Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams

Dosimetry of Continuous Random Motion in High Dose Rate Strontium-90 Plesiotherapy

Strontium-90 plesiotherapy delivers high doses of radiation to superficial lesions (<3 mm depth) with excellent sparing of deeper tissues. The sealed-source applicator tip is circular and 8-10 mm in diameter. Larger treatment fields are treated with multiple overlapping fields. The applicator cannot conform to angular extensions of irregularly shaped fields, resulting in unnecessary treatment of normal tissue, and overlapping fields can overdose in some areas. With strontium-90 sources that have high activity and thus a high dose rate, small variations in duration and position of placement can be even more consequential. This prospective investigation used radiochromic film to evaluate the dosimetry of adjacent, static, overlapping fields compared with that of the same target area treated with the applicator in continuous motion intended to achieve the prescribed exposure to all points within the target. The intent was to minimize over- and underdosed areas. Three shapes of target field were used: single 2 cm circle, curvilinear field, and cloverleaf. Application times were calculated to deliver the dose to the surface, and the procedure was repeated by four operators for qualitative evaluation (1 Gy/100 cGy to target) and four operators to generate quantitative data (5 Gy/500 cGy to target). We found significant differences between methods among operators, dependent on the number of fields, and in dose drop-off at the margin of the treated field. In almost every comparison, continuous motion was more homogenous (p ≤ .01 for standard deviation from expected dose). The continuous motion technique can be used for strontium plesiotherapy when the applicator must be held.

Evaluation of ion recombination and polarity effect on photon depth dose measurements using mini- and micro-ion chamber

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of ion recombination (k s ${k}_s$ ) and polarity (k p o l ${k}_{pol}$ ) correction factors on percentage depth dose (PDD) curves for three ion chambers, using flat and flattening filter free (FFF) beams, across different broad field sizes. A method to assess these effects and their corresponding corrections is proposed.

METHODS

k s ${k}_s$ andk p o l ${k}_{pol}$ were evaluated following the IAEA TRS-398 protocol for three ion chambers: PTW Semiflex-3D-31021, PinPoint-3D-31022, and Semiflex-31010. PDD measurements were acquired from dmax to 32 cm depth at four voltages (± 400 V or ± 300 V, and ± 100 V) for field sizes 4 × 4, 10 × 10, 20 × 20, and 40 × 40 cm2. Thek s ${k}_s$ values were computed after thek p o l ${k}_{pol}$ correction at each applied voltage. This study aimed to assess the variation of the factors along scanning depths for different field sizes, to evaluate the need for correcting the scanning data.

RESULTS

k p o l ${k}_{pol}$ was independent of depth and field size for Semiflex-3D, while it presented an increasing value with depth for the PinPoint-3D.k s ${k}_s$ increased with dose rate, i.e., decreased with depth. The variation of this perturbation effect over the PDD range was about 0.1% for flat beams with all three ion chambers. With FFF beams, it was around 0.3% with PinPoint-3D, and 0.8% for 10FFF with Semiflex-3D. A second-order polynomial fit can be determined to directly correct the raw data scanned along the beam axis for bothk s ${k}_s$ andk p o l ${k}_{pol}$ .

CONCLUSION

k s ${k}_s$ can significantly affect the PDD scanning measurements in FFF beams acquired with Semiflex-3D. An error close to 1% at large depths could be present, meaning an error of less than 0.3% relative to the dose at the depth of dmax.

Magnetic field quality conversion factors experimentally measured in clinical MR-linac beams for seven MR-compatible ionization chamber models

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work was to experimentally quantify MR-compatible ionization chamber response for 1.5T Elekta Unity and 0.35T ViewRay MRIdian MR-linac systems through the determination of the magnetic field quality conversion factor, kB,Q.

METHODS

Seven MR-compatible ionization chamber models from Standard Imaging and PTW were evaluated. Both the quality conversion factor kQ and the magnetic field quality conversion factor kB,Q were experimentally determined through a cross-calibration method. Specifically, the ratio of absorbed dose measured with a reference A1SL chamber under reference conditions to corrected output measured with each test chamber at the same point of measurement allowed for the determination of kB,Q. The angular dependence of the magnetic field quality conversion factor for MR-compatible chamber models was assessed for the 1.5T Elekta Unity system by measuring kB,Q with the chamber axis and magnetic field direction aligned at cardinal angles (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°).

RESULTS

Beam quality conversion (kQ) factors for MR-compatible ionization chambers measured in a standard linac beam showed an average percent difference of -0.09 ± 0.18% compared to computed kQ values for their conventional chamber versions. Similarly, magnetic field quality conversion (kB,Q) factors for corresponding MR and non-MR ionization chamber models measured using the same cross-calibration technique demonstrated average percent differences of -0.1 ± 0.3% and 0.0 ± 0.2% for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian, respectively. Investigation of the angular dependence of this correction factor demonstrated identical chamber response for equivalent MR-compatible and conventional chamber models.

CONCLUSIONS

This work provides critical experimental validation of MR-compatible ionization chamber performance, with a direct comparison of measured kB,Q values to corresponding conventional chamber models demonstrating nearly equivalent chamber response. kB,Q values determined using our experimental method will serve as an important reference for upcoming MR-linac reference dosimetry protocols and ultimately represent an important step towards accurate output calibration of MR-linac systems.

Novel photopeak-independent correction method for internal activity calculation of 99mTc: a simulation study

This paper presents a new method for correcting the contribution of scattered radiation to the measurement of 99mTc internal activity in nuclear medicine patients using gamma cameras. So, this study aims to derive scattering correction factors by Monte Carlo simulation for anterior and posterior count rates (${I}_{\mathrm{A}}$ and ${I}_{\mathrm{P}}$) in the conjugate view method, enabling more precise estimation of activity A(t) compared to traditional trapezoidal and triangular approximations. The new approach eliminates the need to use photopeak for determining the fraction of scattered photons. Our results showed differences of <3% with respect to the real activity and 11% for the trapezoidal and triangular approaches.

Long-term stability of a PTW 34070 large-area parallel ionization chamber in clinical proton scanning beams

PURPOSE

In the modeling of beam data for proton therapy planning systems, absolute dose measurements are performed utilizing a Bragg peak chamber (BPC), which is a parallel-plate ionization chamber. The long-term stability of the BPC is crucial for ensuring accurate absolute dose measurement. The study aims to assess the long-term stability of the BPC in clinical proton pencil beam scanning delivery.

METHODS

The long-term stability evaluation focused on the BPC-Type 34070 (PTW Freiburg, Germany), utilizing clinical proton scanning beams from December 2022 to November 2023. Monthly investigations were conducted to evaluate the response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC and a reference chamber, employing the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. Additionally, assessments were made regarding the BPC's response to monoenergetic beams, along with an examination of the impact of polarity and ion recombination on the BPC.

RESULTS

The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC varied up to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, while the response of the reference chamber remained within a 0.5% range. The BPC's response to the mono-energetic beams varied up to 2.0% across all energies, demonstrating similar variation trends in both the SOBP field and mono-energetic beams. Furthermore, the variations in polarity and ion recombination effect remained stable within a 0.4% range throughout the year. Notably, the reproducibility of the BPC remained high for each measurement conducted, whether for the SOBP field or mono-energetic beams, with a maximum deviation observed at 0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC demonstrated significant variations, with maximum changes of 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the reproducibility of the BPC remained consistently high for each measurement. It is recommended that when conducting absolute dose measurements using a BPC, its response should be compared and corrected against the reference chamber for each measurement.

Quantification of uncertainties in reference and relative dose measurements, dose calculations, and patient setup in modern external beam radiotherapy

Uncertainties in the steps of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) affect patient outcomes. However, few studies have investigated major contributors to these uncertainties. This study investigated factors contributing to reducing uncertainty in delivering a dose to a target volume. The EBRT process was classified into four steps: reference dosimetry, relative dosimetry [percentage depth doses (PDDs) and off-center ratios (OCRs)], dose calculations (PDDs and OCRs in a virtual water phantom), and patient setup using an image-guided radiation therapy system. We evaluated the uncertainties for these steps in conventionally fractionated EBRT for intracranial disease using 4-, 6-, and 10-MV flattened photon beams generated from clinical linear accelerators following the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement and an uncertainty evaluation method with uncorrected deflection. The following were the major contributors to these uncertainties: beam quality conversion factors for reference dosimetry; charge measurements, chamber depth, source-to-surface distance, water evaporation, and field size for relative dosimetry; dose calculation accuracy for the dose calculations; image registration, radiation-imaging isocenter coincidence, variation in radiation isocenter due to gantry and couch rotation, and intrafractional motion for the patient setup. Among the four steps, the relative dosimetry and dose calculation (namely, both penumbral OCRs) steps involved an uncertainty of more than 5% with a coverage factor of 1. In the EBRT process evaluated herein, the uncertainties in the relative dosimetry and dose calculations must be reduced.

The role of volume averaging effects, beam hardening, and phantom scatter in dosimetry of grid therapy

Objective. Current reference dosimetry methods for spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) assume a negligible beam quality change, perturbation, or volume-averaging correction factor. Therefore, the aim of this work was to investigate the impact of the grid collimators on the dosimetric characteristics of a 6 MV photon beam. A detector-specific correction factor,kQgrid,  Qmsr fgrid,fmsr, was proposed. Several dosimeters were evaluated for their ability to measure both reference dose and grid output factors (GOFs).Approach. A Monte Carlo model of a grid collimator was created to study the change in the depth dose characteristics with the grid collimator. The impact of the collimator on the percent depth dose (PDD), electron contamination, and average photon energy was investigated. ThekQgrid,  Qmsr fgrid,fmsrcorrection factors were calculated for two reference-class micro ion chambers. The reference dose and GOFs were measured with a grid collimator using six ion chambers, two silicon diodes, and a diamond detector.Main results.The PDD in the presence of the grid was observed to be steeper compared to the open field. The average photon energy increased from 1.33 MeV to 1.74 MeV with the presence of the grid collimator. The dose contribution by scattered photons was significantly higher at deeper regions for the open field compared to the grid field. ThekQgrid,  Qmsr fgrid,fmsrcorrection was calculated to be <0.5%. The reference dose for all detectors, except for the CC13 and CC04 chambers, was within 1% of each other. The CC13 under-responded up to 3.2% due to volume-averaging effects. The GOFs calculated for all detectors, except Razor and A16, were within 1% of each other.Significance. The phantom scatter dictates the change in the PDD with the presence of the grid. The micro ion chambers exhibit negligiblekQgrid,  Qmsr fgrid,fmsrcorrection. All detectors, except the CC13 ion chamber, were found to be suitable for SFRT reference dosimetry.

