β-Lactamase Characterization of Gram-Negative Pathogens Recovered from Patients Enrolled in the Phase 2 Trials for Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Clinical Efficacies Analyzed against Subsets of Molecularly Characterized Isolates

Antibiotic Treatment of Infections Caused by AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales

AmpC enzymes are a class of beta-lactamases produced by Gram-negative bacteria, including several Enterobacterales. When produced in sufficient amounts, AmpCs can hydrolyze third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) and piperacillin/tazobactam, causing resistance. In Enterobacterales, the AmpC gene can be chromosomal- or plasmid-encoded. Some species, particularly Enterobacter cloacae complex, Klebsiella aerogenes, and Citrobacter freundii, harbor an inducible chromosomal AmpC gene. The expression of this gene can be derepressed during treatment with a beta-lactam, leading to AmpC overproduction and the consequent emergence of resistance to 3GCs and piperacillin/tazobactam during treatment. Because of this phenomenon, the use of carbapenems or cefepime is considered a safer option when treating these pathogens. However, many areas of uncertainty persist, including the risk of derepression related to each beta-lactam; the role of piperacillin/tazobactam compared to cefepime; the best option for severe or difficult-to-treat cases, such as high-inoculum infections (e.g., ventilator-associated pneumonia and undrainable abscesses); the role of de-escalation once clinical stability is obtained; and the best treatment for species with a lower risk of derepression during treatment (e.g., Serratia marcescens and Morganella morganii). The aim of this review is to collate the most relevant information about the microbiological properties of and therapeutic approach to AmpC-producing Enterobacterales in order to inform daily clinical practice.

Antibiotic Resistance in Proteus mirabilis: Mechanism, Status, and Public Health Significance

Proteus mirabilis is a specific opportunistic pathogen of many infections including urinary tract infections (UTIs). Risk factors are linked with the acquisition of multidrug-resistant (MDR) to 3 or more classes of antimicrobials) strains. The resistance in extended-spectrum alpha-lactamase is rare, but the rising resistance in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing strains is a matter of concern. β-lactamases and antibiotic modifying enzymes mainly constitute the ESBLs resistance mechanism by hydrolyzing the antibiotics. Mutation or Porin loss could lead to the reduced permeability of antibiotics, enhanced efflux pump activity hindering the antibiotic access to the target site, antibiotic failure to bind at the target site because of the target modification, and lipopolysaccharide mutation causing the resistance against polymyxin antibiotics. This review aimed to explore various antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in Proteus mirabilis and their impact on public health status.

Epidemiology of resistance of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftazidime-avibactam in a Chinese hospital

AIMS

Klebsiella pneumoniae has been reported to develop increased antibiotic resistance. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is a novel antibiotic with activity against serine-lactamase. Here, we investigated the sensitivity of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) to CZA and the mechanisms of drug resistance in our hospital.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patient characteristics were obtained from medical records. K. pneumoniae and its antibiotic susceptibility were determined using the Vitek-2 Compact instrument. The antibiotic resistance genes KPC, NDM, OXA-48, VIM, IMP, CIM, SPM, TMB, SMB, SIM, AIM and DIM were detected using real-time PCR. Multilocus sequence typing was used for genetic RELATEDNESS analysis. In total, 121 CRKP strains were isolated from patients in the intensive care unit (51·2%), senior ward (12·4%) and neurosurgery department (10%). With an average age of 72·5 years, most patients were in care for respiratory (34·7%), brain (20·7%), digestive tract (13·2%) and cardiovascular (8·3%) diseases. Specimens were predominantly obtained from sputum (39·67%), urine (29·75%) and blood (6·61%).

CONCLUSION

Of 23 CZA-resistant CRKP strains (19·01%), ST11 being the most common at 56·52%, 11 NDM-1-positive (47·83%) and four NDM-5-positive (17·39%) strains were detected.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

Our study indicates that CZA resistance occurs in ~19·01% CRKP strains and that blaNDM-1 and blaNDM-5 might be critical for resistance.

