Local and systemic antibody responses in high-risk adults given live-attenuated and inactivated influenza A virus vaccines

Influenza vaccine for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

BACKGROUND

Influenza vaccinations are currently recommended in the care of people with COPD, but these recommendations are based largely on evidence from observational studies, with very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported. Influenza infection causes excess morbidity and mortality in people with COPD, but there is also the potential for influenza vaccination to cause adverse effects, or not to be cost effective.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether influenza vaccination in people with COPD reduces respiratory illness, reduces mortality, is associated with excess adverse events, and is cost effective.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, two clinical trials registries, and reference lists of articles. A number of drug companies we contacted also provided references. The latest search was carried out in December 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared live or inactivated virus vaccines with placebo, either alone or with another vaccine, in people with COPD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data. All entries were double-checked. We contacted study authors and drug companies for missing information. We used standard methods expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 RCTs with 6750 participants, but only six of these included people with COPD (2469 participants). The others were conducted on elderly and high-risk individuals, some of whom had chronic lung disease. Interventions compared with placebo were inactivated virus injections and live attenuated intranasal virus vaccines. Some studies compared intra-muscular inactivated vaccine and intranasal live attenuated vaccine with intra-muscular inactivated vaccine and intranasal placebo. Studies were conducted in the UK, USA and Thailand.Inactivated vaccine reduced the total number of exacerbations per vaccinated participant compared with those who received placebo (mean difference (MD) -0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.64 to -0.11; P = 0.006; two RCTs, 180 participants; low quality evidence). This was due to the reduction in 'late' exacerbations, occurring after three or four weeks (MD -0.39, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.18; P = 0.0004; two RCTs, 180 participants; low quality evidence). Both in people with COPD, and in older people (only a minority of whom had COPD), there were significantly more local adverse reactions in people who had received the vaccine, but the effects were generally mild and transient.There was no evidence of an effect of intranasal live attenuated virus when this was added to inactivated intramuscular vaccination.Two studies evaluating mortality for influenza vaccine versus placebo were too small to have detected any effect on mortality. However, a large study (N=2215) noted that there was no difference in mortality when adding live attenuated virus to inactivated virus vaccination, AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It appeared, from the limited number of RCTs we were able to include, all of which were more than a decade old, that inactivated vaccine reduced exacerbations in people with COPD. The size of effect was similar to that seen in large observational studies, and was due to a reduction in exacerbations occurring three or more weeks after vaccination, and due to influenza. There was a mild increase in transient local adverse effects with vaccination, but no evidence of an increase in early exacerbations. Addition of live attenuated virus to the inactivated vaccine was not shown to confer additional benefit.

Intranasal co-administration of 1,8-cineole with influenza vaccine provide cross-protection against influenza virus infection

BACKGROUND

Vaccination is the most efficient means for protection against influenza. However, the various vaccines have low efficacy to protect against pandemic strains because of antigenic drift and recombination of influenza virus. Adjuvant therapy is one of the attempts to improve influenza vaccine effective cross-protection against influenza virus infection. Our previous study confirmed that 1,8-cineole inhibits the NF-κB, reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines, and relieves the pathological changes of viral pneumonia in mice infected with influenza virus.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

1,8-cineole, administered via intranasal (i.n.) route, may also have the capacity to be an adjuvant of the influenza vaccine. This study was designed to investigate the potential use of i.n. co-administration of 1,8-cineole, a major component of the Eucalyptus essential oils, with influenza vaccine and whether could provide cross-protection against influenza virus infection in a mouse model.

STUDY DESIGN

I.n. co-administration of 1,8-cineole in two doses (6.25 and 12.5 mg/kg) with influenza vaccine was investigated in a mouse model in order to see whether it could provide cross-protection against influenza virus infection.

METHODS

The mice were intranasally immunized three times at the 0, 7 and 14 day with vaccine containing 0.2 µg hemagglutinin (HA) and/or without 1,8-cineole. Seven days after the 3rd immunization dose, the mice were infected with 50 µl of 15 LD₅₀ (50% mouse lethal dose) influenza virus A/FM/1/47 (H1N1). On day 6 post-infection, 10 mice per group were sacrificed to collect samples, to take the body weight and lung, and detect the viral load, pathological changes in the lungs and antibody, etc. The collected samples included blood serum and nasal lavage fluids. In addition, the survival experiments were carried out  to investigate the survival of mice.

RESULTS

Mice i.n. inoculated with influenza vaccine and 12.5 mg/kg 1,8-cineole increased the production of influenza-specific serum immunoglobulin (Ig) G2a antibodies, stimulated mucosal secretive IgA (s-IgA) responses at the nasal cavity, improved the expression of respiratory tract intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) in the upper respiratory tract, and promoted dendritic cell (DC) maturation and the expression of co-stimulatory molecules cluster of differentiation (CD)40, CD80 and CD86 in peripheral blood. Importantly, mice that had received 1,8-cineole-supplemented influenza vaccine showed longer survival time, milder inflammation, less weight loss and mortality rate and lower lung index and viral titers compared to that of mice immunized a non-1,8-cineole-adjuvanted split vaccine. Thus, i.n. immunization with 1,8-cineole-adjuvanted vaccine induces a superior cross-protective immunity against infection with influenza than an inactivated vaccine only.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that 1,8-cineole (12.5 mg/kg) has a cross-protection against influenza virus, co-administered with inactivated influenza viral antigen in a mouse model.

