Opportunistic immunisation in hospital

Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Human behavior and more specifically behavioral insight-based approaches to vaccine uptake have often been overlooked. While there have been a few narrative reviews indexed in Medline on behavioral interventions to increase vaccine uptake, to our knowledge, none have been systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering not just high but also low-and-middle income countries.

METHODS

We included 613 studies from the Medline database in our systematic review and meta-analysis categorizing different behavioral interventions in 9 domains: education campaigns, on-site vaccination, incentives, free vaccination, institutional recommendation, provider recommendation, reminder and recall, message framing, and vaccine champion. Additionally, considering that there is variability in the acceptance of vaccines among different populations, we assessed studies from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), separately.

FINDINGS

Our results showed that behavioral interventions can considerably improve vaccine uptake in most settings. All domains that we examined improved vaccine uptake with the highest effect size associated with provider recommendation (OR: 3.4 (95%CI: 2.5-4.6); Domain: motivation) and on-site vaccination (OR: 2.9 (95%CI: 2.3-3.7); Domain: practical issues). While the number of studies conducted in LMICs was smaller, the quality of studies was similar with those conducted in HICs. Nevertheless, there were variations in the observed effect sizes.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate that "provider recommendation" and "on-site vaccination" along with other behavioral interventions can be employed to increase vaccination rates globally.

Influenza vaccine administration in a paediatric intensive care unit

AIM

We describe the clinical profile of children and outcomes of influenza immunisation for patients in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

Over two influenza seasons: 19/04/2018 to 07/08/2018 and 02/05/2019 to 10/10/2019, an immunisation nurse and PICU nurse coordinator met weekly and identified patients to receive the influenza vaccine. An inpatient list of PICU patients was screened for eligible patients: greater than 6 months of age, did not have imminent procedures (e.g. surgery) or were not critically unwell, as determined by the treating team, to receive the influenza vaccine. Patients were excluded if they had undergone surgery in the previous 24 hours or were being treated palliatively.

RESULTS

Sixty patients in PICU were identified, with 43% (26/60) receiving the vaccine while in PICU and 17% (10/60) once discharged from PICU to the general ward environment. The majority of patients immunised were in PICU due to cardiac surgery/cardiology or general medical conditions, such as cerebral palsy or RSV bronchiolitis. There were no reported adverse events following immunisation.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated the suitability and acceptability of children in the PICU receiving the seasonal influenza vaccine and tailored interventions to follow-up once discharged from PICU to optimise protection.

Interventions delivered in secondary or tertiary medical care settings to improve routine vaccination uptake in children and young people: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To identify and analyse the interventions delivered opportunistically in secondary or tertiary medical settings, focused on improving routine vaccination uptake in children and young people.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies in English published between 1989 and 2021 detailing interventions delivered in secondary or tertiary care that aimed to improve childhood vaccination coverage. Title, abstract and full-text screening were performed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

After deduplication, the search returned 3456 titles. Following screening and discussion between reviewers, 53 studies were included in the review. Most papers were single-centre studies from high-income countries and varied considerably in terms of their study design, population, target vaccination, clinical setting and intervention delivered. To present and analyse the study findings, and to depict the complexity of vaccination interventions in hospital settings, findings were presented and described as a sequential pathway to opportunistic vaccination in secondary and tertiary care comprising the following stages: (1) identify patients eligible for vaccination; (2) take consent and offer immunisations; (3) order/prescribe vaccine; (4) dispense vaccine; (5) administer vaccine; (6) communicate with primary care; and (7) ongoing benefits of vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Most published studies report improved vaccination coverage associated with opportunistic vaccination interventions in secondary and tertiary care. Children attending hospital appear to have lower baseline vaccination coverage and are likely to benefit from vaccination interventions in these settings. Checking immunisation status is challenging, however, and electronic immunisation registers are required to enable this to be done quickly and accurately in hospital settings. Further research is required in this area, particularly multicentre studies and cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions.

Are child health information services a viable source of accurate vaccination data for clinicians working in paediatric emergency departments in England?

Vaccination is a global success story, yet UK coverage remains undertarget for a number of diseases. The paediatric emergency department (PED) offers the potential for opportunistic vaccination interventions.

