Hyperoside attenuates carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic fibrosis via the poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1-high mobility group protein 1 pathway

Oxidative stress and inflammation have been implicated in hepatic fibrosis. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities are among the pharmacological effects of hyperoside. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hyperoside on hepatic fibrosis and elucidate the underlying processes that perpetuate this relationship. The findings indicated that hyperoside significantly protects mouse livers against damage, inflammation, and fibrosis. Specifically, attenuation of hepatic fibrosis is associated with lower expression of HMGB1 protein and reduced expression of Toll-like receptor 4, PARP-1, and nuclear factor-kB (NF-κB) p65 mRNA and protein. Furthermore, hyperoside inhibited the cytoplasmic translocation of HMGB1 and nuclear localization of NF-κB p65 in the hepatic tissues of mice. The results of this study indicate that hyperoside may impose a blocking or reversing effect on hepatic fibrosis; additionally, the corresponding hyperoside-dependent mechanism may be linked to PARP-1-HMGB1 pathway regulation.

Clinical efficacy of targeted therapy, immunotherapy combined with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (FOLFOX), and lipiodol embolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocarcinoma

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of targeted therapy and immunotherapy combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of FOLFOX and lipiodol embolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients included in the study were those who received targeted therapy and immunotherapy combined with HAIC of FOLFOX and lipiodol embolization in Zhongshan People's Hospital from December 2020 to June 2021 for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Evaluation indicators included objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median duration of response (mDOR), 1-year overall survival rate (OS), surgical conversion rate, and adverse events. Treatment response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST and RECIST v1.1). A total of 35 patients were included in this study, 30 of whom completed treatment evaluation. According to mRECIST evaluation criteria, the objective response rate (ORR) was 83.3% (25/30); the complete response (CR) was 60% (18/30); the partial response (PR) was 23.3% (7/30), and stable disease (SD) was 16.7% (5/30). The mDOR was 10.3 months (95% Cl: 8.27-NE), and the mPFS was 13.2 months (95% CI: 10.3-NE); the surgical conversion rate was 30.0% (9/30). The 1-year OS was 96.7%. There were no serious surgical complications and grade 4 or 5 adverse events of targeted therapy, immunotherapy and HAIC. Some patients had grade 3 adverse reactions in gastrointestinal toxicity or hepatotoxicity, and the adverse reactions were improved after corresponding symptomatic treatment. We concluded that HAIC of FOLFOX and lipiodol embolization combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy had a significant curative effect in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, with no serious adverse reactions and a high rate of surgical conversion rate.

Engineered peptide PLG0206 overcomes limitations of a challenging antimicrobial drug class

The absence of novel antibiotics for drug-resistant and biofilm-associated infections is a global public health crisis. Antimicrobial peptides explored to address this need have encountered significant development challenges associated with size, toxicity, safety profile, and pharmacokinetics. We designed PLG0206, an engineered antimicrobial peptide, to address these limitations. PLG0206 has broad-spectrum activity against >1,200 multidrug-resistant (MDR) ESKAPEE clinical isolates, is rapidly bactericidal, and displays potent anti-biofilm activity against diverse MDR pathogens. PLG0206 displays activity in diverse animal infection models following both systemic (urinary tract infection) and local (prosthetic joint infection) administration. These findings support continuing clinical development of PLG0206 and validate use of rational design for peptide therapeutics to overcome limitations associated with difficult-to-drug pharmaceutical targets.

In vitro activity of iclaprim and comparator agents against Listeria monocytogenes clinical isolates from 2012 to 2018

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the in vitro activity of iclaprim and comparators against 40 Listeria monocytogenes clinical isolates mostly (95%) from patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) from the USA, Australia/New Zealand, Latin America and Europe collected between 2012-2018.

METHODS

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretations were based on CLSI criteria.

RESULTS

The iclaprim MIC₉₀ value for all L. monocytogenes was 0.015 μg/mL. The MIC_50/90 values for iclaprim were 4-fold lower than trimethoprim, the only FDA-approved dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, against all L. monocytogenes.

CONCLUSION

Iclaprim demonstrated lower MIC values than trimethoprim against a collection (2012-2018) of L. monocytogenes clinical isolates mostly from patients with BSI from the USA, Australia/New Zealand, Latin America and Europe.

The activity of the diaminopyrimidine dihydrofolate reducatase inhibitor, iclaprim, against Toxoplasma gondii in an in vitro model: a pilot study

The objective of this pilot study was to examine the activity of iclaprim, a diaminopyrimidine dihydrofolate reducatase inhibitor, in an in vitro infection model of infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Toxoplasma growth was assessed by enzyme linked immunoassay (ELISA) performed directly on the fixed cultures using a peroxidase labeled monoclonal antibody directed against the SAG-l surface protein of T. gondii. For each well, the results were expressed as optical density (OD) values. Iclaprim inhibited T. gondii growth at concentrations between 0.1 and 10 mg/L; the IC₅₀ was estimated at 0.26 mg/L (95% confidence interval 0.22-0.33). Iclaprim was about 10 times more active than trimethoprim, which had an IC₅₀ of 2.3 mg/L. Iclaprim demonstrated synergistic effects at concentrations of 0.02, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/L when combined with subinhibitory concentrations of sulfamethoxazole (0.1 or 0.02 mg/L). These results show that iclaprim is a potent inhibitor of T. gondii growth in vitro. In addition, iclaprim exhibited synergy in vitro when tested in the presence of sulfamethoxazole. Iclaprim should be further investigated as an agent for the treatment or prophylaxis of toxoplasmosis.