Viral infections of the respiratory tract: prevention and treatment

The rapid discovery of specific viral agents as the cause of many acute respiratory diseases was accompanied by considerable optimism that vaccines or other control measures could be developed quickly. Subsequent experience has demonstrated that effective control of these important public health problems has been an elusive goal. However, recent exciting developments in our understanding of the molecular biology and immunology of these viruses may provide the basis for more effective strategies in the future.

Avian influenza pandemic preparedness: developing prepandemic and pandemic vaccines against a moving target

The unprecedented global spread of highly pathogenic avian H5N1 influenza viruses within the past ten years and their extreme lethality to poultry and humans has underscored their potential to cause an influenza pandemic. Combating the threat of an impending H5N1 influenza pandemic will require a combination of pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical intervention strategies. The emergence of the H1N1 pandemic in 2009 emphasised the unpredictable nature of a pandemic influenza. Undoubtedly, vaccines offer the most viable means to combat a pandemic threat. Current egg-based influenza vaccine manufacturing strategies are unlikely to be able to cater to the huge, rapid global demand because of the anticipated scarcity of embryonated eggs in an avian influenza pandemic and other factors associated with the vaccine production process. Therefore, alternative, egg-independent vaccine manufacturing strategies should be evaluated to supplement the traditional egg-derived influenza vaccine manufacturing. Furthermore, evaluation of dose-sparing strategies that offer protection with a reduced antigen dose will be critical for pandemic influenza preparedness. Development of new antiviral therapeutics and other, nonpharmaceutical intervention strategies will further supplement pandemic preparedness. This review highlights the current status of egg-dependent and egg-independent strategies against an avian influenza pandemic.

Flu myths: dispelling the myths associated with live attenuated influenza vaccine

Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), commercially available since 2003, has not gained widespread acceptance among prescribers. This underuse can be traced to several misperceptions and fears regarding LAIV. This review examines both the facts (safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness) and the most pervasive myths about LAIV. Live attenuated influenza vaccine is a safe, highly immunogenic, and effective vaccine. It is well tolerated; only mild and transient upper respiratory infection symptoms occur with LAIV vs placebo, even in higher-risk patients with asthma or the early stages of human immunodeficiency virus. It is immunogenic, especially in induction of mucosal immunity. In certain populations, LAIV is as effective as, and in some cases more effective than, inactivated influenza in preventing influenza infection. It appears to be more effective in preventing influenza infection than trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine when the vaccine virus strain does not closely match that of the circulating wild-type virus. Many myths and misperceptions about the vaccine exist, foremost among them the myth of genetic reversion. Independent mutation in 4 gene segments would be required for reversion of the vaccine strain of influenza virus to a wild type, an unlikely and as yet unobserved event. Although shedding of vaccine virus is common, transmission of vaccine virus has been documented only in a single person, who remained asymptomatic. In the age groups for which it is indicated, LAIV is a safe and effective vaccine to prevent influenza infection.

Influenza vaccine for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Influenza vaccinations are currently recommended in the care of people with COPD, but these recommendations are based largely on evidence from observational studies with very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported. Influenza infection causes excess morbidity and mortality in COPD patients but there is also the potential for influenza vaccination to cause adverse effects or not to be cost effective.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the evidence from RCTs for a treatment effect of influenza vaccination in COPD subjects. Outcomes of interest were exacerbation rates, hospitalisations, mortality, lung function and adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials, and reference lists of articles. References were also provided by a number of drug companies we contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared live or inactivated virus vaccines with placebo, either alone or with another vaccine in persons with COPD. Studies of people with asthma were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data. All entries were double checked. Study authors and drug companies were contacted for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included but only six of these were specifically performed in COPD patients. The others were conducted on elderly and high-risk individuals, some of whom had chronic lung disease. Inactivated vaccine in COPD patients resulted in a significant reduction in the total number of exacerbations per vaccinated subject compared with those who received placebo (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.37, 95% confidence interval -0.64 to -0.11, P = 0.006). This was due to the reduction in "late" exacerbations occurring after three or four weeks (WMD -0.39, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.18, P = 0.0004). In Howells 1961, the number of patients experiencing late exacerbations was also significantly less (odds ratio 0.13, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.45, P = 0.002). Both Howells 1961 and Wongsurakiat 2004 found that inactivated influenza vaccination reduced influenza -related respiratory infections (WMD 0.19, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.48, P = 0.0005). In both COPD patient and in elderly patients (only a minority of whom had COPD), there was a significant increase in the occurrence of local adverse reactions in vaccinees, but the effects were generally mild and transient. There was no evidence of an effect of intranasal live attenuated virus when this was added to inactivated intramuscular vaccination. The studies are too small to have detected any effect on mortality. An updated search conducted in September 2001 did not yield any further studies. A search in 2003 yielded two further reports of the same eligible study Gorse 2003. A search in 2004 yielded two reports of the another eligible study Wongsurakiat 2004. The author informed us of another report of the same study Wongsurakiat 2004/2.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

It appears, from the limited number of studies performed, that inactivated vaccine reduces exacerbations in COPD patients. The size of effect was similar to that seen in large observational studies, and was due to a reduction in exacerbations occurring three or more weeks after vaccination, and due to influenza. There is a mild increase in transient local adverse effects with vaccination, but no evidence of an increase in early exacerbations.