OBJECTIVES

To map the Greater Manchester (GM) Child Health Information System network to see if it was a viable source of vaccination data for clinicians working in the PED as a case study.

METHODS

Postprimary care vaccination management systems for GM were visualised using a systems mapping approach, with data obtained from the Office for National Statistics and commissioners in the GM Health and Social Care Partnership.

RESULTS

Once vaccination data left primary care, it passed through 1 of 10 local child health information services (CHISs), using an assortment of different information technology systems, after which it shed individual identifiers and was aggregated within national systems. None of the existing GM CHISs were accessible to PED practitioners.

CONCLUSION

More work needs to be done to explore possible alternative sources of accurate vaccination data during a PED consultation.

Be inFLUential: Evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to increase influenza vaccination rates among pediatric inpatients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for individual ≥6 months of age, yet vaccination rates remain below national targets in the US. Hospitalization provides another medical setting for influenza vaccination, but the effectiveness of inpatient interventions has not been well studied. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to increase influenza vaccination rates among pediatric inpatients.

METHODS

We conducted a pre-post interventional study on medical inpatient units at Children's Hospital Colorado from September 2016-April 2017 (pre-intervention) and September 2017-April 2018 (intervention). The intervention targeted nurses (web-based education modules, huddles and reminders) and providers (vaccination lists in the electronic health record, reminders, vaccination reports and financial incentives for residents). Outcomes were influenza vaccine ordering rates, and influenza vaccination rates at discharge. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics, bivariate and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 4,050 inpatients in 2016-2017 and 4,523 inpatients in 2017 aged ≥ 6 months, vaccination status was documented for 2,902/4,050 (71.7%) and 3,431/4,523 (75.9%) children aged > 6 months of age hospitalized during the study period. The vaccine ordering rate among eligible children was 28.8% in the pre-intervention season versus 50.2% in the intervention season (p < 0.001). The intervention was associated with 1.23 (95% CI 1.11-1.35) times higher odds of appropriate vaccination screening on admission, 2.27 (95% CI 2.01-2.56) times higher odds of a vaccination being ordered, and 1.39 (95% CI 1.27-1.53) times higher odds of a child being vaccinated against influenza at discharge (all p < 0.001). Residents (56%) and medical providers (39%) were more likely to order vaccines compared with nurses (5%), p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

A multifaceted intervention targeting nurses, residents and providers comprising education, visual reminders, vaccination reports and financial incentives is an effective way of improving influenza vaccine ordering, resulting in higher inpatient influenza vaccination rates.

Pediatric Hospitalizations: Are We Missing an Opportunity to Immunize?

OBJECTIVES

Fewer than half of children receive all recommended immunizations on time. Hospitalizations may be opportunities to address delayed immunizations. Our objectives were to assess (1) prevalence of delayed immunizations among hospitalized patients, (2) missed opportunities to administer delayed immunizations, and (3) time to catch up after discharge.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating immunization status of patients 0 to 21 years of age admitted to an academic children's center from 2012 to 2013 at the time of admission, at discharge, and 18 months postdischarge. Immunization catch-up at 18 months postdischarge was defined as having received immunizations due on discharge per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. χ² and t test analyses compared characteristics among patients caught up and not caught up at 18 months postdischarge. Analysis of variance and logistic regression analyses compared mean number of immunizations needed and odds of immunization catch-up among age groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses compared catch-up time by age, race, sex, and insurance.

RESULTS

Among 166 hospitalized patients, 80 were not up to date on immunizations at admission, and only 1 received catch-up immunizations before discharge. Ninety-nine percent (79 of 80) were not up to date on discharge per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. Thirty percent (24 of 79), mostly adolescents, were not caught up at 18 months postdischarge. Median postdischarge catch-up time was 3.5 months (range: 0.03-18.0 months). Patients 0 to 35 months of age were more likely to catch up compared with those of other ages (hazard ratio = 2.73; P = .001), with no differences seen when comparing race, sex, or insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric hospitalizations provide important opportunities to screen and immunize children.

Pediatric Inpatient Immunizations: A Literature Review

CONTEXT

Timely vaccine uptake in children remains suboptimal. Eliminating missed opportunities is key to increasing childhood immunization rates, and hospitalization offers another potential setting to vaccinate.

