Validation of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) Questionnaire and its potential as a single-item outcome measure in clinical practice

Is the patient-perceived impact of psoriatic arthritis a global concept? An international study in 13 Arab countries (TACTIC study)

The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) questionnaire, a recommended measure of patient-reported impact for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), was initially developed in Europe and may lack universal validity. Recognizing the need for a culturally appropriate tool for Arab patients, this study aimed to TranslAte, CulTurally adapt, and validate the PsAID in ArabIC (TACTIC). The PsAID-12 was translated into Arabic using a rigorous process of double translation, back-translation, and cognitive debriefing. The Arabic version was then validated through a study conducted in 13 Arab countries in 2022. Participants were consecutive literate adult patients diagnosed with PsA and fulfilling the CASPAR criteria. Collected data included PsAID-12, disease activity, and legacy patient-reported outcomes. Psychometric properties, such as internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability, were examined. Factors associated with high PsAID-12 total scores (> 4) were explored using multivariable binary logistic regression. A culturally adapted Arabic PsAID-12 questionnaire was achieved with minor rephrasing. The validation study included 554 patients from 13 countries (mean age 45 years, 59% females), with a mean PsAID score of 3.86 (SD 2.33). The Arabic PsAID-12 demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95), and correlations with other measures ranged from 0.63 to 0.78. Test-retest reliability (N = 138 patients) was substantial (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 0.90 [0.86-0.93]; Cohen's kappa 0.80). Factors associated with a high PsAID score were disability (odds ratio, OR 3.15 [2.03-4.89]), depression (OR 1.56 [1.35-1.81]), widespread pain (OR 1.31 [1.12-1.53]), and disease activity (OR 1.29 [1.13-1.47]). Pain and fatigue were identified as the most impactful PsAID-12 domains for PsA patients. The Arabic PsAID is a valid and reliable measure that reflects the priorities of patients with PsA. PsAID scores correlated with disease activity and legacy outcome measures, as expected, indicating PsAID is a consistent measure of PsA impact across cultures. These findings highlight the potential of the Arabic PsAID in improving the care provided to Arabic-speaking patients worldwide.

Construct validity, reliability, and threshold value for treatment goals of the Thai version of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease Questionnaire for patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the construct validity, reliability, and treatment goal threshold of a Thai-language version of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (Thai-PsAID) questionnaire in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved administering the proposed Thai-PsAID to 117 Thai patients with PsA. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's α test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was assessed using Spearman correlation with clinical disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (cDAPSA), the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), EQ-5D index, and the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). The optimal cutoff score of the Thai-PsAID for minimal disease activity (MDA) was determined by receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Participants had a mean age of 49.5 years, 61 (52.1%) were female, and the median disease duration was 5 years. The median Thai-PsAID score was 2.1, with a Cronbach's α coefficient of .95 and an ICC of 0.77. The mean time to complete the Thai-PsAID was 2.1 min, with no missing data. The Thai-PsAID score demonstrated a moderate correlation with the cDAPSA, HAQ, and EQ-5D with indices (Spearman's rho of .64, .54, and -.55, respectively). The cutoff of 2.7 has 81%-84% sensitivity and 69%-85% specificity for classifying patients with MDA, satisfied PASS, and indicating no need to escalate medication.

CONCLUSIONS

The Thai-PsAID is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool for measuring PsA prognosis. A cutoff of 2.7 accurately discriminates MDA and PASS and indicates no need for medication escalation. The Thai-PsAID may be used as a standalone measure.

Validity and score interpretation of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease: an analysis of pooled data from two phase 3 trials of bimekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate psychometric performance of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) total and individual item scores in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to estimate score change thresholds and scores corresponding to different levels of symptom/impact severity.

METHODS

Data up to week 16 from 1252 patients with active PsA enrolled in two randomised controlled trials of bimekizumab (BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581)) were used to assess construct validity (correlations with other patient-reported outcomes), known-groups validity (based on Minimal Disease Activity index, Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score), reliability (Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)) and responsiveness (sensitivity to change). Clinically meaningful within-patient improvement thresholds were estimated by anchor-based and distribution-based analyses, and symptom/impact severity thresholds were estimated by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) PsAID-12 total score at baseline was 4.19 (1.94). PsAID-12 scores demonstrated good convergent validity and good known-groups validity. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.70) were also good. Responsiveness was acceptable (correlations ≥0.30 for most scores). Improvement thresholds were estimated at 1.5-2 points for the PsAID-12 total score and 2 or 3 points for item scores. Thresholds for different levels of symptom/impact severity could be derived for most PsAID-12 items.

CONCLUSIONS

The PsAID-12 demonstrated robust psychometric properties in a large sample of patients with active PsA, supporting its use as a fit-for-purpose patient-reported outcome in this population. Furthermore, thresholds for score interpretation were derived.