Influenza vaccines: crossing the translational gap to improve outcomes in the elderly

A decline in immune function is a hallmark of aging and influenza is foremost amongst all infectious diseases in the age-related increase in risk for serious complications and death. While epidemiologic studies have demonstrated the benefit of influenza vaccination in older adults, substantial numbers of hospitalizations and deaths attributable to influenza continue to occur, suggesting the need for even more effective vaccines. Clinical trials of new vaccines in older adults that rely on antibody responses as a sole measure of vaccine efficacy cannot evaluate components of the cellular immune response that are critical for protection against influenza in this population. This article will review recent publications that have helped us to understand the spectrum of illnesses caused by influenza and the potential benefits of vaccination, identify key components of the immune response that decline with aging, and describe how new vaccine technologies may reverse these changes to prevent complicated influenza illness in older people.

Intranasal Cold-Adapted Influenza Virus Vaccine Combined with Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccines

Although influenza vaccine delivery strategies have improved coverage rates to unprecedented levels nationally among persons aged 65 years and older, influenza remains one of the greatest vaccine-preventable threats to public health among elderly in the US. A new, intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) was recently approved by the US FDA for use in persons aged 5-49 years, which excludes the elderly population. Limitations of immune response to inactivated influenza vaccine (IAIV) and effectiveness of current influenza vaccination strategies among the elderly suggest that a combined approach using LAIV and/or the IAIV in various permutations might benefit this group. We explore characteristics of the LAIV, data regarding its utility in protecting against influenza in the elderly, and challenges and opportunities regarding potential combined inactivated/live attenuated vaccination strategies for the elderly. Although LAIV appears to hold promise either alone or in combination with IAIV, large well conducted randomised trials are necessary to define further the role of LAIV in preventing influenza morbidity and mortality among the elderly. We also suggest that innovative vaccine coverage strategies designed to optimise prevention and control of influenza and minimise viral transmission in the community must accompany, in parallel, the acquisition of clinical trials data to best combat morbidity and mortality from influenza.

Universal vaccination of healthy children against influenza: a role for the cold-adapted intranasal influenza vaccine

The incidence of influenza in children well exceeds that of the elderly and has been identified as the basis for 20% of doctor visits for children during the winter. The disease results in over 100 hospitalizations per 100000 person-months in children <2 years of age. Furthermore, children serve as the major vector in the community; thus, influenza in children results in significant costs to society. Although efficacious, the current intramuscular, inactivated influenza vaccine is infrequently used in children, and is currently targeted only at children at high risk and those who are household members of such individuals. Experts believe that vaccinating only high risk individuals has little impact on the cycle of annual epidemics, but that universal vaccination of children may very well have a substantial impact. Experimental data support this. A recently published cost-benefit analysis indicated that routine, school-aged vaccination through individual visits to a clinician would save 4 US dollars per child vaccinated. A group program such as a school-based one would save 35 US dollars. One obstacle to universal vaccination includes the real and perceived resistance to the addition of yet another annual injection to the already crowded schedule of routine childhood immunizations. Nearing licensure is an intranasal, live attenuated, cold-adapted intranasal influenza vaccine. Cold-adaptation prevents replication in the lower respiratory tract. Trials have demonstrated immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability in adults as well as children. Placebo-controlled trials have shown efficacy rates of 83 to 94%. This novel vaccine addresses obstacles to universal childhood immunization and would permit a program of routine use that would dramatically reduce transmission and stem epidemics of influenza.

Cold-adapted live influenza vaccine versus inactivated vaccine: systemic vaccine reactions, local and systemic antibody response, and vaccine efficacy. A meta-analysis

Since the 1940s, influenza vaccines are inactivated and purified virus or virus subunit preparations (IIV) administered by the intramuscular route. Since decades, attempts have been made to construct, as an alternative, attenuated live influenza vaccines (LIV) for intranasal administration. Presently, the most successful LIV is derived from the cold-adapted master strains A/Ann Arbor/6/60 (H2N2) and B/Ann Arbor/1/66 (AA-LIV, for Ann-Arbor-derived live influenza vaccine). It has been claimed that AA-LIV is more efficacious than IIV. In order to assess differences between the two vaccines with respect to systemic reactogenicity, antibody response, and efficacy, we performed a meta-analysis on eighteen randomised comparative clinical trials involving a total of 5000 vaccinees of all ages. Pooled odds ratios (AA-LIV versus IIV) were calculated according to the random effects model. The two vaccines were associated with similarly low frequencies of systemic vaccine reactions (pooled odds ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.24). AA-LIV induced significantly lower levels of serum haemagglutination inhibiting antibody and significantly greater levels of local IgA antibody (influenza virus-specific respiratory IgA assayed by ELISA in nasal wash specimens) than IIV. Yet, although they predominantly stimulate different antibody compartments, the two vaccines were similarly efficacious in preventing culture-positive influenza illness. In all trials assessing clinical efficacy, the odds ratios were not significantly different from one (point of equivalence). The pooled odds ratio for influenza A-H3N2 was 1.50 (95% CI: 0.80-2.82), and for A-H1N1, 1.03 (95% CI: 0.58-1.82). The choice between the two vaccine types should be based on weighing the advantage of the attractive non-invasive mode of administration of AA-LIV, against serious concerns about the biological risks inherent to large-scale use of infectious influenza virus, in particular the hazard of gene reassortment with non-human influenza virus strains.

