1
|
Rodger D, Smith JA. Exploring attitudes toward xenotransplantation: A scoping review of healthcare workers, healthcare students, and kidney patients. Xenotransplantation 2024; 31:e12860. [PMID: 38716636 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent advances mean that formal clinical trials of solid organ xenotransplantation are increasingly likely to begin and patients requiring a kidney transplant could be the first participants. Healthcare workers and healthcare students constitute the current and future workforce that will influence public opinion of xenotransplantation. The attitudes of these populations are important to consider before recruitment for formal clinical trials begins. METHODS This scoping review was reported according to the PRISMA extensions for scoping reviews checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases were searched to identify articles that studied the attitudes of healthcare workers, healthcare students, or kidney patients toward xenotransplantation. RESULTS The search generated 816 articles, of which 27 met the eligibility criteria. The studies were conducted in 14 different countries on five different continents. Participants from the 27 studies totaled 29,836-this was constituted of 6,223 (21%) healthcare workers, 21,067 (71%) healthcare students, and 2,546 (8%) kidney patients. All three groups had an overall positive attitude toward xenotransplantation. However, in studies where participants were asked to consider xenotransplantation when the risks and results were not equal to allotransplantation-the overall attitude switched from positive to negative. The results also found that Spanish-speaking populations expressed more favorable views toward xenotransplantation compared to English-speaking populations. CONCLUSION The results of this review suggest that while attitudes of the three groups toward xenotransplantation are-on the face of it-positive, this positivity deteriorates when the risks and outcomes are framed in more clinically realistic terms. Only formal clinical trials can determine how the risks and outcomes of xenotransplantation compare to allotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Rodger
- Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University and Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan A Smith
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of London, Birkbeck, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Flores-Medina J, Ramis G, Gómez-Laguna J, Moll X, Falceto V, San Román-Ascaso F, San Román-Llorens F, Quereda JJ, Herrero JM, Mendonça L, Martin-Barrasa JL, Fernández OM, Muñoz A, Ramírez P, Gutiérrez P, López-Chicheri I, López-Navas A, Ríos A. Organ xenotransplantation acceptance in veterinary students: A multicentric opinion study in Spain. Xenotransplantation 2023; 30:e12823. [PMID: 37695105 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The shortage of available transplant organs has made it necessary to search for alternatives, one of which is xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs could face rejection from society and the personnel involved in its implementation. OBJECTIVES (a) to analyze the attitudes of Veterinary Degree students in six Spanish Universities towards xenotransplantation; and (b) to determine the factors that affect its acceptance. METHODS Of the 2815 students surveyed in the degree program, 2683 valid surveys were obtained. Attitudes towards organ xenotransplantation were evaluated using a validated questionnaire of organ donation. RESULTS If xenotransplantation was confirmed as a clinical reality, 93% (n = 2493) of those surveyed would accept a xenotransplanted organ, whilst 7% would not. If the results of xenotransplantation were worse than those obtained with human donors and it entailed more risk, 12% (n = 318) would be in favor. 56% (n = 1497) of the students would accept a xenotransplantation provisionally pending the arrival of a human organ. Attitudes towards xenotransplantation were affected by the academic year in which a student was studying, with more favorable attitudes among students in the last year (88% in first year vs. 95% in fifth year; p < .001). More favorable attitudes are also observed depending on the attitude they have towards organ transplantation, with those students being more in favor of donating their organs when they die (94% vs. 88%; p < .001). CONCLUSION Veterinary students would have a very favorable attitude toward xenotransplantation if these animal organs functioned as well as human organs. Therefore, these students could play an important role in the future promotion of this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Martínez-Alarcón
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Juan Flores-Medina
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Guillermo Ramis
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jaime Gómez-Laguna
- Department of Anatomy and Comparative Pathology and Toxicology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Xavier Moll
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victoria Falceto
- Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Fidel San Román-Ascaso
- Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fidel San Román-Llorens
- Department of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Juan José Quereda
- Department of Animal Production and Health, Veterinary Public Health and Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, University Cardenal Herrera-CEU, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Herrero
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Livia Mendonça
