Subtype-specific differences in subcellular localization of alpha1-adrenoceptors: chlorethylclonidine preferentially alkylates the accessible cell surface alpha1-adrenoceptors irrespective of the subtype

Identification of a Novel Subtype-Selective α1B-Adrenoceptor Antagonist

α1A-, α1B-, and α1D-adrenoceptors (α1-ARs) are members of the adrenoceptor G protein-coupled receptor family that are activated by adrenaline (epinephrine) and noradrenaline. α1-ARs are clinically targeted using antagonists that have minimal subtype selectivity, such as prazosin and tamsulosin, to treat hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia, respectively. Abundant expression of α1-ARs in the heart and central nervous system (CNS) makes these receptors potential targets for the treatment of cardiovascular and CNS disorders, such as heart failure, epilepsy, and Alzheimer's disease. Our understanding of the precise physiological roles of α1-ARs, however, and their involvement in disease has been hindered by the lack of sufficiently subtype-selective tool compounds, especially for α1B-AR. Here, we report the discovery of 4-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-6-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (Cpd1), as an α1B-AR antagonist that has 10-15-fold selectivity over α1A-AR and α1D-AR. Through computational and site-directed mutagenesis studies, we have identified the binding site of Cpd1 in α1B-AR and propose the molecular basis of α1B-AR selectivity, where the nonconserved V19745.52 residue plays a major role, with contributions from L3146.55 within the α1B-AR pocket. By exploring the structure-activity relationships of Cpd1 at α1B-AR, we have also identified 3-[(cyclohexylamino)methyl]-6-methylquinolin-2(1H)-one (Cpd24), which has a stronger binding affinity than Cpd1, albeit with reduced selectivity for α1B-AR. Cpd1 and Cpd24 represent potential leads for α1B-AR-selective drug discovery and novel tool molecules to further study the physiology of α1-ARs.

Antidepressants Differentially Regulate Intracellular Signaling from α1-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes In Vitro

Currently utilized antidepressants have limited effectiveness and frequently incur undesired effects. Most antidepressants are thought to act via the inhibition of monoamine reuptake; however, direct binding to monoaminergic receptors has been proposed to contribute to both their clinical effectiveness and their side effects, or lack thereof. Among the target receptors of antidepressants, α1‑adrenergic receptors (ARs) have been implicated in depression etiology, antidepressant action, and side effects. However, differences in the direct effects of antidepressants on signaling from the three subtypes of α1-ARs, namely, α1A-, α1B- and α1D‑ARs, have been little explored. We utilized cell lines overexpressing α1A-, α1B- or α1D-ARs to investigate the effects of the antidepressants imipramine (IMI), desipramine (DMI), mianserin (MIA), reboxetine (REB), citalopram (CIT) and fluoxetine (FLU) on noradrenaline-induced second messenger generation by those receptors. We found similar orders of inhibition at α1A-AR (IMI < DMI < CIT < MIA < REB) and α1D‑AR (IMI = DMI < CIT < MIA), while the α1B-AR subtype was the least engaged subtype and was inhibited with low potency by three drugs (MIA < IMI = DMI). In contrast to their direct antagonistic effects, prolonged incubation with IMI and DMI increased the maximal response of the α1B-AR subtype, and the CIT of both the α1A- and the α1B-ARs. Our data demonstrate a complex, subtype-specific modulation of α1-ARs by antidepressants of different groups.

Localization of α-adrenoceptors: JR Vane Medal Lecture

This review is based on the JR Vane Medal Lecture presented at the BPS Winter Meeting in December 2011 by J.C. McGrath. A recording of the lecture is included as supporting information. It covers his laboratory's work from 1990 to 2010 on the localization of vascular α1 -adrenoceptors in native tissues, mainly arteries.

MAIN POINTS

(i) α1 -adrenoceptors are present on several cell types in arteries, not only on medial smooth muscle, but also on adventitial, endothelial and nerve cells; (ii) all three receptor subtypes (α1 A , α1 B , α1 D ) are capable of binding ligands at the cell surface, strongly indicating that they are capable of function and not merely expressed. (iii) all of these cell types can take up an antagonist ligand into the intracellular compartments to which endocytosing receptors move; (iv) each individual subtype can exist at the cell surface and intracellularly in the absence of the other subtypes. As functional pharmacological experiments show variations in the involvement of the different subtypes in contractions of different arteries, it is concluded that the presence and disposition of α1 -adrenoceptors in arteries is not a simple guide to their involvement in function. Similar locations of the subtypes, even in different cell types, suggest that differences between the distribution of subtypes in model systems do not directly correlate with those in native tissues. This review includes a historical summary of the alternative terms used for adrenoceptors (adrenergic receptors, adrenoreceptors) and the author's views on the use of colours to illustrate different items, given his partial colour-blindness.

Inside job: ligand-receptor pharmacology beneath the plasma membrane

Most drugs acting on the cell surface receptors are membrane permeable and thus able to engage their target proteins in different subcellular compartments. However, these drugs' effects on cell surface receptors have historically been studied on the plasma membrane alone. Increasing evidence suggests that small molecules may also modulate their targeted receptors through membrane trafficking or organelle-localized signaling inside the cell. These additional modes of interaction have been reported for functionally diverse ligands of GPCRs, ion channels, and transporters. Such intracellular drug-target engagements affect cell surface expression. Concurrent intracellular and cell surface signaling may also increase the complexity and therapeutic opportunities of small molecule modulation. Here we discuss examples of ligand-receptor interactions that are present in both intra- and extracellular sites, and the potential therapeutic opportunities presented by this phenomenon.

High vascular tone of mouse femoral arteries in vivo is determined by sympathetic nerve activity via α1A- and α1D-adrenoceptor subtypes

Background and purpose

Determining the role of vascular receptors in vivo is difficult and not readily accomplished by systemic application of antagonists or genetic manipulations. Here we used intravital microscopy to measure the contributions of sympathetic receptors, particularly α₁-adrenoceptor subtypes, to contractile activation of femoral artery in vivo.

Experimental approach

Diameter and intracellular calcium ([Ca²⁺]_i) in femoral arteries were determined by intravital fluorescence microscopy in mice expressing a Myosin Light Chain Kinase (MLCK) based calcium-calmodulin biosensor. Pharmacological agents were applied locally to the femoral artery to determine the contributions of vascular receptors to tonic contraction and [Ca²⁺]_i,.

Key results

In the anesthetized animal, femoral arteries were constricted to a diameter equal to 54% of their passive diameter (i.e. tone = 46%). Of this total basal tone, 16% was blocked by RS79948 (0.1 µM) and thus attributable to α₂-adrenoceptors. A further 46% was blocked by prazosin (0.1 µM) and thus attributable to α₁-adrenoceptors. Blockade of P_2X and NPY₁ receptors with suramin (0.5 mM) and BIBP3226 (1.0 µM) respectively, reduced tone by a further 22%, leaving 16% of basal tone unaffected at these concentrations of antagonists. Application of RS100329 (α_1A-selective antagonist) and BMY7378 (α_1D-selective) decreased tone by 29% and 26%, respectively, and reduced [Ca²⁺]_i. Chloroethylclonidine (1 µM preferential for α_1B-) had no effect. Abolition of sympathetic nerve activity (hexamethonium, i.p.) reduced basal tone by 90%.

Conclusion and Implications

Tone of mouse femoral arteries in vivo is almost entirely sympathetic in origin. Activation of α_1A- and α_1D-adrenoceptors elevates [Ca²⁺]_i and accounts for at least 55% of the tone.

Differences in the signaling pathways of α(1A)- and α(1B)-adrenoceptors are related to different endosomal targeting

AIMS

To compare the constitutive and agonist-dependent endosomal trafficking of α(1A)- and α(1B)-adrenoceptors (ARs) and to establish if the internalization pattern determines the signaling pathways of each subtype.

METHODS

Using CypHer5 technology and VSV-G epitope tagged α(1A)- and α(1B)-ARs stably and transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells, we analyzed by confocal microscopy the constitutive and agonist-induced internalization of each subtype, and the temporal relationship between agonist induced internalization and the increase in intracellular calcium (determined by FLUO-3 flouorescence), or the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinases (determined by Western blot).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Constitutive as well as agonist-induced trafficking of α(1A) and α(1B) ARs maintain two different endosomal pools of receptors: one located close to the plasma membrane and the other deeper into the cytosol. Each subtype exhibited specific characteristics of internalization and distribution between these pools that determines their signaling pathways: α(1A)-ARs, when located in the plasma membrane, signal through calcium and ERK1/2 pathways but, when translocated to deeper endosomes, through a mechanism sensitive to β-arrestin and concanavalin A, continue signaling through ERK1/2 and also activate the p38 pathway. α(1B)-ARs signal through calcium and ERK1/2 only when located in the membrane and the signals disappear after endocytosis and by disruption of the membrane lipid rafts by methyl-β-cyclodextrin.