Promises and challenges of live-attenuated intranasal influenza vaccines across the age spectrum: a review

Despite the availability of inactivated influenza vaccines, influenza continues to cause considerable mortality in the elderly, and morbidity in all age groups. Cold-adapted, live-attenuated, intranasally administered influenza vaccines, first developed in the 1960s, have been tested in more than 10,000 volunteers and have been shown to be safe, well-tolerated, and immunogenic. Recent trials suggest that efficacy in children may be superior to that of inactivated vaccines, and efficacy in healthy adults may be similar to that of inactivated vaccines, although there are limited data comparing the two vaccines directly. Advantages of the live-attenuated vaccines include acceptability, ease of administration, and the potential for mass immunization. The possibility of substantially higher vaccination rates across all age groups brings promise for the development of herd immunity and greatly improved control of influenza in the future.

Quantitation of virus-specific classes of antibodies following immunization of mice with attenuated equine herpesvirus 1 and viral glycoprotein D

The antibody responses of CBA/J mice infected intranasally (i.n.) with either the attenuated KyA strain or the pathogenic RacL11 strain of equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) or immunized with recombinant glycoprotein D (rgD) were investigated using the ELISPOT assay to measure EHV-1-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASC) in the regional lymphoid tissue of the respiratory tract. IgG, IgA, and IgM ASC specific for EHV-1 were detected in the mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) and lungs 2 weeks after i.n. infection with EHV-1 strain KyA or RacL11, or immunization with heat-killed KyA or rgD. EHV-1-specific ASC were present in the MLN and lungs at 4 and 8 weeks, but declined in frequency by fivefold in the lung at 8 weeks. However, i.n. immunized (2 x 10(6) pfu KyA or 50 microgram rgD/mouse) mice infected at 8 weeks with pathogenic EHV-1 RacL11 resisted challenge and showed eight- and tenfold increases in MLN ASC and lung ASC, respectively, by 3 days after challenge. In contrast to the intranasal route of immunization, intraperitoneal immunization yielded ASC frequencies in the MLN and lungs that were only slightly above those of nonimmunized control mice. These data indicate that immunization with infectious or heat-killed EHV-1 KyA, or rgD, induces significant levels of virus-specific ASC both in the MLN and lungs, a specific memory B-cell response, and long-term protective immunity. The finding that the numbers of ASC induced by the pathogenic strain versus the attenuated strain of EHV-1, which were virtually identical, indicated that the ability to generate a B-cell response is independent of and does not contribute to EHV-1 virulence.

Influenza vaccine for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Influenza vaccinations are currently recommended in the care of people with COPD, but these recommendations are based largely on evidence from observational studies with very few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reported. Influenza infection causes excess morbidity and mortality in COPD patients but there is also the potential for influenza vaccination to cause adverse effects or not to be cost effective.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the evidence from RCTs for a treatment effect of influenza vaccination in COPD subjects. Outcomes of interest were exacerbation rates, hospitalisations, mortality, lung function and adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. References were also provided by a number of drug companies we contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared live or inactivated virus vaccines with placebo, either alone or with another vaccine in persons with COPD. Studies of people with asthma were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data. All entries were double checked. Study authors and drug companies were contacted for missing information.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials were included but only four of these were specifically performed in COPD patients. The others were conducted on elderly and high-risk individuals, some of whom had chronic lung disease. In one study of inactivated vaccine in COPD patients there was a significant reduction in the total number of exacerbations per vaccinated subject compared with those who received placebo (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.45, 95% confidence interval -0.75 to -0.15, p = 0.004). This difference was mainly due to the reduction in exacerbations occurring after 3 weeks (WMD -0.44, (95% CI -0.68 to -0.20, p<0.001). The number of patients experiencing late exacerbations was also significantly less (OR= 0.13, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.45, p=0.002). There was no evidence of an effect of intranasal live attenuated virus when this was added to inactivated intramuscular vaccination. In studies in elderly patients (only a minority of whom had COPD), there was a significant increase in the occurrence of local adverse reactions in vaccinees, but the effects were generally mild and transient.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

It appears, from the limited number of studies performed, that inactivated vaccine may reduce exacerbations in COPD patients. The size of effect was similar to that seen in large observational studies, and was due to a reduction in exacerbations occurring three or more weeks after vaccination. In elderly, high risk patients there was an increase in adverse effects with vaccination, but these are seen early and are usually mild and transient.

