Spectral method for the correction of the Cerenkov light effect in plastic scintillation detectors: a comparison study of calibration procedures and validation in Cerenkov light-dominated situations

Development and characterisation of a plastic scintillator dosemeter in high-energy photon beams

The radioluminescent (RL) dosemeter is excellent for real-time radiation measurement and can be used in various applications. A plastic scintillator is often the choice sensor because of its size and tissue equivalency. This study aims to characterise a novel plastic scintillator irradiated with high-energy photon beams. An RL dosimetry system was developed using the plastic scintillator. The RL dosimetry system was irradiated using a linear accelerator to characterise the dose linearity, dose rate, energy dependency and depth dose. The developed system showed a linear response toward the dose and dose rate. An energy dependency factor of 1.06 was observed. Depth dose measurement showed a mean deviation of 1.21% from the treatment planning system. The response and characteristics of the plastic scintillator show that it may be used as an alternative in an RL dosimetry system.

Characteristics of a plastic scintillation detector in photon beam dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Plastic scintillating detectors (PSD) have gained popularity due to small size and are ideally suited in small-field dosimetry due to no correction needed and hence detector reading can be compared to dose. Likewise, these detectors are active and water equivalent. A new PSD from Blue Physics is characterized in photon beam.

PURPOSE

Innovation in small-field dosimetry detector has led us to examine Blue Physics PSD (BP-PSD) for use in photon beams from linear accelerator.

METHODS

BP-PSD was acquired and its characteristics were evaluated in photon beams from a Varian TrueBeam. Data were collected in a 3D water tank. Standard parameters; dose, dose rate, energy, angular dependence and temperature dependence were studied. Depth dose, profiles and output in a reference condition as well as small fields were measured.

RESULTS

BP-PSD is versatile and provides data very similar to an ion chamber when Cerenkov radiation is properly accounted. This device measures data pulse by pulse which very few detectors can perform. The differences between ion chamber data and PSD are < 2% in most cases. The angular dependence is a bit pronounces to 1.5% which is due to PSD housing. Depth dose and profiles are comparable within < 1% to an ion chamber. For small fields this detector provides suitable field output factor compared to other detectors and Monte Carlo (MC) simulated data without any added correction factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of Blue Physics PSD is uniquely suitable in photon beam and more so in small fields. The data are reproducible compared to ion chamber for most parameters and ideally suitable for small-field dosimetry without any correction factor.

Magnetic field influence on the light yield from fiber-coupled BCF-60 plastic scintillators of relevance for output factor dosimetry in MR-linacs

Organic plastic scintillators are of interest for ionizing radiation dosimetry in megavoltage photon beams because plastic scintillators have a mass density very similar to that of water. This leads to insignificant perturbation of the electron fluence at the point of measurement in a water phantom. This feature is a benefit for dosimetry in strong magnetic fields (e.g., 1.5 T) as found in linacs with magnetic resonance imaging. The objective of this work was to quantify if the light yield per dose for the scintillating fiber BCF-60 material from Saint-Gobain Ceramics and Plastics Inc. is constant regardless of the magnetic flux density. This question is of importance for establishing traceable measurement in MR linacs using this detector type. Experiments were carried out using an accelerator combined with an electromagnet (max 0.7 T). Scintillator probes were read out using chromatic stem-removal techniques based on two optical channels or full spectral information. Reference dosimetry was carried out with PTW31010 and PTW31021 ionization chambers. TOPAS/GEANT4 was used for modelling. The light yield per dose for the BCF-60 was found to be strongly influenced by the magnitude of the magnetic field from about 1 mT to 0.7 T. The light yield per dose increased (1.3 ± 0.2)% (k = 1) from 1 mT to 10 mT and it increased (4.5 ± 0.9)% (k = 1) from 0 T to 0.7 T. Previous studies of the influence of magnetic fields on medical scintillator dosimetry have been unable to clearly identify if observed changes in scintillator response with magnetic field strength were related to changes in dose, stem signal removal, or scintillator light yield. In the current study of BCF-60, we see a clear change in light yield with magnetic field, and none of the other effects.

A scintillation dosimeter with real-time positional tracking information for in vivo dosimetry error detection in HDR brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of an electromagnetic (EM)-tracked scintillation dosimeter in detecting source positional errors of IVD in HDR brachytherapy treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two different scintillator dosimeter prototypes were coupled to 5 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) EM sensors read by an Aurora V3 system. The scintillators used were a 0.3 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm3 ZnSe:O and a BCF-60 plastic scintillator of 0.5 mm diameter and 2.0 mm in length (Saint-Gobain Crystals). The sensors were placed at the dosimeter's tip at 20.0 mm from the scintillator. The EM sampling rate was 40/s while the scintillator signal was sampled at 100 000/s using two photomultiplier tubes from Hamamatsu (series H10722) connected to a data acquisition board. A high-pass filter and a low-pass filter were used to separate the light signal into two different channels. All measurements were performed with an afterloader unit (Flexitron-Elekta AB, Sweden) in full-scattered (TG43) conditions. EM tracking was further used to provide distance/angle-dependent energy correction for the ZnSe:O inorganic scintillator. For the error detection part, lateral shifts of 0.5 to 3 mm were induced by moving the source away from its planned position. Indexer length (longitudinal) errors between 0.5 to 10 mm were also introduced. The measured dose rate difference was converted to a shift distance, with and without using the positional information from the EM sensor.

RESULTS

The inorganic scintillator had both a signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) and signal-to-background-ratio (SBR) close to 70 times higher than those of the plastic scintillator. The mean absolute difference from the dose measurement to the dose calculated with TG-43U1 was 1.5% ±0.7%. The mean absolute error for BCF-60 detector was 1.7%± 1.2 % $\pm 1.2\%$ when compared to TG-43 calculations formalism. With the inorganic scintillator and EM tracking, a maximum area under the curve (AUC) gain of 24.0% was obtained for a 0.5-mm lateral shift when using the EMT data with the ZnSe:O. Lower AUC gains were obtained for a 3-mm lateral shifts with both scintillators. For the plastic scintillator, the highest gain from using EM tracking information occurred for a 0.5-mm lateral shift at 20 mm from the source. The maximal gain (17.4%) for longitudinal errors was found at the smallest shifts (0.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates that integrating EM tracking to in vivo scintillation dosimeters enables the detection of smaller shifts, by decreasing the dosimeter positioning uncertainty. It also serves to perform position-dependent energy correction for the inorganic scintillator,providing better SNR and SBR, allowing detection of errors at greater distances from the source.

Small field output correction factors at 18 MV

BACKGROUND

The response of various detectors in the radiotherapy energy range has been investigated, especially for 6 and 10 MV energies for small fields, and is summarized in TRS-483. However, data for accelerator energies above 10 MV are sparse or unavailable for many detectors, especially for the energy of 18 MV. Small variations in field output factors for the commissioning of a treatment planning system can have a high impact on calculation of dose distributions.

PURPOSE

Many studies describe an energy dependence of the response for a large number of detectors. We wanted to close the gap for the 18 MV energy regime and determined field output correction factors for different detectors at 18 MV.

METHODS

An ELEKTA Versa HD accelerator at 18 MV was used together with a PTW MP3 water phantom at an SSD of 90 cm. The following detectors were examined: PTW Semiflex 31021, PinPoint 3D 31022, diode 60012, diode 60008 and microDiamond 60019, Sun Nuclear EDGE detector, IBA PFD, SFD, Razor Chamber, Razor Nano Chamber and Razor Diode, Standard Imaging Scintillator Exradin W2 1x3, W2 1x1 and Gafchromic EBT3 film. The dose response was determined at a depth of 10 cm for square fields between 0.5 and 10 cm side length. As reference data a composure of radiochromic film data for small fields (s ≤ 3 $s\le 3$  cm) and data of all compatible chambers for larger fields (s ≥ 3 $s\ge 3$  cm) was used. The effective field sizes of small fields were determined from profiles obtained on radiochromic film. The obtained field output correction factors obey the rules of the TRS-483 protocol.