α(1D)-Adrenoceptor regulates the vasopressor action of α(1A)-adrenoceptor in mesenteric vascular bed of α(1D)-adrenoceptor knockout mice

1 The pressor action of the α(1A)-adrenoceptor (α(1A)-AR) agonist A61603 (N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl] methanesulfonamide) and the α(1)-ARs agonist phenylephrine and their blockade by selective α(1)-ARs antagonists in the isolated mesenteric vascular bed of wild-type (WT) mice and α(1D)-AR knockout (KO α(1D)-AR) mice were evaluated. 2 The apparent potency of A61603 to increase the perfusion pressure in the mesenteric vascular bed of WT and KO α(1D)-AR mice is 86 and 138 times the affinity of phenylephrine, respectively. 3 A61603 also enhanced the perfusion pressure by ≈1.7 fold in the mesenteric vascular bed of WT mice compared with KO α(1D)-AR mice. 4 Because of its high affinity, low concentrations of the α(1A)-AR selective antagonist RS100329 (5-methyl-3-[3-[4-[2-(2,2,2,-trifluoroethoxy) phenyl]-1-piperazinyl] propyl]-2,4-(1H)-pyrimidinedione) shifted the agonist concentration-response curves to the right in the mesenteric vascular bed of WT and KO α(1D)-AR mice. 5 The α(1D)-AR selective antagonist BMY7378 (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4.5] decane-7,9-dione) did not modify the A61603 or the phenylephrine-induced pressor effect. 6 The α(1B/D)-ARs alkylating antagonist chloroethylclonidine (CEC) shifted the agonist concentration-response curves to the right and decreased the maximum phenylephrine-induced vascular contraction in KO α(1D)-AR mice when compared to WT mice; however, CEC only slightly modified the contraction induced by A61603. 7 The results indicate that the isolated mesenteric vascular bed of WT and KO α(1D)-AR mice expresses α(1A)-AR, that the pressor action of α(1A)-AR is up-regulated for α(1D)-AR in WT mice and suggest an important role of α(1B)-AR in the vascular pressure evoked by phenylephrine in KO α(1D)-AR mice.

KISS1R intracellular trafficking and degradation: effect of the Arg386Pro disease-associated mutation

The goal of this study was to investigate how the Arg386Pro mutation prolongs KiSS-1 receptor (KISS1R) responsiveness to kisspeptin, contributing to human central precocious puberty. Confocal imaging showed colocalization of wild-type (WT) KISS1R with a membrane marker, which persisted for up to 5 h of stimulation. Conversely, no colocalization with a lysosome marker was detected. Also, overnight treatment with a lysosome inhibitor did not affect WT KISS1R protein, whereas overnight treatment with a proteasome inhibitor increased protein levels by 24-fold. WT and Arg386Pro KISS1R showed time-dependent internalization upon stimulation. However, both receptors were recycled back to the membrane. The Arg386Pro mutation did not affect the relative distribution of KISS1R in membrane and internalized fractions when compared to WT KISS1R for up to 120 min of stimulation, demonstrating that this mutation does not affect KISS1R trafficking rate. Nonetheless, total Arg386Pro KISS1R was substantially increased compared with WT after 120 min of kisspeptin stimulation. This net increase was eliminated by blockade of detection of recycled receptors, demonstrating that recycled receptors account for the increased responsiveness of this mutant to kisspeptin. We therefore conclude the following: 1) WT KISS1R is degraded by proteasomes rather than lysosomes; 2) WT and Arg386Pro KISS1R are internalized upon stimulation, but most of the internalized receptors are recycled back to the membrane rather than degraded; 3) the Arg386Pro mutation does not affect the rate of KISS1R trafficking--instead, it prolongs responsiveness to kisspeptin by decreasing KISS1R degradation, resulting in the net increase on mutant receptor recycled back to the plasma membrane.

Alpha1-adrenoceptors in the rat cerebral cortex: new insights into the characterization of alpha1L- and alpha1D-adrenoceptors

Among the three alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B) and alpha(1D)) a peculiar intracellular localization and poor coupling to membrane signals of cloned alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor have been reported. In addition, the alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor (low affinity for prazosin), a functional phenotype of alpha(1A), has been described. The purpose of this work was to analyze the expression, cellular localization and coupling to membrane signalling (inositol phosphate accumulation) of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes in a native tissue, the rat cerebral cortex. mRNA for the three subtypes was quantified by real-time RT-PCR (alpha(1D)>alpha(1B)>>alpha(1A)). alpha(1)-Adrenoceptors were also detected by immunoblotting, revealing alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors to be predominantly expressed in the membrane fraction and the alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor to be localized in the cytosolic fraction. Competitive radioligand binding studies revealed the presence of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor in tissue homogenates, whereas only alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-subtypes were detected in membranes. The proportion of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor increased after treatment with noradrenaline, suggesting differences in agonist-mediated trafficking. Saturation experiments detected high- and low (alpha(1A/L))-prazosin binding sites, the latter of which disappeared on incubation with GppNHp. The alpha(1A/L)-adrenoceptor was heavily implicated in the inositol phosphate response, while the alpha(1D)-subtype did not play a relevant role. These results suggest that the predominant cytosolic localization of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor lies behind its poor coupling to membrane signalling such as inositol phosphate pathway. The fact that the alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor detected in radioligand binding studies disappeared in the presence of GppNHp implies that it represents a conformational state of the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor coupled to G-protein.

The alpha 1B/D-adrenoceptor knockout mouse permits isolation of the vascular alpha 1A-adrenoceptor and elucidates its relationship to the other subtypes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mesenteric and carotid arteries from the alpha(1B/D)-adrenoceptor knockout (alpha(1B/D)-KO) were employed to isolate alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor pharmacology and location and to reveal these features in the wild-type (WT) mouse.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Functional pharmacology by wire myography and receptor localization by confocal microscopy, using the fluorescent alpha(1)-adrenoceptor ligand BODIPY FL-Prazosin (QAPB), on mesenteric (an 'alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor' tissue) and carotid (an 'alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor' tissue) arteries.

KEY RESULTS

Alpha(1B/D)-KO mesenteric arteries showed straightforward alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor agonist/antagonist pharmacology. WT had complex pharmacology with alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor components. alpha(1B/D)-KO had a larger alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor response suggesting compensatory up-regulation: no increase in fluorescent ligand binding suggests up-regulation of signalling. alpha(1B/D)-KO carotid arteries had low efficacy alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor responses. WT had complex pharmacology consistent with co-activation of all three subtypes. Fluorescent binding had straightforward alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor characteristics in both arteries of alpha(1B/D)-KO. Fluorescent binding varied between cells in relative intracellular and surface distribution. Total fluorescence was reduced in the alpha(1B/D)-KO due to fewer smooth muscle cells showing fluorescent binding. WT binding was greater and sensitive to alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The straightforward pharmacology and fluorescent binding in the alpha(1B/D)-KO was used to interpret the properties of the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor in the WT. Reduced total fluorescence in alpha(1B/D)-KO arteries, despite a clear difference in the functionally dominant subtype, indicates that measurement of receptor protein is unlikely to correlate with function. Fewer cells bound QAPB in the alpha(1B/D)-KO suggesting different cellular phenotypes of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor exist. The alpha(1B/D)-KO provides robust assays for the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor and takes us closer to understanding multi-receptor subtype interactions.

Expression and function of G-protein-coupled receptorsin the male reproductive tract

This review focuses on the expression and function of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), α1-adrenoceptors and relaxin receptors in the male reproductive tract. The localization and differential expression of mAChR and α1-adrenoceptor subtypes in specific compartments of the efferent ductules, epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicle and prostate of various species indicate a role for these receptors in the modulation of luminal fluid composition and smooth muscle contraction, including effects on male fertility. Furthermore, the activation of mAChRs induces transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the Sertoli cell proliferation. The relaxin receptors are present in the testis, RXFP1 in elongated spermatids and Sertoli cells from rat, and RXFP2 in Leydig and germ cells from rat and human, suggesting a role for these receptors in the spermatogenic process. The localization of both receptors in the apical portion of epithelial cells and smooth muscle layers of the vas deferens suggests an involvement of these receptors in the contraction and regulation of secretion.

