Inducible processing of interferon regulatory factor-2

microRNA Function Is Limited to Cytokine Control in the Acute Response to Virus Infection

With the capacity to fine-tune protein expression via sequence-specific interactions, microRNAs (miRNAs) help regulate cell maintenance and differentiation. While some studies have also implicated miRNAs as regulators of the antiviral response, others have found that the RISC complex that facilitates miRNA-mediated silencing is rendered nonfunctional during cellular stress, including virus infection. To determine the global role of miRNAs in the cellular response to virus infection, we generated a vector that rapidly eliminates total cellular miRNA populations in terminally differentiated primary cultures. Loss of miRNAs has a negligible impact on both innate sensing of and immediate response to acute viral infection. In contrast, miRNA depletion specifically enhances cytokine expression, providing a posttranslational mechanism for immune cell activation during cellular stress. This work highlights the physiological role of miRNAs during the antiviral response and suggests their contribution is limited to chronic infections and the acute activation of the adaptive immune response.

Nuclear localization of catalytically active MMP-2 in endothelial cells and neurons

From microscopic organelles and sub-cellular domains to the level of whole tissues, organs, and body parts, living organisms must continuously maintain and renovate structural components. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) comprise a family of over two dozen Zn-dependent endopeptidases thought to be primary effectors of extracellular tissue renewal and remodeling processes. Endogenous inhibitors, particularly the tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs), counteract MMP-2 proteolytic activity, but also participate in conversion of several pro-MMPs to proteolytically active forms. Numerous pathologies are characterized by imbalances in activities of MMPs relative to TIMPs. MMPs are synthesized and stored in cytoplasmic domains prior to secretion or expression in cell surface-associated form. Several proteases have been identified in cell nuclei, but their functions, regulation, and substrates remain largely unknown. Here we showed that the catalytically active gelatinase MMP-2 is expressed in nuclei of endothelial cells and neurons, but not in glial or Schwannoma cell lines, in a pattern resembling nuclear speckles, and colocalizes with TIMP-1.

A gammaherpesvirus cooperates with interferon-alpha/beta-induced IRF2 to halt viral replication, control reactivation, and minimize host lethality

The gammaherpesviruses, including Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), establish latency in memory B lymphocytes and promote lymphoproliferative disease in immunocompromised individuals. The precise immune mechanisms that prevent gammaherpesvirus reactivation and tumorigenesis are poorly defined. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68) is closely related to EBV and KSHV, and type I (alpha/beta) interferons (IFNαβ) regulate MHV68 reactivation from both B cells and macrophages by unknown mechanisms. Here we demonstrate that IFNβ is highly upregulated during latent infection, in the absence of detectable MHV68 replication. We identify an interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE) in the MHV68 M2 gene promoter that is bound by the IFNαβ-induced transcriptional repressor IRF2 during latency in vivo. The M2 protein regulates B cell signaling to promote establishment of latency and reactivation. Virus lacking the M2 ISRE (ISREΔ) overexpresses M2 mRNA and displays uncontrolled acute replication in vivo, higher latent viral load, and aberrantly high reactivation from latency. These phenotypes of the ISREΔ mutant are B-cell-specific, require IRF2, and correlate with a significant increase in virulence in a model of acute viral pneumonia. We therefore identify a mechanism by which a gammaherpesvirus subverts host IFNαβ signaling in a surprisingly cooperative manner, to directly repress viral replication and reactivation and enforce latency, thereby minimizing acute host disease. Since we find ISREs 5′ to the major lymphocyte latency genes of multiple rodent, primate, and human gammaherpesviruses, we propose that cooperative subversion of IFNαβ-induced IRFs to promote latent infection is an ancient strategy that ensures a stable, minimally-pathogenic virus-host relationship.

Herpesviruses establish life-long infection in a non-replicating state termed latency. During immune compromise, herpesviruses can reactivate and cause severe disease, including cancer. We investigated mechanisms by which interferons alpha/beta (IFNαβ), a family of antiviral immune genes, inhibit reactivation of murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68). MHV68 is related to Epstein-Barr virus and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, human gammaherpesviruses associated with multiple cancers. We made the surprising discovery that during latency, MHV68 cooperates with IFNαβ to inhibit its own replication. Specifically, a viral gene required for reactivation has evolved to be directly repressed by an IFNαβ-induced transcription factor, IRF2. Once virus replication has triggered sufficient IFNαβ production, expression of this viral gene is reduced and reactivation efficiency decreases. This strategy safeguards the health of the host, since a mutant virus that cannot respond to IRF2 replicates uncontrollably and is more virulent. Viral sensing of IFNαβ is also potentially subversive, since it allows MHV68 to detect periods of localized immune quiescence during which it can reactivate and spread to a new host. Thus, we highlight a novel path of virus-host coevolution, toward cooperative subversion of the antiviral immune response. These observations may illuminate new targets for drugs to inhibit herpesvirus reactivation or eliminate herpesvirus-associated tumors.