RESULTS

The W2 1x1 scintillator and the Razor Chamber showed the smallest deviations from the reference curve. The shielded diodes (diode 60008, EDGE detector) showed the highest over-response at small fields, followed by PFD, microDiamond and the unshielded diodes (diode 60012, SFD). The ionization chambers exhibited the well-known volume effect, that is, strong under-response at small fields of up to 9% for the PinPoint 3D, 7% for the Razor Chamber and up to 30% for the Semiflex detector for the smallest studied field size. The small chambers showed a polarity effect in axial orientation, especially the Razor Nano Chamber. Corrections at 18 MV are generally larger than those provided by TRS-483, continuing the trend of increasing corrections between 6 and 10 MV also at a higher accelerator energy. Only the PinPoint 3D Chamber showed a slightly smaller correction.

CONCLUSIONS

Field output correction factors were determined for square field sizes between 0.5 and 10 cm at 18 MV. Most detectors needed a larger correction than at 6 and 10 MV. Thus, the use of correction factors will improve beam data for 18 MV.

Characterization of a 0.8 mm3Medscint plastic scintillator detector system for small field dosimetry

Objective. Plastic scintillator detectors (PSDs) have demonstrated ability to meet requirements of small field dosimetry. Medscint developed a 1 mm long, 1 mm diameter cylindrical PSD with effective volume of 0.8 mm3. Clinically relevant, small field dosimetric properties of this detector, combined with a novel scintillation dosimetry system-HYPERSCINT RP-200, and HYPERDOSE analysis software were evaluated in this study.Approach. This novel scintillator-based dosimetry system was characterized with 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF x-ray beams delivered by Varian TrueBeamTMlinear accelerator. The detector was characterized for leakage, short-term repeatability, dose response linearity, angular response, dose rate response, and field size dependence for radiation field sizes of 0.25 × 0.25 to 10 × 10 cm2. Measured detector specific output ratios were compared with microDiamond output factors to determine small field output correction factors,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr.Main results. The dosimetry system showed excellent short-term repeatability with standard deviation of only 0.04 ± 0.01%. It demonstrated good dose linearity with variations less than 1.0% for 14.4 cGy and above. The dosimetry system was found to be independent of dose rate and angle of irradiation, with deviations for both below 0.5%. Leakage was found to be comparable to background readings. For 6 MV-WFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 1 × 1 cm2agreed with output factors measured with PTW TN60019 microDiamond, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes. For 10 MV-FFF energy beams, detector specific output ratios for field sizes down to 2 × 2 cm2agreed with PTW TN60019 microDiamond output factors, thus,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrequates to unity for these field sizes.kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrfor field sizes down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm2were determined to be within 6% of unity for both 6 MV-WFF and 10 MV-FFF energy beams.Significance. The HYPERSCINT RP-200 dosimetry system coupled with a 0.8 mm3PSD showed excellent dosimetric properties and was found to be clinically relevant for relative dosimetry down to field sizes of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2and potentially smaller.

Technical note: Determining equivalent squares of high-energetic photon fields

PURPOSE

We developed a method based on a physical pencil beam model for accurate equivalent square calculations for rectangular and irregular fields, for different definitions of equivalent squares, for beams with and without flattening filter, different photon energies, and depths in water.

METHODS

We considered two equivalent square definitions: equal dose at a point on the beam axis and equal depth dose, measured as tissue phantom ratio at 20 and 10 cm depth ( TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ ). As dose engine, we used an analytical pencil beam model. By integrating the pencil beam kernels, we assigned square fields to rectangular fields minimizing the dose, respectively, the TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ difference. The results were compared with measurements at 100 mm depth for nominal beam energies of 6 and 18 MV, the Sterling equation, the geometric mean, and data from BJR Suppl 25 (British Institute of Radiology, 1996).

RESULTS

Pencil beam results were closest to the measurements. An energy dependence of several millimeters for small field dimensions and depth dependencies for very elongated fields were observed. For the assignment of WFF square to FFF rectangular fields, using the equal- TPR 20 , 10 $\text{TPR}_{20,10}$ definition, our method agrees with previously published results. For circular fields approximated by leaves, we found deviations to the data from BJR Suppl. 25 below 1 mm for diameters smaller than 200 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the validity range for geometric mean and Sterling equation is limited. Ergo, instead of specifying specific validity ranges, we suggest using the pencil beam method, valid for all aspect ratios, including elongated fields in the primary dose dominated regime. We published our method as python library and graphical user interface on GitHub. Users can choose between two definitions of equivalent square and between WFF and FFF fields. The implemented pencil beam method for irregular fields is also usable for quality assurance such as monitor unit checks.

Dosimetric characterization of a novel commercial plastic scintillation detector with an MR-Linac

BACKGROUND

Plastic scintillators have been used as radiation detectors for the past few years, as they are water-equivalent and independent of the dose, dose rate, and angle of incidence. In addition, they are also independent of the presence of a magnetic field and could be used for in vivo dosimetry in an MR-Linac. With the advent of a new commercial scintillation detector, Blue Physics Model 10, its characterization has been performed on an MR-Linac with a view to future applications.

PURPOSE

To perform the dosimetric characterization and study potential applications of a novel commercial plastic scintillation detector in a MR-Linac.

METHODS

Scintillation detector description, calibration procedure, short-term repeatability, dose-response linearity, dose-rate dependence, angular dependence, and temperature dependence have been studied. Percent-depth-dose (PDD) and beam profiles were measured for small fields and a standard field, as well as output factors, for comparison with other PTW detectors: a diamond diode and PinPoint and Semiflex 3D ionization chambers. The suitability of the plastic scintillator for in vivo dosimetry in a magnetic field has also been studied measuring the dose to a point in an anthropomorphic phantom while acquiring MR imaging. This measured dose was compared with that calculated with Monaco planning system and with that measured with a PTW Semiflex 3D chamber, the latter without acquiring MR images.

RESULTS

Short-term repeatability presented negligible variations (<0.4%) for 100 and 20 MU. Similar results were obtained for dose-response linearity and dose-rate dependence. A small angular dependence was determined, while the scintillator resulted practically independent of the temperature. PDDs showed excellent agreement except in the build-up region, and calculated penumbras with the profiles given by the scintillator were between the ones obtained with the diamond detector and the PinPoint ionization chamber. Measured OF with the scintillator were the highest between all detectors, 1.26% higher than the value obtained with the microdiamond for the smallest field measured, 0.5 × 0.5 cm² . Finally, the total dose to a point measured with the scintillator was 0.51% higher compared to that calculated by the planning system.

CONCLUSION

The Blue Physics model 10 scintillation system showed excellent dosimetric characteristics. Its response independent of the temperature and the presence of a magnetic field make it suitable for in vivo dosimetry in an MR-Linac while acquiring MR images, which could solve the impossibility of performing a dosimetric QA for each adapted plan. Furthermore, its temporal resolution allows independent radiation pulses to be measured and visualized, which could be used in future applications.