Portability of IMRT QA between matched linear accelerators

PURPOSE

To determine if patient-specific IMRT quality assurance can be measured on any matched treatment delivery system (TDS) for patient treatment delivery on another.

METHODS

Three VMAT plans of varying complexity were created for each available energy for head and neck, SBRT lung, and right chestwall anatomical sites. Each plan was delivered on three matched Varian TrueBeam TDSs to the same Scandidos Delta4 Phantom+ diode array with only energy-specific device calibrations. Dose distributions were corrected for TDS output and then compared to TPS calculations using gamma analysis. Round-robin comparisons between measurements from each TDS were also performed using point-by-point dose difference, median dose difference, and the percent of point dose differences within 2% of the mean metrics.

RESULTS

All plans had more than 95% of points passing a gamma analysis using 3%/3 mm criteria with global normalization and a 20% threshold when comparing measurements to calculations. The tightest gamma analysis criteria where a plan still passed > 95% were similar across delivery systems-within 0.5%/0.5 mm for all but three plan/energy combinations. Median dose deviations in measurement-to-measurement comparisons were within 0.7% and 1.0% for global and local normalization, respectively. More than 90% of the point differences were within 2%.

CONCLUSION

A set of plans spanning available energies and complexity levels were delivered by three matched TDSs. Comparisons to calculations and between measurements showed dose distributions delivered by each TDS using the same DICOM RT-plan file meet tolerances much smaller than typical clinical IMRT QA criteria. This demonstrates each TDS is modeled to a similar accuracy by a common class (shared) beam model. Additionally, it demonstrates that dose distributions from one TDS show small differences in median dose to the others. This is an important validation component of the common beam model approach, allowing for operational improvements in the clinic.

Dosimetric impact of calibration coefficients determined using linear accelerator photon and electron beams for ionization chamber in an on-site dosimetry audit

This study aimed to clarify the dosimetric impact of calibration beam quality for calibration coefficients of the absorbed dose to water for an ionization chamber in an on-site dosimetry audit. Institution-measured doses of 200 photon and 184 electron beams were compared with the measured dose using one year data before and after the calibration of the ionization chamber used. For photon and electron reference dosimetry, the agreements of the institution-measured dose against two measured doses in this audit were evaluated using the calibration coefficients determined using 60Co (${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},{}^{60}\mathrm{Co}}$) and linear accelerator (linac) (${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},Q}$) beams. For electron reference dosimetry, the agreement of two institution-measured doses against the measured dose was evaluated using${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},Q}$. Institution-measured doses were evaluated using direct- and cross-calibration coefficients. For photon reference dosimetry, the mean differences and standard deviation (SD) of institution-measured dose against the measured dose using ${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},{}^{60}\mathrm{Co}}$ and ${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},Q}$ were -0.1% ± 0.4% and -0.3% ± 0.4%, respectively. For electron reference dosimetry, the mean differences and SD of institution-measured dose using the direct-calibration coefficient against the measured dose using ${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},{}^{60}\mathrm{Co}}$ and ${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},Q}$ were 1.3% ± 0.8% and 0.8% ± 0.8%, respectively. Further, the mean differences and SD of institution-measured dose using the cross-calibration coefficient against the measured dose using ${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},Q}$ were -0.1% ± 0.6%. For photon beams, the dosimetric impact of introducing calibration coefficients determined using linac beams was small. For electron beams, it was larger, and the measured dose using ${N}_{D,\mathrm{w},Q}$ was most consistent with the institution-measured dose, which was evaluated using a cross-calibration coefficient.

Implementation of an ionization chamber array for linear accelerator monthly dosimetry QA

PURPOSE

The IC Profiler (ICP) manufactured by Sun Nuclear Corporation (SNC) is an ionization chamber (IC) array used for linear accelerator dosimetry measurements. Previous work characterized response of the ICP under various conditions, but there is limited work of its implementation into monthly QA measurement procedures. This work quantifies ICP accuracy and variables that affect accuracy for beam output measurements, and demonstrates feasibility of using the ICP for all recommended monthly dosimetry measurements.

METHODS

A total of 1985 output measurements on six Varian TrueBeam and Edge linear accelerators were performed using three ICP with quad wedges (QWs) and were compared with conventional IC measurements. The accuracy of the ICP for beam output was characterized as the difference between the ICP and IC. Variables that affect ICP accuracy, including gain settings, calibrations, and template baselining as well as machine or energy-specific bias were investigated. Measurements of profile constancy, energy, dose rate constancy, wedge factors, and gating were performed.

RESULTS

The initially observed mean output difference between the ICP and IC was 0.16% (0.61%). When gain settings were optimized, the output difference accuracy improved to -0.02% (0.38%). The output accuracy of the ICP was not dependent on array, dose, temperature and pressure calibrations, or template baselining. Statistically, ICP output accuracy was dependent on machine and beam energy, but clinically, all measurements fell within 0.5% of unity. ICP measurements of energy, dose rate constancy, and wedge factors matched passing results with conventional IC in water measurements. Gating and beam profile constancy measurements demonstrated good stability using the ICP. Finally, monthly dosimetry QA using ICP was completed in an average of 33 min compared to 66 min using the IC.

CONCLUSION

This work demonstrated the feasibility and efficiency of using the ICP, with specific considerations, as a measurement device for dosimetric linear accelerator monthly QA.

AAPM WGTG51 Report 385: Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy electron beams

An Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for the determination of absorbed dose to water is presented for electron beams with energies between 4 MeV and 22 MeV (1.70 cm ≤ R 50 ≤ 8.70 cm $1.70\nobreakspace {\rm cm} \le R_{\text{50}} \le 8.70\nobreakspace {\rm cm}$ ). This updated formalism allows simplified calibration procedures, including the use of calibrated cylindrical ionization chambers in all electron beams without the use of a gradient correction. Newk Q $k_{Q}$ data are provided for electron beams based on Monte Carlo simulations. Implementation guidance is provided. Components of the uncertainty budget in determining absorbed dose to water at the reference depth are discussed. Specifications for a reference-class chamber in electron beams include chamber stability, settling, ion recombination behavior, and polarity dependence. Progress in electron beam reference dosimetry is reviewed. Although this report introduces some major changes (e.g., gradient corrections are implicitly included in the electron beam quality conversion factors), they serve to simplify the calibration procedure. Results for absorbed dose per linac monitor unit are expected to be up to approximately 2 % higher using this Addendum compared to using the original TG-51 protocol.

Evaluation of monthly variations in electrometer calibration coefficients using a charge generator for radiation therapy

Electrometers are important devices that are part of the standard dosimetry system. Therefore, we evaluated the variation of electrometer calibration coefficients (kelec) over 1 year in this study. We investigated two types of electrometers: a rate mode and an integrate mode. Each electrometer was connected to a charge generator, a constant charge was applied, and kelec was determined by measuring the current. The current measurements were repeated once a month. For electrometers with multiple ranges, measurements were taken at low and medium ranges. Almost all kelec measurements agreed within 0.2% of the initial measurements. However, the low range of the electrometer with an integrate mode showed seasonal variation, with a variation greater than 0.2%. This study shows that electrometers may exhibit errors that cannot be detected through annual inspections. The importance of quality assurance using a charge generator at one's own institution was demonstrated.

3D printed heterogeneous paediatric head and adult thorax phantoms for linear accelerator radiotherapy quality assurance: from fabrication to treatment delivery

Objective. This study aims to design and fabricate a 3D printed heterogeneous paediatric head phantom and to customize a thorax phantom for radiotherapy dosimetry.Approach. This study designed, fabricated, and tested 3D printed radiotherapy phantoms that can simulate soft tissue, lung, brain, and bone. Various polymers were considered in designing the phantoms. Polylactic acid+, nylon, and plaster were used in simulating different tissue equivalence. Dimensional accuracy, and CT number were investigated. The phantoms were subjected to a complete radiotherapy clinical workflow. Several treatment plans were delivered in both the head and the thorax phantom from a simple single 6 MV beam, parallel opposed beams, and five-field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams. Dose measurements using an ionization chamber and radiochromic films were compared with the calculated doses of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS).Main results. The fabricated heterogeneous phantoms represent paediatric human head and adult thorax based on its radiation attenuation and anatomy. The measured CT number ranges are within -786.23 ± 10.55, 0.98 ± 3.86, 129.51 ± 12.83, and 651.14 ± 47.76 HU for lung, water/brain, soft tissue, and bone, respectively. It has a good radiological imaging visual similarity relative to a real human head and thorax depicting soft tissue, lung, bone, and brain. The accumulated dose readings for both conformal radiotherapy and IMRT match with the TPS calculated dose within ±2% and ±4% for head and thorax phantom, respectively. The mean pass rate for all the plans delivered are above 90% for gamma analysis criterion of 3%/3 mm.Significance and conclusion. The fabricated heterogeneous paediatric head and thorax phantoms are useful in Linac end-to-end radiotherapy quality assurance based on its CT image and measured radiation dose. The manufacturing and dosimetry workflow of this study can be utilized by other institutions for dosimetry and trainings.

Minimum phantom size for megavoltage photon beam reference dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Water phantoms are required to perform reference dosimetry and beam quality measurements but there are no published studies about the size requirements for such phantoms.

PURPOSE

To investigate, using Monte Carlo techniques, the size requirements for water phantoms used in reference dosimetry and/or to measure the beam quality specifiers% d d ( 10 ) x $\%dd(10)_{\sf x}$ andT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ .

METHODS

The EGSnrc application DOSXYZnrc is used to calculateD ( 10 ) $D(10)$ , the dose per incident fluence at 10 cm depth in a water phantom irradiated by incident10 × 10 cm 2 $10\,\times \,10 \, {\rm {cm}}^{2}$   beams of60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$   or 6 MV photons. The water phantom dimensions are varied from30 × 30 × 40 cm 3 $30 \,\times \, 30 \,\times \, 40 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ to15 × 15 × 22 cm 3 $15 \,\times \, 15 \,\times \, 22 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ and occasionally smaller. The% d d ( 10 ) x $\%dd(10)_{\sf x}$ andT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values are also calculated with care being taken to distinguishT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ results when using Method A (changing depth of water in phantom) and Method B (moving entire phantom). Typical statistical uncertainties are 0.03%.