- Faculty of Veterinary, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil
| | - José Luis Martin-Barrasa
- Experimental Animal Facility, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria, Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
- Animal Infectious Diseases and Ictiopatology, University Institute of Animal Health (IUSA), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Arucas, Spain
| | - Olga María Fernández
- Animalario libre de Patógenos Arrixaca-Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonio Muñoz
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pablo Ramírez
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pedro Gutiérrez
- Urology Service, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Departmen of Surgery, University of La Laguna, San Cristóbal de la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Isabel López-Chicheri
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Ana López-Navas
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonio Ríos
- International Collaborative Donor Project, Murcia, Spain
- Surgery Service, Transplant Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
- Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu C, Liu S. Knowledge of and attitude toward xenotransplantation among medical students in China: A cross-sectional study. Xenotransplantation 2020; 28:e12654. [PMID: 33051907 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are great challenges in the psychosocial aspects of xenotransplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge of and attitude toward xenotransplantation among medical students in China. METHODS A questionnaire consisting of 12 questions was distributed to 1000 first-to-fifth grade medical students, with 200 students in each grade. The questionnaire was self-administered and completed anonymously with no information beforehand. RESULTS The response rate of the questionnaire was 91.5%. Most students had a good knowledge about xenotransplantation. If the results of xenotransplantation were similar with human donation, the acceptance was 63.9% when both organs were available, 70.3% to shorten the waiting time, and 86.4% to save one's life. As for the risks of xenotransplantation, 46.2%, 46.1%, and 36.9% of the respondents were worried about the risk of disease transmission, immunosuppressants, and other unknown risks, respectively. With regard to the psychosocial impacts, 38.4%, 31.9%, and 52.3% were worried about changing one's nature as a human being, changing one's personality, and discrimination by others, respectively. CONCLUSION Most medical students in China had a favorable attitude toward xenotransplantation. Students in the clinical years had a better knowledge of and more favorable attitude toward xenotransplantation. Their concern about the risks of xenotransplantation resolved slightly with seniority, but their concern about psychosocial impacts did not resolve with seniority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Liu
- Department of Psychology, College of the Humanities and Social Sciences, China Medical University, Shengyang, China
| | - Shiqing Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shengyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fraux C, Muñoz Sastre MT, Kpanake L, Sorum PC, Mullet E. French People's Views Regarding Xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc 2020; 53:529-538. [PMID: 32988637 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND French laypeople's views on xenotransplantation were examined. METHODS A convenience sample of 224 adults (among them, 37 nurses) judged of the acceptability of xenotransplantation in 50 realistic scenarios composed of various combinations of 4 factors: 1. the type of graft (eg, pig cardiac valve), 2. the level of urgency (eg, critical condition with very high risk of death in the short term), 3. the patient's or the family's level of consent (eg, the members of the family are divided on the issue), and 4. whether the transplantation was temporary or definitive. The ratings were subjected to cluster analysis and analyses of variance. RESULTS Seven qualitatively different positions were found that were termed Never acceptable (12%), Urgency (4%), Family consent (33%), Religious concerns (15%), Family consent and urgency (10%), Depends on all circumstances (4%), and Always acceptable (11%). Vegans and vegetarians expressed the Never acceptable position more often than nonvegetarians. Health professionals expressed the Family consent position more often than the public. Regular church attendees expressed the Religious concerns position more often than atheists did. CONCLUSIONS Few participants, mostly vegetarians, were opposed to xenotransplantation on principle. About one-third expressed positive views regarding xenotransplantation, either irrespective of circumstances or at least in those cases in which the patient's death is imminent and the family is not opposed for religious reasons. About one-half expressed positive views but deferred to the wishes of the family. The type of xenograft proposed had practically no effect on participants' views.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Fraux
- Department of Psychology, Jean-Jaurès University, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Lonzozou Kpanake
- Department of Social Sciences, University of Québec-TELUQ, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Paul Clay Sorum
- Department of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York
| | - Etienne Mullet