Functional subtypes of renal alpha1-adrenoceptor in diabetic and non-diabetic 2K1C Goldblatt renovascular hypertension

AIM

This study investigates the subtypes of the alpha1-adrenoceptor mediating the adrenergically-induced renal vasoconstrictor responses in streptozotocin-induced diabetic and non-diabetic 2-kidney one clip (2K1C) Goldblatt hypertensive rats.

METHODS

The renal blood flow responses to renal nerve stimulation, noradrenaline, phenylephrine, and methoxamine were measured in the absence and presence of nitrendipine, 5-methylurapidil, chloroethylclonidine and BMY 7378.

RESULTS

The renal vasoconstrictor responses were markedly attenuated by nitrendipine and 5- methylurapidil in the diabetic rats (all P< 0.05). In the non-diabetic rats, these responses were markedly attenuated by nitrendipine, 5-methylurapidil, and BMY 7378 (all P< 0.05). In both experimental groups, chloroethylclonidine markedly accentuated the renal vasoconstrictions caused by all the adrenergic stimuli (all P< 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These observations indicate that alpha 1A-adrenoceptor subtypes play a major role in mediating adrenergically-induced renal vasoconstriction in the diabetic 2K1C Goldblatt hypertensive rats. In the non-diabetic 2K1C Goldblatt hypertensive rats, contributions of alpha 1A and alpha 1D-adrenoceptor subtypes were proposed. Apart from post-synaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptors, both in the diabetic and non-diabetic 2K1C Goldblatt hypertensive rats, the potential involvement of presynaptic alpha 1- adrenoceptors is also suggested.

Immunolocalization of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors in rat and human epididymis

Immunohistochemistry was conducted to analyze the cellular localization of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors along rat and human epididymis. ADR-A, a polyclonal antibody that recognizes the specific C-terminal region of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, immunostained this adrenoceptor subtype in smooth muscle cells surrounding the epididymal tubules and interstitial blood vessels and in subpopulations of epithelial cells from adult rat and human caput and cauda epididymidis. The same cell types from rat epididymidis were immunostained by ADR-1, a polyclonal antibody that recognizes a common region of the three alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes, alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D). Immunostaining with both antibodies was also conducted in adult rat and human vas deferens and seminal vesicle used as positive controls because of the abundance of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors in these tissues. ADR-A- and ADR-1-positive immunostaining was differentially distributed depending on the antibody, method of tissue fixation (Bouin-fixed and fresh frozen tissues), species (rat and human), tissue (caput and cauda epididymidis), and age (immature and adult rats) analyzed. This is the first report immunolocalizing alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor along rat and human epididymis. The presence of this adrenoceptor subtype in epididymal smooth muscle and epithelial cells indicates their contribution to smooth muscle contractile responses and a possible role in the absorptive and/or secretory activities of the epithelium lining the epididymal duct. Taken together, our results should contribute to a better understanding of the physiological role of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors in the epididymidis and the importance of the sympathetic nervous system for male (in)fertility.

The alpha1D-adrenergic receptor is expressed intracellularly and coupled to increases in intracellular calcium and reactive oxygen species in human aortic smooth muscle cells

BACKGROUND

The cellular localization of the alpha1D-adrenergic receptor (alpha1D-AR) is controversial. Studies in heterologous cell systems have shown that this receptor is expressed in intracellular compartments. Other studies show that dimerization with other ARs promotes the cell surface expression of the alpha1D-AR. To assess the cellular localization in vascular smooth muscle cells, we developed an adenoviral vector for the efficient expression of a GFP labeled alpha1D-AR. We also measured cellular localization with immunocytochemistry. Intracellular calcium levels, measurement of reactive oxygen species and contraction of the rat aorta were used as measures of functional activity.

RESULTS

The adenovirally expressed alpha1D-AR was expressed in intracellular compartments in human aortic smooth muscle cells. The intracellular localization of the alpha1D-AR was also demonstrated with immunocytochemistry using an alpha1D-AR specific antibody. RT-PCR analysis detected mRNA transcripts corresponding to the alpha1A-alpha1B- and alpha1D-ARs in these aortic smooth muscle cells. Therefore, the presence of the other alpha1-ARs, and the potential for dimerization with these receptors, does not alter the intracellular expression of the alpha1D-AR. Despite the predominant intracellular localization in vascular smooth muscle cells, the alpha1D-AR remained signaling competent and mediated the phenylephrine-induced increases in intracellular calcium. The alpha1D-AR also was coupled to the generation of reactive oxygen species in smooth muscle cells. There is evidence from heterologous systems that the alpha1D-AR heterodimerizes with the beta2-AR and that desensitization of the beta2-AR results in alpha1D-AR desensitization. In the rat aorta, desensitization of the beta2-AR had no effect on contractile responses mediated by the alpha1D-AR.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the dimerization of the alpha1D-AR with other ARs does not alter the cellular expression or functional response characteristics of the alpha1D-AR.

Alpha1B-adrenoceptors mediate adrenergically-induced renal vasoconstrictions in rats with renal impairment

AIM

This study examined whether alpha1B-adrenoceptors are involved in mediating adrenergically-induced renal vasoconstrictor responses in rats with pathophysiological and normal physiological states.

METHODS

Male Wistar Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats were induced with acute renal failure or experimental early diabetic nephropathy by cisplatin or streptozotocin, respectively. Cisplatin-induced renal failure was confirmed by impaired renal function and pronounced tubular damage. Experimental early diabetic nephropathy was confirmed by hyperglycemia, changes in physiological parameters, and renal function. The hemodynamic study was conducted on anesthetized rats after 7 d of cisplatin (renal failure) and 4 weeks of streptozotocin (experimental early diabetic nephropathy).

RESULTS

In the rats with renal failure and experimental early diabetic nephropathy, there were marked reductions in their baseline renal blood flow (P<0.01). The baseline mean arterial blood pressure was either unaltered or lower (all P>0.05) in the renal failure and experimental early diabetic nephropathy rats, respectively, as compared to their non-renal failure and non-diabetic nephropathy controls. In the rats with renal impairment, chloroethylclonidine caused either accentuation or attenuation (all P<0.01) of the renal vasoconstrictor responses elicited by the adrenergic stimuli. However, in the non-renal failure and in the non-diabetic nephropathy rats, chloroethylclonidine did not cause any alteration in such responses (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the presence of functional alpha1B-adrenoceptors that mediated the adrenergically-induced renal vasoconstrictions in rats with renal impairment, but not in rats with normal renal function.

Characterization of the alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype activating extracellular signal-regulated kinase in submandibular gland acinar cells

Alpha(1)-Adrenoceptors and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) regulate salivary secretion. However, whether alpha(1)-adrenoceptors couple to ERK1/2 activation and the specific alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes involved in salivary glands is unknown. Western blotting of ERK1/2 phosphorylation showed phenylephrine activated ERK1/2 by 2-3-fold in submandibular gland slices and 3-4-fold in submandibular acinar (SMG-C10) cells with an EC(50) of 2.7+/-2 microM. ERK1/2 activation was blocked by either prazosin or HEAT, indicating alpha(1)-adrenoceptors stimulate ERK1/2 in native glands and SMG-C10 cells. Inhibition of [(125)I]HEAT binding by 5-methylurapidil (selective for alpha(1A) over alpha(1B/)alpha(1D)), but not BMY 7378 (selective for alpha(1D) over alpha(1A/)alpha(1B)), was biphasic and best-fit by a two-site binding model with K(i)(H) and K(i)(L) values for 5-methylurapidil of 0.64+/-0.3 and 91+/-7 nM, respectively, in SMG-C10 membranes. From these binding data, we obtained subtype-selective concentrations of 5-methylurapidil to determine the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtype/s activating ERK1/2 in SMG-C10 cells. 5-methylurapidil (20 nM) did not affect phenylephrine- or A-61603- (alpha(1A)-selective agonist) induced ERK1/2 activation; whereas, 30 microM chloroethylclonidine (alpha(1B)-selective antagonist) inhibited ERK1/2 activation by phenylephrine, indicating alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors, but not alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, activate ERK1/2 in submandibular cells. We also examined alpha(1)-adrenoceptor location and dependence on cholesterol-rich microdomains for activating ERK1/2. Sucrose density gradient centrifugation showed 71+/-3% of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor binding sites were in plasma membranes. Cholesterol-disrupting agents filipin and methyl-beta-cyclodextrin inhibited phenylephrine-stimulated ERK1/2. These results show only alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors activate ERK1/2 and suggest subtype-specific ERK1/2 signaling by alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors may be determined by localization to cholesterol-rich microdomains in submandibular cells.

