Variability in the biological response to anti-CD20 B cell depletion in systemic lupus erythaematosus

Dawn of CAR-T cell therapy in autoimmune diseases

ABSTRACT

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has achieved remarkable success in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Based on the immunomodulatory capability of CAR-T cells, efforts have turned toward exploring their potential in treating autoimmune diseases. Bibliometric analysis of 210 records from 128 academic journals published by 372 institutions in 40 countries/regions indicates a growing number of publications on CAR-T therapy for autoimmune diseases, covering a range of subtypes such as systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, among others. CAR-T therapy holds promise in mitigating several shortcomings, including the indiscriminate suppression of the immune system by traditional immunosuppressants, and non-sustaining therapeutic levels of monoclonal antibodies due to inherent pharmacokinetic constraints. By persisting and proliferating in vivo , CAR-T cells can offer a tailored and precise therapeutics. This paper reviewed preclinical experiments and clinical trials involving CAR-T and CAR-related therapies in various autoimmune diseases, incorporating innovations well-studied in the field of hematological tumors, aiming to explore a safe and effective therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory autoimmune diseases.

Rituximab Resistance in Glomerular Diseases: A GlomCon Mini Review

Resistance to rituximab B-cell depletion therapy is a clinically pertinent adverse sequela that can have significant implications for the treatment of immune-mediated glomerular diseases. The true incidence of rituximab resistance remains unknown; however, it is an increasingly recognized treatment complication. Resistance typically presents with suboptimal treatment response, rapid B-cell reconstitution, and a relapsing disease course. Although the diverse mechanisms resulting in rituximab resistance are ongoing topics of research, both primary and secondary mechanisms have been identified as key catalysts. The emergence of human antichimeric antibodies (HACAs) is a major cause of secondary resistance to rituximab therapy and typically appears following repeated drug exposure. Frequently, HACAs develop in the setting of underlying autoimmune disease and contribute to poor B-cell depletion, reduced rituximab therapeutic efficacy, and enhanced drug clearance. The clinical challenge of rituximab resistance necessitates heightened awareness among clinicians. Screening for HACAs should be considered in individuals with poor clinical response to rituximab, more rapid B-cell reconstitution, and relapsing disease. Detection of HACAs may guide treatment alterations, including addition of further immunosuppressive therapy and transitioning to a humanized B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody.

Rituximab as an effective add-on maintenance therapy for disease activities in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease that can result in high morbidity if not treated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of rituximab treatment in a paediatric SLE cohort in Taiwan.

METHODS

The medical records of paediatric patients diagnosed with SLE at the National Taiwan University Hospital between January 1992 and August 2022 who received rituximab as maintenance therapy between January 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. To enhance our analysis, we included a contemporary comparison group, matching in case number and demographic characteristics. This study aimed to describe the indications, efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of paediatric SLE and to analyse the factors associated with disease outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 40 rituximab-treated patients with a median age of 14.3 years at the time of disease diagnosis. In the rituximab-treated cohort, the median score on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 decreased from 8 before rituximab administration to 4 after 2 years. The levels of C3 and C4 increased and anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels decreased significantly within 6 months. The equivalent oral prednisolone dose halved after 6 months. Finally, 8 (20%) patients achieved disease control and 35 (87.5%) patients had no flare-ups during the follow-up period (median, 2 years). Those patients who achieved disease control had a significantly shorter interval between diagnosis and rituximab administration. In terms of adverse effects, only one patient developed hypogammaglobulinaemia that required intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement. Compared with the comparison group (n=53), the rituximab-treated cohort exhibited superior disease outcomes and a reduced incidence of flare-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides real-world data and illuminates rituximab's role in maintaining disease stability among patients with paediatric-onset SLE who are serologically active without major clinical deterioration. Most importantly, no mortality or development of end-stage renal disease was observed in the rituximab-treated cohort.

B cell repopulation trajectory after rituximab treatment in autoimmune diseases: a longitudinal observational study

To investigate B-cell repopulation trajectory and the associated factors in patients with autoimmune diseases (AIDs) who underwent rituximab (RTX) treatment. This is a retrospective study in a large tertiary medical center. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to investigate factors associated with B-cell repopulation. Latent class trajectory modeling (LCTM) was employed to identify distinct B-cell repopulation trajectory longitudinally. A total of 224 patients were included, with a cumulative follow-up time of 193.6 person-years. Patients with antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), connective tissue disease, and IgG4-related disease exhibited significant differences in B-cell repopulation time (p = 0.0055 by log-rank test). Multivariate Cox regression identified that higher levels of IgA (HR 1.21, 95%CI 1.01-1.45, p = 0.040) and concurrent glucocorticoid use (HR = 0.37,95%CI 0.20-0.67, p = 0.001) were associated with B-cell repopulation. The cluster showing prolonged B-cell depletion, identified by LCTM, had lower proportions of male (27% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.033), smoke history (17.6% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.025), higher proportions of AAV (44.3% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.004), RTX dose (p = 0.042), history of cyclophosphamide use (70.4% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.003), meanwhile glucocorticoid use (94.8% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.001). The trajectory of B-cell repopulation after RTX infusion in AIDs was heterogeneous. Certain factors were associated with B-cell repopulation, and a specific cluster of patients demonstrated prolonged B-cell depletion after RTX treatment.

Circulating lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and their correlation with disease activity

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the overall alterations of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A total of 120 patients diagnosed with SLE and 64 health donors were enrolled. The lymphocyte subsets were detected using flow cytometry. Then the changes of lymphocyte subsets in patients and their correlation with disease activity were investigated. Compared with healthy controls, the counts of lymphocytes, T cells, B cells and NK cells in SLE patients were significantly decreased. Further analysis of T cells subpopulations revealed that the decrease in T cells counts in SLE patients was mainly attributed to a sharp decrease in CD4 + T cells counts. Meanwhile, there was a positive correlation between CD4 + T cells counts and serum complement 3 levels, and patients with lower CD4 + T cells counts had higher SLEDAI score. The counts of CD8 + T cells were comparable between SLE patients and controls, while the proportion of CD8 + T cells and cytotoxic T cells (CD8 + CD28 +) was prominently higher in SLE patients. Besides, the expression of HLA-DR on the surface of T and NK cells was significantly upregulated in SLE patients. Circulating lymphocyte subsets of SLE patients were seriously dysregulated, characterized by a decrease in CD4 + T cells and NK cells, as well as an increase in the proportion of activated T and NK cells. Reduction in CD4 + T cells in SLE patients was highly consistent with disease activity, indicating the crucial role of CD4 + T cells in the onset and progression of SLE.

Population Pharmacodynamic Modelling of the CD19+ Suppression Effects of Rituximab in Paediatric Patients with Neurological and Autoimmune Diseases

BACKGROUND

Limited pharmacotherapy and the failure of conventional treatments in complex pathologies in children lead to increased off-label use of rituximab. We aimed to characterize the time course of CD19+ B lymphocytes (CD19+) under treatment with intravenous rituximab in children with neurologic and autoimmune diseases and to evaluate the impact of covariates (i.e., demographics, diagnosis and substitution between innovator and biosimilar product) on rituximab pharmacodynamics and disease activity.

METHODS

Pre- and post-drug infusion CD19+ in peripheral blood were prospectively registered. A population pharmacodynamic model describing the time course of CD19+ was developed with NONMEM v7.4. Simulations of three different rituximab regimens were performed to assess the impact on CD19+. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of clinical response recorded through disease activity scores.