RESULTS

Phantom dimensions have only minor effects for phantoms larger than20 × 20 × 25 cm 3 $20 \,\times \, 20 \,\times \, 25 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ . A table of corrections to the dose at 10 cm depth in10 × 10 cm 2 $10 \,\times \, 10 \, {\rm {cm}}^{2}$   beams of60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$   or 6 MV photons are provided and range from no correction to 0.75% for a60 Co $^{60}{\rm {Co}}$  beam incident on a20 × 20 × 15 cm 3 $20 \,\times \, 20 \,\times \, 15 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ phantom. There can be distinct differences in theT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values measured using Method A or Method B, especially for smaller phantoms. It is explicitly demonstrated that, within ± $\pm$ 0.15%,T P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$ values for a30 × 30 × 30 cm 3 $30 \,\times \, 30 \,\times \, 30 \, {\rm {cm}}^3$ phantom measured using Method A or B are independent of source detector distance between 40 and 200 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

The phantom sizes recommended in the TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 reference dosimetry protocols are adequate for accurate reference dosimetry and in some cases are even conservative. Correction factors are necessary for accurate measurement of the dose at 10 cm depth in smaller phantoms and these factors are provided. Very accurate beam quality specifiers are not required for reference dosimetry itself, but for specifying beam stability and characteristics it is important to specify phantom sizes and also the method used forT P R 10 20 $TPR^{20}_{10}$  measurements.

Suitability of novel 3D-printed and coated vessels for water calorimetry

BACKGROUND

In water calorimetry, absolute dose to water is determined by measuring radiation-induced temperature rises. In conventional water calorimeters, temperature detectors are housed in handmade glass vessels that are filled with high-purity water, thus mitigating radiation-induced exo/endothermic chemical reactions of impurities that would otherwise introduce additional heat gain/loss, known as heat defect. Being hand-crafted, these glass vessels may suffer from imperfections, have shape and design constraints, are often backordered, and can be prohibitively expensive.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work is to determine suitability of 3D-printed plastic vessels that are further coated for use in water calorimetry applications, and to study their stability and characterize their associated heat defect correction factor (k hd ) ${k_{{\mathrm{hd}}}})$ . This novel vessel production technique would allow for cost-effective rapid construction of vessels that can be produced with high accuracy and designs that are simply not practical with current glass vessel construction techniques. This in turn enables water calorimetry applications in many novel radiation delivery modalities, which may include spherical vessels in GammaKnife ICON water calorimetry as an example.

METHODS

Eight vessels were 3D-printed using Accura ClearVue in an SLA 3D-printer. Two vessels were coated with Parylene C and four were coated with Parylene N. The water calorimetry preparation procedures followed for these vessels was identical to that of our traditional glass-vessels (i.e., same cleaning procedures, same high purity water, and same saturation procedures with high purity hydrogen gas). The performance of each vessel was characterized using our in-house built water calorimeter in an Elekta Versa using both 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) and 18 MV beams. The stability of the coating as function of time and accumulated dose was evaluated through repeated measurements.k hd ${k_{{\mathrm{hd}}}}\;$ of each vessel was determined through cross-comparisons against an Exradin A1SL ionization chamber with direction calibration link to Canada's primary standard laboratory.

RESULTS

k HD ${k_{{\mathrm{HD}}}}\;$ of the two uncoated vessels differed by 2.8% under a 6 MV FFF beam. Vessels coated with Parylenes resulted in a stable and reproducible heat defect for both energies. An overallk hd ${k_{{\mathrm{hd}}}}$ of 1.001 ± 0.010 and 1.005 ± 0.010 were obtained for Parylene N and Parylene C coated vessels respectively. All Parylene coated vessels showed agreement, within the established uncertainties, to the zero-heat defect observed in a hydrogen-saturated glass vessel system. An additional long-term study (17 days) of a Parylene N vessel showed no change in response with accumulated dose and time. Electron microscopy images of a Parylene N coated vessel showed a uniform intact coating after repeated irradiations.

CONCLUSIONS

An uncoated 3D-printed vessel is not viable for water calorimetry because it exhibits an unstable vessel-dependent heat defect. However, applying a Parylene coating stabilizes the heat defect, suggesting that coated 3D-printed vessels may be suitable for use in water calorimetry. This method facilitates the creation of intricate vessel shapes, which can be efficiently manufactured using 3D printing.

Investigations on the beam quality correction factor for ionization chambers in high-energy brachytherapy dosimetry

Objective. To enhance the investigations on MC calculated beam quality correction factors of thimble ionization chambers from high-energy brachytherapy sources and to develop reliable reference conditions in source and detector setups in water.Approach. The response of five different ionization chambers from PTW-Freiburg and Standard Imaging was investigated for irradiation by a high dose rate Ir-192 Flexisource in water. For a setup in a Beamscan water phantom, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to calculate correction factors for the chamber readings. After exact positioning of source and detector the absorbed dose rate at the TG-43 reference point at one centimeter nominal distance from the source was measured using these factors and compared to the specification of the calibration certificate. The Monte Carlo calculations were performed using the restricted cema formalism to gain further insight into the chamber response. Calculations were performed for the sensitive volume of the chambers, determined by the methods currently used in investigations of dosimetry in magnetic fields.Main results. Measured dose rates and values from the calibration certificate agreed within the combined uncertainty (k= 2) for all chambers except for one case in which the full air cavity was simulated. The chambers showed a distinct directional dependence. With the restricted cema formalism calculations it was possible to examine volume averaging and energy dependence of the perturbation factors contributing to the beam quality correction factor also differential in energy.Significance. This work determined beam quality correction factors to measure the absorbed dose rate from a brachytherapy source in terms of absorbed dose to water for a variety of ionization chambers. For the accurate dosimetry of brachytherapy sources with ionization chambers it is advisable to use correction factors based on the sensitive volume of the chambers and to take account for the directional dependence of chamber response.

Monte Carlo evaluation of uncertainties in photon and electron TG-51 absorbed dose calibration

PURPOSE

The accuracy of dose delivery to all patients treated with medical linacs depends on the accuracy of beam calibration. Dose delivery cannot be any more accurate than this. Given the importance of this, it seems worthwhile taking another look at the expected uncertainty in TG-51 photon dose calibration and a first look at electron calibration. This work builds on the 2014 addendum to TG-51 for photons and adds to it by also considering electrons. In that publication, estimates were made of the uncertainty in the dose calibration. In this paper, we take a deeper look at this important issue.

METHODS

The methodology used here is more rigorous than previous determinations as it is based on Monte Carlo simulation of uncertainties. It is assumed that mechanical QA has been performed following TG-142 prior to beam calibration and that there are no uncertainties that exceed the tolerances specified by TG-142.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Despite the different methodology and assumptions, the estimated uncertainty in photon beam calibration is close to that in the addendum. The careful user should be able to easily reach a 95% confidence interval (CI) of ± 2.3% for photon beam calibration with standard instrumentation. For electron beams calibrated with a Farmer chamber, the estimated uncertainties are slightly larger, and the 95% CI is ±2.6% for 6 MeV and slightly smaller than this for 18 MeV. There is no clear energy dependence in these results. It is unlikely that the user will be able to improve on these uncertainties as the dominant factor in the uncertainty resides in the ion chamber dose calibration factorN D , w 60 Co $N_{D,w}^{{}^{60}{\mathrm{Co}}}$ . For both photons and electrons, reduction in the ion chamber depth uncertainty below about 0.5 mm and SSD uncertainty below 1 mm have almost no effect on the total dose uncertainty, as uncertainties beyond the user's control totally dominate under these circumstances.

Commissioning and Assessment of Radiation Field and Dose Inhomogeneity for a Dual X-ray Tube Cabinet Irradiator: To Ensure Accurate Dosimetry in Radiation Biology Experiments

Purpose

Standardization of x-ray cabinet irradiator dose, geometry, and calibration reporting is an ongoing process. Multi-tube designs have been introduced into the preclinical market and give a theoretical benefit but have not been widely assessed for use in preclinical irradiation conditions. The aim of this study was to report our experience commissioning a dual x-ray source cabinet irradiator (CIXD, Xstrahl Limited, United Kingdom) and assess the dose distribution for various experimental conditions.

Methods and Materials

Half-value layer (HVL) measurement, profile measurements, and output calibration were performed using a calibrated ion chamber. Constancy measurements were performed twice daily over 2 weeks to assess output fluctuations. Film measurements were completed using solid water to assess percent depth dose and homogeneity within the field and within variable thicknesses of solid water and phosphate-buffered saline solution. Film measurements were repeated for various arrangements of petri dishes filled with phosphate-buffered saline or water and in a 3D-printed mouse phantom.

Results

The x-ray tubes had a measured in-air output of 1.27 Gy/min. The HVL was 1.7 mm Cu. The upper and lower tubes both exhibited the heel effect, but when operated simultaneously, the effect was reduced. Ion chamber measurements revealed a 15% dose inhomogeneity within the tray area (18 × 18 cm2). Film measurements in the petri dishes indicated minor nonuniformities in the arrangements of the experimental apparatus. Measurements from the mouse phantom with film agreed with ion chamber measurements for various phantom placements and orientations.

Conclusions

X-ray cell culture and animal irradiation with dual tube cabinet irradiation is efficient and robust when using established dosimetric tools to confirm output and homogeneity. The conditions assumed for calibrations are often not maintained during experiments. We have confirmed that inhomogeneities are present for single-tube use; however, they are reduced with simultaneous tube use. Additional dosimetric monitoring should be performed for each unique irradiation setup.

Accurate machine-specific reference and small-field dosimetry for a self-shielded neuro-radiosurgical system

BACKGROUND

The newly available ZAP-X stereotactic radiosurgical system is designed for the treatment of intracranial lesions, with several unique features that include a self-shielding, gyroscopic gantry, wheel collimation, non-orthogonal kV imaging, short source-axis distance, and low-energy megavoltage beam. Systematic characterization of its radiation as well as other properties is imperative to ensure its safe and effective clinical application.

PURPOSE

To accurately determine the radiation output of the ZAP-X with a special focus on the smaller diameter cones and an aim to provide useful recommendations on quantification of small field dosimetry.

METHODS

Six different types of detectors were used to measure relative output factors at field sizes ranging from 4 to 25 mm, including the PTW microSilicon and microdiamond diodes, Exradin W2 plastic scintillator, Exradin A16 and A1SL ionization chambers, and the alanine dosimeter. The 25 mm cone served as the reference field size. Absolute dose was determined with both TG-51-based dosimetry using a calibrated PTW Semiflex ion chamber and measurements using alanine dosimeters.