Energy-dependence investigation for a range of clinically used detectors from 70 kV to 6 MV

PURPOSE

Accurate measurement of out-of-field dose in radiotherapy directly impacts beam data modeling in treatment planning systems, verification of implanted electronic devices/lens/fetus dose, secondary cancer risk estimation, and organ-at-risk dose reporting. When performing out-of-field dosimetry, it is therefore imperative that the response of the detector has been well characterized. Due to the softening of the radiation beam out-of-field, many detectors will exhibit energy dependence. This study investigated the energy dependence of a range of clinical available detectors over typical energies experienced out-of-field.

METHODS

The response of detectors to photon beams from 70 kV to 6 MV was measured. The relative change in response from 6 MV down to 70 kV highlighted the expected deviation in the response of detectors that would typically be calibrated in-field for use out-of-field.

RESULTS

The Pinpoint detector displayed the most energy-independent response over the energy range investigated. The Micro-Lion detector was the only detector to show an under-response to all low-energy beams relative to 6 MV. The diode-type detectors showed the largest energy dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering detectors for use in out-of-field dose measurements, it is important that the energy dependence is investigated over a low-energy range as out-of-field the energy spectra comprise a larger component of photons in the 50-100-keV range. This study highlights the variation in response of a range of clinically available detectors to low-energy radiation beams relative to 6 MV for out-of-field dosimetry. The Pinpoint detector was the most energy-independent detector with a response close to unity over the entire energy range investigated.

Extending the EclipseTM AcurosXB output factor table for small field radiosurgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the necessity of extending the output factor table (OF Table) of the Varian Eclipse^TM Treatment Planning System for small field stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiosurgery (SBRT) treatments.

METHODS

A new AcurosXB 15.6 beam model was created in the Eclipse Beam Configuration, which is identical to the one that has been used in the clinic with a default 3 × 3 cm to 40 × 40 cm OF Table, except the OF Table in the new model was extended to cover the range from 1 × 1 cm to 40 × 40 cm. 80 small square and rectangular output factors were measured on a Varian TrueBeam utilizing a Standard Imaging Exradin W2-1×1 scintillator detector, inside a PTW BeamScan water tank with 95 cm SSD at 5 cm depth. Cerenkov contamination was corrected using a rectangular field method (2 cm × 15 cm field). Nine Radiosurgery plans with primary jaw setting ranging from 0.7 cm to 2.0 cm were evaluated by both beam models. The monitor unit (MU) differences between the two beam models were calculated for identical 3-dimensional (3D) absolute dose distributions. Output factors, measured versus Eclipse calculated, were compared down to 0.5 × 0.5 cm primary jaw setting.

RESULTS

For the 6FFF beam, the difference between the two beam models was ∼ 6% for 1 × 1 cm jaw settings and 4% at 1.5 × 1.5 cm, with the extended OF Table requiring higher MUs for the same dose prescription and same 3-dimensional isodose distribution. For the 6MV beam, the corresponding difference is ∼7.5% for 1 × 1 cm, 5% for 1.5 × 1.5 cm, and 3% for 2 × 2 cm jaw settings, with the extended OF Table requiring higher MUs. For jaw settings smaller than 1 × 1 cm, measured dose can be considerably smaller than Eclipse predicted dose, even with the OF Table extension. This is reflected by the fact that the output factor for 0.5 × 0.5 cm, calculated via Eclipse external beam, was more than 30% greater than that measured for both 6FFF and 6MV beams.

CONCLUSIONS

Eclipse does a satisfactory job for primary jaw sizes down to 2 cm. For jaw settings smaller than 1.5 cm, the OF Table in Eclipse should be extended to improve the dose calculation accuracy.

Characterization of the Plastic Scintillator Detector System Exradin W2 in a High Dose Rate Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beam

(1) Background: The Exradin W2 is a commercially available scintillator detector designed for reference and relative dosimetry in small fields. In this work, we investigated the performance of the W2 scintillator in a 10 MV flattening-filter-free photon beam and compared it to the performance of ion chambers designed for small field measurements. (2) Methods: We measured beam profiles and percent depth dose curves with each detector and investigated the linearity of each system based on dose per pulse (DPP) and pulse repetition frequency. (3) Results: We found excellent agreement between the W2 scintillator and the ion chambers for beam profiles and percent depth dose curves. Our results also showed that the two-voltage method of calculating the ion recombination correction factor was sufficient to correct for the ion recombination effect of ion chambers, even at the highest DPP. (4) Conclusions: These findings show that the W2 scintillator shows excellent agreement with ion chambers in high DPP conditions.

Commissioning an Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector for clinical use in small radiation fields

Purpose

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the Standard Imaging Exradin W2 plastic scintillation detector (W2) for use in the types of fields used for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Methods

Prior to testing the W2 in small fields, the W2 was evaluated in standard large field conditions to ensure good detector performance. These tests included energy dependence, short‐term repeatability, dose‐response linearity, angular dependence, temperature dependence, and dose rate dependence. Next, scan settings and calibration of the W2 were optimized to ensure high quality data acquisition. Profiles of small fields shaped by cones and multi‐leaf collimator (MLCs) were measured using the W2 and IBA RAZOR diode in a scanning water tank. Output factors for cones (4–17.5 mm) and MLC fields (1, 2, 3 cm) were acquired with both detectors. Finally, the dose at isocenter for seven radiosurgery plans was measured with the W2 detector.

Results

W2 exhibited acceptable warm‐up behavior, short‐term reproducibility, axial angular dependence, dose‐rate linearity, and dose linearity. The detector exhibits a dependence upon energy, polar angle, and temperature. Scanning measurements taken with the W2 and RAZOR were in good agreement, with full‐width half‐maximum and penumbra widths agreeing to within 0.1 mm. The output factors measured by the W2 and RAZOR exhibited a maximum difference of 1.8%. For the seven point‐dose measurements of radiosurgery plans, the W2 agreed well with our treatment planning system with a maximum deviation of 2.2%. The Čerenkov light ratio calibration method did not significantly impact the measurement of relative profiles, output factors, or point dose measurements.

Conclusion

The W2 demonstrated dosimetric characteristics that are suitable for radiosurgery field measurements. The detector agreed well with the RAZOR diode for output factors and scanned profiles and showed good agreement with the treatment planning system in measurements of clinical treatment plans.

Comparison and Validation of Multiple Detectors against Monte Carlo Simulation for the Use of Small-Field Dosimetry

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare the Exradin W2 scintillator, PTW microDiamond, IBA Razor Nano, and IBA Razor chamber detectors for small-field dose measurements and validate the measured data against the EGSnrc user code and observe the variation between daisy-chained and direct measurement methods for the above detectors.

Materials and Methods

The W2 scintillator, microDiamond, Razor Nano, and Razor chamber detectors were used to measure the in-plane and cross-plane profiles and the output factors (OFs) at 10 cm depth, and 90 source-to-surface distance for 6MV X-rays (Elekta Versa HD). The field sizes ranged from 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm to 5 cm × 5 cm. The BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc user codes (EGSnrc) were used to simulate the reference profiles. Gamma analysis was performed to compare the measured and simulated dose distributions.

Results

The OFs measured with the W2 scintillator, microDiamond, Razor Nano chamber, Razor chamber, and the calculated Monte Carlo (MC) showed agreement to within 1% for the 3 cm × 3 cm field size. The uncertainty in the MC simulation was observed to be 0.4%. The percent difference in OFs measured using daisy-chained and direct measurement methods was within 0.15%, 0.4%, 1.4%, and 2.4% for microDiamond, W2 scintillator, Nano, and Razor chamber detectors, respectively.