RESULTS

281 measurements of CD19+ lymphocyte counts obtained from 63 children with neurologic (n = 36) and autoimmune (n = 27) diseases were available. The time course of CD19+ was described with a turn-over model in which the balance between synthesis and degradation rates is disrupted by rituximab, increasing the latter process. The model predicts half-lives (percent coefficient of variation, CV(%)) of rituximab and CD19+ of 11.6 days (17%) and 173.3 days (22%), respectively. No statistically significant effect was found between any of the studied covariates and model parameters (p > 0.05). Simulations of different regimens showed no clinically significant differences in terms of CD19+ repopulation times. A trend towards a lack of clinical response was observed in patients with lower CD19+ repopulation times and higher areas under the CD19+ versus time curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab pharmacodynamics was described in a real-world setting in children suffering from autoimmune and neurologic diseases. Diagnosis, substitution between innovator rituximab and its biosimilars or type of regimen did not affect rituximab-induced depletion of CD19+ nor the clinical response in this cohort of patients. According to this study, rituximab frequency and dosage may be chosen based on clinical convenience or safety reasons without affecting CD19+ repopulation times. Further studies in larger populations are required to confirm these results.

Biologics in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome in childhood: review and new hypothesis-driven treatment

Nephrotic syndrome affects about 2-7 per 100,000 children yearly and accounts for less than 15% of end stage kidney disease. Steroids still represent the cornerstone of therapy achieving remission in 75-90% of the cases The remaining part result as steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome, characterized by the elevated risk of developing end stage kidney disease and frequently presenting disease recurrence in case of kidney transplant. The pathogenesis of nephrotic syndrome is still far to be elucidated, however, efficacy of immune treatments provided the basis to suggest the involvement of the immune system in the pathogenesis of the disease. Based on these substrates, more immune drugs, further than steroids, were administered in steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome, such as antiproliferative and alkylating agents or calcineurin inhibitors. However, such treatments failed in inducing a sustained remission. In last two decades, the developments of monoclonal antibodies, including the anti-CD20 rituximab and inhibitor of B7-1 abatacept, represented a valid opportunity of treatment. However, also the effectiveness of biologics resulted limited. We here propose a new hypothesis-driven treatment based on the combining administration of rituximab with the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab (NCT05704400), sustained by the hypothesis to target the entire B-cells subtypes pool, including the long-lived plasmacells.

Anti-rituximab antibodies demonstrate neutralizing capacity, associate with lower circulating drug levels and earlier relapse in lupus

OBJECTIVES

High rates of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to rituximab have been demonstrated in patients undergoing treatment for SLE. However, little is known with regard to their long-term dynamics, impact on drug kinetics and subsequent implications for treatment response. In this study, we aimed to evaluate ADA persistence over time, impact on circulating drug levels, assess clinical outcomes and whether they are capable of neutralizing rituximab.

METHODS

Patients with SLE undergoing treatment with rituximab were recruited to this study (n = 35). Serum samples were collected across a follow-up period of 36 months following treatment (n = 114). Clinical and laboratory data were collected pre-treatment and throughout follow-up. ADA were detected via electrochemiluminescent immunoassays. A complement dependent cytotoxicity assay was used to determine neutralizing capacity of ADA in a sub-cohort of positive samples (n = 38).

RESULTS

ADA persisted over the 36-month study period in 64.3% of patients undergoing treatment and titres peaked earlier and remained higher in those who had previously been treated with rituximab when compared with than those who were previously treatment naive. ADA-positive samples had a significantly lower median drug level until six months post rituximab infusion (P = 0.0018). Patients with persistent ADA positivity showed a significant early improvement in disease activity followed by increased rates of relapse. In vitro analysis confirmed the neutralizing capacity of ADA to rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

ADA to rituximab were common and persisted over the 36-month period of this study. They associated with earlier drug elimination, an increased rate of relapse and demonstrated neutralizing capacity in vitro.

Current treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a clinician's perspective

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. Its variable course makes it difficult to standardize patient treatment. This article aims at a literature review on available drugs for treating SLE and on drugs that have shown therapeutic effects in this disease. The PubMed/MEDLINE electronic search engine was used to identify relevant studies. This review presents the current therapeutic options, new biological therapies, and combination therapies of biologics with standard immunosuppressive and immunomodulating drugs. We have also underlined the importance to implement the treat-to-target strategy aimed at reducing or discontinuing therapy with glucocorticosteroids (GCs). The awareness of the benefits and risks of using GCs helps in refining their dosage and thereby obtaining a better safety profile. The advent of biological targeted therapies, and more recently, low-molecular-weight compounds such as kinase inhibitors, initiated numerous clinical trials in SLE patients and led to the approval of two biological drugs, belimumab, and anifrolumab, for SLE treatment. Progress in the treatment of SLE was reflected in the 2019 and 2021 recommendations of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). However, a mass of recent clinical research data requires continuous consolidation to optimize patient outcomes.

Early infection risk in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with rituximab or belimumab from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR): a prospective longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection relative to the general population. We aimed to describe the frequency and risk factors for serious infections in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE treated with rituximab, belimumab, and standard of care therapies in a large national observational cohort.

METHODS

The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) is a UK-based prospective register of patients with SLE. Patients were recruited by their treating physician as part of their scheduled care from 64 centres across the UK by use of a standardised case report form. Inclusion criteria for the BILAG-BR included age older than 5 years, ability to provide informed consent, a diagnosis of SLE, and starting a new biological therapy within the last 12 months or a new standard of care drug within the last month. The primary outcome for this study was the rate of serious infections within the first 12 months of therapy. Serious infections were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, hospital admission, or resulting in morbidity or death. Infection and mortality data were collected from study centres and further mortality data were collected from the UK Office for National Statistics. The relationship between serious infection and drug type was analysed using a multiple-failure Cox proportional hazards model.

FINDINGS

Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 23, 2021, 1383 individuals were recruited to the BILAG-BR. 335 patients were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 1048 participants contributed 1002·7 person-years of follow-up and included 746 (71%) participants on rituximab, 119 (11%) participants on belimumab, and 183 (17%) participants on standard of care. The median age of the cohort was 39 years (IQR 30-50), 942 (90%) of 1048 patients were women and 106 (10%) were men. Of the patients with available ethnicity data, 514 (56%) of 911 were White, 169 (19%) were Asian, 161 (18%) were Black, and 67 (7%) were of multiple-mixed or other ethnic backgrounds. 118 serious infections occurred in 76 individuals during the 12-month study period, which included 92 serious infections in 58 individuals on rituximab, eight serious infections in five individuals receiving belimumab, and 18 serious infections in 13 individuals on standard of care. The overall crude incidence rate of serious infection was 117·7 (95% CI 98·3-141·0) per 1000 person-years. Compared with standard of care, the serious infection risk was similar in the rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·68 [0·60-4·68]) and belimumab groups (1·01 [0·21-4·80]). Across the whole cohort in multivariate analysis, serious infection risk was associated with prednisolone dose (>10 mg; 2·38 [95%CI 1·47-3·84]), hypogammaglobulinaemia (<6 g/L; 2·16 [1·38-3·37]), and multimorbidity (1·45 [1·17-1·80]). Additional concomitant immunosuppressive use appeared to be associated with a reduced risk (0·60 [0·41-0·90]). We found no significant safety signals regarding atypical infections. Six infection-related deaths occurred at a median of 121 days (IQR 60-151) days from cohort entry.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, rituximab, belimumab, and standard immunosuppressive therapy have similar serious infection risks. Key risk factors for serious infections included multimorbidity, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and increased glucocorticoid doses. When considering the risk of serious infection, we propose that immunosupppressives, rituximab, and belimumab should be prioritised as mainstay therapies to optimise SLE management and support proactive minimisation of glucocorticoid use.

