In vitro susceptibility of characterized β-lactamase-producing strains tested with avibactam combinations

Evolving resistance landscape in gram-negative pathogens: An update on β-lactam and β-lactam-inhibitor treatment combinations for carbapenem-resistant organisms

Antibiotic resistance has become a global threat as it is continuously growing due to the evolution of β-lactamases diminishing the activity of classic β-lactam (BL) antibiotics. Recent antibiotic discovery and development efforts have led to the availability of β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) with activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamases as well as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO). Nevertheless, there is still a lack of drugs that target metallo-β-lactamases (MBL), which hydrolyze carbapenems efficiently, and oxacillinases (OXA) often present in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. This review aims to provide a snapshot of microbiology, pharmacology, and clinical data for currently available BL/BLI treatment options as well as agents in late stage development for CRO harboring various β-lactamases including MBL and OXA-enzymes.

Dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, including adjustments for renal impairment, for Phase IIa and Phase III evaluation

PURPOSE

A series of iterative population pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses based on emerging data supported dose selection for aztreonam-avibactam, an investigational combination antibiotic for serious Gram-negative bacterial infections.

METHODS

Two iterations of PK models built from avibactam data in infected patients and aztreonam data in healthy subjects with "patient-like" assumptions were used in joint PTA analyses (primary target: aztreonam 60% fT > 8 mg/L, avibactam 50% fT > 2.5 mg/L) exploring patient variability, infusion durations, and adjustments for moderate (estimated creatinine clearance [CrCL] > 30 to ≤ 50 mL/min) and severe renal impairment (> 15 to ≤ 30 mL/min). Achievement of > 90% joint PTA and the impact of differential renal clearance were considerations in dose selection.

RESULTS

Iteration 1 simulations for Phase I/IIa dose selection/modification demonstrated that 3-h and continuous infusions provide comparable PTA; avibactam dose drives joint PTA within clinically relevant exposure targets; and loading doses support more rapid joint target attainment. An aztreonam/avibactam 500/137 mg 30-min loading dose and 1500/410 mg 3-h maintenance infusions q6h were selected for further evaluation. Iteration 2 simulations using expanded PK models supported an alteration to the regimen (500/167 mg loading; 1500/500 mg q6h maintenance 3-h infusions for CrCL > 50 mL/min) and selection of doses for renal impairment for Phase IIa/III clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

A loading dose plus 3-h maintenance infusions of aztreonam-avibactam in a 3:1 fixed ratio q6h optimizes joint PTA. These analyses supported dose selection for the aztreonam-avibactam Phase III clinical program.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01689207; NCT02655419; NCT03329092; NCT03580044.

In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam and comparators against Metallo-β-Lactamase-producing Enterobacterales from ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2016-2020

OBJECTIVES

Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales are a major challenge worldwide due to limited treatment options. Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI), which is under clinical development, has shown activity against MBL-positive isolates. This study evaluated the prevalence of MBL producers and the nature of enzymes among a global collection of clinical isolates of Enterobacterales from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (ATLAS) surveillance program (2016-2020), and the antimicrobial activity of ATM-AVI and comparators against this collection.

METHODS

Non-duplicate clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (N = 106 686) collected across 63 countries were analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using broth microdilution. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. Provisional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoint of ≤8 mg/L was considered for ATM-AVI. β-lactamase genes were characterized by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. The Cochran Armitage Trend test was used to determine significant trends in percentage of isolates over time.

RESULTS

Overall, MBL-positive isolates were 1.6% of total Enterobacterales isolates globally, with a significant increasing trend observed over time, globally and across regions (P < 0.05). New Delhi MBL (NDM) was the most common MBL (83.3%). ATM-AVI demonstrated potent activity against MBL-positive isolates (MIC ≤8 mg/L: 99.4% isolates inhibited; MIC90, 1 mg/L). Consistent activity was also noted across different regions. Potent activity was demonstrated against different NDM variants and MBL-positive isolates co-carrying other carbapenemases (98.1% and 99.7% isolates inhibited at ≤8 mg/L, respectively). About 0.6% MBL-positive isolates (10/1707) had MICs >8 mg/L for ATM-AVI.

CONCLUSION

ATM-AVI demonstrated potent activity against MBL-positive isolates, including NDM variants and MBL-positive isolates co-carrying other carbapenemases, and may represent a good option for treating infections caused by MBL-positive Enterobacterales.

Worldwide trend discovery of structural and functional relationship of metallo-β-lactamase for structure-based drug design: A bibliometric evaluation and patent analysis

Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) is an enzyme produced by clinically important bacteria that can inactivate many commonly used antibiotics, making them a significant concern in treating bacterial infections and the risk of having high antibiotic resistance issues among the community. This review presents a bibliometric and patent analysis of MBL worldwide research trend based on the Scopus and World Intellectual Property Organization databases in 2013-2022. Based on the keywords related to MBL in the article title, abstract, and keywords, 592 research articles were retrieved for further analysis using various tools such as Microsoft Excel to determine the frequency analysis, VOSviewer for bibliometric networks visualization, and Harzing's Publish or Perish for citation metrics analysis. Standard bibliometric parameters were analysed to evaluate the field's research trend, such as the growth of publications, topographical distribution, top subject area, most relevant journal, top cited documents, most relevant authors, and keyword trend analysis. Within 10 years, MBL discovery has shown a steady and continuous growth of interest among the community of researchers. United States of America, China, and the United Kingdom are the top 3 countries contribute high productivity to the field. The patent analysis also shows several impactful filed patents, indicating the significance of development research on the structural and functional relationship of MBL for an effective structure-based drug design (SBDD). Developing new MBL inhibitors using SBDD could help address the research gap and provide new successful therapeutic options for treating MBL-producing bacterial infections.

Approaches to Testing Novel β-Lactam and β-Lactam Combination Agents in the Clinical Laboratory

The rapid emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens has driven the introduction of novel β-lactam combination agents (BLCs) to the antibiotic market: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and sulbactam-durlobactam. These agents are equipped with innovative mechanisms that confer broad Gram-negative activity, notably against certain challenging carbapenemases. While their introduction offers a beacon of hope, clinical microbiology laboratories must navigate the complexities of susceptibility testing for these agents due to their diverse activity profiles against specific β-lactamases and the possibility of acquired resistance mechanisms in some bacterial isolates. This review explores the complexities of these novel antimicrobial agents detailing the intricacies of their application, providing guidance on the nuances of susceptibility testing, interpretation, and result reporting in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Antimicrobial Activities of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents against Enterobacterales Analyzed by ICU and Non-ICU Wards, Infection Sources, and Geographic Regions: ATLAS Program 2016-2020

Increasing antimicrobial resistance among multidrug-resistant (MDR), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), in particular metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-positive strains, has led to limited treatment options in these isolates. This study evaluated the activity of aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) and comparator antimicrobials against Enterobacterales isolates and key resistance phenotypes stratified by wards, infection sources and geographic regions as part of the ATLAS program between 2016 and 2020. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The susceptibility of antimicrobials were interpreted using CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints. A tentative pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoint of 8 µg/mL was considered for ATM-AVI activity. ATM-AVI inhibited ≥99.2% of Enterobacterales isolates across wards and ≥99.7% isolates across infection sources globally and in all regions at ≤8 µg/mL. For resistance phenotypes, ATM-AVI demonstrated sustained activity across wards and infection sources by inhibiting ≥98.5% and ≥99.1% of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, ≥98.6% and ≥99.1% of ESBL-positive isolates, ≥96.8% and ≥90.9% of carbapenem-resistant (CR) isolates, and ≥96.8% and ≥97.4% of MBL-positive isolates, respectively, at ≤8 µg/mL globally and across regions. Overall, our study demonstrated that ATM-AVI represents an important therapeutic option for infections caused by Enterobacterales, including key resistance phenotypes across different wards and infection sources.

In vitro Activity of Cefepime/Avibactam Against Carbapenem Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Integrative Metabolomics-Proteomics Approach for Resistance Mechanism: A Single-Center Study

Purpose

We aimed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial effects of combination of cefepime/avibactam against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) and explore the resistance mechanism of FEP/AVI.

