1
|
Ralhan K, Iyer KA, Diaz LL, Bird R, Maind A, Zhou QA. Navigating Antibacterial Frontiers: A Panoramic Exploration of Antibacterial Landscapes, Resistance Mechanisms, and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies. ACS Infect Dis 2024; 10:1483-1519. [PMID: 38691668 PMCID: PMC11091902 DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
The development of effective antibacterial solutions has become paramount in maintaining global health in this era of increasing bacterial threats and rampant antibiotic resistance. Traditional antibiotics have played a significant role in combating bacterial infections throughout history. However, the emergence of novel resistant strains necessitates constant innovation in antibacterial research. We have analyzed the data on antibacterials from the CAS Content Collection, the largest human-curated collection of published scientific knowledge, which has proven valuable for quantitative analysis of global scientific knowledge. Our analysis focuses on mining the CAS Content Collection data for recent publications (since 2012). This article aims to explore the intricate landscape of antibacterial research while reviewing the advancement from traditional antibiotics to novel and emerging antibacterial strategies. By delving into the resistance mechanisms, this paper highlights the need to find alternate strategies to address the growing concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Leilani Lotti Diaz
- CAS,
A Division of the American Chemical Society, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
| | - Robert Bird
- CAS,
A Division of the American Chemical Society, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
| | - Ankush Maind
- ACS
International India Pvt. Ltd., Pune 411044, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castaldo N, Vena A, Limongelli A, Giacobbe DR, Bassetti M. Emerging treatment options for skin and soft tissue infections tailoring drug selection to individual patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2024; 37:80-86. [PMID: 38277175 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000001003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide a brief overview of drugs in Phase II and III of development for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), offering insights into potential customized treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS Several drugs are currently in advanced stages of evaluation for the treatment of ABSSSI, and numerous molecules are entering in the early development phases. Notably, many of these drugs exhibit unique mechanisms of action and interesting antimicrobial spectrum. SUMMARY Tailoring antibiotic therapy based on patient characteristics, likely pathogens, type, site and severity of ABSSSI is crucial. Given the inherent limitations of available treatments, the development of novel agents is a pivotal avenue. Such advancements hold promise for enhancing treatment efficacy and simplifying drug selection for ABSSSI in everyday clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Castaldo
- Department of Pulmonology, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine
| | - Antonio Vena
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, IRCCS San Martino polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Limongelli
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, IRCCS San Martino polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, IRCCS San Martino polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, IRCCS San Martino polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Douglas EJ, Laabei M. Staph wars: the antibiotic pipeline strikes back. MICROBIOLOGY (READING, ENGLAND) 2023; 169:001387. [PMID: 37656158 PMCID: PMC10569064 DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.001387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Antibiotic chemotherapy is widely regarded as one of the most significant medical advancements in history. However, the continued misuse of antibiotics has contributed to the rapid rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) globally. Staphylococcus aureus, a major human pathogen, has become synonymous with multidrug resistance and is a leading antimicrobial-resistant pathogen causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. This review focuses on (1) the targets of current anti-staphylococcal antibiotics and the specific mechanisms that confirm resistance; (2) an in-depth analysis of recently licensed antibiotics approved for the treatment of S. aureus infections; and (3) an examination of the pre-clinical pipeline of anti-staphylococcal compounds. In addition, we examine the molecular mechanism of action of novel antimicrobials and derivatives of existing classes of antibiotics, collate data on the emergence of resistance to new compounds and provide an overview of key data from clinical trials evaluating anti-staphylococcal compounds. We present several successful cases in the development of alternative forms of existing antibiotics that have activity against multidrug-resistant S. aureus. Pre-clinical antimicrobials show promise, but more focus and funding are required to develop novel classes of compounds that can curtail the spread of and sustainably control antimicrobial-resistant S. aureus infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maisem Laabei
