1
|
Clark EC, Neumann S, Hopkins S, Kostopoulos A, Hagerman L, Dobbins M. Changes to Public Health Surveillance Methods Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024; 10:e49185. [PMID: 38241067 PMCID: PMC10837764 DOI: 10.2196/49185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public health surveillance plays a vital role in informing public health decision-making. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 caused a widespread shift in public health priorities. Global efforts focused on COVID-19 monitoring and contact tracing. Existing public health programs were interrupted due to physical distancing measures and reallocation of resources. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic intersected with advancements in technologies that have the potential to support public health surveillance efforts. OBJECTIVE This scoping review aims to explore emergent public health surveillance methods during the early COVID-19 pandemic to characterize the impact of the pandemic on surveillance methods. METHODS A scoping search was conducted in multiple databases and by scanning key government and public health organization websites from March 2020 to January 2022. Published papers and gray literature that described the application of new or revised approaches to public health surveillance were included. Papers that discussed the implications of novel public health surveillance approaches from ethical, legal, security, and equity perspectives were also included. The surveillance subject, method, location, and setting were extracted from each paper to identify trends in surveillance practices. Two public health epidemiologists were invited to provide their perspectives as peer reviewers. RESULTS Of the 14,238 unique papers, a total of 241 papers describing novel surveillance methods and changes to surveillance methods are included. Eighty papers were review papers and 161 were single studies. Overall, the literature heavily featured papers detailing surveillance of COVID-19 transmission (n=187). Surveillance of other infectious diseases was also described, including other pathogens (n=12). Other public health topics included vaccines (n=9), mental health (n=11), substance use (n=4), healthy nutrition (n=1), maternal and child health (n=3), antimicrobial resistance (n=2), and misinformation (n=6). The literature was dominated by applications of digital surveillance, for example, by using big data through mobility tracking and infodemiology (n=163). Wastewater surveillance was also heavily represented (n=48). Other papers described adaptations to programs or methods that existed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (n=9). The scoping search also found 109 papers that discuss the ethical, legal, security, and equity implications of emerging surveillance methods. The peer reviewer public health epidemiologists noted that additional changes likely exist, beyond what has been reported and available for evidence syntheses. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated advancements in surveillance and the adoption of new technologies, especially for digital and wastewater surveillance methods. Given the investments in these systems, further applications for public health surveillance are likely. The literature for surveillance methods was dominated by surveillance of infectious diseases, particularly COVID-19. A substantial amount of literature on the ethical, legal, security, and equity implications of these emerging surveillance methods also points to a need for cautious consideration of potential harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Clark
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sophie Neumann
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Hopkins
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alyssa Kostopoulos
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Leah Hagerman
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen Dobbins
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pohl R, Stallmann C, Marquardt P, Kaasch AJ, Heuft HG, Apfelbacher C. Cohort profile: a longitudinal regional cohort study to assess COVID-19 seroprevalence in blood donors - baseline characteristics of the SeMaCo study participants. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068472. [PMID: 37072368 PMCID: PMC10124278 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The SeMaCo study (Serologische Untersuchungen bei Blutspendern des Großraums Magdeburg auf Antikörper gegen SARS-CoV-2), a prospective, longitudinal cohort study with four survey phases spanning 3-5 months each over a period of 22 months, extends the spectrum of seroepidemiological studies in Germany. We present here a careful characterisation of the initial survey phase of the cohort to provide baseline data on infection incidence and obtained from questionnaires, focussing in particular on the attitude towards COVID-19 vaccinations, the vaccination success and the vaccination acceptance. PARTICIPANTS A total of 2195 individual blood donors from the donor pool of the blood donation service of the University Hospital Magdeburg were enrolled in the initial survey phase from 20 January 2021 to 30 April 2021. 2138 participants gave sociodemographic/contact data (51.7% male, mean age 44 years) and 2082 participants answered the vaccination questionnaire. FINDINGS TO DATE Out of 2195 participants with antibody results, 1909 (87.0%) were antibody negative. The remaining 286 subjects (13.0%) were either antibody-positive and vaccinated (160/286; 55.9%) or antibody-positive without vaccination information (17/286; 5.9%) or antibody-positive and unvaccinated (109/286; 38.1%). The latter result reflects the rate of true or highly probable SARS-CoV-2 infections in our initial study cohort. FUTURE PLANS The study primarily aims to measure the prevalence and long-term kinetics of IgG-antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Including the baseline, the study foresees four survey periods of 3-4 months each. At each visit, we will assess the blood donors' attitude towards vaccination, the antibody response following vaccination and/or infection, as well as undesired vaccination effects. We aim to test the same participants during the survey periods by repeated invitations for blood donation to ensure a long-term (follow-up) in as many study participants as possible. After the four survey phases, a longitudinal data set will be created that reflects the course of the antibody levels/frequencies as well as the infection and vaccination incidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00023263.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Pohl
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Stallmann
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Pauline Marquardt
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Achim J Kaasch
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Gert Heuft
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O’Brien SF, Caffrey N, Yi QL, Bolotin S, Janjua NZ, Binka M, Thanh CQ, Stein DR, Lang A, Colquhoun A, Pambrun C, Reedman CN, Drews SJ. Cross-Canada Variability in Blood Donor SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence by Social Determinants of Health. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0335622. [PMID: 36625634 PMCID: PMC9927354 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.03356-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
