GA-binding protein and p300 are essential components of a retinoic acid-induced enhanceosome in myeloid cells

Retinoic acid triggers c-kit gene expression in spermatogonial stem cells through an enhanceosome constituted between transcription factor binding sites for retinoic acid response element (RARE), spleen focus forming virus proviral integration oncogene (SPFI1) (PU.1) and E26 transformation-specific (ETS)

Restricted availability of retinoic acid (RA) in the testicular milieu regulates transcriptional activity of c-kit (KIT, CD117), which aids in the determination of spermatogonial stem-cell differentiation. The effect of RA on c-kit has been reported previously, but its mode of genomic action remains unresolved. We studied the molecular machinery guiding RA responsiveness to the c-kit gene using spermatogonial stem-cell line C18-4 and primary spermatogonial cells. A novel retinoic acid response element (RARE) positioned at -989 nucleotides upstream of the transcription start site (TSS) was identified, providing a binding site for a dimeric RA receptor (i.e. retinoic acid receptor gamma (RARγ) and retinoic X receptor). RA treatment influenced c-kit promoter activity, along with endogenous c-kit expression in C18-4 cells. A comprehensive promoter deletion assay using the pGL3B reporter system characterised the region spanning -271bp and -1011bp upstream of the TSS, which function as minimal promoter and maximal promoter, respectively. In silico analysis predicted that the region -1011 to +58bp comprised the distal enhancer RARE and activators such as spleen focus forming virus proviral integration oncogene (SPFI1) (PU.1), specificity protein 1 (SP1) and four E26 transformation-specific (ETS) tandem binding sites at the proximal region. Gel retardation and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays showed binding for RARγ, PU.1 and SP1 to the predicted consensus binding sequences, whereas GABPα occupied only two out of four ETS binding sites within the c-kit promoter region. We propose that for RA response, an enhanceosome is orchestrated through scaffolding of a CREB-binding protein (CBP)/p300 molecule between RARE and elements in the proximal promoter region, controlling germ-line expression of the c-kit gene. This study outlines the fundamental role played by RARγ, along with other non-RAR transcription factors (PU.1, SP1 and GABPα), in the regulation of c-kit expression in spermatogonial stem cells in response to RA.

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) prime the limb specific Shh enhancer for chromatin changes that balance histone acetylation mediated by E26 transformation-specific (ETS) factors

Sonic hedgehog (Shh) expression in the limb bud organizing centre called the zone of polarizing activity is regulated by the ZRS enhancer. Here, we examine in mouse and in a mouse limb-derived cell line the dynamic events that activate and restrict the spatial activity of the ZRS. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling in the distal limb primes the ZRS at early embryonic stages maintaining a poised, but inactive state broadly across the distal limb mesenchyme. The E26 transformation-specific transcription factor, ETV4, which is induced by FGF signalling and acts as a repressor of ZRS activity, interacts with the histone deacetylase HDAC2 and ensures that the poised ZRS remains transcriptionally inactive. Conversely, GABPα, an activator of the ZRS, recruits p300, which is associated with histone acetylation (H3K27ac) indicative of an active enhancer. Hence, the primed but inactive state of the ZRS is induced by FGF signalling and in combination with balanced histone modification events establishes the restricted, active enhancer responsible for patterning the limb bud during development.

As an animal embryo develops, specific genes need to be switched on and off at the right time and place to ensure that the embryo’s tissues and organs form properly. Proteins called transcription factors control the activity of individual genes by binding to regions of DNA known as enhancers. Changes in the way DNA is packaged inside cells can affect the ability of transcription factors to access the enhancers, and therefore also influence when particular genes are switched on or off.

Sonic hedgehog (or Shh for short) is a gene that helps to control various aspects of development including the formation of the limbs and brain. The limb forms from a structure in the embryo referred to as the limb bud. An enhancer called ZRS regulates the precise position within the limb bud where the Shh gene is active in a region designated as the “zone of polarizing activity”. Yet, it was not known how the enhancer is controlled to ensure this pattern is achieved. Peluso et al. investigated the events that lead to ZRS becoming active in mice embryos.

The experiments show that the ZRS enhancer exists in three different states in cells across the limb bud: poised, active and inactive. The enhancer is poised in a broad region of the limb bud in cells that are potentially able to switch on the Shh gene. Proteins called fibroblast growth factors drive the enhancer to enter this poised state by altering the way the DNA containing the enhancer is packaged in the cell. Specific transcription factors are able to bind to the poised enhancer and it is the balance between these different transcription factors that activates the enhancer in the zone of polarizing activity. Furthermore in the region of the limb bud where the fibroblast growth factors are not present the ZRS is inactive.