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li H, Liang X, Mo G, Guo S, Chen X, Li Y. Efficacy and safety of optional parenteral antimicrobial therapy for complicated skin and soft tissue infections: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30120. [PMID: 36042624 PMCID: PMC9410650 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) carry significant economic burden, as well as morbidity and mortality, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of optional antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of complicated SSTIs (cSSTIs). METHODS We searched PubMed, Medline (Via Ovid SP), Embase (Via Ovid SP), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception to March 22, 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied the use of optional antimicrobial therapy for cSSTIs. Citations' screening, study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were independently performed by 2 authors. The primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological treatment success, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 48 trials covering 24,381 patients assessing 20 types of antimicrobial treatment modalities were included. Overall, omadacycline was associated with the highest beneficial effect on clinical and microbiological treatment success and with the largest rank probability based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve values, avarofloxacin was closely followed. Both had, however, omadacycline was related to moderately safety profiles. Lefamulin ranked as the best option was associated with the lowest risk of severe AEs. Subgroup analysis showed similar results. The quality of primary outcomes was moderate to low. CONCLUSIONS The use of omadacycline was associated with higher rates of clinical and microbiological treatment success for the treatment of cSSTIs, with a relative low risk of AEs. Due to the limitations of the included RCTs, high-quality and well-designed RCTs are needed to further confirm the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huijuan Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xueyan Liang
- Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guangyan Mo
- Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sitong Guo
- Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyu Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, People’s Republic of China
- *Correspondence: Yan Li, Department of Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, People’s Republic of China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang L, Fan J, Zheng L, Chen L. Efficacy and Safety of Iclaprim for the Treatment of Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections: A Methodological Framework. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:932688. [PMID: 35928265 PMCID: PMC9344044 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.932688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the most common infections worldwide. They manifest in a variety of forms, such as erysipelas, cellulitis, and necrotizing fasciitis. Antibiotics are the significant method for clinical treatment of SSTIs. This study reported a methodology framework to determine the efficacy and safety of iclaprim in treatment of SSTIs.Methods: We will search the PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to June 2022 for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on iclaprim with SSTIs. Two authors will independently screen the eligible studies, assess the quality of the included papers, and extract the required information. Randomized controlled trials will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale will be used to evaluate observational studies. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system. RevMan 5.3 will be used for the data synthesis and quantitative analysis.Results and Discussions: This study will provide the clinicians with more high-quality evidence to choose iclaprim for patients with SSTIs.Ethics and Dissemination: This systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data, so ethical approval is not necessary. The results of this meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian Wang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jin Fan
- School of Health Preservation and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Linli Zheng
- Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lingmin Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, The Research Units of West China (2018RU012, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Lingmin Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
New drugs for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2022; 35:112-119. [PMID: 34812745 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen incriminated in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) becoming the predominant cause and representing a significant burden to the healthcare system. The last updated Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines concerning MRSA infections and SSTIs management were published in 2011 and 2014, respectively. The UK updated guidelines for MRSA infection treatment were published in 2021. Older treatment options may be associated with toxicity and require frequent dosing. There is a paucity of recent reviews on the armamentarium of new agents for MRSA SSTIs treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Since 2005, several new antibiotics received a fast-track approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for SSTI treatment. These drugs include delafloxacin, omadacycline, tedizolid, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin. In this manuscript, we will review the data that led to these new drugs approval and discuss their advantages and disadvantages in MRSA SSTIs management. SUMMARY MRSA is a major cause of SSTIs. Several novel therapies covering MRSA were FDA-approved for SSTIs. However, the current IDSA guidelines for MRSA infection and SSTIs as well as the recently published UK guidelines on MRSA treatment only consider these drugs as alternative choices or do not mention them at all.
