Scope of practice of optometrists working in the UK Hospital Eye Service: Second national survey

A review of UK primary care pathways for acute ophthalmic conditions

Care pathways for the management of acute ophthalmic conditions have developed and transformed significantly over recent years, owing to a combination of legislative changes, policy implementation and the pressing requirement to redistribute increased demand away from traditional secondary care providers through collaboration with primary care. Following UK healthcare devolution in 1999, each nation has developed and implemented their own strategies for managing the growing demands on acute ophthalmology services. Local commissioning across England has seen Enhanced Service Pathways develop to provide acute eye care by primary care optometrists, with provision and access dependent upon locality. Northern Ireland has seen the implementation of a nationwide Primary Eyecare Acute Referral Service, whilst in Scotland and Wales, the respective Governments have redesigned primary care optometry General Ophthalmic Service contracts to incorporate provision of extended investigations and management of acute conditions by optometrists across the nation, recognising the added benefit of optometrists with higher qualifications. This narrative review summarises both peer reviewed and appropriate grey literature articles reporting on acute eye care pathways in primary care. Despite significant progress, particularly during the global COVID-19 pandemic, there is arguably still a great deal of further research and evaluation required relating to pathway innovation, the role of professionals with higher qualifications, including independent prescribing, the role of telemedicine, reassurance around clinical safety, and how digital interconnectivity could potentially add value to collaborative schemes to meet the growing demand on acute eyecare.

Comparative outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty delivered by optometrists compared with ophthalmologists: a UK-based multicentre observational study

BACKGROUND

Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), a National Institute for Care and Health Excellence recommended first-line treatment for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension, is increasingly delivered by optometrists. This retrospective multicentre observational study evaluates real-world outcomes of SLT comparing optometrist-treated to ophthalmologist-treated eyes.

METHODS

Adults aged ≥40 years receiving first SLT treatment at three UK hospital eye units (Aintree, Manchester, Macclesfield) between 1 August 2018 and 1 August 2021 were analysed using anonymised local audit data. Outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), drop burden, complications including post-SLT IOP spikes, and composite treatment failures including repeat laser or glaucoma surgery, evaluated at 6-monthly intervals up to 24 months. Groups were compared with parametric and non-parametric tests, accounting for intereye correlation, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using composite treatment failure endpoints was conducted.

RESULTS

207 eyes (131 patients) were analysed, 84 (56 patients) optometrist-treated eyes compared with 123 ophthalmologist-treated eyes (75 patients). No statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were found in change in VA, IOP or glaucoma drops from pre-SLT baseline between optometrist and ophthalmologist-treated eyes, at all time points. More cataracts were detected in optometrist-treated eyes, however, this did not affect differences in VA or cataract surgery frequency. More optometrist-treated eyes underwent glaucoma surgery, however, ophthalmologist-treated eyes had higher drop burden and chance of composite treatment failure up to month 18.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of SLT treatment by optometrists and ophthalmologists are comparable up to 24 months post-treatment. Ophthalmologist-treated eyes may have had more aggressive eye-drop treatment, preventing the need for surgery.

Optometrist-delivered selective laser trabeculoplasty in the HES - a training protocol and early service evaluation

Over the last decade, the delivery of glaucoma care in the UK has changed dramatically, with more non-medical ophthalmic practitioners involved in the care of glaucoma patients. Optometrists and other non-medical professionals are now involved in the delivery of laser treatments in the Hospital Eye Service (HES), but there is currently no standardised national training framework for non-medical clinicians. Moorfields Eye Hospital and UCL's Institute of Ophthalmology have developed and delivered an education and training programme for the delivery of lasers, including Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) by non-medical ophthalmic practitioners. The training programme is based on medical education principles, is informed by previous qualitative research into the role of ophthalmic practitioners in the delivery of laser treatments and is expected to have multidisciplinary benefits for ophthalmic healthcare. Clinical audit data indicate that optometrists can deliver safe SLT treatments, adhering to local protocols.

An evaluation of optometric advanced skills within a UK tertiary based setting

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-based optometrists are undertaking extended roles across ophthalmology that may require them to perform advanced skills (AS). Moorfields Eye Hospital (MEH) is the largest UK employer of hospital-based optometrists, it was sought to investigate which AS are being performed at this centre and how they align to the four pillars of advanced clinical practice (ACP).

METHODS

An online survey was sent to MEH optometrists in May 2022 that asked about professional status, sub-specialties worked, qualifications, acquisition and validation of AS, research and leadership.

RESULTS

Ninety-six optometrists with mean post-qualification experience was 16.2 years (SD 10.4) responded to the survey. There were 84 AS that covered clinical, leadership and research, with respondents achieving a mean of 11.8 (SD 10.3). Those with independent prescribing (IP) qualifications (n = 52) had a higher number of AS compared to non-IP optometrists (p = 0.03). There were 68 clinical AS across the sub-specialties (23 clinical AS were common in ≥2 sub-specialties), 49 out of 120 clinical AS could be performed by at least 60% of staff. Twenty-six optometrists identified with leadership, 56 had undertaken research/audit, 27 had published within a peer-reviewed journal and half of the time spent in active research was funded.