Conclusion

The lateral beam profiles and OFs of W2 scintillator, microDiamond, Razor Nano, and Razor chambers exhibit good agreement with the MC simulation within the nominal field sizes. Our results demonstrate that we can achieve considerable time-saving by directly measuring small-field OFs without daisy-chained methods using microDiamond and W2 scintillator. In terms of ease of use, sensitivity, reproducibility, and from a practical standpoint, we recommend microDiamond for small-field dosimetry.

On the use of polychromatic cameras for high spatial resolution spectral dose measurements

Objective. Despite the demonstrated benefits of hyperspectral formalism for stem effect corrections in the context of fiber dose measurements, this approach has not been yet translated into volumetric measurements where cameras are typically used for their distinguishing spatial resolution. This work investigates demosaicing algorithms for polychromatic cameras based spectral imaging. Approach. The scintillation and Cherenkov signals produced in a radioluminescent phantom are imaged by a polychromatic camera and isolated using the spectral formalism. To do so, five demosaicing algorithms are investigated from calibration to measurements: a clustering method and four interpolation algorithms. The resulting accuracy of scintillation and Cherenkov images is evaluated with measurements of the differences (mean ± standard deviation) between the obtained and expected signals from profiles drawn across a scintillation spot. Signal-to-noise ratio and signal-to-background ratio are further measured and compared in the resulting scintillation images. Finally, the resulting differences on the scintillation signal from a 0.2 × 0.2 cm2 region-of-interest (ROI) were reported. Main results. Clustering, OpenCV, bilinear, Malvar and Menon demosaicing algorithms respectively yielded differences of 3 ± 5%, 1 ± 3%, 1 ± 3%, 1 ± 2% and 2 ± 4% in the resulting scintillation images. For the Cherenkov images, all algorithms provided differences below 1%. All methods enabled measurements over the detectability (SBR > 2) and sensitivity (SNR > 5) thresholds with the bilinear algorithm providing the best SNR value. Clustering, OpenCV, bilinear, Malvar and Menon demosaicing algorithms respectively provided differences on the ROI analysis of 7 ± 5%, 3 ± 2%, 3 ± 2%, 4 ± 2%, 7 ± 3%. Significance. Radioluminescent signals can accurately be isolated using a single polychromatic camera. Moreover, demosaicing using a bilinear kernel provided the best results and enabled Cherenkov signal subtraction while preserving the full spatial resolution of the camera.

External beam irradiation angle measurement using a hybrid Cerenkov-scintillation detector

Objective. In this study, we propose a novel approach designed to take advantage of the Cerenkov light angular dependency to perform a direct measurement of an external beam irradiation angle. Approach. A Cerenkov probe composed of a 10 mm long filtered sensitive volume of clear PMMA optical fibre was built. Both filtered and raw Cerenkov signals from the transport fibre were collected through a single 1 mm diameter transport fibre. An independent plastic scintillation detector composed of 10 mm BCF12 scintillating fibre was also used for simultaneous dose measurements. A first series of measurements aimed at validating the ability to account for the Cerenkov electron energy spectrum dependency by simultaneously measuring the deposited dose, thus isolating signal variations resulting from the angular dependency. Angular calibration curve for fixed dose irradiations and incident angle measurements using electron and photon beams where also achieved. Main results. The beam nominal energy was found to have a significant impact on the shapes of the angular calibration curves. This can be linked to the electron energy spectrum dependency of the Cerenkov emission cone. Irradiation angle measurements exhibit an absolute mean error of 1.86° and 1.02° at 6 and 18 MV, respectively. Similar results were obtained with electron beams and the absolute mean error reaches 1.97°, 1.66°, 1.45° and 0.95° at 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV, respectively. Reducing the numerical aperture of the Cerenkov probe leads to an increased angular dependency for the lowest energy while no major changes were observed at higher energy. This allowed irradiation angle measurements at 6 MeV with a mean absolute error of 4.82°. Significance. The detector offers promising perspectives as a potential tool for future quality assurance applications in radiotherapy, especially for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and brachytherapy applications.

Field output correction factors of stereotactic cones for a diode detector: Dependence on cone size, measurement setup, reference field size and photon energy

This study investigated if field output correction factors (FOCFs) of Varian stereotactic cones for Edge detectorTM had dependence on cone size, measurement setup, reference field size and/or photon energy. Field output factors (FOFs) of stereotactic cones were measured at three depths (1.5 cm, 5 cm and 10 cm) in two different setups (source-to-surface distance (SSD) and source-to-axis distance (SAD)) with two photon energies (6 MV and 6 MV flattening filter free) using the Edge detector and Exradin_® W2 scintillator. Two reference fields (10 × 10 cm² and 4 × 4 cm²) were chosen. FOCFs for the Edge detector were determined by calculating FOF_W2/FOF_Edge and compared among cones and between depths, setups, reference fields and energies. It is concluded that FOCFs for the Edge detector have dependence on cone size, SSD/SAD setup and energy for small cones, but do not have dependence on depth and reference field size.

Deformable scintillation dosimeter: II. Real-time simultaneous measurements of dose and tracking of deformation vector fields

Anatomical motion and deformation pose challenges to the understanding of the delivered dose distribution during radiotherapy treatments. Hence, deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms are increasingly used to map contours and dose distributions from one image set to another. However, the lack of validation tools slows their clinical adoption, despite their commercial availability. This work presents a novel water-equivalent deformable dosimeter that simultaneously measures the dose distribution and tracks deformation vector fields (DVF). The dosimeter in made of an array of 19 scintillating fiber detectors embedded in a cylindrical elastomer matrix. It is imaged by two pairs of stereoscopic cameras tracking the position and angulation of the scintillators, while measuring the dose. The resulting system provides a precision of 0.3 mm on DVF measurements. The dosimeter was irradiated with 5 × 3, 4 × 3 and 3 × 3 cm²6 MV photon beams in both fixed and deformed conditions. The measured DVF was compared to the one computed with a DIR algorithm (Plastimatch). The deviations between the computed and measured DVFs was below 1.5 mm. As for dose measurements, the dosimeter acquired the dose distribution in fixed and deformed conditions within 1% of the treatment planning system calculation and complementary dose validation using the Hyperscint dosimetry system. Using the demonstrated qualities of scintillating detectors, we developed a real-time, water-equivalent deformable dosimeter. Given it's sensor tracking position precision and dose measurements accuracy, the developed detector is a promising tools for the validation of DIR algorithms as well as dose distribution measurements under fixed and deformed conditions.

Quality Assurance for Small-Field VMAT SRS and Conventional-Field IMRT Using the Exradin W1 Scintillator

BACKGROUND

Plastic scintillator detector (PSD) Exradin W1 has shown promising performance in small field dosimetry due to its water equivalence and small sensitive volume. However, few studies reported its capability in measuring fields of conventional sizes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the performance of W1 in measuring point dose of both conventional IMRT plans and VMAT SRS plans.

METHODS

Forty-seven clinical plans (including 29 IMRT plans and 18 VMAT SRS plans with PTV volume less than 8 cm³) from our hospital were included in this study. W1 and Farmer-Type ionization chamber Exradin A19 were used in measuring IMRT plans, and W1 and microchamber Exradin A16 were used in measuring SRS plans. The agreement between the results of different types of detectors and TPS was evaluated.

RESULTS

For IMRT plans, the average differences between measurements and TPS in high-dose regions were 0.27% ± 1.66% and 0.90% ± 1.78% (P = 0.056), and were -0.76% ± 1.47% and 0.37% ± 1.34% in low-dose regions (P = 0.000), for W1 and A19, respectively. For VMAT SRS plans, the average differences between measurements and TPS were -0.19% ± 0.96% and -0.59% ± 1.49% for W1 and A16 with no statistical difference (P = 0.231).