OBJECTIVE

To better understand pediatric inpatient immunization programs, including vaccination rates of inpatients, parental and provider attitudes, barriers to vaccine delivery, and interventions to increase provision of inpatient vaccines.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify articles and conference abstracts related to pediatric inpatient immunization.

STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were studies published in English between January 1990 and January 2019 in which pediatric vaccination in the hospital setting was discussed. Findings from 30 articles and conference abstracts were summarized and organized by topic area.

DATA EXTRACTION

Abstracts were screened for relevance, articles were read, and themes were identified.

RESULTS

Children who are hospitalized have been shown to have lower immunization rates compared with the general population, with 27% to 84% of pediatric inpatients due or overdue for vaccines nationally when verified with official records. Unfortunately, little is done to catch up these children once they have been identified. Access to accurate vaccine histories remains a major barrier in inpatient immunization programs because providers frequently under document and parents over recall a child's vaccine status. Strategies identified to increase inpatient vaccination included creation of a multidisciplinary immunization team, educational interventions, visual reminders, catch-up vaccine plans, order sets, and nursing-driven screening. When offered inpatient vaccination, a majority of parents accepted immunizations for their children.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization may provide an opportunity to augment vaccine uptake. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based strategies to overcome barriers to inpatient vaccination.

Evaluating Interventions to Increase Influenza Vaccination Rates among Pediatric Inpatients

Introduction:

Hospitalization provides an ideal opportunity for influenza vaccination, and strategies can enhance existing tools within the electronic medical record (EMR). The objectives of the study were to introduce and evaluate the effectiveness of provider and family-directed interventions to increase influenza vaccination ordering among inpatients.

Methods:

We conducted a quality improvement initiative for children aged older than 6 months on medical inpatient teams at a large pediatric tertiary care hospital from September 2014 to March 2015, comprising 2 intervention groups (provider reminders and family education) and 1 control group for comparison, using EMR prompts alone. The provider reminder interventions comprised weekly e-mails indicating inpatient immunization status; vaccination reports; and visual reminders. The family education group intervention consisted of handouts regarding the benefits and safety of influenza vaccination. We measured vaccine ordering rates for each group among eligible children and overall vaccination rates. Data were analyzed using Statistical Process Control Charts and Chi-square tests.

Results:

Among 2,552 patients aged older than 6 months hospitalized during the study period, 1,657 were unimmunized. During the intervention period, the provider group ordered 213/409 (52%) influenza vaccines, the family education group ordered 138/460 (30%) and the control group ordered 71/279 (25%) (P < 0.0001). The provider group had higher influenza immunization status than the control group (61% versus 53%; P = 0.0017). Exposure to the intervention did not impact the length of stay/discharge time.

Conclusions:

Provider reminders including e-mails, visual reminders, and vaccination reports are effective ways of increasing inpatient influenza vaccination rates and are more effective than family education, or EMR prompts alone.

Exploring provider and parental perceptions to influenza vaccination in the inpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Hospitalization provides an ideal opportunity for immunization, but few studies have explored provider and parental attitudes toward pediatric inpatient vaccination against influenza.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to determine provider and caregiver attitudes and explore potential barriers to inpatient influenza vaccination.

METHODS

We developed and distributed two surveys to parents/caregivers as well as providers of general pediatric inpatients at Children's Hospital Colorado between October 2014 and March 2015 assessing attitudes toward influenza and inpatient influenza vaccination. We analyzed the Likert scale responses using univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression to assess associations between responses and vaccination status.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 95% and 58% for parents and providers, respectively. Parents of hospitalized children who agreed that flu vaccines are safe (adjusted OR 2.50 [95%CI 1.76-3.58]), and that the influenza vaccine is needed every year had higher odds of having a vaccinated child (adjusted OR 3.30 [95%CI 2.30-4.81]). Most providers (91%) agree that influenza vaccination is an important priority among inpatients, but believe that parental misconceptions and their reluctance for inpatient vaccination are the most important barriers to influenza vaccination. Providers forgetting to ask about vaccination status and order the vaccine are the next most commonly identified barriers. In contrast, most parents surveyed had favorable attitudes toward inpatient influenza vaccination and disagreed that their child was too sick to receive the vaccine during hospitalization.

