A Label-Efficient Framework for Automated Sinonasal CT Segmentation in Image-Guided Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Segmentation, the partitioning of patient imaging into multiple, labeled segments, has several potential clinical benefits but when performed manually is tedious and resource intensive. Automated deep learning (DL)-based segmentation methods can streamline the process. The objective of this study was to evaluate a label-efficient DL pipeline that requires only a small number of annotated scans for semantic segmentation of sinonasal structures in CT scans.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic institution.

METHODS

Forty CT scans were used in this study including 16 scans in which the nasal septum (NS), inferior turbinate (IT), maxillary sinus (MS), and optic nerve (ON) were manually annotated using an open-source software. A label-efficient DL framework was used to train jointly on a few manually labeled scans and the remaining unlabeled scans. Quantitative analysis was then performed to obtain the number of annotated scans needed to achieve submillimeter average surface distances (ASDs).

RESULTS

Our findings reveal that merely four labeled scans are necessary to achieve median submillimeter ASDs for large sinonasal structures-NS (0.96 mm), IT (0.74 mm), and MS (0.43 mm), whereas eight scans are required for smaller structures-ON (0.80 mm).

CONCLUSION

We have evaluated a label-efficient pipeline for segmentation of sinonasal structures. Empirical results demonstrate that automated DL methods can achieve submillimeter accuracy using a small number of labeled CT scans. Our pipeline has the potential to improve pre-operative planning workflows, robotic- and image-guidance navigation systems, computer-assisted diagnosis, and the construction of statistical shape models to quantify population variations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Artificial Intelligence-Based Radiotherapy Contouring and Planning to Improve Global Access to Cancer Care

PURPOSE

Increased automation has been identified as one approach to improving global cancer care. The Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA) is a web-based tool offering automated radiotherapy (RT) contouring and planning to low-resource clinics. In this study, the RPA workflow and clinical acceptability were assessed by physicians around the world.

METHODS

The RPA output for 75 cases was reviewed by at least three physicians; 31 radiation oncologists at 16 institutions in six countries on five continents reviewed RPA contours and plans for clinical acceptability using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

For cervical cancer, RPA plans using bony landmarks were scored as usable as-is in 81% (with minor edits 93%); using soft tissue contours, plans were scored as usable as-is in 79% (with minor edits 96%). For postmastectomy breast cancer, RPA plans were scored as usable as-is in 44% (with minor edits 91%). For whole-brain treatment, RPA plans were scored as usable as-is in 67% (with minor edits 99%). For head/neck cancer, the normal tissue autocontours were acceptable as-is in 89% (with minor edits 97%). The clinical target volumes (CTVs) were acceptable as-is in 40% (with minor edits 93%). The volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were acceptable as-is in 87% (with minor edits 96%). For cervical cancer, the normal tissue autocontours were acceptable as-is in 92% (with minor edits 99%). The CTVs for cervical cancer were scored as acceptable as-is in 83% (with minor edits 92%). The VMAT plans for cervical cancer were acceptable as-is in 99% (with minor edits 100%).

CONCLUSION

The RPA, a web-based tool designed to improve access to high-quality RT in low-resource settings, has high rates of clinical acceptability by practicing clinicians around the world. It has significant potential for successful implementation in low-resource clinics.

Automated Segmentation of Sacral Chordoma and Surrounding Muscles Using Deep Learning Ensemble

PURPOSE

The manual segmentation of organ structures in radiation oncology treatment planning is a time-consuming and highly skilled task, particularly when treating rare tumors like sacral chordomas. This study evaluates the performance of automated deep learning (DL) models in accurately segmenting the gross tumor volume (GTV) and surrounding muscle structures of sacral chordomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An expert radiation oncologist contoured 5 muscle structures (gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, paraspinal, piriformis) and sacral chordoma GTV on computed tomography images from 48 patients. We trained 6 DL auto-segmentation models based on 3-dimensional U-Net and residual 3-dimensional U-Net architectures. We then implemented an average and an optimally weighted average ensemble to improve prediction performance. We evaluated algorithms with the average and standard deviation of the volumetric Dice similarity coefficient, surface Dice similarity coefficient with 2- and 3-mm thresholds, and average symmetric surface distance. One independent expert radiation oncologist assessed the clinical viability of the DL contours and determined the necessary amount of editing before they could be used in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Quantitatively, the ensembles performed the best across all structures. The optimal ensemble (volumetric Dice similarity coefficient, average symmetric surface distance) was (85.5 ± 6.4, 2.6 ± 0.8; GTV), (94.4 ± 1.5, 1.0 ± 0.4; gluteus maximus), (92.6 ± 0.9, 0.9 ± 0.1; gluteus medius), (85.0 ± 2.7, 1.1 ± 0.3; gluteus minimus), (92.1 ± 1.5, 0.8 ± 0.2; paraspinal), and (78.3 ± 5.7, 1.5 ± 0.6; piriformis). The qualitative evaluation suggested that the best model could reduce the total muscle and tumor delineation time to a 19-minute average.

CONCLUSIONS

Our methodology produces expert-level muscle and sacral chordoma tumor segmentation using DL and ensemble modeling. It can substantially augment the streamlining and accuracy of treatment planning and represents a critical step toward automated delineation of the clinical target volume in sarcoma and other disease sites.

A clinical evaluation of the performance of five commercial artificial intelligence contouring systems for radiotherapy

Purpose/objectives

Auto-segmentation with artificial intelligence (AI) offers an opportunity to reduce inter- and intra-observer variability in contouring, to improve the quality of contours, as well as to reduce the time taken to conduct this manual task. In this work we benchmark the AI auto-segmentation contours produced by five commercial vendors against a common dataset.

Methods and materials

The organ at risk (OAR) contours generated by five commercial AI auto-segmentation solutions (Mirada (Mir), MVision (MV), Radformation (Rad), RayStation (Ray) and TheraPanacea (Ther)) were compared to manually-drawn expert contours from 20 breast, 20 head and neck, 20 lung and 20 prostate patients. Comparisons were made using geometric similarity metrics including volumetric and surface Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC and sDSC), Hausdorff distance (HD) and Added Path Length (APL). To assess the time saved, the time taken to manually draw the expert contours, as well as the time to correct the AI contours, were recorded.

Results

There are differences in the number of CT contours offered by each AI auto-segmentation solution at the time of the study (Mir 99; MV 143; Rad 83; Ray 67; Ther 86), with all offering contours of some lymph node levels as well as OARs. Averaged across all structures, the median vDSCs were good for all systems and compared favorably with existing literature: Mir 0.82; MV 0.88; Rad 0.86; Ray 0.87; Ther 0.88. All systems offer substantial time savings, ranging between: breast 14-20 mins; head and neck 74-93 mins; lung 20-26 mins; prostate 35-42 mins. The time saved, averaged across all structures, was similar for all systems: Mir 39.8 mins; MV 43.6 mins; Rad 36.6 min; Ray 43.2 mins; Ther 45.2 mins.

Conclusions

All five commercial AI auto-segmentation solutions evaluated in this work offer high quality contours in significantly reduced time compared to manual contouring, and could be used to render the radiotherapy workflow more efficient and standardized.

Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is 'Clinically Acceptable'?

Developers and users of artificial-intelligence-based tools for automatic contouring and treatment planning in radiotherapy are expected to assess clinical acceptability of these tools. However, what is 'clinical acceptability'? Quantitative and qualitative approaches have been used to assess this ill-defined concept, all of which have advantages and disadvantages or limitations. The approach chosen may depend on the goal of the study as well as on available resources. In this paper, we discuss various aspects of 'clinical acceptability' and how they can move us toward a standard for defining clinical acceptability of new autocontouring and planning tools.