CONCLUSION

W1 showed comparable performance with application-dedicated detectors in point dose measurements for both conventional IMRT and VMAT SRS techniques. It is a potential one-stop solution for general radiotherapy platforms that deliver both IMRT and SRS plans.

Monte Carlo modeling of the influence of strong magnetic fields on the stem-effect in plastic scintillation detectors used in radiotherapy dosimetry

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of strong magnetic fields on the stem-effect in plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs) using Monte Carlo methods.

METHODS

Prior to building the light guide model, the properties of the Čerenkov process in GEANT4 were investigated by simulating depth-dose and depth-Čerenkov emission profiles in water as functions of Čerenkov process input parameters. In addition, profile simulations were performed for magnetic field strengths ranging from 0 T to 1.5 T. A PMMA light guide was constructed in GEANT4 using data from the manufacturer and literature. Simulations were performed with the model as functions of depth and fiber-beam angle where the simulated stem-effect spectrum and the Čerenkov light ratio (CLR) were scored and compared to measured data in the literature. The light guide optical properties were iteratively adjusted until agreement between the simulated and measured data was achieved. Simulations were performed with the validated model as functions of depth and magnetic field strength and the simulated data were compared to measured data in the literature. The model was also used to evaluate the sensitivity of the CLR to the various optical properties of the light guide in different irradiation conditions.

RESULTS

No significant changes in the depth-dose or depth-Čerenkov emission profiles were observed with step-size restrictions imposed by the Čerenkov process input parameters, which was attributed to the condensed history algorithm and transport parameters used in this work. Similar changes in the depth-dose and depth-Čerenkov emission profiles were observed with increasing magnetic field strength, which indicates the Čerenkov process is not adversely impacted by the presence of the magnetic field. Following optimization of the light guide optical properties, agreement within two standard deviations was observed between the simulated and measured optical data for all validation geometries considered. Agreement within one standard deviation was observed between the simulated and measured data for all depths and field strengths ≥0 T whereas discrepancies were observed for magnetic field strengths <-0.35 T. These significant differences were attributed to insufficient measurement data for this irradiation configuration during model validation. Of the light guide optical properties investigated, the fluorescence signal had the greatest impact on the CLR sensitivity to the magnetic field.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant change in the Čerenkov emission per dose in water was observed for magnetic field strengths up to 1.5 T. The nominal fiber fluorescence signal was found to have a significant impact on the CLR sensitivity to varying irradiation conditions where changes up to 11.7% were observed whereas the mirror reflectivity and fiber attenuation had a modest impact with maximum CLR changes of 2.6% and 1.2% relative to 0 T, respectively. The results of this work suggest light guides with low fiber fluorescence should be used with PSDs for dosimetry measurements in magnetic fields to minimize the impact of the magnetic field on the CLR correction.

Advances on inorganic scintillator-based optic fiber dosimeters

This article presents a new perspective on the development of inorganic scintillator-based fiber dosimeters (IOSFDs) for medical radiotherapy dosimetry (RTD) focusing on real-time in vivo dosimetry. The scintillator-based optical fiber dosimeters (SFD) are compact, free of electromagnetic interference, radiation-resistant, and robust. They have shown great potential for real-time in vivo RTD. Compared with organic scintillators (OSs), inorganic scintillators (IOSs) have larger X-ray absorption and higher light output. Variable IOSs with maximum emission peaks in the red part of the spectrum offer convenient stem effect removal. This article outlines the main advantages and disadvantages of utilizing IOSs for SFD fabrication. IOSFDs with different configurations are presented, and their use for dosimetry in X-ray RT, brachytherapy (BT), proton therapy (PT), and boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is reviewed. Challenges including the percentage depth dose (PDD) deviation from the standard ion chamber (IC) measurement, the angular dependence, and the Cherenkov effect are discussed in detail; methods to overcome these problems are also presented.

Real-time in vivo dosimetry system based on an optical fiber-coupled microsized photostimulable phosphor for stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To develop an in vivo dosimeter system for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) that can perform accurate and precise real-time measurements, using a microsized amount of a photostimulable phosphor (PSP), BaFBr:Eu²⁺ .

METHODS

The sensitive volume of the PSP was 1.26 × 10^-5  cm³ . The dosimeter system was designed to apply photostimulation to the PSP after the decay of noise signals, in synchronization with the photon beam pulse of a linear accelerator (LINAC), to eliminate the noise signals completely using a time separation technique. The noise signals included stem signals, and radioluminescence signals generated by the PSP. In addition, the dosimeter system was built on a storage-type dosimeter that could read out a signal after an arbitrary preset number of photon beam pulses were incident. First, the noise and photostimulated luminescence (PSL) signal decay times were measured. Subsequently, we confirmed that the PSL signals could be exclusively read out within the photon beam pulse interval. Finally, using a water phantom, the basic characteristics of the dosimeter system were demonstrated under SBRT conditions, and the feasibility for clinical application was investigated. The reproducibility, dose linearity, dose-rate dependence, temperature dependence, and angular dependence were evaluated. The feasibility was confirmed by measurements at various dose gradients and using a representative treatment plan for a metastatic liver tumor. A clinical plan was created with a two-arc beam volumetric modulated arc therapy using a 10 MV flattening filter-free photon beam. For the water phantom measurements, the clinical plan was compiled into a plan with a fixed gantry angle of 0°. To evaluate the energy dependence during SBRT, the percent depth dose (PDD) was measured and compared with those calculated via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.

RESULTS

All the PSL signals could be read out while eliminating the noise signals within the minimum pulse interval of the LINAC. Stable real-time measurements could be performed with a time resolution of 56 ms (i.e., number of pulses = 20). The dose linearity was good in the dose range of 0.01-100 Gy. The measurements agreed within 1% at dose rates of 40-2400 cGy/min. The temperature and angular dependence were also acceptable since these dependencies had only a negligible effect on the measurements in SBRT. At a dose gradient of 2.21 Gy/mm, the measured dose agreed with that calculated using a treatment planning system (TPS) within the measurement uncertainties due to the probe position. For measurements using a representative treatment plan, the measured dose agreed with that calculated using the TPS within 0.5% at the center of the beam axis. The PDD measurements agreed with the MC calculations to within 1% for field sizes <5 × 5 cm² .

CONCLUSION

The in vivo dosimeter system developed using BaFBr:Eu²⁺ is capable of real-time, accurate, and precise measurement under SBRT conditions. The probe is smaller than a conventional dosimeter, has excellent spatial resolution, and can be valuable in SBRT with a steep dose distribution over a small field. The developed PSP dosimeter system appears to be suitable for in vivo SBRT dosimetry.

Use of a plastic scintillator detector for patient-specific quality assurance of VMAT SRS

Purpose

To evaluate a scintillator detector for patient‐specific quality assurance of VMAT radiosurgery plans.

Methods

The detector was comprised of a 1 mm diameter, 1 mm high scintillator coupled to an acrylic optical fiber. Sixty VMAT SRS plans for treatment of single targets having sizes ranging from 3 mm to 30.2 mm equivalent diameter (median 16.3 mm) were selected. The plans were delivered to a 20 cm × 20 cm x 15 cm water equivalent plastic phantom having either the scintillator detector or radiochromic film at the center. Calibration films were obtained for each measurement session. The films were scanned and converted to dose using a 3‐channel technique.

Results

The mean difference between scintillator and film was ‒0.45% (95% confidence interval ‒0.1% to 0.8%). For target equivalent diameter smaller than the median, the mean difference was 1.1% (95% confidence interval 0.5% to 1.7%). For targets larger than the median, the mean difference was ‒0.2% (95% confidence interval ‒0.7% to 0.1%).