Patients and Methods

This study explored the in vitro antibacterial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and cefepime/avibactam (FEP/AVI) against 40 and 76 CRKP clinical isolates. Proteomics and metabolomics were employed to investigate the resistance mechanisms of CRKP to FEP/AVI.

Results

FEP/AVI (MIC50/MIC90 0.5/4-64/4 μg/mL, resistance rate 17.1%) showed better antibacterial activity against CRKP than CAZ/AVI (MIC50/MIC90 4/4-128/4 μg/mL, resistance rate 20%) in vitro. Bioinformatics analysis showed that the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were enriched in alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and ribosome. Remarkably, transcriptional and translational activity-related pathways were inhibited in FEP/AVI resistant CRKP. Overlap analysis suggested that H-NS might play an important role in resistance to FEP/AVI in CRKP. The mRNA levels of DEPs-related genes (adhE, gltB, purA, ftsI and hns) showed the same trends as DEPs in FEP/AVI susceptible and resistant strains. FEP/AVI resistant isolates demonstrated stronger biofilm formation capacity than susceptible isolates. Metabolomics results showed that disturbed metabolites were mainly lipids, and adenine was decreased in FEP/AVI resistant CRKP.

Conclusion

These results indicated that H-NS, GltB and SpoT may directly or indirectly promote biofilm formation of CRKP and led to FEP/AVI resistance, but inhibited ribosomal function. Our study provides a mechanistic insight into the acquisition of resistance to FEP/AVI in Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Penicillin-Binding Protein 5/6 Acting as a Decoy Target in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Identified by Whole-Cell Receptor Binding and Quantitative Systems Pharmacology

The β-lactam antibiotics have been successfully used for decades to combat susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which has a notoriously difficult to penetrate outer membrane (OM). However, there is a dearth of data on target site penetration and covalent binding of penicillin-binding proteins (PBP) for β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors in intact bacteria. We aimed to determine the time course of PBP binding in intact and lysed cells and estimate the target site penetration and PBP access for 15 compounds in P. aeruginosa PAO1. All β-lactams (at 2 × MIC) considerably bound PBPs 1 to 4 in lysed bacteria. However, PBP binding in intact bacteria was substantially attenuated for slow but not for rapid penetrating β-lactams. Imipenem yielded 1.5 ± 0.11 log10 killing at 1h compared to <0.5 log10 killing for all other drugs. Relative to imipenem, the rate of net influx and PBP access was ~ 2-fold slower for doripenem and meropenem, 7.6-fold for avibactam, 14-fold for ceftazidime, 45-fold for cefepime, 50-fold for sulbactam, 72-fold for ertapenem, ~ 249-fold for piperacillin and aztreonam, 358-fold for tazobactam, ~547-fold for carbenicillin and ticarcillin, and 1,019-fold for cefoxitin. At 2 × MIC, the extent of PBP5/6 binding was highly correlated (r2 = 0.96) with the rate of net influx and PBP access, suggesting that PBP5/6 acted as a decoy target that should be avoided by slowly penetrating, future β-lactams. This first comprehensive assessment of the time course of PBP binding in intact and lysed P. aeruginosa explained why only imipenem killed rapidly. The developed novel covalent binding assay in intact bacteria accounts for all expressed resistance mechanisms.

A therapeutic regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam for a critical patient receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy

The present report firstly described a critically ill patient receiving a dosing regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) (1.875g q24h) to eliminate multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and a scheduled time for prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) every 48h (6h-session beginning 12h after the previous dosage on hemodialysis day). This dosing regimen for CAZ-AVI and a scheduled time for PIRRT allowed pharmacodynamic parameters of ceftazidime and avibactam to have little difference on hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days so that we can maintain a relatively stable drug concentration. Our report highlighted not only the importance of dosing regimens in patients with PIRRT but also the significance of hemodialysis time points during the dosing interval. The innovative therapeutic plan proved to be suitable for patients infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae when on PIRRT according to the trough plasma concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam which were maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration during the dosing interval.

PBP Target Profiling by β-Lactam and β-Lactamase Inhibitors in Intact Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Effects of the Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance Determinants on the Periplasmic Drug Availability

The lack of effective treatment options against Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the main contributors to the silent pandemic. Many antibiotics are ineffective against resistant isolates due to poor target site penetration, efflux, or β-lactamase hydrolysis. Critical insights to design optimized antimicrobial therapies and support translational drug development are needed. In the present work, we analyzed the periplasmic drug uptake and binding to PBPs of 11 structurally different β-lactams and 4 β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) in P. aeruginosa PAO1. The contribution of the most prevalent β-lactam resistance mechanisms to MIC and periplasmic target attainment was also assessed. Bacterial cultures (6.5 log₁₀ CFU/mL) were exposed to 1/2× PAO1 MIC of each antibiotic for 30 min. Unbound PBPs were labeled with Bocillin FL and analyzed using a FluorImager. Imipenem extensively inactivated all targets. Cephalosporins preferentially targeted PBP1a and PBP3. Aztreonam and amdinocillin bound exclusively to PBP3 and to PBP2 and PBP4, respectively. Penicillins bound preferentially to PBP1a, PBP1b, and PBP3. BLIs displayed poor PBP occupancy. Inactivation of oprD elicited a notable reduction of imipenem target attainment, and it was to a lesser extent in the other carbapenems. Improved PBP occupancy was observed for the main targets of the widely used antipseudomonal penicillins, cephalosporins, meropenem, aztreonam, and amdinocillin upon oprM inactivation, in line with MIC changes. AmpC constitutive hyperexpression caused a substantial PBP occupancy reduction for the penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam. Data obtained in this work will support the rational design of optimized β-lactam-based combination therapies against resistant P. aeruginosa infections. IMPORTANCE The growing problem of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative pathogens is linked to three key aspects, (i) the progressive worldwide epidemic spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and pandrug-resistant (PDR) Gram-negative strains, (ii) a decrease in the number of effective new antibiotics against multiresistant isolates, and (iii) the lack of mechanistically informed combinations and dosing strategies. Our combined efforts should focus not only on the development of new antimicrobial agents but the adequate administration of these in combination with other agents currently available in the clinic. Our work determined the effectiveness of these compounds in the clinically relevant bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa at the molecular level, assessing the net influx rate and their ability to access their targets and achieve bacterial killing without generating resistance. The data generated in this work will be helpful for translational drug development.

Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa -an emerging challenge

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) is a major healthcare-associated pathogen worldwide. In the United States, 10–30% of P. aeruginosa isolates are carbapenem-resistant, while globally the percentage varies considerably. A subset of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates harbour carbapenemases, although due in part to limited screening for these enzymes in clinical laboratories, the actual percentage is unknown. Carbapenemase-mediated carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa is a significant concern as it greatly limits the choice of anti-infective strategies, although detecting carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa in the clinical laboratory can be challenging. Such organisms also have been associated with nosocomial spread requiring infection prevention interventions. The carbapenemases present in P. aeruginosa vary widely by region but include the Class A beta-lactamases, KPC and GES; metallo-beta-lactamases IMP, NDM, SPM, and VIM; and the Class D, OXA-48 enzymes. Rapid confirmation and differentiation among the various classes of carbapenemases is key to the initiation of early effective therapy. This may be accomplished using either molecular genotypic methods or phenotypic methods, although both have their limitations. Prompt evidence that rules out carbapenemases guides clinicians to more optimal therapeutic selections based on local phenotypic profiling of non-carbapenemase-producing, carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. This article will review the testing strategies available for optimizing therapy of P. aeruginosa infections.