CONCLUSION

AS are being performed by optometrists within a tertiary eye hospital that supports ACP. IP optometrists had higher self-reported AS but current educational frameworks don't accommodate for some AS. Targeted AS courses with competency-based sign-off may further support high-quality patient care. Further research is required on how advanced care practitioners can support workforce transformation.

Providing capacity in glaucoma care using trained and accredited optometrists: A qualitative evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The role of optometrists in glaucoma within primary and secondary care has been well described. Whilst many studies examined safety and clinical effectiveness, there is a paucity of qualitative research evaluating enablers and barriers for optometrists delivering glaucoma care. The aims of this study are to investigate qualitatively, and from a multi-stakeholder perspective whether optometric glaucoma care is accepted as an effective alternative to traditional models and what contextual factors impact upon their success.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from clinics at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital and nationally via a Glaucoma UK registrant database. Optometrists, ophthalmologists, and other stakeholders involved in glaucoma services were recruited via direct contact and through an optometry educational event. Interviews and focus groups were recorded and transcribed anonymously, then analysed using the framework method and NVivo 12.

RESULTS

Interviews and focus groups were conducted with 38 participants including 14 optometrists and 6 ophthalmologists (from all 4 UK nations), and 15 patients and 3 commissioners/other stakeholders. Themes emerging related to: enablers and drivers; challenges and barriers; training; laser; professional practice; the role of other health professionals; commissioning; COVID-19; and patient experience.

CONCLUSION

Success in developing glaucoma services with optometrists and other health professionals is reliant on multi-stakeholder input, investment in technology and training, inter-professional respect and appropriate time and funding to set up and deliver services. The multi-stakeholder perspective affirms there is notable support for developing glaucoma services delivered by optometrists in primary and secondary care, with caveats around training, appropriate case selection and clinical responsibility.

Barriers to the Diagnosis and Management of Keratoconus Among Optometrists in Kenya

Background

Early diagnosis and management of keratoconus (KC) are important for limiting visual complications of the disease. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of optometrists on the barriers to effective diagnosis and management of KC in Kenya.

Methods

An online questionnaire was distributed to optometrists in Kenya to collect data on barriers to the diagnosis and management of KC.

Results

The majority (60.9%) of optometrists were confident in retinoscopy and subjective refraction. Fewer were confident in the use of keratometers (46.4%) and corneal topographers (24.9%) and in the fitting of rigid gas permeable (RGP) contact lenses (25.0%). The most commonly reported barriers to improving their knowledge and skills were, limited continuous professional development opportunities (87.4%), high costs of conferences (86.1%) and the lack of diagnostic tools (79.5%). Impediments cited to diagnosing and managing KC effectively were a lack of national guidelines (64.9%), patient education material (71.5%), equipment (58.9%) and RGP supply (68.2%) and cost (67.5%). Most commonly reported barriers related to patients were compliance (91.4%), affordability (90.7%), RGP discomfort (89.4%), willingness to pay (88.1%) and the lack of patient education about KC (87.4%).

Conclusion

This study showed that the lack of national guidelines, essential equipment and adequate practitioner knowledge and skills were barriers to KC diagnosis and management. Regulation of optometric education and clinical practice, development of national guidelines for diagnosis and management of KC, up-skilling of practitioners and cost-effective solutions for equipment procurement and maintenance may improve both access to, and quality of, care to patients with KC.

Integration of Refractive Services Provided by Optometrists into the Portuguese National Health Service

Introduction

Refractive error is a public health concern and even with relatively simple and cost-effective interventions it remains usually outside national health services (NHSs) not ensuring universal health coverage. This study aimed to generate evidence about the availability and accessibility of refractive services in Portugal and to present a plan for more efficient services.

Methods

A situation analysis of the Portuguese existing refractive services within the NHS was conducted based on three health systems building blocks: service delivery access, service coverage, and workforce. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis was performed based on existent evidence to identify internal and external factors that can facilitate or hinder the integration of refractive services within the NHS. The number of eye care personnel to be integrated in the NHS was calculated considering the minimum ratios recommended by national and international technical reports.

Results

Portugal has no specific services to address refractive errors within the NHS. Treatment of refractive error occurs at the level of eye care general services. There are 39 NHS eye care services, all hospital-centred and divided into three large groups, according to technical differentiation, the technology required, and workforce capacity. The workforce available is composed of ophthalmologists and orthoptists, together with nurses and other general paramedical assistants. 3 Portuguese municipalities have more than 1 NHS eye care service, 35 have 1 NHS eye care service, and 240 municipalities (in the mainland) have none. In 2021, 52% of the hospitals providing eye care services did not meet the recommended response times. Centralization of eye care services in urban areas, undifferentiated referral systems, and a shortage in the workforce per inhabitant was observed.