RESULTS

The average radiation output factors (maximum deviation from the average) measured with the microDiamond, microSilicon, and W2 detectors were: for the 4 mm cone, 0.741 (1.0%); for the 5 mm cone: 0.817 (1.0%); for the 7.5 mm cone: 0.908 (1.0%); for the 10 mm cone: 0.946 (0.4%); for the 12.5 mm cone: 0.964 (0.2%); for the 15 mm cone: 0.976 (0.1%); for the 20 mm cone: 0.990 (0.1%). For field sizes larger than 10 mm, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers also yielded consistent output factors within 1.5% of those obtained using the microSilicon, microdiamond, and W2 detectors. The absolute dose measurement obtained with alanine was within 1.2%, consistent with combined uncertainties, compared to the PTW Semiflex chamber for the 25 mm reference cone.

CONCLUSION

For field sizes less than 10 mm, the microSilicon diode, microDiamond detector, and W2 scintillator are suitable devices for accurate small field dosimetry of the ZAP-X system. For larger fields, the A1SL and A16 micro-chambers can also be used. Furthermore, alanine dosimetry can be an accurate verification of reference and absolute dose typically measured with ion chambers. Use of multiple suitable detectors and uncertainty analyses were recommended for reliable determination of small field radiation outputs.

A study of polarity effect for various ionization chambers in kilovoltage x-ray beams

BACKGROUND

Ionization chambers play an essential role in dosimetry measurements for kilovoltage (kV) x-ray beams. Despite their widespread use, there is limited data on the absolute values for the polarity correction factors across a range of commonly employed ionization chambers.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the polarity effects for five different ionization chambers in kV x-ray beams.

METHODS

Two plane-parallel chambers being the Advanced Markus and Roos and three cylindrical chambers; 3D PinPoint, Semiflex and Farmer chamber (PTW, Freiburg, Germany), were employed to measure the polarity correction factors. The kV x-ray beams were produced from an Xstrahl 300 unit (Xstrahl Ltd., UK). All measurements were acquired at 2 cm depth in a PTW-MP1 water tank for beams between 60 kVp (HVL 1.29 mm Al) and 300 kVp (HVL 3.08 mm Cu), and field sizes of 2-10 cm diameter for 30 cm focus-source distance (FSD) and 4 × 4 cm2 - 20 × 20 cm2 for 50 cm FSD. The ionization chambers were connected to a PTW-UNIDOS electrometer, and the polarity effect was determined using the AAPM TG-61 code of practice methodology.

RESULTS

The study revealed significant polarity effects in ionization chambers, especially in those with smaller volumes. For the plane-parallel chambers, the Advanced Markus chamber exhibited a maximum polarity effect of 2.5%, whereas the Roos chamber showed 0.3% at 150 KVp with the 10 cm circular diameter open-ended applicator. Among the cylindrical chambers at the same beam energy and applicator, the Pinpoint chamber exhibited a 3% polarity effect, followed by Semiflex with 1.7%, and Farmer with 0.4%. However, as the beam energy increased to 300 kVp, the polarity effect significantly increased reaching 8.5% for the Advanced Markus chamber and 13.5% for the PinPoint chamber at a 20 × 20 cm2 field size. Notably, the magnitude of the polarity effect increased with both the field size and beam energy, and was significantly influenced by the size of the chamber's sensitive volume.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate that ionization chambers can exhibit substantial polarity effects in kV x-ray beams, particularly for those chambers with smaller volumes. Therefore, it is important to account for polarity corrections when conducting relative dose measurements in kV x-ray beams to enhance the dosimetry accuracy and improve patient dose calculations.

Clinical reference dosimetry for the 0.5 T inline rotating biplanar Linac-MR

BACKGROUND

The world's first clinical 0.5 T inline rotating biplanar Linac-MR system is commissioned for clinical use. For reference dosimetry, unique features to device, including an SAD = 120 cm, bore clearance of 60 cm × 110 cm, as well as 0.5 T inline magnetic field, provide some challenges to applying a standard dosimetry protocol (i.e., TG-51).

PURPOSE

In this work, we propose a simple and practical clinical reference dosimetry protocol for the 0.5T biplanar Linac-MR and validated its results.

METHODS

Our dosimetry protocol for this system is as follows: tissue phantom ratios at 20 and 10 cm are first measured and converted into %dd10x beam quality specifier using equations provided and Kalach and Rogers. The converted %dd10x is used to determine the ion chamber correction factor, using the equations in the TG-51 addendum for the Exradin A12 farmer chamber used, which is cross-calibrated with one calibrated at a standards laboratory. For a 0.5 T parallel field, magnetic field effect on chamber response is assumed to have no effect and is not explicitly corrected for. Once the ion chamber correction factor for a non-standard SAD (kQ,msr) is determined, TG-51 is performed to obtain dose at a depth of 10 cm at SAD = 120 cm. The dosimetry protocol is repeated with the magnetic field ramped down. To validate our dosimetry protocol, Monte Carlo (EGSnrc) simulations are performed to confirm the determined kQ,msr values. MC Simulations and magnetic Field On versus Field Off measurements are performed to confirm that the magnetic field has no effect. To validate our overall dosimetry protocol, external dose audits, based on optical simulated luminescent dosimeters, thermal luminescent dosimeters, and alanine dosimeters are performed on the 0.5 T Linac-MR system.

RESULTS

Our EGSnrc results confirm our protocol-determined kQ,msr values, as well as our assumptions about magnetic field effects (kB = 1) within statistical uncertainty for the A-12 chamber. Our external dosimetry procedures also validated our overall dosimetry protocol for the 0.5 T biplanar Linac-MR hybrid. Ramping down the magnetic field has resulted in a dosimetric difference of 0.1%, well within experimental uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

With the 0.5 T parallel magnetic field having minimal effect on the ion chamber response, a TPR20,10 approach to determine beam quality provides an accurate method to perform clinical dosimetry for the 0.5 T biplanar Linac-MR.

Experimental determination of magnetic field quality conversion factors for eleven ionization chambers in 1.5 T and 0.35 T MR-linac systems

BACKGROUND

The static magnetic field present in magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy systems can influence dose deposition and charged particle collection in air-filled ionization chambers. Thus, accurately quantifying the effect of the magnetic field on ionization chamber response is critical for output calibration. Formalisms for reference dosimetry in a magnetic field have been proposed, whereby a magnetic field quality conversion factor kB,Q is defined to account for the combined effects of the magnetic field on the radiation detector. Determination of kB,Q in the literature has focused on Monte Carlo simulation studies, with experimental validation limited to only a few ionization chamber models.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to experimentally measure kB,Q for 11 ionization chamber models in two commercially available MR-guided radiotherapy systems: Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian.

METHODS

Eleven ionization chamber models were characterized in this study: Exradin A12, A12S, A28, and A26, PTW T31010, T31021, and T31022, and IBA FC23-C, CC25, CC13, and CC08. The experimental method to measure kB,Q utilized cross-calibration against a reference Exradin A1SL chamber. Absorbed dose to water was measured for the reference A1SL chamber positioned parallel to the magnetic field with its centroid placed at the machine isocenter at a depth of 10 cm in water for a 10 × 10 cm2 field size at that depth. Output was subsequently measured with the test chamber at the same point of measurement. kB,Q for the test chamber was computed as the ratio of reference dose to test chamber output, with this procedure repeated for each chamber in each MR-guided radiotherapy system. For the high-field 1.5 T Elekta Unity system, the dependence of kB,Q on the chamber orientation relative to the magnetic field was quantified by rotating the chamber about the machine isocenter.

RESULTS

Measured kB,Q values for our test dataset of ionization chamber models ranged from 0.991 to 1.002, and 0.995 to 1.004 for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian, respectively, with kB,Q tending to increase as the chamber sensitive volume increased. Measured kB,Q values largely agreed within uncertainty to published Monte Carlo simulation data and available experimental data. kB,Q deviation from unity was minimized for ionization chamber orientation parallel or antiparallel to the magnetic field, with increased deviations observed at perpendicular orientations. Overall (k = 1) uncertainty in the experimental determination of the magnetic field quality conversion factor, kB,Q was 0.71% and 0.72% for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian systems, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For a high-field MR-linac, the characterization of ionization chamber performance as angular orientation varied relative to the magnetic field confirmed that the ideal orientation for output calibration is parallel. For most of these chamber models, this study represents the first experimental characterization of chamber performance in clinical MR-linac beams. This is a critical step toward accurate output calibration for MR-guided radiotherapy systems and the measured kB,Q values will be an important reference data source for forthcoming MR-linac reference dosimetry protocols.

Proton dosimetry in a magnetic field: Measurement and calculation of magnetic field correction factors for a plane-parallel ionization chamber

BACKGROUND

The combination of magnetic resonance imaging and proton therapy offers the potential to improve cancer treatment. The magnetic field (MF)-dependent change in the dosage of ionization chambers in magnetic resonance imaging-integrated proton therapy (MRiPT) is considered by the correction factork B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ , which needs to be determined experimentally or computed via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.

PURPOSE

In this study,k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ was both measured and simulated with high accuracy for a plane-parallel ionization chamber at different clinical relevant proton energies and MF strengths.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The dose-response of the Advanced Markus chamber (TM34045, PTW, Freiburg, Germany) irradiated with homogeneous 10 × $\times$ 10 cm2 $^2$ quasi mono-energetic fields, using 103.3, 128.4, 153.1, 223.1, and 252.7 MeV proton beams was measured in a water phantom placed in the MF of an electromagnet with MF strengths of 0.32, 0.5, and 1 T. The detector was positioned at a depth of 2 g/cm2 $^2$ in water, with chamber electrodes parallel to the MF lines and perpendicular to the proton beam incidence direction. The measurements were compared with TOPAS MC simulations utilizing COMSOL-calculated 0.32, 0.5, and 1 T MF maps of the electromagnet.k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ was calculated for the measurements for all energies and MF strengths based on the equation:k B ⃗ , M , Q = M Q M Q B ⃗ $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}=\frac{M_\mathrm{Q}}{M_\mathrm{Q}^{\vec{B}}}$ , whereM Q B ⃗ $M_\mathrm{Q}^{\vec{B}}$ andM Q $M_\mathrm{Q}$ were the temperature and air-pressure corrected detector readings with and without the MF, respectively. MC-based correction factors were determined ask B ⃗ , M , Q = D det D det B ⃗ $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}=\frac{D_\mathrm{det}}{D_\mathrm{det}^{\vec{B}}}$ , whereD det B ⃗ $D_\mathrm{det}^{\vec{B}}$ andD det $D_\mathrm{det}$ were the doses deposited in the air cavity of the ionization chamber model with and without the MF, respectively. Furthermore, MF effects on the chamber dosimetry are studied using MC simulations, examining the impact on the absorbed dose-to-water (D W $D_{W}$ ) and the shift in depth of the Bragg peak.