Drug development concerning metallo-β-lactamases in gram-negative bacteria

β-Lactams have been a clinical focus since their emergence and indeed act as a powerful tool to combat severe bacterial infections, but their effectiveness is threatened by drug resistance in bacteria, primarily by the production of serine- and metallo-β-lactamases. Although once of less clinical relevance, metallo-β-lactamases are now increasingly threatening. The rapid dissemination of resistance mediated by metallo-β-lactamases poses an increasing challenge to public health worldwide and comprises most existing antibacterial chemotherapies. Regrettably, there have been no clinically available inhibitors of metallo-β-lactamases until now. To cope with this unique challenge, researchers are exploring multidimensional strategies to combat metallo-β-lactamases. Several studies have been conducted to develop new drug candidates or calibrate already available drugs against metallo-β-lactamases. To provide an overview of this field and inspire more researchers to explore it further, we outline some promising candidates targeting metallo-β-lactamase producers, with a focus on Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Promising candidates in this review are composed of new antibacterial drugs, non-antibacterial drugs, antimicrobial peptides, natural products, and zinc chelators, as well as their combinations with existing antibiotics. This review may provide ideas and insight for others to explore candidate metallo-β-lactamases as well as promote the improvement of existing data to obtain further convincing evidence.

In vitro activity of aztreonam/avibactam against isolates of Enterobacterales collected globally from ATLAS in 2019

OBJECTIVES

Infections caused by drug-resistant Enterobacterales including those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are particularly challenging due to limited therapeutic options. The drug combination aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) is under clinical development for treating serious infections caused by these strains. This study assessed the in vitro activity of ATM-AVI against Enterobacterales isolates collected globally in the ATLAS surveillance programme in 2019.

METHODS

Clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (N=18713) including Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter koseri, Enterobacter cloacae complex, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens collected from 232 sites in 2019 were analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by reference broth microdilution. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic based breakpoint of 8 mg/L was considered for ATM-AVI activity.

RESULTS

ATM-AVI demonstrated potent antimicrobial activity against all Enterobacterales, with 99.9% isolates inhibited at MIC ≤8 mg/L (MIC₉₀, 0.25 mg/L). MICs ≤8 mg/L (>99.0%) were noted for ATM-AVI across regions worldwide. Among other antimicrobials, amikacin, colistin, imipenem, meropenem, and tigecycline were also active (susceptibility >85.0%) against Enterobacterales. Activity of ATM-AVI was sustained against multi-drug resistant, extended-spectrum β-lactamases producing, and carbapenem-resistant isolates (susceptibility >99%; MIC₉₀, 0.25-0.5 mg/L). Importantly, potent activity for ATM-AVI (>99.0%; MIC_90, 0.5 mg/L) was noted among MBL-positive isolates and those producing other carbapenemases, such as KPC and OXA-48.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that ATM-AVI was highly active against a recent collection of Enterobacterales isolates, including those producing MBLs either alone or in combination with other carbapenemases. Thus, ATM-AVI represents a potential option for treating infections caused by antibiotic-resistant Enterobacterales including MBL-producing strains.

The primary pharmacology of ceftazidime/avibactam: in vitro translational biology

Previous reviews of ceftazidime/avibactam have focused on in vitro molecular enzymology and microbiology or the clinically associated properties of the combination. Here we take a different approach. We initiate a series of linked reviews that analyse research on the combination that built the primary pharmacology data required to support the clinical and business risk decisions to perform randomized controlled Phase 3 clinical trials, and the additional microbiological research that was added to the above, and the safety and chemical manufacturing and controls data, that constituted successful regulatory licensing applications for ceftazidime/avibactam in multiple countries, including the USA and the EU. The aim of the series is to provide both a source of reference for clinicians and microbiologists to be able to use ceftazidime/avibactam to its best advantage for patients, but also a case study of bringing a novel β-lactamase inhibitor (in combination with an established β-lactam) through the microbiological aspects of clinical development and regulatory applications, updated finally with a review of resistance occurring in patients under treatment. This first article reviews the biochemistry, structural biology and basic microbiology of the combination, showing that avibactam inhibits the great majority of serine-dependent β-lactamases in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to restore the in vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime. Translation to efficacy against infections in vivo is reviewed in the second co-published article, Nichols et al. (J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; dkac172).

In vitro antibacterial activity of cefiderocol against recent multidrug-resistant carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales isolates

Cefiderocol, a siderophore-containing cephalosporin with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against many β-lactam-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, was tested by broth microdilution against 104 carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacterales clinical isolates from 2011 to 2018. Carbapenemase identification was determined using PCR followed by targeted gene sequencing or whole genome sequencing (WGS). All isolates were multidrug-resistant, 89.4% (93/104) and produced a serine (KPC or SME) carbapenemase, with as many as four β-lactamases present. A VIM-1 or NDM-1 metallo-β-lactamase was confirmed in 6.7% of the isolates (N = 5 and 2, respectively). All isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol, unlike the comparator agents. Susceptibility for comparators ranged from 24.0% for meropenem to 91.3%, 92.3% and 96.1% for imipenem-relebactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam, respectively; 48.1%, 75.2% and 79.8% of the isolates were susceptible to omadacycline, colistin and eravacycline, respectively. Two isolates with cefiderocol MICs of 2 mg/L had mutations or deletions of the iron transport genes fhuA/E or fepA, as determined by WGS.

In Vitro Activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam at Different Inoculum Sizes of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactam-Resistant Enterobacterales Blood Isolates

β-lactam–avibactam combinations have been proposed as carbapenem-sparing therapies, but little data exist on their in vitro activities in infections with high bacterial inocula. We investigated the in vitro efficacies and the inoculum effects of ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam against extended-spectrum β-lactam-resistant Enterobacterales blood isolates. A total of 228 non-repetitive extended-spectrum β-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae blood isolates were prospectively collected in a tertiary center. In vitro susceptibilities to ceftazidime, aztreonam, meropenem, ceftazidime–avibactam, and aztreonam–avibactam were evaluated by broth microdilution method using standard and high inocula. An inoculum effect was defined as an eightfold or greater increase in MIC when tested with the high inoculum. Of the 228 isolates, 99% were susceptible to ceftazidime–avibactam and 99% had low aztreonam–avibactam MICs (≤8 mg/L). Ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam exhibited good in vitro activities; MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ values were 0.5/2 mg/L, 0.125/0.5 mg/L, and ≤0.03/0.25 mg/L, respectively, and aztreonam–avibactam was more active than ceftazidime–avibactam. The frequencies of the inoculum effect with ceftazidime–avibactam and aztreonam–avibactam were lower than with meropenem (14% vs. 38%, p < 0.001 and 30% vs. 38%, p = 0.03, respectively). The β-lactam-avibactam combinations could be useful as carbapenem-sparing strategies, and aztreonam–avibactam has the better in vitro activity but is more subject to the inoculum effect than ceftazidime–avibactam.

Role of new antibiotics in extended-spectrum β-lactamase-, AmpC- infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)- and ampicillinase class C (AmpC)-producing Enterobacterales represent one of the major public threats of the current era. As a consequence, during the last decades there have been great efforts to develop new therapeutic agents against these microorganisms. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical features associated with novel antibiotics with activity against ESBL- and AmpC-producing isolates.

RECENT FINDINGS

There a number of therapeutic agents with activity against ESBL and AmpC than have been introduced and approved over the past few years. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are both carbapenem sparing agents that appear interesting alternatives for treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. Other new β-lactams/ β-lactamase inhibitors (e.g. cefepime-enmetazobactam; ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam; aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam) as well as eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin are also promising agents for treatment of ESBL- and AmpC- infections, but further clinical data are needed to establish their efficacy in comparison to carbapenems. The role of carbapenems/ β-lactamase inhibitors remains to be clarified.

SUMMARY

New therapeutic agents against ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales have distinctive specificities and limitations that require further investigations. Future randomized clinical trials are required to define the best strategy for their use in patients with serious infections due to ESBL- and/or AmpC- infections.

Safety evaluation of current therapies for high-risk severely ill patients with carbapenem-resistant infections

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) are increasingly frequent events, which are associated with a high mortality rate. Traditionally, combination regimens including high doses of "old antibiotics" such as polymyxins, tigecycline, and aminoglycosides have been used to treat these infections, but they were often associated with low efficacy and high excess of side effects and toxicity, especially nephrotoxicity. Along with the development of new compounds, the last decade has seen substantial improvements in the management of CR infections.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aimed to discuss the safety characteristics and tolerability of different new options for treatment of CR infections.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of new drugs showing a potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB represents a unique opportunity to face the threat of resistance, while potentially reducing toxicity. A thorough understanding of the safety profile from clinical trials may guide the use of these new drugs in critically ill patients at high risk for the development of adverse events. Future data coming from real-life studies for drugs targeting CR infections are crucial to confirm the safety profile observed in pivotal trials.