These findings show that fibroblast growth factors, in combination with other changes to the ZRS enhancer, restrict the area in which the enhancer is active to a particular region of the limb bud. Differences in enhancer elements are known to underlie a range of inherited characteristics and may influence whether an individual develops many common diseases. In the future, investigating how cells control the activity of enhancers may provide clues to identifying new targets for drugs to treat some of these diseases.

Cooperative Activity of GABP with PU.1 or C/EBPε Regulates Lamin B Receptor Gene Expression, Implicating Their Roles in Granulocyte Nuclear Maturation

Nuclear segmentation is a hallmark feature of mammalian neutrophil differentiation, but the mechanisms that control this process are poorly understood. Gene expression in maturing neutrophils requires combinatorial actions of lineage-restricted and more widely expressed transcriptional regulators. Examples include interactions of the widely expressed ETS transcription factor, GA-binding protein (GABP), with the relatively lineage-restricted E-twenty-six (ETS) factor, PU.1, and with CCAAT enhancer binding proteins, C/EBPα and C/EBPε. Whether such cooperative interactions between these transcription factors also regulate the expression of genes encoding proteins that control nuclear segmentation is unclear. We investigated the roles of ETS and C/EBP family transcription factors in regulating the gene encoding the lamin B receptor (LBR), an inner nuclear membrane protein whose expression is required for neutrophil nuclear segmentation. Although C/EBPε was previously shown to bind the Lbr promoter, surprisingly, we found that neutrophils derived from Cebpe null mice exhibited normal Lbr gene and protein expression. Instead, GABP provided transcriptional activation through the Lbr promoter in the absence of C/EBPε, and activities supported by GABP were greatly enhanced by either C/EBPε or PU.1. Both GABP and PU.1 bound Ets sites in the Lbr promoter in vitro, and in vivo within both early myeloid progenitors and differentiating neutrophils. These findings demonstrate that GABP, PU.1, and C/EBPε cooperate to control transcription of the gene encoding LBR, a nuclear envelope protein that is required for the characteristic lobulated morphology of mature neutrophils.

Identification of the C/EBPα C-terminal tail residues involved in the protein interaction with GABP and their potency in myeloid differentiation of K562 cells

The CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (C/EBPα) is the member of a family of related basic leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors and is critical for granulopoiesis. We previously demonstrated that C/EBPα interacts with the ETS domain of widely expressed GABPα, which leads to cooperative transcriptional activation of the myeloid-specific promoter for human FCAR encoding the Fc receptor for IgA (FcαR, CD89) in part by facilitating recruitment of C/EBPα to the promoter. The C/EBPα molecule contains transactivation domains (TADs) at its N-terminus and a DNA-binding and dimerization bZIP structure at its C-terminus. We demonstrate here that GABPα interacts with the last 18 residues of the C/EBPα C-terminus beyond the bZIP DNA-binding and dimerizing region. Deletion of this C-terminus resulted in loss of GABPα interaction but not affecting its DNA binding ability, indicating that it is not required for homodimer formation. Moreover, the C-terminus confers the ability to functionally synergize with GABP on a heterologous TAD when fused to the C-terminus of the VP16 TAD. We identified a three-amino acid stretch (amino acids 341-343) that is important for both functional and protein interactions with GABP. Ectopic expression in K562 cells of C/EBPα mutant incapable of interacting with GABPα does not induce expression of granulocytic differentiation markers including CD15, CD11b, GCSF-R and C/EBPε, and does not inhibit proliferation, whereas wild type does. These results demonstrate the functional importance of the C/EBPα C-terminus beyond the bZIP DNA-binding and dimerization region, which may mediate cooperative activation by C/EBPα and GABP of myeloid-specific genes involved in C/EBPα-dependent granulopoiesis.

