non-erosive reflux condition or erosive esophagitis. Our main objective was to evaluate the impact of oesophageal reflux disease on muscle fatigue among patients. The prospective study design was adopted using surveys performed at the South West China Medical University. All patients who were subjected to screening endoscopy at the South West China Medical University were prospectively enrolled in the study. Our study was conducted according to ethical guidelines involving animal and human subjects. Our study used Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) questionnaires to perform data collection on the levels of fatigue, depression, daytime hypersomnolence and anxiety. In the (HADS, Anxiety (β = 0.657, p < .001) and Depression (β = 2.927, p < .001) exhibited significant positive associations with the predicted fatigue. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) showed no significant difference between individuals with and without reflux esophagitis (p = 0.787, power = 0.071). However, a significant difference was observed based on the presence of GERD symptoms (p = 0.003, power = 0.789), with higher mean scores for those with GERD symptoms (6.1±3.5) compared to those without (4.9±2.9). In MFI, significant differences were observed between the two groups for General and Physical Fatigue (p = 0.040, power = 0.823), Mental Fatigue (p = 0.002, power = 0.767), and MFI Total Score (p = 0.002, power = 0.981). In conclusion, GERD symptoms exhibited stronger associations with fatigue and daytime sleepiness than endoscopic findings, emphasizing the impact of symptomatic experiences on well-being.

Analysis of the potential molecular mechanisms of asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often occur simultaneously, with GERD being a comorbidity of asthma. This study aimed to explore the biological markers related to asthma and GERD by bioinformatics analysis.

METHODS

Initially, gene expression datasets for asthma and GERD were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and subsequent differential expression analysis yielded 620 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for asthma and 2367 DEGs for GERD. The intersection of these two gene sets yielded a total of 84 DEGs. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses revealed that these genes may be involved in steroid hormone secretion and cellular stress response. Five hub genes (PTGDR2, CPA3, FCER1A, TPSAB1, and IL1RL1) were identified by a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis and topological algorithm.

RESULTS

Enrichment analysis results indicated that hub genes may be involved in hormone secretion and disease development, particularly in regulating the renin-angiotensin system and systemic arterial blood pressure. PTGDR2, CPA3, TPSAB1, and IL1RL1 were upregulated in both asthma and GERD patient groups, while FCER1A was upregulated in asthma patients but downregulated in GERD patients. Through drug prediction, 22 drugs targeting hub genes PTGDR2, FCER1A, and TPSAB1 were identified. By constructing a transcription factor (TF)-target gene network, we found that eight TFs may regulate the expression of PTGDR2, FCER1A, and IL1RL1.

CONCLUSION

Hence, Asthma and GERD were related to steroid hormone secretion and the renin-angiotensin system.

Efficacy and safety of fundoplication in treating gastroesophageal reflux related chronic cough: A meta-analysis

Gastroesophageal reflux related chronic cough (GERC), is a common type of chronic cough. Drug treatment is the first choice. But some patients are tired of taking medicine everyday and some patients can not benefit from drugs. For these patients, fundoplication may be the most effective method. However, the importance of fundoplication in treating GERC is undervalued, and there is very few meta-analysis looking into the effect and safety of fundoplication in treating GERC. To solve this question, we performed this meta-analysis. The PRISMA strategy was used for this study. Our study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021251072). We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane databases from 1990 to December of 2022. The meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 14. After selection and exclusion, 15 articles out of 672 were included. The meta-analysis showed that the cure rate of laparoscopic fundoplication in treating GERC was 58% (95%CI: 52%-65%), with I2 = 45%; and the effective rate was 86% (95%CI: 80%-93%), with I2 = 0%. Laparoscopic fundoplication is effective for the most of GERC patients; however, when the goal is to cure GERC completely, a relatively conservative attitude should be taken. In terms of safety, laparoscopic fundoplication is quite reliable offered by skilled surgeons.

Efficacy of an oral suspension containing xyloglucan and pea proteins on a murine model of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common foregut disease, affecting about 20% of the adult population. Esophageal epithelial barrier plays a fundamental role in the pathophysiology of GERD; however, pharmacological therapies mainly aim to reduce the acidity of the gastroesophageal environment rather than to protect esophageal tissue integrity. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an oral solution containing xyloglucan and pea proteins (XP) in reestablishing gastroesophageal tissue integrity and biochemical markers. To induce GERD, C57BL/6 mice were alternatively overfed and fasted for 56 days and then treated with XP, sodium alginate, omeprazole, or omeprazole+XP twice daily for 7 days. Gastric pain and inflammatory markers were evaluated after 3 and 7 days of treatment. After sacrifice, the esophagi and stomachs were surgically removed for macroscopic and histological examination. Gastric pain was significantly reduced at days 3 and 7 by XP, omeprazole, and omeprazole+XP, while alginates were ineffective at day 3. XP was able to diminish gastric macroscopic damage and demonstrated the same efficacy as omeprazole in reducing esophageal damage. XP significantly reduced histological damage, with an efficacy comparable to that of omeprazole, but superior to alginates. Inflammatory markers were significantly reduced by XP, with superior efficacy compared with alginates at day 7. Interestingly, XP was also able to significantly increase gastric pH. This study demonstrated that XP restored gastric homeostasis, improved esophageal integrity, and decreased inflammation and pain with a similar efficacy to omeprazole and greater than alginates.