Respiratory viral infections in the elderly

Viral respiratory infections represent a significant challenge for those interested in improving the health of the elderly. Influenza continues to result in a large burden of excess morbidity and mortality. Two effective measures, inactivated influenza vaccine, and the antiviral drugs rimantadine and amantadine, are currently available for control of this disease. Inactivated vaccine should be given yearly to all of those over the age of 65, as well as younger individuals with high-risk medical conditions and individuals delivering care to such persons. Live, intranasally administered attenuated influenza vaccines are also in development, and may be useful in combination with inactivated vaccine in the elderly. The antiviral drugs amantadine and rimantadine are effective in the treatment and prevention of influenza A, although rimantadine is associated with fewer side-effects. Recently, the inhaled neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir, which is active against both influenza A and B viruses, was licensed for use in uncomplicated influenza. The role of this drug in treatment and prevention of influenza in the elderly remains to be determined. Additional neuraminidase inhibitors are also being developed. In addition, to influenza, respiratory infections with respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, rhinovirus, and coronavirus have been identified as potential problems in the elderly. With increasing attention, it is probable that the impact of these infections in this age group will be more extensively documented. Understanding of the immunology and pathogenesis of these infections in elderly adults is in its infancy, and considerable additional work will need to be performed towards development of effective control measures.

Evaluation of live, cold-adapted influenza A and B virus vaccines in elderly and high-risk subjects

We have evaluated the use of live cold-adapted influenza A and B virus vaccines in the elderly. Cold-adapted influenza A and B virus vaccines are safe and modestly immunogenic in individuals over 65 years of age. However, our studies and those of other groups have shown that immune response to cold-adapted vaccines in this age group are modest. Administration of combined cold-adapted influenza A and inactivated influenza vaccine has resulted in slightly higher frequencies of local and systemic humoral immune responses than inactivated vaccine alone in some, but not all, studies. In a double-blind field trial conducted in nursing homes over a 3 year period, combined cold-adapted influenza A (H3N2) and trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine resulted in a 60% decrease (95% CI, 18-82%) in the rate of laboratory documented influenza A compared with inactivated vaccine alone. Further studies of multivalent cold-adapted influenza vaccines used in combination with inactivated vaccine should be performed.

The efficacy of live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenzavirus vaccine in children

BACKGROUND

Influenzavirus vaccine is used infrequently in healthy children, even though the rates of influenza in this group are high. We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent influenzavirus vaccine in children 15 to 71 months old.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-eight children were assigned to receive one dose of vaccine or placebo given by intranasal spray, and 1314 were assigned to receive two doses approximately 60 days apart. The strains included in the vaccine were antigenically equivalent to those in the inactivated influenzavirus vaccine in use at the time. The subjects were monitored with viral cultures for influenza during the subsequent influenza season. A case of influenza was defined as an illness associated with the isolation of wild-type influenzavirus from respiratory secretions.

RESULTS

The intranasal vaccine was accepted and well tolerated. Among children who were initially seronegative, antibody titers increased by a factor of four in 61 to 96 percent, depending on the influenza strain. Culture-positive influenza was significantly less common in the vaccine group (14 cases among 1070 subjects) than the placebo group (95 cases among 532 subjects). The vaccine efficacy was 93 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 88 to 96 percent) against culture-confirmed influenza. Both the one-dose regimen (89 percent efficacy) and the two-dose regimen (94 percent efficacy) were efficacious, and the vaccine was efficacious against both strains of influenza circulating in 1996-1997, A(H3N2) and B. The vaccinated children had significantly fewer febrile illnesses, including 30 percent fewer episodes of febrile otitis media (95 percent confidence interval, 18 to 45 percent; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A live attenuated, cold-adapted influenzavirus vaccine was safe, immunogenic, and effective against influenza A(H3N2) and B in healthy children.

Influenza virus vaccination of patients with chronic lung disease

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of, and mucosal and systemic immune responses induced by two influenza virus vaccine regimens in subjects with COPD.

DESIGN

Single-center, blinded, randomized, prospective clinical trial evaluating two vaccine regimens.

SETTING

Outpatient clinics of St. Louis Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Volunteers (age range, 42 to 88 years) had preexisting COPD with severe obstruction to airflow on average, were male, and were not receiving immunosuppressive medication.

INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-nine volunteers were randomly assigned to receive either bivalent live attenuated influenza A virus vaccine (CAV) or saline solution placebo intranasally. All subjects also received an i.m. injection of trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine (TVV) simultaneously.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Clinical status and pulmonary function measured by spirometry did not change significantly after vaccination. Using hemagglutinins (H1 and H3 HA) which more closely resembled those in CAV, mean levels of anti-HA immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in nasal washings increased significantly after vaccination with CAV and TVV compared to prevaccination, but they did not increase significantly after TVV and intranasal placebo. Mean levels of influenza A virus-stimulated interleukin-2 and -4 produced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro increased significantly after administration of the combination vaccine regimen and to a lesser extent after TVV and intranasal placebo compared to respective prevaccination levels. The timing of the cytokine response appeared different following CAV and TVV compared to TVV and intranasal placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Intranasally administered CAV was safe when given with i.m. administered TVV and there may be an immunologic advantage to administration of the combination vaccine regimen compared to TVV with intranasal placebo.