FUNDING

None.

Efficacy of belimumab combined with rituximab in severe systemic lupus erythematosus: study protocol for the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label Synbiose 2 trial

Background

Belimumab, an anti-B-cell activating factor antibody, is approved for the treatment of auto-antibody positive systemic lupus erythematosus with a high degree of disease activity. Anti-CD20 B cell depletion with rituximab is used in refractory SLE as well, although with variable responses. We hypothesized that incomplete B cell depletion, related to a surge in BAFF levels following rituximab treatment, can cause ongoing disease activity and flares. The Synbiose 1 study primarily focused on immunological effects and shows the preliminary clinical benefit of combined rituximab and belimumab in SLE. The Synbiose 2 study will evaluate the clinical efficacy of combining belimumab with rituximab in patients with severe SLE, allowing the tapering of prednisolone and mycophenolate.

Methods

Synbiose 2 is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label 2-year clinical trial. Seventy adults with severe SLE including lupus nephritis will be randomized 1:1 to receive either standard of care consisting of prednisolone and mycophenolate as induction and maintenance treatment, or belimumab and rituximab combined with standard of care as induction treatment, followed by prednisolone and belimumab as maintenance treatment. The primary objective is to assess whether combined B cell therapy will lead to a reduction of treatment failure. Secondary endpoints are complete and partial clinical and renal response and the improvement of SLE-specific autoimmune phenomena. Safety endpoints include the incidence of adverse events, with a special interest in infections.

Discussion

The Synbiose 2 trial is the first multicenter phase 3 clinical trial investigating combined B cell targeted therapy in SLE, including lupus nephritis. The outcome of this study will provide further evidence for the clinical efficacy of this new treatment strategy in severe SLE.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03747159. Registered on 20 November 2018.

Sequential rituximab therapy sustains remission of nephrotic syndrome but carries high risk of adverse effects

BACKGROUND

Sequential rituximab (RTX) administration has emerged as an important strategy to sustain remission of disease in patients with difficult-to-treat nephrotic syndrome.

METHODS

We report the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with two or more courses of intravenous RTX in 250 patients with difficult-to-treat steroid dependence (n = 127) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-dependent or CNI-refractory steroid resistance (n = 123) managed at one center during 2015-2021. Subsets of patients were cross-sectionally tested for hypogammaglobulinemia, seroprotection against and hyporesponsiveness to vaccines for hepatitis B and tetanus, BK/JC viruria and human antichimeric antibodies (HACAs).

RESULTS

Sequential RTX therapy, initiated at a median of 10 years [interquartile range (IQR) 7.3-14.4], was administered for 1.8 courses/person-year [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-2.0] over 2.0 years (95% CI 1.2-3.0). Therapy was associated with postponement of relapses by a median of 3 years in patients with steroid-sensitive disease and 2 years in those with steroid resistance. Relapses were reduced by a mean of 2.0 relapses/person-year (95% CI 1.8-2.2), enabling a reduction in prednisolone dose to 0.04 mg/kg/day (95% CI 0.01-0.11) and withdrawal of additional immunosuppression in 154 (62%) patients. RTX-associated adverse events, occurring at 0.20 events/person-year (95% CI 0.17-0.23), were chiefly comprised of infusion reactions (n = 108) and infections (n = 46); serious adverse events were observed in 10.8% patients, at 0.03 events/person-year (95% CI 0.02-0.05). Hypogammaglobulinemia was observed in 35% of 177 patients and was moderate to severe in 8.5% of cases. Rates of seroprotection at baseline and response following vaccination were lower for hepatitis B [1.9% and 29.4% (n = 52)] than tetanus [65.5% and 34.5% (n = 58)]. BK/JC viruria, without viremia, was observed in 7.3% of 109 cases. A total of 19 of 107 patients (17.8%) had HACAs, which were associated with B cell nondepletion and serum sickness. Age at therapy of <9-10 years was associated with a risk of early relapse, treatment failure and hypogammaglobulinemia following RTX therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential therapy with RTX effectively reduces relapses in patients with difficult-to-treat steroid- and/or CNI-dependent or CNI-refractory nephrotic syndrome. Therapy is associated with high rates of hypogammaglobulinemia and infusion reactions.

Disparity in peripheral and renal B-cell depletion with rituximab in systemic lupus erythematosus: an opportunity for obinutuzumab?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate key factors that may contribute to the variability of rituximab-mediated peripheral and renal B cell depletion (BCD) in SLE.

METHODS

We analysed: (i) CD19+ B cell counts in patients with SLE before and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after treatment with rituximab, comparing them with RA patients; (ii) the presence of B cells in renal biopsies after rituximab therapy; (iii) whether the duration of BCD correlated with patient demographics and B cell expression of CD20 and FcγRIIb; and (iv) the effect of B cell activation factor (BAFF) on the efficiency of rituximab and obinutuzumab at inducing BCD in whole blood assays, in vitro.

RESULTS

In SLE (n = 71), the duration of BCD was shorter compared with RA (n = 27). B cells were detectable in renal biopsy samples (n = 6) after treatment with rituximab in all patients with poor response while peripheral blood B cells remained low or undetectable in the same patients. There were no significant relationships between peripheral BCD and patient age, disease duration, serum C3 levels or the level of expression of B cell surface proteins CD20 and FcγRIIb. Obinutuzumab was more efficient than rituximab at inducing BCD in whole blood assays, regardless of excess BAFF.

CONCLUSIONS

BCD in SLE is less efficient than in RA. Renal B cell presence following rituximab treatment was associated with poor outcomes. No significant relationships between any measured B cell related, clinical or laboratory parameters and the efficiency of BCD by rituximab was found. Obinutuzumab was superior to rituximab at inducing BCD.

Evaluation of Clinical Relevance and Biological Effects of Antirituximab Antibodies in Patients With Pemphigus

Importance

The clinical relevance of antirituximab antibodies (ARAs) in patients with pemphigus who are treated with rituximab (RTX) is currently unknown.

Objective

To determine the prevalence of ARAs in patients with pemphigus who are treated with RTX and their association with complete remission (CR) and relapse.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This post hoc analysis of the Ritux3 trial was conducted from January 2010 to December 2015 in 25 dermatology departments in France and included 42 patients with moderate-to-severe pemphigus who were randomized to receive treatment with RTX. Five additional patients were recruited for an ancillary study. The proportions of patients who achieved CR or relapsed after an initial treatment cycle of RTX were compared depending on whether patients had ARAs.

Exposures

Patients were treated with 1000 mg of RTX on days 1 and 15 and 2 maintenance infusions of 500 mg at months 12 and 18.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of relapse and sustained CR at month 36. Levels of ARAs, antidesmoglein 1/3 antibodies, RTX serum concentrations, and peripheral blood CD19+ B-cell frequency were measured.