Towards automated organs at risk and target volumes contouring: Defining precision radiation therapy in the modern era

Precision radiotherapy is a critical and indispensable cancer treatment means in the modern clinical workflow with the goal of achieving "quality-up and cost-down" in patient care. The challenge of this therapy lies in developing computerized clinical-assistant solutions with precision, automation, and reproducibility built-in to deliver it at scale. In this work, we provide a comprehensive yet ongoing, incomplete survey of and discussions on the recent progress of utilizing advanced deep learning, semantic organ parsing, multimodal imaging fusion, neural architecture search and medical image analytical techniques to address four corner-stone problems or sub-problems required by all precision radiotherapy workflows, namely, organs at risk (OARs) segmentation, gross tumor volume (GTV) segmentation, metastasized lymph node (LN) detection, and clinical tumor volume (CTV) segmentation. Without loss of generality, we mainly focus on using esophageal and head-and-neck cancers as examples, but the methods can be extrapolated to other types of cancers. High-precision, automated and highly reproducible OAR/GTV/LN/CTV auto-delineation techniques have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing the inter-practitioner variabilities and the time cost to permit rapid treatment planning and adaptive replanning for the benefit of patients. Through the presentation of the achievements and limitations of these techniques in this review, we hope to encourage more collective multidisciplinary precision radiotherapy workflows to transpire.

Clinical target volume segmentation based on gross tumor volume using deep learning for head and neck cancer treatment

Accurate clinical target volume (CTV) delineation is important for head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. However, delineation is time-consuming and susceptible to interobserver variability (IOV). Based on a manual contouring process commonly used in clinical practice, we developed a deep learning (DL)-based method to delineate a low-risk CTV with computed tomography (CT) and gross tumor volume (GTV) input and compared it with a CT-only input. A total of 310 patients with oropharynx cancer were randomly divided into the training set (250) and test set (60). The low-risk CTV and primary GTV contours were used to generate label data for the input and ground truth. A 3D U-Net with a two-channel input of CT and GTV (U-Net_GTV) was proposed and its performance was compared with a U-Net with only CT input (U-Net_CT). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average Hausdorff distance (AHD) were evaluated. The time required to predict the CTV was 0.86 s per patient. U-Net_GTV showed a significantly higher mean DSC value than U-Net_CT (0.80 ± 0.03 and 0.76 ± 0.05) and a significantly lower mean AHD value (3.0 ± 0.5 mm vs 3.5 ± 0.7 mm). Compared to the existing DL method with only CT input, the proposed GTV-based segmentation using DL showed a more precise low-risk CTV segmentation for head and neck cancer. Our findings suggest that the proposed method could reduce the contouring time of a low-risk CTV, allowing the standardization of target delineations for head and neck cancer.

Evaluation Exploration of Atlas-Based and Deep Learning-Based Automatic Contouring for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and explore the difference between an atlas-based and deep learning (DL)-based auto-segmentation scheme for organs at risk (OARs) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases to provide valuable help for clinical practice.

Methods

120 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases were established in the MIM Maestro (atlas) database and trained by a DL-based model (AccuContour^®), and another 20 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cases were randomly selected outside the atlas database. The experienced physicians contoured 14 OARs from 20 patients based on the published consensus guidelines, and these were defined as the reference volumes (V_ref). Meanwhile, these OARs were auto-contoured using an atlas-based model, a pre-built DL-based model, and an on-site trained DL-based model. These volumes were named V_atlas, V_DL-pre-built, and V_DL-trained, respectively. The similarities between V_atlas, V_DL-pre-built, V_DL-trained, and V_ref were assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard coefficient (JAC), maximum Hausdorff distance (HD_max), and deviation of centroid (DC) methods. A one-way ANOVA test was carried out to show the differences (between each two of them).

Results

The results of the three methods were almost similar for the brainstem and eyes. For inner ears and temporomandibular joints, the results of the pre-built DL-based model are the worst, as well as the results of atlas-based auto-segmentation for the lens. For the segmentation of optic nerves, the trained DL-based model shows the best performance (p < 0.05). For the contouring of the oral cavity, the DSC value of V_DL-pre-built is the smallest, and V_DL-trained is the most significant (p < 0.05). For the parotid glands, the DSC of V_atlas is the minimum (about 0.80 or so), and V_DL-pre-built and V_DL-trained are slightly larger (about 0.82 or so). In addition to the oral cavity, parotid glands, and the brainstem, the maximum Hausdorff distances of the other organs are below 0.5 cm using the trained DL-based segmentation model. The trained DL-based segmentation method behaves well in the contouring of all the organs that the maximum average deviation of the centroid is no more than 0.3 cm.

Conclusion

The trained DL-based segmentation performs significantly better than atlas-based segmentation for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, especially for the OARs with small volumes. Although some delineation results still need further modification, auto-segmentation methods improve the work efficiency and provide a level of help for clinical work.

Machine Learning for Auto-Segmentation in Radiotherapy Planning

Manual segmentation of target structures and organs at risk is a crucial step in the radiotherapy workflow. It has the disadvantages that it can require several hours of clinician time per patient and is prone to inter- and intra-observer variability. Automatic segmentation (auto-segmentation), using computer algorithms, seeks to address these issues. Advances in machine learning and computer vision have led to the development of methods for accurate and efficient auto-segmentation. This review surveys auto-segmentation techniques and applications in radiotherapy planning. It provides an overview of traditional approaches to auto-segmentation, including intensity analysis, shape modelling and atlas-based methods. The focus, though, is on uses of machine learning and deep learning, including convolutional neural networks. Finally, the future of machine-learning-driven auto-segmentation in clinical settings is considered, and the barriers that must be overcome for it to be widely accepted into routine practice are highlighted.

Artificial Intelligence: A New Tool in Oncologist's Armamentarium

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become an essential tool in human life because of its pivotal role in communications, transportation, media, and social networking. Inspired by the complex neuronal network and its functions in human beings, AI, using computer-based algorithms and training, had been explored since the 1950s. To tackle the enormous amount of patients' clinical data, imaging, histopathological data, and the increasing pace of research on new treatments and clinical trials, and ever-changing guidelines for treatment with the advent of novel drugs and evidence, AI is the need of the hour. There are numerous publications and active work on AI's role in the field of oncology. In this review, we discuss the fundamental terminology of AI, its applications in oncology on the whole, and its limitations. There is an inter-relationship between AI, machine learning and, deep learning. The virtual branch of AI deals with machine learning. While the physical branch of AI deals with the delivery of different forms of treatment—surgery, targeted drug delivery, and elderly care. The applications of AI in oncology include cancer screening, diagnosis (clinical, imaging, and histopathological), radiation therapy (image acquisition, tumor and organs at risk segmentation, image registration, planning, and delivery), prediction of treatment outcomes and toxicities, prediction of cancer cell sensitivity to therapeutics and clinical decision-making. A specific area of interest is in the development of effective drug combinations tailored to every patient and tumor with the help of AI. Radiomics, the new kid on the block, deals with the planning and administration of radiotherapy. As with any new invention, AI has its fallacies. The limitations include lack of external validation and proof of generalizability, difficulty in data access for rare diseases, ethical and legal issues, no precise logic behind the prediction, and last but not the least, lack of education and expertise among medical professionals. A collaboration between departments of clinical oncology, bioinformatics, and data sciences can help overcome these problems in the near future.

Cascaded deep learning-based auto-segmentation for head and neck cancer patients: Organs at risk on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate multiple deep learning methods for automated segmentation (auto-segmentation) of the parotid glands, submandibular glands, and level II and level III lymph nodes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Outlining radiosensitive organs on images used to assist radiation therapy (radiotherapy) of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is a time-consuming task, in which variability between observers may directly impact on patient treatment outcomes. Auto-segmentation on computed tomography imaging has been shown to result in significant time reductions and more consistent outlines of the organs at risk.

METHODS

Three convolutional neural network (CNN)-based auto-segmentation architectures were developed using manual segmentations and T2-weighted MRI images provided from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) radiotherapy MRI auto-contouring (RT-MAC) challenge dataset (n = 31). Auto-segmentation performance was evaluated with segmentation similarity and surface distance metrics on the RT-MAC dataset with institutional manual segmentations (n = 10). The generalizability of the auto-segmentation methods was assessed on an institutional MRI dataset (n = 10).