Genetically engineered live attenuated influenza A virus vaccine candidates

We have generated new influenza A virus live attenuated vaccine candidates by site-directed mutagenesis and reverse genetics. By mutating specific amino acids in the PB2 polymerase subunit, two temperature-sensitive (ts) attenuated viruses were obtained. Both candidates have 38 degrees C shutoff temperatures in MDCK cells, are attenuated in the respiratory tracts of mice and ferrets, and have very low reactogenicity in ferrets. Infection of mice or ferrets with either mutant conferred significant protection from challenge with the homologous wild-type virus. Three tests for genetic stability were used to assess the propensity for reversion to virulence: 14 days of replication in nude mice, growth at 37 degrees C in tissue culture, and serial passage in ferrets. One candidate, which contains mutations intended to reduce the ability of PB2 to bind to cap structures, was stable in all three assays, whereas the second candidate, which contains mutations found only in other ts strains of influenza virus, lost its ts phenotype in the last two assays. This approach has therefore enabled the creation of live attenuated influenza A virus vaccine candidates suitable for human testing.

Temperature sensitive mutants of influenza A virus generated by reverse genetics and clustered charged to alanine mutagenesis

Temperature sensitive (ts) mutants of influenza A virus have the potential to serve as live attenuated (att) virus vaccines. Previously, ts mutants were isolated by chemical mutagenesis or arose spontaneously, and most likely contained point mutations in one or more genes. While sufficiently attenuated, even the most genetically stable of these viruses was found to revert to a more virulent form in a seronegative vaccinee. Recently developed technology, however, allows the introduction of engineered mutations into the genome of influenza A and B viruses, permitting the rational design of attenuated mutants with the potential for increased genetic stability. To accomplish this goal, we have introduced ts mutations into the PB2 gene of A/Los Angeles/2/87 (H3N2) and rescued the mutated genes into infectious viruses. We have used clustered charged to alanine mutagenesis (substitution of alanine for charged amino acid residues which are present in clusters) of the PB2 gene to generate novel ts mutants. Viruses containing such ts PB2 genes were attenuated in mice and ferrets. This approach has thus yielded several vaccine candidates with ts and attenuated characteristics in animal models. Combination of these mutations with each other or with other ts mutations may lead to a high level of genetic stability.

Virus-specific, antibody-secreting cells during upper respiratory infections

The humoral immune response of 18 army recruits with febrile upper respiratory infection (URI) was studied by enumerating virus-specific, antibody-secreting cells in the peripheral blood. Diagnosis was based on viral antigen detection in nasopharyngeal specimens, virus isolation from throat swabs, or on antibody measurement from paired serum samples. At the time of the sample collection, three viruses, including adenovirus, influenza A, and influenza B, were found mainly to cause URIs among the recruits, and ELISPOT assay for enumeration of the specific antibody-secreting cells was selected for these viruses. Of the 36 patients with febrile URI studied, viral diagnosis was made in 18 cases, which included 11 patients with adenovirus infection, three with influenza A, and four with influenza B. The first blood sample was collected at the first signs of URI and the second and third samples at 2-week intervals. The adenovirus-positive patients developed a strong IgG class antibody-secreting cell response against the homologous virus, which peaked at the first sample and decreased steeply by the second and third samples. In the influenza A and B patients, the response was similar kinetically to that seen in adenovirus-positive patients. In those cases where also IgA and IgM class antibody-secreting cells were determined, the IgG response dominated. The ELISPOT method has potential also as a diagnostic tool for respiratory infections.

Prevention of influenza by the intranasal administration of cold-recombinant, live-attenuated influenza virus vaccine: importance of interferon-gamma production and local IgA response

To clarify which immunological factors were more effective in preventing influenza virus infection, we measured immunological parameters induced by vaccination and infection in vivo and in vitro. Healthy adult subjects (n = 128) were divided into vaccinated (n = 85) and untreated (n = 43) groups. Eighty-five were vaccinated intranasally with a trivalent cold-adapted recombinant influenza virus vaccine containing type A (H1N1 and H3N2) and B viruses. Subjects were mostly seropositive before vaccination. In 29 (80.6%) of the 36 examinees showing a prevaccination HI antibody titre of less than 1:128, the titre increased more than four times after vaccination. On the other hand, an increase of more than four times was found in four (8.2%) of the 49 individuals who had shown a prevaccination titre of more than 1:128. The IgA antibody was negligibly detected in the nasal wash specimens before vaccination, and was induced by vaccination in some cases. Lymphocyte proliferation and interleukin 2 (IL-2) production in cultured lymphocytes of the same subjects stimulated by H1N1 virus in vitro were correlated with the HI antibody titre. However, the interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) production was low before vaccination, regardless of the HI antibody titre, and showed a significant increase after vaccination. It was suggested that local IgA response and IFN-gamma production play important roles in the prevention of influenza. Since there was the outbreak of influenza A (H1N1) in Kochi Prefecture after completion of blood samples 6-8 weeks after the second vaccination, we examined the above hypothesis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