Results

Of 42 participants with vs without ARAs, the mean (SD) age was 55 (17) years and 56 (17) years, respectively; 25 (59.5%) were women. Antirituximab antibodies were detected in the serum samples of 13 of 42 patients (31%) during the first year. Nine patients who experienced relapse before month 12 were excluded because they received additional infusions and could not be further analyzed. Among the 33 remaining patients, 2 patients (6.1%) experienced relapse after month 12, and 31 (95.9%) maintained a sustained CR until month 36. The rate of sustained CR was not different whether patients had ARAs (11 of 13 [85%]) or not (20 of 20 [100%]) (P = .15). Both groups (ARA+ vs ARA-) also had similar CD19+ B-cell depletion and RTX levels, but patients with ARAs had higher anti-desmoglein 3 antibody (DSG3 Abs) levels compared with those without ARAs (mean [SD], 30.1 [50.9] AU/mL vs 4.0 [4.3] AU/mL; P = .03). The 2 patients with ARAs who experienced relapse after month 12 had an undetectable RTX level, incomplete B-cell depletion, and higher anti-DSG3 Abs level than the 11 patients who maintained a sustained CR with ARAs (RTX mean [SD] concentration, 0 ug/mL vs 12.5 [2.2] ug/mL; P = .03; incomplete B-cell depletion, 2 of 2 vs 4 of 11; P = .19; mean [SD] anti-DSG3 Abs levels, 103.5 [61.5] AU/mL vs 19.5 [11.0] AU/mL; P = .001) or patients without ARAs (mean [SD] RTX concentration, 0 ug/mL vs 13.5 [1.8] ug/mL; P = .02; incomplete B-cell depletion, 2 of 2 vs 5 of 20; P = .09; mean [SD] anti-DSG3 Abs level, 103.5 [61.5] AU/mL vs 4.0 [1.0] AU/mL; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study suggest that ARAs are frequently detected in patients with pemphigus who are treated with RTX and generally are not associated with patient outcomes. Only a few patients with the combination of ARAs, low RTX concentration, incomplete B-cell depletion, and persistent serum anti-DSG3 Abs seem at high risk of relapse.

Anti-rituximab antibodies in pediatric steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces sustained remission in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. However, there is no consensus on the optimal regimen and monitoring of rituximab. In other autoimmune diseases, anti-rituximab antibodies (ARA) have been reported in 10-40% of patients, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. In nephrotic syndrome, data are scarce.

METHODS

We report a single-center retrospective study with immuno- and pharmacological monitoring of rituximab treatment in children with frequent relapsing (FR) or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS). We analyzed the monthly monitoring of 24 children, receiving a dose of rituximab (375 mg/m²) between December 2017 and April 2018 at the Pediatric Nephrology Department of Robert-Debré hospital, Paris.

RESULTS

ARA were detected in 7/24 patients (29%), sometimes after the first infusion of rituximab. ARA were present at baseline in two patients previously treated with rituximab. Both displayed no B-cell depletion. ARA were also reported in 5/22 patients during follow-up, with antibodies always detected in the first month following B-cell recovery. An incomplete CD19+CD20- B-cell depletion at M1 (5-25/mm³) and low serum rituximab levels was predictive of developing ARA. The development of de novo ARA during follow-up was not associated with shorter B-cell depletion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that ARA are frequent in children with FR/SDNS and that close immuno- and pharmacological monitoring may help personalizing rituximab treatment in patients needing repeated injections.

On the road to eliminating long-lived plasma cells-"are we there yet?"

Central to protective humoral immunity is the activation of B cells and their terminal differentiation into antibody-secreting plasma cells. Long-lived plasma cells (LLPC) may survive for years to decades. Such long-lived plasma cells are also responsible for producing pathogenic antibodies that cause a variety of challenges such as autoimmunity, allograft rejection, and drug neutralization. Up to now, various therapeutic strategies aimed at durably eliminating pathogenic antibodies have failed, in large part due to their inability to efficiently target LLPCs. Several antibody-based therapies have recently gained regulatory approval or are in clinical phases of development for the treatment of multiple myeloma, a malignancy of plasma cells. We discuss the exciting potential of using these emerging cancer immunotherapies to solve the antibody problem.

Vaccine response following anti-CD20 therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 905 patients

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on vaccine responsiveness in patients who have received anti-CD20 therapy. PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to 4 January 2021 to identify studies of vaccine immunogenicity in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy, including patients with hematologic malignancy or autoimmune disease. The primary outcomes were seroprotection (SP), seroconversion (SC), and/or seroresponse rates for each type of vaccine reported. As the pandemic influenza vaccine (2009 H1N1) has standardized definitions for SP and SC, and represented a novel primary antigen similar to the COVID-19 vaccine, meta-analysis was conducted for SC of studies of this vaccine. Pooled estimates, relative benefit ratios (RBs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Thirty-eight studies (905 patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy) were included (19 studies of patients with hematologic malignancies). Patients on active (<3 months since last dose) anti-CD20 therapy had poor responses to all types of vaccines. The pooled estimate for SC after 1 pandemic influenza vaccine dose in these patients was 3% (95% CI, 0% to 9%), with an RB of 0.05 (95% CI, 0-0.73) compared with healthy controls and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.56) compared with disease controls. SC compared with controls seems abrogated for at least 6 months following treatment (3-6 months post anti-CD20 therapy with an RB of 0.50 [95% CI, 0.24-1.06] compared with healthy and of 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23-0.84] compared with disease controls). For all vaccine types, response to vaccination improves incrementally over time, but may not reach the level of healthy controls even 12 months after therapy.

Approach to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

For more than a year now, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been causing the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic with high mortality and detrimental effects on society, economy, and individual lives. Great hopes are being placed on vaccination as one of the most potent escape strategies from the pandemic and multiple vaccines are already in clinical use. However, there is still a lot of insecurity about the safety and efficacy of vaccines in patients with autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS), especially under treatment with immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive drugs. We propose strategic approaches to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination management in MS patients and encourage fellow physicians to measure the immune response in their patients. Notably, both humoral and cellular responses should be considered since the immunological equivalent for protection from SARS-CoV-2 after infection or vaccination still remains undefined and will most likely involve antiviral cellular immunity. It is important to gain insights into the vaccine response of immunocompromised patients in order to be able to deduce sensible strategies for vaccination in the future.

Lupus, vaccinations and COVID-19: What we know now

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus causing Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has had a huge impact on health services, with a high mortality associated with complications including pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at increased risk of viral infections, and recent data suggests they may be at an increased risk of poor outcomes with COVID-19. This may be particularly true for those on rituximab or high dose steroids. A huge international effort from the scientific community has so far resulted in the temporary authorisation of three vaccines which offer protection against SARS-CoV-2, with over 30 other vaccines being evaluated in ongoing trials. Although there has historically been concern that vaccines may trigger disease flares of SLE, there is little convincing evidence to show this. In general lupus patients appear to gain good protection from vaccination, although there may be reduced efficacy in those with high disease activity or those on immunosuppressive therapies, such as rituximab or high dose steroids. Recent concerns have been raised regarding rare clotting events with the AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine and it is currently unknown whether this risk is higher for those patients with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. With the possibility of annual COVID vaccination programmes in the future, prospective data collection and registries looking at the effect of vaccination on SLE disease control, the incidence of COVID-19 in SLE patients and severity of COVID-19 disease course would all be useful. As mass vaccination programmes begin to roll out across the world, we assess the evidence of the use of vaccines in SLE patients and in particular vaccines targeting SARS-CoV-2.