The Revival of Aztreonam in Combination with Avibactam against Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negatives: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies and Clinical Cases

Infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas are increasingly reported worldwide and are usually associated with high mortality rates (>30%). Neither standard therapy nor consensus for the management of these infections exist. Aztreonam, an old β-lactam antibiotic, is not hydrolyzed by MBLs. However, since many MBL-producing strains co-produce enzymes that could hydrolyze aztreonam (e.g., AmpC, ESBL), a robust β-lactamase inhibitor such as avibactam could be given as a partner drug. We performed a systematic review including 35 in vitro and 18 in vivo studies on the combination aztreonam + avibactam for infections sustained by MBL-producing Gram-negatives. In vitro data on 2209 Gram-negatives were available, showing the high antimicrobial activity of aztreonam (MIC ≤ 4 mg/L when combined with avibactam) in 80% of MBL-producing Enterobacterales, 85% of Stenotrophomonas and 6% of MBL-producing Pseudomonas. Clinical data were available for 94 patients: 83% of them had bloodstream infections. Clinical resolution within 30 days was reported in 80% of infected patients. Analyzing only patients with bloodstream infections (64 patients), death occurred in 19% of patients treated with aztreonam + ceftazidime/avibactam. The combination aztreonam + avibactam appears to be a promising option against MBL-producing bacteria (especially Enterobacterales, much less for Pseudomonas) while waiting for new antimicrobials.

KPC-Mediated Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Collateral Effects in Klebsiella pneumoniae

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae, represent a major threat to public health due to their rapid spread. Novel drug combinations such as ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), combining a broad-spectrum cephalosporin along with a broad-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor, have recently been introduced and have been shown to exhibit excellent activity toward multidrug-resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales strains. However, CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates are now being increasingly reported, mostly corresponding to producers of KPC variants. In this study, we evaluated in vitro the nature of the mutations in the KPC-2 and KPC-3 β-lactamase sequences (the most frequent KPC-type enzymes) that lead to CZA resistance and the subsequent effects of these mutations on susceptibility to other β-lactam antibiotics. Single-step in vitro selection assays were conducted, resulting in the identification of a series of mutations in the KPC sequence which conferred the ability of those mutated enzymes to confer resistance to CZA. Hence, 16 KPC-2 variants and 10 KPC-3 variants were obtained. Production of the KPC variants in an Escherichia coli recombinant strain resulted in a concomitant increased susceptibility to broad-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems, with the exceptions of ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam, compared to wild-type KPC enzymes. Enzymatic assays showed that all of the KPC variants identified exhibited an increased affinity toward ceftazidime and a slightly decreased sensitivity to avibactam, sustaining their impact on CZA resistance. However, their respective carbapenemase activities were concurrently negatively impacted.

Combination of aztreonam, ceftazidime-avibactam and amikacin in the treatment of VIM-1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST235 osteomyelitis

We describe a challenging case of patient with metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa sternal osteomyelitis following aortic valve replacement with biological prosthesis. The strain exhibited a multidrug-resistance phenotype carrying the bla_VIM-1 gene and belonged to the high-risk clone sequence type ST235. The patient was successfully treated with surgical debridement plus antibiotic therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam, and amikacin. Time-kill curves showed that this triple antibiotic combination at 1 × MIC was strongly synergic after 8 h, achieving 99.9% killing and maintaining this until 48 h.

Molecular Basis of AmpC β-Lactamase Induction by Avibactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: PBP Occupancy, Live Cell Binding Dynamics and Impact on Resistant Clinical Isolates Harboring PDC-X Variants

Avibactam belongs to the new class of diazabicyclooctane β-lactamase inhibitors. Its inhibitory spectrum includes class A, C and D enzymes, including P. aeruginosa AmpC. Nonetheless, recent reports have revealed strain-dependent avibactam AmpC induction. In the present work, we wanted to assess the mechanistic basis underlying AmpC induction and determine if derepressed PDC-X mutated enzymes from ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant clinical isolates were further inducible. We determined avibactam concentrations that half-maximally inhibited (IC₅₀) bocillin FL binding. Inducer β-lactams were also studied as comparators. Live cells’ time-course penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) occupancy of avibactam was studied. To assess the ampC induction capacity of avibactam and comparators, qRT-PCR was performed in wild-type PAO1, PBP4, triple PBP4, 5/6 and 7 knockout derivatives and two ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible/resistant XDR clinical isolates belonging to the epidemic high-risk clone ST175. PBP4 inhibition was observed for avibactam and β-lactam comparators. Induction capacity was consistently correlated with PBP4 binding affinity. Outer membrane permeability-limited PBP4 binding was observed in the live cells’ assay. As expected, imipenem and cefoxitin showed strong induction in PAO1, especially for carbapenem; avibactam induction was conversely weaker. Overall, the inducer effect was less remarkable in ampC-derepressed mutants and nonetheless absent upon avibactam exposure in the clinical isolates harboring mutated AmpC variants and their parental strains.

Molecular characterization of clinical isolates of Enterobacterales with elevated MIC values for aztreonam-avibactam from the INFORM global surveillance study, 2012-2017

OBJECTIVES

While aztreonam-avibactam is a potent β-lactam-β-lactamase-inhibitor combination, reduced in vitro activity against some Enterobacterales isolates has been reported. In this study, globally collected clinical isolates of Enterobacterales with elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for aztreonam-avibactam were examined for potential resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

Isolates with aztreonam-avibactam MICs ≥8 μg/mL (n = 55: Escherichia coli, n = 38; Enterobacter cloacae, n = 10; Klebsiella pneumoniae, n = 3; others, n = 4) and <8 μg/mL (n = 18) collected for the INFORM global surveillance programme were characterized by short read whole-genome sequencing. Sequences were inspected for the presence of β-lactamase genes, penicillin-binding protein (PBP) mutations, and disruptions in the coding sequences of porin genes.

RESULTS

All isolates of E. coli testing with aztreonam-avibactam MIC values ≥8 μg/mL carried a previously documented four-amino-acid insertion in PBP3 at position 333 of YRI(K/N/P). Such mutations were absent in isolates with MICs <2 μg/mL (n = 6). Among other species, carriage of PER- or VEB-type β-lactamases was identified in 10/17 (58.8%) of isolates testing with aztreonam-avibactam MICs ≥8 μg/mL, but no isolates with lower MIC values (n = 11).

CONCLUSIONS

PBP3 mutations are known to confer resistance to aztreonam in E. coli, providing a rationale for the elevated MIC values for aztreonam-avibactam in these isolates. Elevated MICs in other isolates were associated with the carriage of PER-type β-lactamases, which have been previously shown to be inhibited less effectively by avibactam than other Class A β-lactamases and may contribute to this phenotype. Other resistance mechanisms contributing to poor in vitro activity for aztreonam-avibactam in some of these isolates are not yet elucidated.

Therapeutic Options for Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales

The spread of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales worldwide without the simultaneous increase in active antibiotics makes these organisms an urgent public health threat. This review summarizes recent advancements in diagnostic and treatment strategies for infections caused by MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Adequate treatment of patients infected with MBL-producing Enterobacterales relies on detection of the β-lactamase in the clinic. There are several molecular platforms that are currently available to identify clinically relevant MBLs as well as other important serine-β-lactamases. Once detected, there are several antibiotics that have historically been used for the treatment of MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Antimicrobials such as aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, fosfomycin, and polymyxins often show promising in vitro activity though clinical data are currently lacking to support their widespread use. Ceftazidime-avibactam combined with aztreonam is promising for treatment of infections caused by MBL-producing Enterobacterales and currently has the most clinical data of any available antibiotic to support its use. While cefiderocol has displayed promising activity against MBL-producing Enterobacterales in vitro and in preliminary clinical studies, further clinical studies will better shed light on its place in treatment. Lastly, there are several promising MBL inhibitors in the pipeline, which may further improve the treatment of MBL-producing Enterobacterales.