Management advice for patients with reflux-like symptoms: an evidence-based consensus

Patients with reflux-like symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) are often not well advised on implementing individualised strategies to help control their symptoms using dietary changes, lifestyle modifications, behavioural changes or fast-acting rescue therapies. One reason for this may be the lack of emphasis in management guidelines owing to 'low-quality' evidence and a paucity of interventional studies. Thus, a panel of 11 gastroenterologists and primary care doctors used the Delphi method to develop consolidated advice for patients based on expert consensus. A steering committee selected topics for literature searches using the PubMed database, and a modified Delphi process including two online meetings and two rounds of voting was conducted to generate consensus statements based on prespecified criteria (67% voting 'strongly agree' or 'agree with minor reservation'). After expert discussion and two rounds of voting, 21 consensus statements were generated, and assigned strength of evidence and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) rating. Eleven statements achieved the strongest (100%) agreement: five are related to diet and include identification and avoidance of dietary triggers, limiting alcohol, coffee and carbonated beverages, and advising patients troubled by postprandial symptoms not to overeat; the remaining six statements concern advice around smoking cessation, weight loss, raising the head-of-the-bed, avoiding recumbency after meals, stress reduction and alginate use. The aim of developing the consensus statements is that they may serve as a foundation for tools and advice that can routinely help patients with reflux-like symptoms better understand the causes of their symptoms and manage their individual risk factors and triggers.

Roles of swallowing and belching in different phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The contributions of swallowing and belching to specific gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) phenotypes are unclear.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed esophageal pH/impedance studies, comparing reflux events preceded by gastric belching (GB), supragastric belching (SGB), air swallowing, and liquid/solid swallowing based on reflux position, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and acid exposure time (AET).

KEY RESULTS

20 GERD patients and 10 controls were studied. Upright GERD patients and controls had a higher proportion of reflux events with a preceding swallow or belch (0.64, 0.64) than the supine group (0.38, p = 0.043). The upright group and controls trended toward a higher proportion of reflux events preceded by overall swallowing (0.61, 0.50) and air swallowing (0.55, 0.48) than the supine group (0.32, 0.31 p = 0.064, p = 0.11), but the three groups had similar rates of liquid/solid swallowing (0.032, 0.024, 0.017, p = 0.69). LES pressure did not correlate with reflux events preceded by swallowing (R2  = 0.021, p = 0.44). There was a higher rate of events preceded by gastric belching in the control group (0.14) than in the upright (0.032) and supine groups (0.066, p = 0.049). LES pressure did not correlate with the rate of events preceded by belching (R2  = 0.000093, p = 0.96). Normal AET patients had a higher rate of events preceded by GB (0.12) than those with increased acid exposure (0.030, p = 0.0083), but the two groups had similar rates of preceding air (0.43, 0.47, p = 0.68), liquid/solid (0.018, 0.032, p = 0.30), and overall swallowing (0.44, 0.53, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Swallowing more than belching is a dominant mechanism for reflux irrespective of GERD position, LES pressure, and AET.

Alterations of the salivary microbiota in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorders. The oral microbiota plays an important role in human health and may be altered by the presence of GERD. Here, we aimed to investigate the alterations of salivary microbiota in GERD patients.

METHODS

We collected clinical information and salivary samples from 60 individuals. All participants underwent combined pH/impedance monitoring measurement and submitted samples for salivary microbiota sequencing. According to acid exposure time and DeMeester score, participants were divided into two groups: GERD + (Group G) and GERD - (Group C).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in alpha diversity between study groups. Regarding beta diversity, principal coordinate analysis plots indicated that the microbiota composition data of the participants were grouped within partial overlapping clusters. The statistical analysis of the distance matrices was performed using the Adonis test (p = 0.017). Based on linear discriminant analysis effect size, the relative abundances of the phylum Bacteroidetes, class Bacteroidia, order Bacteroidales, family Prevotellaceae, and genus unidentified_Prevotellaceae were enriched in Group G. Compared with Group C, the phylum Actinobacteria, classes unidentified_Actinobacteria and Bacilli, orders Micrococcales and Lactobacillales, families Micrococcaceae and Streptococcaceae, and genuses Rothia and Streptococcus were decreased in Group G. At the genus level, the abundances of Streptococcus and Rothia were negatively correlated with DeMeester score and acid exposure time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed alterations of the salivary microbiota in GERD patients, suggesting that acid reflux changes the oral ecosystem.