The Clinical Impact of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Remote Monitoring of Inflammatory Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The inflammatory arthritides (IAs) make up a significant proportion of conditions followed up in rheumatology clinics. These patients require regular monitoring, but this is increasingly difficult with rising patient numbers and demand on clinics. Our objective is to evaluate the clinical impact of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) as a digital remote-monitoring intervention on disease activity, treatment decisions, and health care resource use in patients with IA.

METHODS

Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched, with randomized controlled trials and (nonrandomized) controlled clinical trials included, and meta-analysis and forest plots conducted for each outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias-2 tool and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included with a total of 4,473 patients, with seven studies assessing patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Compared with control, the disease activity in the ePROM group was lower (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.27 to -0.03) and rates of remission/low disease activity were higher (odds ratio1.65; 95% CI 1.02-2.68), but five of eight studies provided additional combined interventions (e.g., disease education). Fewer face to face visits were needed in the remote ePROM group (SMD -0.93; 95% CI -2.14-0.28).

CONCLUSION

Most studies were at high risk of bias with significant heterogeneity in design, but our results suggest there is an advantage in using ePROM monitoring in patients with IAs, with the potential for reduction in health care resource use without detrimental impact in disease outcomes.

Effect of bimekizumab on symptoms and impact of disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis over 3 years: results from BE ACTIVE

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate effects of long-term bimekizumab treatment on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, symptoms and the impact of PsA on patients.

METHODS

Patients with active PsA were enrolled into BE ACTIVE, a 48-week randomised controlled trial (NCT02969525). After Week 48, patients could enter a 104-week open-label extension (NCT03347110), receiving bimekizumab 160 mg every four weeks. PRO measures assessed included arthritis pain visual analogue scale (VAS), PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID)-9, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and HAQ-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Results were analysed as mean (S.E.M.) changes from baseline (CfB) from Week 0 to the end of the open-label extension (3 years) and as percentage of patients reaching patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for global impact (PsAID-9 total score ≤4) and normal function (HAQ-DI total score <0.5). Non-responder imputation was applied to missing binary outcomes.

RESULTS

In 206 patients (mean age 49.3 years, 51.0% male), completion rate was high; 161 (78.2%) patients completed Week 152. Bimekizumab treatment was associated with long-term sustained improvements in pain [arthritis pain VAS CfB; Week 48: -29.9 (1.9); Week 152: -32.0 (1.9)] and fatigue [PsAID-9 fatigue CfB; -2.4 (0.2); -2.7 (0.2)]. High percentages of patients achieved acceptable symptom state (PsAID-9 PASS: 75.2%; 65.0%) and normalised function (HAQ-DI <0.5: 49.0%; 46.1%). Improvements in patient global assessment and SF-36 Physical Component Summary were also sustained.

CONCLUSIONS

Bimekizumab treatment was associated with long-term sustained improvements in pain and fatigue, reducing overall impact of PsA on patients. Physical function and quality of life improved up to 3 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969525, NCT03347110.

Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Remission in Psoriatic Arthritis

Introduction

Achievement of remission in psoriatic arthritis is a key goal for patients and clinicians, yet definitions of remission may vary. Previous efforts have utilized multidomain measures such as minimal disease activity that assess the status of joints, skin, and function to determine current level of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) disease activity. The goal of this study is to identify factors associated with patient-reported psoriatic arthritis remission.

Methods

The National Psoriasis Foundation conducted a cross-sectional study using an online survey of a random stratified sample of 1570 individuals with psoriatic disease in the USA. Participants were asked about a provider diagnosis of psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis, comorbid conditions, and psoriatic arthritis impact and disease activity, and demographic questions. All participants reporting a physician-given diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis were asked if they felt their psoriatic arthritis was in remission (“Do you feel your psoriatic arthritis is in remission?” Yes/No/Unsure) and, if so, length of remission. Individuals with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis reporting a body surface area impacted by psoriasis 3% or less were asked if they felt their psoriasis was in remission. Psoriatic arthritis disease activity and impact was assessed using the nine-question Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-9) instrument and a global PsA-related quality of life question. PsAID-9 scores ≤ 4 were used to indicate acceptable disease state. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with patient-perceived PsA remission.

Results

Of 834 participants with PsA, including 76 (4.8%) with PsA without skin involvement ever, 144 (17.3%) felt their psoriatic arthritis was in remission, with an average remission duration of 43 months. Of those in remission, 116 (78.4%) reported currently using a treatment for their PsA, with most (75.7%) reporting using a biologic therapy for their PsA in the past 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that patient-perceived psoriatic arthritis remission was independently associated with experiencing acceptable disease state (PsAID-9 ≤ 4), perception of psoriasis remission, lower impact of PsA on global quality of life, and non-white race. Age, sex, body mass index, or biologic use in the last 12 months were not associated with patient-reported PsA remission.