Alpha1A-adrenoceptors predominate in the control of blood pressure in mouse mesenteric vascular bed

1 The pressor action of the alpha1A-adrenoceptor agonist, A61603 (N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl] methanesulfonamide) or the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine, and their blockade by selective alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists in the mouse isolated mesenteric vascular bed were evaluated. 2 A61603 showed a approximately 235-fold higher potency in elevating perfusion pressure in mesenteric bed compared to phenylephrine. 3 The alpha1A-adrenoceptor selective antagonist RS 100329 (5-methyl-3-[3-[4-[2-(2,2,2,-trifluoroethoxy) phenyl]-1-piperazinyl] propyl]-2,4-(1H)-pyrimidinedione), displaced with high affinity agonist concentration-response curves to the right in a concentration-dependent manner. 4 The alpha1D-adrenoceptor selective antagonist BMY 7378 (8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4.5] decane-7,9-dione), did not displace A61603 nor did it block the phenylephrine-induced pressor response. 5 The alpha1B/D-adrenoceptor alkylating antagonist chloroethylclonidine (CEC), caused a rightward shift of the phenylephrine concentration-response curve and reduced its maximum response; however, CEC only slightly modified A61603 evoked contraction. 6 The results indicate that the isolated mouse mesenteric vascular bed expresses alpha1A-adrenoceptors and suggest a very discrete role for 1B-adrenoceptors.

Differential regulation on human skin fibroblast by alpha1 adrenergic receptor subtypes

Alpha 1 adrenoceptor (alpha1-AR) regulation of DNA synthesis was studied in human neonatal foreskin fibroblast. Saturation assay with a specific radioligand for alpha1 adrenergic [3H]-prazosin revealed two saturated and specific binding sites with high or low affinity. Competitive binding assay with different antagonist subtypes, defined pharmacologically three major types of alpha1-AR. The alpha1-AR agonists (from 1x10(-10) to 1x10(-4) M) triggered a biphasic action on DNA synthesis reaching maximal stimulation at 1x10(-9) M and maximal inhibition at 1x10(-6) M. Prazosin, abolished the stimulatory (pA2: 9.24) and inhibitory (pA2: 8.80) actions of alpha1-AR agonists. The alpha1-AR stimulation resulted in the activation of phosphoinositide turnover (InsP) via phospholipase C (PLC) involving calcium/calmodulin (CaM) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) that correlates with the DNA synthesis increment; whereas the inhibition resulted in a decrease of cyclic AMP (cAMP) accumulation via adenylate cyclase inhibition. The potency displayed by the specific antagonists tested in binding, DNA synthesis, InsP and NOS at low agonist concentration suggests that they can be elicited by the activation of the same receptor (alpha1B-AR subtype); while the decrement in DNA synthesis and cAMP at high concentration account by the activation of alpha1D-AR coupled to Gi protein. Non-functional alpha1A-AR in neonatal human foreskin fibroblast was observed. Results suggest that the expression of alpha1-AR subtypes on human skin fibroblast may differentially activate signaling pathways that modulate physiological response of the cells.

Real-time detection of alpha1A-AR movement stimulated by phenylephrine in single living cells

AIM

To investigate the movement of alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptors(alpha(1A)-AR) stimulated by agonist, phenylephrine (PE), and the dynamics of receptor movement in real time in single living cells with millisecond resolution.

METHODS

We labeled alpha(1A)-AR using the monoclonal, anti-FLAG (a kind of tag) antibody and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and recorded the trajectory of their transport process in living HEK293A cells stimulated by agonist, PE, and then analyzed their dynamic properties.

RESULTS

The specific detection of alpha(1A)-AR on the surface of living HEK293A-alpha(1A) cells was achieved. alpha(1A)-AR internalize under the stimulation of PE. After the cells were stimulated with PE for 20 min, apparent colocalization was found between alpha(1A)-AR and F-actins. After 40 min stimulation of PE, trajectories of approximate linear motion in HEK293A-alpha(1A) cells were recorded, and their velocity was calculated.

CONCLUSION

The specific labeling method on the living cell surface provides a convenient means of real-time detection of the behavior of surface receptors. By this method we were able to specifically detect alpha(1A)-AR and record the behavior of individual particles of receptors with 50 ms exposure time in real time in single living cells.

Internalization and distribution of three alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes in HEK293A cells before and after agonist stimulation

AIM

To examine the subcellular distribution of the 3 alpha1-adrenoceptor (alpha1-AR) subtypes and their internalization and trafficking upon agonist stimulation in human embryonic kidney 293A cells.

METHODS

Confocal real-time imaging, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and whole cell [3H]-prazosin binding assay were applied to detect the distribution and localization of the 3 alpha1-AR subtypes.

RESULTS

alpha1A-AR was found both on the cell surface and in the cytoplasm; alpha1BAR, however, was predominantly detected on the cell surface, while alpha1D-AR was detected mainly in the intracellular compartments. After stimulation with phenylephrine, localization changes were detected by confocal microscopy for alpha1A- and alpha1B-AR,but the localization of alpha1D-AR were unaffected. Phenylephrine stimulation promoted a more rapid internalization of alpha1B-AR than alpha1A-AR. alpha1D-AR internalization was detected only by ELISA. Whole cell [3H]-prazosin binding assay showed that alpha1A-AR functional receptors were detected both on the cell surface and in the cytoplasm; alpha1B-AR, however, were detected predominantly on the cell surface, while alpha1D-AR were detected mainly in intracellular compartments. Phenylephrine stimulation promoted internalization of alpha1A- and alpha1B-AR.

CONCLUSION

Phenylephrine stimulation induced changes in the localization of the 3 alpha1-AR.

Heterogeneous transportation of alpha1B-adrenoceptor in living cells

The heterogeneous motion of alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1B)-AR) was visualized in living cells with BODIPY-labeled antagonist of AR by single molecule fluorescence microscopy at high spatial resolution. The moving trajectory was reconstructed by precise localization (better than 20 nm) with a least-square fit of a two-dimensional Gaussian point spread function to each single spot. Trajectory analysis revealed two apparent groups of movements: directed motion and hindered motion. The directed motion had speeds higher than 0.1 mum/s. The histogram of diffusion coefficients of the hindered motion showed distinction between the cell membrane and the cytoplasm: the diffusion coefficient was lower near the cell membrane than in the internal cytoplasm, suggesting that alpha(1B)-AR was located or trapped in different networks, which was consistent with the natural distribution of cytoskeleton in living cells. These results suggested that the heterogeneity in the motion of alpha(1B)-AR in living cell might be associated with different localizations of cell skeleton proteins in the cell, which could provide molecular insight of AR regulation in living cells.

Clinical implications from studies of alpha1 adrenergic receptor knockout mice

alpha1-Adrenergic receptors (alpha1-ARs) modulate a large number of physiological functions in cardiovascular and noncardiovascular tissues. Because individual members of the alpha1-AR family (alpha1A-, alpha1B-, and alpha1D-ARs) have overlapping expression profiles in most tissues, elucidation of the precise physiological roles of individual alpha1-AR subtypes remains a challenging task. To alleviate this constraint, a gene targeting approach has been employed to generate mutant mice lacking one or two alpha1-AR genes. Recent studies on these mutant mouse strains are discussed in this article, with an emphasis on the role of alpha1-AR in the central nervous system and lower urinary tracts. These are two major tissues of particular interest for the development of new therapeutic strategies targeted to the alpha1-ARs. By combining gene targeting techniques with pharmacological tools, the specific roles of alpha1-AR subtypes could be delineated.