Collapse
|
7
|
Giacobbe DR, Dettori S, Corcione S, Vena A, Sepulcri C, Maraolo AE, De Rosa FG, Bassetti M. Emerging Treatment Options for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Bloodstream Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence. Infect Drug Resist 2022; 15:2137-2157. [PMID: 35498629 PMCID: PMC9041368 DOI: 10.2147/idr.s318322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Roberto Giacobbe
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino – IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Correspondence: Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino – IRCCS, L.go R. Benzi 10, Genoa, 16132, Italy, Tel +390105554658, Email
| | - Silvia Dettori
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino – IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Corcione
- Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Vena
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino – IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Sepulcri
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino – IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
- Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Bassetti
- Clinica Malattie Infettive, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino – IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muhaj FF, George SJ, Tyring SK. Bacterial resistance and dermatological ramifications. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:12-20. [PMID: 35083740 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The spread of COVID-19 serves as a reminder of the might of microbes in the era of modern medicine. For years, another threat has preoccupied infectious disease experts and public health officials alike: rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Resistance is exceeding stewardship efforts and the rates of new drug development and approval in the market. A dry antimicrobial pipeline is threatening our regression to a pre-antibiotic era. While the consequences of resistance may seem far removed from daily clinical practices, awareness of AMR is significant to dermatological care given that dermatologists prescribe more antibiotics per physician than other providers. Antibiotics in dermatology are often used for prolonged courses, with a significant potential for microbiome alteration and antibiotic-related adverse effects. Through this review we hope to contribute to efforts of bringing the crisis of AMR to the forefront of daily dermatological practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F F Muhaj
- Department of Dermatology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - S J George
- Department of Dermatology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - S K Tyring
- Department of Dermatology, University of Texas McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.,Center for Clinical Studies, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Potential role of new-generation antibiotics in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2021; 34:109-117. [PMID: 33395093 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize the available results of primary analyses from high-quality randomized studies of either recently approved or possible future agents for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). RECENT FINDINGS In the last 2 decades, several novel agents have been approved for the treatment of ABSSSI, that are also active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In addition to already available agents, further molecules are in clinical development that could become available for treating ABSSSI in the forthcoming future. SUMMARY The current and future availability of several new-generation antibiotics will allow to modulate therapeutic choices not only on efficacy but also on other relevant factors such as the combination of the drug safety profile and the comorbidities of any given patient, the expected adherence to outpatient therapy, and the possibilities of early discharge or avoiding hospitalization by means of oral formulations, early switch from intravenous to oral therapy, or single-dose administration of long-acting intravenous agents. With the advent of new-generation antibiotics, all these factors are becoming increasingly essential for tailoring treatment to individual patients in line with the principles of personalized medicine, and for optimizing the use of healthcare resources.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fabre V, Sharara SL, Salinas AB, Carroll KC, Desai S, Cosgrove SE. Does This Patient Need Blood Cultures? A Scoping Review of Indications for Blood Cultures in Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:1339-1347. [PMID: 31942949 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Guidance regarding indications for initial or follow-up blood cultures is limited. We conducted a scoping review of articles published between January 2004 and June 2019 that reported the yield of blood cultures and/or their impact in the clinical management of fever and common infectious syndromes in nonneutropenic adult inpatients. A total of 2893 articles were screened; 50 were included. Based on the reported incidence of bacteremia, syndromes were categorized into low, moderate, and high pretest probability of bacteremia. Routine blood cultures are recommended in syndromes with a high likelihood of bacteremia (eg, endovascular infections) and those with moderate likelihood when cultures from the primary source of infection are unavailable or when prompt initiation of antibiotics is needed prior to obtaining primary source cultures. In syndromes where blood cultures are low-yield, blood cultures can be considered for patients at risk of adverse events if a bacteremia is missed (eg, patient with pacemaker and severe purulent cellulitis). If a patient has adequate source control and risk factors or concern for endovascular infection are not present, most streptococci or Enterobacterales bacteremias do not require routine follow-up blood cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Fabre
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sima L Sharara
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alejandra B Salinas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Karen C Carroll
- Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sanjay Desai
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sara E Cosgrove
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brown NM, Goodman AL, Horner C, Jenkins A, Brown EM. Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): updated guidelines from the UK. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2021; 3:dlaa114. [PMID: 34223066 PMCID: PMC8210269 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaa114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
These evidence-based guidelines are an updated version of those issued in 2008. They have been produced following a review of the published literature (2007-18) pertaining to the treatment of infections caused by MRSA. The guidelines update, where appropriate, previous recommendations, taking into account changes in the UK epidemiology of MRSA, ongoing national surveillance data and the efficacy of novel anti-staphylococcal agents licensed for use in the UK. Emerging therapies that have not been licensed for use in the UK at the time of the review have also been assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas M Brown
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK,Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - Anna L Goodman
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK,MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carolyne Horner
- British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abi Jenkins
- British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, UK
| | - Erwin M Brown
- British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common bacteria causing purulent skin and soft tissue infections. Many disease-causing S aureus strains are methicillin resistant; thus, empiric therapy should be given to cover methicillin-resistant S aureus. Bacterial wound cultures are important for characterizing local susceptibility patterns. Definitive antibiotic therapy is warranted, although there are no compelling data demonstrating superiority of any one antibiotic over another. Antibiotic choice is predicated by the infection severity, local susceptibility patterns, and drug-related safety, tolerability, and cost. Response to therapy is expected within the first days; 5 to 7 days of therapy is typically adequate to achieve cure.