Conclusion

Overall, patient perception of PsA remission was most strongly associated with patient-reported psoriasis remission.

Effectiveness of IL-12/23 inhibition (ustekinumab) versus tumour necrosis factor inhibition in psoriatic arthritis: observational PsABio study results

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate 6-month effectiveness of ustekinumab versus tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), analysing predictors of low disease activity (LDA)/remission.

METHODS

PsABio is a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at 92 sites in eight European countries, who received first-line to third-line ustekinumab or a TNFi. Comparative achievement at 6 months of clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) LDA/remission, and minimal disease activity (MDA)/very LDA using propensity score (PS)-adjusted multivariate logistic regression was assessed.

RESULTS

In the final analysis set of 868 participants with 6-month follow-up data (ustekinumab, n=426; TNFi, n=442), with long-standing disease and a high mean cDAPSA score (31.0 vs 29.8, respectively), proportions of patients in ustekinumab/TNFi treatment groups achieving cDAPSA LDA at 6 months were 45.7%/50.7%. cDAPSA remission was achieved in 14.9%/19.2%, and MDA in 26.4%/30.8% of patients. PS-adjusted odds ratios (OR; 95% confidence interval (CI)) of reaching cDAPSA LDA and MDA were 0.73 (0.46 to 1.15) and 0.87 (0.61 to 1.25) with ustekinumab versus TNFi, indicating no significant difference. High baseline body mass index or high cDAPSA were associated with a lower chance (OR (95% CI)) of reaching cDAPSA LDA with TNFi (0.94 (0.89 to 0.99) and 0.64 (0.52 to 0.79), respectively). Predictive factors were similar to previously published evidence, with cDAPSA and 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease scores and chronic widespread pain at baseline appearing as new risk factors for unfavourable outcome. Safety data were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment targets were reached similarly after 6 months of treatment with ustekinumab and TNFi.

The Effect of Changes in Employment on Health of Work-Related Injured Workers: A Longitudinal Perspectives

This longitudinal study attempted to identify changes in employment status and overall health status. The participants were workers who had experienced work-related injuries in the past. In this study, we used the Panel Study of Workers’ Compensation Insurance from 2013 to 2017. This study utilized propensity score matching for a quasi-experimental design study of the first year to exclude the effects of the confounding variables and exclude the effect of employment status, which is the main independent variable. After applying propensity score matching the research subjects totaled 1070. Changes in employment status were found to have a negative effect on overall health status. This raises new implications for existing industrial accident-related support policies. Thus, it is considered that the scope should be expanded from policies related to re-employment of workers after an industrial accident to improving quality of life through maintaining employment from a long-term perspective. The notable point of this study was to apply the PSM methods. By applying PSM, we clearly identified the effect of changes in employment status on health status.

Comparing the Patient-Reported Physical Function Outcome Measures in a Real-Life International Cohort of Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the psychometric properties of 3 patient-reported outcome measures to assess the physical function in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Data were available for the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI), the 12-item Short Form instrument physical component summary (SF-12 PCS), and the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease instrument functional capacity score (PsAID-FC). Data came from a longitudinal study in 14 countries of consecutive adults with definite PsA with ≥2 years of duration. The score distribution, construct validity, responsiveness, and thresholds of meaning of the patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

At baseline, 414 subjects (52% male) were analyzed. The mean ± SD age was 52.4 ± 12.5 years and duration of illness was 10.9 ± 8.1 years. Ceiling effects were noted in 31% and 21% of patients for HAQ DI and PsAID-FC, respectively; floor effects were minimal. All 3 patient-reported outcome measures met a priori hypotheses for construct validity. After a median follow-up of 4.1 (interquartile range 2.7) months in 350 patients, 27%, 54%, and 18% of patients reported themselves improved, not changed, and worsened, respectively. Change scores were statistically different for groups for worsening versus no-change for all patient-reported outcome measures. PsAID-FC was more sensitive to change than the other 2 patient-reported outcome measures. Comparing groups with worsening condition to no-change, the standardized response mean square ratios were HAQ DI 29.9, SF-12 PCS 16.7, and PsAID-FC 40.1.

CONCLUSION

HAQ DI, SF-12 PCS, and PsAID-FC are valid measures of physical function for PsA. PsAID-FC, a single question, performed similarly to the other patient-reported outcome measures and may be an additional option to measure PsA-specific physical function.

