Single-unit transfusions and hemoglobin trigger: relative impact on red cell utilization

Analysis of a 5-year, evidenced-based, rational blood utilisation project in a South African regional hospital

BACKGROUND

Blood products are a lifesaving but limited resource, particularly in resource-limited settings. Evidence-based transfusion criteria tailored to local hospitals have shown great promise in reducing costs, minimising shortages, and ameliorating the morbidity and mortality associated with liberal blood product usage. We implemented the "Saving Blood, Saving Lives" project to: promote responsible blood product use and reduce blood product ordering inefficiencies and expenditure.

METHODS

A comprehensive change management programme, preceded by 3 months of clinical department consultation and training, was implemented. A new evidence-based protocol for blood product utilisation was developed, together with an accountability form. This form was used in monthly audit meetings to refine policies, identify new problems, improve communication, and to drive hospital staff accountability and training. The primary measure of the programme's success was the change in the number of red cell concentrate units ordered.

RESULTS

Project implementation required minimal time and no additional budget or staff. Annual red cell concentrate usage reduced from 7211 units in year one to 4077 units in year 5 (p < 0.001). Similar reductions were seen in freeze-dried plasma and platelet usage, as well as administrative costs. Total project saving, adjusted to baseline admission numbers, amounted to over R46 million ($2.5 million).

CONCLUSIONS

As a change management programme centred the "Saving Blood, Saving Lives" project, was able to significantly reduce blood product-related administration and expenditure by implementing evidence-based transfusion criteria. The programme is simple, replicable and cost effective, making it ideally suited for use in resource-constrained environments.

A simple program to improve the appropriateness of red blood cell transfusions in non-bleeding hospital patients: a before-and-after study

Introduction

Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is not devoid of risks; nor is anemia. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of a program designed to improve the appropriateness of RBC transfusions in hospital patients.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed time periods before and after program implementation.

Results

Before program implementation 415 out of 23492 (1.8%) patients received at least 1 RBC, whereas after implementation 162 out of 25062 (0.6%) did so. The percentage of appropriate RBC transfusions increased from 23.6 to 37.1%.

Conclusions

A simple program may lead to a 3-fold decrease in transfusion rate and a significant increase in the percentage of appropriate RBC transfusions.

Data and Metrics for Patient Blood Management: A Narrative Review and Practical Guide

Data collection, analysis, and reporting are fundamental for a successful hospital-based patient blood management program; however, very little has been published on the topic. Our aim was to synthesize evidence from a literature review to provide a detailed, practical list of outcome metrics, and the required data collection(s) to inform implementation. Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed were searched for any full-text original research articles published from inception to the year 2020. We included any studies reporting the implementation of interventions or programs study authors defined as "patient blood management" and extracted information on data collected and metrics reported. We included 45 studies describing the implementation of a patient blood management program and/or strategies. The outcomes reported by these studies were grouped into 1 of 36 metrics. We compiled a list of 65 relevant data elements to collect, and their potential source hospital information systems: patient administration, laboratory, transfusion/blood bank, operating room, pharmacy, emergency department, and intensive care unit. We further categorized patient blood management data systems into basic, intermediate, and advanced based on the combination of different information systems sourced. The results of this review can be used to inform patient blood management programs in planning what data collection(s) are needed, where these data can be sourced from, and how they can be analyzed.

How do I reduce variation in red blood cell transfusion practices in a large integrated health care system?

BACKGROUND

Reducing variation in transfusion practices can prevent unwarranted transfusions, an outcome that improves quality of care and patient safety, while lowering costs and eliminating waste of blood. We developed and assessed a system-wide initiative to reduce variation in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in terms of both transfusion utilization and the number of units transfused.

INTERVENTION DESIGN AND METHODS

Our initiative combined a single-unit default order for RBC transfusion in hemodynamically stable, non-bleeding patients with a "Why Give 2 When 1 Will Do?" Choosing Wisely campaign, while also promoting a restrictive hemoglobin threshold (Hb <7 g/dl). This multimodal intervention was implemented across an academic medical center (AMC) with over 950 beds and 10 community hospitals.

RESULTS

Between our baseline (CY 2020) and intervention period (CY 2021), single-unit orders increased from 57% to 70% of all RBC transfusion orders (p < .001). The greatest change in ordering practices was at community hospitals, where single-unit orders increased from 46% to 65% (p < .001). Over the same time period, the system-wide mean (SD) Hb result prior to transfusion fell from 7.3 (0.05) to 7.2 g/dl (0.04) (p < .05). We estimate this effort saved over 4000 units of blood and over $4 million in direct and indirect costs in its first year.