Is Ceftazidime/Avibactam an Option for Serious Infections Due to Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales?: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Carbapenem-sparing regimens are needed for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL)- and AmpC-producing members of the Enterobacterales We sought to compare the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenems against ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales species. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing ceftazidime/avibactam with carbapenems for the treatment of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales was conducted. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with ESBL- and AmpC-specific outcome data were compiled. Of the 246 patients infected with an ESBL-producing microorganism in the ceftazidime/avibactam arm, 224 (91%) had a clinical response at test of cure (TOC), versus 240 of 271 (89%) patients in the carbapenem arm (risk ratio [RR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.08; P = 0.45; I ² = 0%). Clinical response rates for AmpC producers in the ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenem arms were 32/40 (80%) and 37/42 (88%), respectively (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P = 0.35; I ² = 0%). Microbiological response and mortality rates were not reported specifically for ESBL/AmpC producers. Ceftazidime/avibactam may be a carbapenem-sparing option for the treatment of mild to moderate complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales species, and the data are too limited to provide any conclusive recommendations for the AmpC producers. Care should be taken before extrapolating this to severe infections, given that the representation of this population in the reviewed studies was negligible. Ceftazidime/avibactam is a costly drug active against carbapenem-resistant microorganisms and should be used judiciously to preserve its activity against them.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates from South Korea

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZT-AVI) are novel antibiotic combinations active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate their in vitro activities and inoculum effects in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), including carbapenemase-producing (CP)-CRE and non-CP-CRE. A total of 81 independent clinical isolates of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were collected. CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were evaluated by broth microdilution using standard and high inocula. The inoculum effect was defined as an ≥8-fold increase in MIC with high inoculum. Phenotypic determination of β-lactam resistance mechanism and PCR for carbapenemase genes were performed. Of the 81 CRE isolates, 35 (43%) were CP-CRE. Overall, 73% of the isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI, and 95% had low AZT-AVI MICs (≤8 µg/mL). The MIC_50/MIC₉₀s of CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 4/≥512 µg/mL and 0.5/4 µg/mL, respectively. CAZ-AVI was more active against non-CP-CRE than against CP-CRE (susceptibility 80% vs. 63%, p = 0.08; MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 2/16 μg/mL vs. 4/≥512 μg/mL), whereas AZT-AVI was more active against CP-CRE (MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀, 0.25/1 μg/mL vs. 0.5/8 μg/mL). All four isolates with high AZT-AVI MIC (≥16 μg/mL) were resistant to CAZ-AVI, but only 18% (4/22) of CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates had high AZT-AVI MIC. The rates of the inoculum effect for CAZ-AVI and AZT-AVI were 18% and 47%, respectively (p < 0.001). Interestingly, the frequency of the AZT-AVI inoculum effect was higher in K. pneumoniae than E. coli (64% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). AZT-AVI is more active against CRE than CAZ-AVI, even in CP-CRE and CAZ-AVI-resistant isolates. The presence of a substantial inoculum effect may contribute to clinical failure in high-inoculum infections treated with AZT-AVI.

Treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamases infections: what is the current role of new β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The widespread diffusion of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales currently represents a major threat for public health worldwide. Carbapenems are currently considered the first-line choice for serious ESBL infections. However, the dramatic global increase in ESBL prevalence has led to a significant overuse of carbapenems that has promoted the selection and spread of carbapenemases, which might further prejudicated our ability to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens. Therefore, strategies to limit the use of carbapenems should be implemented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although piperacillin-tazobactam should no longer be considered an alternative to carbapenems for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections due to ESBL-producing strains, it might still represent an alternative for step-down therapy or for low-to-moderate severity infection originating from urinary or biliary sources and when piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 mg/l or less. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are both carbapenem sparing agents that appear interesting alternatives for treatment of serious ESBL infections. New β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI), including cefepime-enmetazobactam, ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam, are also promising agents for treatment of ESBL infections, but further clinical data are needed to establish their efficacy relative to carbapenems. The role of carbapenems/β-lactamase inhibitors remain to be clarified.

SUMMARY

New BL/BLI have distinctive specificities and limitations that require further investigations. Future randomized clinical trials are required to define the best strategy for their administering for ESBL infections.

In vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Collected from Three Secondary Hospitals in Southwest China Between 2018 and 2019

Purpose

To assess the antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and aztreonam/avibactam (ATM/AVI) against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates collected from three secondary hospitals in Southwest China between 2018 and 2019.

Materials and Methods

A total of 120 unique CRE clinical isolates were collected and carbapenemase genes were detected using PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using standard broth microdilution method and the results were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints.

Results

The 120 carbapenem-resistant strains included 92 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 10 Escherichia coli, 10 Enterobacter cloacae, five Klebsiella aerogenes, and three Klebsiella oxytoca isolates. Seventy-four percent of these 120 CRE isolates were collected from patients located in non-ICUs; 65.0% of these CRE isolates were collected from male patients; and 34.2% of these isolates were isolated from respiratory tracts. Four different carbapenemase genes were identified among 103 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates, including bla _KPC-2 (n=77), bla _NDM-1 (n=16), bla _NDM-5 (n=12) and bla _IMP-4 (n=2). Overall, 21.7%, 37.5%, 40.8%, 75.0%, and 100% of the CRE strains were susceptible to levofloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, amikacin, CAZ/AVI, and ATM/AVI, respectively. In addition, antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that 96.7% isolates (n=116) were resistant to aztreonam, and the addition of avibactam (4 mg/L) significantly reduced the MICs of those aztreonam-resistant isolates by more than 128-fold (range: ≤0.125-4 mg/L), and 90.0% (n=108) of total 120 isolates were inhibited at ATM/AVI concentration ≤1 mg/L.

Conclusion

Our study revealed significant antimicrobial resistance among the CRE isolates against some commonly used antibiotics in three secondary Chinese hospitals. ATM/AVI exhibited potent activity against CRE isolates, including double carbapenemase-producing isolates, whereas CAZ/AVI was active against all KPC producers.

In vitro activity of aztreonam/avibactam against a global collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae collected from defined culture sources in 2016 and 2017

OBJECTIVES

This study reports on the activity of aztreonam/avibactam (ATM-AVI) against a collection of Klebsiella pneumoniae collected in 2016 and 2017.

METHODS

Non-duplicate K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from four regions (Africa/Middle East, n = 785; Asia-Pacific, n = 1433; Europe, n = 4236; Latin America, n = 1499) and five culture sources (blood, n = 902; intra-abdominal, n = 992; urinary tract, n = 2148; skin and skin structure, n = 1409; lower respiratory tract, n = 2502). MICs were determined at a central laboratory using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution methodology. Susceptibility was determined using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints.

RESULTS

For all culture sources, against all K. pneumoniae, the highest rates of susceptibility were seen for amikacin (>84%), ceftazidime/avibactam (>94%), colistin (>92%) and meropenem (>83%), and >99.9% of isolates were inhibited at an ATM-AVI MIC of ≤4 mg/L. Among meropenem-resistant (MEM-R, n = 583) and meropenem-resistant metallo-β-lactamase-negative (MEM-R-MBLN; n = 469) isolates, susceptibility was highest to ceftazidime/avibactam (79.9% and 99.4%, respectively) and colistin (67.2% and 62.7%, respectively). All MEM-R-MBLN isolates from blood, intra-abdominal, urinary tract and skin and skin structure sources, and all but one isolate from respiratory sources, were inhibited at an ATM-AVI MIC of ≤2 mg/L. Against the meropenem-resistant metallo-β-lactamase positive (MEM-R-MBLP; n = 114) isolates, susceptibility to colistin was between 75.0% (urinary tract isolates) and 93.3% (lower respiratory tract isolates). All MEM-R-MBLP isolates were inhibited at an ATM-AVI MIC of ≤0.5 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

ATM-AVI is active against K. pneumoniae isolates from a range of culture sources across Africa/Middle East, Asia-Pacific, Europe and Latin America. ATM-AVI also has activity against MEM-R-MBLN and MEM-R-MBLP isolates.