Patient-Centered Care in Psoriatic Arthritis-A Perspective on Inflammation, Disease Activity, and Psychosocial Factors

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a seronegative spondyloarthropathy characterized by skin lesions, dactylitis, and enthesitis. Patients with PsA suffer from a variety of psychosocial difficulties and nonspecific symptoms early on in the disease course and continue to experience progressive disease due to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Symptoms initially viewed as somatization could lead to undertreatment and promote psychological distress, poor coping, and negative patient-provider relationships. Pain and fatigue are important complaints that affect the patient's perception and may need to be addressed with a multidisciplinary approach. Maladaptive cognitive responses can lead to a negative illness perception and impact patient beliefs and concerns over treatment, as well as nonadherence. An underlying inflammatory component in affective disorders has been examined, though whether and how it may interact mechanistically in PsA warrants interest. Cognitive behavioral therapy represents a nonpharmacological treatment modality that can be combined with cytokine-targeted therapy to address both somatic and psychological complaints. Future directions for research include: (1) Elucidating nonspecific manifestations (e.g., subclinical stage, differential with functional syndromes) of PsA and how they impact diagnosis and management; (2) characterizing immune-mediated components of mood disorders in PsA; and (3) whether a bidirectional approach with abrogating inflammation and psychotherapeutic support leads to improved outcomes.

Validation and clinical interpretability of PsAID - psoriatic arthritis impact of disease

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of widely varying presentation, which determines functional and psychological impairment, with a high negative impact on patients' quality of life. Therefore, knowing the patient's perception of their health status is of fundamental importance for understanding the real impact of PsA. Given this context, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recently developed the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) - instrument to specifically assess the impact of PsA for the patient.

OBJECTIVE

Validate the brazilian portuguese version of PsAID-12 (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease) and to verify its interpretability in clinical practice, through its relation with measures of psoriatic arthritis activity.

METHODS

A multicenter cross-sectional study, which recruited 160 patients, who met the Classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), in six Brazilian centers of rheumatology. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factorial analysis and also by Spearman correlation with other PROMs and measures of disease activity evaluation.

RESULTS

Of the total number of participants, 50% were female, with a mean age (SD) of 54.0 ± 11.2 years; 68% had only peripheral arthritis and 32% had pure or mixed axial involvement. The majority (67.7%) of the patients were using biological treatment. The reliability of internal consistency (alpha-Cronbach = 0.93) and test-retest (ICC = 0.996) were good. Factor analysis revealed two factors, named physical and psychosocial, which included the skin evaluation item. PsAID-12 correlated significantly with other PROMs, demonstrating good construct validity. PsAID-12 was also significantly associated with the disease activity assessment instruments (DAS28-ESR, ASDAS, and BASDAI) and the MDA status: "Minimum Disease Activity". Fibromyalgia did not significantly affect the final PsAID-12 score.

CONCLUSION

The brazilian version of PsAID-12 has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of the impact of the disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Moreover, it associated significantly with the scores of disease activity assessment.

Effect of filgotinib on health-related quality of life in active psoriatic arthritis: a randomized phase 2 trial (EQUATOR)

Objective

To examine the effects of filgotinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID)9 questionnaire in active PsA.

Methods

Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to filgotinib 200 mg or placebo once daily for 16 weeks in EQUATOR, a multicentre, double-blind, phase 2 randomized controlled trial. HRQoL was assessed with PsAID9 at Weeks 4 and 16. Change from baseline in total and individual domain scores, plus the proportions of patients achieving minimal clinically important improvement (MCII; ⩾3 points) and patient-accepted symptom status (PASS; score <4), were evaluated. Correlation with the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) was investigated.

Results

One hundred and thirty-one patients were randomized to filgotinib or placebo. Filgotinib effects on PsAID9 were observed from Week 4. At Week 16, mean (s.d.) change from baseline in PsAID9 was –2.3 (1.8) and –0.8 (2.2) for filgotinib and placebo, respectively (least-squares mean of group difference –1.48 [95% CI –2.12, –0.84], P < 0.0001), with significant improvements in all domains vs placebo. Significantly more patients on filgotinib achieved MCII (group difference 25.4% [95% CI 8.92, 39.99], P = 0.0022) and PASS (group difference 29.6% [95% CI 10.65, 45.60], P = 0.0018) at Week 16 vs placebo. Similar improvements in SF-36 were observed, with moderate to strong negative correlation between PsAID9 and SF-36.

Conclusion

Filgotinib significantly improved HRQoL vs placebo in patients with active PsA, as measured by PsAID9. To our knowledge, EQUATOR is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate PsAID9.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show, NCT03101670.

Results of a global, patient-based survey assessing the impact of psoriatic arthritis discussed in the context of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory musculoskeletal disease, manifesting as peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, spondylitis, and skin and nail psoriasis. A core set of domains for measuring the impact of PsA has been developed, including pain, patient global assessment, physical function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and fatigue. To understand the impact of PsA on health domains from a patient’s perspective, a global survey was developed and results reported in the context of the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) questionnaire.