Molecular Characterization of Baseline Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from a Phase 3 Nosocomial Pneumonia (ASPECT-NP) Clinical Trial

We reviewed β-lactam-resistant baseline Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa lower respiratory tract isolates collected during the ASPECT-NP phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with meropenem for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated adults. Isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, real-time PCR for the quantification of the expression levels of β-lactamase and efflux pump genes, and Western blot analysis for the detection of OprD (P. aeruginosa only). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes were detected in 168 of 262 Enterobacterales isolates, and among these, bla _CTX-M-15 was the most common, detected in 125 isolates. Sixty-one Enterobacterales isolates carried genes encoding carbapenemases, while 33 isolates did not carry ESBLs or carbapenemases. Carbapenemase-producing isolates carried mainly NDM and OXA-48 variants, with ceftolozane-tazobactam MIC values ranging from 4 to 128 µg/ml. Most ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales isolates that did not carry carbapenemases were Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates that exhibited disrupted OmpK35, specific mutations in OmpK36, and, in some isolates, elevated expression of bla _CTX-M-15 Among 89 P. aeruginosa isolates, carbapenemases and ESBL-encoding genes were observed in 12 and 22 isolates, respectively. P. aeruginosa isolates without acquired β-lactamases displaying elevated expression of AmpC (14 isolates), elevated expression of efflux pumps (11 isolates), and/or a decrease or loss of OprD (22 isolates) were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was active against >75% of the Enterobacterales isolates from the ASPECT-NP trial that did not carry carbapenemases. K. pneumoniae strains resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam might represent a challenge for treatment due to their multiple resistance mechanisms. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was among the agents that displayed the greatest activity against P. aeruginosa isolates. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02070757.).

Is Ceftazidime/Avibactam an Option for Serious Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales?: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Carbapenem-sparing regimens are needed for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing members of the Enterobacterales We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenems against ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales species. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing ceftazidime/avibactam with carbapenems for the treatment of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales was conducted. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ESBL- and AmpC-specific outcome data were compiled. Of the 246 patients infected with an ESBL-producing microorganism in the ceftazidime/avibactam arm, 224 (91%) had a clinical response at test of cure (TOC), versus 240 of 271 (89%) patients in the carbapenem arm (risk ratio [RR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.08; P = 0.45; I ² = 0%). Clinical response rates for AmpC producers in the ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenem arms were 32/40 (80%) and 37/42 (88%), respectively (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P = 0.35; I ² = 0%). Microbiological response and mortality rates were not reported specifically for ESBL/AmpC producers. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be a carbapenem-sparing option for the treatment of mild to moderate complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales species, and the data are too limited to provide any conclusive recommendations for the AmpC producers. Care should be taken before extrapolating this to severe infections, given that the representation of this population in the reviewed studies was negligible. Ceftazidime/avibactam is a costly drug active against carbapenem-resistant microorganisms and should be used judiciously to preserve its activity against them.

Treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamases infections: what is the current role of new β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The widespread diffusion of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales currently represents a major threat for public health worldwide. Carbapenems are currently considered the first-line choice for serious ESBL infections. However, the dramatic global increase in ESBL prevalence has led to a significant overuse of carbapenems that has promoted the selection and spread of carbapenemases, which might further prejudicated our ability to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens. Therefore, strategies to limit the use of carbapenems should be implemented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although piperacillin-tazobactam should no longer be considered an alternative to carbapenems for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections due to ESBL-producing strains, it might still represent an alternative for step-down therapy or for low-to-moderate severity infection originating from urinary or biliary sources and when piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 mg/l or less. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are both carbapenem sparing agents that appear interesting alternatives for treatment of serious ESBL infections. New β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI), including cefepime-enmetazobactam, ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam, are also promising agents for treatment of ESBL infections, but further clinical data are needed to establish their efficacy relative to carbapenems. The role of carbapenems/β-lactamase inhibitors remain to be clarified.

SUMMARY

New BL/BLI have distinctive specificities and limitations that require further investigations. Future randomized clinical trials are required to define the best strategy for their administering for ESBL infections.

Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance

The rising incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) has been recognized as a global emergency. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, epidemiology and treatment options for BSI caused by GNB with DTR, namely extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales; DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa; and DTR Acinetobacter baumannii.