GABP transcription factor is required for myeloid differentiation, in part, through its control of Gfi-1 expression

GABP is an ets transcription factor that regulates genes that are required for myeloid differentiation. The tetrameric GABP complex includes GABPα, which binds DNA via its ets domain, and GABPβ, which contains the transcription activation domain. To examine the role of GABP in myeloid differentiation, we generated mice in which Gabpa can be conditionally deleted in hematopoietic tissues. Gabpa knockout mice rapidly lost myeloid cells, and residual myeloid cells were dysplastic and immunophenotypically abnormal. Bone marrow transplantation demonstrated that Gabpα null cells could not contribute to the myeloid compartment because of cell intrinsic defects. Disruption of Gabpa was associated with a marked reduction in myeloid progenitor cells, and Gabpα null myeloid cells express reduced levels of the transcriptional repressor, Gfi-1. Gabp bound and activated the Gfi1 promoter, and transduction of Gabpa knockout bone marrow with Gfi1 partially rescued defects in myeloid colony formation and myeloid differentiation. We conclude that Gabp is required for myeloid differentiation due, in part, to its regulation of the tran-scriptional repressor Gfi-1.

Amino acid residues in the β3 strand and subsequent loop of the conserved ETS domain that mediate basic leucine zipper (bZIP) recruitment and potentially distinguish functional attributes of Ets proteins

Ets family members share a conserved DNA-binding ETS domain, and serve a variety of roles in development, differentiation and oncogenesis. Besides DNA binding, the ETS domain also participates in protein–protein interactions with other structurally unrelated transcription factors. Although this mechanism appears to confer tissue- or development stage-specific functions on individual Ets proteins, the biological significance of many of these interactions remains to be evaluated, because their molecular basis has been elusive. We previously demonstrated a direct interaction between the ETS domain of the widely expressed GABPα (GA-binding protein α) and the granulocyte inducer C/EBPα (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α), and suggested its involvement in co-operative transcriptional activation of myeloid-specific genes, such as human FCAR encoding FcαR [Fc receptor for IgA (CD89)]. By deletion analysis, we identified helix α3 and the β3/β4 region as the C/EBPα-interacting region. Domain-swapping of individual sub-domains with those of other Ets proteins allowed us to highlight β-strand 3 and the subsequent loop, which when exchanged by those of Elf-1 (E74-like factor 1) reduced the ability to recruit C/EBPα. Further analysis identified a four-amino acid swap mutation of this region (I387L/C388A/K393Q/F395L) that reduces both physical interaction and co-operative transcriptional activation with C/EBPα without affecting its transactivation capacity by itself. Moreover, re-ChIP (re-chromatin immunoprecipitation) analysis demonstrated that GABPα recruits C/EBPα to the FCAR promoter, depending on these residues. The identified amino acid residues could confer the specificity of the action on the Ets proteins in diverse biological processes through mediating the recruitment of its partner factor.

DNA specificity determinants associate with distinct transcription factor functions

To elucidate how genomic sequences build transcriptional control networks, we need to understand the connection between DNA sequence and transcription factor binding and function. Binding predictions based solely on consensus predictions are limited, because a single factor can use degenerate sequence motifs and because related transcription factors often prefer identical sequences. The ETS family transcription factor, ETS1, exemplifies these challenges. Unexpected, redundant occupancy of ETS1 and other ETS proteins is observed at promoters of housekeeping genes in T cells due to common sequence preferences and the presence of strong consensus motifs. However, ETS1 exhibits a specific function in T cell activation; thus, unique transcriptional targets are predicted. To uncover the sequence motifs that mediate specific functions of ETS1, a genome-wide approach, chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), identified both promoter and enhancer binding events in Jurkat T cells. A comparison with DNase I sensitivity both validated the dataset and also improved accuracy. Redundant occupancy of ETS1 with the ETS protein GABPA occurred primarily in promoters of housekeeping genes, whereas ETS1 specific occupancy occurred in the enhancers of T cell–specific genes. Two routes to ETS1 specificity were identified: an intrinsic preference of ETS1 for a variant of the ETS family consensus sequence and the presence of a composite sequence that can support cooperative binding with a RUNX transcription factor. Genome-wide occupancy of RUNX factors corroborated the importance of this partnership. Furthermore, genome-wide occupancy of co-activator CBP indicated tight co-localization with ETS1 at specific enhancers, but not redundant promoters. The distinct sequences associated with redundant versus specific ETS1 occupancy were predictive of promoter or enhancer location and the ontology of nearby genes. These findings demonstrate that diversity of DNA binding motifs may enable variable transcription factor function at different genomic sites.