A Linked Electronic Medical Record-Claims Analysis of the Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Patients Coded for Erosive Esophagitis in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Erosive esophagitis (EE) is a severe form of gastroesophageal reflux disease commonly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The aim of this retrospective, observational cohort study was to describe the characteristics and healthcare burden of patients with EE.

METHODS

We identified adults in the USA with an EE diagnosis between January  1, 2016 and February 28, 2019 in a linked dataset containing electronic health records (EHR) from the Veradigm Network EHR and claims data from Komodo Health. Patients were required to have 1 year of baseline data and 3 years of follow-up data. Patients were stratified by the number of PPI lines of therapy (LOT) during the 4-year study period. We descriptively captured patient characteristics and treatment patterns, along with all-cause and EE-related healthcare utilization and costs.

RESULTS

Among the 158,347 qualifying adults with EE, 71,958 (45.4%) had 1 PPI LOT, 14,985 (9.5%) had 2 LOTs, 15,129 (9.6%) had 3+ LOTs, and 56,275 (35.5%) did not fill a PPI prescription. Omeprazole and pantoprazole comprised more than 70% of any LOT, with patients commonly switching between the two. Mean (standard deviation) annualized all-cause and EE-related healthcare costs in the follow-up period were $16,853 ($70,507) and $523 ($3659), respectively. Both all-cause and EE-related healthcare costs increased with LOTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with EE are commonly treated with prescription PPIs; however, 19.0% of patients cycled through multiple PPIs. Higher PPI use was associated with a higher comorbidity burden and higher healthcare costs compared to 0 PPI use.

Analysis of the gut microbiota in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease using metagenomics and metabolomics

Background

There is no direct evidence of gut microbiota disturbance in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to provide direct evidence and a comprehensive understanding of gut microbiota disturbance in children with GERD through combined metagenomic and metabolomic analysis.

Methods

30 children with GERD and 30 healthy controls (HCs) were continuously enrolled, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the subjects were collected. First, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to evaluate differences in the gut microbiota between children with GERD and HC group, and 10 children with GERD and 10 children in the HC group were selected for metagenomic analysis. Nontargeted metabolomic analysis was performed using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), and metagenomic and metabolomic data were analyzed together.

Results

There were significant differences in the gut microbiota diversity and composition between children with GERD and HCs. The dominant bacteria in children with GERD were Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota. At the species level, the top three core bacterial groups were Bacteroides stercoris, Bacteroides vulgatus and Alistipes putredinis. The main differential pathways were identified to be related to energy, amino acid, vitamin, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. LC/MS detected 288 different metabolites in the positive and negative ion modes between children with GERD and HCs, which were mainly involved in arachidonic acid (AA), tyrosine, glutathione and caffeine metabolism.

Conclusion

This study provides new evidence of the pathogenesis of GERD. There are significant differences in the gut microbiota, metabolites and metabolic pathways between HCs and children with GERD, and the differences in metabolites are related to specific changes in bacterial abundance. In the future, GERD may be treated by targeting specific bacteria related to AA metabolism.

Neuromodulation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review

Background and objectives

In this systematic review, we evaluated the efficacy, mechanisms and safety of three neuromodulation therapies in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), including the effect of neuromodulation therapies on symptoms and key GERD pathophysiologies, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, esophageal motility, gastric motility, and parasympathetic activity. The first therapy is LES electrical stimulation using an implantable electrical stimulator, the second is transcutaneous electrical acustimulation, and the third is manual acupuncture.

Methods

A systematic review of literature according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed. Online databases searched include Medline (Ovid), Embase, and PubMed. Studies were assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria with Covidence, a systematic review software.

Results

The analysis included thirteen clinical studies. Four papers included were registered under two open-label trials on ClinicalTrials.gov for LES electrical stimulation; Five randomized trials with sham-treated controls were analyzed for transcutaneous electrical acustimulation; Four studies, including three involving standard therapy controls and one involving shamtreated controls were included for manual acupuncture. All evaluated studies demonstrated significant beneficial effects on GERD symptoms, using patient-completed questionnaires, objective 24-h measurement of esophageal pH, and patient-reported use of proton pump inhibitors. In evaluating the effect on key GERD pathophysiologies, electrical stimulation significantly increased LES pressure, and transcutaneous electrical acustimulation significantly improved esophageal motility, gastric motility, and parasympathetic activity. None of the evaluated neuromodulation methods produced severe adverse effects.