DISCUSSION

By combining a single-unit default setting in the RBC order with a restrictive hemoglobin threshold, we significantly reduced variation in ordering practices. This effort demonstrates the value of single-unit policies and "nudges" in system-wide patient blood management initiatives.

Incidence and Impact of a Single-Unit Red Blood Cell Transfusion: Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database 2010-2019

BACKGROUND

As the adverse effects of blood transfusions are better understood, recommendations support single-unit red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (SRBCT). However, an isolated SRBCT across the entire index admission suggests even the single unit may be avoidable. We sought to identify the characteristics of cardiac surgery patients receiving an isolated SRBCT and analyze the impact on outcomes.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database was queried for the period between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019. Patients aged >18 years undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting or isolated aortic valve replacement were included. A total of 2,151,430 encounters were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 847,442 patients (39.3%) receiving any RBC transfusion during their index admission, 206,555 (24.4%) received only 1 unit. Propensity-matching analysis determined SRBCT patients were significantly older (67.26 vs 64.02 years; odds ratio [OR], 1.02; P < .001), female (39.1% vs 17.8%; OR, 1.57; P < .001), non-White (18.2% vs 13.1%; OR, 0.81; P < .001), and had a smaller body surface area (1.94 vs 2.07 m2; OR, 0.20; P < .001). They also had higher mortality (1.4% vs 1.0%, P < .001), stroke (1.7% vs 1.2%, P < .001), prolonged ventilation (6.4% vs 3.4%, P < .001), renal failure (1.8% vs 0.9%, P < .001), and reoperations (1.3% vs. 0.5%, P < .001) than patients who received 0 RBCs.

CONCLUSIONS

SRBCT is a common occurrence in adult cardiac surgery. This low-volume transfusion is strongly associated with higher morbidity, even after controlling for preoperative risk factors.

Effect of a Patient Blood Management Program on the Appropriateness of Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with hip fractures frequently receive perioperative transfusions, which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a patient blood management (PBM) program on the appropriateness of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and clinical outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

In 2018, the revised PBM program was implemented at the Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent hip fracture surgery from 2017 to 2020 were evaluated. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed according to the timing of PBM implementation (pre-PBM, early-PBM, and late-PBM). Multiveriate regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors of the adverse outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality or 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 884 elderly patients were included in this study. The proportion of patients who received perioperative RBC transfusions decreased significantly (43.5%, 40.1%, and 33.2% for pre-PBM, early-PBM, and late-PBM, respectively; P = 0.013). However, the appropriateness of RBC transfusion significantly increased (54.0%, 60.1%, and 94.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). The duration of in-hospital stay and 30-day readmission rates significantly decreased. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that RBC transfusion (odds ratio, 1.815; 95% confidence interval, 1.137-2.899; P = 0.013) was significantly associated with adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the PBM program increased the appropriateness of RBC transfusion without compromising transfusion quality and clinical outcomes. Therefore, adopting the PBM program may improve the clinical management of elderly patients following hip fracture surgery.

Appropriateness of Allogeneic Red Blood Cell Transfusions in Non-Bleeding Patients in a Large Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Study

In hemodynamically stable patients, both anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion may be detrimental to patients; hence, a decision regarding RBC transfusion should be based on thorough risk-benefit assessment. According to hematology and transfusion medicine organizations, RBC transfusion is indicated when recommended hemoglobin (Hb) triggers are met, and symptoms of anemia are present. The aim of our study was to examine the appropriateness of RBC transfusions in non-bleeding patients at our institution. We performed a retrospective analysis of all RBC transfusions performed between January 2022 and July 2022. The appropriateness of RBC transfusion was based on the most recent Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB) guidelines and some additional criteria. The overall incidence of RBC transfusions at our institution was 10.2 per 1000 patient-days. There were 216 (26.1%) RBC units appropriately transfused and 612 (73.9%) RBC units that were transfused with no clear indications. The incidence of appropriate and inappropriate RBC transfusions were 2.6 and 7.5 per 1000 patient-days, respectively. The most frequent clinical situations when RBC transfusion was classified as appropriate were: Hb < 70 g/L plus cognitive problems/headache/dizziness (10.1%), Hb < 60 g/L (5.4%), and Hb < 70 g/L plus dyspnea despite oxygen therapy (4.3%). The most frequent causes of inappropriate RBC transfusions were: no Hb determination pre-RBC transfusion (n = 317) and, among these, RBC transfused as a second unit in a single-transfusion episode (n = 260); absence of anemia sings/symptoms pre-transfusion (n = 179); and Hb concentration ≥80 g/L (n = 80). Although the incidence of RBC transfusions in non-bleeding inpatients in our study was generally low, the majority of RBC transfusions were performed outside recommended indications. Red blood cell transfusions were evaluated as inappropriate mainly due to multiple-unit transfusion episodes, absence of anemia signs and/or symptoms pre- transfusion, and liberal transfusion triggers. There is still the need to educate physicians on appropriate indications for RBC transfusion in non-bleeding patients.