Genomes contain sequences that encode both gene products and the instructions for where and when each gene is expressed. This gene expression code is critical for normal development and goes awry in disease processes such as cancer. The gene expression code is interpreted by proteins called transcription factors that bind to particular DNA sequences and carry instructions for gene activation or repression. This recognition code is challenged by the presence of highly-similar transcription factors that prefer almost identical DNA sequences. In addition, studies in living cells indicate that individual transcription factors have significant flexibility in sequence recognition. Here, we identify thousands of positions in the genome of human T cells that are bound by the transcription factor ETS1. These data, along with comparisons to other genomic datasets, allow us to identify DNA sequences that specify ETS1 binding while excluding binding of other related transcription factors. Furthermore, we discover that ETS1 binds more than one sequence and that these sequence variants can predict distinct biological functions of ETS1. Thus, this work contributes to our understanding of the gene expression code by addressing both how a transcription factor can bind unique genomic locations and why a transcription factor binds multiple DNA sequences.

Methylation-sensitive regulation of TMS1/ASC by the Ets factor, GA-binding protein-alpha

Epigenetic silencing involving the aberrant DNA methylation of promoter-associated CpG islands is one mechanism leading to the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in human cancers. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this event remains poorly understood. TMS1/ASC is a novel proapoptotic signaling factor that is subject to epigenetic silencing in human breast and other cancers. The TMS1 promoter is embedded within a CpG island that is unmethylated in normal cells and is spanned by three DNase I-hypersensitive sites (HS). Silencing of TMS1 in cancer cells is accompanied by local alterations in histone modification, remodeling of the HS, and hypermethylation of DNA. In this study, we probed the functional significance of the CpG island-specific HS. We identified a methylation-sensitive complex that bound a 55-bp intronic element corresponding to HS2. Affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry identified a component of this complex to be the GA-binding protein (GABP) alpha. Supershift analysis indicated that the GABPalpha binding partner, GABPbeta1, was also present in the complex. The HS2 element conferred a 3-fold enhancement in TMS1 promoter activity, which was dependent on both intact tandem ets binding sites and the presence of GABPalpha/beta1 in trans. GABPalpha was selectively enriched at HS2 in human cells, and its occupancy was inversely correlated with CpG island methylation. Down-regulation of GABPalpha led to a concomitant decrease in TMS1 expression. These data indicate that the intronic HS2 element acts in cis to maintain transcriptional competency at the TMS1 locus and that this activity is mediated by the ets transcription factor, GABPalpha.

A coordinated phosphorylation cascade initiated by p38MAPK/MSK1 directs RARalpha to target promoters

The nuclear retinoic acid (RA) receptor alpha (RARalpha) is a transcriptional transregulator that controls the expression of specific gene subsets through binding at response elements and dynamic interactions with coregulators, which are coordinated by the ligand. Here, we highlighted a novel paradigm in which the transcription of RARalpha target genes is controlled by phosphorylation cascades initiated by the rapid RA activation of the p38MAPK/MSK1 pathway. We demonstrate that MSK1 phosphorylates RARalpha at S369 located in the ligand-binding domain, allowing the binding of TFIIH and thereby phosphorylation of the N-terminal domain at S77 by cdk7/cyclin H. MSK1 also phosphorylates histone H3 at S10. Finally, the phosphorylation cascade initiated by MSK1 controls the recruitment of RARalpha/TFIIH complexes to response elements and subsequently RARalpha target gene activation. Cancer cells characterized by a deregulated p38MAPK/MSK1 pathway, do not respond to RA, outlining the essential contribution of the RA-triggered phosphorylation cascade in RA signalling.

Identification and structural characterization of a CBP/p300-binding domain from the ETS family transcription factor GABP alpha

Using NMR spectroscopy, we identified and characterized a previously unrecognized structured domain near the N-terminus (residues 35-121) of the ETS family transcription factor GABP alpha. The monomeric domain folds as a five-stranded beta-sheet crossed by a distorted helix. Although globally resembling ubiquitin, the GABP alpha fragment differs in its secondary structure topology and thus appears to represent a new protein fold that we term the OST (On-SighT) domain. The surface of the GABP alpha OST domain contains two predominant clusters of negatively-charged residues suggestive of electrostatically driven interactions with positively-charged partner proteins. Following a best-candidate approach to identify such a partner, we demonstrated through NMR-monitored titrations and glutathione S-transferase pulldown assays that the OST domain binds to the CH1 and CH3 domains of the co-activator histone acetyltransferase CBP/p300. This provides a direct structural link between GABP and a central component of the transcriptional machinery.