Replacement of the C-terminal tetrapeptide (314 PAPV 317 to 314 SSSM 317) in interferon regulatory factor-2 alters its N-terminal DNA-binding activity

Interferon regulatory factor-2 (IRF-2) is an important transcription factor involved in cell growth regulation, immune response and cancer. IRF-2 can function as a transcriptional repressor and activator depending on its DNA-binding activity and protein-protein interactions. We compared the amino acid sequences of IRF-2 and found a C-terminal tetrapeptide (314PAPV317) of mouse IRF-2 to be different (314SSSM317) from human IRF-2. Recombinant GST-IRF-2 with 314PAPV317 (wild type) and 314SSSM317 (mutant) expressed in Escherichia coli were assessed for DNA-binding activity with 32P-(GAAAGT) 4 by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Wild type- and mutant GST-IRF-2 showed similar expression patterns and immunoreactivities but different DNA-binding activities. Mutant (mt) IRF-2 formed higher-molecular-mass, more and stronger DNA-protein complexes in comparison to wild type (wt) IRF-2. Anti-IRF-2 antibody stabilized the DNA-protein complexes formed by both wt IRF-2 and mt IRF-2, resolving the differences. This suggests that PAPV and SSSM sequences at 314-317 in the C-terminal region of mouse and human IRF-2 contribute to conformation of IRF-2 and influence DNA-binding activity of the N-terminal region, indicating intramolecular interactions. Thus, evolution of IRF-2 from murine to human genome has resulted in subtle differences in C-terminal amino acid motifs, which may contribute to qualitative changes in IRF-2-dependent DNA-binding activity and gene expression.

Regulation of IRF2 transcriptional activity by its sumoylation

IRFs constitute a family of transcription factors involved in IFN signaling and in the development and differentiation of the immune system. IRFs activities are regulated at transcriptional level (such as IRF1) and post-translational modifications (such as IRF3 and IRF7). Here we show that IRF2 interacts with the SUMO-E3 ligase PIASy and is sumoylated in vivo. Mutagenesis analysis suggests that IRF2 contains three sumoylation sites. Sumoylation of IRF2 has no significant effects on its nuclear localization and DNA-binding activity, but increases its ability to inhibit IRF1 transcriptional activity and decreases its ability to activate the ISRE and H4 promoters. Our findings suggest that sumoylation of IRF2 regulates its transcriptional activities.

HiNF-P is a bifunctional regulator of cell cycle controlled histone H4 gene transcription

Cell cycle progression beyond the G1/S phase transition requires the activation of a transcription complex containing histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P) and nuclear protein mapped to ataxia telangiectasia (p220(NPAT)) in response to cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2)/cyclin E signaling. We show here that the potent co-activating properties of HiNF-P/p220(NPAT) on the histone H4 gene promoter, which are evident in the majority of human cell types, are sporadically neutralized in distinct somatic cell lines. In cells where HiNF-P and p220(NPAT) do not activate the H4 gene promoter, HiNF-P instead represses transcription. Our data suggest that the cell type specific expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitory (CKI) protein p57(KIP2) inhibits the HiNF-P dependent activation of the histone H4 promoter. We propose that, analogous to E2F proteins and other cell cycle regulatory proteins, HiNF-P is a bifunctional transcriptional regulator that can activate or repress cell cycle controlled genes depending on the cellular context.

The tumor suppressor interferon regulatory factor 1 interferes with SP1 activation to repress the human CDK2 promoter

Cell growth control by interferons (IFNs) involves up-regulation of the tumor suppressor interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1). To exert its anti-proliferative effects, this factor must ultimately control transcription of several key genes that regulate cell cycle progression. Here we show that the G1/S phase-related cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) gene is a novel proliferation-related downstream target of IRF1. We find that IRF1, but not IRF2, IRF3, or IRF7, selectively represses CDK2 gene transcription in a dose- and time-dependent manner. We delineate the IRF1-responsive repressor element between nt -68 to -31 of the CDK2 promoter. For comparison, the tumor suppressor p53 represses CDK2 promoter activity independently of IRF1 through sequences upstream of nt -68, and the CDP/cut/Cux1 homeodomain protein represses transcription down-stream of -31. Thus, IRF1 repression represents one of three distinct mechanisms to attenuate CDK2 levels. The -68/-31 segment lacks a canonical IRF responsive element but contains a single SP1 binding site. Mutation of this element abrogates SP1-dependent enhancement of CDK2 promoter activity as expected but also abolishes IRF1-mediated repression. Forced elevation of SP1 levels increases endogenous CDK2 levels, whereas IRF1 reduces both endogenous SP1 and CDK2 protein levels. Hence, IRF1 represses CDK2 gene expression by interfering with SP1-dependent transcriptional activation. Our findings establish a causal series of events that functionally connect the anti-proliferative effects of interferons with the IRF1-dependent suppression of the CDK2 gene, which encodes a key regulator of the G1/S phase transition.

Characterization of promoter elements directing Mona/Gads molecular adapter expression in T and myelomonocytic cells: involvement of the AML-1 transcription factor

Monocytic adaptor (Mona, also called Gads) is a molecular adaptor implicated in T cell activation and macrophage differentiation. The objective of this study was to identify elements regulating specific expression of Mona/Gads in human T cell and myelomonocytic cell lines. We first confirmed that the -2000 to +150 genomic region relative to the Mona gene transcription start site is sufficient to direct specific reporter gene expression in T cell lines, Jurkat, and MOLT-4 and in the immature myeloid cell lines, KG1a and RC2A. Deletion analysis and electrophoresis mobility shift assay identified several cis regulatory elements: overlapping initiator sequences, one interferon response factor-2 (IRF-2)-binding site at position -154, one GC box recognized by Sp1 and Sp3 at position -52, and two acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-1 binding sites at positions -70 and -13. Site-directed mutagenesis experiments indicated a key role of AML-1 for driving Mona expression in T cells and myeloid cells, and involvement of Sp1/Sp3 and IRF-2 transcription factors to modulate Mona expression in a cell-specific manner.