A pooled analysis of patients with wound infections in the Phase 3 REVIVE trials: randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iclaprim versus vancomycin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

Introduction. Iclaprim is a diaminopyrimidine antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to Gram-positive pathogens.Aim. This analysis evaluates patients with wound infections from two Phase 3 trials of ABSSSI.Methodology. Six-hundred-two patients with wound infections from two Phase 3, double-blinded, randomized, multicenter, active controlled trials (REVIVE-1/-2) were evaluated in a post hoc analysis of iclaprim 80 mg compared with vancomycin 15 mg kg^-1 administered intravenously every 12 h for 5-14 days. The primary endpoint was to determine whether iclaprim was non-inferior (10 % margin) to vancomycin in achieving a ≥20 % reduction from baseline in lesion size 48-72 h after starting study drug (early clinical response [ECR]). Safety was assessed.Results. In REVIVE-1, ECR was 83.5 % with iclaprim versus 79.7 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 3.77%, 95 % CI -4.50%, 12.04%). In REVIVE-2, ECR was 82.7 % with iclaprim versus 76.3 % with vancomycin (treatment difference 6.38%, 95 % CI -3.35%, 16.12%). In the pooled dataset, iclaprim had similar ECR rates compared with vancomycin among wound infection patients (83.2 % vs 78.2 %) with a treatment difference of 5.01 % (95 % CI -1.29%, 11.32%). The safety profile was similar in iclaprim- and vancomycin-treated patients, except for a higher incidence of diarrhea with vancomycin (n=17) compared with iclaprim (n=6) and fatigue with iclaprim (n=17) compared with vancomycin (n=8).Conclusion. Based on early clinical response, iclaprim achieved non-inferiority to vancomycin with a similar safety profile in patients with wound infections suspected or confirmed as caused by Gram-positive pathogens. Iclaprim may be a valuable treatment option for wound infections.

Worldwide surveillance of Iclaprim activity: In Vitro susceptibility of gram-positive pathogens collected from patients with skin and skin structure infections from 2013 to 2017

Iclaprim is a novel diaminopyrimidine, which inhibits bacterial dihydrofolate reductase, and it is active against Gram-positive pathogens including emerging drug-resistant pathogens. In vitro activity of iclaprim and comparators against 1365 Gram-positive clinical isolates from patients with skin and skin structure infections (SSSI) from the United States, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe, Africa or Middle East collected between 2013 and 2017 were tested. Susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) interpretations were based on CLSI criteria. MIC₉₀ for all S.aureus, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, S. agalactiae, S. anginosus, S. constellatus, S. dysgalactiae and S. intermedius were 0.12, 0.12, 0.5, 0.03, 0.5, ≤0.004, ≤0.004, 0.12, and 0.008 μg/ml, respectively. The MIC for iclaprim was 8 to 32-fold lower than trimethoprim, the only FDA approved dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, against all Gram-positive isolates including resistant phenotypes. Iclaprim demonstrated lower MICs than trimethoprim against a collection (2013-2017) of Gram-positive clinical isolates from patients with SSSI from the United States, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Europe.

A Multicenter Evaluation of Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Background

We sought to determine the real-world incidence of and risk factors for vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury (V-AKI) in hospitalized adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI).

Methods

Retrospective, observational, cohort study at ten U.S. medical centers between 2015 and 2019. Hospitalized patients treated with vancomycin (≥ 72 h) for ABSSSI and ≥ one baseline AKI risk factor were eligible. Patients with end-stage kidney disease, on renal replacement therapy or AKI at baseline, were excluded. The primary outcome was V-AKI by the vancomycin guidelines criteria.

Results

In total, 415 patients were included. V-AKI occurred in 39 (9.4%) patients. Independent risk factors for V-AKI were: chronic alcohol abuse (aOR 4.710, 95% CI 1.929–11.499), no medical insurance (aOR 3.451, 95% CI 1.310–9.090), ICU residence (aOR 4.398, 95% CI 1.676–11.541), Gram-negative coverage (aOR 2.926, 95% CI 1.158–7.392) and vancomycin duration (aOR 1.143, 95% CI 1.037–1.260). Based on infection severity and comorbidities, 34.7% of patients were candidates for oral antibiotics at baseline and 39.3% had non-purulent cellulitis which could have been more appropriately treated with a beta-lactam. Patients with V-AKI had significantly longer hospital lengths of stay (9 vs. 6 days, p = 0.001), higher 30-day readmission rates (30.8 vs. 9.0%, p < 0.001) and increased all-cause 30-day mortality (5.1 vs. 0.3%, p = 0.024)

Conclusions

V-AKI occurred in approximately one in ten ABSSSI patients and may be largely prevented by preferential use of oral antibiotics whenever possible, using beta-lactams for non-purulent cellulitis and limiting durations of vancomycin therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-019-00278-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

In Vitro Activities of β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Antimicrobial Agents against Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Pathogens

We tested the in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, and 11 other antimicrobial agents against 420 Burkholderia, Achromobacter, Stenotrophomonas, and Pandoraea strains, 89% of which were cultured from respiratory specimens from persons with cystic fibrosis. Among the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor agents, meropenem-vaborbactam had the greatest activity against Burkholderia and Achromobacter, including multidrug-resistant and extensively-drug-resistant strains. None of the newer β-lactam-β-lactamase combination drugs showed increased activity compared to that of the older agents against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia or Pandoraea spp.