RESULTS

Auto-segmentation performance on the RT-MAC images with institutional segmentations was higher than previously reported MRI methods for the parotid glands (Dice: 0.860 ± 0.067, mean surface distance [MSD]: 1.33 ± 0.40 mm) and the first report of MRI performance for submandibular glands (Dice: 0.830 ± 0.032, MSD: 1.16 ± 0.47 mm). We demonstrate that high-resolution auto-segmentations with improved geometric accuracy can be generated for the parotid and submandibular glands by cascading a localizer CNN and a cropped high-resolution CNN. Improved MSDs were observed between automatic and manual segmentations of the submandibular glands when a low-resolution auto-segmentation was used as prior knowledge in the second-stage CNN. Reduced auto-segmentation performance was observed on our institutional MRI dataset when trained on external RT-MAC images; only the parotid gland auto-segmentations were considered clinically feasible for manual correction (Dice: 0.775 ± 0.105, MSD: 1.20 ± 0.60 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates that CNNs are a suitable method to auto-segment the parotid and submandibular glands on MRI images of patients with HNC, and that cascaded CNNs can generate high-resolution segmentations with improved geometric accuracy. Deep learning methods may be suitable for auto-segmentation of the parotid glands on T2-weighted MRI images from different scanners, but further work is required to improve the performance and generalizability of these methods for auto-segmentation of the submandibular glands and lymph nodes.

Quantitative Comparisons of Deep-learning-based and Atlas-based Auto-segmentation of the Intermediate Risk Clinical Target Volume for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Manual segment target volumes were time-consuming and inter-observer variability couldn't be avoided. With the development of computer science, auto-segmentation had the potential to solve this problem.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy and stability of Atlas-based and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of the intermediate risk clinical target volume, composed of CTV2 and CTVnd, for nasopharyngeal carcinoma quantitatively.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A cascade-deep-residual neural network was constructed to automatically segment CTV2 and CTVnd by deep learning method. Meanwhile, a commercially available software was used to automatically segment the same regions by Atlas-based method. The datasets included contrast computed tomography scans from 102 patients. For each patient, the two regions were manually delineated by one experienced physician. The similarity between the two auto-segmentation methods was quantitatively evaluated by Dice similarity coefficient, the 95th Hausdorff distance, volume overlap error and relative volume difference, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using the ranked Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

The average Dice similarity coefficient (±standard deviation) given by the deep-learning-based and Atlas-based auto-segmentation were 0.84(±0.03) and 0.74(±0.04) for CTV2, 0.79(±0.02) and 0.68(±0.03) for CTVnd, respectively. For the 95th Hausdorff distance, the corresponding values were 6.30±3.55mm and 9.34±3.39mm for CTV2, 7.09±2.27mm and 14.33±3.98mm for CTVnd. Besides, volume overlap error and relative volume difference could also predict the same situations. Statistical analyses showed significant difference between the two auto-segmentation methods (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the Atlas-based segmentation approach, the deep-learning-based segmentation method performed better both in accuracy and stability for meaningful anatomical areas other than organs at risk.

Clinically Applicable Segmentation of Head and Neck Anatomy for Radiotherapy: Deep Learning Algorithm Development and Validation Study

BACKGROUND

Over half a million individuals are diagnosed with head and neck cancer each year globally. Radiotherapy is an important curative treatment for this disease, but it requires manual time to delineate radiosensitive organs at risk. This planning process can delay treatment while also introducing interoperator variability, resulting in downstream radiation dose differences. Although auto-segmentation algorithms offer a potentially time-saving solution, the challenges in defining, quantifying, and achieving expert performance remain.

OBJECTIVE

Adopting a deep learning approach, we aim to demonstrate a 3D U-Net architecture that achieves expert-level performance in delineating 21 distinct head and neck organs at risk commonly segmented in clinical practice.

METHODS

The model was trained on a data set of 663 deidentified computed tomography scans acquired in routine clinical practice and with both segmentations taken from clinical practice and segmentations created by experienced radiographers as part of this research, all in accordance with consensus organ at risk definitions.

RESULTS

We demonstrated the model's clinical applicability by assessing its performance on a test set of 21 computed tomography scans from clinical practice, each with 21 organs at risk segmented by 2 independent experts. We also introduced surface Dice similarity coefficient, a new metric for the comparison of organ delineation, to quantify the deviation between organ at risk surface contours rather than volumes, better reflecting the clinical task of correcting errors in automated organ segmentations. The model's generalizability was then demonstrated on 2 distinct open-source data sets, reflecting different centers and countries to model training.

CONCLUSIONS

Deep learning is an effective and clinically applicable technique for the segmentation of the head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy. With appropriate validation studies and regulatory approvals, this system could improve the efficiency, consistency, and safety of radiotherapy pathways.

Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for 3D Mandible Segmentation in Computed Tomography

Purpose: Classic encoder–decoder-based convolutional neural network (EDCNN) approaches cannot accurately segment detailed anatomical structures of the mandible in computed tomography (CT), for instance, condyles and coronoids of the mandible, which are often affected by noise and metal artifacts. The main reason is that EDCNN approaches ignore the anatomical connectivity of the organs. In this paper, we propose a novel CNN-based 3D mandible segmentation approach that has the ability to accurately segment detailed anatomical structures. Methods: Different from the classic EDCNNs that need to slice or crop the whole CT scan into 2D slices or 3D patches during the segmentation process, our proposed approach can perform mandible segmentation on complete 3D CT scans. The proposed method, namely, RCNNSeg, adopts the structure of the recurrent neural networks to form a directed acyclic graph in order to enable recurrent connections between adjacent nodes to retain their connectivity. Each node then functions as a classic EDCNN to segment a single slice in the CT scan. Our proposed approach can perform 3D mandible segmentation on sequential data of any varied lengths and does not require a large computation cost. The proposed RCNNSeg was evaluated on 109 head and neck CT scans from a local dataset and 40 scans from the PDDCA public dataset. The final accuracy of the proposed RCNNSeg was evaluated by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average symmetric surface distance (ASD), and 95% Hausdorff distance (95HD) between the reference standard and the automated segmentation. Results: The proposed RCNNSeg outperforms the EDCNN-based approaches on both datasets and yields superior quantitative and qualitative performances when compared to the state-of-the-art approaches on the PDDCA dataset. The proposed RCNNSeg generated the most accurate segmentations with an average DSC of 97.48%, ASD of 0.2170 mm, and 95HD of 2.6562 mm on 109 CT scans, and an average DSC of 95.10%, ASD of 0.1367 mm, and 95HD of 1.3560 mm on the PDDCA dataset. Conclusions: The proposed RCNNSeg method generated more accurate automated segmentations than those of the other classic EDCNN segmentation techniques in terms of quantitative and qualitative evaluation. The proposed RCNNSeg has potential for automatic mandible segmentation by learning spatially structured information.

Multiview Self-Supervised Segmentation for OARs Delineation in Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy has become a common treatment option for head and neck (H&N) cancer, and organs at risk (OARs) need to be delineated to implement a high conformal dose distribution. Manual drawing of OARs is time consuming and inaccurate, so automatic drawing based on deep learning models has been proposed to accurately delineate the OARs. However, state-of-the-art performance usually requires a decent amount of delineation, but collecting pixel-level manual delineations is labor intensive and may not be necessary for representation learning. Encouraged by the recent progress in self-supervised learning, this study proposes and evaluates a novel multiview contrastive representation learning to boost the models from unlabelled data. The proposed learning architecture leverages three views of CTs (coronal, sagittal, and transverse plane) to collect positive and negative training samples. Specifically, a CT in 3D is first projected into three 2D views (coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes), then a convolutional neural network takes 3 views as inputs and outputs three individual representations in latent space, and finally, a contrastive loss is used to pull representation of different views of the same image closer (“positive pairs”) and push representations of views from different images (“negative pairs”) apart. To evaluate performance, we collected 220 CT images in H&N cancer patients. The experiment demonstrates that our method significantly improves quantitative performance over the state-of-the-art (from 83% to 86% in absolute Dice scores). Thus, our method provides a powerful and principled means to deal with the label-scarce problem.