Type I interferons and autoimmunity: lessons from the clinic and from IRF-2-deficient mice

Type I interferons (IFN-alpha/beta) are produced upon viral and bacterial infections and play essential roles in host defense. However, since IFN-alpha/beta have multiple regulatory functions on innate and adoptive immunity, dysregulation of the IFN-alpha/beta system both in uninfected hosts and during immune responses against infection can result in immunopathologies. In fact, IFN-alpha/beta therapy often accompanies autoimmune-like symptoms. In this regard, we have recently found that mice lacking IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-2, a negative regulator of IFN-alpha/beta signaling, develop spontaneous, CD8(+) T cell-dependent skin inflammation. This unique animal model, together with other animal models, highlights the importance of the mechanism maintaining the homeostasis in the IFN-alpha/beta system even in the absence of infection.

The class II tumour suppressor gene H-REV107-1 is a target of interferon-regulatory factor-1 and is involved in IFNgamma-induced cell death in human ovarian carcinoma cells

H-rev107-1 is a growth inhibitory RAS target gene capable of suppressing anchorage independent growth in vitro and in vivo. Using a tumour tissue array with 241 matched tumour and normal tissue cDNA pools, we found down-regulation of H-REV107-1 in 7 out of 14 ovary-derived cDNAs. RT-PCR analysis and immunohistochemical investigation confirmed expression of H-REV107-1 in normal ovarian epithelial cells but down-regulation in high grade ovarian carcinomas. H-REV107-1 is also strongly expressed in immortalized rat and human ovarian epithelial cells in vitro, but suppressed in transformed cells by two different mechanisms. KRAS-transformed rat ovarian cells and PA1 teratocarcinoma cells, reversibly repress H-REV107-1 via MAP/ERK signaling. In contrast, treatment of A27/80 and OVCAR-3 epithelial ovarian cancer cells with IFNgamma stimulated H-REV107-1 expression. In NIH3T3 cells harbouring an estrogen-inducible IRF-1, H-rev107-1 is directly induced after activation of IRF-1, indicating that H-rev107-1 is a target of IRF-1. Stimulation of H-REV107-1 expression was also observed in ovarian epithelial cells suggesting that IRF-1 is involved in H-REV107-1 regulation in human ovarian epithelium. In the IFNgamma-sensitive cell line A27/80, H-REV107-1 suppresses colony formation. A27/80 and OVCAR-3 cells overexpressing H-REV107-1 protein underwent apoptosis. These results demonstrate down-regulation of the class II tumour suppressor H-REV107-1 in human ovarian carcinomas and suggest an involvement of H-REV107-1 in interferon-dependent cell death.

IRF family of transcription factors as regulators of host defense

Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) constitute a family of transcription factors that commonly possess a novel helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif. Following the initial identification of two structurally related members, IRF-1 and IRF-2, seven additional members have now been reported. In addition, virally encoded IRFs, which may interfere with cellular IRFs, have also been identified. Thus far, intensive functional analyses have been done on IRF-1, revealing a remarkable functional diversity of this transcription factor in the regulation of cellular response in host defense. Indeed, IRF-1 selectively modulates different sets of genes, depending on the cell type and/or the nature of cellular stimuli, in order to evoke appropriate responses in each. More recently, much attention has also been focused on other IRF family members. Their functional roles, through interactions with their own or other members of the family of transcription factors, are becoming clearer in the regulation of host defense, such as innate and adaptive immune responses and oncogenesis.

Coactivator p300 acetylates the interferon regulatory factor-2 in U937 cells following phorbol ester treatment

Interferon regulatory factor-2 (IRF-2) is a transcription factor of the IRF family that represses interferon-mediated gene expression. In the present study, we show that human monocytic U937 cells express truncated forms of IRF-2 containing the DNA binding domain but lacking much of the C-terminal regulatory domain. U937 cells are shown to respond to phorbol ester 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) to induce expression of histone acetylases p300 and p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF). In addition, TPA treatment led to the appearance of full-length IRF-2, along with a reduction of the truncated protein. Interestingly, full-length IRF-2 in TPA-treated U937 cells occurred as a complex with p300 as well as PCAF and was itself acetylated. Consistent with these results, recombinant IRF-2 was acetylated by p300 and to a lesser degree by PCAF in vitro. Another IRF member, IRF-1, an activator of interferon-mediated transcription, was also acetylated in vitro by these acetylases. Finally, we demonstrate that the addition of IRF-2 but not IRF-1 inhibits core histone acetylation by p300 in vitro. The addition of IRF-2 also inhibited acetylation of nucleosomal histones in TPA-treated U937 cells. Acetylated IRF-2 may affect local chromatin structure in vivo by inhibiting core histone acetylation and may serve as a mechanism by which IRF-2 negatively regulates interferon-inducible transcription.