Collapse
|
13
|
Huang DB, Noviello S, Gemmell CG. Iclaprim reduces the incidence and severity of Staphylococcus aureus-induced septic arthritis in a murine model. Access Microbiol 2020; 1:e000052. [PMID: 32974543 PMCID: PMC7481738 DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is the most common non-gonococcal aetiology of septic arthritis. The efficacy of iclaprim against S. aureus LS-1, a clinical strain identified from a patient with septic arthritis, was studied in MF1 mice to evaluate the activity of iclaprim, which is in clinical development, in preventing joint infections. Iclaprim (2.5–80 mg kg−1) administered as a single dose via the tail vein reduced the incidence of S. aureus septic arthritis and mortality in an experimental murine model of septic arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. B. Huang
- Motif BioSciences, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Trenton, NJ, USA
- *Correspondence: D. B. Huang, ;
| | | | - C. G. Gemmell
- Division of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Glasgow Medical School, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Afabicin, a First-in-Class Antistaphylococcal Antibiotic, in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Clinical Noninferiority to Vancomycin/Linezolid. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64:AAC.00250-20. [PMID: 32747361 PMCID: PMC7508579 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00250-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Afabicin (formerly Debio 1450, AFN-1720) is a prodrug of afabicin desphosphono, an enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI) inhibitor, and is a first-in-class antibiotic with a novel mode of action to specifically target fatty acid synthesis in Staphylococcus spp. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of afabicin were compared with those of vancomycin/linezolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to staphylococci in this multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, and double-dummy phase 2 study. Afabicin (formerly Debio 1450, AFN-1720) is a prodrug of afabicin desphosphono, an enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI) inhibitor, and is a first-in-class antibiotic with a novel mode of action to specifically target fatty acid synthesis in Staphylococcus spp. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of afabicin were compared with those of vancomycin/linezolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to staphylococci in this multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, and double-dummy phase 2 study. Randomized patients (1:1:1) received either low-dose (LD) afabicin (intravenous [i.v.] 80 mg, followed by oral 120 mg, twice a day [BID]), high-dose (HD) afabicin (i.v. 160 mg, followed by oral 240 mg, BID), or vancomycin/linezolid (i.v. vancomycin 1 g or 15 mg/kg, followed by oral linezolid 600 mg, BID). The most frequent baseline pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (97.5% of microbiological intent-to-treat [mITT] population), and 50.4% of patients had methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Clinical response rates at 48 to 72 h postrandomization in the mITT population were comparable among treatment groups (94.6%, 90.1%, and 91.1%, respectively). Both LD and HD afabicin were noninferior to vancomycin/linezolid (differences, −3.5% [95% confidence interval {CI}, −10.8%, 3.9%] and 1.0% [95% CI, −7.3%, 9.2%], respectively). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and were headache (9.1% and 16.8%) and nausea (6.4% and 8.4%) with LD and HD afabicin, respectively. Afabicin was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of ABSSSI due to staphylococci, and these data support further development of afabicin for the treatment of ABSSSI and potentially other types of staphylococcal infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02426918.)