Carbapenem-Sparing Strategies for ESBL Producers: When and How

Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are prevalent worldwide and correlated with hospital infections, but they have been evolving as an increasing cause of community acquired infections. The spread of ESBL constitutes a major threat for public health, and infections with ESBL-producing organisms have been associated with poor outcomes. Established therapeutic options for severe infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms are considered the carbapenems. However, under the pressure of carbapenem overuse and the emergence of resistance, carbapenem-sparing strategies have been implemented. The administration of carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for the treatment of ESBL infections has yielded conflicting results. Herein, the current available knowledge regarding carbapenem-sparing strategies for ESBL producers is reviewed, and the optimal conditions for the "when and how" of carbapenem-sparing agents is discussed. An important point of the review focuses on piperacillin-tazobactam as the agent arousing the most debate. The most available data regarding non-carbapenem β-lactams (i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, temocillin, cephamycins and cefepime) are also thoroughly presented as well as non β-lactams (i.e., aminoglycosides, quinolones, tigecycline, eravacycline and fosfomycin).

Selection of mutants with resistance or diminished susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam from ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Introduction

Difficult Gram-negative infections are increasingly treated with new β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, e.g. ceftazidime/avibactam. Disturbingly, mutations in KPC carbapenemases can confer ceftazidime/avibactam resistance, which is sometimes selected during therapy. We explored whether this risk extended to AmpC and ESBL enzymes.

Methods

Mutants were selected by plating AmpC-derepressed strains, ESBL producers and ceftazidime-susceptible controls on agar containing ceftazidime + avibactam (1 or 4 mg/L). MICs were determined by CLSI agar dilution; WGS was by Illumina methodology.

Results

Using 2× MIC of ceftazidime + 1 mg/L avibactam, mutants were selected from all strain types at frequencies of 10-7-10-9. Rates diminished to <10-9 with 4 mg/L avibactam or higher MIC multiples, except with AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae. Characterized mutants (n = 10; MICs 4-64 mg/L) of AmpC-derepressed strains had modifications in ampC, variously giving Arg168Pro/His, Gly176Arg/Asp, Asn366Tyr or small deletions around positions 309-314. Mutants of ESBL producers (n = 19; MICs 0.5-16 mg/L) mostly had changes affecting permeability, efflux or β-lactamase quantity; only one had an altered β-lactamase, with an Asp182Tyr substitution in CTX-M-15, raising the ceftazidime/avibactam MIC, but abrogating other cephalosporin resistance. Mutants of ceftazidime-susceptible strains were not sequenced, but phenotypes suggested altered drug accumulation or, for Enterobacter cloacae only, AmpC derepression. In further experiments, avibactam reduced, but did not abolish, selection of AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae by ceftazidime.

Conclusions

Most mutants of AmpC-derepressed Enterobacteriaceae had structural mutations in ampC; those of ESBL producers mostly had genetic modifications outside β-lactamase genes, commonly affecting uptake, efflux, or β-lactamase quantity. The clinical significance of these observations remains to be determined.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ceftazidime/avibactam is approved for complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections (UTIs) based on results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data regarding its effectiveness in treating hospital-acquired infections or resistant pathogens have not been systematically compiled.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis including RCTs evaluating ceftazidime/avibactam versus comparator for the treatment of any infection. Primary outcome was 30 day all-cause mortality. Subgroups of hospital-acquired infections and specific resistance phenotypes were planned.

Results

Seven publications (eight trials, 4093 patients) were included, reporting a baseline ∼25% of ESBL-carrying Enterobacteriaceae. No significant difference between ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator (mostly carbapenem) was demonstrated for 30 day all-cause mortality, late follow-up mortality and clinical response [relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.70-1.72, P = 0.69; RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.76, P = 0.25; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01, P = 0.21, respectively, without significant heterogeneity]. Higher microbiological response rate was demonstrated with ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with UTI (RR 1.14, 1.0-1.29, P = 0.05, I2 = 51%). No significant difference in clinical response was demonstrated for patients with ceftazidime-resistant pathogens (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94-1.10, P = 0.66, I2 = 0%). Results for other subgroups of resistant pathogens or hospital-acquired infection were not available. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were significantly more common with ceftazidime/avibactam (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.54, P = 0.05, I2 = 0%).