- Department of Ethics and Work, Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ríos A. Commentary on the manuscript: "Meta-analysis of public perception towards xenotransplantation". Xenotransplantation 2020; 27:e12588. [PMID: 32170797 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Ríos
- Unidad de Trasplantes, Servicio de Cirugía, IMIB - Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.,Departamento de Cirugía, Pediatría, y Obstetricia y Ginecología, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.,Director del Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Puerto Rican Population Residing in Florida: Attitude Towards Organ Xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:455-458. [PMID: 32035677 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Puerto Ricans are one of the majority immigration groups in Florida. However, little is known about their attitudes toward xenotransplantation (XenoTx), a still experimental technique, which is making significant progress. OBJECTIVE To analyze the attitude toward XenoTx of organs among the population of Puerto Rican residents in Florida. METHODS Population under study. Sample taken from the International Collaborative Donor Project and formed by the population born in Puerto Rico and resident in Florida. INCLUSION CRITERIA Over 15 years stratified by age and sex. Instrument valuation. Validated questionnaire of attitude toward xenotransplantation "PCID-XenoTx-Ríos." Setting for the study. Random selection of people to survey based on stratification. Immigrant assistance associations in Florida were consulted to locate potential respondents. RESULTS Of the 259 respondents, 16% are in favor of XenoTx if the results are similar to those obtained with human organs, 74% are against, and 10% are doubtful. If the results are worse than with human organs, only 2% are in favor, 74% against, and 24% undecided. The variables that are associated with this attitude are the following: sex (P = .001); marital status (P < .001); have offspring (P = .004); level of education (P < .001), opinion of a partner toward donation (P = .008), religious beliefs (P < .001), knowing the opinion toward donation of religion (P < .001), prosocial activity (P < .001), attitude toward donation (P ≤ .001), previous relationship with donation (P < .001), possibility of receiving a transplant in the future (P = .001), and attitude toward donation to a relative (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The Puerto Rican population residing in Florida does not hold a favorable attitude toward xenotransplantation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Santainés-Borredá E, Agras-Suarez MC, Cañadas-De la Fuente GA, Hurtado-Pardos B, Bárcena-Calvo C, Alorda-Terrasa C, Morillo-Velázquez JM, Martí-García C, Redin-Areta MD, Alconero-Camarero AR, Jiménez-Navascues ML, Gutierrez-Izquierdo MI, Chamorro-Rebollo E, de Las Nieves Merchán-Felipe M, Barandiaran-Lasa M, Martín-Espinosa N, Gala-León FJ, Oter-Quintana C, Benbunan-Bentata B, Tirado-Altamirano F, Fernández-Vallhonrat MB, Ramírez-Rodrigo J, Maciá-Soler L, Saez A, Sánchez Á, López-Navas A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Student nurses at Spanish universities and their attitude toward xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2019; 26:e12507. [PMID: 30963648 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent immunological and transgenic advances are a promising alternative using limited materials of human origin for transplantation. However, it is essential to achieve social acceptance of this therapy. OBJECTIVE To analyze the attitude of nursing students from Spanish universities toward organ xenotransplantation (XTx) and to determine the factors affecting their attitude. MATERIALS AND METHODS Type of study: A sociological, multicentre, and observational study. STUDY POPULATION Nursing students enrolled in Spain (n = 28,000). SAMPLE SIZE A sample of 10 566 students estimating a proportion of 76% (99% confidence and precision of ±1%), stratified by geographical area and year of study. Instrument of measurement: A validated questionnaire (PCID-XenoTx-RIOS) was handed out to every student in a compulsory session. This survey was self-administered and self-completed voluntarily and anonymously by each student in a period of 5-10 min. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS descriptive analysis, Student's t test, the chi-square test, and a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A completion rate: 84% (n = 8913) was obtained. If the results of XTx were as good as in human donation, 74% (n = 6564) would be in favor and 22% (n = 1946) would have doubts. The following variables affected this attitude: age (P < 0.001); sex (P < 0.001); geographical location (P < 0.001); academic year of study (P < 0.001); attitude toward organ donation (P < 0.001); belief in the possibility of needing a transplant (P < 0.001); discussion of transplantation with one's family (P < 0.001) and friends (P < 0.001); and the opinion of one's partner (P < 0.001). The following variables persisted in the multivariate analysis: being a male (OR = 1.436; P < 0.001); geographical location (OR = 1.937; P < 0.001); an attitude in favor of donation (OR = 1.519; P < 0.001); belief in the possibility of needing a transplant (OR = 1.497; P = 0.036); and having spoken about the issue with family (OR = 1.351; P < 0.001) or friends (OR = 1.240; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The attitude of nursing students toward organ XTx is favorable and is associated with factors of general knowledge about organ donation and transplantation and social interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Martínez-Alarcón