442. Risk Score for Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Disclosures

2289. Bacterial Causes of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI) in Patients with Intravenous Drug Use (IVDU): Phase 3 REVIVE Studies

Background

Opioid addiction in the United States has reached epidemic proportions threatening public health. This analysis evaluates the baseline characteristics and bacterial causes of ABSSSI in patients who were IVDU from two parallel Phase 3 trials comparing the treatment of iclaprim with vancomycin.

Methods

A total of 621 patients who were IVDU from two parallel Phase 3, double-blind, randomized (1:1), active-controlled, multinational, multicenter trials (REVIVE-1 and REVIVE-2) were analyzed both separately and pooled. This post-hoc analysis summarizes the baseline bacterial causes of ABSSSI identified among IVDU. Per protocol, ABSSSI (major abscesses, cellulitis, or wound infections) were defined as having either the presence of purulent or seropurulent drainage before or after surgical intervention of the wound or at least 3 of the following signs and symptoms: discharge, erythema (extending at least 2 cm beyond the wound edge in any direction), swelling and/or induration, heat and/or localized warmth, and/or pain and/or tenderness to palpation. IVDU was defined based on subjected-reported medical history. At the baseline visit, ABSSSI were sampled for microbiological culture. Cultures were performed locally, and isolates were submitted to the central microbiology laboratory.

Results

Among IVDU with ABSSSI, average age was 44 years, 67.6% were male, average lesion size was 322 cm2, 10.8% had abnormal renal function (CrCl ≤ 90 mL/minute), and 3.9% had bacteremia. The bacterial causes of ABSSSI among IVDU are shown in the Table.

Conclusion

IVDU, a growing population, are vulnerable to ABSSSI. S. aureus, including MRSA, and S. anginosus group were the most commonly identified bacterial causes of ABSSSI in patients who are IVDU. Therefore, antibiotic selection should cover these bacteria among IVDU who present with an ABSSSI.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

439. Iclaprim Use for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection (ABSSSI) is Not Associated with Hyperkalemia: Phase 3 REVIVE Studies

Background

Trimethoprim inhibits sodium channels in the distal portion of the renal tubule, thereby impairing renal potassium excretion. Trimethoprim has been associated with a greater risk of hyperkalemia compared with other antibiotics (amoxicillin, nitrofurantoin, cefalexin, ciprofloxacin). An analysis of Phase 3 studies was conducted to determine whether iclaprim, under development for ABSSSI and also a selective bacterial dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor like trimethoprim, is associated with hyperkalemia, relative to vancomycin, an antibiotic not associated with hyperkalemia.

Methods

A post-hoc safety analysis was conducted on pooled results of two Phase 3, double-blind, randomized (1:1), active-controlled trials (REVIVE-1/-2) in patients with ABSSSI. These trials compared iclaprim 80 mg fixed doses with vancomycin 15 mg/kg; both administered intravenously every 12 hours for 5–14 days. Hyperkalemia was defined as serum potassium (K) ≥5.5 mmol/L, if normal at baseline, while on study drug. Hyperkalemia was compared between treatment groups and stratified subgroup comparisons were performed.

Results

Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were similar between the pooled iclaprim and vancomycin groups (table). Hyperkalemia occurred during treatment in 1.5% (9/592) and 2.5% (15/599) of patients treated with iclaprim and vancomycin, respectively. Of the patients with hyperkalemia, one patient in each treatment group had moderate to severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 15–59 mL/minute). Among patients with moderate to severe renal impairment on any RAS, KSD or K supplements, hyperkalemia occurred in 1/16 and 0/16 patients in the iclaprim and vancomycin groups, respectively, and in 2/83 and 0/46 patients with mild to no renal impairment. No patients with hyperkalemia experienced adverse events of palpitations, chest pain, myalgia, muscular weakness or fatigue.

Conclusion

No differences in hyperkalemia were seen between the iclaprim and vancomycin groups in the Phase 3 REVIVE studies. In general, few cases of hyperkalemia occurred among patients with renal impairment treated with concomitant angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers treated with iclaprim.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Evaluation of in vitro activity of iclaprim in combination with other antimicrobials against pulmonary pathogens: a pilot study

In this pilot study, the in vitro antimicrobial activity of iclaprim, a diaminopyrimidine, tested in combination with other antimicrobials against recent and common Gram-positive and Gram-negative respiratory pathogens, was examined by the checkerboard method. The range of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for iclaprim against all bacteria tested in the study was 0.03 to >128 µg ml⁻¹. Iclaprim exhibited synergy with sulfamethoxazole against 11 of the 16 bacterial strains tested, with mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values of 0.2–0.5. Synergy with sulfamethoxazole was demonstrated against all Gram-positive bacteria and selected Gram-negative bacteria. Neither synergy nor antagonism was observed for combinations of iclaprim with ampicillin, meropenem, tetracycline, levofloxacin, aztreonam, piperacillin/tazobactam, colistin, cefepime or gentamicin against any of the bacterial strains tested. The significant reduction in the MIC values observed with the combination of iclaprim and sulfamethoxazole demonstrates that this regimen could be effective against common Gram-positive and selected Gram-negative respiratory bacteria.

The Basics and the Advancements in Diagnosis of Bacterial Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are the leading infectious cause of death and the sixth-leading cause of death overall worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae, with more than 90 serotypes, remains the most common identified cause of community-acquired acute bacterial pneumonia. Antibiotics treat LRTIs with a bacterial etiology. With the potential for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, defining the etiology of the LRTI is imperative for appropriate patient treatment. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are point-of-care tests that may differentiate bacterial versus viral etiologies of LRTIs. Major advancements are currently advancing the ability to make rapid diagnoses and identification of the bacterial etiology of LRTIs, which will continue to support antimicrobial stewardship, and is the focus of this review.