Conclusions

The scintillator detector response is independent of target size for targets as small as 3 mm and is well‐suited for patient‐specific quality assurance of VMAT SRS plans. Further work is needed to evaluate the accuracy for VMAT plans that treat multiple targets using a single isocenter.

THE USE OF THE EXRADIN W1 PLASTIC SCINTILLATOR FOR MEASUREMENTS IN EXTERNAL RADIOTHERAPY

The Exradin W1 plastic scintillator (Standard Imaging) was examined for measurement suitability in high-energy photon beams, high-energy electron beams and tomotherapy in terms of dose to water for reference fields. For photon beams, pulse repetition rate dependence, calibration stability, noise from the photodiode enclosure, detector motion during treatment, output factors, off-axis doses and percentage depth doses were tested. For electron and tomotherapy beams, energy non-dependence was verified. All features make the detector suitable in small and non-standards fields, and for electron beams.

Quality assurance for Gamma Knife Perfexion using the Exradin W1 plastic scintillation detector and Lucy phantom

The goal of this work is to validate the use of the Exradin W1 plastic scintillation detector (PSD) to measure profiles and output factors from Gamma Knife Perfexion collimators in a Lucy phantom. The Exradin W1 PSD has a small-volume, near-water-equivalent, energy-independent sensitive element. Output measurements were performed for all 3 collimators (4 mm, 8 mm, and 16 mm) of the Gamma Knife Perfexion system, and these measurements were compared to measurements made with an A16 ion chamber and an EBT3 film and to the nominal values. We showed that a configuration in which the focus or 'shot' moves while the detector remains fixed is essentially equivalent to a configuration in which the focus is fixed while the detector moves. A Lucy phantom containing a PSD was moved in small steps to acquire profiles in all three dimensions. EBT3 film was inserted in the Lucy phantom and exposed to a single shot for each collimator. The relative values for output factors measured with the PSD were 1.000, 0.892, and 0.795, for the 16 mm, 8 mm, and 4 mm collimators, respectively. The values measured with EBT3 film were 1.000, 0.881, and 0.793, and the values measured with the A16 ion chamber were 1.000, 0.883, and 0.727. The nominal output factors for the Gamma Knife Perfexion are 1.000, 0.900, and 0.814, respectively. There was excellent agreement between all profiles measured with the PSD and EBT3 as well as with the treatment planning system data provided by the vendor. In light of our results, the Exradin W1 PSD is well suited for beam quality assurance of a Gamma Knife Perfexion irradiator.

Characteristics of the Exradin W1 scintillator in the magnetic field

To investigate the angular dependency of the W1 scintillator with and without a magnetic field, the beam incidence angles to the detector varied from 0° to 360° at intervals of 30° when the detector was pointed in both the craniocaudal and right‐to‐left directions. The beam incidence angles also varied from 0° to 360° at intervals of 45° when the W1 scintillator was in the anterior‐to‐posterior direction. To investigate the field size dependency of the W1 scintillator with and without a magnetic field, the doses by an identical beam‐on time were measured at various square field sizes and the measured doses were normalized to the dose at the field of 10.5 cm × 10.5 cm (FS10.5). With and without a magnetic field, the deviations of the doses to the dose at the beam incident angle of 0° were always less than 1% regardless of the dosimeter positioning relative to the magnetic field direction. When the field sizes were equal to or less than FS10.5, the differences in the output factors with and without a magnetic field were less than 0.7%. However, those were larger than 1% at fields larger than FS10.5, and up to 3.1%. The W1 scintillator showed no angular dependency to the magnetic field. Differences larger than 1% in the output factors with and without a magnetic field were observed at field sizes larger than 10.5 cm × 10.5 cm.

Dosimetric properties of colloidal quantum dot-based systems for scintillation dosimetry

Colloidal quantum dots (cQDs) are starting to be used in radiation detection, either combined with an organic fluorophore or used as a sole luminescent material. In the latter case, only few studies report on cQD-based detectors for medical applications, especially for scintillation dosimetry in radiation therapy. Moreover, most of these studies focus on the effects of radiation on cQD photoluminescence but do not look into the properties of the scintillation signal itself. The present article provides a study of those cQD scintillation properties not previously investigated including the linearity of the signal as a function of dose, the signal dose rate and beam energy dependencies. The latter was also characterized for the commercially available scintillating fiber BCF-60 and liquid scintillator Ultima Gold. CdSe multishell cQDs in two physical forms were used as a sensitive dosimeter volume: a cQD powder to constitute a fiber optic based dosimeter and cQD liquid dispersions to be volumetric dosimeters. The signal linearity was assessed with a R² coefficient  >0.999 over a clinically relevant dose range at kV and MV beam energies. The cQDs had a good overall dose rate independence, with a change from the relative dose of 1% at MV energies and 2% at kV energies, of their scintillation output when irradiated with an orthovoltage device and a linear accelerator. Regarding the beam energy dependence, the cQD powder had the highest dependence amongst all the scintillators compared, the 120 kVp light output being up to almost 4 times that of the 6 MV beam. The smallest effect of the beam energy was reported for the cQD alkylbenzene liquid dispersion, having a variation of light signal normalized to 6 MV of 15% that is even less than for BCF-60 and Ultima Gold.

Evaluating small field dosimetry with the Acuros XB (AXB) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) dose calculation algorithms in the eclipse treatment planning system

Background:

An increasing number of external beam treatment modalities including intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic radiosurgery uses very small fields for treatment planning and delivery. However, there are major challenges in small photon field dosimetry, due to the partial occlusion of the direct photon beam source’s view from the measurement point, lack of lateral charged particle equilibrium, steep dose-rate gradient and volume averaging effect of the detector response and variation of the energy fluence in the lateral direction of the beam. Therefore, experimental measurements of dosimetric parameters such as percent depth doses (PDDs), beam profiles and relative output factors (ROFs) for small fields continue to be a challenge.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, we used a homogeneous water phantom and the heterogeneous anthropomorphic stereotactic end-to-end verification (STEEV) head phantom for all dose measurements and calculations. PDDs, lateral dose profiles and ROFs were calculated in the Eclipse Treatment Planning System version 13·6 using the Acuros XB (AXB) and the analytical anisotropic algorithms (AAAs) in a homogenous water phantom. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and measurements using the Exradin W1 Scintillator were also accomplished for four photon energies: 6 MV, 6FFF, 10 MV and 10FFF. Two VMAT treatment plans were generated for two different targets: one located in the brain and the other in the neck (close to the trachea) in the head phantom (CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA). A Varian Truebeam linear accelerator (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used for all treatment deliveries. Calculated results with AXB and AAA were compared with MC simulations and measurements.

Results:

The average difference of PDDs between W1 Exradin Scintillator measurements and MC simulations, AAA and AXB algorithm calculations were 1·2, 2·4 and 3·2%, respectively, for all field sizes and energies. AXB and AAA showed differences in ROF of about 0·3 and 2·9%, respectively, compared with W1 Exradin Scintillator measured values. For the target located in the brain in the head phantom, the average dose difference between W1 Exradin Scintillator and the MC simulations, AAA and AXB were 0·2, 3·2 and 2·7%, respectively, for all field sizes. Similarly, for the target located in the neck, the respective dose differences were 3·8, 5·7 and 3·5%.