Conclusions

Ceftazidime/avibactam is clinically and microbiologically as effective as carbapenems for treatment of infections in a setting of ∼25% ESBL-carrying Enterobacteriaceae. Safety of the drug should be further evaluated owing to a higher rate of SAEs compared with carbapenems. Further studies should assess the drug's effectiveness in the treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Clinical cure rate and cost-effectiveness of carbapenem-sparing beta-lactams vs. meropenem for Gram-negative infections: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis

The increasing incidence of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)/AmpC-producing bacteria leads to increasing use of carbapenems and risk of carbapenem resistance. Treatment success of carbapenem-sparing beta-lactams (CSBs) for ESBL infections is unclear. The aim of this study was to appraise the clinical cure rate and estimate the cost-effectiveness of meropenem vs. CSBs (piperacillin-tazobactam, temocillin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam) for urinary tract infections (UTIs) or intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to ESBL/AmpC-producing bacteria. A systematic literature search of the Cochrane library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies assessing the clinical cure rate of the antibiotics. To assess the cost-effectiveness of CSBs vs. meropenem, a combined decision analytic and Markov model was probabilistically analysed over a 5-year period. The main outcome was presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and evaluated with a threshold of €20 000 per life year gained (LYG). From 656 identified articles, 17 and 14 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and quantitative synthesis, respectively. A clinical cure of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam was comparable to meropenem in patients with complicated IAIs (cIAIs) due to ESBL (Risk ratio [RR]=1·04, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0·95-1·13). Both temocillin and ceftolozane-tazobactam were deemed cost-effective compared to meropenem with €157·58 and €13 398·34 per LYG, respectively, in patients with UTIs due to ESBL. However, only ceftazidime-avibactam (plus metronidazole) was cost-effective for the treatment of IAIs, with €16 916·77 per LYG. These results show that several CSBs can be considered as viable candidates for the treatment of UTIs and IAIs caused by ESBL.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Italy

Resistance to carbapenems in Enterobacteriaceae is a serious concern for public health. Alternative treatment options involving carbapenem-sparing regimen for patients with serious infections caused by multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae are urgently needed. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) is a new combination of a third generation cephalosporin and a non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, in which avibactam is capable to expand the ceftazidime activity also against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. To date, no data exist regarding the activity of CZA against strains isolated in the Italian context, which is known as endemic for ESBL producers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of CZA, in comparison to ceftazidime (CAZ), against 90 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, collected from blood and urine samples at our Institute. Thus, avibactam has been able to restore the activity of CAZ in all cases, suggesting the potential use of CZA as a carbapenem-sparing model, especially when limited therapeutic options exist.

Characterization of β-Lactamase Content of Ceftazidime-Resistant Pathogens Recovered during the Pathogen-Directed Phase 3 REPRISE Trial for Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Correlation of Efficacy against β-Lactamase Producers

REPRISE was a pathogen-directed (ceftazidime-resistant) phase 3 prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and best available therapy (BAT) in the treatment of hospitalized adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). This study characterized the β-lactamase content of ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered during the baseline visits of patients enrolled in REPRISE. Ceftazidime had MIC₉₀ results of >64 μg/ml against baseline Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa bla _CTX-M variants were the most common β-lactamases found in Escherichia coli (detected in 94.3% of all E. coli isolates) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (91.2%), whereas Proteus mirabilis often carried plasmid AmpC (pAmpC) (66.7%). bla _KPC (6 isolates), bla _NDM-1 (3), bla _OXA-48 (3), and bla _VIM (2) were detected in 4.9% (14/284) of Enterobacteriaceae Overall, clinical cure rates against the Enterobacteriaceae were 91.2% and 90.8% for the CAZ-AVI and BAT groups, respectively, or 92.5% and 92.9% in the subset of patients infected with isolates harboring bla _CTX-M Patients with baseline isolates carrying AmpC genes (pAmpC and/or overexpression of intrinsic AmpC) showed clinical cure rates of 80.0% and 89.5% for CAZ-AVI and BAT arms, respectively. Favorable microbiological responses were generally lower than clinical cure rates in both arms, but CAZ-AVI (80.0 to 85.0%) showed microbiological response rates consistently higher than those for BAT (57.9 to 64.3%) among patients with non-carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae Lower microbiological response rates (50.0%) were found in patients with carbapenemase producers from both arms. This study expands on efficacy data analysis of CAZ-AVI among patients infected with ceftazidime-resistant pathogens, especially bla _CTX-M-carrying isolates, and although clinical cure rates for CAZ-AVI and BAT were similar, eradication rates for CAZ-AVI were higher than those for BAT. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01644643.).