The clinical efficacy of Rituximab administration in autoimmunity disorders, primary immunodeficiency diseases and malignancies

Rituximab (RTX), as a monoclonal antibody-based immunotherapeutic intervention targeting CD20 on B cells, has proven efficacy in the treatment of patients with some immune-mediated diseases. In the present review, we provided information on the immunobiological mechanisms of signaling for RTX and its clinical applications, according to the immune-pathophysiology involved in the microenvironment of multiple diseases. We highlighted combination therapy, dose schedules, and laboratory monitoring, as well as the associated common and rare side effects to avoid. We also discussed the efficacy and safety of RTX-based therapeutic strategies and whether RTX therapy can be used as a promising treatment regimen for autoimmune diseases, primary immunodeficiency diseases, and malignancies. Our review highlights and supports the importance of collaboration between basic medical researchers and clinical specialists when considering the use of RTX in the treatment of various immune-mediated disorders.

Emerging B-Cell Therapies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem, autoimmune disease of unknown etiology, whose hallmark is the production of autoantibodies. B cells are promising targets for novel SLE therapies. In 2011, belimumab (Benlysta®), a fully humanized monoclonal antibody inhibiting B-cell activation and proliferation, was the first medication in 50 years to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat adult SLE. This review discusses the current experience with B-cell-targeted therapies, including those targeting B-cell-surface antigens (rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, obexelimab, epratuzumab, daratumumab), B-cell survival factors (belimumab, tabalumab, atacicept, blisibimod), or B-cell intracellular functions (ibrutinib, fenebrutinib, proteasome inhibitors), for the management of SLE. It focuses on ongoing clinical trials and real-world post-marketing use, where available, including their safety profiles, and concludes with our recommendations for B-cell-centric approaches to the management of SLE.

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune inflammatory condition with a wide spectrum of disease manifestations and severities, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. The aetiopathogenesis of SLE is complex. Young women and certain ethnicities are commonly affected, suggesting a significant hormonal and genetic influence. Diverse immunological abnormalities have been described. A characteristic abnormality is the presence of autoantibodies, implicating a central role for B cells in disease pathogenesis and/or perpetuation. Whilst conventional therapies have improved outcomes, a great unmet need remains. Recently, biological therapies are being explored. B-cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been in use off-label for nearly two decades. Inconsistent results between uncontrolled and controlled studies have raised doubts about its efficacy. In this review, we will focus on B cell abnormalities and the rationale behind B-cell depletion therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), rituximab, will be explored including an evaluation of clinical and trial experience. Finally, we will discuss the mechanistic basis for considering alternative anti-CD20 mAbs.

Unfavorable impact of anti-rituximab antibodies on clinical outcomes in children with complicated steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Anti-rituximab antibodies (ARA) are associated not only with adverse events, such as infusion reactions (IR) and serum sickness, but also with rituximab efficacy. However, the clinical relevance of ARA in children with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) remains unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical outcomes of 13 children with complicated SDNS receiving repeated single-dose rituximab treatments at 375 mg/m² to assess whether ARA formation could impact toxicity and efficacy of additional rituximab. Pre-rituximab 22 samples collected from patients who developed IR during the second or subsequent rituximab doses were measured by electrochemiluminescence analysis.

RESULTS

ARA were identified in 5 of 13 patients (9 of 22 samples). Median time to recovery of CD19⁺ B cells to > 1% of total lymphocytes and median relapse-free time after rituximab treatment were significantly shorter in the 9 ARA-positive samples than the 13 ARA-negative samples (41 vs. 100 days, p < 0.01 and 119 vs. 308 days, p < 0.05, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that time to CD19+ B cell recovery after rituximab was significantly shorter in ARA-positive samples than in ARA-negative samples (p < 0.005). Severe IR developed in two ARA-positive patients and serum sickness in one ARA-positive patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ARA formation was high in the pre-rituximab samples of patients with complicated SDNS who developed IR during the second or subsequent rituximab doses, suggesting that ARA formation might have an unfavorable impact on the toxicity and efficacy of additional rituximab doses in these patients.

Effect of ocrelizumab on vaccine responses in patients with multiple sclerosis: The VELOCE study

OBJECTIVE

The phase IIIb A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Ocrelizumab on Immune Responses in Participants With Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (VELOCE) study (NCT02545868) assessed responses to selected vaccines in ocrelizumab (OCR)-treated patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 into the OCR group (n = 68; OCR 600 mg) or control group (n = 34; interferon beta or no disease-modifying therapy). All received tetanus toxoid (TT)-containing vaccine, Pneumovax (23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [23-PPV]), and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The OCR group was subdivided into OCR1 (n = 33) and OCR2 (n = 35) at randomization. The OCR1 group received Prevnar (13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine) 4 weeks after 23-PPV; the OCR2 and control groups received influenza vaccine. Vaccinations started 12 weeks after OCR initiation (OCR group) or on day 1 (control group).

RESULTS

Positive response rate to TT vaccine at 8 weeks was 23.9% in the OCR vs 54.5% in the control group. Positive response rate to ≥5 serotypes in 23-PPV at 4 weeks was 71.6% in the OCR and 100% in the control group. Prevnar did not enhance response to pneumococcal serotypes in common with Pneumovax. Humoral response to KLH was decreased in the OCR vs control group. Seroprotection rates at 4 weeks against 5 influenza strains ranged from 55.6% to 80.0% in the OCR2 group and 75.0% to 97.0% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Peripherally B-cell-depleted OCR recipients mounted attenuated humoral responses to clinically relevant vaccines and the neoantigen KLH, suggesting that use of standard nonlive vaccines while on OCR treatment remains a consideration. For seasonal influenza vaccines, it is recommended to vaccinate patients on OCR because a potentially protective humoral response, even if attenuated, can be expected.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence confirming that the humoral response to nonlive vaccines in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after OCR treatment is attenuated compared with untreated or interferon beta-treated patients, but they can still be expected to be protective.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02545868.

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus show increased proportions of CD19+CD20- B cells and secretion of related autoantibodies

BACKGROUND

At present, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatments targeting systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are complex, variable, and often have disappointing outcomes. High levels of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligands (PD-L1, PD-L2) or CD80/CD86 on B cell surfaces are markers of increased B cell activity. However, their expression levels on CD19⁺CD20^+/- B cells and their clinical significance for SLE dynamics have not been carefully investigated.

METHODS

Flow cytometry was used to detect the expression levels of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CD80, and CD86 on CD19⁺CD20^+/- B cells in peripheral blood from SLE patients and healthy controls (HCs). The amount of anti-dsDNA and immunoglobin G (IgG) secreted by CD19⁺CD20^+/- B cells was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

CD19⁺CD20^- B cell frequency was significantly higher in SLE patients than in HCs (P < 0.001), and was positively correlated with disease activity. In SLE patients, frequencies of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, and CD86 on CD19⁺CD20^- B cells were significantly higher than CD19⁺CD20⁺ B cells (P ≤ 0.002) and were significantly correlated with individual laboratory and clinically based parameters (P < 0.05). In vitro tests, we found that the levels of anti-dsDNA and IgG secreted by CD19⁺CD20^- B cells from patients with SLE were significantly higher than the HC group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found abnormal frequency of CD19⁺CD20^- B cells and increased expression of surface markers on these cells from SLE patients. And the CD19⁺CD20^- B cells had the ability to proliferate and secrete anti-dsDNA and IgG. Additionally, our results suggested that CD19⁺CD20^- B cells from SLE patients may be the activated B cells and caused poor efficacy of rituximab. Key Points • CD19⁺CD20^- B cell frequencies were significantly higher in SLE patients. • Frequencies of PD-1 and its ligands on CD19⁺CD20^- B cells increased significantly in SLE patients. • CD19⁺CD20^- B cells in SLE patients had the ability to secrete anti-dsDNA and IgG. • CD19⁺CD20^- B cells in SLE patients may be the activated B cells and caused poor efficacy of rituximab.