High doses of purified influenza A virus hemagglutinin significantly augment serum and nasal secretion antibody responses in healthy young adults

The reactogenicity and immunogenicity of purified influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) vaccines administered intramuscularly were evaluated in two placebo-controlled clinical trials. A total of 139 healthy young adults were randomized to receive increasing doses of monovalent influenza A/Taiwan/1/86 (H1N1) virus HA (range, 0 to 405 micrograms per dose [study 1]). An additional 139 subjects were given increasing doses of a trivalent HA vaccine containing equal amounts of A/H1N1 virus, A/Shanghai/16/89 (H3N2) virus, and influenza B/Yamagata/16/88 virus HA (range, 0 to 135 micrograms of HA per strain, 0 to 405 micrograms per dose) or a standard dose of commercial influenza vaccine (study 2). Increasing doses of HA were associated with increasing frequencies of symptoms at the vaccination site early after vaccination, but all doses were well tolerated. Occurrence of systemic symptoms was unrelated to dose. Increasing the dose of HA resulted in increasingly higher postimmunization levels of serum hemagglutination inhibiting and neutralizing antibody levels versus influenza A/H1N1 virus in study 1 (P < 0.05); these enhanced responses persisted for up to 6 months. Nasal secretory immunoglobulin A and G antibody responses were assessed 2 weeks after immunization with monovalent H1N1 virus HA; the frequencies of significant responses also increased in a dose-related fashion. Similar increases in serum antibody levels were noted for both A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 viruses in study 2. These data provide a basis for proceeding with the evaluation of high doses of purified HA in the elderly.

Reduced infectivity of cold-adapted influenza A H1N1 viruses in the elderly: correlation with serum and local antibodies

OBJECTIVE

To compare young and elderly adults in terms of their immune responses and rates of infection following intranasal vaccination with a live attenuated influenza virus.

DESIGN

Time series, comparing outcomes in young and elderly convenience sample.

METHOD

Retrospective laboratory analysis of serum and nasal wash specimens collected during prior studies in which young or elderly volunteers had been inoculated with cold-adapted influenza A/Kawasaki/86 (H1N1) reassortant virus.

SETTING

Johns Hopkins Center for Immunization Research.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthy young and elderly adults with pre-vaccination serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers less than or equal to 1:8.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Antibody responses in serum and nasal washes.

MAIN RESULTS

The proportion of vaccinees who developed any serum or local antibody response was higher in young compared with elderly subjects (20/20 vs 5/14, P less than 0.0005). Resistance to infection with cold-adapted virus correlated with pre-vaccination levels of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG), serum IgA, and nasal wash IgA antibody to whole virus antigen. Age was highly correlated with a lack of response to vaccine by simple regression, but not when data were adjusted for pre-existing antibody levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Cold-adapted reassortant influenza A H1N1 viruses achieve lower rates of infection in elderly than young adults, primarily due to age-related differences in preexisting levels of immunity which may not be reflected by HAI titer.

Superiority of live attenuated compared with inactivated influenza A virus vaccines in older, chronically ill adults

Forty-eight older adults with chronic diseases were vaccinated intranasally with live attenuated influenza A/Korea/1/82 (H3N2), CR59 virus. Forty-two (88 percent) CR59 virus recipients became infected with vaccine virus without adverse effects or change in mean pulmonary function even among the 29 infected recipients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Among control groups who received either monovalent or trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccines intramuscularly, the rates of fourfold rises in serum antibody titer to hemagglutinin (HA) were not different from the rate following CR59 virus inoculation. However, CR59 virus was superior to inactivated virus vaccine at stimulating secretory antibody to HA. Vaccinees age 65 years and older were more likely to shed CR59 virus in nasal secretions than were younger vaccinees, but antibody responses were not different. CR59 virus vaccine was safe and immunogenic in this population and more often induced a nasal wash IgA antibody response than the inactivated virus vaccines.

In elderly persons live attenuated influenza A virus vaccines do not offer an advantage over inactivated virus vaccine in inducing serum or secretory antibodies or local immunologic memory

In a double-blind, randomized trial, 102 healthy elderly subjects were inoculated with one of four preparations: (i) intranasal bivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine containing cold-adapted A/Kawasaki/86 (H1N1) and cold-adapted A/Bethesda/85 (H3N2) viruses; (ii) parenteral trivalent inactivated subvirion vaccine containing A/Taiwan/86 (H1N1), A/Leningrad/86 (H3N2), and B/Ann Arbor/86 antigens; (iii) both vaccines; or (iv) placebo. To determine whether local or systemic immunization augmented mucosal immunologic memory, all volunteers were challenged intranasally 12 weeks later with the inactivated virus vaccine. We used a hemagglutination inhibition assay to measure antibodies in sera and a kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies in sera and nasal washes, respectively. In comparison with the live virus vaccine, the inactivated virus vaccine elicited higher and more frequent rises of serum antibodies, while nasal wash antibody responses were similar. The vaccine combination induced serum and local antibodies slightly more often than the inactivated vaccine alone did. Coadministration of live influenza A virus vaccine did not alter the serum antibody response to the influenza B virus component of the inactivated vaccine. The anamnestic nasal antibody response elicited by intranasal inactivated virus challenge did not differ in the live, inactivated, or combined vaccine groups from that observed in the placebo group not previously immunized. These results suggest that in elderly persons cold-adapted influenza A virus vaccines offer little advantage over inactivated virus vaccines in terms of inducing serum or secretory antibody or local immunological memory. Studies are needed to determine whether both vaccines in combination are more efficacious than inactivated vaccine alone in people in this age group.