The cell cycle control element of histone H4 gene transcription is maximally responsive to interferon regulatory factor pairs IRF-1/IRF-3 and IRF-1/IRF-7

Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) are transcriptional mediators of interferon-responsive signaling pathways that are involved in antiviral defense, immune response, and cell growth regulation. To investigate the role of IRF proteins in the regulation of histone H4 gene transcription, we compared the transcriptional contributions of IRF-1, IRF-2, IRF-3, and IRF-7 using transient transfection assays with H4 promoter/luciferase (Luc) reporter genes. These IRF proteins up-regulate reporter gene expression but IRF-1, IRF-3, and IRF-7 are more potent activators of the H4 promoter than IRF-2. Forced expression of different IRF combinations reveals that IRF-2 reduces IRF-1 or IRF-3 dependent activation, but does not affect IRF-7 function. Thus, IRF-2 may have a dual function in histone H4 gene transcription by acting as a weak activator at low dosage and a competitive inhibitor of other strongly activating IRFs at high levels. IRF-1/IRF-3 and IRF-1/IRF-7 pairs each mediate the highest levels of site II-dependent promoter activity and can up-regulate transcription by 120-150-fold. We also find that interferon gamma up-regulates IRF-1 and site II-dependent promoter activity. This up-regulation is not observed when the IRF site is mutated or if cells are preloaded with IRF-1. Our results indicate that IRF-1, IRF-2, IRF-3, and IRF-7 can all regulate histone H4 gene expression. The pairwise utilization of distinct IRF factors provides a flexible transcriptional mechanism for integration of diverse growth-related signaling pathways.

Molecular characterization of celtix-1, a bromodomain protein interacting with the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 2

Transcriptional control at the G1/S-phase transition of the cell cycle requires functional interactions of multimeric promoter regulatory complexes that contain DNA binding proteins, transcriptional cofactors, and/or chromatin modifying enzymes. Transcriptional regulation of the human histone H4/n gene (FO108) is mediated by Interferon Regulatory Factor-2 (IRF-2), as well as other histone gene promoter factors. To identify proteins that interact with cell-cycle regulatory factors, we performed yeast two-hybrid analysis with IRF-2 and identified a novel human protein termed Celtix-1 which binds to IRF-2. Celtix-1 contains several phylogenetically conserved domains, including a bromodomain, which is found in a number of transcriptional cofactors. Using a panel of IRF-2 deletion mutants in yeast two-hybrid assays, we established that Celtix-1 contacts the C-terminus of IRF-2. Celtix-1 directly interacts with IRF-2 based on binding studies with glutathione S-transferase (GST)/IRF-2 fusion proteins, and immunofluorescence studies suggest that Celtix-1 and IRF-2 associate in situ. Celtix-1 is distributed throughout the nucleus in a heterodisperse pattern. A subset of Celtix-1 colocalizes with the hyperacetylated forms of histones H3 and H4, as well as with the hyperphosphorylated, transcriptionally active form of RNA polymerase II. We conclude that the bromodomain protein Celtix-1 is a novel IRF-2 interacting protein that associates with transcriptionally active chromatin in situ.

Gene repression by coactivator repulsion

We show that the IRF-2 oncoprotein represses virus-induced IFN-beta gene transcription via a novel mechanism. Virus infection induces recruitment of IRF-2 to some of the endogenous IFN-beta enhancers as part of the enhanceosome. Enhanceosomes bearing IRF-2 cannot activate transcription, due to the presence of a domain in IRF-2 that prevents enhanceosome-dependent recruitment of the CBP-Pol II holoenzyme complex. As a consequence, IRF-2 incorporation into enhanceosomes restricts the number of IFN-beta promoters directing transcription. Remarkably, deletion of the IRF-2 gene increases IFN-beta expression by expanding the number of cells capable of inducing IFN-beta gene transcription in response to virus infection.

Evidence for IRF-1-dependent gene expression deficiency in interferon unresponsive HepG2 cells

Induction of the antiproliferative and antiviral state by IFNs (type I and II) is dramatically impaired in HepG2 cells. We show here that RNase L, IDO, GBP-2 and iNOS genes normally expressed as a secondary response to IFN are no longer inducible in HepG2 cells, while induction of primary response genes (IRF-1, PKR, p48-ISGF3gamma, 2-5AS, 6-16 and p56-(trp)tRNA) are unaffected. On the basis of previous data implicating transcription factor IRF-1 in the induction of some IFN-induced genes, we tested the effects of transfecting an IRF-1 oligonucleotide antisense in HeLa cells and found specifically impaired IFN induction of secondary response genes (RNase L, IDO and GBP-2). This raised the possibility that IRF-1 was defective in HepG2 cells. However, some molecular and biochemical analyses reveal that IRF-1 is induced normally by IFNs and retains its normal size, cellular location, phosphorylation status and ability to bind the IDO promoter in vitro. Therefore, we conclude that although the primary response pathway is fully functional, some aspects of the secondary pathway involving IRF-1 (but not IRF-1 itself) are defective in HepG2 cells. It may be possible that the promoter region of these deficient HepG2-genes requires an unidentified transcription factor in addition to de novo IRF-1, which could be elicited by a cooperative activator.

Type I interferons

Type I interferons (IFNs) constitute a family of structurally related proteins that are all derived from the same ancestral gene and act on a common cell-surface receptor. Contrary to many other cytokines, the production of type I IFNs is not a specialized function, and all cells in the organism can produce them, usually as a result of induction by viruses, via the formation of double-stranded RNA. Type I IFNs are indeed responsible for the first line of defense during virus infection and act through the induction of a great number of proteins. Of these, at least thirty have been characterized, and there are probably many more. In addition to their direct antiviral effect, type I IFNs exert a wide variety of other activities, such as for example the induction of various cytokines and the stimulation of different effector cells of the immune system. Due to these pleiotropic effects, recombinant interferons are used in the clinic to treat a variety of diseases, among which cancer, viral hepatitis and multiple sclerosis.