Neutralizing Anti-Rituximab Antibodies and Relapse in Membranous Nephropathy Treated With Rituximab

Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is an autoimmune disease associated with antibodies against podocyte proteins: M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) or thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A) in 70 and 3% of patients, respectively. Antibody titer is correlated with disease activity: rising during active disease and decreasing before remission. Therefore, decreasing PLA2R1-Antibodies titer has become an important goal of therapy. Rituximab a chimeric monoclonal antibody induces remission in 60-80% of primary MN patients. All monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab can elicit antidrug antibodies, which may interfere with therapeutic response. We aim to analyze the relevance of anti-rituximab antibodies on the outcome of MN after a first course of rituximab. Forty-four MN patients were included and treated with two 1 g infusions of rituximab at 2-weeks interval. Anti-rituximab antibodies, CD19 count, and clinical response were analyzed. Then, we (i) analyzed the association of anti-rituximab antibodies at month-6 with response to treatment: remission, relapse and the need for another rituximab course; (ii) confirmed if anti-rituximab antibodies could neutralize rituximab B-cells depletion; and (iii) tested whether anti-rituximab antibodies could cross-inhibit new humanized anti-CD20 therapies. Anti-rituximab antibodies were detected in 10 patients (23%). Seventeen patients received a second rituximab course after a median time of 12 months (7-12), following nine cases of resistance and eight relapses. Anti-rituximab antibodies were significantly associated with faster B-cell reconstitution at month-6 (75 [57-89] vs. 2 [0-41] cells/μl, p = 0.006), higher proteinuria 12 months after rituximab infusion (1.7 [0.7; 5.8] vs. 0.6 [0.2; 3.4], p = 0.03) and before treatment modification (3.5 [1.6; 7.1] vs. 1.7 [0.2; 1.7] p = 0.0004). Remission rate 6 months after rituximab was not different according to anti-rituximab status (p > 0.99) but the rate of relapse was significantly higher for patients with anti-rituximab antibodies (p < 0.001). These patients required more frequently a second course of rituximab infusions (7/10 vs. 10/34, p = 0.03). Anti-rituximab antibodies neutralized rituximab activity in 8/10 patients and cross-reacted with other humanized monoclonal antibodies in only two patients. Three patients with anti-rituximab antibodies were successfully treated with ofatumumab. Anti-rituximab antibodies could neutralize rituximab B cells cytotoxicity and impact clinical outcome of MN patients. Humanized anti-CD20 seems to be a satisfying therapeutic alternative for patients with anti-rituximab antibodies and resistant or relapsing MN.

B Cell Abnormalities in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis-Role in Pathogenesis and Effect of Immunosuppressive Treatments

Abnormalities in B cells play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN). Breach in central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms generates autoreactive B cells which contribute to the pathogenesis of SLE and LN. Dysregulation of B cell transcription factors, cytokines and B cell-T cell interaction can result in aberrant B cell maturation and autoantibody production. These immunological abnormalities also lead to perturbations in circulating and infiltrating B cells in SLE and LN patients. Conventional and novel immunosuppressive medications confer differential effects on B cells which have important clinical implications. While cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) showed comparable clinical efficacy in active LN, MMF induction was associated with earlier reduction in circulating plasmablasts and plasma cells. Accumulating evidence suggests that MMF maintenance is associated with lower risk of disease relapse than azathioprine, which may be explained by its more potent and selective suppression of B cell proliferation. Novel therapeutic approaches targeting the B cell repertoire include B cell depletion with monoclonal antibodies binding to cell surface markers, inhibition of B cell cytokines, and modulation of costimulatory signals in B cell-T cell interaction. These biologics, despite showing improvements in serological parameters and proteinuria, did not achieve primary endpoints when used as add-on therapy to standard treatments in active LN patients. Other emerging treatments such as calcineurin inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and proteasome inhibitors also show distinct inhibitory effects on the B cell repertoire. Advancement in the knowledge on B cell biology has fueled the development of new therapeutic strategies in SLE and LN. Modification in background treatments, study endpoints and selective recruitment of subjects showing aberrant B cells or its signaling pathways when designing future clinical trials may better elucidate the roles of these novel therapies for SLE and LN patients.

B cells targeting therapy in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease which affects the majority of organs and systems. Traditional therapies do not lead to complete remission of disease but only relieve symptoms and inflammation. B cells are the most important effector cell types in the pathogenesis of SLE. Therefore, therapies targeting B cells and their related cytokines are a very important milestone for SLE treatment. Several biologics that modulate B cells, either depleting B cells or blocking B cell functions, have been developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Belimumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically binds B cells activating factor (BAFF), was the first of these agents approved for SLE treatment. In this review, we explore the currently available evidence in B cell targeted therapies in SLE including agents that target B cell surface antigens (CD19, CD20, CD22), B cell survival factors (BAFF and a proliferation-inducing ligand, APRIL), cytokines (interleukin-1 and type 1 interferons) and co-stimulatory molecules (CD40 ligand). We highlighted the mechanisms of action and the individual characteristics of these biologics, and present an update on the clinical trials that have evaluated their efficacy and safety. Finally, we describe some of the emerging and promising therapies for SLE treatment.

Multiple Functions of B Cells in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by excessive autoantibody production and multi-organ involvement. Although the etiology of SLE still remains unclear, recent studies have characterized several pathogenic B cell subsets and regulatory B cell subsets involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. Among pathogenic B cell subsets, age-associated B cells (ABCs) are a newly identified subset of autoreactive B cells with T-bet-dependent transcriptional programs and unique functional features in SLE. Accumulation of T-bet⁺ CD11c⁺ ABCs has been observed in SLE patients and lupus mouse models. In addition, innate-like B cells with the autoreactive B cell receptor (BCR) expression and long-lived plasma cells with persistent autoantibody production contribute to the development of SLE. Moreover, several regulatory B cell subsets with immune suppressive functions have been identified, while the impaired inhibitory effects of regulatory B cells have been indicated in SLE. Thus, further elucidation on the functional features of B cell subsets will provide new insights in understanding lupus pathogenesis and lead to novel therapeutic interventions in the treatment of SLE.

Moving Forward With Biologics in Lupus Nephritis

The majority of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus develop lupus nephritis (LN) which significantly contributes to increased risks of hospitalizations, ESRD, and death. Unfortunately, treatments for LN have not changed over the past 15 years. Despite continued efforts to elucidate the pathogenesis of LN, no new drugs have yet replaced the standard-of-care regimens of cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil plus high-dose corticosteroids. The significant limitations of standard-of-care are low complete response rates, risk of flares, and ongoing inflammation in the kidney leading to progressive renal dysfunction. Repeat and prolonged treatments are often needed to control disease, leading to a high level of severe side effects. The development of targeted drugs with better efficacy and safety are desperately needed. The rationale for targeting key immunologic pathways in LN continues to be strongly supported by basic and translational research and has generated the hope and excitement of testing these therapies in human LN. This review provides an overview of biologics studied to date in clinical trials of LN, discusses the potential reasons for their failure, and addresses the challenges moving forward.

Rituximab-induced serum sickness is more frequent in autoimmune diseases as compared to hematological malignancies: A French nationwide study

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab induced serum sickness (RISS) is a rare delayed hypersensitivity reaction. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the RISS cases reported in France.

METHOD

Serum sickness cases involving rituximab were identified from the French PharmacoVigilance Database from 1998 to 2016.