The effects of iclaprim on exotoxin production in methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

PURPOSE

Extracellular protein toxins contribute to the pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus infections. The present study compared the effects of iclaprim and trimethoprim - two folic acid synthesis inhibitors - with nafcillin and vancomycin on production of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), alpha haemolysin (AH) and toxic-shock syndrome toxin I (TSST-1) in methicillin-resistant and vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (MRSA and VISA, respectively).

METHODOLOGY

Northern blotting and RT-PCR were used to assess gene transcription; toxin-specific bioassays were used to measure protein toxin production.

RESULTS

As shown previously, sub-inhibitory concentrations (sub-MIC) of nafcillin increased and prolonged MRSA toxin gene transcription and enhanced PVL, TSST-1 and AH production. Sub-inhibitory doses of iclaprim and trimethoprim delayed maximal AH gene (hla) transcription and suppressed AH production; both drugs delayed, but neither reduced, maximal TSST-1 production. Trimethoprim significantly increased lukF-PV expression and PVL production compared to both untreated and iclaprim-treated cultures. Higher concentrations of iclaprim and trimethoprim markedly suppressed MRSA growth, mRNA synthesis and toxin production. In VISA, iclaprim, vancomycin and nafcillin variably increased tst and hla expression, but only nafcillin increased toxin production. Despite its ability to increase hla expression, iclaprim was the most potent inhibitor of AH production.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that, due to its ability to suppress toxin production, iclaprim should be effective against severe staphylococcal infections caused by toxin-producing MRSA and VISA strains, especially given its ability to concentrate at sites of infection such as skin and skin structures and the lung.

Iclaprim activity against wild-type and corresponding thymidine kinase-deficient Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse protection model

The in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitors are inhibited in the presence of free thymidine in the growth milieu and in rodent efficacy models. However, for thymidine kinase (TK) deficient mutant bacteria, the presence of free thymidine does not impact the activity of DHFR inhibitors, and these mutants were used to assess the in vivo efficacy of the DHFR inhibitor, iclaprim. The efficacies of iclaprim, trimethoprim, and vancomycin were evaluated in a systemic mouse infection model. Female CD-1 mice were infected intraperitoneally (IP) with wild-type Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MSSA) or AW 6 (MRSA) or their corresponding isogenic TK-deficient mutant S. aureus strains AH 1246 and AH 1252. Iclaprim showed potent antibacterial activity against both the TK-deficient mutant S. aureus strains, with PD₅₀ values of 1.8 and < 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, for strains AH 1246 and AH 1252. In contrast, poor antibacterial activity was observed against corresponding wild-type (TK competent) S. aureus strains, with PD₅₀ values of 10.8 and 2.2 mg/kg, respectively, for strains ATCC 25923 and AW 6. This study confirms that thymidine plays an important antagonistic role when determining the efficacy of DHFR inhibitors in vivo. This is the first study to show that iclaprim is active against TK-deficient S. aureus strains in a systemic mouse infection model, and that TK-deficient mutants may be used to evaluate iclaprim's activity in rodent models in vivo.

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of iclaprim activity against wild-type and corresponding thymidine kinase-deficient Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse abscess model

The efficacy of iclaprim against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and its corresponding isogenic TK-deficient mutant S. aureus strain AH 1246 mixed with cytodex beads was studied in a mouse abscess infection model. Iclaprim (2-80 mg kg^-1) administered as a single dose via the subcutaneous route (2 h post-infection) was efficacious against the TK-deficient mutant with 1 and 2 log10 c.f.u. reductions at the 24 h post initiation of treatment time point, at doses of 14.4 and 30 mg kg^-1, respectively. In contrast, poor antibacterial activity was observed against corresponding wild-type (TK-competent) S. aureus strain, ATCC 25923, at all doses tested. The PK/PD parameter which appeared to correlate best with efficacy was AUC/MIC (R²=0.91). This study showed that TK-deficient mutants may be used to evaluate DHFRi activity and PK/PD relationship in a mouse abscess model.

Iclaprim: a differentiated option for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections

INTRODUCTION

Iclaprim is a selective bacterial dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) inhibitor. Although there are alternative options for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), iclaprim is differentiated from other available antibiotics. Areas covered: Iclaprim is under clinical development for ABSSSI. This review summarizes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, microbiology, clinical development program, and the differentiation of iclaprim from other antibiotics. Expert commentary: Iclaprim has a different mechanism of action (DHFR inhibitor) compared to most other antibiotics, is active and rapidly bactericidal against Gram-positive pathogens including antibiotic-resistant pathogens, and suppresses bacterial exotoxins (alpha hemolysin, Panton Valentine leukocidin, and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1). Compared to trimethoprim, iclaprim has lower MIC_90s, can be given without a sulfonamide, overcomes select trimethoprim resistance, and does not cause hyperkalemia. Iclaprim is administered as a fixed dose, does not require dose adjustment in renally-impaired or obese patients, and was not associated with nephrotoxicity in the Phase 3 pivotal REVIVE studies. Iclaprim represents a novel, alternative option for the treatment of severe skin and skin structure infections due to Gram-positive bacteria, particularly in patients at risk of acute kidney injury.