Collapse
|
15
|
Noviello S, Corey GR, Holland TL, Lodise T, O'Riordan W, Wilcox MH, File TM, Dryden M, Balser B, Scaramucci A, Torres A, Huang DB. A pooled analysis of patients with wound infections in the Phase 3 REVIVE trials: randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iclaprim versus vancomycin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. J Med Microbiol 2020; 69:625-630. [PMID: 32195649 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Iclaprim is a diaminopyrimidine antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to Gram-positive pathogens.Aim. This analysis evaluates patients with wound infections from two Phase 3 trials of ABSSSI.Methodology. Six-hundred-two patients with wound infections from two Phase 3, double-blinded, randomized, multicenter, active controlled trials (REVIVE-1/-2) were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of iclaprim 80 mg compared with vancomycin 15 mg kg-1 administered intravenously every 12 h for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was to determine whether iclaprim was non-inferior (10 % margin) to vancomycin in achieving a ≥20 % reduction from baseline in lesion size 48-72 h after starting study drug (early clinical response [ECR]). Safety was assessed.Results. In REVIVE-1, ECR was 83.5 % with iclaprim versus 79.7 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 3.77%, 95 % CI -4.50%, 12.04%). In REVIVE-2, ECR was 82.7 % with iclaprim versus 76.3 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 6.38%, 95 % CI -3.35%, 16.12%). In the pooled dataset, iclaprim had similar ECR rates compared with vancomycin among wound infection patients (83.2 % vs 78.2 %) with a treatment difference of 5.01 % (95 % CI -1.29%, 11.32%). The safety profile was similar in iclaprim- and vancomycin-treated patients, except for a higher incidence of diarrhea with vancomycin (n=17) compared with iclaprim (n=6) and fatigue with iclaprim (n=17) compared with vancomycin (n=8).Conclusion. Based on early clinical response, iclaprim achieved non-inferiority to vancomycin with a similar safety profile in patients with wound infections suspected or confirmed as caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Iclaprim may be a valuable treatment option for wound infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G Ralph Corey
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Thomas Lodise
- Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York
| | | | - Mark H Wilcox
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals & University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Matthew Dryden
- Department of Microbiology and Infection, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, UK
| | | | | | - Antoni Torres
- Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Institut D'investigacions August Pi I Sunyer, Centro de Investigación Biomedica En Red-Enfermedades Respiratorias, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David B Huang
- Motif BioSciences, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.,Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Trenton, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koulenti D, Xu E, Song A, Sum Mok IY, Karageorgopoulos DE, Armaganidis A, Tsiodras S, Lipman J. Emerging Treatment Options for Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Positive Microorganisms. Microorganisms 2020; 8:E191. [PMID: 32019171 PMCID: PMC7074912 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial agents are currently the mainstay of treatment for bacterial infections worldwide. However, due to the increased use of antimicrobials in both human and animal medicine, pathogens have now evolved to possess high levels of multi-drug resistance, leading to the persistence and spread of difficult-to-treat infections. Several current antibacterial agents active against Gram-positive bacteria will be rendered useless in the face of increasing resistance rates. There are several emerging antibiotics under development, some of which have been shown to be more effective with an improved safety profile than current treatment regimens against Gram-positive bacteria. We will extensively discuss these antibiotics under clinical development (phase I-III clinical trials) to combat Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium and Streptococcus pneumoniae. We will delve into the mechanism of actions, microbiological spectrum, and, where available, the pharmacokinetics, safety profile, and efficacy of these drugs, aiming to provide a comprehensive review to the involved stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Despoina Koulenti
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; (E.X.); (A.S.); (I.Y.S.M.); (J.L.)