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca Univeristy Hospital, El Palmar, Spain.,Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, Spain.,"International Collaborative Donor Project", El Palmar, Spain
| | - Antonio Ríos
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca Univeristy Hospital, El Palmar, Spain.,Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, Spain.,"International Collaborative Donor Project", El Palmar, Spain
| | - Elena Santainés-Borredá
- Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Enfermeria, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Carmen Bárcena-Calvo
- Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia-Área de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de León, León, Spain
| | - Carme Alorda-Terrasa
- Departamento de Enfermeria y Fisioterapia, Universidad de las Islas Baleares, Baleares, Spain
| | - Juan Manuel Morillo-Velázquez
- Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Escuela Universitaria de Enfermería y Fisioterapia "San Juan de Dios", Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain
| | - Celia Martí-García
- Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Elena Chamorro-Rebollo
- Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia Salus Infirmorum, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Maite Barandiaran-Lasa
- Facultad de Medicina y Enfermería, Departamento de Enfermería II Donostia, Sección Donostia UPV/EHU, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Noelia Martín-Espinosa
- Escuela Universitaria de Enfermería y Fisioterapia de Toledo, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, Toledo, Spain
| | | | | | - Bibinha Benbunan-Bentata
- Departamento de Personalidad, evaluación y tratamiento psicológico, Universalidad de Granada, Melilla, Spain
| | | | | | - Jesús Ramírez-Rodrigo
- Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud de Ceuta, Universidad de Granada, Ceuta, Spain
| | - Loreto Maciá-Soler
- Departamento de Enfermería, Facultad de Ciencias de la salud, Universidad de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Aida Saez
- Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, Spain
| | - Álvaro Sánchez
- "International Collaborative Donor Project", El Palmar, Spain
| | - Ana López-Navas
- Departmento de Psicología, Universidad Católica San Antonio Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pablo Ramírez
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca Univeristy Hospital, El Palmar, Spain.,Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, Spain.,"International Collaborative Donor Project", El Palmar, Spain
| | - Pascual Parrilla
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Unit, Virgen de la Arrixaca Univeristy Hospital, El Palmar, Spain.,Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), El Palmar, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ríos A, López-Gómez S, Belmonte J, López-Navas A, Sánchez A, Carrillo J, Ruiz-Manzanera J, Hernández A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Acceptance of the Xenotransplantation of Organs Among the Population of the Spanish Gypsy Ethnic Group. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:293-295. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
9
|
Ríos A, López-Navas A, Gutiérrez P, Gómez F, Iriarte J, Herruzo R, Blanco G, Llorca F, Asunsolo A, Sánchez P, Fernández A, de Jesús M, Martínez Alarcón L, Lana A, Fuentes L, Hernández J, Virseda J, Yelamos J, Bondía J, Hernández A, Ayala M, Flores-Medina J, Carrillo J, Sánchez Á, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Do Religious Factors Influence the Attitude Toward Organ Donation Among Medical Students? A Spanish Multicenter Study. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:250-252. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
10
|
Are Dominicans in Favor of Xenotransplantation? A Study of the Attitude of Dominican Immigrants Residing in Spain and the United States. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2296-2299. [PMID: 30316345 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Xenotransplantation carries many social and cultural implications. The immigrant population in countries with xenotransplantation programs, such as Spain and the United States, will play an important role in accepting such therapy. The objective of the study is to analyze the attitude toward xenotransplantation among the Dominican population residing in the United States and Spain. METHODS The study population was born in the Dominican Republic and resides in the southeastern United States and Spain. A sample population older than 15 years was obtained randomly and stratified by age and sex. Attitude was assessed using a validated questionnaire on psychosocial aspects toward xenotransplantation (PCID-XENOTx-Ríos). A random selection of people to be surveyed was carried out. Assistance from immigration support associations was needed to advise on the location of potential respondents. RESULTS A total of 123 respondents were included in the study: A sample was taken of residents of the population from the Dominican Republic residing in Florida, United States (n = 66), and in Spain (n = 57). If it was assumed that xenotransplanted organs functioned as well as human ones, 30% would be in favor. If the results were worse, only 7% would be in favor. This favorable attitude was related to the following variables (P < .05): level of education, an attitude in favor of deceased and living organ donation, and having spoken about donation and transplantation within the family. CONCLUSIONS The attitude toward xenotransplantation among the population from the Dominican Republic who are residing in the southeastern United States and Spain is unfavorable.