Iclaprim, a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor antibiotic in Phase III of clinical development: a review of its pharmacology, microbiology and clinical efficacy and safety

Iclaprim is under clinical development for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and nosocomial pneumonia most often due to Gram-positive bacteria, including infections due to drug-resistant bacteria. In two recent Phase III studies of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, intravenous iclaprim 80 mg every 12 h was noninferior to dose-adjusted vancomycin. Additional studies are planned for patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Iclaprim represents an alternative for the treatment of severe skin and pulmonary infections due to Gram-positive bacteria.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analyses To Determine the Optimal Fixed Dosing Regimen of Iclaprim for Treatment of Patients with Serious Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Pathogens

Iclaprim is a bacterial dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor that is currently being evaluated in two phase 3 trials for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Prior animal infection model studies suggest that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) drivers for efficacy are area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUC0-24ss), AUC/MIC, and time above the MIC during the dosing interval (T > MIC), while QTc prolongation was associated with the maximal concentration at steady state (Cmaxss) in a thorough QTc phase 1 study. Using PK data collected from 470 patients from the previously conducted phase 3 complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) trials, population PK modeling and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) were used to identify a fixed iclaprim dosage regimen for the ongoing phase 3 ABSSSI studies that maximizes AUC0-24ss, AUC/MIC, and T > MIC while minimizing the probability of a Cmaxss of ≥800 ng/ml relative to the values for the previously employed cSSSI regimen of 0.8 mg/kg of body weight infused intravenously over 0.5 h every 12 h. The MCS analyses indicated that administration of 80 mg as a 2-h infusion every 12 h provides 28%, 28%, and 32% increases in AUC0-24ss, AUC/MIC, and T > MIC, respectively, compared to values for the 0.8-mg/kg cSSSI regimen, while decreasing the probability of a Cmaxss of ≥800 ng/ml, by 9%. Based on PK/PD analyses, 80 mg iclaprim administered over 2 h every 12 h was selected as the dosing scheme for subsequent phase 3 clinical trials.

An Updated Review of Iclaprim: A Potent and Rapidly Bactericidal Antibiotic for the Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by Gram-Positive Including Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

New antibiotics are needed because of the increased morbidity and mortality associated with multidrug-resistant bacteria. Iclaprim, a bacterial dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, not currently approved, is being studied for the treatment of skin infections and nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-positve bacteria, including multidrug-resistant bacteria. Iclaprim showed noninferiority at -10% to linezolid in 1 of 2 phase 3 studies for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections with a weight-based dose (0.8 mg/kg) but did not show noninferiority at -10% to linezolid in a second phase 3 study. More recently, iclaprim has shown noninferiority at -10% to vancomycin in 2 phase 3 studies for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections with an optimized fixed dose (80 mg). A phase 3 study for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia is upcoming. If, as anticipated, iclaprim becomes available for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections, it will serve as an alternative to current antibiotics for treatment of severe infections. This article will provide an update to the chemistry, preclinical, pharmacology, microbiology, clinical and regulatory status of iclaprim.

The effect of pulmonary surfactant on the in vitro activity of Iclaprim against common respiratory bacterial pathogens

The in vitro antimicrobial activity of iclaprim, a novel diaminopyrimidine, against common respiratory bacteria remained unchanged in the presence of pulmonary surfactant (Survanta®) at concentrations that greatly antagonized the antimicrobial activity of daptomycin. These results indicate that iclaprim could be a potential treatment for pneumonia caused by susceptible and multidrug resistant bacteria.

A Phase II Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iclaprim Versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Suspected or Confirmed to be Due to Gram-positive Pathogens

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this Phase II study was to compare the clinical cure rates of 2 iclaprim dosages versus vancomycin in the treatment of patients with nosocomial pneumonia suspected or confirmed to be caused by gram-positive pathogens.

METHODS

This study was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. A total of 70 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive iclaprim 0.8 mg/kg IV q12h (iclaprim q12h; n = 23), iclaprim 1.2 mg/kg IV q8h (iclaprim q8h; n = 24), or vancomycin 1 g IV q12h (vancomycin; n = 23) for 7 to 14 days. The primary end point was clinical cure in the intention-to-treat population at test of cure (TOC; 7 [1] days' posttreatment) visit.

FINDINGS

The baseline and demographic characteristics of patients treated with either iclaprim or vancomycin were comparable. Cure rates in the intention-to-treat population were 73.9% (17 of 23), 62.5% (15 of 24), and 52.2% (12 of 23) at the TOC visit in the iclaprim q12h, iclaprim q8h, and vancomycin groups, respectively (iclaprim q12h vs vancomycin, P = 0.13; iclaprim q8h vs vancomycin, P = 0.47). The death rates within 28 days of the start of treatment were 8.7% (2 of 23), 12.5% (3 of 24), and 21.7% (5 of 23) for the iclaprim q12h, iclaprim q8h, and vancomycin groups (no statistically significant differences). The adverse event profile of both iclaprim dosing regimens was similar to that of vancomycin.

IMPLICATIONS

Iclaprim had clinical cure rates and a safety profile comparable with vancomycin among patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Iclaprim could be an important new therapeutic option for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia, and a pivotal clinical trial is warranted to evaluate its safety and efficacy in this indication.