An Automated Workflow to Improve Efficiency in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning by Prioritizing Organs at Risk

PURPOSE

Manual delineation (MD) of organs at risk (OAR) is time and labor intensive. Auto-delineation (AD) can reduce the need for MD, but because current algorithms are imperfect, manual review and modification is still typically used. Recognizing that many OARs are sufficiently far from important dose levels that they do not pose a realistic risk, we hypothesize that some OARs can be excluded from MD and manual review with no clinical effect. The purpose of this study was to develop a method that automatically identifies these OARs and enables more efficient workflows that incorporate AD without degrading clinical quality.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Preliminary dose map estimates were generated for n = 10 patients with head and neck cancers using only prescription and target-volume information. Conservative estimates of clinical OAR objectives were computed using AD structures with spatial expansion buffers to account for potential delineation uncertainties. OARs with estimated dose metrics below clinical tolerances were deemed low priority and excluded from MD and/or manual review. Final plans were then optimized using high-priority MD OARs and low-priority AD OARs and compared with reference plans generated using all MD OARs. Multiple different spatial buffers were used to accommodate different potential delineation uncertainties.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven out of 201 total OARs were identified as low-priority using the proposed methodology, which permitted a 33% reduction in structures requiring manual delineation/review. Plans optimized using low-priority AD OARs without review or modification met all planning objectives that were met when all MD OARs were used, indicating clinical equivalence.

CONCLUSIONS

Prioritizing OARs using estimated dose distributions allowed a substantial reduction in required MD and review without affecting clinically relevant dosimetry.

The role of computational methods for automating and improving clinical target volume definition

Treatment planning in radiotherapy distinguishes three target volume concepts: the gross tumor volume (GTV), the clinical target volume (CTV), and the planning target volume (PTV). Over time, GTV definition and PTV margins have improved through the development of novel imaging techniques and better image guidance, respectively. CTV definition is sometimes considered the weakest element in the planning process. CTV definition is particularly complex since the extension of microscopic disease cannot be seen using currently available in-vivo imaging techniques. Instead, CTV definition has to incorporate knowledge of the patterns of tumor progression. While CTV delineation has largely been considered the domain of radiation oncologists, this paper, arising from a 2019 ESTRO Physics research workshop, discusses the contributions that medical physics and computer science can make by developing computational methods to support CTV definition. First, we overview the role of image segmentation algorithms, which may in part automate CTV delineation through segmentation of lymph node stations or normal tissues representing anatomical boundaries of microscopic tumor progression. The recent success of deep convolutional neural networks has also enabled learning entire CTV delineations from examples. Second, we discuss the use of mathematical models of tumor progression for CTV definition, using as example the application of glioma growth models to facilitate GTV-to-CTV expansion for glioblastoma that is consistent with neuroanatomy. We further consider statistical machine learning models to quantify lymphatic metastatic progression of tumors, which may eventually improve elective CTV definition. Lastly, we discuss approaches to incorporate uncertainty in CTV definition into treatment plan optimization as well as general limitations of the CTV concept in the case of infiltrating tumors without natural boundaries.

Automatic segmentation and applicator reconstruction for CT-based brachytherapy of cervical cancer using 3D convolutional neural networks

In this study, we present deep learning-based approaches to automatic segmentation and applicator reconstruction with high accuracy and efficiency in the planning computed tomography (CT) for cervical cancer brachytherapy (BT). A novel three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was proposed and referred to as DSD-UNET. The dataset of 91 patients received CT-based BT of cervical cancer was used to train and test DSD-UNET model for auto-segmentation of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Automatic applicator reconstruction was achieved with DSD-UNET-based segmentation of applicator components followed by 3D skeletonization and polynomial curve fitting. Digitization of the channel paths for tandem and ovoid applicator in the planning CT was evaluated utilizing the data from 32 patients. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Index (JI), and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy. The segmentation performance of DSD-UNET was compared with that of 3D U-Net. Results showed that DSD-UNET method outperformed 3D U-Net on segmentations of all the structures. The mean DSC values of DSD-UNET method were 86.9%, 82.9%, and 82.1% for bladder, HR-CTV, and rectum, respectively. For the performance of automatic applicator reconstruction, outstanding segmentation accuracy was first achieved for the intrauterine and ovoid tubes (average DSC value of 92.1%, average HD value of 2.3 mm). Finally, HDs between the channel paths determined automatically and manually were 0.88 ± 0.12 mm, 0.95 ± 0.16 mm, and 0.96 ± 0.15 mm for the intrauterine, left ovoid, and right ovoid tubes, respectively. The proposed DSD-UNET method outperformed the 3D U-Net and could segment HR-CTV, bladder, and rectum with relatively good accuracy. Accurate digitization of the channel paths could be achieved with the DSD-UNET-based method. The proposed approaches could be useful to improve the efficiency and consistency of treatment planning for cervical cancer BT.

Auto-segmentation of organs at risk for head and neck radiotherapy planning: From atlas-based to deep learning methods

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the basic treatment modalities for cancer of the head and neck (H&N), which requires a precise spatial description of the target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) to deliver a highly conformal radiation dose to the tumor cells while sparing the healthy tissues. For this purpose, target volumes and OARs have to be delineated and segmented from medical images. As manual delineation is a tedious and time-consuming task subjected to intra/interobserver variability, computerized auto-segmentation has been developed as an alternative. The field of medical imaging and RT planning has experienced an increased interest in the past decade, with new emerging trends that shifted the field of H&N OAR auto-segmentation from atlas-based to deep learning-based approaches. In this review, we systematically analyzed 78 relevant publications on auto-segmentation of OARs in the H&N region from 2008 to date, and provided critical discussions and recommendations from various perspectives: image modality - both computed tomography and magnetic resonance image modalities are being exploited, but the potential of the latter should be explored more in the future; OAR - the spinal cord, brainstem, and major salivary glands are the most studied OARs, but additional experiments should be conducted for several less studied soft tissue structures; image database - several image databases with the corresponding ground truth are currently available for methodology evaluation, but should be augmented with data from multiple observers and multiple institutions; methodology - current methods have shifted from atlas-based to deep learning auto-segmentation, which is expected to become even more sophisticated; ground truth - delineation guidelines should be followed and participation of multiple experts from multiple institutions is recommended; performance metrics - the Dice coefficient as the standard volumetric overlap metrics should be accompanied with at least one distance metrics, and combined with clinical acceptability scores and risk assessments; segmentation performance - the best performing methods achieve clinically acceptable auto-segmentation for several OARs, however, the dosimetric impact should be also studied to provide clinically relevant endpoints for RT planning.

Deep learning vs. atlas-based models for fast auto-segmentation of the masticatory muscles on head and neck CT images

BACKGROUND

Impaired function of masticatory muscles will lead to trismus. Routine delineation of these muscles during planning may improve dose tracking and facilitate dose reduction resulting in decreased radiation-related trismus. This study aimed to compare a deep learning model with a commercial atlas-based model for fast auto-segmentation of the masticatory muscles on head and neck computed tomography (CT) images.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Paired masseter (M), temporalis (T), medial and lateral pterygoid (MP, LP) muscles were manually segmented on 56 CT images. CT images were randomly divided into training (n = 27) and validation (n = 29) cohorts. Two methods were used for automatic delineation of masticatory muscles (MMs): Deep learning auto-segmentation (DLAS) and atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS). The automatic algorithms were evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, precision, Hausdorff distance (HD), HD95, and mean surface distance (MSD). A consolidated score was calculated by normalizing the metrics against interobserver variability and averaging over all patients. Differences in dose (∆Dose) to MMs for DLAS and ABAS segmentations were assessed. A paired t-test was used to compare the geometric and dosimetric difference between DLAS and ABAS methods.

RESULTS

DLAS outperformed ABAS in delineating all MMs (p < 0.05). The DLAS mean DSC for M, T, MP, and LP ranged from 0.83 ± 0.03 to 0.89 ± 0.02, the ABAS mean DSC ranged from 0.79 ± 0.05 to 0.85 ± 0.04. The mean value for recall, HD, HD95, MSD also improved with DLAS for auto-segmentation. Interobserver variation revealed the highest variability in DSC and MSD for both T and MP, and the highest scores were achieved for T by both automatic algorithms. With few exceptions, the mean ∆D98%, ∆D95%, ∆D50%, and ∆D2% for all structures were below 10% for DLAS and ABAS and had no detectable statistical difference (P > 0.05). DLAS based contours had dose endpoints more closely matched with that of the manually segmented when compared with ABAS.

CONCLUSIONS

DLAS auto-segmentation of masticatory muscles for the head and neck radiotherapy had improved segmentation accuracy compared with ABAS with no qualitative difference in dosimetric endpoints compared to manually segmented contours.