Diverse actions of retinoid receptors in cancer prevention and treatment

Retinoids (retinol [vitamin A] and its biologically active metabolites) are essential signaling molecules that control various developmental pathways and influence the proliferation and differentiation of a variety of cell types. The physiological actions of retinoids are mediated primarily by the retinoic acid receptors alpha, beta, and gamma (RARs) and rexinoid receptors alpha, beta, and gamma. Although mutations in RARalpha, via the PML-RARalpha fusion proteins, result in acute promyelocytic leukemia, RARs have generally not been reported to be mutated or part of fusion proteins in carcinomas. However, the retinoid signaling pathway is often compromised in carcinomas. Altered retinol metabolism, including low levels of lecithin:retinol acyl trasferase and retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2, and higher levels of CYP26A1, has been observed in various tumors. RARbeta(2) expression is also reduced or is absent in many types of cancer. A greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which retinoids induce cell differentiation, and in particular stem cell differentiation, is required in order to solve the issue of retinoid resistance in tumors, and thereby to utilize RA and synthetic retinoids more effectively in combination therapies for human cancer.

Postsynaptic chromatin is under neural control at the neuromuscular junction

In adult skeletal muscle, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) specifically accumulates at the neuromuscular junction, to allow neurotransmission. This clustering is paralleled by a compartmentalization of AChR genes expression to subsynaptic nuclei, which acquire a unique gene expression program and a specific morphology in response to neural cues. Our results demonstrate that neural agrin-dependent reprogramming of myonuclei involves chromatin remodelling, histone hyperacetylation and histone hyperphosphorylation. Activation of AChR genes in subsynaptic nuclei is mediated by the transcription factor GABP. Here we demonstrate that upon activation, GABP recruits the histone acetyl transferase (HAT) p300 on the AChR epsilon subunit promoter, whereas it rather recruits the histone deacetylase HDAC1 when the promoter is not activated. Moreover, the HAT activity of p300 is required in vivo for AChR expression. GABP therefore couples chromatin hyperacetylation and AChR activation by neural factors in subsynaptic nuclei.

The Ets transcription factor GABP is required for cell-cycle progression

The transition from cellular quiescence (G0) into S phase is regulated by the mitogenic-activation of D-type cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), the sequestration of the Cdk inhibitors (CDKIs), p21 and p27, and the hyperphosphorylation of Rb with release of E2F transcription factors. However, fibroblasts that lack all D-type cyclins can still undergo serum-induced proliferation and key E2F targets are expressed at stable levels despite cyclical Rb-E2F activity. Here, we show that serum induces expression of the Ets transcription factor, Gabpalpha, and that its ectopic expression induces quiescent cells to re-enter the cell cycle. Genetic disruption of Gabpalpha prevents entry into S phase, and selectively reduces expression of genes that are required for DNA synthesis and degradation of CDKIs, yet does not alter expression of D-type cyclins, Cdks, Rb or E2Fs. Thus, GABP is necessary and sufficient for re-entry into the cell cycle and it regulates a pathway that is distinct from that of D-type cyclins and CDKs.

Maturation stage-specific regulation of megakaryopoiesis by pointed-domain Ets proteins

Numerous megakaryocyte-specific genes contain signature Ets-binding sites in their regulatory regions. Fli-1 (friend leukemia integration 1), an Ets transcription factor, is required for the normal maturation of megakaryocytes and controls the expression of multiple megakaryocyte-specific genes. However, in Fli-1-/- mice, early megakaryopoiesis persists, and the expression of the early megakaryocyte-specific genes, alphaIIb and cMpl, is maintained, consistent with functional compensation by a related Ets factor(s). Here we identify the Ets protein GABPalpha (GA-binding protein alpha) as a regulator of early megakaryocyte-specific genes. Notably, GABPalpha preferentially occupies Ets elements of early megakaryocyte-specific genes in vitro and in vivo, whereas Fli-1 binds both early and late megakaryocyte-specific genes. Moreover, the ratio of GABPalpha/Fli-1 expression declines throughout megakaryocyte maturation. Consistent with this expression pattern, primary fetal liver-derived megakaryocytes from Fli-1-deficient murine embryos exhibit reduced expression of genes associated with late stages of maturation (glycoprotein [GP] Ibalpha, GPIX, and platelet factor 4 [PF4]), whereas GABPalpha-deficient megakaryocytes were mostly impaired in the expression of early megakaryocyte-specific genes (alphaIIb and cMpl). Finally, mechanistic experiments revealed that GABPalpha, like Fli-1, can impart transcriptional synergy between the hematopoietic transcription factor GATA-1 and its cofactor FOG-1 (friend of GATA-1). In concert, these data reveal disparate, but overlapping, functions of Ets transcription factors at distinct stages of megakaryocyte maturation.