Collapse
|
11
|
Martínez-Alarcón L, Ríos A, Ramis G, Quereda J, Herrero J, Mendonça L, Muñoz A, Hernández A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Impact of 2009 Pandemic H1N1 Influenza A Virus on Veterinary Students' Perception of Xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2291-2295. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
12
|
Ríos A, López-Navas A, Flores-Medina J, Ayala M, Garrido G, José Sebastián M, Sánchez Á, Martínez L, Ramis G, Hernández A, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Level of Acceptance of Solid Organ and Tissue Xenotransplantation Among the Bolivian Population Residing in Spain. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:2300-2302. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
13
|
Amin L, Hashim H, Mahadi Z, Che Ngah A, Ismail K. Determinants of stakeholders' attitudes to xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2018; 25:e12430. [PMID: 29932474 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in xenotransplantation have the potential to resolve the issue of organ shortages. Despite this, the procedure is expected to meet with a degree of resistance from the public. The purpose of this study was to identify the relevant factors influencing stakeholders' attitudes towards xenotransplantation. METHODS A multidimensional survey instrument measuring attitudes to xenotransplantation, including the factors that predict such attitudes, was developed based on earlier studies and validated. It was then completed by 469 respondents who were stratified in accordance with stakeholder groups in Malaysia. A single-step SEM analysis was then conducted to estimate the measurement and create a structural model using IBM SPSS Amos version 20 with a maximum-likelihood function. RESULTS The attitudes of Malaysian stakeholders towards xenotransplantation were moderately positive (mean score of 4.20). The most important direct predictor of attitude to xenotransplantation was perceived benefit (β = 0.59, P < .001) followed by perceived moral concern (β = -0.32, P < .001). Perceived risk had a strong positive association with moral concern (β = 0.65, P < .001), while attitude to nature had a positive association with perceived benefit (β = 0.16, P < .01) and a negative association with perceived risk (β = -0.19, P < .01). Religiosity had a positive relationship with perceived risk (β = 0.13, P < .05) while engagement with biotechnology had a positive relationship with perceived benefits (β = 0.26, P < .001) and a negative association with risks (β = -0.15, P < .05) and moral issues (β = -0.11, P < .05). CONCLUSION The Malaysian stakeholders were cautious about xenotransplantation. This study showed that their views regarding the application are complex and multifaceted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Latifah Amin
- Pusat Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Hasrizul Hashim
- Pusat Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Zurina Mahadi
- Pusat Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Anisah Che Ngah
- Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Khaidzir Ismail
- Pusat Citra Universiti, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.,Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abalovich A, Matsumoto S, Wechsler CJ, Carulla ME, Siciliano ME, Sznaider D, Denner J, Elliott RB. Level of acceptance of islet cell and kidney xenotransplants by personnel of hospitals with and without experience in clinical xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 2017. [PMID: 28623861 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, significant progress in both safety and efficacy has been achieved in the field of xenotransplantation, as exemplified by results from the first clinical trials of porcine islet transplantation. It would be of interest to learn whether the attitude of the clinical staff involved in such trials changes as the trials are carried out in their own hospital. METHODS One hundred and