Measuring the Impact of a Blood Supply Shortage Using Data Science

BACKGROUND

Transfusion medicine is the only section of the clinical laboratory that performs diagnostic testing and dispenses a drug (blood) on the basis of those results. However, not all of the testing that informs the clinical decision to prescribe a blood transfusion is performed in the blood bank. To form a holistic assessment of blood bank responsiveness to clinical needs, it is important to be able to merge blood bank data with datapoints from the hematology laboratory and the electronic medical record.

METHODS

We built an interactive visualization of the time from hemoglobin result availability to initiation of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and monitored the result over a 2-year period that coincided with several severe blood shortages. The visualization runs entirely on free software and was designed to be feasibly deployed on a variety of hospital information technology platforms without the need for significant data science expertise.

RESULTS

Patient factors, such as hemoglobin concentration, blood type, and presence of minor blood group antibodies influenced the time to initiation of transfusion. Time to transfusion initiation did not appear to be significantly affected by periods of blood shortage.

CONCLUSION

Overall, we demonstrate a proof of concept that complex, but clinically important, blood bank quality metrics can be generated with the support of a free, user-friendly system that aggregates data from multiple sources.

Optimierung der Depotführung für Erythrozytenkonzentrate in Krankenhäusern

Blutdepots ohne eigene Herstellung müssen Versorgungssicherheit garantieren, dabei aber auch eine möglichst geringe Verfallsrate sicherstellen. Für die Anzahl der zu bevorratenden Erythrozytenkonzentrate (EK) der verschiedenen Blutgruppen wird folgendes Berechnungsmodell gefunden: 1. Die örtliche Verteilung der AB0-Blutgruppen im Patientenkollektiv kann mit dem Hardy-Weinberg-Gesetz auf Plausibilität überprüft werden. 2. Der Beobachtungszeitraum ist die durchschnittliche Restlaufzeit von der Lieferung bis zum Ende der Haltbarkeit. 3. Der Erwartungswert für die Fallzahl transfundierter Patienten einer bestimmten Blutgruppe gehorcht einer Binomialverteilung. 4. Die Anzahl transfundierter Erythrozytenkonzentrate pro Patient ist geometrisch verteilt. 5. Eine Matrix wird gebildet, deren Zellen das Produkt aus Fallzahl (3.) und EK pro Fall (4.) und somit die Anzahl der benötigten EK enthalten. Nur letztgenannte sind für die Führung des Blutdepots interessant. Subtrahiert man die Zahl der im Beobachtungszeitraum (2.) benötigten EK von der Depotgröße, erhält man den Verfall. Der Vorrat von EK der Blutgruppe 0 bemisst sich an der maximal zu erwartenden Zahl benötigter Konserven für einen Fall bis zur nächstmöglichen Lieferung, wenn der durchschnittliche Depotumsatz diesen Wert nicht übersteigt. Er kann somit insbesondere in peripheren Krankenhäusern mit Akutversorgung die oben beschriebene Kalkulation deutlich überschreiten. Für Blutgruppe A gilt dieser Grundsatz nicht, wenn auch kompatible (0 auf A) Transfusionen stattfinden sollen. Binomial ist bei kleiner Anzahl nach links – das heißt gegen Null – schief verteilt. Dies betrifft in jedem Fall AB, bei jährlichem Depotumsatz unter ungefähr 1000 EK aber auch Blutgruppe B. Möchte man den Verfall vermeiden, darf man die betroffenen Blutgruppen nicht – zumindest nicht in dem notwendigen Umfang – bevorraten und muss dann majorkompatibel transfundieren. Die Unterschiede der einzelnen AB0-Blutgruppen in Herstellung (Blutgruppenverteilung in der Spenderpopulation) und der Bevorratung in Krankenhaus-Blutdepots sind hierin begründet. Entsprechende Überlegungen gelten gleichermaßen für den Rhesusfaktor D. Die oft emotional geführte Debatte über die zu bevorratende Anzahl an EK kann mittels dieses mathematischen Modells auf eine rationale Grundlage zurückgeführt werden. Das Rechenmodell ist mit einem einfachen Tabellenkalkulationsprogramm möglich. Das Blutdepot bestimmt damit den optimalen Bestand. Für die Blutspendedienste ergibt sich hieraus die Möglichkeit, die Kunden individuell, das heißt umsatzabhängig, zu beraten und gegebenenfalls den Preis entsprechend zu gestalten. Im Rahmen der Qualitätssicherung können abteilungs- oder krankenhausspezifische Besonderheiten im Transfusionsverhalten dargestellt werden.