Methods

An online patient-based global survey was conducted by The Harris Poll in Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the US between November 2, 2017 and March 12, 2018. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years old with a diagnosis of PsA for > 1 year, had visited a rheumatologist/dermatologist in the past 12 months and reported using ≥ 1 synthetic/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug for PsA. Patients reported on PsA severity and symptoms, and the impact of PsA on HRQoL. After survey completion, responses were aligned with PsAID health domains. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were conducted.

Results

This analysis included 1286 patients from eight countries. Most patients (97%) reported musculoskeletal symptoms relating to PsA in the past year. Common moderate/major impacts of PsA were on physical activity (78%), ability to perform certain activities (76%), work productivity (62%), and career path (57%). Skin/nail symptoms occurred in 80% of patients. Overall, 69% of patients reported that PsA had a moderate/major impact on emotional/mental wellbeing, 56% on romantic relationships/intimacy, and 44% on relationships with family and friends. Social impacts included emotional distress (58%), social shame or disapproval (32%), and ceased participation in social activities (45%). Over half of all patients experienced unusual fatigue over the past 12 months (52%). The health domains that patients reported as being impacted by PsA aligned with life impact domains of the patient-derived PsAID health domains.

Conclusion

These results highlight the impact of PsA on multiple health domains from a patient perspective that should be considered during shared decision-making processes between healthcare providers and patients.

Psoriatic arthritis impact of disease questionnaire: validity, reliability and its clinical potential

The psoriatic arthritis impact of disease (PSAID) questionnaire has been developed to measure disease impact on patients with psoriatic arthritis. It was aimed to evaluate its validity and reliability in association with sociodemographic and clinical factors and compare it with disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures in a Turkish psoriatic arthritis population. A prospective observational study was conducted to validate the Turkish version of the PSAID. All consecutive patients with psoriatic arthritis were evaluated between January 2019 and October 2019. Demographic and clinical features were recorded. The PSAID and patient-reported outcome measures were applied to all patients. Interclass and intra-class correlation analyses were performed. Convergent validity and correlation coefficients were used for validity analyses. There were 80 patients with a mean age of 50.2 ± 9.9 years. Cronbach's α value of the PSAID and intra-class correlation were 0.799 and 0.984, respectively. The total median PSAID score was 4.7. Pain, fatigue, ability to work, functional capacity and feeling of discomfort were the five highest-scoring subscales. There was satisfactory internal consistency for each subscale of the PSAID. As disease severity increased from low to high, the PSAID scores significantly increased. There were acceptable correlations between the PSAID and other patient-reported outcome measures. The PSAID is shown to be a reliable and valid questionnaire in Turkish patients with psoriatic arthritis. Good correlation with disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures represent an opportunity to use the PSAID in clinical practice to tailor individualized treatment choices.

Disease features associated with a low disease impact in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results of a cross-sectional multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes measures, such as those provided by the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire, have been found to be a reliable indicator of change during treatment, predictive of long-term outcomes, and the impact of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on patients' lives. The objective of the study was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of PsA patients with a low disease impact and to analyze predictive factors for that state.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of a cross-sectional multicenter study that included 223 consecutive patients. PsAID questionnaire was used to estimate disease impact. Patients with a PsAID < 4 were considered in low disease impact. Minimal disease activity (MDA) response and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were also assessed. The degree of agreement between the different outcomes was addressed by Cohen's kappa index.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two (54.7%) patients reached a PsAID < 4. Among them, 52.0% and 68.0% presented articular or skin remission, respectively. Almost 75% of patients were in MDA state and 85.2% presented a low disability state according to the HAQ. A moderate concordance between HAQ ≤ 0.5 and PsAID < 4 (k = 0.53), fair between MDA and PsAID < 4 (k = 0.36), and moderate between DAPSA remission and PsAID < 4 (k = 0.46) was observed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) disease (OR 0.40, 95%CI, 0.20-0.79, p = 0.009), family history of PsA (OR 0.25, 95%CI, 0.09-0.72, p = 0.010), and higher C-reactive protein (OR 0.92, 95%CI, 0.85-0.99, p = 0.036) were significantly less likely to reach a PsAID < 4.

CONCLUSIONS

There is certain discrepancy between disease activity measures and a low impact of disease in PsA. Clinical features (DIP joint involvement), biologic activity, and genetic factors (familial history) seem to be associated with lower odds of reaching a low disease impact.

Comorbidities associated with psoriatic arthritis: Review and update

Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthropathy frequently associated with psoriasis and several other comorbidities. The goal of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the epidemiology, clinical implications, pathological mechanisms proposed, and screening and management recommendations for the comorbidities related with PsA. Reported comorbidities include cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, inflammatory bowel disease, fatty liver disease, uveitis, kidney disease, infections, osteoporosis, depression, central sensitization syndrome, and gout. Given that these comorbidities may affect both clinical outcomes and the management for these patients, their recognition and monitoring by all health-care providers caring for patients with psoriatic arthritis is of utmost importance.