Conclusions

Cumulative evidence from the evaluated studies indicates that neuromodulation therapies were effective in treating the GERD symptoms and key underlying GERD pathophysiologies. They are thus valuable options for individualized GERD treatment.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Symptoms potentially attributable to gastroesophageal reflux disease are among those most commonly reported to primary care providers in the outpatient setting. In this review, we discuss clinical approaches to the evaluation and management of these symptoms, including proton pump inhibitor trials as well as specific indications or clinical settings that warrant referral to Gastroenterology specialists.

Functional Food in Relation to Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common esophageal disorder characterized by troublesome symptoms associated with increased esophageal acid exposure. The cornerstones of therapy in this regard include treatment with acid-suppressive agents, lifestyle modifications, and dietary therapy, although the latter has not been well defined. As concerns regarding long-term proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use continue to be explored, patients and healthcare providers are becoming increasingly interested in the role of diet in disease management. However, dietary interventions lack evidence of the synthesis effect of functional foods. The following is a review of dietary therapy for GERD, emphasizing food components' impact on GERD pathophysiology and management. Although the sequential dietary elimination of food groups is a common practice, the literature supports broader intervention, including reduced overall sugar intake, increased dietary fiber, and changes in overall eating practices. While the primary concern of food companies is to provide safe products, the caloric, nutritional, and functional composition of foods is also generating interest in the food industry due to consumers' concerns.

Network Pharmacology-Based Exploration of the Mechanism of Action of Shugan Hewei Recipe in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease with Anxiety and Depression

The Shugan Hewei recipe (SHR) is a well-recognized traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) prescription that has been shown to significantly improve chest pain, acid regurgitation, and the mood of GERD. Nonetheless, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, the active compounds and targets of SHR were predicted using network pharmacology. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses were utilized to explore the therapeutic mechanism of SHR. Combined with the drug target obtained from network pharmacology, the therapeutic effect and mechanism of SHR were observed. SHR’s main active compounds included quercetin, kaempferol, and luteolin. The core targets of SHR and GERD were TGF-β1, IL-1β, IL-4, CXCL10, MAPK1, MAPK3, CXCL8, IL-10, IL-2, and FOS, involving virus infection, inflammatory response, and body immunity. The core targets of SHR during the treatment of mental disorders were GABRA1, GABRA2, GABRA3, GABRA5, and GABRA6, involving synaptic transmission and transmembrane movement. Animal experiments revealed that SHR could repair the lower esophageal mucosa, mediate inflammatory factors, and GABA receptors and improve the behavior of rats. Overall, our results substantiate that SHR has huge prospects for widespread application in treating GERD subjects with anxiety and depression.

Inflammatory and Proliferative Pathway Activation in Human Esophageal Myofibroblasts Treated with Acidic Bile Salts

Subepithelial human esophageal myofibroblasts (HEMFs) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are exposed to luminal contents via impaired squamous epithelium barrier integrity. The supernatant of HEMFs treated with acidic bile salts reflective of in vivo reflux increases squamous epithelial thickness. We aimed to identify the involved mechanisms using an unbiased approach. Acidic-bile-salt-treated primary HEMF cultures (n = 4) were submitted for RNA-Seq and analyzed with Partek Flow followed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). A total of 1165 molecules (579 downregulated, 586 upregulated) were differentially expressed, with most top regulated molecules either extracellular or in the plasma membrane. Increases in HEMF CXCL-8, IL-6, AREG, and EREG mRNA, and protein secretion were confirmed. Top identified canonical pathways were agranulocyte and granulocyte adhesion and diapedesis, PI3K/AKT signaling, CCR5 signaling in macrophages, and the STAT3 pathway. Top diseases and biological functions were cellular growth and development, hematopoiesis, immune cell trafficking, and cell-mediated response. The targets of the top upstream regulator ErbB2 included CXCL-8, IL-6, and AREG and the inhibition of CXCL-8 in the HEMF supernatant decreased squamous epithelial proliferation. Our work shows an inflammatory/immune cell and proliferative pathways activation in HEMFs in the GERD environment and identifies CXCL-8 as a HEMF-derived chemokine with paracrine proliferative effects on squamous epithelium.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD): Highlighting Diagnosis, Treatment, and Lifestyle Changes

Millions of people worldwide are affected by the prevalent clinical issue, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Both conventional and unusual symptoms can identify patients. Many people with GERD benefit from symptomatic relief and are shielded from consequences by acid suppression medication. Our capacity to recognise and manage disease consequences has improved thanks to developments in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. One of the biggest typical gastrointestinal problems treated by physicians and primary care doctors is GERD, which is characterised by heartburn and regurgitation symptoms. GERD prevalence has increased, especially in North America and East Asia. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the cornerstone of medical treatment for GERD for the past thirty years. However, clinicians and patients are becoming more aware of the adverse effects of the PPI class of medications recently.