four clinical staff members from the Eva Peron Hospital of San Martin (Buenos Aires, Argentina) where clinical trials of islet xenotransplantation have been performed and 92 similar staff members from the Diego Thompson Hospital (Buenos Aires, Argentina) where no such xenotransplantation has been carried out participated in the study. Data were collected anonymously using questionnaires. RESULTS Statistically significant differences between the acceptance of xenotransplantation by clinical personnel in a hospital that had carried out clinical xenotransplantation trials were observed when compared with the acceptance of a similar staff from the hospital that had not carried out such trials. CONCLUSION This study shows that involvement in clinical xenotransplantation trials significantly changes the attitude of the clinical staff towards this technology and suggests that better information given to the society may increase acceptance of the xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Abalovich
- Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos Eva Perón de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Carlos J Wechsler
- Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos Eva Perón de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mariana E Carulla
- Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos Eva Perón de San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Daniel Sznaider
- Hospital Municipal Dr. Diego Thompson, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Joachim Denner
- Robert Koch Institute, HIV and other Retroviruses, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Timsit MO, Branchereau J, Thuret R, Kleinclauss F. [Renal transplantation in 2046: Future and perspectives]. Prog Urol 2016; 26:1132-1142. [PMID: 27665406 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2016.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Revised: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report major findings that may build the future of kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Relevant publications were identified through Medline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Embase (http://www.embase.com) database from 1960 to 2016 using the following keywords, in association, "bio-engineering; heterotransplantation; immunomodulation; kidney; regenerative medicine; xenotransplantation". Articles were selected according to methods, language of publication and relevance. A total of 5621 articles were identified including 2264 for xenotransplantation, 1058 for regenerative medicine and 2299 for immunomodulation; after careful selection, 86 publications were eligible for our review. RESULTS Despite genetic constructs, xenotransplantation faces the inevitable obstacle of species barrier. Uncertainty regarding xenograft acceptance by recipients as well as ethical considerations due to the debatable utilization of animal lives, are major limits for its future. Regenerative medicine and tridimensional bioprinting allow successful implantation of organs. Bioengineering, using decellularized tissue matrices or synthetic scaffold, seeded with pluripotent cells and assembled using bioreactors, provide exciting results but remain far for reconstituting renal complexity and vascular patency. Immune tolerance may be achieved through a tough initial T-cell depletion or a combined haplo-identical bone marrow transplant leading to lymphohematopoietic chimerism. CONCLUSION Current researches aim to increase the pool of organs available for transplantation (xenotransplants and bio-artificial kidneys) and to increase allograft survival through the induction of immune tolerance. Reported results suggest the onset of a thrilling new era for renal transplantation providing end-stage renal disease-patients with an improved survival and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-O Timsit
- Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris-Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.