Assessment of the many faces of PsA: single and composite measures in PsA clinical trials

PsA is a complex, heterogeneous disease that can place a large burden on patients' psychological and physical well-being. The multifaceted nature of PsA poses a significant assessment challenge, both in randomized control trials and in clinical practice. In recent years, there has been much progress in the development of unidimensional and composite measures of disease activity, as well as of questionnaires that capture the patient's perspective of the condition. Despite these advances, there remains uncertainty around which tools to implement within a research setting. This review aims to summarize the currently available clinical and patient-derived assessment tools, providing a practical and informative resource for the assessment of PsA. This review will also explore recent advancements in digital approaches to the assessment of rheumatological conditions. This will highlight the potential for digitalization in the assessment and monitoring of PsA, outlining innovative means of capturing disease activity and treatment response.

Measurement properties of instruments assessing psoriatic arthritis symptoms for psoriasis clinical trials: a systematic literature review

Introduction: The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) identified 'Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Symptoms' as a core domain to be measured in psoriasis clinical trials. This domain includes the measurement of pain, patient global and physical function. Herein, we evaluated the quality (i.e. measurement properties) of five candidate 'PsA Symptoms' measures: Patient Global Assessment (PGA) for Joints, PGA for PsA, the Routine Assessment Patient Index 3 (RAPID3), the PsA Impact of Disease 9 (PsAID9) and PsAID12.Areas covered: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (inception-to-March 2018) for studies assessing the measurement properties of candidate instruments. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of 12 eligible articles using the COSMIN checklist. For each measurement property, we rated the quality of the evidence as 'high,' 'moderate,' 'low,' or 'very low' (GRADE approach) and classified the results as 'sufficient,' 'insufficient,' or 'inconsistent.' Finally, we provided recommendations.Expert opinion: In PsA, RAPID3 had 'very low' quality evidence for 'sufficient' content validity and no evidence of internal structure. Global assessment instruments had 'very low' quality evidence for 'inconsistent' content validity. PsAID9 and PsAID12 had 'low' evidence for 'sufficient' content validity and were recommended to measure 'PsA Symptoms.' Further validation studies will improve the level of evidence of this recommendation.

Comparing methotrexate monotherapy with methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis: protocol of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (COMPLETE-PsA)

Background

Both methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) are registered and regularly prescribed as first-line treatments for the use in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and they are occasionally used in combination. However, evidence about their individual, and especially combined efficacy, in PsA is lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of MTX and LEF combination therapy to MTX monotherapy in patients with PsA.

Methods

COMPLETE-PsA is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-untreated patients (n = 78) with clinical diagnosis of active (i.e. ≥2 swollen joints) PsA will be randomized 1:1 (stratified for high disease activity, Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score [PASDAS] ≥ 5.4) to the combination or monotherapy. The intervention group receives MTX 25 mg (oral or subcutaneous) once weekly plus LEF 20 mg daily, and the control group receives the same but with placebo instead of LEF daily. Primary endpoint is between-group difference in PASDAS at 16 weeks, adjusted for baseline PASDAS. Key secondary parameters include between-group comparisons in change in Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score, skin score, enthesitis score, dactylitis score, and swollen/tender joint count, as well as the proportion of patients fulfilling minimal disease activity (MDA), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response criteria at week 16. Furthermore, safety, function and quality of life (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ], Psoriatic Arthritic Impact of Disease [PSAID], Short Form 12 [SF-12]) will be assessed.

Discussion

This is, to our knowledge, the first randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of MTX and LEF combination therapy in patients with PsA. The study will provide important information for treatment strategies and treatment recommendations.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register NTR7632 (3 December 2018). CMO NL66544.091.18 (19 November 2018).

Expert Consensus on a Set of Outcomes to Assess the Effectiveness of Biologic Treatment in Psoriatic Arthritis: The MERECES Study

Objective.

To reach a consensus on the instruments to be used in clinical practice to evaluate the effectiveness of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the short to medium term (3–6 mos), and to establish the minimum health outcomes for treatment continuation.

Methods.

A 2-round Delphi questionnaire was developed based on both the information gathered in the literature review and 4 discussion groups. The suitability and feasibility of the proposed sets of instruments were assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was established when at least 75% of healthcare professionals (HCP) reached agreement. To define a minimum health outcome to continue treatment, a combination of 4 disease activity states and 3 health-related quality of life states were defined for 3 hypothetical patient profiles. HCP were given a dichotomous choice (yes/no) to respond to whether they would continue treatment in each case.

Results.

The second round was completed by 106 HCP. Consensus was reached on the use of (1) Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis + Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID12) or minimal disease activity + PsAID12 + C-reactive protein, in peripheral PsA; and (2) Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score + PsAID12, in axial PsA. Health outcomes considered sufficient to continue treatment were stricter for bDMARD-naive patients than for patients who failed several bDMARD.