Atlas-based auto-segmentation for postoperative radiotherapy planning in endometrial and cervical cancers

Background

Since intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has become popular for the treatment of gynecologic cancers, the contouring process has become more critical. This study evaluated the feasibility of atlas-based auto-segmentation (ABAS) for contouring in patients with endometrial and cervical cancers.

Methods

A total of 75 sets of planning CT images from 75 patients were collected. Contours for the pelvic nodal clinical target volume (CTV), femur, and bladder were carefully generated by two skilled radiation oncologists. Of 75 patients, 60 were randomly registered in three different atlas libraries for ABAS in groups of 20, 40, or 60. ABAS was conducted in 15 patients, followed by manual correction (ABAS_c). The time required to generate all contours was recorded, and the accuracy of segmentation was assessed using Dice’s coefficient (DC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD) and compared to those of manually delineated contours.

Results

For ABAS-CTV, the best results were achieved with groups of 60 patients (DC, 0.79; HD, 19.7 mm) and the worst results with groups of 20 patients (DC, 0.75; p = 0.012; HD, 21.3 mm; p = 0.002). ABAS_c-CTV performed better than ABAS-CTV in terms of both HD and DC (ABAS_c [n = 60]; DC, 0.84; HD, 15.6 mm; all p < 0.017). ABAS required an average of 45.1 s, whereas ABAS_c required 191.1 s; both methods required less time than the manual methods (p < 0.001). Both ABAS-Femur and simultaneous ABAS-Bilateral-femurs showed satisfactory performance, regardless of the atlas library used (DC > 0.9 and HD ≤10.0 mm), with significant time reduction compared to that needed for manual delineation (p < 0.001). However, ABAS-Bladder did not prove to be feasible, with inferior results regardless of library size (DC < 0.6 and HD > 40 mm). Furthermore, ABAS_c-Bladder required a longer processing time than manual contouring to achieve the same accuracy.

Conclusions

ABAS could help physicians to delineate the CTV and organs-at-risk (e.g., femurs) in IMRT planning considering its consistency, efficacy, and accuracy.

Automated delineation of the clinical target volume using anatomically constrained 3D expansion of the gross tumor volume

PURPOSE

Delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) is arguably the weakest link in the treatment planning chain. This work aims to support clinicians in this crucial task.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

While the CTV itself is ambiguous, it is much easier to identify structures that do not belong to the CTV and serve as barriers to the spread of the disease. We segment the known barrier structures using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CTV is then obtained by starting from the manually delineated gross tumor volume (GTV) and expanding it while taking into account the barrier structures. Mathematically, we define the CTV as an iso-surface in the 3D map of shortest paths of all voxels from the GTV. The shortest paths are found with the Dijkstra algorithm. While the method is generally applicable, we test it on 206 glioma and glioblastoma cases.

RESULTS

The auto-segmented barrier structures for the brain cases include the ventricles, falx cerebri, tentorium cerebelli, brain sinuses, and the outer surface of the brain. Manual and auto-segmented barrier structures agree with surface Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 at 2 mm tolerance. Comparison of manual and automatically delineated CTVs shows a median surface DSC of 0.79.

CONCLUSIONS

Barrier structures for CTV definition can be auto-delineated with outstanding precision using a CNN. An algorithm for automated calculation of the CTV by 3D expansion of the GTV while respecting anatomical barriers has been developed. It shows good agreement with manual CTV definition for brain tumors.

Dynamic multiatlas selection-based consensus segmentation of head and neck structures from CT images

PURPOSE

Manual delineation of head and neck (H&N) organ-at-risk (OAR) structures for radiation therapy planning is time consuming and highly variable. Therefore, we developed a dynamic multiatlas selection-based approach for fast and reproducible segmentation.

METHODS

Our approach dynamically selects and weights the appropriate number of atlases for weighted label fusion and generates segmentations and consensus maps indicating voxel-wise agreement between different atlases. Atlases were selected for a target as those exceeding an alignment weight called dynamic atlas attention index. Alignment weights were computed at the image level and called global weighted voting (GWV) or at the structure level and called structure weighted voting (SWV) by using a normalized metric computed as the sum of squared distances of computed tomography (CT)-radiodensity and modality-independent neighborhood descriptors (extracting edge information). Performance comparisons were performed using 77 H&N CT images from an internal Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center dataset (N = 45) and an external dataset (N = 32) using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), 95th percentile of HD, median of maximum surface distance, and volume ratio error against expert delineation. Pairwise DSC accuracy comparisons of proposed (GWV, SWV) vs single best atlas (BA) or majority voting (MV) methods were performed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.

RESULTS

Both SWV and GWV methods produced significantly better segmentation accuracy than BA (P < 0.001) and MV (P < 0.001) for all OARs within both datasets. SWV generated the most accurate segmentations with DSC of: 0.88 for oral cavity, 0.85 for mandible, 0.84 for cord, 0.76 for brainstem and parotids, 0.71 for larynx, and 0.60 for submandibular glands. SWV's accuracy exceeded GWV's for submandibular glands (DSC = 0.60 vs 0.52, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The contributed SWV and GWV methods generated more accurate automated segmentations than the other two multiatlas-based segmentation techniques. The consensus maps could be combined with segmentations to visualize voxel-wise consensus between atlases within OARs during manual review.

Artificial intelligence in oncology, its scope and future prospects with specific reference to radiation oncology

OBJECTIVE

Artificial intelligence (AI) seems to be bridging the gap between the acquisition of data and its meaningful interpretation. These approaches, have shown outstanding capabilities, outperforming most classification and regression methods to date and the ability to automatically learn the most suitable data representation for the task at hand and present it for better correlation. This article tries to sensitize the practising radiation oncologists to understand where the potential role of AI lies and what further can be achieved with it.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Contemporary literature was searched and the available literature was sorted and an attempt at writing a comprehensive non-systematic review was made.

RESULTS

The article addresses various areas in oncology, especially in the field of radiation oncology, where the work based on AI has been done. Whether it's the screening modalities, or diagnosis or the prognostic assays, AI has come with more accurately defining results and survival of patients. Various steps and protocols in radiation oncology are now using AI-based methods, like in the steps of planning, segmentation and delivery of radiation. Benefit of AI across all the platforms of health sector may lead to a more refined and personalized medicine in near future.

CONCLUSION

AI with the use of machine learning and artificial neural networks has come up with faster and more accurate solutions for the problems faced by oncologist. The uses of AI,are likely to get increased exponentially . However, concerns regarding demographic discrepancies in relation to patients, disease and their natural history and reports of manipulation of AI, the ultimate responsibility will rest on the treating physicians.

AAR-RT - A system for auto-contouring organs at risk on CT images for radiation therapy planning: Principles, design, and large-scale evaluation on head-and-neck and thoracic cancer cases