RESULTS

The detector showed a reduced dose-response for all measured energies and MF strengths, resulting in experimentally determinedk B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ values larger than unity. For all energies and MF strengths examined,k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ ranged between 1.0065 and 1.0205. The dependence on the energy and the MF strength was found to be non-linear with a maximum at 1 T and 252.7 MeV. The MC simulatedk B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ values agreed with the experimentally determined correction factors within their standard deviations with a maximum difference of 0.6%. The MC calculated impact onD W $D_{W}$ was smaller 0.2 %.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, measurements and simulations were compared for proton dosimetry within MFs using an Advanced Markus chamber. Good agreement ofk B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ was found between experimentally determined and MC calculated values. The performed benchmarking of the MC code allows for calculatingk B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ for various ionization chamber models, MF strengths and proton energies to generate the data needed for a proton dosimetry protocol within MFs and is, therefore, a step towards MRiPT.

Determination of thePrpand radial dose correction factor in reference dosimetry

Objectives.In an addendum to AAPM TG-51 protocol, McEwenet al, (DOI:10.1118/1.4866223) introduced a new factorPrpto account for the radial dose distribution of the photon beam over the detector volume mainly in flattening filter free (FFF) beams.Prpand its extension to non-FFF beam reference dosimetry is investigated to see its impact in a clinical situation.Approches.ThePrpwas measured using simplified version of Sudhyadhomet al(DOI:10.1118/1.4941691) for Elekta and Varian FFF beams with two commonly used calibration detectors; PTW-30013 and Exradin-A12 ion chambers after acquiring high resolution profiles in detectors cardinal coordinates. For radial dose correction factor, the ion chambers were placed in a small water phantom and the central axis position was set to center of the sensitive volume on the treatment table and was studied by rotating the table by 15-degree interval from -90 to +90 degrees with respect to the initial (zero) position.Main results.The magnitude ofPrpvaries very little with machine, detector and beam energies to a value of 1.003 ± 0.0005 and 1.005 ± 0.0005 for 6FFF and 10FFF, respectively. The radial anisotropy for the Elekta machine with Exradin-A12 and PTW-30013 detector the magnitudes are in the range of (0.9995±0.0011 to 1.0015±0.0010) and (0.9998±0.0007 to 1.0015±0.0010), respectively. Similarly, for the Varian machine with Exradin-A12 and PTW-30013 ion chambers, the magnitudes are in the range of (1.0004±0.0010 to 1.0018±0.0018) and (1.0006±0.0009 to 1.0027±0.0007), respectively.Significance.ThePrpis ≤ 0.3% and 0.5% for 6FFF and 10FFF, respectively. The radial dose correction factor in regular beams also does not impact the dosimetry where the maximum magnitude is ±0.2% which is within experimental uncertainty.

Evaluation of ion chamber response for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy

Ion chambers are required for calibration and reference dosimetry applications in radiation therapy (RT). However, exposure of ion chambers in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) conditions pertinent to FLASH-RT leads to severe saturation and ion recombination, which limits their performance and usability. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate a set of commonly used commercially available ion chambers in RT, all with different design characteristics, and use this information to produce a prototype ion chamber with improved performance in UHDR conditions as a first step toward ion chambers specific for FLASH-RT. The Advanced Markus and Exradin A10, A26, and A20 ion chambers were evaluated. The chambers were placed in a water tank, at a depth of 2 cm, and exposed to an UHDR electron beam at different pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude settings on an IntraOp Mobetron. Ion chamber responses were investigated for the various beam parameter settings to isolate their dependence on integrated dose, mean dose rate and instantaneous dose rate, dose-per-pulse (DPP), and their design features such as chamber type, bias voltage, and collection volume. Furthermore, a thin parallel-plate (TPP) prototype ion chamber with reduced collector plate separation and volume was constructed and equally evaluated as the other chambers. The charge collection efficiency of the investigated ion chambers decreased with increasing DPP, whereas the mean dose rate did not affect the response of the chambers (± 1%). The dependence of the chamber response on DPP was found to be solely related to the total dose within the pulse, and not on mean dose rate, PW, or instantaneous dose rate within the ranges investigated. The polarity correction factor (Ppol ) values of the TPP prototype, A10, and Advanced Markus chambers were found to be independent of DPP and dose rate (± 2%), while the A20 and A26 chambers yielded significantly larger variations and dependencies under the same conditions. Ion chamber performance evaluated under different irradiation conditions of an UHDR electron beam revealed a strong dependence on DPP and a negligible dependence on the mean and instantaneous dose rates. These results suggest that modifications to ion chambers design to improve their usability in UHDR beamlines should focus on minimizing DPP effects, with emphasis on optimizing the electric field strength, through the construction of smaller electrode separation and larger bias voltages. This was confirmed through the production and evaluation of a prototype ion chamber specifically designed with these characteristics.

A multicenter study of modified electron beam output calibration

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the accuracy of a modified electron beam calibration based on the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM-TG-51 in multicenter radiotherapy.

METHODS

This study was performed using the Elekta and Varian Linear Accelerator electron beams with energies of 4-22 MeV under reference conditions using cylindrical (PTW 30013, IBA FC65-G, and IBA FC65-P) and parallel-plate (PTW 34045, PTW 34001, and IBA PPC-40) chambers. The modified calibration used a cylindrical chamber and an updatedk ' Q $k{^{\prime}}_Q$ based on Monte Carlo calculations, whereas TRS-398 and TG-51 used cylindrical and parallel-plate chambers for reference dosimetry. The dose ratio of the modified calibration procedure, TRS-398 and TG-51 were obtained by comparing the dose at the maximum depth of the modified calibration to TRS-398 and TG-51.

RESULTS

The study found that all cylindrical chambers' beam quality conversion factors determined with the modified calibration( k ' Q ) $( {{{k^{\prime}}}_Q} )$ to the TRS-398 and TG-51 vary from 0.994 to 1.003 and 1.000 to 1.010, respectively. The dose ratio of modified/TRS-398cyl and modified/TRS-398parallel-plate, the variation ranges were 0.980-1.014 and 0.981-1.019, while for the counterpart modified/TG-51cyl was found varying between 0.991 and 1.017 and the ratio of modified/TG-51parallel-plate varied in the range of 0.981-1.019.

CONCLUSION

This multi-institutional study analyzed a modified calibration procedure utilizing new data for electron beam calibrations at multiple institutions and evaluated existing calibration protocols. Based on observed variations, the current calibration protocols should be updated with detailed metrics on the stability of linac components.

Survey on reference dosimetry practice in Hokuriku region, Japan

This study aimed to obtain reference dosimetry practices for flattened photon and electron beams. A questionnaire survey on these practices was sent to 37 facilities that performed radiotherapy using these beams in Fukui, Ishikawa, Niigata and Toyama, Japan. The survey comprised equipment (dosemeters, water phantoms, thermometers, barometers and hygrometers) and procedures for reference dosimetry (water used as the phantoms, verification of chamber placement, periodic checks of ion recombination- and polarity-corrections, pre-irradiation and relative humidity monitoring). Responses were received from 19 institutions. In the 19 institutions, a reference-class dosemeter was used for the reference dosimetry. In 6 of the 19 institutions, a 10-year-old or older dosemeter was used. Any barometers, thermometers and hygrometers were not recalibrated. Dosimetry equipment necessitates regular maintenance. Moreover, it is necessary to have a backup dosimetry system in clinics to account for potential malfunctions or instances when the primary system is sent for calibration.

Charge collection efficiency of commercially available parallel-plate ionisation chambers in ultra-high dose-per-pulse electron beams

Objective. This investigation aims to experimentally determine the charge collection efficiency (CCE) of six commercially available parallel-plate ionisation chamber (PPIC) models in ultra-high dose-per-pulse (UHDPP) electron beams.Approach. The CCE of 22 PPICs has been measured in UHDPP electron beams at the National Metrology Institution of Germany (PTB). The CCE was determined for a dose per pulse (DPP) range between 0.1 and 6.4 Gy (pulse duration of 2.5μs). The results obtained with the different PPICs were compared to evaluate the reproducibility, intra- and inter-model variation, and the performance of a CCE empirical model.Main results. The intra-model variation was, on average, 4.0%, which is more than three times the total combined relative standard uncertainty and was found to be greater at higher DPP (up to 20%). The inter-model variation for the PPIC with 2 mm electrode spacing, which was found to be, on average, 10%, was also significant compared to the relative uncertainty and the intra-model variation. The observed CCE variation could not be explained only by the expected deviation of the electrode spacing from the nominal value within the manufacturing tolerance. It should also be noted that a substantial polarity effect, between 0.914(5) and 1.201(3), was observed, and significant intra- and inter-model variation was observed on this effect.Significance. For research and pre-clinical study, the commercially available PPIC with a well-known CCE (directly measured for the specific chamber) and with a small electrode spacing could be used for relative and absolute dosimetry with a lower-limit uncertainty of 1.6% (k= 1) in the best case. However, to use a PPIC as a secondary standard in UHDPP electron beams for clinical purposes would require new model development to reduce the ion recombination, the polarity effect, and the total standard uncertainty on the dose measurement.

Quantifying uncertainties associated with reference dosimetry in an MR-Linac

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiation therapy provides capabilities to utilize high-resolution and real-time MR imaging before and during treatment, which is critical for adaptive radiotherapy. This emerging modality has been promptly adopted in the clinic settings in advance of adaptations to reference dosimetry formalism that are needed to account for the presence of strong magnetic fields. In particular, the influence of magnetic field on the uncertainty of parameters in the reference dosimetry equation needs to be determined in order to fully characterize the uncertainty budget for reference dosimetry in MR-guided radiation therapy systems.

PURPOSE

To identify and quantify key sources of uncertainty in the reference dosimetry of external high energy radiotherapy beams in the presence of a strong magnetic field.