Transfusion Medicine Informatics: A Review of Current Practice and a Glimpse into the Future

Clinical informatics has been described as the "relentless pursuit of assisting people" by using data and information technology to improve health care. A core principle is that a person supported by information technology is superior to either a person or machine alone. Striving toward this harmonization, the transfusion medicine field has had a significant number of accomplishments. Clinical informatics interventions have helped achieve better quality, efficiency, and safety in nearly all aspects of transfusion medicine. This review summarizes these accomplishments and provides a preview of novel ideas that could transform transfusion medicine into a proactive, data-driven, and patient-centered discipline.

Impact of body weight on hemoglobin increments in adult red blood cell transfusion

BACKGROUND

Though weight is a major consideration when transfusing blood in pediatric patients, it is generally not considered when dosing transfusions in adults. We hypothesized that the change in hemoglobin (Hb) concentration is inversely proportional to body weight when transfusing red blood cells (RBC) in adults.

METHODS

A total of 13,620 adult surgical patients at our institution were assessed in this retrospective cohort study (2009-2016). Patients were stratified based on total body weight (kg): 40-59.9 (16.6%), 60-79.9 (40.4%), 80-99.9 (28.8%), 100-119.9 (11.3%), and 120-139.9 (2.9%). The primary outcome was the change in Hb per RBC unit transfused. Subgroup analyses were performed after stratification by sex (male/female) and the total number of RBC units received (1/2/≥3 units). Multivariable models were used to assess the association between weight and change in Hb.

RESULTS

As patients' body weight increased, there was a decrease in the mean change in Hb per RBC unit transfused (40-59.9 kg: 0.85 g/dL, 60-79.9 kg: 0.73 g/dL, 80-99.9 kg: 0.66 g/dL, 100-119.9 kg: 0.60 g/dL, 120-139.9 kg: 0.55 g/dL; p < .0001). This corresponded with a 35% difference in the change in Hb between the lowest and highest weight categories on univariate analysis. Similar trends were seen after subgroup stratification. On multivariable analysis, for every 20 kg increase in patient weight, there was a ~6.5% decrease in the change in Hb per RBC unit transfused (p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient body weight differentially impacts the change in Hb after RBC transfusion. These findings justify incorporating body weight into the clinical decision-making process when transfusing blood in adult surgical patients.

Management and prevention of anemia (acute bleeding excluded) in adult critical care patients

OBJECTIVE

Anemia is very common in critical care patients, on admission (affecting about two thirds of patients), but also during and after their stay, due to repeated blood loss, the effects of inflammation on erythropoiesis, a decreased red blood cell life span, and haemodilution. Anemia is associated with severity of illness and length of stay.

METHODS

A committee composed of 16 experts from four scientific societies, SFAR, SRLF, SFTS and SFVTT, evaluated three fields: (1) anaemia prevention, (2) transfusion strategies and (3) non-transfusion treatment of anaemia. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The SFAR-SRLF guideline panel provided ten statements concerning the management of anemia in adult critical care patients. Acute haemorrhage and chronic anemia were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for ten recommendations. Three of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and four had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). No GRADE recommendation could be provided for two questions in the absence of strong consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal patient management. The experts recommended phlebotomy reduction strategies, restrictive red blood cell transfusion and a single-unit transfusion policy, the use of red blood cells regardless of storage time, treatment of anemic patients with erythropoietin, especially after trauma, in the absence of contraindications and avoidance of iron therapy (except in the context of erythropoietin therapy).

Management and prevention of anemia (acute bleeding excluded) in adult critical care patients

Objective

Anemia is very common in critical care patients, on admission (affecting about two-thirds of patients), but also during and after their stay, due to repeated blood loss, the effects of inflammation on erythropoiesis, a decreased red blood cell life span, and haemodilution. Anemia is associated with severity of illness and length of stay.

Methods

A committee composed of 16 experts from four scientific societies, SFAR, SRLF, SFTS and SFVTT, evaluated three fields: (1) anemia prevention, (2) transfusion strategies and (3) non-transfusion treatment of anemia. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE^® methodology.