We compared the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies in blood donors across Canadian regions in 2021. The seroprevalence was the highest in Alberta and the Prairies, and it was so low in Atlantic Canada that few correlates were observed. Being male and of young age were predictive of seropositivity. Racialization was associated with higher seroprevalence in British Columbia and Ontario but not in Alberta and the Prairies. Living in a materially deprived neighborhood predicted higher seroprevalence, but it was more linear across quintiles in Alberta and the Prairies, whereas in British Columbia and Ontario, the most affluent 60% were similarly low and the most deprived 40% similarly elevated. Living in a more socially deprived neighborhood (more single individuals and one parent families) was associated with lower seroprevalence in British Columbia and Ontario but not in Alberta and the Prairies. These data show striking variability in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence across regions by social determinants of health. IMPORTANCE Canadian blood donors are a healthy adult population that shows clear disparities associated with racialization and material deprivation. This underscores the pervasiveness of the socioeconomic gradient on SARS-CoV-2 infections in Canada. We identify regional differences in the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and social determinants of health. Cross-Canada studies, such as ours, are rare because health information is under provincial jurisdiction and is not available in sufficient detail in national data sets, whereas other national seroprevalence studies have insufficient sample sizes for regional comparisons. Ours is the largest seroprevalence study in Canada. An important strength of our study is the interpretation input from a public health team that represented multiple Canadian provinces. Our blood donor seroprevalence study has informed Canadian public health policy at national and provincial levels since the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila F. O’Brien
- Epidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Niamh Caffrey
- Epidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qi-Long Yi
- Epidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelly Bolotin
- Center for Vaccine Preventable Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Naveed Z. Janjua
- BC Centre for Disease Control, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mawuena Binka
- BC Centre for Disease Control, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Caroline Quach Thanh
- Department of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Infection Prevention & Control, Clinical Department of Laboratory Medicine, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Derek R. Stein
- Cadham Provincial Laboratory, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Amanda Lang
- Roy Romanow Provincial laboratory, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Amy Colquhoun
- Population Health Assessment, Alberta Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Chantale Pambrun
- Medical Affairs & Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cassandra N. Reedman
- Epidemiology and Surveillance, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven J. Drews
- Medical Microbiology Department, Canadian Blood Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Division of Diagnostic and Applied Microbiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Erikstrup C, Laksafoss AD, Gladov J, Kaspersen KA, Mikkelsen S, Hindhede L, Boldsen JK, Jørgensen SW, Ethelberg S, Holm DK, Bruun MT, Nissen J, Schwinn M, Brodersen T, Mikkelsen C, Sækmose SG, Sørensen E, Harritshøj LH, Aagaard B, Dinh KM, Busch MP, Jørgensen CS, Krause TG, Ullum H, Ostrowski SR, Espenhain L, Pedersen OBV. Seroprevalence and infection fatality rate of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Denmark: A nationwide serosurveillance study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2022; 21:100479. [PMID: 35959415 PMCID: PMC9355516 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Introduction of the Omicron variant caused a steep rise in SARS-CoV-2 infections despite high vaccination coverage in the Danish population. We used blood donor serosurveillance to estimate the percentage of recently infected residents in the similarly aged background population with no known comorbidity. Methods To detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies induced due to recent infection, and not vaccination, we assessed anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) immunoglobulin G (IgG) in blood donor samples. Individual level data on SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR results and vaccination status were available. Anti-N IgG was measured fortnightly from January 18 to April 3, 2022. Samples from November 2021 were analysed to assess seroprevalence before introduction of the Omicron variant in Denmark. Findings A total of 43 088 donations from 35 309 Danish blood donors aged 17–72 years were screened. In November 2021, 1·2% (103/8 701) of donors had detectable anti-N IgG antibodies. Adjusting for test sensitivity (estimates ranging from 74%–81%) and November seroprevalence, we estimate that 66% (95% confidence intervals (CI): 63%–70%) of the healthy, similarly aged Danish population had been infected between November 1, 2021, and March 15, 2022. One third of infections were not captured by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. The infection fatality rate (IFR) was 6·2 (CI: 5·1–7·5) per 100 000 infections. Interpretation Screening for anti-N IgG and linkage to national registers allowed us to detect recent infections and accurately assess assay sensitivity in vaccinated or previously infected individuals during the Omicron outbreak. The IFR was lower than during previous waves. Funding The Danish Ministry of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Erikstrup
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Danish Big Data Centre for Environment and Health (BERTHA), Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
- Corresponding author at: Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
| | - Anna Damkjær Laksafoss
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Josephine Gladov
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Kathrine Agergård Kaspersen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Danish Big Data Centre for Environment and Health (BERTHA), Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Susan Mikkelsen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Lotte Hindhede
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Jens Kjærgaard Boldsen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
- Danish Big Data Centre for Environment and Health (BERTHA), Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | | | - Steen Ethelberg
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Dorte Kinggaard Holm
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Mie Topholm Bruun
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Janna Nissen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Michael Schwinn