Additionally, surgical fundoplication has significantly decreased, while the evolution of non-medical therapeutic methodologies for GERD has increased. In the treatment of GERD, lifestyle changes are crucial. Individual variances can be seen in how GERD symptoms change in response to different diets. The study implies that there may be a connection between reflux occurrence and salty foods, chocolates, fat-rich foods, and aerated beverages, even if there is insufficient data to support this theory. In lifestyle modifications, other factors involved are the head of the bed, patients' lying down position, smoking, fat or obesity, and physical exercise. The number of reviews focusing on various diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities is very less, so this review puts emphasis on these areas. This review also covers GERD and its symptoms, epidemiology, and pathophysiology, but significantly focuses on diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle modification effects. 

NF-κB: A novel therapeutic pathway for gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a common chronic disease in clinical practice, has been widely studied, its potential adverse impact on patients is still a significant clinical concern. It is necessary to understand the pathogenesis of the disease and choose appropriate treatment according to its mechanism. The pathogenesis of GERD is diverse and complex. As the traditional treatment methods are expensive and ineffective in alleviating symptoms in some patients, new treatment options need to be explored. Our previous study suggested that the activation of nuclear factor-kappa beta (NF-κB) in esophageal mucosa may be related to the injury of epithelial barrier function caused by reflux. Based on the literature and our previous study results, it is speculated that inhibition of NF-κB activation may block the insult of GERD on the esophageal mucosal barrier. NF-κB may play an important role in the development of GERD. This article reviews the pathogenesis of GERD and the relationship between NF-κB and GERD, in order to provide new strategies for the treatment of GERD.

Objective Outcomes of an Extended Anti-reflux Mucosectomy in the Treatment of PPI-Dependent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (with Video)

BACKGROUND

Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a choice for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We present an extended anti-reflux mucosectomy, named ligation-assisted anti-reflux mucosectomy (L-ARMS). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the procedure and short-term outcomes on PPI use and symptom resolution.

METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained for retrospective review of a prospectively collected database including patients who underwent L-ARMS. L-ARMS includes mucosa ligation and endoscopic mucosectomy without submucosal injection around the squamocolumnar junction. The GERD symptoms, endoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring results, and manometry were collected by chart review. Voluntary validated surveys assessed symptomatic improvement over time.

RESULTS

There were 69 patients available for review. The procedure was technically completed in all cases with no severe complications, and the average operation time was 33 min. At 6 months after L-ARMS, treatment with PPIs had been halted in 55.1% of the patients, 30.4% of the enrolled patients used PPIs occasionally, and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, DeMeester scores, and GERD-health-related quality of life questionnaire (GERD-HRQL) scores showed a significant improvement compared with the baseline measurements (P < 0.001). Forty-five patients complained of mild dysphagia and were relieved in 4 weeks with no specific treatment. Compared to patients without dysphagia, patients complained of dysphagia after surgery had better clinical benefits indicated by GERD-HRQL and DeMeester score.

CONCLUSIONS

As a modified ARMS, L-ARMS is an effective procedure for controlling GERD symptoms, esophageal acid exposure, and LES pressure, which can be safely performed endoscopically in a time-saving and simple manner.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and oral health: A narrative review

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a clinical condition in which stomach contents leak backward into the esophagus. It affects millions of people worldwide and has a detrimental effect on quality of life. Heartburn and acid regurgitation are typical GERD symptoms, while atypical manifestations include noncardiac chest pain, cough and laryngitis. The oral and maxillofacial manifestations of GERD may include dental erosion, xerostomia, mucositis, aphthous like ulcerations, sour taste, burning mouth, hyperesthesia, bruxism, and/or temporomandibular disorder (TMD). This narrative review provides oral health care professionals with an update to medical aspects of GERD, recognition and management of oral and maxillofacial manifestations of the condition and provision of appropriate dental care for this patient population.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

As many as one-half of all patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not derive benefit from acid suppression. This review outlines a personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approach to GERD symptoms.