Localization of the mouse alpha1A-adrenergic receptor (AR) in the brain: alpha1AAR is expressed in neurons, GABAergic interneurons, and NG2 oligodendrocyte progenitors

alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) are not well defined in the central nervous system. The particular cell types and areas that express these receptors are uncertain because of the lack of high avidity antibodies and selective ligands. We have developed transgenic mice that either systemically overexpress the human alpha(1A)-AR subtype fused with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or express the EGFP protein alone under the control of the mouse alpha(1A)-AR promoter. We confirm our transgenic model against the alpha(1A)-AR knockout mouse, which expresses the LacZ gene in place of the coding region for the alpha(1A)-AR. By using these models, we have now determined cellular localization of the alpha(1A)-AR in the brain, at the protein level. The alpha(1A)-AR or the EGFP protein is expressed prominently in neuronal cells in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, midbrain, pontine olivary nuclei, trigeminal nuclei, cerebellum, and spinal cord. The types of neurons were diverse, and the alpha(1A)-AR colocalized with markers for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Recordings from alpha(1A)-AR EGFP-expressing cells in the stratum oriens of the hippocampal CA1 region confirmed that these cells were interneurons. We could not detect expression of the alpha(1A)-AR in mature astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, or cerebral blood vessels, but we could detect the alpha(1A)-AR in oligodendrocyte progenitors. We conclude that the alpha(1A)-AR is abundant in the brain, expressed in various types of neurons, and may regulate the function of oligodendrocyte progenitors, interneurons, GABA, and NMDA receptor containing neurons.

Heterodimerization and surface localization of G protein coupled receptors

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest human gene families, and are targets for many important therapeutic drugs. Over the last few years, there has been a major paradigm shift in our understanding of how these receptors function. Formerly, GPCRs were thought to exist as monomers that, upon agonist occupation, activated a heterotrimeric G protein to alter the concentrations of specific second messengers. Until recently, this relatively linear cascade has been the standard paradigm for signaling by these molecules. However, it is now clear that this model is not adequate to explain many aspects of GPCR function. We now know that many, if not most, GPCRs form homo- and/or hetero-oligomeric complexes and interact directly with intracellular proteins in addition to G proteins. It now appears that many GPCRs may not function independently, but might more accurately be described as subunits of large multi-protein signaling complexes. These observations raise many important new questions; some of which include: (1) how many functionally and pharmacologically distinct receptor subtypes exist in vivo? (2) Which GPCRs physically associate, and in what stochiometries? (3) What are the roles of individual subunits in binding ligand and activating responses? (4) Are the pharmacological or signaling properties of GPCR heterodimers different from monomers? Since these receptors are the targets for a large number of clinically useful compounds, such information is likely to be of direct therapeutic importance, both in understanding how existing drugs work, but also in discovering novel compounds to treat disease.

Molecular cloning, stable expression and cellular localization of human α1-adrenergic receptor subtypes: effect of charcoal/dextran treated serum on expression and localization of α1D -adrenergic receptor

The cDNAs encoding for three subtypes of adrenergic receptors, alpha1A-, alpha1B- and alpha1D-ARs, were cloned and expressed in HEK 293 cells. Expression of alpha1A- and alpha1B-AR subtypes in HEK 293 cells was stable even with increased passages but that of alpha1D-AR was not. Cellular localization studies using immunofluorescence and flow cytometry revealed that expression of alpha1A- and alpha1B-ARs was primarily localized on the cell membrane whereas expression of alpha1D-AR was predominantly intracellular. Our studies clearly demonstrated that the culturing of the recombinant cell lines expressing alpha1D-AR in charcoal/dextran treated fetal bovine serum (FBS) resulted in targeting of alpha1D-AR to the cell membrane and thus, significantly improving its stability and availability for ligand binding studies.

Mammalian Tolloid Alters Subcellular Localization, Internalization, and Signaling of α1a-Adrenergic Receptors

In the present study, we identified the CUB5 domain of mammalian Tolloid (mTLD) as a novel protein binding to alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor (AR) using the yeast two-hybrid system. Whereas CUB5 did not couple to either alpha(1B)-AR or alpha(1D)-AR. It was determined that amino acids 322 to 359 of alpha(1A)-AR were the major binding region for CUB5. The direct interaction between alpha(1A)-AR cytoplasmic tail and CUB5 was discovered by glutathione S-transferase pull-down assay. We confirmed the interaction of mTLD with alpha(1A)-AR in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells by immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Although mTLD did not affect the density and affinity of receptors in crudely prepared membranes from HEK293 cells stably expressing alpha(1A)-AR, it significantly altered the subcellular localization of the receptors. Moreover, mTLD reduced the level of cell surface alpha(1A)-ARs, delayed the initial rate of agonist-induced receptor internalization, and facilitated agonist-induced calcium transient. We have demonstrated that mTLD interacts with alpha(1A)-AR directly, alters the subcellular localization of receptor, and influences agonist-induced alpha(1A)-AR internalization and calcium signaling.

(+)-Cyclazosin, a selective α1B-adrenoceptor antagonist: Functional evaluation in rat and rabbit tissues

To shed light on the discrepancy between reported binding and functional affinity and selectivity at alpha(1b/B)-adrenoceptors, the antagonist (+)-cyclazosin was reinvestigated in rat and rabbit tissues. It displayed a competitive antagonism at alpha(1A) and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors of rat prostatic vas deferens and aorta with pA(2) values 7.75 and 7.27, respectively. In rabbit thoracic aorta (+)-cyclazosin competitively antagonized noradrenaline-induced contractions at alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors with a pA(2) value of 8.85, whereas its affinity at alpha(1L)-adrenoceptors was markedly lower (pA(2) = 6.75-7.09). In conclusion, these data confirmed that (+)-cyclazosin is a selective alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor antagonist also in functional assays, showing 13- and 38-fold selectivity for the alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor over alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-subtypes, respectively. Furthermore, (+)-cyclazosin displayed a significant selectivity for alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors relative to the alpha(1L)-subtype.

Expression of beta adrenergic receptors in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos

Accumulating evidence indicates the role of endogenous catecholamines in mammalian embryogenesis. We searched public databases containing nucleotide sequences derived from mouse preimplantation cDNA libraries and found a partial sequence homology between a cDNA clone from mouse blastocysts and the mouse beta 2-adrenergic receptor sequence. No significant sequence homology was found for other mouse adrenergic and dopamine receptors. Using RT-PCR, we showed that beta 2-adrenoceptor is transcribed not only at blastocyst stage but also at earlier stages of preimplantation development as well as in oocytes. Moreover, we demonstrated that transcripts encoding both isoforms of the beta 3-adrenoceptor (beta 3a- and beta 3b-) are expressed in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos as well. We did not detect the beta 1-adrenoceptor transcript either in oocytes or in preimplantation embryos. Using an antibody against the mouse beta 2-adrenergic receptor, we showed that the receptor protein is expressed in oocytes and preimplantation embryos; in blastocysts, the immufluorescence labeling was stronger in the inner cell mass than in throphectodermal cells. The cell number of the in vitro cultured mouse preimplantation embryos exposed to isoproterenol (a potent beta adrenoceptor agonist) was lower than in control embryos, suggesting that activation of beta adrenergic receptors by appropriate agonist concentration can influence cell proliferation in mouse pre-implantation embryos. Thus, our results indicate that beta adrenergic receptors are expressed in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos and that ligands for the receptors can affect the mouse embryo even in the very early stages of development.

Heterodimerization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Specificity and Functional Significance

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface receptors that mediate physiological responses to a diverse array of stimuli. GPCRs have traditionally been thought to act as monomers, but recent evidence suggests that GPCRs may form dimers (or higher-order oligomers) as part of their normal trafficking and function. In fact, certain GPCRs seem to have a strict requirement for heterodimerization to attain proper surface expression and functional activity. Even those GPCRs that do not absolutely require heterodimerization may still specifically associate with other GPCR subtypes, sometimes resulting in dramatic effects on receptor pharmacology, signaling, and/or internalization. Understanding the specificity and functional significance of GPCR heterodimerization is of tremendous clinical importance since GPCRs are the molecular targets for numerous therapeutic drugs.