The role of new β-lactamase inhibitors in gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, traditional β-lactams have dramatically reduced their effectiveness against gram-negative bacteria mainly because of their ability to express multiple β-lactamase or carabapenemases that are not hydrolyzed by the old β-lactam inhibitors (BLIs) such as clavulanic acid, tazobactam, and sulbactam. New BLIs molecules have been developed to face the need of compounds that are active against multidrug or pandrug resistant gram-negative pathogens. The aim of this review is to summarize the new generation of BLIs and β-lactams combinations.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of new molecules with activity against Ambler class A (e.g., extended-spectrum β-lactamases, serine carbapenemases), class C (e.g., AmpC), or class D (e.g., oxacillinase-48) have been recently approved in combination with old β-lactams for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria, and other agents are under investigation. These new compounds include diazabicyclooctanones non-β-lactam inhibitors (e.g., avibactam, relebactam, nacubactam) and boronic acid inhibitors (e.g., vaborbactam).

SUMMARY

Newly approved and investigational new BLIs are expected to offer many advantages for the management of patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Promising characteristics of new compounds include high activity against multi drug resistance gram-negative bacteria and a favorable safety profile.

New cephalosporins for the treatment of pneumonia in internal medicine wards

The burden of hospital admission for pneumonia in internal medicine wards may not be underestimated; otherwise, cases of pneumonia are a frequent indication for antimicrobial prescriptions. Community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia are characterized by high healthcare costs, morbidity and non-negligible rates of fatality. The overcoming prevalence of resistant gram-negative and positive bacteria (e.g., methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin and ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases producing Enterobacteriaceae) has made the most of the first-line agents ineffective for treating lower respiratory tract infections. A broad-spectrum of activity, favourable pulmonary penetration, harmlessness and avoiding in some cases a combination therapy, characterise new cephalosporins such as ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftobiprole, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftaroline. We aimed to summarise the role and place in therapy of new cephalosporins in community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia within the setting of internal medicine wards. The "universal pneumonia antibiotic strategy" is no longer acceptable for treating lung infections. Antimicrobial therapy should be individualized considering local antimicrobial resistance and epidemiology, the stage of the illness and potential host factors predisposing to a high risk for specific pathogens.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators against Gram-negative bacterial isolates collected from Latin American centres between 2015 and 2017

Objectives

We report the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam and comparators against 7729 Enterobacterales isolates and 2053 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from six Latin American countries between 2015 and 2017.

Methods

A central reference laboratory performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing using broth microdilution panels according to CLSI guidelines. The presence of β-lactamases was confirmed using multiplex PCR assays.

Results

Susceptibility rates among Enterobacterales were highest for ceftazidime/avibactam (99.3%, MIC₉₀ = 0.5 mg/L), meropenem (95.4%, MIC₉₀ = 0.12 mg/L) and amikacin (93.5%, MIC₉₀ = 8 mg/L). High susceptibility rates were observed for ceftazidime/avibactam in all six countries. The majority of carbapenemase-positive isolates among Enterobacterales (N = 366, 4.7%) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (86.9%), colistin (76.8%) and amikacin (60.9%); MBL-positive isolates (N = 49, 0.6%) were susceptible only to colistin (79.6%), with a minority susceptible to amikacin (49.0%), aztreonam and levofloxacin (both 30.6%). Highest rates of susceptibility among P. aeruginosa isolates were for colistin (99.2%) and ceftazidime/avibactam (86.6%), with rates of susceptibility to all other agents being <80.0%. MDR P. aeruginosa isolates (N = 712, 34.7%) had a high rate of susceptibility to colistin (98.9%); the rate of susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam was 61.4% and <50.0% to all other comparator agents. A total of 235 (11.4%) isolates of P. aeruginosa were carbapenemase positive and 148 (7.2%) were MBL positive; both subsets had high rates of susceptibility to colistin (98.3% and 100%, respectively).

Conclusions

Ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility rates in Latin American countries are stable and high; ceftazidime/avibactam can be an appropriate treatment for patients with infections caused by Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa and for whom treatment options may be limited.

In vitro activity of aztreonam-avibactam against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae-A multicenter study in China

OBJECTIVES

To study the molecular epidemiology of clinical metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in China and to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of MBL-Enterobacteriaceae isolates to aztreonam-avibactam.

METHODS

Bacterial speciation was determined using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. PCR was used to screen for common carbapenemase genes. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of common clinical antibiotics and aztreonam-avibactam was performed using the standard broth microdilution method.

RESULTS

A total of 161 MBL-Enterobacteriaceae isolates were included, with Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 73, 45.4%) and Escherichia coli (n = 53, 32.9%) being the most common species. Among the 161 isolates, bla_NDM (n = 151), bla_IMP (n = 13), and bla_VIM (n = 2) were detected, including five strains (3.1%) co-harboring two MBLs. MBL-Enterobacteriaceae isolates frequently contained two (n = 55, 34.2%) or more (n = 89, 55.3%) additional serine β-lactamase genes (bla_KPC, bla_CTX-M, bla_TEM, or bla_SHV). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that 81.4% of isolates (n = 131) were resistant to aztreonam. The rates of resistance to cefazolin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and piperacillin-tazobactam were all over 90%. The addition of avibactam (4 μg/ml) significantly reduced the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the aztreonam-resistant isolates by more than 8-fold (range ≤0.125 to 4 μg/ml), with a MIC₅₀/MIC₉₀ of ≤0.125/1 μg/ml among the 131 isolates. Overall, 96.9% (n = 156) of the total isolates were inhibited at an aztreonam-avibactam concentration of ≤1 μg/ml. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis found that in patients with MBL-Enterobacteriaceae infections, the presence of pre-existing lung disease (adjusted odds ratio 8.267, 95% confidence interval 1.925-28.297; p = 0.004) was associated with a hazard effect on worse disease outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of aztreonam-avibactam is highly potent against MBL-Enterobacteriaceae and may serve as a new candidate for the treatment of infections caused by MBL-Enterobacteriaceae in China.

Synergistic activities of ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with different antibiotics against colistin-nonsusceptible clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Background: This study aims to analyse the effect of ceftazidime-avibactam plus various antibiotics against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Intensive Care Units.Methods: 40 non-duplicate P. aeruginosa isolates were screened for their MICs of ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin, levofloxacin, doripenem and tobramycin. MICs were determined by the broth microdilution method. The in vitro bactericidal activities of ceftazidime-avibactam compared to studied antibiotics were also determined by time-kill curve assays both at 1xMIC and at 4xMIC against carbapenemase-producing or -not producing six colistin-nonsusceptible MDR clinical strains of P. aeruginosa. Additionally, synergistic interactions were investigated by the time-kill curve assay.Results: The MIC₉₀ values for ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin, levofloxacin, doripenem and tobramycin against MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were found to be >256, 64, 8, 64, 128, and >256 mg/L, respectively. The minimum bactericidal concentration₉₀ values for those antibiotics were also >256, 64, 16, 128, 256, and >256 mg/L, respectively. While doripenem, tobramycin and levofloxacin were bactericidal (>3 log₁₀ killing) against the 2/6, 3/6 and 1/6 P. aeruginosa isolates at 4xMIC concentrations, respectively, levofloxacin and tobramycin were bactericidal against only one isolate (1/6) at 1xMIC concentrations at 24 h. The synergistic interactions of these antimicrobial agents were also achieved with ceftazidime/avibactam + colistin (4/6), ceftazidime/avibactam + tobramycin (3/6), and ceftazidime/avibactam + levofloxacin (3/6) combinations. No antagonism was observed against studied P. aeruginosa strains.Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that ceftazidime/avibactam with colistin, or tobramycin, were effective against colistin-nonsusceptible strains. This combination therapy could be an alternative antibiotic therapy for resistant P. aeruginosa strains.