Conclusions

Portuguese NHS has all the requirements to reorientate refractive care from the current hospital-based model to primary care. The country also has a trained and qualified workforce to address this condition. Evidence demonstrates that the provision of refractive services at primary care is efficient and effective and translates into an opportunity to identify other visual conditions.

Evidence for commonly used teaching, learning and assessment methods in contact lens clinical skills education

INTRODUCTION

Evidence based practice is now an important part of healthcare education. The aim of this narrative literature review was to determine what evidence exists on the efficacy of commonly used teaching and learning and assessment methods in the realm of contact lens skills education (CLE) in order to provide insights into best practice. A summary of the global regulation and provision of postgraduate learning and continuing professional development in CLE is included.

METHOD

An expert panel of educators was recruited and completed a literature review of current evidence of teaching and learning and assessment methods in healthcare training, with an emphasis on health care, general optometry and CLE.

RESULTS

No direct evidence of benefit of teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE were found. There was evidence for the benefit of some teaching and learning and assessment methods in other disciplines that could be transferable to CLE and could help students meet the intended learning outcomes. There was evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; clinical teaching and learning, flipped classrooms, clinical skills videos and clerkships. For assessment these methods were; essays, case presentations, objective structured clinical examinations, self-assessment and formative assessment. There was no evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; journal clubs and case discussions. Nor was any evidence found for the following assessment methods; multiple-choice questions, oral examinations, objective structured practical examinations, holistic assessment, and summative assessment.

CONCLUSION

Investigation into the efficacy of common teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE are required and would be beneficial for the entire community of contact lens educators, and other disciplines that wish to adapt this approach of evidence-based teaching.

Three-year outcomes of an optometrist-led virtual clinic for new glaucoma referrals

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the outcomes of an optometrist-led virtual glaucoma clinic (VGC).

METHODS

New patients referred to the glaucoma service who were consultant triaged as 'low risk' were assessed virtually by specialist-trained optometrists in the VGC and either discharged or monitored for a period of 3 years. Ten percent of virtual case notes were audited by a glaucoma consultant to verify quality and generate learning objectives. Retrospective case-note review and analysis of all patients seen in the virtual clinic between 2014 and 2016 was undertaken to determine 3-year outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1710 new patients were seen in the clinic between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2016. Of these, 1033 (60.4%) patients required no outpatient input in 3 years of follow-up. Additionally, 320 (18.7%) were discharged at the first visit, and the proportion of glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertension patients who converted to glaucoma was 12.1% and 5.8%, respectively. At 3 years, 95 patients had died, 159 were lost to follow-up, 576 were discharged and 371 were diagnosed with glaucoma at baseline or during the 3-year follow-up. The cumulative discharge proportion from the service at the end of 3 years was 82.6%. No patients required emergency eye treatment or sight-impairment registration, and of the 12 referred back to the clinic on discharge, only five required ongoing monitoring.

CONCLUSION

This optometrist-led VGC combined two aspects of novel service delivery to reduce the burden of glaucoma monitoring in outpatient departments and consolidate consultant contact to patients requiring more intervention. This model will be of value in units establishing virtual services and looking to expand the role of allied health professionals.

An analysis of glaucoma repeat measures assessment results: Are core competencies enough?

PURPOSE

The need to validate core competency skills in qualified optometrists wishing to take part in extended roles in glaucoma care has been questioned. This analysis examines the ability of qualified optometrists to perform relevant core competency skills under standardised objective assessment conditions to explore whether such validation is justified. It also investigates if there are associations between performance, gender and length of time since qualification.

METHODS

Anonymised data from the Cardiff University assessment programme for the Wales Optometry Postgraduate Education Centre (WOPEC) Local Optical Committee Support Unit glaucoma referral filtering and monitoring pathway delivered between January 2017 and March 2020 were analysed. Results were combined with demographic data from the General Optical Council register of optometrists in the UK to investigate associations between performance and practitioner characteristics, namely length of time since qualification and gender.

RESULTS

The assessment results of 2215 optometrists practising in England (approximately 15% of all UK registered optometrists and 30% of all optometrists registered in England) were analysed. Failure rates for first time assessment in each of five objective structured clinical examination style practical assessments were 8.5% (van Herick); 8.8% (slit lamp binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy); 10.1% (Goldmann applanation tonometry calibration); 21.9% (Goldmann applanation tonometry) and 23.3% (case scenario interpretation and management). There were either no associations or at most very weak associations between performance and practitioner characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that these competencies are not universally present in optometrists practising in England and that ongoing training and assessment of these competencies is justified for entry into extended roles. There are no meaningful associations between performance in these assessments and gender or time since qualification.