Application of Next-Generation Sequencing for Characterization of Surveillance and Clinical Trial Isolates: Analysis of the Distribution of β-lactamase Resistance Genes and Lineage Background in the United States

Background

Sequencing technologies and techniques have seen remarkable transformation and innovation that have significantly affected sequencing capability. Data analyses have replaced sequencing as the main challenge. This paper provides an overview on applying next-generation sequencing (NGS) and analysis and discusses the benefits and challenges. In addition, this document shows results from using NGS and bioinformatics tools to screen for β-lactamase genes and assess the epidemiological structure of Escherichia coli– and Klebsiella pneumoniae–causing bloodstream (BSIs) and urinary tract (UTIs) infections in patients hospitalized in the United States during the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program for 2016.

Methods

A total of 3525 isolates (2751 E. coli and 774 K. pneumoniae) causing BSIs (n = 892) and UTIs (n = 2633) in hospitalized patients in the United States were included. Isolates were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution, and those that met a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)–based screening criteria had their genomes sequenced and analyzed.

Results

A total of 11.6% and 16.1% of E. coli–causing UTIs and BSIs, respectively, met the MIC-based criteria, whereas 11.0% and 13.7% of K. pneumoniae isolates causing UTIs and BSIs, respectively, met the criteria. Among E. coli, bla_CTX-M variants (87.6% overall) prevailed (60.5% of CTX-M group 1 and 26.9% of group 9). A total of 60.3% of K. pneumoniae isolates carried bla_CTX-M variants (52.7% and 7.6% of groups 1 and 9, respectively). Two E. coli (0.6%) and 13 K. pneumoniae (12.9%) isolates harbored bla_KPC. Among KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (2 from BSIs and 11 from UTIs), 84.6% (11/13) were ST258 (CC258). Seventeen and 38 unique clonal complexes (CCs) were noted in E. coli that caused BSIs and UTIs, respectively, and CC131 (or ST131) was the most common CC among BSI (53.6%) and UTI (58.2%) isolates. Twenty-three and 26 CCs were noted among K. pneumoniae–causing BSIs and UTIs, respectively. CC258 (28.3%) prevailed in UTI pathogens, whereas CC307 (15.0%) was the most common CC among BSI isolates.

Conclusions

This study provides a benchmark for the distribution of β-lactamase genes and the population structure information for the most common Enterobacteriaceae species responsible for BSIs and UTIs in US medical centers during the 2016 SENTRY Program.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Data on the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) are limited. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to clarify the role of CAZ-AVI for patients with serious Gram-negative bacterial infections. The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies involving CAZ-AVI. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model. Twelve articles (4951 patients) were included, consisting of nine RCTs and three observational studies comparing CAZ-AVI with other regimens, e.g. carbapenems or colistin. CAZ-AVI showed a comparable clinical response (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.02; I2 = 0%) and non-inferior bacterial eradication (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.93-1.17; I2 = 79.1%) to carbapenems. No significant difference was detected between groups regarding mortality and adverse events. Moreover, subgroup analyses demonstrated that CAZ-AVI improved the clinical response (RR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.29) with reduced mortality (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.63) in patients infected by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae versus comparators. Likewise, CAZ-AVI improved the clinical cure rate of bloodstream infections (RR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.54-2.88). An improved ability of CAZ-AVI in microbiological eradication was also detected in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (RR = 1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.21). CAZ-AVI exhibited comparable efficacy and safety with carbapenems. Therefore, this agent might be a potential powerful agent for patients with serious Gram-negative bacterial infections.