METHODS

In the absence of a formalized Task Group report for reference dosimetry in MR-integrated linacs, the currently suggested formalism follows the TG-51 protocol with the addition of a quality conversion factor kBQ accounting for the effects of the magnetic field on ionization chamber response. In this work, we quantify various sources of uncertainty that impact each of the parameters in the formalism, and evaluate their overall contribution to the final dose. Measurements are done in a 1.5 T MR-Linac (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) which integrates a 1.5 T Philips MR scanner and a 7 MVFFF linac. The responses of several reference-class small volume ionization chambers (Exradin:A1SL, IBA:CC13, PTW:Semiflex-3D) and Farmer type ionization chambers (Exradin:A19, IBA:FC65-G) were evaluated throughout this process. Long-term reproducibility and stability of beam quality,TPR 10 20 ${\mathrm{TPR}}_{10}^{20}$ , was also measured with an in-house built phantom.

RESULTS

Relative to the conventional external high energy linacs, the uncertainty on overall reference dose in MR-linac is more significantly affected by the chamber setup: A translational displacement along y-axis of ± 3 mm results in dose variation of < |0.20| ± 0.02% (k = 1), while rotation of ± 5° in horizontal and vertical parallel planes relative to relative to the direction of magnetic field, did not exceed variation of < |0.44| ± 0.02% for all 5 ionization chambers. We measured a larger dose variation for xy-plane (horizontal) rotations (< |0.44| ± 0.02% (k = 1)) than for yz-plane (vertical) rotations (< ||0.28| ± 0.02% (k = 1)), which we associate with the gradient of kB,Q as a function of chamber orientation with respect to direction of the B0 -field. Uncertainty in Pion (for two depths), Ppol (with various sub-studies including effects of cable length, cable looping in the MRgRT bore, connector type in magnetic environment), and Prp were determined. Combined conversion factor kQ × kB,Q was provided for two reference depths at four cardinal angle orientations. Over a two-year period, beam quality was quite stable withTPR 10 20 ${\mathrm{TPR}}_{10}^{20}$ being 0.669 ± 0.01%. The actual magnitude ofTPR 10 20 ${\mathrm{TPR}}_{10}^{20}$ was measured using identical equipment and compared between two different Elekta Unity MR-Linacs with results agreeing to within 0.21%.

CONCLUSION

In this work, the uncertainty of a number of parameters influencing reference dosimetry was quantified. The results of this work can be used to identify best practice guidelines for reference dosimetry in the presence of magnetic fields, and to evaluate an uncertainty budget for future reference dosimetry protocols for MR-linac.

AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.b: Linear accelerator performance tests

The purpose of this guideline is to provide a list of critical performance tests to assist the Qualified Medical Physicist (QMP) in establishing and maintaining a safe and effective quality assurance (QA) program. The performance tests on a linear accelerator (linac) should be selected to fit the clinical patterns of use of the accelerator and care should be given to perform tests which are relevant to detecting errors related to the specific use of the accelerator. Current recommendations for linac QA were reviewed to determine any changes required to those tests highlighted by the original report as well as considering new components of the treatment process that have become common since its publication. Recommendations are made on the acquisition of reference data, routine establishment of machine isocenter, basing performance tests on clinical use of the linac, working with vendors to establish QA tests and performing tests after maintenance and upgrades. The recommended tests proposed in this guideline were chosen based on consensus of the guideline's committee after assessing necessary changes from the previous report. The tests are grouped together by class of test (e.g., dosimetry, mechanical, etc.) and clinical parameter tested. Implementation notes are included for each test so that the QMP can understand the overall goal of each test. This guideline will assist the QMP in developing a comprehensive QA program for linacs in the external beam radiation therapy setting. The committee sought to prioritize tests by their implication on quality and patient safety. The QMP is ultimately responsible for implementing appropriate tests. In the spirit of the report from American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 100, individual institutions are encouraged to analyze the risks involved in their own clinical practice and determine which performance tests are relevant in their own radiotherapy clinics.

Technical note: Point-by-point ion-recombination correction for accurate dose profile measurement in high dose-per-pulse irradiation field

BACKGROUND

Although flattening filter free (FFF) beams are commonly used in clinical treatment, the accuracy of dose measurements in FFF beams has been questioned. Higher dose per pulse (DPP) such as FFF beams from a linear accelerator may cause problems in dose profile measurements using an ionization chamber due to the change of the charge collection efficiency. Ionization chambers are commonly used for percent depth dose (PDD) measurements. Changes of DPP due to chamber movement during PDD measurement can vary the ion collection efficiency of ionization chambers. In the case of FF beams, the DPP fluctuation is negligible, but in the case of the FFF beams, the DPP is 2.5 ∼ 4 times larger than that of the FF beam, and the change in ion collection efficiency is larger than that of the FF beam. PDD profile normalized by maximum dose depth, 10 cm depth for example, may therefore be affected by the ion collection efficiency.

PURPOSE

In this study, we investigate the characteristics of the ion collection efficiency change depending on the DPP of each ionization chamber in the FFF beam. We furthermore propose a method to obtain the chamber- independent PDD by applying a DPP-dependent ion recombination correction.

METHODS

Prior to investigating the relationship between DPP and charge collection efficiency, Jaffe-plots were generated with different DPP settings to investigate the linearity between the applied voltage and collected charge. The absolute dose measurement using eight ionization chambers under the irradiation settings of 0.148, 0.087, and 0.008 cGy/pulse were performed. Applied voltages for the Jaffe-plots were 100, 125, 150, 200, 250, and 300 V. The ion recombination correction factor Pion was calculated by the two-voltage analysis (TVA) method at the applied voltages of 300 and 100 V. The DPP dependency of the charge collection efficiency for each ionization chamber were evaluated from the DPP- Pion plot. PDD profiles for the 10 MV FFF beam were measured using Farmer type chambers (TN30013, FC65-P, and FC65-G) and mini-type chambers (TN31010, TN31021, CC13, CC04, and FC23-C). The PDD profiles were corrected with ion recombination correction at negative and positive polar applied voltages of 100 and 300 V.

RESULTS

From the DPP-Pion relation for each ionization chamber with DPP ranging from 0.008 cGy/pulse to 0.148 cGy/pulse, all Farmer and mini-type chambers satisfied the requirements described in AAPM TG-51 addendum. However, Pion for the CC13 was most affected by DPP among tested chambers. The maximum deviation among PDDs using eight ionization chambers for 10 MV FFF was about 1%, but the deviation was suppressed to about 0.5% by applying ion recombination correction at each depth.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the deviation of PDD profile among the ionization chambers was reduced by the ion recombination coefficient including the DPP dependency, especially for high DPP beams such as FFF beams. The present method is particularly effective for CC13, where the ion collection efficiency is highly DPP dependent.

Dosimetric characterization of foam padding with posterior fields in palliative radiation therapy

Patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy for the palliative treatment of painful bony metastases may have difficulty maintaining a still position on a rigid uncovered couch top, both during CT simulation as well as during patient setup, image guidance, and treatment on the linear accelerator. For these patients, a thin foam pad or mattress is sometimes used to mitigate patient discomfort. It was desired to quantify the effect of the padding in cases in which the patient is to be treated supine with posterior beams when the majority of the beam weighting traverses both the couch and the pad. Ion chamber measurements in-phantom were acquired with 6 MV, 10 MV, and 15 MV photon beams. At depths of maximum dose, the pad resulted in a difference of signal collected ≤1%. At the phantom surface, the pad resulted in an increase in signal ranging from 1% to 6.5% for the measured beams. CT data of the pad, both with and without applied pressure, indicated that the pad had average HU values close to air.

Framework for Quality Assurance of Ultrahigh Dose Rate Clinical Trials Investigating FLASH Effects and Current Technology Gaps

FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT), delivered with ultrahigh dose rate (UHDR), may allow patients to be treated with less normal tissue toxicity for a given tumor dose compared with currently used conventional dose rate. Clinical trials are being carried out and are needed to test whether this improved therapeutic ratio can be achieved clinically. During the clinical trials, quality assurance and credentialing of equipment and participating sites, particularly pertaining to UHDR-specific aspects, will be crucial for the validity of the outcomes of such trials. This report represents an initial framework proposed by the NRG Oncology Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology FLASH working group on quality assurance of potential UHDR clinical trials and reviews current technology gaps to overcome. An important but separate consideration is the appropriate design of trials to most effectively answer clinical and scientific questions about FLASH. This paper begins with an overview of UHDR RT delivery methods. UHDR beam delivery parameters are then covered, with a focus on electron and proton modalities. The definition and control of safe UHDR beam delivery and current and needed dosimetry technologies are reviewed and discussed. System and site credentialing for large, multi-institution trials are reviewed. Quality assurance is then discussed, and new requirements are presented for treatment system standard analysis, patient positioning, and treatment planning. The tables and figures in this paper are meant to serve as reference points as we move toward FLASH-RT clinical trial performance. Some major questions regarding FLASH-RT are discussed, and next steps in this field are proposed. FLASH-RT has potential but is associated with significant risks and complexities. We need to redefine optimization to focus not only on the dose but also on the dose rate in a manner that is robust and understandable and that can be prescribed, validated, and confirmed in real time. Robust patient safety systems and access to treatment data will be critical as FLASH-RT moves into the clinical trials.

Quality assurance of six cylindrical and two parallel plate chambers by radioactive check device: Influence of chamber age to its performance

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performances of eight ionization chambers, (two types) manufactured in a time span of 14 years, with radioactive source devices and photon beams.

METHODS

The measurements were performed with six Farmer and two parallel plate ionization chambers with appropriate radioactive check devices and accompanying inserts. Some tests were performed with photon beams at linear accelerator. Physical visibility check, stability, linearity of response, directional dependence, determination of leakage current, ion recombination and polarity effect and influence of background radiation tests were conducted and analyzed.

RESULTS

The performance of all Farmer ionization chambers was in agreement to IEC standard as well as for parallel plate type chambers. Long-term stability of older planparallel chamber was somewhat worse than expected.

CONCLUSION

Radioactive check devices have proven to be easy to use in clinical environment. According to results of this work Farmer type ionization chambers showed good quality regardless of the time of production, which make them long-term suitable for clinical dosimetry in radiotherapy. Also, for parallel plate type of ionization chambers the results showed fine agreement with the IEC standard, except long-term stability for older chamber, which needs further investigation.