Conclusion.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multidisciplinary consensus on a set of outcomes for the evaluation of bDMARD effectiveness in PsA, in routine clinical practice.

Designing effective graphs to get your message across

Research is of little use if its results are not effectively communicated. Data visualised in graphs (and tables) are key components in any scientific report, but their design leaves much to be desired. This viewpoint focuses on graph design, following two general principles: clear vision and clear understanding. Clear vision is achieved by maximising the signal to noise ratio. In a graph, the signal is the data in the form of symbols, lines or other graphic elements, and the noise is the support structure necessary to interpret the data. Clear understanding is achieved when the story in the data is told effectively, through organisation of the data and use of text. These principles are illustrated by original and improved graphs from recent publications, completed by tutorial material online (appendices, web pages and film clips). The popular matrix form (multiple graphs in one frame) is discussed as a special case. Differences between publication (including the proofing stage) and presentation are outlined. Suggestions are made for better peer review and processing of graphs in the publication stage.

Psoriatic arthritis for dermatologists

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) affects up to one-third of patients with psoriasis. It is the major comorbidity of psoriasis because of the likelihood that loss of function and permanent disability will develop if initiation of treatment is delayed. Dermatologists are uniquely positioned to recognize early signs of PsA and be the first-line healthcare practitioners to detect PsA in patients with psoriasis. PsA can affect six clinical domains: peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis, psoriasis, psoriatic nail disease, and axial disease. However, not every patient will have involvement of all domains and the domains affected can change over time. Complicating the diagnosis is the condition's similarity with other arthritic diseases and potential heterogeneity. In this article, we provide practical guidance for dermatologists for detecting PsA in patients with psoriasis. We also review the available treatment options by each clinical domain of PsA and give advice on how to interpret the results of PsA clinical trials. Through early recognition of PsA in patients with psoriasis and initiation of proper treatment, dermatologists can help to prevent PsA disease progression, irreversible joint damage, and resultant permanent disability, and improve quality of life.

A novel role for the psoriatic arthritis impact of disease (PsAID) questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) uses the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) as one criterion. HAQ does not correlate well with disease activity with increased PsA disease duration, and its use in the MDA has been questioned. The Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) was specifically developed for PsA Patients. We aimed to validate the PsAID within our patient cohort and determine if the PsAID can replace the HAQ in the MDA.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from the PsA clinic and assessed according to a standard protocol including demographics, clinical features and laboratory tests. Descriptive statistics were calculated. PsAID cut-offs for use in the MDA were generated based on the Clinical Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA).

RESULTS

115 patients completed the PsAID. There were 70 males, 45 females, with a mean PsA duration of 18.7 (±11.6) years. Mean scores of PsAID-9 and PsAID-12 were 3.4 (±2.4) and 3.2 (±2.3), respectively. The PsAID correlated moderately well with 9 of the PROMs administered in the clinic (ρ = 0.51-0.78). Four PsAID cutoffs based on cDAPSA were generated for use in the MDA: remission (REM) PsAID-9, REM PsAID-12, low disease activity (LDA) PsAID-9, and LDA PsAID-12. All four versions of the PsAID MDAs had sensitivity greater than 85% with the HAQ-MDA, and three versions of the PsAID-MDA had specificity greater than 85% with the HAQ-MDA.

CONCLUSIONS

The high sensitivity and specificity of the PsAID-MDA with the HAQ-MDA suggest that the PsAID is an effective replacement for the HAQ in the MDA.

Change in PsAID-12 scores in patients continuing or discontinuing anti-TNF treatments in psoriatic arthritis: results from the HUR-BIO biologic registry

OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease 12-item questionnaire (PsAID-12) has been developed to be used in psoriatic arthritis in daily practice. The aim of the present study was to assess the change values of PsAID-12 in PsA patients continuing or discontinuing anti-TNF treatment.

METHODS

We recruited patients from the Hacettepe University biological database (HUR-BIO). Overall, 70 PsA patients had PsAID-12 score before the initiation of the first anti-TNF treatment. Stopping or switching the anti-TNF treatment due to inefficacy was definitely considered a negative response. Changes were evaluated by the comparison with the baseline PsAID-12 score in compliance with the favorable and unfavorable responses to anti-TNF treatments. The standardized response mean (SRM) was used for determining the response.

RESULTS

Seventy (78.6% female) patients were analyzed and their mean age was 45.5 years (12.0 years). The mean follow-up duration was 18.3 months (12.6 months). At baseline, the mean PsAID-12 score was 6.6 (1.5). Physicians stopped or switched the treatment in 28 patients (40.0%) due to the inefficacy of anti-TNF treatment. The ΔPsAID-12 score was 0.25 (1.71) in the patients discontinuing anti-TNF treatment and 3.52 (2.31) in the patients continuing their anti-TNF treatment (p < 0.001). The SRM scores higher for PsAID-12, particularly in the well response to anti-TNF treatments.