Results

The SFAR–SRLF guideline panel provided ten statements concerning the management of anemia in adult critical care patients. Acute haemorrhage and chronic anemia were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for ten recommendations. Three of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and four had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). No GRADE recommendation could be provided for two questions in the absence of strong consensus.

Conclusions

The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal patient management. The experts recommended phlebotomy reduction strategies, restrictive red blood cell transfusion and a single-unit transfusion policy, the use of red blood cells regardless of storage time, treatment of anaemic patients with erythropoietin, especially after trauma, in the absence of contraindications and avoidance of iron therapy (except in the context of erythropoietin therapy).

Using arterial-venous oxygen difference to guide red blood cell transfusion strategy

Background

Guidelines recommend a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy based on hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that the arterial-venous oxygen difference (A-V O_2diff), a surrogate for the oxygen delivery to consumption ratio, could provide a more personalized approach to identify patients who may benefit from transfusion.

Methods

A prospective observational study including 177 non-bleeding adult patients with a Hb concentration of 7.0–10.0 g/dL within 72 h after ICU admission. The A-V O_2diff, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂), and oxygen extraction ratio (O₂ER) were noted when a patient’s Hb was first within this range. Transfusion decisions were made by the treating physician according to institutional policy. We used the median A-V O_2diff value in the study cohort (3.7 mL) to classify the transfusion strategy in each patient as “appropriate” (patient transfused when the A-V O_2diff > 3.7 mL or not transfused when the A-V O_2diff ≤ 3.7 mL) or “inappropriate” (patient transfused when the A-V O_2diff ≤ 3.7 mL or not transfused when the A-V O_2diff > 3.7 mL). The primary outcome was 90-day mortality.

Results

Patients managed with an “appropriate” strategy had lower mortality rates (23/96 [24%] vs. 36/81 [44%]; p = 0.004), and an “appropriate” strategy was independently associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 [95% CI 0.30–0.89], p = 0.01). There was a trend to less acute kidney injury with the “appropriate” than with the “inappropriate” strategy (13% vs. 26%, p = 0.06), and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score decreased more rapidly (p = 0.01). The A-V O_2diff, but not the ScvO₂, predicted 90-day mortality in transfused (AUROC = 0.656) and non-transfused (AUROC = 0.630) patients with moderate accuracy. Using the ROC curve analysis, the best A-V O_2diff cutoffs for predicting mortality were 3.6 mL in transfused and 3.5 mL in non-transfused patients.

Conclusions

In anemic, non-bleeding critically ill patients, transfusion may be associated with lower 90-day mortality and morbidity in patients with higher A-V O_2diff.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03767127. Retrospectively registered on 6 December 2018.

Early intravenous iron administration in the Emergency Department reduces red blood cell unit transfusion, hospitalisation, re-transfusion, length of stay and costs

BACKGROUND

Moderate to severe iron deficiency anaemia is a common finding in patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). According to Patient Blood Management principles, intravenous iron should be the therapy of choice instead of blood transfusion for selected cases affected by chronic iron deficiency anaemia. However, this option is only rarely taken into account by physicians in the ED. As a result, in many circumstances, treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in the ED can differ from that of the Anaemia Clinic. With the aim of reducing inappropriate transfusions, and to implement intravenous iron usage, we shared a specific protocol with the ED.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of all subjects admitted to the ED (n=267, Post-protocol group) with hemoglobin ≤9.0 g/dL and mean corpuscular volume <80 fL in a 13-month period, except if the massive transfusion protocol was activated, and results were compared with an equivalent Pre-protocol historical cohort (n=226).

RESULTS

In comparison with the Pre-protocol series, the number of patients transfused did not change, but the appropriateness in terms of transfusion and red blood cell volume transfused improved sharply (87.0 vs 13.3%; p<0.001) with a significant increase in intravenous iron administration (50.2 vs 4.4% of cases; p<0.001). As a positive consequence, both the time spent in the ED by patients who were then directly discharged and costs per subject treated dropped by 37.9% and 59.0%, respectively. Treatment with infusion only in comparison with transfusion only led to a statistically significant Relative Risk reduction in transfusion on the ward and post-discharge transfusion of 55.6% and 44.4%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The implementation of Patient Blood Management principles and early intravenous iron therapy in the Emergency Department have proved to be effective tools to optimise resources both in terms of units transfused and costs.