Conclusion:

In this study, we compared dosimetric parameters such as PDD, beam profile and ROFs in water phantom and isocenter point dose measurements in an anthropomorphic head phantom representing a patient. We observed that measurements using the W1 Exradin scintillator agreed well with MC simulations and can be used efficiently for dosimetric parameters such as PDDs and dose profiles and patient-specific quality assurance measurements for small fields. In both homogenous and heterogeneous media, the AXB algorithm dose prediction agrees well with MC and measurements and was found to be superior to the AAA algorithm.

A novel method for the determination of field output factors and output correction factors for small static fields for six diodes and a microdiamond detector in megavoltage photon beams

Purpose

The goal of this work is to provide a large and consistent set of data for detector‐specific output correction factors, kQclin,Qreffclin,fref, for small static fields for seven solid‐state detectors and to determine field output factors, ΩQclin,Qreffclin,fref, using EBT3 radiochromic films and W1 plastic scintillator as reference detectors on two different linear accelerators and four megavoltage photon beams. Consistent measurement conditions and recommendations given in the International Code of Practice TRS‐483 for small‐field dosimetry were followed throughout the study.

Methods

ΩQclin,Qreffclin,fref were determined on two linacs, Elekta Versa HD and Varian TrueBeam, for 6 and 10 MV beams with and without flattening filter and for nine fields ranging from 0.5 × 0.5 cm² to 10 × 10 cm². Signal readings obtained with EBT3 radiochromic films and W1 plastic scintillator were fitted by an analytical function. Volume averaging correction factors, determined from two‐dimensional (2D) dose matrices obtained with EBT3 films and fitted to bivariate Gaussian function, were used to correct measured signals. kQclin,Qreffclin,fref were determined empirically for six diodes, IBA SFD, IBA Razor, PTW 60008 P, PTW 60012 E, PTW 60018 SRS, and SN EDGE, and a PTW 60019 microDiamond detector.

Results

Field output factors and detector‐specific kQclin,Qreffclin,fref are presented in the form of analytical functions as well as in the form of discrete values. It is found that in general, for a given linac, small‐field output factors need to be determined for every combination of beam energy and filtration (WFF or FFF) and field size as the differences between them can be statistically significant (P < 0.05). For different beam energies, the present data for kQclin,Qreffclin,fref are found to differ significantly (P < 0.05) from the corresponding data published in TRS‐483 mostly for the smallest fields (<1.5 cm). For the PTW microDiamond detector, statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between kQclin,Qreffclin,fref values were found for all investigated beams on an Elekta Versa HD linac for field sizes 0.5 × 0.5 cm² and 0.8 × 0.8 cm². Significant differences in kQclin,Qreffclin,fref between beams of a given energy but with and without flattening filters are found for measurements made in small fields (<1.5 cm) at a given linac. Differences in kQclin,Qreffclin,fref are also found when measurements are made at different linacs using the same beam energy filtration combination; for the PTW microDiamond detector, these differences were found to be around 6% and were considered as significant.

Conclusions

Selection of two reference detectors, EBT3 films and W1 plastic scintillator, and use of an analytical function, is a novel approach for the determination of ΩQclin,Qreffclin,fref for small static fields in megavoltage photon beams. Large set of kQclin,Qreffclin,fref data for seven solid‐state detectors and four beam energies determined on two linacs by a single group of researchers can be considered a valuable supplement to the literature and the TRS‐483 dataset.

Validation of MLC-based linac radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia

This study details a validation process for linear accelerator‐based treatment of trigeminal neuralgia using HD‐MLC field collimation. Nine trigeminal neuralgia treatment plans utilizing HD‐MLC were selected for absolute dose measurement at isocenter using a commercial scintillating detector in an anthropomorphic phantom. Four plans were chosen for film dosimetry measurements in each of the three principal planes to assess spatial dose distribution agreement with the treatment planning system. Additionally, trajectory log analysis for each treatment field in the nine cases was performed to assess mechanical positioning accuracy of the MLC system during delivery. Scintillator and film measurements both revealed mean dose agreement at isocenter of better than 3% while FWHM of the 2D dose distribution in each plane showed agreement between plan and measurement within 0.2 mm. Analysis of log files revealed a maximum MLC leaf positioning error of 0.04 mm across 178 treatment fields. In conjunction with a quality‐controlled treatment delivery methodology, an appropriately commissioned treatment planning system can be used for accurate and clinically appropriate design of trigeminal neuralgia treatment plans utilizing HD‐MLC.

Effect of Magnetic Field Strength on Plastic Scintillation Detector Response

Purpose

To characterize the response of plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs) to high-energy photon radiation as a function of magnetic field strength.

Materials and Methods

PSDs were placed inside a plastic phantom held at the center point between 2 magnets and irradiated using a 6-MV photon beam from a linear accelerator. The magnetic field was varied from 0 T to 1.5 T by 0.3-T increments. The light emission and stem-effect-corrected response as a function of magnetic field strength were obtained for both a commercial PSD (Exradin W1, Standard Imaging) and an in-house hyperspectral PSD. Spectral signatures were obtained for the in-house PSD, and light emission from a bare fiber was also measured.

Results

Light emission increased as magnetic field strength increased for all detectors tested. The tested PSDs exhibited an increase in light intensity of 10% to 20%, mostly owing to the increase in Cerenkov light produced within and transmitted along the optical fiber. When corrected for stem effects, the increase in PSD response went down to 2.4% for both detectors. This most likely represents the change in the inherent dose deposition within the phantom.

Conclusion

PSDs with a suitable stem-effect removal approach were less dependent on magnetic field strength and had better water equivalence than did ion chambers tested in previous studies. PSDs therefore show great promise for use in both quality assurance and in-vivo dosimetry applications in a magnetic field environment.

Evaluation of the accuracy of the CyberKnife Synchrony™ Respiratory Tracking System using a plastic scintillator

PURPOSE

The Synchrony™ Respiratory Tracking System of the CyberKnife® Robotic Radiosurgery System (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) enables real-time tracking of moving targets such as lung and liver tumors during radiotherapy. Although film measurements have been used for quality assurance of the tracking system, they cannot evaluate the temporal tracking accuracy. We have developed a verification system using a plastic scintillator that can evaluate the temporal accuracy of the CyberKnife Synchrony.

METHODS

A phantom consisting of a U-shaped plastic frame with three fiducial markers was used. The phantom was moved on a plastic scintillator plate. To identify the phantom position on the recording video in darkness, four pieces of fluorescent tape representing the corners of a 10 cm × 10 cm square around an 8 cm × 8 cm window were attached to the phantom. For a stable respiration model, the phantom was moved with the fourth power of a sinusoidal wave with breathing cycles of 4, 3, and 2 s and an amplitude of 1 cm. To simulate irregular breathing, the respiratory cycle was varied with Gaussian random numbers. A virtual target was generated at the center of the fluorescent markers using the MultiPlan™ treatment planning system. Photon beams were irradiated using a fiducial tracking technique. In a dark room, the fluorescent light of the markers and the scintillation light of the beam position were recorded using a camera. For each video frame, a homography matrix was calculated from the four fluorescent marker positions, and the beam position derived from the scintillation light was corrected. To correct the displacement of the beam position due to oblique irradiation angles and other systematic measurement errors, offset values were derived from measurements with the phantom held stationary.