Transcriptional repression of type I IFN genes

Transcriptional regulation is a consequence of the combination of both activation and repression for establishing specific patterns of eukaryotic gene expression. The regulation of the expression of type I interferon (IFN-A and IFN-B) multigene family is controlled primarily at the transcriptional level and has been widely studied as a model for understanding the mechanisms of stable repression, transient virus induction and postinduction repression of the genes. The positive and negative regulatory elements required for this on/off switch have been defined within a complex 5' upstream region of their transcription start site. The differential expression pattern of type I IFN genes is thought to involve both substitutions in the virus responsive element (VRE) and presence or absence of negatively acting sequences surrounding the VRE. In this review we discuss several mechanisms of negative regulation due to the existence of common or specific elements in the IFN-B and IFN-A genes and we summarize recent studies on transcriptional repressors that bind to these promoters.

Cell cycle regulation of histone H4 gene transcription requires the oncogenic factor IRF-2

Histone genes display a peak in transcription in early S phase and are ideal models for cell cycle-regulated gene expression. We have previously shown that the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 2 (IRF-2) can activate histone H4 gene expression. In this report we establish that a mouse histone H4 gene and its human homolog lose stringent cell cycle control in synchronized embryonic fibroblasts in which IRF-2 has been ablated. We also show that there are reduced mRNA levels of this endogenous mouse histone H4 gene in the IRF-2(-/-) cells. Strikingly, the overall mRNA level and cell cycle regulation of histone H4 transcription are restored when IRF-2 is reintroduced to these cells. IRF-2 is a negative regulator of the interferon response and has oncogenic potential, but little is known of the mechanism of these activities. Our results suggest that IRF-2 is an active player in E2F-independent cell cycle-regulated gene expression at the G1/S phase transition. IRF-2 was previously considered a passive antagonist to the tumor suppressor IRF-1 but can now join other oncogenic factors such as c-Myb and E2F1 that are predicted to mediate their transforming capabilities by actively regulating genes necessary for cell cycle progression.

The growing family of interferon regulatory factors

Interferons (IFN) exert their multiple biological effects through the induction of expression of over 30 genes encoding proteins with antiviral, antiproliferative and immunomodulatory functions. Among the many IFN-inducible proteins are the Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs), a family of transcription regulators, originally consisting of the well-characterized IRF-1 and IRF-2 proteins; the family has now expanded to over 10 members and is still growing. The present review provides a detailed description of recently characterized IRF family members. Studies analyzing IRF-expressing cell lines and IRF knockout mice reveal that each member of the IRF family exerts distinct roles in biological processes such as pathogen response, cytokine signalling, cell growth regulation and hematopoietic development. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which the IRFs affect these important cellular events and IFN expression will contribute to a greater understanding of events leading to various viral, immune and malignant disease states and will suggest novel strategies for antiviral and immune modulatory therapy.

Hepatic nuclear factor 3 and high mobility group I/Y proteins bind the insulin response element of the insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 promoter

The insulin response element (IRE) of the human insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) promoter contains a palindrome of the T(A/G)TTT sequence crucial to hormonal regulation of many genes. In initial studies of how this IRE participates in hormonal regulation, the electromobility shift assay was used under a variety of conditions to identify IRE-binding proteins. An exhaustive search identified five proteins that specifically bind this IRE; purified proteins were used to show that all five are related to either the high mobility group I/Y (HMGI/Y) or hepatic nuclear factor 3 (HNF3) protein families. Further studies used purified HNF3 and HMGI proteins to show: 1) eah protects the IGFBP-1 IRE from deoxyribonuclease I (DNaseI) digestion; and 2) HNF3 but not HMGI/Y binds to the related phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and Apo CIII IREs. A series of IRE mutants with variable responsiveness to insulin were used to show that the presence of a TGTTT sequence in the mutants did parallel, but HMGI/Y and HNF3 binding to the mutants did not parallel, the ability of the mutants to confer the inhibitory effect of insulin. In contrast, HNF3 binding to these IRE mutants roughly correlates with response of the mutants to glucocorticoids. The way by which HNF3 and/or other as yet unidentified IRE-binding proteins confer insulin inhibition to IGFBP-1 transcription and the role of HMGI/Y in IRE function have yet to be established.

Interferon-independent and -induced regulation of Epstein-Barr virus EBNA-1 gene transcription in Burkitt lymphoma

Replication of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome within latently infected cells is dependent on the EBV EBNA-1 protein. The objective of this study was to identify transcriptional regulatory proteins that mediate EBNA-1 expression via the viral promoter Qp, which is active in EBV-associated tumors such as Burkitt lymphoma and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Results of a yeast one-hybrid screen suggested that a subset of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family may regulate EBNA-1 transcription by targeting an essential cis-regulatory element of Qp, QRE-2. Further investigation indicated that the transcriptional activator IRF-1 and the closely related IRF-2, a repressor of interferon-induced gene expression, are both capable of activating Qp. However, the major QRE-2-specific binding activity detected within extracts of Burkitt lymphoma cells was attributed to IRF-2, suggesting that interferon-independent activation of Qp is largely mediated by IRF-2 in these cells. We observed no effect of gamma interferon on Qp activity in transfection assays, whereas we observed a moderate but significant repression of Qp activity in response to alpha interferon, possibly mediated by either the interferon consensus sequence binding protein or IRF-7, a novel alpha interferon-inducible factor identified in this study. Since expression of IRF-1 and IRF-2 is increased in response to interferons, the Qp activity observed in the presence of interferon likely represented an equilibrium between IRF factors that activate and those that repress gene expression in response to interferon. Thus, by usurping both IRF-1 and its transcriptional antagonist IRF-2 to activate Qp, EBV has evolved not only a mechanism to constitutively express EBNA-1 but also one which may sustain EBNA-1 expression in the face of the antiviral effects of interferon.