In Vivo Efficacy of Plazomicin Alone or in Combination with Meropenem or Tigecycline against Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Exhibiting Various Resistance Mechanisms in an Immunocompetent Murine Septicemia Model

Plazomicin is a novel aminoglycoside with potent in vitro activity against multidrug- and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of plazomicin exposure, alone and in combination with meropenem or tigecycline, against Enterobacteriaceae in the immunocompetent murine septicemia model. ICR mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with bacterial suspensions. Eight Enterobacteriaceae isolates with wide ranges of plazomicin, meropenem, and tigecycline MICs were utilized. Treatment mice were administered plazomicin, meropenem, or tigecycline human-equivalent doses alone or in combinations of plazomicin-meropenem and plazomicin-tigecycline. Treatments were initiated at 1 h postinfection and continued for 24 h. Efficacy was assessed by determination of mouse survival through 96 h. Compared with the survival of the controls, plazomicin monotherapy produced a significant improvement in survival for all mice infected with the isolates (P < 0.05) and resulted in overall survival rates of 86% (n = 50) and 53.3% (n = 30) for mice infected with isolates with plazomicin MICs of ≤4 and ≥8 mg/liter, respectively (P < 0.05). The survival of the meropenem and tigecycline groups correlated well with susceptibilities of their respective isolates, with incremental increases in survival being observed at lower MIC values. For mice infected with isolate Klebsiella pneumoniae 561 (plazomicin, meropenem, and tigecycline MICs, 8, >32, and 2 mg/liter, respectively), combination therapies showed a significant reduction in mortality compared with that achieved with any monotherapy (P < 0.05). Plazomicin monotherapy resulted in improved survival in the immunocompetent murine septicemia model, notably, for mice infected with isolates with plazomicin MICs of ≤4 mg/liter. As evidenced by our current data, coadministration of meropenem or tigecycline could potentially lead to a further improvement in survival. These data support a role for plazomicin in the management of septicemia due to Enterobacteriaceae with plazomicin MICs of ≤4 mg/liter, including carbapenem-resistant isolates.

Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in a rat intra-abdominal abscess model against a ceftazidime- and meropenem-resistant isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying blaKPC-2

Efficacies of ceftazidime-avibactam (4:1 w/w) and ceftazidime were tested against ceftazidime-susceptible (bla_KPC-2-negative), and meropenem- and ceftazidime-resistant (bla_KPC-2-positive), Klebsiella pneumoniae in a 52-h, multiple dose, abdominal abscess model in the rat. Efficacies corresponded to minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) measured in vitro and were consistent with drug exposures modelled from pharmacokinetics in infected animals. The ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem control treatments were effective in the rat abscess model against the susceptible strain, whereas only ceftazidime-avibactam was effective against K. pneumoniae harbouring bla_KPC-2.

Molecular β-Lactamase Characterization of Aerobic Gram-Negative Pathogens Recovered from Patients Enrolled in the Ceftazidime-Avibactam Phase 3 Trials for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, with Efficacies Analyzed against Susceptible and Resistant Subsets

The correlation of the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (plus metronidazole) with that of meropenem was evaluated in subjects infected with Gram-negative isolates having characterized β-lactam resistance mechanisms from the complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) phase 3 clinical trials. Enterobacteriaceae isolates displaying ceftriaxone and/or ceftazidime MIC values of ≥2 μg/ml and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with ceftazidime MIC values of ≥16 μg/ml were characterized for extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL) content. Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa isolates with imipenem and meropenem MIC values of ≥2 and ≥8 μg/ml, respectively, were tested for carbapenemase genes. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical cure at test of cure (TOC) among the members of the microbiologically modified intention-to-treat (mMITT) population. A total of 14.5% (56/387) and 18.8% (74/394) of patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem arms had isolates that met the MIC screening criteria at the baseline visit, respectively. CTX-M variants alone (29.7%; 41/138) or in combination with OXA-1/30 (35.5%; 49/138), most commonly, blaCTX-M group 1 variants (79/90; 87.8%), represented the β-lactamases most frequently observed among Enterobacteriaceae isolates. Among the patients infected with pathogens that did not meet the screening criteria, 82.2% showed clinical cure in the ceftazidime-avibactam group versus 85.9% in the meropenem group. Among patients infected with any pathogens that met the MIC screening criteria, clinical cure rates at TOC were 87.5% and 86.5% for the ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem groups, respectively. Ceftazidime-avibactam had clinical cure rates of 92.5% to 90.5% among patients infected with ESBL- and/or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae strains at the baseline visit, while meropenem showed rates of 84.9% to 85.4%. The ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem groups had cure rates of 75.0% and 86.7%, respectively, among patients having any pathogens producing AmpC enzymes. The efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam was similar to that of meropenem for treatment of cIAI caused by ESBL-producing organisms. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01499290 and NCT01500239.).

