Mad1 function is regulated through elements within the carboxy terminus

Direct HPV E6/Myc interactions induce histone modifications, Pol II phosphorylation, and hTERT promoter activation

Human Papillomavirus Viruses (HPVs) are associated with the majority of human cervical and anal cancers and 10-30% of head and neck squamous carcinomas. E6 oncoprotein from high risk HPVs interacts with the p53 tumor suppressor protein to facilitate its degradation and increases telomerase activity for extending the life span of host cells. We published previously that the Myc cellular transcription factor associates with the high-risk HPV E6 protein in vivo and participates in the transactivation of the hTERT promoter. In the present study, we further analyzed the role of E6 and the Myc-Max-Mad network in regulating the hTERT promoter. We confirmed that E6 and Myc interact independently and that Max can also form a complex with E6. However, the E6/Max complex is observed only in the presence of Myc, suggesting that E6 associates with Myc/Max dimers. Consistent with the hypothesis that Myc is required for E6 induction of the hTERT promoter, Myc antagonists (Mad or Mnt) significantly blocked E6-mediated transactivation of the hTERT promoter. Analysis of Myc mutants demonstrated that both the transactivation domain and HLH domain of Myc protein were required for binding E6 and for the consequent transactivation of the hTERT promoter, by either Myc or E6. We also showed that E6 increased phosphorylation of Pol II on the hTERT promoter and induced epigenetic histone modifications of the hTERT promoter. More important, knockdown of Myc expression dramatically decreased engagement of acetyl-histones and Pol II at the hTERT promoter in E6-expressing cells. Thus, E6/Myc interaction triggers the transactivation of the hTERT promoter by modulating both histone modifications, Pol II phosphorylation and promoter engagement, suggesting a novel mechanism for telomerase activation and a new target for HPV- associated human cancer.

The suppression of MAD1 by AKT-mediated phosphorylation activates MAD1 target genes transcription

MAX dimerization protein 1 (MAD1) is a transcription suppressor that antagonizes MYC-mediated transcription activation, and the inhibition mechanism occurs mainly through the competition of target genes' promoter MYC binding sites by MAD1. The promoter binding proteins switch between MYC and MAD1 affects cell proliferation and differentiation. However, little is known about MAD1's regulation process in cancer cells. Here, we present evidence that AKT inhibits MAD1-mediated transcription repression by physical interaction with and phosphorylation of MAD1. Phosphorylation reduces the binding affinity between MAD1 and its target genes' promoter and thereby abolishes its transcription suppression function. Mutation of the phosphorylation site from serine to alanine rescues the DNA-binding ability in the presence of activated AKT. In addition, AKT inhibits MAD1-mediated target genes (hTERT and ODC) transcription repression and promotes cell cycle and cell growth. However, mutated S145A MAD1 abrogates the inhibition by AKT. Thus, our results suggest that phosphorylation of MAD1 by AKT inhibits MAD1-mediated transcription suppression and subsequently activates the transcription of MAD1 target genes.

The Mad side of the Max network: antagonizing the function of Myc and more

A significant body of evidence has been accumulated that demonstrates decisive roles of members of the Myc/Max/Mad network in the control of various aspects of cell behavior, including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The components of this network serve as transcriptional regulators. Mad family members, including Mad1, Mxi1, Mad3, Mad4, Mnt, and Mga, function in part as antagonists of Myc oncoproteins. At the molecular level this antagonism is reflected by the different cofactor/chromatin remodeling complexes that are recruited by Myc and Mad family members. One important function of the latter is their ability to repress gene transcription. In this review we summarize the current view of how this repression is achieved and what the consequences of Mad action are for cell behavior. In addition, we point out some of the many aspects that have not been clarified and thus leave us with a rather incomplete picture of the functions, both molecular and at the cellular level, of Mad family members.

Mnt transcriptional repressor is functionally regulated during cell cycle progression

The Myc/Max/Mad network of transcription factors regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, and transformation. Similar to other proteins of the network, Mnt forms heterodimers with Max and binds CACGTG E-Box elements. Transcriptional repression by Mnt is mediated through association with mSin3, and deletion of the mSin3-interacting domain (SID) converts Mnt to a transcriptional activator. Mnt is coexpressed with Myc in proliferating cells and has been suggested to be a modulator of Myc function. We report that Mnt is expressed both in growth-arrested and proliferating mouse fibroblasts and is phosphorylated when resting cells are induced to re-enter the cell cycle. Importantly, the interaction between Mnt and mSin3 is disrupted upon serum stimulation resulting in decreased Mnt-associated HDAC activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that Mnt binds and recruits mSin3 to the Myc target gene cyclin D2 in quiescent mouse fibroblasts. Interference with Mnt expression by RNAi resulted in upregulation of cyclin D2 expression in growth-arrested fibroblasts, supporting the view that Mnt represses cyclin D2 transcription in quiescent cells. Our data suggest a model in which phosphorylation of Mnt at cell cycle entry results in disruption of Mnt-mSin3-HDAC1 interaction, which allows induction of Myc target genes by release of Mnt-mediated transcriptional repression.