Response of HIV-Infected Patients with Asymptomatic Syphilis to Intensive Intramuscular Therapy with Ceftriaxone or Procaine Penicillin

The objective of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the response of HIV-infected patients with asymptomatic syphilis to one of two intensive antibiotic treatment regimens. Thirty-one HIV-infected patients with serum rapid plasma reagin titre ≥1:4 and no clinical findings of syphilis were randomized to receive daily intramuscular injections of ceftriaxone or procaine penicillin (plus oral probenecid) for 15 days; 24 returned for follow-up study. Seven of 10 (70%) procaine penicillin-treated patients and 10 of 14 (71%) ceftriaxone-treated patients had a ≥4-fold decline in RPR ( P=0.94); two penicillin-treated and one ceftriaxone-treated patient relapsed. Two patients failed ceftriaxone therapy. Three penicillin-treated, and two ceftriaxone-treated patients were serofast. Serological responses were similar in those patients with and without asymptomatic neurosyphilis. There was no difference in the serologic response to daily treatment with ceftriaxone vs that with procaine penicillin plus probenecid; both treatments were associated with comparatively high rates of serological non-response and relapse.

Value of C-arm computed tomography in radiofrequency ablation of small lung lesions

This study aimed to explore the value of C-arm computed tomography (CT) applications in radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small lung lesions. The puncture success rate, cumulative survival rate, tumor response rate, complications, and radiation dose during C-arm CT-guided RFA of 36 small lung lesions in 34 patients were analyzed. In 35 RFA procedures for 36 small lung lesions, the puncture success rate was 100%. There were 7 cases of complications, including 4 cases of pneumothorax (puncture suction or closed chest drainage was not required) and 3 cases of hemoptysis. The cumulative survival rate in the 34 patients after RFA was 100% at 6 months, 69.0% at 1 year, and 60.0% at 2 years. In assessments of 36 foci imaged during the follow-up period, the total response rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were 77.8% (28/36), 69.7% (23/33), and 61.3% (19/31), respectively. The mean cumulative dose and average effective dose during surgery were 120.1 ± 61.4 mGy and 3.5 ± 1.7 mSv, respectively. The application of C-arm CT to RFA of small lung lesions could provide abundant information to the surgeon and increase the lesion puncture success rate and is considered to be a promising image-guided technology.

Linezolid effects on bacterial toxin production and host immune response: review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Linezolid is active against a broad range of gram-positive pathogens and has the potential to also affect production of bacterial toxins and host immune function.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the evidence for direct effects of linezolid on bacterial toxin synthesis and modulation of host immune responses.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed of the PubMed and OVID databases. Reviews and non-English language articles were excluded. Articles with information on the effect of linezolid on bacterial toxin synthesis and immune responses were selected for further review, and data were summarized.

RESULTS

Substantial in vitro evidence supports effects of linezolid on bacterial toxin production; however, the strength of the evidence and the nature of the effects are mixed. In the case of Staphylococcus aureus, repeated observations support the inhibition of production of certain staphylococcal toxins (Panton-Valentine leukocidin, protein A, and α- and β-hemolysin) by linezolid, whereas only solitary reports indicate inhibition (toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, coagulase, autolysins, and enterotoxins A and B) or stimulation (phenol-soluble modulins) of toxin production by linezolid. In the case of Streptococcus pyogenes, there are solitary reports of linezolid inhibition (protein M, deoxyribonuclease, and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins A, B, and F) or stimulation (immunogenic secreted protein 2 and streptococcal inhibitor of complement-mediated lysis) of toxin production, whereas published evidence for effects on streptolysin O production is conflicting. In vitro data are limited, but suggest that linezolid might also have indirect effects on host cytokine expression through inhibition of bacterial production of toxins. In vivo data from preclinical animal studies and a single clinical study in humans are limited and equivocal insofar as a potential role for linezolid in modulating the host inflammatory response; this is due in part to the difficulty in isolating antimicrobial effects and toxin synthesis inhibitory effects of linezolid from any secondary effects on host inflammatory response.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence supports the possibility that linezolid can inhibit, and in some cases stimulate, toxin production in clinically relevant pathogens. However, more research will be needed to determine the potential clinical relevance of those findings for linezolid.

Plasmid transferability of KPC into a virulent K2 serotype Klebsiella pneumoniae

BACKGROUND

KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are associated with high mortality; however, their virulence determinants are not well defined.

METHODS

We investigated the virulence and plasmid transferability among KPC-containing K. pneumoniae isolates.

RESULTS

KPC-2 and -3 were successfully conjugated and retained by a virulent K2 K. pneumoniae recipient isolate. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed KPC-2 and -3 donor strains were resistant to more than four classes of antibiotics while the K2 isolate was only initially resistant to ampicillin. After conjugation of KPC-2 and -3, the K2 K. pneumoniae transconjugants became resistant to all beta-lactams. Additionally, the KPC K2 K. pneumoniae transconjugants continued to retain its high serum resistance and murine lethality.

CONCLUSIONS

Conjugation and retainment of KPC by virulent K2 K. pneumoniae and the ability of the tranconjugants to maintain its high serum resistance and murine lethality after conjugation was demonstrated in this study. These findings are concerning for the potential of KPC-like genes to disseminate among virulent K. pneumoniae isolates.

Combination therapy with lysin CF-301 and antibiotic is superior to antibiotic alone for treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced murine bacteremia

Lysins are bacteriophage-derived enzymes that degrade bacterial peptidoglycans. Lysin CF-301 is being developed to treat Staphylococcus aureus because of its potent, specific, and rapid bacteriolytic effects. It also demonstrates activity on drug-resistant strains, has a low resistance profile, eradicates biofilms, and acts synergistically with antibiotics. CF-301 was bacteriolytic against 250 S. aureus strains tested including 120 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates. In time-kill studies with 62 strains, CF-301 reduced S. aureus by 3-log₁₀ within 30 minutes compared to 6–12 hours required by antibiotics. In bacteremia, CF-301 increased survival by reducing blood MRSA 100-fold within 1 hour. Combinations of CF-301 with vancomycin or daptomycin synergized in vitro and increased survival significantly in staphylococcal-induced bacteremia compared to treatment with antibiotics alone (P < .0001). Superiority of CF-301 combinations with antibiotics was confirmed in 26 independent bacteremia studies. Combinations including CF-301 and antibiotics represent an attractive alternative to antibiotic monotherapies currently used to treat S. aureus bacteremia.