Enhanced lymphoproliferation to influenza A virus following vaccination of older, chronically ill adults with live-attenuated viruses

To question whether cellular immunity was stimulated by live-attenuated viruses in older, chronically ill adults, we intranasally inoculated 2 groups of volunteers (n = 37) with 2 different cold-recombinant, live-attenuated influenza A virus vaccines, and measured peripheral blood mononuclear cell responsiveness to influenza antigens and mitogen before and after vaccination. Lymphocyte proliferation to vaccine virus and to heterosubtypic influenza A virus increased postvaccination even in the subpopulation of vaccines who had a 4-fold nasal wash antibody titer rise to vaccine virus hemagglutinin, but no concomitant serum antibody titer rise to hemagglutinin. Vaccines aged greater than or equal to 65 years exhibited a rise in proliferation to vaccine virus postvaccination, as well. Based on lymphocyte proliferation, vaccine virus infection induced an enhanced cell-mediated immune response. Higher prevaccination serum antibody titers, however, were associated with protection from vaccine virus infection, and higher lymphocyte proliferation was not.

Enhancement of anti-influenza A virus cytotoxicity following influenza A virus vaccination in older, chronically ill adults

We studied anti-influenza cytotoxicity by bulk peripheral blood mononuclear leukocyte (PBL) cultures derived from older, chronically ill volunteers undergoing vaccination. Vaccinees received either cold-recombinant, live-attenuated influenza A/Korea/1/82 (H3N2) virus intranasally or inactivated monovalent influenza A/Taiwan/1/86 (H1N1) subvirion vaccine intramuscularly. PBL were collected pre- and postvaccination and in vitro stimulated by autologous PBL infected with influenza A virus homologous and heterosubtypic to the respective vaccine strain. Cytotoxicity was measured against influenza A virus-infected autologous and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched PBL targets infected with influenza A virus homologous or heterosubtypic to the vaccine virus strain. Vaccinees infected with the live-attenuated virus developed significant rises in mean anti-influenza, HLA-restricted cytotoxicity that was cross-reactive against influenza A viruses homologous and heterosubtypic to the vaccine virus. The enhanced cross-reactive cytotoxicity was inducible postvaccination by in vitro stimulation with autologous PBL infected with the homologous influenza A (H3N2) virus and with influenza A (H1N1) virus. In contrast, after vaccination with inactivated monovalent subvirion vaccine, volunteers developed significant increases in mean anti-influenza, HLA-restricted cytotoxicity only against autologous PBL infected with homologous influenza A (H1N1) virus. Increased cytotoxicity occurred only after in vitro stimulation with autologous cells infected with homologous influenza A (H1N1) virus. Mean gamma interferon levels in supernatant fluids of influenza A virus-stimulated effector PBL did not increase postvaccination, despite increased levels of anti-influenza cytotoxicity displayed by the effector cells. We conclude that the live-attenuated influenza A virus infection induced a broader range of enhanced anti-influenza cytotoxicity than did the inactivated subvirion vaccine.

Systemic and local antibody responses in elderly subjects given live or inactivated influenza A virus vaccines

Intranasal live attenuated cold-adapted (ca) influenza A/Kawasaki/9/86 (H1N1) reassortant virus and parenteral inactivated influenza A/Taiwan/1/86 (H1N1) virus were given alone or in combination to 80 ambulatory elderly subjects. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure hemagglutinin-specific (HA) antibodies in serum and nasal wash specimens collected before vaccination and 1 and 3 months later. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and nasal wash IgA HA responses were elicited in 56 and 20%, respectively, of 25 inactivated-virus vaccinees and in 67 and 48%, respectively, of 27 recipients of both vaccines but in only 36 and 25%, respectively, of 28 vaccinees given live virus alone. Inactivated virus, administered alone or with live virus vaccine, induced higher titers of serum antibody than did the live virus alone. In contrast, nasal IgA HA antibody was elicited more often and in greater quantity by the vaccine combination than by either vaccine alone. Despite these differences, the peak titers of local antibody mounted by each group of vaccinees were similar. By 3 months postvaccination, serum IgG and nasal IgA HA antibody titers remained elevated above prevaccination levels in 50 and 17%, respectively, of the inactivated-virus vaccinees and in 46 and 23%, respectively, of recipients of both vaccines but in only 19 and 7%, respectively, of the live-virus and systemic antibodies, if vaccinees. The finding that live ca influenza A virus induced short-lived local and systemic antibodies, if confirmed, suggests that live virus vaccination may not be a suitable alternative or adjunct to inactivated virus vaccination for the elderly.