Contouring (segmentation) of Organs at Risk (OARs) in medical images is required for accurate radiation therapy (RT) planning. In current clinical practice, OAR contouring is performed with low levels of automation. Although several approaches have been proposed in the literature for improving automation, it is difficult to gain an understanding of how well these methods would perform in a realistic clinical setting. This is chiefly due to three key factors - small number of patient studies used for evaluation, lack of performance evaluation as a function of input image quality, and lack of precise anatomic definitions of OARs. In this paper, extending our previous body-wide Automatic Anatomy Recognition (AAR) framework to RT planning of OARs in the head and neck (H&N) and thoracic body regions, we present a methodology called AAR-RT to overcome some of these hurdles. AAR-RT follows AAR's 3-stage paradigm of model-building, object-recognition, and object-delineation. Model-building: Three key advances were made over AAR. (i) AAR-RT (like AAR) starts off with a computationally precise definition of the two body regions and all of their OARs. Ground truth delineations of OARs are then generated following these definitions strictly. We retrospectively gathered patient data sets and the associated contour data sets that have been created previously in routine clinical RT planning from our Radiation Oncology department and mended the contours to conform to these definitions. We then derived an Object Quality Score (OQS) for each OAR sample and an Image Quality Score (IQS) for each study, both on a 1-to-10 scale, based on quality grades assigned to each OAR sample following 9 key quality criteria. Only studies with high IQS and high OQS for all of their OARs were selected for model building. IQS and OQS were employed for evaluating AAR-RT's performance as a function of image/object quality. (ii) In place of the previous hand-crafted hierarchy for organizing OARs in AAR, we devised a method to find an optimal hierarchy for each body region. Optimality was based on minimizing object recognition error. (iii) In addition to the parent-to-child relationship encoded in the hierarchy in previous AAR, we developed a directed probability graph technique to further improve recognition accuracy by learning and encoding in the model "steady" relationships that may exist among OAR boundaries in the three orthogonal planes. Object-recognition: The two key improvements over the previous approach are (i) use of the optimal hierarchy for actual recognition of OARs in a given image, and (ii) refined recognition by making use of the trained probability graph. Object-delineation: We use a kNN classifier confined to the fuzzy object mask localized by the recognition step and then fit optimally the fuzzy mask to the kNN-derived voxel cluster to bring back shape constraint on the object. We evaluated AAR-RT on 205 thoracic and 298 H&N (total 503) studies, involving both planning and re-planning scans and a total of 21 organs (9 - thorax, 12 - H&N). The studies were gathered from two patient age groups for each gender - 40-59 years and 60-79 years. The number of 3D OAR samples analyzed from the two body regions was 4301. IQS and OQS tended to cluster at the two ends of the score scale. Accordingly, we considered two quality groups for each gender - good and poor. Good quality data sets typically had OQS ≥ 6 and had distortions, artifacts, pathology etc. in not more than 3 slices through the object. The number of model-worthy data sets used for training were 38 for thorax and 36 for H&N, and the remaining 479 studies were used for testing AAR-RT. Accordingly, we created 4 anatomy models, one each for: Thorax male (20 model-worthy data sets), Thorax female (18 model-worthy data sets), H&N male (20 model-worthy data sets), and H&N female (16 model-worthy data sets). On "good" cases, AAR-RT's recognition accuracy was within 2 voxels and delineation boundary distance was within ∼1 voxel. This was similar to the variability observed between two dosimetrists in manually contouring 5-6 OARs in each of 169 studies. On "poor" cases, AAR-RT's errors hovered around 5 voxels for recognition and 2 voxels for boundary distance. The performance was similar on planning and replanning cases, and there was no gender difference in performance. AAR-RT's recognition operation is much more robust than delineation. Understanding object and image quality and how they influence performance is crucial for devising effective object recognition and delineation algorithms. OQS seems to be more important than IQS in determining accuracy. Streak artifacts arising from dental implants and fillings and beam hardening from bone pose the greatest challenge to auto-contouring methods.

Radiomics and Machine Learning for Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancers

Introduction: An increasing number of parameters can be considered when making decisions in oncology. Tumor characteristics can also be extracted from imaging through the use of radiomics and add to this wealth of clinical data. Machine learning can encompass these parameters and thus enhance clinical decision as well as radiotherapy workflow. Methods: We performed a description of machine learning applications at each step of treatment by radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. We then performed a systematic review on radiomics and machine learning outcome prediction models in head and neck cancers. Results: Machine Learning has several promising applications in treatment planning with automatic organ at risk delineation improvements and adaptative radiotherapy workflow automation. It may also provide new approaches for Normal Tissue Complication Probability models. Radiomics may provide additional data on tumors for improved machine learning powered predictive models, not only on survival, but also on risk of distant metastasis, in field recurrence, HPV status and extra nodal spread. However, most studies provide preliminary data requiring further validation. Conclusion: Promising perspectives arise from machine learning applications and radiomics based models, yet further data are necessary for their implementation in daily care.

AnatomyNet: Deep learning for fast and fully automated whole-volume segmentation of head and neck anatomy

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) is a common treatment option for head and neck (HaN) cancer. An important step involved in RT planning is the delineation of organs-at-risks (OARs) based on HaN computed tomography (CT). However, manually delineating OARs is time-consuming as each slice of CT images needs to be individually examined and a typical CT consists of hundreds of slices. Automating OARs segmentation has the benefit of both reducing the time and improving the quality of RT planning. Existing anatomy autosegmentation algorithms use primarily atlas-based methods, which require sophisticated atlas creation and cannot adequately account for anatomy variations among patients. In this work, we propose an end-to-end, atlas-free three-dimensional (3D) convolutional deep learning framework for fast and fully automated whole-volume HaN anatomy segmentation.

METHODS

Our deep learning model, called AnatomyNet, segments OARs from head and neck CT images in an end-to-end fashion, receiving whole-volume HaN CT images as input and generating masks of all OARs of interest in one shot. AnatomyNet is built upon the popular 3D U-net architecture, but extends it in three important ways: (a) a new encoding scheme to allow autosegmentation on whole-volume CT images instead of local patches or subsets of slices, (b) incorporating 3D squeeze-and-excitation residual blocks in encoding layers for better feature representation, and (c) a new loss function combining Dice scores and focal loss to facilitate the training of the neural model. These features are designed to address two main challenges in deep learning-based HaN segmentation: (a) segmenting small anatomies (i.e., optic chiasm and optic nerves) occupying only a few slices, and (b) training with inconsistent data annotations with missing ground truth for some anatomical structures.

RESULTS

We collected 261 HaN CT images to train AnatomyNet and used MICCAI Head and Neck Auto Segmentation Challenge 2015 as a benchmark dataset to evaluate the performance of AnatomyNet. The objective is to segment nine anatomies: brain stem, chiasm, mandible, optic nerve left, optic nerve right, parotid gland left, parotid gland right, submandibular gland left, and submandibular gland right. Compared to previous state-of-the-art results from the MICCAI 2015 competition, AnatomyNet increases Dice similarity coefficient by 3.3% on average. AnatomyNet takes about 0.12 s to fully segment a head and neck CT image of dimension 178 × 302 × 225, significantly faster than previous methods. In addition, the model is able to process whole-volume CT images and delineate all OARs in one pass, requiring little pre- or postprocessing.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning models offer a feasible solution to the problem of delineating OARs from CT images. We demonstrate that our proposed model can improve segmentation accuracy and simplify the autosegmentation pipeline. With this method, it is possible to delineate OARs of a head and neck CT within a fraction of a second.

Technical Note: More accurate and efficient segmentation of organs-at-risk in radiotherapy with convolutional neural networks cascades

PURPOSE

Manual delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) in radiotherapy is both time-consuming and subjective. Automated and more accurate segmentation is of the utmost importance in clinical application. The purpose of this study is to further improve the segmentation accuracy and efficiency with a novel network named convolutional neural networks (CNN) Cascades.

METHODS

CNN Cascades was a two-step, coarse-to-fine approach that consisted of a simple region detector (SRD) and a fine segmentation unit (FSU). The SRD first used a relative shallow network to define the region of interest (ROI) where the organ was located, and then, the FSU took the smaller ROI as input and adopted a deep network for fine segmentation. The imaging data (14,651 slices) of 100 head-and-neck patients with segmentations were used for this study. The performance was compared with the state-of-the-art single CNN in terms of accuracy with metrics of Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) values.

RESULTS

The proposed CNN Cascades outperformed the single CNN on accuracy for each OAR. Similarly, for the average of all OARs, it was also the best with mean DSC of 0.90 (SRD: 0.86, FSU: 0.87, and U-Net: 0.85) and the mean HD of 3.0 mm (SRD: 4.0, FSU: 3.6, and U-Net: 4.4). Meanwhile, the CNN Cascades reduced the mean segmentation time per patient by 48% (FSU) and 5% (U-Net), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed two-step network demonstrated superior performance by reducing the input region. This potentially can be an effective segmentation method that provides accurate and consistent delineation with reduced clinician interventions for clinical applications as well as for quality assurance of a multicenter clinical trial.

Multi-institutional study of the variability in target delineation for six targets commonly treated with radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Although accurate delineation of the target is a key factor of success in radiosurgery there are no consensus guidelines for target contouring.

AIM

The aim of the present study was therefore to quantify the variability in target delineation and discuss the potential clinical implications, for six targets regarded as common in stereotactic radiosurgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve Gamma Knife centers participated in the study by contouring the targets and organs at risks and performing the treatment plans. Analysis of target delineation variability was based on metrics defined based on agreement volumes derived from overlapping structures following a previously developed method. The 50% agreement volume (AV₅₀), the common and the encompassing volumes as well as the Agreement Volume Index (AVI) were determined.