| | - J Branchereau
- Service d'urologie et transplantation, CHU de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - R Thuret
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHU de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France; Université de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France
| | - F Kleinclauss
- Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, CHRU de Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France; Université de Franche-Comté, 25000 Besançon, France; Inserm UMR 1098, 25000 Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Looking for New Alternatives: What Nursing Students of Lodz's Medical University in Poland Think About the Use of Organs Coming From Animals? Transplant Proc 2016; 48:2476-2478. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
17
|
Ríos A, López-Navas AI, Martínez-Alarcón L, Ramis G, Hernández AM, Ayala MA, Garrido G, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. Acceptance of organ xenotransplantation among Latin American immigrants resident in the United States. Xenotransplantation 2016; 23:269-78. [PMID: 27422340 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Making xenotransplantation socially acceptable is the first step in working toward the promotion of this potential therapy option for providing transplant organs. OBJECTIVE To analyze the attitude toward xenotransplantation among the Latin American population resident in Florida (the USA), and to determine the variables affecting this attitude. METHODS A sample of Latin American residents in the state of Florida was randomized and stratified according to nationality, age, and sex (n = 1524). Attitude was assessed using a validated questionnaire (PCID-XenoTx Rios) which was self-completed anonymously. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS descriptive analysis, Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The questionnaire completion rate was 95% (n = 1450). If it was assumed that xenotransplanted organs functioned as well as human ones, 10% (n = 147) would be in favor, 73% (n = 1092) against, and 17% (n = 246) undecided. If the results were worse, only 2% (n = 35) would be in favor. This favorable attitude was related to country of origin (Honduras and Guatemala; P < 0.001); age (P < 0.001); sex (women; P < 0.001); marital status (married; P < 0.001); descendents (yes; P < 0.001); level of formal education (secondary education and university; P < 0.001); participation in voluntary prosocial activities (yes; P < 0.001); having spoken about donation and transplantation within the family (yes; P < 0.001); a partner's favorable attitude toward transplantation (P = 0.040); religion (catholic; P < 0.001); knowing the attitude of one's religion toward donation (yes; P < 0.001); previous experience of donation and/or transplantation (yes; P < 0.001); a belief that one might need a transplant in the future (yes; P < 0.001); and a favorable attitude toward human donation (yes; P < 0.001). The following were associated with attitude in the multivariate analysis: age (≥40 yrs; OR = 1.152); marital status (married; OR = 500); prosocial activities (yes, I participate in them; OR = 9.196. No, but I would like to; OR = 332.538); religion (catholic; OR = 2000); attitude toward deceased organ donation (in favor; OR = 2000); and previous experience of donation and/or transplantation (yes; OR = 500). CONCLUSIONS The attitude of Latin Americans resident in Florida toward xenotransplantation is very negative, and is determined by many psychosocial factors, mainly related to their prior attitude toward the different kinds of human organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Ríos
- International Collaborative Donor Project ("Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante"), Murcia, Spain.,Regional Transplant Center, Consejería de Sanidad, Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.,Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (IMIB), Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ana Isabel López-Navas
- International Collaborative Donor Project ("Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante"), Murcia, Spain.,Regional Transplant Center, Consejería de Sanidad, Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain.,Department of Psychology, UCAM, San Antonio Catholic University, Murcia, Spain
| | - Laura Martínez-Alarcón
- International Collaborative Donor Project ("Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante"), Murcia, Spain.,Regional Transplant Center, Consejería de Sanidad, Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain.,Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (IMIB), Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Miguel Hernández
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Unidad de Docencia y Formación Continuada, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - Marco Antonio Ayala
- Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío, León, Guanajuato, Mexico.,HGSZ No 10 del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Delegación Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
| | | | - Pablo Ramírez
- Regional Transplant Center, Consejería de Sanidad, Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.,Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (IMIB), Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pascual Parrilla