A pilot program to improve vaccination status for hospitalized children

OBJECTIVES

Screening of immunization status at each health care encounter is recommended to improve immunization coverage rates but is often limited to primary care practices. A pilot intervention study was performed to ascertain the immunization status of hospitalized children and determine if development of an immunization plan before discharge would improve the vaccination status for such children.

METHODS

On the basis of power calculations estimated to detect an increase in immunization status from 60% to 70% with 80% power, 356 randomly selected children were enrolled between March 6, 2012 and June 14, 2012. Immunization records were obtained, immunization status determined, and parent/guardian informed if catch-up dose(s) were needed. If parent requested vaccine dose(s), they were administered before discharge.

RESULTS

Vaccination status was current per Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines in 73% of hospitalized children, and 27% children required catch-up dose(s) (200 doses for 95 children). Human papilloma virus vaccine (dose 1), varicella zoster vaccine (dose 2), and meningococcal conjugate vaccine were the most commonly identified dose(s) needed. Of those requiring catch-up dose(s), 25% were caught up, increasing vaccination status to 80% at 1-month post hospital discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to determine the immunization status of hospitalized pediatric patients of all ages, including adolescents, providing new data on the immunization status of the inpatient pediatric population. A pilot intervention consisting of obtaining immunization records, determining immunization status, and discussing catch-up dose(s) before discharge resulted in improvement of immunization status, suggesting that the inpatient setting may be used along with many other national strategies to help address missed vaccination opportunities.

Vaccine-preventable disease susceptibility in a British paediatric assessment unit

Aims: To evaluate practice within a paediatric secondary-care centre before and after introduction of simple interventions to improve identification of under-immunised children and facilitate catch-up immunisations. Methods: The population-based child health database was used to check immunisation status for two cohorts of 200 consecutive admissions before and after routine printing of immunisation histories from the database and raising staff awareness. Vaccine-preventable disease (VPD) susceptibility burdens were calculated for each child. Case notes were assessed for accuracy and documentation of ward-based interventions. Results: Fourteen per cent of all children were under-immunised on admission and 27% of these were more than five years behind schedule. Under-immunised children's VPD susceptibility burdens ranged from 0-40,858 days and in 59% exceeded 1,000 days. Over one month the paediatric admission unit saw children with a combined VPD susceptibility burden of 1,323 child-years. Positive identification of under-immunised children increased by 40% (95% confidence interval: 12-62, p=0.002) following the introduction of routine database printouts. Conclusion: Children presenting to British secondary care units have large VPD susceptibility burdens. Positive identification of under-immunised children substantially improved after the introduction of routine database printouts, but catch-up immunisation rates did not increase.

Using routinely collected data to improve immunisation histories

Immunisation is one of the most effective health interventions in existence yet outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases continue to occur in developed countries. High rates of cover are needed to provide adequate herd immunity and there is evidence that a significant proportion of paediatric inpatients are not up to date even in areas with high levels of community cover. A proportion of these children will have parents who consciously declined immunisation, however the remaining children represent a vulnerable cohort whose under-immunisation is not routinely identified.

Two-hundred consecutive admissions to rural paediatric assessment unit had their routinely documented vaccination histories checked against their records on the regional Child Health Information System (CHIS). 30 children (15%) were not up to date on the CHIS, yet routine clerking only identified 5 of these children (17%). After introduction of a simple system whereby ward clerks and doctors were taught how to access and print full immunisation histories from the CHIS, a further 200 consecutive admissions were audited. A similar number were not up to date (29/200) but the proportion of children with missing immunisations correctly identified in the clerking documentation increased to 52% (15 children). This is a 35% improvement (95% CI; 12–58%).

Access to routinely collected data can significantly improve identification of under-immunised children and contribute towards higher levels of individual and herd-immunity.

Validity of vaccination cards and parental recall to estimate vaccination coverage: a systematic review of the literature

Immunization programs frequently rely on household vaccination cards, parental recall, or both to calculate vaccination coverage. This information is used at both the global and national level for planning and allocating performance-based funds. However, the validity of household-derived coverage sources has not yet been widely assessed or discussed. To advance knowledge on the validity of different sources of immunization coverage, we undertook a global review of literature. We assessed concordance, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and coverage percentage point difference when subtracting household vaccination source from a medical provider source. Median coverage difference per paper ranged from -61 to +1 percentage points between card versus provider sources and -58 to +45 percentage points between recall versus provider source. When card and recall sources were combined, median coverage difference ranged from -40 to +56 percentage points. Overall, concordance, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value showed poor agreement, providing evidence that household vaccination information may not be reliable, and should be interpreted with care. While only 5 papers (11%) included in this review were from low-middle income countries, low-middle income countries often rely more heavily on household vaccination information for decision making. Recommended actions include strengthening quality of child-level data and increasing investments to improve vaccination card availability and card marking. There is also an urgent need for additional validation studies of vaccine coverage in low and middle income countries.