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CTZ-AVI) as a treatment for hospitalized adult patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections

Avibactam, a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, has recently been co-formulated with ceftazidime and approved for use in patients with complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections, where no better treatment alternative exists. The basis for its FDA approval has been the extensive clinical experience with ceftazidime and the demonstration in vitro and in animal models that the addition of avibactam reverses resistance to ceftazidime in extended-spectrum β-lactamase and some carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Early clinical data are promising, with efficacy demonstrated in patients with complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections. This review will summarize the in vitro, animal and clinical data available on this agent to date.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) represent a large proportion of all hospital admissions and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit. Rising rates of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO), including extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas spp., for which there are few remaining active antimicrobial agents, pose an increased challenge to clinicians. Patients with frequent exposures to the health care system or multiple recurrent IAIs are at increased risk for MDRO; however, treatment options have traditionally been limited, in some cases necessitating the utilization of last-line agents with unfavorable side-effect profiles. Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam are two new cephalosporin and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with recent US Food and Drug Administration approvals for the treatment of cIAI in combination with metronidazole. Ceftolozane/tazobactam has demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against MDR and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas spp., including carbapenem-nonsusceptible strains, while ceftazidime/avibactam effectively inhibits a broad range of β-lactamases, making it an excellent option for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Both agents were shown to be noninferior to meropenem for treatment of cIAI in Phase III trials; however, reduced responses in patients with renal impairment at baseline highlight the importance of routine serum creatinine monitoring and ongoing dose adjustments. This review highlights in vitro and in vivo data of these two agents and suggests their proper place in cIAI treatment to ensure adequate therapy in our most at-risk patients while sparing unnecessary use in patients without MDRO risk factors.

An update on the management of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a growing concern due to limited therapeutic options. Gram-negative bacteria, specifically Enterobacteriaceae, are common causes of both community-acquired and hospital acquired UTIs. These organisms can acquire genes that encode for multiple antibiotic resistance mechanisms, including extended-spectrum-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC- β -lactamase, and carbapenemases. The assessment of suspected UTI includes identification of characteristic symptoms or signs, urinalysis, dipstick or microscopic tests, and urine culture if indicated. UTIs are categorized according to location (upper versus lower urinary tract) and severity (uncomplicated versus complicated). Increasing rates of antibiotic resistance necessitate judicious use of antibiotics through the application of antimicrobial stewardship principles. Knowledge of the common causative pathogens of UTIs including local susceptibility patterns are essential in determining appropriate empiric therapy. The recommended first-line empiric therapies for acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis in otherwise healthy adult nonpregnant females is a 5-day course of nitrofurantion or a 3-g single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine. Second-line options include fluoroquinolones and β-lactams, such as amoxicillin-clavulanate. Current treatment options for UTIs due to AmpC- β -lactamase-producing organisms include fosfomycin, nitrofurantion, fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems. In addition, treatment options for UTIs due to ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriaceae include nitrofurantion, fosfomycin, fluoroquinolones, cefoxitin, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and aminoglycosides. Based on identification and susceptibility results, alternatives to carbapenems may be used to treat mild-moderate UTIs caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin, polymixin B, fosfomycin, aztreonam, aminoglycosides, and tigecycline are treatment options for UTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Treatment options for UTIs caused by multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas spp. include fluoroquinolones, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, colistin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The use of fluoroquinolones for empiric treatment of UTIs should be restricted due to increased rates of resistance. Aminoglycosides, colistin, and tigecycline are considered alternatives in the setting of MDR Gram-negative infections in patients with limited therapeutic options.