Comparison of derived correction factors for effects of ion recombination and photon beam quality index following TG-51 and TRS-398 dosimetry protocols

In this study, ion recombination correction factor (k_S) and beam quality conversion factor ( [Formula: see text] ) values were extracted following the recommendations of the TRS-398 and TG-51 dosimetry protocols for widely used cylindrical ionization chambers for high energy photon beam dosimetry to quantify the agreement between the instructions for these two protocols for absolute dosimetry inside water. Four different types of cylindrical ionization chambers comprising Farmer (TM30013), Semiflex 0.125 cm³ (TM31010), Semiflex 0.3 cm³ (TM31013), and PinPoint (TM31016) were considered, and k_S and [Formula: see text] values were determined at photon energies of 6 MV and 15 MV. The maximum difference between the measured k_S values according to the instructions in the TRS-398 and TG-51 protocols was 0.03%. The k_S data measured with both protocols agreed well with those measured by using the Jaffe-plot approach, where the maximum difference was about 0.33%. The observed differences between the [Formula: see text] factors measured by using the TRS-398 and TG-51 dosimetry protocols at photon energies of 6 MV and 15 MV were 0.37% and 0.55%, respectively. The [Formula: see text] values measured using the TG-51 dosimetry protocols were slightly closer to those measured by a reference ionization chamber dosimeter. We conclude that the maximum differences were about 0.4% and 0.6% in the absorbed dose measurements according to the TRS-398 and TG-51 instructions at photon energies of 6 MV and 15 MV, respectively. The type of ionization chamber employed also affected the differences, where the maximum and minimum dose differences were found using the Farmer and PinPoint chambers, respectively.

Quantification of the role of lead foil in flattening filter free beam reference dosimetry

PURPOSE

To quantify the potential error in outputs for flattening filter free (FFF) beams associated with use of a lead foil in beam quality determination per the addendum protocol for TG-51, we examined differences in measurements of the beam quality conversion factor k_Q when using or not using lead foil.

METHODS

Two FFF beams, a 6 MV FFF and a 10 MV FFF, were calibrated on eight Varian TrueBeams and two Elekta Versa HD linear accelerators (linacs) according to the TG-51 addendum protocol by using Farmer ionization chambers [TN 30013 (PTW) and SNC600c (Sun Nuclear)] with traceable absorbed dose-to-water calibrations. In determining k_Q , the percentage depth-dose at 10 cm [PDD(10)] was measured with 10×10 cm² field size at 100 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). PDD(10) values were measured either with a 1 mm lead foil positioned in the path of the beam [%dd(10)_Pb ] or with omission of a lead foil [%dd(10)]. The %dd(10)x values were then calculated and the k_Q factors determined by using the empirical fit equation in the TG-51 addendum for the PTW 30013 chambers. A similar equation was used to calculate k_Q for the SNC600c chamber, with the fitting parameters taken from a very recent Monte Carlo study. The differences in k_Q factors were compared for with lead foil vs. without lead foil.

RESULTS

Differences in %dd(10)x with lead foil and with omission of lead foil were 0.9 ± 0.2% for the 6 MV FFF beam and 0.6 ± 0.1% for the 10 MV FFF beam. Differences in k_Q values with lead foil and with omission of lead foil were -0.1 ± 0.02% for the 6 MV FFF and -0.1 ± 0.01% for the 10 MV FFF beams.

CONCLUSION

With evaluation of the lead foil role in determination of the k_Q factor for FFF beams. Our results suggest that the omission of lead foil introduces approximately 0.1% of error for reference dosimetry of FFF beams on both TrueBeam and Versa platforms.

NEW IDEA FOR DETERMINING THE OPTIMAL NUMBER OF MEASUREMENTS IN ABSORBED DOSE-TO-WATER MEASUREMENT OF HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON BEAM

This study presents a new idea for estimating the number of measurements required for determining the uncertainty in obtaining the desired water absorbed dose using the variation obtained from multicenter absorbed dose measurement data. The number of dose measurements depends on the performance of each linear accelerator (LINAC) tested and the dosimetry equipment and procedure used. However, optimising the number of data collected for the absorbed dose to water has been inadequately reported. Using the absorbed dose measurement data collected 10 times as a reference value, we will compare the changes in the variation of the measurement results caused by the difference in the number of repeated measurements of the absorbed dose. The number of measurements is determined statistically such that this variation would be smaller than the change in absorbed dose. Thus, we can determine the optimum number of measurements suitable for the variability of each LINAC.

Measurement of the modified TG43 parameters for the bare S7600 Xoft Axxent source model

PURPOSE

The purpose of this work is to provide measured data for the modified TG43 parameters [DeWerd et al.] for the newest, Galden-cooled S7600 Xoft Axxent source model.

METHODS

The measurement of radial dose distributions at distances of 1 cm to 4 cm from the source was performed using TLD100 microcubes, EBT3 film, and an Exradin A26 microionization chamber. The overall uncertainty and reproducibility of each dosimeter was evaluated for its use in determining the radial dose function and dose rate conversion coefficient. An acrylic phantom developed in house for previous works was used to measure the polar anisotropy function using TLD100 microcubes at distances of 1 cm, 2 cm, and 5 cm from the source.

RESULTS

The Exradin A26 chamber was deemed most suitable for measuring the radial dose function. Values determined had a maximum k = 1 uncertainty of 1.4%. The dose rate conversion coefficient measured with the chamber was found to be 9.33 ± 0.21cGy/hrμGy/min. TLD100 microcube measurements of the polar anisotropy had average uncertainties of 6%, 3%, and 2.5% at 1 cm, 2 cm, and 5 cm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified TG43 parameters for the bare source were measured with reasonable uncertainty. The values determined will aid with the clinical implementation of the source for breast and endometrial cancer applications.

Therapeutic radiation beam output and energy variation across clinics, technologies, and time

Over the past several decades, a medical physics service group covering 35 clinical sites has provided routine monthly output and energy quality assurance for over 75 linear accelerators. Based on the geographical spread of these clinics and the large number of physicists involved in data acquisition, a systematic calibration procedure was established to ensure uniformity. A consistent measurement geometry and data collection technique is used across all machines for every calendar month, using a standardized set of acrylic slabs. Charge readings in acrylic phantoms are linked to AAPM's TG-51 formalism via a parameter denoted k_acrylic , used to convert raw charge readings to machine output values. Statistical analyses of energy ratios and k_acrylic values are presented. Employing the k_acrylic concept with a uniform measurement geometry of similar acrylic blocks was found to be a reproducible and simple way of referencing a calibration completed in water under reference conditions and comparing to other machines, with the ability to alert physicists of outliers.

Correcting for the effect of ambient pressure fluctuations on measured output from a linear accelerator with a sealed monitor chamber

Objective.Ambient pressure fluctuations deform the walls of a sealed monitor chamber in a linear accelerator (LINAC) and affect the output. This study retrospectively quantified the output variations accompanying ambient pressure fluctuations in a LINAC equipped with a sealed monitor chamber and introduced a novel approach of calculating the adjusted output free from the effect of ambient pressure fluctuations.Approach.The output data for the 6 MV and 10 MV X-rays measured between March 2014 and September 2015 were analysed. This period was further divided into four sub-periods according to the output calibrations. Output behaviours were modelled using multiple regression analysis with ambient pressure and the time elapsed since the last calibration as explanatory variables. The output variations accompanying ambient pressure fluctuations were calculated using regression parameters and were subtracted from the measured outputs to obtain the adjusted outputs.Main results.The partial regression coefficients for ambient pressure varied from -2.3 × 10^-4to -1.8 × 10^-4cGy/MU/hPa for 6 MV and from -1.9 × 10^-4to -1.2 × 10^-4cGy/MU/hPa for 10 MV X-rays. These partial regression coefficient values were comparable among the four sub-periods and the two x-ray energies, respectively. These findings suggest that the degree of the output variations accompanying ambient pressure fluctuations is independent of x-ray energies and is determined by the internal structure of the chamber and the pressure differential between the inside and outside of the chamber. The adjusted outputs showed a better fit with the time trend line than the measured outputs.Significance.This study demonstrates a novel procedure for obtaining the adjusted outputs and allows precise observation of the output behaviours of a LINAC equipped with a sealed monitor chamber. Combined observation of the measured and adjusted output facilitates the detection of output anomalies, thus contributing to quality control (QC) of LINACs.

On the perturbation effect and LET dependence of beam quality correction factors in carbon ion beams

BACKGROUND

In a recent study, we reported beam quality correction factors, f_Q , in carbon ion beams using Monte Carlo (MC) methods for a cylindrical and a parallel-plate ionization chamber (IC). A non-negligible perturbation effect was observed; however, the magnitude of the perturbation correction due to the specific IC subcomponents was not included. Furthermore, the stopping power data presented in the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) report 73 were used, whereas the latest stopping power data have been reported in the ICRU report 90.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to extend our previous work by computing f_Q correction factors using the ICRU 90 stopping power data and by reporting IC-specific perturbation correction factors. Possible energy or linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the f_Q correction factor was investigated by simulating both pristine beams and spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBPs).

METHODS

The TOol for PArticle Simulation (TOPAS)/GEANT4 MC code was used in this study. A 30 × 30 × 50 cm³ water phantom was simulated with a uniform 10 × 10 cm² parallel beam incident on the surface. A Farmer-type cylindrical IC (Exradin A12) and two parallel-plate ICs (Exradin P11 and A11) were simulated in TOPAS using the manufacturer-provided geometrical drawings. The f_Q correction factor was calculated in pristine carbon ion beams in the 150-450 MeV/u energy range at 2 cm depth and in the middle of the flat region of four SOBPs. The k_Q correction factor was calculated by simulating the f_Qo correction factor in a ⁶⁰ Co beam at 5 cm depth. The perturbation correction factors due to the presence of the individual IC subcomponents, such as the displacement effect in the air cavity, collecting electrode, chamber wall, and chamber stem, were calculated at 2 cm depth for monoenergetic beams only. Additionally, the mean dose-averaged and track-averaged LET was calculated at the depths at which the f_Q was calculated.

RESULTS

The ICRU 90 f_Q correction factors were reported. The p_dis correction factor was found to be significant for the cylindrical IC with magnitudes up to 1.70%. The individual perturbation corrections for the parallel-plate ICs were <1.0% except for the A11 p_cel correction at the lowest energy. The f_Q correction for the P11 IC exhibited an energy dependence of >1.00% and displayed differences up to 0.87% between pristine beams and SOBPs. Conversely, the f_Q for A11 and A12 displayed a minimal energy dependence of <0.50%. The energy dependence was found to manifest in the LET dependence for the P11 IC. A statistically significant LET dependence was found only for the P11 IC in pristine beams only with a magnitude of <1.10%.