Correlation between mRNA levels and functional role of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes in arteries: evidence of alpha1L as a functional isoform of the alpha1A-adrenoceptor

The mRNA levels for the three alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes, alpha1A, alpha1B, and alpha1D, were quantified by real-time RT-PCR in arteries from Wistar rats. The alpha1D-adrenoceptor was prominent in both aorta (79.0%) and mesenteric artery (68.7%), alpha1A predominated in tail (61.7%) and small mesenteric artery (73.3%), and both alpha1A- and alpha1D-subtypes were expressed at similar levels in iliac artery. The mRNA levels of the alpha1B-subtype were a minority in all vessels (1.7-11.1%). Concentration-response curves of contraction in response to phenylephrine or relaxation in response to alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonists on maximal sustained contraction induced by phenylephrine were constructed from control vessels and vessels pretreated with 100 micromol/l chloroethylclonidine (CEC) for 30 min. The significant decrease in the phenylephrine potency observed after CEC treatment together with the inhibitory potency displayed by 8-{2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-8-azaspiro (4,5) decane-7-dionedihydrochloride} (BMY-7378, an alpha1D-adrenoceptor antagonist) confirm the relevant role of alpha1D-adrenoceptors in aorta and iliac and proximal mesenteric arteries. The potency of 5-methylurapidil (an alpha1A-adrenoceptor antagonist) and the changes in the potency of both BMY-7378 and 5-methylurapidil after CEC treatment provided evidence of a mixed population of alpha1A- and alpha1D-adrenoceptors in iliac and distal mesenteric arteries. The low potency of prazosin (pIC50 < 9) as well as the high 5-methylurapidil potency in tail and small mesenteric arteries suggest the main role of alpha1A/alpha1L-adrenoceptors with minor participation of the alpha1D-subtype. The mRNA levels and CEC treatment corroborated this pattern and confirmed that the alpha1L-adrenoceptor could be a functional isoform of the alpha1A-subtype.

Differential agonist-mediated internalization of the human 5-hydroxytryptamine 7 receptor isoforms

The human 5-hydroxytryptamine 7 (5-HT(7)) serotonin receptor is a class A G-protein coupled receptor that has three isoforms, 5-HT(7(a)), 5-HT(7(b)), and 5-HT(7(d)), which are produced by alternative splicing. The 5-HT(7) receptors are expressed in discrete areas of the brain and in both vascular and gastrointestinal smooth muscle. Central nervous system 5-HT(7) receptors may play a role in mood and sleep disorders. 5-HT(7) receptors show high affinity for a number of antidepressants and typical and atypical antipsychotics. We report here that the human 5-HT(7(d)) isoform expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells exhibits a pattern of receptor trafficking in response to agonist that differ from 5-HT(7(a)) or 5-HT(7(b)) isoforms. We employed a modification of a live cell-labeling technique to demonstrate that surface 5-HT(7(d)) receptors are constitutively internalized in the absence of agonist. This is in contrast to 5-HT(7(a)) and 5-HT(7(b)) isoforms, which do not show this profound agonist-independent internalization. Indeed, the 5-HT(7(d)) isoform displays this internalization in the presence of a 5-HT(7) -specific antagonist. In addition, the human 5-HT(7) isoform shows a diminished efficacy in stimulation of cAMP-responsive reporter gene activity in transfected cells compared with 5-HT(7(a)) or 5-HT(7(b)) receptors expressed at comparable levels. Thus, the carboxy-terminal tail of 5-HT(7(d)), which is the longest among known human 5-HT(7) isoforms, may contain a motif that interacts with cellular transport mechanisms that is distinct from 5-HT(7(a)) and 5-HT(7(b)).

Free fatty acids regulate gut incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion through GPR120

Diabetes, a disease in which the body does not produce or use insulin properly, is a serious global health problem. Gut polypeptides secreted in response to food intake, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), are potent incretin hormones that enhance the glucose-dependent secretion of insulin from pancreatic beta cells. Free fatty acids (FFAs) provide an important energy source and also act as signaling molecules in various cellular processes, including the secretion of gut incretin peptides. Here we show that a G-protein-coupled receptor, GPR120, which is abundantly expressed in intestine, functions as a receptor for unsaturated long-chain FFAs. Furthermore, we show that the stimulation of GPR120 by FFAs promotes the secretion of GLP-1 in vitro and in vivo, and increases circulating insulin. Because GLP-1 is the most potent insulinotropic incretin, our results indicate that GPR120-mediated GLP-1 secretion induced by dietary FFAs is important in the treatment of diabetes.

High-affinity interactions between human alpha1A-adrenoceptor C-terminal splice variants produce homo- and heterodimers but do not generate the alpha1L-adrenoceptor

Using combinations of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer and the functional complementation of pairs of inactive receptor-G protein fusion proteins, the human alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor was shown to form homodimeric/oligomeric complexes when expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Saturation bioluminescence resonance energy transfer studies indicated the alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor homodimer interactions to be high affinity and some 75 times greater than interactions between the alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor and the delta opioid peptide receptor. Only a fraction of the alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptors was at the plasma membrane of HEK293 cells at steady state. However, dimers of alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptors were also present in intracellular membranes, and the dimer status of those delivered to the cell surface was unaffected by the presence of agonist. Splice variation can generate at least three forms of the human alpha(1A-1)-adrenoceptor with differences limited to the C-terminal tail. Each of the alpha(1A-1), alpha(1A-2a), and alpha(1A-3a)-adrenoceptor splice variants formed homodimers/oligomers, and all combinations of these splice variants were able to generate heterodimeric/oligomeric interactions. Despite the coexpression of these splice variants in human tissues that possess the pharmacologically defined alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor binding site, coexpression of any pair in HEK293 cells failed to generate ligand binding characteristic of the alpha(1L)-adrenoceptor.

Cellular trafficking of human alpha1a-adrenergic receptors is continuous and primarily agonist-independent

Alpha1a-adrenergic receptors (alpha1aARs) are present intracellularly and at the cell surface in cultured and natural cell models, where they are subject to agonist-mediated desensitization and internalization. To explore alpha1aAR trafficking, a hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged alpha1aAR/enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fusion protein was expressed in rat-1 fibroblasts and tracked by EGFP fluorescence and antibody labeling of surface receptors. Confocal analysis of antibody-labeled surface receptors revealed unexpected constitutive internalization in the absence of agonist stimulation. In partial agreement, the inverse agonist prazosin also caused a modest 20 +/- 2% increase in surface receptor levels, suggesting a partial block of constitutive internalization caused by decreased basal activation. However, prazosin was unable to prevent internalization of antibody-tagged surface receptors observed by confocal microscopy or cause obvious redistribution of intracellular receptor to the surface, suggesting that the alpha1aAR is internalizing even in a basal-inactive state. In contrast to the alpha1aAR, surface labeling of an HA-tagged alpha1b-EGFP fusion protein did not result in any apparent constitutive internalization. Constitutive internalization of the alpha1aAR seems to occur alongside reversible agonist-induced internalization, and both seem to involve clathrin-mediated endocytosis but not degradation in lysozymes. Surface receptor density must be maintained by recycling, because the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide has no effect on total or surface receptor density in agonist-treated or untreated cells for 6 h. Constitutive agonist-independent trafficking of alpha1aARs may provide a novel mechanism by which an internal pool of alpha1aARs are maintained and recycled to allow continuous agonist-induced signaling.

Cell surface expression of alpha1D-adrenergic receptors is controlled by heterodimerization with alpha1B-adrenergic receptors

alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) belong to the large Class I G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and comprise three subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)). Previous work with heterologously expressed C-terminal green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged alpha(1)-ARs showed that alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs localize to the plasma membrane, whereas alpha(1D)-ARs accumulate intracellularly. We recently showed that alpha(1D)- and alpha(1B)-ARs form heterodimers, whereas alpha(1D)- and alpha(1A)-ARs do not. Here, we examined the role of heterodimerization in regulating alpha(1D)-AR localization using both confocal imaging of GFP- or CFP-tagged alpha(1)-ARs and a luminometer-based surface expression assay in HEK293 cells. Co-expression with alpha(1B)-ARs caused alpha(1D)-ARs to quantitatively translocate to the cell surface, but co-expression with alpha(1A)-ARs did not. Truncation of the alpha(1B)-AR extracellular N terminus or intracellular C terminus had no effect on surface expression of alpha(1D)-ARs, suggesting primary involvement of the hydrophobic core. Co-transfection with an uncoupled mutant alpha(1B)-AR (Delta12alpha(1B)) increased both alpha(1D)-AR surface expression and coupling to norepinephrine-stimulated Ca(2+) mobilization. Finally, GFP-tagged alpha(1D)-ARs were not detected on the cell surface when expressed in rat aortic smooth muscle cells that express no endogenous ARs, but were almost exclusively localized on the surface when expressed in DDT(1)MF-2 cells, which express endogenous alpha(1B)-ARs. These studies demonstrate that alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR heterodimerization controls surface expression and functional coupling of alpha(1D)-ARs, the N- and C-terminal domains are not involved in this interaction, and that alpha(1B)-AR G protein coupling is not required. These observations may be relevant to many other Class I G protein-coupled receptors, where the functional consequences of heterodimerization are still poorly understood.