Synergism between multiple virus-induced factor-binding elements involved in the differential expression of interferon A genes

Comparative transfection analysis of murine interferon A4 and interferon A11 promoter constructs transiently transfected in mouse L929 and human HeLa S3 cells infected with Newcastle disease virus showed that the second positive regulatory domain I-like domain (D motif), located between nucleotides -57 and -46 upstream of the transcription start site, contributes to the activation of virus-induced transcription of the interferon (IFN)-A4 gene promoter by cooperating with the positive regulatory domain I-like and TG-like domains previously described. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay performed with the virus-inducible fragments containing these motifs indicated that the binding activity that we have denoted as virus-induced factor (Génin, P., Bragança, J., Darracq, N., Doly, J., and Civas, A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 5055-5063) is different from interferon-stimulated gene factor 3. It binds to the D motif but not to the virus-unresponsive form of the D motif disrupted by a G-57 --> C substitution. We show that the low levels of IFN-A11 gene expression are caused essentially by the lack of two inducible enhancer domains disrupted by the A-78 --> G and the G-57 --> C substitutions. These data suggest a model taking account of the differential regulation of IFN-A gene family members. They also suggest that virus-induced factor may correspond to the primary transcription factor directly activated by virus that is involved in the initiation of IFN-A gene transcription.

Immunodeficiency and chronic myelogenous leukemia-like syndrome in mice with a targeted mutation of the ICSBP gene

Interferon consensus sequence binding protein (ICSBP) is a transcription factor of the interferon (IFN) regulatory factor (IRF) family. Mice with a null mutation of ICSBP exhibit two prominent phenotypes related to previously described activities of the IRF family. The first is enhanced susceptibility to virus infections associated with impaired production of IFN(gamma). The second is deregulated hematopoiesis in both ICSBP-/- and ICSBP+/- mice that manifests as a syndrome similar to human chronic myelogenous leukemia. The chronic period of the disease progresses to a fatal blast crisis characterized by a clonal expansion of undifferentiated cells. Normal mice injected with cells from mice in blast crisis developed acute leukemia within 6 weeks of transfer. These results suggest a novel role for ICSBP in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells.

Interferon regulatory factor-2 directs transcription from the gp91phox promoter

Repressor elements in the gp91(phox) promoter are necessary to restrict tissue-specific transcription to mature phagocytes. Deletion of these elements leads to significant promoter activity in cell lines such as HEL and K562 that do not normally express gp91(phox). The -100 to +12 base pair gp91(phox) promoter region is sufficient to direct maximal de-repressed transcription in these cells. However, promoter activity is dramatically decreased following a 16-base pair truncation that deletes an interferon-stimulated response element. This element interacts with IRF-1 and IRF-2, members of the interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors. In addition, this promoter region is bound by a factor with properties similar to BID, a DNA-binding protein that also interacts with three upstream sites within the gp91(phox) promoter. Transient transfection studies using mutated promoters indicate that both the IRF and BID binding sites are required for maximal gp91(phox) promoter activity. Overexpression of IRF-1 or IRF-2 in K562 cells leads to transactivation of gp91(phox) promoter constructs, which is dependent on the presence of an intact IRF binding site. IRF-2 predominates in macrophages that express the gp91(phox) gene as well as in HEL and K562 cells. We conclude that IRF-2 and BID activate gp91(phox) promoter activity in the absence of transcriptional repression.

ISGF3 gamma p48, a specificity switch for interferon activated transcription factors

Interferon (IFN) induces gene expression by phosphorylating latent transcription factors of the STAT family. Two different STAT multimeric complexes that bind distinct enhancer elements are activated by IFN alpha and IFN gamma, dictated by the DNA-binding protein ISGF3 gamma p48. This protein, a member of the IFN regulatory factor (IFR) family, acts as an adaptor protein to redirect STAT multimers from their intrinsic palindromic sequence specificity to interactions with a composite element composed of an IRF site juxtaposed with a STAT half-site. Sequence similarity within the IRF family suggests that other members could serve as adaptor proteins for transcriptional activators. Recent evidence suggests that PIP (LSIRF) sequesters the Ets protein PU.1 at a composite DNA element lends support to this adaptor hypothesis.

Activation of a cell-cycle-regulated histone gene by the oncogenic transcription factor IRF-2

The human histone H4 gene FO108 is regulated during the cell cycle with a peak in transcription during early S phase. The cell-cycle element (CCE) required for H4 histone activation is a sequence of 11 base pairs that binds a protein factor in electrophoretic mobility shift assays that has been designated histone nuclear factor M (HiNF-M). Here we report the purification of HiNF-M, and show it to be a protein of relative molecular mass (M(r)) 48K that is identical to interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 2 (IRF-2), a negative transcriptional regulator of the IFN response. Recombinant IRF-2 (as well as the related protein IRF-1 (ref. 5)) binds the CCE specifically and activates transcription of this H4 histone gene. IRF-2 has been shown to have oncogenic potential, and our results demonstrate a link between IRF-2 and a gene that is functionally coupled to DNA replication and cell-cycle progression at the G1/S phase transition.