CONCLUSIONS

The perturbation and k_Q correction factor should be calculated for the specific IC to be used in carbon ion beam reference dosimetry as a function of beam quality.

Technical note: Absolute dose measurements of a vault-free radiosurgery system

BACKGROUND

Methods for accurate absolute dose (AD) calibration are essential for the proper functioning of radiotherapy treatment machines. Many systems do not conform to TG-51 calibration standards, and modifications are required. TG-21 calibration is also a viable methodology for these situations with the appropriate setup, equipment, and factors. It has been shown that both these methods result in minimal errors. A similar approach has been taken in calibrating the dose for a recent vault-free radiosurgery system.

PURPOSE

To evaluate modified TG-21 and TG-51 protocols for AD calibrations of the ZAP-X radiosurgery system using ion chambers, film, and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

METHODS

The current treatment planning system for ZAP-X requires AD calibration at d_max (7 mm) and 450 mm source-to-axis distance. Both N D , w 60 C o [ G y / C ] $N_{D,w}^{{60}Co}[ {Gy/C} ]$ and N_x [R/C] calibration coefficients were provided by an accredited dosimetry calibration laboratory for a physikalisch technische werkstatten (PTW) 31010 chamber (0.125 cc). The vendor provides an f-bracket that can be mounted on the collimator. Various phantoms can then be attached to the f-bracket. A custom acrylic phantom was designed based on recommendations from TG-21 and technical report series-398 that places the chamber at 500 mm from the source with a depth of 44-mm acrylic and 456-mm SSD. N_x along with other TG-21 parameters was used to calculate the AD. Measurements using a PTW MP3-XS water tank and the same chamber were used to calculate AD using N D , w 60 C o $N_{D,w}^{{60}Co}$ and TG-51 factors. Dose verification was performed using Gafchromic film and 3rd party TLDs.

RESULTS

Measurements from TG-51, TG-21 (utilizing the custom acrylic phantom), film, and TLDs agreed to within ± 2%.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified TG-51 AD calculation in water is preferred but may not be practical due to the difficulty in tank setup. The TG-21 modified protocol using a custom acrylic phantom is an accurate alternative option for dose calibration. Both of these methods are within acceptable agreement and provide confidence in the system's AD calibration.

AAPM WGTG51 Report 374: Guidance for TG-51 reference dosimetry

Practical guidelines that are not explicit in the TG-51 protocol and its Addendum for photon beam dosimetry are presented for the implementation of the TG-51 protocol for reference dosimetry of external high-energy photon and electron beams. These guidelines pertain to: (i) measurement of depth-ionization curves required to obtain beam quality specifiers for the selection of beam quality conversion factors, (ii) considerations for the dosimetry system and specifications of a reference-class ionization chamber, (iii) commissioning a dosimetry system and frequency of measurements, (iv) positioning/aligning the water tank and ionization chamber for depth ionization and reference dose measurements, (v) requirements for ancillary equipment needed to measure charge (triaxial cables and electrometers) and to correct for environmental conditions, and (vi) translation from dose at the reference depth to that at the depth required by the treatment planning system. Procedures are identified to achieve the most accurate results (errors up to 8% have been observed) and, where applicable, a commonly used simplified procedure is described and the impact on reference dosimetry measurements is discussed so that the medical physicist can be informed on where to allocate resources.

Assessing the DNA Damaging Effectiveness of Ionizing Radiation Using Plasmid DNA

Plasmid DNA is useful for investigating the DNA damaging effects of ionizing radiation. In this study, we have explored the feasibility of plasmid DNA-based detectors to assess the DNA damaging effectiveness of two radiotherapy X-ray beam qualities after undergoing return shipment of ~8000 km between two institutions. The detectors consisted of 18 μL of pBR322 DNA enclosed with an aluminum seal in nine cylindrical cavities drilled into polycarbonate blocks. We shipped them to Toronto, Canada for irradiation with either 100 kVp or 6 MV X-ray beams to doses of 10, 20, and 30 Gy in triplicate before being shipped back to San Diego, USA. The Toronto return shipment also included non-irradiated controls and we kept a separate set of controls in San Diego. In San Diego, we quantified DNA single strand breaks (SSBs), double strand breaks (DSBs), and applied Nth and Fpg enzymes to quantify oxidized base damage. The rate of DSBs/Gy/plasmid was 2.8±0.7 greater for the 100 kVp than the 6 MV irradiation. The 100 kVp irradiation also resulted in 5±2 times more DSBs/SSB than the 6 MV beam, demonstrating that the detector is sensitive enough to quantify relative DNA damage effectiveness, even after shipment over thousands of kilometers.

Characterization of the Plastic Scintillator Detector System Exradin W2 in a High Dose Rate Flattening-Filter-Free Photon Beam

(1) Background: The Exradin W2 is a commercially available scintillator detector designed for reference and relative dosimetry in small fields. In this work, we investigated the performance of the W2 scintillator in a 10 MV flattening-filter-free photon beam and compared it to the performance of ion chambers designed for small field measurements. (2) Methods: We measured beam profiles and percent depth dose curves with each detector and investigated the linearity of each system based on dose per pulse (DPP) and pulse repetition frequency. (3) Results: We found excellent agreement between the W2 scintillator and the ion chambers for beam profiles and percent depth dose curves. Our results also showed that the two-voltage method of calculating the ion recombination correction factor was sufficient to correct for the ion recombination effect of ion chambers, even at the highest DPP. (4) Conclusions: These findings show that the W2 scintillator shows excellent agreement with ion chambers in high DPP conditions.

Construction and pre-evaluation of an in-house cylindrical ionization chamber fabricated from locally available materials

Introduction: The objectives of this study were to construct a very robust in-house cylindrical ionization chamber from locally available materials to minimize cost, and to assess its suitability for use in a clinical setting.

Materials and Methods: The entire body of the constructed IC was composed of Perspex (PMMA). Other components of the IC were made from locally available materials, such as paper and discarded items. The in-house IC was made waterproof by passing the triaxial cable connecting its various electrodes through a plastic tube which once served as a drainage tube of a urine bag. This connection was made such that the chamber was vented to the environment. The completed in-house IC was evaluated for: polarity effect, ion recombination, ion collection efficiency, stability, dose linearity, stem effect, leakage current, angular, dose rate and energy dependences.

Results: Although the pre-evaluation results confirmed that the in-house IC satisfied the stipulated international standards for ICs, there was a need to enhance the stem effect and leakage current characteristics of the IC. The in-house IC was found to have an absorbed dose to water calibration coefficient of 4.475 x 107 Gy/C (uncertainty of 1.6%) for cobalt 60 through a cross-calibration with a commercial 0.6 cc cylindrical IC with traceability to the Germany National Dosimetry Laboratory. Using a Jaffé diagram, the in-house IC was also found to have a recombination correction factor of 1.0078 when operated at the calibration voltage of + 400 V. In terms of beam quality correction factors for megavoltage beams, the in-house IC was found to exhibit characteristics similar to those of Scanditronix-Wellhofer IC 70 Farmer type IC.

Conclusion: The constructed in-house Farmer-type IC was able to meet all the recommended characteristics for an IC, and therefore, the in-house IC is suitable for beam output calibration in external beam radiotherapy.

Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement for cylindrical ionization chambers in megavoltage photon beams

Current dosimetry protocols specify an effective point of measurement (EPOM) shift of 0.6r for a cylindrical ionization chamber in photon beams. However, prior studies have reported that this shift was excessively large. The objective of this study was to experimentally evaluate the EPOM shifts in photon beams for cylindrical ionization chambers, which are widely used in clinical practice, and thus determine the appropriate EPOM shift. A microdiamond detector, which is a semiconductor detector with a small sensitive volume, was used as a reference detector, and the EPOM shifts of 11 types of cylindrical ionization chambers were evaluated at 6 MV and 10 MV. The depth shift from the percent depth dose (PDD) of the reference detector to that of the evaluated chamber was calculated using the least-squares method and was defined as the EPOM shift. The EPOM shift of the 10 MV condition was slightly larger than that of the 6 MV condition. However, because this trend was not observed for all chambers, the results of the two energies were averaged, and the EPOM shifts were determined to be 0.33r-0.43r (± 0.05) for 10 types of ionization chambers, and 0.03r (± 0.03) for the A1SL chamber. The shifts for all ionization chambers were smaller than 0.6r, indicating that the recommended EPOM shifts were overestimated and the absorbed dose was underestimated at the calibration depth. Hence, the appropriate EPOM shift of the 10 types of ionization chambers was 0.4r (the geometric center of the A1SL chamber), with a dose uncertainty of 0.05%.

Enhancement of the EGSnrc code egs_chamber for fast fluence calculations of charged particles

PURPOSE

Simulation of absorbed dose deposition in a detector is one of the key tasks of Monte Carlo (MC) dosimetry methodology. Recent publications (Hartmann and Zink, 2018; Hartmann and Zink, 2019; Hartmann et al., 2021) have shown that knowledge of the charged particle fluence differential in energy contributing to absorbed dose is useful to provide enhanced insight on how response depends on detector properties. While some EGSnrc MC codes provide output of charged particle spectra, they are often restricted in setup options or limited in calculation efficiency. For detector simulations, a promising approach is to upgrade the EGSnrc code egs_chamber which so far does not offer charged particle calculations.

METHODS

Since the user code cavity offers charged particle fluence calculation, the underlying algorithm was embedded in egs_chamber. The modified code was tested against two EGSnrc applications and DOSXYZnrc which was modified accordingly by one of the authors. Furthermore, the gain in efficiency achieved by photon cross section enhancement was determined quantitatively.

RESULTS

Electron and positron fluence spectra and restricted cema calculated by egs_chamber agreed well with the compared applications thus demonstrating the feasibility of the new code. Additionally, variance reduction techniques are now applicable also for fluence calculations. Depending on the simulation setup, considerable gains in efficiency were obtained by photon cross section enhancement.

CONCLUSION

The enhanced egs_chamber code represents a valuable tool to investigate the response of detectors with respect to absorbed dose and fluence distribution and the perturbation caused by the detector in a reasonable computation time. By using intermediate phase space scoring, egs_chamber offers parallel calculation of charged particle fluence spectra for different detector configurations in one single run.