Lysins: the arrival of pathogen-directed anti-infectives

Lysins represent a novel class of anti-infectives derived from bacteriophage. Lysins are bacterial cell-wall hydrolytic enzymes that selectively and rapidly kill (≥3 log c.f.u. in 30 min) specific Gram-positive bacteria providing a targeted therapeutic approach with minimal impact on unrelated commensal flora. The potential for bacterial resistance to lysins is considered low due to targeting of highly conserved peptidoglycan components. Through cutting-edge genetic engineering, lysins can be assembled into large libraries of anti-infective agents tailored to any bacterium of interest including drug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens such as meticillin- and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Lysins can eliminate bacteria systemically and topically from mucosal surfaces and biofilms, as evidenced by experimental models of sepsis, endocarditis, pneumonia, meningitis, and nasopharyngeal, skin and vaginal decolonization. Furthermore, lysins can act synergistically with antibiotics and, in the process, resensitize bacteria to non-susceptible antibiotics. Clinical trials are being prepared to assess the safety and pharmacokinetic properties of lysins in humans.

A risk score for identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients presenting to the hospital with pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represents an important pathogen in healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP). The concept of HCAP, though, may not perform well as a screening test for MRSA and can lead to overuse of antibiotics. We developed a risk score to identify patients presenting to the hospital with pneumonia unlikely to have MRSA.

METHODS

We identified patients admitted with pneumonia (Apr 2005-Mar 2009) at 62 hospitals in the US. We only included patients with lab evidence of bacterial infection (e.g., positive respiratory secretions, blood, or pleural cultures or urinary antigen testing). We determined variables independently associated with the presence of MRSA based on logistic regression (two-thirds of cohort) and developed a risk prediction model based on these factors. We validated the model in the remaining population.

RESULTS

The cohort included 5975 patients and MRSA was identified in 14%. The final risk score consisted of eight variables and a potential total score of 10. Points were assigned as follows: two for recent hospitalization or ICU admission; one each for age < 30 or > 79 years, prior IV antibiotic exposure, dementia, cerebrovascular disease, female with diabetes, or recent exposure to a nursing home/long term acute care facility/skilled nursing facility. This study shows how the prevalence of MRSA rose with increasing score after stratifying the scores into Low (0 to 1 points), Medium (2 to 5 points) and High (6 or more points) risk. When the score was 0 or 1, the prevalence of MRSA was < 10% while the prevalence of MRSA climbed to > 30% when the score was 6 or greater.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA represents a cause of pneumonia presenting to the hospital. This simple risk score identifies patients at low risk for MRSA and in whom anti-MRSA therapy might be withheld.

Rifaximin therapy of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain and altered bowel habits in the absence of specific organic pathology. Although the underlying pathogenesis of IBS is not well-understood, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) or other abnormalities in the gut flora is believed to contribute to the development of a subset of IBS cases. Rifaximin is a poorly absorbed antimicrobial with activity against enteric pathogens. A number of studies have shown a significant improvement in IBS symptoms with antibiotic therapy including rifaximin. In this review, we discuss the pharmacokinetics, in vitro susceptibility profile, and efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of rifaximin treatment of IBS.

Incidence of Intravenous Catheter-Site Complications in Patients Treated with Linezolid or Vancomycin for Skin Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare all-cause adverse events (AEs) and those caused by intravenous (IV) catheter-site complications (IVCSCs) using data from a previously published study of the use of linezolid or vancomycin for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) suspected or proven to be caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Methods

To examine the incidence of AEs caused by the 2 antibiotic treatments, we conducted a post hoc analysis of data from a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 4 study. Patients were randomized to treatment with either oral (PO) or IV linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours or with IV vancomycin 15 mg/kg every 12 hours with dose adjustment as needed. Study treatment was administered for 7 to 14 days. We excluded patients with baseline bacteremia (n = 11) and those who started on PO linezolid (n = 215). We analyzed data only from patients who received at least 1 dose of IV study medication.

Results

Patient demographics and types of cSSSI were comparable among patients receiving linezolid (n = 315) and vancomycin (n = 511). Mean durations of IV therapy for patients receiving linezolid and vancomycin were 4.5 days and 7.6 days (1,418 and 3,884 patient-days, respectively). All-cause AEs were reported in 50% and 51% of patients in the linezolid and vancomycin groups, respectively; all-cause IVCSCs were reported in 2% and 7%, respectively. Treatment-related IVCSCs were reported in 1 patient in the linezolid group and 16 patients in the vancomycin group.

Conclusions

The overall rate of AEs was similar among patients receiving linezolid and vancomycin, but AEs caused by IVCSCs were more frequent among patients receiving vancomycin and rare episodes of bacteremia and sepsis were more common in the linezolid group.