RESULTS

The average SDs of beam position measured without phantom motion were 0.16 and 0.20 mm for lateral and longitudinal directions, respectively. For the stable respiration model, the tracking errors (mean ± SD) were 0.40 ± 0.64 mm, -0.07 ± 0.79 mm, and 0.45 ± 1.14 mm for breathing cycles of 4, 3, and 2 s, respectively. The tracking errors showed significant linear correlation with the phantom velocity. The correlation coefficients were 0.897, 0.913, and 0.957 for breathing cycles of 4, 3, and 2 s, respectively. The unstable respiration model also showed linear correlation between tracking errors and phantom velocity. The probability of tracking error incidents increased with decreasing length of the respiratory cycles. Although the tracking error incidents increased with larger variations in respiratory cycle, the effect on the cumulative probability was insignificant. For a respiratory cycle of 4 s, the maximum tracking error was 1.10 and 1.43 mm at the probability of 10% and 5%, respectively. Large tracking errors were observed when there was phase shift between the tumor and the LED marker.

CONCLUSION

This technique allows evaluation of the motion tracking accuracy of the Synchrony™ system over time by measurement of the photon beam. The velocity of the target and phase shift have significant effects on accuracy.

Thermoplastic wrapped lead sheet to reduce cardiac device cumulative dose

The objective of this project is to evaluate the percentage dose reduction in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) using a thermoplastic wrapped lead sheet. The dose to CIED is evaluated in various situations with and without a lead shield. The efficiency of this type of shielding is supported by measurements made with a commercial plastic scintillation detector (PSD). Percentage depth dose (PDD) curve and lateral dose measurements (LDMs) were made with and without shielding for photon and electron beams. Photon LDMs were made at a depth of 0.5 cm. PSD measurements were compared with dose calculation from the treatment planning system (TPS). The benefit of shielding is greater at 23 MV than at 6 MV, with an average reduction of 71% and 59% of dose, respectively, for out-of-field distance range between 3 and 15 cm. Measurement of posterior beams shows there is no significant increase in skin dose due to backscatter from the lead sheet even when the field intercepts it. Large deviations between TPS calculation and measurements have been observed. The use of lead shielding with an anterior field is advised and provides an easy way to decrease the cumulative dose to CIEDs. Interception of shielding by an electron beam would increase significantly the cumulative dose to CIED for high energies or decrease the quality of the treatment. For a posterior out-of-field, shielding does not have a significant impact on CIED dose.

A comparative study of three small-field detectors for patient specific stereotactic arc dosimetry

This paper examines the difference in patient specific dosimetry using three different detectors of varying active volume, density and composition, for quality assurance of stereotactic treatments. A PTW 60017 unshielded electron diode, an Exradin W1 scintillator, and a PTW 31014 PinPoint small volume ionisation chamber were setup in a Lucy 3D QA phantom, and were positioned at the isocentre of an Elekta Axesse, with beam modulator collimator, using Exactrac and a HexaPODTM couch. Dose measurements were acquired for 43 stereotactic arcs, and compared to BrainLAB iPlan version 3.0.0 treatment planning system (TPS) calculations using a pencil beam algorithm. It was found that for arcs with field sizes [Formula: see text] mm, the properties of a detector have minimal impact on the measured doses, with all three detectors agreeing with the TPS (to within 5%). However, for field sizes [Formula: see text] mm, only the scintillator was found to yield results to within 5% of the TPS. The dose discrepancies were found to increase with decreasing field size. It is recommended that for field sizes [Formula: see text] mm, a water equivalent dosimeter like the Exradin W1 scintillator be used in order to minimise detector composition perturbations in the measured doses.

Small composite field correction factors for the CyberKnife radiosurgery system: clinical and PCSR plans

A formalism has been proposed for small and non-standard photon fields in which [Formula: see text] correction factors are used to correct dosimeter response in small fields (indiviual or composite) relative to that in a larger machine-specific reference (MSR) field. For clinical plans consisting of several fields, a plan-class specific reference (PCSR) plan can also be defined, serving as an intermediate calibration field between the MSR and clinical plans within a certain plan-class. In this work, the formalism was applied in the calculation of [Formula: see text] for 21 clinical plans delivered by the [Formula: see text] radiosurgery system, each plan employing one or two of the smallest diameter collimators: 5 mm, 7.5 mm, and 10 mm. Three detectors were considered: the Exradin A16 and A26 micro chambers, and the W1 plastic scintillator. The clinical plans were grouped into 7 plan-classes according to commonly shared characteristics. The suitability of using a PCSR plan to represent the detector response of each plan within the plan-class was investigated. Total and intermediate correction factors were calculated using the [Formula: see text] Monte Carlo user code. The corrections for the micro chambers were large, primarily due to the presence of the low-density air cavity and the volume averaging effect. The correction for the scintillator was found to be close to unity for most plans, indicating that this detector may be used to measure small clinical plan correction factors in any plan except for those using the 5 mm collimator. The PCSR plan was shown to be applicable to plan-classes comprising isocentric plans only, with plan-classes divided according to collimator size. For non-isocentric plans, the variation of [Formula: see text] as a function of the point of measurement within a single plan, as well as the high inter-plan-class variability of the correction factor, precludes the use of a PCSR plan.

Technical Note: Evaluation of plastic scintillator detector for small field stereotactic patient-specific quality assurance

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of a commercial plastic scintillator detector (PSD) for small-field stereotactic patient-specific quality assurance (QA) measurements using flattening-filter-free beam.

METHODS

A total of 10 spherical targets [volume range: (0.03 cc-2 cc)] were planned with two techniques: (a) dynamic conformal arc (DCA-10 plans) and (b) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT-10 plans). All plans were generated using Varian Eclipse treatment planning system, and AcurosXB v.13 algorithm in 1.0 mm grid size. Additionally, 14 previously treated cranial and spine SRS plans were evaluated [6 DCA, 8 VMAT, volume range: (0.04 cc-119.02 cc)]. Plan modulation was quantified via two metrics: MU per prescription dose (MU/Rx) and Average Leaf Pair Opening (ALPO). QA was performed on the Varian Edge linear accelerator equipped with HDMLC. Three detectors were used: (a) PinPoint ion chamber (PTW; active volume 0.015 cc), (b) Exradin W1 PSD (Standard Imaging; active volume 0.002 cc), and (c) Gafchromic EBT3 film (Ashland). PinPoint chamber and PSD were positioned perpendicular to beam axis in a Lucy phantom (Standard Imaging); films were placed horizontally capturing the coronal plane.

RESULTS

PSD, film, and PinPoint chamber measured average differences of 1.00 ± 1.54%, 1.30 ± 1.69%, and -0.66 ± 2.36%, respectively, compared to AcurosXB dose calculation. As the target volume decreased, PinPoint chamber measured lower doses (maximum -5.07% at 0.07 cc target), while PSD and film measured higher doses (2.87% and 2.54% at 0.03 cc target) than AcurosXB. Film agreed with the benchmark detector PSD by an average difference of 0.31 ± 1.20%, but suffered from larger uncertainty; PinPoint chamber underestimated dose by more than 4% for targets smaller than 0.2 cc. Taking PSD as the measurement standard, DCA plans achieved good QA results across all volumes studied, with an average of -0.07 ± 0.89%; for VMAT plans, PSD measured consistently higher dose (1.95 ± 1.36%) than AcurosXB. Correlation study revealed that plan modulation quantified by both MU/Rx and ALPO correlated significantly with QA results.

CONCLUSION

Among all three detectors, PSD demonstrated superior performances in plans with small fields and heavy modulation. High consistency and low uncertainty made PSD a suitable detector for clinical routine SRS QA. PinPoint chamber should be avoided for targets smaller than 0.2 cc; film dosimetry can be utilized with careful evaluation of its uncertainty bracket. Compared to PSD measurements, AcurosXB calculation demonstrated high accuracy for nonmodulated small fields. The positive correlation between plan modulation and QA discrepancy calls for our attention for clinical SRS plans with high modulation.