The N Terminus of the Human α1D-Adrenergic Receptor Prevents Cell Surface Expression

We previously reported that truncation of the N-terminal 79 amino acids of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors (Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs) greatly increases binding site density. In this study, we determined whether this effect was associated with changes in alpha(1D)-AR subcellular localization. Confocal imaging of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged receptors and sucrose density gradient fractionation suggested that full-length alpha(1D)-ARs were found primarily in intracellular compartments, whereas Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs were translocated to the plasma membrane. This resulted in a 3- to 4-fold increase in intrinsic activity for stimulation of inositol phosphate formation by norepinephrine. We determined whether this effect was transplantable by creating N-terminal chimeras of alpha(1)-ARs containing the body of one subtype and the N terminus of another (alpha(1A)NT-D, alpha(1B)NT-D, alpha(1D)NT-A, and alpha(1D)NT-B). When expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, radioligand binding revealed that binding densities of alpha(1A)-or alpha(1B)-ARs containing the alpha(1D)-N terminus decreased by 86 to 93%, whereas substitution of alpha(1A)- or alpha(1B)-N termini increased alpha(1D)-AR binding site density by 2- to 3-fold. Confocal microscopy showed that GFP-tagged alpha(1D)NT-B-ARs were found only on the cell surface, whereas GFP-tagged alpha(1B)NT-D-ARs were completely intracellular. Radioligand binding and confocal imaging of GFP-tagged alpha(1D)- and Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-ARs expressed in rat aortic smooth muscle cells produced similar results, suggesting these effects are generalizable to cell types that endogenously express alpha(1D)-ARs. These findings demonstrate that the N-terminal region of alpha(1D)-ARs contain a transplantable signal that is critical for regulating formation of functional bindings, through regulating cellular localization.

α1-Adrenergic receptor subtypes: non-identical triplets with different dancing partners?

Alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors are one of the three subfamilies of G protein coupled receptors activated by epinephrine and norepinephrine to control important functions in many target organs. Three human subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), alpha(1D)) are derived from separate genes and are highly homologous in their transmembrane domains but not in their amino or carboxyl termini. Recent advances in our understanding of these "non-identical triplets" include development of knockout mice lacking single or multiple subtypes, new insights into subcellular localization and trafficking, identification of allosteric modulators, and increasing evidence for an important role in brain function. Although all three subtypes activate the same G(q/11) signaling pathway, they also appear to interact with different protein binding partners. Recent evidence suggests they may also form dimers, and may initiate independent signals through pathways yet to be clearly elucidated. Thus, this subfamily represents a common phenomenon of a group of similar but non-identical receptor subtypes activated by the same neurotransmitter, whose individual functional roles remain to be clearly established.

Subtype-Specific Dimerization of α1-Adrenoceptors: Effects on Receptor Expression and Pharmacological Properties

The potential role of dimerization in controlling the expression and pharmacological properties of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes was examined using coimmunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged receptors. Human alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha1A, alpha1B, alpha1D) were tagged at their amino-termini with Flag or hemagglutinin epitopes and transfected into human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Homodimerization of all three subtypes was observed by coimmunoprecipitation of receptors with different tags and was not altered by norepinephrine treatment. Heterodimer formation between hemagglutinin-tagged alpha1B-adrenoceptors and Flag-tagged alpha1A- or alpha1D-adrenoceptors was also observed. However, no alpha1A/alpha1D-adrenoceptor heterodimers were observed, suggesting that dimerization is subtype-specific. The extent of heterodimerization was also unaltered by norepinephrine treatment. alpha1-Adrenoceptor truncation mutants lacking carboxyl or amino-terminal sequences formed homo- and heterodimers similarly to full-length receptors, suggesting that these domains play little or no role in dimerization. Biotinylation with a membrane-impermeable agent showed that monomers and homo- and hetero-oligomers of all three subtypes are expressed on the cell surface. Radioligand binding studies showed that heterodimerization did not alter the affinity of alpha1-adrenoceptors for norepinephrine, prazosin, or subtype-selective antagonists, suggesting that dimerization does not result in pharmacologically distinct subtypes. However, coexpression of alpha1B-adrenoceptors significantly increased both binding site density and protein expression of alpha1A- and alpha1D-adrenoceptors, and increased cell surface expression of alpha1D-adrenoceptors, suggesting a functional role for heterodimerization. Conversely, coexpression of alpha1A-with alpha1D-adrenoceptors, which did not heterodimerize, had no effect on receptor density or protein. These studies demonstrate subtype-selective heterodimerization of alpha1-adrenoceptors, which does not change their pharmacological properties but seems to have functional consequences in regulating receptor expression and trafficking.

Fluorescent ligands, antibodies, and proteins for the study of receptors

Fluorescent molecules bound to receptors can show their location and, if binding is reversible, can provide pharmacological information such as affinity and proximity between interacting molecules. The spatial precision offered by visualisation transcends the diverse localisation and low molecular concentration of receptor molecules. Consequently, the relationships between receptor location and function and life cycles of receptors have become better understood as a result of fluorescent labeling. Each of these aspects contributes new insights to drug action and potential new targets. The relationships between spatial distribution of receptor and function are largely unknown. This is particularly apparent for native receptors expressed in their normal host tissues where communication between heterogeneous cell types influences receptor distribution and function. In cultured cell systems, particularly for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), fluorescence-based methods have enabled the visualisation of the cycle of agonist-stimulated receptor clustering, endocytic internalisation to the perinuclear region, degradation of the receptor-ligand complex, and recycling back to the surface membrane. Using variant forms of green fluorescent protein (GFP), antibodies, or fluorescent ligands, it is possible to detect or visualise the formation of oligomeric receptor complexes. Careful selection of fluorescent molecules based on their spectral properties enables resonance energy transfer and multilabel visualisation with colocalisation studies. Fluorescent agonist and antagonist ligands are now being used in parallel with GFP to study receptor cycling in live cells. This review covers how labeling and visualisation technologies have been applied to the study of major pharmacologically important receptors and illustrates this by giving examples of recent techniques that have relied on GFP, antibodies, or fluorescent ligands alone or in combination for the purpose of studying GPCR.

Mechanism of the negative inotropic effects of alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonists on mouse myocardium

This study was done to identify the mechanism of the alpha1-adrenoceptor (AR) mediated negative inotropic effects of phenylephrine (PE) on adult mouse myocardium. As reported by others, we also found that the nonselective alpha1AR agonist PE produced a negative inotropic effect on ventricular strips from adult mice that was inhibited by the alpha1AAR antagonist 5-methylurapidil (5MU) but not by the alpha1BAR antagonist chloroethylclonidine (CEC) or the alpha1DAR antagonist BMY 7378. The selective alpha1AAR agonist A61603 also produced a negative inotropic effect, which was antagonized by 5MU. Phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (activator of all PKC isoforms) mimicked the negative inotropic responses to PE and A61603. The negative inotropic effects of PE were inhibited by bisindolylmaleimide (inhibitor of all PKC isoforms) but not by Gö 6976 (inhibitor of Ca2+-dependent PKC). Rottlerin, an inhibitor of Ca2+-independent PKCdelta, antagonized the negative inotropic effects of PE and A61603. PE and A61603 increased the translocation of PKCdelta, which was prevented by rottlerin. These data suggest that the alpha1AR-mediated negative inotropy on adult mouse myocardium is signaled by Ca2+-independent PKCdelta.

Recent advances in alpha1-adrenoceptor pharmacology

alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) mediate some of the main actions of the natural catecholamines, adrenaline and noradrenaline. They participate in many essential physiological processes, such as sympathetic neurotransmission, modulation of hepatic metabolism, control of vascular tone, cardiac contraction, and the regulation of smooth muscle activity in the genitourinary system. Here, we review recent progress on subtype-specific subcellular localization, participation in signaling cascades, and the pivotal function of alpha(1)-ARs, as delineated through studies on genetically engineered animals. Together, these findings will provide new insights into the physiological and pathophysiological roles of the alpha(1)-ARs.