Clinical decision support and improved blood use in patient blood management

Despite many years of published medical society guidelines for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion therapy, along with clinical trials that provide Level 1 evidence that restrictive transfusion practices can be used safely and are equivalent to transfusions given more liberally, annualized blood transfusion activity did not begin to decline in the United States until 2010. Adoption of electronic medical records has subsequently allowed implementation of clinical decision support (CDS): best practice alerts that can be initiated to improve the use of blood components. We describe our own institutional experience using a targeted CDS to promote restrictive blood transfusion practice and to improve RBC use. A 42% reduction in RBC transfusions was demonstrated at our institution from a baseline in 2008 through 2015, and the rate remained stable through 2018. Although the data cannot be used to infer causality, this decreased RBC use was accompanied by improved clinical outcomes.

A Restrictive Hemoglobin Transfusion Threshold of Less Than 7 g/dL Decreases Blood Utilization Without Compromising Outcomes in Patients With Hip Fractures

INTRODUCTION

In patients with hip fracture, a transfusion threshold of hemoglobin (Hb) <8 g/dL is associated with similar or better outcomes than more liberal thresholds. Whether a more restrictive threshold of <7 g/dL Hb produces equivalent outcomes in such patients is unknown. The aim of the study was to examine whether a restrictive threshold of <7 g/dL Hb is safe in this population.

METHODS

In January 2015, a blood management program was implemented that uses a restrictive transfusion threshold of <7 g/dL Hb in hemodynamically stable patients and <8 g/dL in patients with symptomatic anemia or a history of coronary artery disease. We identified 498 patients treated for hip fractures from January 2013 through May 2017. We compared perioperative outcomes of 207 patients treated before with those of 291 patients treated after restrictive threshold implementation.

RESULTS

After restrictive threshold implementation, the proportion of patients receiving packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions decreased from 51% to 33% (P < 0.001); the mean number of PRBC units transfused per patient decreased by 40% (from 1.1 to 0.7; P < 0.001); inpatient cardiac morbidity decreased from 22.2% to 12.4% (P = 0.004); 30-day readmissions decreased from 14% to 8.6% (P = 0.04); and length of stay was unchanged (P = 0.06). Compared with the prerestrictive threshold cohort, the postrestrictive threshold group had lower odds of transfusion (odds ratio [OR] = 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29 to 0.62); transfusion of >1 unit of PRBCs (OR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.52); and inpatient cardiac morbidity (OR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.75). No significant differences were observed in inpatient morbidity, mortality, 30-day readmission, or 90-day survival.

DISCUSSION

A restrictive threshold of <7 g/dL Hb in hemodynamically stable patients with hip fractures is associated with noninferior perioperative outcomes and less blood utilization compared with a threshold of <8 g/dL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Patient Blood Management Program Improves Blood Use and Clinical Outcomes in Orthopedic Surgery

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC

WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Although randomized trials show that patients do well when given less blood, there remains a persistent impression that orthopedic surgery patients require a higher hemoglobin transfusion threshold than other patient populations (8 g/dl vs. 7 g/dl). The authors tested the hypothesis in orthopedic patients that implementation of a patient blood management program encouraging a hemoglobin threshold less than 7 g/dl results in decreased blood use with no change in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

After launching a multifaceted patient blood management program, the authors retrospectively evaluated all adult orthopedic patients, comparing transfusion practices and clinical outcomes in the pre- and post-blood management cohorts. Risk adjustment accounted for age, sex, surgical procedure, and case mix index.

RESULTS

After patient blood management implementation, the mean hemoglobin threshold decreased from 7.8 ± 1.0 g/dl to 6.8 ± 1.0 g/dl (P < 0.0001). Erythrocyte use decreased by 32.5% (from 338 to 228 erythrocyte units per 1,000 patients; P = 0.0007). Clinical outcomes improved, with decreased morbidity (from 1.3% to 0.54%; P = 0.01), composite morbidity or mortality (from 1.5% to 0.75%; P = 0.035), and 30-day readmissions (from 9.0% to 5.8%; P = 0.0002). Improved outcomes were primarily recognized in patients 65 yr of age and older. After risk adjustment, patient blood management was independently associated with decreased composite morbidity or mortality (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.86; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

In a retrospective study, patient blood management was associated with reduced blood use with similar or improved clinical outcomes in orthopedic surgery. A hemoglobin threshold of 7 g/dl appears to be safe for many orthopedic patients.