METHODS

The Best Practice Advice statements presented here were developed from expert review of existing literature combined with extensive discussion and expert opinion to provide practical advice. Formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of recommendations was not the intent of this clinical practice update. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Clinicians should develop a care plan for investigation of symptoms suggestive of GERD, selection of therapy (with explanation of potential risks and benefits), and long-term management, including possible de-escalation, in a shared-decision making model with the patient. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Clinicians should provide standardized educational material on GERD mechanisms, weight management, lifestyle and dietary behaviors, relaxation strategies, and awareness about the brain-gut axis relationship to patients with reflux symptoms. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should emphasize safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the treatment of GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Clinicians should provide patients presenting with troublesome heartburn, regurgitation, and/or non-cardiac chest pain without alarm symptoms a 4- to 8-week trial of single-dose PPI therapy. With inadequate response, dosing can be increased to twice a day or switched to a more effective acid suppressive agent once a day. When there is adequate response, PPI should be tapered to the lowest effective dose. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: If PPI therapy is continued in a patient with unproven GERD, clinicians should evaluate the appropriateness and dosing within 12 months after initiation, and offer endoscopy with prolonged wireless reflux monitoring off PPI therapy to establish appropriateness of long-term PPI therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: If troublesome heartburn, regurgitation, and/or non-cardiac chest pain do not respond adequately to a PPI trial or when alarm symptoms exist, clinicians should investigate with endoscopy and, in the absence of erosive reflux disease (Los Angeles B or greater) or long-segment (≥3 cm) Barrett's esophagus, perform prolonged wireless pH monitoring off medication (96-hour preferred if available) to confirm and phenotype GERD or to rule out GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Complete endoscopic evaluation of GERD symptoms includes inspection for erosive esophagitis (graded according to the Los Angeles classification when present), diaphragmatic hiatus (Hill grade of flap valve), axial hiatus hernia length, and inspection for Barrett's esophagus (graded according to the Prague classification and biopsied when present). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Clinicians should perform upfront objective reflux testing off medication (rather than an empiric PPI trial) in patients with isolated extra-esophageal symptoms and suspicion for reflux etiology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: In symptomatic patients with proven GERD, clinicians should consider ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring on PPI as an option to determine the mechanism of persisting esophageal symptoms despite therapy (if adequate expertise exists for interpretation). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Clinicians should personalize adjunctive pharmacotherapy to the GERD phenotype, in contrast to empiric use of these agents. Adjunctive agents include alginate antacids for breakthrough symptoms, nighttime H2 receptor antagonists for nocturnal symptoms, baclofen for regurgitation or belch predominant symptoms, and prokinetics for coexistent gastroparesis. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Clinicians should provide pharmacologic neuromodulation, and/or referral to a behavioral therapist for hypnotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, diaphragmatic breathing, and relaxation strategies in patients with functional heartburn or reflux disease associated with esophageal hypervigilance reflux hypersensitivity and/or behavioral disorders. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: In patients with proven GERD, laparoscopic fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation are effective surgical options, and transoral incisionless fundoplication is an effective endoscopic option in carefully selected patients. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: In patients with proven GERD, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is an effective primary anti-reflux intervention in obese patients, and a salvage option in non-obese patients, whereas sleeve gastrectomy has potential to worsen GERD. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Candidacy for invasive anti-reflux procedures includes confirmatory evidence of pathologic GERD, exclusion of achalasia, and assessment of esophageal peristaltic function.

Complex Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most prevalent gastrointestinal disorder posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Diagnosis should be objectively defined with endoscopy and pH testing, while novel metrics may augment diagnosis for inconclusive GERD cases, including the postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and esophageal mucosal impedance. Conditions that overlap with or mimic GERD should be considered such as achalasia, rumination, and eosinophilic esophagitis. Genetic testing for proton pump inhibitor metabolism is an option for precision therapy in complex persistent GERD. Proton pump inhibitor refractory GERD may require medical, surgical, or endoscopic therapies. The presence of GERD should be objectively evaluated in achalasia patients treated with peroral endoscopic myotomy, and further studies are needed to determine timing of this evaluation. Patients with scleroderma are at a high risk for GERD owing to abnormal esophageal motility and should be managed with aggressive medical therapy and lifestyle changes given the high prevalence of esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus in this population. Further studies are needed to understand the complex mechanisms of GERD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung transplantation.

Reviewing the User-Centered Design Process for a Comprehensive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) App

The objective of this study was to design a user-centered mobile health (mHealth) application for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and evaluate its design features and effectiveness for use by doctors. Prior to designing, our team undertook a discovery process that involved creating personas, conducting a competitor analysis and heuristic evaluation of existing apps, along with interviews with acid reflux patients. Then, we created a low-fidelity prototype, which was revised on the basis of several rounds of user testing. During the design phase, each round of user testing included a mix of surveys, concurrent think-alouds, and interviews to gather user feedback on the prototypes. Lastly, an evaluation phase consisting of gathering feedback on the user-centered design approach from user experience experts and medical doctors specialized in GERD was conducted. Overall, the final GERD app includes important features for tracking symptoms and triggers, analytics, data export, and community information, while promoting individualization, accessibility, and usability. The documentation of the design process of this app serves as a reference point for future medical app developers as it followed an empirically supported user-centered design strategy and resulted in an app which received positive feedback from users and human factors experts. We also intend to share some of the limitations due to the constrained resources, as well as potential ways to strengthen the design process for mHealth applications.