RESULTS

Results showed that the lowest AVI (0.16) was found for one of the analyzed metastases (range of delineated volumes 1.27-3.33 cm³). AVI for the other two metastases was 0.62 and 0.37, respectively. Corresponding AVIs for the cavernous sinus meningioma, pituitary adenoma and vestibular schwannoma were 0.22, 0.37 and 0.50.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the variability in the contouring was much higher than expected and therefore further work in standardizing the contouring practice in radiosurgery is warranted.

[Siriade 2.0: An e-learning platform for radiation oncology contouring]

PURPOSE

In 2008, the French national society of radiation oncology (SFRO) and the association for radiation oncology continued education (AFCOR) created Siriade, an e-learning website dedicated to contouring.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2015 and 2017, this platform was updated using the latest digital online tools available. Two main sections were needed: a theoretical part and another section of online workshops.

RESULTS

Teaching courses are available as online commented videos, available on demand. The practical section of the website is an online contouring workshop that automatically generates a report quantifying the quality of the user's delineation compared with the experts'.

CONCLUSION

Siriade 2.0 is an innovating digital tool for radiation oncology initial and continuous education.

Case-control comparison brain lesion segmentation for early infarct detection

Computed Tomography (CT) images are widely used for the identification of abnormal brain tissues following infarct and hemorrhage of a stroke. The treatment of this medical condition mainly depends on doctors' experience. While manual lesion delineation by medical doctors is currently considered as the standard approach, it is time-consuming and dependent on each doctor's expertise and experience. In this study, a case-control comparison brain lesion segmentation (CCBLS) method is proposed to segment the region pertaining to brain injury by comparing the voxel intensity of CT images between control subjects and stroke patients. The method is able to segment the brain lesion from the stacked CT images automatically without prior knowledge of the location or the presence of the lesion. The aim is to reduce medical doctors' burden and assist them in making an accurate diagnosis. A case study with 300 sets of CT images from control subjects and stroke patients is conducted. Comparing with other existing methods, the outcome ascertains the effectiveness of the proposed method in detecting brain infarct of stroke patients.

Geometric and dosimetric evaluations of atlas-based segmentation methods of MR images in the head and neck region

Owing to its excellent soft-tissue contrast, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has found an increased application in radiation therapy (RT). By harnessing these properties for treatment planning, automated segmentation methods can alleviate the manual workload burden to the clinical workflow. We investigated atlas-based segmentation methods of organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck (H&N) region using one approach that selected the most similar atlas from a library of segmented images and two multi-atlas approaches. The latter were based on weighted majority voting and an iterative atlas-fusion approach called STEPS. We built the atlas library from pre-treatment T1-weighted MR images of 12 patients with manual contours of the parotids, spinal cord and mandible, delineated by a clinician. Following a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy, we measured the geometric accuracy by calculating Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), standard and 95% Hausdorff distances (HD and HD95), and the mean surface distance (MSD), whereby the manual contours served as the gold standard. To benchmark the algorithm, we determined the inter-observer variability (IOV) between three observers. To investigate the dosimetric effect of segmentation inaccuracies, we implemented an auto-planning strategy within the treatment planning system Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). For each set of auto-segmented OARs, we generated a plan for a 9-beam step and shoot intensity modulated RT treatment, designed according to our institution's clinical H&N protocol. Superimposing the dose distributions on the gold standard OARs, we calculated dose differences to OARs caused by delineation differences between auto-segmented and gold standard OARs. We investigated the correlations between geometric and dosimetric differences. The mean DSC was larger than 0.8 and the mean MSD smaller than 2 mm for the multi-atlas approaches, resulting in a geometric accuracy comparable to previously published results and within the range of the IOV. While dosimetric differences could be as large as 23% of the clinical goal, treatment plans fulfilled all imposed clinical goals for the gold standard OARs. Correlations between geometric and dosimetric measures were low with R2  <  0.5. The geometric accuracy and the ability to achieve clinically acceptable treatment plans indicate the suitability of using atlas-based contours for RT treatment planning purposes. The low correlations between geometric and dosimetric measures suggest that geometric measures alone are not sufficient to predict the dosimetric impact of segmentation inaccuracies on treatment planning for the data utilised in this study.

Geometric and dosimetric evaluations of atlas-based segmentation methods of MR images in the head and neck region

Owing to its excellent soft-tissue contrast, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has found an increased application in radiation therapy (RT). By harnessing these properties for treatment planning, automated segmentation methods can alleviate the manual workload burden to the clinical workflow. We investigated atlas-based segmentation methods of organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck (H&N) region using one approach that selected the most similar atlas from a library of segmented images and two multi-atlas approaches. The latter were based on weighted majority voting and an iterative atlas-fusion approach called STEPS. We built the atlas library from pre-treatment T1-weighted MR images of 12 patients with manual contours of the parotids, spinal cord and mandible, delineated by a clinician. Following a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy, we measured the geometric accuracy by calculating Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), standard and 95% Hausdorff distances (HD and HD95), and the mean surface distance (MSD), whereby the manual contours served as the gold standard. To benchmark the algorithm, we determined the inter-observer variability (IOV) between three observers. To investigate the dosimetric effect of segmentation inaccuracies, we implemented an auto-planning strategy within the treatment planning system Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). For each set of auto-segmented OARs, we generated a plan for a 9-beam step and shoot intensity modulated RT treatment, designed according to our institution's clinical H&N protocol. Superimposing the dose distributions on the gold standard OARs, we calculated dose differences to OARs caused by delineation differences between auto-segmented and gold standard OARs. We investigated the correlations between geometric and dosimetric differences. The mean DSC was larger than 0.8 and the mean MSD smaller than 2 mm for the multi-atlas approaches, resulting in a geometric accuracy comparable to previously published results and within the range of the IOV. While dosimetric differences could be as large as 23% of the clinical goal, treatment plans fulfilled all imposed clinical goals for the gold standard OARs. Correlations between geometric and dosimetric measures were low with R²  <  0.5. The geometric accuracy and the ability to achieve clinically acceptable treatment plans indicate the suitability of using atlas-based contours for RT treatment planning purposes. The low correlations between geometric and dosimetric measures suggest that geometric measures alone are not sufficient to predict the dosimetric impact of segmentation inaccuracies on treatment planning for the data utilised in this study.

Segmentation of parotid glands from registered CT and MR images

PURPOSE

To develop an automatic multimodal method for segmentation of parotid glands (PGs) from pre-registered computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images and compare its results to the results of an existing state-of-the-art algorithm that segments PGs from CT images only.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance images of head and neck were registered to the accompanying CT images using two different state-of-the-art registration procedures. The reference domains of registered image pairs were divided on the complementary PG regions and backgrounds according to the manual delineation of PGs on CT images, provided by a physician. Patches of intensity values from both image modalities, centered around randomly sampled voxels from the reference domain, served as positive or negative samples in the training of the convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier. The trained CNN accepted a previously unseen (registered) image pair and classified its voxels according to the resemblance of its patches to the patches used for training. The final segmentation was refined using a graph-cut algorithm, followed by the dilate-erode operations.

RESULTS

Using the same image dataset, segmentation of PGs was performed using the proposed multimodal algorithm and an existing monomodal algorithm, which segments PGs from CT images only. The mean value of the achieved Dice overlapping coefficient for the proposed algorithm was 78.8%, while the corresponding mean value for the monomodal algorithm was 76.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Automatic PG segmentation on the planning CT image can be augmented with the MR image modality, leading to an improved RT planning of head and neck cancer.

Auto-contouring via Automatic Anatomy Recognition of Organs at Risk in Head and Neck Cancer on CT images

Contouring of the organs at risk is a vital part of routine radiation therapy planning. For the head and neck (H&N) region, this is more challenging due to the complexity of anatomy, the presence of streak artifacts, and the variations of object appearance. In this paper, we describe the latest advances in our Automatic Anatomy Recognition (AAR) approach, which aims to automatically contour multiple objects in the head and neck region on planning CT images. Our method has three major steps: model building, object recognition, and object delineation. First, the better-quality images from our cohort of H&N CT studies are used to build fuzzy models and find the optimal hierarchy for arranging objects based on the relationship between objects. Then, the object recognition step exploits the rich prior anatomic information encoded in the hierarchy to derive the location and pose for each object, which leads to generalizable and robust methods and mitigation of object localization challenges. Finally, the delineation algorithms employ local features to contour the boundary based on object recognition results. We make several improvements within the AAR framework, including finding recognition-error-driven optimal hierarchy, modeling boundary relationships, combining texture and intensity, and evaluating object quality. Experiments were conducted on the largest ensemble of clinical data sets reported to date, including 216 planning CT studies and over 2,600 object samples. The preliminary results show that on data sets with minimal (<4 slices) streak artifacts and other deviations, overall recognition accuracy reaches 2 voxels, with overall delineation Dice coefficient close to 0.8 and Hausdorff Distance within 1 voxel.