Assessing the impact of alternative splicing on domain interactions in the human proteome

We have constructed a database of alternatively spliced protein forms (ASP), consisting of 13,384 protein isoform sequences of 4422 human genes (www.bioinformatics.ucla.edu/ASP). We identified fifty protein domain types that were selectively removed by alternative splicing at much higher frequencies than average (p-value < 0.01). These include many well-known protein-interaction domains (e.g., KRAB; ankyrin repeats; Kelch) including some that have been previously shown to be regulated functionally by alternative splicing (e.g., collagen domain). We present a number of novel examples (Kruppel transcription factors; Pbx2; Enc1) from the ASP database, illustrating how this pattern of alternative splicing changes the structure of a biological pathway, by redirecting protein interaction networks at key switch points. Our bioinformatics analysis indicates that a major impact of alternative splicing is removal of protein-protein interaction domains that mediate key linkages in protein interaction networks. ASP expands the available dataset of human alternatively spliced protein forms from 1989 human genes (SwissProt release 42) to 5413 (nonredundant set, ASP + SwissProt), a nearly 3-fold increase. ASP will enhance the existing pool of protein sequences that are searched by mass spectroscopy software during the identification of peptide fragments.

In vivo chromatin remodeling events leading to inflammatory gene transcription under diabetic conditions

The transcription factor NF-kappaB (NF-kappaB) plays a pivotal role in regulating inflammatory gene expression. Its effects are optimized by various coactivators including histone acetyltransferases (HATs) such as CBP/p300 and p/CAF. Evidence shows that high glucose (HG) conditions mimicking diabetes can activate the transcription of NF-kappaB-regulated inflammatory genes. However, the underlying in vivo transcription and nuclear chromatin remodeling events are unknown. We therefore carried out chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in monocytes to identify 1) chromatin factors bound to the promoters of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and related NF-kappaB-regulated genes under HG or diabetic conditions, 2) specific lysine (Lys (K)) residues on histone H3 (HH3) and HH4 acetylated in this process. HG treatment of THP-1 monocytes increased the transcriptional activity of NF-kappaB p65, which was augmented by CBP/p300 and p/CAF. ChIP assays showed that HG increased the recruitment of NF-kappaB p65, CPB, and p/CAF to the TNF-alpha and COX-2 promoters. Interestingly, ChIP assays also demonstrated concomitant acetylation of HH3 at Lys(9) and Lys(14), and HH4 at Lys(5), Lys(8), and Lys(12) at the TNF-alpha and COX-2 promoters. Overexpression of histone deacetylase (HDAC) isoforms inhibited p65-mediated TNF-alpha transcription. In contrast, a HDAC inhibitor stimulated gene transcription and histone acetylation. Finally, we demonstrated increased HH3 acetylation at TNF-alpha and COX-2 promoters in human blood monocytes from type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects relative to nondiabetic. These results show for the first time that diabetic conditions can increase in vivo recruitment of NF-kappaB and HATs, as well as histone acetylation at the promoters of inflammatory genes, leading to chromatin remodeling and transcription.

Signaling disrupts mSin3A binding to the Mad1-like Sin3-interacting domain of TIEG2, an Sp1-like repressor

A Sin3-interacting domain (SID) originally described in Mad proteins is necessary for both transcriptional repression and growth suppression by these transcription factors. We recently reported that a structurally and functionally related Mad1-like SID is also present in five Sp1-like repressor proteins (TIEG1, TIEG2, BTEB1, BTEB3 and BTEB4), demonstrating that SID-mSin3A interactions have a wider functional impact on transcriptional repression. SID-mSin3A interaction is necessary for the anti-proliferative function of Mad, TIEG and BTEB proteins. It remains to be established, however, whether the SID-mSin3A interaction is constitutive or regulated. Here, we describe that the Mad1-like SID domain of the Sp1-like repressor TIEG2 is inhibited by the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-Ras-MEK1-ERK2 signaling pathway, via phosphorylation of four serine/threonine sites adjacent to the SID. This phenomenon disrupts the SID-mSin3A interaction and thereby inhibits TIEG2's repression activity. Thus, these results show for the first time that the repression of a SID-containing protein is regulated by signaling rather than functioning in a constitutive manner, extending our understanding of how the function of SID-containing repressors may be controlled.