Interferon regulatory factor element and interferon regulatory factor 1 in the induction of major histocompatibility complex class I genes in neural cells

The role of the MHC-IRF-E and interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) in the regulation of MHC class I genes in astrocytes was analyzed. Transcriptional activation of MHC class I genes after treatment of astrocytes with various inducers occurred over a period of hours and correlated with cell surface expression. Functional analysis of the MHC class I gene promoter region confirmed that induction was controlled by a restricted region of 88 base pairs containing two well-defined inducible enhancers, the MHC-CRE and the MHC-IRF-E. Further analysis showed that potential MHC-CRE enhancer activity was silent. Therefore, the MHC-IRF-E, rather than the MHC-CRE, appeared responsible for enhancement of the MHC class I gene and was supported by three findings: (1) site-directed mutation of the MHC-IRF-E-abrogated induction, (2) promoter constructs containing IRF-Es as the sole enhancers were highly inducible in astrocytes, and (3) the expression of transcription factor IRF-1, which acts through the MHC-IRF-E to induce MHC class I genes, was induced to high levels in parallel with that of MHC class I induction. The induction of the IRF-1 gene correlated with the prior induction of the gamma-activated factor (GAF) or NF-kappa B, depending on the inducer, indicating that both gamma activation sites (GAS) and kappa B sites in the IRF-1 promoter are important.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is required for processing the NF-kappa B1 precursor protein and the activation of NF-kappa B

We demonstrate an essential role for the proteasome complex in two proteolytic processes required for activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B. The p105 precursor of the p50 subunit of NF-kappa B is processed in vitro by an ATP-dependent process that requires proteasomes and ubiquitin conjugation. The C-terminal region of p105 is rapidly degraded, leaving the N-terminal p50 domain. p105 processing can be blocked in intact cells with inhibitors of the proteasome or in yeast with proteasome mutants. These inhibitors also block the activation of NF-kappa B and the rapid degradation of I kappa B alpha induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha. Thus, the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway functions not only in the complete degradation of polypeptides, but also in the regulated processing of precursors into active proteins.

Viral induction of the human beta interferon promoter: modulation of transcription by NF-kappa B/rel proteins and interferon regulatory factors

Multiple regulatory domains within the -100 region of the beta interferon (IFN-beta) promoter control the inducible response of the IFN gene to virus infection. In this study, we demonstrate that the formation of NF-kappa B-specific complexes on the positive regulatory domain II (PRDII) precedes the onset of detectable IFN-beta transcription in Sendai virus-infected cells. By using NF-kappa B subunit-specific antibodies, a temporal shift in the composition of NF-kappa B subunits in association with the PRDII domain is detected as a function of time after virus infection. Furthermore, a virus-induced degradation of I kappa B alpha (MAD3) protein is observed between 2 and 8 h after infection; at later times, de novo synthesis of I kappa B alpha restores I kappa B alpha to levels found in uninduced cells and correlates with the down regulation of IFN-beta transcription. In cotransfection experiments using various NF-kappa B subunit expression plasmids and two copies of PRDII/NF-kappa B linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene, we demonstrate that expression of p65, c-Rel, or p50 or combinations of p50-p65 and p65-c-Rel differentially stimulated PRDII-dependent transcription. Coexpression of I kappa B alpha completely abrogated p65-, c-Rel-, or p65-p50-induced gene activity. When the entire IFN-beta promoter (-281 to +19) was used in coexpression studies, synergistic stimulation of IFN-beta promoter activity was obtained when NF-kappa B subunits were coexpressed together with the IFN regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) transcription factor. Overexpression of either I kappa B or the IRF-2 repressor was able to abrogate inducibility of the IFN-beta promoter. Thus, multiple regulatory events--including differential activation of DNA-binding NF-kappa B heterodimers, degradation of I kappa B alpha, synergistic interaction between IRF-1 and NF-kappa B, and decreased repression by I kappa B and IRF-2--are all required for the transcriptional activation of the IFN-beta promoter.

Sequences distal to the AP1/E box motif are involved in the cell type-specific expression of the rat tyrosine hydroxylase gene

In order to define cell type-specific elements associated with the catecholamine biosynthetic enzyme, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), transient transfections of promoter deletion constructs were used to test relative reporter-gene activities in TH-expressing and -nonexpressing cell lines. Such assays demonstrated that a region between -503 and -578 contributed to rat TH promoter activity in the pheochromocytoma cell line PC12. Deletion of these sequences resulted in a 66% loss in cell type-specific activity. Mutations within the E box/dyad symmetry element (CAGGTGCCTGTGACAGTG) did not affect the basal and cell type-specific pattern of expression exhibited by the rat TH promoter. Promoter fusion constructs between the rat TH promoter (-741 and -197) and the human TH promoter (-197 and +1) exhibited reporter-gene activities equivalent to that of wild-type -741 rat TH constructs, further demonstrating that sequence elements upstream of the rat E box/dyad symmetry are important for cell type-specific expression. Gel-shift experiments indicated that a PC12 nuclear factor could bind to a 39-bp sequence within this region in a cell type-specific manner. The size of this factor was 52 kDa as determined by UV cross-linking experiments.