Automatic Intracranial Segmentation: Is the Clinician Still Needed?

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic hypofractionated radiotherapy is an effective treatment for brain metastases in oligometastatic patients. Its planning is however time-consuming because of the number of organs at risk to be manually segmented. This study evaluates 2 automated segmentation commercial software.

METHODS

Patients were scanned in the treatment position. The computed tomography scan was registered on a magnetic resonance imaging and volumes were manually segmented by a clinician. Then 2 automated segmentations were performed (with iPlan and Smart Segmentation). RT STRUCT files were compared with Aquilab's Artistruct segment comparison module. We selected common segmented volume ratio as the main judging criterion. Secondary criteria were Dice-Sørensen coefficients, overlap ratio, and additional segmented volume.

RESULTS

Twenty consecutive patients were included. Agreement between manual and automated contouring was poor. Common segmented volumes ranged from 7.71% to 82.54%, Dice-Sørensen coefficient ranged from 0.0745 to 0.8398, overlap ratio ranged from 0.0414 to 0.7275, and additional segmented volume ranged from 9.80% to 92.25%. Each software outperformed the other on some organs while performing worse on others.

CONCLUSION

No software seemed clearly better than the other. Common segmented volumes were much too low for routine use in stereotactic hypofractionated brain radiotherapy. Manual editing is still needed.

Clinical evaluation of atlas and deep learning based automatic contouring for lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Contouring of organs at risk (OARs) is an important but time consuming part of radiotherapy treatment planning. The aim of this study was to investigate whether using institutional created software-generated contouring will save time if used as a starting point for manual OAR contouring for lung cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty CT scans of stage I-III NSCLC patients were used to compare user adjusted contours after an atlas-based and deep learning contour, against manual delineation. The lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, heart and mediastinum were contoured for this study. The time to perform the manual tasks was recorded.

RESULTS

With a median time of 20 min for manual contouring, the total median time saved was 7.8 min when using atlas-based contouring and 10 min for deep learning contouring. Both atlas based and deep learning adjustment times were significantly lower than manual contouring time for all OARs except for the left lung and esophagus of the atlas based contouring.

CONCLUSIONS

User adjustment of software generated contours is a viable strategy to reduce contouring time of OARs for lung radiotherapy while conforming to local clinical standards. In addition, deep learning contouring shows promising results compared to existing solutions.

Assessment of the novel online delineation workshop dummy run approach using FALCON within a European multicentre trial in cervical cancer (RAIDs)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Online delineation workshops (ODW) permit training of geographically dispersed participants. The purpose is to evaluate the methodology of an ODW using FALCON to harmonize delineation within a European multicentre trial on locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two ODW included 46 clinicians (14 centres). Clinicians completed baseline (C1), guideline (C2) and final contours (C3) for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) for LACC. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was evaluated quantitatively (using the DICE index) and qualitatively compared to expert contours.

RESULTS

Nine clinicians submitted for EBRT and BT for C1-C3. Thirty-two sent any contour. Interobserver quantitative comparisons for EBRT showed significant improvement for C2 vs. C1 for bowel, CTV node, CTV-p and GTV node with significant detriment for GTV node (C3 vs. C1; C2), CTV-p (C3 vs. C2) and bowel (C3 vs. C2), showing in general an improvement in C2 vs. C1, with a detriment in C3 vs. C2 for two target volumes and an organ at risk. For BT there was significant improvement for C2 vs. C1 for bladder, GTV, HR-CTV and IR-CTV, with significant detriment for bladder (C3 vs. C2), thus overall improvement in C2 vs. C1, with only a detriment in C3 vs. C2 for bladder. Centres using MRI imaging for BT contouring did significantly better in the BT case for HR-CTV than those which used other techniques (C2 vs. C1: p<0.005; C3 vs. C1: p=0.02). Intraobserver quantitative comparisons showed significant improvement contouring a region of interest between C2 vs. C1, C3 vs. C1 and C3 vs. C2 for EBRT and between C2 and C1 for BT.

CONCLUSIONS

ODW offer training, initial contouring harmonization and allow assessment of centres.

RapidPlan head and neck model: the objectives and possible clinical benefit

Background

To evaluate a knowledge based planning model for RapidPlan (RP) generated for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) patient treatments, as well its ability to possibly improve the clinical plan quality. The stability of the model was assessed also for a different beam geometry, different dose fractionation and different management of bilateral structures (parotids).

Methods

Dosimetric and geometric data from plans of 83 patients presenting HNC were selected for the model training. All the plans used volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT, RapidArc) to treat two targets at dose levels of 69.96 and 54.45 Gy in 33 fractions with simultaneous integrated boost. Two models were generated, the first separating the ipsi- and contra-lateral parotids, while the second associating the two parotids to a single structure for training. The optimization objectives were adjusted to the final model to better translate the institutional planning and dosimetric strategies and trade-offs. The models were validated on 20 HNC patients, comparing the RP generated plans and the clinical plans. RP generated plans were also compared between the clinical beam arrangement and a simpler geometry, as well as for a different fractionation scheme.

Results

RP improved significantly the clinical plan quality, with a reduction of 2 Gy, 5 Gy, and 10 Gy of the mean parotid, oral cavity and laryngeal doses, respectively. A simpler beam geometry was deteriorating the plan quality, but in a small amount, keeping a significant improvement relative to the clinical plan. The two models, with one or two parotid structures, showed very similar results. NTCP evaluations indicated the possibility of improving (NTCP decreasing of about 7%) the toxicity profile when using the RP solution.

Conclusions

The HNC RP model showed improved plan quality and planning stability for beam geometry and fractionation. An adequate choice of the objectives in the model is necessary for the trade-offs strategies.

Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks

PURPOSE

Accurate segmentation of organs-at-risks (OARs) is the key step for efficient planning of radiation therapy for head and neck (HaN) cancer treatment. In the work, we proposed the first deep learning-based algorithm, for segmentation of OARs in HaN CT images, and compared its performance against state-of-the-art automated segmentation algorithms, commercial software, and interobserver variability.

METHODS

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-a concept from the field of deep learning-were used to study consistent intensity patterns of OARs from training CT images and to segment the OAR in a previously unseen test CT image. For CNN training, we extracted a representative number of positive intensity patches around voxels that belong to the OAR of interest in training CT images, and negative intensity patches around voxels that belong to the surrounding structures. These patches then passed through a sequence of CNN layers that captured local image features such as corners, end-points, and edges, and combined them into more complex high-order features that can efficiently describe the OAR. The trained network was applied to classify voxels in a region of interest in the test image where the corresponding OAR is expected to be located. We then smoothed the obtained classification results by using Markov random fields algorithm. We finally extracted the largest connected component of the smoothed voxels classified as the OAR by CNN, performed dilate-erode operations to remove cavities of the component, which resulted in segmentation of the OAR in the test image.

RESULTS

The performance of CNNs was validated on segmentation of spinal cord, mandible, parotid glands, submandibular glands, larynx, pharynx, eye globes, optic nerves, and optic chiasm using 50 CT images. The obtained segmentation results varied from 37.4% Dice coefficient (DSC) for chiasm to 89.5% DSC for mandible. We also analyzed the performance of state-of-the-art algorithms and commercial software reported in the literature, and observed that CNNs demonstrate similar or superior performance on segmentation of spinal cord, mandible, parotid glands, larynx, pharynx, eye globes, and optic nerves, but inferior performance on segmentation of submandibular glands and optic chiasm.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that convolution neural networks can accurately segment most of OARs using a representative database of 50 HaN CT images. At the same time, inclusion of additional information, for example, MR images, may be beneficial to some OARs with poorly visible boundaries.