Effectiveness of a telephone-based nursing intervention to reduce hospital utilization by COVID-19 patients

Effectiveness of telehealth versus in-person care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

In this systematic review, we compared the effectiveness of telehealth with in-person care during the pandemic using PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from March 2020 to April 2023. We included English-language, U.S.-healthcare relevant studies comparing telehealth with in-person care conducted after the onset of the pandemic. Two reviewers independently screened search results, serially extracted data, and independently assessed the risk of bias and strength of evidence. We identified 77 studies, the majority of which (47, 61%) were judged to have a serious or high risk of bias. Differences, if any, in healthcare utilization and clinical outcomes between in-person and telehealth care were generally small and/or not clinically meaningful and varied across the type of outcome and clinical area. For process outcomes, there was a mostly lower rate of missed visits and changes in therapy/medication and higher rates of therapy/medication adherence among patients receiving an initial telehealth visit compared with those receiving in-person care. However, the rates of up-to-date labs/paraclinical assessment were also lower among patients receiving an initial telehealth visit compared with those receiving in-person care. Most studies lacked a standardized approach to assessing outcomes. While we refrain from making an overall conclusion about the performance of telehealth versus in-person visits the use of telehealth is comparable to in-person care across a variety of outcomes and clinical areas. As we transition through the COVID-19 era, models for integrating telehealth with traditional care become increasingly important, and ongoing evaluations of telehealth will be particularly valuable.

Effect of a Structured Multilevel Telehealth Service on Hospital Admissions and Mortality During COVID-19 in a Resource-Limited Region in Brazil: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic represented a great stimulus for the adoption of telehealth and many initiatives in this field have emerged worldwide. However, despite this massive growth, data addressing the effectiveness of telehealth with respect to clinical outcomes remain scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the adoption of a structured multilevel telehealth service on hospital admissions during the acute illness course and the mortality of adult patients with flu syndrome in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in two Brazilian cities where a public COVID-19 telehealth service (TeleCOVID-MG) was deployed. TeleCOVID-MG was a structured multilevel telehealth service, including (1) first response and risk stratification through a chatbot software or phone call center, (2) teleconsultations with nurses and medical doctors, and (3) a telemonitoring system. For this analysis, we included data of adult patients registered in the Flu Syndrome notification databases who were diagnosed with flu syndrome between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021. The exposed group comprised patients with flu syndrome who used TeleCOVID-MG at least once during the illness course and the control group comprised patients who did not use this telehealth service during the respiratory illness course. Sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes data were extracted from the Brazilian official databases for flu syndrome, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (due to any respiratory virus), and mortality. Models for the clinical outcomes were estimated by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The final study population comprised 82,182 adult patients with a valid registry in the Flu Syndrome notification system. When compared to patients who did not use the service (n=67,689, 82.4%), patients supported by TeleCOVID-MG (n=14,493, 17.6%) had a lower chance of hospitalization during the acute respiratory illness course, even after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and underlying medical conditions (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.94; P=.005). No difference in mortality was observed between groups (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86-1.12; P=.83).

CONCLUSIONS

A telehealth service applied on a large scale in a limited-resource region to tackle COVID-19 was related to reduced hospitalizations without increasing the mortality rate. Quality health care using inexpensive and readily available telehealth and digital health tools may be delivered in areas with limited resources and should be considered as a potential and valuable health care strategy. The success of a telehealth initiative relies on a partnership between the involved stakeholders to define the roles and responsibilities; set an alignment between the different modalities and levels of health care; and address the usual drawbacks related to the implementation process, such as infrastructure and accessibility issues.

Human resource management (HRM) strategies of medical staff during the COVID-19 pandemic

Healthcare workers are at the forefront of fight against COVID-19 and the managers of medical centers should develop coping strategies for the challenges caused by COVID-19, especially for health human resources in order to improve the performance of healthcare organizations. Hence, the purpose of this study is to investigate the human resource management strategies of medical staff during the COVID-19 to help them cope with the new strains of COVID-19 or epidemics of viral diseases that may occur in the future. In this study, a search was performed in the international Web of Science electronic database, using keywords such as human resource management and COVID-19. As a result, a total of 1884 articles published between January 1st, 2020 and October 22nd, 2021 were extracted. After screening the articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 articles were selected to enter the study. Then, a scientometric analysis was performed on the content of selected articles and the results were presented in the form of tables and conceptual models. In total, 9 strategies were extracted from the selected articles including development of organizational culture, staff screening, policy-making, infection control training and monitoring the implementation of learned materials, patient management, human resource management, psychological and motivational support, communication and coordination, and digital health services. Employing comprehensive strategies to maintain the health of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 can play an effective role in reducing burnout, improving productivity and employee satisfaction, and in increasing the resilience of healthcare workers. It also has a positive effect on the patient's safety. Revision and reengineering of human resource management strategies in health and treatment organizations according to different cultures and contexts require research and investment in creative and innovative strategies.

Association Between Perceived Access to Healthcare and the Perception of Illness Among Peruvian Adults with Chronic Diseases During COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly affected the provision of care for patients with chronic diseases. Due to social restrictions and reductions in contact with health services, the negative perception of chronic disease is expected to have increased. The aim of this study was to determine the association between perceived access to healthcare and the perception of illness among Peruvian population with chronic disease. It was a cross-sectional analytical study, with a sample of 987 inhabitants to whom the questionnaires "Coverage of health services" and "The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire" (BIPQ) were applied. Having health insurance (PRa = 0.683; 95% CI = 0.613-0.761) acts as a protective factor for a positive illness perception of chronic disease, however, a waiting time greater than 3 months to obtain a medical appointment (PRa = 1.417; 95% CI = 1.319-1.522) and poor access to health services (PRa = 1.435; 95% CI = 1.226-1.681) resulted in the probability of a negative illness perception of chronic disease. Thus, there is an association between perceived poor access to healthcare and the negative illness perception of chronic disease in Peruvian population during pandemic COVID-19.