- 2nd Critical Care Department, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece;
| | - Elena Xu
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; (E.X.); (A.S.); (I.Y.S.M.); (J.L.)
| | - Andrew Song
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; (E.X.); (A.S.); (I.Y.S.M.); (J.L.)
| | - Isaac Yin Sum Mok
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; (E.X.); (A.S.); (I.Y.S.M.); (J.L.)
| | - Drosos E. Karageorgopoulos
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (D.E.K.); (S.T.)
| | | | - Sotirios Tsiodras
- 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (D.E.K.); (S.T.)
| | - Jeffrey Lipman
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; (E.X.); (A.S.); (I.Y.S.M.); (J.L.)
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Nîmes (CHU), University of Montpellier, 30029 Nîmes, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 17:203-218. [PMID: 30737488 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 878] [Impact Index Per Article: 219.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most successful modern pathogens. The same organism that lives as a commensal and is transmitted in both health-care and community settings is also a leading cause of bacteraemia, endocarditis, skin and soft tissue infections, bone and joint infections and hospital-acquired infections. Genetically diverse, the epidemiology of MRSA is primarily characterized by the serial emergence of epidemic strains. Although its incidence has recently declined in some regions, MRSA still poses a formidable clinical threat, with persistently high morbidity and mortality. Successful treatment remains challenging and requires the evaluation of both novel antimicrobials and adjunctive aspects of care, such as infectious disease consultation, echocardiography and source control. In this Review, we provide an overview of basic and clinical MRSA research and summarize the expansive body of literature on the epidemiology, transmission, genetic diversity, evolution, surveillance and treatment of MRSA.
Collapse
|
18
|
Bassetti M, Carnelutti A, Castaldo N, Peghin M. Important new therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:2317-2334. [PMID: 31622115 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1675637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections represent a leading cause of infection-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. There has been a welcome increase in the number of agents available for the treatment of MRSA infection over the last decade and several clinical trials are currently investigating the role of new experimental strategies.Areas covered: The purpose of this manuscript is to review the efficacy and safety of recently approved anti-MRSA molecules as well as some newer agents currently under investigation with a specific focus on the potential role of these drugs in everyday clinical practice.Expert opinion: Many new drugs with an activity against MRSA have been recently approved or are in an advanced stage of development. All these compounds represent promising options to enhance our antibiotic armamentarium. However, data regarding the use of these new compounds in real-life terms are limited and their best placement in therapy and in terms of optimization of medical resources and balance of cost-effectiveness requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Genoa and Hospital Policlinico San Martino-IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessia Carnelutti
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Nadia Castaldo
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Maddalena Peghin
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Huang DB, Charrier C, Le Bras C, Hawser S, Noviello S. The incidence and patient outcomes of ABSSSI by iclaprim MIC values in the phase 3 REVIVE trials for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. J Med Microbiol 2019; 68:898-902. [DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David B. Huang
- 1 Motif BioSciences, Princeton, NJ, USA
- 2 Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Trenton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jaffa RK, Pillinger KE, Roshdy D, Isip JA, Pasquale TR. Novel developments in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:1493-1502. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1617851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rupal K. Jaffa
- Department of Pharmacy, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Kelly E. Pillinger
- Department of Pharmacy, Strong Memorial Hospital, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Danya Roshdy