Improvements in red blood cell transfusion utilization following implementation of a single-unit default for electronic ordering

BACKGROUND

The prevention of excessive allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is an important component of patient blood management initiatives. In this investigation, changes in transfusion behaviors following modification of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) procedures for RBC transfusions to a single-unit default quantity were assessed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This is an observational cohort study of adults for whom nonemergency allogeneic RBC transfusions were ordered in the 2 years before and 2 years after the date of modification of the CPOE system to a single-unit default (June 18, 2015). Changes in the frequency of single- versus multiunit RBC transfusion orders and other transfusion metrics were compared between preintervention and postintervention cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 52,773 unique transfusion orders for 61,989 RBC units were included, of which 60,045 (96.9%) were transfused. Single-unit orders increased annually, from 10,404 (74.1%) in the first year to 11,645 (88.6%) in the last year, while multiunit orders decreased by more than half (p < 0.0001). The number of RBC units transfused decreased by 13.9% from 32,528 in the preintervention cohort to 27,497 in the post intervention cohort (p < 0.0001) with an estimated reduction in transfusion-related expenditures of nearly $4 million. The percentage of transfusions associated with a posttransfusion hemoglobin of10 g/dL or greater decreased by 34.5% (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Modification of the CPOE process such that nonemergency RBC transfusion orders were defaulted to a single unit was associated with decreased rates of multiunit RBC transfusion orders, lower transfusion volumes, and substantial cost savings.

Reducing two-unit red cell transfusions on the oncology ward: a choosing wisely initiative

Background/context

Despite Choosing Wisely recommendations for single unit red blood cell transfusion orders, ~50% of orders on the oncology ward at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) were for two units. The oncology ward at LHSC is a 60 bed tertiary care unit. In mid 2016, LHSC was 18 months into its implementation of computerised provider order entry (CPOE).

Aim/objectives

By December 2017, increase the proportion of one-unit red cell transfusion orders on the oncology ward from 50% to 80%

Measures

Outcome: % one-unit red cell transfusion orders (aggregated monthly).

Improvement/innovation/change ideas

Our initial theory was that unawareness of the guidelines (established in 2014) and subscription to the obsolete doctrine of two-unit transfusions were the primary behavioural drivers. Initial change ideas included an educational/awareness blitz including rounds presentations, memos and posters. Failure led us to revisit our hypothesis and carry out a real-time audit, where our team was notified on each two-unit transfusion. This revealed the true root cause: the overwhelming majority of two-unit transfusions could be traced back to standing orders that were entered on an admission order set. After provider engagement, we proceeded to remove all admission order sets containing two-unit transfusions.

Impact/lessons learned/results

After order set removal, our one-unit transfusion rate rose to 86% and was sustained for 17 months. We learnt two primary lessons. First that CPOE and poor order set design combined to perpetuate poor ordering practices. Second that revisiting our hypothesis and engaging in thoughtful root cause analysis that included direct observation ultimately led to an effective, sustainable solution.

Discussion/spread

Our study underscores the importance of executing root cause analysis on a microsystem level. We would expect the factors driving poor performance to be completely different on a service such as general internal medicine. Our study also highlights the potential pitfalls of CPOE and the importance of regular order set review to ensure adherence to current evidence.

Single versus double-unit transfusion: Safety and efficacy for patients with hematologic malignancies

OBJECTIVES

Although hemoglobin thresholds for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion have decreased, double-unit RBC transfusion practices persist. We studied the effects switching from predominantly double-unit to single-unit RBC transfusions had on utilization and clinical outcomes for malignant hematology patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review compared malignant hematology patients before and after implementing single-unit RBC transfusion policy. Hemoglobin threshold was 8.0 g/dL for both groups. RBC utilization metrics included number of RBC units transfused, RBC units transfused per admission, and number of transfusion episodes. Clinical outcomes included length of stay, 30-day mortality, and outpatient RBC transfusion 30-days post-discharge.

RESULTS

Baseline hemoglobin was similar in both groups. The single-unit group was transfused with fewer RBC units per admission (5.1 vs 4.5, P = 0.01) than the double-unit group, but had more transfusion episodes per admission (4.1 vs 2.7, P < 0.001). After implementing single-unit policy, a 29% reduction in RBC utilization was observed. Mean hemoglobin at discharge was lower in the single-unit group (8.9 vs 9.5 g/dL, P = 0.005). No significant differences in length of stay or 30-day mortality were observed.

CONCLUSION

Transfusing malignant hematology patients with single RBC units is safe and efficacious. Electronic provider order systems facilitating RBC transfusion requests provide excellent adherence to transfusion policy.

Choosing Wisely, another way to spread blood transfusion's good practices

Medical practice should be as much as possible ruled by evidence-based medicine. A lot of experts contribute to that, in heavy structured procedures where they write detailed and precise clinical practice recommendations. Such documents are essential but they are often far from everyday questions patients and their general practitioners are asking. There is room for a more concise and practical approach and that is "Choosing Wisely". This approach asks every medical society to identify "things physicians and patients should question" and provide clear and proven replies. In doing so, it is expected a reduction of overused exams, treatments, or procedures which are not helpful for patients. "Better treated with less" is the global idea. A lot of countries are now going down that road, including France who plans to develop it. Several of them have blood transfusion societies which have already published their recommendations, and also first studies on their impact on the ground. Comparison of these works shows clearly that priorities are nearly the same everywhere.