Mechanisms of transcriptional synergism between distinct virus-inducible enhancer elements

The high mobility group protein HMG I(Y) and the transcription factor NF-kappa B are required for the activity of positive regulatory domain II (PRDII), a virus-inducible regulatory element of the human interferon-beta gene promoter. In this paper we provide evidence that HMG I(Y) is also required for the activity of PRDIV, a regulatory element that synergizes with PRDII. In this case, HMG I(Y) stimulates binding of activating transcription factor 2 (ATF-2) and the assembly of inducible complexes containing ATF-2 and c-Jun. Remarkably, HMG I(Y) also specifically interacts with the leucine zipper/basic region of ATF-2, and ATF-2 in turn interacts with NF-kappa B. We therefore propose that the HMG I(Y) plays a critical structural role in establishing transcriptional synergy between PRDII and PRDIV by promoting the activities and/or binding of NF-kappa B and ATF-2 and by facilitating their interaction.

Cell type-specific regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I gene expression in astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and neurons

Mechanisms of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I gene regulation in cells of the CNS have been studied in vitro. Astrocytes in primary cultures, but neither oligodendrocytes nor neurons, constitutively expressed cell surface MHC class I molecules. Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) treatment led to induction of MHC class I expression in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes but not in neurons. The conserved upstream sequence containing the juxtaposed nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B-like region I and IFN-response consensus sequence (ICS) constitutively enhanced MHC class I gene promoter activity in astrocytes, but not in oligodendrocytes or in neurons. Nuclear extracts from astrocytes, but not from oligodendrocytes and neurons, had a binding activity specific for the NF-kappa B-like region I sequence, indicating that constitutive expression of MHC class I genes is governed by the upstream region I enhancer and its binding factor. IFN-gamma treatment led to induction of MHC class I promoter activity in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, but not in neurons. In accordance with this observation, a nuclear factor that binds to the ICS was induced in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes but not in neurons following IFN-gamma treatment. This study illustrates cell type-specific regulation of MHC class I genes in the CNS that correlates with the expression of DNA binding factors relevant to MHC class I gene transcription.

The interferon-stimulable response elements of two human genes detect overlapping sets of transcription factors

We have previously reported three types of DNA-protein complexes, formed specifically with the interferon-stimulable response elements (ISRE) in the 5' flanking DNA of the interferon-inducible 6-16 and 9-27 genes, a type-I interferon-inducible early complex involving factor E (ISGF3), M and G complexes induced more slowly in response to type-I and type-II interferons, respectively and C1/C2, a constitutive complex(s). Similar complexes have been reported by others. The operationally defined band-shift complexes M, G and C1/C2 are shown here to be heterogeneous and to differ in their factor content, depending on the ISRE probe. With a 9-27 ISRE probe the M, G and C1/C2 complexes all contain the gamma subunit of ISGF3, which is present constitutively but is induced in response to IFN-alpha (to yield M) or IFN-gamma (to yield G). In contrast, a 6-16 ISRE probe forms band-shift complexes with IFN-alpha-inducible and IFN-gamma-inducible IRF1 and IRF2. With a 6-16 ISRE probe, therefore, M and G each correspond to two complexes which co-migrate in band-shift assays, one corresponding to IRF1, the other to IRF2. With this probe, the constitutive complex C1/C2 corresponds predominantly to IRF2. Consistent with this, IRF1 and IRF2 have lower affinity for the 9-27 ISRE than the 6-16 ISRE, whereas the reverse is true for E (ISGF3) and its gamma subunit. Relatively small differences in affinity appear sufficient to determine whether or not a band-shift complex is detected. In the case of IRF1 and IRF2, the different affinities for the 6-16 and 9-27 probes are dominated by a dinucleotide sequence in the centre of the 14-nucleotide 'core' ISRE. In contrast, preferential binding of E (ISGF3) by the 39-nucleotide 9-27 ISRE-containing sequence, although ISRE dependent, appears to be mediated by sequences 3' of the 'core' ISRE. Accordingly, these complexes can be simultaneously assayed using a hybrid probe consisting of the 5' flanking region and 'core' ISRE sequences from the 6-16 gene and sequences immediately 3' of the 'core' 9-27 ISRE sequence. No evidence was obtained for a modulatory role in factor binding for a pseudo-ISRE sequence close to ISRE in the 9-27 gene. The precise roles of IRF1 and IRF2 in the induction of IFN-beta and the control of interferon-inducible gene expression remain to be established.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Characterization of TH3, an induction-specific protein interacting with the interferon beta promoter

We report the purification and characterization of a unique DNA-binding protein termed TH3 that interacts with the positive regulatory domain (PRD) I and PRDIII domains of the interferon (IFN) beta promoter. In cells treated with poly rl:rC and cycloheximide, appearance of TH3 DNA-binding activity was inversely proportional to the disappearance of a constitutive complex TH1 and coincided temporally with induction of IFN-beta gene transcription. The TH3 DNA-binding protein is a small 14-kDa polypeptide that appears to be derived from the TH1 complex; TH1 in turn is related to interferon regulatory factor (IRF) 2 by immunological cross-reactivity. The TH3 protein appeared to lack the epitope required for recognition by anti-IRF-2 antisera; however, a short microsequence obtained for TH3 overlapped a sequence from the IRF-2 protein. Although TH3 binds to multimers of the AAGTGA hexamer and to PRDI, the TH3 protein alone had a predominantly neutral phenotype on PRDI-dependent transcription in vitro and lacked the negative transcriptional effect attributed to IRF-2. These results raise the possibility that specific proteolysis of a negative regulatory protein involved in silencing the IFN-beta promoter may be an important event leading to transcriptional activation of the interferon gene.