Opportunities taken: the need for and effectiveness of secondary care opportunistic immunisation

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of a formalised opportunistic immunisation (OI) system in a hospital setting.

METHODS

Pre-post implementation audit of missed immunisation opportunities.

RESULTS

Of 5583 children in the National Immunisation Register cohort seen in a hospital setting, 1641 (29.4%) were under-immunised, compared with the concurrent regional cohort of 15%. Māori children were less likely to be age-appropriately immunised (36.9% under-immunised, P < 0.0005, χ(2) = 41.4). Of the 1641 under-immunised children, 337 (20.5%) were deemed to have current medical reasons not to be immunised acutely, and of the remaining 1304, 244 (18.7%) declined immunisations. This left 1060 for whom immunisation was possible, and we immunised 880 (83.0%) of these. All children were re-engaged with primary care services.

CONCLUSIONS

Children in contact with secondary care services have low immunisation rates with ethnic disparity. Appropriately resourced formalised OI is effective, with potential for further improvement. The system we have implemented enhances primary care involvement.

Missed immunisation opportunities in emergency departments in northern New South Wales, Australia

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of children less than 12 months of age presenting to Hunter New England (HNE) emergency departments (EDs) during 2009 who were overdue for immunisations and identify factors associated with overdue status.

METHODS

The immunisation status of all children aged between 3 months and 1 year (120-365 days) who presented at an HNE ED between 1 January and 31 December 2009 was determined using Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) 30-day overdue reports. The ED dataset and ACIR reports were linked using a deterministic method.

RESULTS

Six per cent (253/4218) of children who attended an HNE ED in 2009 were overdue for immunisation and 28.1% (71/253) presented multiple times while overdue. There was a median delay of 77 days from their first presentation while overdue until they no longer appeared on the ACIR 30-day overdue report. Children who presented while overdue were more likely to present multiple times to EDs (RR = 1.45; P = 0.0025), be in a life-threatening triage category (P = 0.012) and present at tertiary referral hospitals (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Important missed immunisation opportunities occurred in HNE EDs and may occur in other EDs in Australia. Half of the children who presented to Hunter New England emergency departments while overdue for immunisation remained overdue for greater than 77 days following their presentation. Opportunities exist in EDs and paediatric inpatient wards for ensuring that all children are protected against vaccine-preventable diseases.

Immunisation coverage in Australian Indigenous children: Time to move the goal posts

Childhood immunisation coverage reported at 12 to <15 months and 2 years of age, may mask deficiencies in the timeliness of vaccines designed to protect against diseases in infancy. This study aimed to evaluate immunisation timeliness in Indigenous infants in the Northern Territory, Australia. Coverage was analysed at the date children turned 7, 13 and 18 months of age. By 7 months of age, 45.2% of children had completed the recommended schedule, increasing to 49.5% and 81.2% at 13 and 18 months of age, respectively. Immunisation performance benchmarks must focus on improving the timeliness in these children in the first year of life.

Opportunistic immunisation of infants admitted to hospital: are we doing enough?

AIM

To determine the accuracy and effectiveness of opportunistic immunisation of children admitted to the paediatric unit of a large teaching hospital using retrospectively collected data.

METHODS

Immunisation status, documented using clinical indicator (CI) forms, of all admissions over a 1-year period was compared with that recorded by the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. In order to determine the effectiveness of providing catch-up plans, we analysed the difference in catch-up times of the children with and without a catch-up plan on their CI form.