RESULTS

We analyzed 37 cases of RISS. Rituximab was prescribed for an autoimmune disease in 78% of cases. Serum sickness occurred mainly after the first injection (54%) with a median time to onset of 12 days. The most frequent manifestations were rheumatologic symptoms (92%), fever (87%), and skin lesions (78%). The incidence was significantly higher when rituximab was used for autoimmune diseases than for a hematological malignancies. Taking into account the existence of a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) as the indication of rituximab or as a comorbidity, the incidence of RISS in patients with SLE was even higher.

DISCUSSION

We report on the largest series of RISS studied to date and confirm that this reaction preferentially occurs in patients with autoimmune disease, especially SLE. This may be due to B-cell lysis, leading to the release of intracellular antigens into the serum and subsequent antigen-antibody complex formation, especially in patients with elevated autoantibody production. This could also explain why RISS often occurred after a single injection.

CONCLUSION

Patients generally recovered from RISS rapidly without obvious benefit from corticosteroid therapy. The risk of recurrence should prompt clinicians to question the use of rituximab after an episode of RISS.

2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases

To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) published in 2011. Four systematic literature reviews were performed regarding the incidence/prevalence of vaccine-preventable infections among patients with AIIRD; efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccines; effect of anti-rheumatic drugs on the response to vaccines; effect of vaccination of household of AIIRDs patients. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and expert opinion. The updated recommendations comprise six overarching principles and nine recommendations. The former address the need for an annual vaccination status assessment, shared decision-making and timing of vaccination, favouring vaccination during quiescent disease, preferably prior to the initiation of immunosuppression. Non-live vaccines can be safely provided to AIIRD patients regardless of underlying therapy, whereas live-attenuated vaccines may be considered with caution. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination should be strongly considered for the majority of patients with AIIRD. Tetanus toxoid and human papilloma virus vaccination should be provided to AIIRD patients as recommended for the general population. Hepatitis A, hepatitis B and herpes zoster vaccination should be administered to AIIRD patients at risk. Immunocompetent household members of patients with AIIRD should receive vaccines according to national guidelines, except for the oral poliomyelitis vaccine. Live-attenuated vaccines should be avoided during the first 6 months of life in newborns of mothers treated with biologics during the second half of pregnancy. These 2019 EULAR recommendations provide an up-to-date guidance on the management of vaccinations in patients with AIIRD.

Biologics in the Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus: A Critical Literature Review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease affecting multiple organ systems that runs an unpredictable course and may present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations. Advances in treatment over the last decades, such as use of corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, have improved life expectancy of SLE sufferers. Unfortunately, in many cases effective management of SLE is still related to severe drug-induced toxicity and contributes to organ function deterioration and infective complications, particularly among patients with refractory disease and/or lupus nephritis. Consequently, there is an unmet need for drugs with a better efficacy and safety profile. A range of different biologic agents have been proposed and subjected to clinical trials, particularly dedicated to this subset of patients whose disease is inadequately controlled by conventional treatment regimes. Unfortunately, most of these trials have given unsatisfactory results, with belimumab being the only targeted therapy approved for the treatment of SLE so far. Despite these pitfalls, several novel biologic agents targeting B cells, T cells, or cytokines are constantly being evaluated in clinical trials. It seems that they may enhance the therapeutic efficacy when combined with standard therapies. These efforts raise the hope that novel drugs for patients with refractory SLE may be available in the near future. This article reviews the current biological therapies being tested in the treatment of SLE.

Immunosuppressive therapy with rituximab in common variable immunodeficiency

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most frequent symptomatic primary antibody deficiency in adulthood and is characterized by the marked reduction of IgG and IgA serum levels. Thanks to the successful use of polyvalent immunoglobulin replacement therapy to treat and prevent recurrent infections, non-infectious complications, including autoimmunity, polyclonal lymphoproliferation and malignancies, have progressively become the major cause of morbidity and mortality in CVID patients. The management of these complications is particularly challenging, often requiring multiple lines of immunosuppressive treatments. Over the last 5–10 years, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (i.e., rituximab) has been increasingly used for the treatment of both autoimmune and non-malignant lymphoproliferative manifestations associated with CVID. This review illustrates the evidence on the use of rituximab in CVID. For this purpose, first we discuss the mechanisms proposed for the rituximab mediated B-cell depletion; then, we analyze the literature data regarding the CVID-related complications for which rituximab has been used, focusing on autoimmune cytopenias, granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) and non-malignant lymphoproliferative syndromes. The cumulative data suggest that in the vast majority of the studies, rituximab has proven to be an effective and relatively safe therapeutic option. However, there are currently no data on the long-term efficacy and side effects of rituximab and other second-line therapeutic options. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to optimize the management strategies of non-infectious complications of CVID.

Periodically repeated rituximab administrations in children with refractory nephrotic syndrome: 2-year multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Rituximab (RTX) is effective in maintaining remission in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS), but a standard protocol of RTX administration has not been established.

METHODS

This study was a 2-year multicenter observational study, in which consistent treatments and evaluations were performed. We enrolled pediatric patients with refractory NS between January 2015 and December 2015. RTX infusion was performed four times at 6-month intervals, followed by mizoribine pulse therapy with early discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Primary endpoints were the relapse-free survival rate and the number of relapses after RTX administration. Secondary endpoints were changes in side effects associated with long-term steroid administration.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were analyzed. The relapse-free survival rate at 1 year and 2 years was 50 and 46%, respectively. Twenty-one patients accomplished our protocol and the frequency of relapse was reduced under the discontinuation of CNI. Although two patients were diagnosed with frequent relapse and/or steroid dependency during the observation period, the frequency of relapse decreased with each rituximab dose. Statistically significant improvements in all steroid complications were observed in the final examination, but no significant improvements were observed from 1 to 2 years after RTX administration. One patient had agranulocytosis, and three patients showed electrocardiographic abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Our protocol was useful and safe for refractory NS. However, RTX administration four times might have been excessive in patients who had no relapse by 1 year after the initial RTX administration. Further investigation of the most appropriate method of RTX administration is required.

Anti-drug Antibodies Against a Novel Humanized Anti-CD20 Antibody Impair Its Therapeutic Effect on Primary Biliary Cholangitis in Human CD20- and FcγR-Expressing Mice

There is considerable interest in expanding B cell-targeted therapies in human autoimmune diseases. However, clinical trials in human primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) using a chimeric antibody against human CD20 (hCD20) have showed limited efficacy. Two potential explanations for these disappointing results are the appearance of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and the high frequency of patients with moderate PBC or patients who had failed ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. Here, we studied a novel humanized IgG1 antibody against hCD20 and explored its efficacy in early stage PBC using a well-defined murine model. We developed a unique murine model consisting of dnTGF-βRII mice expressing hCD20 and human Fcγ receptors (hFcγRs). Beginning at 4–6 weeks of age, equivalent to stage I/II human PBC, female mice were given weekly injections of an anti-hCD20 antibody (TKM-011) or vehicle control, and monitored for liver histology as well as a broad panel of immunological readouts. After 16 weeks' treatment, we observed a significant reduction in portal inflammation, a decrease in liver-infiltrating mononuclear cells as well as a reduction in liver CD8⁺ T cells. Importantly, direct correlations between numbers of liver non-B cells and B cells (r = 0.7426, p = 0.0006) and between numbers of liver memory CD8⁺ T cells and B cells (r = 0.6423, p = 0.0054) were apparent. Accompanying these changes was a dramatic reduction in anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMAs), interleukin (IL)-12p40 and IL-5, and elevated levels of the anti-inflammatory chemokine CXCL1/KC. In mice that developed ADAs, clinical improvements were less pronounced. Sustained treatment with B cell-targeted therapies may broadly inhibit effector pathways in PBC, but may need to be administered early in the natural history of PBC.