- Department of Pharmacy, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Motos A, Yang H, Yang M, Torres A. Perspectives on synthetic pharmacotherapy for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:1439-1448. [PMID: 31095426 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1617852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Nosocomial pneumonia is the second most common infection in hospital settings, resulting in substantial increases in morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. The rapid increase in resistance of nosocomial pathogens to many antibiotics and the high dissemination of resistance genes highlight the need for innovative approaches to combat difficult-to-treat nosocomial respiratory infections. Areas covered: This review summarizes the synthetic antimicrobials that are currently in development for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, focusing on antibiotics in the final phases of clinical development and on the strategies employed by novel synthetic antimicrobial peptides. Expert opinion: Several novel synthetic antimicrobials are currently in the pipeline, and it appears that new antimicrobial peptides or mimetics will soon be made available, expanding the opportunities to treat nosocomial pneumonia. However, the approval process for use in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia is arduous. Given that significant investments by pharmaceutical companies have ended in failure to obtain the approval of regulatory agencies, novel platforms for antimicrobial discovery are needed. The identification of new and fully synthetic chemical structures with activity against nosocomial pathogens needs to be followed by preclinical studies in large animals and by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in specific critically ill populations to assess lung penetration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Motos
- Division of Animal Experimentation, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Clinic , Barcelona , Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias , Madrid , Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer , Barcelona , Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Hua Yang
- Division of Animal Experimentation, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Clinic , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Minlan Yang
- Division of Animal Experimentation, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Clinic , Barcelona , Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Antoni Torres
- Division of Animal Experimentation, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Clinic , Barcelona , Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias , Madrid , Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer , Barcelona , Spain.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona , Barcelona , Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
A Pooled Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Iclaprim Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Patients With Intravenous Drug Use: Phase 3 REVIVE Studies. Clin Ther 2019; 41:1090-1096. [PMID: 31030995 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of iclaprim versus vancomycin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) in patients who were intravenous drug users (IVDUs). METHODS A total of 621 patients who were IVDUs from 2 parallel Phase III, double-blind, randomized (1:1), active-controlled, multinational, multicenter trials (REVIVE-1 and REVIVE-2) were analyzed separately and pooled. This post hoc analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety profile of iclaprim 80 mg fixed dose compared with vancomycin 15 mg/kg administered intravenously during 2 h every 12 h for 5-14 days among this population. The primary end point of these studies was to determine whether iclaprim was noninferior (10% margin) to vancomycin in achieving a ≥20% reduction in lesion size at 48-72 h after initiation of treatment with the study drug (early clinical response) in the intent-to-treat population. The safety profile was assessed based on adverse events and laboratory parameters. FINDINGS Iclaprim had higher early clinical response rates (85.8%; 95% CI, 81.5%-89.4%) compared with vancomycin (79.8%; 95% CI, 74.8%-84.2%) among patients with ABSSSIs who were IVDUs, with a treatment difference of +6.00% (95% CI, 0.06-12.0). The safety profile was similar in the iclaprim and vancomycin arms, with 3.7% and 5.0%, respectively, of patients discontinuing study therapy because of adverse events and 1.9% and 3.4%, respectively, of patients developing serious adverse events. IMPLICATIONS Iclaprim had a higher early clinical response rate and favorable safety profile compared with vancomycin for the treatment of ABSSSIs in patients who were IVDUs. Iclaprim may be a valuable treatment option for ABSSSIs in this patient population.
Collapse
|
23
|
In Vitro Activity of Iclaprim against Isolates in Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials (REVIVE-1 and -2) for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63:AAC.02239-18. [PMID: 30642922 DOI: 10.1128/aac.02239-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Iclaprim, a selective bacterial dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, and other antibiotics were tested against Gram-positive isolates from two phase 3 studies of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) (REVIVE-1 and -2). Seven hundred ninety baseline isolates, including Staphylococcus aureus, β-hemolytic streptococci, and Streptococcus anginosus group, underwent antibacterial susceptibility testing. Iclaprim had an MIC90 of 0.12 μg/ml for S. aureus (0.12 μg/ml for methicillin susceptible, 0.25 μg/ml for methicillin resistant), 0.25 μg/ml for β-hemolytic streptococci, and 0.008 μg/ml for S. anginosus group. Iclaprim demonstrated potent activity against these Gram-positive ABSSSI isolates.