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Thorsten Brodersen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Zealand University Hospital, DK-4700 Naestved, Denmark
| | - Christina Mikkelsen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health, Copenhagen University, DK-2200 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Susanne Gjørup Sækmose
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Zealand University Hospital, DK-4700 Naestved, Denmark
| | - Erik Sørensen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Lene Holm Harritshøj
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Bitten Aagaard
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Khoa Manh Dinh
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Michael P. Busch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Charlotte Sværke Jørgensen
- Department of Virus and Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Tyra Grove Krause
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Henrik Ullum
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Sisse Rye Ostrowski
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Laura Espenhain
- Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
| | - Ole Birger Vesterager Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Zealand University Hospital, DK-4700 Naestved, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miller MJ, Himschoot A, Fitch N, Jawalkar S, Freeman D, Hilton C, Berney K, Guy GP, Benoit TJ, Clarke KE, Busch MP, Opsomer JD, Stramer SL, Hall AJ, Gundlapalli AV, MacNeil A, McCord R, Sunshine G, Howard-Williams M, Dunphy C, Jones JM. Association of Trends in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Seroprevalence and State-Issued Nonpharmaceutical Interventions: United States, 1 August 2020 to 30 March 2021. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75:S264-S270. [PMID: 35684974 PMCID: PMC9214164 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assess if state-issued nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are associated with reduced rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection as measured through anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) seroprevalence, a proxy for cumulative prior infection that distinguishes seropositivity from vaccination. METHODS Monthly anti-N seroprevalence during 1 August 2020 to 30 March 2021 was estimated using a nationwide blood donor serosurvey. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we measured the association of seropositivity and state-issued, county-specific NPIs for mask mandates, gathering bans, and bar closures. RESULTS Compared with individuals living in a county with all three NPIs in place, the odds of having anti-N antibodies were 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-2.3) times higher for people living in a county that did not have any of the 3 NPIs, 1.6 (95% CI: 1.5-1.7) times higher for people living in a county that only had a mask mandate and gathering ban policy, and 1.4 (95% CI: 1.3-1.5) times higher for people living in a county that had only a mask mandate. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with studies assessing NPIs relative to COVID-19 incidence and mortality, the presence of NPIs were associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence indicating lower rates of cumulative infections. Multiple NPIs are likely more effective than single NPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen J. Miller
- Corresponding author: Maureen J. Miller, MD MPH, CDC COVID-19 Response, 1600 Clifton Rd. NE, MS 10-1, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027 ()
| | | | - Natalie Fitch
- Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Dane Freeman
- Georgia Tech Research Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Kevin Berney
- Geospatial Research, Analysis, and Services Program (GRASP), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gery P. Guy
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tina J. Benoit
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kristie E.N. Clarke
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Susan L. Stramer
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Aron J. Hall
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Adi V. Gundlapalli
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Adam MacNeil
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Russell McCord
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Gregory Sunshine
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mara Howard-Williams
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Christopher Dunphy
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jefferson M. Jones
- CDC COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fink RV, Fisher L, Sulaeman H, Dave H, Levy ME, McCann L, Di Germanio C, Notari EP, Green V, Cyrus S, Williamson P, Saa P, Haynes JM, Groves J, Mathew S, Kaidarova Z, Bruhn R, Grebe E, Opsomer J, Jones JM, Miller MJ, Busch MP, Stone M. How do we…form and coordinate a national serosurvey of SARS-CoV-2 within the blood collection industry? Transfusion 2022; 62:1321-1333. [PMID: 35607854 PMCID: PMC9348230 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background A national serosurvey of U.S. blood donors conducted in partnership with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was initiated to estimate the prevalence of SARS‐CoV‐2 infections and vaccinations. Methods Beginning in July 2020, the Nationwide Blood Donor Seroprevalence Study collaborated with multiple blood collection organizations, testing labs, and leadership from government partners to capture, test, and analyze approximately 150,000 blood donation specimens per month in a repeated, cross‐sectional seroprevalence survey. Results A CDC website (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#nationwide-blood-donor-seroprevalence) provided stratified, population‐level results to public health professionals and the general public. Discussion The study adapted operations as the pandemic evolved, changing specimen flow and testing algorithms, and collecting additional data elements in response to changing policies on universal blood donation screening and administration of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike‐based vaccines. The national serosurvey demonstrated the utility of serosurveillance testing of residual blood donations and highlighted the role of the blood collection industry in public–private partnerships during a public health emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lois Fisher
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Honey Dave
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Lily McCann
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Paula Saa
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - James M Haynes
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Jamel Groves
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | | | | | - Roberta Bruhn
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eduard Grebe
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.,DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | | | - Jefferson M Jones
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maureen J Miller
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael P Busch
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mars Stone
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|