CONCLUSION

A decrease of 3.5 units in PsAID-12 score shows a favorable response to anti-TNF treatment. Changes in PsAID-12 score had well discrimination capacity for anti-TNF treatments.

PsAID12 Provisionally Endorsed at OMERACT 2018 as Core Outcome Measure to Assess Psoriatic Arthritis-specific Health-related Quality of Life in Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) working group is developing a Core Outcome Measurement Set for PsA clinical trials [randomized controlled trials (RCT) and longitudinal observational studies (LOS)] using the OMERACT Filter 2.1 instrument selection algorithm. Our objective was to assess the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire (PsAID12) for the measurement of the core domain PsA-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

METHODS

PsAID12 measurement property evidence gathered in a systematic literature review, and additional analyses conducted in LOS, were used to inform a consensus process. Analyses that had not been published were independently reviewed by the OMERACT technical advisory group. Data and process were presented, discussed in breakout groups, and voted on at the OMERACT conference (Terrigal, Australia, May 2018).

RESULTS

PsAID12 fulfilled the green (good to go) OMERACT standards for domain match, feasibility, reliability, and construct/longitudinal construct validity. Discrimination and thresholds of meaning were amber (caution but good enough to go forward). The overall working group recommendation was amber/provisional endorsement of PsAID12 for measuring PsA-specific HRQOL in RCT and LOS. Of 96 participants who voted at the PsA OMERACT workshop, 87.5% (84) voted "yes" to endorse this recommendation; 14 of the 96 were patient research partners (PRP) and 93% of them (13) voted "yes"; 82 participants were not PRP and 87% of them (71) voted "yes."

CONCLUSION

At OMERACT 2018, PsAID12 was the first patient-reported outcome measure provisionally endorsed as a core outcome measure for disease-specific HRQOL in PsA clinical trials. PsAID12 discrimination and improvement thresholds will be studied in future RCT.

Assessing Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Literature Review

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a multifaceted disease, with a high impact on patients’ psychological and physical well-being. There is increasing recognition that assessment of both clinical aspects of disease and patient identified concerns, such as fatigue, work disability, and treatment satisfaction need to be addressed. Only then can we fully understand disease burden and make well-informed treatment decisions aimed at improving patients’ lives. In recent years, there has been much progress in the development of unidimensional and composite measures of disease activity, as well as questionnaires capturing the patient’s perspective in psoriatic disease. Despite these advances, there remains disagreement amongst clinicians as to which instruments should be used. As a consequence, they are yet to receive widespread implementation in routine clinical practice. This review aims to summarize currently available clinical and patient-derived assessment tools, which will provide clinicians with a practical and informative resource.

Comparing patient-perceived and physician-perceived remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 410 patients from 14 countries

Background

The objective was to compare different definitions of remission and low disease activity (LDA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), based on both patients’ and physicians’ perspectives.

Methods

In ReFlap (Remission/Flare in PsA; NCT03119805), adults with physician-confirmed PsA and >2 years of disease duration in 14 countries were included. Remission was defined as very low disease activity (VLDA), Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) ≤4, and physician-perceived and patient-perceived remission (specific question yes/no), and LDA as minimal disease activity (MDA), DAPSA <14, and physician-perceived and patient-perceived LDA. Frequencies of these definitions, their agreement (prevalence-adjusted kappa), and sensitivity and specificity versus patient-defined status were assessed cross-sectionally.

Results

Of 410 patients, the mean age (SD) was 53.9 (12.5) years, 50.7% were male, disease duration was 11.2 (8.2) years, 56.8% were on biologics, and remission/LDA was frequently attained: respectively, for remission from 12.4% (VLDA) to 36.1% (physician-perceived remission), and for LDA from 25.4% (MDA) to 43.9% (patient-perceived LDA). Thus, patient-perceived remission/LDA was frequent (65.4%). Agreement between patient-perceived remission/LDA and composite scores was moderate to good (kappa range, 0.12–0.65). When patient-perceived remission or LDA status is used as reference, DAPSA-defined remission/LDA and VLDA/MDA had a sensitivity of 73.1% and 51.5%, respectively, and a specificity of 76.8% and 88.0%, respectively. Physician-perceived remission/LDA using a single question was frequent (67.6%) but performed poorly against other definitions.

Conclusion

In this unselected population, remission/LDA was frequently attained. VLDA/MDA was a more stringent definition than DAPSA-based remission/LDA. DAPSA-based remission/LDA performed better than VLDA/MDA to detect patient-defined remission or remission/LDA. Further studies of long-term outcomes are needed.