Matrix metalloproteinase-7 induces E-cadherin cleavage in acid-exposed primary human pharyngeal epithelial cells via the ROS/ERK/c-Jun pathway

Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is caused by pharyngeal mucosal damage due to the reflux of gastric contents, including acid, pepsin, and bile juice. Our previous study has demonstrated that LPRD is associated with the cleavage of E-cadherin, which is facilitated by the acid-activated matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7); however, the mechanism by which the acid activates MMP-7 remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanism by which MMP-7 is activated in the pharyngeal epithelial cells that are exposed to acid. The levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured in the epithelial cells exposed to acid. To investigate the signaling mechanism of ROS in the expression of MMP-7, the mechanism of action of the mitogen-activated protein kinase was examined. The expression of various signaling factors was determined, according to the presence or absence of each inhibitor in the acid-exposed pharyngeal epithelial cells. To identify changes in the cleavage of E-cadherin, the integrity of the mucosal membrane was assessed using a transepithelial permeability test. We found that acid exposure increased the levels of ROS, phosphorylated-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK) 1/2, and phosphorylated-c-Jun (p–c-Jun) in pharyngeal epithelial cells. The ROS inhibitor reduced the expression of p-ERK and MMP-7, while the ERK inhibitor reduced the expression of p–c-Jun and MMP-7. Moreover, the c-Jun inhibitor reduced the expression of MMP-7 and blocked the degradation of E-cadherin. In addition, decrease in the levels of immunostained E-cadherin and increase in transepithelial permeability after acid exposure were collectively alleviated by the inhibitors of ROS, ERK, and c-Jun. The degradation of E-cadherin that occurs after human mucosal cells are exposed to acid appears to be caused by an increase in the expression of MMP-7 via the ROS/ERK/c-Jun pathway, which is thought to be an important mechanism associated with the development of LPRD.

Key messages

• ROS is triggered when reflux occurs.

• ROS regulates the transcription factor c-Jun via the ERK pathway.

• The increase in MMP-7 that induces LPRD is induced via the ROS/ERK/c-Jun pathway.

• This study revealed for the first time the expression mechanism of MMP-7, which is one of the causes of LPRD.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00109-021-02166-z.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Compression Device as an Adjunct to Proton Pump Inhibition for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

BACKGROUND

The Reflux Band, an external upper esophageal sphincter (UES) compression device, reduces esophago-pharyngeal reflux events. This study aimed to assess device efficacy as an adjunct to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

METHODS

This two-phase prospective clinical trial enrolled adults with at least 8 weeks of laryngeal symptoms (sore throat, throat clearing, dysphonia) not using PPI therapy at two tertiary care centers over 26 months. Participants used double dose PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 1 and the external UES compression device nightly along with PPI for 4 weeks in Phase 2. Questionnaire scores and salivary pepsin concentration were measured throughout the study. The primary endpoint of symptom response was defined as reflux symptom index (RSI) score ≤ 13 and/or > 50% reduction in RSI.

RESULTS

Thirty-one participants completed the study: 52% male, mean age 47.9 years (SD 14.0), and mean body mass index (BMI) 26.2 kg/m² (5.1). Primary endpoint was met in 11 (35%) participants after Phase 1 (PPI alone) and 17 (55%) after Phase 2 (Device + PPI). Compared to baseline, mean RSI score (24.1 (10.9)) decreased at end of Phase 1 (PPI alone) (21.9 (9.7); p = 0.06) and significantly decreased at end of Phase 2 (Device + PPI) (15.5 (10.3); p < 0.01). Compared to non-responders, responders to Device + PPI had a significantly lower BMI (p = 0.02) and higher salivary pepsin concentration (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This clinical trial highlights the potential efficacy of the external UES compression device (Reflux Band) as an adjunct to PPI for patients with LPR (ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT03619811).

Uninvestigated Dyspepsia and Heartburn Overlap Syndrome at Industrial Hub of Eastern Siberia

Aim. A study of the overlap syndrome of uninvestigated dyspepsia and heartburn at an industrial hub city of Eastern Siberia.Materials and methods. A total of 1,382 subjects (684 men and 698 women, mean age 40.6 years) were randomly selected and examined for the central district of Krasnoyarsk. The clinical check-up and interviewing results were registered with a standard questionnaire. Heartburn was diagnosed as per the Montreal Consensus. Since no endoscopic patient examination had been performed, dyspepsia was assumed uninvestigated. Dyspepsia was diagnosed as per the Rome IV criteria. The study conduction complied with ethical standards. Each participant signed an informed examination consent, in accordance to the regulations by the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. The survey data were analysed with common statistical methods.Results. Heartburn, uninvestigated dyspepsia and their overlap syndrome had prevalence of 12.4, 21.1 and 5% in study population, respectively. Uninvestigated dyspepsia was registered in 40.4% patients with and 18.4% — without heartburn (p < 0.001). The risk factors of overlap syndrome were age >40 years (p = 0.002), obesity (p = 0.002), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and/or aspirin intake (p = 0.004) and tobacco smoking (p = 0.007). Among total patients with the heartburn/uninvestigated dyspepsia overlap syndrome, only 33.3% systemically had proton pump inhibitors, and only 17.4% had a prokinetic therapy.Conclusion. The heartburn/uninvestigated dyspepsia overlap syndrome is an actual issue in the Krasnoyarsk population. Attention is warranted to this problem to optimise treatment and prevention measures.