Collapse
|
24
|
Surveillance of iclaprim activity: in vitro susceptibility of Gram-positive skin infection pathogens collected from 2015 to 2016 from North America and Europe. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 93:154-158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
25
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Rising rates of multidrug-resistant organisms has necessitated the development of novel antimicrobials. In this review, we will highlight agents that have recently received licensure and those that are in clinical development. RECENT FINDINGS In recent years, development of novel antimicrobial agents has accelerated. Although most studies have targeted the adult population, studies in pediatric patients are underway. Adequately powered clinical trials are needed to establish the safety and role of these new drugs. SUMMARY The recent development of novel antimicrobials to combat multidrug-resistant organisms is encouraging; however, more studies in the pediatric population are needed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Bryant AE, Gomi S, Katahira E, Huang DB, Stevens DL. The effects of iclaprim on exotoxin production in methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol 2019; 68:456-466. [PMID: 30676310 DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Extracellular protein toxins contribute to the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. The present study compared the effects of iclaprim and trimethoprim - two folic acid synthesis inhibitors - with nafcillin and vancomycin on production of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), alpha haemolysin (AH) and toxic-shock syndrome toxin I (TSST-1) in methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (MRSA and VISA, respectively). METHODOLOGY Northern blotting and RT-PCR were used to assess gene transcription; toxin-specific bioassays were used to measure protein toxin production. RESULTS As shown previously, sub-inhibitory concentrations (sub-MIC) of nafcillin increased and prolonged MRSA toxin gene transcription and enhanced PVL, TSST-1 and AH production. Sub-inhibitory doses of iclaprim and trimethoprim delayed maximal AH gene (hla) transcription and suppressed AH production; both drugs delayed, but neither reduced, maximal TSST-1 production. Trimethoprim significantly increased lukF-PV expression and PVL production compared to both untreated and iclaprim-treated cultures. Higher concentrations of iclaprim and trimethoprim markedly suppressed MRSA growth, mRNA synthesis and toxin production. In VISA, iclaprim, vancomycin and nafcillin variably increased tst and hla expression, but only nafcillin increased toxin production. Despite its ability to increase hla expression, iclaprim was the most potent inhibitor of AH production. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that, due to its ability to suppress toxin production, iclaprim should be effective against severe staphylococcal infections caused by toxin-producing MRSA and VISA strains, especially given its ability to concentrate at sites of infection such as skin and skin structures and the lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Bryant
- 1 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sumiko Gomi
- 2 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA
| | - Eva Katahira
- 2 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA
| | | | - Dennis L Stevens
- 1 University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- 2 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Patel N, Huang D, Lodise T. Potential for Cost Saving with Iclaprim Owing to Avoidance of Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Clin Drug Investig 2018; 38:935-943. [PMID: 30105549 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-018-0686-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Vancomycin is the most prescribed antibiotic for hospitalized adults with skin and skin structure infections. Vancomycin is associated with acute kidney injury. Iclaprim is an antibiotic under development for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and is not associated with acute kidney injury. This economic model sought to determine the potential cost saving with iclaprim owing to avoidance of vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury among hospitalized patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS A hospital cost-minimization model was developed to estimate the overall cost impact of replacing empiric vancomycin with iclaprim among hospitalized adult patients with skin and skin structure infections. The structural model included: vancomycin acquisition; vancomycin assay; incidence of vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury; excess hospital length of stay if acute kidney injury occurred; frequency/cost of specialty physician consults after occurrence of acute kidney injury; and probability/cost of acute dialysis as a result of acute kidney injury. Iclaprim treatment duration was 7 days and iclaprim acquisition cost was varied to determine the upper end of the daily iclaprim price that still conferred cost savings relative to vancomycin. Duration of hospitalization for iclaprim was assumed to be the same as patients with no acute kidney injury. RESULTS Based on the overall acute kidney injury rate (9.2%), the neutral acquisition price threshold for iclaprim vs. vancomycin was US$1373.47/regimen. Across various subpopulations where acute kidney injury risk ranged between 9.2 and 16.7%, the daily iclaprim acquisition cost that still conferred cost savings was up to US$300/day. CONCLUSIONS Iclaprim has the potential to reduce the economic burden of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in hospitalized patients at risk for vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury when iclaprim acquisition is US$300/day or less.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nimish Patel
- Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 106 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY, 12208-3492, USA
| | - David Huang
- Motif BioSciences, Inc., 125 Park Avenue, 25th Floor, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Thomas Lodise
- Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 106 New Scotland Ave, Albany, NY, 12208-3492, USA.
- IDRx Solutions LLC, 11 Mohagany Drive, Albany, NY, 12208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
An update on Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis from the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (ISAC). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2018; 53:9-15. [PMID: 30240836 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 09/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|