RESULTS

The details of 614 admissions in the study period were included. Comparing the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register with the CI for assessing immunisation status, we found that 83 of the 573 (14.5%) were incorrectly recorded, and only 25 of the 82 admissions in which the infant was overdue were identified on the ward. Children were more likely to be vaccinated within 30 days and 90 days of admission if they had been given a catch-up plan. Of the children who had not been given a catch-up plan, almost half were still overdue at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Admission to hospital provides opportunities for both routine and catch-up immunisation; however, for opportunistic immunisation to be effective, health service screening and immunisation documentation must be accurate.

Vaccination coverage by special health care needs status in young children

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare vaccination coverage among children 19 to 35 months of age with and without special health care needs overall and among demographic subgroups.

METHODS

Data are from the National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs, a module of the State and Local Area Integrated Telephone Survey, which was sponsored by the Health Resources and Services Administration Maternal and Child Health Bureau and conducted in 2000-2002 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics. We used data from the National Immunization Survey and the National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs to examine immunization coverage rates for individual vaccines and an array of combined series vaccinations. The relationship between special needs and immunization status was analyzed by age, gender, and race or ethnicity of the child; the child's health insurance type; the mother's educational attainment and presence in the household; and household income relative to the federal poverty level.

RESULTS

Overall, there were no significant differences between children with and without special needs for any of the individual antigens or combined immunization series. Some significant differences by special needs status were found within certain demographic subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that, generally children with special health care needs have immunization rates that are very similar to typically developing children. There is some evidence that children with special health care needs are at risk for underimmunization if they are non-Hispanic white or live in an affluent household and are more likely to be immunized if they are Hispanic, poor, publicly insured, or if their mothers did not complete high school. These findings may be due to outreach or support programs that target disadvantaged children. However, it is important to note that the majority of comparisons within demographic subgroups show no significant differences between children with special health care needs and children without special health care needs.

Missed opportunities to vaccinate children admitted to a paediatric tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Inequalities in vaccine uptake exist. Studies suggest paediatric inpatients have lower rates of immunisation uptake than the general population. Various UK policies advocate opportunistic immunisation.

AIM

To evaluate practice within a paediatric tertiary hospital in identifying and facilitating vaccination of inpatients who were not fully immunised.

METHODS

Case notes for 225 inpatients were examined. Thirty staff of various professions and grades were interviewed. Policies, forms and documents used in the hospital were reviewed.

RESULTS

Immunisation status was recorded for 71% of children admitted, but for 69% of these immunisations were documented as "up-to-date" without any further information recorded. At least 20% of inpatients were incompletely immunised, but very little was done to facilitate vaccination. There was no training for staff either in giving advice or in administering vaccines and staff views differed regarding the hospital's role in immunisations. While there were guidelines for specific groups of patients, there were no general immunisation policies. Incorrect and out-of-date immunisation schedules were found on documents.

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunities to immunise children continue to be missed by all levels of health care service provision. Tertiary centres have a role to play in supporting primary care services to ensure that these vulnerable children are appropriately immunised. Measures are being taken to address the problems identified in this study and we strongly suspect that other hospitals in the UK ought to be confronting these issues as well.

Incomplete immunisation uptake in infancy: maternal reasons

We examined uptake of primary immunisations in infancy and the reasons given by mothers for either incompletely or not immunising their infants. We used data from the Millennium Cohort Study, a cohort of 18,819 infants born between September 2000 and January 2002 in the UK. 95.6% infants were reported to be fully immunised, 3.3% partially immunised and 1.1% unimmunised. Mothers most frequently cited medical reasons (45%) for partial immunisation (n=697), but beliefs or attitudes (47%) for no immunisation (n=228). An understanding of maternal reasons for incomplete immunisation status may assist in identifying appropriate interventions to maximise uptake.

Does qualitative synthesis of anecdotal evidence with that from scientific research help in understanding public health issues: a review of low MMR uptake

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To explore the professional and parental factors underlying low MMR uptake by qualitative synthesis of evidence from technical and non-technical anecdotal literature.

METHODS

An intensive investigation of literature covering research, press, online, E groups and grey literature was carried out using devised search strategies. Key themes were identified from both the research and anecdotal evidence, which were merged to form common themes.

RESULTS

The review of technical literature identified media scare and inadequate information from health professionals as the main reasons for non-uptake of MMR. The non-technical anecdotal evidence showed that professionals' belief in parental right to choose, target payments and fear of autism were the major factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Anecdotal evidence may contribute to evidence-based public health practice, especially in widely debated public health issues.