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.,Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital (IMIB), Murcia Health Service, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ríos A, López-Navas A, López-López A, Gómez FJ, Iriarte J, Herruzo R, Blanco G, Llorca FJ, Asunsolo A, Sánchez P, Gutiérrez PR, Fernández A, de Jesús MT, Martínez Alarcón L, Lana A, Fuentes L, Hernández JR, Virseda J, Yelamos J, Bondía JA, Hernández A, Ayala MA, Ramis G, Ramírez P, Parrilla P. The level of acceptance of spanish medical students of the transplantation of solid organs from animals: a stratified and multicentre study. Xenotransplantation 2015; 22:476-86. [PMID: 26602493 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Accepted: 10/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research into the transplantation of solid organs from animals (xenotransplantation) is generating interest and curiosity given that this could be a way of resolving the shortage in transplant organs. However, the fact is that currently xenotransplantation is far from becoming a clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To analyse the attitude of medical students from Spanish universities towards the donation of organs from animals and to determine the factors affecting their attitudes. MATERIAL AND METHODS TYPE OF STUDY A sociological, interdisciplinary, observational and multicentre study in Spain. STUDY POPULATION Students enrolled on the medical degree in Spain (n = 34 000). SAMPLE SIZE A sample of 9598 students (a confidence level of 99% and precision of ± 1%) stratified by geographical area and academic year. Instrument of measurement: A validated questionnaire of attitude towards organ xenotransplantation (PCID-XenoTx RIOS) which was self-administered and completed anonymously. RESULTS A completion rate of 95.7% (n = 9275) was obtained. If the results of xenotransplantation were as good as in human donation, 81% (n = 7491) would be in favour, 3% (n = 308) against and 16% (n = 1476) undecided. The following variables affected this attitude: sex (P < 0.001); academic year (P < 0.001); discussion of transplantation with one's family (P < 0.001) and friends (P < 0.001); the opinion of one's partner (P < 0.001); the respondent's attitude towards organ donation (P < 0.001); religion (P < 0.001); and participation in altruistic activities (P < 0.001). The following variables persisted in the multivariate analysis: (1) being a female (OR = 1.794; P < 0.001); (2) academic year (OR = 2.487; P < 0.001); (3) having spoken about the issue with one's family (OR = 1.200; P = 0.019); (4) the favourable opinion of one's partner (OR = 1.526; P = 0.028); (5) an attitude in favour of donation (OR = 2.087; P < 0.001); (6) being an atheist/agnostic, (OR = 2.5; P < 0.001); and (7) a belief that one's religion is in favour of transplantation (OR = 1.317; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Spanish medical students have a favourable attitude towards xenotransplantation. This willingness and interest could be a decisive platform for the development and strengthening of research, both for centres with a pre-clinical xenotransplantation programme and new healthcare centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Ríos
- International Collaborative Donor Project ("Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante"), Murcia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.,Transplant Unit, Surgery Service, IMIB - Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.,Regional Transplant Centre, Consejería de Sanidad y Consumo de la Región de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ana López-Navas
- International Collaborative Donor Project ("Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante"), Murcia, Spain.,Department of Psychology, Universidad Católica San Antonio (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
| | - Ana López-López
- Department of Urology, San Juan University Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Gerardo Blanco
- Servicio de Cirugía HBP y Trasplante Hepático, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | - Angel Asunsolo
- Departamento de Cirugía, Ciencias Médicas y Sociales, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Alcalá Campus Científico-Tecnológico, Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pilar Sánchez
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Pedro Ramón Gutiérrez
- Servicio de Urología (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, CHUC) y Departamento de Cirugía (Universidad de La Laguna, ULL) San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández
- Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas Básicas, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Laura Martínez Alarcón
- International Collaborative Donor Project ("Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante"), Murcia, Spain.,Transplant Unit, Surgery Service, IMIB - Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| | - Alberto Lana
- Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Área de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Lorena Fuentes
- Departamento de Farmacología y Fisiología Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y del Deporte, Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
| | | | | | - José Yelamos
- Department of Immunology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Hernández
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, Unidad de Docencia y Formación Continuada, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Servicio Murciano de Salud, El Palmar, Spain
| | - Marco Antonio Ayala
- Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío, León, Mexico.,HGSZ No. 10 del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Delegación Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexico
| | | | - Pablo Ramírez
- International Collaborative Donor Project ("Proyecto Colaborativo Internacional Donante"), Murcia, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.,Transplant Unit, Surgery Service, IMIB - Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain.,Regional Transplant Centre, Consejería de Sanidad y Consumo de la Región de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pascual Parrilla
- Department of Surgery, Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.,Transplant Unit, Surgery Service, IMIB - Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Mikla M, Rios A, Lopez-Navas A, Dobrowolska B, Kilanska D, Martinez-Alarcon L, Ramis G, Ramirez P, Lopez Montesinos M. Attitude of Nursing Students at the University of Lublin in Poland Toward Xenotransplantation of Organs. Transplant Proc 2015; 47:2593-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Revised: 10/03/2015] [Accepted: 10/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
20
|
Burlak C. Xenotransplantation literature update, January-February 2014. Xenotransplantation 2014; 21:196-9. [PMID: 25268251 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2014] [Accepted: 04/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Burlak
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|