Effects of acids, pepsin, bile acids, and trypsin on laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases: physiopathology and therapeutic targets

PURPOSE

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a general term for the reflux of gastroduodenal contents into the laryngopharynx, oropharynx and even the nasopharynx, causing a series of symptoms and signs. Currently, little is known regarding the physiopathology of LPRD, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the drugs of choice for treatment. Although acid reflux plays a critical role in LPRD, PPIs fail to relieve symptoms in up to 40% of patients with LPRD. The influence of other reflux substances on LPRD, including pepsin, bile acid, and trypsin, has received increasing attention. Clarification of the substances involved in LPRD is the basis for LPRD treatment.

METHODS

A review of the effects of acids, pepsin, bile acids, and trypsin on laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases was conducted in PubMed.

RESULTS

Different reflux substances have different effects on LPRD, which will cause various symptoms, inflammatory diseases and neoplastic diseases of the laryngopharynx. For LPRD caused by different reflux substances, 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry (MII-pH), salivary pepsin, bile acid and other tests should be established so that different drugs and treatment courses can be used to provide patients with more personalized treatment plans.

CONCLUSION

This article summarizes the research progress of different reflux substances on the pathogenesis, detection index and treatment of LPRD and lays a theoretical foundation to develop target drugs and clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Analysis of current approaches to the treatment and quality of life improvement in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in case of its combination with the syndrome of undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia

When the structure of the connective tissue is disturbed, the probability of developing pathology of the internal organs increases. The gastrointestinal tract is one of the systems that is most often involved in the pathological process in the case of such disorders. Due to its mesenchymal origin, the esophagus is one of the first to suffer. Normalization of mineral metabolism, correction of immunological and bioenergetic status are the main tasks in the treatment of such patients. Therapy with magnesium drugs, vitamins, anabolic drugs, ?-blockers, aldosterone antagonists, and amino acid drugs should also be used for this purpose. Patients in this group should also take drugs that contain vitamin D3

Current Advancement on the Dynamic Mechanism of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common clinical disease associated with upper gastrointestinal motility disorders. Recently, with improvements in living standards and changes in lifestyle and dietary habits, the incidence of GERD has been increasing yearly. However, the mechanism of GERD has not been fully elucidated due to its complex pathogenesis, and this had led to unsatisfactory therapeutic outcomes. Currently, the occurrence and development of GERD involve multiple factors. Its pathogenesis is mainly thought to be related to factors, such as lower esophageal sphincter pressure, transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, crural diaphragmatic dysfunction, hiatus hernia, and impaired esophageal clearance. Therefore, explaining the pathogenesis of GERD more clearly and systematically, exploring potential and effective therapeutic targets, and choosing the best treatment methods have gradually become the focus of scholars' attention. Herein, we reviewed current advancements in the dynamic mechanism of GERD to better counsel patients on possible treatment options.

Roles of Adipokines in Digestive Diseases: Markers of Inflammation, Metabolic Alteration and Disease Progression

Adipose tissue is a highly dynamic endocrine tissue and constitutes a central node in the interorgan crosstalk network through adipokines, which cause pleiotropic effects, including the modulation of angiogenesis, metabolism, and inflammation. Specifically, digestive cancers grow anatomically near adipose tissue. During their interaction with cancer cells, adipocytes are reprogrammed into cancer-associated adipocytes and secrete adipokines to affect tumor cells. Moreover, the liver is the central metabolic hub. Adipose tissue and the liver cooperatively regulate whole-body energy homeostasis via adipokines. Obesity, the excessive accumulation of adipose tissue due to hyperplasia and hypertrophy, is currently considered a global epidemic and is related to low-grade systemic inflammation characterized by altered adipokine regulation. Obesity-related digestive diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal cancer, colon polyps and cancer, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, viral hepatitis-related diseases, cholelithiasis, gallbladder cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and diabetes, might cause specific alterations in adipokine profiles. These patterns and associated bases potentially contribute to the identification of prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic approaches for the associated digestive diseases. This review highlights important findings about altered adipokine profiles relevant to digestive diseases, including hepatic, pancreatic, gastrointestinal, and biliary tract diseases, with a perspective on clinical implications and mechanistic explorations.