N-terminal truncation of human alpha1D-adrenoceptors increases expression of binding sites but not protein

The role of the N-terminus of human alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors was examined by deleting the first 79 amino acids (Delta(1-79)) and epitope-tagging to facilitate immunoprecipitation and detection. Following transfection into HEK293 cells, 6- to 13-fold increases in the density of specific [125I]BE 2254 binding sites were observed for both tagged and untagged Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)- compared to full-length alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors, while agonist and antagonist affinities remained unchanged. In contrast, immunoprecipitation of tagged receptors showed that full-length alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor protein was at least twice as abundant as Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor protein. Photoaffinity labelling with [125I]arylazidoprazosin showed much more intense labelling of tagged Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)- than of full-length alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors. Substantial N-linked glycosylation of tagged Delta(1-79)alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors was observed, although full-length alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors contain two consensus glycosylation sites but are not glycosylated. These results suggest that N-terminal truncation of alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors enhances processing of a binding competent form in HEK293 cells; and show a clear dissociation between abundance of receptor protein and density of receptor binding sites.

Role of Dbl's big sister in the anti-mitogenic pathway from alpha1B-adrenergic receptor to c-Jun N-terminal kinase

We previously reported that the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor leads to activation of Rho family small GTPases, and in turn, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), which results in the inhibition of cell proliferation. Here, we show the involvement of the Rho family guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Dbl's Big Sister (Dbs) in the signaling pathway. Transfection of a Dbl-homology (DH) and pleckstrin-homology (PH) domain-deficient form of Dbs into cells blocked the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor-induced activation of JNK. Conversely, transfection of an isolated DH domain of Dbs induced JNK activation. Stimulation of the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor enhanced an intrinsic Cdc42-GEF activity of Dbs in a manner dependent on Src family tyrosine kinases. Additionally, DH and PH domain deficient Dbs blocked the receptor-induced inhibition of cell proliferation, while DH domain of Dbs inhibited cell proliferation via the JNK-dependent pathway. Taken together, Dbs may play an important role in the anti-mitogenic JNK pathway downstream of the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor.

A knockout approach indicates a minor vasoconstrictor role for vascular alpha1B-adrenoceptors in mouse

Pharmacological analysis alone has failed to clarify the role of the three alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes in modulating vascular tone, due to a lack of sufficiently selective antagonists, particularly for the alpha (1B)-adrenoceptor, and the complexity when three receptor subtypes are potentially activated by the same agonist. We adopted a combined genetics/ pharmacology strategy based on the alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor knockout (KO) mouse. The potency of three alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists vs. phenylephrine was tested in aorta, carotid, mesenteric, and caudal isolated arteries from KO and wild-type (WT) mice. In the KO mouse the pharmacology became straightforward, showing alpha(1D) in two major conducting arteries (aorta and carotid) and alpha(1A) in two distributing arteries (mesenteric and caudal). By combining antagonist pharmacology and genetics, we provide a simplified analysis of alpha(1)-mediated vasoconstriction, demonstrating that alpha(1D) and alpha(1A) are the major subtypes involved in vasoconstriction, with a minor but definite contribution from alpha(1B) in every vessel.

Differences in the cellular localization and agonist-mediated internalization properties of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes

The cellular localization, agonist-mediated internalization, and desensitization properties of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1)-AR) subtypes conjugated with green fluorescent protein (alpha(1)-AR/GFP) were assessed using real-time imaging of living, transiently transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. The alpha(1B)-AR/GFP fluorescence was detected predominantly on the cell surface. Stimulation of the alpha(1B)-AR with phenylephrine led to an increase in extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation and promoted rapid alpha(1B)-AR/GFP internalization. Long-term exposure (15 h) to phenylephrine resulted in desensitization of the alpha(1B)-AR-mediated activation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Alpha(1A)-AR/GFP fluorescence was detected not only on the cell surface but also intracellularly. The rate of internalization of the cell surface population alpha(1A)-AR/GFPs was slower than that seen for the alpha(1B)-AR. Agonist exposure also resulted in desensitization of the alpha(1A)-AR-mediated increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation. The alpha(1D)-AR/GFP fluorescence was detected mainly intracellularly, and this localization was unaffected by exposure to phenylephrine. Phenylephrine treatment of alpha(1D)-AR/GFP expressing cells increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation. However, this increase was not significant. Cotransfection with beta-arrestin 1 did not increase the rate or extent of agonist-stimulated alpha(1A)- or alpha(1B)-AR/GFP internalization. However, a dominant-negative form of the beta-arrestin 1, beta-arrestin 1 (319-418), blocked agonist-mediated internalization of both the alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs. These data show that transfected alpha(1)-AR/GFP fusion proteins are functional, that there are differences in the cellular distribution and agonist-mediated internalization between the alpha(1)-ARs, and that agonist-mediated alpha(1)-AR internalization is dependent on arrestins and can be desensitized by long-term exposure to an agonist. These differences could contribute to the diversity in physiologic responses regulated by the alpha(1)-ARs.

Recent progress in alpha 1-adrenoceptor pharmacology

The adrenoceptors (ARs) play a key role in the modulation of sympathetic nervous system activity and are a site of action for many clinically important therapeutic agents. The alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes (alpha1A-, alpha1B-, and alpha1D-AR) play a prominent role in regulating vascular tone and hypertrophic growth of smooth muscle and cardiac cells. Their functional characteristics with respect to ligand binding and second messenger utilization have been well described. Here, we review recent progress on subtype-specific subcellular localization, participation in signaling cascades, and the pivotal function of alpha1-ARs, as delineated through studies on genetically engineered animals. Together, these findings will provide new insights into the physiological and pathophysiological roles of the alpha1-ARs.

Differences in the subcellular localization of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes can affect the subtype selectivity of drugs in a study with the fluorescent ligand BODIPY FL-prazosin

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes are differentially distributed in the cell; however, it remains unclear how this affects the subtype selectivity of particular drugs. In the present study, we used flow cytometry analysis with the fluorescent ligand, BODIPY FL-prazosin, to study the relationship between the subcellular distribution of subtype receptors and the subtype-selective character of ligands using alpha1a and alpha1b-adrenoceptors (ARs). Alpha1a-ARs predominantly localize inside the cell, while alpha1b-ARs on the cell surface. Flow cytometry analysis and confocal laser-scanning micrographs of living cells showed that BODIPY FL-prazosin can label not only alpha1-ARs on the cell surface, but also those localized inside the cell. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis of alpha1A-AR-selective drug, KMD-3213, and alpha1B-AR-selective drug, CEC, revealed that the major determinant of the subtype selectivity of each drug is different. The alpha1A-AR selectivity of KMD-3213 can be explained by its much higher affinity for alpha1a-AR than alpha1b-AR (affinity-dependent selectivity), while the alpha1B-AR selectivity of the hydrophilic alkylating agent CEC is due to preferential inactivation of alpha1-ARs on the cell surface (receptor localization-dependent selectivity). This study illustrates that factors in addition to the affinity of the drug for the receptor, such as subcellular localization of the receptor, should be taken into account in assessing the subtype selectivity of a drug.

Alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes in rat epididymis and the effects of sexual maturation

We have characterized the expression of alpha1-adrenoceptor in epididymis from rats in different stages of sexual maturation: 40 (immature), 60 (young adult), and 120 (adult) days of age. Plasma testosterone levels were low in the immature animals but increased significantly in the 60- and 120-day-old animals. These changes were followed by a progressive increase in rat body weight and in caput and cauda epididymis relative weight. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay indicated that alpha1a-, alpha1b-, and alpha1d-adrenoceptor transcripts were present in both caput and cauda epididymis from adult rats. Ribonuclease protection assays further indicated that the expression of these alpha1-adrenoceptor transcripts differed with age and epididymal region analyzed. Prazosin (nonselective alpha1 antagonist), 5-methyl urapidil (alpha1A-selective), and BMY 7378 (alpha1D-selective) displaced [3H]prazosin binding curves in caput and cauda epididymis from 40- and 120-day-old rats. The potency order for these antagonists, as calculated from the negative logarithm of the inhibition constant (pK(i)) values for the high-affinity sites, indicated a predominant population of alpha1A-adrenoceptor subtype in caput and cauda epididymis from adult animals. Differences in pK(i) values in caput and cauda epididymis from immature and adult animals also suggested that the relative amount of alpha1-adrenoceptors, at the protein level, is modulated by sexual maturation. Taken together, the changes in alpha1-adrenoceptor expression during sexual maturation may suggest specific roles for these receptors in epididymal function.