Impact of a patient blood management program within an Orthogeriatric care service

BACKGROUND

Patient blood management (PBM) performs multidisciplinary strategies to optimize red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Orthogeriatric share care models (surgeon and geriatrician manage the patient together from admission) have the goal of improving outcomes in hip fracture patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted. Patients aged ≥70 years undergoing hip fracture (HF) surgery were consecutively included. When admitted on the orthogeriatric service a PBM protocol was applied based on: perioperative antithrombotic management, intravenous iron sucrose administration and restrictive transfusion criteria. Risk factors, clinical and functional effects of transfusion and its requirements were assessed to audit our model.

RESULTS

A total of 383 patients participated (women, 78.8%; median age, 86 (82-90) years). 210 patients (54.8%) were transfused. Age (OR = 1.055, 95% CI 1.017-1.094; p = 0.004) and Hemoglobin (Hb) level on admission (OR = 0.497, 95% CI 0.413-0.597; p < 0.001) were found to be significant risk factors for transfusion. Transfusion increased length of stay (b = 1.37, 95% CI 0.543-2.196; p = 0.001) but did not have an effect on other variables.

DISCUSSION

The PBM program established within an orthogeriatric service showed positive outcomes in terms of clinical complications, mortality, delirium or functional recovery in transfused patients, whereas it did not impact on shorter length of stay. The risk of transfusion on admission was predicted with the lower Hb levels on admission, along with the age of the patients. New measurements as homogenous restrictive transfusion criteria, a single-unit RBC transfusion and the assessment of the intravenous iron efficacy are need to be applied as a result of the high transfusion requirements.

The blood utilization calculator, a target-based electronic decision support algorithm, increases the use of single-unit transfusions in a large academic medical center

BACKGROUND

Electronic decision support has been used to reduce use of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. With the goal of reducing transfusions, we modified our RBC orders to default to 1 unit. Next, we created a target-based algorithm, the blood utilization calculator or BUC, to calculate a dose in units, based on initial hemoglobin or hematocrit and weight.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

RBC orders defaulted to 1 unit in March 2016 and the BUC was implemented in July 2016. This gave three periods to compare old orders (before intervention), new orders (1-unit default), and the BUC period. A hospital dashboard that tracks blood product orders was queried to determine changes in single-unit transfusions between periods. Changes in transfusions were compared by analysis of variance. Acceptance of the BUC dosage recommendation was studied in both medical-based and surgical-based specialties.

RESULTS

The number of single-unit transfusions showed significant increases after each of the two interventions studied from 247 ± 19 before interventions to 358 ± 19 and then to 445 ± 141-unit transfusions/month (p < 0.0001). The ratio of 1-unit to 2-unit transfusions increased from 0.72 to 1.67 (p < 0.0001) and we observed a 19% overall reduction in units transfused. The BUC recommendation was accepted in 49% of orders.

CONCLUSIONS

One-unit default orders and implementation of the BUC resulted in a significant increase in the use of single-unit transfusions. Improvement in the rate of acceptance of the BUC recommendation should further increase the use of single-unit transfusions.

Addressing gaps in international blood availability and transfusion safety in low- and middle-income countries: a NHLBI workshop

In April 2017, a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, and the Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science was held to discuss blood availability and transfusion safety in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The purpose of the workshop was to identify research opportunities for implementation science (IS) to improve the availability of safe blood and blood components and transfusion practices in LMICs. IS describes the late stages of the translational research spectrum and studies optimal and sustainable strategies to deliver proven-effective interventions. Regional working groups were formed to focus on opportunities and challenges in East Africa, Central/West Africa, Middle East and North Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, Southeast Asia, Western Pacific Asia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. The need for an "adequate supply of safe blood" emerged as the major overriding theme. Among the regional working groups, common cross-cutting themes were evident. The majority of research questions, priorities, and strategies fell into the categories of blood availability, blood transfusion safety, appropriate use of blood, quality systems, health economics and budgeting, and training and education in IS. The workshop also brought into focus inadequate country-level data that can be used as the basis for IS initiatives. A mixed approach of needs assessment and targeted interventions with sufficient evidence base to move toward sustainment is an appropriate next step for blood availability and transfusion safety research in LMICs.