Phenotypic and genotypic screening and clonal analysis of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae at a single hospital

Detection of bla(KPC)-harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) in the clinical laboratory remains a difficult task. Decreased ertapenem (ERT) susceptibility has been considered one of the most sensitive phenotypic indicators of K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) production, but has been found to be nonspecific. Susceptibility testing using imipenem or meropenem lacks the sensitivity for detection of KPCs, and there is limited experience using doripenem (DOR). Fifty-five individual ERT-nonsusceptible KP isolates and 19 isolates that were ERT-susceptible, extended spectrum β-lactamase-positive KP were collected from the clinical laboratory and tested for DOR susceptibility by Etest methodology. PCR screening for bla(KPC) was performed on all specimens. All but three isolates with ERT resistance were KPC positive by PCR. Compared to PCR, ERT detection of KPC had a sensitivity of 98% and a false-positive rate of 6%. Overall, there was a 97% agreement between ERT and DOR susceptibility results. However, there was one KPC-positive isolate that was discrepant (ERT susceptible, DOR nonsusceptible by Etest). Selected isolates of KP from both groups underwent pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis to determine the degree of genetic relatedness of KPC-positive and KPC-negative isolates. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of selected KPC-positive and KPC-negative KP identified a common pattern between both groups. The resistance to DOR and/or ERT is sensitive and a specific indicator for detection of bla(KPC) in KP.

Combined retrospective analysis of seven phase II and III trials of the efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae is of concern. Up to 30% of pneumococcal isolates worldwide are multidrug resistant.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis was to assess the effectiveness of linezolid for the treatment of pneumonia caused by S pneumoniae, including multidrug-resistant S pneumoniae (MDRSP).

METHODS

Data from 7 Phase II and III clinical trials that assessed the efficacy of linezolid in community- or hospital-acquired pneumonia were pooled. Adults and children (aged ≤12 years) received linezolid 600 mg and 10 mg/kg, respectively, IV or PO q12h for 7 to 14 days, with the exception of patients with documented bacteremia who could be treated for up to 28 days. Patients with a confirmed baseline isolate of S pneumoniae, including MDRSP, were assessed for clinical and microbiological outcomes. MDRSP was defined as an isolated strain of S pneumoniae that was resistant to ≥3 classes of antibiotics. Clinical cure was defined as the resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of pneumonia compared with baseline, with either improvement or absence of progression of abnormalities on chest radiography. Microbiological eradication was defined as documented or presumed eradication at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Results from patients with indeterminate or missing outcomes at TOC were not included in the analyses.

RESULTS

Of the patients with no bacteremia and treated with linezolid, 19 adults had MDRSP and 165 had non-MDRSP, and 3 children had MDRSP and 7 had non-MDRSP. Clinical cure and microbiological eradication rates were not significantly different between those infected with an MDRSP or non-MDRSP pathogen, respectively, in adults (16/19 [84%] and 150/164 [91%]) and children (3/3 [100%] and 7/7 [100%]).

CONCLUSION

Linezolid was efficacious for the treatment of pneumonia caused by S pneumoniae, including multidrug-resistant strains.

Evaluation of steady-state pharmacokinetic interactions between ritonavir-boosted BILR 355, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and lamivudine/zidovudine in healthy subjects

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

BILR 355 is a second generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. It has shown promising in vitro anti-HIV-1 activities and favourable human pharmacokinetic properties after co-administration with ritonavir (RTV). Lamivudine (3TC) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. It is excreted predominantly in urine by a transporter-mediated pathway. These two drugs are likely to be given together to HIV-infected patients. The objective of this study was to investigate any steady-state pharmacokinetic interactions between RTV-boosted BILR 355 and 3TC/zidovudine (ZDV).

METHODS

This was a randomized, open label, prospective study. In group A, 39 healthy subjects were given 3TC/ZDV (150 mg/300 mg) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 7 days, and then BILR 355 and RTV (BILR 355/r, 150 mg/100 mg) were co-administered with this regimen for an additional 7 days. Intensive blood samples were taken on days 7 and 14 for pharmacokinetic assessments. In group B, 12 healthy subjects were given BILR 355/r (150 mg/100 mg) b.i.d. for 7 days. The pharmacokinetic data from group B were pooled with data from group B subjects in other similar studies performed in parallel (BILR 355 alone group in BILR 355 drug-drug interaction studies with tipranavir, lopinavir/RTV, and emtricitabine/tenofovir DF; BILR 355 regimen was the same).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After co-administration with BILR 355/r, the AUC(12,ss) and C(max,ss) of 3TC increased by 45% and 24%, respectively; the elimination half-life (t(1/2) ,ss) of 3TC was significantly increased. However, the pharmacokinetics of ZDV was unchanged. Co-administration with 3TC/ZDV resulted in a 22% decrease in AUC(12,ss) and a 20% decrease in C(max,ss) for BILR 355. The observed increase in exposure and prolongation of t(1/2,ss) of 3TC is potentially related to inhibition of OCT-mediated urinary excretion of 3TC.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Concomitant administration of BILR 355 with 3TC/ZDV resulted in a modest decrease in exposure to BILR 355 and a 45% increase in exposure to 3TC.

The role of rifaximin in the treatment and chemoprophylaxis of travelers' diarrhea

Travelers’ diarrhea is a common illness among international travelers from developed to developing countries. Travelers’ diarrhea is caused by ingestion of contaminated food and water. Bacteria are the primary cause of travelers’ diarrhea. In most surveys, the most common diarrheal pathogen identified is enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. There are several antimicrobial agents available for the treatment of travelers’ diarrhea including rifaximin which is approved in the United States for the treatment of travelers’ diarrhea due to noninvasive E. coli strains. In this review, we will review the most recent advances of rifaximin for the treatment and prevention of travelers’ diarrhea, with regard to its pharmacokinetics, in vitro susceptibility profile, and efficacy and safety data from clinical trials.