Evaluation of the synergy of ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with colistin, doripenem, levofloxacin, tigecycline, and tobramycin against OXA-48 producing Enterobacterales

This study aims to analyze the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus various antibiotics against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales isolated from Intensive Care Units. Seventy-four non-duplicate OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales isolates were screened for their MICs by the microbroth dilution method. The in-vitro bactericidal and synergistic activities of ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with other antibiotics were determined by time-kill curve assays. According to our results, colistin was the most active drug with higher susceptibility rates in the strains. Colistin, levofloxacin, tobramycin, and doripenem showed bactericidal effects against different isolates. The best synergistic interactions were achieved with ceftazidime/avibactam + colistin, ceftazidime/avibactam + tobramycin, and ceftazidime/avibactam + tigecycline against studied strains used at 1xMIC concentrations at 24 h. No antagonism was observed against studied OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales strains.The findings of this study suggest that ceftazidime/avibactam plus colistin, tobramycin, or tigecycline were more effective against OXA-48-producing Enterobacterales strains. This combination therapy could be an alternative antibiotic therapy for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales strains.

Characterizing the role of porin mutations in susceptibility of beta lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to ceftaroline and ceftaroline-avibactam

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the role of porins in the susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftaroline and ceftaroline-avibactam.

METHODS

Susceptibility to ceftaroline and ceftaroline-avibactam was tested by broth microdilution method in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates (n = 65), including isogenic mutants (n = 30) and clinical isolates (n = 35), with different outer membrane porin defects in the presence or absence of beta lactamases.

RESULTS

Ceftaroline exhibited excellent activity against all the isogenic porin mutants with a MIC range of 0.125-0.25 μg/ml. Ceftaroline showed limited activity in the presence of extended spectrum β-lactamase enzymes in isogenic mutant constructs as expected but regained effectiveness in combination with avibactam against these isolates except those carrying metallo-carbapenemase (IMP-4) with an MIC range of 0.25->32 μg/ml. Ceftaroline-avibactam was able to inhibit 86% of the clinical isolates (n = 35) of Klebsiella pneumoniae carrying porin defects and multiple beta lactamases with only four isolates showing raised MICs against the combination (MIC range 0.125-4 μg/ml). One clinical isolate with IMP-4 carbapenemase had an MIC value of >32 μg/ml.

CONCLUSION

Outer membrane porins play a key role in the transport of ceftaroline inKlebsiella pneumoniae but it remains effective in isolates with altered permeability due to common porin mutations. The addition of avibactam substantially enhances the potency of ceftaroline providing an effective remedy to the problem of omnipresent beta lactamases in these bacteria.

CPO Complete, a novel test for fast, accurate phenotypic detection and classification of carbapenemases

Carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) are Gram-negative bacteria that are typically resistant to most or all antibiotics and are responsible for a global pandemic of high mortality. Rapid, accurate detection of CPOs and the classification of their carbapenemases are valuable tools for reducing the mortality of the CPO-associated infections, preventing the spread of CPOs, and optimizing use of new β-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam. The current study evaluated the performance of CPO Complete, a novel, manual, phenotypic carbapenemase detection and classification test. The test was evaluated for sensitivity and specificity against 262 CPO isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii and 67 non-CPO isolates. It was also evaluated for carbapenemase classification accuracy against 205 CPOs that produced a single carbapenemase class. The test exhibited 100% sensitivity 98.5% specificity for carbapenemase detection within 90 minutes and detected 74.1% of carbapenemases within 10 minutes. In the classification evaluation, 99.0% of carbapenemases were correctly classified for isolates that produced a single carbapenemase. The test is technically simple and has potential for adaptation to automated instruments. With lyophilized kit storage at temperatures up to 38°C, the CPO Complete test has the potential to provide rapid, accurate carbapenemase detection and classification in both limited resource and technologically advanced laboratories.

Strategies to Overcome Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) Making Use of Non-Essential Target Inhibitors: A Review

Antibiotics have always been considered as one of the most relevant discoveries of the twentieth century. Unfortunately, the dawn of the antibiotic era has sadly corresponded to the rise of the phenomenon of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a natural process whereby microbes evolve in such a way to withstand the action of drugs. In this context, the identification of new potential antimicrobial targets and/or the identification of new chemical entities as antimicrobial drugs are in great demand. To date, among the many possible approaches used to deal with antibiotic resistance is the use of antibiotic adjuvants that hit bacterial non-essential targets. In this review, the author focuses on the discovery of antibiotic adjuvants and on new tools to study and reduce the prevalence of resistant bacterial infections.

Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pooled data from the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme

Objectives

This analysis evaluated the clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates pooled from the adult Phase III clinical trials in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) or nosocomial pneumonia (NP) including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Methods

Baseline isolates from five Phase III randomized controlled trials of ceftazidime/avibactam versus predominantly carbapenem comparators in patients with cIAI (RECLAIM 1 and 2; NCT01499290 and RECLAIM 3; NCT01726023), cUTI (RECAPTURE 1 and 2; NCT01595438 and NCT01599806), NP including VAP (REPROVE; NCT01808092) and cIAI or cUTI caused by ceftazidime-non-susceptible Gram-negative pathogens (REPRISE; NCT01644643) were tested for MDR status and susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam and carbapenem-based comparators using CLSI broth microdilution methodology. Microbiological and clinical responses for patients with ≥1 MDR Enterobacteriaceae or P. aeruginosa isolate were assessed at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit.

Results

In the pooled microbiologically modified ITT population, 1051 patients with MDR Enterobacteriaceae and 95 patients with MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were identified. Favourable microbiological response rates at TOC for all MDR Enterobacteriaceae and MDR P. aeruginosa were 78.4% and 57.1%, respectively, for ceftazidime/avibactam and 71.6% and 53.8%, respectively, for comparators. The proportions of patients with ≥1 MDR isolate who were clinically cured at TOC were similar in the ceftazidime/avibactam (85.4%) and comparator (87.9%) arms.

Conclusions

Ceftazidime/avibactam demonstrated similar clinical efficacy to predominantly carbapenem comparators against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, and may be a suitable alternative to carbapenem-based therapies for cIAI, cUTI and NP/VAP caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in European countries: INFORM global surveillance 2012-15

Objectives

The activity of ceftazidime/avibactam was assessed against 5716 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from 96 medical centres in 18 European countries as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance programme from 2012 to 2015. Activity was analysed against subsets of isolates based on resistance phenotypes and β-lactamase content.

Methods

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by broth microdilution and β-lactamase genes were detected by PCR screening and sequencing.

Results

Ceftazidime/avibactam was highly active in vitro against the overall collection of P. aeruginosa isolates and colistin-resistant isolates (92.4% and 92.9% susceptible, respectively). Although activity was slightly reduced against MBL-negative subsets of ceftazidime-non-susceptible (79.6% susceptible), meropenem-non-susceptible (85.1% susceptible) and MDR (81.6% susceptible) P. aeruginosa, ceftazidime/avibactam remained the second most active entity, after colistin, compared with all other comparator agents tested. At the country level, susceptibility to ceftazidime/avibactam ranged from 74.6% to 99.6%, with decreased susceptibilities only observed in countries where MBLs are more frequently encountered, such as the Czech Republic, Greece, Romania and Russia. Ceftazidime/avibactam was also active in vitro against 87.6% of meropenem-non-susceptible isolates in which no acquired β-lactamases were detected by molecular methods; these isolates were assumed to hyperproduce the chromosomally encoded AmpC in combination with alterations in OprD or drug efflux. As expected, ceftazidime/avibactam was not active against isolates carrying MBLs.

Conclusions

The data show that ceftazidime/avibactam is highly potent in vitro against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa collected in European countries, including isolates that exhibit resistance to ceftazidime, meropenem and colistin and combined resistance to agents from multiple drug classes.

Safety and Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole in the Treatment of Children ≥3 Months to <18 Years With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection: Results From a Phase 2, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole is effective in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) in adults. This single-blind, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (NCT02475733) evaluated the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole in children with cIAI.