Impact of HACA on Immunomodulation and Treatment Toxicity Following ch14.18/CHO Long-Term Infusion with Interleukin-2: Results from a SIOPEN Phase 2 Trial

GD₂-directed immunotherapies improve survival of high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) patients (pts). Treatment with chimeric anti-GD₂ antibodies (Ab), such as ch14.18, can induce development of human anti-chimeric Ab (HACA). Here, we report HACA effects on ch14.18/CHO pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pain intensity in pts treated by long-term infusion (LTI) of ch14.18/CHO combined with IL-2. 124 pts received up to 5 cycles of ch14.18/CHO 10 days (d) infusion (10 mg/m²/d; d8–18) combined with s.c. IL-2 (6 × 10⁶ IU/m²/d; d1–5, d8–12). HACA, treatment toxicity, ch14.18/CHO levels, Ab-dependent cellular- (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) were assessed using respective validated assays. HACA-negative pts showed a steadily decreased pain in cycle 1 (74% pts without morphine by d5 of LTI) with further decrease in subsequent cycles. Ch14.18/CHO peak concentrations of 11.26 ± 0.50 µg/mL found in cycle 1 were further elevated in subsequent cycles and resulted in robust GD₂-specific CDC and ADCC. Development of HACA (21% of pts) resulted in strong reduction of ch14.18/CHO levels, abrogated CDC and ADCC. Surprisingly, no difference in pain toxicity between HACA-positive and -negative pts was found. In conclusion, ch14.18/CHO LTI combined with IL-2 results in strong activation of Ab effector functions. Importantly, HACA response abrogated CDC but did not affect pain intensity indicating CDC-independent pain induction.

Peripheral Blood B Cell Depletion after Rituximab and Complete Response in Lupus Nephritis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Incomplete peripheral blood B cell depletion after rituximab in lupus nephritis might correlate with inability to reduce tubulointerstitial lymphoid aggregates in the kidney, which together could be responsible for inadequate response to treatment. We utilized data from the Lupus Nephritis Assessment with Rituximab (LUNAR) study to characterize the variability of peripheral blood B cell depletion after rituximab and assess its association with complete response in patients with lupus nephritis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We analyzed 68 participants treated with rituximab. Peripheral blood B cell depletion was defined as 0 cells/µl, termed "complete peripheral depletion," assessed over 78 weeks. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between characteristics of complete peripheral depletion and complete response (defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio <0.5 mg/mg, and normal serum creatinine or an increase in creatinine <15%, if normal at baseline), assessed at week 78.

RESULTS

A total of 53 (78%) participants achieved complete peripheral depletion (0 cells/µl) in a median time of 182 days (interquartile range, 80-339).The median duration of complete peripheral depletion was 71 days (interquartile range, 14-158). Twenty-five (47%) participants with complete peripheral depletion achieved complete response, compared with two (13%) without. Complete peripheral depletion was associated with complete response (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.8; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.2 to 28; P=0.03). Longer time to achieving complete peripheral depletion was associated with a lower likelihood of complete response (unadjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P=0.02). Complete peripheral depletion lasting >71 days (the median) was associated with complete response (unadjusted OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 11; P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

There was substantial variability in peripheral blood B cell depletion in patients with lupus nephritis treated with rituximab from the LUNAR trial. Achievement of complete peripheral depletion, as well as the rapidity and duration of complete peripheral depletion, were associated with complete response at week 78.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2018_09_06_CJASNPodcast_18_10_.mp3.

Targeting B Cells and Plasma Cells in Autoimmune Diseases

Success with B cell depletion using rituximab has proven the concept that B lineage cells represent a valid target for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, and has promoted the development of other B cell targeting agents. Present data confirm that B cell depletion is beneficial in various autoimmune disorders and also show that it can worsen the disease course in some patients. These findings suggest that B lineage cells not only produce pathogenic autoantibodies, but also significantly contribute to the regulation of inflammation. In this review, we will discuss the multiple pro- and anti-inflammatory roles of B lineage cells play in autoimmune diseases, in the context of recent findings using B lineage targeting therapies.

Humanization of chimeric anti-CD20 antibody by logical and bioinformatics approach with retention of biological activity

AIM

To develop a fully bioactive humanized antibody from the chimeric rituximab for potential clinical applications using a relatively simpler and faster logical and bioinformatics approach.

METHODS

From bioinformatics data, mismatched mouse amino acids in variable light and heavy chain amphipathic regions were identified and substituted with those common to human antibody framework. Appropriate synthetic DNA sequences inserted into vectors were transfected into HEK293 cells to produce the humanized antibody.

RESULTS

Humanized antibodies showed specific binding to CD20 and greater cytotoxicity to cancer WIL2-NS cell proliferation than rituximab in vitro.

CONCLUSION

A humanized version of rituximab with potential to be developed into a biobetter for treatment of B-cell disorders has been successfully generated using a logical and bioinformatics approach.

Outcomes of rituximab therapy in refractory lupus: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Conventional treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with damage accrual, hence increased morbidity rate. Off-label use of rituximab (RTX) has shown significant promise in this patient group; however, data are still controversial. We aimed to analyze the outcomes of RTX therapy in refractory lupus using a meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

Electronic search of the medical literature was conducted using a combination of relevant keywords to retrieve studies on the safety and efficacy of RTX in SLE and LN patients. Results were screened against our inclusion and exclusion criteria and two reviewers independently extracted the data for analysis. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to pool the data from individual studies and provide summary effect estimates.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies that enrolled 1112 patients were finally eligible for the meta-analysis. The overall global, complete, and partial response rates to RTX therapy were 72%, 46%, and 32%, respectively. RTX significantly decreased Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) scores (p<0.001). Prednisone dose was significantly reduced after RTX treatment in both SLE and LN groups (p<0.001), and proteinuria was lowered in SLE (p<0.001) than in LN patients (p=0.07). Infection and infusion-related reactions were the most common side effects.

CONCLUSION

RTX therapy in refractory SLE and LN patients proved clinical efficacy and favorable safety outcomes. Larger well-designed randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Anti-Rituximab antibody in patients with NMOSDs treated with low dose Rituximab

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a mouse-human chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and has been increasingly used for preventing relapses in NMOSDs. The clinical relevance of Anti-Rituximab antibodies (ARA) against Rituximab in NMOSDs is unknown.

METHODS

Nineteen NMOSDs patients receiving repeated 100mg Rituximab treatment were recruited. The ARA was quantitatively analyzed by enzyme linked immunoassay. Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were analyzed concurrently.

RESULTS

ARR was reduced markedly since starting Rituximab therapy in the majority (78.9%) of NMOSDs patients. 36.9% (7/19) patients were ARA positive. There was no significant difference in the improvement of ARR and EDSS after treatment with Rituximab in either ARA positive or negative groups. The frequency of Rituximab reinfusion was higher in patients with ARA, suggesting that the presence of ARA led to an increased frequency of Rituximab reinfusion to maintain B cell depletion.

CONCLUSION

The majority of (78.9%) patients with NMOSDs were responsive to low dose Rituximab. The presence of ARA is associated with the requirement for increased frequency of Rituximab reinfusion to maintain treatment response in NMOSDs. In patients with ARA it might be necessary to detect ARA levels and monitor B cell depletion closely, or even attempt other treatments.