METHODS

Hospitalized children (≥3 months to <18 years) with cIAI were randomized 3:1 to receive intravenous ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole, or meropenem, for a minimum of 72 hours (9 doses), with optional switch to oral therapy thereafter for a total treatment duration of 7-15 days. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study, along with clinical and microbiologic outcomes, and pharmacokinetics. A blinded observer determined adverse event (AE) causality, and clinical outcomes up to the late follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Eighty-three children were randomized and received study drug (61 ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and 22 meropenem); most (90.4%) had a diagnosis of appendicitis. Predominant Gram-negative baseline pathogens were Escherichia coli (79.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (33.3%); 2 E. coli isolates were ceftazidime-non-susceptible. AEs occurred in 52.5% and 59.1% of patients in the ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole and meropenem groups, respectively. Serious AEs occurred in 8.2% and 4.5% of patients, respectively; none was considered drug related. No deaths occurred. Favorable clinical/microbiologic responses were observed in ≥90% of patients in both treatment groups at end-of-intravenous treatment and test-of-cure visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to ceftazidime alone, and appeared effective in pediatric patients with cIAI due to Gram-negative pathogens, including ceftazidime-non-susceptible strains.

New antibiotics for ventilator-associated pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria represents a global emerging problem. Delayed prescription of an adequate treatment for VAP has been associated with higher morbidity and mortality. New molecules have been developed to face the need of compounds that are active against resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. The aim of this review is to summarize the current scenario of new therapeutic options for the treatment of VAP.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of new antibiotics with activity against MDR have been recently approved for the treatment of VAP, and other agents are under investigation. In this review, the authors summarize the current therapeutic options for the treatment of VAP that showed promising implications for clinical practice, including new compounds belonging to old antibiotic classes (e.g., ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, tedizolid, cefiderocol, eravacycline, and plazomicin) and novel chemical classes, such as murepavadin. Nebulized antibiotics that are currently in development for the treatment of pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients are also presented.

SUMMARY

Newly approved and investigational drugs for the treatment of VAP are expected to offer many advantages for the management of patients with respiratory infections caused by MDR. Promising characteristics of new compounds include high activity against both methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and MDR Gram-negative bacteria and a favorable safety profile.

Novel Mercapto Propionamide Derivatives with Potent New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-1 Inhibitory Activity and Low Toxicity

The emergence and worldwide prevalence of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1 (NDM-1) expressing Gram-negative bacteria with resistance against most β-lactam antibiotics pose a serious threat to human health. However, no NDM-1 inhibitors are clinically approved at present. Herein, based on the lead compound captopril, a series of compounds were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for NDM-1 inhibitory activities. All designed compounds showed single digit micromolar or submicromolar NDM-1 inhibitory activities, which were much more potent than that of captopril. Among them, compounds 14a and 14m exhibited excellent NDM-1 inhibitory activities, with IC₅₀ values of 0.10 and 0.12 μM, respectively. Further studies demonstrated that compound 14m displayed low cytotoxicity, good water solubility, high metabolic stability, and low acute toxicity in mice. Importantly, compound 14m exhibited potent synergistic antimicrobial activities with Meropenem (MEM) for the treatment of clinically isolated NDM-1-expressing strains.

New Antibiotics for Pneumonia

Delayed antimicrobial prescriptions and inappropriate treatment can lead to poor outcomes in pneumonia. In nosocomial infections, especially in countries reporting high rates of antimicrobial resistance, the presence of multidrug-resistant gram-negative and gam-positive bacteria can limit options for adequate antimicrobial treatment. New antibiotics, belonging to known classes of antimicrobials or characterized by novel mechanisms of actions, have recently been approved or are under development. Advantages of the new compounds include enhanced spectrum of activity against resistant bacteria, high lung penetration, good tolerability, and possibility for intravenous to oral sequential therapy. This article reviews characteristics of newly approved and investigational compounds.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin American Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015

The International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program collected clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n = 7,665) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,794) from 26 medical centers in six Latin American countries from 2012 to 2015. The in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators was determined for the isolates using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution method. Enterobacteriaceae were highly susceptible (99.7%) to ceftazidime-avibactam, including 99.9% of metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-negative isolates; 87.4% of all P. aeruginosa isolates and 92.8% of MBL-negative isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam. Susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam ranged from 99.4% to 100% for Enterobacteriaceae and from 79.1% to 94.7% for P. aeruginosa when isolates were analyzed by country of origin. Ceftazidime-avibactam inhibited 99.6% to 100% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates that carried serine β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC cephalosporinases, and carbapenemases (KPC and OXA-48-like) as well as 99.7%, 99.6%, 99.5%, and 99.2% of MBL-negative isolates demonstrating ceftazidime-nonsusceptible, multidrug-resistant (MDR), meropenem-nonsusceptible, and colistin-resistant phenotypes, respectively. Among carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 750), 14.7% carried MBLs with or without additional acquired serine β-lactamases, while in the majority of isolates (70.0%), no acquired β-lactamase was identified. Ceftazidime-avibactam inhibited 89.5% of carbapenem-nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates in which no acquired β-lactamase was detected. Overall, clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae collected in Latin America from 2012 to 2015 were highly susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, including isolates that exhibited resistance to ceftazidime, meropenem, colistin, or an MDR phenotype. Country-specific variations were noted in the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa isolates to ceftazidime-avibactam.

Activity of Cefepime-Zidebactam against Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Gram-Negative Pathogens

This study compared the activity of cefepime + zidebactam (FEP-ZID) and selected currently available antibacterial agents against a panel of multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates chosen to provide an extreme challenge for antibacterial activity. FEP–ZID had a very broad and potent in vitro spectrum of activity, and was highly active against many MDR isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Notably, it inhibited isolates producing carbapenemases of Ambler classes A, B, and D, and P. aeruginosa isolates with multiple resistance mechanisms including combinations of upregulated efflux, diminished or non-functional OprD porins, and AmpC overproduction. Its clinical role will be determined initially by the breakpoints assigned to it, comparison studies with other investigational β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and ultimately by the developing body of therapeutic outcome data.

The rise and rise of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria

Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to the delivery of effective care and already causes 700000 excess deaths per year worldwide. International consensus on action to combat antimicrobial resistance was reached in 2015. Australia is implementing a national strategy. The clinical consequences of antimicrobial resistance are seen most acutely in multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, where they cause increased mortality and morbidity and threaten the delivery of once routine medical care. The solution to antimicrobial resistance is complex and multifaceted. Antimicrobial stewardship, that is optimising the use of the antibiotics we currently have, is the most rapidly deployable mitigation. Several novel antibiotics with activity against a range of drug-resistant bacteria are now available clinically, leading to hope that innovative solutions will reduce the impact of resistance. It is critical that these new drugs are protected from inappropriate use.

New treatments of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative ventilator-associated pneumonia

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains an important clinical problem globally, being associated with significant morbidity and mortality. As management of VAP requires adequate and timely antibiotic administration, global emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses serious challenges over our ability to maintain this axiom. Development of antimicrobials against MDR Gram-negative pathogens has therefore emerged as a priority and some new antibiotics have been marketed or approach late stage of development. The aim of this review is to analyse new therapeutic options from the point view of potential treatment of VAP. Among recently developed antimicrobials presented herein, it is obvious that we will have promising therapeutic options against VAP caused by Enterobacteriaceae excluding those producing metallo-β-lactamases, against which only cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam are expected to be active. Against infections caused by carbapenem non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ceftolozane/tazobactam and to a lesser extend ceftazidime/avibactam may cover a proportion of current medical needs, but there still remain a considerable proportion of strains which harbor other resistance mechanisms. Murepavadin and cefiderocol hold promise against this particularly notorious pathogen. Finally, Acinetobacter baummannii remains a treatment-challenge. Eravacycline, cefiderocol and probably plazomicin seem to be the most promising agents against this difficult-to treat pathogen, but we have still a long road ahead, to see their position in clinical practice and particularly in VAP. In summary, despite persisting and increasing unmet medical needs, several newly approved and forthcoming agents hold promise for the treatment of VAP and hopefully will enrich our antimicrobial arsenal in the next few years. Targeted pharmacokinetic and clinical studies in real-life scenario of VAP are important to position these new agents in clinical practice, whereas vigilant use will ensure their longevity in our armamentarium.